Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64 0
38.3k
| id
int64 8
10k
| q
stringlengths 5
13k
| r
stringlengths 3
35.3k
| s
stringclasses 2
values | q'
stringlengths 3
2.67k
| r'
stringlengths 3
6.78k
| Unnamed: 6
float64 | total no.: 7987
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37,287 | 9,778 |
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community"
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis"
| null | null |
37,286 | 9,778 |
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words"
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes"
| null | null |
37,283 | 9,778 |
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"why it is rejected among the scientific community , In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered"
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished ,"
| null | null |
37,282 | 9,778 |
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
| null | null |
37,284 | 9,778 |
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community , are : 1 . It depends solely upon the ignorance of certain scientific disciplines and the current limits of scientific discovery . In other words , every time more information about biology is discovered , ID becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The two main problems with ID , and why it is rejected among the scientific community ,"
|
"JUST LIKE ABIOGENESIS ! Every time more information about biology is discovered , abiogenesis becomes diminished , rather than bolstered ."
| null | null |
37,290 | 9,779 |
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
|
AGREE
|
"THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
| null | null |
37,291 | 9,779 |
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
|
AGREE
|
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
| null | null |
37,289 | 9,779 |
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
|
AGREE
|
"I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
| null | null |
37,288 | 9,779 |
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
|
AGREE
|
"I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"I must admit I never tried to gain access swords"
| null | null |
37,293 | 9,779 |
"Really ? When ? I have talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly , I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there ."
|
AGREE
|
"talked to many an Aussie who do martial arts and THEY are n't even allowed to get a permit to teach with swords"
|
"Possibly ,"
| null | null |
37,296 | 9,780 |
"He found that adaptive genetic mutations arising systematically under these circumstances outnumbered maladaptive and inconsequential mutations to a high degree , statistically speaking . A most significant finding , and one that has been repeated again and again and again , to the point where somatic hypermutation is accepted by bacteriologists as a legitimate 'immune response ' enabling rapid adaptive [ EAM ] evolution [ antibiotic resistance ] in eusocial bacteria ."
|
"I 've examined Hall 's papers and they make interesting reading . However , further research , including some undertaken by Hall himself , has informed the debate greatly . For one thing , many of the experimental results to which Hall originally proposed sub-population hypermutation ( your 'hypermutation as a eusocial response ' ) as an explanation have proved inconsistent with that hypothesis . The Amplification Mutation model described above is a much better fit , correctly predicting such details as clonally-related bacteria possessing redundant lac- copies in addition to the lac+ revertant . The articles I 've already cited , though they focus on the Cairns system 's experimental vulnerabilities as the origin of the recent directed/adaptive mutagenesis misperception , also include Hall 's work in their assessment . Hall himself performed a followup experiment to his work on anomalous rates of trpAB+ dual revertants , acknowledging that a colleague 's suggestion , that stochastically-occurring trpA+trpB revertants were growing on waste byproducts secreted by non-growing trpAtrpB+ revertants was probably correct . In short , though hypermutation of a sub-population does occur sometimes , it is not always an organismic response ( eg mutation promoters coincidentally amplified along with useful genes ) , and the 'successful ' mutants do not always , or even mostly , arise from within that subpopulation . Also , you still seem reluctant to acknowledge the implications of the existence of a physical mechanism for hypermutation under stress . It must itself have evolved somehow - which makes it logically ( as well as empirically , as evidenced by my original post in which 4/5ths of the adaptive bacteria exhibited no increased mutation rate ) not a prerequisite for evolution . It 's just one more adaptation to the environment - in this case , the environment 's potential for inducing - though carcinogens or simple uncertainty at the molecular level - genetic change ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"He found that adaptive genetic mutations"
|
"I 've examined Hall 's papers and they make interesting reading"
| null | null |
37,295 | 9,780 |
"He found that adaptive genetic mutations arising systematically under these circumstances outnumbered maladaptive and inconsequential mutations to a high degree , statistically speaking . A most significant finding , and one that has been repeated again and again and again , to the point where somatic hypermutation is accepted by bacteriologists as a legitimate 'immune response ' enabling rapid adaptive [ EAM ] evolution [ antibiotic resistance ] in eusocial bacteria ."
|
"I 've examined Hall 's papers and they make interesting reading . However , further research , including some undertaken by Hall himself , has informed the debate greatly . For one thing , many of the experimental results to which Hall originally proposed sub-population hypermutation ( your 'hypermutation as a eusocial response ' ) as an explanation have proved inconsistent with that hypothesis . The Amplification Mutation model described above is a much better fit , correctly predicting such details as clonally-related bacteria possessing redundant lac- copies in addition to the lac+ revertant . The articles I 've already cited , though they focus on the Cairns system 's experimental vulnerabilities as the origin of the recent directed/adaptive mutagenesis misperception , also include Hall 's work in their assessment . Hall himself performed a followup experiment to his work on anomalous rates of trpAB+ dual revertants , acknowledging that a colleague 's suggestion , that stochastically-occurring trpA+trpB revertants were growing on waste byproducts secreted by non-growing trpAtrpB+ revertants was probably correct . In short , though hypermutation of a sub-population does occur sometimes , it is not always an organismic response ( eg mutation promoters coincidentally amplified along with useful genes ) , and the 'successful ' mutants do not always , or even mostly , arise from within that subpopulation . Also , you still seem reluctant to acknowledge the implications of the existence of a physical mechanism for hypermutation under stress . It must itself have evolved somehow - which makes it logically ( as well as empirically , as evidenced by my original post in which 4/5ths of the adaptive bacteria exhibited no increased mutation rate ) not a prerequisite for evolution . It 's just one more adaptation to the environment - in this case , the environment 's potential for inducing - though carcinogens or simple uncertainty at the molecular level - genetic change ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"A most significant finding , and one that has been repeated again and again and again , to the point where somatic hypermutation is accepted by bacteriologists as a legitimate 'immune response ' enabling rapid adaptive [ EAM ] evolution [ antibiotic resistance ] in eusocial bacteria ."
|
"For one thing , many of the experimental results to which Hall originally proposed sub-population hypermutation ( your 'hypermutation as a eusocial response ' ) as an explanation have proved inconsistent with that hypothesis ."
| null | null |
37,294 | 9,780 |
"He found that adaptive genetic mutations arising systematically under these circumstances outnumbered maladaptive and inconsequential mutations to a high degree , statistically speaking . A most significant finding , and one that has been repeated again and again and again , to the point where somatic hypermutation is accepted by bacteriologists as a legitimate 'immune response ' enabling rapid adaptive [ EAM ] evolution [ antibiotic resistance ] in eusocial bacteria ."
|
"I 've examined Hall 's papers and they make interesting reading . However , further research , including some undertaken by Hall himself , has informed the debate greatly . For one thing , many of the experimental results to which Hall originally proposed sub-population hypermutation ( your 'hypermutation as a eusocial response ' ) as an explanation have proved inconsistent with that hypothesis . The Amplification Mutation model described above is a much better fit , correctly predicting such details as clonally-related bacteria possessing redundant lac- copies in addition to the lac+ revertant . The articles I 've already cited , though they focus on the Cairns system 's experimental vulnerabilities as the origin of the recent directed/adaptive mutagenesis misperception , also include Hall 's work in their assessment . Hall himself performed a followup experiment to his work on anomalous rates of trpAB+ dual revertants , acknowledging that a colleague 's suggestion , that stochastically-occurring trpA+trpB revertants were growing on waste byproducts secreted by non-growing trpAtrpB+ revertants was probably correct . In short , though hypermutation of a sub-population does occur sometimes , it is not always an organismic response ( eg mutation promoters coincidentally amplified along with useful genes ) , and the 'successful ' mutants do not always , or even mostly , arise from within that subpopulation . Also , you still seem reluctant to acknowledge the implications of the existence of a physical mechanism for hypermutation under stress . It must itself have evolved somehow - which makes it logically ( as well as empirically , as evidenced by my original post in which 4/5ths of the adaptive bacteria exhibited no increased mutation rate ) not a prerequisite for evolution . It 's just one more adaptation to the environment - in this case , the environment 's potential for inducing - though carcinogens or simple uncertainty at the molecular level - genetic change ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"found that adaptive genetic mutations arising systematically outnumbered maladaptive and inconsequential mutations A most significant finding somatic hypermutation is accepted by bacteriologists as a legitimate 'immune response"
|
"experimental results to which Hall originally proposed have proved inconsistent with that hypothesis to the you still seem reluctant to acknowledge the implications of the existence of a physical mechanism for hypermutation under stress It 's just one more adaptation environment"
| null | null |
37,298 | 9,781 |
"Gavin Newsom- I expected more from him when I supported him in the 2003 election . He showed himself as a family-man/Catholic , but he ended up being the exact oppisate , supporting abortion , and giving homosexuals marriage licenses . I love San Francisco , but I hate the people . Sometimes , the people make me want to move to Sacramento or DC to fix things up ."
|
"And what is wrong with giving homosexuals the right to settle down with the person they love ? What is it to you if a few limp-wrists get married in San Francisco ? Homosexuals are people , too , who take out their garbage , pay their taxes , go to work , take care of their dogs , and what they do in their bedroom is none of your business ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"but he ended up being the exact oppisate , supporting abortion , and giving homosexuals marriage licenses I love San Francisco , but I hate the people ."
|
"what is wrong with giving homosexuals the right to settle down with the person they love ? Homosexuals are people what they do in their bedroom is none of your business ."
| null | null |
37,297 | 9,781 |
"Gavin Newsom- I expected more from him when I supported him in the 2003 election . He showed himself as a family-man/Catholic , but he ended up being the exact oppisate , supporting abortion , and giving homosexuals marriage licenses . I love San Francisco , but I hate the people . Sometimes , the people make me want to move to Sacramento or DC to fix things up ."
|
"And what is wrong with giving homosexuals the right to settle down with the person they love ? What is it to you if a few limp-wrists get married in San Francisco ? Homosexuals are people , too , who take out their garbage , pay their taxes , go to work , take care of their dogs , and what they do in their bedroom is none of your business ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"He showed himself as a family-man/Catholic , but he ended up being the exact oppisate"
|
"And what is wrong with giving homosexuals the right to settle down with the person they love ?"
| null | null |
37,301 | 9,782 |
"I do n't think they are very smart ."
|
"Of course they 're not very smart ; they put more stock in fable than in undeniable evidence . However , since when is intelligence a necessary component of effect ? ( Dubya has affected the entire world ; does that mean he 's a genius ? ) To be fair , that feedback could be interpreted in different ways : the `` flaws in arguments `` might be from the DVDs , or they might be the alleged flaws that the DVDs `` expose. ``"
|
AGREE
|
"do n't think they are very smart ."
|
"Of course they 're not very smart ; they put more stock in fable than in undeniable evidence ."
| null | null |
37,302 | 9,782 |
"I do n't think they are very smart ."
|
"Of course they 're not very smart ; they put more stock in fable than in undeniable evidence . However , since when is intelligence a necessary component of effect ? ( Dubya has affected the entire world ; does that mean he 's a genius ? ) To be fair , that feedback could be interpreted in different ways : the `` flaws in arguments `` might be from the DVDs , or they might be the alleged flaws that the DVDs `` expose. ``"
|
AGREE
|
"I do n't think they are very smart ."
|
"Of course they 're not very smart ; they put more stock in fable than in undeniable evidence"
| null | null |
37,304 | 9,783 |
"How can you say such things ? The Bible says that God CREATED over and OVER and OVER again ! And you reject that and say that everything came about by evolution ? If you reject the literal account of the Creation in Genesis , you are saying that God is a liar ! If you can not trust God 's Word from the first verse , how can you know that the rest of it can be trusted ?"
|
"It 's not a literal account unless you interpret it that way ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"How can you say such things ? The Bible says that God CREATED over and OVER and OVER again !"
|
"It 's not a literal account unless you interpret it that way ."
| null | null |
37,305 | 9,783 |
"How can you say such things ? The Bible says that God CREATED over and OVER and OVER again ! And you reject that and say that everything came about by evolution ? If you reject the literal account of the Creation in Genesis , you are saying that God is a liar ! If you can not trust God 's Word from the first verse , how can you know that the rest of it can be trusted ?"
|
"It 's not a literal account unless you interpret it that way ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"If you reject the literal account of the Creation in Genesis , you are saying that God is a liar !"
|
"It 's not a literal account unless you interpret it that way ."
| null | null |
37,307 | 9,784 |
"Stellar and Planetary Evolution : origin of stars and planets"
|
"You mean that the planets and stars have always existed ? Really - so how come we see stars being made in nurseries via the Hubble telescope ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Stellar and Planetary Evolution : origin of stars and planets"
|
"so how come we see stars being made in nurseries via the Hubble telescope ."
| null | null |
37,306 | 9,784 |
"Stellar and Planetary Evolution : origin of stars and planets"
|
"You mean that the planets and stars have always existed ? Really - so how come we see stars being made in nurseries via the Hubble telescope ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Stellar and Planetary Evolution origin of stars and planets"
|
"mean that the planets and stars have always existed ? how come we see stars being made in nurseries"
| null | null |
37,310 | 9,785 |
"Evolution does not prove or disprove anything . It offers an explanation of why things are as they are , and is considered by far the most likely explanation of the explanations available . This is ever the way of science : observe what is around you and try to find an explanation , then verify if the explanation holds true . This is also the reason why these debates still exist : because they are waged in the wrong direction . '' Prove evolution ! `` '' No you prove creation ! Prove god ! `` '' No , you disprove god ! `` leads nowhere . We 're looking at the world , and wonder what makes it tick because we are naturally curious ( according to evolutionists , probably because apes curious about `` what is making that tall grass sway when there is no wind `` got to live longer , the longer life being spent on having more . According to creationist , because god made us so. ) . Understanding the world is generally useful , since we get creative ideas about how to keep it as it is when we like it or how to change it when we do n't like it . Possible explanations pop up all the time and as they are mutually exclusive , we usually try to see which one is more likely . None can ever be proven true . For all we know , god may indeed have created the world 6000 years ago and then spend an enormous amount of effort to make it look waaay older . Of course , such a god either has a great sense of ( I tremble at thinking about what his idea of a practical joke might be ) or is a rather individual . Or dividual , no one ever explained how god/s might procreate ."
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation . and you also have a choice to belive that explanation . becuase several .. not too smart people ... developed other ideas of how this magnificent earth got here . oh and johnhanks i will never believe evolution . and that my opinion . and im not saying has to believe it i just wanted to know your take on this question ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Evolution does not prove or disprove anything ."
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation ."
| null | null |
37,309 | 9,785 |
"Evolution does not prove or disprove anything . It offers an explanation of why things are as they are , and is considered by far the most likely explanation of the explanations available . This is ever the way of science : observe what is around you and try to find an explanation , then verify if the explanation holds true . This is also the reason why these debates still exist : because they are waged in the wrong direction . '' Prove evolution ! `` '' No you prove creation ! Prove god ! `` '' No , you disprove god ! `` leads nowhere . We 're looking at the world , and wonder what makes it tick because we are naturally curious ( according to evolutionists , probably because apes curious about `` what is making that tall grass sway when there is no wind `` got to live longer , the longer life being spent on having more . According to creationist , because god made us so. ) . Understanding the world is generally useful , since we get creative ideas about how to keep it as it is when we like it or how to change it when we do n't like it . Possible explanations pop up all the time and as they are mutually exclusive , we usually try to see which one is more likely . None can ever be proven true . For all we know , god may indeed have created the world 6000 years ago and then spend an enormous amount of effort to make it look waaay older . Of course , such a god either has a great sense of ( I tremble at thinking about what his idea of a practical joke might be ) or is a rather individual . Or dividual , no one ever explained how god/s might procreate ."
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation . and you also have a choice to belive that explanation . becuase several .. not too smart people ... developed other ideas of how this magnificent earth got here . oh and johnhanks i will never believe evolution . and that my opinion . and im not saying has to believe it i just wanted to know your take on this question ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"This is also the reason why these debates still exist : because they are waged in the wrong direction . '' Prove evolution ! `` '' No you prove creation ! Prove god ! `` '' No , you disprove god ! `` leads nowhere . We 're looking at the world , and wonder what makes it tick because we are naturally"
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation . and you also have a choice to belive that explanation ."
| null | null |
37,311 | 9,785 |
"Evolution does not prove or disprove anything . It offers an explanation of why things are as they are , and is considered by far the most likely explanation of the explanations available . This is ever the way of science : observe what is around you and try to find an explanation , then verify if the explanation holds true . This is also the reason why these debates still exist : because they are waged in the wrong direction . '' Prove evolution ! `` '' No you prove creation ! Prove god ! `` '' No , you disprove god ! `` leads nowhere . We 're looking at the world , and wonder what makes it tick because we are naturally curious ( according to evolutionists , probably because apes curious about `` what is making that tall grass sway when there is no wind `` got to live longer , the longer life being spent on having more . According to creationist , because god made us so. ) . Understanding the world is generally useful , since we get creative ideas about how to keep it as it is when we like it or how to change it when we do n't like it . Possible explanations pop up all the time and as they are mutually exclusive , we usually try to see which one is more likely . None can ever be proven true . For all we know , god may indeed have created the world 6000 years ago and then spend an enormous amount of effort to make it look waaay older . Of course , such a god either has a great sense of ( I tremble at thinking about what his idea of a practical joke might be ) or is a rather individual . Or dividual , no one ever explained how god/s might procreate ."
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation . and you also have a choice to belive that explanation . becuase several .. not too smart people ... developed other ideas of how this magnificent earth got here . oh and johnhanks i will never believe evolution . and that my opinion . and im not saying has to believe it i just wanted to know your take on this question ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Evolution does not prove or disprove anything . offers an explanation of why things are as they are , is considered by far the most likely explanation of the explanations available No you prove creation ! Prove god ! `` '' No , you disprove god ! `` leads nowhere ."
|
"i think i like this answer because they said it offered an explanation you also have a choice to belive that explanation ."
| null | null |
37,313 | 9,786 |
"1 ) How long does intelligent design take , x years or is it instantaneous ? 2 ) By what mechanism does the designer interact with the natural world ? 3 ) When and why does the designer choose to interact with the world ? 4 ) Why has the vast majority of intelligently designed life ceased to exist ? if it was designed correctly in the first place why was it necessary to discard so many forms and replace them with different ones , as evidenced by the fossil record ? 5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
|
"May I attempt to respond as an IDist would respond ? 1 ) If God -- err , the designer can pop IC systems into existence at will , do n't you think He ... /she/it can do so any way he/she/it damn well pleases ? See also answer 2 . 2 ) IDists need no mechanistic explanation . The idea that evidence for design means design stands by itself . ( Nevermind that the crux of ID is that it demands an evolutionary mechanism for the appearance of alleged IC/ `` unevolvable `` systems ; the ID philosophy totally sidesteps that requirement . ) 3 ) Again , the validity of ID depends not on the designer 's choices but only on the designer interacting at all . 4 ) OEC/IDists will claim that environmental conditions have changed over millions of years just like mainstream science says they have ; after all , some IDists `` do n't doubt `` mechanisms such as natural selection . For the obvious problem of the designer `` letting `` species go extinct , see answer 3 . I 'm guessing that YEC/IDists will just point to the flood . And the conspiracy theorist/IDists will blame Satan for trying to mislead people . 5 ) Not a single one . ( Either that answer , or maybe `` Well , uh , has n't Behe done something by now ? '' , which still means none . ) So there you have it . An evolutionist 's formulation of an IDists response . Appropriately , because ID as a whole is essentially an argument from ignorance , ignorance plays a role the answers to all your questions . ( `` Do n't know `` / `` Do n't care `` / `` Does n't matter. `` ) ID simply sidesteps these issues . Also notice that none of the statements are testable or falsifiable , except for the parts of the OEC view that are perfectly compatible with geology and evolution . Some will claim that they `` have no reason `` to doubt common descent ( a la Behe ) but do a conspicuously good job of not saying they actually believe it . And if any IDists have a problem with my responses , they 're able to post their own responses . However , they were able to do that even before I responded , and they did n't ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"How long does intelligent design"
|
"May I attempt to respond as an IDist would respond ?"
| null | null |
37,312 | 9,786 |
"1 ) How long does intelligent design take , x years or is it instantaneous ? 2 ) By what mechanism does the designer interact with the natural world ? 3 ) When and why does the designer choose to interact with the world ? 4 ) Why has the vast majority of intelligently designed life ceased to exist ? if it was designed correctly in the first place why was it necessary to discard so many forms and replace them with different ones , as evidenced by the fossil record ? 5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
|
"May I attempt to respond as an IDist would respond ? 1 ) If God -- err , the designer can pop IC systems into existence at will , do n't you think He ... /she/it can do so any way he/she/it damn well pleases ? See also answer 2 . 2 ) IDists need no mechanistic explanation . The idea that evidence for design means design stands by itself . ( Nevermind that the crux of ID is that it demands an evolutionary mechanism for the appearance of alleged IC/ `` unevolvable `` systems ; the ID philosophy totally sidesteps that requirement . ) 3 ) Again , the validity of ID depends not on the designer 's choices but only on the designer interacting at all . 4 ) OEC/IDists will claim that environmental conditions have changed over millions of years just like mainstream science says they have ; after all , some IDists `` do n't doubt `` mechanisms such as natural selection . For the obvious problem of the designer `` letting `` species go extinct , see answer 3 . I 'm guessing that YEC/IDists will just point to the flood . And the conspiracy theorist/IDists will blame Satan for trying to mislead people . 5 ) Not a single one . ( Either that answer , or maybe `` Well , uh , has n't Behe done something by now ? '' , which still means none . ) So there you have it . An evolutionist 's formulation of an IDists response . Appropriately , because ID as a whole is essentially an argument from ignorance , ignorance plays a role the answers to all your questions . ( `` Do n't know `` / `` Do n't care `` / `` Does n't matter. `` ) ID simply sidesteps these issues . Also notice that none of the statements are testable or falsifiable , except for the parts of the OEC view that are perfectly compatible with geology and evolution . Some will claim that they `` have no reason `` to doubt common descent ( a la Behe ) but do a conspicuously good job of not saying they actually believe it . And if any IDists have a problem with my responses , they 're able to post their own responses . However , they were able to do that even before I responded , and they did n't ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"By what mechanism does the designer interact with the natural world ?"
|
"IDists need no mechanistic explanation . The idea that evidence for design means design stands by itself . ( Nevermind that the crux of ID is that it demands an evolutionary mechanism for the appearance of alleged IC/ `` unevolvable `` systems ; the ID philosophy totally sidesteps that requirement . )"
| null | null |
37,314 | 9,786 |
"1 ) How long does intelligent design take , x years or is it instantaneous ? 2 ) By what mechanism does the designer interact with the natural world ? 3 ) When and why does the designer choose to interact with the world ? 4 ) Why has the vast majority of intelligently designed life ceased to exist ? if it was designed correctly in the first place why was it necessary to discard so many forms and replace them with different ones , as evidenced by the fossil record ? 5 ) What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
|
"May I attempt to respond as an IDist would respond ? 1 ) If God -- err , the designer can pop IC systems into existence at will , do n't you think He ... /she/it can do so any way he/she/it damn well pleases ? See also answer 2 . 2 ) IDists need no mechanistic explanation . The idea that evidence for design means design stands by itself . ( Nevermind that the crux of ID is that it demands an evolutionary mechanism for the appearance of alleged IC/ `` unevolvable `` systems ; the ID philosophy totally sidesteps that requirement . ) 3 ) Again , the validity of ID depends not on the designer 's choices but only on the designer interacting at all . 4 ) OEC/IDists will claim that environmental conditions have changed over millions of years just like mainstream science says they have ; after all , some IDists `` do n't doubt `` mechanisms such as natural selection . For the obvious problem of the designer `` letting `` species go extinct , see answer 3 . I 'm guessing that YEC/IDists will just point to the flood . And the conspiracy theorist/IDists will blame Satan for trying to mislead people . 5 ) Not a single one . ( Either that answer , or maybe `` Well , uh , has n't Behe done something by now ? '' , which still means none . ) So there you have it . An evolutionist 's formulation of an IDists response . Appropriately , because ID as a whole is essentially an argument from ignorance , ignorance plays a role the answers to all your questions . ( `` Do n't know `` / `` Do n't care `` / `` Does n't matter. `` ) ID simply sidesteps these issues . Also notice that none of the statements are testable or falsifiable , except for the parts of the OEC view that are perfectly compatible with geology and evolution . Some will claim that they `` have no reason `` to doubt common descent ( a la Behe ) but do a conspicuously good job of not saying they actually believe it . And if any IDists have a problem with my responses , they 're able to post their own responses . However , they were able to do that even before I responded , and they did n't ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"How long does intelligent design take , x years or is it instantaneous ? what mechanism does the designer interact with the natural world ? When and why does the designer choose to interact with the world ? What experiments have been conducted to verify the occurence of intelligent design ?"
|
"the designer can pop IC systems into existence at will , . The idea that evidence for design means design stands by itself . the validity of ID depends not on the designer 's choices but only on the designer interacting at all Not a single one"
| null | null |
37,321 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them ."
|
"They should be shot immediately ."
| null | null |
37,316 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
| null | null |
37,320 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them ."
|
"They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy"
| null | null |
37,318 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately"
| null | null |
37,317 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em"
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately ."
| null | null |
37,322 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them ."
|
"They should be shot immediately ."
| null | null |
37,319 | 9,787 |
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"Illinois government probably agrees . They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy ."
|
AGREE
|
"Shoot them . That 'll larn em ."
|
"They should be shot immediately . Because once they 're armed , it wo n't be so easy"
| null | null |
37,327 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition"
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately ,"
| null | null |
37,324 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves"
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats"
| null | null |
37,329 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"should be schooled in nutrition teach their patients how to cure themselves"
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes"
| null | null |
37,331 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food ``"
| null | null |
37,326 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food ``"
| null | null |
37,332 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution ``"
| null | null |
37,325 | 9,788 |
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary schemes to prevent destructive `` lamarckian evolution `` on the basis of a single flawed experiment on cats ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Doctors should be schooled in nutrition so they can teach their patients how to cure themselves ."
|
"Doctors ARE schooled in nutrition , however inadequately , this does n't mean they 're going to recommend crackpot `` raw food `` dietary"
| null | null |
37,338 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters"
|
"Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships"
| null | null |
37,339 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"goal of anti-abortionist is clear . job of self restraint is that of each participant"
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women"
| null | null |
37,335 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself ,"
| null | null |
37,333 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"anti-abortionist is clear ."
|
": Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself"
| null | null |
37,337 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint"
|
"Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself"
| null | null |
37,334 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage"
| null | null |
37,341 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear"
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself"
| null | null |
37,340 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters"
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of ``"
| null | null |
37,336 | 9,789 |
"The goal of anti-abortionist is clear . The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters ."
|
"Translation : Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself , they only oppose abortion because they believe forcing women to remain pregnant is an appropriate punishment for their True Sin , sex outside of marriage . The goal is n't to `` prevent murder `` at all , this is merely a convenient excuse to punish women who stray from traditional relationships . That 's why those opposed to abortion are also opposed to contraception , even though contraception prevents abortion . So the fact that abortion protestors also prevent people from accessing contraception is n't contradictory at all , it is completely in line with their goals ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"goal of anti-abortionist is clear ."
|
"Anti-abortionist intellectuals are n't really opposed to abortion as an end in itself"
| null | null |
37,344 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie ."
| null | null |
37,342 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
| null | null |
37,346 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie ."
| null | null |
37,350 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No"
| null | null |
37,349 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie"
| null | null |
37,343 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie"
| null | null |
37,348 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie"
| null | null |
37,345 | 9,790 |
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie . I have stated that a literal interpretation of it has been proven false beyond all reasonable doubt ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that Biblical creation is a lie"
|
"No . I have never stated that Biblical creation is a lie ."
| null | null |
37,352 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence ."
| null | null |
37,353 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you"
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors ,"
| null | null |
37,355 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition ."
| null | null |
37,351 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence ."
| null | null |
37,357 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to"
| null | null |
37,358 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder ."
| null | null |
37,356 | 9,791 |
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you , or you are a punk ."
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition . Since drug dealers ca n't go to the police or any other security agency for protection from their customers or competitors , they are forced to rely on their reputation for violence . Remove drug prohibition and you 'd solve most of America 's problem with murder . Within a year , there 'd be no street drug trade . Sure , there 'd still be drug addiction , but it would be a health and safety problem , like nicotine or alcohol addiction , not a murder problem . Adding gun prohibition on top of drug prohibition is only likely to compound it ."
|
AGREE
|
"Our Inner City youth in the U.S. tend to believe that you can not allow anyone to insult you"
|
"And this stems back to drug prohibition"
| null | null |
37,360 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe"
|
"brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory"
| null | null |
37,368 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity"
|
"that take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine ."
| null | null |
37,361 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"what 's my point in all this ?"
|
"explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man"
| null | null |
37,365 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation ,"
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine"
| null | null |
37,362 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible"
| null | null |
37,367 | 9,792 |
"So , what 's my point in all this ? I 'm not trying to say that Unkerpaulie 's doctrine is wrong . I 'm just trying to show that it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation , and so there 's no necessary conflict between being a good Christian and believing evolution . There are certainly certain branches of Christianity for which evolution is anathema , but that 's a property of those particular branches , and not an inherent property of Christianity as a whole ."
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine . as you demonstrated above , in order to remove the significance of genesis , you must fill in the gaps with explanations that are not based on , and sometimes contrary to , the bible . clearly , why even call that a christian if they are not folowing the pattern of christ , dont believe in redemption and original sin , and dont believe that this very redemption restores man back to the form man was originally intended to live . that said , i 'm very curious to hear exactly how this `` brand `` of christian fits evolution into the scripture as a basis for their christianity . in order to do that , they 'd need to : - understand exactly what the `` allegory `` of genesis represents - explain how man can be considered in the likeness of God presently - explain exactly why jesus died if there is no original sin - identify the time in history that God was first revealed to man - account for the souls of the homonid species before modern man so far , noone has even ever come close to scratching the surface on these questions . in fact , members of this `` brand `` of christianity become VERY hard to find when discussions like these arise . yet they are quick to pat themselves on the back for `` not being like those fundamentalists who reject science `` . if your version of christianity is the right one , lets discuss it"
|
DISAGREE
|
"it 's pefectly possible to believe in Christianity and the Bible without believing in a literal Genesis , Fall , or Creation ,"
|
"i wouls suggest that `` brand `` of christianity that doesnt take genesis as literal is based on an unbiblical doctrine"
| null | null |
37,373 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about"
| null | null |
37,377 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
| null | null |
37,369 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"are just that close in showing how life could come from"
|
"I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers"
| null | null |
37,371 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers"
| null | null |
37,372 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"They are just that close in showing how life could come from"
|
"I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers"
| null | null |
37,376 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist"
| null | null |
37,375 | 9,793 |
"But there was a big evolutionary hyp over this and some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers . There is no hype about Miller/Urey . It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"some people were saying `` They are just that close in showing how life could come from non-life. ``"
|
"Really ? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers ."
| null | null |
37,379 | 9,794 |
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"No need to learn more . It is n't an exception . The exception is the vagina ( and the uterus ) . Males do n't have corresponding structures , inside out or otherwise . The penis is n't an inverted vagina , it is a testosterone influenced clitoris ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the ONLY exception"
|
"is n't an exception The exception is the vagina it"
| null | null |
37,381 | 9,794 |
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"No need to learn more . It is n't an exception . The exception is the vagina ( and the uterus ) . Males do n't have corresponding structures , inside out or otherwise . The penis is n't an inverted vagina , it is a testosterone influenced clitoris ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"No need to learn more . It is n't an"
| null | null |
37,380 | 9,794 |
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"No need to learn more . It is n't an exception . The exception is the vagina ( and the uterus ) . Males do n't have corresponding structures , inside out or otherwise . The penis is n't an inverted vagina , it is a testosterone influenced clitoris ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"It is n't an exception . The exception is the vagina ( and the uterus ) . Males do n't have corresponding structures , inside out or otherwise ."
| null | null |
37,378 | 9,794 |
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception , if we ever learn more about it"
|
"No need to learn more . It is n't an exception . The exception is the vagina ( and the uterus ) . Males do n't have corresponding structures , inside out or otherwise . The penis is n't an inverted vagina , it is a testosterone influenced clitoris ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"the ONLY exception- and possibly not an exception ,"
|
"it is a testosterone influenced clitoris ."
| null | null |
37,382 | 9,795 |
"Recent studies apparently show that pot is more harmful than you say . One joint is said to contain more carcinogens than four tobacco cigarettes . I doubt your 20,000 joints theory . You have a simplistic argument going for pot . I ca n't agree that legalizing all drugs would be a good thing either . Programs in Holland have failed to produce significant if any benefits to society in general . The druggies seem to have benefitted by having arrest-free drug zones and access to whatever they want , but the cost of drugs still requires some income , something that most of them likely do not have other than from crime , begging or social programs . One `` benefit `` I see from legalizing drugs is that the users could be more easily identified ."
|
"Yea the legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems . Crime , suicide , mental health problems , and physical health problems ."
|
AGREE
|
"studies apparently show that pot is more harmful than you say . contain more carcinogens than four tobacco cigarettes"
|
"legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems . Crime , suicide , mental health problems"
| null | null |
37,384 | 9,795 |
"Recent studies apparently show that pot is more harmful than you say . One joint is said to contain more carcinogens than four tobacco cigarettes . I doubt your 20,000 joints theory . You have a simplistic argument going for pot . I ca n't agree that legalizing all drugs would be a good thing either . Programs in Holland have failed to produce significant if any benefits to society in general . The druggies seem to have benefitted by having arrest-free drug zones and access to whatever they want , but the cost of drugs still requires some income , something that most of them likely do not have other than from crime , begging or social programs . One `` benefit `` I see from legalizing drugs is that the users could be more easily identified ."
|
"Yea the legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems . Crime , suicide , mental health problems , and physical health problems ."
|
AGREE
|
"Recent studies apparently show that pot is more harmful than you say . One joint is said to contain more carcinogens than four tobacco ``"
|
"Yea the legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems . Crime , suicide , mental health problems , and physical health problems ."
| null | null |
37,385 | 9,795 |
"Recent studies apparently show that pot is more harmful than you say . One joint is said to contain more carcinogens than four tobacco cigarettes . I doubt your 20,000 joints theory . You have a simplistic argument going for pot . I ca n't agree that legalizing all drugs would be a good thing either . Programs in Holland have failed to produce significant if any benefits to society in general . The druggies seem to have benefitted by having arrest-free drug zones and access to whatever they want , but the cost of drugs still requires some income , something that most of them likely do not have other than from crime , begging or social programs . One `` benefit `` I see from legalizing drugs is that the users could be more easily identified ."
|
"Yea the legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems . Crime , suicide , mental health problems , and physical health problems ."
|
AGREE
|
"I see from legalizing drugs is that the users could be more easily identified ."
|
"Yea"
| null | null |
37,388 | 9,796 |
"`` Through precise radiometric clocks and clever stratigraphic connections `` If you have precise radiometric { clocks } why would you need { clever } stratigraphic connections ? I want one of them radiometric clocks ! ROFL ! This is best described by the phrase . If you ca n't dazzle 'em with brilliance , baffle them with bs . They used to say we date the rocks by the fossils and the fossils by the rocks but this sounds better . At least to you it seems ."
|
"Any geologists want to help me out here ? What they mean by this is that there are sediments in one place and sediments in another place . They can date them radiometrically to determine that they are both from the Edicarian period ( even though they may be seperated by millions of years ) . They then verify that they are Edicarian by looking at the layering to determine if the two pieces were at one point connected , but are now seperated due to tectonics . I 'm sure I 'm not entirely correct about these methods . I think I 'd better study up on some of these qeustions HERE . Maybe you should too ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"At least to you it seems ."
|
"Any geologists want to help me out here ?"
| null | null |
37,386 | 9,796 |
"`` Through precise radiometric clocks and clever stratigraphic connections `` If you have precise radiometric { clocks } why would you need { clever } stratigraphic connections ? I want one of them radiometric clocks ! ROFL ! This is best described by the phrase . If you ca n't dazzle 'em with brilliance , baffle them with bs . They used to say we date the rocks by the fossils and the fossils by the rocks but this sounds better . At least to you it seems ."
|
"Any geologists want to help me out here ? What they mean by this is that there are sediments in one place and sediments in another place . They can date them radiometrically to determine that they are both from the Edicarian period ( even though they may be seperated by millions of years ) . They then verify that they are Edicarian by looking at the layering to determine if the two pieces were at one point connected , but are now seperated due to tectonics . I 'm sure I 'm not entirely correct about these methods . I think I 'd better study up on some of these qeustions HERE . Maybe you should too ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Through precise radiometric clocks and clever stratigraphic connections `` If you have precise radiometric { clocks } why would you need { clever } stratigraphic connections ?"
|
"Any geologists want to help me out here ? What they mean by this is that there are sediments in one place and sediments in another place ."
| null | null |
37,389 | 9,796 |
"`` Through precise radiometric clocks and clever stratigraphic connections `` If you have precise radiometric { clocks } why would you need { clever } stratigraphic connections ? I want one of them radiometric clocks ! ROFL ! This is best described by the phrase . If you ca n't dazzle 'em with brilliance , baffle them with bs . They used to say we date the rocks by the fossils and the fossils by the rocks but this sounds better . At least to you it seems ."
|
"Any geologists want to help me out here ? What they mean by this is that there are sediments in one place and sediments in another place . They can date them radiometrically to determine that they are both from the Edicarian period ( even though they may be seperated by millions of years ) . They then verify that they are Edicarian by looking at the layering to determine if the two pieces were at one point connected , but are now seperated due to tectonics . I 'm sure I 'm not entirely correct about these methods . I think I 'd better study up on some of these qeustions HERE . Maybe you should too ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"If you have precise radiometric { clocks } why would you need { clever } stratigraphic connections ? They used to say we date the rocks by the fossils"
|
"They can date them radiometrically"
| null | null |
37,393 | 9,797 |
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ? If you bothered to read your own article : Really if this is another one of your fresh organic sample = age of decades of time capsule because they were both on top of the ground , you 're officially delusional . Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"did you miss this quote in the article ? ? ? ? Clanking like ceramic , all of these bones were fossilized All I have to say is you guys are hilarious . First you say humans have never been found near dinosaurs ... then when I show you otherwise you just make up excuses ! So how do you explain the soft tissue , flexible , red tissue found in t-rex bones ? http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... no_tissue.html How do you explain the following ? Fossils Yield 10-Million-Year-Old Bone Marrow -- A First http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ssil-bone.html Fossilized bone marrow has been discovered in ten-million-year-old frogs and salamanders from an ancient lake bed in Spain , scientists announced Friday . The specimens are the first examples of fossilized bone marrow ever to be discovered . They are so well preserved that the original color of the tissue is still visible . '' The marrow is organically preserved , `` McNamara said . '' The original color of the marrow is preserved . Like modern frogs , she says , the bones show an inner zone of yellow , fatty marrow , encircled by an outer zone of red marrow. `` or this : Fossil Meat Found in 380-Million-Year-Old Fish http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... -tissue_2.html this is a pretty good trick for a creature that is over a third of a billion years old ! And by the way ... do n't let the words `` fossilized `` fool you ... fossilization/petrification can happen very rapidly .... as shown here : http : //www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/ ... petrified.html"
|
DISAGREE
|
"another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have the area since the Dinosaurs died ? picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"you you say humans have never been found near dinosaurs ... then when I show you otherwise you just make up excuses do n't let the words `` fossilized `` fool"
| null | null |
37,391 | 9,797 |
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ? If you bothered to read your own article : Really if this is another one of your fresh organic sample = age of decades of time capsule because they were both on top of the ground , you 're officially delusional . Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"did you miss this quote in the article ? ? ? ? Clanking like ceramic , all of these bones were fossilized All I have to say is you guys are hilarious . First you say humans have never been found near dinosaurs ... then when I show you otherwise you just make up excuses ! So how do you explain the soft tissue , flexible , red tissue found in t-rex bones ? http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... no_tissue.html How do you explain the following ? Fossils Yield 10-Million-Year-Old Bone Marrow -- A First http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ssil-bone.html Fossilized bone marrow has been discovered in ten-million-year-old frogs and salamanders from an ancient lake bed in Spain , scientists announced Friday . The specimens are the first examples of fossilized bone marrow ever to be discovered . They are so well preserved that the original color of the tissue is still visible . '' The marrow is organically preserved , `` McNamara said . '' The original color of the marrow is preserved . Like modern frogs , she says , the bones show an inner zone of yellow , fatty marrow , encircled by an outer zone of red marrow. `` or this : Fossil Meat Found in 380-Million-Year-Old Fish http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... -tissue_2.html this is a pretty good trick for a creature that is over a third of a billion years old ! And by the way ... do n't let the words `` fossilized `` fool you ... fossilization/petrification can happen very rapidly .... as shown here : http : //www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/ ... petrified.html"
|
DISAGREE
|
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ? If you bothered to read your own article : Really if this is another one of your fresh organic sample = age of decades of time capsule because they were both on top of the ground , you 're officially delusional . Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"did you miss this in the article ? ? ? ? '' ``"
| null | null |
37,390 | 9,797 |
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ? If you bothered to read your own article : Really if this is another one of your fresh organic sample = age of decades of time capsule because they were both on top of the ground , you 're officially delusional . Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"did you miss this quote in the article ? ? ? ? Clanking like ceramic , all of these bones were fossilized All I have to say is you guys are hilarious . First you say humans have never been found near dinosaurs ... then when I show you otherwise you just make up excuses ! So how do you explain the soft tissue , flexible , red tissue found in t-rex bones ? http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... no_tissue.html How do you explain the following ? Fossils Yield 10-Million-Year-Old Bone Marrow -- A First http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ssil-bone.html Fossilized bone marrow has been discovered in ten-million-year-old frogs and salamanders from an ancient lake bed in Spain , scientists announced Friday . The specimens are the first examples of fossilized bone marrow ever to be discovered . They are so well preserved that the original color of the tissue is still visible . '' The marrow is organically preserved , `` McNamara said . '' The original color of the marrow is preserved . Like modern frogs , she says , the bones show an inner zone of yellow , fatty marrow , encircled by an outer zone of red marrow. `` or this : Fossil Meat Found in 380-Million-Year-Old Fish http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... -tissue_2.html this is a pretty good trick for a creature that is over a third of a billion years old ! And by the way ... do n't let the words `` fossilized `` fool you ... fossilization/petrification can happen very rapidly .... as shown here : http : //www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/ ... petrified.html"
|
DISAGREE
|
"Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"as shown here : http : //www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/ ... petrified.html"
| null | null |
37,392 | 9,797 |
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ? If you bothered to read your own article : Really if this is another one of your fresh organic sample = age of decades of time capsule because they were both on top of the ground , you 're officially delusional . Except the picture of the human remains are clearly NOT fossilized"
|
"did you miss this quote in the article ? ? ? ? Clanking like ceramic , all of these bones were fossilized All I have to say is you guys are hilarious . First you say humans have never been found near dinosaurs ... then when I show you otherwise you just make up excuses ! So how do you explain the soft tissue , flexible , red tissue found in t-rex bones ? http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... no_tissue.html How do you explain the following ? Fossils Yield 10-Million-Year-Old Bone Marrow -- A First http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... ssil-bone.html Fossilized bone marrow has been discovered in ten-million-year-old frogs and salamanders from an ancient lake bed in Spain , scientists announced Friday . The specimens are the first examples of fossilized bone marrow ever to be discovered . They are so well preserved that the original color of the tissue is still visible . '' The marrow is organically preserved , `` McNamara said . '' The original color of the marrow is preserved . Like modern frogs , she says , the bones show an inner zone of yellow , fatty marrow , encircled by an outer zone of red marrow. `` or this : Fossil Meat Found in 380-Million-Year-Old Fish http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/n ... -tissue_2.html this is a pretty good trick for a creature that is over a third of a billion years old ! And by the way ... do n't let the words `` fossilized `` fool you ... fossilization/petrification can happen very rapidly .... as shown here : http : //www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/ ... petrified.html"
|
DISAGREE
|
"And this is merely another piece of evidence that Sport 's a XXXXX . How about the simplistic explanation that people and other organisms have inhabitated the area since the Dinosaurs died ?"
|
"The marrow is organically preserved , `` McNamara said . '' The original color of the marrow is preserved . Like modern frogs , she says , the bones show an inner zone of yellow , fatty marrow ,"
| null | null |
37,394 | 9,798 |
"You are n't serious are you ? ? ? Is this a joke ? You 're one of the most active attackers of Christianity in these threads . Are n't you the one that likes to use the term `` Christonazi ? ``"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"You are n't serious are you ? ? ? Is this a joke ? You 're one of the most active attackers of Christianity in these ``"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
| null | null |
37,397 | 9,798 |
"You are n't serious are you ? ? ? Is this a joke ? You 're one of the most active attackers of Christianity in these threads . Are n't you the one that likes to use the term `` Christonazi ? ``"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"You are n't serious are you ?"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
| null | null |
37,395 | 9,798 |
"You are n't serious are you ? ? ? Is this a joke ? You 're one of the most active attackers of Christianity in these threads . Are n't you the one that likes to use the term `` Christonazi ? ``"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"You are n't serious are you ? ? ? Is this a joke ?"
|
"You mean he does not agree with your view of christianity ."
| null | null |
37,398 | 9,799 |
"Try this scenario . A 15 or 16 year old girl has her 18 year old boyfriend pick up the medication ."
|
"Good . Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Try this scenario . A 15 or 16 year old girl has her 18 year old boyfriend pick up the medication ."
|
"Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
| null | null |
37,400 | 9,799 |
"Try this scenario . A 15 or 16 year old girl has her 18 year old boyfriend pick up the medication ."
|
"Good . Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Try this scenario . A 15 or 16 year old girl has her 18 year old boyfriend pick up the medication ."
|
"Good . Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
| null | null |
37,399 | 9,799 |
"Try this scenario . A 15 or 16 year old girl has her 18 year old boyfriend pick up the medication ."
|
"Good . Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Try this scenario ."
|
"Better yet if they had access to and used birth control to begin with ."
| null | null |
37,402 | 9,800 |
"Prove that it is untrustworthy ... It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization ."
|
"This was done in my post # 7 of this thread . I showed that the research articles NARTH claims to quote say something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what NARTH pretends ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that it is untrustworthy ... It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization ."
|
"This was done in my post # 7 of this thread . I showed that the research articles NARTH claims to quote say something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what NARTH pretends ..."
| null | null |
37,404 | 9,800 |
"Prove that it is untrustworthy ... It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization ."
|
"This was done in my post # 7 of this thread . I showed that the research articles NARTH claims to quote say something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what NARTH pretends ..."
|
DISAGREE
|
"Prove that it is untrustworthy ... It is an organization of professionals and is as trustworthy as any other Professional organization"
|
"This was done in my post # 7 of this"
| null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.