Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
3,195
837
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement ... couples like Ray Horn and life partner , the guy that was Oprah 's designer and his life mate , and sometimes Ellen Degeneres ? Why do these people get treated well overall and not lumped into that `` but he/she 's gay `` group ? It 's good that these people are in the world and showing people that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal . Anyone else ever notice this ?"
"Because they live on a coast ?"
DISAGREE
"Why do these people get treated well overall"
"Because they live on a coast ?"
null
null
3,199
837
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement ... couples like Ray Horn and life partner , the guy that was Oprah 's designer and his life mate , and sometimes Ellen Degeneres ? Why do these people get treated well overall and not lumped into that `` but he/she 's gay `` group ? It 's good that these people are in the world and showing people that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal . Anyone else ever notice this ?"
"Because they live on a coast ?"
DISAGREE
"Anyone else ever notice this ?"
"they live on a coast ?"
null
null
3,197
837
"Have you ever noticed that there are some gay couples that seem to bypass all the hate and ignorance of the anti-gay movement ... couples like Ray Horn and life partner , the guy that was Oprah 's designer and his life mate , and sometimes Ellen Degeneres ? Why do these people get treated well overall and not lumped into that `` but he/she 's gay `` group ? It 's good that these people are in the world and showing people that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal . Anyone else ever notice this ?"
"Because they live on a coast ?"
DISAGREE
"that gay does n't mean sick or abnormal"
"Because they live on a coast"
null
null
3,201
838
"This post is directed mainly toward men . Women feel free to discuss , but I would like the actual answers to the questions to be from the men . Hitlers or Helpers ? Which one are you ? Hitler defined the Jews as nonhumans , as parasites , so he did execute them . He did . He exercised his freedom of choice , imposed his will upon them , and had them cleaned out from the country . He had them removed , scraped away . A helper is someone who stands alongside another in assistance , and protection . So , which are you ? What kind of a man are you ? Do you have the guts to stand up and defend the weak and helpless ? Or , have you redefined human life so that you can justify killing it ? Do you have the guts to be men and stand for what is right ? Or , is sitting in your couch , watching TV , easier to do than be good men ? Do you have the strength to curtail your own sensual desires ? Or do you seek women for your own pleasure , and then destroy the lives formed in the long because they are inconvenient ? Or , let 's see where you stand ? Are you a Hitler or a helper ? - REAL MEN stand up for the innocent even at the cost of their lives . - REAL MEN do what is right , even when it 's inconvenient . - REAL MEN recognize that there are things greater than themselves , like righteousness , integrity , the need to protect women , the obligation to provide for children , and they live their lives according . - non men get women pregnant after a tryst of satisfying their own desires , and then the emotional burden on the woman to destroy the life within her . - non men advocate killing the weak and defenseless . - non men hide behind the sinful and asinine intellectual arguments of liberals and the ungodly in order to justify the destruction of life so they might be self-assured , and self comforted . - I 'm a real man because I stand against unrighteousness - even when it is extremely difficult . - I 'm a real man because I protect the innocent and the weak . - I 'm a real man because I stand against other males who seek to justify killing the weak and innocent . - I 'm a real man because I advocate the production and preservation of life . - I 'm a real man because I do not set the mother against the child . - I am a real man because I do n't redefine life in emotionally neutral and dry intellectual terms to ease my own conscience . I 'm a helper working against Hitlers !"
"If this is the only way you define manhood , then congratulations . You know passion is a tricky thing . It can bring great gains in society , great achievement . It can also bring horrible horrible things , like this writing . You are making a strawman , if you create your own opposition and make them absurd , then it is surely absurd . You know , here 's what I think about abortion . It does n't matter to me . I do n't really care either way . That being said , it is safer to legalize , it is better to regulate it , and ultimately , as men , we do n't get the choice , do we ? The day when you have to walk into that abortion clinic and make that decision , you stand up and tell me what a real man is . Those poor girls and women who go through abortions did what they had to do , more than you could ever do . Do n't stand on your high horse and lecture the world on the virtuousness of your position . Do n't talk about being virtuous , be virtuous . A `` real man `` helps those who he loves , whether he likes what they did . A father loves his sons and daughters , despite what they do , rather in spite of what they have done . Good day to you ."
DISAGREE
"I am a real man because I do n't redefine life in emotionally neutral and dry intellectual terms to ease my own conscience ."
"If this is the only way you define manhood , then congratulations . A `` real man `` helps those who he loves , whether he likes what they did ."
null
null
3,203
838
"This post is directed mainly toward men . Women feel free to discuss , but I would like the actual answers to the questions to be from the men . Hitlers or Helpers ? Which one are you ? Hitler defined the Jews as nonhumans , as parasites , so he did execute them . He did . He exercised his freedom of choice , imposed his will upon them , and had them cleaned out from the country . He had them removed , scraped away . A helper is someone who stands alongside another in assistance , and protection . So , which are you ? What kind of a man are you ? Do you have the guts to stand up and defend the weak and helpless ? Or , have you redefined human life so that you can justify killing it ? Do you have the guts to be men and stand for what is right ? Or , is sitting in your couch , watching TV , easier to do than be good men ? Do you have the strength to curtail your own sensual desires ? Or do you seek women for your own pleasure , and then destroy the lives formed in the long because they are inconvenient ? Or , let 's see where you stand ? Are you a Hitler or a helper ? - REAL MEN stand up for the innocent even at the cost of their lives . - REAL MEN do what is right , even when it 's inconvenient . - REAL MEN recognize that there are things greater than themselves , like righteousness , integrity , the need to protect women , the obligation to provide for children , and they live their lives according . - non men get women pregnant after a tryst of satisfying their own desires , and then the emotional burden on the woman to destroy the life within her . - non men advocate killing the weak and defenseless . - non men hide behind the sinful and asinine intellectual arguments of liberals and the ungodly in order to justify the destruction of life so they might be self-assured , and self comforted . - I 'm a real man because I stand against unrighteousness - even when it is extremely difficult . - I 'm a real man because I protect the innocent and the weak . - I 'm a real man because I stand against other males who seek to justify killing the weak and innocent . - I 'm a real man because I advocate the production and preservation of life . - I 'm a real man because I do not set the mother against the child . - I am a real man because I do n't redefine life in emotionally neutral and dry intellectual terms to ease my own conscience . I 'm a helper working against Hitlers !"
"If this is the only way you define manhood , then congratulations . You know passion is a tricky thing . It can bring great gains in society , great achievement . It can also bring horrible horrible things , like this writing . You are making a strawman , if you create your own opposition and make them absurd , then it is surely absurd . You know , here 's what I think about abortion . It does n't matter to me . I do n't really care either way . That being said , it is safer to legalize , it is better to regulate it , and ultimately , as men , we do n't get the choice , do we ? The day when you have to walk into that abortion clinic and make that decision , you stand up and tell me what a real man is . Those poor girls and women who go through abortions did what they had to do , more than you could ever do . Do n't stand on your high horse and lecture the world on the virtuousness of your position . Do n't talk about being virtuous , be virtuous . A `` real man `` helps those who he loves , whether he likes what they did . A father loves his sons and daughters , despite what they do , rather in spite of what they have done . Good day to you ."
DISAGREE
"have you redefined human life so that you can justify killing it"
"it is safer to legalize , it is better to regulate it , and ultimately , as men , we do n't get the choice , do we ?"
null
null
3,200
838
"This post is directed mainly toward men . Women feel free to discuss , but I would like the actual answers to the questions to be from the men . Hitlers or Helpers ? Which one are you ? Hitler defined the Jews as nonhumans , as parasites , so he did execute them . He did . He exercised his freedom of choice , imposed his will upon them , and had them cleaned out from the country . He had them removed , scraped away . A helper is someone who stands alongside another in assistance , and protection . So , which are you ? What kind of a man are you ? Do you have the guts to stand up and defend the weak and helpless ? Or , have you redefined human life so that you can justify killing it ? Do you have the guts to be men and stand for what is right ? Or , is sitting in your couch , watching TV , easier to do than be good men ? Do you have the strength to curtail your own sensual desires ? Or do you seek women for your own pleasure , and then destroy the lives formed in the long because they are inconvenient ? Or , let 's see where you stand ? Are you a Hitler or a helper ? - REAL MEN stand up for the innocent even at the cost of their lives . - REAL MEN do what is right , even when it 's inconvenient . - REAL MEN recognize that there are things greater than themselves , like righteousness , integrity , the need to protect women , the obligation to provide for children , and they live their lives according . - non men get women pregnant after a tryst of satisfying their own desires , and then the emotional burden on the woman to destroy the life within her . - non men advocate killing the weak and defenseless . - non men hide behind the sinful and asinine intellectual arguments of liberals and the ungodly in order to justify the destruction of life so they might be self-assured , and self comforted . - I 'm a real man because I stand against unrighteousness - even when it is extremely difficult . - I 'm a real man because I protect the innocent and the weak . - I 'm a real man because I stand against other males who seek to justify killing the weak and innocent . - I 'm a real man because I advocate the production and preservation of life . - I 'm a real man because I do not set the mother against the child . - I am a real man because I do n't redefine life in emotionally neutral and dry intellectual terms to ease my own conscience . I 'm a helper working against Hitlers !"
"If this is the only way you define manhood , then congratulations . You know passion is a tricky thing . It can bring great gains in society , great achievement . It can also bring horrible horrible things , like this writing . You are making a strawman , if you create your own opposition and make them absurd , then it is surely absurd . You know , here 's what I think about abortion . It does n't matter to me . I do n't really care either way . That being said , it is safer to legalize , it is better to regulate it , and ultimately , as men , we do n't get the choice , do we ? The day when you have to walk into that abortion clinic and make that decision , you stand up and tell me what a real man is . Those poor girls and women who go through abortions did what they had to do , more than you could ever do . Do n't stand on your high horse and lecture the world on the virtuousness of your position . Do n't talk about being virtuous , be virtuous . A `` real man `` helps those who he loves , whether he likes what they did . A father loves his sons and daughters , despite what they do , rather in spite of what they have done . Good day to you ."
DISAGREE
"guts to stand up and defend the weak and REAL MEN emotional burden on the against and preservation of life"
"define to legalize , abortion clinic and make that decision , girls and women who go through abortions"
null
null
3,205
839
"And thanks to you Archie for again showing that you do n't know the definition of the word `` dishonesty `` . Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ? Should be easy to grab a whole list , seeing as how I constantly lie ."
"Did n't I just do that above ? Or is it beyond you to comprehend that ! I see no reason to wallow in the mud with you beyond proving my point ."
DISAGREE
"Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ?"
"Did n't I just do that above ?"
null
null
3,206
839
"And thanks to you Archie for again showing that you do n't know the definition of the word `` dishonesty `` . Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ? Should be easy to grab a whole list , seeing as how I constantly lie ."
"Did n't I just do that above ? Or is it beyond you to comprehend that ! I see no reason to wallow in the mud with you beyond proving my point ."
DISAGREE
"Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ?"
"Did n't I just do that above ?"
null
null
3,207
839
"And thanks to you Archie for again showing that you do n't know the definition of the word `` dishonesty `` . Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ? Should be easy to grab a whole list , seeing as how I constantly lie ."
"Did n't I just do that above ? Or is it beyond you to comprehend that ! I see no reason to wallow in the mud with you beyond proving my point ."
DISAGREE
"Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ?"
"Did n't I just do that above ?"
null
null
3,208
839
"And thanks to you Archie for again showing that you do n't know the definition of the word `` dishonesty `` . Want to point out any lies I 've told lately ? Should be easy to grab a whole list , seeing as how I constantly lie ."
"Did n't I just do that above ? Or is it beyond you to comprehend that ! I see no reason to wallow in the mud with you beyond proving my point ."
DISAGREE
"the definition of the word `` dishonesty"
"I see no reason to wallow in the mud with you beyond proving my point ."
null
null
3,212
840
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity ?"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation on a plasmid . A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
DISAGREE
"Were they able to show"
"Yes ."
null
null
3,210
840
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity ?"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation on a plasmid . A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
DISAGREE
"enzyme activity"
"mutations in bacteria"
null
null
3,213
840
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity ?"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation on a plasmid . A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
DISAGREE
"Were they able to show"
"Yes"
null
null
3,209
840
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity ?"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation on a plasmid . A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
DISAGREE
"that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity"
"A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
null
null
3,211
840
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code that mutated on a gene somewhere and created this new enzyme activity ?"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation on a plasmid . A fairly common source of useful mutations in bacteria ."
DISAGREE
"Were they able to show a previously non-existing code"
"Yes . The first one isolated was a frame-shift mutation"
null
null
3,218
848
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ? Therefore , the laws of logic are not human constructs ."
"This contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power . If there were no living beings , there would be no logic . There would be plenty to think about but nobody to do any thinking requiring what we know today as logic . Logic is TOTALLY a human construct . ... and since it has nothing at all to do with the existence of God , atheists are just as good at it as the Bible Thumpers . As a matter of fact , I know an atheist who is far more logical than anyone else I 've heard to date ."
DISAGREE
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ?"
"This contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power ."
null
null
3,214
848
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ? Therefore , the laws of logic are not human constructs ."
"This contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power . If there were no living beings , there would be no logic . There would be plenty to think about but nobody to do any thinking requiring what we know today as logic . Logic is TOTALLY a human construct . ... and since it has nothing at all to do with the existence of God , atheists are just as good at it as the Bible Thumpers . As a matter of fact , I know an atheist who is far more logical than anyone else I 've heard to date ."
DISAGREE
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ?"
"As a matter of fact , I know an atheist who is far more logical than anyone else I 've heard to date"
null
null
3,217
848
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ? Therefore , the laws of logic are not human constructs ."
"This contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power . If there were no living beings , there would be no logic . There would be plenty to think about but nobody to do any thinking requiring what we know today as logic . Logic is TOTALLY a human construct . ... and since it has nothing at all to do with the existence of God , atheists are just as good at it as the Bible Thumpers . As a matter of fact , I know an atheist who is far more logical than anyone else I 've heard to date ."
DISAGREE
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ?"
"the If , be human and are"
null
null
3,215
848
"If they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ? Therefore , the laws of logic are not human constructs ."
"This contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power . If there were no living beings , there would be no logic . There would be plenty to think about but nobody to do any thinking requiring what we know today as logic . Logic is TOTALLY a human construct . ... and since it has nothing at all to do with the existence of God , atheists are just as good at it as the Bible Thumpers . As a matter of fact , I know an atheist who is far more logical than anyone else I 've heard to date ."
DISAGREE
"they are produced from human minds , and human minds are mutually contradictory , then how can the constructs be absolute ? Therefore , the laws of logic are not human constructs"
"contradicts the fact that logic is an invention born of brain power . If there were no living beings , there would be no logic . There would be plenty to think about but nobody to do any thinking requiring what we know today as logic . Logic is TOTALLY a human construct"
null
null
3,222
849
"God IS GOOD all the time ..."
"Then why does n't He answer prayers like He says He will in the Bible ?"
DISAGREE
"God IS GOOD all the time ..."
"Then why does n't He answer prayers"
null
null
3,223
849
"God IS GOOD all the time ..."
"Then why does n't He answer prayers like He says He will in the Bible ?"
DISAGREE
"God IS GOOD all the time ..."
"why does n't He answer prayers like He says He will in the Bible ?"
null
null
3,221
849
"God IS GOOD all the time ..."
"Then why does n't He answer prayers like He says He will in the Bible ?"
DISAGREE
"God IS GOOD all the time"
"Then why does n't He answer prayers like He says He will in the Bible"
null
null
3,228
850
"But there 's no evidence here for creation . All you can do is argue ( extremely poorly ) against an old earth . Three strikes and your out , kid . Hit the showers ."
"Actually Electro , do you remember this thread ? Evidence for a flood ? Oddly enough it took 20 pages before one of them even tried to argue against the reasons why the flood did not occur ."
AGREE
"there 's no evidence here for creation"
"it took 20 pages before one of them even tried to argue against the reasons why the flood did not occur ."
null
null
3,225
850
"But there 's no evidence here for creation . All you can do is argue ( extremely poorly ) against an old earth . Three strikes and your out , kid . Hit the showers ."
"Actually Electro , do you remember this thread ? Evidence for a flood ? Oddly enough it took 20 pages before one of them even tried to argue against the reasons why the flood did not occur ."
AGREE
"But there 's no evidence here for creation . All you can do is argue ( extremely poorly ) against an old earth ."
"Actually Electro , do you remember this thread ? Evidence for a flood ?"
null
null
3,224
850
"But there 's no evidence here for creation . All you can do is argue ( extremely poorly ) against an old earth . Three strikes and your out , kid . Hit the showers ."
"Actually Electro , do you remember this thread ? Evidence for a flood ? Oddly enough it took 20 pages before one of them even tried to argue against the reasons why the flood did not occur ."
AGREE
"But there 's no evidence here for creation . All you can do is argue ( extremely poorly ) against an old earth ."
"Actually Electro , do you remember this thread ? Evidence for a flood ? Oddly enough it took 20 pages before one of them even tried to argue against the reasons why the flood did not occur ."
null
null
3,233
851
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No ."
DISAGREE
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No"
null
null
3,232
851
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No ."
DISAGREE
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No"
null
null
3,230
851
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No ."
DISAGREE
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No"
null
null
3,231
851
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No ."
DISAGREE
"Is abortion a crime ?"
"No"
null
null
3,234
852
"Do n't count on it . The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous . Religious views are almost never even mentioned in local politics . At the most , you see perhaps a flyer that says `` Vote ______ `` . The Christians who want to teach Intelligent Design in schools are an extreme minority that the media , in all its story-searching rating-mongering glory , is blowing out of proportion ."
"And , what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
DISAGREE
"The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous . Religious views are almost never even mentioned in local politics . At the most , you see perhaps a flyer that says `` Vote ______ `` . The Christians who want to teach Intelligent Design in schools"
"And , what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ?"
null
null
3,236
852
"Do n't count on it . The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous . Religious views are almost never even mentioned in local politics . At the most , you see perhaps a flyer that says `` Vote ______ `` . The Christians who want to teach Intelligent Design in schools are an extreme minority that the media , in all its story-searching rating-mongering glory , is blowing out of proportion ."
"And , what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
DISAGREE
"The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous ."
"what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
null
null
3,238
852
"Do n't count on it . The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous . Religious views are almost never even mentioned in local politics . At the most , you see perhaps a flyer that says `` Vote ______ `` . The Christians who want to teach Intelligent Design in schools are an extreme minority that the media , in all its story-searching rating-mongering glory , is blowing out of proportion ."
"And , what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
DISAGREE
"Do n't count on it . The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5"
"what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ?"
null
null
3,237
852
"Do n't count on it . The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5 , based upon a relatively recent poll . I will try to dig it up . Also , calling most Kansas residents stupid for voting in Christian Board of Education members is ridiculous . Religious views are almost never even mentioned in local politics . At the most , you see perhaps a flyer that says `` Vote ______ `` . The Christians who want to teach Intelligent Design in schools are an extreme minority that the media , in all its story-searching rating-mongering glory , is blowing out of proportion ."
"And , what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
DISAGREE
"The number of scientists in the American scientific community that subscribe to creationism is about % 5"
"what percentage is that ? How was the poll conducted ? Who conducted it ? How was the determination made about who was a 'scientist ' ?"
null
null
3,243
853
"There is quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as , and individuals ignoring the laws as they see fit is anarchy ( checked out the Free State project , you are a beleiver in Arnacho-captalism or so it seems which is a form of anarchy ) , nothing nessesarily wrong with it though . Understood the point it was making , just the logic is flawed ."
"1. militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; `` their troops were untrained militia `` ; `` Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia `` -- United States Constitution . There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't . 2 . '' The Free State Project is a plan in which 20,000 or more liberty-oriented people will move to New Hampshire , where they may work within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government . The success of the Free State Project would likely entail reductions in burdensome taxation and regulation , reforms in state and local law , an end to federal mandates , and a restoration of constitutional federalism , demonstrating the benefits of liberty to the rest of the nation and the world. `` Working within our political system to bring back liberty minded governance like our founding fathers envisioned . Anarcho-capitialism it is not ."
DISAGREE
"There is quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as ,"
"militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't ."
null
null
3,241
853
"There is quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as , and individuals ignoring the laws as they see fit is anarchy ( checked out the Free State project , you are a beleiver in Arnacho-captalism or so it seems which is a form of anarchy ) , nothing nessesarily wrong with it though . Understood the point it was making , just the logic is flawed ."
"1. militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; `` their troops were untrained militia `` ; `` Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia `` -- United States Constitution . There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't . 2 . '' The Free State Project is a plan in which 20,000 or more liberty-oriented people will move to New Hampshire , where they may work within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government . The success of the Free State Project would likely entail reductions in burdensome taxation and regulation , reforms in state and local law , an end to federal mandates , and a restoration of constitutional federalism , demonstrating the benefits of liberty to the rest of the nation and the world. `` Working within our political system to bring back liberty minded governance like our founding fathers envisioned . Anarcho-capitialism it is not ."
DISAGREE
"quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as , and individuals ignoring the laws as they see fit is anarchy ( checked out the Free State project , you are a beleiver in Arnacho-captalism or so it seems which is a form of anarchy ) , nothing nessesarily wrong with it though . Understood the point it was making , just the logic is flawed"
"militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; `` their troops were untrained militia `` ; `` Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia `` -- United States Constitution . There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't . 2 . '' The Free State Project is a plan in which 20,000 or more liberty-oriented people will move to New Hampshire , where they may work within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government . The success of the Free State Project would likely entail reductions in burdensome taxation and regulation , reforms in state and local law , an end to federal mandates , and a restoration of constitutional federalism , demonstrating the benefits of liberty to the rest of the nation and the"
null
null
3,239
853
"There is quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as , and individuals ignoring the laws as they see fit is anarchy ( checked out the Free State project , you are a beleiver in Arnacho-captalism or so it seems which is a form of anarchy ) , nothing nessesarily wrong with it though . Understood the point it was making , just the logic is flawed ."
"1. militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; `` their troops were untrained militia `` ; `` Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia `` -- United States Constitution . There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't . 2 . '' The Free State Project is a plan in which 20,000 or more liberty-oriented people will move to New Hampshire , where they may work within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government . The success of the Free State Project would likely entail reductions in burdensome taxation and regulation , reforms in state and local law , an end to federal mandates , and a restoration of constitutional federalism , demonstrating the benefits of liberty to the rest of the nation and the world. `` Working within our political system to bring back liberty minded governance like our founding fathers envisioned . Anarcho-capitialism it is not ."
DISAGREE
"There is quite a bit of debate what the militia can be interpreted as , and individuals ignoring the laws as they see fit is anarchy"
"1. militia - the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service ; `` their troops were untrained militia `` ; `` Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia `` -- United States Constitution . There is only debate on militia from those who wish to redefine its meaning into something it is n't ."
null
null
3,245
854
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case . This was not a legality issue , but an education issue ."
DISAGREE
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case ."
null
null
3,246
854
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case . This was not a legality issue , but an education issue ."
DISAGREE
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case ."
null
null
3,247
854
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case . This was not a legality issue , but an education issue ."
DISAGREE
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case ."
null
null
3,248
854
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't , as abortion WAS a legal option in this case . This was not a legality issue , but an education issue ."
DISAGREE
"Shows what lengths women can go to if legal abortion is n't an option ."
"No it does n't"
null
null
3,252
855
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also go to this link where an Israeli citizen talks about guns and gun-control in Israel . http : //www.counsel.net/chatboards/2n .... 02.36.24.html Sounds like Israel has strict gun-control laws but also lots of guns . Gun-control has not led to gun confiscation in that nation ."
DISAGREE
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss"
"Yes , it does . Read it all ."
null
null
3,253
855
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also go to this link where an Israeli citizen talks about guns and gun-control in Israel . http : //www.counsel.net/chatboards/2n .... 02.36.24.html Sounds like Israel has strict gun-control laws but also lots of guns . Gun-control has not led to gun confiscation in that nation ."
DISAGREE
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it"
"Yes , it does ."
null
null
3,250
855
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also go to this link where an Israeli citizen talks about guns and gun-control in Israel . http : //www.counsel.net/chatboards/2n .... 02.36.24.html Sounds like Israel has strict gun-control laws but also lots of guns . Gun-control has not led to gun confiscation in that nation ."
DISAGREE
"has in ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also to this link where an Israeli citizen and in Israel . but also of guns . has not gun confiscation in that"
null
null
3,251
855
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also go to this link where an Israeli citizen talks about guns and gun-control in Israel . http : //www.counsel.net/chatboards/2n .... 02.36.24.html Sounds like Israel has strict gun-control laws but also lots of guns . Gun-control has not led to gun confiscation in that nation ."
DISAGREE
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it"
"Yes , it does . Read it all ."
null
null
3,249
855
"Your link has nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Yes , it does . Read it all . Also go to this link where an Israeli citizen talks about guns and gun-control in Israel . http : //www.counsel.net/chatboards/2n .... 02.36.24.html Sounds like Israel has strict gun-control laws but also lots of guns . Gun-control has not led to gun confiscation in that nation ."
DISAGREE
"nothing about Isreal or the Swiss in it ."
"Read it Israeli citizen talks about guns"
null
null
3,255
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
null
null
3,260
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"Once you smoke too much"
"what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke"
null
null
3,257
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"Once you smoke too much"
"what is the specific amount become a drug crazed fiend ?"
null
null
3,256
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"not ,"
"of have to a"
null
null
3,259
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
null
null
3,258
856
"Once you smoke too much ( which is not much ) ,"
"Oh ? And what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
DISAGREE
"Once you smoke too much"
"what is the specific amount of pot you have to smoke before you become a drug crazed fiend ?"
null
null
3,263
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"' There was just one problem : they ``"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' ``"
null
null
3,265
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"There was just one problem : they"
"I have serious concerns about research done by Lott ."
null
null
3,266
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"Brady Bill does not lower crime Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners ."
"serious concerns about research The validity of other statistics"
null
null
3,264
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http :"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott ."
null
null
3,261
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"The http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were anti-gunners . '' Lott 's have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . a by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) set out to the Brady was they couldn't. `` http :"
"have about research by . '' been to that the of the The in also did and Lott 's out crime a were not in the ( ) `` http :"
null
null
3,262
857
"The Brady Bill does not lower crime : http : //jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5/585 A little dated , 1997 , but also note that both Cook and Ludwig were both anti-gunners . '' Brady Law Proponents : Ludwig , Cook , JAMA Among Lott 's harshest critics have been anti-self-defense academics Professors Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook . In a study funded by the anti-self-defense Joyce Foundation and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA ) they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they couldn't. `` http : //rpc.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/gc083100.htm"
"As for myself , I have serious concerns about research done by Lott . '' Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim that 98 % of defensive gun uses do n't involve the firing of the weapon . When questioned Lott has changed his story several times about where he got the 98 % statistic from . The validity of other statistics in his book are also in question because he did n't control for such factors as poverty and drug use . David Mustard , co-author of Lott 's study , admitted under oath in Klein v. Mustard that the study left out certain variables which are relevant to the crime rate . Gary Kleck , a pro-gun advocate and researcher , commented on this ' [ More ] likely , the declines in crime , coinciding with relaxation of carry laws were largely attributable to other factors not controlled for in the Lott and Mustard analysis ' ( Targeting Guns ; p. 372 ) .While the case against Lott may not be as strong as the case against Bellesiles , enough questions have been raised about Lott 's book that it would be wise to refrain from relying too much on his research. `` http : //www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg ... stomer-reviews"
DISAGREE
"they set out to debunk Lott 's findings regarding the Brady law . There was just one problem : they"
"I have serious concerns about research done by Lott Lott has been unable to provide evidence to back up his claim When questioned Lott has changed his story several times"
null
null
3,268
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism ."
null
null
3,267
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"No . Not in matters of science"
"Not in matters of atheism . when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ?"
null
null
3,269
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"Not in matters of science"
"Not in matters of atheism"
null
null
3,271
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"Not in matters of science"
"science discovers 150 year old writings of Darwin"
null
null
3,272
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"Not in matters of science ."
"when science discovers something that seems to agree"
null
null
3,270
858
"No . Not in matters of science ."
"Not in matters of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers something that seems to agree with the 150 year old writings of Darwin , are the writings of Darwin disregarded ? Or is that type of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
DISAGREE
"Not of science"
"Not in of atheism . Tell me , when science discovers that to with the writings Darwin , are disregarded ? Or is that of history trumpeted to the masses ?"
null
null
3,277
859
"Evolutionists can not support thier theory and expect you to find proof to support yours ."
"I thought you said that you had been following the converstaion . I guess you did n't understand any of it ."
DISAGREE
"Evolutionists can not support thier theory and expect you to find proof to support yours ."
"I thought you said that you had been following the converstaion ."
null
null
3,274
859
"Evolutionists can not support thier theory and expect you to find proof to support yours ."
"I thought you said that you had been following the converstaion . I guess you did n't understand any of it ."
DISAGREE
"can not support thier theory and expect you to find proof to support yours ."
"I guess you did n't understand any of it ."
null
null
3,284
860
"5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is definitely worth the read ."
DISAGREE
"experiments have been conducted intelligent design ?"
"recommend reading Debating Design Darwin to DNA"
null
null
3,281
860
"5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is definitely worth the read ."
DISAGREE
"experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic"
null
null
3,279
860
"5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is definitely worth the read ."
DISAGREE
"What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design"
"A lot of work has been done I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA ,"
null
null
3,282
860
"5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is definitely worth the read ."
DISAGREE
"been conducted to the"
"A of has been on that . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is worth the read ."
null
null
3,283
860
"5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"A lot of work has been done on that topic . I would recommend reading Debating Design from Darwin to DNA It is a monster of a book , but it is definitely worth the read ."
DISAGREE
"What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
"but it is definitely worth the read ."
null
null
3,287
861
"I have characterized certain ideas , notions , and opinions as stupid and simple-minded , but not you personally ."
"Oh , WW , come on now . If you say something to me about how Vitality works , and I say 'that 's a stupid / simple-minded idea ' , are you seriously telling me you would n't take that as a personal attack ?"
DISAGREE
"characterized certain ideas , notions , and opinions as stupid and simple-minded ,"
"and I say 'that 's a stupid / simple-minded idea ' , are you seriously telling me you would n't take that as a personal attack ?"
null
null
3,285
861
"I have characterized certain ideas , notions , and opinions as stupid and simple-minded , but not you personally ."
"Oh , WW , come on now . If you say something to me about how Vitality works , and I say 'that 's a stupid / simple-minded idea ' , are you seriously telling me you would n't take that as a personal attack ?"
DISAGREE
"have characterized certain ideas , notions , and opinions as stupid and simple-minded"
"I say 'that 's a stupid / simple-minded idea you would n't take that as a personal attack ?"
null
null
3,286
861
"I have characterized certain ideas , notions , and opinions as stupid and simple-minded , but not you personally ."
"Oh , WW , come on now . If you say something to me about how Vitality works , and I say 'that 's a stupid / simple-minded idea ' , are you seriously telling me you would n't take that as a personal attack ?"
DISAGREE
"I , and as simple-minded you ."
"WW on . If you say something to me about how Vitality works and I 'that 's a / simple-minded ' are you telling me you n't as a personal attack ?"
null
null
3,295
862
"Today , no informed creationist would deny natural selection ."
"Then 99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell . It seems that your position is that `` informed `` creationists are neo-Darwinists , fully accepting of the theories of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"Today , no informed creationist would deny natural selection ."
"Then 99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell ``"
null
null
3,296
862
"Today , no informed creationist would deny natural selection ."
"Then 99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell . It seems that your position is that `` informed `` creationists are neo-Darwinists , fully accepting of the theories of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"Today , no informed creationist would deny natural selection"
"Then 99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell seems that your position is that `` informed `` creationists are neo-Darwinists , fully accepting of the theories of evolution ."
null
null
3,291
862
"Today , no informed creationist would deny natural selection ."
"Then 99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell . It seems that your position is that `` informed `` creationists are neo-Darwinists , fully accepting of the theories of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"no informed creationist would deny natural selection ."
"99 % of creationists are not informed as far as I can tell ."
null
null
3,299
863
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances , I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them . The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . Reduced to a short sentence , the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature ."
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . So often , this debate is phrased in terms of the mother 's rights vs those of the fetus , but we often forget ( including myself ) that other people can also be deeply affected by abortion decisions - including the family which might lose a mother . I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . Even there , though , the doctor him/herself would have to have some level of judgement about what level of risk is `` acceptable `` and what is n't . Ultimately , someone has to make that decision . Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
AGREE
"I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them"
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children ``"
null
null
3,300
863
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances , I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them . The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . Reduced to a short sentence , the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature ."
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . So often , this debate is phrased in terms of the mother 's rights vs those of the fetus , but we often forget ( including myself ) that other people can also be deeply affected by abortion decisions - including the family which might lose a mother . I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . Even there , though , the doctor him/herself would have to have some level of judgement about what level of risk is `` acceptable `` and what is n't . Ultimately , someone has to make that decision . Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
AGREE
"I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother"
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children"
null
null
3,298
863
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances , I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them . The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . Reduced to a short sentence , the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature ."
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . So often , this debate is phrased in terms of the mother 's rights vs those of the fetus , but we often forget ( including myself ) that other people can also be deeply affected by abortion decisions - including the family which might lose a mother . I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . Even there , though , the doctor him/herself would have to have some level of judgement about what level of risk is `` acceptable `` and what is n't . Ultimately , someone has to make that decision . Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
AGREE
"The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature"
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . , I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . ``"
null
null
3,302
863
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances , I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them . The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . Reduced to a short sentence , the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature ."
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . So often , this debate is phrased in terms of the mother 's rights vs those of the fetus , but we often forget ( including myself ) that other people can also be deeply affected by abortion decisions - including the family which might lose a mother . I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . Even there , though , the doctor him/herself would have to have some level of judgement about what level of risk is `` acceptable `` and what is n't . Ultimately , someone has to make that decision . Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
AGREE
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances ,"
"You have a good point"
null
null
3,297
863
"Regarding the line to be drawn between valid and invalid medical circumstances , I suspect it is best left to the physician 's who encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern . I personally know quite little about them . The ones I would categorize as valid would be those that threaten the continued healthy life of the mother in such a way as to include the possibility of her being unable to function as a mother and caretaker of not only the expected child but those she may already be tending . Reduced to a short sentence , the line should be drawn under the doctor 's signature ."
"You have a good point about the imporance of the mother being healthy enough to take care of the other children . So often , this debate is phrased in terms of the mother 's rights vs those of the fetus , but we often forget ( including myself ) that other people can also be deeply affected by abortion decisions - including the family which might lose a mother . I would also generally agree that the doctor can often best say what type of health risk exists . Even there , though , the doctor him/herself would have to have some level of judgement about what level of risk is `` acceptable `` and what is n't . Ultimately , someone has to make that decision . Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
AGREE
"encounter and are familiar with the various causes for concern ."
"Part of the goal of this thread was to discuss what type of risks are acceptable and what are n't ."
null
null
3,308
864
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. `` Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ? More importantly , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ? The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
DISAGREE
"nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ?"
null
null
3,307
864
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. `` Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ? More importantly , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ? The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
DISAGREE
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used"
"The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
null
null
3,305
864
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. `` Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ? More importantly , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ? The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
DISAGREE
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of ."
null
null
3,304
864
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. `` Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ? More importantly , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ? The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
DISAGREE
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate"
"all men are created equal , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ?"
null
null
3,303
864
"I neither believe that `` all life is sacred `` nor that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all ."
"As I 'm sure you know , the Declaration of Independence states : `` ... all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. `` Who or what do you consider to be the ( capitalised ) Creator in this text ? More importantly , who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ? The Declaration certainly seems to tie up the notion of 'inalienable rights ' with religion . No more , I 'm going to bed ."
DISAGREE
"that `` god `` or religion should be used in the debate at all"
" all men are created equal , they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights `` Who or what do you consider to be the Creator in this text ? who do you think the authors of the Declaration considered the Creator to be ?"
null
null
3,311
865
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself . I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive . It might have been environmental , but it certainly was n't a 'choice' I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals , that pattern repeats itself ."
DISAGREE
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself ."
null
null
3,314
865
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself . I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive . It might have been environmental , but it certainly was n't a 'choice' I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals , that pattern repeats itself ."
DISAGREE
"what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive ."
null
null
3,309
865
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself . I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive . It might have been environmental , but it certainly was n't a 'choice' I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals , that pattern repeats itself ."
DISAGREE
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself ."
null
null
3,312
865
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself . I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive . It might have been environmental , but it certainly was n't a 'choice' I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals , that pattern repeats itself ."
DISAGREE
"how do you know you were born heterosexual"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself ."
null
null
3,310
865
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ? what suggests that you were born with a particular sexual orientation ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself . I have known other people who have . I do n't 'CHOOSE ' who I think is sexually attractive . It might have been environmental , but it certainly was n't a 'choice' I have to assume that at least for some , if not most homosexuals , that pattern repeats itself ."
DISAGREE
"how do you know you were born heterosexual ?"
"Because , not once , did I have feel any sort of physical attraction to the same gender as myself ."
null
null
3,317
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
null
null
3,318
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
null
null
3,319
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
null
null
3,320
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like"
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also"
null
null
3,316
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
null
null
3,315
866
"I 've filled marc in on this before , but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
AGREE
"but as usual he 's ignoring the information that he does n't like ."
"Atheists tend to ignore information they do n't like also ."
null
null
3,323
867
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of this . Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does . As such , you can no more force her , against her will , to provide bodily resources to an embryo or fetus , than you can yourself be forced to give of your bodily resources against your will . Even if somebody is bleeding to death , and your blood can save their life , they still do n't have the right to force you to safely give them of your blood . Each person have that right to control their bodily resources . If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will . When you do n't insist that everybody else be subject to such requirements , then the argument is hypocritical and misogynistic . And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution , the woman has the right to privacy , to control her onw body ."
AGREE
"Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure , Each person have that right to control their bodily resources If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will"
null
null
3,326
867
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of this . Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does . As such , you can no more force her , against her will , to provide bodily resources to an embryo or fetus , than you can yourself be forced to give of your bodily resources against your will . Even if somebody is bleeding to death , and your blood can save their life , they still do n't have the right to force you to safely give them of your blood . Each person have that right to control their bodily resources . If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will . When you do n't insist that everybody else be subject to such requirements , then the argument is hypocritical and misogynistic . And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution , the woman has the right to privacy , to control her onw body ."
AGREE
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish ."
"Sure"
null
null
3,324
867
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of this . Do you mind helping me out a little by drawing this argument out in a little more detail ?"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does . As such , you can no more force her , against her will , to provide bodily resources to an embryo or fetus , than you can yourself be forced to give of your bodily resources against your will . Even if somebody is bleeding to death , and your blood can save their life , they still do n't have the right to force you to safely give them of your blood . Each person have that right to control their bodily resources . If you want to force the woman to remain pregnant , you are forcing her to give of her bodily resources against her will . When you do n't insist that everybody else be subject to such requirements , then the argument is hypocritical and misogynistic . And , of course the US Supreme Court agrees with this , thus ruling that per the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution , the woman has the right to privacy , to control her onw body ."
AGREE
"I 've seen that argued throughout these posts , but I do n't think I 've seen the argument from start to finish . As such , I have not been absolutely convinced of"
"Sure . The woman is a person , and individual , sentient human being . She has the same right to control her bodily resources as any other person does ."
null
null