{ // 获取包含Hugging Face文本的span元素 const spans = link.querySelectorAll('span.whitespace-nowrap, span.hidden.whitespace-nowrap'); spans.forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.trim().match(/Hugging\s*Face/i)) { span.textContent = 'AI快站'; } }); }); // 替换logo图片的alt属性 document.querySelectorAll('img[alt*="Hugging"], img[alt*="Face"]').forEach(img => { if (img.alt.match(/Hugging\s*Face/i)) { img.alt = 'AI快站 logo'; } }); } // 替换导航栏中的链接 function replaceNavigationLinks() { // 已替换标记,防止重复运行 if (window._navLinksReplaced) { return; } // 已经替换过的链接集合,防止重复替换 const replacedLinks = new Set(); // 只在导航栏区域查找和替换链接 const headerArea = document.querySelector('header') || document.querySelector('nav'); if (!headerArea) { return; } // 在导航区域内查找链接 const navLinks = headerArea.querySelectorAll('a'); navLinks.forEach(link => { // 如果已经替换过,跳过 if (replacedLinks.has(link)) return; const linkText = link.textContent.trim(); const linkHref = link.getAttribute('href') || ''; // 替换Spaces链接 - 仅替换一次 if ( (linkHref.includes('/spaces') || linkHref === '/spaces' || linkText === 'Spaces' || linkText.match(/^s*Spacess*$/i)) && linkText !== 'OCR模型免费转Markdown' && linkText !== 'OCR模型免费转Markdown' ) { link.textContent = 'OCR模型免费转Markdown'; link.href = 'https://fast360.xyz'; link.setAttribute('target', '_blank'); link.setAttribute('rel', 'noopener noreferrer'); replacedLinks.add(link); } // 删除Posts链接 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/posts') || linkHref === '/posts' || linkText === 'Posts' || linkText.match(/^s*Postss*$/i)) ) { if (link.parentNode) { link.parentNode.removeChild(link); } replacedLinks.add(link); } // 替换Docs链接 - 仅替换一次 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/docs') || linkHref === '/docs' || linkText === 'Docs' || linkText.match(/^s*Docss*$/i)) && linkText !== '模型下载攻略' ) { link.textContent = '模型下载攻略'; link.href = '/'; replacedLinks.add(link); } // 删除Enterprise链接 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/enterprise') || linkHref === '/enterprise' || linkText === 'Enterprise' || linkText.match(/^s*Enterprises*$/i)) ) { if (link.parentNode) { link.parentNode.removeChild(link); } replacedLinks.add(link); } }); // 查找可能嵌套的Spaces和Posts文本 const textNodes = []; function findTextNodes(element) { if (element.nodeType === Node.TEXT_NODE) { const text = element.textContent.trim(); if (text === 'Spaces' || text === 'Posts' || text === 'Enterprise') { textNodes.push(element); } } else { for (const child of element.childNodes) { findTextNodes(child); } } } // 只在导航区域内查找文本节点 findTextNodes(headerArea); // 替换找到的文本节点 textNodes.forEach(node => { const text = node.textContent.trim(); if (text === 'Spaces') { node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(/Spaces/g, 'OCR模型免费转Markdown'); } else if (text === 'Posts') { // 删除Posts文本节点 if (node.parentNode) { node.parentNode.removeChild(node); } } else if (text === 'Enterprise') { // 删除Enterprise文本节点 if (node.parentNode) { node.parentNode.removeChild(node); } } }); // 标记已替换完成 window._navLinksReplaced = true; } // 替换代码区域中的域名 function replaceCodeDomains() { // 特别处理span.hljs-string和span.njs-string元素 document.querySelectorAll('span.hljs-string, span.njs-string, span[class*="hljs-string"], span[class*="njs-string"]').forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { span.textContent = span.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 替换hljs-string类的span中的域名(移除多余的转义符号) document.querySelectorAll('span.hljs-string, span[class*="hljs-string"]').forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { span.textContent = span.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 替换pre和code标签中包含git clone命令的域名 document.querySelectorAll('pre, code').forEach(element => { if (element.textContent && element.textContent.includes('git clone')) { const text = element.innerHTML; if (text.includes('huggingface.co')) { element.innerHTML = text.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); // 处理特定的命令行示例 document.querySelectorAll('pre, code').forEach(element => { const text = element.innerHTML; if (text.includes('huggingface.co')) { // 针对git clone命令的专门处理 if (text.includes('git clone') || text.includes('GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1')) { element.innerHTML = text.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); // 特别处理模型下载页面上的代码片段 document.querySelectorAll('.flex.border-t, .svelte_hydrator, .inline-block').forEach(container => { const content = container.innerHTML; if (content && content.includes('huggingface.co')) { container.innerHTML = content.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 特别处理模型仓库克隆对话框中的代码片段 try { // 查找包含"Clone this model repository"标题的对话框 const cloneDialog = document.querySelector('.svelte_hydration_boundary, [data-target="MainHeader"]'); if (cloneDialog) { // 查找对话框中所有的代码片段和命令示例 const codeElements = cloneDialog.querySelectorAll('pre, code, span'); codeElements.forEach(element => { if (element.textContent && element.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { if (element.innerHTML.includes('huggingface.co')) { element.innerHTML = element.innerHTML.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } else { element.textContent = element.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); } // 更精确地定位克隆命令中的域名 document.querySelectorAll('[data-target]').forEach(container => { const codeBlocks = container.querySelectorAll('pre, code, span.hljs-string'); codeBlocks.forEach(block => { if (block.textContent && block.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { if (block.innerHTML.includes('huggingface.co')) { block.innerHTML = block.innerHTML.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } else { block.textContent = block.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); }); } catch (e) { // 错误处理但不打印日志 } } // 当DOM加载完成后执行替换 if (document.readyState === 'loading') { document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => { replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); replaceCodeDomains(); // 只在必要时执行替换 - 3秒后再次检查 setTimeout(() => { if (!window._navLinksReplaced) { console.log('[Client] 3秒后重新检查导航链接'); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }, 3000); }); } else { replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); replaceCodeDomains(); // 只在必要时执行替换 - 3秒后再次检查 setTimeout(() => { if (!window._navLinksReplaced) { console.log('[Client] 3秒后重新检查导航链接'); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }, 3000); } // 增加一个MutationObserver来处理可能的动态元素加载 const observer = new MutationObserver(mutations => { // 检查是否导航区域有变化 const hasNavChanges = mutations.some(mutation => { // 检查是否存在header或nav元素变化 return Array.from(mutation.addedNodes).some(node => { if (node.nodeType === Node.ELEMENT_NODE) { // 检查是否是导航元素或其子元素 if (node.tagName === 'HEADER' || node.tagName === 'NAV' || node.querySelector('header, nav')) { return true; } // 检查是否在导航元素内部 let parent = node.parentElement; while (parent) { if (parent.tagName === 'HEADER' || parent.tagName === 'NAV') { return true; } parent = parent.parentElement; } } return false; }); }); // 只在导航区域有变化时执行替换 if (hasNavChanges) { // 重置替换状态,允许再次替换 window._navLinksReplaced = false; replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }); // 开始观察document.body的变化,包括子节点 if (document.body) { observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); } else { document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => { observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); }); } })(); \", \"parent_index\": 5, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1,"[]":117,"[{\"bbox\": [285, 377, 327, 389], \"content\": \"\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"caption\"}, {\"bbox\": [167, 416, 444, 622], \"content\": \"
M1Cl2(M1)M2Cl2(M2)
Q(v5, V-7 . 29 ) Q(V2,√-5 · 31)(2, 16)Q(V5 · 29, √-7)(2, 16)
Q(V13,√-3 ·37)(4, 4) (2,16)Q(v5,√-2 : 31) Q(V37,√-3. 13(2, 16) (2,16)
(2,16)
Q(V-11,v5 · 29)(2,16)Q(V29, √-5 · 11)(2, 16)
Q(V5, V-17 · 19)(4, 4)Q(v17, V-5 · 19 )
Q(V29, √-2 . 7)(2,16)Q(V2, √-7 . 29)(2,16)
Q(v5 . 89, √-1)(4, 4)Q(V5, √-89 )(2,8)
Q(V37, √-5 · 11)(4, 4)Q(v5, √-37 · 11)(2,32)
Q(V53,√-3·13)(4, 4)Q(V13 · 53, √-3)(2,2,4)
Q(V37, √-2 . 7)(2, 16)Q(v2,√-7 . 37)(2, 16)
Q(√13,√-2 · 23)(4, 4)Q(v2,√-13 · 23(2, 16)
\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1,"[{\"bbox\": [112, 125, 481, 231], \"content\": \"
ExperimentEnergy [MeV]Observed flux (SNU)SSM1 predic- tion (SNU)Ratio
Homestake[2]0.872.56 ± 0.2321-2 20.33±0.05
Sage[3]0.233 - 0.467±80.52 ± 0.07
Gallex[4]0.233 - 0.478±80.60 ± 0.07
Kamiokande[5]7-132.80 ± 0.380.53 ± 0.11
Super-Kam.[6]6 - 132.42 +0.12 -0.090.46 ± 0.08
\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1,"[{\"bbox\": [181, 125, 412, 202], \"content\": \"
L/E [km/GeV]Re
101.20 ± 0.151.00 ± 0.15
1001.20 ± 0.150.85 ± 0.12
10001.20 ± 0.150.70± 0.10
100001.20 ± 0.150.60± 0.08
\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1,"[{\"bbox\": [162, 141, 432, 290], \"content\": \"
ProbabilityL/E [km/GeV]
P(ve → ve) > 0.99 P(vμ→vμ) >0.99 P(vμ(vμ)→ ve(ve)) < 0.90 · 10-3 P(vμ→v)< 0.002 P(vμ ←→v)<0.35 P(vμ →v)< 0.022 P(ve →v)< 0.125 P(ve ←> vμ)< 0.25 P(ve →ve) > 0.75[11]88 0.34 0.31 0.039 31 0.053 0.031 40 232
\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"body\"}, {\"bbox\": [123, 376, 471, 438], \"content\": \"
M2 - M² [eV2]M3 - M2 [eV2]S23S13S12
7.04.9· 10-115.0·10-30.830.080.50-3.14
7.21.6 · 10-105.0·10-30.570.000.74-3.14
7.24.3· 10-105.0·10-30.570.000.743.14
\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"body\"}, {\"bbox\": [122, 459, 471, 474], \"content\": \"\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"caption\"}]":1,"[{\"bbox\": [228, 110, 383, 167], \"content\": \"
d(G')h2(L)h2(K1)h2(K2)
12m2
22m+14
>3≥2m+2M8
\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1,"[{\"bbox\": [125, 385, 486, 408], \"content\": \"\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"caption\"}, {\"bbox\": [189, 412, 422, 468], \"content\": \"
q2Cl2(K2)q1h2(K1)q2Cl2(K2)h2(L)
2(2)122(2)2m+1
2(4)14(2,2)2m+3
\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"body\"}]":1}}}}],"rows":[{"rowIdx":0,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/0/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=bd~2rDV6XQu6CYDOmexGwit1lcT8Ky5dP9U8pBWPtFRIfSAMrLpn5bInrV902Ogl6MLlt2iCfc91hmrbCsS-O0JHfr5GflZHmOUMkzWUk~FA3JOig0z--L8n02XQMIQyOs0rNXw~AHFatYZc5W7hwMBNBqpysXVn56N~kg8SPhQQdrs0-XfAa45Fy8pd6LbR8NYv1Jt5Vp-hCw40LpLvX7xO7ezH6wheDrbOv2j5UpaKK8vrWHaW8WGcdzq8IiDL-cS6SDRGUakADZF3pK-rfzT3ky29VZaa6mZsC6z6oXTJkBJ3xGAXH6s4OwMn1xXl8yWi81lu-NIWUuOsSXGvlw__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"string","value":"# Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space\n\nChristian Fleischhack∗\n\nMathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany\n\nMax-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany\n\nJanuary 5, 2000\n\n# Abstract\n\nThe action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\\mathbf{G}$ .\n\nFirst a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1."},"html":{"kind":"string","value":"\n

Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space

\n

Christian Fleischhack∗

\n

Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany

\n

Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany

\n

January 5, 2000

\n

Abstract

\n

The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\\mathbf{G}$ .

\n

First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.

"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":0,"string":"0"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space \", \"text_level\": 1, \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Christian Fleischhack∗ \", \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany \", \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany \", \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"January 5, 2000 \", \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Abstract \", \"text_level\": 1, \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\\\\mathbf{G}$ . \", \"page_idx\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\\\\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1. \", \"page_idx\": 0}]"},"model_output":{"kind":"string","value":"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [257, 1020, 1412, 1020, 1412, 1319, 257, 1319], \"score\": 0.975}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [257, 942, 1410, 942, 1410, 1018, 257, 1018], \"score\": 0.919}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [375, 566, 1296, 566, 1296, 691, 375, 691], \"score\": 0.905}, {\"category_id\": 0, \"poly\": [233, 153, 1436, 153, 1436, 221, 233, 221], \"score\": 0.904}, {\"category_id\": 0, \"poly\": [765, 886, 902, 886, 902, 923, 765, 923], \"score\": 0.877}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [697, 722, 974, 722, 974, 767, 697, 767], \"score\": 0.859}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [647, 270, 1031, 270, 1031, 314, 647, 314], \"score\": 0.842}, {\"category_id\": 2, \"poly\": [39, 572, 104, 572, 104, 1443, 39, 1443], \"score\": 0.829}, {\"category_id\": 2, \"poly\": [823, 1958, 843, 1958, 843, 1988, 823, 1988], \"score\": 0.776}, {\"category_id\": 2, \"poly\": [358, 1877, 1155, 1877, 1155, 1909, 358, 1909], \"score\": 0.723}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [371, 361, 723, 361, 723, 525, 371, 525], \"score\": 0.632}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [897, 360, 1350, 360, 1350, 525, 897, 525], \"score\": 0.569}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [371, 359, 1352, 359, 1352, 527, 371, 527], \"score\": 0.367}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [540, 1100, 565, 1100, 565, 1127, 540, 1127], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [978, 950, 998, 950, 998, 980, 978, 980], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1379, 1138, 1400, 1138, 1400, 1169, 1379, 1169], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1189, 950, 1214, 950, 1214, 978, 1189, 978], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [824, 1138, 849, 1138, 849, 1165, 824, 1165], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [814, 1256, 842, 1256, 842, 1278, 814, 1278], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1015, 992, 1042, 992, 1042, 1015, 1015, 1015], \"score\": 0.88, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [300.0, 1024.0, 1411.0, 1024.0, 1411.0, 1061.0, 300.0, 1061.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [258.0, 1061.0, 1410.0, 1061.0, 1410.0, 1100.0, 258.0, 1100.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [258.0, 1101.0, 539.0, 1101.0, 539.0, 1136.0, 258.0, 1136.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [566.0, 1101.0, 1412.0, 1101.0, 1412.0, 1136.0, 566.0, 1136.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [257.0, 1137.0, 823.0, 1137.0, 823.0, 1176.0, 257.0, 1176.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [850.0, 1137.0, 1378.0, 1137.0, 1378.0, 1176.0, 850.0, 1176.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1401.0, 1137.0, 1410.0, 1137.0, 1410.0, 1176.0, 1401.0, 1176.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [258.0, 1176.0, 1410.0, 1176.0, 1410.0, 1211.0, 258.0, 1211.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [254.0, 1211.0, 1414.0, 1211.0, 1414.0, 1251.0, 254.0, 1251.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [258.0, 1251.0, 813.0, 1251.0, 813.0, 1289.0, 258.0, 1289.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [843.0, 1251.0, 1412.0, 1251.0, 1412.0, 1289.0, 843.0, 1289.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [257.0, 1289.0, 1099.0, 1289.0, 1099.0, 1324.0, 257.0, 1324.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [300.0, 947.0, 977.0, 947.0, 977.0, 988.0, 300.0, 988.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [999.0, 947.0, 1188.0, 947.0, 1188.0, 988.0, 999.0, 988.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1215.0, 947.0, 1410.0, 947.0, 1410.0, 988.0, 1215.0, 988.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [258.0, 988.0, 1014.0, 988.0, 1014.0, 1027.0, 258.0, 1027.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1043.0, 988.0, 1053.0, 988.0, 1053.0, 1027.0, 1043.0, 1027.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [376.0, 573.0, 1294.0, 573.0, 1294.0, 611.0, 376.0, 611.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [710.0, 613.0, 962.0, 613.0, 962.0, 653.0, 710.0, 653.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [662.0, 656.0, 1009.0, 656.0, 1009.0, 694.0, 662.0, 694.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [237.0, 166.0, 1428.0, 166.0, 1428.0, 224.0, 237.0, 224.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [765.0, 889.0, 905.0, 889.0, 905.0, 927.0, 765.0, 927.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [696.0, 728.0, 969.0, 728.0, 969.0, 768.0, 696.0, 768.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [650.0, 280.0, 1029.0, 280.0, 1029.0, 317.0, 650.0, 317.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [42.0, 574.0, 102.0, 574.0, 102.0, 1446.0, 42.0, 1446.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [823.0, 1961.0, 844.0, 1961.0, 844.0, 1993.0, 823.0, 1993.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [355.0, 1882.0, 1158.0, 1882.0, 1158.0, 1914.0, 355.0, 1914.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [376.0, 369.0, 720.0, 369.0, 720.0, 403.0, 376.0, 403.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [413.0, 407.0, 683.0, 407.0, 683.0, 448.0, 413.0, 448.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [403.0, 449.0, 691.0, 449.0, 691.0, 487.0, 403.0, 487.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [374.0, 490.0, 723.0, 490.0, 723.0, 530.0, 374.0, 530.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [900.0, 369.0, 1352.0, 369.0, 1352.0, 404.0, 900.0, 404.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [991.0, 407.0, 1261.0, 407.0, 1261.0, 449.0, 991.0, 449.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [977.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 489.0, 977.0, 489.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [951.0, 489.0, 1299.0, 489.0, 1299.0, 532.0, 951.0, 532.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [375.0, 365.0, 722.0, 365.0, 722.0, 406.0, 375.0, 406.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [899.0, 368.0, 1351.0, 368.0, 1351.0, 406.0, 899.0, 406.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [411.0, 403.0, 686.0, 403.0, 686.0, 452.0, 411.0, 452.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [990.0, 406.0, 1263.0, 406.0, 1263.0, 450.0, 990.0, 450.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [400.0, 446.0, 694.0, 446.0, 694.0, 491.0, 400.0, 491.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [979.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 489.0, 979.0, 489.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [373.0, 490.0, 722.0, 490.0, 722.0, 530.0, 373.0, 530.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [951.0, 490.0, 1301.0, 490.0, 1301.0, 530.0, 951.0, 530.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}], \"page_info\": {\"page_no\": 0, \"height\": 2200, \"width\": 1700}}"},"middle":{"kind":"string","value":"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [83, 55, 516, 79], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [85, 59, 514, 80], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [85, 59, 514, 80], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 0}], \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [232, 97, 371, 113], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [234, 100, 370, 114], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [234, 100, 370, 114], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Christian Fleischhack∗\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 1}], \"index\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [133, 129, 486, 189], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 131, 486, 146], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 131, 259, 146], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Mathematisches Institut\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [324, 132, 486, 145], \"score\": 0.9786086678504944, \"content\": \"Institut fir Theoretische Physik\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [147, 145, 453, 162], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [147, 145, 246, 162], \"score\": 0.9850176572799683, \"content\": \"Universitat Leipzig\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [356, 146, 453, 161], \"score\": 0.9910887479782104, \"content\": \"Universitat Leipzig\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [144, 160, 457, 176], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [144, 160, 249, 176], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Augustusplatz 10/11\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [351, 161, 457, 176], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Augustusplatz 10/11\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [134, 176, 467, 191], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [134, 176, 260, 190], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [342, 176, 467, 191], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 5}], \"index\": 3.5}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [135, 203, 466, 248], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 206, 465, 219], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 206, 465, 219], \"score\": 0.9778387546539307, \"content\": \"Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [255, 220, 346, 235], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [255, 220, 346, 235], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Inselstraße 22-26\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [238, 236, 363, 249], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [238, 236, 363, 249], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04103 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 8}], \"index\": 7}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [250, 259, 350, 276], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [250, 262, 348, 276], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [250, 262, 348, 276], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"January 5, 2000\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 9}], \"index\": 9}, {\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [275, 318, 324, 332], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [275, 320, 325, 333], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [275, 320, 325, 333], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Abstract\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 10}], \"index\": 10}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 339, 507, 366], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 340, 507, 355], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 340, 351, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [352, 342, 359, 352], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [359, 340, 427, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" on the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [428, 342, 437, 352], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [437, 340, 507, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of generalized\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [92, 355, 379, 369], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 355, 365, 369], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"connections is investigated for compact structure groups \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [365, 357, 375, 365], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [375, 355, 379, 369], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 12}], \"index\": 11.5}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 367, 508, 474], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 368, 507, 381], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 368, 507, 381], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 13}, {\"bbox\": [92, 381, 507, 396], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 381, 507, 396], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 14}, {\"bbox\": [92, 396, 508, 408], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 396, 194, 408], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"theorem is proven on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [194, 396, 203, 405], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [203, 396, 508, 408], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 15}, {\"bbox\": [92, 409, 507, 423], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 409, 296, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [296, 409, 305, 419], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [306, 409, 496, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is topologically regularly stratified by \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [496, 409, 504, 420], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [504, 409, 507, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 16}, {\"bbox\": [92, 423, 507, 435], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 423, 507, 435], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 17}, {\"bbox\": [91, 435, 509, 450], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [91, 435, 509, 450], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 18}, {\"bbox\": [92, 450, 508, 464], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 450, 292, 464], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [293, 452, 303, 460], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [303, 450, 508, 464], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Finally, we show that the set of all gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 19}, {\"bbox\": [92, 464, 395, 476], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 464, 395, 476], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 20}], \"index\": 16.5}], \"layout_bboxes\": [], \"page_idx\": 0, \"page_size\": [612.0, 792.0], \"_layout_tree\": [], \"images\": [], \"tables\": [], \"interline_equations\": [], \"discarded_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"discarded\", \"bbox\": [14, 205, 37, 519], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [15, 206, 36, 520], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [15, 206, 36, 520], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"arXiv:math-ph/0001008v1 5 Jan 2000\", \"type\": \"text\", \"height\": 314, \"width\": 21}]}]}, {\"type\": \"discarded\", \"bbox\": [296, 704, 303, 715], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [296, 705, 303, 717], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [296, 705, 303, 717], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"1\", \"type\": \"text\"}]}]}, {\"type\": \"discarded\", \"bbox\": [128, 675, 415, 687], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [127, 677, 416, 689], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [127, 677, 416, 689], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"ristian.Fleischhack@itp.uni-leipzig.de or Christian.Fleischhack@mi\", \"type\": \"text\"}]}]}], \"need_drop\": false, \"drop_reason\": [], \"para_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [83, 55, 516, 79], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [85, 59, 514, 80], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [85, 59, 514, 80], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 0}], \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [232, 97, 371, 113], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [234, 100, 370, 114], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [234, 100, 370, 114], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Christian Fleischhack∗\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 1}], \"index\": 1, \"bbox_fs\": [234, 100, 370, 114]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [133, 129, 486, 189], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 131, 486, 146], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 131, 259, 146], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Mathematisches Institut\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [324, 132, 486, 145], \"score\": 0.9786086678504944, \"content\": \"Institut fir Theoretische Physik\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [147, 145, 453, 162], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [147, 145, 246, 162], \"score\": 0.9850176572799683, \"content\": \"Universitat Leipzig\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [356, 146, 453, 161], \"score\": 0.9910887479782104, \"content\": \"Universitat Leipzig\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [144, 160, 457, 176], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [144, 160, 249, 176], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Augustusplatz 10/11\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [351, 161, 457, 176], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Augustusplatz 10/11\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [134, 176, 467, 191], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [134, 176, 260, 190], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [342, 176, 467, 191], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 5}], \"index\": 3.5, \"bbox_fs\": [134, 131, 486, 191]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [135, 203, 466, 248], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 206, 465, 219], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [135, 206, 465, 219], \"score\": 0.9778387546539307, \"content\": \"Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [255, 220, 346, 235], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [255, 220, 346, 235], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Inselstraße 22-26\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [238, 236, 363, 249], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [238, 236, 363, 249], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"04103 Leipzig, Germany\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 8}], \"index\": 7, \"bbox_fs\": [135, 206, 465, 249]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [250, 259, 350, 276], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [250, 262, 348, 276], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [250, 262, 348, 276], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"January 5, 2000\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 9}], \"index\": 9, \"bbox_fs\": [250, 262, 348, 276]}, {\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [275, 318, 324, 332], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [275, 320, 325, 333], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [275, 320, 325, 333], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Abstract\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 10}], \"index\": 10}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 339, 507, 366], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 340, 507, 355], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 340, 351, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [352, 342, 359, 352], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [359, 340, 427, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" on the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [428, 342, 437, 352], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [437, 340, 507, 355], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of generalized\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [92, 355, 379, 369], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 355, 365, 369], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"connections is investigated for compact structure groups \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [365, 357, 375, 365], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [375, 355, 379, 369], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 12}], \"index\": 11.5, \"bbox_fs\": [92, 340, 507, 369]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 367, 508, 474], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 368, 507, 381], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [108, 368, 507, 381], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 13}, {\"bbox\": [92, 381, 507, 396], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 381, 507, 396], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 14}, {\"bbox\": [92, 396, 508, 408], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 396, 194, 408], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"theorem is proven on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [194, 396, 203, 405], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [203, 396, 508, 408], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 15}, {\"bbox\": [92, 409, 507, 423], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 409, 296, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [296, 409, 305, 419], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [306, 409, 496, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is topologically regularly stratified by \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [496, 409, 504, 420], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [504, 409, 507, 423], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 16}, {\"bbox\": [92, 423, 507, 435], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 423, 507, 435], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 17}, {\"bbox\": [91, 435, 509, 450], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [91, 435, 509, 450], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 18}, {\"bbox\": [92, 450, 508, 464], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 450, 292, 464], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [293, 452, 303, 460], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [303, 450, 508, 464], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Finally, we show that the set of all gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 19}, {\"bbox\": [92, 464, 395, 476], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [92, 464, 395, 476], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 20}], \"index\": 16.5, \"bbox_fs\": [91, 368, 509, 476]}]}"},"layout":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [83, 55, 516, 79], \"content\": \"Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space\", \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [232, 97, 371, 113], \"content\": \"Christian Fleischhack∗\", \"index\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [133, 129, 486, 189], \"content\": \"Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"index\": 2}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [135, 203, 466, 248], \"content\": \"Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany\", \"index\": 3}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [250, 259, 350, 276], \"content\": \"January 5, 2000\", \"index\": 4}, {\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [275, 318, 324, 332], \"content\": \"Abstract\", \"index\": 5}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 339, 507, 366], \"content\": \"The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group on the space of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups .\", \"index\": 6}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [92, 367, 508, 474], \"content\": \"First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, is topologically regularly stratified by . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.\", \"index\": 7}]"},"lines":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"bbox\": [85, 59, 514, 80], \"content\": \"Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [234, 100, 370, 114], \"content\": \"Christian Fleischhack∗\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [135, 131, 486, 146], \"content\": \"Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [147, 145, 453, 162], \"content\": \"Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [144, 160, 457, 176], \"content\": \"Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [134, 176, 467, 191], \"content\": \"04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [135, 206, 465, 219], \"content\": \"Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [255, 220, 346, 235], \"content\": \"Inselstraße 22-26\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [238, 236, 363, 249], \"content\": \"04103 Leipzig, Germany\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [250, 262, 348, 276], \"content\": \"January 5, 2000\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [275, 320, 325, 333], \"content\": \"Abstract\", \"parent_index\": 5, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [108, 340, 507, 355], \"content\": \"The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group on the space of generalized\", \"parent_index\": 6, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [92, 355, 379, 369], \"content\": \"connections is investigated for compact structure groups .\", \"parent_index\": 6, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [108, 368, 507, 381], \"content\": \"First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [92, 381, 507, 396], \"content\": \"orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [92, 396, 508, 408], \"content\": \"theorem is proven on . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [92, 409, 507, 423], \"content\": \"theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, is topologically regularly stratified by .\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [92, 423, 507, 435], \"content\": \"These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [91, 435, 509, 450], \"content\": \"As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [92, 450, 508, 464], \"content\": \"(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [92, 464, 395, 476], \"content\": \"orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"line_index\": 7}]"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"bbox\": [352, 342, 359, 352], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"parent_index\": 6, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [428, 342, 437, 352], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 6, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [365, 357, 375, 365], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 6, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [194, 396, 203, 405], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [296, 409, 305, 419], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [496, 409, 504, 420], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [293, 452, 303, 460], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 7, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}]"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":1,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/1/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=BUJ5BAD6yRznIJMyCSrCwUHv488h5ndKqSON2FfnYi9iSocNJIzr6XjivInec7ZfyhnSMeOKuZ6BpyfYRB4alW3ZEr78HZoqj1lFDoYYBmcN8GAFmw~15RhlqfVNDbWUk-dmhUt03ifFDulrmzw5RU-nhM0Rhoz~~yIwEyGMSmTAQTdHX3~W-xv8uokRQle0V4MnYNQ6W5a--Mj1xJ-YNvVs0JFudCTUO1nw-2jNrHPYGrchJuxoMfxob8f-LIHviFrgAUAciqm-zzjBvjZWqoyByLeAu0mbMPP64fDG~2LQDFrW4Kob0DsV3dKcbfG8qmKTPDCWPkD6o0r9Rj9i~A__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"string","value":"# 1 Introduction\n\nFor quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ on $\\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare.\n\nAbout 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\\mathcal{A}$ .\n\nDespite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.\n\nBoth from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\\mathcal{A}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski."},"html":{"kind":"string","value":"\n

1 Introduction

\n

For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ on $\\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare.

\n

About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\\mathcal{A}$ .

\n

Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.

\n

Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\\mathcal{A}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.

\n"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":1,"string":"1"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"1 Introduction \", \"text_level\": 1, \"page_idx\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\\\\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\\\\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\\\\mathcal{G}$ on $\\\\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare. \", \"page_idx\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\\\\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\\\\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\\\\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\\\\circ\\\\mathcal{G}\\\\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\\\\circ{\\\\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\\\\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\\\\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\\\\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\\\\mathcal{A}$ . \", \"page_idx\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\\\\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\\\\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\\\\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\\\\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\\\\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\\\\mathcal{G}$ to $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\\\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\\\\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\\\\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}/\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization. \", \"page_idx\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\\\\mathcal{A}$ and $\\\\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\\\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\\\\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski. \", \"page_idx\": 1}]"},"model_output":{"kind":"string","value":"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [177, 115, 1496, 115, 1496, 636, 177, 636], \"score\": 0.971}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [176, 637, 1495, 637, 1495, 1078, 176, 1078], \"score\": 0.968}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [176, 1080, 1494, 1080, 1494, 1682, 176, 1682], \"score\": 0.922}, {\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [178, 1683, 1494, 1683, 1494, 1881, 178, 1881], \"score\": 0.888}, {\"category_id\": 0, \"poly\": [177, 30, 558, 30, 558, 83, 177, 83], \"score\": 0.879}, {\"category_id\": 2, \"poly\": [822, 1958, 844, 1958, 844, 1987, 822, 1987], \"score\": 0.783}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [379, 567, 444, 567, 444, 600, 379, 600], \"score\": 0.95, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1365, 366, 1431, 366, 1431, 401, 1365, 401], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [482, 1168, 547, 1168, 547, 1203, 482, 1203], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1310, 1088, 1375, 1088, 1375, 1122, 1310, 1122], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [756, 606, 820, 606, 820, 641, 756, 641], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [930, 325, 995, 325, 995, 360, 930, 360], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [449, 1646, 514, 1646, 514, 1685, 449, 1685], \"score\": 0.94, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}/\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [176, 849, 315, 849, 315, 878, 176, 878], \"score\": 0.93, \"latex\": \"A\\\\circ\\\\mathcal{G}\\\\subseteq A\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [176, 889, 253, 889, 253, 917, 176, 917], \"score\": 0.92, \"latex\": \"A\\\\circ{\\\\mathcal{G}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1210, 1010, 1232, 1010, 1232, 1037, 1210, 1037], \"score\": 0.92, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1208, 247, 1230, 247, 1230, 274, 1208, 274], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [551, 1531, 587, 1531, 587, 1555, 551, 1555], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"M\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [348, 1647, 375, 1647, 375, 1677, 348, 1677], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [373, 1567, 395, 1567, 395, 1599, 373, 1599], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [609, 970, 631, 970, 631, 996, 609, 996], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [703, 1331, 738, 1331, 738, 1355, 703, 1355], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"M\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [176, 1492, 202, 1492, 202, 1516, 176, 1516], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{P}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [952, 1527, 974, 1527, 974, 1559, 952, 1559], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1024, 1527, 1051, 1527, 1051, 1556, 1024, 1556], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1010, 1486, 1033, 1486, 1033, 1518, 1010, 1518], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [629, 1010, 657, 1010, 657, 1035, 629, 1035], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1008, 1772, 1030, 1772, 1030, 1799, 1008, 1799], \"score\": 0.91, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [729, 1050, 756, 1050, 756, 1074, 729, 1074], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1351, 1767, 1379, 1767, 1379, 1796, 1351, 1796], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [901, 1772, 928, 1772, 928, 1797, 901, 1797], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1013, 1571, 1043, 1571, 1043, 1596, 1013, 1596], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1159, 207, 1182, 207, 1182, 234, 1159, 234], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1033, 809, 1061, 809, 1061, 833, 1033, 833], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [271, 1567, 298, 1567, 298, 1595, 271, 1595], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [345, 729, 366, 729, 366, 757, 345, 757], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1287, 247, 1314, 247, 1314, 272, 1287, 272], \"score\": 0.9, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [637, 1812, 665, 1812, 665, 1836, 637, 1836], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1394, 849, 1419, 849, 1419, 873, 1394, 873], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"A\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1238, 167, 1265, 167, 1265, 191, 1238, 191], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1458, 1767, 1482, 1767, 1482, 1799, 1458, 1799], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1002, 729, 1029, 729, 1029, 754, 1002, 754], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [812, 363, 839, 363, 839, 392, 812, 392], \"score\": 0.89, \"latex\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [636, 1531, 666, 1531, 666, 1556, 636, 1556], \"score\": 0.88, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [1451, 1571, 1481, 1571, 1481, 1596, 1451, 1596], \"score\": 0.88, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [176, 1331, 206, 1331, 206, 1355, 176, 1355], \"score\": 0.87, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 13, \"poly\": [662, 1491, 692, 1491, 692, 1516, 662, 1516], \"score\": 0.87, \"latex\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 120.0, 1494.0, 120.0, 1494.0, 162.0, 173.0, 162.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 162.0, 1237.0, 162.0, 1237.0, 204.0, 174.0, 204.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1266.0, 162.0, 1496.0, 162.0, 1496.0, 204.0, 1266.0, 204.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 199.0, 1158.0, 199.0, 1158.0, 244.0, 173.0, 244.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1183.0, 199.0, 1494.0, 199.0, 1494.0, 244.0, 1183.0, 244.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 244.0, 1207.0, 244.0, 1207.0, 281.0, 174.0, 281.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1231.0, 244.0, 1286.0, 244.0, 1286.0, 281.0, 1231.0, 281.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1315.0, 244.0, 1491.0, 244.0, 1491.0, 281.0, 1315.0, 281.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 281.0, 1496.0, 281.0, 1496.0, 323.0, 174.0, 323.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [176.0, 323.0, 929.0, 323.0, 929.0, 361.0, 176.0, 361.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [996.0, 323.0, 1493.0, 323.0, 1493.0, 361.0, 996.0, 361.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 362.0, 811.0, 362.0, 811.0, 404.0, 171.0, 404.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [840.0, 362.0, 1364.0, 362.0, 1364.0, 404.0, 840.0, 404.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1432.0, 362.0, 1496.0, 362.0, 1496.0, 404.0, 1432.0, 404.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 405.0, 1496.0, 405.0, 1496.0, 443.0, 174.0, 443.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 441.0, 1497.0, 441.0, 1497.0, 484.0, 171.0, 484.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 483.0, 1496.0, 483.0, 1496.0, 523.0, 171.0, 523.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 523.0, 1496.0, 523.0, 1496.0, 565.0, 174.0, 565.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 562.0, 378.0, 562.0, 378.0, 604.0, 171.0, 604.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [445.0, 562.0, 1497.0, 562.0, 1497.0, 604.0, 445.0, 604.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 602.0, 755.0, 602.0, 755.0, 643.0, 173.0, 643.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [821.0, 602.0, 1454.0, 602.0, 1454.0, 643.0, 821.0, 643.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 642.0, 1499.0, 642.0, 1499.0, 685.0, 175.0, 685.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [170.0, 678.0, 1496.0, 678.0, 1496.0, 732.0, 170.0, 732.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [176.0, 725.0, 344.0, 725.0, 344.0, 764.0, 176.0, 764.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [367.0, 725.0, 1001.0, 725.0, 1001.0, 764.0, 367.0, 764.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1030.0, 725.0, 1493.0, 725.0, 1493.0, 764.0, 1030.0, 764.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 765.0, 1495.0, 765.0, 1495.0, 804.0, 175.0, 804.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 805.0, 1032.0, 805.0, 1032.0, 844.0, 173.0, 844.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1062.0, 805.0, 1492.0, 805.0, 1492.0, 844.0, 1062.0, 844.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 844.0, 175.0, 844.0, 175.0, 887.0, 173.0, 887.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [316.0, 844.0, 1393.0, 844.0, 1393.0, 887.0, 316.0, 887.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1420.0, 844.0, 1495.0, 844.0, 1495.0, 887.0, 1420.0, 887.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 885.0, 175.0, 885.0, 175.0, 924.0, 175.0, 924.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [254.0, 885.0, 1493.0, 885.0, 1493.0, 924.0, 254.0, 924.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [172.0, 924.0, 1495.0, 924.0, 1495.0, 967.0, 172.0, 967.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 965.0, 608.0, 965.0, 608.0, 1004.0, 173.0, 1004.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [632.0, 965.0, 1495.0, 965.0, 1495.0, 1004.0, 632.0, 1004.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [172.0, 1002.0, 628.0, 1002.0, 628.0, 1047.0, 172.0, 1047.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [658.0, 1002.0, 1209.0, 1002.0, 1209.0, 1047.0, 658.0, 1047.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1233.0, 1002.0, 1496.0, 1002.0, 1496.0, 1047.0, 1233.0, 1047.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1047.0, 728.0, 1047.0, 728.0, 1085.0, 175.0, 1085.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [757.0, 1047.0, 769.0, 1047.0, 769.0, 1085.0, 757.0, 1085.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1084.0, 1309.0, 1084.0, 1309.0, 1125.0, 175.0, 1125.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1376.0, 1084.0, 1494.0, 1084.0, 1494.0, 1125.0, 1376.0, 1125.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1127.0, 1491.0, 1127.0, 1491.0, 1163.0, 175.0, 1163.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [172.0, 1165.0, 481.0, 1165.0, 481.0, 1204.0, 172.0, 1204.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [548.0, 1165.0, 1492.0, 1165.0, 1492.0, 1204.0, 548.0, 1204.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1206.0, 1492.0, 1206.0, 1492.0, 1246.0, 173.0, 1246.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1248.0, 1492.0, 1248.0, 1492.0, 1284.0, 175.0, 1284.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1284.0, 1494.0, 1284.0, 1494.0, 1327.0, 173.0, 1327.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [172.0, 1324.0, 175.0, 1324.0, 175.0, 1366.0, 172.0, 1366.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [207.0, 1324.0, 702.0, 1324.0, 702.0, 1366.0, 207.0, 1366.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [739.0, 1324.0, 1495.0, 1324.0, 1495.0, 1366.0, 739.0, 1366.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1366.0, 1495.0, 1366.0, 1495.0, 1407.0, 175.0, 1407.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1409.0, 1494.0, 1409.0, 1494.0, 1445.0, 175.0, 1445.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1447.0, 1491.0, 1447.0, 1491.0, 1483.0, 173.0, 1483.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1486.0, 175.0, 1486.0, 175.0, 1527.0, 173.0, 1527.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [203.0, 1486.0, 661.0, 1486.0, 661.0, 1527.0, 203.0, 1527.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [693.0, 1486.0, 1009.0, 1486.0, 1009.0, 1527.0, 693.0, 1527.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1034.0, 1486.0, 1494.0, 1486.0, 1494.0, 1527.0, 1034.0, 1527.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1523.0, 550.0, 1523.0, 550.0, 1567.0, 173.0, 1567.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [588.0, 1523.0, 635.0, 1523.0, 635.0, 1567.0, 588.0, 1567.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [667.0, 1523.0, 951.0, 1523.0, 951.0, 1567.0, 667.0, 1567.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [975.0, 1523.0, 1023.0, 1523.0, 1023.0, 1567.0, 975.0, 1567.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1052.0, 1523.0, 1492.0, 1523.0, 1492.0, 1567.0, 1052.0, 1567.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1564.0, 270.0, 1564.0, 270.0, 1608.0, 173.0, 1608.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [299.0, 1564.0, 372.0, 1564.0, 372.0, 1608.0, 299.0, 1608.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [396.0, 1564.0, 1012.0, 1564.0, 1012.0, 1608.0, 396.0, 1608.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1044.0, 1564.0, 1450.0, 1564.0, 1450.0, 1608.0, 1044.0, 1608.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1482.0, 1564.0, 1492.0, 1564.0, 1492.0, 1608.0, 1482.0, 1608.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1606.0, 1494.0, 1606.0, 1494.0, 1647.0, 173.0, 1647.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [173.0, 1644.0, 347.0, 1644.0, 347.0, 1690.0, 173.0, 1690.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [376.0, 1644.0, 448.0, 1644.0, 448.0, 1690.0, 376.0, 1690.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [515.0, 1644.0, 1426.0, 1644.0, 1426.0, 1690.0, 515.0, 1690.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [174.0, 1686.0, 1494.0, 1686.0, 1494.0, 1729.0, 174.0, 1729.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 1721.0, 1494.0, 1721.0, 1494.0, 1771.0, 171.0, 1771.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [171.0, 1763.0, 900.0, 1763.0, 900.0, 1808.0, 171.0, 1808.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [929.0, 1763.0, 1007.0, 1763.0, 1007.0, 1808.0, 929.0, 1808.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1031.0, 1763.0, 1350.0, 1763.0, 1350.0, 1808.0, 1031.0, 1808.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1380.0, 1763.0, 1457.0, 1763.0, 1457.0, 1808.0, 1380.0, 1808.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [1483.0, 1763.0, 1494.0, 1763.0, 1494.0, 1808.0, 1483.0, 1808.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1808.0, 636.0, 1808.0, 636.0, 1847.0, 175.0, 1847.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [666.0, 1808.0, 1489.0, 1808.0, 1489.0, 1847.0, 666.0, 1847.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [175.0, 1846.0, 1495.0, 1846.0, 1495.0, 1889.0, 175.0, 1889.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [177.0, 44.0, 204.0, 44.0, 204.0, 78.0, 177.0, 78.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [252.0, 37.0, 555.0, 37.0, 555.0, 83.0, 252.0, 83.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}, {\"category_id\": 15, \"poly\": [822.0, 1960.0, 846.0, 1960.0, 846.0, 1996.0, 822.0, 1996.0], \"score\": 1.0, \"text\": \"\"}], \"page_info\": {\"page_no\": 1, \"height\": 2200, \"width\": 1700}}"},"middle":{"kind":"string","value":"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [63, 10, 200, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 13, 199, 29], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 15, 73, 28], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"1\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [90, 13, 199, 29], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Introduction\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 0}], \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 41, 538, 228], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 43, 537, 58], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 43, 537, 58], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [62, 58, 538, 73], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 58, 445, 73], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [445, 60, 455, 68], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [455, 58, 538, 73], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of smooth con-\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [62, 71, 537, 87], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 71, 416, 87], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [417, 74, 425, 84], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [425, 71, 537, 87], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of all smooth gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [62, 87, 536, 101], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 87, 434, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [434, 88, 442, 98], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [443, 87, 462, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [463, 88, 473, 97], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [473, 87, 536, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Physically,\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [62, 101, 538, 116], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 101, 538, 116], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [63, 116, 537, 129], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 116, 334, 129], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [334, 117, 358, 129], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [358, 116, 537, 129], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", is the configuration space for the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [61, 130, 538, 145], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 130, 291, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [292, 130, 302, 141], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [302, 130, 491, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", which is an affine space, the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [491, 131, 515, 144], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 13, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [515, 130, 538, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" has\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [62, 145, 538, 159], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 145, 538, 159], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [61, 158, 538, 174], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 158, 538, 174], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [61, 173, 538, 188], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 173, 538, 188], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [62, 188, 538, 203], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 188, 538, 203], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [61, 202, 538, 217], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 202, 136, 217], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"a measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [136, 204, 159, 216], \"score\": 0.95, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [160, 202, 538, 217], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [62, 216, 523, 231], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 216, 271, 231], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"better understanding of the structure of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [272, 218, 295, 230], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [295, 216, 523, 231], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". However, up to now, results are quite rare.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 13}], \"index\": 7}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 229, 538, 388], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 231, 539, 246], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 231, 539, 246], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 14}, {\"bbox\": [61, 244, 538, 263], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 244, 538, 263], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 15}, {\"bbox\": [63, 261, 537, 275], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 261, 123, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"[16]). Now, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [124, 262, 131, 272], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [132, 261, 360, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [360, 262, 370, 271], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [370, 261, 537, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". About 15 years ago, Kondracki\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 16}, {\"bbox\": [63, 275, 538, 289], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 275, 538, 289], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 17}, {\"bbox\": [62, 289, 537, 303], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 289, 371, 303], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [371, 291, 381, 299], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [382, 289, 537, 303], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". This means, for every orbit\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 18}, {\"bbox\": [63, 303, 538, 319], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 305, 113, 316], \"score\": 0.93, \"content\": \"A\\\\circ\\\\mathcal{G}\\\\subseteq A\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 50}, {\"bbox\": [113, 303, 501, 319], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [501, 305, 510, 314], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"A\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [511, 303, 538, 319], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" onto\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 19}, {\"bbox\": [63, 318, 537, 332], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 320, 91, 330], \"score\": 0.92, \"content\": \"A\\\\circ{\\\\mathcal{G}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 28}, {\"bbox\": [91, 318, 537, 332], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 20}, {\"bbox\": [61, 332, 538, 348], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 332, 538, 348], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 21}, {\"bbox\": [62, 347, 538, 361], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 347, 218, 361], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"stabilizer under the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [219, 349, 227, 358], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [227, 347, 538, 361], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 22}, {\"bbox\": [61, 360, 538, 376], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 360, 226, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Rogulski proved that the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [226, 363, 236, 372], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [236, 360, 435, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is regularly stratified by the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [435, 363, 443, 373], \"score\": 0.92, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [443, 360, 538, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". In particular, all\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [63, 376, 276, 390], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 376, 262, 390], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the strata are smooth submanifolds of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [262, 378, 272, 386], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [272, 376, 276, 390], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 24}], \"index\": 19}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 388, 537, 605], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 390, 537, 405], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 390, 471, 405], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [471, 391, 495, 403], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [495, 390, 537, 405], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" has not\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 25}, {\"bbox\": [63, 405, 536, 418], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 405, 536, 418], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 26}, {\"bbox\": [61, 419, 537, 433], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 419, 173, 433], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"but, however, not for \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [173, 420, 196, 433], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 13, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [197, 419, 537, 433], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 27}, {\"bbox\": [62, 434, 537, 448], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 434, 537, 448], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 28}, {\"bbox\": [63, 449, 537, 462], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 449, 537, 462], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 29}, {\"bbox\": [62, 462, 537, 477], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 462, 537, 477], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 30}, {\"bbox\": [63, 476, 538, 491], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 479, 74, 487], \"score\": 0.87, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [74, 476, 252, 491], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to the paths in the base manifold \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [253, 479, 265, 487], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"M\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [266, 476, 538, 491], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 31}, {\"bbox\": [63, 491, 538, 506], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 491, 538, 506], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 32}, {\"bbox\": [63, 507, 537, 520], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 507, 537, 520], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 33}, {\"bbox\": [62, 520, 536, 533], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 520, 536, 533], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 34}, {\"bbox\": [63, 534, 537, 549], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 537, 72, 545], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{P}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [73, 534, 237, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of paths to the structure group \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [238, 536, 249, 545], \"score\": 0.87, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [249, 534, 363, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Analogously, the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [363, 534, 371, 546], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [372, 534, 537, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of generalized gauge transforms\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 35}, {\"bbox\": [62, 548, 537, 564], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 548, 198, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"collects all functions from \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [198, 551, 211, 559], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"M\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 13}, {\"bbox\": [211, 548, 228, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [228, 551, 239, 560], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [240, 548, 342, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Now the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [342, 549, 350, 561], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [351, 548, 368, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [368, 549, 378, 560], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [378, 548, 537, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is defined purely algebraically.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 36}, {\"bbox\": [62, 563, 537, 578], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 563, 97, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Given \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [97, 564, 107, 574], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [107, 563, 133, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [134, 564, 142, 575], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [142, 563, 364, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" the topologies induced by the topology of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [364, 565, 375, 574], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [375, 563, 522, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", one sees that, for compact \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [522, 565, 533, 574], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [533, 563, 537, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \",\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 37}, {\"bbox\": [62, 578, 537, 592], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 578, 537, 592], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 38}, {\"bbox\": [62, 591, 513, 608], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 591, 124, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [125, 592, 135, 603], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [135, 591, 161, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [161, 592, 185, 606], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}/\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 14, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [185, 591, 513, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 39}], \"index\": 32}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [64, 605, 537, 677], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 606, 537, 622], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 606, 537, 622], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 40}, {\"bbox\": [61, 619, 537, 637], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 619, 537, 637], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 41}, {\"bbox\": [61, 634, 537, 650], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 634, 324, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"framework. First of all, it has been proven that \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [324, 637, 334, 646], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [334, 634, 362, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [362, 637, 370, 647], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [371, 634, 486, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" are dense subsets in \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [486, 636, 496, 646], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [496, 634, 524, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [524, 636, 533, 647], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [533, 634, 537, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \",\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 42}, {\"bbox\": [63, 650, 536, 664], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 650, 228, 664], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"respectively [17]. Furthermore, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [229, 652, 239, 660], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [239, 650, 536, 664], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 43}, {\"bbox\": [63, 664, 538, 680], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 664, 538, 680], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 44}], \"index\": 42}], \"layout_bboxes\": [], \"page_idx\": 1, \"page_size\": [612.0, 792.0], \"_layout_tree\": [], \"images\": [], \"tables\": [], \"interline_equations\": [], \"discarded_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"discarded\", \"bbox\": [295, 704, 303, 715], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [295, 705, 304, 718], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [295, 705, 304, 718], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"2\", \"type\": \"text\"}]}]}], \"need_drop\": false, \"drop_reason\": [], \"para_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [63, 10, 200, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 13, 199, 29], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 15, 73, 28], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"1\", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [90, 13, 199, 29], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Introduction\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 0}], \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 41, 538, 228], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 43, 537, 58], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 43, 537, 58], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [62, 58, 538, 73], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 58, 445, 73], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [445, 60, 455, 68], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [455, 58, 538, 73], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of smooth con-\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [62, 71, 537, 87], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 71, 416, 87], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [417, 74, 425, 84], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [425, 71, 537, 87], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of all smooth gauge\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [62, 87, 536, 101], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 87, 434, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [434, 88, 442, 98], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [443, 87, 462, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [463, 88, 473, 97], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [473, 87, 536, 101], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Physically,\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [62, 101, 538, 116], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 101, 538, 116], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [63, 116, 537, 129], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 116, 334, 129], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [334, 117, 358, 129], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [358, 116, 537, 129], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", is the configuration space for the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [61, 130, 538, 145], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 130, 291, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [292, 130, 302, 141], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [302, 130, 491, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", which is an affine space, the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [491, 131, 515, 144], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 13, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [515, 130, 538, 145], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" has\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [62, 145, 538, 159], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 145, 538, 159], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [61, 158, 538, 174], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 158, 538, 174], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [61, 173, 538, 188], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 173, 538, 188], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [62, 188, 538, 203], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 188, 538, 203], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [61, 202, 538, 217], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 202, 136, 217], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"a measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [136, 204, 159, 216], \"score\": 0.95, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [160, 202, 538, 217], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [62, 216, 523, 231], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 216, 271, 231], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"better understanding of the structure of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [272, 218, 295, 230], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [295, 216, 523, 231], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". However, up to now, results are quite rare.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 13}], \"index\": 7, \"bbox_fs\": [61, 43, 538, 231]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 229, 538, 388], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 231, 539, 246], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 231, 539, 246], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 14}, {\"bbox\": [61, 244, 538, 263], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 244, 538, 263], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 15}, {\"bbox\": [63, 261, 537, 275], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 261, 123, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"[16]). Now, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [124, 262, 131, 272], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [132, 261, 360, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [360, 262, 370, 271], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [370, 261, 537, 275], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". About 15 years ago, Kondracki\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 16}, {\"bbox\": [63, 275, 538, 289], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 275, 538, 289], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 17}, {\"bbox\": [62, 289, 537, 303], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 289, 371, 303], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [371, 291, 381, 299], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [382, 289, 537, 303], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". This means, for every orbit\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 18}, {\"bbox\": [63, 303, 538, 319], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 305, 113, 316], \"score\": 0.93, \"content\": \"A\\\\circ\\\\mathcal{G}\\\\subseteq A\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 50}, {\"bbox\": [113, 303, 501, 319], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [501, 305, 510, 314], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"A\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [511, 303, 538, 319], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" onto\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 19}, {\"bbox\": [63, 318, 537, 332], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 320, 91, 330], \"score\": 0.92, \"content\": \"A\\\\circ{\\\\mathcal{G}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 28}, {\"bbox\": [91, 318, 537, 332], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 20}, {\"bbox\": [61, 332, 538, 348], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 332, 538, 348], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 21}, {\"bbox\": [62, 347, 538, 361], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 347, 218, 361], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"stabilizer under the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [219, 349, 227, 358], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [227, 347, 538, 361], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 22}, {\"bbox\": [61, 360, 538, 376], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 360, 226, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Rogulski proved that the space \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [226, 363, 236, 372], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [236, 360, 435, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is regularly stratified by the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [435, 363, 443, 373], \"score\": 0.92, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [443, 360, 538, 376], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". In particular, all\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [63, 376, 276, 390], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 376, 262, 390], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the strata are smooth submanifolds of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [262, 378, 272, 386], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [272, 376, 276, 390], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \".\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 24}], \"index\": 19, \"bbox_fs\": [61, 231, 539, 390]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 388, 537, 605], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 390, 537, 405], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 390, 471, 405], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [471, 391, 495, 403], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [495, 390, 537, 405], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" has not\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 25}, {\"bbox\": [63, 405, 536, 418], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 405, 536, 418], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 26}, {\"bbox\": [61, 419, 537, 433], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 419, 173, 433], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"but, however, not for \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [173, 420, 196, 433], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 13, \"width\": 23}, {\"bbox\": [197, 419, 537, 433], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 27}, {\"bbox\": [62, 434, 537, 448], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 434, 537, 448], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 28}, {\"bbox\": [63, 449, 537, 462], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 449, 537, 462], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 29}, {\"bbox\": [62, 462, 537, 477], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 462, 537, 477], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 30}, {\"bbox\": [63, 476, 538, 491], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 479, 74, 487], \"score\": 0.87, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [74, 476, 252, 491], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to the paths in the base manifold \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [253, 479, 265, 487], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"M\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [266, 476, 538, 491], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 31}, {\"bbox\": [63, 491, 538, 506], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 491, 538, 506], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 32}, {\"bbox\": [63, 507, 537, 520], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 507, 537, 520], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 33}, {\"bbox\": [62, 520, 536, 533], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 520, 536, 533], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 34}, {\"bbox\": [63, 534, 537, 549], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 537, 72, 545], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{P}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [73, 534, 237, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of paths to the structure group \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [238, 536, 249, 545], \"score\": 0.87, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [249, 534, 363, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Analogously, the set \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [363, 534, 371, 546], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [372, 534, 537, 549], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" of generalized gauge transforms\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 35}, {\"bbox\": [62, 548, 537, 564], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 548, 198, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"collects all functions from \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [198, 551, 211, 559], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"M\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 13}, {\"bbox\": [211, 548, 228, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [228, 551, 239, 560], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [240, 548, 342, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \". Now the action of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [342, 549, 350, 561], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 12, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [351, 548, 368, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" to \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [368, 549, 378, 560], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [378, 548, 537, 564], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is defined purely algebraically.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 36}, {\"bbox\": [62, 563, 537, 578], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 563, 97, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Given \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [97, 564, 107, 574], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [107, 563, 133, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [134, 564, 142, 575], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [142, 563, 364, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" the topologies induced by the topology of \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [364, 565, 375, 574], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [375, 563, 522, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", one sees that, for compact \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [522, 565, 533, 574], \"score\": 0.88, \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [533, 563, 537, 578], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \",\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 37}, {\"bbox\": [62, 578, 537, 592], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 578, 537, 592], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 38}, {\"bbox\": [62, 591, 513, 608], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 591, 124, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"measure on \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [125, 592, 135, 603], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [135, 591, 161, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [161, 592, 185, 606], \"score\": 0.94, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}/\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 14, \"width\": 24}, {\"bbox\": [185, 591, 513, 608], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \", the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 39}], \"index\": 32, \"bbox_fs\": [61, 390, 538, 608]}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [64, 605, 537, 677], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 606, 537, 622], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 606, 537, 622], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 40}, {\"bbox\": [61, 619, 537, 637], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 619, 537, 637], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 41}, {\"bbox\": [61, 634, 537, 650], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 634, 324, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"framework. First of all, it has been proven that \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [324, 637, 334, 646], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 9, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [334, 634, 362, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [362, 637, 370, 647], \"score\": 0.91, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [371, 634, 486, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" are dense subsets in \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [486, 636, 496, 646], \"score\": 0.9, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 10, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [496, 634, 524, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" and \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [524, 636, 533, 647], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 11, \"width\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [533, 634, 537, 650], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \",\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 42}, {\"bbox\": [63, 650, 536, 664], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 650, 228, 664], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"respectively [17]. Furthermore, \", \"type\": \"text\"}, {\"bbox\": [229, 652, 239, 660], \"score\": 0.89, \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"type\": \"inline_equation\", \"height\": 8, \"width\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [239, 650, 536, 664], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \" is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 43}, {\"bbox\": [63, 664, 538, 680], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 664, 538, 680], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman\", \"type\": \"text\"}], \"index\": 44}, {\"bbox\": [63, 18, 536, 31], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 18, 536, 31], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two-\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [63, 32, 537, 45], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 32, 537, 45], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [61, 45, 537, 60], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 45, 537, 60], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [62, 59, 537, 75], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [62, 59, 537, 75], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [63, 75, 537, 90], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 75, 537, 90], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"[9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [61, 88, 538, 106], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 88, 538, 106], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [61, 104, 537, 119], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [61, 104, 537, 119], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [63, 119, 536, 132], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [63, 119, 536, 132], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [64, 133, 352, 146], \"spans\": [{\"bbox\": [64, 133, 352, 146], \"score\": 1.0, \"content\": \"completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.\", \"type\": \"text\", \"cross_page\": true}], \"index\": 8}], \"index\": 42, \"bbox_fs\": [61, 606, 538, 680]}]}"},"layout":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [63, 10, 200, 29], \"content\": \"1 Introduction\", \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 41, 538, 228], \"content\": \"For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set of smooth con- nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of on . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to , which is an affine space, the space has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of . However, up to now, results are quite rare.\", \"index\": 1}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 229, 538, 388], \"content\": \"About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on . This means, for every orbit there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of onto . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space is regularly stratified by the action of . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of .\", \"index\": 2}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 388, 537, 605], \"content\": \"Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group to the paths in the base manifold such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid of paths to the structure group . Analogously, the set of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from to . Now the action of to is defined purely algebraically. Given and the topologies induced by the topology of , one sees that, for compact , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on and , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.\", \"index\": 3}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [64, 605, 537, 677], \"content\": \"Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that and are dense subsets in and , respectively [17]. Furthermore, is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two- dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.\", \"index\": 4}]"},"lines":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"bbox\": [63, 13, 199, 29], \"content\": \"1 Introduction\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [62, 43, 537, 58], \"content\": \"For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [62, 58, 538, 73], \"content\": \"classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set of smooth con-\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [62, 71, 537, 87], \"content\": \"nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set of all smooth gauge\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [62, 87, 536, 101], \"content\": \"transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of on . Physically,\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [62, 101, 538, 116], \"content\": \"two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [63, 116, 537, 129], \"content\": \"Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in , is the configuration space for the\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [61, 130, 538, 145], \"content\": \"gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to , which is an affine space, the space has\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [62, 145, 538, 159], \"content\": \"a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [61, 158, 538, 174], \"content\": \"not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [61, 173, 538, 188], \"content\": \"gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [62, 188, 538, 203], \"content\": \"has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [61, 202, 538, 217], \"content\": \"a measure on . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [62, 216, 523, 231], \"content\": \"better understanding of the structure of . However, up to now, results are quite rare.\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"line_index\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [63, 231, 539, 246], \"content\": \"About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [61, 244, 538, 263], \"content\": \"connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [63, 261, 537, 275], \"content\": \"[16]). Now, is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on . About 15 years ago, Kondracki\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [63, 275, 538, 289], \"content\": \"and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [62, 289, 537, 303], \"content\": \"remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on . This means, for every orbit\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [63, 303, 538, 319], \"content\": \"there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of onto\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [63, 318, 537, 332], \"content\": \". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [61, 332, 538, 348], \"content\": \"contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [62, 347, 538, 361], \"content\": \"stabilizer under the action of . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [61, 360, 538, 376], \"content\": \"Rogulski proved that the space is regularly stratified by the action of . In particular, all\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [63, 376, 276, 390], \"content\": \"the strata are smooth submanifolds of .\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"line_index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [63, 390, 537, 405], \"content\": \"Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on has not\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [63, 405, 536, 418], \"content\": \"been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [61, 419, 537, 433], \"content\": \"but, however, not for itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [62, 434, 537, 448], \"content\": \"the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [63, 449, 537, 462], \"content\": \"can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [62, 462, 537, 477], \"content\": \"parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [63, 476, 538, 491], \"content\": \"to the paths in the base manifold such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [63, 491, 538, 506], \"content\": \"the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [63, 507, 537, 520], \"content\": \"parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [62, 520, 536, 533], \"content\": \"is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [63, 534, 537, 549], \"content\": \"of paths to the structure group . Analogously, the set of generalized gauge transforms\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [62, 548, 537, 564], \"content\": \"collects all functions from to . Now the action of to is defined purely algebraically.\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [62, 563, 537, 578], \"content\": \"Given and the topologies induced by the topology of , one sees that, for compact ,\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [62, 578, 537, 592], \"content\": \"these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 13}, {\"bbox\": [62, 591, 513, 608], \"content\": \"measure on and , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"line_index\": 14}, {\"bbox\": [62, 606, 537, 622], \"content\": \"Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 0}, {\"bbox\": [61, 619, 537, 637], \"content\": \"”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 1}, {\"bbox\": [61, 634, 537, 650], \"content\": \"framework. First of all, it has been proven that and are dense subsets in and ,\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 2}, {\"bbox\": [63, 650, 536, 664], \"content\": \"respectively [17]. Furthermore, is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 3}, {\"bbox\": [63, 664, 538, 680], \"content\": \"These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 4}, {\"bbox\": [63, 18, 536, 31], \"content\": \"path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two-\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 5}, {\"bbox\": [63, 32, 537, 45], \"content\": \"dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 6}, {\"bbox\": [61, 45, 537, 60], \"content\": \"standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 7}, {\"bbox\": [62, 59, 537, 75], \"content\": \"of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 8}, {\"bbox\": [63, 75, 537, 90], \"content\": \"[9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 9}, {\"bbox\": [61, 88, 538, 106], \"content\": \"holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 10}, {\"bbox\": [61, 104, 537, 119], \"content\": \"the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 11}, {\"bbox\": [63, 119, 536, 132], \"content\": \"for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 12}, {\"bbox\": [64, 133, 352, 146], \"content\": \"completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"line_index\": 13}]"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"string","value":"[{\"bbox\": [445, 60, 455, 68], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [417, 74, 425, 84], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [434, 88, 442, 98], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [463, 88, 473, 97], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [334, 117, 358, 129], \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [292, 130, 302, 141], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [491, 131, 515, 144], \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [136, 204, 159, 216], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [272, 218, 295, 230], \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal G\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [124, 262, 131, 272], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [360, 262, 370, 271], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [371, 291, 381, 299], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [63, 305, 113, 316], \"content\": \"A\\\\circ\\\\mathcal{G}\\\\subseteq A\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [501, 305, 510, 314], \"content\": \"A\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [63, 320, 91, 330], \"content\": \"A\\\\circ{\\\\mathcal{G}}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [219, 349, 227, 358], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [226, 363, 236, 372], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [435, 363, 443, 373], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [262, 378, 272, 386], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 2, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [471, 391, 495, 403], \"content\": \"\\\\scriptstyle A/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [173, 420, 196, 433], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}/\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [63, 479, 74, 487], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [253, 479, 265, 487], \"content\": \"M\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [63, 537, 72, 545], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{P}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [238, 536, 249, 545], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [363, 534, 371, 546], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [198, 551, 211, 559], \"content\": \"M\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [228, 551, 239, 560], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [342, 549, 350, 561], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [368, 549, 378, 560], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [97, 564, 107, 574], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [134, 564, 142, 575], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [364, 565, 375, 574], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [522, 565, 533, 574], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [125, 592, 135, 603], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [161, 592, 185, 606], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}/\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{G}}}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [324, 637, 334, 646], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [362, 637, 370, 647], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{G}\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [486, 636, 496, 646], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [524, 636, 533, 647], \"content\": \"\\\\overline{{g}}\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, {\"bbox\": [229, 652, 239, 660], \"content\": \"\\\\mathcal{A}\", \"parent_index\": 4, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}]"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":2,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/2/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=dQK~jUmOQqaDVbw4-XGO4uAwGNrxyvK3EdTzmJyihvFrhKhMECcL-6dTvRvdS~lZWtOjkzB0k9tDkcmesLS5Y-TXDAsTcAFNzHFgTYo8KE1U82JHiGackM4SKEJbYmgsLNeKNMD-EdQlSEpScWnt0yqjoVEnOjuam9GO5M3zyrR8AM9GuK9AR-TM7sn3NcNjfvTPR2ydqpadTv-UlB~FFOIJx8-EJM9q-nuWwck5UvWFR5a779a2H4hkleE~m-vNbpEPYGmSr-FVnRiuKvpmpTgFQjzC6LvQDC2V1LhufM~pIBGG~Wov5yS1QYzK0cDrZtY4mdtcmLGIWK~4VbR9JA__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"The outline of the paper is as follows:\\n\\nAfter fixing the notations we prove a very crucial lemma"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

The outline of the paper is as follows:

\\n

\\n

• A generalized connection ${\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\in{\\"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":3,"string":"3"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"\\\", \\\"page_idx\\\": 3}, {\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"• A gene"},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 1, \\\"poly\\\": [216, 40, 1495, 40, 1495, 322, 216, 322], \\\"score"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [77, 14, 538, 115], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [79"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [77, 14, 538, 115], \\\"content\\\": \\\"\\\", \\\"index\\\": 0}, {\\\"type\\\": \\\""},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [61, 117, 538, 134], \\\"content\\\": \\\"• A generalized connection is a homomorphism1 "},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [213, 118, 248, 129], \\\"content\\\": \\\"{\\\\\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\\\\\in{\\\\\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\", \\\""},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":4,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/4/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=rf9NidMtXhwpBBA6tNZLXXg~I4VD7bpXAHTz-9xoCWza8GiuxOPIxqi8BAL0v6QA5hmoHzDzBUZn2JVngiBizjtO10TdihC1M5QA46WY~sfz1Wo1kc5K2Pi62rwICGY3aoklZS4MtQr4iqS7Okfyo0y8fJt4H-qSBf~~una7m0PRhoVLN73kn-uAPw86XNMUhZ6MjzOdK~cGlmg7KOY24yfbZ08gL7nXsxzwk4VVRPPWWUX-w65L8wZ9S7UbD-3JFGLRiguA2ejS1fIjaCSqOFtmPe6ny-wvZaxdktpOXvGrvFVFC6kQY268QgPjTAEd4qE9Fl3PWgJr4Ht~fRbC7Q__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"Definition 3.3 Let $t\\\\in\\\\mathcal T$ . We define the following expressions:\\n\\n$$\\n\\\\begin{array}{"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

Definition 3.3 Let $t\\\\in\\\\mathcal T$ . We define the f"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":4,"string":"4"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"Definition 3.3 Let $t\\\\\\\\in\\\\\\\\mathcal T$ . We define the followi"},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 8, \\\"poly\\\": [714, 89, 1197, 89, 1197, 221, 714, 221], \\\"score"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [62, 14, 397, 29], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [62,"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [62, 14, 397, 29], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Definition 3.3 Let . We define t"},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [62, 17, 396, 31], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Definition 3.3 Let . We define the following express"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [174, 19, 203, 28], \\\"content\\\": \\\"t\\\\\\\\in\\\\\\\\mathcal T\\\", \\\"parent_index\\\": 0, \\\"subty"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":5,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/5/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=oUPSG5jAoX6aFn0KTv8UWRQBOCqpTCkjkFX8xbNUoeqy~AKq9sifz8cE7hSc4m5UvYvf54PV3x69ffCcdOP0n4lmNMMI4GAkhLnotiG42oAvU5ztww74BjredGzVWdpnBC5ORRQJe-~pnFrQwj519TnDnER0950naokpngtAtgyqrWW~paS5w1Ck9QXo-RHeX5LzLmQ252PC~piuu1ZWFjgk4IcJo5gos7Ygn78L1pQNd1eokvGoW-W1EDzQwQiFV61qsXUKiD~ii5-ae0KIOwq0txIm93L75mQd60lKCUjd7S20THzBgUiT5~N-R4CYiztm-lReTh8clqpWyEt39Q__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"Proof • $\\\\varphi_{\\\\alpha}:{\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}}\\\\longrightarrow\\\\mathbf{G}^{\\\\#\\\\alpha}$"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

Proof • $\\\\varphi_{\\\\alpha}:{\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":5,"string":"5"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"Proof • $\\\\\\\\varphi_{\\\\\\\\alpha}:{\\\\\\\\overline{{\\\\\\\\mathcal{A}}}"},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 0, \\\"poly\\\": [174, 456, 806, 456, 806, 504, 174, 504], \\\"score"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [61, 12, 539, 146], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [61"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [61, 12, 539, 146], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Proof • is as a map into a pr"},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [61, 14, 536, 35], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Proof • is as a map into a product space continuou"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [123, 17, 209, 30], \\\"content\\\": \\\"\\\\\\\\varphi_{\\\\\\\\alpha}:{\\\\\\\\overline{{\\\\\\\\mathcal{A}"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":6,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/6/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=i1nyPBW4qktbPzXvZDptJBEHXEf0X16hYltVnbCC~j2iUTTafsnZQb64ZzmRV48-WuVdNUknGiC48EY~UQJmH0a~oKpaTJEQjQTzQD2ePARyvlSwaafGDr8TqkxJJ4DY0KLLsSehs5IYX5uHbvqzNNV29opNc4RnMwun35CZxN7uCOBJQ29MapkP4iJ1gyi46cKle0JpUUw0HHsHo0shGsZ4VRy3MfFsWkzlNVushZvv12Z3uUapU-zL7IJy1HxBdlvKzvg2gneHpCkw3dCWIT8FmjeNQZ1BiOBF07c6FED0U9uNBNaybFxojwPyfGv39w7lB768quXCk1sK4I-eXg__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"# 5.1 The Idea\\n\\nOur proof imitates in a certain sense the proof of the standard slice theorem (se"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

5.1 The Idea

\\n

Our"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":6,"string":"6"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"5.1 The Idea \\\", \\\"text_level\\\": 1, \\\"page_idx\\\": 6}, {\\\"type\\\": "},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 1, \\\"poly\\\": [172, 866, 1496, 866, 1496, 985, 172, 985], \\\"sco"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"title\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [62, 12, 165, 29], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [61"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"title\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [62, 12, 165, 29], \\\"content\\\": \\\"5.1 The Idea\\\", \\\"index\\\": 0}, {"},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [61, 15, 164, 30], \\\"content\\\": \\\"5.1 The Idea\\\", \\\"parent_index\\\": 0, \\\"line_index\\\": "},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [367, 55, 384, 64], \\\"content\\\": \\\"L i e\\\", \\\"parent_index\\\": 1, \\\"subtype\\\": \\\"inline\\"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":7,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/7/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=JfiBGfa2gbv6zp3tdUvzvlWFWIWmHFmAZOQwc8lLTKdVLc~kmHDBR-MLUARBOvY17VbL1WVNv0gzg4f1a9Dufu6bvj6pCppPhf3RfSK0UiTT-~8kwRBcziJ9JiSwQVq0ZEq95KRH9ICtHE3Tc41wdSA8njGF2rykVhLi~zDAOa6of0awJdaw1nieVONOuuvgF5kSYcNs2sN5oBLNsue~pMgrbHGLREPbq17HgeC-FmxGIuwSjxYvjK5pnVdpJ~F2tno-kCduUqwcsme7~8Xpi5x~AX7x8sDIsAVM9FfThq1qPtz0mO9QEzirDqQfoikpI8Txr-ivIIuxtddZhM9kSA__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"# 5.2 The Proof\\n\\nProof 1. Let ${\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\in{\\\\overline{{A}}}$ . Choose for $\\\\overline{{"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

5.2 The Proof

\\n

Pro"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":7,"string":"7"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"5.2 The Proof \\\", \\\"text_level\\\": 1, \\\"page_idx\\\": 7}, {\\\"type\\\":"},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 8, \\\"poly\\\": [544, 1186, 1363, 1186, 1363, 1448, 544, 1448], \\"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"title\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [61, 12, 176, 29], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [62"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"title\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [61, 12, 176, 29], \\\"content\\\": \\\"5.2 The Proof\\\", \\\"index\\\": 0}, "},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [62, 15, 174, 29], \\\"content\\\": \\\"5.2 The Proof\\\", \\\"parent_index\\\": 0, \\\"line_index\\\":"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [153, 39, 189, 50], \\\"content\\\": \\\"{\\\\\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\\\\\in{\\\\\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\", \\\"pa"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}},{"rowIdx":8,"cells":{"image":{"kind":"image","value":{"src":"https://datasets-server.huggingface.co/assets/v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10/--/78831de6acb1568684aa5e491f467c279baa48dd/--/default/train/8/image/image.jpg?Expires=1756136271&Signature=igzCBotcSrK1bmNchweqX-8SG0ixggfHB-5TrXAIkrQHuqx2s4OX-Y0f0FUfB13QGIiKZnoauVGgF6w844bopMjfD2Pge8atuUdxXgD6Zu~dSckMoWsnYdpozKZv9MRS3yTlturJiv20Xqw~ljnlN79kZq0z9DKSwSLfwdVhpZ71~ElBEZKVR4S6nLrQ~qQFUXiGOGY6dTAah6TKtEvwbDnSLLtCuOmSqsduW1ZAmBoajatdXDi0jFes5f~aOvXjiql7xeJTEY5yZF1c8VvNpLmubfMoyxvgzZo298BYcrBWEsh5GPditZfIhAL7ybuHdkyW~jgtarsEWJo95BBAWg__&Key-Pair-Id=K3EI6M078Z3AC3","height":1650,"width":1275},"inferredFromUrl":false},"markdown":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"6. $F$ is equivariant.\\n\\nLet $\\\\overline{{A}}^{\\\\prime\\\\prime}=\\\\overline{{A}}^{\\\\prime}\\\\circ\\\\ov"},"html":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"\\n

6. $F$ is equivariant.

\\n

\\n

Since $\\\\varphi$ , $f$ and $\\\\tau_{\\\\mathbf G}$ are co"},"pdf_name":{"kind":"string","value":"0001008v1"},"page_number":{"kind":"number","value":9,"string":"9"},"pdf_width":{"kind":"number","value":612,"string":"612"},"pdf_height":{"kind":"number","value":792,"string":"792"},"image_width":{"kind":"number","value":1275,"string":"1,275"},"image_height":{"kind":"number","value":1650,"string":"1,650"},"content_list":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"text\\\": \\\"Since $\\\\\\\\varphi$ , $f$ and $\\\\\\\\tau_{\\\\\\\\mathbf G}$ are continu"},"model_output":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"layout_dets\\\": [{\\\"category_id\\\": 8, \\\"poly\\\": [474, 1358, 1429, 1358, 1429, 1637, 474, 1637], \\"},"middle":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"{\\\"preproc_blocks\\\": [{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [147, 15, 371, 29], \\\"lines\\\": [{\\\"bbox\\\": [14"},"layout":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"type\\\": \\\"text\\\", \\\"bbox\\\": [147, 15, 371, 29], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Since , and are continuous,"},"lines":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [149, 17, 369, 31], \\\"content\\\": \\\"Since , and are continuous, the map\\\", \\\"parent"},"images":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"},"equations":{"kind":"truncated","value":"\"[{\\\"bbox\\\": [179, 22, 187, 30], \\\"content\\\": \\\"\\\\\\\\varphi\\\", \\\"parent_index\\\": 0, \\\"subtype\\\": \\\"in"},"tables":{"kind":"string","value":"[]"}}}],"truncated":true},"paginationData":{"pageIndex":0,"numItemsPerPage":100,"numTotalItems":124,"offset":0,"length":100}},"jwt":"eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJyZWFkIjp0cnVlLCJwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI6eyJyZXBvLmNvbnRlbnQucmVhZCI6dHJ1ZX0sImlhdCI6MTc1NjEzMjY3MSwic3ViIjoiL2RhdGFzZXRzL3YxdjFkL3ZpdmlkX3NpbmdsZV9kYXRhc2V0X2FyeGl2XzEwIiwiZXhwIjoxNzU2MTM2MjcxLCJpc3MiOiJodHRwczovL2h1Z2dpbmdmYWNlLmNvIn0.CnKRcGmQRXlzu37Aa6VfzSmTkqnZYOMeWdt_o8alq2CAwxB__2bfBfE5RZZoWySMBj87bKP-gfgP58WpVgscCg","displayUrls":true},"dataset":"v1v1d/vivid_single_dataset_arxiv_10","isGated":false,"isPrivate":false,"hasParquetFormat":true,"author":{"_id":"670c18acb781bec147c23267","avatarUrl":"https://aifasthub.com/avatars/v1/production/uploads/6442d975ad54813badc1ddf7/xybQVges_Zhl6JvQtF_Ri.png","fullname":"ViViD","name":"v1v1d","type":"org","isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"isEnterprise":false,"followerCount":5},"compact":true}">

Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
image
imagewidth (px)
1.28k
1.28k
markdown
stringlengths
37
7.92k
html
stringlengths
176
8.24k
pdf_name
stringclasses
9 values
page_number
int64
0
21
pdf_width
float64
612
612
pdf_height
float64
792
792
image_width
int64
1.28k
1.28k
image_height
int64
1.65k
1.65k
content_list
stringlengths
46
8.42k
model_output
stringlengths
581
35.5k
middle
stringlengths
2.81k
73.3k
layout
stringlengths
75
5.1k
lines
stringlengths
2
15.5k
images
stringclasses
16 values
equations
stringlengths
2
14.1k
tables
stringclasses
8 values
# Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space Christian Fleischhack∗ Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany January 5, 2000 # Abstract The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\mathbf{G}$ . First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.
<html><body> <h1 data-bbox="83 55 516 79">Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space </h1> <p data-bbox="232 97 371 113">Christian Fleischhack∗ </p> <p data-bbox="133 129 486 189">Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany </p> <p data-bbox="135 203 466 248">Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany </p> <p data-bbox="250 259 350 276">January 5, 2000 </p> <h1 data-bbox="275 318 324 332">Abstract </h1> <p data-bbox="92 339 507 366">The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\mathbf{G}$ . </p> <p data-bbox="92 367 508 474">First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1. </p>
0001008v1
0
612
792
1,275
1,650
[{"type": "text", "text": "Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space ", "text_level": 1, "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "Christian Fleischhack∗ ", "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany ", "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany ", "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "January 5, 2000 ", "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "Abstract ", "text_level": 1, "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ on the space $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups $\\mathbf{G}$ . ", "page_idx": 0}, {"type": "text", "text": "First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is topologically regularly stratified by $\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of $\\mathbf{G}$ . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1. ", "page_idx": 0}]
{"layout_dets": [{"category_id": 1, "poly": [257, 1020, 1412, 1020, 1412, 1319, 257, 1319], "score": 0.975}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [257, 942, 1410, 942, 1410, 1018, 257, 1018], "score": 0.919}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [375, 566, 1296, 566, 1296, 691, 375, 691], "score": 0.905}, {"category_id": 0, "poly": [233, 153, 1436, 153, 1436, 221, 233, 221], "score": 0.904}, {"category_id": 0, "poly": [765, 886, 902, 886, 902, 923, 765, 923], "score": 0.877}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [697, 722, 974, 722, 974, 767, 697, 767], "score": 0.859}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [647, 270, 1031, 270, 1031, 314, 647, 314], "score": 0.842}, {"category_id": 2, "poly": [39, 572, 104, 572, 104, 1443, 39, 1443], "score": 0.829}, {"category_id": 2, "poly": [823, 1958, 843, 1958, 843, 1988, 823, 1988], "score": 0.776}, {"category_id": 2, "poly": [358, 1877, 1155, 1877, 1155, 1909, 358, 1909], "score": 0.723}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [371, 361, 723, 361, 723, 525, 371, 525], "score": 0.632}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [897, 360, 1350, 360, 1350, 525, 897, 525], "score": 0.569}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [371, 359, 1352, 359, 1352, 527, 371, 527], "score": 0.367}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [540, 1100, 565, 1100, 565, 1127, 540, 1127], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [978, 950, 998, 950, 998, 980, 978, 980], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1379, 1138, 1400, 1138, 1400, 1169, 1379, 1169], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1189, 950, 1214, 950, 1214, 978, 1189, 978], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [824, 1138, 849, 1138, 849, 1165, 824, 1165], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [814, 1256, 842, 1256, 842, 1278, 814, 1278], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1015, 992, 1042, 992, 1042, 1015, 1015, 1015], "score": 0.88, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [300.0, 1024.0, 1411.0, 1024.0, 1411.0, 1061.0, 300.0, 1061.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [258.0, 1061.0, 1410.0, 1061.0, 1410.0, 1100.0, 258.0, 1100.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [258.0, 1101.0, 539.0, 1101.0, 539.0, 1136.0, 258.0, 1136.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [566.0, 1101.0, 1412.0, 1101.0, 1412.0, 1136.0, 566.0, 1136.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [257.0, 1137.0, 823.0, 1137.0, 823.0, 1176.0, 257.0, 1176.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [850.0, 1137.0, 1378.0, 1137.0, 1378.0, 1176.0, 850.0, 1176.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1401.0, 1137.0, 1410.0, 1137.0, 1410.0, 1176.0, 1401.0, 1176.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [258.0, 1176.0, 1410.0, 1176.0, 1410.0, 1211.0, 258.0, 1211.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [254.0, 1211.0, 1414.0, 1211.0, 1414.0, 1251.0, 254.0, 1251.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [258.0, 1251.0, 813.0, 1251.0, 813.0, 1289.0, 258.0, 1289.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [843.0, 1251.0, 1412.0, 1251.0, 1412.0, 1289.0, 843.0, 1289.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [257.0, 1289.0, 1099.0, 1289.0, 1099.0, 1324.0, 257.0, 1324.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [300.0, 947.0, 977.0, 947.0, 977.0, 988.0, 300.0, 988.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [999.0, 947.0, 1188.0, 947.0, 1188.0, 988.0, 999.0, 988.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1215.0, 947.0, 1410.0, 947.0, 1410.0, 988.0, 1215.0, 988.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [258.0, 988.0, 1014.0, 988.0, 1014.0, 1027.0, 258.0, 1027.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1043.0, 988.0, 1053.0, 988.0, 1053.0, 1027.0, 1043.0, 1027.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [376.0, 573.0, 1294.0, 573.0, 1294.0, 611.0, 376.0, 611.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [710.0, 613.0, 962.0, 613.0, 962.0, 653.0, 710.0, 653.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [662.0, 656.0, 1009.0, 656.0, 1009.0, 694.0, 662.0, 694.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [237.0, 166.0, 1428.0, 166.0, 1428.0, 224.0, 237.0, 224.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [765.0, 889.0, 905.0, 889.0, 905.0, 927.0, 765.0, 927.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [696.0, 728.0, 969.0, 728.0, 969.0, 768.0, 696.0, 768.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [650.0, 280.0, 1029.0, 280.0, 1029.0, 317.0, 650.0, 317.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [42.0, 574.0, 102.0, 574.0, 102.0, 1446.0, 42.0, 1446.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [823.0, 1961.0, 844.0, 1961.0, 844.0, 1993.0, 823.0, 1993.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [355.0, 1882.0, 1158.0, 1882.0, 1158.0, 1914.0, 355.0, 1914.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [376.0, 369.0, 720.0, 369.0, 720.0, 403.0, 376.0, 403.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [413.0, 407.0, 683.0, 407.0, 683.0, 448.0, 413.0, 448.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [403.0, 449.0, 691.0, 449.0, 691.0, 487.0, 403.0, 487.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [374.0, 490.0, 723.0, 490.0, 723.0, 530.0, 374.0, 530.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [900.0, 369.0, 1352.0, 369.0, 1352.0, 404.0, 900.0, 404.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [991.0, 407.0, 1261.0, 407.0, 1261.0, 449.0, 991.0, 449.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [977.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 489.0, 977.0, 489.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [951.0, 489.0, 1299.0, 489.0, 1299.0, 532.0, 951.0, 532.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [375.0, 365.0, 722.0, 365.0, 722.0, 406.0, 375.0, 406.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [899.0, 368.0, 1351.0, 368.0, 1351.0, 406.0, 899.0, 406.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [411.0, 403.0, 686.0, 403.0, 686.0, 452.0, 411.0, 452.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [990.0, 406.0, 1263.0, 406.0, 1263.0, 450.0, 990.0, 450.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [400.0, 446.0, 694.0, 446.0, 694.0, 491.0, 400.0, 491.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [979.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 448.0, 1270.0, 489.0, 979.0, 489.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [373.0, 490.0, 722.0, 490.0, 722.0, 530.0, 373.0, 530.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [951.0, 490.0, 1301.0, 490.0, 1301.0, 530.0, 951.0, 530.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}], "page_info": {"page_no": 0, "height": 2200, "width": 1700}}
{"preproc_blocks": [{"type": "title", "bbox": [83, 55, 516, 79], "lines": [{"bbox": [85, 59, 514, 80], "spans": [{"bbox": [85, 59, 514, 80], "score": 1.0, "content": "Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space", "type": "text"}], "index": 0}], "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [232, 97, 371, 113], "lines": [{"bbox": [234, 100, 370, 114], "spans": [{"bbox": [234, 100, 370, 114], "score": 1.0, "content": "Christian Fleischhack∗", "type": "text"}], "index": 1}], "index": 1}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [133, 129, 486, 189], "lines": [{"bbox": [135, 131, 486, 146], "spans": [{"bbox": [135, 131, 259, 146], "score": 1.0, "content": "Mathematisches Institut", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [324, 132, 486, 145], "score": 0.9786086678504944, "content": "Institut fir Theoretische Physik", "type": "text"}], "index": 2}, {"bbox": [147, 145, 453, 162], "spans": [{"bbox": [147, 145, 246, 162], "score": 0.9850176572799683, "content": "Universitat Leipzig", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [356, 146, 453, 161], "score": 0.9910887479782104, "content": "Universitat Leipzig", "type": "text"}], "index": 3}, {"bbox": [144, 160, 457, 176], "spans": [{"bbox": [144, 160, 249, 176], "score": 1.0, "content": "Augustusplatz 10/11", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [351, 161, 457, 176], "score": 1.0, "content": "Augustusplatz 10/11", "type": "text"}], "index": 4}, {"bbox": [134, 176, 467, 191], "spans": [{"bbox": [134, 176, 260, 190], "score": 1.0, "content": "04109 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [342, 176, 467, 191], "score": 1.0, "content": "04109 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}], "index": 5}], "index": 3.5}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [135, 203, 466, 248], "lines": [{"bbox": [135, 206, 465, 219], "spans": [{"bbox": [135, 206, 465, 219], "score": 0.9778387546539307, "content": "Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften", "type": "text"}], "index": 6}, {"bbox": [255, 220, 346, 235], "spans": [{"bbox": [255, 220, 346, 235], "score": 1.0, "content": "Inselstraße 22-26", "type": "text"}], "index": 7}, {"bbox": [238, 236, 363, 249], "spans": [{"bbox": [238, 236, 363, 249], "score": 1.0, "content": "04103 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}], "index": 8}], "index": 7}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [250, 259, 350, 276], "lines": [{"bbox": [250, 262, 348, 276], "spans": [{"bbox": [250, 262, 348, 276], "score": 1.0, "content": "January 5, 2000", "type": "text"}], "index": 9}], "index": 9}, {"type": "title", "bbox": [275, 318, 324, 332], "lines": [{"bbox": [275, 320, 325, 333], "spans": [{"bbox": [275, 320, 325, 333], "score": 1.0, "content": "Abstract", "type": "text"}], "index": 10}], "index": 10}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 339, 507, 366], "lines": [{"bbox": [108, 340, 507, 355], "spans": [{"bbox": [108, 340, 351, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": "The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [352, 342, 359, 352], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 7}, {"bbox": [359, 340, 427, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": " on the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [428, 342, 437, 352], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [437, 340, 507, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": " of generalized", "type": "text"}], "index": 11}, {"bbox": [92, 355, 379, 369], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 355, 365, 369], "score": 1.0, "content": "connections is investigated for compact structure groups ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [365, 357, 375, 365], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [375, 355, 379, 369], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 12}], "index": 11.5}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 367, 508, 474], "lines": [{"bbox": [108, 368, 507, 381], "spans": [{"bbox": [108, 368, 507, 381], "score": 1.0, "content": "First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 13}, {"bbox": [92, 381, 507, 396], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 381, 507, 396], "score": 1.0, "content": "orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice", "type": "text"}], "index": 14}, {"bbox": [92, 396, 508, 408], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 396, 194, 408], "score": 1.0, "content": "theorem is proven on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [194, 396, 203, 405], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [203, 396, 508, 408], "score": 1.0, "content": ". This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness", "type": "text"}], "index": 15}, {"bbox": [92, 409, 507, 423], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 409, 296, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": "theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [296, 409, 305, 419], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [306, 409, 496, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": " is topologically regularly stratified by ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [496, 409, 504, 420], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [504, 409, 507, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 16}, {"bbox": [92, 423, 507, 435], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 423, 507, 435], "score": 1.0, "content": "These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.", "type": "text"}], "index": 17}, {"bbox": [91, 435, 509, 450], "spans": [{"bbox": [91, 435, 509, 450], "score": 1.0, "content": "As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all", "type": "text"}], "index": 18}, {"bbox": [92, 450, 508, 464], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 450, 292, 464], "score": 1.0, "content": "(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [293, 452, 303, 460], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [303, 450, 508, 464], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Finally, we show that the set of all gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 19}, {"bbox": [92, 464, 395, 476], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 464, 395, 476], "score": 1.0, "content": "orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.", "type": "text"}], "index": 20}], "index": 16.5}], "layout_bboxes": [], "page_idx": 0, "page_size": [612.0, 792.0], "_layout_tree": [], "images": [], "tables": [], "interline_equations": [], "discarded_blocks": [{"type": "discarded", "bbox": [14, 205, 37, 519], "lines": [{"bbox": [15, 206, 36, 520], "spans": [{"bbox": [15, 206, 36, 520], "score": 1.0, "content": "arXiv:math-ph/0001008v1 5 Jan 2000", "type": "text", "height": 314, "width": 21}]}]}, {"type": "discarded", "bbox": [296, 704, 303, 715], "lines": [{"bbox": [296, 705, 303, 717], "spans": [{"bbox": [296, 705, 303, 717], "score": 1.0, "content": "1", "type": "text"}]}]}, {"type": "discarded", "bbox": [128, 675, 415, 687], "lines": [{"bbox": [127, 677, 416, 689], "spans": [{"bbox": [127, 677, 416, 689], "score": 1.0, "content": "[email protected] or Christian.Fleischhack@mi", "type": "text"}]}]}], "need_drop": false, "drop_reason": [], "para_blocks": [{"type": "title", "bbox": [83, 55, 516, 79], "lines": [{"bbox": [85, 59, 514, 80], "spans": [{"bbox": [85, 59, 514, 80], "score": 1.0, "content": "Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space", "type": "text"}], "index": 0}], "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [232, 97, 371, 113], "lines": [{"bbox": [234, 100, 370, 114], "spans": [{"bbox": [234, 100, 370, 114], "score": 1.0, "content": "Christian Fleischhack∗", "type": "text"}], "index": 1}], "index": 1, "bbox_fs": [234, 100, 370, 114]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [133, 129, 486, 189], "lines": [{"bbox": [135, 131, 486, 146], "spans": [{"bbox": [135, 131, 259, 146], "score": 1.0, "content": "Mathematisches Institut", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [324, 132, 486, 145], "score": 0.9786086678504944, "content": "Institut fir Theoretische Physik", "type": "text"}], "index": 2}, {"bbox": [147, 145, 453, 162], "spans": [{"bbox": [147, 145, 246, 162], "score": 0.9850176572799683, "content": "Universitat Leipzig", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [356, 146, 453, 161], "score": 0.9910887479782104, "content": "Universitat Leipzig", "type": "text"}], "index": 3}, {"bbox": [144, 160, 457, 176], "spans": [{"bbox": [144, 160, 249, 176], "score": 1.0, "content": "Augustusplatz 10/11", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [351, 161, 457, 176], "score": 1.0, "content": "Augustusplatz 10/11", "type": "text"}], "index": 4}, {"bbox": [134, 176, 467, 191], "spans": [{"bbox": [134, 176, 260, 190], "score": 1.0, "content": "04109 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [342, 176, 467, 191], "score": 1.0, "content": "04109 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}], "index": 5}], "index": 3.5, "bbox_fs": [134, 131, 486, 191]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [135, 203, 466, 248], "lines": [{"bbox": [135, 206, 465, 219], "spans": [{"bbox": [135, 206, 465, 219], "score": 0.9778387546539307, "content": "Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften", "type": "text"}], "index": 6}, {"bbox": [255, 220, 346, 235], "spans": [{"bbox": [255, 220, 346, 235], "score": 1.0, "content": "Inselstraße 22-26", "type": "text"}], "index": 7}, {"bbox": [238, 236, 363, 249], "spans": [{"bbox": [238, 236, 363, 249], "score": 1.0, "content": "04103 Leipzig, Germany", "type": "text"}], "index": 8}], "index": 7, "bbox_fs": [135, 206, 465, 249]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [250, 259, 350, 276], "lines": [{"bbox": [250, 262, 348, 276], "spans": [{"bbox": [250, 262, 348, 276], "score": 1.0, "content": "January 5, 2000", "type": "text"}], "index": 9}], "index": 9, "bbox_fs": [250, 262, 348, 276]}, {"type": "title", "bbox": [275, 318, 324, 332], "lines": [{"bbox": [275, 320, 325, 333], "spans": [{"bbox": [275, 320, 325, 333], "score": 1.0, "content": "Abstract", "type": "text"}], "index": 10}], "index": 10}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 339, 507, 366], "lines": [{"bbox": [108, 340, 507, 355], "spans": [{"bbox": [108, 340, 351, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": "The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [352, 342, 359, 352], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 7}, {"bbox": [359, 340, 427, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": " on the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [428, 342, 437, 352], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [437, 340, 507, 355], "score": 1.0, "content": " of generalized", "type": "text"}], "index": 11}, {"bbox": [92, 355, 379, 369], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 355, 365, 369], "score": 1.0, "content": "connections is investigated for compact structure groups ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [365, 357, 375, 365], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [375, 355, 379, 369], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 12}], "index": 11.5, "bbox_fs": [92, 340, 507, 369]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 367, 508, 474], "lines": [{"bbox": [108, 368, 507, 381], "spans": [{"bbox": [108, 368, 507, 381], "score": 1.0, "content": "First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 13}, {"bbox": [92, 381, 507, 396], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 381, 507, 396], "score": 1.0, "content": "orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice", "type": "text"}], "index": 14}, {"bbox": [92, 396, 508, 408], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 396, 194, 408], "score": 1.0, "content": "theorem is proven on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [194, 396, 203, 405], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [203, 396, 508, 408], "score": 1.0, "content": ". This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness", "type": "text"}], "index": 15}, {"bbox": [92, 409, 507, 423], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 409, 296, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": "theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [296, 409, 305, 419], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [306, 409, 496, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": " is topologically regularly stratified by ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [496, 409, 504, 420], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [504, 409, 507, 423], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 16}, {"bbox": [92, 423, 507, 435], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 423, 507, 435], "score": 1.0, "content": "These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.", "type": "text"}], "index": 17}, {"bbox": [91, 435, 509, 450], "spans": [{"bbox": [91, 435, 509, 450], "score": 1.0, "content": "As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all", "type": "text"}], "index": 18}, {"bbox": [92, 450, 508, 464], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 450, 292, 464], "score": 1.0, "content": "(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [293, 452, 303, 460], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [303, 450, 508, 464], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Finally, we show that the set of all gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 19}, {"bbox": [92, 464, 395, 476], "spans": [{"bbox": [92, 464, 395, 476], "score": 1.0, "content": "orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.", "type": "text"}], "index": 20}], "index": 16.5, "bbox_fs": [91, 368, 509, 476]}]}
[{"type": "title", "bbox": [83, 55, 516, 79], "content": "Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space", "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [232, 97, 371, 113], "content": "Christian Fleischhack∗", "index": 1}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [133, 129, 486, 189], "content": "Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11 04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany", "index": 2}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [135, 203, 466, 248], "content": "Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Inselstraße 22-26 04103 Leipzig, Germany", "index": 3}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [250, 259, 350, 276], "content": "January 5, 2000", "index": 4}, {"type": "title", "bbox": [275, 318, 324, 332], "content": "Abstract", "index": 5}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 339, 507, 366], "content": "The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group on the space of generalized connections is investigated for compact structure groups .", "index": 6}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [92, 367, 508, 474], "content": "First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice theorem is proven on . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, is topologically regularly stratified by . These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections. As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all (conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.", "index": 7}]
[{"bbox": [85, 59, 514, 80], "content": "Stratification of the Generalized Gauge Orbit Space", "parent_index": 0, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [234, 100, 370, 114], "content": "Christian Fleischhack∗", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [135, 131, 486, 146], "content": "Mathematisches Institut Institut fir Theoretische Physik", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [147, 145, 453, 162], "content": "Universitat Leipzig Universitat Leipzig", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [144, 160, 457, 176], "content": "Augustusplatz 10/11 Augustusplatz 10/11", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [134, 176, 467, 191], "content": "04109 Leipzig, Germany 04109 Leipzig, Germany", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [135, 206, 465, 219], "content": "Max-Planck-Institut fir Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [255, 220, 346, 235], "content": "Inselstraße 22-26", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [238, 236, 363, 249], "content": "04103 Leipzig, Germany", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [250, 262, 348, 276], "content": "January 5, 2000", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [275, 320, 325, 333], "content": "Abstract", "parent_index": 5, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [108, 340, 507, 355], "content": "The action of Ashtekar’s generalized gauge group on the space of generalized", "parent_index": 6, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [92, 355, 379, 369], "content": "connections is investigated for compact structure groups .", "parent_index": 6, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [108, 368, 507, 381], "content": "First a stratum is defined to be the set of all connections of one and the same gauge", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [92, 381, 507, 396], "content": "orbit type, i.e. the conjugacy class of the centralizer of the holonomy group. Then a slice", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [92, 396, 508, 408], "content": "theorem is proven on . This yields the openness of the strata. Afterwards, a denseness", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [92, 409, 507, 423], "content": "theorem is proven for the strata. Hence, is topologically regularly stratified by .", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [92, 423, 507, 435], "content": "These results coincide with those of Kondracki and Rogulski for Sobolev connections.", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 4}, {"bbox": [91, 435, 509, 450], "content": "As a by-product, we prove that the set of all gauge orbit types equals the set of all", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 5}, {"bbox": [92, 450, 508, 464], "content": "(conjugacy classes of) Howe subgroups of . Finally, we show that the set of all gauge", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 6}, {"bbox": [92, 464, 395, 476], "content": "orbits with maximal type has the full induced Haar measure 1.", "parent_index": 7, "line_index": 7}]
[]
[{"bbox": [352, 342, 359, 352], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "parent_index": 6, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [428, 342, 437, 352], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 6, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [365, 357, 375, 365], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 6, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [194, 396, 203, 405], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 7, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [296, 409, 305, 419], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 7, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [496, 409, 504, 420], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "parent_index": 7, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [293, 452, 303, 460], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 7, "subtype": "inline"}]
[]
# 1 Introduction For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare. About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\circ\mathcal{G}\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\circ{\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\mathcal{A}$ . Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\mathcal{G}$ to $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}/\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization. Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.
<html><body> <h1 data-bbox="63 10 200 29">1 Introduction </h1> <p data-bbox="63 41 538 228">For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare. </p> <p data-bbox="63 229 538 388">About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\circ\mathcal{G}\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\circ{\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\mathcal{A}$ . </p> <p data-bbox="63 388 537 605">Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\scriptstyle A/\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\mathcal{G}$ to $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}/\overline{{\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization. </p> <p data-bbox="64 605 537 677">Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\overline{{\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski. </p> </body></html>
0001008v1
1
612
792
1,275
1,650
[{"type": "text", "text": "1 Introduction ", "text_level": 1, "page_idx": 1}, {"type": "text", "text": "For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set $\\mathcal{A}$ of smooth connections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set $\\mathcal{G}$ of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ on $\\mathcal{A}$ . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ , which is an affine space, the space $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G$ . However, up to now, results are quite rare. ", "page_idx": 1}, {"type": "text", "text": "About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, $\\mathcal{G}$ is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on $\\mathcal{A}$ . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on $\\mathcal{A}$ . This means, for every orbit $A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A$ there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of $A$ onto $A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}$ . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space $\\mathcal{A}$ is regularly stratified by the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of $\\mathcal{A}$ . ", "page_idx": 1}, {"type": "text", "text": "Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on $\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}$ has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for $\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}$ itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ to the paths in the base manifold $M$ such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid $\\mathcal{P}$ of paths to the structure group $\\mathbf{G}$ . Analogously, the set $\\overline{{g}}$ of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from $M$ to $\\mathbf{G}$ . Now the action of $\\mathcal{G}$ to $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ is defined purely algebraically. Given $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ the topologies induced by the topology of $\\mathbf{G}$ , one sees that, for compact $\\mathbf{G}$ , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}$ , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization. ", "page_idx": 1}, {"type": "text", "text": "Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that $\\mathcal{A}$ and $\\mathcal{G}$ are dense subsets in $\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}$ and $\\overline{{g}}$ , respectively [17]. Furthermore, $\\mathcal{A}$ is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the twodimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski. ", "page_idx": 1}]
{"layout_dets": [{"category_id": 1, "poly": [177, 115, 1496, 115, 1496, 636, 177, 636], "score": 0.971}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [176, 637, 1495, 637, 1495, 1078, 176, 1078], "score": 0.968}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [176, 1080, 1494, 1080, 1494, 1682, 176, 1682], "score": 0.922}, {"category_id": 1, "poly": [178, 1683, 1494, 1683, 1494, 1881, 178, 1881], "score": 0.888}, {"category_id": 0, "poly": [177, 30, 558, 30, 558, 83, 177, 83], "score": 0.879}, {"category_id": 2, "poly": [822, 1958, 844, 1958, 844, 1987, 822, 1987], "score": 0.783}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [379, 567, 444, 567, 444, 600, 379, 600], "score": 0.95, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1365, 366, 1431, 366, 1431, 401, 1365, 401], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [482, 1168, 547, 1168, 547, 1203, 482, 1203], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1310, 1088, 1375, 1088, 1375, 1122, 1310, 1122], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [756, 606, 820, 606, 820, 641, 756, 641], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [930, 325, 995, 325, 995, 360, 930, 360], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [449, 1646, 514, 1646, 514, 1685, 449, 1685], "score": 0.94, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [176, 849, 315, 849, 315, 878, 176, 878], "score": 0.93, "latex": "A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [176, 889, 253, 889, 253, 917, 176, 917], "score": 0.92, "latex": "A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1210, 1010, 1232, 1010, 1232, 1037, 1210, 1037], "score": 0.92, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1208, 247, 1230, 247, 1230, 274, 1208, 274], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [551, 1531, 587, 1531, 587, 1555, 551, 1555], "score": 0.91, "latex": "M"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [348, 1647, 375, 1647, 375, 1677, 348, 1677], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [373, 1567, 395, 1567, 395, 1599, 373, 1599], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [609, 970, 631, 970, 631, 996, 609, 996], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [703, 1331, 738, 1331, 738, 1355, 703, 1355], "score": 0.91, "latex": "M"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [176, 1492, 202, 1492, 202, 1516, 176, 1516], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{P}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [952, 1527, 974, 1527, 974, 1559, 952, 1559], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1024, 1527, 1051, 1527, 1051, 1556, 1024, 1556], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1010, 1486, 1033, 1486, 1033, 1518, 1010, 1518], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\overline{{g}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [629, 1010, 657, 1010, 657, 1035, 629, 1035], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1008, 1772, 1030, 1772, 1030, 1799, 1008, 1799], "score": 0.91, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [729, 1050, 756, 1050, 756, 1074, 729, 1074], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1351, 1767, 1379, 1767, 1379, 1796, 1351, 1796], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [901, 1772, 928, 1772, 928, 1797, 901, 1797], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1013, 1571, 1043, 1571, 1043, 1596, 1013, 1596], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1159, 207, 1182, 207, 1182, 234, 1159, 234], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1033, 809, 1061, 809, 1061, 833, 1033, 833], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [271, 1567, 298, 1567, 298, 1595, 271, 1595], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [345, 729, 366, 729, 366, 757, 345, 757], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1287, 247, 1314, 247, 1314, 272, 1287, 272], "score": 0.9, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [637, 1812, 665, 1812, 665, 1836, 637, 1836], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1394, 849, 1419, 849, 1419, 873, 1394, 873], "score": 0.89, "latex": "A"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1238, 167, 1265, 167, 1265, 191, 1238, 191], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1458, 1767, 1482, 1767, 1482, 1799, 1458, 1799], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\overline{{g}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1002, 729, 1029, 729, 1029, 754, 1002, 754], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\mathcal{A}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [812, 363, 839, 363, 839, 392, 812, 392], "score": 0.89, "latex": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [636, 1531, 666, 1531, 666, 1556, 636, 1556], "score": 0.88, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [1451, 1571, 1481, 1571, 1481, 1596, 1451, 1596], "score": 0.88, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [176, 1331, 206, 1331, 206, 1355, 176, 1355], "score": 0.87, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 13, "poly": [662, 1491, 692, 1491, 692, 1516, 662, 1516], "score": 0.87, "latex": "\\mathbf{G}"}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 120.0, 1494.0, 120.0, 1494.0, 162.0, 173.0, 162.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 162.0, 1237.0, 162.0, 1237.0, 204.0, 174.0, 204.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1266.0, 162.0, 1496.0, 162.0, 1496.0, 204.0, 1266.0, 204.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 199.0, 1158.0, 199.0, 1158.0, 244.0, 173.0, 244.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1183.0, 199.0, 1494.0, 199.0, 1494.0, 244.0, 1183.0, 244.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 244.0, 1207.0, 244.0, 1207.0, 281.0, 174.0, 281.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1231.0, 244.0, 1286.0, 244.0, 1286.0, 281.0, 1231.0, 281.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1315.0, 244.0, 1491.0, 244.0, 1491.0, 281.0, 1315.0, 281.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 281.0, 1496.0, 281.0, 1496.0, 323.0, 174.0, 323.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [176.0, 323.0, 929.0, 323.0, 929.0, 361.0, 176.0, 361.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [996.0, 323.0, 1493.0, 323.0, 1493.0, 361.0, 996.0, 361.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 362.0, 811.0, 362.0, 811.0, 404.0, 171.0, 404.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [840.0, 362.0, 1364.0, 362.0, 1364.0, 404.0, 840.0, 404.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1432.0, 362.0, 1496.0, 362.0, 1496.0, 404.0, 1432.0, 404.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 405.0, 1496.0, 405.0, 1496.0, 443.0, 174.0, 443.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 441.0, 1497.0, 441.0, 1497.0, 484.0, 171.0, 484.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 483.0, 1496.0, 483.0, 1496.0, 523.0, 171.0, 523.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 523.0, 1496.0, 523.0, 1496.0, 565.0, 174.0, 565.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 562.0, 378.0, 562.0, 378.0, 604.0, 171.0, 604.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [445.0, 562.0, 1497.0, 562.0, 1497.0, 604.0, 445.0, 604.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 602.0, 755.0, 602.0, 755.0, 643.0, 173.0, 643.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [821.0, 602.0, 1454.0, 602.0, 1454.0, 643.0, 821.0, 643.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 642.0, 1499.0, 642.0, 1499.0, 685.0, 175.0, 685.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [170.0, 678.0, 1496.0, 678.0, 1496.0, 732.0, 170.0, 732.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [176.0, 725.0, 344.0, 725.0, 344.0, 764.0, 176.0, 764.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [367.0, 725.0, 1001.0, 725.0, 1001.0, 764.0, 367.0, 764.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1030.0, 725.0, 1493.0, 725.0, 1493.0, 764.0, 1030.0, 764.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 765.0, 1495.0, 765.0, 1495.0, 804.0, 175.0, 804.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 805.0, 1032.0, 805.0, 1032.0, 844.0, 173.0, 844.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1062.0, 805.0, 1492.0, 805.0, 1492.0, 844.0, 1062.0, 844.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 844.0, 175.0, 844.0, 175.0, 887.0, 173.0, 887.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [316.0, 844.0, 1393.0, 844.0, 1393.0, 887.0, 316.0, 887.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1420.0, 844.0, 1495.0, 844.0, 1495.0, 887.0, 1420.0, 887.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 885.0, 175.0, 885.0, 175.0, 924.0, 175.0, 924.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [254.0, 885.0, 1493.0, 885.0, 1493.0, 924.0, 254.0, 924.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [172.0, 924.0, 1495.0, 924.0, 1495.0, 967.0, 172.0, 967.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 965.0, 608.0, 965.0, 608.0, 1004.0, 173.0, 1004.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [632.0, 965.0, 1495.0, 965.0, 1495.0, 1004.0, 632.0, 1004.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [172.0, 1002.0, 628.0, 1002.0, 628.0, 1047.0, 172.0, 1047.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [658.0, 1002.0, 1209.0, 1002.0, 1209.0, 1047.0, 658.0, 1047.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1233.0, 1002.0, 1496.0, 1002.0, 1496.0, 1047.0, 1233.0, 1047.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1047.0, 728.0, 1047.0, 728.0, 1085.0, 175.0, 1085.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [757.0, 1047.0, 769.0, 1047.0, 769.0, 1085.0, 757.0, 1085.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1084.0, 1309.0, 1084.0, 1309.0, 1125.0, 175.0, 1125.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1376.0, 1084.0, 1494.0, 1084.0, 1494.0, 1125.0, 1376.0, 1125.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1127.0, 1491.0, 1127.0, 1491.0, 1163.0, 175.0, 1163.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [172.0, 1165.0, 481.0, 1165.0, 481.0, 1204.0, 172.0, 1204.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [548.0, 1165.0, 1492.0, 1165.0, 1492.0, 1204.0, 548.0, 1204.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1206.0, 1492.0, 1206.0, 1492.0, 1246.0, 173.0, 1246.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1248.0, 1492.0, 1248.0, 1492.0, 1284.0, 175.0, 1284.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1284.0, 1494.0, 1284.0, 1494.0, 1327.0, 173.0, 1327.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [172.0, 1324.0, 175.0, 1324.0, 175.0, 1366.0, 172.0, 1366.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [207.0, 1324.0, 702.0, 1324.0, 702.0, 1366.0, 207.0, 1366.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [739.0, 1324.0, 1495.0, 1324.0, 1495.0, 1366.0, 739.0, 1366.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1366.0, 1495.0, 1366.0, 1495.0, 1407.0, 175.0, 1407.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1409.0, 1494.0, 1409.0, 1494.0, 1445.0, 175.0, 1445.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1447.0, 1491.0, 1447.0, 1491.0, 1483.0, 173.0, 1483.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1486.0, 175.0, 1486.0, 175.0, 1527.0, 173.0, 1527.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [203.0, 1486.0, 661.0, 1486.0, 661.0, 1527.0, 203.0, 1527.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [693.0, 1486.0, 1009.0, 1486.0, 1009.0, 1527.0, 693.0, 1527.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1034.0, 1486.0, 1494.0, 1486.0, 1494.0, 1527.0, 1034.0, 1527.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1523.0, 550.0, 1523.0, 550.0, 1567.0, 173.0, 1567.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [588.0, 1523.0, 635.0, 1523.0, 635.0, 1567.0, 588.0, 1567.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [667.0, 1523.0, 951.0, 1523.0, 951.0, 1567.0, 667.0, 1567.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [975.0, 1523.0, 1023.0, 1523.0, 1023.0, 1567.0, 975.0, 1567.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1052.0, 1523.0, 1492.0, 1523.0, 1492.0, 1567.0, 1052.0, 1567.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1564.0, 270.0, 1564.0, 270.0, 1608.0, 173.0, 1608.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [299.0, 1564.0, 372.0, 1564.0, 372.0, 1608.0, 299.0, 1608.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [396.0, 1564.0, 1012.0, 1564.0, 1012.0, 1608.0, 396.0, 1608.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1044.0, 1564.0, 1450.0, 1564.0, 1450.0, 1608.0, 1044.0, 1608.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1482.0, 1564.0, 1492.0, 1564.0, 1492.0, 1608.0, 1482.0, 1608.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1606.0, 1494.0, 1606.0, 1494.0, 1647.0, 173.0, 1647.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [173.0, 1644.0, 347.0, 1644.0, 347.0, 1690.0, 173.0, 1690.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [376.0, 1644.0, 448.0, 1644.0, 448.0, 1690.0, 376.0, 1690.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [515.0, 1644.0, 1426.0, 1644.0, 1426.0, 1690.0, 515.0, 1690.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [174.0, 1686.0, 1494.0, 1686.0, 1494.0, 1729.0, 174.0, 1729.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 1721.0, 1494.0, 1721.0, 1494.0, 1771.0, 171.0, 1771.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [171.0, 1763.0, 900.0, 1763.0, 900.0, 1808.0, 171.0, 1808.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [929.0, 1763.0, 1007.0, 1763.0, 1007.0, 1808.0, 929.0, 1808.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1031.0, 1763.0, 1350.0, 1763.0, 1350.0, 1808.0, 1031.0, 1808.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1380.0, 1763.0, 1457.0, 1763.0, 1457.0, 1808.0, 1380.0, 1808.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [1483.0, 1763.0, 1494.0, 1763.0, 1494.0, 1808.0, 1483.0, 1808.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1808.0, 636.0, 1808.0, 636.0, 1847.0, 175.0, 1847.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [666.0, 1808.0, 1489.0, 1808.0, 1489.0, 1847.0, 666.0, 1847.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [175.0, 1846.0, 1495.0, 1846.0, 1495.0, 1889.0, 175.0, 1889.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [177.0, 44.0, 204.0, 44.0, 204.0, 78.0, 177.0, 78.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [252.0, 37.0, 555.0, 37.0, 555.0, 83.0, 252.0, 83.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}, {"category_id": 15, "poly": [822.0, 1960.0, 846.0, 1960.0, 846.0, 1996.0, 822.0, 1996.0], "score": 1.0, "text": ""}], "page_info": {"page_no": 1, "height": 2200, "width": 1700}}
{"preproc_blocks": [{"type": "title", "bbox": [63, 10, 200, 29], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 13, 199, 29], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 15, 73, 28], "score": 1.0, "content": "1", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [90, 13, 199, 29], "score": 1.0, "content": "Introduction", "type": "text"}], "index": 0}], "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 41, 538, 228], "lines": [{"bbox": [62, 43, 537, 58], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 43, 537, 58], "score": 1.0, "content": "For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A", "type": "text"}], "index": 1}, {"bbox": [62, 58, 538, 73], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 58, 445, 73], "score": 1.0, "content": "classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [445, 60, 455, 68], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [455, 58, 538, 73], "score": 1.0, "content": " of smooth con-", "type": "text"}], "index": 2}, {"bbox": [62, 71, 537, 87], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 71, 416, 87], "score": 1.0, "content": "nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [417, 74, 425, 84], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [425, 71, 537, 87], "score": 1.0, "content": " of all smooth gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 3}, {"bbox": [62, 87, 536, 101], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 87, 434, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": "transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [434, 88, 442, 98], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [443, 87, 462, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": " on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [463, 88, 473, 97], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [473, 87, 536, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Physically,", "type": "text"}], "index": 4}, {"bbox": [62, 101, 538, 116], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 101, 538, 116], "score": 1.0, "content": "two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.", "type": "text"}], "index": 5}, {"bbox": [63, 116, 537, 129], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 116, 334, 129], "score": 1.0, "content": "Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [334, 117, 358, 129], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [358, 116, 537, 129], "score": 1.0, "content": ", is the configuration space for the", "type": "text"}], "index": 6}, {"bbox": [61, 130, 538, 145], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 130, 291, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": "gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [292, 130, 302, 141], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [302, 130, 491, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": ", which is an affine space, the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [491, 131, 515, 144], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 13, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [515, 130, 538, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": " has", "type": "text"}], "index": 7}, {"bbox": [62, 145, 538, 159], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 145, 538, 159], "score": 1.0, "content": "a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is", "type": "text"}], "index": 8}, {"bbox": [61, 158, 538, 174], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 158, 538, 174], "score": 1.0, "content": "not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a", "type": "text"}], "index": 9}, {"bbox": [61, 173, 538, 188], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 173, 538, 188], "score": 1.0, "content": "gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one", "type": "text"}], "index": 10}, {"bbox": [62, 188, 538, 203], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 188, 538, 203], "score": 1.0, "content": "has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence", "type": "text"}], "index": 11}, {"bbox": [61, 202, 538, 217], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 202, 136, 217], "score": 1.0, "content": "a measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [136, 204, 159, 216], "score": 0.95, "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [160, 202, 538, 217], "score": 1.0, "content": ". As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a", "type": "text"}], "index": 12}, {"bbox": [62, 216, 523, 231], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 216, 271, 231], "score": 1.0, "content": "better understanding of the structure of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [272, 218, 295, 230], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [295, 216, 523, 231], "score": 1.0, "content": ". However, up to now, results are quite rare.", "type": "text"}], "index": 13}], "index": 7}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 229, 538, 388], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 231, 539, 246], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 231, 539, 246], "score": 1.0, "content": "About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of", "type": "text"}], "index": 14}, {"bbox": [61, 244, 538, 263], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 244, 538, 263], "score": 1.0, "content": "connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,", "type": "text"}], "index": 15}, {"bbox": [63, 261, 537, 275], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 261, 123, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": "[16]). Now, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [124, 262, 131, 272], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 7}, {"bbox": [132, 261, 360, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": " is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [360, 262, 370, 271], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [370, 261, 537, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": ". About 15 years ago, Kondracki", "type": "text"}], "index": 16}, {"bbox": [63, 275, 538, 289], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 275, 538, 289], "score": 1.0, "content": "and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most", "type": "text"}], "index": 17}, {"bbox": [62, 289, 537, 303], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 289, 371, 303], "score": 1.0, "content": "remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [371, 291, 381, 299], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [382, 289, 537, 303], "score": 1.0, "content": ". This means, for every orbit", "type": "text"}], "index": 18}, {"bbox": [63, 303, 538, 319], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 305, 113, 316], "score": 0.93, "content": "A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 50}, {"bbox": [113, 303, 501, 319], "score": 1.0, "content": " there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [501, 305, 510, 314], "score": 0.89, "content": "A", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [511, 303, 538, 319], "score": 1.0, "content": " onto", "type": "text"}], "index": 19}, {"bbox": [63, 318, 537, 332], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 320, 91, 330], "score": 0.92, "content": "A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 28}, {"bbox": [91, 318, 537, 332], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum", "type": "text"}], "index": 20}, {"bbox": [61, 332, 538, 348], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 332, 538, 348], "score": 1.0, "content": "contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)", "type": "text"}], "index": 21}, {"bbox": [62, 347, 538, 361], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 347, 218, 361], "score": 1.0, "content": "stabilizer under the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [219, 349, 227, 358], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [227, 347, 538, 361], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and", "type": "text"}], "index": 22}, {"bbox": [61, 360, 538, 376], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 360, 226, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": "Rogulski proved that the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [226, 363, 236, 372], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [236, 360, 435, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": " is regularly stratified by the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [435, 363, 443, 373], "score": 0.92, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [443, 360, 538, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": ". In particular, all", "type": "text"}], "index": 23}, {"bbox": [63, 376, 276, 390], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 376, 262, 390], "score": 1.0, "content": "the strata are smooth submanifolds of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [262, 378, 272, 386], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [272, 376, 276, 390], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 24}], "index": 19}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 388, 537, 605], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 390, 537, 405], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 390, 471, 405], "score": 1.0, "content": "Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [471, 391, 495, 403], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [495, 390, 537, 405], "score": 1.0, "content": " has not", "type": "text"}], "index": 25}, {"bbox": [63, 405, 536, 418], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 405, 536, 418], "score": 1.0, "content": "been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],", "type": "text"}], "index": 26}, {"bbox": [61, 419, 537, 433], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 419, 173, 433], "score": 1.0, "content": "but, however, not for ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [173, 420, 196, 433], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 13, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [197, 419, 537, 433], "score": 1.0, "content": " itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for", "type": "text"}], "index": 27}, {"bbox": [62, 434, 537, 448], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 434, 537, 448], "score": 1.0, "content": "the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection", "type": "text"}], "index": 28}, {"bbox": [63, 449, 537, 462], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 449, 537, 462], "score": 1.0, "content": "can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these", "type": "text"}], "index": 29}, {"bbox": [62, 462, 537, 477], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 462, 537, 477], "score": 1.0, "content": "parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group", "type": "text"}], "index": 30}, {"bbox": [63, 476, 538, 491], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 479, 74, 487], "score": 0.87, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [74, 476, 252, 491], "score": 1.0, "content": " to the paths in the base manifold ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [253, 479, 265, 487], "score": 0.91, "content": "M", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 12}, {"bbox": [266, 476, 538, 491], "score": 1.0, "content": " such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to", "type": "text"}], "index": 31}, {"bbox": [63, 491, 538, 506], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 491, 538, 506], "score": 1.0, "content": "the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the", "type": "text"}], "index": 32}, {"bbox": [63, 507, 537, 520], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 507, 537, 520], "score": 1.0, "content": "parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction", "type": "text"}], "index": 33}, {"bbox": [62, 520, 536, 533], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 520, 536, 533], "score": 1.0, "content": "is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid", "type": "text"}], "index": 34}, {"bbox": [63, 534, 537, 549], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 537, 72, 545], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{P}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [73, 534, 237, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": " of paths to the structure group ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [238, 536, 249, 545], "score": 0.87, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [249, 534, 363, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Analogously, the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [363, 534, 371, 546], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [372, 534, 537, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": " of generalized gauge transforms", "type": "text"}], "index": 35}, {"bbox": [62, 548, 537, 564], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 548, 198, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": "collects all functions from ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [198, 551, 211, 559], "score": 0.91, "content": "M", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 13}, {"bbox": [211, 548, 228, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [228, 551, 239, 560], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [240, 548, 342, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Now the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [342, 549, 350, 561], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [351, 548, 368, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [368, 549, 378, 560], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [378, 548, 537, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " is defined purely algebraically.", "type": "text"}], "index": 36}, {"bbox": [62, 563, 537, 578], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 563, 97, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": "Given ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [97, 564, 107, 574], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [107, 563, 133, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [134, 564, 142, 575], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [142, 563, 364, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": " the topologies induced by the topology of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [364, 565, 375, 574], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [375, 563, 522, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": ", one sees that, for compact ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [522, 565, 533, 574], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [533, 563, 537, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": ",", "type": "text"}], "index": 37}, {"bbox": [62, 578, 537, 592], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 578, 537, 592], "score": 1.0, "content": "these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar", "type": "text"}], "index": 38}, {"bbox": [62, 591, 513, 608], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 591, 124, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": "measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [125, 592, 135, 603], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [135, 591, 161, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [161, 592, 185, 606], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 14, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [185, 591, 513, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": ", the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.", "type": "text"}], "index": 39}], "index": 32}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [64, 605, 537, 677], "lines": [{"bbox": [62, 606, 537, 622], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 606, 537, 622], "score": 1.0, "content": "Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the", "type": "text"}], "index": 40}, {"bbox": [61, 619, 537, 637], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 619, 537, 637], "score": 1.0, "content": "”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar", "type": "text"}], "index": 41}, {"bbox": [61, 634, 537, 650], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 634, 324, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": "framework. First of all, it has been proven that ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [324, 637, 334, 646], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [334, 634, 362, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [362, 637, 370, 647], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [371, 634, 486, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " are dense subsets in ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [486, 636, 496, 646], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [496, 634, 524, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [524, 636, 533, 647], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [533, 634, 537, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": ",", "type": "text"}], "index": 42}, {"bbox": [63, 650, 536, 664], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 650, 228, 664], "score": 1.0, "content": "respectively [17]. Furthermore, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [229, 652, 239, 660], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [239, 650, 536, 664], "score": 1.0, "content": " is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].", "type": "text"}], "index": 43}, {"bbox": [63, 664, 538, 680], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 664, 538, 680], "score": 1.0, "content": "These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman", "type": "text"}], "index": 44}], "index": 42}], "layout_bboxes": [], "page_idx": 1, "page_size": [612.0, 792.0], "_layout_tree": [], "images": [], "tables": [], "interline_equations": [], "discarded_blocks": [{"type": "discarded", "bbox": [295, 704, 303, 715], "lines": [{"bbox": [295, 705, 304, 718], "spans": [{"bbox": [295, 705, 304, 718], "score": 1.0, "content": "2", "type": "text"}]}]}], "need_drop": false, "drop_reason": [], "para_blocks": [{"type": "title", "bbox": [63, 10, 200, 29], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 13, 199, 29], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 15, 73, 28], "score": 1.0, "content": "1", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [90, 13, 199, 29], "score": 1.0, "content": "Introduction", "type": "text"}], "index": 0}], "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 41, 538, 228], "lines": [{"bbox": [62, 43, 537, 58], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 43, 537, 58], "score": 1.0, "content": "For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A", "type": "text"}], "index": 1}, {"bbox": [62, 58, 538, 73], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 58, 445, 73], "score": 1.0, "content": "classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [445, 60, 455, 68], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [455, 58, 538, 73], "score": 1.0, "content": " of smooth con-", "type": "text"}], "index": 2}, {"bbox": [62, 71, 537, 87], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 71, 416, 87], "score": 1.0, "content": "nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [417, 74, 425, 84], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [425, 71, 537, 87], "score": 1.0, "content": " of all smooth gauge", "type": "text"}], "index": 3}, {"bbox": [62, 87, 536, 101], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 87, 434, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": "transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [434, 88, 442, 98], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [443, 87, 462, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": " on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [463, 88, 473, 97], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [473, 87, 536, 101], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Physically,", "type": "text"}], "index": 4}, {"bbox": [62, 101, 538, 116], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 101, 538, 116], "score": 1.0, "content": "two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.", "type": "text"}], "index": 5}, {"bbox": [63, 116, 537, 129], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 116, 334, 129], "score": 1.0, "content": "Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [334, 117, 358, 129], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [358, 116, 537, 129], "score": 1.0, "content": ", is the configuration space for the", "type": "text"}], "index": 6}, {"bbox": [61, 130, 538, 145], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 130, 291, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": "gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [292, 130, 302, 141], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [302, 130, 491, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": ", which is an affine space, the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [491, 131, 515, 144], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 13, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [515, 130, 538, 145], "score": 1.0, "content": " has", "type": "text"}], "index": 7}, {"bbox": [62, 145, 538, 159], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 145, 538, 159], "score": 1.0, "content": "a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is", "type": "text"}], "index": 8}, {"bbox": [61, 158, 538, 174], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 158, 538, 174], "score": 1.0, "content": "not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a", "type": "text"}], "index": 9}, {"bbox": [61, 173, 538, 188], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 173, 538, 188], "score": 1.0, "content": "gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one", "type": "text"}], "index": 10}, {"bbox": [62, 188, 538, 203], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 188, 538, 203], "score": 1.0, "content": "has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence", "type": "text"}], "index": 11}, {"bbox": [61, 202, 538, 217], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 202, 136, 217], "score": 1.0, "content": "a measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [136, 204, 159, 216], "score": 0.95, "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [160, 202, 538, 217], "score": 1.0, "content": ". As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a", "type": "text"}], "index": 12}, {"bbox": [62, 216, 523, 231], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 216, 271, 231], "score": 1.0, "content": "better understanding of the structure of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [272, 218, 295, 230], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [295, 216, 523, 231], "score": 1.0, "content": ". However, up to now, results are quite rare.", "type": "text"}], "index": 13}], "index": 7, "bbox_fs": [61, 43, 538, 231]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 229, 538, 388], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 231, 539, 246], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 231, 539, 246], "score": 1.0, "content": "About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of", "type": "text"}], "index": 14}, {"bbox": [61, 244, 538, 263], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 244, 538, 263], "score": 1.0, "content": "connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,", "type": "text"}], "index": 15}, {"bbox": [63, 261, 537, 275], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 261, 123, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": "[16]). Now, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [124, 262, 131, 272], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 7}, {"bbox": [132, 261, 360, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": " is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [360, 262, 370, 271], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [370, 261, 537, 275], "score": 1.0, "content": ". About 15 years ago, Kondracki", "type": "text"}], "index": 16}, {"bbox": [63, 275, 538, 289], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 275, 538, 289], "score": 1.0, "content": "and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most", "type": "text"}], "index": 17}, {"bbox": [62, 289, 537, 303], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 289, 371, 303], "score": 1.0, "content": "remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [371, 291, 381, 299], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [382, 289, 537, 303], "score": 1.0, "content": ". This means, for every orbit", "type": "text"}], "index": 18}, {"bbox": [63, 303, 538, 319], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 305, 113, 316], "score": 0.93, "content": "A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 50}, {"bbox": [113, 303, 501, 319], "score": 1.0, "content": " there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [501, 305, 510, 314], "score": 0.89, "content": "A", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [511, 303, 538, 319], "score": 1.0, "content": " onto", "type": "text"}], "index": 19}, {"bbox": [63, 318, 537, 332], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 320, 91, 330], "score": 0.92, "content": "A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 28}, {"bbox": [91, 318, 537, 332], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum", "type": "text"}], "index": 20}, {"bbox": [61, 332, 538, 348], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 332, 538, 348], "score": 1.0, "content": "contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)", "type": "text"}], "index": 21}, {"bbox": [62, 347, 538, 361], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 347, 218, 361], "score": 1.0, "content": "stabilizer under the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [219, 349, 227, 358], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [227, 347, 538, 361], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and", "type": "text"}], "index": 22}, {"bbox": [61, 360, 538, 376], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 360, 226, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": "Rogulski proved that the space ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [226, 363, 236, 372], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [236, 360, 435, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": " is regularly stratified by the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [435, 363, 443, 373], "score": 0.92, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [443, 360, 538, 376], "score": 1.0, "content": ". In particular, all", "type": "text"}], "index": 23}, {"bbox": [63, 376, 276, 390], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 376, 262, 390], "score": 1.0, "content": "the strata are smooth submanifolds of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [262, 378, 272, 386], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [272, 376, 276, 390], "score": 1.0, "content": ".", "type": "text"}], "index": 24}], "index": 19, "bbox_fs": [61, 231, 539, 390]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 388, 537, 605], "lines": [{"bbox": [63, 390, 537, 405], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 390, 471, 405], "score": 1.0, "content": "Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [471, 391, 495, 403], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [495, 390, 537, 405], "score": 1.0, "content": " has not", "type": "text"}], "index": 25}, {"bbox": [63, 405, 536, 418], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 405, 536, 418], "score": 1.0, "content": "been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],", "type": "text"}], "index": 26}, {"bbox": [61, 419, 537, 433], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 419, 173, 433], "score": 1.0, "content": "but, however, not for ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [173, 420, 196, 433], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 13, "width": 23}, {"bbox": [197, 419, 537, 433], "score": 1.0, "content": " itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for", "type": "text"}], "index": 27}, {"bbox": [62, 434, 537, 448], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 434, 537, 448], "score": 1.0, "content": "the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection", "type": "text"}], "index": 28}, {"bbox": [63, 449, 537, 462], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 449, 537, 462], "score": 1.0, "content": "can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these", "type": "text"}], "index": 29}, {"bbox": [62, 462, 537, 477], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 462, 537, 477], "score": 1.0, "content": "parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group", "type": "text"}], "index": 30}, {"bbox": [63, 476, 538, 491], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 479, 74, 487], "score": 0.87, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [74, 476, 252, 491], "score": 1.0, "content": " to the paths in the base manifold ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [253, 479, 265, 487], "score": 0.91, "content": "M", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 12}, {"bbox": [266, 476, 538, 491], "score": 1.0, "content": " such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to", "type": "text"}], "index": 31}, {"bbox": [63, 491, 538, 506], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 491, 538, 506], "score": 1.0, "content": "the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the", "type": "text"}], "index": 32}, {"bbox": [63, 507, 537, 520], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 507, 537, 520], "score": 1.0, "content": "parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction", "type": "text"}], "index": 33}, {"bbox": [62, 520, 536, 533], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 520, 536, 533], "score": 1.0, "content": "is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid", "type": "text"}], "index": 34}, {"bbox": [63, 534, 537, 549], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 537, 72, 545], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{P}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [73, 534, 237, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": " of paths to the structure group ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [238, 536, 249, 545], "score": 0.87, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [249, 534, 363, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Analogously, the set ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [363, 534, 371, 546], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [372, 534, 537, 549], "score": 1.0, "content": " of generalized gauge transforms", "type": "text"}], "index": 35}, {"bbox": [62, 548, 537, 564], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 548, 198, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": "collects all functions from ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [198, 551, 211, 559], "score": 0.91, "content": "M", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 13}, {"bbox": [211, 548, 228, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [228, 551, 239, 560], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [240, 548, 342, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": ". Now the action of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [342, 549, 350, 561], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 12, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [351, 548, 368, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " to ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [368, 549, 378, 560], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [378, 548, 537, 564], "score": 1.0, "content": " is defined purely algebraically.", "type": "text"}], "index": 36}, {"bbox": [62, 563, 537, 578], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 563, 97, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": "Given ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [97, 564, 107, 574], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [107, 563, 133, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [134, 564, 142, 575], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [142, 563, 364, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": " the topologies induced by the topology of ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [364, 565, 375, 574], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [375, 563, 522, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": ", one sees that, for compact ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [522, 565, 533, 574], "score": 0.88, "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 11}, {"bbox": [533, 563, 537, 578], "score": 1.0, "content": ",", "type": "text"}], "index": 37}, {"bbox": [62, 578, 537, 592], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 578, 537, 592], "score": 1.0, "content": "these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar", "type": "text"}], "index": 38}, {"bbox": [62, 591, 513, 608], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 591, 124, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": "measure on ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [125, 592, 135, 603], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [135, 591, 161, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [161, 592, 185, 606], "score": 0.94, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 14, "width": 24}, {"bbox": [185, 591, 513, 608], "score": 1.0, "content": ", the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.", "type": "text"}], "index": 39}], "index": 32, "bbox_fs": [61, 390, 538, 608]}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [64, 605, 537, 677], "lines": [{"bbox": [62, 606, 537, 622], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 606, 537, 622], "score": 1.0, "content": "Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the", "type": "text"}], "index": 40}, {"bbox": [61, 619, 537, 637], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 619, 537, 637], "score": 1.0, "content": "”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar", "type": "text"}], "index": 41}, {"bbox": [61, 634, 537, 650], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 634, 324, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": "framework. First of all, it has been proven that ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [324, 637, 334, 646], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 9, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [334, 634, 362, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [362, 637, 370, 647], "score": 0.91, "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 8}, {"bbox": [371, 634, 486, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " are dense subsets in ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [486, 636, 496, 646], "score": 0.9, "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 10, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [496, 634, 524, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": " and ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [524, 636, 533, 647], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 11, "width": 9}, {"bbox": [533, 634, 537, 650], "score": 1.0, "content": ",", "type": "text"}], "index": 42}, {"bbox": [63, 650, 536, 664], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 650, 228, 664], "score": 1.0, "content": "respectively [17]. Furthermore, ", "type": "text"}, {"bbox": [229, 652, 239, 660], "score": 0.89, "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "type": "inline_equation", "height": 8, "width": 10}, {"bbox": [239, 650, 536, 664], "score": 1.0, "content": " is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].", "type": "text"}], "index": 43}, {"bbox": [63, 664, 538, 680], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 664, 538, 680], "score": 1.0, "content": "These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman", "type": "text"}], "index": 44}, {"bbox": [63, 18, 536, 31], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 18, 536, 31], "score": 1.0, "content": "path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two-", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 0}, {"bbox": [63, 32, 537, 45], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 32, 537, 45], "score": 1.0, "content": "dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 1}, {"bbox": [61, 45, 537, 60], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 45, 537, 60], "score": 1.0, "content": "standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 2}, {"bbox": [62, 59, 537, 75], "spans": [{"bbox": [62, 59, 537, 75], "score": 1.0, "content": "of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 3}, {"bbox": [63, 75, 537, 90], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 75, 537, 90], "score": 1.0, "content": "[9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 4}, {"bbox": [61, 88, 538, 106], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 88, 538, 106], "score": 1.0, "content": "holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 5}, {"bbox": [61, 104, 537, 119], "spans": [{"bbox": [61, 104, 537, 119], "score": 1.0, "content": "the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 6}, {"bbox": [63, 119, 536, 132], "spans": [{"bbox": [63, 119, 536, 132], "score": 1.0, "content": "for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 7}, {"bbox": [64, 133, 352, 146], "spans": [{"bbox": [64, 133, 352, 146], "score": 1.0, "content": "completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.", "type": "text", "cross_page": true}], "index": 8}], "index": 42, "bbox_fs": [61, 606, 538, 680]}]}
[{"type": "title", "bbox": [63, 10, 200, 29], "content": "1 Introduction", "index": 0}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 41, 538, 228], "content": "For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set of smooth con- nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set of all smooth gauge transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of on . Physically, two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation. Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in , is the configuration space for the gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to , which is an affine space, the space has a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence a measure on . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a better understanding of the structure of . However, up to now, results are quite rare.", "index": 1}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 229, 538, 388], "content": "About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g., [16]). Now, is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on . About 15 years ago, Kondracki and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on . This means, for every orbit there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of onto . Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the) stabilizer under the action of . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and Rogulski proved that the space is regularly stratified by the action of . In particular, all the strata are smooth submanifolds of .", "index": 2}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [63, 388, 537, 605], "content": "Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on has not been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2], but, however, not for itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group to the paths in the base manifold such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid of paths to the structure group . Analogously, the set of generalized gauge transforms collects all functions from to . Now the action of to is defined purely algebraically. Given and the topologies induced by the topology of , one sees that, for compact , these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar measure on and , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.", "index": 3}, {"type": "text", "bbox": [64, 605, 537, 677], "content": "Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the ”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar framework. First of all, it has been proven that and are dense subsets in and , respectively [17]. Furthermore, is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15]. These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two- dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper [9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.", "index": 4}]
[{"bbox": [63, 13, 199, 29], "content": "1 Introduction", "parent_index": 0, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [62, 43, 537, 58], "content": "For quite a long time the geometric structure of gauge theories has been investigated. A", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [62, 58, 538, 73], "content": "classical (pure) gauge theory consists of three basic objects: First the set of smooth con-", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [62, 71, 537, 87], "content": "nections (”gauge fields”) in a principle fiber bundle, then the set of all smooth gauge", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [62, 87, 536, 101], "content": "transforms, i.e. automorphisms of this bundle, and finally the action of on . Physically,", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [62, 101, 538, 116], "content": "two gauge fields that are related by a gauge transform describe one and the same situation.", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 4}, {"bbox": [63, 116, 537, 129], "content": "Thus, the space of all gauge orbits, i.e. elements in , is the configuration space for the", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 5}, {"bbox": [61, 130, 538, 145], "content": "gauge theory. Unfortunately, in contrast to , which is an affine space, the space has", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 6}, {"bbox": [62, 145, 538, 159], "content": "a very complicated structure: It is non-affin, non-compact and infinite-dimensional and it is", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 7}, {"bbox": [61, 158, 538, 174], "content": "not a manifold. This causes enormous problems, in particular, when one wants to quantize a", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 8}, {"bbox": [61, 173, 538, 188], "content": "gauge theory. One possible quantization method is the path integral quantization. Here one", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 9}, {"bbox": [62, 188, 538, 203], "content": "has to find an appropriate measure on the configuration space of the classical theory, hence", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 10}, {"bbox": [61, 202, 538, 217], "content": "a measure on . As just indicated, this is very hard to find. Thus, one has hoped for a", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 11}, {"bbox": [62, 216, 523, 231], "content": "better understanding of the structure of . However, up to now, results are quite rare.", "parent_index": 1, "line_index": 12}, {"bbox": [63, 231, 539, 246], "content": "About 20 years ago, the efforts were focussed on a related problem: The consideration of", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [61, 244, 538, 263], "content": "connections and gauge transforms that are contained in a certain Sobolev class (see, e.g.,", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [63, 261, 537, 275], "content": "[16]). Now, is a Hilbert-Lie group and acts smoothly on . About 15 years ago, Kondracki", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [63, 275, 538, 289], "content": "and Rogulski [12] found lots of fundamental properties of this action. Perhaps, the most", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [62, 289, 537, 303], "content": "remarkable theorem they obtained was a slice theorem on . This means, for every orbit", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 4}, {"bbox": [63, 303, 538, 319], "content": "there is an equivariant retraction from a (so-called tubular) neighborhood of onto", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 5}, {"bbox": [63, 318, 537, 332], "content": ". Using this theorem they could clarify the structure of the so-called strata. A stratum", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 6}, {"bbox": [61, 332, 538, 348], "content": "contains all connections that have the same, fixed type, i.e. the same (conjugacy class of the)", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 7}, {"bbox": [62, 347, 538, 361], "content": "stabilizer under the action of . Using a denseness theorem for the strata, Kondracki and", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 8}, {"bbox": [61, 360, 538, 376], "content": "Rogulski proved that the space is regularly stratified by the action of . In particular, all", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 9}, {"bbox": [63, 376, 276, 390], "content": "the strata are smooth submanifolds of .", "parent_index": 2, "line_index": 10}, {"bbox": [63, 390, 537, 405], "content": "Despite these results the mathematically rigorous construction of a measure on has not", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [63, 405, 536, 418], "content": "been achieved. This problem was solved – at least preliminary – by Ashtekar et al. [1, 2],", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [61, 419, 537, 433], "content": "but, however, not for itself. Their idea was to drop simply all smoothness conditions for", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [62, 434, 537, 448], "content": "the connections and gauge transforms. In detail, they first used the fact that a connection", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [63, 449, 537, 462], "content": "can always be reconstructed uniquely by its parallel transports. On the other hand, these", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 4}, {"bbox": [62, 462, 537, 477], "content": "parallel transports can be identified with an assignment of elements of the structure group", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 5}, {"bbox": [63, 476, 538, 491], "content": "to the paths in the base manifold such that the concatenation of paths corresponds to", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 6}, {"bbox": [63, 491, 538, 506], "content": "the product of these group elements. It is intuitively clear that for smooth connections the", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 7}, {"bbox": [63, 507, 537, 520], "content": "parallel transports additionally depend smoothly on the paths [14]. But now this restriction", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 8}, {"bbox": [62, 520, 536, 533], "content": "is removed for the generalized connections. They are only homomorphisms from the groupoid", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 9}, {"bbox": [63, 534, 537, 549], "content": "of paths to the structure group . Analogously, the set of generalized gauge transforms", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 10}, {"bbox": [62, 548, 537, 564], "content": "collects all functions from to . Now the action of to is defined purely algebraically.", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 11}, {"bbox": [62, 563, 537, 578], "content": "Given and the topologies induced by the topology of , one sees that, for compact ,", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 12}, {"bbox": [62, 578, 537, 592], "content": "these spaces are again compact. This guarantees the existence of a natural induced Haar", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 13}, {"bbox": [62, 591, 513, 608], "content": "measure on and , the new configuration space for the path integral quantization.", "parent_index": 3, "line_index": 14}, {"bbox": [62, 606, 537, 622], "content": "Both from the mathematical and from the physical point of view it is very interesting how the", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 0}, {"bbox": [61, 619, 537, 637], "content": "”classical” regular gauge theories are related to the generalized formulation in the Ashtekar", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 1}, {"bbox": [61, 634, 537, 650], "content": "framework. First of all, it has been proven that and are dense subsets in and ,", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 2}, {"bbox": [63, 650, 536, 664], "content": "respectively [17]. Furthermore, is contained in a set of induced Haar measure zero [15].", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 3}, {"bbox": [63, 664, 538, 680], "content": "These properties coincide exactly with the experiences known from the Wiener or Feynman", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 4}, {"bbox": [63, 18, 536, 31], "content": "path integral. Then the Wilson loop expectation values have been determined for the two-", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 5}, {"bbox": [63, 32, 537, 45], "content": "dimensional pure Yang-Mills theory [5, 11] – in coincidence with the known results in the", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 6}, {"bbox": [61, 45, 537, 60], "content": "standard framework. In the present paper we continue the investigations on how the results", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 7}, {"bbox": [62, 59, 537, 75], "content": "of Kondracki and Rogulski can be extended to the Ashtekar framework. In a previous paper", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 8}, {"bbox": [63, 75, 537, 90], "content": "[9] we have already shown that the gauge orbit type is determined by the centralizer of the", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 9}, {"bbox": [61, 88, 538, 106], "content": "holonomy group. This closely related to the observations of Kondracki and Sadowski [13]. In", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 10}, {"bbox": [61, 104, 537, 119], "content": "the present paper we are going to prove that there is a slice theorem and a denseness theorem", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 11}, {"bbox": [63, 119, 536, 132], "content": "for the space of connections in the Ashtekar framework as well. However, our methods are", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 12}, {"bbox": [64, 133, 352, 146], "content": "completely different to those of Kondracki and Rogulski.", "parent_index": 4, "line_index": 13}]
[]
[{"bbox": [445, 60, 455, 68], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [417, 74, 425, 84], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [434, 88, 442, 98], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [463, 88, 473, 97], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [334, 117, 358, 129], "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [292, 130, 302, 141], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [491, 131, 515, 144], "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [136, 204, 159, 216], "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [272, 218, 295, 230], "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal G", "parent_index": 1, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [124, 262, 131, 272], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [360, 262, 370, 271], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [371, 291, 381, 299], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [63, 305, 113, 316], "content": "A\\circ\\mathcal{G}\\subseteq A", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [501, 305, 510, 314], "content": "A", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [63, 320, 91, 330], "content": "A\\circ{\\mathcal{G}}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [219, 349, 227, 358], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [226, 363, 236, 372], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [435, 363, 443, 373], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [262, 378, 272, 386], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 2, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [471, 391, 495, 403], "content": "\\scriptstyle A/\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [173, 420, 196, 433], "content": "\\mathcal{A}/\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [63, 479, 74, 487], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [253, 479, 265, 487], "content": "M", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [63, 537, 72, 545], "content": "\\mathcal{P}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [238, 536, 249, 545], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [363, 534, 371, 546], "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [198, 551, 211, 559], "content": "M", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [228, 551, 239, 560], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [342, 549, 350, 561], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [368, 549, 378, 560], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [97, 564, 107, 574], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [134, 564, 142, 575], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [364, 565, 375, 574], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [522, 565, 533, 574], "content": "\\mathbf{G}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [125, 592, 135, 603], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [161, 592, 185, 606], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}/\\overline{{\\mathcal{G}}}", "parent_index": 3, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [324, 637, 334, 646], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 4, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [362, 637, 370, 647], "content": "\\mathcal{G}", "parent_index": 4, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [486, 636, 496, 646], "content": "\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}", "parent_index": 4, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [524, 636, 533, 647], "content": "\\overline{{g}}", "parent_index": 4, "subtype": "inline"}, {"bbox": [229, 652, 239, 660], "content": "\\mathcal{A}", "parent_index": 4, "subtype": "inline"}]
[]
"The outline of the paper is as follows:\n\nAfter fixing the notations we prove a very crucial lemma(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"63 155 257 169\">The outline of the paper is as follows: </p>\n<p data(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
2
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"\", \"page_idx\": 2}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"The outlin(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [176, 42, 1496, 42, 1496, 403, 176, 403], \"score(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 15, 538, 145], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [63(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [63, 15, 538, 145], \"content\": \"\", \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [63, 157, 257, 171], \"content\": \"The outline of the paper is as follows:\", \"parent(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [157, 246, 173, 254], \"content\": \"\\\\mathbf{G}^{n}\", \"parent_index\": 3, \"subtyp(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"• A generalized connection ${\\overline{{A}}}\\in{\\overline{{A}}}$ is a homomorphism1 $h_{\\over(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"65 116 538 173\">• A generalized connection ${\\overline{{A}}}\\in{\(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
3
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"\", \"page_idx\": 3}, {\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"• A gene(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [216, 40, 1495, 40, 1495, 322, 216, 322], \"score(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [77, 14, 538, 115], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [79(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [77, 14, 538, 115], \"content\": \"\", \"index\": 0}, {\"type\": \"(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [61, 117, 538, 134], \"content\": \"• A generalized connection is a homomorphism1 (...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [213, 118, 248, 129], \"content\": \"{\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\in{\\\\overline{{A}}}\", \"(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"Definition 3.3 Let $t\\in\\mathcal T$ . We define the following expressions:\n\n$$\n\\begin{array}{(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"62 14 397 29\">Definition 3.3 Let $t\\in\\mathcal T$ . We define the f(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
4
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Definition 3.3 Let $t\\\\in\\\\mathcal T$ . We define the followi(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 8, \"poly\": [714, 89, 1197, 89, 1197, 221, 714, 221], \"score(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [62, 14, 397, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62,(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [62, 14, 397, 29], \"content\": \"Definition 3.3 Let . We define t(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [62, 17, 396, 31], \"content\": \"Definition 3.3 Let . We define the following express(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [174, 19, 203, 28], \"content\": \"t\\\\in\\\\mathcal T\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subty(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"Proof • $\\varphi_{\\alpha}:{\\overline{{\\mathcal{A}}}}\\longrightarrow\\mathbf{G}^{\\#\\alpha}$(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"61 12 539 146\">Proof • $\\varphi_{\\alpha}:{\\overline{{\\mathcal{A(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
5
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Proof • $\\\\varphi_{\\\\alpha}:{\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}}}(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 0, \"poly\": [174, 456, 806, 456, 806, 504, 174, 504], \"score(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [61, 12, 539, 146], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [61(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [61, 12, 539, 146], \"content\": \"Proof • is as a map into a pr(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [61, 14, 536, 35], \"content\": \"Proof • is as a map into a product space continuou(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [123, 17, 209, 30], \"content\": \"\\\\varphi_{\\\\alpha}:{\\\\overline{{\\\\mathcal{A}(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"# 5.1 The Idea\n\nOur proof imitates in a certain sense the proof of the standard slice theorem (se(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<h1 data-bbox=\"62 12 165 29\">5.1 The Idea </h1>\n<p data-bbox=\"62 36 538 166\">Our(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
6
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"5.1 The Idea \", \"text_level\": 1, \"page_idx\": 6}, {\"type\": (...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 1, \"poly\": [172, 866, 1496, 866, 1496, 985, 172, 985], \"sco(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [62, 12, 165, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [61(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [62, 12, 165, 29], \"content\": \"5.1 The Idea\", \"index\": 0}, {(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [61, 15, 164, 30], \"content\": \"5.1 The Idea\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"line_index\": (...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [367, 55, 384, 64], \"content\": \"L i e\", \"parent_index\": 1, \"subtype\": \"inline\(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"# 5.2 The Proof\n\nProof 1. Let ${\\overline{{A}}}\\in{\\overline{{A}}}$ . Choose for $\\overline{{(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<h1 data-bbox=\"61 12 176 29\">5.2 The Proof </h1>\n<p data-bbox=\"62 35 539 80\">Pro(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
7
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"5.2 The Proof \", \"text_level\": 1, \"page_idx\": 7}, {\"type\":(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 8, \"poly\": [544, 1186, 1363, 1186, 1363, 1448, 544, 1448], \(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [61, 12, 176, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [62(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"title\", \"bbox\": [61, 12, 176, 29], \"content\": \"5.2 The Proof\", \"index\": 0}, (...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [62, 15, 174, 29], \"content\": \"5.2 The Proof\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"line_index\":(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [153, 39, 189, 50], \"content\": \"{\\\\overline{{A}}}\\\\in{\\\\overline{{A}}}\", \"pa(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"6. $F$ is equivariant.\n\nLet $\\overline{{A}}^{\\prime\\prime}=\\overline{{A}}^{\\prime}\\circ\\ov(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"110 15 218 28\">6. $F$ is equivariant. </p>\n<p data-bbox=\"132 28 309(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
8
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"6. $F$ is equivariant. \", \"page_idx\": 8}, {\"type\": \"text\",(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 8, \"poly\": [736, 129, 1172, 129, 1172, 348, 736, 348], \"sco(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [110, 15, 218, 28], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [11(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [110, 15, 218, 28], \"content\": \"6. is equivariant.\", \"index\"(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [111, 17, 217, 30], \"content\": \"6. is equivariant.\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"line_i(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [132, 19, 141, 28], \"content\": \"F\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"inline\"}, (...TRUNCATED)
[]
"Since $\\varphi$ , $f$ and $\\tau_{\\mathbf G}$ are continuous, the map\n\n$$\nF^{\\prime}:=\\tau_{(...TRUNCATED)
"<html><body>\n<p data-bbox=\"147 15 371 29\">Since $\\varphi$ , $f$ and $\\tau_{\\mathbf G}$ are co(...TRUNCATED)
0001008v1
9
612
792
1,275
1,650
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"text\": \"Since $\\\\varphi$ , $f$ and $\\\\tau_{\\\\mathbf G}$ are continu(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"layout_dets\": [{\"category_id\": 8, \"poly\": [474, 1358, 1429, 1358, 1429, 1637, 474, 1637], \(...TRUNCATED)
"{\"preproc_blocks\": [{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [147, 15, 371, 29], \"lines\": [{\"bbox\": [14(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"type\": \"text\", \"bbox\": [147, 15, 371, 29], \"content\": \"Since , and are continuous,(...TRUNCATED)
"[{\"bbox\": [149, 17, 369, 31], \"content\": \"Since , and are continuous, the map\", \"parent(...TRUNCATED)
[]
"[{\"bbox\": [179, 22, 187, 30], \"content\": \"\\\\varphi\", \"parent_index\": 0, \"subtype\": \"in(...TRUNCATED)
[]
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Hello

Downloads last month
16