Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
2,708
715
"This is not true ."
"Yes it is , police are n't obligated by the US Constitution to protect individual citizens . If they were , lawsuits could be filed every time a crime is committed , and the police would go bankrupt really quick ."
DISAGREE
"This is not true"
"Yes it is"
null
null
2,712
716
"DNA is just a representative of what we are , where we live , what our social environment is , what our ecological environment is , etc ."
"BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ! [ /quote ] So you are saying that my DNA reflects the fact that I live in Texas ?"
DISAGREE
"DNA is just a representative of what we are , where we live"
"So you are saying that my DNA reflects the fact that I live in Texas"
null
null
2,711
716
"DNA is just a representative of what we are , where we live , what our social environment is , what our ecological environment is , etc ."
"BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ! [ /quote ] So you are saying that my DNA reflects the fact that I live in Texas ?"
DISAGREE
"DNA is just a representative of what we are , where we live"
"So you are saying that my DNA reflects the fact that I live in Texas ?"
null
null
2,715
717
"The reason we make maps of the universe on the scale of billions of light years is that the scientific method has led us to that tentative but evidentially robust conclusion . I mean , look at this . A section of the sky the width of a dime 75 feet away , crammed with galaxies . And there 's nothing special about that dime 's worth of sky , either ."
"Crammed with them , sure , why not ? It ’ s easy , only a few million light years . The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too ."
DISAGREE
"the scientific method has led us to that tentative but evidentially robust conclusion"
"The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too ."
null
null
2,713
717
"The reason we make maps of the universe on the scale of billions of light years is that the scientific method has led us to that tentative but evidentially robust conclusion . I mean , look at this . A section of the sky the width of a dime 75 feet away , crammed with galaxies . And there 's nothing special about that dime 's worth of sky , either ."
"Crammed with them , sure , why not ? It ’ s easy , only a few million light years . The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too ."
DISAGREE
"A section of the sky the width of a dime 75 feet away , crammed with galaxies"
"Crammed with them , sure , why not ?"
null
null
2,714
717
"The reason we make maps of the universe on the scale of billions of light years is that the scientific method has led us to that tentative but evidentially robust conclusion . I mean , look at this . A section of the sky the width of a dime 75 feet away , crammed with galaxies . And there 's nothing special about that dime 's worth of sky , either ."
"Crammed with them , sure , why not ? It ’ s easy , only a few million light years . The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too ."
DISAGREE
"reason we make maps of the universe on the scale of billions of light years is that the scientific method"
"easy , only a few million light years . The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too"
null
null
2,716
718
"Um . Have you read Leveticus ? And I mean , read it . Not skimmed it . Because , God loves everybody . Are you reaching ?"
"Semantics . God has mandated against homosexuality . My point is , people are prepared to admit that the creation story , and the story of noahs arc are metaphors . They read them , and then look at the evidence to hand and say `` Well , it ca n't be really true the way it is written , so it must mean this ... `` But the bias of the church against homosexuality is based of a small passage of text which , it seems , can not be interpreted away . That part that condemns homosexuality is accurate , straight-from-gods-mouth truth . Again , why the dichotomy ? Why are some parts of the bible open to interpretation , but others are rigid ?"
DISAGREE
"God loves everybody"
"God has mandated against homosexuality . My point is , people are prepared to admit that the creation story , and the story of noahs arc are metaphors"
null
null
2,718
718
"Um . Have you read Leveticus ? And I mean , read it . Not skimmed it . Because , God loves everybody . Are you reaching ?"
"Semantics . God has mandated against homosexuality . My point is , people are prepared to admit that the creation story , and the story of noahs arc are metaphors . They read them , and then look at the evidence to hand and say `` Well , it ca n't be really true the way it is written , so it must mean this ... `` But the bias of the church against homosexuality is based of a small passage of text which , it seems , can not be interpreted away . That part that condemns homosexuality is accurate , straight-from-gods-mouth truth . Again , why the dichotomy ? Why are some parts of the bible open to interpretation , but others are rigid ?"
DISAGREE
"Because , God loves everybody"
"Why are some parts of the bible open to interpretation , but others are rigid ?"
null
null
2,717
718
"Um . Have you read Leveticus ? And I mean , read it . Not skimmed it . Because , God loves everybody . Are you reaching ?"
"Semantics . God has mandated against homosexuality . My point is , people are prepared to admit that the creation story , and the story of noahs arc are metaphors . They read them , and then look at the evidence to hand and say `` Well , it ca n't be really true the way it is written , so it must mean this ... `` But the bias of the church against homosexuality is based of a small passage of text which , it seems , can not be interpreted away . That part that condemns homosexuality is accurate , straight-from-gods-mouth truth . Again , why the dichotomy ? Why are some parts of the bible open to interpretation , but others are rigid ?"
DISAGREE
"Have you read Leveticus ? God loves everybody ."
"God has mandated against homosexuality"
null
null
2,719
719
"audi alteram partem or in English `` hear both sides of an argument `` ...."
"Well said . It is a disgrace that the `` Flat Earth `` side of the argument never gets a look in geography lessons and that the `` Spontaneous Creation `` side of the argument never gets a look in when teaching kids about the life cycle of insects . Do you realise that they refuse to present the `` Cheese `` side of the argument when teaching about the moon these days ? It 's outrageous , how can our kids get a balanced education if such bias is allowed to continue !"
DISAGREE
"hear both sides of an argument `` ...."
"Do you realise that they refuse to present the `` Cheese `` side of the argument when teaching about the moon these days ? It 's outrageous"
null
null
2,721
719
"audi alteram partem or in English `` hear both sides of an argument `` ...."
"Well said . It is a disgrace that the `` Flat Earth `` side of the argument never gets a look in geography lessons and that the `` Spontaneous Creation `` side of the argument never gets a look in when teaching kids about the life cycle of insects . Do you realise that they refuse to present the `` Cheese `` side of the argument when teaching about the moon these days ? It 's outrageous , how can our kids get a balanced education if such bias is allowed to continue !"
DISAGREE
"hear both sides of an argument"
"Well said"
null
null
2,720
719
"audi alteram partem or in English `` hear both sides of an argument `` ...."
"Well said . It is a disgrace that the `` Flat Earth `` side of the argument never gets a look in geography lessons and that the `` Spontaneous Creation `` side of the argument never gets a look in when teaching kids about the life cycle of insects . Do you realise that they refuse to present the `` Cheese `` side of the argument when teaching about the moon these days ? It 's outrageous , how can our kids get a balanced education if such bias is allowed to continue !"
DISAGREE
"hear both sides of an argument"
"Well said . It is a disgrace that the `` Flat Earth `` side of the argument never gets a look in geography lessons"
null
null
2,723
720
"Well , there is no way I 'd ever need an abortion , except for rape . I decided at 10 to live a life of celibacy because so much human suffering is related to desires of the flesh ."
"Well that explains your anger . I hope you are blessed with homeliness . Makes your commitment easier to keep . How old are you now ?"
DISAGREE
"I decided at 10 to live a life of celibacy"
"that explains your anger . I hope you are blessed with homeliness"
null
null
2,724
720
"Well , there is no way I 'd ever need an abortion , except for rape . I decided at 10 to live a life of celibacy because so much human suffering is related to desires of the flesh ."
"Well that explains your anger . I hope you are blessed with homeliness . Makes your commitment easier to keep . How old are you now ?"
DISAGREE
"I decided at 10 to live a life of celibacy"
"Well that explains your anger"
null
null
2,727
721
"Modern society does not fit well with the society of 2000+ years ago , with their beleifs eroding away those who see themselves primarily as 'American Christians ' may find this involentary loss of beleif as worrying and threatening to the older , more familiar ways . This might manifest as a general feeling of fear and being threatened , hence the percieved need for weapons ."
"So , are you saying that all anti-gunners are fearless ? ? ? If so , ,I must laugh ."
DISAGREE
"might manifest as a general feeling of fear and being threatened , hence the percieved need for weapons ."
"you saying that all anti-gunners are fearless ? ? ? If so , ,I must laugh ."
null
null
2,726
721
"Modern society does not fit well with the society of 2000+ years ago , with their beleifs eroding away those who see themselves primarily as 'American Christians ' may find this involentary loss of beleif as worrying and threatening to the older , more familiar ways . This might manifest as a general feeling of fear and being threatened , hence the percieved need for weapons ."
"So , are you saying that all anti-gunners are fearless ? ? ? If so , ,I must laugh ."
DISAGREE
"This might manifest as a general feeling of fear and being threatened"
"So , are you saying that all anti-gunners are fearless ? ? ?"
null
null
2,729
722
"I laughed so hard when I read that Kronus . Unfortunately , its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
AGREE
"I laughed so hard when I read that Kronus . Unfortunately , its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
null
null
2,728
722
"I laughed so hard when I read that Kronus . Unfortunately , its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
AGREE
"I laughed so hard when I read that Kronus . Unfortunately , its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
null
null
2,730
722
"I laughed so hard when I read that Kronus . Unfortunately , its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
AGREE
"its funny because its true ."
"Oh boy , you said it ! Is the Earth 's Magnetic Field Young ?"
null
null
2,731
723
"As we all have seen , creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it . Let 's examine their style 1 ) Refuse to comment upon scientific procedures 2 ) When faced with hard facts , move the argument to either a emotional ground , or question the personal , non-scientific beliefs of the evolution believer . 3 ) Lie like there is no tomorrow 4 ) Refuse to acknowledge anything they simply do n't like 5 ) When faced with a point they can not use # 2 on , ignore it completely like it does not exist 6 ) Classical ad-naeseum Can you think of any more ?"
"1 . ) Refusing to comment on scientific procedure means absolutely nothing . Maybe we do n't have anything to say . 2 . ) Testing your beliefs of your own scientific conclusions is not wrong . 3 . ) I do n't lie dude . 4 . ) Because we do n't give the response you would like is not wrong . 5 . ) Do n't think so . 6 . ) The only thing classical ad-naeseum is your own preconceived idea's of creationism and creationist . You do n't want to debate the issues like normal civil people , you just want try to make fools of creationists . Usually you 're the one who start 's the insulting . Your hatred is obivious and you 're open to nothing . Just good 'ol boys patting each other on the back . I know this probably does n't apply to everyone , there are some good guys out there ."
DISAGREE
"As we all have seen , creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it ."
"Because we do n't give the you would like is not wrong ."
null
null
2,733
723
"As we all have seen , creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it . Let 's examine their style 1 ) Refuse to comment upon scientific procedures 2 ) When faced with hard facts , move the argument to either a emotional ground , or question the personal , non-scientific beliefs of the evolution believer . 3 ) Lie like there is no tomorrow 4 ) Refuse to acknowledge anything they simply do n't like 5 ) When faced with a point they can not use # 2 on , ignore it completely like it does not exist 6 ) Classical ad-naeseum Can you think of any more ?"
"1 . ) Refusing to comment on scientific procedure means absolutely nothing . Maybe we do n't have anything to say . 2 . ) Testing your beliefs of your own scientific conclusions is not wrong . 3 . ) I do n't lie dude . 4 . ) Because we do n't give the response you would like is not wrong . 5 . ) Do n't think so . 6 . ) The only thing classical ad-naeseum is your own preconceived idea's of creationism and creationist . You do n't want to debate the issues like normal civil people , you just want try to make fools of creationists . Usually you 're the one who start 's the insulting . Your hatred is obivious and you 're open to nothing . Just good 'ol boys patting each other on the back . I know this probably does n't apply to everyone , there are some good guys out there ."
DISAGREE
"creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it ."
"The only thing classical ad-naeseum is your own preconceived of creationism and creationist . You do n't want to debate the issues like normal civil people , you just want try to make fools of creationists 's"
null
null
2,734
724
"( The following one-pager is taken from the U.S. Department of State publication , Principles of Democracy . ) • To maintain human rights , citizens in any free society need to be vigilant . Citizen responsibility – through a variety of participatory activities – ensures that government remains accountable to the people ."
"And here our Government says : Rights and Responsibilities"
DISAGREE
"ensures that government remains accountable to the people ."
"And here our Government says : Rights and Responsibilities"
null
null
2,736
724
"( The following one-pager is taken from the U.S. Department of State publication , Principles of Democracy . ) • To maintain human rights , citizens in any free society need to be vigilant . Citizen responsibility – through a variety of participatory activities – ensures that government remains accountable to the people ."
"And here our Government says : Rights and Responsibilities"
DISAGREE
"U.S. Department of State publication , Principles of Democracy"
"Rights and Responsibilities"
null
null
2,735
724
"( The following one-pager is taken from the U.S. Department of State publication , Principles of Democracy . ) • To maintain human rights , citizens in any free society need to be vigilant . Citizen responsibility – through a variety of participatory activities – ensures that government remains accountable to the people ."
"And here our Government says : Rights and Responsibilities"
DISAGREE
"The following one-pager is taken from the U.S. Department of State publication ,"
"And here our Government says : Rights and Responsibilities"
null
null
2,739
725
"I agree ... just what we need . The court will not hear the case so more guns on the street"
"The criminals in DC already have their guns . All striking down DC 's handgun ban will do is let the law abiding be able to better defend themselves and be armed for a change ."
DISAGREE
"I agree ... just what we need . The court will not hear the case so more guns on the street"
"The criminals in DC already have their guns ."
null
null
2,738
725
"I agree ... just what we need . The court will not hear the case so more guns on the street"
"The criminals in DC already have their guns . All striking down DC 's handgun ban will do is let the law abiding be able to better defend themselves and be armed for a change ."
DISAGREE
"The court will not hear the case so more guns on the street"
"All striking down DC 's handgun ban will do is let the law abiding be able to better defend themselves and be armed for a change"
null
null
2,741
726
"I agree . These laws limiting magazine capacity are based on stupid assumptions that are based on Hollywood ( think drive by Hollywood ) . The average shooting involves less than 5 rounds fired . So limiting the capacity has no affect on crime ."
"Well , I have heard people on the pro-gun side say that most defensive gun uses do n't involve firing even one round . So limiting the capacity would probably have less of an effect on the ability to defend yourself than on crime . So why are people from the gun lobby always whining about restrictions like this ? When semi-automatic rifles were banned in Australia , hunters welcomed the law . They saw it as a challenge because it takes greater skill to shoot an animal with a bolt action rifle . Not so in America where some gun owners like to use guns that could take down planes to shoot small animals ."
AGREE
"limiting the capacity has no affect on crime"
"So limiting the capacity would probably have less of an effect on the ability to defend yourself than on crime ."
null
null
2,742
726
"I agree . These laws limiting magazine capacity are based on stupid assumptions that are based on Hollywood ( think drive by Hollywood ) . The average shooting involves less than 5 rounds fired . So limiting the capacity has no affect on crime ."
"Well , I have heard people on the pro-gun side say that most defensive gun uses do n't involve firing even one round . So limiting the capacity would probably have less of an effect on the ability to defend yourself than on crime . So why are people from the gun lobby always whining about restrictions like this ? When semi-automatic rifles were banned in Australia , hunters welcomed the law . They saw it as a challenge because it takes greater skill to shoot an animal with a bolt action rifle . Not so in America where some gun owners like to use guns that could take down planes to shoot small animals ."
AGREE
"So limiting the capacity has no affect on crime ."
"When semi-automatic rifles were banned in Australia , hunters welcomed the law . They saw it as a challenge because it takes greater skill to shoot an animal with a bolt action rifle ."
null
null
2,740
726
"I agree . These laws limiting magazine capacity are based on stupid assumptions that are based on Hollywood ( think drive by Hollywood ) . The average shooting involves less than 5 rounds fired . So limiting the capacity has no affect on crime ."
"Well , I have heard people on the pro-gun side say that most defensive gun uses do n't involve firing even one round . So limiting the capacity would probably have less of an effect on the ability to defend yourself than on crime . So why are people from the gun lobby always whining about restrictions like this ? When semi-automatic rifles were banned in Australia , hunters welcomed the law . They saw it as a challenge because it takes greater skill to shoot an animal with a bolt action rifle . Not so in America where some gun owners like to use guns that could take down planes to shoot small animals ."
AGREE
"These laws limiting magazine capacity are based on stupid assumptions"
"most defensive gun uses do n't involve firing even one round"
null
null
2,743
727
"Gay marriage will change the institution ."
"So what ? It 's not like institutions in this country have n't been changed before , including the supposed intitution of marriage ! Guess what ? It 's called progress , get used to it ."
DISAGREE
"marriage will change the institution ."
"It 's called progress , get used to it ."
null
null
2,745
727
"Gay marriage will change the institution ."
"So what ? It 's not like institutions in this country have n't been changed before , including the supposed intitution of marriage ! Guess what ? It 's called progress , get used to it ."
DISAGREE
"Gay marriage will change the institution ."
"So what ? It 's not like institutions in this country have n't been changed before"
null
null
2,746
728
"How is that conclusion derived at ? The passage is speaking to the consequences to a man who 's actions cause the death of an unborn child ."
"It is in the first place unclear to whom the `` further harm `` is done . But even granting that the fetus dies , it is not clear how the situation is analogous to abortion , because the intentions of not only the man but even more importantly of the pregnant woman are completely different ."
DISAGREE
"man who 's actions cause the death of an unborn child"
"But even granting that the fetus dies , it is not clear how the situation is analogous to abortion , because the intentions of not only the man but even more importantly of the pregnant woman are completely different"
null
null
2,748
728
"How is that conclusion derived at ? The passage is speaking to the consequences to a man who 's actions cause the death of an unborn child ."
"It is in the first place unclear to whom the `` further harm `` is done . But even granting that the fetus dies , it is not clear how the situation is analogous to abortion , because the intentions of not only the man but even more importantly of the pregnant woman are completely different ."
DISAGREE
"How is that conclusion derived at ?"
"It is in the first place unclear to whom the `` further harm `` is done"
null
null
2,747
728
"How is that conclusion derived at ? The passage is speaking to the consequences to a man who 's actions cause the death of an unborn child ."
"It is in the first place unclear to whom the `` further harm `` is done . But even granting that the fetus dies , it is not clear how the situation is analogous to abortion , because the intentions of not only the man but even more importantly of the pregnant woman are completely different ."
DISAGREE
"How is that conclusion derived at ?"
"intentions of not only the man but even more importantly of the pregnant woman are completely different ."
null
null
2,752
736
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
DISAGREE
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong"
"You have n't proven anything"
null
null
2,751
736
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
DISAGREE
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
null
null
2,750
736
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
DISAGREE
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say ."
null
null
2,753
736
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
DISAGREE
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong ."
"You have n't proven"
null
null
2,749
736
"I 've cited several pieces of evidence that prove you wrong . You just wish to ignore them as you do everything that contridicts your belief ."
"You have n't proven anything . All you have done is spew your same old drivel which ignores what I actually say and reinterprets it to mean what you want it to say . You must corrupt what I say since you ca n't accept the truth of my beliefs and win your fallacious argument ."
DISAGREE
"cited several pieces of evidence wish to ignore them"
"spew your same old drivel corrupt what I say"
null
null
2,758
737
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students . In the Arthur Jones copy/paste in my first post , did you notice how he said that his professor , Otto Lowenstien , `` made a point of telling me that no creationist would be allowed to do research in his department ! ``"
"I believe this is wrong . But this is a private company , and if they want to discriminate based on religion , that 's fine , just as a church may outlaw atheists . Do I agree with it ? No . But does it have to do with our debate ? No . This is about the science classroom . Also , again abiogenesis is a hypothesis , the same level as ID ."
DISAGREE
"abiogenesis `` Otto Lowenstien , `` made a point of telling me that no creationist would be allowed to do research in his department ! ``"
"I believe this is wrong . But this is a private company , and if they want to discriminate based on religion Also , again abiogenesis is a hypothesis , the same level as ID ."
null
null
2,759
737
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students . In the Arthur Jones copy/paste in my first post , did you notice how he said that his professor , Otto Lowenstien , `` made a point of telling me that no creationist would be allowed to do research in his department ! ``"
"I believe this is wrong . But this is a private company , and if they want to discriminate based on religion , that 's fine , just as a church may outlaw atheists . Do I agree with it ? No . But does it have to do with our debate ? No . This is about the science classroom . Also , again abiogenesis is a hypothesis , the same level as ID ."
DISAGREE
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students ."
"I believe this is wrong ."
null
null
2,755
737
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students . In the Arthur Jones copy/paste in my first post , did you notice how he said that his professor , Otto Lowenstien , `` made a point of telling me that no creationist would be allowed to do research in his department ! ``"
"I believe this is wrong . But this is a private company , and if they want to discriminate based on religion , that 's fine , just as a church may outlaw atheists . Do I agree with it ? No . But does it have to do with our debate ? No . This is about the science classroom . Also , again abiogenesis is a hypothesis , the same level as ID ."
DISAGREE
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students ."
"believe this is"
null
null
2,760
737
"But abiogenesis , and so much more of `` science `` attempts to stop religion - attempts to alter the worldview of students . In the Arthur Jones copy/paste in my first post , did you notice how he said that his professor , Otto Lowenstien , `` made a point of telling me that no creationist would be allowed to do research in his department ! ``"
"I believe this is wrong . But this is a private company , and if they want to discriminate based on religion , that 's fine , just as a church may outlaw atheists . Do I agree with it ? No . But does it have to do with our debate ? No . This is about the science classroom . Also , again abiogenesis is a hypothesis , the same level as ID ."
DISAGREE
"abiogenesis attempts to stop religion Otto Lowenstien"
"I believe this is wrong discriminate based on religion"
null
null
2,762
738
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . Miller continues by explaining that he feels God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely heard , believed , and repeated dozens of times : We do n't see huge Godly magic tricks because `` God does n't work that way. `` When I ask for an obvious sign , like my keyboard floating before my eyes , and it does n't happen , the excuse I hear is that `` God does n't work that way. `` Now , all of a sudden , marc has a problem with that explanation . Go figure ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation . His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
DISAGREE
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation ."
null
null
2,763
738
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . Miller continues by explaining that he feels God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely heard , believed , and repeated dozens of times : We do n't see huge Godly magic tricks because `` God does n't work that way. `` When I ask for an obvious sign , like my keyboard floating before my eyes , and it does n't happen , the excuse I hear is that `` God does n't work that way. `` Now , all of a sudden , marc has a problem with that explanation . Go figure ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation . His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
DISAGREE
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . ``"
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning"
null
null
2,761
738
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . Miller continues by explaining that he feels God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely heard , believed , and repeated dozens of times : We do n't see huge Godly magic tricks because `` God does n't work that way. `` When I ask for an obvious sign , like my keyboard floating before my eyes , and it does n't happen , the excuse I hear is that `` God does n't work that way. `` Now , all of a sudden , marc has a problem with that explanation . Go figure ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation . His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
DISAGREE
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation ."
null
null
2,766
738
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . Miller continues by explaining that he feels God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely heard , believed , and repeated dozens of times : We do n't see huge Godly magic tricks because `` God does n't work that way. `` When I ask for an obvious sign , like my keyboard floating before my eyes , and it does n't happen , the excuse I hear is that `` God does n't work that way. `` Now , all of a sudden , marc has a problem with that explanation . Go figure ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation . His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
DISAGREE
"strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely"
"world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible"
null
null
2,764
738
"I wo n't try to explain this , but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting . Miller continues by explaining that he feels God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed , and he puts it in a context than any believer has surely heard , believed , and repeated dozens of times : We do n't see huge Godly magic tricks because `` God does n't work that way. `` When I ask for an obvious sign , like my keyboard floating before my eyes , and it does n't happen , the excuse I hear is that `` God does n't work that way. `` Now , all of a sudden , marc has a problem with that explanation . Go figure ."
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today , not what happened concerning creation . His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
DISAGREE
"but anybody who has the book can read pages 240-243 to see what marc is once again omitting God 's interactions with the world are few and far between because they are strategically placed ``"
"And that 's all irrelevent , because pages 240-243 concern what happens in the world today His feelings about God 's interactions with the world today would be different if he had a basic knowledge of the Bible ."
null
null
2,767
739
"4 ) Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair . It 's up to anyone who actually watched the movie to decide if these people just were n't intelligent enough to make the grade , while ALL the Ward Churchill 's of the academic world seldom seem to have any problems ."
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks -- about the assertions of `` the expelled. `` Trying to deflect attention from your inability to respond substantively wo n't fly with us ; these guys are fudging the stories and sharing only selected pieces in a specific attempt to hide what really happened . For what it 's worth , I feel a hell of a lot more vulnerable as an atheist in my profession and location than IDers should feel in research and teaching academia ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair ."
"Trying to deflect attention from your inability to respond substantively wo n't fly with us ;"
null
null
2,768
739
"4 ) Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair . It 's up to anyone who actually watched the movie to decide if these people just were n't intelligent enough to make the grade , while ALL the Ward Churchill 's of the academic world seldom seem to have any problems ."
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks -- about the assertions of `` the expelled. `` Trying to deflect attention from your inability to respond substantively wo n't fly with us ; these guys are fudging the stories and sharing only selected pieces in a specific attempt to hide what really happened . For what it 's worth , I feel a hell of a lot more vulnerable as an atheist in my profession and location than IDers should feel in research and teaching academia ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly"
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks -- about the assertions of `` the ."
null
null
2,772
739
"4 ) Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair . It 's up to anyone who actually watched the movie to decide if these people just were n't intelligent enough to make the grade , while ALL the Ward Churchill 's of the academic world seldom seem to have any problems ."
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks -- about the assertions of `` the expelled. `` Trying to deflect attention from your inability to respond substantively wo n't fly with us ; these guys are fudging the stories and sharing only selected pieces in a specific attempt to hide what really happened . For what it 's worth , I feel a hell of a lot more vulnerable as an atheist in my profession and location than IDers should feel in research and teaching academia ."
DISAGREE
"It 's up to anyone who actually watched the movie to decide if these people just were n't intelligent enough to make the grade , while ALL the Ward Churchill 's of the academic world seldom seem to have any problems"
"which the movie apparently lacks `` the these guys are fudging the stories and sharing only selected pieces in a specific attempt to hide what really happened ."
null
null
2,769
739
"4 ) Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair . It 's up to anyone who actually watched the movie to decide if these people just were n't intelligent enough to make the grade , while ALL the Ward Churchill 's of the academic world seldom seem to have any problems ."
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks -- about the assertions of `` the expelled. `` Trying to deflect attention from your inability to respond substantively wo n't fly with us ; these guys are fudging the stories and sharing only selected pieces in a specific attempt to hide what really happened . For what it 's worth , I feel a hell of a lot more vulnerable as an atheist in my profession and location than IDers should feel in research and teaching academia ."
DISAGREE
"Yes , there are all kinds of long winded rants about all the details of how the ID proponents were being treated perfectly fair ."
"Notice that nowhere here do you address the claims and evidence -- which the movie apparently lacks"
null
null
2,773
740
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"Since you redacted my previous statement , I repeat it for your benefit : There is nothing racist about the truth . Notice the underlying message in your posted article is about the Court of Appeals throwing her LAWSUIT out . That was the underlying agenda which motivated this racist jerk who also happens to be black . It is common of these people today to refuse to obey the law , then blame the cops for not allowing them to act like they do . Remember that it was she who was speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat . She deserved what she got even though the thought of a pregnant woman being tasered is scary to me , she could have avoided it by cooperating with the police . I 'm not pregnant and I would cooperate to avoid it . This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
DISAGREE
"stated stereotype of the person racist stereotype and you know it"
"redacted my previous statement blame the cops for not allowing them"
null
null
2,778
740
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"Since you redacted my previous statement , I repeat it for your benefit : There is nothing racist about the truth . Notice the underlying message in your posted article is about the Court of Appeals throwing her LAWSUIT out . That was the underlying agenda which motivated this racist jerk who also happens to be black . It is common of these people today to refuse to obey the law , then blame the cops for not allowing them to act like they do . Remember that it was she who was speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat . She deserved what she got even though the thought of a pregnant woman being tasered is scary to me , she could have avoided it by cooperating with the police . I 'm not pregnant and I would cooperate to avoid it . This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
DISAGREE
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know"
"This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
null
null
2,777
740
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"Since you redacted my previous statement , I repeat it for your benefit : There is nothing racist about the truth . Notice the underlying message in your posted article is about the Court of Appeals throwing her LAWSUIT out . That was the underlying agenda which motivated this racist jerk who also happens to be black . It is common of these people today to refuse to obey the law , then blame the cops for not allowing them to act like they do . Remember that it was she who was speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat . She deserved what she got even though the thought of a pregnant woman being tasered is scary to me , she could have avoided it by cooperating with the police . I 'm not pregnant and I would cooperate to avoid it . This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
DISAGREE
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is"
"There is nothing racist about the truth ."
null
null
2,776
740
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"Since you redacted my previous statement , I repeat it for your benefit : There is nothing racist about the truth . Notice the underlying message in your posted article is about the Court of Appeals throwing her LAWSUIT out . That was the underlying agenda which motivated this racist jerk who also happens to be black . It is common of these people today to refuse to obey the law , then blame the cops for not allowing them to act like they do . Remember that it was she who was speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat . She deserved what she got even though the thought of a pregnant woman being tasered is scary to me , she could have avoided it by cooperating with the police . I 'm not pregnant and I would cooperate to avoid it . This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
DISAGREE
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"There is nothing racist about the truth ."
null
null
2,774
740
"Your stated stereotype of the person in the story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype and you know it ."
"Since you redacted my previous statement , I repeat it for your benefit : There is nothing racist about the truth . Notice the underlying message in your posted article is about the Court of Appeals throwing her LAWSUIT out . That was the underlying agenda which motivated this racist jerk who also happens to be black . It is common of these people today to refuse to obey the law , then blame the cops for not allowing them to act like they do . Remember that it was she who was speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat . She deserved what she got even though the thought of a pregnant woman being tasered is scary to me , she could have avoided it by cooperating with the police . I 'm not pregnant and I would cooperate to avoid it . This is why I think she had other motives which makes her the lowest of the low since she was carrying another life within her ."
DISAGREE
"story is racist . It 's a racist stereotype"
"speeding in a school zone , then to refuse to give up her keys made her a public safety threat"
null
null
2,783
741
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with . Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed . Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children . I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
DISAGREE
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with"
"I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
null
null
2,780
741
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with . Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed . Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children . I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
DISAGREE
"Roe v. Wade Heller similarities"
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children I see absolutely no comparison between the two"
null
null
2,784
741
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with . Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed . Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children . I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
DISAGREE
"Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
null
null
2,782
741
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with . Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed . Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children . I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
DISAGREE
"Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade and Heller"
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question"
null
null
2,779
741
"In other words , you think a Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with . Roe v. Wade and Heller do share some striking similarities ."
"Heller is about determining the answer to a long standing question on the nature of the Second Amendment , and how much gun control is legally allowed . Roe v. Wade is about finding legal precedent for the murder of unborn children . I see absolutely no comparison between the two ."
DISAGREE
"Supreme Court decision should only shut down the debate if it 's a decision you agree with"
"absolutely no comparison between the two"
null
null
2,787
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"are the mutated fish really a different species"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation"
null
null
2,788
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other ."
null
null
2,786
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"the mutated fish a different species or are they merely a race"
"all these fish in the same pool was n't of speciation"
null
null
2,785
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race"
"a population driven by the environment"
null
null
2,789
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same"
null
null
2,790
742
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No , they 're the same species . If you put all these fish in the same pool at the end they would all breed with each other . The example was n't of speciation , merely of a change in a population driven by the environment , which is the essense of evolution ."
DISAGREE
"But are the mutated fish really a different species or are they merely a race , like humans with different skin colors ?"
"No"
null
null
2,794
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"according to percent of guns from the United States"
"not a direct trouble the stats from the US but is untraced or untraceable"
null
null
2,793
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` ."
null
null
2,799
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico"
"We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US"
null
null
2,796
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States"
"Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US"
null
null
2,797
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States ."
"that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ?"
null
null
2,798
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States ."
"The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable ."
null
null
2,791
743
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct quote . Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
DISAGREE
"Its the reading comprehension thing kicking in . ... [ according to ATF special agent William Newell , about 17 percent of guns associated with crime in Mexico came from the United States . ... 5th paragraph"
"Except that that would be the author 's words , not a direct Notice the absence of quotation marks ? Special Agent Newell never said `` 17 % came from the US `` . The author has as much trouble with the stats as you . 17 % of the total have been traced to the US . We do n't know the percentage of the total that did indeed come from the US but is untraced or untraceable . See the difference ?"
null
null
2,802
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
null
null
2,806
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership modern military weapons"
"were black powder rifles what are the non-recreational benefits of guns"
null
null
2,801
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason"
"modern military weapons I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own ."
null
null
2,807
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership"
"when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles ."
null
null
2,805
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles"
null
null
2,804
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy"
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles ."
null
null
2,808
744
"The pistol and hunting rifle is not enough . Please read the 2nd Amendment . It does not mention hunting as a reason for firearm owership or a reason for firearm ownership . What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons . The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend democracy from enemies of democracy who are armed with modern military weapons . The 2nd Amendment does not mean I fight the enemies of democracy with hunting guns . It means I fight back with the same guns they will probably be shooting at ME with ."
"Well when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles . Feel free to defend yourself with black powder rifles . In addition , what are the non-recreational benefits of guns . In other words , what would we lose by taking away automatic guns ( since I know your manly self could never part with every weapon you own . )"
DISAGREE
"What the 2nd Amendment refers to is modern military weapons . So , yes , we 'need ' military weapons ."
"when the second amendment was written , `` modern military weapons `` were black powder rifles"
null
null
2,811
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
null
null
2,816
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with not an argument for divine intervention ?"
null
null
2,814
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy"
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention"
null
null
2,813
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
null
null
2,815
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy"
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention"
null
null
2,817
745
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention under `` creationism `` , disproving evolution would not prove creationism . That 's called a `` false dichotomy `` ."
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with for the diversity of life without divine intervention not an argument for divine intervention ?"
DISAGREE
"Even if you want to lump any and all divine intervention"
"how is disproving the best explanation scientists can come up with"
null
null
2,825
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one"
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one"
null
null
2,819
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,824
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one"
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,822
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one ,"
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,823
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one"
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,820
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution no practical way to undo that"
"one can argue it was a pagan institution"
null
null
2,818
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one"
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,826
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one"
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one"
null
null
2,821
746
"You 're a bit late there , are n't you ? Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"Actually , one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
DISAGREE
"Marriage has become a state institution as much as a religious one , and I see no practical way to undo that at this point ."
"one can argue that it was a pagan institution long before it was a religious one ."
null
null
2,828
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"The REAL happens between different"
"not the only `` REAL occur within a population"
null
null
2,830
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
null
null
2,827
747
"The REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"That is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
DISAGREE
"REAL survival of the fittest happens between different populations of animals ."
"is not the only `` REAL `` evolution . It does occur within a population ."
null
null