Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
37,403
9,800
"Prove that it is untrustworthy ... It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization ."
"This was done in my post # 7 of this thread . I showed that the research articles NARTH claims to quote say something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what NARTH pretends ..."
DISAGREE
"It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization ."
"This was done in my post # 7 of this thread . I"
null
null
37,414
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm"
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA"
null
null
37,406
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen ."
"comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
null
null
37,409
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't ``"
null
null
37,410
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in"
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't ``"
null
null
37,407
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen ."
"The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
null
null
37,413
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm"
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA ,"
null
null
37,408
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic ."
"they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count ."
null
null
37,411
9,801
"This is truly one of the most idiotic `` FAQs `` I have ever seen . Though when I say idiotic I really mean `` dishonest `` . And when I say `` FAQs `` I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old . http : //members.tripod.com/~antilemming/main.htm in 1997 . Although you have taken out the bit about how maybe Stalin did n't really kill many people . I am astounded by the logic . In the original FAQ , China and Vietnam are also identified as `` successful socialist states `` , and North Korea as a `` socialist state `` , along with glorious Cuba ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count . Oh yes and I as a communist have read more than this like Communist Manifesto , Das Kapital , and The State and Revolution . and I have read much history of the USSR and I frequently visit a communist forum . And I have read the Soviet documents from the 30 's , most `` Modern Information `` comes from Nazi William Hearst , Robert Conquest , and The Fascist Alexander Solzhenitsyn ."
DISAGREE
"I mean piles of steaming turd . You appear to have cut and pasted this from a website created by a 15 year old ."
"You listed the wrong website it is from the YCLUSA , they never talked about Stalin , and China and Vietnam have less laws limiting Capitalism than the US does so thay do n't count ."
null
null
37,415
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission ."
null
null
37,422
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal"
"Would that be OK for them to do ?"
null
null
37,416
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission"
null
null
37,419
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ?"
null
null
37,418
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ?"
null
null
37,423
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ?"
null
null
37,417
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ?"
null
null
37,421
9,802
"The person paying for the disposal ."
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ? What if they said that because of organ donor shortages that now it would be law in your state that when you die , all of your organs would be taken out of your body and reused without your permission . Would that be OK for them to do ?"
DISAGREE
"The person paying for the disposal"
"So you believe that the person who is going to die has no say so in the matter of what happens to their body ?"
null
null
37,430
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for ."
null
null
37,427
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for ."
null
null
37,425
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
null
null
37,428
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for ."
null
null
37,429
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for ."
null
null
37,431
9,803
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created for . One must wonder if BS can have several uses to man and ID has but one which is the more valuable ?"
AGREE
"Does it have any use at all , aside from promoting a religious agenda ?"
"That is the only purpose it was created"
null
null
37,435
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
null
null
37,441
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate"
"Fair enough ."
null
null
37,433
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
null
null
37,434
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
null
null
37,440
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz"
"Fair enough ."
null
null
37,439
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life"
"Fair enough ."
null
null
37,438
9,804
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough . However , before we start I would like to clarify a few minor points in your opening challenge ."
AGREE
"The purpose of this thread is to continue/reboot the debate between myself and Chuz Life within the general topic of abortion legality ."
"Fair enough ."
null
null
37,447
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,444
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,443
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,448
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,449
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts"
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,450
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,442
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"`` was ruled on by the courts . our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,446
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally ``"
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,445
9,805
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts . What is discussed above is entirely separate . To say something brief to get you up to speed , our state constitution CAN NOT violate the federal constitution . So if Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment , then Prop 8 loses . Whether or not Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment is the question that is currently being examined ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
AGREE
"Do you not understand what is currently going on ? The ruling on whether the California state constitutional amendment was enacted `` legally `` was ruled on by the courts ."
"If DOMA is n't declared unconstitutional , then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind ."
null
null
37,453
9,806
"Is this another personal attack ? Or is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda so you feel you must lash out like an angry child ? Is that your issue lyteboy ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money . The fact that you do n't know any better than to do that with your money is telling , though . If you think that the C ( R ) SC actually does ID-based scientific research , you 're exactly the dupe they 're looking for . I 'm serious . Do the research for yourself . I wo n't even give you links , because you 'll blow them off as propaganda . Find any scientific journal article written by a DI member that 's actually based on actual scientific experimentation or investigation and supports ID . I dare you ."
DISAGREE
"Is this another personal attack ? Or is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda so you feel you must lash out like an angry child ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money . The fact that you do n't know any better than to do that with your money is telling , though ."
null
null
37,452
9,806
"Is this another personal attack ? Or is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda so you feel you must lash out like an angry child ? Is that your issue lyteboy ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money . The fact that you do n't know any better than to do that with your money is telling , though . If you think that the C ( R ) SC actually does ID-based scientific research , you 're exactly the dupe they 're looking for . I 'm serious . Do the research for yourself . I wo n't even give you links , because you 'll blow them off as propaganda . Find any scientific journal article written by a DI member that 's actually based on actual scientific experimentation or investigation and supports ID . I dare you ."
DISAGREE
"Is is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda"
"If you think that the C ( R ) SC actually does ID-based scientific research , you 're exactly the dupe they 're looking for ."
null
null
37,456
9,806
"Is this another personal attack ? Or is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda so you feel you must lash out like an angry child ? Is that your issue lyteboy ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money . The fact that you do n't know any better than to do that with your money is telling , though . If you think that the C ( R ) SC actually does ID-based scientific research , you 're exactly the dupe they 're looking for . I 'm serious . Do the research for yourself . I wo n't even give you links , because you 'll blow them off as propaganda . Find any scientific journal article written by a DI member that 's actually based on actual scientific experimentation or investigation and supports ID . I dare you ."
DISAGREE
"is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money ."
null
null
37,459
9,806
"Is this another personal attack ? Or is it killing you that i would donate money to an organization that opposes your secular humanist agenda so you feel you must lash out like an angry child ? Is that your issue lyteboy ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money . The fact that you do n't know any better than to do that with your money is telling , though . If you think that the C ( R ) SC actually does ID-based scientific research , you 're exactly the dupe they 're looking for . I 'm serious . Do the research for yourself . I wo n't even give you links , because you 'll blow them off as propaganda . Find any scientific journal article written by a DI member that 's actually based on actual scientific experimentation or investigation and supports ID . I dare you ."
DISAGREE
"Is this another personal attack ?"
"You can do whatever you want to do with your money ."
null
null
37,466
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being"
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ?"
null
null
37,468
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ?"
null
null
37,467
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks ,"
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ?"
null
null
37,463
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a"
null
null
37,460
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .."
"but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
null
null
37,464
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw ."
null
null
37,462
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"its killing a baby but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person should automatically be the legal one ."
null
null
37,461
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .."
"However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two"
null
null
37,465
9,807
"um ... gee ... its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being .. at 4 weeks , its a fish .. at 5 .. its a rodent .. but after 8 .. its in the shape of a human ... there is no way around that fact ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ? That 's your line to draw . However , I doubt you could persuade many courts that 'looking like a human ' was a valid qualifier for being a person . Everyone draws the line somewhere - be it conception , birth , or some point in between the two ( if not before or after , in some cases ) . That does n't mean that their version of 'the line ' should automatically be the legal one . At the moment ( in the UK , at least ) , that line is legally drawn at the point when the baby becomes viable ; that is , when it could potentially survive a premature birth . Before that point , everyone can choose their own qualifiers . You can argue that the line should be legally redrawn ... but I doubt 'looking like a human ' will be considered the strongest of arguments ."
DISAGREE
"its killing a baby ... now .. before 8 weeks , its not in the form of a human being ."
"So you only class an abortion as something that occurs 8 weeks after conception ?"
null
null
37,469
9,808
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve via phenotypic plasticity ?"
"Yes ."
DISAGREE
"Do you really doubt me"
"Yes ."
null
null
37,471
9,808
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve via phenotypic plasticity ?"
"Yes ."
DISAGREE
"Do you really doubt me"
"Yes ."
null
null
37,472
9,808
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve via phenotypic plasticity ?"
"Yes ."
DISAGREE
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve"
"Yes"
null
null
37,470
9,808
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve via phenotypic plasticity ?"
"Yes ."
DISAGREE
"Do you really doubt me"
"Yes ."
null
null
37,473
9,808
"Do you really doubt me when I tell you that all these show to evolve via phenotypic plasticity ?"
"Yes ."
DISAGREE
"Do you really doubt me"
"Yes"
null
null
37,478
9,809
"Same with birds -- who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant . How well a bird flies is very important . If a bird is born with feathers in the wrong position , it will probably not fly well and will have a much harder time evading predators ."
DISAGREE
"who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant ."
null
null
37,476
9,809
"Same with birds -- who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant . How well a bird flies is very important . If a bird is born with feathers in the wrong position , it will probably not fly well and will have a much harder time evading predators ."
DISAGREE
"who all look basically the same"
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically"
null
null
37,475
9,809
"Same with birds -- who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant . How well a bird flies is very important . If a bird is born with feathers in the wrong position , it will probably not fly well and will have a much harder time evading predators ."
DISAGREE
"all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant"
null
null
37,477
9,809
"Same with birds -- who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How something `` looks basically `` is basically irrelevant . How well a bird flies is very important . If a bird is born with feathers in the wrong position , it will probably not fly well and will have a much harder time evading predators ."
DISAGREE
"who all look basically the same in a given population ."
"How well a bird flies is very important . If a bird is born with feathers"
null
null
37,481
9,810
"I do n't think pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare . If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ? That 's what pro-choice groups do . Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ? yup , they do that too . As an individual , i give up time and resources to help the local family planning clinic . I ran sexual health campaigns at college . I recently did a drive to get goods to sell at a jumble sale , the profits of which go to a local single parent ( note - not just single mother ) group - and that 's just for starters . What do you do to help lower the abortion rate ?"
DISAGREE
"pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare"
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ?"
null
null
37,480
9,810
"I do n't think pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare . If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ? That 's what pro-choice groups do . Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ? yup , they do that too . As an individual , i give up time and resources to help the local family planning clinic . I ran sexual health campaigns at college . I recently did a drive to get goods to sell at a jumble sale , the profits of which go to a local single parent ( note - not just single mother ) group - and that 's just for starters . What do you do to help lower the abortion rate ?"
DISAGREE
"If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ? That 's what pro-choice groups do . Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ? yup , they do that too ."
null
null
37,483
9,810
"I do n't think pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare . If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ? That 's what pro-choice groups do . Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ? yup , they do that too . As an individual , i give up time and resources to help the local family planning clinic . I ran sexual health campaigns at college . I recently did a drive to get goods to sell at a jumble sale , the profits of which go to a local single parent ( note - not just single mother ) group - and that 's just for starters . What do you do to help lower the abortion rate ?"
DISAGREE
"I do n't think pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare"
"What do you do to help lower the abortion rate ?"
null
null
37,482
9,810
"I do n't think pro-choicers in general care whether or not abortion is truly rare . If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like campaigning for better information on and access to b/c you mean ? That 's what pro-choice groups do . Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ? yup , they do that too . As an individual , i give up time and resources to help the local family planning clinic . I ran sexual health campaigns at college . I recently did a drive to get goods to sell at a jumble sale , the profits of which go to a local single parent ( note - not just single mother ) group - and that 's just for starters . What do you do to help lower the abortion rate ?"
DISAGREE
"If they did they would put more effort into making sure it is rare , and not just legal ."
"Like seeking to improve benefits and general support for single parents ?"
null
null
37,488
9,811
"the evolutionists ont he other hand ( YECs anyway ) .... well , that one is a no brainer . I personally can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution , since to disprove this you essentially have to disprove the existance of god , and nobody has ever managed to do so ( though the concept of an invisible man in the sky is a little silly ) ."
"Right . Spoken like a true YEC . In other words , you want the state to teach your religion in science class . Why the dishonest posing ? Why do n't you explain to us how your religious mythology is science ? If you get to teach your religion , can I teach mine ?"
DISAGREE
"can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution"
"you want the state to teach your religion in science class explain to us how your religious mythology is science ?"
null
null
37,487
9,811
"the evolutionists ont he other hand ( YECs anyway ) .... well , that one is a no brainer . I personally can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution , since to disprove this you essentially have to disprove the existance of god , and nobody has ever managed to do so ( though the concept of an invisible man in the sky is a little silly ) ."
"Right . Spoken like a true YEC . In other words , you want the state to teach your religion in science class . Why the dishonest posing ? Why do n't you explain to us how your religious mythology is science ? If you get to teach your religion , can I teach mine ?"
DISAGREE
"the concept of an invisible man in the sky is a little silly"
"Why the dishonest posing ?"
null
null
37,485
9,811
"the evolutionists ont he other hand ( YECs anyway ) .... well , that one is a no brainer . I personally can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution , since to disprove this you essentially have to disprove the existance of god , and nobody has ever managed to do so ( though the concept of an invisible man in the sky is a little silly ) ."
"Right . Spoken like a true YEC . In other words , you want the state to teach your religion in science class . Why the dishonest posing ? Why do n't you explain to us how your religious mythology is science ? If you get to teach your religion , can I teach mine ?"
DISAGREE
"I personally can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution"
"Why the dishonest posing ? Why do n't you explain to us how your religious mythology is science ?"
null
null
37,484
9,811
"the evolutionists ont he other hand ( YECs anyway ) .... well , that one is a no brainer . I personally can not find fault witht he intelligent design folks who feel that god guided evolution , since to disprove this you essentially have to disprove the existance of god , and nobody has ever managed to do so ( though the concept of an invisible man in the sky is a little silly ) ."
"Right . Spoken like a true YEC . In other words , you want the state to teach your religion in science class . Why the dishonest posing ? Why do n't you explain to us how your religious mythology is science ? If you get to teach your religion , can I teach mine ?"
DISAGREE
"since to disprove this you essentially have to disprove the existance"
"explain to us how your religious mythology is science"
null
null
37,493
9,812
"Its kinda like the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one ! VT loses . Sorry , but those are the rules ..."
DISAGREE
"slow and steady progress"
"Godwin in one ! VT loses ."
null
null
37,490
9,812
"Its kinda like the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one ! VT loses . Sorry , but those are the rules ..."
DISAGREE
"the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one !"
null
null
37,489
9,812
"Its kinda like the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one ! VT loses . Sorry , but those are the rules ..."
DISAGREE
"like the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one !"
null
null
37,492
9,812
"Its kinda like the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party changed the whole nation 's perspective on the jews ."
"And Godwin in one ! VT loses . Sorry , but those are the rules ..."
DISAGREE
"the germans after slow and steady progress of the nazi party"
"Godwin in one ! VT loses . Sorry , but those are the rules"
null
null
37,494
9,813
"He is before all things , and in him all things hold together . ( Colossians 1:17 )"
"and"
DISAGREE
"all things hold together"
"and"
null
null
37,495
9,813
"He is before all things , and in him all things hold together . ( Colossians 1:17 )"
"and"
DISAGREE
"He is before all things , and in him all things hold together"
"and"
null
null
37,497
9,814
"This argument is self-defeating . A theory is not a fact , no matter how much evidence may support the theory . Bad wording . But again , if you claim something as a fact , you must have proof , verified in both your method of reasoning , and the reasoning utilized by the person you are proving the fact to ."
"A fact is simply a phenomenon that is observable by any competent observer . It is not proven . For example , Euclid made the assumption that one and only one straight line exists between two points . This is generally considered a fact . However , two points that can not be connected by a straight line could be discovered tomorrow , and that Euclid 's first postulate would be disproven ."
DISAGREE
"This argument is self-defeating . A theory is not a fact , no matter how much evidence may support the theory ."
"A fact is simply a phenomenon that is observable by any competent observer . It is not proven ."
null
null
37,500
9,814
"This argument is self-defeating . A theory is not a fact , no matter how much evidence may support the theory . Bad wording . But again , if you claim something as a fact , you must have proof , verified in both your method of reasoning , and the reasoning utilized by the person you are proving the fact to ."
"A fact is simply a phenomenon that is observable by any competent observer . It is not proven . For example , Euclid made the assumption that one and only one straight line exists between two points . This is generally considered a fact . However , two points that can not be connected by a straight line could be discovered tomorrow , and that Euclid 's first postulate would be disproven ."
DISAGREE
"you claim something as a fact ,"
"It is not proven"
null
null
37,506
9,822
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ? You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! ! One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group . Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on . Changes in genetic material through mutation add to the gene pool and are passed on through mating . If you are an isolated group of animals , and you have enough mutations and mating , you will change over time . The environment , through one process , can choose who succeeds and who does n't . It 's natural selection . There are other mechanisms , of course , so that 's not the only one . We already know that Human brain development could possible have occured due to a new diet , in a new area . Meat allowed for a larget brain , which in turn allowed for better skills , compared to other animals . Humans used tools as well , which was aided by using hands . Eventually , these animals descended from the trees and ceased to be arboreal creatures , because they needed to use their hands for tools . You ca n't do that that well if you are swining in a tree ."
DISAGREE
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden ,"
"You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. ``"
null
null
37,504
9,822
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ? You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! ! One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group . Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on . Changes in genetic material through mutation add to the gene pool and are passed on through mating . If you are an isolated group of animals , and you have enough mutations and mating , you will change over time . The environment , through one process , can choose who succeeds and who does n't . It 's natural selection . There are other mechanisms , of course , so that 's not the only one . We already know that Human brain development could possible have occured due to a new diet , in a new area . Meat allowed for a larget brain , which in turn allowed for better skills , compared to other animals . Humans used tools as well , which was aided by using hands . Eventually , these animals descended from the trees and ceased to be arboreal creatures , because they needed to use their hands for tools . You ca n't do that that well if you are swining in a tree ."
DISAGREE
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ?"
null
null
37,502
9,822
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ? You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! ! One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group . Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on . Changes in genetic material through mutation add to the gene pool and are passed on through mating . If you are an isolated group of animals , and you have enough mutations and mating , you will change over time . The environment , through one process , can choose who succeeds and who does n't . It 's natural selection . There are other mechanisms , of course , so that 's not the only one . We already know that Human brain development could possible have occured due to a new diet , in a new area . Meat allowed for a larget brain , which in turn allowed for better skills , compared to other animals . Humans used tools as well , which was aided by using hands . Eventually , these animals descended from the trees and ceased to be arboreal creatures , because they needed to use their hands for tools . You ca n't do that that well if you are swining in a tree ."
DISAGREE
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on ."
null
null
37,503
9,822
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ? You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! ! One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group . Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on . Changes in genetic material through mutation add to the gene pool and are passed on through mating . If you are an isolated group of animals , and you have enough mutations and mating , you will change over time . The environment , through one process , can choose who succeeds and who does n't . It 's natural selection . There are other mechanisms , of course , so that 's not the only one . We already know that Human brain development could possible have occured due to a new diet , in a new area . Meat allowed for a larget brain , which in turn allowed for better skills , compared to other animals . Humans used tools as well , which was aided by using hands . Eventually , these animals descended from the trees and ceased to be arboreal creatures , because they needed to use their hands for tools . You ca n't do that that well if you are swining in a tree ."
DISAGREE
"what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment ,"
null
null
37,505
9,822
"I 'm not saying the primates changed all of a sudden , but what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You actually think Evolution works by what creatuers want ? You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! ! One want an organism can change is due to being in a different environment , isolated from the previous group . Mutations can occur , and if they are n't killer , they are passed on . Changes in genetic material through mutation add to the gene pool and are passed on through mating . If you are an isolated group of animals , and you have enough mutations and mating , you will change over time . The environment , through one process , can choose who succeeds and who does n't . It 's natural selection . There are other mechanisms , of course , so that 's not the only one . We already know that Human brain development could possible have occured due to a new diet , in a new area . Meat allowed for a larget brain , which in turn allowed for better skills , compared to other animals . Humans used tools as well , which was aided by using hands . Eventually , these animals descended from the trees and ceased to be arboreal creatures , because they needed to use their hands for tools . You ca n't do that that well if you are swining in a tree ."
DISAGREE
"what all of a sudden made them want to change ."
"You think they just got up one day and said , `` ya know Bob , I wan na evolve. `` ! ! Oops , there goes my tail ! !"
null
null
37,507
9,823
"If I was a creationist , I 'd try to avoid discussing the merits of my belief.Which is probably why you are not a creationist . But consider it from the point of view of a true believer . First comes the ideology , any discussion of that ideology will by a true believer will FIND justifications after the fact of the belief . SS is a good example of this . As is I suppose WW . Ideologues first arrive at the belief and then find justifications for it . Scientists study data and obeservations and draw conclusions which those data and observations support . The two approaches are entirely separate and opposed to one another . Scientists draw inferences , true believers make declarations of faith ."
"* * Which is why you darwinists , for all that you parade yourselves as 'scientists ' , are really nothing but 'true believers ' , intent upon evangelizing your core ideology , materialist atheism ."
DISAGREE
"Scientists draw inferences , true believers make declarations of faith ."
"darwinists are really nothing but 'true believers ' , intent upon evangelizing your core ideology , materialist atheism ."
null
null
37,510
9,823
"If I was a creationist , I 'd try to avoid discussing the merits of my belief.Which is probably why you are not a creationist . But consider it from the point of view of a true believer . First comes the ideology , any discussion of that ideology will by a true believer will FIND justifications after the fact of the belief . SS is a good example of this . As is I suppose WW . Ideologues first arrive at the belief and then find justifications for it . Scientists study data and obeservations and draw conclusions which those data and observations support . The two approaches are entirely separate and opposed to one another . Scientists draw inferences , true believers make declarations of faith ."
"* * Which is why you darwinists , for all that you parade yourselves as 'scientists ' , are really nothing but 'true believers ' , intent upon evangelizing your core ideology , materialist atheism ."
DISAGREE
"Scientists draw inferences , true believers make declarations of faith ."
"Which is why you darwinists , for all that you parade yourselves as 'scientists ' , are really nothing but 'true believers '"
null
null
37,511
9,823
"If I was a creationist , I 'd try to avoid discussing the merits of my belief.Which is probably why you are not a creationist . But consider it from the point of view of a true believer . First comes the ideology , any discussion of that ideology will by a true believer will FIND justifications after the fact of the belief . SS is a good example of this . As is I suppose WW . Ideologues first arrive at the belief and then find justifications for it . Scientists study data and obeservations and draw conclusions which those data and observations support . The two approaches are entirely separate and opposed to one another . Scientists draw inferences , true believers make declarations of faith ."
"* * Which is why you darwinists , for all that you parade yourselves as 'scientists ' , are really nothing but 'true believers ' , intent upon evangelizing your core ideology , materialist atheism ."
DISAGREE
"If I was a creationist , I 'd try to avoid discussing the merits of my belief"
"Which is why you darwinists ,"
null
null
37,512
9,824
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
DISAGREE
"does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
null
null
37,516
9,824
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
DISAGREE
"pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me"
null
null
37,514
9,824
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
DISAGREE
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
null
null
37,515
9,824
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
DISAGREE
"Is he a pathological liar or does he just say the opposite of everything Bush says ?"
"Using Bush as a 180 compass is just fine by me ."
null
null
37,518
9,825
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor . There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim , people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
DISAGREE
"a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
null
null
37,517
9,825
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor . There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim , people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
DISAGREE
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor ."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim ,"
null
null
37,519
9,825
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor . There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim , people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
DISAGREE
"There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
null
null
37,521
9,825
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor . There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim , people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
DISAGREE
"There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die"
"people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation"
null
null
37,520
9,825
"Funnily enough a lot of sick people visit the doctor . There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die ..."
"And , just as you gun control advocates claim , people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
DISAGREE
"There is also a correlation between sick people and people who die"
"people who own guns and people who die also have a correlation ."
null
null
37,522
9,826
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ? How fast were you going ? Bet it was more than 35 mph !"
DISAGREE
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ?"
null
null
37,523
9,826
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ? How fast were you going ? Bet it was more than 35 mph !"
DISAGREE
"The not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ?"
null
null
37,524
9,826
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ? How fast were you going ? Bet it was more than 35 mph !"
DISAGREE
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing"
"And how would you know this Archie ?"
null
null
37,526
9,826
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ? How fast were you going ? Bet it was more than 35 mph !"
DISAGREE
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ?"
null
null
37,525
9,826
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line that signing it was not an admittance of guilt"
"And how would you know this Archie ? Have you been stopped for speeding and asked to sign one ? How fast were you going ? Bet it was more than 35 mph !"
DISAGREE
"The ticket she was required to sign says right below the line"
"And how would you know this"
null
null
37,529
9,827
"Can you please provide a cite in the Constitution that supports the notion that a Supreme Court Justice nominee has the power to declare that any case is `` settled law `` and the subsequent power to make it so ? I did n't think so ."
"And can you provide a citation from the Constitution that supports the notion that a President can send the military half-way round the world without a declaration of war from Congress ? Come now . To call an issue `` settled law `` is , as someone else pointed out , to emphasize stare decisis , i.e . '' to stand by what has been decided , `` i.e . to recognize the binding nature of precedent . This is why , in those rare cases where long-standing precedents are overturned , it 's such a big deal : the court essentially admits that it had been wrong . As to so-called `` judicial activism `` -- and again as someone else pointed out -- to emphasize stare decisis is preciesly the opposite of `` judicial activism. `` With regard to Roe itself , what I find remarkable is that the court exercised so much restraint : the justices explicitly refused to make a declaration about when life begins . They explicitly claimed not to have any qualifications to make such a decision , and they noted that even those who examine the issue thoroughly -- scientists and physicians , theologians and philosophers -- are nowhere near a consensus on the matter . So they decided not step in and settle such metaphysical questions . Indeed , it is ultimately individuals whom the court allowed to make this decision as they see fit . And so , they based the decision on the right to privacy . Said right is not explicit in the Constitution , but that does n't matter ( see the Ninth Amendment for why ) . And said right is also not absolute ( as the decision again explicitly says ) : it is limited in this case by the state 's compelling interest in protecting prenatal life ( a point which is often overlooked by all sides in the abortion debate ) , and that interest is directly proportional to the viability of the fetus . But what Roe clarified is that any law establishing the protection of prenatal life as an unconditional trump of the mother 's right to privacy is unconstitutional . Within reasonable limits , she herself gets to decide when life begins , and to act accordingly . Like I said , judicial restraint . And a stunning example of defending the individual from government interference or social discrimination in matters of conscience , to boot ."
DISAGREE
"Can you please provide a that a Supreme Court Justice nominee has the power ."
"can you provide a that a President"
null
null