Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
622
174
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun , yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"Actually , you can . You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
DISAGREE
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun , yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"Actually , you can . You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
null
null
623
174
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun , yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"Actually , you can . You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
DISAGREE
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"Actually , you can . You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
null
null
625
174
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun , yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"Actually , you can . You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
DISAGREE
"I am a person 15 years of age and I want my gun , yet I ca n't get one . Why not ?"
"You can get a cap and ball revolver via mail order LEGALLY ."
null
null
632
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"No it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
null
null
629
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"despite what you and your girlfriend becoming increasingly accepted ,"
"actually I have not seen your point of view expressed"
null
null
633
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"my POV The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all ."
null
null
631
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"whether it supports my POV"
"Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least"
null
null
628
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted"
"actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums ."
null
null
630
175
"No , it has not , despite what you and your girlfriend say . And , whether it supports my POV , as I believe it does , is not the point . The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink to the bottom without further plugging up and bailing out"
"Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums . Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all . Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all , but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical ."
DISAGREE
"The point is that my POV is valid , scientific , and becoming increasingly accepted , while your darwinist boat , riddled with leaks and worm holes from day one , is finally being allowed to sink"
"Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it . Quick search reveals NO mentions at all ."
null
null
635
176
"If no one owned weapons , then the police would be virtually unneccesary except to stop crimes committed with fists alone . Most criminals use a weaon of some kind , you see ."
"Yes , you are 100 % correct . Criminals would be sure to pay the tax on their illegally owned pistol , just like they pay income tax on drug money . Oh , wait they do n't pay tax on their drug money . Most criminals break the law you see ."
DISAGREE
"the police virtually unneccesary Most criminals use a weaon"
"Criminals they do n't pay tax Most criminals break the law"
null
null
638
176
"If no one owned weapons , then the police would be virtually unneccesary except to stop crimes committed with fists alone . Most criminals use a weaon of some kind , you see ."
"Yes , you are 100 % correct . Criminals would be sure to pay the tax on their illegally owned pistol , just like they pay income tax on drug money . Oh , wait they do n't pay tax on their drug money . Most criminals break the law you see ."
DISAGREE
"If no one owned weapons ,"
"Yes , you are 100 % correct illegally owned pistol ,"
null
null
636
176
"If no one owned weapons , then the police would be virtually unneccesary except to stop crimes committed with fists alone . Most criminals use a weaon of some kind , you see ."
"Yes , you are 100 % correct . Criminals would be sure to pay the tax on their illegally owned pistol , just like they pay income tax on drug money . Oh , wait they do n't pay tax on their drug money . Most criminals break the law you see ."
DISAGREE
"If no one owned weapons , then the police would be virtually unneccesary except to stop crimes committed with fists alone"
"Yes , you are 100 % correct . Criminals would be sure to pay the tax on their illegally owned pistol , just like they pay income tax on drug money ."
null
null
634
176
"If no one owned weapons , then the police would be virtually unneccesary except to stop crimes committed with fists alone . Most criminals use a weaon of some kind , you see ."
"Yes , you are 100 % correct . Criminals would be sure to pay the tax on their illegally owned pistol , just like they pay income tax on drug money . Oh , wait they do n't pay tax on their drug money . Most criminals break the law you see ."
DISAGREE
"no one owned weapons , police would be virtually crimes committed with fists alone criminals use of some kind"
"wait they do n't pay tax criminals break the law"
null
null
641
177
"OK , first off , this thread is for people who are either partially convinced about the existence of God , or have some problem with the nature of God as they understand it . this is not a thread where evidence is needed , just opinions and personal persuasions . if you believe God exists or have absolutely no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not . its just to explore the reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about God"
"you mean like partially pregnant or almost pregnant or almost a virgin ? I do n't have a beef with God , I only pick on guys shorter or weaker than I ."
DISAGREE
"if you believe God exists or have absolutely no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not . its just to explore the reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about God"
"I do n't have a beef with God , I only pick on guys shorter or weaker than I ."
null
null
640
177
"OK , first off , this thread is for people who are either partially convinced about the existence of God , or have some problem with the nature of God as they understand it . this is not a thread where evidence is needed , just opinions and personal persuasions . if you believe God exists or have absolutely no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not . its just to explore the reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about God"
"you mean like partially pregnant or almost pregnant or almost a virgin ? I do n't have a beef with God , I only pick on guys shorter or weaker than I ."
DISAGREE
"existence of God , nature of God no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not ."
"God"
null
null
643
177
"OK , first off , this thread is for people who are either partially convinced about the existence of God , or have some problem with the nature of God as they understand it . this is not a thread where evidence is needed , just opinions and personal persuasions . if you believe God exists or have absolutely no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not . its just to explore the reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about God"
"you mean like partially pregnant or almost pregnant or almost a virgin ? I do n't have a beef with God , I only pick on guys shorter or weaker than I ."
DISAGREE
"this thread is for people who are either partially convinced about the existence of God , or have some problem with the nature of God as they understand it"
"you mean like partially pregnant or almost pregnant or almost a virgin ? I do n't have a beef with God"
null
null
639
177
"OK , first off , this thread is for people who are either partially convinced about the existence of God , or have some problem with the nature of God as they understand it . this is not a thread where evidence is needed , just opinions and personal persuasions . if you believe God exists or have absolutely no doubt that God exists , then you can contribute , but its not the intention of this thread to prove that God exists or not . its just to explore the reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about God"
"you mean like partially pregnant or almost pregnant or almost a virgin ? I do n't have a beef with God , I only pick on guys shorter or weaker than I ."
DISAGREE
"reasons why people believe or doubt whatever about"
"do n't have a beef with"
null
null
644
178
"The discussion really got blown out of proportion somewhere along the line . I just had a problem with justifying abortion with false terms . It seemed more than obvious to me to use the meaning of words that is common in the English langauge . This is obviously the purpose of a dictionary and thus that is what I try to reasonably use in a discussion ."
"But even the dictionary definition contains multiple meanings - reflecting the multiple uses of a particular word - and even many of those definitions were vaguely stated . I think that most people on both sides of the debate value `` human rights `` . In valuing `` human rights `` , they have a particular image in mind of what is `` human `` in that case . Do you really think that , by forcing them to acknowledge one of the dictionary definitions of `` human `` , you will change their view on who or what deserves `` human rights `` ? There view is based not on official definitions but on underlying feelings of what , in humans , they value - and mental existence is one criteria that is a requirement for them and for myself . I do n't know who the main person is that is pushing the arguements about definitions now - you or Shooterandproud or ShadowPickachu or Sigma or gman , etc - but , whoever it is , please think about what exactly it is you are trying to accomplish . Do you seriously think that changing a persons definition of a word will alter their view on abortion rights ?"
DISAGREE
"false terms meaning of words purpose of a dictionary what try to reasonably use"
"dictionary contains multiple meanings `` `` , view is based not on official definitions but on underlying feelings do you seriously think"
null
null
650
179
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of Genesis' Then again , it never was meant to be taken literally . There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be literal"
DISAGREE
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of"
null
null
653
179
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of Genesis' Then again , it never was meant to be taken literally . There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be literal"
DISAGREE
"new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be"
null
null
649
179
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of Genesis' Then again , it never was meant to be taken literally . There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be literal"
DISAGREE
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of"
null
null
652
179
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of Genesis' Then again , it never was meant to be taken literally . There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be literal"
DISAGREE
"new to this idea science has over-ruled Creation"
"should have been specific never was meant to be taken literally"
null
null
651
179
"I 'm new to this idea that science has over-ruled Creation . Please explain ."
"He probably should have been specific , and said 'the literal 6 day creation of Genesis' Then again , it never was meant to be taken literally . There are too many puns , and political refrences in it to be literal"
DISAGREE
"new to this idea science has over-ruled Creation explain"
"should have been specific , . too many puns to be literal"
null
null
658
180
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
DISAGREE
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
null
null
655
180
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
DISAGREE
"abiogenesis evolution can not be proven"
"See above , yet again"
null
null
657
180
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
DISAGREE
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
null
null
654
180
"without abiogenesis proven evolution can not be proven ."
"See above , yet again"
DISAGREE
"can not be proven"
"above"
null
null
661
181
"i own several ak47s as well as chinese sks rifles im not a gang banger. . the last thing i want to do is shoot another person am i wrong ? i like to shoot ( saftley ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes . Then you need no reason nor do you have to justify yourself to anyone . The Constitution or firearms laws have nothing to do with `` if you need one `` ."
AGREE
"like to shoot ( ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes"
null
null
663
181
"i own several ak47s as well as chinese sks rifles im not a gang banger. . the last thing i want to do is shoot another person am i wrong ? i like to shoot ( saftley ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes . Then you need no reason nor do you have to justify yourself to anyone . The Constitution or firearms laws have nothing to do with `` if you need one `` ."
AGREE
"i own several ak47s im not a gang"
"you do not break and criminal codes The Constitution"
null
null
660
181
"i own several ak47s as well as chinese sks rifles im not a gang banger. . the last thing i want to do is shoot another person am i wrong ? i like to shoot ( saftley ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes . Then you need no reason nor do you have to justify yourself to anyone . The Constitution or firearms laws have nothing to do with `` if you need one `` ."
AGREE
"i own several ak47s chinese sks rifles like to shoot"
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes"
null
null
659
181
"i own several ak47s as well as chinese sks rifles im not a gang banger. . the last thing i want to do is shoot another person am i wrong ? i like to shoot ( saftley ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes . Then you need no reason nor do you have to justify yourself to anyone . The Constitution or firearms laws have nothing to do with `` if you need one `` ."
AGREE
"last thing i want to do is shoot another person am i wrong ? i like to shoot ( saftley ) at targets its just more fun to do it with a semi-auto rifles ."
"If guns make you happy and you do not break and criminal codes . Then you need no reason nor do you have to justify yourself to"
null
null
666
182
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"You did when you talked about someone loving objects , or a mokey , etc ."
DISAGREE
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"someone loving objects , or a mokey ,"
null
null
667
182
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"You did when you talked about someone loving objects , or a mokey , etc ."
DISAGREE
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"You did when you talked about someone loving objects ,"
null
null
664
182
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"You did when you talked about someone loving objects , or a mokey , etc ."
DISAGREE
"Who said anything about a different form of love ?"
"did when you talked about someone loving objects , or a mokey , etc"
null
null
670
190
"If every creature in the population changes its phenotype at the same time in response to an evironmental cue ( diet , temperature , predators , etc ) , this could give the illusion of evolution -- or change -- in the fossil record ."
"Great idea . Explain why all the tests that prove it wrong are irrelevant ."
DISAGREE
"the same time in to an evironmental cue ( diet , temperature , predators , etc ) , this could give the illusion of evolution -- or change"
"Explain why all the tests that prove it wrong are irrelevant ."
null
null
669
190
"If every creature in the population changes its phenotype at the same time in response to an evironmental cue ( diet , temperature , predators , etc ) , this could give the illusion of evolution -- or change -- in the fossil record ."
"Great idea . Explain why all the tests that prove it wrong are irrelevant ."
DISAGREE
"If every creature in the population changes its phenotype at the same time"
"the"
null
null
671
190
"If every creature in the population changes its phenotype at the same time in response to an evironmental cue ( diet , temperature , predators , etc ) , this could give the illusion of evolution -- or change -- in the fossil record ."
"Great idea . Explain why all the tests that prove it wrong are irrelevant ."
DISAGREE
"this could give the illusion of evolution"
"Explain why all the tests that prove it wrong are irrelevant ."
null
null
675
191
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ? If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up , and to heck with what it did to religion ."
DISAGREE
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ?"
null
null
678
191
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ? If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up , and to heck with what it did to religion ."
DISAGREE
"knowledge of God can only come through faith"
"Who says God cares about religion ?"
null
null
677
191
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ? If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up , and to heck with what it did to religion ."
DISAGREE
"knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ?"
null
null
674
191
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ? If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up , and to heck with what it did to religion ."
DISAGREE
"knowledge of God can only come through faith"
"If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up"
null
null
676
191
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ? If God felt like giving us certain knowledge , he could just show up , and to heck with what it did to religion ."
DISAGREE
"from a religious perspective , knowledge of God can only come through faith ."
"Who says God cares about religion ?"
null
null
681
192
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations , which is exactly the sort of thing this thread is about ."
"And the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
DISAGREE
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations ,"
"the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
null
null
682
192
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations , which is exactly the sort of thing this thread is about ."
"And the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
DISAGREE
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations ,"
"the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
null
null
679
192
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations , which is exactly the sort of thing this thread is about ."
"And the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
DISAGREE
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations , which is exactly the sort of thing this thread is about ."
"And the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
null
null
680
192
"What you did was use unfounded generalizations , which is exactly the sort of thing this thread is about ."
"And the assertion that pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle `` would be what ?"
DISAGREE
"use unfounded generalizations"
"pregnancy is a `` wonderful miracle ``"
null
null
684
193
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter . The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution . It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was ."
DISAGREE
"what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was"
null
null
686
193
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter . The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution . It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was ."
DISAGREE
"what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter ."
null
null
688
193
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter . The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution . It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was ."
DISAGREE
"rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love"
null
null
687
193
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter . The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution . It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was ."
DISAGREE
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love ."
null
null
685
193
"So what rational reason would there be to deny them the right to marry the person they love ?"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love . Benefits though , are a different matter . The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution . It 's not about anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was ."
DISAGREE
"rational reason to deny them the right to marry the person they love"
"They can `` marry `` whomever they love , The state and society views marriage as an opposite-sex institution anyone getting harmed ; no one said it was"
null
null
689
194
"The thing is , though , god and humans are n't the only candidates . Mach illustrated this point in the first post . Ogres , vampires , ghosts , etc . are all other possible candidates . That said , change `` God `` to `` ogres `` and the argument proves the existence of ogres ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question ."
AGREE
"change `` God `` to `` ogres `` and the argument proves the existence of ogres ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question ."
null
null
690
194
"The thing is , though , god and humans are n't the only candidates . Mach illustrated this point in the first post . Ogres , vampires , ghosts , etc . are all other possible candidates . That said , change `` God `` to `` ogres `` and the argument proves the existence of ogres ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question ."
AGREE
"The thing is , though , god and humans are n't the only candidates . Mach illustrated this point in the first post ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question ."
null
null
691
194
"The thing is , though , god and humans are n't the only candidates . Mach illustrated this point in the first post . Ogres , vampires , ghosts , etc . are all other possible candidates . That said , change `` God `` to `` ogres `` and the argument proves the existence of ogres ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question ."
AGREE
"change `` God `` to `` ogres `` and the argument proves the existence of ogres ."
"I see , thanks for answering my question"
null
null
693
195
"The sky is blue ? Evolution is true ? The pope lives in Rome ? Bears * * * * in the woods ? * Goes back to work and is slightly annoyed ShadowPikachu made a announcement from the department of the Obvious *"
"But did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me !"
DISAGREE
"Goes back to work and is slightly annoyed ShadowPikachu made a announcement from the department of the Obvious *"
"But did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me !"
null
null
694
195
"The sky is blue ? Evolution is true ? The pope lives in Rome ? Bears * * * * in the woods ? * Goes back to work and is slightly annoyed ShadowPikachu made a announcement from the department of the Obvious *"
"But did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me !"
DISAGREE
"The sky is blue ? Evolution is true ? The pope lives in Rome ?"
"But did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me"
null
null
696
195
"The sky is blue ? Evolution is true ? The pope lives in Rome ? Bears * * * * in the woods ? * Goes back to work and is slightly annoyed ShadowPikachu made a announcement from the department of the Obvious *"
"But did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me !"
DISAGREE
"Goes back to work and is slightly annoyed"
"did n't they tell you ? They outsourced your job to me !"
null
null
700
196
"a pro-gunner with the SN of `` marxismismurder `` conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative . The SN was inspired by VOR who kept signing his posts with quotes from Karl Marx ."
DISAGREE
"conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold"
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative"
null
null
698
196
"a pro-gunner with the SN of `` marxismismurder `` conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative . The SN was inspired by VOR who kept signing his posts with quotes from Karl Marx ."
DISAGREE
"do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative ."
null
null
697
196
"a pro-gunner with the SN of `` marxismismurder `` conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative . The SN was inspired by VOR who kept signing his posts with quotes from Karl Marx ."
DISAGREE
"a pro-gunner with the SN of `` marxismismurder `` conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative ."
null
null
699
196
"a pro-gunner with the SN of `` marxismismurder `` conservative was a pretty safe bet . You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative . The SN was inspired by VOR who kept signing his posts with quotes from Karl Marx ."
DISAGREE
"You do n't see many liberals in that mold ."
"I believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution , this makes me neither a liberal or conservative ."
null
null
706
197
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old . if we dont continue running on a deficit , then our generation will receive a check too . and who knows , you might really really NEED it . many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions . its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect . The average life span at the time was below 66 years . Since then americans have been insulting the state and disrupting it 's plans by not dying young enough ."
DISAGREE
"every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check"
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect"
null
null
702
197
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old . if we dont continue running on a deficit , then our generation will receive a check too . and who knows , you might really really NEED it . many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions . its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect . The average life span at the time was below 66 years . Since then americans have been insulting the state and disrupting it 's plans by not dying young enough ."
DISAGREE
"its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"most americans would not be around to collect ."
null
null
705
197
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old . if we dont continue running on a deficit , then our generation will receive a check too . and who knows , you might really really NEED it . many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions . its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect . The average life span at the time was below 66 years . Since then americans have been insulting the state and disrupting it 's plans by not dying young enough ."
DISAGREE
"FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check"
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect ."
null
null
703
197
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old . if we dont continue running on a deficit , then our generation will receive a check too . and who knows , you might really really NEED it . many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions . its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect . The average life span at the time was below 66 years . Since then americans have been insulting the state and disrupting it 's plans by not dying young enough ."
DISAGREE
"many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions ."
"The average life span at the time was below 66 years"
null
null
704
197
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old . if we dont continue running on a deficit , then our generation will receive a check too . and who knows , you might really really NEED it . many old people use it to help pay for their prescriptions . its easy to condemn social security when you 're young , but just you wait until retirement age ."
"When FDR started social security he was betting that most americans would not be around to collect . The average life span at the time was below 66 years . Since then americans have been insulting the state and disrupting it 's plans by not dying young enough ."
DISAGREE
"Originally posted by fallingupwards i 'm sure every old person from the time of FDR to the present was very pleased to receive their social security check when they turned 66 years old ."
"The average life span at the time was below 66 years"
null
null
712
198
"Maybe someone already said this but , problem is , we cant let the government take away any of our rights . Once they start doing that it would set precedence and who knows were it would end . Personally I wouldn ’ t own a gun for self defense because I am just not that big of a sissy ."
"You know what they call people like you ? Victims ."
DISAGREE
"they start doing that it would set precedence and who knows were it would end"
"You know what they call people like you ? Victims ."
null
null
708
198
"Maybe someone already said this but , problem is , we cant let the government take away any of our rights . Once they start doing that it would set precedence and who knows were it would end . Personally I wouldn ’ t own a gun for self defense because I am just not that big of a sissy ."
"You know what they call people like you ? Victims ."
DISAGREE
"Personally I wouldn ’ t own a gun for self defense"
"what they call people like you ? Victims ."
null
null
709
198
"Maybe someone already said this but , problem is , we cant let the government take away any of our rights . Once they start doing that it would set precedence and who knows were it would end . Personally I wouldn ’ t own a gun for self defense because I am just not that big of a sissy ."
"You know what they call people like you ? Victims ."
DISAGREE
"Maybe someone already said this but , problem is , we cant let the government take away any of our rights"
"You know what they call people like you ? Victims ."
null
null
716
199
"On Wednesday , April 28 , the Assembly Appropriations Committee met to consider Assembly Bill 1810 and Assembly Bill 2223 . AB1810 was placed into the suspense file due to financial costs and will be reconsidered in the near future . This bill may be acted upon at a later date . Please continue checking your email and NRA-ILA : : for any updates on AB1810 . AB2223 was re-scheduled for next week . AB1810 would establish a registration system , similar to the one currently in place for handguns , for all newly-acquired long guns . Under AB1810 , the make , model and serial number of the firearm as well as the identifying information of the purchaser would be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General ’ s office . If AB1810 were enacted , violent criminals would continue doing what they do now – obtain firearms through illegal means . This bill would not decrease crime but will rather have disastrous effects on the already financially unstable Golden State . AB1810 would impose additional burdens on California ’ s taxpayers to maintain the registration system as well as on the state ’ s licensed firearms dealers , small businesses who already deal with extensive business requirements . One simply needs to look at Canada , a nation with draconian firearms registration , to see the results – billions in cumulative administrative costs , annual cost overruns , no clear substantiation of public safety benefits , unjust prosecution , and a bureaucratic complexity that daunts those willing to comply . Ironically , California is considering a new registration scheme as Canada is considering doing away with its system ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law . A waste of money in financial crunch time , or just good law making ? However , that is not the only options . You can say whatever you like . It is a free country . At least for now . Given all of the new laws being made , and the bureaucracy they create , thus adding more and further regs . associated with bigger government , the trend does n't look good for Freedom from governmental intrusions . But at least for now ."
DISAGREE
"was placed into the suspense file due to financial costs and will be reconsidered in the near future ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law . A waste of money in financial crunch time"
null
null
717
199
"On Wednesday , April 28 , the Assembly Appropriations Committee met to consider Assembly Bill 1810 and Assembly Bill 2223 . AB1810 was placed into the suspense file due to financial costs and will be reconsidered in the near future . This bill may be acted upon at a later date . Please continue checking your email and NRA-ILA : : for any updates on AB1810 . AB2223 was re-scheduled for next week . AB1810 would establish a registration system , similar to the one currently in place for handguns , for all newly-acquired long guns . Under AB1810 , the make , model and serial number of the firearm as well as the identifying information of the purchaser would be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General ’ s office . If AB1810 were enacted , violent criminals would continue doing what they do now – obtain firearms through illegal means . This bill would not decrease crime but will rather have disastrous effects on the already financially unstable Golden State . AB1810 would impose additional burdens on California ’ s taxpayers to maintain the registration system as well as on the state ’ s licensed firearms dealers , small businesses who already deal with extensive business requirements . One simply needs to look at Canada , a nation with draconian firearms registration , to see the results – billions in cumulative administrative costs , annual cost overruns , no clear substantiation of public safety benefits , unjust prosecution , and a bureaucratic complexity that daunts those willing to comply . Ironically , California is considering a new registration scheme as Canada is considering doing away with its system ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law . A waste of money in financial crunch time , or just good law making ? However , that is not the only options . You can say whatever you like . It is a free country . At least for now . Given all of the new laws being made , and the bureaucracy they create , thus adding more and further regs . associated with bigger government , the trend does n't look good for Freedom from governmental intrusions . But at least for now ."
DISAGREE
"considering a new registration scheme as Canada is considering doing away with its system ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law ."
null
null
714
199
"On Wednesday , April 28 , the Assembly Appropriations Committee met to consider Assembly Bill 1810 and Assembly Bill 2223 . AB1810 was placed into the suspense file due to financial costs and will be reconsidered in the near future . This bill may be acted upon at a later date . Please continue checking your email and NRA-ILA : : for any updates on AB1810 . AB2223 was re-scheduled for next week . AB1810 would establish a registration system , similar to the one currently in place for handguns , for all newly-acquired long guns . Under AB1810 , the make , model and serial number of the firearm as well as the identifying information of the purchaser would be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General ’ s office . If AB1810 were enacted , violent criminals would continue doing what they do now – obtain firearms through illegal means . This bill would not decrease crime but will rather have disastrous effects on the already financially unstable Golden State . AB1810 would impose additional burdens on California ’ s taxpayers to maintain the registration system as well as on the state ’ s licensed firearms dealers , small businesses who already deal with extensive business requirements . One simply needs to look at Canada , a nation with draconian firearms registration , to see the results – billions in cumulative administrative costs , annual cost overruns , no clear substantiation of public safety benefits , unjust prosecution , and a bureaucratic complexity that daunts those willing to comply . Ironically , California is considering a new registration scheme as Canada is considering doing away with its system ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law . A waste of money in financial crunch time , or just good law making ? However , that is not the only options . You can say whatever you like . It is a free country . At least for now . Given all of the new laws being made , and the bureaucracy they create , thus adding more and further regs . associated with bigger government , the trend does n't look good for Freedom from governmental intrusions . But at least for now ."
DISAGREE
"California is considering a new registration scheme"
"ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law ."
null
null
718
199
"On Wednesday , April 28 , the Assembly Appropriations Committee met to consider Assembly Bill 1810 and Assembly Bill 2223 . AB1810 was placed into the suspense file due to financial costs and will be reconsidered in the near future . This bill may be acted upon at a later date . Please continue checking your email and NRA-ILA : : for any updates on AB1810 . AB2223 was re-scheduled for next week . AB1810 would establish a registration system , similar to the one currently in place for handguns , for all newly-acquired long guns . Under AB1810 , the make , model and serial number of the firearm as well as the identifying information of the purchaser would be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General ’ s office . If AB1810 were enacted , violent criminals would continue doing what they do now – obtain firearms through illegal means . This bill would not decrease crime but will rather have disastrous effects on the already financially unstable Golden State . AB1810 would impose additional burdens on California ’ s taxpayers to maintain the registration system as well as on the state ’ s licensed firearms dealers , small businesses who already deal with extensive business requirements . One simply needs to look at Canada , a nation with draconian firearms registration , to see the results – billions in cumulative administrative costs , annual cost overruns , no clear substantiation of public safety benefits , unjust prosecution , and a bureaucratic complexity that daunts those willing to comply . Ironically , California is considering a new registration scheme as Canada is considering doing away with its system ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law . A waste of money in financial crunch time , or just good law making ? However , that is not the only options . You can say whatever you like . It is a free country . At least for now . Given all of the new laws being made , and the bureaucracy they create , thus adding more and further regs . associated with bigger government , the trend does n't look good for Freedom from governmental intrusions . But at least for now ."
DISAGREE
"This bill may be acted upon at a later date . Please continue checking your email and NRA-ILA : : for any updates on AB1810 ."
"Let 's ask our California resident what he thinks of this new law ."
null
null
725
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns ."
"Well said ."
null
null
722
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns"
"The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments"
null
null
724
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns ."
"Well said ."
null
null
720
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"that more guns will solve the problem"
"the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
null
null
721
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns"
"The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance"
null
null
723
200
"Those who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns . Those who interpret the second ammendment as an obligation will argue that more guns will solve the problem . Those who see it as an issue in itself , with the firearms as a secondary factor will be ignored or belittled by the other two groups ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances rather than attributing anything to developments leading up to and cumulating in that circumstance . Take away guns , knifes , etc . and something will be used , perhaps a deadly spray poison with components and mixing instructions available on the Internet . People will clamor to censor the Internet but distance themselves from social ills or personality defects as the basic , underlying cause ."
AGREE
"who support gun control will agitate for more restrictions on availability of guns ."
"Well said . The truth of the matter is society 's desire to hang blame on obvious contributing circumstances"
null
null
727
201
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
AGREE
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
null
null
728
201
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
AGREE
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
null
null
731
201
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
AGREE
"Was he behind this great `` age of science ``"
"rejected the Trinity ."
null
null
730
201
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
AGREE
"Was he behind this ``"
"he rejected the Trinity ."
null
null
729
201
"Originally posted by Gabor By the way Newton was also a Bible scholar . Was he behind this great `` age of science `` mentally ?"
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity ."
AGREE
"the way Newton was also a Bible scholar ."
"And as a result of his Bible studies he rejected the Trinity"
null
null
735
202
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts .."
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes - her blood , her immune system , her calories - it puts stress on her joints , muscles , heart , and bladder . Pregnacy can demand major sacrifices in behavior and diet - some of which can be detrimental . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
DISAGREE
"the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts"
"It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant"
null
null
734
202
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts .."
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes - her blood , her immune system , her calories - it puts stress on her joints , muscles , heart , and bladder . Pregnacy can demand major sacrifices in behavior and diet - some of which can be detrimental . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
DISAGREE
"the child is not the woman 's body ."
"It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
null
null
733
202
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts .."
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes - her blood , her immune system , her calories - it puts stress on her joints , muscles , heart , and bladder . Pregnacy can demand major sacrifices in behavior and diet - some of which can be detrimental . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
DISAGREE
"the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby"
"It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes"
null
null
732
202
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts .."
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes - her blood , her immune system , her calories - it puts stress on her joints , muscles , heart , and bladder . Pregnacy can demand major sacrifices in behavior and diet - some of which can be detrimental . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
DISAGREE
"the child is not the woman 's body ."
"is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy"
null
null
737
202
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts .."
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant . It lives off her life processes - her blood , her immune system , her calories - it puts stress on her joints , muscles , heart , and bladder . Pregnacy can demand major sacrifices in behavior and diet - some of which can be detrimental . No a baby is n't the woman 's body - but a pregnancy IS ."
DISAGREE
"So therefore , the child is not the woman 's body . my other conclusion would be , the woman really doesnt have the right to do anything to that baby inside of her except to be a vessel in carrying out that childs destiny to be born . thats just my thoughts"
"That 's really simplified . It 's not like a woman 's body is a suitcase and the fetus is biologically self-reliant"
null
null
740
203
"-- the old way does n't hold water ."
"What ? The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension . I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before . It only adds understanding . Sadly , you do n't seem to understand ."
DISAGREE
"the old way does n't hold water ."
"The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension"
null
null
742
203
"-- the old way does n't hold water ."
"What ? The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension . I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before . It only adds understanding . Sadly , you do n't seem to understand ."
DISAGREE
"the old way does n't"
"What ? ``"
null
null
741
203
"-- the old way does n't hold water ."
"What ? The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension . I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before . It only adds understanding . Sadly , you do n't seem to understand ."
DISAGREE
"the old way does n't hold water ."
"The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes ."
null
null
738
203
"-- the old way does n't hold water ."
"What ? The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension . I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before . It only adds understanding . Sadly , you do n't seem to understand ."
DISAGREE
"old way does n't hold water ."
"I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before ."
null
null
743
203
"-- the old way does n't hold water ."
"What ? The understanding of HOX genes has n't actually changed the understanding of mutations to other genes . It has added an additional dimension . I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` but an understanding of regulatory genes does not negate anything that went before . It only adds understanding . Sadly , you do n't seem to understand ."
DISAGREE
"old way does n't hold water"
"What ? I 'm not sure what you mean by `` the old way , `` you do n't seem to understand ."
null
null
747
204
"Originally posted by gilligan8503 if i want to kill myself , i do n't fear it . you act like people have multiple personalities and can not control what the other is doing . if i choose to commit suicide , it 's all good . that is what i want . if someone shoots and kills me , i have not choice . you say you fear a fatty diet , but i bet you wo n't walk into a gang circle and XXXX them off . do it if you are so sure you do n't fear guns ."
"No I wo n't walk into that situation . What you feel to be right is OK with me . It is what you feel to be right and try to make it public policy is what I disagree with . You should fear yourself . YOU are a greater danger to yourself than a felon with a firearm . You have an extremely skewed sense of risk assement . I do n't expect to change your mind , after all I do n't expect to convince someone with an irrational fear of flying that it is safe . Want to kill yourself ? Sucide ? That is very irrational is n't it ?"
DISAGREE
"if someone shoots and kills me"
"YOU are a greater danger to yourself"
null
null
745
204
"Originally posted by gilligan8503 if i want to kill myself , i do n't fear it . you act like people have multiple personalities and can not control what the other is doing . if i choose to commit suicide , it 's all good . that is what i want . if someone shoots and kills me , i have not choice . you say you fear a fatty diet , but i bet you wo n't walk into a gang circle and XXXX them off . do it if you are so sure you do n't fear guns ."
"No I wo n't walk into that situation . What you feel to be right is OK with me . It is what you feel to be right and try to make it public policy is what I disagree with . You should fear yourself . YOU are a greater danger to yourself than a felon with a firearm . You have an extremely skewed sense of risk assement . I do n't expect to change your mind , after all I do n't expect to convince someone with an irrational fear of flying that it is safe . Want to kill yourself ? Sucide ? That is very irrational is n't it ?"
DISAGREE
"Originally posted by gilligan8503 if i want to kill myself , i do n't fear it"
"No I wo n't walk into that situation ."
null
null
744
204
"Originally posted by gilligan8503 if i want to kill myself , i do n't fear it . you act like people have multiple personalities and can not control what the other is doing . if i choose to commit suicide , it 's all good . that is what i want . if someone shoots and kills me , i have not choice . you say you fear a fatty diet , but i bet you wo n't walk into a gang circle and XXXX them off . do it if you are so sure you do n't fear guns ."
"No I wo n't walk into that situation . What you feel to be right is OK with me . It is what you feel to be right and try to make it public policy is what I disagree with . You should fear yourself . YOU are a greater danger to yourself than a felon with a firearm . You have an extremely skewed sense of risk assement . I do n't expect to change your mind , after all I do n't expect to convince someone with an irrational fear of flying that it is safe . Want to kill yourself ? Sucide ? That is very irrational is n't it ?"
DISAGREE
"you say you fear a fatty diet , but i bet you wo n't walk into a gang circle and XXXX them off ."
"It is what you feel to be right and try to make it public policy is what I disagree with ."
null
null
749
205
"I 've asked this question and many others you may see me post , in a number of other forums . I 've recieved similar arguments , about a country not deciding to invade us . No Particular country was ever mentioned , However , if possible , I would like to belatedly clarify that I am asking this question in the context of the time we are now living in , as opposed to any other time . ( I 'm not sure if I made that at all clear in the post that started the thread . ) ( I take it that this question has been asked before in this forum , rather recently , I assume ? ? ? If not in an initial thread post , then perhaps within another thread . )"
"This topic was discussed in another thread . Kelvin said that- `` If it were not the private ownership of guns in 1941 , you would be speaking Japanese if you live on the Westcoast , German if you live on the Eastcoast. `` Urban Legend . It should be illegal for women to have sex ."
AGREE
"I 've recieved similar arguments , about a country not deciding to invade us ."
"Kelvin said that- `` If it were not the private ownership of guns in 1941 , you would be speaking Japanese if you live on the Westcoast ,"
null
null
748
205
"I 've asked this question and many others you may see me post , in a number of other forums . I 've recieved similar arguments , about a country not deciding to invade us . No Particular country was ever mentioned , However , if possible , I would like to belatedly clarify that I am asking this question in the context of the time we are now living in , as opposed to any other time . ( I 'm not sure if I made that at all clear in the post that started the thread . ) ( I take it that this question has been asked before in this forum , rather recently , I assume ? ? ? If not in an initial thread post , then perhaps within another thread . )"
"This topic was discussed in another thread . Kelvin said that- `` If it were not the private ownership of guns in 1941 , you would be speaking Japanese if you live on the Westcoast , German if you live on the Eastcoast. `` Urban Legend . It should be illegal for women to have sex ."
AGREE
"in was another thread ."
"If it were not the private ownership of guns"
null
null
751
205
"I 've asked this question and many others you may see me post , in a number of other forums . I 've recieved similar arguments , about a country not deciding to invade us . No Particular country was ever mentioned , However , if possible , I would like to belatedly clarify that I am asking this question in the context of the time we are now living in , as opposed to any other time . ( I 'm not sure if I made that at all clear in the post that started the thread . ) ( I take it that this question has been asked before in this forum , rather recently , I assume ? ? ? If not in an initial thread post , then perhaps within another thread . )"
"This topic was discussed in another thread . Kelvin said that- `` If it were not the private ownership of guns in 1941 , you would be speaking Japanese if you live on the Westcoast , German if you live on the Eastcoast. `` Urban Legend . It should be illegal for women to have sex ."
AGREE
"I 've asked this question and many others you may see me post , in a number of other forums"
"This topic was discussed in another thread ."
null
null