Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
3,321
867
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of this . Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does . As such , you can no more force her , against her will , to provide bodily resources to an embryo or fetus , than you can yourself be forced to give of your bodily resources against your will . Even if somebody is bleeding to death , and your blood can save their life , they still do n't have the right to force you to safely give them of your blood . Each person have that right to control their bodily resources . If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will . When you do n't insist that everybody else be subject to such requirements , then the argument is hypocritical and misogynistic . And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution , the woman has the right to privacy , to control her onw body ."
AGREE
"Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment"
null
null
3,325
867
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of this . Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does . As such , you can no more force her , against her will , to provide bodily resources to an embryo or fetus , than you can yourself be forced to give of your bodily resources against your will . Even if somebody is bleeding to death , and your blood can save their life , they still do n't have the right to force you to safely give them of your blood . Each person have that right to control their bodily resources . If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will . When you do n't insist that everybody else be subject to such requirements , then the argument is hypocritical and misogynistic . And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution , the woman has the right to privacy , to control her onw body ."
AGREE
"Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure"
null
null
3,328
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record ,"
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them ."
null
null
3,327
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them ."
null
null
3,332
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years ."
"Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed"
null
null
3,329
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record"
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed"
null
null
3,331
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years ."
"No"
null
null
3,330
868
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years . Furthermore , it was based upon the fossil record , which is supposedly shows how everything evolved ."
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them . Then when we did see the descendants of the fossils and it got changed , that 's how science works , when better data is found , the theories are changed ."
DISAGREE
"The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of"
"No , it was based upon the fact we had n't seen one , yet there were fossils of them"
null
null
3,336
869
"Another question might be , have evolutionists figured out the `` mock `` gene yet ? Mockery was a great ingredient in Christian salvation . Judas mocked Jesus in the garden , the chief priests and scribes laughed him to scorn , Herod mocked him , the servants and the soldiers jeered at him and insulted him , and on the cross all sorts of taunts were thrown at him . I do n't claim to be perfect - mockery could possibly be an effective tool in certain instances , but I may be wrong about that . Is mockery synonymous with evil ? The opposite of love ? Do atheists do it more than Christians ?"
"Why you quoted me is questionable . What I posted was merely a series of mathematical equations proving that Hovind is completely full of * * * * . How you consider mathematical equations `` mockery `` I do n't know , but more likely , you did not bother to watch the video . Instead , in your normal fashion , you simply ASSUMED what you wanted to believe and then went from there rather then actually looking at what it was and what it had to say . Your post more accurately is towards the link that AA posted in defense of his beliefs ( yet failed to realize was satirizing those beliefs ) . Furthermore , I 'm not an atheist even though your poor definition wants me to be ."
DISAGREE
"I do n't claim to be perfect - mockery could possibly be an effective tool in certain instances , but I may be wrong about that"
"Your post more accurately is towards the link that AA posted in defense of his beliefs"
null
null
3,335
869
"Another question might be , have evolutionists figured out the `` mock `` gene yet ? Mockery was a great ingredient in Christian salvation . Judas mocked Jesus in the garden , the chief priests and scribes laughed him to scorn , Herod mocked him , the servants and the soldiers jeered at him and insulted him , and on the cross all sorts of taunts were thrown at him . I do n't claim to be perfect - mockery could possibly be an effective tool in certain instances , but I may be wrong about that . Is mockery synonymous with evil ? The opposite of love ? Do atheists do it more than Christians ?"
"Why you quoted me is questionable . What I posted was merely a series of mathematical equations proving that Hovind is completely full of * * * * . How you consider mathematical equations `` mockery `` I do n't know , but more likely , you did not bother to watch the video . Instead , in your normal fashion , you simply ASSUMED what you wanted to believe and then went from there rather then actually looking at what it was and what it had to say . Your post more accurately is towards the link that AA posted in defense of his beliefs ( yet failed to realize was satirizing those beliefs ) . Furthermore , I 'm not an atheist even though your poor definition wants me to be ."
DISAGREE
"evolutionists figured out the `` mock `` gene Judas mocked Jesus"
"quoted me is questionable series of mathematical equations"
null
null
3,338
870
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes . Not `` assumes `` . But PREDICTS ."
"Actually , you are living in the past . That DNA changes is neither an assumption nor a prediction . It is an observation ."
DISAGREE
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes . ``"
"you are living in the past . That DNA changes is neither an assumption nor a prediction ."
null
null
3,339
870
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes . Not `` assumes `` . But PREDICTS ."
"Actually , you are living in the past . That DNA changes is neither an assumption nor a prediction . It is an observation ."
DISAGREE
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes"
"you are living in the past DNA changes It is an observation"
null
null
3,337
870
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes . Not `` assumes `` . But PREDICTS ."
"Actually , you are living in the past . That DNA changes is neither an assumption nor a prediction . It is an observation ."
DISAGREE
"Evolution PREDICTS that DNA changes . Not `` assumes `` . But PREDICTS"
"DNA changes is neither an assumption nor a prediction . It is an observation ."
null
null
3,342
871
"So you are saying that because the gun is of value you should just let the burgular take everything else of value , Rape your wife and possibly kill you all because you might get shot ? XXXX . You are now quoting that burgulars will invade homes more because there are guns in there ? Again this is this frauds own personal research to meet his agenda . Please show me his raw data .. otherwise it is XXXX . Your quote starts out with fact ( the 74 % ) then goes off into fantasy land of the quotes of one or two CRIMINALS who support your global socialist agenda and then he does `` his own study `` . XXXX ! GOA and other pro freedom groups footnote and annotate thier sources for your review not some `` oh we looked at the fbi statistics and from `` our own `` research we have found that pistol gripped assault rifles can go on a kill crazy rampage whether or not a human is actually holding the thing `` XXXX ! The latest is the BATFE is XXXXXX at the brady foundation for misrepresenting their data ... hmm ..... C R A P !"
"Well , if burglars want to steal guns then it makes sense that they would be likely to target the homes of gun owners . And the source is from the recently published book Evaluating Gun Policy which you can read and review . The source is listed at the bottom ."
DISAGREE
"gun is of value quoting that burgulars will invade homes more"
"if burglars want to steal likely to target the homes of gun owners"
null
null
3,343
871
"So you are saying that because the gun is of value you should just let the burgular take everything else of value , Rape your wife and possibly kill you all because you might get shot ? XXXX . You are now quoting that burgulars will invade homes more because there are guns in there ? Again this is this frauds own personal research to meet his agenda . Please show me his raw data .. otherwise it is XXXX . Your quote starts out with fact ( the 74 % ) then goes off into fantasy land of the quotes of one or two CRIMINALS who support your global socialist agenda and then he does `` his own study `` . XXXX ! GOA and other pro freedom groups footnote and annotate thier sources for your review not some `` oh we looked at the fbi statistics and from `` our own `` research we have found that pistol gripped assault rifles can go on a kill crazy rampage whether or not a human is actually holding the thing `` XXXX ! The latest is the BATFE is XXXXXX at the brady foundation for misrepresenting their data ... hmm ..... C R A P !"
"Well , if burglars want to steal guns then it makes sense that they would be likely to target the homes of gun owners . And the source is from the recently published book Evaluating Gun Policy which you can read and review . The source is listed at the bottom ."
DISAGREE
"then goes off into fantasy land of the quotes of one or two CRIMINALS who support your global socialist agenda and then he does `` his own study `` ."
"The source is listed at the bottom"
null
null
3,341
871
"So you are saying that because the gun is of value you should just let the burgular take everything else of value , Rape your wife and possibly kill you all because you might get shot ? XXXX . You are now quoting that burgulars will invade homes more because there are guns in there ? Again this is this frauds own personal research to meet his agenda . Please show me his raw data .. otherwise it is XXXX . Your quote starts out with fact ( the 74 % ) then goes off into fantasy land of the quotes of one or two CRIMINALS who support your global socialist agenda and then he does `` his own study `` . XXXX ! GOA and other pro freedom groups footnote and annotate thier sources for your review not some `` oh we looked at the fbi statistics and from `` our own `` research we have found that pistol gripped assault rifles can go on a kill crazy rampage whether or not a human is actually holding the thing `` XXXX ! The latest is the BATFE is XXXXXX at the brady foundation for misrepresenting their data ... hmm ..... C R A P !"
"Well , if burglars want to steal guns then it makes sense that they would be likely to target the homes of gun owners . And the source is from the recently published book Evaluating Gun Policy which you can read and review . The source is listed at the bottom ."
DISAGREE
"you should just let the burgular take everything else of value ,"
"if burglars want to steal guns then it makes sense that they would be likely to target the homes of gun owners"
null
null
3,344
872
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"Really ? Let 's consider the matter of Jesus ' claimed virgin birth , a claim brought forth by Matthew long after Paul 's time . Here 's Paul on the subject ... Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord , which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh ; ... which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine . EZ , evidence contained within the NT points to a gradual evolution of Christology over a considerable period of time ."
DISAGREE
"No foundation for Paul unaware"
"Jesus ' claimed virgin birth , claim brought forth by Matthew"
null
null
3,347
872
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"Really ? Let 's consider the matter of Jesus ' claimed virgin birth , a claim brought forth by Matthew long after Paul 's time . Here 's Paul on the subject ... Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord , which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh ; ... which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine . EZ , evidence contained within the NT points to a gradual evolution of Christology over a considerable period of time ."
DISAGREE
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine ."
null
null
3,346
872
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"Really ? Let 's consider the matter of Jesus ' claimed virgin birth , a claim brought forth by Matthew long after Paul 's time . Here 's Paul on the subject ... Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord , which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh ; ... which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine . EZ , evidence contained within the NT points to a gradual evolution of Christology over a considerable period of time ."
DISAGREE
"allegedly being `` unaware"
"which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine ."
null
null
3,345
872
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"Really ? Let 's consider the matter of Jesus ' claimed virgin birth , a claim brought forth by Matthew long after Paul 's time . Here 's Paul on the subject ... Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord , which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh ; ... which suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine . EZ , evidence contained within the NT points to a gradual evolution of Christology over a considerable period of time ."
DISAGREE
"No foundation for Paul allegedly being `` unaware `` of these things ."
"Really ? Let 's consider the matter of Jesus ' claimed virgin birth ... suggests that Paul considered Jesus ' conception to be fairly routine ."
null
null
3,351
873
"Fort example , I was talking to an old friend and she told me that something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"If your friend is hearing voices in her head to walk into traffic , she needs some psychiatric help ."
DISAGREE
"something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"she needs some psychiatric help ."
null
null
3,348
873
"Fort example , I was talking to an old friend and she told me that something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"If your friend is hearing voices in her head to walk into traffic , she needs some psychiatric help ."
DISAGREE
"friend and she told me that something would tell her to go head"
"friend is hearing voices in her head to walk"
null
null
3,349
873
"Fort example , I was talking to an old friend and she told me that something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"If your friend is hearing voices in her head to walk into traffic , she needs some psychiatric help ."
DISAGREE
"I was talking to an old friend go head on with on coming traffic"
"friend is hearing voices she needs some psychiatric help"
null
null
3,350
873
"Fort example , I was talking to an old friend and she told me that something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"If your friend is hearing voices in her head to walk into traffic , she needs some psychiatric help ."
DISAGREE
"told me that something would tell her to go head on with on coming traffic ."
"If your friend is hearing voices in her head to walk into traffic , she needs some psychiatric help ."
null
null
3,355
874
"Some people do also get a pleasureable effect from shooting guns and using them for such purposes as hunting and target practice ."
"But the fact remains that guns are , by design , weapons ."
DISAGREE
"get a pleasureable effect from shooting guns purposes as hunting and target practice"
"guns are , by design , weapons"
null
null
3,352
874
"Some people do also get a pleasureable effect from shooting guns and using them for such purposes as hunting and target practice ."
"But the fact remains that guns are , by design , weapons ."
DISAGREE
"people do also get a pleasureable effect from shooting guns"
"But the fact remains that guns are , by design , weapons ."
null
null
3,354
874
"Some people do also get a pleasureable effect from shooting guns and using them for such purposes as hunting and target practice ."
"But the fact remains that guns are , by design , weapons ."
DISAGREE
"and using them for such purposes as hunting and target practice ."
"fact remains that guns are , by design , weapons ."
null
null
3,359
875
"That 's really all I have to offer to this debate , hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points , seeing as I 'm hardly the expert ."
"That 's the thing , though ; even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts . supersport , on the other hand , does n't know any better ."
AGREE
"hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points"
"self-professed non-expert refute the ridiculous points"
null
null
3,356
875
"That 's really all I have to offer to this debate , hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points , seeing as I 'm hardly the expert ."
"That 's the thing , though ; even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts . supersport , on the other hand , does n't know any better ."
AGREE
"'s really all I have to offer to this debate , hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points"
"even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts ."
null
null
3,357
875
"That 's really all I have to offer to this debate , hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points , seeing as I 'm hardly the expert ."
"That 's the thing , though ; even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts . supersport , on the other hand , does n't know any better ."
AGREE
"hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points , seeing as I 'm hardly the expert ."
"even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts"
null
null
3,358
875
"That 's really all I have to offer to this debate , hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points , seeing as I 'm hardly the expert ."
"That 's the thing , though ; even a self-professed non-expert can perfectly well refute the ridiculous points supersport continually spouts . supersport , on the other hand , does n't know any better ."
AGREE
"hopefully somebody will help verify/strengthen my points"
"points other hand , does n't know any better ."
null
null
3,361
876
"You said that the colour changes are caused by a single gene . This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene . This is of course IMHO . What you classify as evolution , I call  “ variation within a kind ” . You aren ’ t working off the big picture idea ."
"And you do n't have any picture . You have no idea of what recessive really means , do you . Actually , since the first observation of a black peppered moth in 1848 , several other mutations have caused other variations of color in peppered moths . They are intermediate between the typica and the carbonaria , but they are extremely rare . These alleles form a hierarchy of dominence in which the carbonaria is the full dominant , and the typica is fully recessive . Please define `` kind. `` Please define `` variation. `` Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
DISAGREE
"This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene . This is of course IMHO . What you classify as evolution , I call  variation within a kind ."
"Please define `` kind. `` Please define `` variation. `` Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
null
null
3,360
876
"You said that the colour changes are caused by a single gene . This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene . This is of course IMHO . What you classify as evolution , I call  “ variation within a kind ” . You aren ’ t working off the big picture idea ."
"And you do n't have any picture . You have no idea of what recessive really means , do you . Actually , since the first observation of a black peppered moth in 1848 , several other mutations have caused other variations of color in peppered moths . They are intermediate between the typica and the carbonaria , but they are extremely rare . These alleles form a hierarchy of dominence in which the carbonaria is the full dominant , and the typica is fully recessive . Please define `` kind. `` Please define `` variation. `` Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
DISAGREE
"I call  variation within a kindÂ"
"hierarchy of dominence"
null
null
3,363
876
"You said that the colour changes are caused by a single gene . This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene . This is of course IMHO . What you classify as evolution , I call  “ variation within a kind ” . You aren ’ t working off the big picture idea ."
"And you do n't have any picture . You have no idea of what recessive really means , do you . Actually , since the first observation of a black peppered moth in 1848 , several other mutations have caused other variations of color in peppered moths . They are intermediate between the typica and the carbonaria , but they are extremely rare . These alleles form a hierarchy of dominence in which the carbonaria is the full dominant , and the typica is fully recessive . Please define `` kind. `` Please define `` variation. `` Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
DISAGREE
"This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene"
"They are intermediate between the typica and the carbonaria , but they are extremely rare"
null
null
3,362
876
"You said that the colour changes are caused by a single gene . This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene . This is of course IMHO . What you classify as evolution , I call  “ variation within a kind ” . You aren ’ t working off the big picture idea ."
"And you do n't have any picture . You have no idea of what recessive really means , do you . Actually , since the first observation of a black peppered moth in 1848 , several other mutations have caused other variations of color in peppered moths . They are intermediate between the typica and the carbonaria , but they are extremely rare . These alleles form a hierarchy of dominence in which the carbonaria is the full dominant , and the typica is fully recessive . Please define `` kind. `` Please define `` variation. `` Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
DISAGREE
"You said that the colour changes are caused by a single gene . This further goes to imply that a mutation could disable the primary gene and activate the recessive gene ."
"Please explain the origin of this `` variation in kind. ``"
null
null
3,366
877
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says . ..... It could also affect the balance of the climate system itself and even possibly alter the behaviour of the Gulf Stream . Part of the process is likely to mean more precipitation ( hail , rain , sleet and snow ) at higher latitudes , and so more water flowing down the rivers . ...... If the global water distribution changes , this could have important social and economic consequences . An altered hydrological cycle might conceivably have a profound cooling effect on north-west Europe as well . The American Geophysical Union , publisher of the journal , says : `` It could also alter the balance of the climate system itself , such as the Atlantic thermohaline circulation , a kind of conveyor belt . ... `` It is possible the increase in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could contribute to an alteration in the thermohaline circulation , because it is diluting the saltiness of the seawater and reducing its density. ``"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ? Or in your second quote : `` But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out . This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously thought. `` Huh ?"
DISAGREE
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ?"
null
null
3,365
877
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says . ..... It could also affect the balance of the climate system itself and even possibly alter the behaviour of the Gulf Stream . Part of the process is likely to mean more precipitation ( hail , rain , sleet and snow ) at higher latitudes , and so more water flowing down the rivers . ...... If the global water distribution changes , this could have important social and economic consequences . An altered hydrological cycle might conceivably have a profound cooling effect on north-west Europe as well . The American Geophysical Union , publisher of the journal , says : `` It could also alter the balance of the climate system itself , such as the Atlantic thermohaline circulation , a kind of conveyor belt . ... `` It is possible the increase in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could contribute to an alteration in the thermohaline circulation , because it is diluting the saltiness of the seawater and reducing its density. ``"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ? Or in your second quote : `` But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out . This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously thought. `` Huh ?"
DISAGREE
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ?"
null
null
3,367
877
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says . ..... It could also affect the balance of the climate system itself and even possibly alter the behaviour of the Gulf Stream . Part of the process is likely to mean more precipitation ( hail , rain , sleet and snow ) at higher latitudes , and so more water flowing down the rivers . ...... If the global water distribution changes , this could have important social and economic consequences . An altered hydrological cycle might conceivably have a profound cooling effect on north-west Europe as well . The American Geophysical Union , publisher of the journal , says : `` It could also alter the balance of the climate system itself , such as the Atlantic thermohaline circulation , a kind of conveyor belt . ... `` It is possible the increase in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could contribute to an alteration in the thermohaline circulation , because it is diluting the saltiness of the seawater and reducing its density. ``"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ? Or in your second quote : `` But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out . This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously thought. `` Huh ?"
DISAGREE
"It could also affect the balance of the climate system itself and even possibly alter the behaviour of the Gulf Stream . Part of the process is likely to mean more precipitation ( hail , rain , sleet and snow ) at higher latitudes , and so more water flowing down the rivers ."
"This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously thought. `` Huh ?"
null
null
3,368
877
"The rise in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could change the global distribution of water , the team says . ..... It could also affect the balance of the climate system itself and even possibly alter the behaviour of the Gulf Stream . Part of the process is likely to mean more precipitation ( hail , rain , sleet and snow ) at higher latitudes , and so more water flowing down the rivers . ...... If the global water distribution changes , this could have important social and economic consequences . An altered hydrological cycle might conceivably have a profound cooling effect on north-west Europe as well . The American Geophysical Union , publisher of the journal , says : `` It could also alter the balance of the climate system itself , such as the Atlantic thermohaline circulation , a kind of conveyor belt . ... `` It is possible the increase in fresh water entering the Arctic Ocean could contribute to an alteration in the thermohaline circulation , because it is diluting the saltiness of the seawater and reducing its density. ``"
"Nothing like quoting experts willing to stick their scientific necks out , huh ? Or in your second quote : `` But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out . This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously thought. `` Huh ?"
DISAGREE
"this could have important social and economic consequences ."
"This means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the greenhouse effect than previously"
null
null
3,372
878
"Yet there was a case that I read about somewhere , where a sticker was placed in science textbooks advising children to study evolution `` with an open mind `` , and an ACLU lawsuit ensued ."
"Indeed . Cobb County Georgia . And the sticker was found unconstitutional in Federal Court . The problem was that it was religiously motivated , was placed only in biology texts , did n't say anything true that the teachers were n't already teaching , and actually was not accurate . The sticker was found to be unconstitutional because it violated the second prong of the Lemon Test . I suspect that you do n't know what that is . Anyway , the 11th Circuit reversed ."
AGREE
"Yet there was a case that I read about somewhere"
"Indeed . Cobb County Georgia ."
null
null
3,370
878
"Yet there was a case that I read about somewhere , where a sticker was placed in science textbooks advising children to study evolution `` with an open mind `` , and an ACLU lawsuit ensued ."
"Indeed . Cobb County Georgia . And the sticker was found unconstitutional in Federal Court . The problem was that it was religiously motivated , was placed only in biology texts , did n't say anything true that the teachers were n't already teaching , and actually was not accurate . The sticker was found to be unconstitutional because it violated the second prong of the Lemon Test . I suspect that you do n't know what that is . Anyway , the 11th Circuit reversed ."
AGREE
"there was a case that I read about somewhere , where a sticker was placed in science textbooks advising children to study evolution `` with an open mind `` , and an ACLU lawsuit ensued ."
"Indeed . Cobb County Georgia . And the sticker was found unconstitutional in Federal Court . The problem was that it was religiously motivated , was placed only in biology texts , did n't say anything true that the teachers were n't already teaching , and actually was not accurate ."
null
null
3,373
878
"Yet there was a case that I read about somewhere , where a sticker was placed in science textbooks advising children to study evolution `` with an open mind `` , and an ACLU lawsuit ensued ."
"Indeed . Cobb County Georgia . And the sticker was found unconstitutional in Federal Court . The problem was that it was religiously motivated , was placed only in biology texts , did n't say anything true that the teachers were n't already teaching , and actually was not accurate . The sticker was found to be unconstitutional because it violated the second prong of the Lemon Test . I suspect that you do n't know what that is . Anyway , the 11th Circuit reversed ."
AGREE
"that I read about somewhere , where a sticker was placed in science textbooks advising children to study evolution"
"The sticker was found to be unconstitutional because it violated the second prong of the Lemon Test ."
null
null
3,374
879
"http : //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
DISAGREE
": //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
null
null
3,376
879
"http : //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
DISAGREE
"http : //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
null
null
3,375
879
"http : //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
DISAGREE
"http : //news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai ... 5/nabort15.xml"
"I think that I do n't have quite enough Tobasco in my Bloody Mary ."
null
null
3,380
880
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property . It would be unconstitutional for the seminaries to be on property owned by the school district . The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional ( although I do n't see how ) . Pertinent decisions about religious instruction and schools are : McCollum v. Board of Education ( 333 U.S. 203 ) Zorach v. Clauson ( 343 U.S. 306 ) McCollum found that religious instruction on school property is unconstitutional , while Zorach found that `` accommodating `` religious instruction by releasing students from school for that purpose was not ."
"Yep thats true . There in separate buildings but right next to each other . I see it being about as attractive as a crack house next to a school with a revolving door in front ."
AGREE
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds"
"Yep thats true ."
null
null
3,378
880
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property . It would be unconstitutional for the seminaries to be on property owned by the school district . The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional ( although I do n't see how ) . Pertinent decisions about religious instruction and schools are : McCollum v. Board of Education ( 333 U.S. 203 ) Zorach v. Clauson ( 343 U.S. 306 ) McCollum found that religious instruction on school property is unconstitutional , while Zorach found that `` accommodating `` religious instruction by releasing students from school for that purpose was not ."
"Yep thats true . There in separate buildings but right next to each other . I see it being about as attractive as a crack house next to a school with a revolving door in front ."
AGREE
"The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional"
"it being about as attractive as a crack house next to a school with a revolving door in front ."
null
null
3,381
880
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property . It would be unconstitutional for the seminaries to be on property owned by the school district . The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional ( although I do n't see how ) . Pertinent decisions about religious instruction and schools are : McCollum v. Board of Education ( 333 U.S. 203 ) Zorach v. Clauson ( 343 U.S. 306 ) McCollum found that religious instruction on school property is unconstitutional , while Zorach found that `` accommodating `` religious instruction by releasing students from school for that purpose was not ."
"Yep thats true . There in separate buildings but right next to each other . I see it being about as attractive as a crack house next to a school with a revolving door in front ."
AGREE
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property . It would be unconstitutional for the seminaries to be on property owned by the school district . The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional ( although I do n't see how ) ."
"Yep true . There in separate buildings but right next to each other ."
null
null
3,379
880
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property . It would be unconstitutional for the seminaries to be on property owned by the school district . The children go to the seminary on released-time , which has been found to be constitutional ( although I do n't see how ) . Pertinent decisions about religious instruction and schools are : McCollum v. Board of Education ( 333 U.S. 203 ) Zorach v. Clauson ( 343 U.S. 306 ) McCollum found that religious instruction on school property is unconstitutional , while Zorach found that `` accommodating `` religious instruction by releasing students from school for that purpose was not ."
"Yep thats true . There in separate buildings but right next to each other . I see it being about as attractive as a crack house next to a school with a revolving door in front ."
AGREE
"Actually , the Mormon seminaries are n't `` on the grounds , `` although they may be on an adjacent , privately owned piece of property ."
"Yep thats true ."
null
null
3,382
881
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design . It might be argued that a computer implies a programmer . However , this may be taking the analogy too far . What the universe is computing , in Lloyd ’ s picture , is not some external output but rather its own behavior . And a very large portion of its computing power seems to be tied up in such behavior as random collisions of atoms . What a way to spin this . This actually favors ID . If the majority of the computational resources are wasted , it reduces the amount of probabilistic resources .  “ monkeys typing on computers can produce simple code that would generate a wide variety of outputs. ” I ’ d like to see that . ( Is he trying to make monkeys out of Stephen Wolfram et al ? ) Elsewhere , Seife uses terminology that is likely to create confusion . He posits a possible  “ law of conservation of information ,  ” without noting that Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski has used the same wording to propose a different law . Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally . Transparent , intellectually dishonest obfuscation . Comment by j — March 9 , 2006 @ 6:47 am"
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true . One definition has nothing to do with the other . Blah blah blah . http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
DISAGREE
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design ."
"All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim"
null
null
3,383
881
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design . It might be argued that a computer implies a programmer . However , this may be taking the analogy too far . What the universe is computing , in Lloyd ’ s picture , is not some external output but rather its own behavior . And a very large portion of its computing power seems to be tied up in such behavior as random collisions of atoms . What a way to spin this . This actually favors ID . If the majority of the computational resources are wasted , it reduces the amount of probabilistic resources .  “ monkeys typing on computers can produce simple code that would generate a wide variety of outputs. ” I ’ d like to see that . ( Is he trying to make monkeys out of Stephen Wolfram et al ? ) Elsewhere , Seife uses terminology that is likely to create confusion . He posits a possible  “ law of conservation of information ,  ” without noting that Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski has used the same wording to propose a different law . Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally . Transparent , intellectually dishonest obfuscation . Comment by j — March 9 , 2006 @ 6:47 am"
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true . One definition has nothing to do with the other . Blah blah blah . http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
DISAGREE
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design ."
"http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
null
null
3,386
881
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design . It might be argued that a computer implies a programmer . However , this may be taking the analogy too far . What the universe is computing , in Lloyd ’ s picture , is not some external output but rather its own behavior . And a very large portion of its computing power seems to be tied up in such behavior as random collisions of atoms . What a way to spin this . This actually favors ID . If the majority of the computational resources are wasted , it reduces the amount of probabilistic resources .  “ monkeys typing on computers can produce simple code that would generate a wide variety of outputs. ” I ’ d like to see that . ( Is he trying to make monkeys out of Stephen Wolfram et al ? ) Elsewhere , Seife uses terminology that is likely to create confusion . He posits a possible  “ law of conservation of information ,  ” without noting that Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski has used the same wording to propose a different law . Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally . Transparent , intellectually dishonest obfuscation . Comment by j — March 9 , 2006 @ 6:47 am"
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true . One definition has nothing to do with the other . Blah blah blah . http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
DISAGREE
"Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally ."
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true"
null
null
3,384
881
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design . It might be argued that a computer implies a programmer . However , this may be taking the analogy too far . What the universe is computing , in Lloyd ’ s picture , is not some external output but rather its own behavior . And a very large portion of its computing power seems to be tied up in such behavior as random collisions of atoms . What a way to spin this . This actually favors ID . If the majority of the computational resources are wasted , it reduces the amount of probabilistic resources .  “ monkeys typing on computers can produce simple code that would generate a wide variety of outputs. ” I ’ d like to see that . ( Is he trying to make monkeys out of Stephen Wolfram et al ? ) Elsewhere , Seife uses terminology that is likely to create confusion . He posits a possible  “ law of conservation of information ,  ” without noting that Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski has used the same wording to propose a different law . Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally . Transparent , intellectually dishonest obfuscation . Comment by j — March 9 , 2006 @ 6:47 am"
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true . One definition has nothing to do with the other . Blah blah blah . http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
DISAGREE
"this may be taking the analogy too far ."
"One definition has nothing to do with the other ."
null
null
3,385
881
"The universe-as-computer concept may also play into the current strife about intelligent design . It might be argued that a computer implies a programmer . However , this may be taking the analogy too far . What the universe is computing , in Lloyd ’ s picture , is not some external output but rather its own behavior . And a very large portion of its computing power seems to be tied up in such behavior as random collisions of atoms . What a way to spin this . This actually favors ID . If the majority of the computational resources are wasted , it reduces the amount of probabilistic resources .  “ monkeys typing on computers can produce simple code that would generate a wide variety of outputs. ” I ’ d like to see that . ( Is he trying to make monkeys out of Stephen Wolfram et al ? ) Elsewhere , Seife uses terminology that is likely to create confusion . He posits a possible  “ law of conservation of information ,  ” without noting that Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski has used the same wording to propose a different law . Seife is referring to [ blah blah blah ] . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski ’ s claim that organisms contain information that could not have been produced naturally . Transparent , intellectually dishonest obfuscation . Comment by j — March 9 , 2006 @ 6:47 am"
"Well , j , the blah blah blah part was pretty important . It said , `` Seife is referring to how information continues to exist in some form after it has been violently altered ; the smoke from a burning newspaper contains data about the newspaper 's content , albeit impossible to reconstruct , and even black holes seem not to truly eradicate the information in the matter they consume . All of which has nothing to do with Dembski 's claim ... `` which is true . One definition has nothing to do with the other . Blah blah blah . http : //www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/903"
DISAGREE
"intelligent design"
"violently altered"
null
null
3,387
882
"I wish to wave the flag for the middle ground . I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically . I do believe that many events ( including the flood ) happened in some form or other and many of these are long-ago racial memories which may well have been enhanced/distorted/spun over the course of millenia ."
"Me too ."
AGREE
"I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically ."
"Me too ."
null
null
3,390
882
"I wish to wave the flag for the middle ground . I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically . I do believe that many events ( including the flood ) happened in some form or other and many of these are long-ago racial memories which may well have been enhanced/distorted/spun over the course of millenia ."
"Me too ."
AGREE
"I wish to wave the flag for the middle ground . I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically ."
"Me too ."
null
null
3,388
882
"I wish to wave the flag for the middle ground . I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically . I do believe that many events ( including the flood ) happened in some form or other and many of these are long-ago racial memories which may well have been enhanced/distorted/spun over the course of millenia ."
"Me too ."
AGREE
"I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically ."
"Me too ."
null
null
3,389
882
"I wish to wave the flag for the middle ground . I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically . I do believe that many events ( including the flood ) happened in some form or other and many of these are long-ago racial memories which may well have been enhanced/distorted/spun over the course of millenia ."
"Me too ."
AGREE
"I do not believe that the Bible is 100 % accurate historically"
"Me too ."
null
null
3,395
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,394
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,397
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible"
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,391
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,398
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible"
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,393
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,392
890
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
DISAGREE
"It contradicts a literal interpretation of the Bible ."
"And ... ?"
null
null
3,406
891
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve . And what criminal enterprises has the people of his good city people supplied other cities with . I mean besides the crimes his investigators committed . Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
DISAGREE
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523"
"Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
null
null
3,408
891
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve . And what criminal enterprises has the people of his good city people supplied other cities with . I mean besides the crimes his investigators committed . Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
DISAGREE
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder Property crime = 149,989"
"The good mayor cities and look for crimes ?"
null
null
3,403
891
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve . And what criminal enterprises has the people of his good city people supplied other cities with . I mean besides the crimes his investigators committed . Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
DISAGREE
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ?"
null
null
3,400
891
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve . And what criminal enterprises has the people of his good city people supplied other cities with . I mean besides the crimes his investigators committed . Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
DISAGREE
"Violent crimes Murder Forcible rape Robbery Aggravated assault Property crime"
"And YET ! good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
null
null
3,402
891
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve . And what criminal enterprises has the people of his good city people supplied other cities with . I mean besides the crimes his investigators committed . Drugs , thugs , and murderers to name a few . Bloomberg , stay the heck where you belong !"
DISAGREE
"Violent crimes = 48,430 Murder = 523 Forcible rape = 890 Robbery = 22,186 Aggravated assault = 24,831 Property crime = 149,989"
"And YET ! The good mayor has the time , money , and extra man power to go to other cities and look for crimes ? Heck . I have been to New York , and he has an awful lot of nerve going anywhere else looking for crimes to solve ."
null
null
3,410
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"science has over-ruled Creation Please explain"
"not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
null
null
3,415
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang"
null
null
3,416
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to ,"
null
null
3,417
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"new to this idea that science has"
"The 7 day creation I am referring to possibility of divine creation"
null
null
3,411
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation ."
"not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang"
null
null
3,414
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"over-ruled Creation ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
null
null
3,412
892
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
AGREE
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"The 7 day creation I am referring to , not merely the possibility of divine creation through the Big bang etc"
null
null
3,426
893
"Because it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"So according to you , you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , because that makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy and who 's the good guy ; being the good guy is never armed , and thus never able to defend themselves ."
DISAGREE
"it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit"
"you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed"
null
null
3,421
893
"Because it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"So according to you , you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , because that makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy and who 's the good guy ; being the good guy is never armed , and thus never able to defend themselves ."
DISAGREE
"Because it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"So according to you , you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , because that makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy and who 's the good guy"
null
null
3,423
893
"Because it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"So according to you , you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , because that makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy and who 's the good guy ; being the good guy is never armed , and thus never able to defend themselves ."
DISAGREE
"it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , being the good guy is never armed , and thus never able to defend themselves ."
null
null
3,425
893
"Because it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit in New York ,"
"So according to you , you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed , because that makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy and who 's the good guy ; being the good guy is never armed , and thus never able to defend themselves ."
DISAGREE
"it is illegal to own a handgun without a difficult-to-get permit"
"you 'd prefer it if only the bad guys are armed makes it easy to tell who 's the bad guy"
null
null
3,428
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems ."
null
null
3,429
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems ."
null
null
3,432
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"is the point !"
"yet to prove only have theory"
null
null
3,430
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause"
null
null
3,433
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"yet to prove with statistical evidence You only have theory and a few isolated incidents"
null
null
3,434
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"you have yet to prove with statistical evidence few isolated incidents"
null
null
3,435
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
null
null
3,431
894
"Yes , that is the point !"
"And you have yet to prove with statistical evidence that gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , that is the point !"
"gun shows cause problems . You only have theory and a few isolated incidents ."
null
null
3,437
895
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
DISAGREE
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
null
null
3,444
895
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
DISAGREE
"just wants a bigger budget yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
null
null
3,443
895
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
DISAGREE
"John Raven just wants a bigger budget problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
null
null
3,438
895
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
DISAGREE
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
null
null
3,439
895
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget and so he 's made up yet more stuff about the problems of CO2 pollution"
"Why is this clear ?"
DISAGREE
"Clearly this John Raven just wants a bigger budget he 's made up yet more stuff"
"Why is this clear ?"
null
null
3,446
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point ."
"Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
null
null
3,445
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point ,"
"fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument"
null
null
3,451
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument"
null
null
3,449
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
null
null
3,447
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point"
"Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
null
null
3,452
896
"Good questions . I agree that this logic is somewhat flawed ( unless quote mined ) . God could have made Adam and Eve . He could then have planted evidence that life evolved to this point . The miracle could have happened , too , in much the same way ."
"See my post above , Hi . marc ignores fundamentals of Miller 's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument ."
DISAGREE
"agree that this logic is somewhat flawed The miracle could have happened , too ,"
"See my post above ignores fundamentals"
null
null