Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
3,589
933
"Well let 's put it this way . I really like playing baseball . So I put in a law that says everyone has to play baseball unless they 're in a position where it will threaten their life . Since it 's such a wonderful thing no one should have any problem with a law passed , right ?"
"But I do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go through. `` You see , if pro-choicers only used the 'pregnancy-is-bad-if-forced argument , they might have a point , but they often do n't add the last part . Besides , no one ever forces a woman to get pregnant in the first place ."
DISAGREE
"So I put in a law that says everyone has to play baseball unless they 're in a position where it will threaten their life ."
"But I do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go through. ``"
null
null
3,588
933
"Well let 's put it this way . I really like playing baseball . So I put in a law that says everyone has to play baseball unless they 're in a position where it will threaten their life . Since it 's such a wonderful thing no one should have any problem with a law passed , right ?"
"But I do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go through. `` You see , if pro-choicers only used the 'pregnancy-is-bad-if-forced argument , they might have a point , but they often do n't add the last part . Besides , no one ever forces a woman to get pregnant in the first place ."
DISAGREE
"baseball"
"But I do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go through. ``"
null
null
3,591
933
"Well let 's put it this way . I really like playing baseball . So I put in a law that says everyone has to play baseball unless they 're in a position where it will threaten their life . Since it 's such a wonderful thing no one should have any problem with a law passed , right ?"
"But I do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go through. `` You see , if pro-choicers only used the 'pregnancy-is-bad-if-forced argument , they might have a point , but they often do n't add the last part . Besides , no one ever forces a woman to get pregnant in the first place ."
DISAGREE
"I really like playing baseball . So I put in a law that says everyone has to play baseball unless they 're in a position where it will threaten their life . Since it 's such a wonderful thing no one should have any problem with a law passed , right ?"
"do n't hear you saying things like `` baseball is always harmful to the player `` or `` baseball is something no one should have to go ."
null
null
3,594
934
"I appreciate that you said that because you are one of the few Creationits who realize that nothing the bible says is completely proven and a fact ... it 's not the infallible word of God ... it 's a book my humans and that IS a fact ... And the examples you gave ( Tower , Noah ) only state that ... I really like your opinion and really appreciate that ..."
"i think shortej is not a creationist . he/she never said so , and started off by saying he/she accepts evolution and maintains her catholic beliefs . ( i have a hunch its `` she `` )"
DISAGREE
"I appreciate that you said that because you are one of the few Creationits who realize that nothing the bible says is completely proven and a fact"
"i think shortej is not a creationist ."
null
null
3,595
934
"I appreciate that you said that because you are one of the few Creationits who realize that nothing the bible says is completely proven and a fact ... it 's not the infallible word of God ... it 's a book my humans and that IS a fact ... And the examples you gave ( Tower , Noah ) only state that ... I really like your opinion and really appreciate that ..."
"i think shortej is not a creationist . he/she never said so , and started off by saying he/she accepts evolution and maintains her catholic beliefs . ( i have a hunch its `` she `` )"
DISAGREE
"Creationits nothing the bible says is completely proven and a fact"
"i think shortej is not a creationist and started off by saying he/she accepts evolution ``"
null
null
3,599
935
"I 'm not sure what your point is . Are you trying to raise the Hitler question ? Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty . What does any of that have to do with the differential reproductive success of advantageous alleles ? Evolutionary theory is not a moral imperitive . It is an explanation of what is observed in nature ."
"Actually if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists . If you got that simple trivial thing wrong , why should I trust you in things that I do not know ? Atheistic evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith acknowledged of Hitler : `` The Germal Fuhrer ... is an evolutinoist ; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of eolution. `` ~ Keith , A. , 1947 . '' Evolution and Ethics `` , Putman , New York , p.230.Do n't worry , some of my friends did n't know either . If evolution is true , than it should have some reasonable explanation as to why we have morals , but it does n't ."
DISAGREE
"Are you trying to raise the Hitler question ?"
"you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists . `` ''"
null
null
3,598
935
"I 'm not sure what your point is . Are you trying to raise the Hitler question ? Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty . What does any of that have to do with the differential reproductive success of advantageous alleles ? Evolutionary theory is not a moral imperitive . It is an explanation of what is observed in nature ."
"Actually if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists . If you got that simple trivial thing wrong , why should I trust you in things that I do not know ? Atheistic evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith acknowledged of Hitler : `` The Germal Fuhrer ... is an evolutinoist ; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of eolution. `` ~ Keith , A. , 1947 . '' Evolution and Ethics `` , Putman , New York , p.230.Do n't worry , some of my friends did n't know either . If evolution is true , than it should have some reasonable explanation as to why we have morals , but it does n't ."
DISAGREE
"Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty . What does any of that have to do with the differential reproductive success of advantageous alleles ? Evolutionary theory is not a moral imperitive ."
"if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolution is true , than it should have some reasonable explanation as to why we have morals , but it does n't ."
null
null
3,596
935
"I 'm not sure what your point is . Are you trying to raise the Hitler question ? Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty . What does any of that have to do with the differential reproductive success of advantageous alleles ? Evolutionary theory is not a moral imperitive . It is an explanation of what is observed in nature ."
"Actually if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists . If you got that simple trivial thing wrong , why should I trust you in things that I do not know ? Atheistic evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith acknowledged of Hitler : `` The Germal Fuhrer ... is an evolutinoist ; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of eolution. `` ~ Keith , A. , 1947 . '' Evolution and Ethics `` , Putman , New York , p.230.Do n't worry , some of my friends did n't know either . If evolution is true , than it should have some reasonable explanation as to why we have morals , but it does n't ."
DISAGREE
"Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty"
"Actually if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists"
null
null
3,597
935
"I 'm not sure what your point is . Are you trying to raise the Hitler question ? Hitler was a Christian and claimed that he was doing his Christian duty . What does any of that have to do with the differential reproductive success of advantageous alleles ? Evolutionary theory is not a moral imperitive . It is an explanation of what is observed in nature ."
"Actually if you were educated in history you would know that Hitler was an evolutionists . If you got that simple trivial thing wrong , why should I trust you in things that I do not know ? Atheistic evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith acknowledged of Hitler : `` The Germal Fuhrer ... is an evolutinoist ; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of eolution. `` ~ Keith , A. , 1947 . '' Evolution and Ethics `` , Putman , New York , p.230.Do n't worry , some of my friends did n't know either . If evolution is true , than it should have some reasonable explanation as to why we have morals , but it does n't ."
DISAGREE
"Hitler"
"Hitler was an evolutionists . `` ... ''"
null
null
3,600
936
"Actually I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate . Besides it will backfire on them the first time some one is denied something because they are n't married and have a civil union this will be back in court . I aslo would like to see the language to see if there is any penalties for those who do not treat the civil unions as marriages ."
"Excellent point . If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it , Civil Unons would be excellent . Unfortunately , those opposing gay marriage would never agree to such a thing ."
AGREE
"I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate ."
"Excellent point . Civil Unons would be excellent ."
null
null
3,602
936
"Actually I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate . Besides it will backfire on them the first time some one is denied something because they are n't married and have a civil union this will be back in court . I aslo would like to see the language to see if there is any penalties for those who do not treat the civil unions as marriages ."
"Excellent point . If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it , Civil Unons would be excellent . Unfortunately , those opposing gay marriage would never agree to such a thing ."
AGREE
"Actually I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate ."
"Excellent point"
null
null
3,603
936
"Actually I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate . Besides it will backfire on them the first time some one is denied something because they are n't married and have a civil union this will be back in court . I aslo would like to see the language to see if there is any penalties for those who do not treat the civil unions as marriages ."
"Excellent point . If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it , Civil Unons would be excellent . Unfortunately , those opposing gay marriage would never agree to such a thing ."
AGREE
"civil unions marriage certificate and"
"If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it"
null
null
3,601
936
"Actually I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate . Besides it will backfire on them the first time some one is denied something because they are n't married and have a civil union this will be back in court . I aslo would like to see the language to see if there is any penalties for those who do not treat the civil unions as marriages ."
"Excellent point . If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it , Civil Unons would be excellent . Unfortunately , those opposing gay marriage would never agree to such a thing ."
AGREE
"I have no problem with civil unions as long as civil unions replace the marriage certificate . Besides it will backfire on them the first time some one is denied something because they are n't married and have a civil union this will be back in court ."
"Excellent point . If the government only gave civil unions to everyone ( heteros and gays alike ) and the churches got to do the religious side of it , Civil Unons would be excellent . Unfortunately , those opposing gay marriage would never agree to such a thing ."
null
null
3,607
937
"Other paranoid voices argue that the citizens should arm themselves against their own government ."
"So you think the Constitution is `` paranoid `` huh ? You need to read the Federalist and anti- Federalist papers and quotes from our FF ."
DISAGREE
"paranoid"
"So you think the Constitution is `` paranoid `` huh ?"
null
null
3,605
937
"Other paranoid voices argue that the citizens should arm themselves against their own government ."
"So you think the Constitution is `` paranoid `` huh ? You need to read the Federalist and anti- Federalist papers and quotes from our FF ."
DISAGREE
"Other paranoid voices argue that the citizens should arm themselves against their own government ."
"So you think the Constitution is `` paranoid `` huh ?"
null
null
3,608
938
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table ?"
"Actually , try comparing murder rates with those of the UK - was my point , especially murder by gun . You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
DISAGREE
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table ?"
"Actually , try comparing murder rates with those of the UK"
null
null
3,609
938
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table ?"
"Actually , try comparing murder rates with those of the UK - was my point , especially murder by gun . You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
DISAGREE
"how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas"
"I 've already argued against it ."
null
null
3,611
938
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table ?"
"Actually , try comparing murder rates with those of the UK - was my point , especially murder by gun . You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
DISAGREE
"how many people per capita own guns table"
"try comparing murder rates You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
null
null
3,610
938
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table ?"
"Actually , try comparing murder rates with those of the UK - was my point , especially murder by gun . You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
DISAGREE
"And how many people per capita own guns in each of the areas in your table"
"try comparing murder rates with those of the UK - was my point , especially murder by gun . You 've got your table of state shootings , and I 've already argued against it ."
null
null
3,614
939
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"This is a good site , but very atheist I think . Do you know of a good theistic equivalent ? I do not mean like those awful websites that misrepresent science to try and shoehorn the world into their Bible stories ( sorry to pick on Christians here , but it is Christian ones that I notice ) , but ones that look at real science and look to see if a theistic explaination works for things ?"
DISAGREE
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"This is a good site"
null
null
3,613
939
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"This is a good site , but very atheist I think . Do you know of a good theistic equivalent ? I do not mean like those awful websites that misrepresent science to try and shoehorn the world into their Bible stories ( sorry to pick on Christians here , but it is Christian ones that I notice ) , but ones that look at real science and look to see if a theistic explaination works for things ?"
DISAGREE
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"This is a good site , but very atheist I think . Do you know of a good theistic equivalent"
null
null
3,615
939
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"This is a good site , but very atheist I think . Do you know of a good theistic equivalent ? I do not mean like those awful websites that misrepresent science to try and shoehorn the world into their Bible stories ( sorry to pick on Christians here , but it is Christian ones that I notice ) , but ones that look at real science and look to see if a theistic explaination works for things ?"
DISAGREE
"http : www.talkorigins.org"
"very atheist I think ."
null
null
3,620
940
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies and threaten the solvency of solidly middle-class Americans . They propose comprehensive national health insurance as a solution . A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes closer to poverty level than to middle class . Moreover , for national health insurance to have an impact , it would have to define `` medical `` expenses in a much broader way than is now typical of either private or government-funded plans . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate , contrived and dishonest—but the myth : persistent , persuasive and unrealistic . —President John F. Kennedy , Commencement Address at Yale University , 11 June 1962 . Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact -- Dranove and Millenson 25 ( 2 ) : w74 -- Health Affairs"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
DISAGREE
"A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent"
"for"
null
null
3,616
940
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies and threaten the solvency of solidly middle-class Americans . They propose comprehensive national health insurance as a solution . A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes closer to poverty level than to middle class . Moreover , for national health insurance to have an impact , it would have to define `` medical `` expenses in a much broader way than is now typical of either private or government-funded plans . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate , contrived and dishonest—but the myth : persistent , persuasive and unrealistic . —President John F. Kennedy , Commencement Address at Yale University , 11 June 1962 . Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact -- Dranove and Millenson 25 ( 2 ) : w74 -- Health Affairs"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
DISAGREE
"medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies"
": //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
null
null
3,618
940
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies and threaten the solvency of solidly middle-class Americans . They propose comprehensive national health insurance as a solution . A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes closer to poverty level than to middle class . Moreover , for national health insurance to have an impact , it would have to define `` medical `` expenses in a much broader way than is now typical of either private or government-funded plans . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate , contrived and dishonest—but the myth : persistent , persuasive and unrealistic . —President John F. Kennedy , Commencement Address at Yale University , 11 June 1962 . Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact -- Dranove and Millenson 25 ( 2 ) : w74 -- Health Affairs"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
DISAGREE
"A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
null
null
3,619
940
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies and threaten the solvency of solidly middle-class Americans . They propose comprehensive national health insurance as a solution . A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes closer to poverty level than to middle class . Moreover , for national health insurance to have an impact , it would have to define `` medical `` expenses in a much broader way than is now typical of either private or government-funded plans . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate , contrived and dishonest—but the myth : persistent , persuasive and unrealistic . —President John F. Kennedy , Commencement Address at Yale University , 11 June 1962 . Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact -- Dranove and Millenson 25 ( 2 ) : w74 -- Health Affairs"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
DISAGREE
"Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies"
"for you MIT stat loving freaks :"
null
null
3,617
940
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues recently contended that medical problems contribute to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies and threaten the solvency of solidly middle-class Americans . They propose comprehensive national health insurance as a solution . A reexamination of their data suggests that medical bills are a contributing factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies and that those affected tend to have incomes closer to poverty level than to middle class . Moreover , for national health insurance to have an impact , it would have to define `` medical `` expenses in a much broader way than is now typical of either private or government-funded plans . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate , contrived and dishonest—but the myth : persistent , persuasive and unrealistic . —President John F. Kennedy , Commencement Address at Yale University , 11 June 1962 . Medical Bankruptcy : Myth Versus Fact -- Dranove and Millenson 25 ( 2 ) : w74 -- Health Affairs"
"and for you MIT stat loving freaks : http : //web.mit.edu/~noto/Public/bk_v8.pdf"
DISAGREE
"BANKRUPTCY Medical Bankruptcy Myth David Dranove and Michael L. Millenson Abstract David Himmelstein and colleagues medical to 54.5 percent of personal bankruptcies the middle-class Americans . propose comprehensive national health insurance a solution reexamination of their are a factor in just 17 percent of personal bankruptcies those incomes closer to poverty than middle class . , for national health insurance to an impact , it would have to define `` medical in a broader than is now either private or government-funded plans ."
"and for you MIT : http :"
null
null
3,624
941
"I was and am fine actually . Do n't know about anyone else , but I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant ? The person searching for truth or the person who claims to know everything ?"
"oh , it 's obvious that non-darwinists have no affect on you guys . Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence ... it 's made up on your worldview and your belief in materialism ."
DISAGREE
"I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant ?"
"Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence"
null
null
3,625
941
"I was and am fine actually . Do n't know about anyone else , but I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant ? The person searching for truth or the person who claims to know everything ?"
"oh , it 's obvious that non-darwinists have no affect on you guys . Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence ... it 's made up on your worldview and your belief in materialism ."
DISAGREE
"The person searching for truth"
"your mind is not made up on the evidence"
null
null
3,623
941
"I was and am fine actually . Do n't know about anyone else , but I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant ? The person searching for truth or the person who claims to know everything ?"
"oh , it 's obvious that non-darwinists have no affect on you guys . Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence ... it 's made up on your worldview and your belief in materialism ."
DISAGREE
"but I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant"
"it 's obvious that non-darwinists have no affect on you guys . Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence"
null
null
3,622
941
"I was and am fine actually . Do n't know about anyone else , but I do n't think you have that much impact on our lives SS Who 's more arrogant ? The person searching for truth or the person who claims to know everything ?"
"oh , it 's obvious that non-darwinists have no affect on you guys . Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence ... it 's made up on your worldview and your belief in materialism ."
DISAGREE
"Who 's more arrogant ? The person searching for truth or the person who claims to know everything ?"
"Nothing will ever change your mind because your mind is not made up on the evidence"
null
null
3,629
942
"those kind of websites are like porn to gun nuts but getting big gun wont compensate for being born with a small one"
"Just as being anti-gun wo n't compensate for being born with a small brain ."
DISAGREE
"getting big gun wont compensate for being born with a small one"
"being anti-gun wo n't compensate for being born with a small brain ."
null
null
3,628
942
"those kind of websites are like porn to gun nuts but getting big gun wont compensate for being born with a small one"
"Just as being anti-gun wo n't compensate for being born with a small brain ."
DISAGREE
"getting big gun born with a small one"
"being anti-gun born with a small brain ."
null
null
3,626
942
"those kind of websites are like porn to gun nuts but getting big gun wont compensate for being born with a small one"
"Just as being anti-gun wo n't compensate for being born with a small brain ."
DISAGREE
"websites are like to gun but compensate for being born with a one"
"anti-gun compensate for being born with a ."
null
null
3,631
943
"Ah good question but there is a difference in topic : The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God to be good or for the rapists to be evil but rather I am posing the question to those who do claim that God is good and there is evil * This thread asks a similar but not quite the same question . Let me affirm : I do not have a beleif in `` God `` . I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
DISAGREE
"The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ?"
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
null
null
3,633
943
"Ah good question but there is a difference in topic : The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God to be good or for the rapists to be evil but rather I am posing the question to those who do claim that God is good and there is evil * This thread asks a similar but not quite the same question . Let me affirm : I do not have a beleif in `` God `` . I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
DISAGREE
"question but there is a in : thread you to asks Why such an and God create a world with evil ? * But first you must not that be good or the rapists rather I am who do that God is good and there is evil * This thread a similar but not quite the same . Let me : I do not in `` God good or evil ."
"So what you 'we ' think is evil ?"
null
null
3,632
943
"Ah good question but there is a difference in topic : The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God to be good or for the rapists to be evil but rather I am posing the question to those who do claim that God is good and there is evil * This thread asks a similar but not quite the same question . Let me affirm : I do not have a beleif in `` God `` . I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
DISAGREE
"Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God"
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
null
null
3,635
943
"Ah good question but there is a difference in topic : The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God to be good or for the rapists to be evil but rather I am posing the question to those who do claim that God is good and there is evil * This thread asks a similar but not quite the same question . Let me affirm : I do not have a beleif in `` God `` . I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
DISAGREE
"those who do claim that God is good and there is evil"
"what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
null
null
3,634
943
"Ah good question but there is a difference in topic : The thread you referred to asks : Why does such an all loving and good God create a world with evil ? * But first you must realize it is not myself that claims for God to be good or for the rapists to be evil but rather I am posing the question to those who do claim that God is good and there is evil * This thread asks a similar but not quite the same question . Let me affirm : I do not have a beleif in `` God `` . I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"So what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
DISAGREE
"I do not beleive in good or evil ."
"what is it that you believe 'we ' think is evil ?"
null
null
3,639
944
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious assumptions and prejudgements , at all ."
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave , really ."
DISAGREE
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious assumptions"
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave ,"
null
null
3,638
944
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious assumptions and prejudgements , at all ."
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave , really ."
DISAGREE
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious"
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave , really ."
null
null
3,637
944
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious assumptions and prejudgements , at all ."
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave , really ."
DISAGREE
"utterly uninfluenced psychologically"
"like how a scientist should aspire to behave"
null
null
3,636
944
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced , psychologically , by any worldview , any metaphysic , any particular set of unconscious assumptions and prejudgements , at all ."
"Rather like how a scientist should aspire to behave , really ."
DISAGREE
"Somebody utterly uninfluenced by unconscious assumptions and prejudgements"
"how a scientist should aspire to behave"
null
null
3,640
945
"and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
"Well , it showed how it was physically possible to generate amino acids from inorganic material . That 's rather impressive . Again , irrelevant and unrelated to the Scientific theory of Evolution , regardless of you trying to create that association . Your continued attempt at doing so despite having been shown and told multiple times that the two are unrelated , well that only shows one thing , namely that you are dishonest ."
DISAGREE
"some `` They are that close how life from"
"how it was to amino acids from inorganic material . That rather . Again , and to the Scientific of Evolution , you that . Your attempt so times that the two are only one thing you are dishonest ."
null
null
3,644
945
"and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
"Well , it showed how it was physically possible to generate amino acids from inorganic material . That 's rather impressive . Again , irrelevant and unrelated to the Scientific theory of Evolution , regardless of you trying to create that association . Your continued attempt at doing so despite having been shown and told multiple times that the two are unrelated , well that only shows one thing , namely that you are dishonest ."
DISAGREE
"people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from"
"Your continued attempt at doing so despite having been shown and told multiple times that the two are unrelated ,"
null
null
3,641
945
"and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
"Well , it showed how it was physically possible to generate amino acids from inorganic material . That 's rather impressive . Again , irrelevant and unrelated to the Scientific theory of Evolution , regardless of you trying to create that association . Your continued attempt at doing so despite having been shown and told multiple times that the two are unrelated , well that only shows one thing , namely that you are dishonest ."
DISAGREE
"showing how life could come from"
"irrelevant and unrelated the two are unrelated"
null
null
3,643
945
"and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
"Well , it showed how it was physically possible to generate amino acids from inorganic material . That 's rather impressive . Again , irrelevant and unrelated to the Scientific theory of Evolution , regardless of you trying to create that association . Your continued attempt at doing so despite having been shown and told multiple times that the two are unrelated , well that only shows one thing , namely that you are dishonest ."
DISAGREE
"They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
"That 's rather impressive . Again , irrelevant and unrelated to the Scientific theory of Evolution , regardless of you trying to create that association ."
null
null
3,647
946
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review . That 's the `` top `` - that 's where the leadership is ."
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees -- the overwhelming majority of whom have no connection with evolution , and most of whom are considerably more politically conservative than university faculties -- are behind the whole thing ? Wow . You know , this sort of claim requires evidence . I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement . Got any ? And who are the `` top `` in the peer-review process ? Editors ? Please explain what you mean ."
DISAGREE
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review ."
"I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement"
null
null
3,649
946
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review . That 's the `` top `` - that 's where the leadership is ."
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees -- the overwhelming majority of whom have no connection with evolution , and most of whom are considerably more politically conservative than university faculties -- are behind the whole thing ? Wow . You know , this sort of claim requires evidence . I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement . Got any ? And who are the `` top `` in the peer-review process ? Editors ? Please explain what you mean ."
DISAGREE
"university administrations peer review That 's the `` top `` - that 's where the leadership is ."
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees most of whom are considerably more politically conservative than university faculties I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement . Got any ? And who are the `` top `` in the peer-review process ? Editors ? Please explain what you mean ."
null
null
3,648
946
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review . That 's the `` top `` - that 's where the leadership is ."
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees -- the overwhelming majority of whom have no connection with evolution , and most of whom are considerably more politically conservative than university faculties -- are behind the whole thing ? Wow . You know , this sort of claim requires evidence . I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement . Got any ? And who are the `` top `` in the peer-review process ? Editors ? Please explain what you mean ."
DISAGREE
"'s established in university administrations and peer review"
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees --"
null
null
3,646
946
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review . That 's the `` top `` - that 's where the leadership is ."
"Really ? So , university presidents and trustees -- the overwhelming majority of whom have no connection with evolution , and most of whom are considerably more politically conservative than university faculties -- are behind the whole thing ? Wow . You know , this sort of claim requires evidence . I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement . Got any ? And who are the `` top `` in the peer-review process ? Editors ? Please explain what you mean ."
DISAGREE
"It 's established in university administrations and peer review"
"I would like see your evidence of university administration involvement ."
null
null
3,653
947
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created . When you look at humans and apes as being of a different nature , some quantum leap had to have occurred . While the physical ( common usage ) human may have evolved from ape , that essense of what makes humans human occurred in a much different manner . Comparing the DNA of humans and apes tells us nothing about the differences of the two . That which makes humans human does not reside in the physical self , it is of another nature . So the creationist are right in concept at least . In short the limited theory of quantum potential simply contends the nature of our existence is to recognize our potential , to prepare for the next quantum leap . Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
DISAGREE
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) ."
null
null
3,654
947
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created . When you look at humans and apes as being of a different nature , some quantum leap had to have occurred . While the physical ( common usage ) human may have evolved from ape , that essense of what makes humans human occurred in a much different manner . Comparing the DNA of humans and apes tells us nothing about the differences of the two . That which makes humans human does not reside in the physical self , it is of another nature . So the creationist are right in concept at least . In short the limited theory of quantum potential simply contends the nature of our existence is to recognize our potential , to prepare for the next quantum leap . Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
DISAGREE
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created"
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing"
null
null
3,650
947
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created . When you look at humans and apes as being of a different nature , some quantum leap had to have occurred . While the physical ( common usage ) human may have evolved from ape , that essense of what makes humans human occurred in a much different manner . Comparing the DNA of humans and apes tells us nothing about the differences of the two . That which makes humans human does not reside in the physical self , it is of another nature . So the creationist are right in concept at least . In short the limited theory of quantum potential simply contends the nature of our existence is to recognize our potential , to prepare for the next quantum leap . Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
DISAGREE
"a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created"
"An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true ."
null
null
3,651
947
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created . When you look at humans and apes as being of a different nature , some quantum leap had to have occurred . While the physical ( common usage ) human may have evolved from ape , that essense of what makes humans human occurred in a much different manner . Comparing the DNA of humans and apes tells us nothing about the differences of the two . That which makes humans human does not reside in the physical self , it is of another nature . So the creationist are right in concept at least . In short the limited theory of quantum potential simply contends the nature of our existence is to recognize our potential , to prepare for the next quantum leap . Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
DISAGREE
"Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
null
null
3,652
947
"What we see throughout the history of the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created . When you look at humans and apes as being of a different nature , some quantum leap had to have occurred . While the physical ( common usage ) human may have evolved from ape , that essense of what makes humans human occurred in a much different manner . Comparing the DNA of humans and apes tells us nothing about the differences of the two . That which makes humans human does not reside in the physical self , it is of another nature . So the creationist are right in concept at least . In short the limited theory of quantum potential simply contends the nature of our existence is to recognize our potential , to prepare for the next quantum leap . Once that idea is internalized , one can see how limited our current views are ."
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
DISAGREE
"the universe is a continuous cycle of things becoming more complex and things of a different nature being created"
"You 've got it backwards , disorder in the universe is increasing , ( see entropy ) . An increase in complexity does not mean there is an increase in organized matter , the opposite is true . A random pile of building material is more complex then a house which is created from that same pile of building materials , because that material is now organized . To make matters worse , organized matter increases entropy because it takes energy to organize it ."
null
null
3,659
948
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting . I suspect this was simply intended to be a PRIVATE SCREENING of a film . Private screening are extremely common in the film world . The whole idea of a private screening is that ... well , it 's private . Meaning , only some people are allowed to the screening . If they were rejecting people at the door , it was obviously a private screening , so one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited . This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film . So essentially , someone who 's eager to play the hypocrisy card blogs about trying to sneak into a private screening of a film , but getting kicked out while his celebrity companion managed to get in . Big whoopin ' deal . Since there does n't seem to actually be any objective reporting done on this event , here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light ... Did Richard Dawkins just crash the party at a screening of  “ Expelled ” ? Some of the comments in the comments section there also shed light on the incident ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu . It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night . Here 's a link to Mathis discussing the making of the movie , the process they utilized and how they did n't quote the scientists interviewed out of context at all . The scientists even got the questions they would ask in advance when requested . http : //intelligentdesign.podOmatic.c ... 15_39_42-08_00"
DISAGREE
"Private screening are extremely common in the film world"
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu"
null
null
3,657
948
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting . I suspect this was simply intended to be a PRIVATE SCREENING of a film . Private screening are extremely common in the film world . The whole idea of a private screening is that ... well , it 's private . Meaning , only some people are allowed to the screening . If they were rejecting people at the door , it was obviously a private screening , so one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited . This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film . So essentially , someone who 's eager to play the hypocrisy card blogs about trying to sneak into a private screening of a film , but getting kicked out while his celebrity companion managed to get in . Big whoopin ' deal . Since there does n't seem to actually be any objective reporting done on this event , here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light ... Did Richard Dawkins just crash the party at a screening of  “ Expelled ” ? Some of the comments in the comments section there also shed light on the incident ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu . It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night . Here 's a link to Mathis discussing the making of the movie , the process they utilized and how they did n't quote the scientists interviewed out of context at all . The scientists even got the questions they would ask in advance when requested . http : //intelligentdesign.podOmatic.c ... 15_39_42-08_00"
DISAGREE
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu ."
null
null
3,655
948
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting . I suspect this was simply intended to be a PRIVATE SCREENING of a film . Private screening are extremely common in the film world . The whole idea of a private screening is that ... well , it 's private . Meaning , only some people are allowed to the screening . If they were rejecting people at the door , it was obviously a private screening , so one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited . This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film . So essentially , someone who 's eager to play the hypocrisy card blogs about trying to sneak into a private screening of a film , but getting kicked out while his celebrity companion managed to get in . Big whoopin ' deal . Since there does n't seem to actually be any objective reporting done on this event , here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light ... Did Richard Dawkins just crash the party at a screening of  “ Expelled ” ? Some of the comments in the comments section there also shed light on the incident ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu . It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night . Here 's a link to Mathis discussing the making of the movie , the process they utilized and how they did n't quote the scientists interviewed out of context at all . The scientists even got the questions they would ask in advance when requested . http : //intelligentdesign.podOmatic.c ... 15_39_42-08_00"
DISAGREE
"This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film"
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story ."
null
null
3,656
948
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting . I suspect this was simply intended to be a PRIVATE SCREENING of a film . Private screening are extremely common in the film world . The whole idea of a private screening is that ... well , it 's private . Meaning , only some people are allowed to the screening . If they were rejecting people at the door , it was obviously a private screening , so one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited . This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film . So essentially , someone who 's eager to play the hypocrisy card blogs about trying to sneak into a private screening of a film , but getting kicked out while his celebrity companion managed to get in . Big whoopin ' deal . Since there does n't seem to actually be any objective reporting done on this event , here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light ... Did Richard Dawkins just crash the party at a screening of  “ Expelled ” ? Some of the comments in the comments section there also shed light on the incident ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu . It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night . Here 's a link to Mathis discussing the making of the movie , the process they utilized and how they did n't quote the scientists interviewed out of context at all . The scientists even got the questions they would ask in advance when requested . http : //intelligentdesign.podOmatic.c ... 15_39_42-08_00"
DISAGREE
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu ."
null
null
3,658
948
"Here we have a case of an event where we definitely need some objective reporting . I suspect this was simply intended to be a PRIVATE SCREENING of a film . Private screening are extremely common in the film world . The whole idea of a private screening is that ... well , it 's private . Meaning , only some people are allowed to the screening . If they were rejecting people at the door , it was obviously a private screening , so one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited . This does n't sound like a case of anyone trying to bring science in to challenge something , but rather someone trying to crash a private screening of a film . So essentially , someone who 's eager to play the hypocrisy card blogs about trying to sneak into a private screening of a film , but getting kicked out while his celebrity companion managed to get in . Big whoopin ' deal . Since there does n't seem to actually be any objective reporting done on this event , here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light ... Did Richard Dawkins just crash the party at a screening of  “ Expelled ” ? Some of the comments in the comments section there also shed light on the incident ."
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu . It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night . Here 's a link to Mathis discussing the making of the movie , the process they utilized and how they did n't quote the scientists interviewed out of context at all . The scientists even got the questions they would ask in advance when requested . http : //intelligentdesign.podOmatic.c ... 15_39_42-08_00"
DISAGREE
"one has to wonder why these guys were trying to get in to begin with if they were n't invited here 's a different blog entry of the event that presents it in a different ( and probably more realistic ) light"
"Thanks for posting the other side of the story jyoshu It helps to give a much more balanced look at what happened that night ."
null
null
3,660
949
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space . Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . You are in no better position than I am . You do n't know anymore than I do . Science has admitted that antarctica was much warmer several thousand years ago ... not only that but the following map shows that the continent was not frozen . And if it was not frozen several hundreds years ago .... and it was not frozen 4-5,000 years ago , as it was stated on this next seal link , then it 's pretty safe to say that animals and humans could have both been there in recent history ( within a few thousand years . ) I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted ..... and there 's got to be a reason for this drastic change in temperatures . http : //www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ent-seals.html In an Antarctic `` ghost town , `` freeze-dried whiskers , skin , and bones provide evidence that the South Pole was a much warmer place not too long ago , a new study reveals . '' We thought , This is really strange . If they are elephant seals , what are they doing here ? `` Hall said . The discovery , scientists say , is the first hard evidence for a warming period in the region between 2,300 and 1,100 years ago . An earlier warming period , between 6,000 and 4,000 years ago , has been recognized by other researchers and is believed to have been widespread , at least throughout the Southern Hemisphere . ( so widespread that there was n't snow on the ground and it was n't frozen over ! )"
DISAGREE
"wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"'s only wishful thinking that they have n't ."
null
null
3,663
949
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space . Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . You are in no better position than I am . You do n't know anymore than I do . Science has admitted that antarctica was much warmer several thousand years ago ... not only that but the following map shows that the continent was not frozen . And if it was not frozen several hundreds years ago .... and it was not frozen 4-5,000 years ago , as it was stated on this next seal link , then it 's pretty safe to say that animals and humans could have both been there in recent history ( within a few thousand years . ) I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted ..... and there 's got to be a reason for this drastic change in temperatures . http : //www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ent-seals.html In an Antarctic `` ghost town , `` freeze-dried whiskers , skin , and bones provide evidence that the South Pole was a much warmer place not too long ago , a new study reveals . '' We thought , This is really strange . If they are elephant seals , what are they doing here ? `` Hall said . The discovery , scientists say , is the first hard evidence for a warming period in the region between 2,300 and 1,100 years ago . An earlier warming period , between 6,000 and 4,000 years ago , has been recognized by other researchers and is believed to have been widespread , at least throughout the Southern Hemisphere . ( so widespread that there was n't snow on the ground and it was n't frozen over ! )"
DISAGREE
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't ."
null
null
3,664
949
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space . Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . You are in no better position than I am . You do n't know anymore than I do . Science has admitted that antarctica was much warmer several thousand years ago ... not only that but the following map shows that the continent was not frozen . And if it was not frozen several hundreds years ago .... and it was not frozen 4-5,000 years ago , as it was stated on this next seal link , then it 's pretty safe to say that animals and humans could have both been there in recent history ( within a few thousand years . ) I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted ..... and there 's got to be a reason for this drastic change in temperatures . http : //www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ent-seals.html In an Antarctic `` ghost town , `` freeze-dried whiskers , skin , and bones provide evidence that the South Pole was a much warmer place not too long ago , a new study reveals . '' We thought , This is really strange . If they are elephant seals , what are they doing here ? `` Hall said . The discovery , scientists say , is the first hard evidence for a warming period in the region between 2,300 and 1,100 years ago . An earlier warming period , between 6,000 and 4,000 years ago , has been recognized by other researchers and is believed to have been widespread , at least throughout the Southern Hemisphere . ( so widespread that there was n't snow on the ground and it was n't frozen over ! )"
DISAGREE
"Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't"
null
null
3,662
949
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space . Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . You are in no better position than I am . You do n't know anymore than I do . Science has admitted that antarctica was much warmer several thousand years ago ... not only that but the following map shows that the continent was not frozen . And if it was not frozen several hundreds years ago .... and it was not frozen 4-5,000 years ago , as it was stated on this next seal link , then it 's pretty safe to say that animals and humans could have both been there in recent history ( within a few thousand years . ) I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted ..... and there 's got to be a reason for this drastic change in temperatures . http : //www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ent-seals.html In an Antarctic `` ghost town , `` freeze-dried whiskers , skin , and bones provide evidence that the South Pole was a much warmer place not too long ago , a new study reveals . '' We thought , This is really strange . If they are elephant seals , what are they doing here ? `` Hall said . The discovery , scientists say , is the first hard evidence for a warming period in the region between 2,300 and 1,100 years ago . An earlier warming period , between 6,000 and 4,000 years ago , has been recognized by other researchers and is believed to have been widespread , at least throughout the Southern Hemisphere . ( so widespread that there was n't snow on the ground and it was n't frozen over ! )"
DISAGREE
"coast drawn sideways to save space ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't ."
null
null
3,661
949
"Piri Reis ' map merely shows a continuation of the S.American coast drawn sideways to save space . Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof that Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . You are in no better position than I am . You do n't know anymore than I do . Science has admitted that antarctica was much warmer several thousand years ago ... not only that but the following map shows that the continent was not frozen . And if it was not frozen several hundreds years ago .... and it was not frozen 4-5,000 years ago , as it was stated on this next seal link , then it 's pretty safe to say that animals and humans could have both been there in recent history ( within a few thousand years . ) I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted ..... and there 's got to be a reason for this drastic change in temperatures . http : //www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ent-seals.html In an Antarctic `` ghost town , `` freeze-dried whiskers , skin , and bones provide evidence that the South Pole was a much warmer place not too long ago , a new study reveals . '' We thought , This is really strange . If they are elephant seals , what are they doing here ? `` Hall said . The discovery , scientists say , is the first hard evidence for a warming period in the region between 2,300 and 1,100 years ago . An earlier warming period , between 6,000 and 4,000 years ago , has been recognized by other researchers and is believed to have been widespread , at least throughout the Southern Hemisphere . ( so widespread that there was n't snow on the ground and it was n't frozen over ! )"
DISAGREE
"Only really wishful thinking could turn it into proof Antarctica has been joined to S.America in human times ."
"And it 's only wishful thinking that they have n't . I agree this is no proof that it was attached , however , it is proof that the weather/temperature was DRASTICALLY different on antarctica than science has admitted `` ''"
null
null
3,667
950
"I beg your pardon ? How did you arrive at pregnancy versus death ? Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't . Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening ?"
DISAGREE
"How did you arrive at pregnancy versus death ? Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't . Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening ?"
null
null
3,665
950
"I beg your pardon ? How did you arrive at pregnancy versus death ? Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't . Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening ?"
DISAGREE
"Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death"
"Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening"
null
null
3,668
950
"I beg your pardon ? How did you arrive at pregnancy versus death ? Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't . Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening ?"
DISAGREE
"Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't"
null
null
3,666
950
"I beg your pardon ? How did you arrive at pregnancy versus death ? Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Sometimes a pregancy means death . Most of the time it does n't . Are we allowed to make this distinction since you brought it up or must we treat every pregnancy as life threatening ?"
DISAGREE
"Did you know that sometimes pregnancy can mean death ?"
"Most of the time it does n't ."
null
null
3,673
951
"I am a Christian , so I believe that the meaning of life is to be re-acquainted with God and to live your life in according to his Word . Which , in my opinion is a far better life than : `` I 'm born of chance , I did n't ask to be here , I serve no purpose , so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life ends. ``"
"78.4 years ? Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that . I was thinking about 112.7 years . Yeah . That 's about right ."
DISAGREE
"I am a Christian , so I believe that the meaning of life is to be re-acquainted with God and to live your life in according to his Word ."
"Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that"
null
null
3,672
951
"I am a Christian , so I believe that the meaning of life is to be re-acquainted with God and to live your life in according to his Word . Which , in my opinion is a far better life than : `` I 'm born of chance , I did n't ask to be here , I serve no purpose , so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life ends. ``"
"78.4 years ? Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that . I was thinking about 112.7 years . Yeah . That 's about right ."
DISAGREE
"I serve no purpose , so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life ends. ``"
"excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that ."
null
null
3,674
951
"I am a Christian , so I believe that the meaning of life is to be re-acquainted with God and to live your life in according to his Word . Which , in my opinion is a far better life than : `` I 'm born of chance , I did n't ask to be here , I serve no purpose , so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life ends. ``"
"78.4 years ? Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that . I was thinking about 112.7 years . Yeah . That 's about right ."
DISAGREE
"Which , in my opinion is a far better life than"
"Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that"
null
null
3,671
951
"I am a Christian , so I believe that the meaning of life is to be re-acquainted with God and to live your life in according to his Word . Which , in my opinion is a far better life than : `` I 'm born of chance , I did n't ask to be here , I serve no purpose , so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life ends. ``"
"78.4 years ? Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that . I was thinking about 112.7 years . Yeah . That 's about right ."
DISAGREE
"so I might as well live egocentrically for the next 78.4 years until my life"
"78.4 years ? Well excuse me but I intend to live much longer than that"
null
null
3,677
952
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism ."
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
DISAGREE
"with the possible exception of empiticism"
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical"
null
null
3,679
952
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism ."
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
DISAGREE
"so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy ,"
"you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
null
null
3,678
952
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism ."
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
DISAGREE
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy"
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific"
null
null
3,675
952
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism ."
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
DISAGREE
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy"
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
null
null
3,676
952
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism ."
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
DISAGREE
"However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_"
"Then you concede that EAM is not scientific , since its premise is philosophical ."
null
null
3,681
953
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever . Fourth change in 8 years . http : //timesofindia.indiatimes.com/N ... ow/1614628.cms"
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth . While I live across the river in Parkville , Missouri , I used to live in Overland Park Kansas and went to school there . I think they are generally pretty good public schools , it 's just the state school board that keeps effing everything up when they get some christonazis on board ."
AGREE
"Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever"
"I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth"
null
null
3,682
953
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever . Fourth change in 8 years . http : //timesofindia.indiatimes.com/N ... ow/1614628.cms"
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth . While I live across the river in Parkville , Missouri , I used to live in Overland Park Kansas and went to school there . I think they are generally pretty good public schools , it 's just the state school board that keeps effing everything up when they get some christonazis on board ."
AGREE
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever . Fourth change in 8 years ."
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth . While I live across the river in Parkville , Missouri , I used to live in Overland Park Kansas and went to school there . I think they are generally pretty good public schools , it 's just the state school board that keeps effing everything up when they get some christonazis on board ."
null
null
3,683
953
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever . Fourth change in 8 years . http : //timesofindia.indiatimes.com/N ... ow/1614628.cms"
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth . While I live across the river in Parkville , Missouri , I used to live in Overland Park Kansas and went to school there . I think they are generally pretty good public schools , it 's just the state school board that keeps effing everything up when they get some christonazis on board ."
AGREE
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever ."
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth ."
null
null
3,680
953
"It 's finally changed back . Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever . Fourth change in 8 years . http : //timesofindia.indiatimes.com/N ... ow/1614628.cms"
"Thank God . I too hope it does n't keep going back and forth . While I live across the river in Parkville , Missouri , I used to live in Overland Park Kansas and went to school there . I think they are generally pretty good public schools , it 's just the state school board that keeps effing everything up when they get some christonazis on board ."
AGREE
"Hopefully it wo n't continue to go in this back and forth forever"
"hope it does n't keep going back and forth ."
null
null
3,684
954
"I 'm not too familiar with this ... does this mean the US will be funding organizations outside the US that support or perform abortions ( or can ) or does it mean they will be able to fund organizations that are foreign owned and have operations in the US ? Hopefully someone will know"
"Obama overturns ban on overseas abortion funding I thought abortion was the fix for bad or no family planning"
DISAGREE
"I 'm not too familiar with this"
"I thought abortion was the fix for bad or no family planning"
null
null
3,686
954
"I 'm not too familiar with this ... does this mean the US will be funding organizations outside the US that support or perform abortions ( or can ) or does it mean they will be able to fund organizations that are foreign owned and have operations in the US ? Hopefully someone will know"
"Obama overturns ban on overseas abortion funding I thought abortion was the fix for bad or no family planning"
DISAGREE
"Hopefully someone will know"
"Obama overturns ban on overseas abortion funding"
null
null
3,685
954
"I 'm not too familiar with this ... does this mean the US will be funding organizations outside the US that support or perform abortions ( or can ) or does it mean they will be able to fund organizations that are foreign owned and have operations in the US ? Hopefully someone will know"
"Obama overturns ban on overseas abortion funding I thought abortion was the fix for bad or no family planning"
DISAGREE
"I 'm not too familiar with this ... does this mean the US will be funding organizations outside the US that support or perform abortions ( or can ) or does it mean they will be able to fund organizations that are foreign owned and have operations in the US ?"
"Obama overturns ban on overseas abortion funding I thought abortion was the fix for bad or no family planning"
null
null
3,691
955
"Of all those likely to be mislead by your statement , it 's young impressionable school children . Publicly paid school teachers misleading them with statements like that , without a full explanation ( prohibited by the courts ) does get an establishment of atheism started . It 's what I mean when I say that when church and state are separated , atheism and state are combined . Maybe government could be neutral , if it was small . The U.S. government is no longer small ."
"Paranoia is so ugly . It 's not OK to teach scientific theory but it is OK to tell them that mythology is fact ?"
DISAGREE
"atheism and state are combined . Maybe government could be neutral"
"Paranoia is so ugly"
null
null
3,688
955
"Of all those likely to be mislead by your statement , it 's young impressionable school children . Publicly paid school teachers misleading them with statements like that , without a full explanation ( prohibited by the courts ) does get an establishment of atheism started . It 's what I mean when I say that when church and state are separated , atheism and state are combined . Maybe government could be neutral , if it was small . The U.S. government is no longer small ."
"Paranoia is so ugly . It 's not OK to teach scientific theory but it is OK to tell them that mythology is fact ?"
DISAGREE
"Publicly paid school teachers misleading them with statements"
"It 's not OK to teach scientific theory but it is OK to tell them that mythology is fact ?"
null
null
3,689
955
"Of all those likely to be mislead by your statement , it 's young impressionable school children . Publicly paid school teachers misleading them with statements like that , without a full explanation ( prohibited by the courts ) does get an establishment of atheism started . It 's what I mean when I say that when church and state are separated , atheism and state are combined . Maybe government could be neutral , if it was small . The U.S. government is no longer small ."
"Paranoia is so ugly . It 's not OK to teach scientific theory but it is OK to tell them that mythology is fact ?"
DISAGREE
"likely to be mislead by your statement"
"It 's not OK to teach scientific theory but it is OK to tell them that mythology is fact"
null
null
3,694
956
"False , since Copernicus had already propsed same , it was really because Gallieo was a jerk with the Pope and Church authorities . No one else was treated like him . He was a `` special `` case . - Click Here"
"He was n't that special a case . Let 's not forget about Giordano Bruno who was burned at the stake for refusing to recant his idea that that the stars in the sky were all suns with worlds and intellegent beings on them . http : //galileo.rice.edu/chr/bruno.html but alas : It is often maintained that Bruno was executed because of his Copernicanism and his belief in the infinity of inhabited worlds . In fact , we do not know the exact grounds on which he was declared a heretic because his file is missing from the records . All the same , he was burned for being a heretic ."
DISAGREE
"No one else was treated like him . He was a `` special ``"
"He was n't that special a case"
null
null
3,693
956
"False , since Copernicus had already propsed same , it was really because Gallieo was a jerk with the Pope and Church authorities . No one else was treated like him . He was a `` special `` case . - Click Here"
"He was n't that special a case . Let 's not forget about Giordano Bruno who was burned at the stake for refusing to recant his idea that that the stars in the sky were all suns with worlds and intellegent beings on them . http : //galileo.rice.edu/chr/bruno.html but alas : It is often maintained that Bruno was executed because of his Copernicanism and his belief in the infinity of inhabited worlds . In fact , we do not know the exact grounds on which he was declared a heretic because his file is missing from the records . All the same , he was burned for being a heretic ."
DISAGREE
"He was a `` special `` case"
"He was n't that special a case"
null
null
3,692
956
"False , since Copernicus had already propsed same , it was really because Gallieo was a jerk with the Pope and Church authorities . No one else was treated like him . He was a `` special `` case . - Click Here"
"He was n't that special a case . Let 's not forget about Giordano Bruno who was burned at the stake for refusing to recant his idea that that the stars in the sky were all suns with worlds and intellegent beings on them . http : //galileo.rice.edu/chr/bruno.html but alas : It is often maintained that Bruno was executed because of his Copernicanism and his belief in the infinity of inhabited worlds . In fact , we do not know the exact grounds on which he was declared a heretic because his file is missing from the records . All the same , he was burned for being a heretic ."
DISAGREE
"False , since Copernicus had already propsed same , it was really because Gallieo was a jerk with the Pope and Church authorities . No one else was treated like him . He was a `` special `` case"
"He was n't that special a case . Let 's not forget about Giordano Bruno who was burned at the stake for refusing to recant his idea that that the stars in the sky were all suns with worlds and intellegent beings on them ."
null
null
3,696
957
"1 . Reason does not imply truth , it 's a method of separating truth from what is false ,"
"In which you contradict your first clause with the second . You say reason is n't about finding truth ; but separating if from what is false ; which is to find what is truth !"
DISAGREE
"Reason does not imply truth , it 's a method of separating truth from what is false ,"
"In which you contradict your first clause with the second . You say reason is n't about finding truth ; but separating if from what is false ; which is to find what is truth !"
null
null
3,698
957
"1 . Reason does not imply truth , it 's a method of separating truth from what is false ,"
"In which you contradict your first clause with the second . You say reason is n't about finding truth ; but separating if from what is false ; which is to find what is truth !"
DISAGREE
"Reason does not imply truth"
"In which you contradict your first clause"
null
null
3,699
957
"1 . Reason does not imply truth , it 's a method of separating truth from what is false ,"
"In which you contradict your first clause with the second . You say reason is n't about finding truth ; but separating if from what is false ; which is to find what is truth !"
DISAGREE
"separating truth from what is false"
"separating if from what is false"
null
null
3,700
958
"Do you believe that a fetus in a women 's body is just undeveloped tissue or a start in where human life begins ? Undeveloped tissue . Both . Human life ."
"Both . It 's where a human life begins but not a life yet ."
AGREE
"a fetus in a women 's body is just undeveloped tissue or a start in where human life begins ?"
"Both . It 's where a human life begins but not a life yet ."
null
null
3,706
959
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar 's and to God the things that are God 's . And good moral character is one of the things to render unto God . So , the answer is there is a higher Law than the Constitution . God rules ! And now the verse of the day : A man who remains stiff-necked after many rebukes will suddenly be destroyed -- without remedy . - Proverbs 29:1"
AGREE
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"So , the answer is there is a higher Law than the Constitution . God rules !"
null
null
3,705
959
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar 's and to God the things that are God 's . And good moral character is one of the things to render unto God . So , the answer is there is a higher Law than the Constitution . God rules ! And now the verse of the day : A man who remains stiff-necked after many rebukes will suddenly be destroyed -- without remedy . - Proverbs 29:1"
AGREE
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"So , the answer is there is a higher Law than the Constitution . God rules !"
null
null
3,707
959
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar 's and to God the things that are God 's . And good moral character is one of the things to render unto God . So , the answer is there is a higher Law than the Constitution . God rules ! And now the verse of the day : A man who remains stiff-necked after many rebukes will suddenly be destroyed -- without remedy . - Proverbs 29:1"
AGREE
"Is the bible our constitution ?"
"there is a higher Law than the Constitution"
null
null
3,711
967
"Since that would be me let 's go over my position and you tell me which parts are n't reasonable and why :"
"Time to get a helmet ..."
DISAGREE
"let 's go over my position"
"to get a helmet"
null
null