Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
2,957
778
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other . This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
DISAGREE
"clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
null
null
2,953
778
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other . This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
DISAGREE
"a clearly distinct difference"
"No baby at any age"
null
null
2,954
778
"But viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference between a zygote and a new-born baby ."
"There 's a distinct difference ... so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other . This difference in age does n't mean anything ."
DISAGREE
"viability outside another human being is a clearly distinct difference"
"so what ? No baby at any age can live outside the womb . It still needs care and attention like any other"
null
null
2,962
779
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised . That 's a typical response when someone calls your bluff . Waxy"
DISAGREE
"playing a game"
"Waxy"
null
null
2,961
779
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised . That 's a typical response when someone calls your bluff . Waxy"
DISAGREE
"Do your own research"
"That 's a typical when someone calls your bluff ."
null
null
2,959
779
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised . That 's a typical response when someone calls your bluff . Waxy"
DISAGREE
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised ."
null
null
2,958
779
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised . That 's a typical response when someone calls your bluff . Waxy"
DISAGREE
"Do your own research . I am not interested in playing a game ."
"I 'm not surprised . That 's a typical response when someone calls your bluff ."
null
null
2,967
780
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child . After a little exploration , I found the rifle he kept down in the basement and the rifle and ammunition that was in one of the bedrooms on the ground floor ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
DISAGREE
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
null
null
2,965
780
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child . After a little exploration , I found the rifle he kept down in the basement and the rifle and ammunition that was in one of the bedrooms on the ground floor ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
DISAGREE
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot ."
null
null
2,968
780
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child . After a little exploration , I found the rifle he kept down in the basement and the rifle and ammunition that was in one of the bedrooms on the ground floor ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
DISAGREE
"I found the rifle he kept down in the basement and the rifle and ammunition that was in one of the bedrooms on the ground floor ."
"you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
null
null
2,964
780
"I remember staying at my grandfather 's house during the summers as a child . After a little exploration , I found the rifle he kept down in the basement and the rifle and ammunition that was in one of the bedrooms on the ground floor ."
"Well obviously you did n't shoot yourself or somebody else ."
DISAGREE
"the rifle and ammunition"
"obviously"
null
null
2,973
781
"It is the secular museums that are not willing to admit their commitment , by faith , to an unproven story of origins . Yet their words betray them . For instance , the Museum of the Earth ’ s Guide for Museum Docents repeats the mantra :  “ Questions or debates about evolutionary mechanisms have nothing to do with our confidence in whether evolution occurred. ”"
"What ?"
DISAGREE
"It is the secular museums that are not willing to admit their commitment , by faith , to an unproven story of origins"
"What"
null
null
2,972
781
"It is the secular museums that are not willing to admit their commitment , by faith , to an unproven story of origins . Yet their words betray them . For instance , the Museum of the Earth ’ s Guide for Museum Docents repeats the mantra :  “ Questions or debates about evolutionary mechanisms have nothing to do with our confidence in whether evolution occurred. ”"
"What ?"
DISAGREE
"It is the secular museums that are not willing to admit their commitment , by faith , to an unproven story of origins ."
"What ?"
null
null
2,970
781
"It is the secular museums that are not willing to admit their commitment , by faith , to an unproven story of origins . Yet their words betray them . For instance , the Museum of the Earth ’ s Guide for Museum Docents repeats the mantra :  “ Questions or debates about evolutionary mechanisms have nothing to do with our confidence in whether evolution occurred. ”"
"What ?"
DISAGREE
"have nothing to do with our confidence in whether evolution"
"What ?"
null
null
2,974
782
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction ) . A thing is what it is ( Law of identity ) . A statement is either true or false ( Law of excluded middle ) . These are simple , absolute logical absolutes ."
"There are contradictions in the bible , for so the bible does n't obey the law of non contradiction . As to the law of identity , Jesus is called both the `` Son of God `` and the `` Son of Man `` , which means Also , many parts of the bible are taken as 'metaphors ' - yet the law of excluded middle should prevent us from doing that . I 'm sure someone will be able to refute my individual points , but on the whole the bible is not an entirely logical source . Furthermore , even if these laws were created by a God , this God does not have to be the same one described in any religion whatsoever . In fact , he does n't have to be omnipotent , so he could even be dead - Atheists could state that God created these laws then died . In which case , God does not exist but Atheists have still accounted for the creation of said laws ."
DISAGREE
"of ."
"Son of Man"
null
null
2,977
782
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction ) . A thing is what it is ( Law of identity ) . A statement is either true or false ( Law of excluded middle ) . These are simple , absolute logical absolutes ."
"There are contradictions in the bible , for so the bible does n't obey the law of non contradiction . As to the law of identity , Jesus is called both the `` Son of God `` and the `` Son of Man `` , which means Also , many parts of the bible are taken as 'metaphors ' - yet the law of excluded middle should prevent us from doing that . I 'm sure someone will be able to refute my individual points , but on the whole the bible is not an entirely logical source . Furthermore , even if these laws were created by a God , this God does not have to be the same one described in any religion whatsoever . In fact , he does n't have to be omnipotent , so he could even be dead - Atheists could state that God created these laws then died . In which case , God does not exist but Atheists have still accounted for the creation of said laws ."
DISAGREE
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction )"
"There are contradictions in the bible , for so the bible does n't obey the law of non contradiction . ``"
null
null
2,976
782
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction ) . A thing is what it is ( Law of identity ) . A statement is either true or false ( Law of excluded middle ) . These are simple , absolute logical absolutes ."
"There are contradictions in the bible , for so the bible does n't obey the law of non contradiction . As to the law of identity , Jesus is called both the `` Son of God `` and the `` Son of Man `` , which means Also , many parts of the bible are taken as 'metaphors ' - yet the law of excluded middle should prevent us from doing that . I 'm sure someone will be able to refute my individual points , but on the whole the bible is not an entirely logical source . Furthermore , even if these laws were created by a God , this God does not have to be the same one described in any religion whatsoever . In fact , he does n't have to be omnipotent , so he could even be dead - Atheists could state that God created these laws then died . In which case , God does not exist but Atheists have still accounted for the creation of said laws ."
DISAGREE
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction ) . A thing is what it is ( Law of identity ) ."
"In which case , God does not exist but Atheists have still accounted for the creation of said laws ."
null
null
2,975
782
"Examples of logical absolutes are : something can not be itself and not itself at the same time ( Law of non contradiction ) . A thing is what it is ( Law of identity ) . A statement is either true or false ( Law of excluded middle ) . These are simple , absolute logical absolutes ."
"There are contradictions in the bible , for so the bible does n't obey the law of non contradiction . As to the law of identity , Jesus is called both the `` Son of God `` and the `` Son of Man `` , which means Also , many parts of the bible are taken as 'metaphors ' - yet the law of excluded middle should prevent us from doing that . I 'm sure someone will be able to refute my individual points , but on the whole the bible is not an entirely logical source . Furthermore , even if these laws were created by a God , this God does not have to be the same one described in any religion whatsoever . In fact , he does n't have to be omnipotent , so he could even be dead - Atheists could state that God created these laws then died . In which case , God does not exist but Atheists have still accounted for the creation of said laws ."
DISAGREE
"absolutes"
"could state that God created these laws then died"
null
null
2,980
783
"There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule : gun laws don ’ t effect criminals ."
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
DISAGREE
"more guns on the street gun laws don ’ t effect criminals"
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
null
null
2,985
783
"There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule : gun laws don ’ t effect criminals ."
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
DISAGREE
"gun laws don ’ t effect criminals"
"then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
null
null
2,983
783
"There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule : gun laws don ’ t effect criminals ."
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
DISAGREE
"gun laws don ’ t effect criminals"
"low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK"
null
null
2,981
783
"There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule : gun laws don ’ t effect criminals ."
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
DISAGREE
"There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule : gun laws don ’ t effect criminals ."
"If guns laws do n't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK ?"
null
null
2,990
784
"Shut up habit . You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say . As my mother used to tell me when I was 5 , you 're talking privelages have been revoked ."
"1 ) It 's Habbit . You could at least take 5 seconds to get my name right . 2 ) Considering you and your friends are the ones complaining , not debating ? 3 ) Actually , none of my posting privileges have my revoked . Try again ."
DISAGREE
"You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say"
"You could at least take 5 seconds to get my name"
null
null
2,988
784
"Shut up habit . You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say . As my mother used to tell me when I was 5 , you 're talking privelages have been revoked ."
"1 ) It 's Habbit . You could at least take 5 seconds to get my name right . 2 ) Considering you and your friends are the ones complaining , not debating ? 3 ) Actually , none of my posting privileges have my revoked . Try again ."
DISAGREE
"You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say ."
"Considering you and your friends are the ones complaining , not debating ?"
null
null
2,989
784
"Shut up habit . You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say . As my mother used to tell me when I was 5 , you 're talking privelages have been revoked ."
"1 ) It 's Habbit . You could at least take 5 seconds to get my name right . 2 ) Considering you and your friends are the ones complaining , not debating ? 3 ) Actually , none of my posting privileges have my revoked . Try again ."
DISAGREE
"Shut up habit . You really and truly have absolutely nothing to say . As my mother used to tell me when I was 5 ,"
"It 's Habbit ."
null
null
2,991
792
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"There you go . It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour ."
"It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
null
null
2,994
792
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"There you go . It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"There you go It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out the facts are the facts !"
null
null
2,995
792
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"There you go . It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
DISAGREE
"'s a bit rich for them to call it murder oncologists murder tumours all the time"
"There you go the facts are the facts !"
null
null
2,992
792
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"There you go . It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour"
"It 's difficult to find which side of your mouth to talk out of when the facts are the facts !"
null
null
2,998
793
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's . It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support . Why the father did n't get a say on if the baby was born or not so why should he have to pay child supportbecause the law says so ."
DISAGREE
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate"
null
null
2,999
793
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's . It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support . Why the father did n't get a say on if the baby was born or not so why should he have to pay child supportbecause the law says so ."
DISAGREE
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's It should be left up to her and her doctor"
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them support Why the father did n't get a say why should he have to pay child"
null
null
2,997
793
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's . It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support . Why the father did n't get a say on if the baby was born or not so why should he have to pay child supportbecause the law says so ."
DISAGREE
"The burden of a pregnancy is the It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support . Why the father did n't get a say on if the baby was born or not so why should he have to pay child supportbecause the law says so ."
null
null
2,996
793
"The burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's . It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"I 'm sorry but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support . Why the father did n't get a say on if the baby was born or not so why should he have to pay child supportbecause the law says so ."
DISAGREE
"burden of a pregnancy is the woman 's . It should be left up to her and her doctor to decide what is best for her ."
"but the baby is a part of both of them . Should it be that the mother decides to keep the baby and the father want 's her to terminate the state will still come chasing for child support ."
null
null
3,002
794
"You can make the statement 'Based on the current available evidence , I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it . Sorry if this is just turning into word games ."
DISAGREE
"I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it ."
null
null
3,004
794
"You can make the statement 'Based on the current available evidence , I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it . Sorry if this is just turning into word games ."
DISAGREE
"current available evidence , I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it"
null
null
3,001
794
"You can make the statement 'Based on the current available evidence , I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it . Sorry if this is just turning into word games ."
DISAGREE
"You can make the statement 'Based on the current available evidence , I do not believe in the existance of any god/gods . '"
"Is that not agnostic ? You leave yourself open to change if evidence dictates it . Sorry if this is just turning into word games ."
null
null
3,008
795
"Naturally , one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera . Pity ."
DISAGREE
"one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera ."
null
null
3,009
795
"Naturally , one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera . Pity ."
DISAGREE
"Naturally one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera Pity"
null
null
3,006
795
"Naturally , one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera . Pity ."
DISAGREE
"Naturally , one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera . Pity ."
null
null
3,010
795
"Naturally , one can only observe what exists in the present ."
"And I just spent all that money on a new camera . Pity ."
DISAGREE
"can only observe what exists in the present ."
"spent all that money on a new camera Pity ."
null
null
3,014
796
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"Oh . You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a cause . The word is Greek and means  “ witness ” . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
DISAGREE
"Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison"
"You just lost me . warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him"
null
null
3,012
796
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"Oh . You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a cause . The word is Greek and means  “ witness ” . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
DISAGREE
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a The word is Greek and means  witness . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
null
null
3,013
796
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"Oh . You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a cause . The word is Greek and means  “ witness ” . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
DISAGREE
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business"
"You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake"
null
null
3,015
796
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"Oh . You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a cause . The word is Greek and means  “ witness ” . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
DISAGREE
"To me Christ was saying mind your own business be good little Italians of the Roman Empire you wo n't do much good sitting in prison crucified on a tree"
"You just lost me The fact is Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . sought to kill every Christian they could find Christians were crucified by the thousands"
null
null
3,011
796
"To me , Christ was saying mind your own business and be good little Italians of the Roman Empire -- - you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"Oh . You just lost me . The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake . Read Matthew 10:5-42 , if you care for the full text . Basically he told them they would be beaten , thrown in prison , crucified , and put to death if they followed him . And that is exactly what happened to the disciples and all those who gave a witness for Christ as Lord and Savior . The various Roman emperors in those years of the early church sought to kill every Christian they could find , men , women , and children . Christians were crucified by the thousands , covered in pitch , and sit afire to provide light for the emporer ’ s lavish garden parties . They were killed in the arena by wild animals and tortured to death in numerous ways . They were called martyrs , which now means one who dies for a cause . The word is Greek and means  “ witness ” . These witnesses for Christ were killed for their faith . How many Christians would we have today if they had to die for their faith ? In spite of everything that the emperor did , they could not kill the Christians fast enough . More were believing in Christ every day , and eventually even the Roman emperor himself became a Christian and Christianity was embraced and sanctioned ."
DISAGREE
"you wo n't do much good for the cause sitting in prison or crucified on a tree ."
"The fact is , Jesus warned his followers that they would be persecuted for his sake ."
null
null
3,019
797
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's . But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
DISAGREE
"the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident the whole evolution of Man was an accident too all our thought processes are mere this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise His use of the word accident `` negative connotation that seems to scare believers ''"
null
null
3,016
797
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's . But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
DISAGREE
"the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident evolution of Man was an accident too"
"accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` without the negative connotation"
null
null
3,017
797
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's . But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
DISAGREE
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
null
null
3,020
797
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's . But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
DISAGREE
"the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision ,"
"when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise"
null
null
3,018
797
" ‘ If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision , then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident , and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too . If so , then all our thought processes are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms . And this holds for the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else 's . But if their thoughts—i.e . of Materialism and Astronomy—are merely accidental by-products , why should we believe them to be true ? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ? His use of the word accident can readily be replaced by `` the natural laws of the universe `` , or other more descriptive terms , without the negative connotation that seems to scare believers . '' We 're an accident ? OMG , then we must right ! '' ."
DISAGREE
"I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give a correct account of all the other accidents. ’"
"C.S.Lewis believes things on faith , yet we are to use his words , which he is not here to clarify , as evidence that my claim is false , when he obviously accepts the same illogical claim as premise ?"
null
null
3,025
798
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
DISAGREE
"cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans `` sham only one of two are being considered"
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women Have you no regard for them"
null
null
3,023
798
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
DISAGREE
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ?"
null
null
3,022
798
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
DISAGREE
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
null
null
3,021
798
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
DISAGREE
"established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham ."
"pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
null
null
3,024
798
"This thread has established the cold disregard for undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans . In the name of caring for the rights of humans . Which exposes the argument of `` in the name of someone 's rights `` a sham . As rights of only one of two are being considered ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ? Have you no regard for them ?"
DISAGREE
"undeserved pain and death inflicted upon what would be a child created by the irresponsible acts of humans ."
"What about the pain and death inflicted upon the innocent women and girls forced to give birth ?"
null
null
3,026
799
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ? Gim me a break . He supports what his constituents want him to support or he does n't get elected . In case you have n't noticed , the majority of Americans are against gay marriage ."
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` . The strawman you are attempting to construct is just that - a strawman . As to `` the majority of Americans are against gay marriage `` , who really gives a flying ? The majority of Americans thought that slavery was acceptable , that blacks and whites should n't marry , that `` seperate-but-equal `` policies were acceptable ( and equal ) , that women should not have equal rights as men , that discrimination on the basis of gender , race , etc . was acceptable , and on and on . The `` majority of Americans `` have been for a whole lot of pretty ing stupid things . Your argument is n't helped whatsoever with your appeal to majority ."
DISAGREE
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ?"
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` ."
null
null
3,028
799
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ? Gim me a break . He supports what his constituents want him to support or he does n't get elected . In case you have n't noticed , the majority of Americans are against gay marriage ."
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` . The strawman you are attempting to construct is just that - a strawman . As to `` the majority of Americans are against gay marriage `` , who really gives a flying ? The majority of Americans thought that slavery was acceptable , that blacks and whites should n't marry , that `` seperate-but-equal `` policies were acceptable ( and equal ) , that women should not have equal rights as men , that discrimination on the basis of gender , race , etc . was acceptable , and on and on . The `` majority of Americans `` have been for a whole lot of pretty ing stupid things . Your argument is n't helped whatsoever with your appeal to majority ."
DISAGREE
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ?"
"No ."
null
null
3,030
799
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ? Gim me a break . He supports what his constituents want him to support or he does n't get elected . In case you have n't noticed , the majority of Americans are against gay marriage ."
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` . The strawman you are attempting to construct is just that - a strawman . As to `` the majority of Americans are against gay marriage `` , who really gives a flying ? The majority of Americans thought that slavery was acceptable , that blacks and whites should n't marry , that `` seperate-but-equal `` policies were acceptable ( and equal ) , that women should not have equal rights as men , that discrimination on the basis of gender , race , etc . was acceptable , and on and on . The `` majority of Americans `` have been for a whole lot of pretty ing stupid things . Your argument is n't helped whatsoever with your appeal to majority ."
DISAGREE
"in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ?"
"She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage"
null
null
3,027
799
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ? Gim me a break . He supports what his constituents want him to support or he does n't get elected . In case you have n't noticed , the majority of Americans are against gay marriage ."
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` . The strawman you are attempting to construct is just that - a strawman . As to `` the majority of Americans are against gay marriage `` , who really gives a flying ? The majority of Americans thought that slavery was acceptable , that blacks and whites should n't marry , that `` seperate-but-equal `` policies were acceptable ( and equal ) , that women should not have equal rights as men , that discrimination on the basis of gender , race , etc . was acceptable , and on and on . The `` majority of Americans `` have been for a whole lot of pretty ing stupid things . Your argument is n't helped whatsoever with your appeal to majority ."
DISAGREE
"in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ?"
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete"
null
null
3,029
799
"So , in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ? Gim me a break . He supports what his constituents want him to support or he does n't get elected . In case you have n't noticed , the majority of Americans are against gay marriage ."
"No . She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` . The strawman you are attempting to construct is just that - a strawman . As to `` the majority of Americans are against gay marriage `` , who really gives a flying ? The majority of Americans thought that slavery was acceptable , that blacks and whites should n't marry , that `` seperate-but-equal `` policies were acceptable ( and equal ) , that women should not have equal rights as men , that discrimination on the basis of gender , race , etc . was acceptable , and on and on . The `` majority of Americans `` have been for a whole lot of pretty ing stupid things . Your argument is n't helped whatsoever with your appeal to majority ."
DISAGREE
"in order to be against gay marriage , a person has to be faithful in his own marriage ?"
"She ( Ohioprof ) is saying that for a person to not look like a complete disgusting hypocrite while arguing against gay marriage on the basis of `` defending Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` , that person must not engage in behaviours diametrically opposed to said `` Traditional ( TM ) Marriage `` ."
null
null
3,033
800
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"Give it a rest ... what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam ."
DISAGREE
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam"
null
null
3,034
800
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"Give it a rest ... what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam ."
DISAGREE
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part"
null
null
3,035
800
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"Give it a rest ... what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam ."
DISAGREE
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing"
"what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part"
null
null
3,032
800
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"Give it a rest ... what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam ."
DISAGREE
"I smell an arcane semantics-based proof brewing ..."
"what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part ... no foam ."
null
null
3,039
801
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second . Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour ."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second ."
null
null
3,037
801
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second . Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
DISAGREE
"And oncologists murder tumours all the time"
"Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ?"
null
null
3,036
801
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second . Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time"
"Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
null
null
3,038
801
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second . Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
DISAGREE
"it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour ."
"Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ?"
null
null
3,040
801
"And secondly , it 's a bit rich for them to call it murder when a blastocyst can turn into a tumour . And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally , just for a second . Have you ever heard of a tumor growing into a sentient life form as a fetus does ? I 'd appreciate a link documenting such an occurrence so we pro-lifers can start planning save the tumor rally 's ."
DISAGREE
"And oncologists murder tumours all the time ..."
"Now settle down charlie , and try to think rationally"
null
null
3,043
802
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely , thus putting guns in the hands of criminals ... making us all more unsafe ."
"How is that silly ? You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ? And many of those are stolen from legal buyers . While it is a poor argument to argue that firearms should be banned for that primary reason , the underlying principle of control over supply is hardly silly . Unless you think that control over nuclear weapons is silly . Maybe you would . After all , you are Isly ."
DISAGREE
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely ,"
"How is that silly ?"
null
null
3,042
802
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely , thus putting guns in the hands of criminals ... making us all more unsafe ."
"How is that silly ? You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ? And many of those are stolen from legal buyers . While it is a poor argument to argue that firearms should be banned for that primary reason , the underlying principle of control over supply is hardly silly . Unless you think that control over nuclear weapons is silly . Maybe you would . After all , you are Isly ."
DISAGREE
"silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely"
"How is that silly ? You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ? And many of those are stolen from legal buyers"
null
null
3,045
802
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely , thus putting guns in the hands of criminals ... making us all more unsafe ."
"How is that silly ? You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ? And many of those are stolen from legal buyers . While it is a poor argument to argue that firearms should be banned for that primary reason , the underlying principle of control over supply is hardly silly . Unless you think that control over nuclear weapons is silly . Maybe you would . After all , you are Isly ."
DISAGREE
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely"
"You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ?"
null
null
3,044
802
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely , thus putting guns in the hands of criminals ... making us all more unsafe ."
"How is that silly ? You do realize that the vast majority of firearms used in crimes are stolen no ? And many of those are stolen from legal buyers . While it is a poor argument to argue that firearms should be banned for that primary reason , the underlying principle of control over supply is hardly silly . Unless you think that control over nuclear weapons is silly . Maybe you would . After all , you are Isly ."
DISAGREE
"There will always be the silly argument that allowing people to own guns makes gun thefts more likely"
"How is that silly"
null
null
3,050
803
"We are arguing whether ID is a science , and we both seem to agree that it is n't , yet you justify allowing it into the science curriculum because the curriculum is already messed up so we should add more messed up stuff from the other side to balance it out ? Sorry , that does n't work ."
"It works , because we live in a messed up world . In the US , restricting ideas is what does n't work ."
DISAGREE
"Sorry , that does n't work ."
"It works"
null
null
3,047
803
"We are arguing whether ID is a science , and we both seem to agree that it is n't , yet you justify allowing it into the science curriculum because the curriculum is already messed up so we should add more messed up stuff from the other side to balance it out ? Sorry , that does n't work ."
"It works , because we live in a messed up world . In the US , restricting ideas is what does n't work ."
DISAGREE
"We are arguing whether ID is a science , and we both seem to agree that it is n't ,"
"It works , because we live in a messed up world . In the US , restricting ideas is what does n't work ."
null
null
3,048
803
"We are arguing whether ID is a science , and we both seem to agree that it is n't , yet you justify allowing it into the science curriculum because the curriculum is already messed up so we should add more messed up stuff from the other side to balance it out ? Sorry , that does n't work ."
"It works , because we live in a messed up world . In the US , restricting ideas is what does n't work ."
DISAGREE
"you justify allowing it into the science curriculum because the curriculum is already messed up Sorry , that does n't work"
"It works , because we live in a messed up world . In the US , restricting ideas is what does n't work ."
null
null
3,055
804
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that . It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property is going to stop a mad man determined to do it ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
DISAGREE
"concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that ."
"when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
null
null
3,054
804
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that . It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property is going to stop a mad man determined to do it ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
DISAGREE
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds"
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns"
null
null
3,051
804
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that . It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property is going to stop a mad man determined to do it ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
DISAGREE
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
null
null
3,053
804
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that . It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property is going to stop a mad man determined to do it ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
DISAGREE
"It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property"
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience"
null
null
3,052
804
"All the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that . It 's not like laws that say you ca n't bring a gun on school property is going to stop a mad man determined to do it ."
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
DISAGREE
"the more reason to relax concealed carry laws on school grounds , so teachers and other adults there can at least stop somebody like that"
"And when the President speaks in public we could hand out guns to the audience so that they could respond to any assassination attempt ."
null
null
3,057
805
"So you may want us to believe that abandoning Gods truths and principles is the way to save the church foundit , which I do n't think you actually believe at all , and I 'm sure your god satan agrees with what you recommend . But that is n't how it works in reality , as abandoning Gods truths never leads to good which the massive losses to the above mentioned churches membership is evidence of . Spiritually Dead churches do n't grow , living churches which possess the Holy Spirit of the living God do . So stop your lies and twisting of reality foundit ."
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving . Rather than listen to that , Archie would have us listen to people who are ENTRENCHED in REPEATING the very reasons why people are leaving Christianity ... Such glaring misrepresentation of reality is obviously an act of a dinosaur complaining as it sinks into the tar pit . A logical person can very well ask `` If the reason people leave Christianity is because the religion is not adhering to biblical principles , then WHY do we STILL HAVE MOST CHRISTIANS thinking homosexuality is a sin ? `` Cause you see , changes like the above with the Lutherans DO NOT come about because most people WANT the church to be more strict ... They come about because there are MORE people in the church who WANT the change ."
DISAGREE
"you may want us to believe that abandoning Gods truths and principles is the way to save the church foundit"
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving ."
null
null
3,056
805
"So you may want us to believe that abandoning Gods truths and principles is the way to save the church foundit , which I do n't think you actually believe at all , and I 'm sure your god satan agrees with what you recommend . But that is n't how it works in reality , as abandoning Gods truths never leads to good which the massive losses to the above mentioned churches membership is evidence of . Spiritually Dead churches do n't grow , living churches which possess the Holy Spirit of the living God do . So stop your lies and twisting of reality foundit ."
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving . Rather than listen to that , Archie would have us listen to people who are ENTRENCHED in REPEATING the very reasons why people are leaving Christianity ... Such glaring misrepresentation of reality is obviously an act of a dinosaur complaining as it sinks into the tar pit . A logical person can very well ask `` If the reason people leave Christianity is because the religion is not adhering to biblical principles , then WHY do we STILL HAVE MOST CHRISTIANS thinking homosexuality is a sin ? `` Cause you see , changes like the above with the Lutherans DO NOT come about because most people WANT the church to be more strict ... They come about because there are MORE people in the church who WANT the change ."
DISAGREE
"as abandoning Gods truths never leads to good which the massive losses to the above mentioned churches membership is evidence of ."
"I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving"
null
null
3,060
805
"So you may want us to believe that abandoning Gods truths and principles is the way to save the church foundit , which I do n't think you actually believe at all , and I 'm sure your god satan agrees with what you recommend . But that is n't how it works in reality , as abandoning Gods truths never leads to good which the massive losses to the above mentioned churches membership is evidence of . Spiritually Dead churches do n't grow , living churches which possess the Holy Spirit of the living God do . So stop your lies and twisting of reality foundit ."
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving . Rather than listen to that , Archie would have us listen to people who are ENTRENCHED in REPEATING the very reasons why people are leaving Christianity ... Such glaring misrepresentation of reality is obviously an act of a dinosaur complaining as it sinks into the tar pit . A logical person can very well ask `` If the reason people leave Christianity is because the religion is not adhering to biblical principles , then WHY do we STILL HAVE MOST CHRISTIANS thinking homosexuality is a sin ? `` Cause you see , changes like the above with the Lutherans DO NOT come about because most people WANT the church to be more strict ... They come about because there are MORE people in the church who WANT the change ."
DISAGREE
"stop your lies"
"I spoke no lies"
null
null
3,059
805
"So you may want us to believe that abandoning Gods truths and principles is the way to save the church foundit , which I do n't think you actually believe at all , and I 'm sure your god satan agrees with what you recommend . But that is n't how it works in reality , as abandoning Gods truths never leads to good which the massive losses to the above mentioned churches membership is evidence of . Spiritually Dead churches do n't grow , living churches which possess the Holy Spirit of the living God do . So stop your lies and twisting of reality foundit ."
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position WITH POLLS that actually ask the people leaving WHY they are leaving . Rather than listen to that , Archie would have us listen to people who are ENTRENCHED in REPEATING the very reasons why people are leaving Christianity ... Such glaring misrepresentation of reality is obviously an act of a dinosaur complaining as it sinks into the tar pit . A logical person can very well ask `` If the reason people leave Christianity is because the religion is not adhering to biblical principles , then WHY do we STILL HAVE MOST CHRISTIANS thinking homosexuality is a sin ? `` Cause you see , changes like the above with the Lutherans DO NOT come about because most people WANT the church to be more strict ... They come about because there are MORE people in the church who WANT the change ."
DISAGREE
"So stop your lies and twisting of reality foundit ."
"I spoke no lies . I can substantiate my position"
null
null
3,064
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point"
null
null
3,066
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"does a human become a person ?"
"unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
null
null
3,063
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings"
null
null
3,061
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"a ."
"a completely point in time , unrelated to or teachings ."
null
null
3,065
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ?"
"unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
null
null
3,062
806
"archangelWhen does a human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
DISAGREE
"human become a person ? At conception ."
"This is a completely arbitrary point in time , unrelated to scientific or biblical teachings ."
null
null
3,069
807
"And this study is just on tadpoles . Does anyone think that this is not a world-wide , creation-wide phenomenon ? Of course it is . Every creature is a product of their environment . Traits are formed from the beginning of conception -- all the way throughout life . Over time , this may give the illusion of `` evolution `` in the fossil record ."
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
DISAGREE
"And this study is just on tadpoles"
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
null
null
3,071
807
"And this study is just on tadpoles . Does anyone think that this is not a world-wide , creation-wide phenomenon ? Of course it is . Every creature is a product of their environment . Traits are formed from the beginning of conception -- all the way throughout life . Over time , this may give the illusion of `` evolution `` in the fossil record ."
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
DISAGREE
"this study is just on tadpoles"
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
null
null
3,070
807
"And this study is just on tadpoles . Does anyone think that this is not a world-wide , creation-wide phenomenon ? Of course it is . Every creature is a product of their environment . Traits are formed from the beginning of conception -- all the way throughout life . Over time , this may give the illusion of `` evolution `` in the fossil record ."
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
DISAGREE
"this study is just on tadpoles"
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
null
null
3,072
807
"And this study is just on tadpoles . Does anyone think that this is not a world-wide , creation-wide phenomenon ? Of course it is . Every creature is a product of their environment . Traits are formed from the beginning of conception -- all the way throughout life . Over time , this may give the illusion of `` evolution `` in the fossil record ."
"Fossils show inherited change . Adaptation does not ."
DISAGREE
"this may give the illusion of `` evolution ``"
"show inherited change ."
null
null
3,075
808
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
DISAGREE
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
null
null
3,073
808
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
DISAGREE
"no duplicity between the two ."
"One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other ,"
null
null
3,076
808
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
DISAGREE
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence ."
null
null
3,074
808
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
DISAGREE
"see no between the two ."
"One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally the other , as they appear in the same by the same author ."
null
null
3,078
808
"I see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible . Neither of them have any evidence ( apart from the bible ) to support their existence . One of them has been proven to be utterly false . This naturally discredits the other , as they appear in the same publication by the same author . Why decide one is true when the other is clearly not , and neither have any other supporting evidence ?"
DISAGREE
"see no duplicity between the two ."
"They are both written in the bible"
null
null