Search is not available for this dataset
Unnamed: 0
int64
0
38.3k
id
int64
8
10k
q
stringlengths
5
13k
r
stringlengths
3
35.3k
s
stringclasses
2 values
q'
stringlengths
3
2.67k
r'
stringlengths
3
6.78k
Unnamed: 6
float64
total no.: 7987
float64
1,374
396
"If all of our experiments show the Earth is 4.5 billion years old , then that is how old it is . If the Bible says something different , then either God meant Genesis for peoples past and now uses scientists to explain things better ( though I am uncomfortable with this idea as many scientists are atheists ) , or our puny minds , compared with God 's , have n't yet worked out how Genesis and an old Earth tie together"
"Such as what ? It is not like putting two electrodes into the Earth and getting a measurement on some sort of gadget . The only way to measure how old something is , is by using a set of arbitrary assumptions . There are few things that you need to take into account , such as the rate of decay , and so on . Creationists know that there is something seriously wrong with the radio-metric dating methods . Explain this then , carbon dating of wood under lava that was erupted from Rangitoto ( an island volcano near Auckland , NZ ) indicates that the erruption was around 200 years ago ( the name is said to mean `` Red Sky `` , suggesting that the Maoris , who have been their for 1000 years at the most , witnessed this event ) . Yet potassium-argon dating of the lava rock has given ages of up to half a million years old ! Now this alone is a big flaw . Any person who uses their logic can tell that the result of the potassium-argon is way out , it should be less than 200 years . The radio-carbon date is only restricted to thousands of years , because even after several hundreds of thousands of years , there will be no more radio-carbon left . The above came from Snelling , A. , `` Dating Dilemma : Fossil wood in `` ancient `` sandstone `` , Creation 21 ( 3 ) :39-41 . Creationists do n't have ( by their own admissions ) all of the answers when it comes to radio-metric dating methods , but they can see enough that there is something seriously wrong with the underlying assumptions . Professor Richard Mauger says : `` In general , dates in the `` correct ball park `` are assumed to be correct and are published , but those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor are discrepencies fuly explained. ``"
AGREE
"If all of our experiments show the Earth is 4.5 billion years old , then that is how old it is ."
"The only way to measure how old something is , is by using a set of arbitrary assumptions ."
null
null
1,376
396
"If all of our experiments show the Earth is 4.5 billion years old , then that is how old it is . If the Bible says something different , then either God meant Genesis for peoples past and now uses scientists to explain things better ( though I am uncomfortable with this idea as many scientists are atheists ) , or our puny minds , compared with God 's , have n't yet worked out how Genesis and an old Earth tie together"
"Such as what ? It is not like putting two electrodes into the Earth and getting a measurement on some sort of gadget . The only way to measure how old something is , is by using a set of arbitrary assumptions . There are few things that you need to take into account , such as the rate of decay , and so on . Creationists know that there is something seriously wrong with the radio-metric dating methods . Explain this then , carbon dating of wood under lava that was erupted from Rangitoto ( an island volcano near Auckland , NZ ) indicates that the erruption was around 200 years ago ( the name is said to mean `` Red Sky `` , suggesting that the Maoris , who have been their for 1000 years at the most , witnessed this event ) . Yet potassium-argon dating of the lava rock has given ages of up to half a million years old ! Now this alone is a big flaw . Any person who uses their logic can tell that the result of the potassium-argon is way out , it should be less than 200 years . The radio-carbon date is only restricted to thousands of years , because even after several hundreds of thousands of years , there will be no more radio-carbon left . The above came from Snelling , A. , `` Dating Dilemma : Fossil wood in `` ancient `` sandstone `` , Creation 21 ( 3 ) :39-41 . Creationists do n't have ( by their own admissions ) all of the answers when it comes to radio-metric dating methods , but they can see enough that there is something seriously wrong with the underlying assumptions . Professor Richard Mauger says : `` In general , dates in the `` correct ball park `` are assumed to be correct and are published , but those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor are discrepencies fuly explained. ``"
AGREE
"the Earth is 4.5 billion years old"
"The only way to measure how old something is , is by using a set of arbitrary assumptions rate of decay there is something seriously wrong with the radio-metric dating methods `` Snelling"
null
null
1,379
397
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
DISAGREE
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
null
null
1,381
397
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
DISAGREE
"stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
null
null
1,378
397
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
DISAGREE
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
null
null
1,380
397
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
DISAGREE
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX"
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
null
null
1,382
397
"Shut up you retarded moronic XXXXX . You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
DISAGREE
"You little whining baby , stop wasting my time you dumb fool ."
"At least you are aware of your own mental deficiencies ."
null
null
1,386
398
"What this means is : that we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome , no matter how much we learn about it ."
"In my lifetime , we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
DISAGREE
"we will never figure out the intricate workings of the"
"we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
null
null
1,385
398
"What this means is : that we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome , no matter how much we learn about it ."
"In my lifetime , we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
DISAGREE
"that we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome , no matter how much we learn about it ."
"we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
null
null
1,383
398
"What this means is : that we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome , no matter how much we learn about it ."
"In my lifetime , we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
DISAGREE
"we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome"
"we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
null
null
1,387
398
"What this means is : that we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome , no matter how much we learn about it ."
"In my lifetime , we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn ."
DISAGREE
"we will never figure out the intricate workings of the genome"
"we 've made huge strides , but there 's a lot more to learn"
null
null
1,392
399
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God , who claim to know exactly what it is that God wants and believes/ To me , somehow , it smacks of self-idolatrization , prideful in being `` next `` to God ."
"What else is new ?"
AGREE
"it smacks of self-idolatrization , prideful in being `` next `` to God ."
"What else is new ?"
null
null
1,391
399
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God , who claim to know exactly what it is that God wants and believes/ To me , somehow , it smacks of self-idolatrization , prideful in being `` next `` to God ."
"What else is new ?"
AGREE
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God"
"What else is new ?"
null
null
1,390
399
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God , who claim to know exactly what it is that God wants and believes/ To me , somehow , it smacks of self-idolatrization , prideful in being `` next `` to God ."
"What else is new ?"
AGREE
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God ``"
"What else is new ?"
null
null
1,388
399
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God , who claim to know exactly what it is that God wants and believes/ To me , somehow , it smacks of self-idolatrization , prideful in being `` next `` to God ."
"What else is new ?"
AGREE
"I am gravely offended by those who claim to be on a first name basis with God , who claim to know exactly what it is that God wants and"
"What else is new ?"
null
null
1,396
400
"In Genesis , humans are created seperately from all other creatures , but apes and monkeys are not specifically mentioned ."
"But on the other hand , Genesis is n't a scientific document . No wonder . Why would a bronze age nomad from the Levant be aware of at least 3 tailless species of primates , or even the tailed primates from Africa , South America , and even Madigascar . If they are n't mentioned in the Bible , do they exist ?"
DISAGREE
"In Genesis humans are created seperately from all other creatures ,"
"Genesis is n't a scientific document"
null
null
1,393
400
"In Genesis , humans are created seperately from all other creatures , but apes and monkeys are not specifically mentioned ."
"But on the other hand , Genesis is n't a scientific document . No wonder . Why would a bronze age nomad from the Levant be aware of at least 3 tailless species of primates , or even the tailed primates from Africa , South America , and even Madigascar . If they are n't mentioned in the Bible , do they exist ?"
DISAGREE
"In Genesis , humans are created seperately from all other creatures , but apes and monkeys are not specifically mentioned ."
"But on the other hand , Genesis is n't a scientific document ."
null
null
1,394
400
"In Genesis , humans are created seperately from all other creatures , but apes and monkeys are not specifically mentioned ."
"But on the other hand , Genesis is n't a scientific document . No wonder . Why would a bronze age nomad from the Levant be aware of at least 3 tailless species of primates , or even the tailed primates from Africa , South America , and even Madigascar . If they are n't mentioned in the Bible , do they exist ?"
DISAGREE
"In Genesis , humans are created seperately"
"But on the other hand , Genesis is n't a scientific document ."
null
null
1,400
401
"so we would penalize financially those who want to have kids ?"
"Well , I forgot to add one thing : a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior ."
AGREE
"we would penalize financially those who want to have kids"
"I forgot to add one thing : a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior ."
null
null
1,401
401
"so we would penalize financially those who want to have kids ?"
"Well , I forgot to add one thing : a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior ."
AGREE
"we would penalize financially those who want to have kids ?"
"I forgot to add one thing : a legal notice to the gov't"
null
null
1,398
401
"so we would penalize financially those who want to have kids ?"
"Well , I forgot to add one thing : a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior ."
AGREE
"so we would penalize financially those who want to have kids ?"
"a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior ."
null
null
1,407
402
"The court followed the idea of not changing the game after it has been played . They changed the law , but they wont undo what had been done before the law change . For example , say the changed the fine for speeding to 10,000 dollars . People who had already been given speeding tickets would not be fined more money . People who were married before prop 8 did so completely legally . The law has been changed , but the act of marrying that they performed was legal at the time it was performed , so it would be wrong to undo that ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense . But in doing this , the Court may have created a situation where plaintiffs can argue that California is denying people the equal protection of the laws , by allowing some people to be married to same-sex spouses and not allowing other people to be so married . If that is the argument that the plaintiffs make in their federal lawsuit , this could be interesting . The courts might have to interpret whether allowing some people to be married and not allowing other people to be married violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution . And then they might have to decide whether this means that all same-sex couples must have the right to marry , because some of them can be legally married . In other words , this situation may be an opportunity , because no one can argue that this is a case of apples and oranges of same-sex couples being different from opposite-sex couples . Now you have same-sex couples who are legally married and same-sex couples who can not be legally married in the same state , which can be argued to be denial of equal protection of the laws . I do n't know .... it could be interesting . Maybe things wo n't play out this way . We 'll have to wait and see ."
AGREE
"The court followed the idea of not changing the game after it has been played . They changed the law ,"
"Yes"
null
null
1,405
402
"The court followed the idea of not changing the game after it has been played . They changed the law , but they wont undo what had been done before the law change . For example , say the changed the fine for speeding to 10,000 dollars . People who had already been given speeding tickets would not be fined more money . People who were married before prop 8 did so completely legally . The law has been changed , but the act of marrying that they performed was legal at the time it was performed , so it would be wrong to undo that ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense . But in doing this , the Court may have created a situation where plaintiffs can argue that California is denying people the equal protection of the laws , by allowing some people to be married to same-sex spouses and not allowing other people to be so married . If that is the argument that the plaintiffs make in their federal lawsuit , this could be interesting . The courts might have to interpret whether allowing some people to be married and not allowing other people to be married violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution . And then they might have to decide whether this means that all same-sex couples must have the right to marry , because some of them can be legally married . In other words , this situation may be an opportunity , because no one can argue that this is a case of apples and oranges of same-sex couples being different from opposite-sex couples . Now you have same-sex couples who are legally married and same-sex couples who can not be legally married in the same state , which can be argued to be denial of equal protection of the laws . I do n't know .... it could be interesting . Maybe things wo n't play out this way . We 'll have to wait and see ."
AGREE
"The law has been changed , but the act of marrying that they performed was legal at the time it was performed , so it would be wrong to undo that ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense ."
null
null
1,406
402
"The court followed the idea of not changing the game after it has been played . They changed the law , but they wont undo what had been done before the law change . For example , say the changed the fine for speeding to 10,000 dollars . People who had already been given speeding tickets would not be fined more money . People who were married before prop 8 did so completely legally . The law has been changed , but the act of marrying that they performed was legal at the time it was performed , so it would be wrong to undo that ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense . But in doing this , the Court may have created a situation where plaintiffs can argue that California is denying people the equal protection of the laws , by allowing some people to be married to same-sex spouses and not allowing other people to be so married . If that is the argument that the plaintiffs make in their federal lawsuit , this could be interesting . The courts might have to interpret whether allowing some people to be married and not allowing other people to be married violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution . And then they might have to decide whether this means that all same-sex couples must have the right to marry , because some of them can be legally married . In other words , this situation may be an opportunity , because no one can argue that this is a case of apples and oranges of same-sex couples being different from opposite-sex couples . Now you have same-sex couples who are legally married and same-sex couples who can not be legally married in the same state , which can be argued to be denial of equal protection of the laws . I do n't know .... it could be interesting . Maybe things wo n't play out this way . We 'll have to wait and see ."
AGREE
"People who were married before prop 8 did so completely legally ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense"
null
null
1,403
402
"The court followed the idea of not changing the game after it has been played . They changed the law , but they wont undo what had been done before the law change . For example , say the changed the fine for speeding to 10,000 dollars . People who had already been given speeding tickets would not be fined more money . People who were married before prop 8 did so completely legally . The law has been changed , but the act of marrying that they performed was legal at the time it was performed , so it would be wrong to undo that ."
"Yes , that 's all true , and it makes complete sense . But in doing this , the Court may have created a situation where plaintiffs can argue that California is denying people the equal protection of the laws , by allowing some people to be married to same-sex spouses and not allowing other people to be so married . If that is the argument that the plaintiffs make in their federal lawsuit , this could be interesting . The courts might have to interpret whether allowing some people to be married and not allowing other people to be married violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution . And then they might have to decide whether this means that all same-sex couples must have the right to marry , because some of them can be legally married . In other words , this situation may be an opportunity , because no one can argue that this is a case of apples and oranges of same-sex couples being different from opposite-sex couples . Now you have same-sex couples who are legally married and same-sex couples who can not be legally married in the same state , which can be argued to be denial of equal protection of the laws . I do n't know .... it could be interesting . Maybe things wo n't play out this way . We 'll have to wait and see ."
AGREE
"the idea of not changing the game after it has been played ."
"But in doing this , the Court may have created a situation where plaintiffs can argue that California is denying people the equal protection of the laws ,"
null
null
1,411
403
"i 'm saying , 'according to the dictionary ' may not mean that much . the dictionary is too , what is the word , standard to describe certain things . it says 'killing of a human ' , but what about the vegans ? they believe that killing an animal is murder . words and the meaning of words change over time ."
"But the government ca n't work with connotative meanings . It has to go by what is written . In this case , the definition of murder by every source I have read states that murder is the killing of another human ."
DISAGREE
"it says 'killing of a human ' , but what about the vegans ? they believe that killing"
"every source I have read states that murder is the killing of another human ."
null
null
1,412
403
"i 'm saying , 'according to the dictionary ' may not mean that much . the dictionary is too , what is the word , standard to describe certain things . it says 'killing of a human ' , but what about the vegans ? they believe that killing an animal is murder . words and the meaning of words change over time ."
"But the government ca n't work with connotative meanings . It has to go by what is written . In this case , the definition of murder by every source I have read states that murder is the killing of another human ."
DISAGREE
"killing an animal is murder"
"the definition of murder by every source I have read states that murder is the killing of another human ."
null
null
1,408
403
"i 'm saying , 'according to the dictionary ' may not mean that much . the dictionary is too , what is the word , standard to describe certain things . it says 'killing of a human ' , but what about the vegans ? they believe that killing an animal is murder . words and the meaning of words change over time ."
"But the government ca n't work with connotative meanings . It has to go by what is written . In this case , the definition of murder by every source I have read states that murder is the killing of another human ."
DISAGREE
"i 'm saying , 'according to the dictionary ' may not mean that much words and the meaning of words change over time ."
"But the government ca n't work with connotative meanings . It has to go by what is written ."
null
null
1,413
404
"ROFL . They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"... ? Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
DISAGREE
"They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
null
null
1,414
404
"ROFL . They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"... ? Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
DISAGREE
"They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
null
null
1,416
404
"ROFL . They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"... ? Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
DISAGREE
"ROFL"
"you 've misread what I said"
null
null
1,415
404
"ROFL . They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"... ? Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
DISAGREE
"They all believe in a god but hope there is n't"
"Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
null
null
1,417
404
"ROFL . They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"... ? Either you 've misread what I said , twisted what I said , or you 're just stupid ."
DISAGREE
"They all believe in a god but hope there is n't ?"
"you 've misread what I said"
null
null
1,421
405
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
DISAGREE
"pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
null
null
1,419
405
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
DISAGREE
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
null
null
1,422
405
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
DISAGREE
"pro-choice is pro-life"
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
null
null
1,418
405
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
DISAGREE
"A position of pro-choice is pro-life because the lives and quality of life of women are valued ."
"Leonard Peikoff said it first"
null
null
1,425
406
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no . The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
DISAGREE
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no ."
null
null
1,423
406
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no . The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
DISAGREE
"are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
null
null
1,427
406
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no . The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
DISAGREE
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are"
"The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God"
null
null
1,424
406
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no . The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
DISAGREE
"what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol"
null
null
1,426
406
"So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"Oh no . The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
DISAGREE
"the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are , and are not first ( primary ) causes ."
"The main disagreement between theistic evolutionists and Fundmentalists is that Fundies are n't worshipping God , but a false idol of their own making ."
null
null
1,430
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence"
"The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ?"
null
null
1,432
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"God decided to make the Earth improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence"
"your god is an imperfect god needed many attempts Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
null
null
1,431
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures ,"
"The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience"
null
null
1,433
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man"
"Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation"
null
null
1,429
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living"
"god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning"
null
null
1,428
407
"Here it goes , as God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"I see . The your god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation . By the way , how do you know that god is n't still creating other forms of life ? Why do you believe that imperfect mankind is the culmination . Maybe your god is just pausing while trying to figure out improvements ."
DISAGREE
"God decided to make the Earth he kept creating various living creatures , improving each new model until he culminated in man with intelligence ."
"god is an imperfect god that learns from experience and makes decisions based on that learning . Your god needed many attempts to reach the culmination of creation ."
null
null
1,439
408
"Furthermore , as usual your analysis is ridiculously limited . Arizona and Arkansas , two states with anti-gay measures , voted for McCain electorally . Florida voted for Obama by a margin of 51 % . If we go with some easy/sleazy assumptions for quick math , that means that if about 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass ."
"And your analysis is flat out lacking . What everyone else seems to realize is that the reason Obama won is because of FAR higher turnout , many by African American voters . ( Who more tend to be ... taa daa ! ... Democrats ! ) There is definitely a considerable discrepancy in Obama supporters and gay marriage supporters . Of that , there can be no doubt . And your anaysis of the FL situation is completely removed from reality . FL requires a vote of over 60 % for an amendment to pass . It would n't pass at 59 % , let alone 50 . So not only do you demonstrate a lack of even knowing what was needed there , it does n't even fit as an apt comparison ."
DISAGREE
"your analysis is ridiculously limited Florida voted for Obama by a margin of 51 % 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass"
"your analysis is flat out lacking Obama won is because of FAR higher turnout your anaysis of the FL situation is completely removed from reality FL requires a vote of over 60 % for an amendment to pass . It would n't pass at 59 % , let alone 50 ."
null
null
1,438
408
"Furthermore , as usual your analysis is ridiculously limited . Arizona and Arkansas , two states with anti-gay measures , voted for McCain electorally . Florida voted for Obama by a margin of 51 % . If we go with some easy/sleazy assumptions for quick math , that means that if about 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass ."
"And your analysis is flat out lacking . What everyone else seems to realize is that the reason Obama won is because of FAR higher turnout , many by African American voters . ( Who more tend to be ... taa daa ! ... Democrats ! ) There is definitely a considerable discrepancy in Obama supporters and gay marriage supporters . Of that , there can be no doubt . And your anaysis of the FL situation is completely removed from reality . FL requires a vote of over 60 % for an amendment to pass . It would n't pass at 59 % , let alone 50 . So not only do you demonstrate a lack of even knowing what was needed there , it does n't even fit as an apt comparison ."
DISAGREE
"about 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass ."
"your analysis is flat out lacking . There is definitely a considerable discrepancy in Obama supporters and gay marriage supporters ."
null
null
1,434
408
"Furthermore , as usual your analysis is ridiculously limited . Arizona and Arkansas , two states with anti-gay measures , voted for McCain electorally . Florida voted for Obama by a margin of 51 % . If we go with some easy/sleazy assumptions for quick math , that means that if about 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass ."
"And your analysis is flat out lacking . What everyone else seems to realize is that the reason Obama won is because of FAR higher turnout , many by African American voters . ( Who more tend to be ... taa daa ! ... Democrats ! ) There is definitely a considerable discrepancy in Obama supporters and gay marriage supporters . Of that , there can be no doubt . And your anaysis of the FL situation is completely removed from reality . FL requires a vote of over 60 % for an amendment to pass . It would n't pass at 59 % , let alone 50 . So not only do you demonstrate a lack of even knowing what was needed there , it does n't even fit as an apt comparison ."
DISAGREE
"anti-gay measures , 2 % of those voting for Obama decided they did n't want gay marriage , then the anti-gay marriage initiative would pass ."
"And your analysis is flat out lacking ."
null
null
1,443
409
"Nothing at all . You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ? I think if anyone took to this they 'd find themselves asked to leave establishments routinely . I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers ."
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ? And the I smell posers comment ... well , I 'll just say that I think you 're jumping to a premature conclusion . I 'm catching up on this thread and have a few more pages to go , but I wanted to address this comment before I go on . Most of us who openly carry in Michigan , are licensed to conceal , but we are carrying openly to promote the concept . Let me note that I , too , believe that openly carrying an unloaded firearm is asking for trouble . I ca n't see how it could make any situation safer , with it taking seconds to load a gun and get it into battery . Luckily we carry loaded here , which drastically changes the dynamics . When one can go from either concealment or a side holstered weapon to putting holes in a center mass in under a second , that 's an effective deterrent . Then we hear the `` gun grab `` argument - if you 're openly carrying , anyone could grab your gun . This just is n't practical . If a criminal wants a gun , h'es going to B & amp ; E a house or obtain it by other means than trying to take it off of someone who 's wearing one . There 's just too big a chance of getting shot . Not to mention that when someone is openly carrying , they generally have a heightened state of awareness . We pay more attention to what 's going on around us . Another hitch in that argument is equipment . Most who OC , like me , have retention holsters . They `` lock `` the gun into place in the holster and a button must be pressed to draw the weapon . Therefore , someone would n't be able to just sneak up and pull the weapon from its holster . Criminals traditionally go for easy targets . If Joe is visibly armed and Pete is n't , which would be the more likely victim ? If a thug walks into a C-store with ill intentions and sees a customer or two armed , I can say with certainty that the thug will wait until the store 's empty or pick another location . Carrying openly can be an effective crime deterrent , and seeing armed good guys here and there is a constant reminder to the criminal element that we ( , the People ) are taking arms and proactively defending ourselves . Just bear these things in mind before jumping on the `` open carry is crazy `` bandwagon ."
DISAGREE
"You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ?"
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ?"
null
null
1,440
409
"Nothing at all . You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ? I think if anyone took to this they 'd find themselves asked to leave establishments routinely . I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers ."
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ? And the I smell posers comment ... well , I 'll just say that I think you 're jumping to a premature conclusion . I 'm catching up on this thread and have a few more pages to go , but I wanted to address this comment before I go on . Most of us who openly carry in Michigan , are licensed to conceal , but we are carrying openly to promote the concept . Let me note that I , too , believe that openly carrying an unloaded firearm is asking for trouble . I ca n't see how it could make any situation safer , with it taking seconds to load a gun and get it into battery . Luckily we carry loaded here , which drastically changes the dynamics . When one can go from either concealment or a side holstered weapon to putting holes in a center mass in under a second , that 's an effective deterrent . Then we hear the `` gun grab `` argument - if you 're openly carrying , anyone could grab your gun . This just is n't practical . If a criminal wants a gun , h'es going to B & amp ; E a house or obtain it by other means than trying to take it off of someone who 's wearing one . There 's just too big a chance of getting shot . Not to mention that when someone is openly carrying , they generally have a heightened state of awareness . We pay more attention to what 's going on around us . Another hitch in that argument is equipment . Most who OC , like me , have retention holsters . They `` lock `` the gun into place in the holster and a button must be pressed to draw the weapon . Therefore , someone would n't be able to just sneak up and pull the weapon from its holster . Criminals traditionally go for easy targets . If Joe is visibly armed and Pete is n't , which would be the more likely victim ? If a thug walks into a C-store with ill intentions and sees a customer or two armed , I can say with certainty that the thug will wait until the store 's empty or pick another location . Carrying openly can be an effective crime deterrent , and seeing armed good guys here and there is a constant reminder to the criminal element that we ( , the People ) are taking arms and proactively defending ourselves . Just bear these things in mind before jumping on the `` open carry is crazy `` bandwagon ."
DISAGREE
"I think if anyone took to this they 'd find themselves asked to leave establishments routinely ."
"I can say with certainty that the thug will wait until the store 's empty or pick another location . Carrying openly can be an effective crime deterrent , and seeing armed good guys here and there is a constant reminder to the criminal element that we ( , the People ) are taking arms and proactively defending ourselves ."
null
null
1,442
409
"Nothing at all . You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ? I think if anyone took to this they 'd find themselves asked to leave establishments routinely . I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers ."
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ? And the I smell posers comment ... well , I 'll just say that I think you 're jumping to a premature conclusion . I 'm catching up on this thread and have a few more pages to go , but I wanted to address this comment before I go on . Most of us who openly carry in Michigan , are licensed to conceal , but we are carrying openly to promote the concept . Let me note that I , too , believe that openly carrying an unloaded firearm is asking for trouble . I ca n't see how it could make any situation safer , with it taking seconds to load a gun and get it into battery . Luckily we carry loaded here , which drastically changes the dynamics . When one can go from either concealment or a side holstered weapon to putting holes in a center mass in under a second , that 's an effective deterrent . Then we hear the `` gun grab `` argument - if you 're openly carrying , anyone could grab your gun . This just is n't practical . If a criminal wants a gun , h'es going to B & amp ; E a house or obtain it by other means than trying to take it off of someone who 's wearing one . There 's just too big a chance of getting shot . Not to mention that when someone is openly carrying , they generally have a heightened state of awareness . We pay more attention to what 's going on around us . Another hitch in that argument is equipment . Most who OC , like me , have retention holsters . They `` lock `` the gun into place in the holster and a button must be pressed to draw the weapon . Therefore , someone would n't be able to just sneak up and pull the weapon from its holster . Criminals traditionally go for easy targets . If Joe is visibly armed and Pete is n't , which would be the more likely victim ? If a thug walks into a C-store with ill intentions and sees a customer or two armed , I can say with certainty that the thug will wait until the store 's empty or pick another location . Carrying openly can be an effective crime deterrent , and seeing armed good guys here and there is a constant reminder to the criminal element that we ( , the People ) are taking arms and proactively defending ourselves . Just bear these things in mind before jumping on the `` open carry is crazy `` bandwagon ."
DISAGREE
"You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ? I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers ."
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ? Most of us who openly carry in Michigan , are licensed to conceal , but we are carrying openly to promote the concept I , too , believe that openly carrying an unloaded firearm is asking for trouble ``"
null
null
1,441
409
"Nothing at all . You think open carrying of loaded handguns in public will become fashionable in CA ? I think if anyone took to this they 'd find themselves asked to leave establishments routinely . I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers ."
"Open carry is gaining momentum in Michigan , so who knows ? And the I smell posers comment ... well , I 'll just say that I think you 're jumping to a premature conclusion . I 'm catching up on this thread and have a few more pages to go , but I wanted to address this comment before I go on . Most of us who openly carry in Michigan , are licensed to conceal , but we are carrying openly to promote the concept . Let me note that I , too , believe that openly carrying an unloaded firearm is asking for trouble . I ca n't see how it could make any situation safer , with it taking seconds to load a gun and get it into battery . Luckily we carry loaded here , which drastically changes the dynamics . When one can go from either concealment or a side holstered weapon to putting holes in a center mass in under a second , that 's an effective deterrent . Then we hear the `` gun grab `` argument - if you 're openly carrying , anyone could grab your gun . This just is n't practical . If a criminal wants a gun , h'es going to B & amp ; E a house or obtain it by other means than trying to take it off of someone who 's wearing one . There 's just too big a chance of getting shot . Not to mention that when someone is openly carrying , they generally have a heightened state of awareness . We pay more attention to what 's going on around us . Another hitch in that argument is equipment . Most who OC , like me , have retention holsters . They `` lock `` the gun into place in the holster and a button must be pressed to draw the weapon . Therefore , someone would n't be able to just sneak up and pull the weapon from its holster . Criminals traditionally go for easy targets . If Joe is visibly armed and Pete is n't , which would be the more likely victim ? If a thug walks into a C-store with ill intentions and sees a customer or two armed , I can say with certainty that the thug will wait until the store 's empty or pick another location . Carrying openly can be an effective crime deterrent , and seeing armed good guys here and there is a constant reminder to the criminal element that we ( , the People ) are taking arms and proactively defending ourselves . Just bear these things in mind before jumping on the `` open carry is crazy `` bandwagon ."
DISAGREE
"I 'm not against concealed carry in principle but open carry seems silly to me . I smell posers"
"I smell posers comment ... well , I 'll just say that I think you 're jumping to a premature conclusion"
null
null
1,451
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
null
null
1,450
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board"
null
null
1,448
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I dont walk at night I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
null
null
1,446
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me"
"Happy from the anehiem board"
null
null
1,449
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me"
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ?"
null
null
1,447
410
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
DISAGREE
"I dont walk at night , and I am friends with neighbors that watch out for me ."
"Is this Happy from the anehiem board ? ! ? ! ?"
null
null
1,457
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news ``"
"you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything"
null
null
1,455
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` ."
"you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all"
null
null
1,452
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
null
null
1,453
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ?"
null
null
1,454
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others"
"As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
null
null
1,456
411
"I condemn the Wrong at every opportunity . Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news `` . The WOT is and was a hoax , but Koolade drinkers enjoy squandering the lives of others on their adventures abroad ."
"And you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ? As usual you make blanket condemnations while proving nothing at all ."
DISAGREE
"Whackjob Nutso Drivel is a fraudulent use of the term `` news"
"you call this warped opinion of yours evidence of anything ?"
null
null
1,462
412
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals that must have died as the emigrated from the arks resting place ? Answer those two and I 'll have lots more"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . In fact , we 've got accounts from heaps of different cultures all around the world . We 've got cultures from all over who have a memory of what happened , and despite this , no one believes them ."
DISAGREE
"god is also the god of deceit"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account"
null
null
1,458
412
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals that must have died as the emigrated from the arks resting place ? Answer those two and I 'll have lots more"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . In fact , we 've got accounts from heaps of different cultures all around the world . We 've got cultures from all over who have a memory of what happened , and despite this , no one believes them ."
DISAGREE
"god of deceit . erase all evidence erase the bones"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . heaps of different cultures all around the world"
null
null
1,463
412
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals that must have died as the emigrated from the arks resting place ? Answer those two and I 'll have lots more"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . In fact , we 've got accounts from heaps of different cultures all around the world . We 've got cultures from all over who have a memory of what happened , and despite this , no one believes them ."
DISAGREE
"Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals"
"He did n't erase all evidence"
null
null
1,459
412
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals that must have died as the emigrated from the arks resting place ? Answer those two and I 'll have lots more"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . In fact , we 've got accounts from heaps of different cultures all around the world . We 've got cultures from all over who have a memory of what happened , and despite this , no one believes them ."
DISAGREE
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ?"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . heaps of different cultures all around the world"
null
null
1,460
412
"Your god is also the god of deceit . Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? Why erase the bones from the animals that must have died as the emigrated from the arks resting place ? Answer those two and I 'll have lots more"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . In fact , we 've got accounts from heaps of different cultures all around the world . We 've got cultures from all over who have a memory of what happened , and despite this , no one believes them ."
DISAGREE
"Your god is also the god of deceit Why else would he erase all evidence of such a flood ? the bones from animals died"
"He did n't erase all evidence . We have the Bible account . We 've got cultures"
null
null
1,468
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws"
null
null
1,467
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
null
null
1,464
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
null
null
1,466
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
null
null
1,465
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
null
null
1,469
413
"BTW- swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` gin control laws ."
AGREE
"swords are also protected under the second amendment"
"the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for `` Reasonable `` control laws"
null
null
1,470
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
null
null
1,473
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone"
null
null
1,471
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
null
null
1,475
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
null
null
1,472
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
null
null
1,474
414
"Dogs become more friendly when testosterone is reduced in their bodies through neutering :"
"Are you trying to make an argument against gun ownership , or just testosterone ?"
DISAGREE
"testosterone"
"just testosterone ?"
null
null
1,481
415
"Do n't let him off the hook that easily . Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Oh ! You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Ah , now I see . That was supposed to be the trick . Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
DISAGREE
"Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop"
null
null
1,479
415
"Do n't let him off the hook that easily . Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Oh ! You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Ah , now I see . That was supposed to be the trick . Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
DISAGREE
"Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
null
null
1,478
415
"Do n't let him off the hook that easily . Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Oh ! You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Ah , now I see . That was supposed to be the trick . Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
DISAGREE
"Do n't let him off the hook that easily . Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Oh ! You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Ah , now I see Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
null
null
1,480
415
"Do n't let him off the hook that easily . Make him explain its development in the womb ."
"Oh ! You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Ah , now I see . That was supposed to be the trick . Sorry Electrolyte , but that was not a funny joke ."
DISAGREE
"him Make him explain its development in the womb"
"You mean how it 's a tail during the earlier stages of fetal develop -- Electrolyte"
null
null
1,482
416
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist . Where 's the difference ? The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs because they ca n't think for themselves , and they rely on the government in order to survive ."
DISAGREE
"there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs"
null
null
1,484
416
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist . Where 's the difference ? The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs because they ca n't think for themselves , and they rely on the government in order to survive ."
DISAGREE
"there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist ."
null
null
1,485
416
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist . Where 's the difference ? The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs because they ca n't think for themselves , and they rely on the government in order to survive ."
DISAGREE
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ?"
null
null
1,483
416
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist . Where 's the difference ? The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs because they ca n't think for themselves , and they rely on the government in order to survive ."
DISAGREE
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist ."
null
null
1,487
416
"sarablaze , there 's billion of people like you , do n't know why but just `` follow the follower `` !"
"Oh , so is your God the Chinese government ? Honestly , most atheists will say people believe in God because they ca n't think for themselves and must rely on something in order to exist . Where 's the difference ? The Chinese follow the Chinese government like puppy dogs because they ca n't think for themselves , and they rely on the government in order to survive ."
DISAGREE
"follow the follower"
"The Chinese follow the Chinese government"
null
null
1,490
417
"However , not all members of the population are able to breed ."
"And reproduction rates are not uniform among a population . Do n't let him bait you into following his unstated assumptions . However , I must say that those are fine examples of competition within populations . Good work . Same with `` artificial `` ( or at least , not exactly natural ) selection ."
AGREE
"not all members of the population are able to breed ."
"And reproduction rates are not uniform among a population ."
null
null
1,492
417
"However , not all members of the population are able to breed ."
"And reproduction rates are not uniform among a population . Do n't let him bait you into following his unstated assumptions . However , I must say that those are fine examples of competition within populations . Good work . Same with `` artificial `` ( or at least , not exactly natural ) selection ."
AGREE
"population are able to breed ."
"reproduction rates are not uniform among a population ."
null
null
1,493
417
"However , not all members of the population are able to breed ."
"And reproduction rates are not uniform among a population . Do n't let him bait you into following his unstated assumptions . However , I must say that those are fine examples of competition within populations . Good work . Same with `` artificial `` ( or at least , not exactly natural ) selection ."
AGREE
"not all members of the population are able to breed ."
"reproduction rates are not uniform among a population competition within populations ``"
null
null
1,494
418
"2 . The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above . B. a legend that grew over time , well after anyone could have proven the legend false . C. a lie fabricated by his followers immediately after his death D. an honest misunderstanding ; the Jews lost the body and were embarressed to admit their mistake while his followers were hallucinating E. Other ( limit your response to 50 words )"
"2 , A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
DISAGREE
"The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above ."
"A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
null
null
1,499
418
"2 . The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above . B. a legend that grew over time , well after anyone could have proven the legend false . C. a lie fabricated by his followers immediately after his death D. an honest misunderstanding ; the Jews lost the body and were embarressed to admit their mistake while his followers were hallucinating E. Other ( limit your response to 50 words )"
"2 , A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
DISAGREE
"could have proven the legend false"
"Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
null
null
1,496
418
"2 . The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above . B. a legend that grew over time , well after anyone could have proven the legend false . C. a lie fabricated by his followers immediately after his death D. an honest misunderstanding ; the Jews lost the body and were embarressed to admit their mistake while his followers were hallucinating E. Other ( limit your response to 50 words )"
"2 , A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
DISAGREE
"The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above . B. a legend that grew over time , well after anyone could have proven the legend false . C. a lie fabricated by his followers immediately after his death D. an honest misunderstanding ; the Jews lost the body and were embarressed to admit their mistake while his followers were hallucinating E. Other ( limit your response to 50 words )"
"2 , A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
null
null
1,497
418
"2 . The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above . B. a legend that grew over time , well after anyone could have proven the legend false . C. a lie fabricated by his followers immediately after his death D. an honest misunderstanding ; the Jews lost the body and were embarressed to admit their mistake while his followers were hallucinating E. Other ( limit your response to 50 words )"
"2 , A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
DISAGREE
"The resurrection story of Jesus is : A. a myth - see answer ' A ' above ."
"A . Myth ; Complete fabrication ."
null
null