Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64 0
38.3k
| id
int64 8
10k
| q
stringlengths 5
13k
| r
stringlengths 3
35.3k
| s
stringclasses 2
values | q'
stringlengths 3
2.67k
| r'
stringlengths 3
6.78k
| Unnamed: 6
float64 | total no.: 7987
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,083 | 809 |
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems"
|
"thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
| null | null |
3,079 | 809 |
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
| null | null |
3,081 | 809 |
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"has no evidence to support it ."
| null | null |
3,082 | 809 |
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"whether it is directed by -- either way , life is designed ."
|
"point of view which has no to support it ."
| null | null |
3,080 | 809 |
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature or whether it is directed by some god -- either way , life is intelligently designed ."
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Whether the intelligence responsible for the organization of living systems is a force of nature"
|
"And thats a point of view which has no evidence to support it ."
| null | null |
3,090 | 810 |
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"if it was , would you consider it a"
|
"What the kind of a question is that ?"
| null | null |
3,086 | 810 |
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"was illegal , would you consider it a crime"
|
"the Hell kind of a question is that"
| null | null |
3,088 | 810 |
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
| null | null |
3,085 | 810 |
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"question is that ?"
| null | null |
3,089 | 810 |
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Well if it was illegal , would you consider it a crime ?"
|
"What the Hell kind of a question is that ?"
| null | null |
3,096 | 811 |
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience , that the world that we live in exists and that our experiences of the moment are real ."
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made before we can use the data ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience ,"
|
"We have no data that says 'an outside world exists '"
| null | null |
3,094 | 811 |
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience , that the world that we live in exists and that our experiences of the moment are real ."
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made before we can use the data ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption ,"
|
"How is that based on experience ?"
| null | null |
3,095 | 811 |
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience , that the world that we live in exists and that our experiences of the moment are real ."
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made before we can use the data ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"all , that the world that we live in exists and that our of the are real ."
|
"We have no data that says ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made we can use the data ."
| null | null |
3,092 | 811 |
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience , that the world that we live in exists and that our experiences of the moment are real ."
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made before we can use the data ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience"
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists"
| null | null |
3,093 | 811 |
"I , and most people , have a firm assumption , based on all of our and all human 's experience , that the world that we live in exists and that our experiences of the moment are real ."
|
"How is that based on experience ? We have no data that says 'an outside world exists ' . The assumption that such a world exists is made before we can use the data ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"based on all of our and all human 's experience ,"
|
"How is that based on experience ?"
| null | null |
3,101 | 812 |
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry . One of them runs an abortion clinic ; another formerly served as an attorney for NARAL . Neither researcher disclosed this information to JAMA . This is an incidence of researcher bias entering into the scientific method . And your belief in this article takes faith . Steve Calvin August 30 , 2005 In the Minneapolis Star-Tribune Last week 's article on fetal pain in the Journal of the American Medical Association proves the desperation of the defenders of unrestricted abortion . The article reviews medical literature and concludes that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain prior to 30 weeks gestation . The authors were clearly motivated to write what I view as a medical fantasy to counter proposed federal legislation that would limit abortion in the second trimester . The legislation would require informing women considering abortion that fetuses beyond 20 weeks feel pain and would require anesthesia for the fetus . Twenty-five years of delivering babies and a specialization in high-risk obstetrics provide me some experience to refute the claim that fetuses feel no pain until 30 weeks . Many of the tiny babies that I deliver , some as small as 1 pound at 23 weeks , have required surgery during their difficult neonatal battle for life . All of them receive anesthesia . Before the 1970s , many newborns , both term and preterm , were operated on without anesthesia in the mistaken belief that they could not feel pain . They certainly could n't tell anyone about their discomfort . With more sophisticated monitoring it became clear that blood pressure and pulse rose dramatically during the trauma of surgery . Subsequently , a subspecialty of pediatric anesthesia developed . Those who deny fetal pain claim that hormonal and withdrawal responses to invasive procedures are mere reflexes and are no evidence of pain . Recently , I performed an amniocentesis on a patient at 21 weeks gestation because of a possible infection . On ultrasound , the fetus pulled away from the needle when it grazed her arm . It is clear to me that this fetus felt discomfort , and that she would feel horrible pain if she were dismembered in the exercise of an unjust constitutional right . The medical literature duel over abortion has been quite one-sided since most of the medical hierarchy is ardently pro-abortion . There are , however , courageous exceptions . The most important medical study on abortion this year got absolutely no media coverage . A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
|
AGREE
|
"owes us an apology ."
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry ."
| null | null |
3,097 | 812 |
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry . One of them runs an abortion clinic ; another formerly served as an attorney for NARAL . Neither researcher disclosed this information to JAMA . This is an incidence of researcher bias entering into the scientific method . And your belief in this article takes faith . Steve Calvin August 30 , 2005 In the Minneapolis Star-Tribune Last week 's article on fetal pain in the Journal of the American Medical Association proves the desperation of the defenders of unrestricted abortion . The article reviews medical literature and concludes that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain prior to 30 weeks gestation . The authors were clearly motivated to write what I view as a medical fantasy to counter proposed federal legislation that would limit abortion in the second trimester . The legislation would require informing women considering abortion that fetuses beyond 20 weeks feel pain and would require anesthesia for the fetus . Twenty-five years of delivering babies and a specialization in high-risk obstetrics provide me some experience to refute the claim that fetuses feel no pain until 30 weeks . Many of the tiny babies that I deliver , some as small as 1 pound at 23 weeks , have required surgery during their difficult neonatal battle for life . All of them receive anesthesia . Before the 1970s , many newborns , both term and preterm , were operated on without anesthesia in the mistaken belief that they could not feel pain . They certainly could n't tell anyone about their discomfort . With more sophisticated monitoring it became clear that blood pressure and pulse rose dramatically during the trauma of surgery . Subsequently , a subspecialty of pediatric anesthesia developed . Those who deny fetal pain claim that hormonal and withdrawal responses to invasive procedures are mere reflexes and are no evidence of pain . Recently , I performed an amniocentesis on a patient at 21 weeks gestation because of a possible infection . On ultrasound , the fetus pulled away from the needle when it grazed her arm . It is clear to me that this fetus felt discomfort , and that she would feel horrible pain if she were dismembered in the exercise of an unjust constitutional right . The medical literature duel over abortion has been quite one-sided since most of the medical hierarchy is ardently pro-abortion . There are , however , courageous exceptions . The most important medical study on abortion this year got absolutely no media coverage . A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
|
AGREE
|
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
| null | null |
3,102 | 812 |
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry . One of them runs an abortion clinic ; another formerly served as an attorney for NARAL . Neither researcher disclosed this information to JAMA . This is an incidence of researcher bias entering into the scientific method . And your belief in this article takes faith . Steve Calvin August 30 , 2005 In the Minneapolis Star-Tribune Last week 's article on fetal pain in the Journal of the American Medical Association proves the desperation of the defenders of unrestricted abortion . The article reviews medical literature and concludes that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain prior to 30 weeks gestation . The authors were clearly motivated to write what I view as a medical fantasy to counter proposed federal legislation that would limit abortion in the second trimester . The legislation would require informing women considering abortion that fetuses beyond 20 weeks feel pain and would require anesthesia for the fetus . Twenty-five years of delivering babies and a specialization in high-risk obstetrics provide me some experience to refute the claim that fetuses feel no pain until 30 weeks . Many of the tiny babies that I deliver , some as small as 1 pound at 23 weeks , have required surgery during their difficult neonatal battle for life . All of them receive anesthesia . Before the 1970s , many newborns , both term and preterm , were operated on without anesthesia in the mistaken belief that they could not feel pain . They certainly could n't tell anyone about their discomfort . With more sophisticated monitoring it became clear that blood pressure and pulse rose dramatically during the trauma of surgery . Subsequently , a subspecialty of pediatric anesthesia developed . Those who deny fetal pain claim that hormonal and withdrawal responses to invasive procedures are mere reflexes and are no evidence of pain . Recently , I performed an amniocentesis on a patient at 21 weeks gestation because of a possible infection . On ultrasound , the fetus pulled away from the needle when it grazed her arm . It is clear to me that this fetus felt discomfort , and that she would feel horrible pain if she were dismembered in the exercise of an unjust constitutional right . The medical literature duel over abortion has been quite one-sided since most of the medical hierarchy is ardently pro-abortion . There are , however , courageous exceptions . The most important medical study on abortion this year got absolutely no media coverage . A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
|
AGREE
|
"I think Maximus owes us an apology ."
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry"
| null | null |
3,098 | 812 |
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry . One of them runs an abortion clinic ; another formerly served as an attorney for NARAL . Neither researcher disclosed this information to JAMA . This is an incidence of researcher bias entering into the scientific method . And your belief in this article takes faith . Steve Calvin August 30 , 2005 In the Minneapolis Star-Tribune Last week 's article on fetal pain in the Journal of the American Medical Association proves the desperation of the defenders of unrestricted abortion . The article reviews medical literature and concludes that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain prior to 30 weeks gestation . The authors were clearly motivated to write what I view as a medical fantasy to counter proposed federal legislation that would limit abortion in the second trimester . The legislation would require informing women considering abortion that fetuses beyond 20 weeks feel pain and would require anesthesia for the fetus . Twenty-five years of delivering babies and a specialization in high-risk obstetrics provide me some experience to refute the claim that fetuses feel no pain until 30 weeks . Many of the tiny babies that I deliver , some as small as 1 pound at 23 weeks , have required surgery during their difficult neonatal battle for life . All of them receive anesthesia . Before the 1970s , many newborns , both term and preterm , were operated on without anesthesia in the mistaken belief that they could not feel pain . They certainly could n't tell anyone about their discomfort . With more sophisticated monitoring it became clear that blood pressure and pulse rose dramatically during the trauma of surgery . Subsequently , a subspecialty of pediatric anesthesia developed . Those who deny fetal pain claim that hormonal and withdrawal responses to invasive procedures are mere reflexes and are no evidence of pain . Recently , I performed an amniocentesis on a patient at 21 weeks gestation because of a possible infection . On ultrasound , the fetus pulled away from the needle when it grazed her arm . It is clear to me that this fetus felt discomfort , and that she would feel horrible pain if she were dismembered in the exercise of an unjust constitutional right . The medical literature duel over abortion has been quite one-sided since most of the medical hierarchy is ardently pro-abortion . There are , however , courageous exceptions . The most important medical study on abortion this year got absolutely no media coverage . A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
|
AGREE
|
"I think Maximus owes us an ."
|
"in the All of them receive . Before the , many newborns , both and preterm , were operated on without belief that they could not feel pain"
| null | null |
3,099 | 812 |
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"Well , it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry . One of them runs an abortion clinic ; another formerly served as an attorney for NARAL . Neither researcher disclosed this information to JAMA . This is an incidence of researcher bias entering into the scientific method . And your belief in this article takes faith . Steve Calvin August 30 , 2005 In the Minneapolis Star-Tribune Last week 's article on fetal pain in the Journal of the American Medical Association proves the desperation of the defenders of unrestricted abortion . The article reviews medical literature and concludes that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain prior to 30 weeks gestation . The authors were clearly motivated to write what I view as a medical fantasy to counter proposed federal legislation that would limit abortion in the second trimester . The legislation would require informing women considering abortion that fetuses beyond 20 weeks feel pain and would require anesthesia for the fetus . Twenty-five years of delivering babies and a specialization in high-risk obstetrics provide me some experience to refute the claim that fetuses feel no pain until 30 weeks . Many of the tiny babies that I deliver , some as small as 1 pound at 23 weeks , have required surgery during their difficult neonatal battle for life . All of them receive anesthesia . Before the 1970s , many newborns , both term and preterm , were operated on without anesthesia in the mistaken belief that they could not feel pain . They certainly could n't tell anyone about their discomfort . With more sophisticated monitoring it became clear that blood pressure and pulse rose dramatically during the trauma of surgery . Subsequently , a subspecialty of pediatric anesthesia developed . Those who deny fetal pain claim that hormonal and withdrawal responses to invasive procedures are mere reflexes and are no evidence of pain . Recently , I performed an amniocentesis on a patient at 21 weeks gestation because of a possible infection . On ultrasound , the fetus pulled away from the needle when it grazed her arm . It is clear to me that this fetus felt discomfort , and that she would feel horrible pain if she were dismembered in the exercise of an unjust constitutional right . The medical literature duel over abortion has been quite one-sided since most of the medical hierarchy is ardently pro-abortion . There are , however , courageous exceptions . The most important medical study on abortion this year got absolutely no media coverage . A French study in the April 2005 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology convincingly showed that a previous abortion increased the risk of subsequent delivery at 22 to 27 weeks by 70 percent . Premature birth has heavy personal and societal costs , yet the alarm over the increasing rate of prematurity ignores the abortion connection . The fight over requirements for informed consent prior to abortion continues because abortion defenders refuse to accept any restriction on this manufactured constitutional right to exercise prenatal lethal violence . Their blind orthodoxy requires denial of fetal pain and willful ignorance of the significant long-term consequences of abortion . Steve Calvin is a Minneapolis physician ."
|
AGREE
|
"I think Maximus owes us an apology . http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/"
|
"it is interesting to not that two of the five researchers have ties to the abortion industry ."
| null | null |
3,103 | 813 |
"This is not true . The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory there were human-ancestors and chimp-ancestors side by side in the primordial ooze ; there were 'us ' and 'them ' . That is absolutely and categorically not the case . I know you insist you understand what evolutionary theory claims , but statements like this demonstrate otherwise . I do n't know what to do except try to help you understand better ."
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do . And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze , then evolved into bacteria to enzymes then amino acids , ( not necessarily in that order ) leading to more complex life forms which eventually crawled out of that ooze and breathed air as amphibians , then to reptiles which some how evolved wings to become birds , and through all of this alleged conglomeration of life came mammals after the Dinos were forced into extinction by that big ole comet . And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too . But none of it can be proven at all when all is said and done ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory"
|
"And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too ."
| null | null |
3,105 | 813 |
"This is not true . The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory there were human-ancestors and chimp-ancestors side by side in the primordial ooze ; there were 'us ' and 'them ' . That is absolutely and categorically not the case . I know you insist you understand what evolutionary theory claims , but statements like this demonstrate otherwise . I do n't know what to do except try to help you understand better ."
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do . And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze , then evolved into bacteria to enzymes then amino acids , ( not necessarily in that order ) leading to more complex life forms which eventually crawled out of that ooze and breathed air as amphibians , then to reptiles which some how evolved wings to become birds , and through all of this alleged conglomeration of life came mammals after the Dinos were forced into extinction by that big ole comet . And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too . But none of it can be proven at all when all is said and done ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory there were human-ancestors and chimp-ancestors side by side in the primordial ooze"
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do . And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze"
| null | null |
3,104 | 813 |
"This is not true . The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory there were human-ancestors and chimp-ancestors side by side in the primordial ooze ; there were 'us ' and 'them ' . That is absolutely and categorically not the case . I know you insist you understand what evolutionary theory claims , but statements like this demonstrate otherwise . I do n't know what to do except try to help you understand better ."
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do . And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze , then evolved into bacteria to enzymes then amino acids , ( not necessarily in that order ) leading to more complex life forms which eventually crawled out of that ooze and breathed air as amphibians , then to reptiles which some how evolved wings to become birds , and through all of this alleged conglomeration of life came mammals after the Dinos were forced into extinction by that big ole comet . And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too . But none of it can be proven at all when all is said and done ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"That is absolutely and categorically not the case ."
|
"bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too . But none of it can be proven at all when all is said and done ."
| null | null |
3,106 | 813 |
"This is not true . The wording is highly misleading , because it implies that according to evolutionary theory there were human-ancestors and chimp-ancestors side by side in the primordial ooze ; there were 'us ' and 'them ' . That is absolutely and categorically not the case . I know you insist you understand what evolutionary theory claims , but statements like this demonstrate otherwise . I do n't know what to do except try to help you understand better ."
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do . And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze , then evolved into bacteria to enzymes then amino acids , ( not necessarily in that order ) leading to more complex life forms which eventually crawled out of that ooze and breathed air as amphibians , then to reptiles which some how evolved wings to become birds , and through all of this alleged conglomeration of life came mammals after the Dinos were forced into extinction by that big ole comet . And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too . But none of it can be proven at all when all is said and done ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"evolutionary theory primordial ooze"
|
"I know , because I do n't believe there was any primordial ooze at all . But you do And you also believe that simple celled life formed in that ooze more complex life forms which eventually crawled out of that ooze amphibians , then to reptiles which some how evolved wings to become birds , and through all of this alleged conglomeration of life came mammals after the Dinos were forced into extinction by that big ole comet . And do n't bother telling me that they believe birds came from Dinos because I 'm aware of that belief too ."
| null | null |
3,111 | 814 |
"How infantile . Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
|
DISAGREE
|
"even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
| null | null |
3,108 | 814 |
"How infantile . Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
|
DISAGREE
|
"even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas"
| null | null |
3,110 | 814 |
"How infantile . Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
|
DISAGREE
|
"change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas"
| null | null |
3,109 | 814 |
"How infantile . Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
|
DISAGREE
|
"How infantile Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
| null | null |
3,112 | 814 |
"How infantile . Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"Hate to have to spoil things , but the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Still , even after this change Kansas is the laughing stock of the world ."
|
"the rest of the world has really no interest at all in Kansas and its scholastic problems"
| null | null |
3,116 | 815 |
"Originally posted by DarKnight `` in for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun `` pistols they 'll switch to automatic assault weapons ( which , imported illegally from the middle east/asia , kalashnikov rifles are CHEAPER then domestic US pistols ) ."
|
"Oh ! Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their ."
|
"Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
| null | null |
3,114 | 815 |
"Originally posted by DarKnight `` in for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun `` pistols they 'll switch to automatic assault weapons ( which , imported illegally from the middle east/asia , kalashnikov rifles are CHEAPER then domestic US pistols ) ."
|
"Oh ! Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun `` pistols they 'll switch to automatic assault weapons which , imported illegally from the middle east/asia , kalashnikov rifles domestic US"
|
"Oh ! Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
| null | null |
3,113 | 815 |
"Originally posted by DarKnight `` in for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun `` pistols they 'll switch to automatic assault weapons ( which , imported illegally from the middle east/asia , kalashnikov rifles are CHEAPER then domestic US pistols ) ."
|
"Oh ! Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"in for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun ``"
|
"Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country ."
| null | null |
3,115 | 815 |
"Originally posted by DarKnight `` in for a penny , in for a pound `` mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their .38 `` weekend fun `` pistols they 'll switch to automatic assault weapons ( which , imported illegally from the middle east/asia , kalashnikov rifles are CHEAPER then domestic US pistols ) ."
|
"Oh ! Did you mean something like this in gun free France : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/internatio ... ews+-+guardian Those weapons were cheap and from an eastern block country . Machine guns are for sissy American felons . Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"mentality would mean gun rampages would be worse because instead of using their"
|
"Real felons in gun free France use anti-tank weapons ."
| null | null |
3,120 | 816 |
"The golden rule is not just one sided . It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking . I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part ) but , to be consistent , I should realize that they have expectations of me ( the giving part ) ."
|
"Upon reviewing the golden rule `` do unto others as you would have them do unto you `` I see nothing of any other 'side . ' It 's very clear -- treat others the way you 'd want to be treated . No one wants to be treated badly , so if you follow the golden rule , you 'll be benevolent ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The golden rule is not just one sided . It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking ."
|
"Upon reviewing the golden rule `` do unto others as you would have them do unto you '"
| null | null |
3,122 | 816 |
"The golden rule is not just one sided . It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking . I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part ) but , to be consistent , I should realize that they have expectations of me ( the giving part ) ."
|
"Upon reviewing the golden rule `` do unto others as you would have them do unto you `` I see nothing of any other 'side . ' It 's very clear -- treat others the way you 'd want to be treated . No one wants to be treated badly , so if you follow the golden rule , you 'll be benevolent ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part )"
|
"you would have them do unto you `` I see nothing of any other 'side ."
| null | null |
3,118 | 816 |
"The golden rule is not just one sided . It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking . I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part ) but , to be consistent , I should realize that they have expectations of me ( the giving part ) ."
|
"Upon reviewing the golden rule `` do unto others as you would have them do unto you `` I see nothing of any other 'side . ' It 's very clear -- treat others the way you 'd want to be treated . No one wants to be treated badly , so if you follow the golden rule , you 'll be benevolent ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part )"
|
"I see nothing of any other 'side . ' It 's very clear -- treat"
| null | null |
3,119 | 816 |
"The golden rule is not just one sided . It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking . I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part ) but , to be consistent , I should realize that they have expectations of me ( the giving part ) ."
|
"Upon reviewing the golden rule `` do unto others as you would have them do unto you `` I see nothing of any other 'side . ' It 's very clear -- treat others the way you 'd want to be treated . No one wants to be treated badly , so if you follow the golden rule , you 'll be benevolent ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"It does not expect us to do all giving and no taking . I have expectations of how others should treat me ( the taking part )"
|
"the It 's very clear -- treat others the way you 'd want to be treated . No one wants to be treated badly , so if you follow the golden rule , you 'll be benevolent ."
| null | null |
3,125 | 817 |
"I am most interested in your demonstration that your mind controls your genes . I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome and then have children with the same stripes in order to show that your mind driven alteration is in fact genetic ! Good luck ."
|
"Well that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype , but also to new , heritable traits passed down to future generations . You guys ' hypothesis that it takes a new or changed gene for `` evolution `` ( ie .. change in population over time ) to take place is unsupported , unscientific , un-proven -- and ultimately wrong ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome and then have children with the same stripes in order to show that your mind driven alteration is in fact genetic"
|
"that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype"
| null | null |
3,124 | 817 |
"I am most interested in your demonstration that your mind controls your genes . I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome and then have children with the same stripes in order to show that your mind driven alteration is in fact genetic ! Good luck ."
|
"Well that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype , but also to new , heritable traits passed down to future generations . You guys ' hypothesis that it takes a new or changed gene for `` evolution `` ( ie .. change in population over time ) to take place is unsupported , unscientific , un-proven -- and ultimately wrong ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind"
|
"new , heritable traits passed down to future generations ."
| null | null |
3,126 | 817 |
"I am most interested in your demonstration that your mind controls your genes . I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome and then have children with the same stripes in order to show that your mind driven alteration is in fact genetic ! Good luck ."
|
"Well that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype , but also to new , heritable traits passed down to future generations . You guys ' hypothesis that it takes a new or changed gene for `` evolution `` ( ie .. change in population over time ) to take place is unsupported , unscientific , un-proven -- and ultimately wrong ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"demonstration that your mind controls your genes I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome"
|
"Well that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype , but also to new , heritable traits passed down to future generations . ``"
| null | null |
3,127 | 817 |
"I am most interested in your demonstration that your mind controls your genes . I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome and then have children with the same stripes in order to show that your mind driven alteration is in fact genetic ! Good luck ."
|
"Well that 's just like a good darwinist to make a ridiculous challenge . What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings can re-express genes , which can lead not only to a change in phenotype , but also to new , heritable traits passed down to future generations . You guys ' hypothesis that it takes a new or changed gene for `` evolution `` ( ie .. change in population over time ) to take place is unsupported , unscientific , un-proven -- and ultimately wrong ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I challenge you to make yourself striped like a tiger by altering with your mind your own geneome"
|
"What I can show , however , is that thoughts , emotions and social settings"
| null | null |
3,128 | 818 |
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence , not being self-contradictory ( as your statements often are ) , and not contradicting some other validated knowledge . Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational . Anything else ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational ."
| null | null |
3,132 | 818 |
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence , not being self-contradictory ( as your statements often are ) , and not contradicting some other validated knowledge . Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational . Anything else ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally ,"
|
"The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence"
| null | null |
3,130 | 818 |
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence , not being self-contradictory ( as your statements often are ) , and not contradicting some other validated knowledge . Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational . Anything else ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational"
| null | null |
3,129 | 818 |
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence , not being self-contradictory ( as your statements often are ) , and not contradicting some other validated knowledge . Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational . Anything else ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"rational statement ."
|
"Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational ."
| null | null |
3,131 | 818 |
"Is this a rational statement ? If so , prove it rationally , by science ."
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . The entire theory , as is all knowledge , is subject to evidence , not being self-contradictory ( as your statements often are ) , and not contradicting some other validated knowledge . Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational . Anything else ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"prove it rationally science"
|
"OK. Evolution claims nothing that is outside the realm of the knowable . It 's by that definition , rational . evidence Evolution meets these requirements , and is therefore entirely rational ."
| null | null |
3,136 | 819 |
"For instance , she has also listed the `` tornado in a hangar assembling a 747 `` argument against abiogenesis , which I know was fed to her and to which not one atheist here could resist replying at least , `` Umm , not quite ... ``"
|
"Well , my reply probably would n't be that polite ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"argument against abiogenesis , which I know was fed to her and to which not one atheist"
|
"Well , my reply probably would n't be that polite"
| null | null |
3,137 | 819 |
"For instance , she has also listed the `` tornado in a hangar assembling a 747 `` argument against abiogenesis , which I know was fed to her and to which not one atheist here could resist replying at least , `` Umm , not quite ... ``"
|
"Well , my reply probably would n't be that polite ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"which not one atheist here could resist replying at least , `` Umm , not quite ... ``"
|
"Well my reply probably would n't be that polite ..."
| null | null |
3,139 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ?"
| null | null |
3,142 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ?"
| null | null |
3,138 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective"
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
| null | null |
3,140 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective"
|
"even understand the very basics of biology"
| null | null |
3,143 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask"
|
"I suspect you do n't understand the question ."
| null | null |
3,141 | 827 |
"All this proves is that atheists/ secular humanists/ evolutionists ca n't even consider an opposing perspective that seeks to answer the question they ask ."
|
"And how does that perspective even deal with the problem of limited ATP production in a low oxygen atmosphere ? I suspect you do n't understand the question . You 're completely avoiding the issue of oxygen in the first place . You do n't even understand the very basics of biology !"
|
DISAGREE
|
"ca n't even consider an opposing perspective answer the question they ask ."
|
"how does that perspective even deal with the problem I suspect you do n't understand the question ."
| null | null |
3,145 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . `` I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want ."
| null | null |
3,147 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation ."
| null | null |
3,149 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ?"
|
"Yes ,"
| null | null |
3,144 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"claim this happened by mutation"
|
"assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort"
| null | null |
3,148 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want ."
| null | null |
3,146 | 828 |
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation . What do you mean by `` what sort `` ? I assume you 're looking for something more in depth than `` the genetic sort `` . I 'm afraid I ca n't rattle off the difference in the sequences if that 's what you want . If that 's not what you want than you 'll have to ask a more specific question ."
|
AGREE
|
"Do you claim this happened by mutation ? If so , what sort of mutation ?"
|
"Yes , it happened through mutation ."
| null | null |
3,154 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
| null | null |
3,153 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
| null | null |
3,150 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"I suggest you read Genesis ."
| null | null |
3,151 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man"
|
"I suggest you read Genesis"
| null | null |
3,155 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"Attention Trebor Jewish Tanakh"
|
"If you want an answer to that I suggest you read Genesis ."
| null | null |
3,152 | 829 |
"Attention Trebor : According to your own Jewish Tanakh , is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"If you want an answer to that , I suggest you read Genesis ."
|
AGREE
|
"is God the Creator of the heavens and earth , and man ?"
|
"I suggest you read Genesis"
| null | null |
3,161 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes ."
| null | null |
3,158 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes ."
| null | null |
3,159 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class"
| null | null |
3,157 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse"
| null | null |
3,160 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"where is the proof for evolution ?"
|
"Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse"
| null | null |
3,156 | 830 |
"I am going to ask you one more time , where is the proof for evolution ? Where are the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process `` ?"
|
"And I am going to say to you one more time , take a class , I am not going to give it to you . There are millions of fossilized links showing slow and obvious changes . Horse fossils show a very gradual evolution to what is today considered the horse ( but oh wait you knew that since you studied evolution so well with such and open mind . ) There is also this little thing called punctuated equilibrium where there is a sudden large change ( usually thought to have been caused by mutation ) But again , since you studied evolution you knew about that ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the milllions of fossilized links with slow and obvious changes supposedly caused by the `` evolving process ``"
|
"( usually thought to have been caused by mutation"
| null | null |
3,166 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I too am witness God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
| null | null |
3,165 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ?"
| null | null |
3,163 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"am witness to God 's miracles"
|
"people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food"
| null | null |
3,162 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I too am witness to God 's miracles"
|
"Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ?"
| null | null |
3,164 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I too am witness God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
| null | null |
3,167 | 831 |
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ? A baby being born ? A prayer apparently being answered ? A near miss ? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God ? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave ? And people walking on water ? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food ? What kind of miracles are we talking about here ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I too am witness to God 's miracles ."
|
"What , specifically , are you witnessing ?"
| null | null |
3,170 | 832 |
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances when it comes to what we can measure . This makes it reasonable to approach any question dealing with what we can measure from a strictly materialistic standpoint ."
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer ( assuming you 're also talking about 'pain ' ) ? a ) Is it strictly materialistic , or do they use non-material methods as well ? b ) Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results This makes it reasonable to approach any question dealing with what we can measure"
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
| null | null |
3,169 | 832 |
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances when it comes to what we can measure . This makes it reasonable to approach any question dealing with what we can measure from a strictly materialistic standpoint ."
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer ( assuming you 're also talking about 'pain ' ) ? a ) Is it strictly materialistic , or do they use non-material methods as well ? b ) Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"materialistic measure"
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer assuming you 're also talking about 'pain ' Is it strictly materialistic do they use non-material methods as well ? Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
| null | null |
3,172 | 832 |
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances when it comes to what we can measure . This makes it reasonable to approach any question dealing with what we can measure from a strictly materialistic standpoint ."
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer ( assuming you 're also talking about 'pain ' ) ? a ) Is it strictly materialistic , or do they use non-material methods as well ? b ) Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances when it comes to what we can measure ."
|
"what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer ( assuming you 're also talking about 'pain"
| null | null |
3,173 | 832 |
"I beleive Currently a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances when it comes to what we can measure . This makes it reasonable to approach any question dealing with what we can measure from a strictly materialistic standpoint ."
|
"Really , what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer ( assuming you 're also talking about 'pain ' ) ? a ) Is it strictly materialistic , or do they use non-material methods as well ? b ) Can it be used to onbjectively measure pain ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"a strictly materialistic approach has come up with better results in some circustances"
|
"what is the materialistinc approach to which you refer"
| null | null |
3,178 | 833 |
"Meanwhile , there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content . Also not mentioned is the fact that Noah and sons must have collected seeds from every PLANT on earth because I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Oh really ? Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has . The Earth is very able to repair itself in spite of modern mans sense of self importance . Here 's some interesting photographic evidence of it . www.pbase.com/andrys/noah"
|
DISAGREE
|
"rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content"
|
"some interesting photographic evidence of it ."
| null | null |
3,177 | 833 |
"Meanwhile , there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content . Also not mentioned is the fact that Noah and sons must have collected seeds from every PLANT on earth because I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Oh really ? Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has . The Earth is very able to repair itself in spite of modern mans sense of self importance . Here 's some interesting photographic evidence of it . www.pbase.com/andrys/noah"
|
DISAGREE
|
"there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content"
|
"Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded ."
| null | null |
3,176 | 833 |
"Meanwhile , there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content . Also not mentioned is the fact that Noah and sons must have collected seeds from every PLANT on earth because I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Oh really ? Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has . The Earth is very able to repair itself in spite of modern mans sense of self importance . Here 's some interesting photographic evidence of it . www.pbase.com/andrys/noah"
|
DISAGREE
|
"there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content ."
|
"Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ?"
| null | null |
3,175 | 833 |
"Meanwhile , there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content . Also not mentioned is the fact that Noah and sons must have collected seeds from every PLANT on earth because I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Oh really ? Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has . The Earth is very able to repair itself in spite of modern mans sense of self importance . Here 's some interesting photographic evidence of it . www.pbase.com/andrys/noah"
|
DISAGREE
|
"not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days"
|
"Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has"
| null | null |
3,174 | 833 |
"Meanwhile , there must have been provisions on the Ark for marine animals and fish as the rainwater would have undoubtedly altered the water pH and saline content . Also not mentioned is the fact that Noah and sons must have collected seeds from every PLANT on earth because I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Oh really ? Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has . The Earth is very able to repair itself in spite of modern mans sense of self importance . Here 's some interesting photographic evidence of it . www.pbase.com/andrys/noah"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I am personally not aware of many plant types that can survive completely submerged for 40 days ."
|
"Parts of New Orleans were under water for more than 40 days before all the water receeded . Has n't the plant life there replenished naturally in the wild ? Of course it has ."
| null | null |
3,184 | 834 |
".. and that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"Well , at least accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief . The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"responsibility and accountability on both famale and male"
|
"your desire to control her own body in bondage"
| null | null |
3,180 | 834 |
".. and that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"Well , at least accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief . The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage"
| null | null |
3,182 | 834 |
".. and that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"Well , at least accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief . The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created"
|
"The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
| null | null |
3,181 | 834 |
".. and that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"Well , at least accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief . The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male"
|
"accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief"
| null | null |
3,183 | 834 |
".. and that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male that created `` the means `` to form the child ."
|
"Well , at least accoreding to your `` because I say so `` belief . The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body in bondage to your particular brand of outraged morality ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"that responsibility and accountability is on both famale and male"
|
"The woman , of course , do n't need to pay attention to your desire to control her own body"
| null | null |
3,188 | 835 |
"The English government has effectively abolished the right of Englishmen , confirmed in their 1689 Bill of Rights , to `` have arms for their defence , ``"
|
"To be more accurate , ( not something noted amongst the pro-gun rabble ) the right of protestants to have arms for their defence against catholics . I think we 've all seen quite enough of this `` defence `` in Northern Ireland . ( assuming that yanks can locate the place with a map )"
|
DISAGREE
|
"The English government has effectively abolished the right of Englishmen"
|
"the right of protestants to have arms for their defence against catholics"
| null | null |
3,186 | 835 |
"The English government has effectively abolished the right of Englishmen , confirmed in their 1689 Bill of Rights , to `` have arms for their defence , ``"
|
"To be more accurate , ( not something noted amongst the pro-gun rabble ) the right of protestants to have arms for their defence against catholics . I think we 've all seen quite enough of this `` defence `` in Northern Ireland . ( assuming that yanks can locate the place with a map )"
|
DISAGREE
|
"has effectively abolished the right of Englishmen , ``"
|
"the right of protestants to have arms for their defence ``"
| null | null |
3,193 | 836 |
"Except that it does nothing of the sort ... But then , what can we expect from somebody citing a website trying to sell you liquid vitamin supplement ... Nevertheless , we look into the Pottenger 's cats claim . Here is a page called , `` Lesson of the Pottenger 's Cats Experiment : cats are not humans. `` Although it 's a page aimed at explaining why this `` experiment `` is not applicable to humans , it exposes the other , erm , flaws in this experiment . The one striking me based on the wikipedia list of diets for the groups should be obvious to everyone : many of these cats were being deprived of protein . This page confirms and elaborates . In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food . The difference is that good owners do n't feed their pets deficient diets . The real irony here is that this experiment -- were it reliable -- would be the antithesis of supersport 's Lamarckism . In order for supersport to be supported , the cats being fed inadequate diets would re-develop those broken pathways for manufacturing essential amino acids . Obviously , they did not . The only thing we see here is the effect of poor ( i.e . positively malnutritive ) diet . We can conclude that supersport 's Morton 's demon is pretty much in full control . There 's no other explanation for somebody seeing this experiment and thinking it supports Lamarckism , or even counters evolutionary theory , even if he does n't know the basics of experimentation and nutrition ."
|
"The reality is this is no different the following link : ie ... the animals who were fed one diet passed on traits differently than those who were fed another diet . Traits , according to evolutionists arise RANOCMLY . Get that , geniuses ? RANDOMLY . This is not random . Structural damage in this case did not happen randomly .... nor did the dengenerative effects to the fur , nervous systems , bones , allergies , and mental processes . Instead this was all dictated by the environment . Thus , despite the emergence of new traits in the milk/cooked food-fed diet of the one population , it had nothing to do with darwinian random mutation or natural selection . This is a hole . A huge hole .... it 's environmental evolution ... that is , animals simply changing with a changing environment . Lamarckism predicts that the environment changes first , followed up by new traits . Neo-darwinists say that new traits arise before and/or unoriented to the environment , only to be then be selected . I win . And this is no different than the following : http : //www.the-scientist.com/2004/7/5/14/1/ Normally , the fur of agouti mice is yellow , brown , or a calico-like mixture of the two , depending on the number of attached methyl groups . But when Duke University researchers Jirtle and Waterland fed folic acid and other methyl-rich supplements to pregnant mothers , despite the fact that all offspring inherited exactly the same agouti gene ( i.e. , with no nucleotide differences ) , mice who received supplements had offspring with mostly brown fur , whereas mice without supplements gave birth to mostly yellow pups with a higher susceptibility to obesity , diabetes , and cancer . LAMARCKJean-Baptiste Lamarck ( 1744–1829 ) The environmental ability of epigenetic inheritance may not necessarily bring to mind Lamarckian images of giraffes stretching their necks to reach the treetops ( and then giving birth to progeny with similarly stretched necks ) , but it does give researchers reason to reconsider long-refuted notions about the inheritance of acquired characteristics . Eighteenth-century French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck proposed that environmental cues could cause phenotypic changes transmittable to offspring . Checkmate , losers . Oh , and by the way , electro-loser ..... it does n't matter if this diet experiment can be extrapolated to humans or not . ( Of course I realize you are just spouting your mouth off just to hear your head rattle ) ... the reality is , though , these cats evolved new traits by way of non-darwinian mechanisms . So did the mice in both experiments and so did the pigs . Are you truly trying to tell me that cats and mice and pigs evolve by way of the inheritance of acquired characteristics but humans do n't ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food ."
|
"the animals who were fed one diet passed on traits differently than those who were fed another diet ."
| null | null |
3,190 | 836 |
"Except that it does nothing of the sort ... But then , what can we expect from somebody citing a website trying to sell you liquid vitamin supplement ... Nevertheless , we look into the Pottenger 's cats claim . Here is a page called , `` Lesson of the Pottenger 's Cats Experiment : cats are not humans. `` Although it 's a page aimed at explaining why this `` experiment `` is not applicable to humans , it exposes the other , erm , flaws in this experiment . The one striking me based on the wikipedia list of diets for the groups should be obvious to everyone : many of these cats were being deprived of protein . This page confirms and elaborates . In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food . The difference is that good owners do n't feed their pets deficient diets . The real irony here is that this experiment -- were it reliable -- would be the antithesis of supersport 's Lamarckism . In order for supersport to be supported , the cats being fed inadequate diets would re-develop those broken pathways for manufacturing essential amino acids . Obviously , they did not . The only thing we see here is the effect of poor ( i.e . positively malnutritive ) diet . We can conclude that supersport 's Morton 's demon is pretty much in full control . There 's no other explanation for somebody seeing this experiment and thinking it supports Lamarckism , or even counters evolutionary theory , even if he does n't know the basics of experimentation and nutrition ."
|
"The reality is this is no different the following link : ie ... the animals who were fed one diet passed on traits differently than those who were fed another diet . Traits , according to evolutionists arise RANOCMLY . Get that , geniuses ? RANDOMLY . This is not random . Structural damage in this case did not happen randomly .... nor did the dengenerative effects to the fur , nervous systems , bones , allergies , and mental processes . Instead this was all dictated by the environment . Thus , despite the emergence of new traits in the milk/cooked food-fed diet of the one population , it had nothing to do with darwinian random mutation or natural selection . This is a hole . A huge hole .... it 's environmental evolution ... that is , animals simply changing with a changing environment . Lamarckism predicts that the environment changes first , followed up by new traits . Neo-darwinists say that new traits arise before and/or unoriented to the environment , only to be then be selected . I win . And this is no different than the following : http : //www.the-scientist.com/2004/7/5/14/1/ Normally , the fur of agouti mice is yellow , brown , or a calico-like mixture of the two , depending on the number of attached methyl groups . But when Duke University researchers Jirtle and Waterland fed folic acid and other methyl-rich supplements to pregnant mothers , despite the fact that all offspring inherited exactly the same agouti gene ( i.e. , with no nucleotide differences ) , mice who received supplements had offspring with mostly brown fur , whereas mice without supplements gave birth to mostly yellow pups with a higher susceptibility to obesity , diabetes , and cancer . LAMARCKJean-Baptiste Lamarck ( 1744–1829 ) The environmental ability of epigenetic inheritance may not necessarily bring to mind Lamarckian images of giraffes stretching their necks to reach the treetops ( and then giving birth to progeny with similarly stretched necks ) , but it does give researchers reason to reconsider long-refuted notions about the inheritance of acquired characteristics . Eighteenth-century French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck proposed that environmental cues could cause phenotypic changes transmittable to offspring . Checkmate , losers . Oh , and by the way , electro-loser ..... it does n't matter if this diet experiment can be extrapolated to humans or not . ( Of course I realize you are just spouting your mouth off just to hear your head rattle ) ... the reality is , though , these cats evolved new traits by way of non-darwinian mechanisms . So did the mice in both experiments and so did the pigs . Are you truly trying to tell me that cats and mice and pigs evolve by way of the inheritance of acquired characteristics but humans do n't ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"liquid vitamin supplement cats are not not applicable to humans , experimentation and nutrition"
|
"environmental evolution animals simply changing with a changing of acquired mechanisms"
| null | null |
3,194 | 836 |
"Except that it does nothing of the sort ... But then , what can we expect from somebody citing a website trying to sell you liquid vitamin supplement ... Nevertheless , we look into the Pottenger 's cats claim . Here is a page called , `` Lesson of the Pottenger 's Cats Experiment : cats are not humans. `` Although it 's a page aimed at explaining why this `` experiment `` is not applicable to humans , it exposes the other , erm , flaws in this experiment . The one striking me based on the wikipedia list of diets for the groups should be obvious to everyone : many of these cats were being deprived of protein . This page confirms and elaborates . In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food . The difference is that good owners do n't feed their pets deficient diets . The real irony here is that this experiment -- were it reliable -- would be the antithesis of supersport 's Lamarckism . In order for supersport to be supported , the cats being fed inadequate diets would re-develop those broken pathways for manufacturing essential amino acids . Obviously , they did not . The only thing we see here is the effect of poor ( i.e . positively malnutritive ) diet . We can conclude that supersport 's Morton 's demon is pretty much in full control . There 's no other explanation for somebody seeing this experiment and thinking it supports Lamarckism , or even counters evolutionary theory , even if he does n't know the basics of experimentation and nutrition ."
|
"The reality is this is no different the following link : ie ... the animals who were fed one diet passed on traits differently than those who were fed another diet . Traits , according to evolutionists arise RANOCMLY . Get that , geniuses ? RANDOMLY . This is not random . Structural damage in this case did not happen randomly .... nor did the dengenerative effects to the fur , nervous systems , bones , allergies , and mental processes . Instead this was all dictated by the environment . Thus , despite the emergence of new traits in the milk/cooked food-fed diet of the one population , it had nothing to do with darwinian random mutation or natural selection . This is a hole . A huge hole .... it 's environmental evolution ... that is , animals simply changing with a changing environment . Lamarckism predicts that the environment changes first , followed up by new traits . Neo-darwinists say that new traits arise before and/or unoriented to the environment , only to be then be selected . I win . And this is no different than the following : http : //www.the-scientist.com/2004/7/5/14/1/ Normally , the fur of agouti mice is yellow , brown , or a calico-like mixture of the two , depending on the number of attached methyl groups . But when Duke University researchers Jirtle and Waterland fed folic acid and other methyl-rich supplements to pregnant mothers , despite the fact that all offspring inherited exactly the same agouti gene ( i.e. , with no nucleotide differences ) , mice who received supplements had offspring with mostly brown fur , whereas mice without supplements gave birth to mostly yellow pups with a higher susceptibility to obesity , diabetes , and cancer . LAMARCKJean-Baptiste Lamarck ( 1744–1829 ) The environmental ability of epigenetic inheritance may not necessarily bring to mind Lamarckian images of giraffes stretching their necks to reach the treetops ( and then giving birth to progeny with similarly stretched necks ) , but it does give researchers reason to reconsider long-refuted notions about the inheritance of acquired characteristics . Eighteenth-century French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck proposed that environmental cues could cause phenotypic changes transmittable to offspring . Checkmate , losers . Oh , and by the way , electro-loser ..... it does n't matter if this diet experiment can be extrapolated to humans or not . ( Of course I realize you are just spouting your mouth off just to hear your head rattle ) ... the reality is , though , these cats evolved new traits by way of non-darwinian mechanisms . So did the mice in both experiments and so did the pigs . Are you truly trying to tell me that cats and mice and pigs evolve by way of the inheritance of acquired characteristics but humans do n't ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"The difference is that good owners do n't feed their pets deficient diets ."
|
"the environment changes first , followed up by new traits"
| null | null |
3,192 | 836 |
"Except that it does nothing of the sort ... But then , what can we expect from somebody citing a website trying to sell you liquid vitamin supplement ... Nevertheless , we look into the Pottenger 's cats claim . Here is a page called , `` Lesson of the Pottenger 's Cats Experiment : cats are not humans. `` Although it 's a page aimed at explaining why this `` experiment `` is not applicable to humans , it exposes the other , erm , flaws in this experiment . The one striking me based on the wikipedia list of diets for the groups should be obvious to everyone : many of these cats were being deprived of protein . This page confirms and elaborates . In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food . The difference is that good owners do n't feed their pets deficient diets . The real irony here is that this experiment -- were it reliable -- would be the antithesis of supersport 's Lamarckism . In order for supersport to be supported , the cats being fed inadequate diets would re-develop those broken pathways for manufacturing essential amino acids . Obviously , they did not . The only thing we see here is the effect of poor ( i.e . positively malnutritive ) diet . We can conclude that supersport 's Morton 's demon is pretty much in full control . There 's no other explanation for somebody seeing this experiment and thinking it supports Lamarckism , or even counters evolutionary theory , even if he does n't know the basics of experimentation and nutrition ."
|
"The reality is this is no different the following link : ie ... the animals who were fed one diet passed on traits differently than those who were fed another diet . Traits , according to evolutionists arise RANOCMLY . Get that , geniuses ? RANDOMLY . This is not random . Structural damage in this case did not happen randomly .... nor did the dengenerative effects to the fur , nervous systems , bones , allergies , and mental processes . Instead this was all dictated by the environment . Thus , despite the emergence of new traits in the milk/cooked food-fed diet of the one population , it had nothing to do with darwinian random mutation or natural selection . This is a hole . A huge hole .... it 's environmental evolution ... that is , animals simply changing with a changing environment . Lamarckism predicts that the environment changes first , followed up by new traits . Neo-darwinists say that new traits arise before and/or unoriented to the environment , only to be then be selected . I win . And this is no different than the following : http : //www.the-scientist.com/2004/7/5/14/1/ Normally , the fur of agouti mice is yellow , brown , or a calico-like mixture of the two , depending on the number of attached methyl groups . But when Duke University researchers Jirtle and Waterland fed folic acid and other methyl-rich supplements to pregnant mothers , despite the fact that all offspring inherited exactly the same agouti gene ( i.e. , with no nucleotide differences ) , mice who received supplements had offspring with mostly brown fur , whereas mice without supplements gave birth to mostly yellow pups with a higher susceptibility to obesity , diabetes , and cancer . LAMARCKJean-Baptiste Lamarck ( 1744–1829 ) The environmental ability of epigenetic inheritance may not necessarily bring to mind Lamarckian images of giraffes stretching their necks to reach the treetops ( and then giving birth to progeny with similarly stretched necks ) , but it does give researchers reason to reconsider long-refuted notions about the inheritance of acquired characteristics . Eighteenth-century French naturalist Jean Baptiste de Lamarck proposed that environmental cues could cause phenotypic changes transmittable to offspring . Checkmate , losers . Oh , and by the way , electro-loser ..... it does n't matter if this diet experiment can be extrapolated to humans or not . ( Of course I realize you are just spouting your mouth off just to hear your head rattle ) ... the reality is , though , these cats evolved new traits by way of non-darwinian mechanisms . So did the mice in both experiments and so did the pigs . Are you truly trying to tell me that cats and mice and pigs evolve by way of the inheritance of acquired characteristics but humans do n't ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"many of these cats were being deprived of protein . This page confirms and elaborates . In fact , its first point is that today 's cats have no problem reproducing for several generations on today 's cooked food ."
|
"Structural damage in this case did not happen randomly .... nor did the dengenerative effects to the fur , nervous systems , bones , allergies , and mental processes . Instead this was all dictated by the environment"
| null | null |
3,198 | 837 |
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement ... couples like Ray Horn and life partner , the guy that was Oprah 's designer and his life mate , and sometimes Ellen Degeneres ? Why do these people get treated well overall and not lumped into that `` but he/she 's gay `` group ? It 's good that these people are in the world and showing people that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal . Anyone else ever notice this ?"
|
"Because they live on a coast ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"gay all the hate and does n't mean sick or abnormal ."
|
"coast"
| null | null |
3,196 | 837 |
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement ... couples like Ray Horn and life partner , the guy that was Oprah 's designer and his life mate , and sometimes Ellen Degeneres ? Why do these people get treated well overall and not lumped into that `` but he/she 's gay `` group ? It 's good that these people are in the world and showing people that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal . Anyone else ever notice this ?"
|
"Because they live on a coast ?"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement"
|
"Because they live on a coast"
| null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.