Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
2,832
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
null
null
2,835
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` It does occur within a population ."
null
null
2,833
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
null
null
2,829
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
null
null
2,834
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution ."
null
null
2,842
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"admit what he is trying to establish . rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene"
"special pleading on your part unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible"
null
null
2,840
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
null
null
2,836
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age"
null
null
2,841
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible ."
null
null
2,838
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible ."
null
null
2,843
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso"
"the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible ."
null
null
2,839
748
"Oh , I know what he is trying to establish there . I do want him to own up and admit what he is trying to establish . Do n't expect him to , but hey , `` miracles `` happen ( according to him ) . In fact , as a return question , I 'd like to ask him : does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible . Otherwise , it 's special pleading on your part , and thus logically fallacious . This is one of many inconsistencies between skeptics in regards to the scrutiny of the Bible . They are unwilling to put the standards they have on the Bible against other books similar in age . If they did , there would not be a single book left standing ."
DISAGREE
"does someone rely on the Odyssey to establish the existence of Pallas Athene , Circe or Calypso ?"
"Because the Iliad and Odyssey do not claim to be divine does not mean they should be placed under a different threshold as the Bible"
null
null
2,848
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"Out of context sermon ? But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda `` I will stick to the context which matches what I have said ."
null
null
2,851
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you"
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures ."
null
null
2,847
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"I 'll sermon . been a Christian for 26 years give you a"
"of misinformation propaganda does not guarantee you to be an expert"
null
null
2,849
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
null
null
2,853
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ."
"The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning"
null
null
2,846
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"I 'll if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... give you a sermon ."
"let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures"
null
null
2,852
749
"I 'll be nice ... Out of context sermon ? How about a paraphrased question ... Know the differance ? Forgive me for not having the cut and paste abilities that you have ... Dont be one of those people who gets all huffy puffy over the question . I am all for being armed ... I AM armed ... I have years of tatical weapons training . You should also know ... I have also been a Christian for 26 years ... I am more likely to agree with you , then disagree with you ... But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures . propaganda n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause . mis·in·form Pronunciation Key ( msn-fôrm ) tr.v . mis·in·formed , mis·in·form·ing , mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information . con·text Pronunciation Key ( kntkst ) n. 1 . The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning . 2 . The circumstances in which an event occurs ; a setting . And since your `` experience `` does not guarantee you to be an expert I will stick to the context which matches what I have said . Job 32 : 4 And Elihu had waited for Job with words , because they were older than he in days . 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of the three men , then his anger burned . 6 And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said , I am young , and you are very aged ; so I held back and was afraid to make my knowledge known to you . 7 I said , Days will speak , and many years will make wisdom known . 8 But it is a spirit in man giving them perception , even the breath of the Almighty . 9 It is not the great that are wise , nor the aged who perceive justice ; 10 so then I say , Listen to me ; I will declare my knowledge , I also ."
DISAGREE
"But if its an `` out of context sermon `` you want ... let me put down my Bible ... Ill give you a sermon ."
"Sure let me have your sermon/propaganda of misinformation since it does n't match the context of the Scriptures ."
null
null
2,855
750
"... so where does cancer come from ? Is n't that 'cells producing something other than what they are ' ?"
"No , think about what you just said . A cancer cell does n't mutate , it attacks healthy cells and causes the destruction of healthy tissue . Kinda like liberals in a healthy society - they are the free radicals of the body politic , huh ... go figure ."
DISAGREE
"Is n't that 'cells producing something other than what they are"
"A cancer cell does n't mutate , it attacks healthy cells and causes the destruction of healthy tissue"
null
null
2,856
750
"... so where does cancer come from ? Is n't that 'cells producing something other than what they are ' ?"
"No , think about what you just said . A cancer cell does n't mutate , it attacks healthy cells and causes the destruction of healthy tissue . Kinda like liberals in a healthy society - they are the free radicals of the body politic , huh ... go figure ."
DISAGREE
"cancer come from producing something other"
"attacks healthy cells and causes the destruction of healthy tissue liberals in a healthy society -"
null
null
2,857
750
"... so where does cancer come from ? Is n't that 'cells producing something other than what they are ' ?"
"No , think about what you just said . A cancer cell does n't mutate , it attacks healthy cells and causes the destruction of healthy tissue . Kinda like liberals in a healthy society - they are the free radicals of the body politic , huh ... go figure ."
DISAGREE
"cancer come from ? producing something"
"cancer cell does n't mutate attacks healthy cells"
null
null
2,859
751
"Why did n't God put a picture of a chair on a deer 's butt ?"
"Because deer do n't live in Africa ."
DISAGREE
"God put a picture of a chair on a deer 's butt"
"Because deer do n't live in Africa"
null
null
2,860
751
"Why did n't God put a picture of a chair on a deer 's butt ?"
"Because deer do n't live in Africa ."
DISAGREE
"God a chair on a deer 's butt ?"
"deer do n't live in Africa"
null
null
2,865
752
"As my Aunt and Uncle helped to provide a loving and safe atmosphere for my mongoloid cousin until he died , so too would I provide love and security for the downs or mongoloid produced by any of my children . It 's called a `` family unit `` . Yes , I am willing to do that ."
"Mongoloid ? Is this 1937 ?"
DISAGREE
"loving and safe atmosphere love and security"
"Mongoloid 1937"
null
null
2,862
752
"As my Aunt and Uncle helped to provide a loving and safe atmosphere for my mongoloid cousin until he died , so too would I provide love and security for the downs or mongoloid produced by any of my children . It 's called a `` family unit `` . Yes , I am willing to do that ."
"Mongoloid ? Is this 1937 ?"
DISAGREE
"safe atmosphere for my mongoloid cousin until he died"
"Is this 1937"
null
null
2,867
753
"* See John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe `` , Institute for Creation Research USA for more evidences for Noah 's Flood . [ Many information from above came from `` The Updated & amp ; Expanded Answers Book `` ."
"The Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , the geology is all wrong : http : //www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html The flood explains nothing which can not be explained by other , better-supported means and directly contradicts vast swathes of evidence : Biodivesity and the fossil record are not consistent with the flood . Genetic profiling is not consistent with the flood ( in humans and animals ) The Ark could not hold all animal life . A global mark would have left marks across the entire globe at a consistent time period ; these marks are not found ."
DISAGREE
"John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon Institute for Creation Research USA"
"Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , The Ark could not hold all animal life"
null
null
2,866
753
"* See John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe `` , Institute for Creation Research USA for more evidences for Noah 's Flood . [ Many information from above came from `` The Updated & amp ; Expanded Answers Book `` ."
"The Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , the geology is all wrong : http : //www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html The flood explains nothing which can not be explained by other , better-supported means and directly contradicts vast swathes of evidence : Biodivesity and the fossil record are not consistent with the flood . Genetic profiling is not consistent with the flood ( in humans and animals ) The Ark could not hold all animal life . A global mark would have left marks across the entire globe at a consistent time period ; these marks are not found ."
DISAGREE
"The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe"
"better-supported means and directly contradicts vast swathes of evidence : Biodivesity and the fossil record are not consistent with the flood"
null
null
2,868
753
"* See John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe `` , Institute for Creation Research USA for more evidences for Noah 's Flood . [ Many information from above came from `` The Updated & amp ; Expanded Answers Book `` ."
"The Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , the geology is all wrong : http : //www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html The flood explains nothing which can not be explained by other , better-supported means and directly contradicts vast swathes of evidence : Biodivesity and the fossil record are not consistent with the flood . Genetic profiling is not consistent with the flood ( in humans and animals ) The Ark could not hold all animal life . A global mark would have left marks across the entire globe at a consistent time period ; these marks are not found ."
DISAGREE
"The Young Earth `` `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe ``"
"Grand canyon The flood explains nothing"
null
null
2,869
753
"* See John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe `` , Institute for Creation Research USA for more evidences for Noah 's Flood . [ Many information from above came from `` The Updated & amp ; Expanded Answers Book `` ."
"The Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , the geology is all wrong : http : //www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html The flood explains nothing which can not be explained by other , better-supported means and directly contradicts vast swathes of evidence : Biodivesity and the fossil record are not consistent with the flood . Genetic profiling is not consistent with the flood ( in humans and animals ) The Ark could not hold all animal life . A global mark would have left marks across the entire globe at a consistent time period ; these marks are not found ."
DISAGREE
"See John Morris ' 1994 book `` The Young Earth `` and S. Austin 's 1994 `` Grand Canyon : Monument to Catastrophe `` , Institute for Creation Research USA for more evidences for Noah 's Flood ."
"The Grand canyon could not have been created by a flood event , the geology is all wrong"
null
null
2,873
754
"Another way : If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years , how can a mere 40 or 50 years clear up the controversy and produce the real dinosaur prints we are convinced that they are ?"
"No one saw a man 's track for 100 million years . You told me that you had read the material at the links . Did you lie or is it that you did n't understand any of it ? Some of the best `` man tracks `` were found by removing the soil on top of the slab . Some of the tracks were only the shallow impression of the middle part of the tridactyl print . Mr. Carl Baugh claimed these were human tracks . He convinced John Morris of the ICR . After these tracks had been exposed for about 10 years , Glen Kuban invited John Morris back to look again . In some of those tracks the softer infill has since eroded to show clearly the tridactyl nature of the tracks . In others , the infill has changed color by being exposed to the river water . The outline of the entire track is vivible in the stone . John Morris now agrees that there is no track in the river that was made by a human . I am amazed that you went to visit this river and did n't go inside the Park Headquarters . They have a very nice display that explains the history . Also there are signs at various points of access to the river with signs with information . How is it that you paid attention to none of it . But you said in your original post , `` The heel marks are clear as are the arches and in many instances , the toes. `` That just is n't true . You did n't see that in the river . Maybe you stopped at Mr. Carl Baugh 's `` Creation Evidence Museum `` and saw his carved footprint and his cast of a Pleurocoelus print in which he imagines he sees a human track . He gives a lovely ad hoc explanation about how the person slipped and the toes are turned under . I think that maybe you forgot your hat on the day you went to Glen Rose . It 's hot in Texas and you were having delusions if you saw what you claim in the river ."
DISAGREE
"If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years , how can a mere 40 or 50 years clear up the controversy and produce the real dinosaur prints we are convinced that they are ?"
"Some of the best `` man tracks `` were found by removing the soil on top of the slab . Some of the tracks were only the shallow impression of the middle part of the tridactyl print . Mr. Carl Baugh claimed these were human tracks . He convinced John Morris of the ICR . After these tracks had been exposed for about 10 years , Glen Kuban invited John Morris back to look again . In some of those tracks the softer infill has since eroded to show clearly the tridactyl nature of the tracks ."
null
null
2,871
754
"Another way : If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years , how can a mere 40 or 50 years clear up the controversy and produce the real dinosaur prints we are convinced that they are ?"
"No one saw a man 's track for 100 million years . You told me that you had read the material at the links . Did you lie or is it that you did n't understand any of it ? Some of the best `` man tracks `` were found by removing the soil on top of the slab . Some of the tracks were only the shallow impression of the middle part of the tridactyl print . Mr. Carl Baugh claimed these were human tracks . He convinced John Morris of the ICR . After these tracks had been exposed for about 10 years , Glen Kuban invited John Morris back to look again . In some of those tracks the softer infill has since eroded to show clearly the tridactyl nature of the tracks . In others , the infill has changed color by being exposed to the river water . The outline of the entire track is vivible in the stone . John Morris now agrees that there is no track in the river that was made by a human . I am amazed that you went to visit this river and did n't go inside the Park Headquarters . They have a very nice display that explains the history . Also there are signs at various points of access to the river with signs with information . How is it that you paid attention to none of it . But you said in your original post , `` The heel marks are clear as are the arches and in many instances , the toes. `` That just is n't true . You did n't see that in the river . Maybe you stopped at Mr. Carl Baugh 's `` Creation Evidence Museum `` and saw his carved footprint and his cast of a Pleurocoelus print in which he imagines he sees a human track . He gives a lovely ad hoc explanation about how the person slipped and the toes are turned under . I think that maybe you forgot your hat on the day you went to Glen Rose . It 's hot in Texas and you were having delusions if you saw what you claim in the river ."
DISAGREE
"If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years , how can a mere 40 or 50 years clear up the controversy"
"John Morris now agrees that there is no track in the river that was made by a human . I am amazed that you went to visit this river and did n't go inside the Park Headquarters ."
null
null
2,872
754
"Another way : If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years , how can a mere 40 or 50 years clear up the controversy and produce the real dinosaur prints we are convinced that they are ?"
"No one saw a man 's track for 100 million years . You told me that you had read the material at the links . Did you lie or is it that you did n't understand any of it ? Some of the best `` man tracks `` were found by removing the soil on top of the slab . Some of the tracks were only the shallow impression of the middle part of the tridactyl print . Mr. Carl Baugh claimed these were human tracks . He convinced John Morris of the ICR . After these tracks had been exposed for about 10 years , Glen Kuban invited John Morris back to look again . In some of those tracks the softer infill has since eroded to show clearly the tridactyl nature of the tracks . In others , the infill has changed color by being exposed to the river water . The outline of the entire track is vivible in the stone . John Morris now agrees that there is no track in the river that was made by a human . I am amazed that you went to visit this river and did n't go inside the Park Headquarters . They have a very nice display that explains the history . Also there are signs at various points of access to the river with signs with information . How is it that you paid attention to none of it . But you said in your original post , `` The heel marks are clear as are the arches and in many instances , the toes. `` That just is n't true . You did n't see that in the river . Maybe you stopped at Mr. Carl Baugh 's `` Creation Evidence Museum `` and saw his carved footprint and his cast of a Pleurocoelus print in which he imagines he sees a human track . He gives a lovely ad hoc explanation about how the person slipped and the toes are turned under . I think that maybe you forgot your hat on the day you went to Glen Rose . It 's hot in Texas and you were having delusions if you saw what you claim in the river ."
DISAGREE
"If we saw a man 's print for 100 million years real dinosaur prints we are convinced"
"No one saw a man 's track for 100 million years That just is n't true ."
null
null
2,876
755
"Simone : Sorry , but that 's not in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment . Try again ."
"Do you believe that the freedom to not participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion `` ?"
DISAGREE
"Establishment Clause of the First Amendment . Try again ."
"participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion"
null
null
2,877
755
"Simone : Sorry , but that 's not in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment . Try again ."
"Do you believe that the freedom to not participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion `` ?"
DISAGREE
"Establishment Clause of the First Amendment ."
"religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion"
null
null
2,875
755
"Simone : Sorry , but that 's not in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment . Try again ."
"Do you believe that the freedom to not participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion `` ?"
DISAGREE
"Establishment Clause of the First Amendment"
"freedom to not participate in any religion"
null
null
2,874
755
"Simone : Sorry , but that 's not in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment . Try again ."
"Do you believe that the freedom to not participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion `` ?"
DISAGREE
"Simone : Sorry , but that 's not in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment"
"Do you believe that the freedom to not participate in any religion whatsoever is not covered by the expression `` Freedom of Religion `` ?"
null
null
2,879
756
"Next they ’ ve trashed God ’ s creation by diverting everyone ’ s attention . It ’ s a subtle move that not many people have noticed . But I ’ ve noticed . What they ’ ve done is a clever sleight-of-hand move . Science no longer looks at animals . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments . Instead they ’ ve turned everyone ’ s attention to genes , bacteria and virusesÂ….and this is because they know full-well that most people know nothing about these thingsÂ….Thus , they assume ( correctly , unfortunately ) that most people will just take their word for it ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . My brother is a wildlife biology major in college meaning his primary focus is ...... looking at animals and their relationships to one another . It is somewhat understandable that your misconception could arise because molecular biology and genetic engineering are the latest crazes in science . The simple fact is most of the big breakthroughs when studying whole animals have been made . A similar turn has occured in chemistry . I could argue that chemists have subtly turned away from chemical reactions . All the research now is about electron orbitals and nano-structures . The reason for this is these are new fields that are relatively young and many scientists are interested in them . I myself am doing research on buckminster fullerenes . It does n't mean we 've abandoned good old fashioned reactions , we just have more field to play in now ."
DISAGREE
"Next they ’ ve trashed God ’ s creation by diverting everyone ’ s attention . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . I myself am doing research on buckminster fullerenes ."
null
null
2,878
756
"Next they ’ ve trashed God ’ s creation by diverting everyone ’ s attention . It ’ s a subtle move that not many people have noticed . But I ’ ve noticed . What they ’ ve done is a clever sleight-of-hand move . Science no longer looks at animals . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments . Instead they ’ ve turned everyone ’ s attention to genes , bacteria and virusesÂ….and this is because they know full-well that most people know nothing about these thingsÂ….Thus , they assume ( correctly , unfortunately ) that most people will just take their word for it ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . My brother is a wildlife biology major in college meaning his primary focus is ...... looking at animals and their relationships to one another . It is somewhat understandable that your misconception could arise because molecular biology and genetic engineering are the latest crazes in science . The simple fact is most of the big breakthroughs when studying whole animals have been made . A similar turn has occured in chemistry . I could argue that chemists have subtly turned away from chemical reactions . All the research now is about electron orbitals and nano-structures . The reason for this is these are new fields that are relatively young and many scientists are interested in them . I myself am doing research on buckminster fullerenes . It does n't mean we 've abandoned good old fashioned reactions , we just have more field to play in now ."
DISAGREE
"diverting everyone ’ s clever sleight-of-hand move ."
"science no longer looks at animals relationships to one another ."
null
null
2,880
756
"Next they ’ ve trashed God ’ s creation by diverting everyone ’ s attention . It ’ s a subtle move that not many people have noticed . But I ’ ve noticed . What they ’ ve done is a clever sleight-of-hand move . Science no longer looks at animals . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments . Instead they ’ ve turned everyone ’ s attention to genes , bacteria and virusesÂ….and this is because they know full-well that most people know nothing about these thingsÂ….Thus , they assume ( correctly , unfortunately ) that most people will just take their word for it ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . My brother is a wildlife biology major in college meaning his primary focus is ...... looking at animals and their relationships to one another . It is somewhat understandable that your misconception could arise because molecular biology and genetic engineering are the latest crazes in science . The simple fact is most of the big breakthroughs when studying whole animals have been made . A similar turn has occured in chemistry . I could argue that chemists have subtly turned away from chemical reactions . All the research now is about electron orbitals and nano-structures . The reason for this is these are new fields that are relatively young and many scientists are interested in them . I myself am doing research on buckminster fullerenes . It does n't mean we 've abandoned good old fashioned reactions , we just have more field to play in now ."
DISAGREE
"Science no longer looks at animals . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments . Instead they ’ ve turned everyone ’ s attention to genes , bacteria and virusesÂ….and this is because they know full-well that most people know nothing about these thingsÂ….Thus , they assume ( correctly , unfortunately ) that most people will just take their word for it ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . My brother is a wildlife biology major in college meaning his primary focus is ...... looking at animals and their relationships to one another ."
null
null
2,882
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
null
null
2,885
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished"
"Not that hard to figure out dude"
null
null
2,883
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ..."
null
null
2,886
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely"
"Not that hard to figure out dude"
null
null
2,887
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows ,"
"What is your proof ?"
null
null
2,884
764
"If men fight , and hurt a woman with child , so that she gives birth prematurely , yet no harm follows , he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman 's husband imposes on him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine . But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude ... What is your proof ?"
AGREE
"But if any harm follows , then you shall give life for life"
"Not that hard to figure out dude"
null
null
2,889
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"Well then this does n't answer my question ."
"Do you understand that ?"
null
null
2,891
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people )"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare"
null
null
2,893
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & mdash ;"
"you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world ."
null
null
2,888
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured"
"administrative cost we perform too many tests , we have high . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED"
null
null
2,890
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change ."
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world ."
null
null
2,892
765
"Well then this does n't answer my question . If you have 10 doctors for 100 people ( this is just an example ) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $ 100 a year then your health care per capita is $ 10 ( [ 10doctors x $ 100 ] /100 people ) . If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $ 10 per capita as well because you population did not change . Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country , 2007 & amp ; mdash ; Infoplease.com So again , if you go from $ 6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $ 4,100 per capita then where did that money come from ?"
"Well , you have `` proved `` that the U.S. health insurance does not have any higher administrative cost than Medicare or the rest od the industrialized world . I think your problem is that you are convinced in your head that that in our healthcare there is no waste . And you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . You will have to admit that there is waste . For example we have 5x as many MRI scanners than we need , we perform too many tests , we have high adminstrative cost . All these costs will be reduced . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED . I do not know how many times I have to repeat this before you get it . The volume of this work PER INSURED will decrease . Do you understand that ?"
DISAGREE
"Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured : did that money come from ?"
"you are trying to square it with the obvious fact that our cost is the highest with nothing to show for it . There will be fewer of these things PER INSURED ."
null
null
2,894
766
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution . To those of you out there who believe in both I 'd like to know a few things ... a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact . a ) my personal view is that all sentient beings have souls , and that souls are intricately linked with mental awareness/cognisance ( Dolphins , monkeys , apes , octopuses , parrots , etc. ) . So , I 'd say yes we evolved it ( I think god `` attaches `` it to us when our minds develop ) , and it occured with the dawn of sentience . b ) The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . I do n't view it as a particular event ( Adam and Eve myth is a sort of metaphor or way of talking about it ) . Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
DISAGREE
"a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"all sentient beings have Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
null
null
2,896
766
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution . To those of you out there who believe in both I 'd like to know a few things ... a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact . a ) my personal view is that all sentient beings have souls , and that souls are intricately linked with mental awareness/cognisance ( Dolphins , monkeys , apes , octopuses , parrots , etc. ) . So , I 'd say yes we evolved it ( I think god `` attaches `` it to us when our minds develop ) , and it occured with the dawn of sentience . b ) The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . I do n't view it as a particular event ( Adam and Eve myth is a sort of metaphor or way of talking about it ) . Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
DISAGREE
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution ."
"Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
null
null
2,897
766
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution . To those of you out there who believe in both I 'd like to know a few things ... a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact . a ) my personal view is that all sentient beings have souls , and that souls are intricately linked with mental awareness/cognisance ( Dolphins , monkeys , apes , octopuses , parrots , etc. ) . So , I 'd say yes we evolved it ( I think god `` attaches `` it to us when our minds develop ) , and it occured with the dawn of sentience . b ) The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . I do n't view it as a particular event ( Adam and Eve myth is a sort of metaphor or way of talking about it ) . Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
DISAGREE
"Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . Jesus came to take that sin away"
null
null
2,899
766
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution . To those of you out there who believe in both I 'd like to know a few things ... a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact . a ) my personal view is that all sentient beings have souls , and that souls are intricately linked with mental awareness/cognisance ( Dolphins , monkeys , apes , octopuses , parrots , etc. ) . So , I 'd say yes we evolved it ( I think god `` attaches `` it to us when our minds develop ) , and it occured with the dawn of sentience . b ) The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . I do n't view it as a particular event ( Adam and Eve myth is a sort of metaphor or way of talking about it ) . Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
DISAGREE
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution ."
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact ."
null
null
2,898
766
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution . To those of you out there who believe in both I 'd like to know a few things ... a ) Did we evolve a soul ? b ) Why did Jesus come to save us ? ( when did the first sin happen ? )"
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact . a ) my personal view is that all sentient beings have souls , and that souls are intricately linked with mental awareness/cognisance ( Dolphins , monkeys , apes , octopuses , parrots , etc. ) . So , I 'd say yes we evolved it ( I think god `` attaches `` it to us when our minds develop ) , and it occured with the dawn of sentience . b ) The `` first sin `` is something that has always existed ever since death existed . I do n't view it as a particular event ( Adam and Eve myth is a sort of metaphor or way of talking about it ) . Jesus came to take that sin away , allowing us to overcome death in eternity ."
DISAGREE
"It seems a number of Christians believe also in evolution ."
"Well , I 'm a Christian who believes that evolution is a fact ."
null
null
2,903
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom"
"Not this time ."
null
null
2,904
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom ,"
"Not this time"
null
null
2,905
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
null
null
2,902
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"the ."
"Not this time ."
null
null
2,901
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
null
null
2,900
767
"They are not talking about actually teaching creationism in the classroom , nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution ."
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
DISAGREE
"nor is there actually any discussion about not teaching evolution"
"Not this time . That was the previous attempt by the good people of Kansas ."
null
null
2,911
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ?"
null
null
2,906
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens ``"
"I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
null
null
2,908
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) ,"
"is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ?"
null
null
2,910
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association"
"is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ?"
null
null
2,909
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom"
"is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ?"
null
null
2,907
768
"Gun Lobby Promoted `` Final War `` Against Federal Government National Rifle Association ( NRA ) Led Fight , Warning `` Final War Has Begun `` Soldier of Fortune Publisher Robert K. Brown Also Serves on NRA Board of Directors Anti-government writings in Soldier of Fortune magazine regarding the federal government 's 1993 assault on the Branch Davidian compound at Waco being presented during the sentencing portion of the McVeigh trial were only a small sample of the language of war offered by America 's gun lobby to its `` freedom fighters `` prior to the 1995 Oklahoma bombing . In the period leading up to the bombing , violent , written attacks on the federal government were led by the National Rifle Association ( NRA ) , which announced in its magazines that `` The Final War Has Begun. `` Soldier of Fortune publisher Robert K. Brown also serves on the NRA board of directors . McVeigh himself is a former NRA member . Attacks made on the federal government by the NRA in this `` war `` included : In his 1994 book Guns , Crime , and Freedom , NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre compared the final FBI assault on the Branch Davidian compound to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising , stating , `` What occurred is reminiscent of the stand-off at the Warsaw ghetto . The Jews , whose religious views were unpopular with the Nazis , were trapped inside the ghetto and had ten handguns . When the Nazi soldiers tried to take the Jews from the ghetto , shooting started , the soldiers fell back , and the siege began . In the end , the Nazis burned down the ghetto to end the tiring siege. `` An April 1995 American Rifleman article referred to federal Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco and Firearms agents as `` armed terrorists `` who are `` harassing , intimidating and hurting honest citizens `` with `` the brute force of unchecked , renegade federal power. `` The article added , `` The terror often comes at the hands of BATF agents clad in ninja black , but the terror does n't stop there. `` Previously in direct mail , Wayne LaPierre had referred to federal agents as `` jack-booted government thugs. `` In the June 1994 American Rifleman , the NRA warned of an alleged gun control `` Master Plan `` that employed the `` the fascist language of Stalin , Hitler , Castro and Saddam Hussein. `` In January 1994 NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre warned , `` We have repeatedly warned this assault was coming , and the time of reckoning is here . If you or your children want to own a gun as free American citizens in the years ahead , then prepare to stand and fight with us now. `` In an October 1993 American Rifleman attack on the Federal Bureau of Investigation which featured goose-stepping military personnel , the NRA asked , `` What 's the first step to a police state ? `` In the ad Wayne LaPierre urged readers to , `` Take back your government and save your guns `` and warned that the FBI 's `` extremist leadership is determined to become a political anti-gun police force . That 's a line they can not cross . The FBI can not be deployed to terrorize honest gun owners .... `` These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media . VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann states , `` Publications like Soldier of Fortune and organizations like the National Rifle Association helped put a violent fringe of American gun owners on a 'war ' footing . Timothy McVeigh was just the first to jump into the breach. `` http : //www.vpc.org/press/9706mcve.htm So someone finally decided to take all that wacko gun nut propaganda seriously and rebel against the government by bombing the federal building ."
"Oh boy , is this what the Anti-gun crowd has come to ? Blaming the NRA for ... a bombing ? I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
DISAGREE
"These and other examples of inflammatory language employed by the NRA in its attack on the federal government found by the Violence Policy Center are available to the news media ."
"I think you have just lost about all credibility with me ."
null
null
2,916
769
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property . I suppose ( but am not familiar enough with all of the details to know for sure ) that some even used the Bible to justify linching blacks ."
DISAGREE
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property ."
null
null
2,912
769
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property . I suppose ( but am not familiar enough with all of the details to know for sure ) that some even used the Bible to justify linching blacks ."
DISAGREE
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"also to justify their treating blacks as mere property ."
null
null
2,913
769
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property . I suppose ( but am not familiar enough with all of the details to know for sure ) that some even used the Bible to justify linching blacks ."
DISAGREE
"They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks ,"
null
null
2,917
769
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property . I suppose ( but am not familiar enough with all of the details to know for sure ) that some even used the Bible to justify linching blacks ."
DISAGREE
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks"
null
null
2,914
769
"[ They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks , and also to justify their treating blacks as mere property . I suppose ( but am not familiar enough with all of the details to know for sure ) that some even used the Bible to justify linching blacks ."
DISAGREE
"They shot ] another guy because he was black ."
"And religious folk in the south used the Bible to justify enslavement of thousands or millions of blacks ,"
null
null
2,922
770
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ? Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
DISAGREE
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines"
null
null
2,919
770
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ? Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
DISAGREE
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
null
null
2,923
770
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ? Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
DISAGREE
"Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
null
null
2,918
770
"Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially ? Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
DISAGREE
"Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm , whether one brandishes it or not , a sentence punishable by life in prison ?"
"Because that would violate the 8th Amendment 's provision outlawing excessive fines , and cruel and unusual punishment ."
null
null
2,927
771
"There 's also the fact that the police have better things to do than penalize people for something that is n't a crime or a threat to anyone 's safety . Who should law enforcement be targeting more , a dangerous gang with ties to the mexican mafia , or a single mom who forgot about putting her pistol in the safe before going to the grocery store ? Police resources are limited as is . I do n't see why we should be squandering what resources we have , going after people for technical violations rather than true crimes that victimize anyone and everyone . Sex offenders who rape and kill children are required to be photographed and fingerprinted . Why are you in favor of people exercising a constitutional right , being treated in the exact same way ? I ca n't see any type of measurable affect photographing and fingerprinting gun owners would have on fighting crime . We know that criminals wo n't submit to registration , they 're not permitted to own or possess guns under any circumstances , etc . To me this seems more about the regulation of a constitutional right and the harassment of honest gun owners than anything else ."
"Government employees are also expected to be fingerprinted but I do n't think any reasonable person would think that is treating them like criminals . In the early period of America most gun owners were required to be government employees by law- they were required to enroll in the militia and received pay for doing so ."
DISAGREE
"I ca n't see any type of measurable affect photographing and fingerprinting gun owners would have on fighting crime . We know that criminals wo n't submit to registration , they 're not permitted to own or possess guns under any circumstances , etc . To me this seems more about the regulation of a constitutional right and the harassment of honest gun owners than anything else ."
"In the early period of America most gun owners were required to be government employees by law- they were required to enroll in the militia and received pay for doing so ."
null
null
2,924
771
"There 's also the fact that the police have better things to do than penalize people for something that is n't a crime or a threat to anyone 's safety . Who should law enforcement be targeting more , a dangerous gang with ties to the mexican mafia , or a single mom who forgot about putting her pistol in the safe before going to the grocery store ? Police resources are limited as is . I do n't see why we should be squandering what resources we have , going after people for technical violations rather than true crimes that victimize anyone and everyone . Sex offenders who rape and kill children are required to be photographed and fingerprinted . Why are you in favor of people exercising a constitutional right , being treated in the exact same way ? I ca n't see any type of measurable affect photographing and fingerprinting gun owners would have on fighting crime . We know that criminals wo n't submit to registration , they 're not permitted to own or possess guns under any circumstances , etc . To me this seems more about the regulation of a constitutional right and the harassment of honest gun owners than anything else ."
"Government employees are also expected to be fingerprinted but I do n't think any reasonable person would think that is treating them like criminals . In the early period of America most gun owners were required to be government employees by law- they were required to enroll in the militia and received pay for doing so ."
DISAGREE
"police have better things to do than penalize people for something that is n't a crime or a threat to anyone 's safety . Why are you in favor of people exercising a constitutional right , being treated in the exact same way ?"
"Government employees are also expected to be fingerprinted but I do n't think any reasonable person would think that is treating them like criminals . In the early period of America most gun owners were required to be government employees by law- they were required to enroll in the militia and received pay for doing so ."
null
null
2,931
772
"`` The Myth of the Pedophile Priest `` : http : //www.catholiceducation.org/ar ... ion/re0534.html"
"Seeing the article you linked to was written in 2002 , over three years ago , do you think the author could perhaps incorporate the new data and rename his piece , `` Maybe There Is Some Truth About Pedophile Priests After All `` ?"
DISAGREE
"Pedophile Priest http : //www.catholiceducation.org/ar ... ion/re0534.html"
"the article you linked to was written in 2002 and `` Maybe There Is Some Truth About Pedophile Priests After All `` ?"
null
null
2,930
772
"`` The Myth of the Pedophile Priest `` : http : //www.catholiceducation.org/ar ... ion/re0534.html"
"Seeing the article you linked to was written in 2002 , over three years ago , do you think the author could perhaps incorporate the new data and rename his piece , `` Maybe There Is Some Truth About Pedophile Priests After All `` ?"
DISAGREE
"The Myth of the Pedophile Priest `` : http : //www.catholiceducation.org/ar ... ion/re0534.html"
"Seeing the article you linked to was written in 2002"
null
null
2,929
772
"`` The Myth of the Pedophile Priest `` : http : //www.catholiceducation.org/ar ... ion/re0534.html"
"Seeing the article you linked to was written in 2002 , over three years ago , do you think the author could perhaps incorporate the new data and rename his piece , `` Maybe There Is Some Truth About Pedophile Priests After All `` ?"
DISAGREE
"The Myth of the Pedophile Priest ``"
"Maybe There Is Some Truth About Pedophile Priests After All `` ?"
null
null
2,933
773
"Hi all , I decided to start a thread to see what folks had to say about fossilization . I 'll start by saying that , as I understand it , death is certain and fossilization of the remains is highly uncommon . An animal or plant dies and immediately scavengers , animals plants and bacteria , start the process of reclaiming materials from the carcass . There is very little chance of any part of the organism to be left to fossilize . Unless the carcass was relatively quickly protected from scavenger organisms , there is hardly any chance it will form a fossil . So , maybe most fossils we see are the result of a tragic , untimely death . Is this evidence for the flood ?"
"Well by the Flood , I assume you are refering to the description given in Genesis ? Fossils we find today have been attributed to a remarkable variety of environmental settings that allowed them to be preserved . Also , you seem to be refering to the preservation of large animals such as terrestrial vertebrates , which are far rarer than fossils of marine organisms with calcarous skeletons . In that regard , some types of rock are basically one huge fossil as most of their composition is derived from dead animal material . There are just so many different types in which creatures are preserved it is not possible to consider the events within the context of a word like `` tragic `` Unusual ? sometimes . In some cases the word inevitable is the most apt . Also , there are quite a few numbers of ways in which animals have been preserved without the direct involvement of water/sedimentation- terrestrial invertebrates trapped in amber , tarpit `` traps `` like those of the famous Rancho la Brea with remarkable preservations of ice-age mammal fauna and mummified animals from desert environments ( off the top of my head ) . Plus then you have a whole set of fossils preserved in water conditions where there has been very slow , low energy deposition of sediments , like black shales and the Lithographic limestones of Solnhofen ."
DISAGREE
"fossilization of the remains is highly uncommon . flood"
"Genesis Fossils we find today have been attributed to a remarkable variety of environmental settings that allowed them to be preserved . ``"
null
null
2,932
773
"Hi all , I decided to start a thread to see what folks had to say about fossilization . I 'll start by saying that , as I understand it , death is certain and fossilization of the remains is highly uncommon . An animal or plant dies and immediately scavengers , animals plants and bacteria , start the process of reclaiming materials from the carcass . There is very little chance of any part of the organism to be left to fossilize . Unless the carcass was relatively quickly protected from scavenger organisms , there is hardly any chance it will form a fossil . So , maybe most fossils we see are the result of a tragic , untimely death . Is this evidence for the flood ?"
"Well by the Flood , I assume you are refering to the description given in Genesis ? Fossils we find today have been attributed to a remarkable variety of environmental settings that allowed them to be preserved . Also , you seem to be refering to the preservation of large animals such as terrestrial vertebrates , which are far rarer than fossils of marine organisms with calcarous skeletons . In that regard , some types of rock are basically one huge fossil as most of their composition is derived from dead animal material . There are just so many different types in which creatures are preserved it is not possible to consider the events within the context of a word like `` tragic `` Unusual ? sometimes . In some cases the word inevitable is the most apt . Also , there are quite a few numbers of ways in which animals have been preserved without the direct involvement of water/sedimentation- terrestrial invertebrates trapped in amber , tarpit `` traps `` like those of the famous Rancho la Brea with remarkable preservations of ice-age mammal fauna and mummified animals from desert environments ( off the top of my head ) . Plus then you have a whole set of fossils preserved in water conditions where there has been very slow , low energy deposition of sediments , like black shales and the Lithographic limestones of Solnhofen ."
DISAGREE
"Unless the carcass was relatively quickly protected from scavenger organisms , there is hardly any chance it will form a fossil . So , maybe most fossils we see are the result of a tragic , untimely death . Is this evidence for the flood ?"
"Also , there are quite a few numbers of ways in which animals have been preserved without the direct involvement of water/sedimentation- terrestrial invertebrates trapped in amber , tarpit `` traps `` like those of the famous Rancho la Brea with remarkable preservations of ice-age mammal fauna and mummified animals from desert environments ( off the top of my head ) . Plus then you have a whole set of fossils preserved in water conditions where there has been very slow , low energy deposition of sediments , like black shales and the Lithographic limestones of Solnhofen"
null
null
2,935
773
"Hi all , I decided to start a thread to see what folks had to say about fossilization . I 'll start by saying that , as I understand it , death is certain and fossilization of the remains is highly uncommon . An animal or plant dies and immediately scavengers , animals plants and bacteria , start the process of reclaiming materials from the carcass . There is very little chance of any part of the organism to be left to fossilize . Unless the carcass was relatively quickly protected from scavenger organisms , there is hardly any chance it will form a fossil . So , maybe most fossils we see are the result of a tragic , untimely death . Is this evidence for the flood ?"
"Well by the Flood , I assume you are refering to the description given in Genesis ? Fossils we find today have been attributed to a remarkable variety of environmental settings that allowed them to be preserved . Also , you seem to be refering to the preservation of large animals such as terrestrial vertebrates , which are far rarer than fossils of marine organisms with calcarous skeletons . In that regard , some types of rock are basically one huge fossil as most of their composition is derived from dead animal material . There are just so many different types in which creatures are preserved it is not possible to consider the events within the context of a word like `` tragic `` Unusual ? sometimes . In some cases the word inevitable is the most apt . Also , there are quite a few numbers of ways in which animals have been preserved without the direct involvement of water/sedimentation- terrestrial invertebrates trapped in amber , tarpit `` traps `` like those of the famous Rancho la Brea with remarkable preservations of ice-age mammal fauna and mummified animals from desert environments ( off the top of my head ) . Plus then you have a whole set of fossils preserved in water conditions where there has been very slow , low energy deposition of sediments , like black shales and the Lithographic limestones of Solnhofen ."
DISAGREE
"I decided to start a thread to see what folks had to say about fossilization ."
"Well by the Flood , I assume you are refering to the description given in Genesis ?"
null
null
2,936
774
"Oh ... so humans all must have the same bone structure ? Kind of like pigmies and Kenyans look so similar . I 'll prove to you on a future post how Neandertals developed their traits -- including their bone structures through a nonrandom mechanism ."
"Prove something besides your ignorance ? Homo-erectus and Neandertals differ in cranium size , bone size , bone structure , number of bones as well as the length and width of individual bones . I can see why people are laughing at you"
DISAGREE
"Kind of like pigmies and Kenyans look so similar . I 'll prove to you on a future post how Neandertals developed their traits -- including their bone structures through a nonrandom mechanism ."
"Homo-erectus and Neandertals differ in cranium size , bone size , bone structure , number of bones as well as the length and width of individual bones . I can see why people are laughing at you"
null
null
2,939
774
"Oh ... so humans all must have the same bone structure ? Kind of like pigmies and Kenyans look so similar . I 'll prove to you on a future post how Neandertals developed their traits -- including their bone structures through a nonrandom mechanism ."
"Prove something besides your ignorance ? Homo-erectus and Neandertals differ in cranium size , bone size , bone structure , number of bones as well as the length and width of individual bones . I can see why people are laughing at you"
DISAGREE
"so humans all must have the same bone structure ?"
"Prove something besides your ignorance ?"
null
null
2,942
775
"http : //www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155326,00.html She is the guardian of the state ..... this is going over the line now ."
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
AGREE
"She is the guardian of the state ..... this is going over the line now ."
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
null
null
2,941
775
"http : //www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155326,00.html She is the guardian of the state ..... this is going over the line now ."
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
AGREE
"http : //www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155326,00.html"
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
null
null
2,943
775
"http : //www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155326,00.html She is the guardian of the state ..... this is going over the line now ."
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
AGREE
"She is the guardian of the state ..... this is going over the line now"
"HAPPY BIRTHDAY"
null
null
2,947
776
"One drug , Lapatinib , can halve the speed of growth of breast cancer in one in five women with an aggressive form of the disease ."
"So , you are talking an incredibly expensive drug that MAY work 20 % of the time when it is used . Are they just letting these people die .... giving them morphine for the pain and letting them waste away ? No"
DISAGREE
"One drug , Lapatinib , can halve the speed of growth of breast cancer in one in five women with an aggressive form of the disease ."
"you are talking an incredibly expensive drug that MAY work 20 % of the time when it is used ."
null
null
2,944
776
"One drug , Lapatinib , can halve the speed of growth of breast cancer in one in five women with an aggressive form of the disease ."
"So , you are talking an incredibly expensive drug that MAY work 20 % of the time when it is used . Are they just letting these people die .... giving them morphine for the pain and letting them waste away ? No"
DISAGREE
"Lapatinib , can halve the speed of growth of breast cancer in one in five women with an aggressive form of the disease ."
"Are they just letting these people die .... giving them morphine for the pain and letting them waste away ? No"
null
null
2,946
776
"One drug , Lapatinib , can halve the speed of growth of breast cancer in one in five women with an aggressive form of the disease ."
"So , you are talking an incredibly expensive drug that MAY work 20 % of the time when it is used . Are they just letting these people die .... giving them morphine for the pain and letting them waste away ? No"
DISAGREE
"Lapatinib"
"So , you are talking an incredibly expensive drug that MAY work 20 % of the time when it is used ."
null
null
2,948
777
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
DISAGREE
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
null
null
2,950
777
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
DISAGREE
"Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
null
null
2,951
777
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
DISAGREE
"baby"
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
null
null
2,949
777
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
DISAGREE
"According to what ? Are you saying you should be able to kill a baby 2 inches from being born if you wanted ? It is n't born yet ."
"It also is n't a baby yet either . It is called a fetus ."
null
null
2,952
778
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other . This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
DISAGREE
"outside baby ."
"a baby . and"
null
null
2,955
778
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other . This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
DISAGREE
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ?"
null
null