{ // 获取包含Hugging Face文本的span元素 const spans = link.querySelectorAll('span.whitespace-nowrap, span.hidden.whitespace-nowrap'); spans.forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.trim().match(/Hugging\s*Face/i)) { span.textContent = 'AI快站'; } }); }); // 替换logo图片的alt属性 document.querySelectorAll('img[alt*="Hugging"], img[alt*="Face"]').forEach(img => { if (img.alt.match(/Hugging\s*Face/i)) { img.alt = 'AI快站 logo'; } }); } // 替换导航栏中的链接 function replaceNavigationLinks() { // 已替换标记,防止重复运行 if (window._navLinksReplaced) { return; } // 已经替换过的链接集合,防止重复替换 const replacedLinks = new Set(); // 只在导航栏区域查找和替换链接 const headerArea = document.querySelector('header') || document.querySelector('nav'); if (!headerArea) { return; } // 在导航区域内查找链接 const navLinks = headerArea.querySelectorAll('a'); navLinks.forEach(link => { // 如果已经替换过,跳过 if (replacedLinks.has(link)) return; const linkText = link.textContent.trim(); const linkHref = link.getAttribute('href') || ''; // 替换Spaces链接 - 仅替换一次 if ( (linkHref.includes('/spaces') || linkHref === '/spaces' || linkText === 'Spaces' || linkText.match(/^s*Spacess*$/i)) && linkText !== 'OCR模型免费转Markdown' && linkText !== 'OCR模型免费转Markdown' ) { link.textContent = 'OCR模型免费转Markdown'; link.href = 'https://fast360.xyz'; link.setAttribute('target', '_blank'); link.setAttribute('rel', 'noopener noreferrer'); replacedLinks.add(link); } // 删除Posts链接 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/posts') || linkHref === '/posts' || linkText === 'Posts' || linkText.match(/^s*Postss*$/i)) ) { if (link.parentNode) { link.parentNode.removeChild(link); } replacedLinks.add(link); } // 替换Docs链接 - 仅替换一次 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/docs') || linkHref === '/docs' || linkText === 'Docs' || linkText.match(/^s*Docss*$/i)) && linkText !== '模型下载攻略' ) { link.textContent = '模型下载攻略'; link.href = '/'; replacedLinks.add(link); } // 删除Enterprise链接 else if ( (linkHref.includes('/enterprise') || linkHref === '/enterprise' || linkText === 'Enterprise' || linkText.match(/^s*Enterprises*$/i)) ) { if (link.parentNode) { link.parentNode.removeChild(link); } replacedLinks.add(link); } }); // 查找可能嵌套的Spaces和Posts文本 const textNodes = []; function findTextNodes(element) { if (element.nodeType === Node.TEXT_NODE) { const text = element.textContent.trim(); if (text === 'Spaces' || text === 'Posts' || text === 'Enterprise') { textNodes.push(element); } } else { for (const child of element.childNodes) { findTextNodes(child); } } } // 只在导航区域内查找文本节点 findTextNodes(headerArea); // 替换找到的文本节点 textNodes.forEach(node => { const text = node.textContent.trim(); if (text === 'Spaces') { node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(/Spaces/g, 'OCR模型免费转Markdown'); } else if (text === 'Posts') { // 删除Posts文本节点 if (node.parentNode) { node.parentNode.removeChild(node); } } else if (text === 'Enterprise') { // 删除Enterprise文本节点 if (node.parentNode) { node.parentNode.removeChild(node); } } }); // 标记已替换完成 window._navLinksReplaced = true; } // 替换代码区域中的域名 function replaceCodeDomains() { // 特别处理span.hljs-string和span.njs-string元素 document.querySelectorAll('span.hljs-string, span.njs-string, span[class*="hljs-string"], span[class*="njs-string"]').forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { span.textContent = span.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 替换hljs-string类的span中的域名(移除多余的转义符号) document.querySelectorAll('span.hljs-string, span[class*="hljs-string"]').forEach(span => { if (span.textContent && span.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { span.textContent = span.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 替换pre和code标签中包含git clone命令的域名 document.querySelectorAll('pre, code').forEach(element => { if (element.textContent && element.textContent.includes('git clone')) { const text = element.innerHTML; if (text.includes('huggingface.co')) { element.innerHTML = text.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); // 处理特定的命令行示例 document.querySelectorAll('pre, code').forEach(element => { const text = element.innerHTML; if (text.includes('huggingface.co')) { // 针对git clone命令的专门处理 if (text.includes('git clone') || text.includes('GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1')) { element.innerHTML = text.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); // 特别处理模型下载页面上的代码片段 document.querySelectorAll('.flex.border-t, .svelte_hydrator, .inline-block').forEach(container => { const content = container.innerHTML; if (content && content.includes('huggingface.co')) { container.innerHTML = content.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } }); // 特别处理模型仓库克隆对话框中的代码片段 try { // 查找包含"Clone this model repository"标题的对话框 const cloneDialog = document.querySelector('.svelte_hydration_boundary, [data-target="MainHeader"]'); if (cloneDialog) { // 查找对话框中所有的代码片段和命令示例 const codeElements = cloneDialog.querySelectorAll('pre, code, span'); codeElements.forEach(element => { if (element.textContent && element.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { if (element.innerHTML.includes('huggingface.co')) { element.innerHTML = element.innerHTML.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } else { element.textContent = element.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); } // 更精确地定位克隆命令中的域名 document.querySelectorAll('[data-target]').forEach(container => { const codeBlocks = container.querySelectorAll('pre, code, span.hljs-string'); codeBlocks.forEach(block => { if (block.textContent && block.textContent.includes('huggingface.co')) { if (block.innerHTML.includes('huggingface.co')) { block.innerHTML = block.innerHTML.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } else { block.textContent = block.textContent.replace(/huggingface.co/g, 'aifasthub.com'); } } }); }); } catch (e) { // 错误处理但不打印日志 } } // 当DOM加载完成后执行替换 if (document.readyState === 'loading') { document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => { replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); replaceCodeDomains(); // 只在必要时执行替换 - 3秒后再次检查 setTimeout(() => { if (!window._navLinksReplaced) { console.log('[Client] 3秒后重新检查导航链接'); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }, 3000); }); } else { replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); replaceCodeDomains(); // 只在必要时执行替换 - 3秒后再次检查 setTimeout(() => { if (!window._navLinksReplaced) { console.log('[Client] 3秒后重新检查导航链接'); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }, 3000); } // 增加一个MutationObserver来处理可能的动态元素加载 const observer = new MutationObserver(mutations => { // 检查是否导航区域有变化 const hasNavChanges = mutations.some(mutation => { // 检查是否存在header或nav元素变化 return Array.from(mutation.addedNodes).some(node => { if (node.nodeType === Node.ELEMENT_NODE) { // 检查是否是导航元素或其子元素 if (node.tagName === 'HEADER' || node.tagName === 'NAV' || node.querySelector('header, nav')) { return true; } // 检查是否在导航元素内部 let parent = node.parentElement; while (parent) { if (parent.tagName === 'HEADER' || parent.tagName === 'NAV') { return true; } parent = parent.parentElement; } } return false; }); }); // 只在导航区域有变化时执行替换 if (hasNavChanges) { // 重置替换状态,允许再次替换 window._navLinksReplaced = false; replaceHeaderBranding(); replaceNavigationLinks(); } }); // 开始观察document.body的变化,包括子节点 if (document.body) { observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); } else { document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => { observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); }); } })(); "},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"acedirect@aircanada.ca"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"websaver@guava.ease.lsoft.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":54832,"string":"54,832"}}},{"rowIdx":1269,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"lokay-m/all_documents/2124."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"eRequest ,\n For some reason, the eRequests that you filled out never made it to \nEnronOnline. Please re-submit your request following the instructions on the \nattached document. Remember that you need to specify what applications you \nneed user ids and passwords to access (example: external website-EnronOnline, \nCitrix Terminal Server Client, reports access).\nCall me at x-53854 if you have any questions.\nCarl"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"carl.carter@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"tk.lohman@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":285076,"string":"285,076"}}},{"rowIdx":1270,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"skilling-j/inbox/121."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Conference Call Info ,\n ---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Connolly/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 09:50 AM ---------------------------\n\nJoannie Williamson@ENRON\n04/30/2001 09:35 AM\n\n\nTo:\tLisa Connolly/HOU/EES@EES\ncc:\t \nSubject:\tFire Chief Selection Committee Conference Call - Monday, April 30 @ Noon\n\n\nLisa, information to distribute for the call today.\n\n\nHFD Conference Call\nMonday, April 30 - 12:00 - 12:30p\nDial-in: 612-332-0820\nConfirmation: 585060\n\nThanks,\nJoannie"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"lisa.connolly@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"jeff.skilling@enron.com, etblaw@aol.com, gbsmith@smith-graham.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":444806,"string":"444,806"}}},{"rowIdx":1271,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"lay-k/_sent/188."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Re: Telephonic Board Meeting ,\n Hi Tom - this would be good as Ken Lay will not be able to attend next week. \nHe will be out of the country.\n\nRosalee\n\n\n\n\n\"Siekman, Tom\" on 03/15/2001 10:25:53 AM\nTo: \"Capellas, Michael D.\" , \"Lawrence T. Babbio \nJr. (E-mail)\" , \"Kenneth L. (Ken) Lay (E-mail)\" \n, \"'Sandy.Litvak@Disney.com'\" , \n\"Kenneth (Ken) Roman (E-mail)\" , \"Lucie Salhany \n(E-mail)\" \ncc: \"Auwers, Linda\" \nSubject: Telephonic Board Meeting\n\n\nThank you for making yourself available this afternoon. We want to apprise\nyou of recent developments and our planned responses. The regular Board\nMeeting is scheduled for next week. This may not be required in view of the\ndiscussions we'll have this afternoon. We'll confirm this afternoon whether\nthe Board Meeting is required."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"rosalee.fleming@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"tom.siekman@compaq.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":267911,"string":"267,911"}}},{"rowIdx":1272,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"whalley-g/_sent_mail/3."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Whalley's Budget Meeting ,\n Subject: Enron Wholesale Budget Meeting\n\n Date: Tuesday, June 19\n\n Time: 11:00 a.m. CST\n\n Location: EB32C2"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"liz.taylor@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"john.sherriff@enron.com, michael.brown@enron.com, rebecca.mcdonald@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":498475,"string":"498,475"}}},{"rowIdx":1273,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"donohoe-t/deleted_items/28."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Highlights from this morning's ENE/DYN analyst conference call ,\n Listened in on the analyst call this morning. Here are my notes. Did not yet have a chance to organize them, so they're simply in chronological order.\n\nThe call began with Watson, Bergstrom, and Whalley reading from prepared statements. Watson spoke for c. 10 minutes, Bergstrom for 5, and Whalley spoke for perhaps 30 seconds. Dynegy management was noticeably in control of the call. Enron executives spoke when questions were directed to them. \n\nSpecific points:\nEES will be a part of the new company. \nEnron assets will be revalued at closing. \nThe investment in Northern Natural takes the form of convertible preferred. If the merger does not go through, Dynegy has the right to acquire Northern for 'very little' additional consideration. If DYN terminates the merger and ENE 'has sufficient liquidity', ENE has right to repurchase the convertible preferred. \nDebt/equity of combined company expected to be <45%.\nBoth companies will remain on RatingsWatch negative. \nChevronTexaco will hold 169MM shares out of a total 650MM shares of the post-merger entity. \nWatson reiterates that going forward, the new entity will be run with a focus on transparent and clear financial structure and disclosure, with a significant reduction in on- and off-balance-sheet leverage. \nIn what was termed a \"new approach\", the new entity will be run with a focus on cash flow rather than earnings. \nRumors that Dynegy did the deal because of an unhedged exposure to Enron are not true. Dynegy owed Enron <$50MM. \nLay says that Enron had other options, 'particularly financial'.\nAll of the discussion and activity has taken place over the last two weeks.\nLay acknowledges that the number for exposure to securities lawsuits may be 'pretty big', but that the companies feel they're able to appropriately value this exposure.\nLay says we have nothing else to hide, but internal investigation still under way. \nLay: had the SPEs been capitalized with perhaps $30MM more of risk capital, there would have been no question that they would have qualified for off-balance-sheet treatment and there would have been no need to restate earnings last week to reflect consolidation of the SPEs.\nDynegy says that 'several' internal investigations continue at Enron, and thus DYN/ENE cannot say with certainty that there's absolutely nothing else out there.\nDoty (Dynegy CFO) says that late last week, ENE had 'close to a billion' in cash. \nOsprey will be unwound late next summer. Marlin will be unwound after closing.\nMany of the off-balance-sheet structures, including the credit-linked notes, are expected to be unwound/redeemed or at least significantly reduced prior to closing.\nWith regard to ENE asset dispositions, these will be accelerated to the extent possible. However, Doty says that 'our backs are not against the wall', and the company will continue to focus on getting value for its assets as well as cash.\nENE will renew its 364-day facility (believe this is the $3Bn facility that we drew down a couple of weeks ago) within the next 6-8 weeks. \nBBB-flat most likely rating for combined entity, according to initial comments from ratings agencies.\nMcMahon says 'no comment' to WSJ article indicating that ENE's banks are preparing to make an equity infusion into ENE in the next few weeks.\nConsolidation of trading activity: Mid- and back-office consolidation will see substantial progress prior to closing, such that only the front office / trading books will need to be combined at closing. EES, NNG and TW have no real overlap with existing DYN activity, so there won't be much integration work required there. The big integration effort will be ENA.\nWatson says that the 'creative financing' surrounded non-core assets. Doty adds that, 'frankly', DYN assigned zero economic value to non-core businesses in their valuation model. They bracketed the maximum expected exposure from the non-core assets/businesses and left it at that.\nWatson mentions that DYN would not have gotten involved with Enron had they not been approached by 'Enron's top three executives', who said that they thought a combination with Dynegy made the most strategic sense for both companies. Says that their approach evidenced a willingness to work with DYN to integrate the two companies that made a big difference in Dynegy's deliberations on proceeding with the merger.\nWatson/Doty said that they're NOT 100% sure that no surprises remain in Enron's books--but that the risk/reward offered by the combination was compelling. \nThe deal does have material-adverse-change outs for Dynegy, covering any MAC regarding Enron's assets or businesses. Dynegy's lawyers indicated that the MAC language was a 'blunt instrument' under which it would be difficult to bring a case, so Dynegy inserted a specific paragraph that gives Dynegy the right to terminate the merger if the Enron's total legal liability (from any source or cause of action) tops $3.5Bn prior to closing.\nMcMahon adds that there 'could' be more restatements, but he 'does not expect' there to be more restatements.\nENE international hard assets definitely on the asset disposition list.\nThe merger structure calls for a new entity to take over Enron.\nEnron is planning to hold an Enron-specific conference call in the next few days, tentatively scheduled for Wednesday.\nInitial reaction of ratings agencies 'very positive' to combined entities. \nMcMahon acknowledges that Enron would have had to have an additional equity infusion prior to year-end, had the merger not materialized.\nDynegy's earnings guidance places Enron-related earnings accretion at $0.90-0.95, which represents a '25% haircut' to Enron internal estimates. Doty says that this is all operating earnings--figure does not include any amounts from expected synergies.\nDoty says that both Enron and Dynegy's books, as far as he understands, are relatively short-term in weight, and this will continue to be the weighting of the new entity. Says a 'very very substantial' portion of future trading earnings will be expected to be cash.\nChevronTexaco's investment in Dynegy was calculated at a 5% discount to public prices on the date of negotiation (not disclosed). Given the runup in Dynegy stock last week, ChevronTexaco's investment is now at a 'more substantial' discount to market prices. ChevronTexaco has provision to get 'different prices at closing if those prices are substantially better'. (No further clarification given).\nWhalley believes that 'we'll retain' the Enron traders and marketers. They're used to being part of a winning team, and the combined entity will definitely be a winner. They have talked with most of the Enron business leaders, and they are 'very excited' by the combination. They will be working with the Enron business leaders to ensure talent is retained. Whalley was asked if there will be any key employee retention provisions. He says that 'to the extent necessary, yes.'\nWatson says that the trading strategy of the combined entity will be a combination of DYN and ENE--there will be more of an asset-backed trading focus, but by the same token the new Dynegy will be involved in much more financial market-making trading than the Dynegy of today.\nWatson says that if there were to be any change in culture, he's a strong team player. He does not want to see an individual do well if the company or division does not do well.\n\nGive me a call if you'd like me to try to clarify any of these comments.\n\nPatrick Tucker\nx3-3055"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"patrick.tucker@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"s..pollan@enron.com, lindsay.culotta@enron.com, e.murrell@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":95269,"string":"95,269"}}},{"rowIdx":1274,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"watson-k/sent_items/574."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Accepted: FTS2 discussion and Energas ,\n Mark, \n\nWill Maria or Dorothy be able to attend and provide their historical knowledge? \n\nI've got it booked on my calendar. \n\nThanks, Kim."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"kimberly.watson@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"mark.mcconnell@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":496408,"string":"496,408"}}},{"rowIdx":1275,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"rogers-b/deleted_items/375."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Local Reliability???? ,\n On Saturday, 11/17, the Operational Announcements state that both Roseton units would be committed for Local Reliability on Sunday. I have two questions concerning this commitment; 1) What happened after SCUC ran that required two 600 mw units be put on at minimum? 2) Since the local Transmission Owner didn't request these units on, why is it referred to as Local Reliability? There is a substantial amount of uplift generated ( no pun intended ) by this decision and when the term Local Reliability is used it raises a question as to the allocation of this cost."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"tcanino@cenhud.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":378053,"string":"378,053"}}},{"rowIdx":1276,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"sanders-r/all_documents/1333."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"EWS/Enron Global Markets Litigation Update ,\n Attached is the EWS/Enron Global Markets Litigation Update. Please let me \nknow if you have any questions. Thank you."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"jan.cooley@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"stephanie.harris@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":392784,"string":"392,784"}}},{"rowIdx":1277,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"weldon-c/all_documents/222."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Ft. Pierce ,\n ---------------------- Forwarded by Edith Cross/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:56 \nAM ---------------------------\n\n\nJohn Griffith@ENRON\n11/09/2000 03:22 PM\nTo: Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth \nHowley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Berney C \nAucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Ft. Pierce\n\nJust a small correction. The demand number of $.85 is actually $.8215, \ncommodity is $.0307 and fuel is 3%. The unofficial in service date is 5/03. \nPlease let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.\n\nJohn"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"edith.cross@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"eric.boyt@enron.com, v.weldon@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":497112,"string":"497,112"}}},{"rowIdx":1278,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"martin-t/inbox/44."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Pipelines ,\n The pipeline meeting with the UBS lawyers was moved to Friday at 3:00. Power jumped ahead of us."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"s..shively@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"a..martin@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":323528,"string":"323,528"}}},{"rowIdx":1279,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"cuilla-m/deleted_items/148."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Assessing the post September 11 Landscape: CERA's New Global Energy ,\n Assessing the post September 11 Landscape: CERA's New Global Energy\nInitiative\n\nThe uncertainties created by the attack on September 11 and the global\nresponse have created turmoil for near-term energy planning and\ninvestment decision making. Circumstances demand rapid reassessments of\nnear-term risks and strategies. In response to client requests, CERA is\nundertaking a comprehensive, new initiative to develop a framework for\nunderstanding potential energy futures and their implications. This\nspecial multiclient project will include interactive analyses,\nface-to-face workshops, and real-time updates. It will draw on CERA's\nbroad industry and regional expertise, offering participants both a\nframework and a robust tool for evaluating strategies across all sectors\nof the energy business and all geographies. The focus will be on\ncreating new and highly relevant insights into the energy future and the\npolitical and economic context. It will highlight both key trends and\nprobable discontinuities -- and assess urgent issues in a setting that\nwill promote thoughtful and informed dialogue.\n\nBy emphasizing both virtual and in-person exchanges among participating\nmembers and CERA experts, we will establish a three-year road map for\ndecision makers across the energy business, to complement CERA's\nindustry-specific and shorter-term analyses. In addition, the process\nwill offer a unique opportunity to interact with others across the\nenergy spectrum and to share ideas and experiences.\n\n* Could the economic slowdown be prolonged and inflation be rekindled?\n* What is the impact on energy demand -- does the fuel mix shift?\n* How great are the risks for disruptions of supply? In which countries\nand for which fuels?\n* How would disruptions play out? And how tumultuous will they be for\nenergy companies?\n* How will energy policies change -- relative to energy security,\nenvironmental trade-offs, and fuel strategies?\n* Will the global coalition hold, or are we moving to a more divided and\nmore fractured world?\n* How profound will be the changes for the energy business?\n\nThis timely series provides a three-year horizon that draws on the\nframework established in CERA's longer-term scenarios. It uses the clash\nbetween the \"Fragmentation\" and \"Globality\" scenarios as the starting\npoint for assessing the new world in which energy-decision makers will\noperate and the critical choices they will face.\n\nThe first workshop will be held in Houston on November 15, in\nconjunction with CERA's Fall Roundtable series. Additional workshops,\nboth in Houston and other cities and via online technologies, will\nfollow. We will announce the entire schedule, with events and\ndeliverables, soon. The process will deliver a clear framework for\nanticipating the future, and conclusions for energy strategy. \n\nFor more information, please contact Steve Haggett at shaggett@cera.com,\nor +617 441 2646."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"webmaster@cera.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":""},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":54605,"string":"54,605"}}},{"rowIdx":1280,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"dasovich-j/all_documents/28327."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Enron Mentions - 07/05/01 ,\n Wall Street Reporter Interviews George A. Kast, President & CEO of Global \nWater Technologies\nBusiness Wire, 07/05/01\n\nDevelopments in California's energy crisis\nAssociated Press Newswires, 07/05/01\n\nUK: ANALYSIS-Where have all the LME volumes gone?\nReuters English News Service, 07/05/01\nUSA: UPDATE 1-New Power adds customers with two deals.\nReuters English News Service, 07/05/01\n\nFactiva Energy Digest\nFactiva Energy Digest, 07/05/01\n\nIndia Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2)\nBloomberg, 07/05/01\n\nCalifornia Seeks Cheaper Long-Term Power Contracts, Paper Says\nBloomberg, 07/05/01\n\nUSA: U.S. Cash LPG-Propane firms on bullish crude oil fundamentals.\nReuters English News Service, 07/05/01\n\n\nWall Street Reporter Interviews George A. Kast, President & CEO of Global \nWater Technologies\n\n07/05/2001\nBusiness Wire \n(Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire) \n\nGOLDEN, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 5, 2001--Global Water Technologies, Inc. \n(OTCBB: GWTR), a full-service cooling water company utilizing advanced \ntechnologies and engineered solutions to provide process cooling water to \npower plants, process industry and municipalities, worldwide, today announced \nthat George A. Kast, President and CEO, has been featured in an interview by \nWall Street Reporter. In the interview, Kast discussed industry trends, \nmarket potential and growth opportunities in the markets that the Company has \ncultivated. \nThe interview was conducted on Tuesday, July 3, 2001, at 1:00 p.m. (MT) by \nMatt Cleary, and is currently audibly available, on the Wall Street \nReporter's web site, www.wallstreetreporter.com, by clicking on the CEO \nInterviews link.\nCommenting on this interview, George Kast, President and CEO stated: \"We are \nvery pleased to be featured in an interview by the Wall Street Reporter. This \nis a very exciting time for Global Water Technologies, Inc. and we are \nexcited that this forum gives us the opportunity to present our story to the \ninvestment community.\" \nThe interview primarily covered the most recent corporate events and the \nCompany's efforts to implement its business strategy, capitalizing on its \ncompetitive advantages in the rapidly expanding power, energy and utility \nsector. The Wall Street Reporter is a leading information source for \nprofessional investors seeking new investment ideas. Their in-depth \ninterviews of CEOs with leading public companies are geared toward \nsophisticated investors who demand an unbiased, unscripted, first-hand \nperspective that enables them to make informed investment decisions. \n\nAbout Global Water Technologies \n\nGlobal Water Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: GWTR) is a company with major \ninterests in the areas of power, energy and water. The company utilizes its \nproprietary technology to enhance power production by providing cold, clean \nwater to increase operating efficiencies, reduce water use and operating \ncosts. Through this process, GWTR is able to increase their client's power \noutput by up to 10% depending upon age, design and efficiency of the plant. \nGWTR's client base includes, but is not limited to, the following companies: \nGeneral Electric (NYSE: GE), Enron subsidiary companies (NYSE: ENE), Raytheon \nCompany (NYSE: RTN), Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM), British Petroleum \nAmoco, Mitsubishi, Mobil, Texaco (NYSE: TX), Duke Fluor Daniel, Kerr McGee \n(NYSE: KMD) and Calpine (NYSE: CPN). \n\nForward-Looking Statement \n\nThis news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of \nSection 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the \nSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are subject to \nrisks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially \nfrom those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company may \nexperience significant fluctuations in future operating results due to a \nnumber of economic, competitive and other factors, including, among other \nthings, the size and timing of customer orders, changes in laws, new or \nincreased competition, delays in new products, production problems, changes \nin market demand, market acceptance of new products, seasonal in product \npurchases, and changes in foreign exchange rates. These factors, and other \nfactors, which could materially affect the Company and its operations are \nincluded in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission \nand are incorporated herein.\n\nCONTACT: Global Water Technologies, Inc. Steve Rash, 303/215-1100, Ext. 192 \ninfo@gwtr.com www.gwtr.com or Equity Growth & Management Tom Waite, \n407/444-0375 \n12:00 EDT JULY 5, 2001 \nDevelopments in California's energy crisis\nBy The Associated Press\n\n07/05/2001\nAssociated Press Newswires \nCopyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. \n\nDevelopments in California's energy crisis: \nTHURSDAY:\n- No power alerts as electricity reserves stay above 7 percent. \n- The Senate Judiciary Committee continues its debate at a hearing over Gov. \nGray Davis' proposal to aid financially strapped Southern California Edison. \n- Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante and Assemblywoman Barbara Matthews introduce two \nadditional whistleblowers from power plant operated by Duke Energy. \n- The grand jury that will probe criminal charges of price gouging by energy \ngenerators will convene this week in Sacramento. The 19 new members of the \nSacramento County grand jury were assigned by State Attorney General Bill \nLockyer and will assess the results of several government investigations. \n- The U.S. Trustee argues again in bankruptcy court that ratepayers should \nhave a committee to represent their interests in the Pacific Gas & Electric \nCo. bankruptcy proceedings. \nWEDNESDAY: \n- No power alerts as electricity reserves stay above 7 percent. \nWHAT'S NEXT: \n- The Senate committee investigating possible price manipulation in \nCalifornia's energy market meets Tuesday. The committee will vote on contempt \ncitations against generators Mirant and Enron who failed to comply with \nsubpoenas for documents. Six other suppliers have until Tuesday to turn over \ndocuments. \nTHE PROBLEM: \nHigh demand, high wholesale energy costs, transmission glitches and a tight \nsupply worsened by scarce hydroelectric power in the Northwest and \nmaintenance at aging California power plants are all factors in California's \nelectricity crisis. \nSouthern California Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric say they've lost \nnearly $14 billion since June 2000 to high wholesale prices the state's \nelectricity deregulation law bars them from passing on to consumers. PG&E, \nsaying it hasn't received the help it needs from regulators or state \nlawmakers, filed for federal bankruptcy protection April 6. Electricity and \nnatural gas suppliers, scared off by the companies' poor credit ratings, are \nrefusing to sell to them, leading the state in January to start buying power \nfor the utilities' nearly 9 million residential and business customers. The \nstate is also buying power for a third investor-owned utility, San Diego Gas \n& Electric, which is in better financial shape than much larger Edison and \nPG&E but also struggling with high wholesale power costs. \nThe Public Utilities Commission has approved average rate increases of 37 \npercent for the heaviest residential customers and 38 percent for commercial \ncustomers, and hikes of up to 49 percent for industrial customers and 15 \npercent or 20 percent for agricultural customers to help finance the state's \nmultibillion-dollar power buys. \nTrack the state's blackout warnings on the Web at \nwww.caiso.com/SystemStatus.html.\n\nUK: ANALYSIS-Where have all the LME volumes gone?\nBy Martin Hayes\n\n07/05/2001\nReuters English News Service \n(C) Reuters Limited 2001. \n\nLONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - Years of rising business on the London Metal \nExchange (LME) could be over, after volume dropped in the first half of 2001, \nand many in the world's largest industrial metals market say the growth may \nnever be recaptured. \nSenior traders cite several factors behind the 16 percent decline in business \nin the first six months - prices are depressed, rival electronic systems have \nsprung up, global economies are weak.\n\"The problem is the general conditions that are prevailing at the moment - we \nare seeing recessionary signs that are dampening the market. It is cyclical, \nand that is the worry because the cycle is lasting some time,\" one said. \nSince 1991, volumes have risen from 16.93 million lots to 2000's record 66.44 \nmillion. There have previously been troughs in the business and price cycle, \nbut these did not markedly affect volumes - the 1994/1995 decline was some \n500,000 lots. \nSo the concern now is that this downturn is different. \n\"That (lower volume) is horrible. Some business is undoubtedly going off the \nmarket, but a lot of people are not making proprietary positions anymore - \nthey are not making any money,\" a director at an LME associate broker said. \n\"It is going to get a lot worse - it is a bleak picture at the moment for \nnext year. A lot of people will have to ask: 'Is it worth being in the \nbusiness?',\" a manager at another broker said. \nThe LME said this week that total futures and options turnover during \nJan/June 2001 fell to 29.899 million lots, down from Jan/June 2000, when \nvolume rose 18 percent to 35.440 million. Traded options turnover has \nvirtually halved, falling to 1.481 million lots from 2.784 million. \nLME data showed that this half-year was still the third highest on record, \nonly tailing 1999 by 100,000 lots. \n\"(this)...clearly illustrates the continuing health of the LME and the \nessential part it plays as a hedging medium to the global metal market, \ndespite the current economic environment,\" the LME said on Thursday. \nSWITCHED ON SCREENS BLUR THE PICTURE \nThe major factor that emerged last year is electronic trading, either \nweb-based or specific screen-based platforms. \nCompetitors such as Enron Online and Spectron Metals have grabbed business \nwhile the LME has also sanctioned and launched its own system, LME Select. \nMany of these trade LME contracts, so the turnovers are still being \nincorporated into the Exchange's volumes. But the ethos of screen-trading has \nimplications for broker costs and revenues. \n\"You are seeing more business going towards the screens - and some platforms \nwill offer a less-regulated OTC (over-the-counter) market,\" the manager said. \nLME ring-dealers and associate brokers now face even lower commissions. Costs \nwill fall when screens offer straight-through processing, embracing \nback-office functions such as matching. \n\"In an electronic market, the cost of serving a client drops dramatically and \nif a customer has direct access to the market, which could happen, he gets \ndirect control,\" he said. \nIn London's soft commodity markets, which migrated away from trading floors \nto screens in 2000, commissions have fallen sharply, he noted. \nFor the moment, the LME retains a traditional open-outcry floor - it and \nLondon's International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) are the last bastions of this \nform of trading. \nBusiness is also transacted in offices over telephones. But this is also \nchanging with the advent of screens. \n\"In some ways the screens, whoever they belong to, may be the problem,\" a \nsenior trader said. \n\"In the old days, you used to talk to people more, get a feel for the market, \nand take a punt. Not so much now - the big boys still chat, but not as much, \nand with the screens it is almost a 'matched bargain' situation,\" he said. \nMETAL INDUSTRY SHYING AWAY \nThe malaise affecting prices is not helping, especially as there is little \nincentive for consumers to buy, while a falling market always sees less \nspeculative activity. \nMost of this year has seen prices progressively weaker, with copper at its \nlowest since July 1999, zinc and tin at levels last seen nearly eight years \nago, lead at a 12-month low-point and nickel and aluminium at two-month lows. \nAlthough prices have been softer, there have been occasions when tightness \nhas prevailed. When the market moves from contango, when nearby prices are \ncheaper than forward, into backwardation, which is the opposite, hedging \ndries up. \nAlthough the LME derives much of its liquidity from speculators, the bulk of \nits trade comes from the metals industry - hedging and price protection. \n\"There is routine hedging taking place, but what one would call the strategic \npositioning is just not happening at the moment,\" the manager said. \nMARKET CONTRACTION LIKELY \nIf volumes continue to fall, and there is the pressure on commissions, then \nfurther contraction and consolidation in the market appears likely. There are \nnow only 12 ring-dealing members of the LME - those who alone are entitled to \ntrade on the open-outcry floor - down from nearly 30 in the mid-1980s. \n\"There is too much capacity in the market even now, and these ongoing rumours \ndo not help. For months one RDM has supposedly been taking over another. It \nis about time they got on with it,\" the senior trader said. \n\"A base metal trading operation may eventually come down to a few people \nsitting at the end of a treasury desk,\" the associate broker director said.\n\nUSA: UPDATE 1-New Power adds customers with two deals.\n\n07/05/2001\nReuters English News Service \n(C) Reuters Limited 2001. \n\nNEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) - New Power Co., a national energy provider partly \nowned by powerhouse Enron Corp. , said on Thursday it plans to make two \nseparate acquisitions that would increase its customer base by about 20 \npercent and raise its visibility in Pennsylvania and Ohio. \nFinancial terms of the agreements with AES Direct, the retail marketing \nsubsidiary of independent power company AES Corp. , and with CoEnergy, a unit \nof Michigan-based DTE Energy , were not disclosed.\nPurchase, New York-based New Power, a unit of NewPower Holdings Inc. , which \nwas formed to take advantage of electricity deregulation, said the deals \nwould add a total of 121,000 electric and natural gas customers. At the end \nof the first quarter, it had about 631,000 customers, a company spokeswoman \nsaid. \nNew Power said it signed an agreement to buy AES Direct's customer base and \nrelated assets, including natural gas inventory, supply and transportation \ncontracts as well as billing and customer service operations. \nIt also is buying Ohio-based customers from CoEnergy, gaining entry into \nservice areas of four additional utilities. \nShares of New Energy were unchanged at $8.75 in morning New York Stock \nExchange trade, the low end of a 52-week range of $4.63 to $28.69.\n\nFactiva Energy Digest - July 5, 2001.\n\n07/05/2001\nFactiva Energy Digest \nCopyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive Ltd., trading as \nFactiva. \n\nPOWER & UTILITY \n*German Utilities Should Expand Abroad, Consultant Says \nCOLOGNE, Germany (Reuters) - Germany's top utilities lag far behind major \nforeign rivals in the share of revenues derived internationally, which could \nlimit future growth, a consultant told an industry conference on Thursday. \n\"Germany's market leaders lag behind in their market presence in Europe and \nthe rest of the world,\" said Volker Flegel, a European energy expert at \nconsultancy A.T. Kearney's Munich office. \"If they don't act fast, the gap \nwill widen....They have to adopt more of a pan-European perspective,\" he \nsaid, singling out Spain as the most attractive investment target. \nFlegel said revenues generated outside Germany by the country's top four \nutilities ranged between 3.0% of turnover at HEW, to 11% at E.ON, 11.7% at \nRWE (RWEG.DE) and 15.1% at EnBW. By comparison, the shares of foreign sales \nat U.S. energy groups TXU and Enron were 36% and 18.6%. Foreign sales \ncontributed 18.6% to turnover at French/Belgian group Electrabel and 18.3% at \nFrance's EdF. \n*New Power Adds 20% to Customer Base With Two Deals \nNEW YORK(Reuters) - New Power Co., a national energy provider partly owned by \npowerhouse Enron Corp., on Thursday increased its customer base by about 20% \nand its visibility in Pennsylvania and Ohio with two separate acquisitions. \nFinancial terms were not disclosed. New Power, a unit of NewPower Holdings \nInc., which was formed to take advantage of electricity deregulation, added a \ntotal of 121,000 electric and natural gas customers to its customer base of \nabout 615,000. \nNew Power said it signed an agreement to buy the customer base and related \nassets of AES Direct, the retail marketing subsidiary of independent power \ncompany AES Corp., which includes natural gas inventory, supply and \ntransportation contracts as well as billing and customer service operations. \nIt also bought Ohio-based customers from CoEnergy, a unit of Michigan-based \nDTE Energy, gaining entry into service areas of four additional utilities. \nFull versions of these and other energy stories are available from Dow\nJones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing \nFactiva Contact: Marc Donatiello, +1 609-627-2659, \nmarc.donatiello@factiva.com. \n(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.). \n\nIndia Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2)\n2001-07-05 09:12 (New York)\n\nIndia Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2)\n\n (Adds minister's comment starting in 19th paragraph.)\n\n New York, July 5 (Bloomberg) -- India must cap its federal\nand state government budget deficits or risk having its credit\nrating lowered, a Standard & Poor's analyst said.\n India's ``BB'' rating, which is two notches below investment\ngrade, may be cut if the combined deficits widen to more than 10\npercent of gross domestic product from nine percent now, Joydeep\nMukherji, S&P's associate director and India analyst, said in an\ninterview.\n ``We continue to watch the fiscal problem very closely as\nthat is the most vulnerable area that could lead to a negative\nrating action,'' Mukherji said.\n The warning comes as the government plans to increase\nspending to bolster a slowing economy. A lower rating would raise\nthe cost of borrowing for the government and Indian companies,\nalready among the highest in Asia. India's benchmark 10-year bond\nyield is 9.6 percent, higher than 6.5 percent for comparable\nChinese bonds and 6.8 percent for South Korean bonds, both of\nwhich have an investment grade rating.\n S&P lowered the outlook on India's rating to ``stable'' from\n``positive'' in October. The agency cited India's failure to meet\ndeadlines for sales of state-owned companies. The rating is among\nthe lowest in the region.\n Last week, an analyst for Moody's Investors Service said\nIndia must step up sales of state assets and trim its budget\ndeficit to avoid a reduction in the outlook on its debt. Moody's\n``Ba2'' rating, also two notches below investment grade, has a\n``positive'' outlook, meaning it may be raised.\n\n Growing Debt\n\n Fitch cut India's long-term sovereign rating outlook to\n``negative'' from ``stable'' on May 31. Fitch, which rates India\n``BB+,'' one notch below investment grade, cited ``concerns about\nfiscal policy, privatization and a deterioration in the investment\nclimate.''\n ``Any downward change in the country's rating or outlook will\nadversely impact investments in India,'' said Kalpana Morparia,\nexecutive director of lender ICICI Ltd., which borrowed about $100\nmillion in international markets last year.\n Years of budget deficits have saddled India with 14 trillion\nrupees ($297 billion) of debt, equal to about 63 percent of GDP.\nServicing the debt leaves little money to invest in schools,\nhospitals or other projects that could improve the well-being of\nIndians and raise the rate of economic growth in the world's\nsecond most-populous country.\n\n Slowdown\n\n The economy expanded 3.8 percent in the quarter ended March\n31 from a year earlier, down from 5 percent growth the previous\nquarter and the slowest pace in nearly three years, as a two-year\ndrought pruned rural incomes. In response, Finance Minister\nYashwant Sinha said last week he would step up government spending\nto stimulate the economy.\n ``Lower growth may mean lower tax revenue and increased\npressure on governments to raise spending that could enlarge the\ncombined deficits of the central and state governments beyond 10\npercent of GDP this year, potentially weakening the rating,''\nMukherji said.\n Investors too are getting concerned with the government's\nprofligacy. In the first two months of the fiscal year, the\ncentral government's budget deficit has reached a quarter of the\ntarget for the year as a whole.\n ``The growing deficit bothers me,'' said Bharat Shah, who\nmanages 33 billion rupees at Birla Sun Life Asset Management in\nMumbai. ``There's a need for a sharp reduction in expenditure that\nwill call for political consensus, which I don't think is in\nplace.''\n Without pruning deficits, the government can't hope to lower\ninterest rates. Higher interest rates in India damp the\ngovernment's plan of attracting more foreign companies to set up\nbusinesses locally.\n\n Overseas Investment\n\n ``The most important thing to do is to get more foreign\ndirect investment, which is the mother of all solutions,'' Shah\nsaid. Last year, India managed to attract $4.5 billion in foreign\ninvestment, a tenth of what China took in.\n India's program to sell state assets, reduce tariffs and\notherwise free the economy from government interference hasn't\nmoved as fast as expected, Mukherji said.\n ``India has had about 3 years' worth of economic reforms\nspread out over the last 10 years,'' he said.\n For example, the government said it planned to raise 120\nbillion rupees by selling stakes in more than 20 state-run\ncompanies in the fiscal year that began April 1. So far this year,\nit hasn't sold a single stake.\n\n Privatization\n\n Privatization minister Arun Shourie said delays in selling\nstakes in companies such as national carrier Air India Ltd. and\nstate-run hotel chain India Tourism Development Corp. were not\nunusual and investors need to be patient.\n ``We are proceeding methodically,'' Shourie told reporters at\na news conference late last night. ``Have faith in the process.''\n S&P isn't convinced. If the government's economic program\nfails to gather speed, the country may slip to its pre-1990s\ngrowth rate of 3.5 percent a year from an average of more than 7\npercent in the 1990s, Mukherji said.\n The dispute between the Maharashtra State Electricity Board\nand Enron Corp., the country's biggest foreign investor, which has\nset up a $3 billion power plant, is a ``long-term disaster'' and a\n``bad, loud and clear signal to potential foreign investors,''\nMukherji said.\n The state electricity board has refused to pay 3 billion\nrupees for power supplied by Enron's local unit, Dabhol Power Co.\nIndia hasn't delivered on guarantees to pay for the power. The\ndispute is widely seen as a litmus test for foreign investment in\nIndia.\n ``The Indian private sector is used to bad politics and\nfailed economic policies, such as energy reforms, but the foreign\nprivate sector is not,'' Mukherji said.\n\n--Gautam Chakravorthy in the Mumbai newsroom (91-22) 233-9027 or\nat chakravorthy@bloomberg.net, with reporting by Anindya\nMukherjee, Abhay Singh and Arijit Ghosh in New Delhi/clw/pv/nmn\n\n\n \nCalifornia Seeks Cheaper Long-Term Power Contracts, Paper Says\n2001-07-05 14:44 (New York)\n\n\n Washington, July 5 (Bloomberg) -- California Governor Gray\nDavis said the state would consider accepting some of the\n$8.9 billion he says energy companies overcharged the state for\nelectricity in the form of lower rates on long-term contracts, the\nSan Jose Mercury News reported.\n While the money doesn't have to be paid in cash, it ``has to\nnet out to $8.9 billion,'' Davis told the paper.\n Energy companies such as Duke Power Corp., Enron Corp. and\nWilliams Cos. have said their prices were fair, with some saying\nthe state owes them money. The companies' response to Davis's\noffer wasn't clear, the paper said.\n Settlement talks are scheduled to end Monday in Washington,\nthe paper said. Few details have emerged because the overseeing\njudge imposed a gag rule on the discussions.\n\n(San Jose Mercury News 7-3)\n\nSee {SJMN } for the San Jose Mercury News Web site.\n\n--Russell Hubbard in the Princeton newsroom at (609) 279-4131, or\nat rhubbard2@bloomberg.net/jjs\n\nStory illustration: See {PMATSPSP GP D } to graph the\nBloomberg PowerMatch Index of Southern California power prices.\n\n\nUSA: U.S. Cash LPG-Propane firms on bullish crude oil fundamentals.\n\n07/05/2001\nReuters English News Service\n(C) Reuters Limited 2001.\n\nNEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) - U.S. cash liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) \nstrengthened on bullish crude oil fundamentals early Thursday, traders said. \nMont Belvieu, Texas propane gained a penny to trade at 35.88 and 36.00 cents \na gallon, while Conway product traded 0.50 cent higher at 40.50 cents a \ngallon, traders said.\nU.S. national crude supplies fell by 4.0 million barrels last week, according \nto the American Petroleum Institute (API), while the Energy Information (EIA) \nreported a bigger draw of 4.8 million barrels. \nCrude oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) were up 58 \ncents to $26.82 a barrel midday on the inventory numbers, while weighing the \neffect of Iraq resuming exports, which it stopped a month ago in protest of \nU.N. sanction discussions. \nMeanwhile, natural gas futures fell 8.10 cents go $3.120 per million British \nthermal units (mmBtu) amid stronger cash values. \nEthanes tracked the strength, with Belvieu purity up 0.50 cent to trade at \n26.50 cents a gallon, and mix up 0.63 cents to trade at 25.63 cents a gallon, \ndealers said. Conway mix talked steady at 24.25/24.88 cents a gallon. \nIn Belvieu, normal butane fell a penny to talk at 41.88/42.50 cents a gallon, \nisobutane firmed 0.25 cent to trade at 43.25 cents a gallon, and natural \ngasoline fell 0.50 cent to trade at 51.12 cents a gallon for Dynegy barrels \nand 52.50 cents a gallon for Enron barrels, dealers said. \nNo deals were heard on the heavies on Conway. Normal butane talked steady at \n41.50/41.63 cents a gallon, isobutane down a penny at 50.00/51.50 cents a \ngallon and natural gasoline up 0.50 cent to be offered at 53.50 cents a \ngallon, traders said. \n- ((Soo Youn, New York Energy Desk, 646-223-6057, soo.youn@reuters.com))."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"sharonda.stephens@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"ann.schmidt@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":61433,"string":"61,433"}}},{"rowIdx":1281,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"kitchen-l/_americas/esvl/562."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"RE: Bengalla Biz ,\n Jez our concerns are not just an internal approval issue. Under Australian Law the Directors of ECAPPL need to be satisfied when a company incurs a debt that it can be paid. Failure to discharge this duty can mean the directors would be personally for the debt. If the Coal Group is comfortable to make to enter into these commitments then that is the obvious way forward. One of the Coal Group in the Sydney office (presumably Paul McPhee) could replace Heidi Mason as resident director. \n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tPeters, Jez \nSent:\tTuesday, 13 November 2001 9:33 AM\nTo:\tSuttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Minns, David; Mason, Heidi\nCc:\tSkinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam; Bradford, William S.; Nimmo, Matthew; Mcclellan, George; Staley, Stuart; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Kitchen, Louise\nSubject:\tRE: Bengalla Biz\n\nWe seem to be going round in circle's here and hence hopefully all the relevant people are now on copy of this e-mail so we can resolve swiftly. This cargo is due to be shipped in seven days with the coal already being railed to port. It is coal which will be shipped to service European commitments and represents the cheapest way to do so taking all costs into account (including financing). Needless to say if we pull out of this deal at this stage it will have huge ramifications with our customer and send all the wrong signals to our counterparties in this part of the world. Last but not least we will need to look elsewhere to procure coal for these European sales at what is likely to be a higher price.\n\nAppreciate the green light.\n\nThks\nJez\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tSuttle, John \nSent:\tTuesday, 13 November 2001 9:21 AM\nTo:\tMiyai, Tark; Minns, David; Mason, Heidi\nCc:\tPeters, Jez; Skinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam; Bradford, William S.; Nimmo, Matthew\nSubject:\tRE: Bengalla Biz\n\nIt has been made clear to me that Jeff Shankman needs to clear this transaction through Bill Bradford and Louise Kitchen prior to any capital going out the door. It is my understanding that this has not been done.\n\nJohn\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMiyai, Tark \nSent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM\nTo:\tMinns, David; Mason, Heidi; Suttle, John\nCc:\tPeters, Jez; Skinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam\nSubject:\tFW: Bengalla Biz\n\nDavid,\n\nSee below Jeff Shankman's ok to proceed as usual.\nTax has come back with ok. Coal is being delivered to port.\nBengalla has oked to our draft as well.\n\nPls review and comment asap.\n\nCredit, any comment on Bengalla?\n\nTark\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tStaley, Stuart \nSent:\tTuesday, November 13, 2001 2:57 AM\nTo:\tPeters, Jez; Miyai, Tark; Pielop, Stuart; Skinner, Fiona\nSubject:\tFW: Bengalla Biz\n\nFYR...\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tShankman, Jeffrey A. \nSent:\t12 November 2001 15:02\nTo:\tMcclellan, George\nCc:\tPrice, Brent A.; Staley, Stuart\nSubject:\tRE: Bengalla\n\nI would proceed as business as usual.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMcclellan, George \nSent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 8:59 AM\nTo:\tShankman, Jeffrey A.\nCc:\tPrice, Brent A.\nSubject:\tFW: Bengalla\n\n\nGuys - we need to address this - can we discuss during our lunch meeting today.\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tStaley, Stuart \nSent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 5:05 AM\nTo:\tMcclellan, George\nCc:\tBradley, Peter; Maley, Paul\nSubject:\tFW: Bengalla\n\n\nGeorge:\n\nDetails on the cargo we are loading out of Newcastle. Sailing time is roughly 45 days. Cargo to be sold to ARA/German customers, most with payment terms 5 days post delivery. Also - it would help to get an idea of how diificult this exercise will be in the coming months, as we have a couple more loading before year end.\n\nWork it,\n\nStu\n\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMiyai, Tark \nSent:\t12 November 2001 02:12\nTo:\tStaley, Stuart; Bradley, Peter\nCc:\tPeters, Jez\nSubject:\tBengalla\n\nStu,\n\nI refer to your e-mail to Jez last week and advise you the expected payment value and timing etc.\n\nVessel name:\tMV \"Cotsworld\"\nETA:\t\t21/Nov \nETS:\t\t22/Nov\nLoading tonnage: approx. 128kmt (9kmt from Stratford and 119kmt from Bengalla)\nPayment value and timing :\t\n\t\tValue\t\tTiming\t\n Bengalla:\tUS$3.3mil(*)\t19th (**)\n Stratford:\tUS$0.2mil(*)\t26th \t\t\n\n* Inclusive of 10% GST\n** Bengall has already delivered 49kmt of coal to port and will complete the delivery on 15th. \nThe contract is based on FIS and the invoice weight and quality be determined by the inbound analysis while they take des/dem risk.\nBecause of their concern over our credit Bengalla has insisted on our payment by TT against the presentation of documents. Docs are likely to be \npresented on 16th or 19th at the latest. \n\nThe draft contract which Bengalla has confirmed has a provision that the invoice weight is determined based on B/L quantity instead of inbound rail weight \nif we take 100% of Bengalla coal onto our vessel. If we do that, they can not present their docs until the vessel has compeleted the loading and our payment date would be say 26th instead.\n\nRegards,\n\n\nTark"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"david.minns@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"jez.peters@enron.com, john.suttle@enron.com, tark.miyai@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":257680,"string":"257,680"}}},{"rowIdx":1282,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"donohoe-t/all_documents/170."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Weekend Outage for 10-27-00 through 10-30-00 ,\n ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n------------------------\nW E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y\n\nF O R\n\nOctober 27, 2000 5:00pm through October 30, 2000 12:00am\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n------------------------\n\nSCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: \n\nARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nAZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nEB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nEDI SERVER: \nImpact: EDI\nTime: Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:00:00 PM thru Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:15:00 PM\nOutage: Migrate EDI servers to diverse switches\nEnvironments Impacted: EDI, three to four seconds per connection.\nPurpose: To provide diverse paths in case of switch failure. Will migrate the \nEDI connections from 192.168.63.11\nswitch to the 192.168.28.4 and .5 switches. \nBackout: Move back to old connections\nContact(s): Vincent Fox 713-853-5337\n \nENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: \nImpact: EES\nTime: Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:15:00 PM thru Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:30:00 PM\nOutage: Port Channel for EES Switches\nEnvironments Impacted: EES\nPurpose: The connections between the two boxes is running near capacity. Want \nto install fast etherchannel \nconnections between the two EES switches to increase bandwidth between the \ntwo units.\nBackout: Turn off etherchannel\nContact(s): Vincent Fox 713-853-5337 \n\nFIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nINTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nLOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nMARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nNT: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nOS/2: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nOTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nSITARA: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nSUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nTELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages\n\nTERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.\n\nUNIFY: No Scheduled Outages.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n-------------------------------------------------------\nFOR ASSISTANCE\n\n(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center\n(713) 853-5536 Information Risk Management\n\nSpecific Applications Help:\nUnify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]\nSitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]\nRUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]\nOSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]\nCPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]\nEDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]\nAll Other Systems (713) 563-5797 [Pager]\n or (713) 563-5987 [Pager]"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"enron.announcements@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"houston.report@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":95137,"string":"95,137"}}},{"rowIdx":1283,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"germany-c/bankrupt/transport/sonat/11."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"RE: Sonat Park & Loan ,\n 3/14/02 \n10:25 am\n\nBarbara Gilbert, my scheduling rep. at Sonat, informed me that the attorneys in Sonat's Houston office will be contacting Enron's attorneys to set up a meeting to address the PAL issue. . \n\nChristina Sanchez\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tGermany, Chris \nSent:\tThursday, March 14, 2002 10:08 AM\nTo:\tMcMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'\nCc:\tParks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret\nSubject:\tRE: Sonat Park & Loan\n\n3/14/02\n9:50 AM Per Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent. Tammi spoke to Lisa Guthrie (205-325-3816) at Sonat to find out what flexibility Sequent would have taking out the parked gas. Lisa said she didn't know if Enron could sell the gas.\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMcMichael Jr., Ed \nSent:\tWednesday, March 13, 2002 7:29 PM\nTo:\tGermany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'\nCc:\tParks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret\nSubject:\tRE: Sonat Park & Loan\n\nThanks for the information. Sell, Sell, Sell! Sell it all to Sequent for March if you can get a good bid and have them agree to pay the moment we/they get confirmation on the nomination. Try to get other bids to validate as best you can. Do not talk to Sonat unless you have to - - asking permission is not advisable. \n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tGermany, Chris \nSent:\tWednesday, March 13, 2002 4:38 PM\nTo:\tMcMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'\nCc:\tParks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail); Dhont, Margaret\nSubject:\tSonat Park & Loan\n\nRuth Concannon told me we want to try and sell the parked gas on Sonat. This is what we have found out over the last 2 days.\n\nENA no longer has the ability to do nominations on Sonat's scheduling Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) believes that under normal conditions, we can sell the parked gas on Sonat without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would nominate the gas away from a specific PAL meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream contract. Today I spoke with Tammi Depaolis at Sequent - she is interested in buying the gas and she might prepay for it. I need to know;\n\n1. What volume to sell, I assume we are talking about 188,949 dth on deal #1222, which means we ignore the loaned volume of 96,000 dth on deal #1424.\n2. What period do I sell the gas for? All out by March 31st subject to the operational conditions on the pipeline? Or base load in April? I prefer all out by March 31st but I would like to ask the pipeline if that's ok?\n3. How many bids do I need to get? I called Sequent because I know they are active on Sonat.\n4. This may not matter but did Sonat ever pay us for the gas ENA sold them in January 2002 (see items in red down below).\n\nTammi will probably check with the pipeline to see if its ok to take our gas. I don't want to sell gas to someone then find out the pipeline will not let them take it.\n\nAll of my previous notes are shown below in blue.\n\n\nSummary: Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001. According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay. Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th. \n\n\n\n2/19/02 History - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat \nENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat. All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001. Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract. \n\nDeal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back. ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth. The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002, SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system.\n\nDeal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002. Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth. In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th. That left a balance of 188,949 dth. On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001. According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424]. According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets. According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account. ENA should have paid some bigger amount when the gas was parked in August.\n\nOther items;\nENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001. ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42. According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy. ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087). ENA used 77,292 dth of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park. ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January.\n\nSonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696). I left a message for Patti to call me.\n\n2/20/02\nPatti Frances returned my call. Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th. I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) that ENA did supply. Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay. I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed. She will check on it and call me back.\n\n2/25/02\nPer Kay Mann - Mark Ellenberg is the legal counsel assigned to this contract.\n1:10 PM. Left a follow-up message for Patti Frances regarding our conversation on 2/20/02.\n\n3/11/02\nPer Ruth - Mark Ellenberg wants us to try and pull the gas out of the Sonat Pal. Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) will find out 1) if we still have access to Sonat's EBB and 2) if we can nominate the gas out of the PAL's.\n\n3/13/02\nPer Christina - ENA's ID's and passwords have been cancelled. Christina called Barbara Gilbert (205-325-7310), ENA's account rep at Sonat - Barbara said she would talk about this issue with Sonat's legal counsel and see if its ok to set up ENA with an ID. Christina also believes we could sell the gas without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would use a specific PAL's meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream.\n3:30 PM Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent is interested in buying this gas and she might prepay to get it. She will see if they can take the gas without ENA doing a nomination. I need to verify the volume parked and when I want Sonat to take it out.\n3:40 PM Barbara is waiting to hear from Sonat's legal department."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"christina.sanchez@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"chris.germany@enron.com, ed.mcmichael@enron.com, ruth.concannon@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":128361,"string":"128,361"}}},{"rowIdx":1284,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"lavorato-j/calendar/82."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Mtg: Richard Lewis - General Europe/Focus on UK ,\n Topic for John on Monday - for me to tell him what's going on in Europe, particularly the UK.\n\nR\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMcCormack, Tracie \nSent:\tWednesday, May 09, 2001 11:39 AM\nTo:\tHillis, Kimberly\nSubject:\tRE: Richard Lewis Visist May 14th\n\n9-10am is great for Richard. Does John have his own office? If not, would you book them a room for an hour or so.\n\nRichard didn't mentioned a topic for the meeting, I think it's just a general catch-up.\n\nDo let me know the room number, or the location of John's office.\n\nMany thanks Kim,\n\nTracie"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"hillis@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":""},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":264705,"string":"264,705"}}},{"rowIdx":1285,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"rodrique-r/_sent_mail/623."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Re: ,\n Why did you send my message back to me with no reply of your own???"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"robin.rodrigue@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"paul.rodrigue@trin.net"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":372369,"string":"372,369"}}},{"rowIdx":1286,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"jones-t/all_documents/3113."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"NSTAR Companies ,\n Tana,\n\nWill you be providing a full legal profile for this c/p (8/1 approval list)?\n\nThanks,\nStephanie\n---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 \n04:31 PM ---------------------------\n \n\n\nFrom: Frank L Davis \n 08/08/2000 04:10 PM\t\n\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\n\nTo: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: \nSubject: NSTAR Companies\n\n\n---------------------- Forwarded by Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 04:10 \nPM ---------------------------\n\n\nLeslie Hansen\n08/08/2000 02:37 PM\nTo: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: NSTAR Companies\n\nNSTAR Companies is authorized to buy US power via EOL -- thus, this CP shoudl \nbe set up for ENRON SALES only pursuant to the on-line GTCs.\n\nThanks,\n\nLeslie"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"stephanie.sever@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"tana.jones@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":183632,"string":"183,632"}}},{"rowIdx":1287,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"stepenovitch-j/inbox/121."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":" ,\n ----- Forwarded by Joe Stepenovitch/EMT/FPL on 10/01/2001 02:21 PM -----\n\n Marty Mennes\n To: Joe Stepenovitch/EMT/FPL@FPL\n 10/01/2001 cc:\n 02:11 PM Subject:\n\n\n\n\n\nFYI\n\n\n\n\nI wanted to drop you a note to let you know that after 6.5 years I have\nleft Dynegy. It has been an honor for me to work w/ you over the last\nseveral years in my various roles there.\n\nI will taking a little time off to recharge my batteries but will be back\nsoon enough in a new role. Will update you when things are finalized. If\nyou want to contact me please call me @ 713-828-2237.\n\nThank you and God Bless you and your family!\n\nJ. Jolly Hayden"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"joe_stepenovitch@fpl.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"joe_stepenovitch@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":457324,"string":"457,324"}}},{"rowIdx":1288,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"beck-s/_sent_mail/1047."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Re: Credit Watch List--12/27/00 ,\n Can you put a referenced as of date on the spreadsheet itself? If you print \nthe spreadsheet for reference after receiving the e:mail, there is no as of \ndate that appears on the print out of the spreadsheet. Your attachment \nincludes the date as the name of the file, but this does not appear when you \nsimply print our the attached spreadsheet. Thanks. --Sally Beck \n\n\n \n\n\nFrom: Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON \n 12/27/2000 10:10 AM\t\n\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\n\nTo: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R \nConner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nKelly Lovvorn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle \nSchultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nChristian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nWinston Cheng/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nMike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve \nNeal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nLee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan W \nPereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, \nSylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel \nReck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nAndrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzy Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nSteve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara \nShackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S \nShively/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nJefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A \nAllen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nJohn Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D \nBaughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F \nBrawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nGary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry G \nCash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert \nCotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom \nDonohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael \nEtringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H \nFoster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie \nA Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Halgren/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nNicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg \nMcClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, \nJung-Suk Suh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark \nTaylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred \nLagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N \nGilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, \nJoseph Graham/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana \nJones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nSteve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary \nCook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M \nBraband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert \nWalker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nCarol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa \nGraves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nDonald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick \nJenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W \nLamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, \nPeter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nMarc Horowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra \nPerlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah \nMulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barend \nVanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, James R Barker/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B \nFleming/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES, \nMonica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Sunil \nDalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J \nEwing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi \nDePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joanie H \nNgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J \nHanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda J \nEwing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nIsabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Eubanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew \nHill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J \nLavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Martin O'Leary/HOU/EES@EES, Souad \nMahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jay \nKnoblauh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned Higgins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert \nShiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan \nMcCairns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ragan Bond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina \nRangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Greer/NA/Enron@Enron, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nDaniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Mandola/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea \nHauser/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Cowan/NA/Enron@Enron, \nLisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nBryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Kyle/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nCheryl Lantz Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace L \nBywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron \nGreen/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nTeresa Seibel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tracy \nNgo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, \nrmservices@Enron, Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, \nJames Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Todd W \nLambert/HOU/EES@EES, Morgan Babin/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L \nDriscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Laura R Arnold/HOU/EES@EES, Jay Blaine/HOU/EES@EES, \nZarin Imam/HOU/EES@EES, Jesus Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES, \nSharon Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES, Christina \nBangle/HOU/EES@EES, Rhonda Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES, \nTom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry \nPendegraft/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: \nSubject: Credit Watch List--12/27/00\n\n Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing. If there are any \npersonnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please \ninsure that they receive a copy of this report.\n\nTo add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been \nsent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.\n\nFor other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond \nat x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"sally.beck@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"veronica.espinoza@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":20576,"string":"20,576"}}},{"rowIdx":1289,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"guzman-m/all_documents/839."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Deal Changes - Add Comments ,\n This is also directed at us...\nPlease take this under consideration where possible.\nBill\n---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 \n03:10 PM ---------------------------\n Kate Symes 03/08/2001 02:50 PM\n\nTo: Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Samantha Law/PDX/ECT@ECT, Valarie \nSabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert \nBadeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom \nAlonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, \nDiana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla \nHoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, \nMichael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams \nIII/PDX/ECT@ECT\ncc: \n\nSubject: Deal Changes - Add Comments\n\nMelissa Murphy would like us to begin adding a note in the comments section \nof all the deals we change. I know most of you already do this when you make \nbig changes to deals, but she'd like to see more comments more often. Of \ncourse this mostly applies to me, but I thought I'd pass it along just in \ncase. See the attached e-mail, and let me know if you have questions.\n\nThanks,\nKate\n---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 02:52 PM \n---------------------------\n\n\nMelissa Ann Murphy\n03/08/2001 02:20 PM\nTo: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT\ncc: \n\nSubject: Hello\n\nHi, I was wondering if it would too time consuming for you to add a note in \nthe comments box inside deal entry when you change a deal. We always try to \nput a note in the comments box so it is easier to research what has changed \non a trade in the future. If you could add notes it would help us out when \nwe are researching past deals. Let me know what you think.\n\nThanks,\nMelissa"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"bill.iii@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"portland.shift@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":147759,"string":"147,759"}}},{"rowIdx":1290,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"kitchen-l/_americas/mexico/59."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"RE: Stealth ,\n Louise,\n\nSteve and I conferenced with Joe Galan this week. He is heading to Washington DC for the remainder of this week. I am planning to talk to him Monday and set something up for next week.\n\nI sent him the Mexican bank contacts and hopefully by next week he will have a better feel for what is in the realm of do-able. I will let you know when we plan to meet next week.\n\nMatt\n\nMatthew Duffy\nEnron de Mexico\nPhone: From the US - 011 528 152 2417\n Inside Mexico - (8) 152-2417\n\n\n\n\n\tLouise Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate 07/11/2001 05:38 PM \t To: Matthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: RE: Stealth\t\n\n\nHad another conversation with Joe - he is not very confident about getting financing through traditional methods - are you still arranging the meeting?\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMatthew Duffy \nSent:\tFriday, July 06, 2001 2:00 PM\nTo:\tLouise Kitchen\nCc:\tSteve Irvin; Victor M Gonzalez\nSubject:\tRe: Stealth\n\nLouise, I know that Steve has brought this up with the folks who are working the Vitro selldown. In other words we are not banking on a single entity to make this happen, we are considering other buyers.\n\nMatt\n\nMatthew Duffy\nEnron de Mexico\nPhone: From the US - 011 528 152 2417\n Inside Mexico - (8) 152-2417\n\n\n\n\n\n\tLouise Kitchen@ECT 07/05/2001 03:12 PM \t To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Matthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Stealth << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> \t\n\n\n\nProbably didn't make myself clear enough - sorry its been a long day. Have we thought about flipping to another developer (other than your millionaire guy), you probably have pursued others apart from him but others may be interested - we are finding buyers for Alamac which is surprizing.\n \n\n\n \nSteve Irvin\n07/05/2001 02:28 PM\nTo:\tLouise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:\tMatthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON \n\nSubject:\tRe: Stealth << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> \n\nLouise,\n\nThe earnings strategy of all \"Stealth\" projects is to sell of the majority of the equity in the project to a third party. I don't think we know yet whether someone like Transalta would be interested in a project of this size and at this location but we would certainly welcome any and all interested buyers of the project to a selldown process. We do think that most buyers would place a premium on their offer for the equity in these projects if financing has already occurred or is assurred, but we are not married to the idea. \n\nAs to the financing fees, we have assumed US$ 750,000 as a minimum up front fee a bank would charge for the project to be worth their time. Brian Kerrigan provided me with that cost assumption for a one-off financing for a project of this size, prior to his leaving.\n\nThanks,\n\n\nSteve\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"matthew.duffy@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"louise.kitchen@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":258623,"string":"258,623"}}},{"rowIdx":1291,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"dasovich-j/sent_items/538."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"More Amusing News from California ,\n Davis devises new borrowing plan \nHis executive order could speed up $12.5 billion in bond sales and bypass PUC oversight of repayment mechanism. \nSACRAMENTO -- Gov. Gray Davis is crafting a new plan to expedite the long-delayed borrowing of $12.5 billion to repay the sagging California state budget for emergency electricity it bought during the energy crisis. \nThe plan -- which could be contained in an executive order as early as next week -- would minimize the role of the state's top power regulator, the Public Utilities Commission, which enraged Davis last week when it declined to sign off on his original plan. \nWith enough power now under contract to avert blackouts and plans in place for the recovery of the two state's largest utilities, the repayment to the state treasury would resolve one of the last remaining issues of the energy crisis. \n\"That is one scenario,\" Davis spokeswoman Hilary McLean said Wednesday when asked about the proposal. \"There are a number of different scenarios being considered. Nothing has jelled yet that is ready to be publicly announced.\" \nMost involved in the debate have long agreed that the state should sell $12.5 billion in revenue bonds, most of which, about $9.6 billion, would go back into the state treasury. The issue was how to lock in a mechanism by which the bonds would be repaid - a critical step before they could be marketed to investors. \nDavis wanted the PUC to approve a plan that would repay the bonds and cover the state's energy costs through the revenues collected from ratepayers. But the PUC said the administration's proposal might prove inadequate over time, leading to future rate hikes. \nThe PUC also said the administration's plan gave too much authority to the Davis-controlled Department of Water Resources, by allowing the department to raise electricity rates to get more revenue. \nThe PUC, which is set up to be an independent board with the sole responsibility for setting utility rates, did not want to cede that authority. It rejected the Davis plan Oct. 2 on a 4-1 vote, led by its president, Davis appointee Loretta Lynch. \nDavis earlier said the commission's approval was necessary to reassure investors and get the bonds to market. \nThe plan now under review, however, would bypass that. \nThe DWR would not directly set rates, but under the Davis plan it would be charged with identifying how the money coming in from customers' utility bills over the next 20 years would be allocated - in effect, guaranteeing that paying back the bonds would have equal priority with paying back the suppliers of the energy. Proponents of the plan believe that would satisfy Wall Street. \nThe administration believes it would require no additional rate hikes. \nLynch said Wednesday that she had not been involved in the latest negotiations, but questioned whether Davis had the authority to issue an executive order allowing the DWR to get involved in setting rates. \n\"I've been told for six months that the PUC was needed to pass a rate agreement. If the DWR can get the bonds sold by themselves, then great,\" Lynch said. \"But to dedicate rates, it takes a financing order from the PUC or a statutory change in law, a statutory set-aside. It takes one of those two things.\" \nThe governor is likely to announce the plan sometime following his expected veto of the bill that lays out the Legislature's version of the payback plan. By law, the governor has until Sunday to act on SB18xx, by Senate Leader John Burton, D-San Francisco. \nDavis opposes Burton's bill because it gives bond buyers priority in getting paid, followed by the energy suppliers. The power companies' contracts contain provisions giving them payment priority, which Davis believes could throw the contracts into legal dispute. \nIf Davis signs the order soon, the bonds could go to market early next year. Having the proceeds in the state treasury by then is considered by some critical with the state facing a projected $4 billion to $6 billion shortfall in other income."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"jeff.dasovich@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"f..calger@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":79181,"string":"79,181"}}},{"rowIdx":1292,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"kaminski-v/all_documents/4816."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Resume-Jeff Andrews ,\n Vince,\nAttached is the evaluation form and resume for your interview w/ Jeff Andrews \nthis afternoon at 5pm. I will bring him to your office at that time.\nJeff is interviewing for a research position within the coal group. Please \nfeel free to contact if there are any questions.\nThanks\n\nChris Williams\nENA Staffing\nx39866"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"chris.williams@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"vince.kaminski@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":207155,"string":"207,155"}}},{"rowIdx":1293,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"taylor-m/sent_items/133."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"FW: For hours of endless revenge.......... ,\n This one has sound so be careful.....\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Sayre, Frank \nSent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:38 PM\nTo: Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Taylor, Mark\nE (Legal)\nSubject: FW: For hours of endless revenge..........\n\n\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Graham Wandrag [mailto:wandrag@kernelgroup.com]\nSent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:13 AM\nTo: Henrik Karlberg; Ian Gadd; Paddy Hodson; Jonathan Foster; Keiran\nHale; Stephen Terry; Bob Smillie; Darryl Baldwin; Dave Knight; Dave\nKnight; Sayre, Frank; James Galowski; Marc Murph Morrison\nSubject: For hours of endless revenge..........\n\n\nhttp://www.fieler.com/terror/"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"legal <.taylor@enron.com>"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"tedbockius@spherion.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":483613,"string":"483,613"}}},{"rowIdx":1294,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"tycholiz-b/inbox/102."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Supervisor Evaluation Forms ,\n TYCHOLIZ, BARRY L:\n \nAttached below you will find the final Evaluation forms for your direct reports; these forms have been pre-populated with your employees' basic data. If you have already completed your employees' final Evaluations, you may disregard these forms. \n \nWhen completing the Evaluation, carefully consider employee input, consolidated feedback and your observations of their performance and contribution, and encourage employee participation in the evaluation discussion. For many employees, this will be the only formal opportunity to discuss their performance with their supervisor. \n \nFinal Evaluations should be completed and returned to your HR representative by August 17 (July 31 for all those in Business Units reporting to Enron Europe) for employees in job groups below Vice President level. \n \nIf you have any questions, please contact your HR representative or the PEP help desk at x34777, option 4. \n \nWe recommend saving all the below attachment[s] at once in the following manner:\nOutlook Users: Go to File -> Save Attachments, click OK if prompted, then choose which directory to save the documents under.\nLotus Notes Users: Go to Attachment -> Detach All, then choose which directory to save the documents under."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"perfmgmt@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"barry.tycholiz@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":490423,"string":"490,423"}}},{"rowIdx":1295,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"maggi-m/deleted_items/1436."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"RE: ,\n can you dance\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tNelson, Michelle \nSent:\tWednesday, November 21, 2001 9:30 AM\nTo:\tMaggi, Mike\nSubject:\tRE: \n\ni can't sing. that was a joke.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tMaggi, Mike \nSent:\tWednesday, November 21, 2001 9:29 AM\nTo:\tNelson, Michelle\nSubject:\tRE: \n\nwell you made me laugh, i want to here you sing\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tNelson, Michelle \nSent:\tWednesday, November 21, 2001 9:24 AM\nTo:\tMaggi, Mike\nSubject:\t\n\nI think that this is what I said:\n\nYou better be in a great mood today! It's turkey eve, it's cold outside and perfect weather for hot chocolate! Then I started to sing you some song, but I can't remember which one. It was a christmas song. and I told you that you were missing out because you have ever heard me sing. it was dumb, but funny at the time."},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"mike.maggi@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"michelle.nelson@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":297929,"string":"297,929"}}},{"rowIdx":1296,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"dasovich-j/all_documents/8253."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Fw: R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032: Comments of the Independent Energy ,\n In case you did not receive the final version, here is the IEP Filed\nComments at the CPUC on criteria for forward contracting.\n\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: Eric Janssen \nTo: Andy Brown ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ;\n; ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ; ;\n; ;\n; ;\n; ;\n; ;\nSent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:27 PM\nSubject: R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032: Comments of the Independent Energy\nProducers Association in Response to D.00-12-065\n\n\n> Greetings: attached please find the Comments of the Independent Energy\n> Producers Association which were filed at the PUC this afternoon. The\n> document is in Word 97 format.\n> <<010108 IEP Cmts Frwd Criteria FINAL.doc>>\n>\n> Eric Janssen\n> Legal Assistant\n> Ellison, Schneider & Harris\n> 2015 H Street\n> Sacramento, California 95814\n> Tel: (916) 447-2166\n> Fax: (916) 447-3512\n> Email: ericj@eslawfirm.com\n>\n>\n\n - 010108 IEP Cmts Frwd Criteria FINAL.doc"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"steven@iepa.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"wfhall2@duke-energy.com, wscobee@caithnessenergy.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":65393,"string":"65,393"}}},{"rowIdx":1297,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"kaminski-v/_sent_mail/4819."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Introduction ,\n ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 \n07:55 AM ---------------------------\n\n\n on 06/20/2000 03:12:53 PM\nTo: \"Vince J Kaminski\" \ncc: richard.larsen@effem.com \nSubject: Introduction\n\n\nVince:\n\n As way of introduction, I wanted to write a bit about Mars inc. and then\nabout CDS,\nthe unit I head. Mars is a private company, considered to be the largest\nprivately owned\nmanufacturing company in the world. Mars is not in the habit of disclosing \nits\nfinances,\nso the best I could do is refer to Forbes' estimate of $15 Billion annual\nrevenue and\nto the profit margins of similar companies between 5-12%. Mars is in the\nbusiness of\nmanufacturing confectionery (m&m, Dove bar, skittles, twix, - all (R))\nfood (Uncle Ben rice (R)) pet food (Pedigree, Whiskas Waltham (R)) and other\nproducts.\n\nMars has prospered during the years because of a unique philosophy that\nemphasizes the\nlong term goals of the company. Part of the philosophy is to look for win-win\nsolutions with\nits suppliers, customers and partners.\n\nAs can be understood from the nature of the company, a large chunk of its\nexpenses\ngoes towards purchasing commodity like products, and hence the history of\nresearching\nthose commodities and the weather that influences their supply and the demand\n(people\neat less ice cream in the winter and less chocolate in the summer).\n\nCDS has a history of few decades in forecasting weather and has been very\nsuccessful,\nwith an envious track record, in helping Mars get a competitive advantage in\nthese arenas.\nCDS is a global group (in 4 countries across two continents) which supports \nthe\npurchasing\nfunction and the corporate at large in these and other arenas. It is a\nmultidiscipline and\nmultinational team with a lot to offer.\n\nNot having a ready access to the energy markets, and with a risk profile based\non\nmanufacturing expertise, Mars has decided to look for potential partners in \nthis\narea.\nEnron presence in the market place certainly makes it an interesting party to\ntalk to.\n\nIn talking to Enron, we are careful to suggest that Mars is not committing to\nanything\nat this point, and all we are after is to find out if there is an interest to\npursue the opportunity\nwe discussed in the future.\n\nI am looking forward to our video conference call.\n\nKind regards,\n\nAvi\n\n\n\n---------------------------------------\nAvi I. Hauser PhD MBA\nCDS Director\n100 International Drive Mt Olive NJ 07828-1383\n+ 1 973 691 3664 (office)\n+ 1 973 347 8189 (fax)\n+ 1 973 727 3622 (car + slow paging)\nhauser@cdsusa.com"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"vince.kaminski@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"vince.kaminski@enron.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":201778,"string":"201,778"}}},{"rowIdx":1298,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"campbell-l/all_documents/1172."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"November Bills ,\n marketrelations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:\n\nDear Market Participants,\n\nThe November invoices will not be posted today; they are expected to be posted\ntomorrow, Friday, November 8.\n\nCustomer Relations\n518-356-6060"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"marketrelations@nyiso.com"},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":40385,"string":"40,385"}}},{"rowIdx":1299,"cells":{"file":{"kind":"string","value":"white-s/all_documents/33."},"message":{"kind":"string","value":"Power LTD Rec ,\n Attached is the November LTD reconciliation. Due to the quick turn around \nof this report, some items still require further research. If you notice an \nitem that needs changing, please let me know.\n\nAs you know, I will be out until after the first of the year. Hope you all \nhave a Happy Holidays!"},"Sender":{"kind":"string","value":"tracy.greene@enron.com"},"Receiver(s)":{"kind":"string","value":"amy.clemons@enron.com, jenny.latham@enron.com, casey.evans@enron.com, "},"__index_level_0__":{"kind":"number","value":503774,"string":"503,774"}}}],"truncated":false,"partial":false},"paginationData":{"pageIndex":12,"numItemsPerPage":100,"numTotalItems":24966,"offset":1200,"length":100}},"jwt":"eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJyZWFkIjp0cnVlLCJwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI6eyJyZXBvLmNvbnRlbnQucmVhZCI6dHJ1ZX0sImlhdCI6MTc1NzQ4MzE2MSwic3ViIjoiL2RhdGFzZXRzL2lsaGFteHgvc2FhbXBsZV9lbnJvbiIsImV4cCI6MTc1NzQ4Njc2MSwiaXNzIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9odWdnaW5nZmFjZS5jbyJ9.OjSHnPkv6JZp24vxDgOuHjP3BaxS1MGUlUpJmeE9SUcUFyb7zKiQ0AkLt1LOD02hgMxPzisNH_xlTvB7qQIIBg","displayUrls":true},"discussionsStats":{"closed":0,"open":1,"total":1},"fullWidth":true,"hasGatedAccess":true,"hasFullAccess":true,"isEmbedded":false,"savedQueries":{"community":[],"user":[]}}">
file
stringlengths
10
65
message
stringlengths
6
218k
Sender
stringlengths
10
72
Receiver(s)
stringlengths
0
4.35k
__index_level_0__
int64
1
517k
mann-k/_sent_mail/2580.
, Call me when you can. Kay
301,132
carson-m/_sent_mail/142.
advice , ---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 05/22/2000 10:39 AM --------------------------- [email protected] on 05/22/2000 09:23:47 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: advice ---------------------- Forwarded by Marcus J Moreland/OR4/AEPIN on 05/22/2000 10:20 AM --------------------------- Rusty Parks <[email protected]> on 05/18/2000 09:47:50 AM To: "'Ann Steed'" <[email protected]>, "'Cronin, Brian'" <[email protected]>, "'Elizabeth Grady'" <[email protected]>, "'Fine, Todd & Dani'" <[email protected]>, "'Folks'" <[email protected]>, "'Hammons, Carey'" <[email protected]>, "'Hammons, J. P.'" <[email protected]>, "'Hammons, Josh'" <[email protected]>, "'Hammons, Kelly'" <[email protected]>, "'Huber, Brian'" <[email protected]>, "'Massieon, Andy'" <[email protected]>, "'Massieon, Lynn'" <[email protected]>, "'Massieon, Mark'" <[email protected]>, "'Moreland, Kimberely'" <[email protected]>, "'Moreland, Marcus'" <[email protected]>, "'Tanya & Josie'" <[email protected]>, "'Vossen, Christy'" <[email protected]>, "'wade johnson'" <[email protected]>, "'Warman, Matt'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: advice Dear Abby, I am a sailor in the United States Coast Guard. My parents live in the suburb of Philadelphia and one of my sisters, who lives in Bensonhurst is married to a transvestite. My Father and Mother have recently been arrested for growing and selling marijuana and are currently dependent on my other two sisters, who are prostitutes in Jersey City. I have two brothers, one who is currently serving a non-parole life sentence in Attica, for the rape & murder of a teenage boy in 1994, the other currently being held in the Wellington Remand Center on charges of incest with his three children. I have recently become engaged to marry a former Thai prostitute who lives in the Bronx and indeed is still a part-time "working girl" in a brothel, however, her time there is limited as she has recently been infected with an STD. We intend to marry as soon as possible and are currently looking into the possibility of opening our own brothel, with my fiancee utilizing her knowledge of the industry working as the manager. I am hoping my two sisters would be interested in joining our team. Although I would prefer them not to prostitute themselves, at least it would get them off the streets and, hopefully, the heroin. I love my fiancee and look forward to bringing her into the family, and of course I want to be totally honest with her. This is my dilemma: Should I tell her about my cousin who graduated from RICE University? Signed, Worried about my reputation
46,529
germany-c/_sent_mail/1047.
Parking , May cash $4.00 June Numbers Nymx $3.78 CNG Basis Bid $.215 CNG Index Prem (.0075) Net $3.9875 actually losing $.01 or so before we figure the fuel of 1.95% Fuel Cost at $4.00 = $4.00/(1-.0195) - $4.00 = $.08 Now its $.09 in the hole (.01+.08)
123,128
bailey-s/deleted_items/243.
Lauscher Fiber , Someone from settlements contact Kay at 843-871-3200 EXT. 203 to determine default rate of interest. May or maynot terminate. Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490
9,638
rogers-b/all_documents/522.
ENRON CONFERENCE CALL , ---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/21/2000 04:40 PM --------------------------- "Heckler, James" <[email protected]> on 10/21/2000 04:11:28 PM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Bartlett, James" <[email protected]>, "Iaconetti, Louis" <[email protected]>, "Al-Farisi, Omar" <[email protected]>, "Modi, Rishi" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: ENRON CONFERENCE CALL Gentlemen, A conference call has been arranged for 7:30pm EST on Sunday, October the 22nd. The dial in number is 1-888-814-5961. The pass code is 96583#. If any difficulties arise, you may call 1-800-788-1085. Regards, James J. Heckler Global Energy & Project Finance V:(212) 325-5809 F: (212) 325-8323 CREDIT | FIRST SUISSE | BOSTON This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
377,005
lay-k/inbox/749.
, Why have you allowed this to happen....we have lost everything despite working our butts off. You have had the most talented people in the business as you keep reminding us, so why? Your millions will keep you insulated from true hardship, we will have to endure further hardship, including non payment of receipts incurred on behalf of doing business for Enron. I don't regret my time here but I am disgusted at the mode of departure. Regards, Brian Hunter-Lindsay [email protected]
272,399
perlingiere-d/all_documents/2350.
RE: Enron/GISB Contract , Beth, Thanks for your e-mail. This will put us in agreement. I have incorporate= d=20 our changes as discussed in the following revised Section 13. If you are i= n=20 agreement, I will prepare execution documents. Section 13 is further modified by inserting the following new Section 13.10= : Enron recognizes that, when NEGM is acting as Buyer hereunder, NEGM is=20 purchasing gas on behalf of certain gas companies (the =01&Repurchasers=018= ) to=20 whom it immediately resells such gas at the Delivery Point(s). The parties= =20 further agree that the term =01&Transporter=018 when used in this Contract,= =20 including, but not limited to, in Sections 4 and 11., shall include any=20 company acting in the capacity of a transporter for any Repurchaser and agr= ee=20 that Section 4.3 of the Contract will apply to invoices from such=20 Transporters for Imbalance Charges received from such Transporters to the= =20 same extent as if such invoices were received by NEGM provided, that all=20 parties scheduled and nominated the same volumes as Enron and NEGM schedule= d=20 and nominated on hehalf of such Repurchaser at the Delivery Point(s). =20 Many thanks for your assistance with this matter.=20 =20 Regards, Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected] Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490
358,799
guzman-m/all_documents/1178.
The Aggregate Scheduled Volume Project has been completed! , After nearly a year of work, we now have a tool to show us the meaning behind our MW volume. I would like to thank the following people for their help on this very difficult project: Glenn Anderson - for a multitude of Enpower coding, the lion's share of the work on this project. Murray O'Neill and Dave Poston - for their assistance and knowledge in project management and "developer-speak". Dan Maxwell - for creating the final VB tool that was the capstone of the project. Thank you all for your very hard work, we have a product to be proud of! Cara
146,069
zipper-a/deleted_items/460.
The Money.net Morning Scoop , [IMAGE] =09[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] =09 [IMAGE]=09 [IMAGE]=09 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] STOCK QUOTES: [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [I= MAGE] Please support our advertisers [IMAGE] Sponsored by: Celltrader.com = [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ** SAVE $200 on a WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS DEVICE ** Sign= up for unlimited wireless Internet service and Save $200 on a RIM 950 wire= less device. Connect to the Internet ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Get unlimited Inte= rnet access & email, real-time quotes, and trade stocks and futures wireles= sly. Sign up today at: http://www.celltrader.com/products/rim950.asp?cellid= =3D10013 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] The Scoop [IMAGE] Stocks Seen Lower at Open; = Eyes on Intel Stocks are expected to start Thursday's session flat to lowe= r as corporate profit jitters continue to buffet the market and investors = brace for a mid-quarter report from computer chip giant Intel Corp. [Full= Story ] [IMAGE] Sponsored by: AT? [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [= IMAGE] [IMAGE] Inside Scoop Living Large Markets Life Stages Book Rev= iews [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Dow Jones Dow Jones Ind 30 [IMAGE] NAS= DAQ Comp. NASDAQ Comp. [IMAGE] Most Popular Stocks [IMAGE] TXN 36.= 53 1.02 [IMAGE] F 23.9 -0.32 [IMAGE] COMPX 2228.48 10.75 [IMAG= E] INDU 11091.84 21.60 [IMAGE] CSCO 21.1 0.34 [IMAGE] LU 8.36 -= 0.13 [IMAGE] TOY 28.23 0.08 [IMAGE] MRVL 27.949 1.19 [IMAGE] = [IMAGE] money.net Feature [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Now you can link back to Mone= y.net no matter what site you're on with our new interactive Tool Bar. Jump= to your streaming real time portfolio tracker, search for something on Goo= gle and check the latest sports scores with ESPN. Trust us, you will love t= his product!!!!! www.athoc.com/wis/activate/default.asp?pid=3D20523&mktmsg= =3DCA1 [IMAGE] Don't forget to check out today's feature stories [IMAG= E] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stocks Hit by Gloomy Corporate News Concern over ea= rnings forecasts sour stocks [Full Story ] [IMAGE] The Daily Strategist -= Still in a Trading Range Signs of cracks in the backbone of U.S. Product= ivity [Full Story ] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] If you have ques= tions about our site, please email us at [email protected] . If there's a sub= ject you'd like to read about, please email us at [email protected] . To un= subscribe from this mailing, please click here to go to http://www.money.n= et/scripts/unsubscribe . [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ?2001 Money.net Incorp= orated . Market Data Provided in part by: MarketFeed.com, Reuters, Inc.Reu= ters , S?Comstock. All quotes delayed at least 15 minutes. (Except in Scre= amer - Real-Time Portfolio Tracker) Charts provided by Goinvest.com, Inc. = Terms and Conditions ? Privacy Policy By accessing and using this page= you agree to the Terms of Service .
515,833
shackleton-s/all_documents/2915.
Re: Vitol S.A. , Paul This is something that we have discussed a little in London and what I believe is required is an umbrella netting and cross default agreement sign by all parties. However, this is difficult to draft and is questionable to its enforceability, especially with Swiss entities. I guess this is Legal's call. Lee From: Paul Radous @ ENRON 09/08/2000 14:42 To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT cc: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Vitol S.A. Agreed. However, if we have to negotiate separate ISDAs, we will have to incorporate different threshold amounts. My question is, Is there any way we can draft these documents such that only one, overall threshold could be set under which all Vitol exposure can be aggregated? Lee Munden@ECT 08/09/2000 08:27 AM To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Vitol S.A. Paul I have always believed that Vitol SA and Vitol SA Inc are one and the same company anyway. IE the later is simply a US branch. Lee From: Paul Radous @ ENRON 09/08/2000 14:19 To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT cc: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Vitol S.A. Okay. I will inform the ENA commercial team that they will need to allocate the total available line with ECTRIC. I believe separate masters with separate credit thresholds will be required. Though I would appreciate input from legal if we can somehow net Vitol S.A. (Swiss) with its US unit, Vitol S.A. Inc. under one master and thus set only one, global limit without the need to allocate. Lee Munden@ECT 08/09/2000 03:42 AM To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Vitol S.A. Paul Yes, we have received figures for end 12/99 plus unaudited figs for 31/5/00. I believe Neil is doing the analysis and will input them into CAS - credit Analysis shortly. Lee ---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Munden/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 09:43 --------------------------- From: Paul Radous @ ENRON 08/08/2000 21:22 To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Vitol S.A. Lee Just wanted to follow up and see if we have received the updated financials yet from Vitol. Paul
415,397
bass-e/_sent_mail/259.
MORE PLAYS , time to break out some of the old plays? ---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 11:39 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Eric Bass 10/18/99 06:03 PM To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: MORE PLAYS
10,580
jones-t/all_documents/10391.
Re: EOL approvals, 03-21-01 , Ditto Credit. Tana Jones@ECT 03/21/2001 05:18 PM To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: EOL approvals, 03-21-01 ----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 05:18 PM ----- Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 03/21/2001 05:15 PM To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: EOL approvals, 03-21-01 Please see attached.
179,363
forney-j/inbox/180.
FW: Length in the Hourly Ercot book for 11/22-11/26 , The basis of this power is $10.25. -----Original Message----- From: Forney, John M. Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:38 AM To: Capasso, Joe; Day, Smith L.; Phillips, George; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Olinde Jr., Steve; Oh, Seung-Taek Subject: Length in the Hourly Ercot book for 11/22-11/26 We have 25 mw's of length for the 8 hr offpeak block from thanksgiving through monday. hours ending 23 & 24 have the most value. This is your position, leave in North pool or sell as necessary. JMF
114,156
baughman-d/all_documents/53.
PayPal Email Confirmation , You're almost done signing up for PayPal! To confirm that this is your email address, just click on the following link and enter your password: https://secure.paypal.com/ece/cn=02427961649633002166&em=don.baughman%40enron. com If your email program has problems with hypertext links, you may also confirm your email address by logging into your PayPal account. Click on the link to "Confirm your email address" and then enter the following confirmation number: 0242-7961-6496-3300-2166 If you need help, please contact customer service by email at [email protected]. Thanks for using PayPal!
18,104
shankman-j/all_documents/686.
Re: Sempra meeting , I'm not sure it is a good idea to go. can we talk about this monday am? Jeff From: George McClellan 11/22/2000 02:25 PM To: Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Sempra meeting We are scheduled to meet Sempra in Stamford on Tuesday, Nov. 28 to discuss our differences. I have reserved a flight at 6:50 am Tuesday for me, Dan and Matt to return Tues. pm. I'm not sure if both of you need to go, but we can decide Monday. I will be reachable on my cell Thurs - Sun, (713-304-7306) and home Sun. pm (281-242-4001) if anything new comes up. Thanks.
431,151
blair-l/meetings/785.
Larry Berger/Monthly Acct. Mtg. Conference room EB4194 , CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT Description: Larry Berger/Monthly Acct. Mtg. Conference room EB4194 Date: 4/20/2001 Time: 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time) Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team Detailed Description:
35,221
baughman-d/all_documents/175.
Holiday posting schedule , Just wanted to let you know that TNE will be posting the hourly indexes for Feb. 16 and 19 and the daily indexes for Feb. 20 and 21 on Tuesday. ? ? Bobette Riner??????????????????????????????? Senior Power Markets Analyst?????? TradersNews Energy 713/647-8690 FAX: 713/647-7552 cell: 832/428-7008 [email protected] http://www.tradersnewspower.com ? ?
17,848
stclair-c/all_documents/461.
Re: Enron Online , Leslie: Dave Forster must sign off on all ETA amendments that we do. It may be a good idea for you to send him the new ETA amendment letter and walk him through the chnages that you have made to address your issues so that he understands what is going on. If you want me to be involved in that conversation, I'm happy to participate. Thanks. Carol Leslie Hansen 05/18/2000 03:42 PM To: [email protected]@ENRON cc: [email protected], Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Enron Online Cort: I have reviewed the Mutual Assistance Agreement and am not entirely comfortable that it establishes the authority of GPU Services Company to enter into power transactions on behalf of the utilities. The Agreement provides in Section 3 that "each Company . . . will furnish to such other Company . . . one or more of the Goods . . ." and that "[a]ll Goods provided hereunder shall be priced at cost . . ." Thus, the Agreement provides that the Service Company can buy power and sell it to a utility at cost. It does not expressly provide that the Service Company can act as agent on behalf of the utilities in purchasing or selling power on their behalf. I wanted to confirm that there was no other documentation available that more clearly identified the authority of GPU Services to act as agent on behalf of the utilities. In the absence of such documentation, I propose language to add to the Electronic Trading Agreement to address my concerns. I would also like to have each of the utilities sign a short acknowledgment form acknowledging the authority of GPU Service Company to enter into transactions with EPMI on its behalf. Attached below please find my proposed revisions to the Letter Agreement amending the ETA (which was originally forwarded to you by Carol St. Clair) as well as the proposed Acknowledgment. I look forward to discussing any questions or comments you may have. Regards, Leslie Hansen 713-853-6121 [email protected] 05/18/2000 08:18 AM To: "Leslie Hansen" <[email protected]> cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Enron Online Leslie: The Mutual Assistance Agreement that was sent to you was filed with the Pa PUC . I'll check but I believe the filing to which you are referring was originally filed with the SEC back in the early 1970's and has since been amended a number of times. Obviously as a part of a holding company structure GPU Service is required to have SEC approval to provide services to our operating companies. The GPU Service corporate records are not located here in Reading, PA....do you really need the SEC document? Cort "Leslie Hansen" <[email protected]> on 05/16/2000 02:51:37 PM To: Cortlandt Choate@GPU, John H Roberts@GPU cc: Subject: Enron Online As I understand it, Section 13(b) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act requires registered holding companies to obtain approval from the SEC in order to form a service company to provide services to its affiliates in the system. I have reviewed the Mutual Assistance Agreement that John faxed to me earlier. Is this the Agreement which was filed by General Public Utilities Corporation with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(b) of the PUHCA on SEC Form U-13-1 or otherwise? Regards, Leslie Hansen (713) 853-6121
451,125
dasovich-j/all_documents/2082.
Monthly Update to ENA , Please review and update your sections of the regulatory report by close of business today, if possible. If you do not have an update, let me know that as well. TTT ----- Forwarded by Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 09:39 AM ----- James D Steffes@ENRON 10/03/2000 11:49 AM To: Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robin Kittel/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, richard shapiro/NA/Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Monthly Update to ENA Thane - As we discussed, can you please contact the appropriate people to update this Worksheet on EGA key activities for ENA. Typically I have based this report on the IRTF submitted by the different offices (please see last report attached). My goal is to have a new report to Tammy Shepard (Dave Delainey's person) by the 5th of each month. It would be great if we could go over your final draft on the 4th before sending it in to ENA. Please call me with any questions. Cheers, Jim
60,010
dasovich-j/all_documents/10550.
Davis Blames Crisis On State Republicans , Davis Blames Crisis On State Republicans But Democratic controller points at governor Carla Marinucci, John Wildermuth, Chronicle Political Writers Sunday, April 1, 2001 ,2001 San Francisco Chronicle URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/04/01/M N154353.DTL Anaheim -- The politics of energy dominated the state Democratic convention yesterday, as anxious delegates gave a lukewarm reception to embattled Gov. Gray Davis, who clashed bitterly with party rival, Controller Kathleen Connell. Speaking at the Anaheim convention center, where dimmed lights were a constant reminder of yesterday's Stage 2 alert, Davis blamed California's energy woes on former Gov. Pete Wilson, Republican lawmakers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which, he charged, has failed to regulate greedy energy firms selling power at "out of control prices." He insisted that he was not sure rate increases were necessary, refusing to say whether he would support huge hikes backed by the Public Utilities Commission last week. He suggested, however, that he favors a system of tiered electricity pricing. "These Republicans -- who were so enamored with deregulation just five years ago -- have become even more enamored with criticizing me as I try to clean up their mess," the governor said to tepid applause from the 1,900 delegates. "This deregulation disaster was authored by a Republican legislator, passed by a Republican Assembly, signed into law by a Republican governor and implemented with undue haste by a Republican PUC." But the governor's Republican-bashing was overshadowed politically by an attack by state Controller Connell, a candidate for Los Angeles mayor -- who rejected what she called Davis' "finger-pointing" and assailed his handling of the crisis. The dramatic development demonstrated both deepening rifts within California's ruling party and the high political stakes of the energy crisis. "There will be no excuses for Democrats in this state, because we dominate state government," Connell said in a convention speech in which she also outlined proposals to require "power hogs," such as malls, to install their own microgenerators. "I spent the past eight years making sure the state had a surplus, and now I'm seeing it eaten away every day by energy costs. . . . Whatever solution (the governor) provides must come fast and be shared openly with the people of California," she said in a dig at Davis, who has been criticized for moving too cautiously and for resisting disclosure of energy contracts to the public. Warning of the costs of "a delay and an incremental approach to an indefinite problem," she said, "I won't stand by and allow the consumers to pick up the tab." DAVIS DEFENDS POLICIES Asked to respond to Connell's critique, Davis told reporters, "I believe we've moved at warp speed to address this problem. . . . We've kept the light on most days." The governor, who endorsed Connell's opponent, former Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa for mayor, then added, "It might be if she's not happy with that, she can run for governor next time." Garry South, the governor's senior political adviser, was even more caustic, lambasting Connell as a party infidel. "This is why Kathleen Connell doesn't have a friend in all Los Angeles," he said. "She's been picking on the governor since day one." "It's all air," he said of her talk. "Not only hot air but a foul wind." In an interview while campaigning later in the day, Connell toughened her rhetoric, saying, "The emperor has no more clothes here in California." "We are well into the fifth month (of the energy crisis) and we have yet to find any answers from the administration," said Connell, who promised to release her own detailed solutions to the crisis next week. Unlike many Democrats at the convention, festooned with "Wilson Did It" signs, she rejected as "irrelevant" the suggestion by Davis that Republicans were to blame for California's energy woes. "Californians are wearying of this finger-pointing and closed-door negotiations and extended debate," she told The Chronicle. "The public is no longer going to be patient with us. They're going to hold the governor accountable when they get the bill." CONNELL LAGGING IN POLL Connell, who is forced by term limits to give up her post as controller next year, has lagged in her campaign to become mayor of Los Angeles. With 10 days to the election, a recent poll showed her running fourth behind City Attorney James Hahn, Villaraigosa and businessman Steve Soboroff. Despite Davis' words and speculation among delegates, Connell denied she was eyeing the governor's seat for the future. "I'm not looking two or three years down the line," she said. "But I hope the governor is looking toward an immediate solution to this problem." The governor's speech was his first since the PUC announced rate increases of as much as 46 percent. Davis refused to say whether he would support the immediate rate increase approved by the PUC but suggested that he would back a tiered billing system. "If a rate increase becomes absolutely necessary to keep our lights on and our economy strong, you can be sure of one thing from this governor," Davis said. "I'll fight to protect those least able to pay, reward those who conserve the most and 'motivate' those who are the biggest guzzlers to cut back." He later dodged reporters' questions about specifics, repeatedly saying that within the next two weeks he would release a statement detailing "what, if any" increases were needed. "Many advisers from Wall Street are running numbers, and they appear to be different from the PUC's," he said. Davis also said he has already done a lot to address the crisis and had "kick started" construction of new power plants and successfully promoted conservation programs. Some of Davis' backers at the convention, watching the squabbling, expressed concern about some of the governor's tactics. "People want a leader to lead," said Susan Leal, San Francisco's city treasurer. "They're looking for someone to come out and take command, regardless of who started this." But, she said, Davis is a tough and smart politician, and "people are still going to be forgiving if (the governor) does something to attack the problem." OTHER DEMOCRATS BLAME GOP Other Democratic Party leaders were also quick to defend Davis and to blame Republicans. Terry McAuliffe, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, suggested that President Bush has ignored California's energy problems because "he's worried to death about Davis running for president." California is the world's sixth-biggest economy, McAuliffe noted in an interview, and Bush "has basically written it off, saying, 'Good luck to you. You're not getting any help.' " Art Torres, chairman of the state Democratic Party, said Davis "is attacked every day by the backbench Republican yahoos in the Legislature" and predicted that public concern over energy would ebb by next year's election. "We're looking at issues that are going to transcend the energy issues we see now," Torres said, such as crime and violence in the schools, economics, the environment and abortion. But political analyst Sherry Bebich Jeffee said Connell's criticism was evidence of a party split and perhaps "the opening salvo in 2002," when Davis is up for re-election. Davis's entire party, she said, could be in trouble if voters get fed up with higher energy bills. "Do the math," said Jeffee, noting that Democrats hold all but one state office and control of the both houses of the Legislature. "If you're going to throw the bums out, the bums in this state are mostly Democrats." E-mail Carla Marinucci at [email protected] and John Wildermuth at [email protected].
55,999
lenhart-m/inbox/52.
TRV Notification: (Wellhead Positions - 11/27/2001) , The report named: Wellhead Positions <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Wellhead+Positions&category_cd=8&category_name=WELLHEAD&toc_hide=1&sTV1=8&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/27/2001>, published as of 11/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
276,843
whalley-g/all_documents/344.
Vitol consulting deal , Hello Greg.? My accounting group in Boston has informed me that the $100k consulting invoice dated April 3 remains outstanding.? I'd appreciate your following up to find out status.? Thanks in advance.? Neil. ?
498,723
keiser-k/inbox/278.
RE: NetcoBooks , -----Original Message----- From: Postlethwaite, John Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:21 PM [Bill D. Hare] John, The change has been made. Bill To: Hare, Bill D. Cc: Lozano, Melba Subject: RE: NetcoBooks Bill, just a follow up to the book list that you sent. Regarding West Hourly, it looks like it is NETCO-ST-HOURLY. This will work, but the problem is that it doesn't differentiate between the west and east trading groups. Am I reading this wrong? My request was for the short name to be NETCO-W-HOURLY. Melba, in response to one of your emails to me, West Hourly is set up as noted above. John -----Original Message----- From: Hare, Bill D. Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:15 AM To: Lewis, Jon Paul; Postlethwaite, John; Valdes, John; Evans, Casey; Keiser, Kam; Luu, Duong; White, Stacey W. Cc: Chitradurga, Sundar; Theriot, Kim S. Subject: NetcoBooks I have attached the latest list (as of 01/13/02 8:30 AM) of all NETCO Books setup. << File: NetcoBooksasof011302.xls >>
255,414
shankman-j/old_email/47.
Surrealism and an old contact , Dear Jeff- I have been in Atlanta for two weeks and am continuing to unpack and assemble furniture. I thought of you last night as I came across the wonderful surrealism book that you gave me; what a great book. Of course, I had to stop my unpacking to read through parts of it. I did not get much unapcking done, but I had fun. I reconnected with Christina Johns, one of my roomates at Penn with Dori and she passed along Dori's email address. I sent her an email and she responded, and appears to be happy in Philly with her 18 month old daughter. I told her that we had seen each other in NYC during the past years and gave her an update on your successes and accomplishments. I hope that work is going well. I have to return to an orientation session. My new phone number (404)248-2290 and address 757 Houston Mill Rd. NE, Apt. 8 Atlanta, GA. 30329-4240. Does Enron have an office in Atlanta? Best, andi
433,105
williams-w3/bill_williams_iii/484.
TRANSSTATUS 7568 RECEIVED , Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below: ASSIGNMENT_REF = 7568 SELLER_CODE = TEPC SELLER_DUNS = 006902704 CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276 AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0 PATH_NAME = W/TEP/COR500SVL345/CORONADO-SPRINGERVILLE POINT_OF_RECEIPT = CORONADO500 POINT_OF_DELIVERY = SPRINGER345 SOURCE = SRP SINK = EPE CAPACITY = 0 CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25 SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY TS_CLASS = NON-FIRM TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT TS_PERIOD = ON_PEAK TS_WINDOW = FIXED TS_SUBCLASS = TRANS NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1 OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default START_TIME = 07/30/2001 STOP_TIME = 07/30/2001 CEILING_PRICE = 6.52 OFFER_PRICE = 3.00 BID_PRICE = 3.00 PRICE_UNITS = $/MWh PRECONFIRMED = YES ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A POSTING_REF = 0 SALE_REF = REQUEST_REF = DEAL_REF = NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG = STATUS = RECEIVED STATUS_NOTIFICATION = [email protected] STATUS_COMMENTS = TIME_QUEUED = 07/30/2001 TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 07/30/2001 PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS = SELLER_COMMENTS = CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = BEGINNING HE 14PPT THRU HE 17PPT SELLER_NAME = TEPC SELLER_PHONE = (520)745-7193 SELLER_FAX = (520)571-4036 SELLER_EMAIL = [email protected] CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc. CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801 CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272 CUSTOMER_EMAIL = [email protected] REASSIGNED_REF = 0 REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
509,419
cuilla-m/sent_items/14.
RE: , these are from last year so the the final rules may change a little but not much -----Original Message----- From: Hull, Bryan Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:03 PM To: Cuilla, Martin Subject: RE: will you send me the rules? and do we have a website? -----Original Message----- From: Cuilla, Martin Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:10 PM To: Bass, Eric; Cuilla, Martin; Ermis, Frank; Grigsby, Mike; Hull, Bryan; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Mckay, Brad; Murrell, Russell E; Neal, Scott; Shively, Hunter S.; South, Steven P.; Williams, Jason (Trading) Subject: The draft will be held Tuesday Sept. 4th and Wednesday Sept. 5th starting at 5pm. It should only take about 1 - 1 1/2 hours each day Draft order selection: Matt Lenhart Jason Williams Eric Bass Steve South Mike Grigsby Tori Kuykendall Hunter Shively McKay/Neal Martin Cuilla Russell Murrell Frank Ermis Bryan Hull
55,241
maggi-m/deleted_items/1360.
RE: , thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:23 PM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: yep -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: why? because he is mean! -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:21 PM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: i love your dad -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:19 PM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: ok, but i'm warning you. you have your hands full. my dad always told me that if someone ever kidnapped me they would bring me right back. -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:18 PM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: i can take it, and its a deal on the new clothes thing -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:17 PM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: i don't know about that. i'm a brat! -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:16 PM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: i think i could -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:14 PM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: see, you couldn't handle me. i am a freak!! :)
297,848
shackleton-s/sent_items/110.
RE: Orlando Utilities Commission , I can wait; just didn't want it to slip through the cracks. Thanks. Sara -----Original Message----- From: Rohauer, Tanya Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:50 AM To: Shackleton, Sara Subject: RE: Orlando Utilities Commission he is out until thursday due to death in the family. if urgent, let me know and I will reassign -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:40 AM To: Johnson, Rudwell Cc: Rohauer, Tanya Subject: FW: Orlando Utilities Commission Hi, Rudwell. Can you please resond to me email. Thanks. Sara -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:51 PM To: Johnson, Rudwell Cc: Friedman, Richard Subject: Orlando Utilities Commission Rudwell: You are handling this counterparty from a credit perspective. Rich Friedman from Global Markets has called to inquire about the status of this ISDA request. Please refer to Lotus Notes to review the last action taken by Russell in February, 2001. Please determine whether we can eliminate the Credit Support Annex from this agreement before we send another version. You will note that this counterparty wants to rely entirely on the form used by Aron. Russell has a copy of this agreement. Do you want to put this on the legal credit list for follow up? Thanks. Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490
425,980
jones-t/all_documents/10548.
Out of Office AutoReply: ClickPaper 03-20-01 Amendment _ GCP , I will be out of the office at a training course from Tuesday, March 27th through Friday, March 30th. For any urgent matters please contact Ken Curry at (713) 853-6165. Thanks, Aparna Rajaram Ph: (713) 345-4563 Fax: (713) 853-9476 [email protected]
179,529
lavorato-j/sent_items/428.
RE: EOL , Liquidity feeds on itself. PJM Cinergy and Entergy were not liquid until we made them liquid. -----Original Message----- From: Zufferli, John Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:26 AM To: Lavorato, John Subject: EOL No to be overly defensive, but in very liquid markets (ie PJM, Cinergy and Entergy) the EOL bid/offer is 2.5-3.5%. In the west MidC, NP,SP, the bid offer is 3-4.5%. In a market it which I am 95% of the trades with no liquidity without me, my EOL bid offer is 4-5%. I think the is very reasonable, if I felt that being tighter would allow more trades without me either being the repository of unwanted MW or being the only supplier of MW, then I would be tighter.
266,823
geaccone-t/sent_items/57.
FW: , -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:35 PM To: Kilmer III, Robert Subject: FW: -----Original Message----- From: Donoho, Lindy Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:17 PM To: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: RE: Here it is. I'm going to be making some changes before our 3:00 meeting w/ Danny today. I was planning on having the final to you tomorrow after I make any other changes we discuss in that meeting. -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:41 PM To: Donoho, Lindy Subject: Can you e-mail me the latest and greatest 2002 presentation? Thanks
122,988
gang-l/deleted_items/10.
RE: , sorry you can't make it. it'd be fun to have you and i'm sure everyone would like to see you, especially kim and suzanne. i'm travelling a good part of next week. let's shoot for the following week. -----Original Message----- From: Gang, Lisa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:37 AM To: ELLIOT (E-mail) Subject: hey sweet cheeks....how the hell are ya????how's BPA? i bet you will do so well there...let me know when you become the next vp of power...hey i'm not going to make it your party...i completely flaked.... can we get together for lunch or dinner next week? i would love to see ya... lisa ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
119,479
bass-e/_sent_mail/408.
, By the way, wear your grey "HEAT" jerseys to the game and bring a blue t-shirt as an extra.
10,745
farmer-d/all_documents/315.
Enron / HPL Actuals for November 2, 2000 , Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 45.000 / HPL Gas Daily
102,355
nemec-g/all_documents/156.
Re: 4 Days to Go , Rude Dog, Maverick, It's no good up here. I'm holding on too tight. I've lost the edge. Yes, it is close. I am pretty pumped. I am also extremely nervous about Barnette and their passing game. Looks like Walker and Hill will be the starting corners. Yikes! I think our defense will be able to put some pressure on Barnette with the type of speed we have at linebacker now. If we don't get any pressure on Barnette, I think we will likely lose this game. But I am hopeful that big Shaun Rogers will wreak havoc in the middle. The offense is still a big questions. The level of talent on the OL gives me comfort. Davis, Kirk-Hughes (so big they gave him two names), Roesler, etc. are all big time. The 1st series should be really interesting. I think we come out passing lights out to loosen up the run defense. Then start sending Ike off Roesler and Davis. Occasionally send Flowers down the field on the fly and have Applewhite throw it as far as he can. It is going to be a good one. Which game is the first one you'll be able to go to? How are the Australian women? Bring pictures and stories. Preferably with much embellishment. G$ Bruce Rudy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/24/99 09:35 PM To: Gerald Nemec@ECT cc: Subject: 4 Days to Go G$- Well, only 4 more days to go until kickoff. What do you think about the game? I saw that we are 9.5 point favorites. I personally would love to win by that much. NCSt.'s passing attack really scares me. I guess I still don't have a lot of confidence in our CBs yet. I think that Jammer and Jackson(from what I have read) are solid in the middle and our front 4 is just plain stout. We have alot of depth at LB as well, so I guess we will need to get maximum pressure on Barnette to help out JW, EH, AB, & RB. Offensively, from what I have been reading, it sounds like Applewhite has been very sharp and our RBs aren't going to be as weak as I first thought. Also, I understand the OL is coming along quite well. So, do we win? How do you see the game unfolding? I won't get it out here, but I will try to listen to it on the internet. I can't wait to get back and watch these games! Talk to me Goose. Bruce
344,767
gay-r/_sent_mail/109.
, Bob: here is what I have so far. There may be additions (hopefully not deletions). Thanks.
120,078
white-s/meetings/294.
Do Not Delete - Repeat parent for Doorstep - Oslo , CALENDAR ENTRY: INVITATION Description: Do Not Delete - Repeat parent for Doorstep - Oslo Date: 4/16/2001 Time: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time) Meeting Dates: 5/14/2001, 5/15/2001, 5/16/2001, 5/17/2001, 5/18/2001 Detailed Description:
505,892
beck-s/all_documents/277.
SEC VaR , Gary and Georgeanne let me know that all but 487 shares of EOG are hedged (without the EOG leg, the Cerberus total return swap is really only a loan, and its VaR is about $500 thousand). I have recalculated, and the total return swaps VaR fell to $34 million in December and $18 million in November. December VaR is still up substantially from November, and the primary reason now is that since natural gas prices are up so much, the value of the Bammel Looper and Mid Texas total return swaps has increased. The more money we make, the more we can potentially lose. Regards, Eugenio
23,553
lewis-a/deleted_items/589.
Fwd: Itinerary Companion for Andrew , Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Apparently-To: [email protected] via web13207.mail.yahoo.com; 06 Jan 2002 = 16:54:38 -0800 (PST) X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from 65.216.67.71 (EHLO mailhost.wm.orbitz.com) (65.216.67.71) = by mta501.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2002 16:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from wl01 (simidfw01.wm.orbitz.com [10.50.100.11])=09by mailhost.= wm.orbitz.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g070t1qH010274=09for <ahl_34@ya= hoo.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:55:01 -0600 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:54:37 -0600 (CST) From: Orbitz Traveler Care <[email protected]> To: "Mr. Andrew Lewis " <[email protected]> Subject: Itinerary Companion for Andrew Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 3065 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09[IMAGE]=09[IMAGE]=09 [IMAGE]=09=09=09=09=09[IMAGE]=09[IMAGE]=09 [IMAGE]=09Hello Andrew, Thanks for traveling with Orbitz. This is your o= fficial "Itinerary Companion" which confirms that ticket numbers have been = issued for your "Chicago 1/19/02" trip. Sat, Jan 19 - IAH to ORD This e= -mail contains your flight information, including your ticket numbers. Bec= ause you're traveling with an e-ticket, no ticket will be mailed to you. = For check-in purposes, you'll need a government-issued photo ID. To pass t= hrough airport security, however, you must print out either this e-mail or = your itinerary in "My Stuff" (by clicking "print itinerary") and bring it = with you to the airport. Remember, you will not be allowed to board or pa= ss airport security without a copy of one of these print outs, as they're t= he only ones which contain your ticket numbers. If you're not checking lug= gage, you may proceed directly to the gate with this print out. Your Orbi= tz record locator is 2HSPJH. Passenger Details Passenger [IMAGE] Ticket = No. [IMAGE] Fare Type [IMAGE] Ticket Price MR. ANDREW LEWIS [IMAGE] 0051511= 630427 [IMAGE] 1 Web Only [IMAGE] $197.59USD AMY YUEH [IMAGE] 0051511630428= [IMAGE] 1 Web Only [IMAGE] $197.59USD Total Airfare (including taxes) [I= MAGE] $395.18 Total Price for this Air Invoice [IMAGE] $395.18 Credit Card = Type MasterCard Credit Card Number xxxxxxxxxxxx1598 Houston (IAH) to C= hicago (ORD) Saturday, Jan 19 Flight: Continental Airlines 146 = [IMAGE] Departure: Jan 19 1:20 PM CST (IAH) [IMAGE] Arrival: Jan 19 3= :53 PM CST (ORD) [IMAGE] Class: Economy Chicago (ORD) to Houston = (IAH) Monday, Jan 21 Flight: Continental Airlines 647 [IMAGE] = Departure: Jan 21 5:05 PM CST (ORD) [IMAGE] Arrival: Jan 21 7:40 PM CS= T (IAH) [IMAGE] Class: Economy Please note: New security provisions= allow for only one piece of carry-on baggage per passenger, plus a persona= l item such as a purse, briefcase, or laptop. Most importantly, because s= chedule changes may occur prior to or during your travel dates, Orbitz will= make every effort possible to contact you by e-mail if your itinerary has = changed. Such changes will always be noted in "My Stuff" as well, and we r= ecommend you check there periodically before your trip. We also suggest yo= u update your Traveler Care Alert preferences if necessary so we can conta= ct you with updates during your trip. Billing Information for this Itiner= ary Orbitz Member Name: Mr. Andrew Lewis Address: ANDREW LEWIS 3131 TI= MMONS LN APT 1010 HOUSTON TX 77027 US E-Mail: [email protected] May we hel= p you add a rental car or hotel to this trip? Again, thank you for ch= oosing Orbitz. Orbitz Customer Care P.S. About 48 hours before your trip= , look for an "Airport Ready" e-mail which will contain all sorts of great = information to make your trip as smooth and hassle-free as possible! And r= emember, Orbitz Customer Service Representatives are available to help you = 24 hours a day at 888-656-4546.[IMAGE]=09[IMAGE]=09[IMAGE]=09Sunday, Jan 6 = =09=09=09 Important notice related to the ticket terms and conditions.=09=09=09=09= =09=09=09 We've listed all kinds of helpful information in our Frequently Asked Quest= ions (FAQs) at the Help and Customer Support page at Orbitz.=09=09=09=09=09= =09=09 [IMAGE]=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 [IMAGE]
280,844
campbell-l/inbox/1386.
Required Digital Cert: OATI WEB OASIS , For OATI webOasis, you will need a Digital Certification on YOUR computer that matches YOUR ID and Password. I have attached your Digital Certificate. Please (Double-Click) install it on your computer. Then, access http://www.oatioasis.com Your username is: lfcampbell Your password is: EPMI
43,918
scott-s/_sent_mail/1391.
I knew it... , Best Product Placement: Taking corporate sponsorship to absurdly intimate levels, Pepsi spokesdiva Britney Spears wore a tiny medallion with the soft-drink company's logo in her bellybutton ring during her much hyped commercial. Although, considering the amount of money the company has sunk into her, it may have been a homing device.
403,156
tycholiz-b/inbox/213.
ABC/ANG Capacity ( your interest in firm/IT Winter 2001) , BT; - I feel like foghorn leghorn on this project (ie: "I'm pitching but not one's catching")...I have been trying to find ABC/ANG capacity (per your inquiry for 10,000 capacity for winter only) in addition to looking for 5,000 of ABC only capacity for Petrobank (they actually have firm ANG/PGT but let their ABC go) - fyi, (this has not been press released) but it looks like NOVA/ANG will have an additional 60,000 of contracted capacity avail this Nov 1 (part of the expansion that was to go with the PGT expansion but is being done early as it only goes as far as kinsgate)...no surprise that the shipper to get the capacity is BC Gas (to use for Southern Crossing) - I'm afraid that the best we can offer is IT Tolls (.17 C/GJ for Nova + .08 C/GJ for ANG + .06 for Fuel on ANG) = .31 C/GJ - as far as ABC capacity, there are mismatches (that are complicated by higher fuel rates in the winter) but I will keep working the phones - do you know if any of the PNW/Calif shippers-utilities have excess ABC capacity and an interest in ANG/PGT??? (Petrobank will likely look at any term winter/1 yr/longer) - based on previous dealings, Petrobank is motivated Thanks, GH
490,546
south-s/all_documents/27.
Wild Goose Storage and the Ruby Pipeline , The following news release comes from today's Gas Daily. Feel free to call us at Wild Goose Storage Inc. to discuss what opportunities are available to align your storage needs with this new pipeline capacity. Keep in mind that our open season for new storage capacity at Wild Goose closes on May 22. For information contact either Ben Ledene with Wild Goose in Calgary at (403) 266-8192 or Chris Price and Mark Baldwin with Interstate Gas Services in California at (925) 243-0350. From today's Gas Daily: Copyright , Financial Times Energy, 2001 Colorado Interstate Gas is holding an open season through May 31 to evaluate whether it should add capacity from the Rockies to Nevada and northern California markets. The project, called the Ruby Pipeline, would total up to 750 million cfd of incremental capacity and would begin service in late 2003. Bid sheets can be obtained from CIG's Web site at www.cigco.com/business/colorado/index.html. CIG said gas production from the Rocky Mountain supply basins "is projected to increase dramatically over the next few years and the Ruby Pipeline Project will provide access to these supplies." The Ruby project will consist of approximately 850 miles of 30- inch and 36-inch pipeline running from western Wyoming through Utah to Elko, Nev., to points of delivery near Reno, Nev., Yuba City, Calif., and Sacramento, Calif. CIG said it anticipates interconnecting with the northern California gas storage facility of Wild Goose Storage, which is currently holding its own open season to evaluate expanding its facility. Ruby is considered the second phase of a project involving CIG and Questar. The first phase, which entails an agreement between Questar and CIG, involves Questar developing a 74-mile looping project in Utah. Questar plans to sell 50% of the ownership interest in the phase I project to a CIG affiliate, CIG Gas Supply, on the day the phase I facilities go online. CIG Supply will then lease its 50% interest in the project back to Questar under a 33-year lease, which would give Questar full operational rights. For more information about the Ruby project, contact Craig Coombs at 719-520-4387, Ed Miller at 719-520-4305, or Tom Dobson at 719-520-3792. RW
449,365
jones-t/all_documents/1058.
HS Resources, Inc. , Can you add the referenced counterparty to the next list. We just got a master in signed with them and they cannot trade weather, pulp & paper & fx. Much thanks!
179,564
dasovich-j/all_documents/10784.
Re: FERC ruling on Kern expansion , Hmm. Interesting. Thanks for the info. Do we know who got to Breathitt? Forgive me, but what time did we pick to talk today? And will you call me? Best, Jeff
56,256
dasovich-j/all_documents/364.
ebiz project , Hi Jeff, Aiaz, Attached is my roommates ebay capstone project I mentioned, figured it would give us a good background for the case...it was a last minute project (as i can attest to by the NO sleep I got from being in the room next to him the night before the due date :) so it's a little rough, but good "leisure reading" :) I don't have Anil's email, so could one of you please forward to him? Thanks, Kelly, still cracking the whip on this project :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com - ebay.doc
63,301
cash-m/inbox/dlr/33.
Weekly EEAC Mailings , The following EEAC Mailings have been added to the O:\HR\OLER\Everyone\EEAC Mailings\2001 Mailings Directory. 01-159 2001 VETS-100 Report Same as Last Year, New Reporting Requirements Again Optional <http://www.eeac.org/private/01-159.pdf> We have been advised that the 2001 VETS-100 form, which will start going out in the mail to federal contractors on August 8, is the same as the version used for the 1999 and 2000 reporting cycles. 01-158 A Valid Employment Arbitration Agreement May Preclude Class Action Lawsuits <http://www.eeac.org/private/01-158.pdf> EEAC's analysis reveals that there is support in the federal case law for concluding that an enforceable agreement to arbitrate employment disputes may cut off the option of bringing a class action lawsuit. 01-157 FLSA/Wage-Hour Clearinghouse Calls <http://www.eeac.org/private/01-157.pdf> While EEAC does not regularly track wage-hour compliance issues, we do get calls about the topic from time to time. We are therefore pleased to have access to an expert who might be able to help those of you who have wage-hour inquiries. 01-156 Bipartisan Class Action Legislation Would Achieve Some Modest Reforms Favorable to Corporate Defendants <http://www.eeac.org/private/01-156.pdf> A bipartisan group in the House of Representatives would like to achieve some modest reforms to stem perceived abuses in class action litigation that harm both plaintiffs and defendants.
49,523
derrick-j/sent_items/328.
RE: Career Opportunities at Enron , Dear Mr. Pincus: Thank you for your message and for sending your resume to me. I have forwarded your information to Mr. Mark Haedicke, General Counsel of our Wholesale Group, and to Ms. Vicki Sharp, General Counsel of our Retail Group, for consideration in connection with any opportunities that may exist or come up. Please give my best to Les. Sincerely, Jim Derrick -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Career Opportunities at Enron Dear Mr. Derrick: Les LoBaugh suggested that I contact you to inquire about an in-house counsel position at Enron. I am the General Counsel of Niagara Mohawk Holding's unregulated subsidiaries, Niagara Mohawk Energy, Inc. and Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing, Inc. We expect the sale of Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing to close in November or December of this year, pending FERC approval, and a sale of Niagara Mohawk Energy's Distributed Power and Energy Services Business units may occur contemporaneously with that closing. Therefore, I am now pursuing other career opportunities. I am a good candidate for an in-house counsel position at Enron because of my 12 years experience as an attorney in the energy industry. As General Counsel for the Company, I provide legal services and business advise to senior management and the Board of Directors of both the energy marketing and the energy services subsidiaries. My experience includes drafting and negotiating gas and electric retail sales agreements and master agreements and related documents for wholesale energy trading and marketing transactions, including physical transactions and financial instruments such as swaps. I monitor and I am responsible for representing my company in FERC and state regulatory proceedings. I keep up to date on the fast moving events and trends in the energy marketing and trading industry by closely monitoring regulatory proceedings, reading information that is published in trade and related energy industry publications and my involvement with the National Energy Marketers Association and the Federal Energy Bar Association. I am also responsible for representing the company and managing outside counsel in litigation and alternative dispute resolution proceedings. My experience includes utility regulatory and legal matters, the transactional work associated with corporate mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, human resource/employee issues, interconnection agreements, municipal law, leasing, financing and secured transaction agreements, commercial contracts, condemnation litigation and real property matters. I have attached my resume for your review. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to schedule an interview. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Steven R. Pincus (See attached file: Pincus Resume.doc) - Pincus Resume.doc << File: Pincus Resume.doc >>
93,225
symes-k/all_documents/3361.
Re: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries , Kate: That is fine with me. Are we OK with this? C Kate Symes 04/13/2001 11:04 AM To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries I've gone ahead and entered the counterparty name "Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc." in Chris Foster's deal #573679, in the interest of moving it along through the confirmation process. (The deal was done on 4/6 and flowed on 4/10.) I spoke with Bob Ellery (Sierra) yesterday and he seemed fine with the name we have in our system, although I'm sure he's not the final authority. Then I spoke with the Confirms group today and they were ready to get the deal off of their new deal report. So, since I haven't heard anything to the contrary, I changed the deal from it's "new counterparty" status. Please let me know if this presents a problem for any of you. Thanks, Kate Symes Trading Support 503-464-7486
465,123
jones-t/all_documents/3491.
Oh knower of all things... , We've got a draft master with the following rounding conventions: Short tons: zero decimals Temperatures: zero decimals US Dollar Amounts: to the nearest cent Do you know whether those are our standard rounding conventions? P.S. Do you get a invite to our favorite email person's political swankienda?
184,045
taylor-m/inbox/297.
ERMT Corp. and Clinton Update , Mark All work on the application for a power marketing certificate has stopped and we have not asked that changes be made to reflect the merger agreement with Dynegy. This would involve a considerable amount of work and a further analysis as to market power being prepared. If and when it is required we can instruct that the work be performed. I have advised our gas pipelines regulatory compliance group (Frazier King) as to the filing which may need to be made in the event that the application is made by ERMT Corp. There is no further action required on this, provided that ERMT Corp. remains the name of the entity. If you are considering a name change please advise as soon as is practicable in order that this can be addressed. The share transfer forms transferring the shares in Clinton to Enron Corp. have been executed, effective 30 October 2001. These need to be initialed and transfer accepted by the President of Enron Corp. I am sending these to you to initial. Marcus
479,777
donoho-l/inbox/junk_file/274.
RIGZONE Industry News , RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------ Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry to view the complete version, please go to: http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=217 ------------------------------------------------------------
94,497
shankman-j/all_documents/1062.
Re: Annual Oil Spill Crisis Management Training , put on calendar ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/04/200= 0=20 05:57 PM --------------------------- From: Alan Aronowitz on 10/04/2000 04:42 PM Sent by: Nony Flores To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A=20 Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,= =20 Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M=20 Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Hicks/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eileen=20 Kisluk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P=20 Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael J=20 Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Philips/HOU/ECT@EC= T,=20 Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer=20 Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,= =20 Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, John=20 Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle=20 Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT,= =20 Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie=20 Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Foust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Travis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Renee= =20 Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Nelly Carpenter/NA/Enron@ENRON=20 Subject: Re: Annual Oil Spill Crisis Management Training Please reserve Thursday, October 19, 2000 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. to=20 participate in our third annual oil spill training program. Some of you= =20 were part of the task force that helped to design the Oil Spill Crisis=20 Management Plan, and it is well recognized that periodic training is an=20 essential part of implementing the Plan. The training program (8:30 a.m. -= =20 noon) and a brief tabletop exercise (1:00 p.m.- 3:00 p.m.) are being design= ed=20 by ENA Legal and Enron Global Markets Commercial Support (Scott Earnest and= =20 Kevin Sweeney), and our oil spill consultant, Robert J. Meyers and=20 Associates, Inc. Typically, these types of programs run for 3 or 4 days, bu= t=20 we have condensed the curriculum so that we can get sufficiently trained in= =20 3/4's of a day. We believe that this intensive training effort will give u= s=20 all a chance to learn more about the Plan and the role that each of us are= =20 assigned. The company=01,s success in dealing with a future spill crisis w= ill=20 depend on how well we are prepared to perform in such circumstances. The training is scheduled to occur in Houston in the Enron Building in Room= =20 49C1. If any other person in your group should be included in this program= ,=20 please let Nony Flores know at ext. 37541 and we will add them to the list.= =20 A full copy of the Plan will be distributed during training. =20 Thanks again for your participation in this very important effort. Regards, Alan Aronowitz Harry Collins Kevin Sweeney Scott Earnest
430,484
shackleton-s/inbox/138.
Enserco energy Inc. , Bill: Here is what Enserco is willing to do: They are willing to extend the term of the $million LC to January 31st if we agree to extend the January due dates on settlement payments for physical gas and financial trades to January 31st. They believe that they have a good argument against our right to declare an Event of Default based on their failure to renew and the LC will expire on 12/31. It is questionable under the ISDA whether they are required to renew while we are in default. Leslie: I need to know what payments are owed in December and January between ENA and Enserco for physical gas and financial trades under the ISDA. Lisa, Julia and Lou: Would EY need to approve this? Carol St. Clair EB 4539 713-853-3989 (phone) 713-646-3393 (fax) 281-382-1943 (cell phone) 8774545506 (pager) 281-890-8862 (home fax) [email protected]
421,324
salisbury-h/inbox/719.
FW: Index Option , -----Original Message----- From: Dunton, Heather Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:07 AM To: Yang, Zhiyun; Lee, Norman; Luu, Duong; Gupta, Sanjay; Crooks, William; Kroumov, Kroum Cc: Postlethwaite, John; Chang, Fran; Law, Samantha; Warner, Nicholas Subject: Index Option We have the approval from the business unit (Matt Motley) to implement Index Option deal type as such: Index Option will be a physical option with a strike @ an Index. For a BDay option expiry the analysis will work as follows: The forward position will be valued taking the deal strip hours, these hours will be valued against the scalars - the hours in the money compared to the forward underlying price will be estimated as exercised. Only the hours in the money will be evaluated. For the day of exercise the hours evaluated will be the hours exercised in scheduling. Daily the Option Exercise function in Enpower will create an Index Forward Leg from the Index Option (expiry will be daily but the price will be hourly) @ a strike of the specified Index. Liquidation: Liquidation for the next day will be calculated using the actual exercised strip against the curve as the mid price. The True-up will be index vs curve when the index is published. This is how we would analyze each hour. The sum of each hour will be the value of the option. For each hour: HE7 = Strike = Forward Price (since Index is not available) Underlying = Forward Price * scalar Vol = Daily Vol Rate = Libor Time = same as daily (treated as a daily option for time) Vo =f(u,s,v,r,t) V = Intrinsic + Extrinsic -----Original Message----- From: Dunton, Heather Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:41 AM To: Motley, Matt Cc: Yang, Zhiyun; Lee, Norman; Luu, Duong; Gupta, Sanjay; Crooks, William; Kroumov, Kroum; Postlethwaite, John Subject: Index Option Matt I need written confirmation regarding the analysis of the new Deal Type "Index Option" for IT to implement. Index Option will be a physical option with a strike @ an Index. For a BDay option expiry the analysis will work as follows: The forward position will be valued taking the deal strip hours, these hours will be valued against the scalars - the hours in the money compared to the forward underlying price will be estimated as exercised. Only the hours in the money will be evaluated. For the day of exercise the hours evaluated will be the hours exercised in scheduling. Buy Call: Estimated Exercised hour will have a price above the mid Buy Put: Estimated Exercised hour will have a price below the mid Daily the Option Exercise function in Enpower will create an Index Forward Leg from the Index Option (expiry will be daily but the price will be hourly) @ a strike of the specified Index. Liquidation: Liquidation for the next day will be calculated using the actual exercised strip against the curve as the mid price. The True-up will be index vs curve when the index is published.
391,392
guzman-m/all_documents/1245.
New TTC at Palo , This notification was on the SRP Oasis webstie" "The owners of Palo Verde East transmission system have completed studies supporting an increase in the system's rating from 3810 MW to 4750 MW. This increase in TTC affects the PV-WestWing 500kV #1 and #2 transmission lines adn the PV-Kyrene 500kV transmission line path rating. This new TTC will become effective at 12:01 am on February 1, 2001 The owners of the three transmission lines are Arizona Public Service, El Paso Electric Company, PNM, and SRP. The increased rating will be allocated to each company based upon their ownership share of the transmission lines."
146,144
steffes-j/sent_items/29.
CAEM Take on Legislation , Not too sure how important, but wanted everyone to see the discussion from Jamie Wimberley at CAEM. Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Jamie Wimberly" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jamie+20Wimberly+22+20+3CBenjamin+2EWimberly+40Verizon+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:34 PM To: Steffes, James D. Cc: [email protected] Subject: Response from Jamie Wimberly Jim: Thank you for your thoughtful response. Even if Enron is a "hot button" these days, we remain big fans of yours. In regard to your comments on the letter, I disagree with some of the assertions. First, I am fairly confident that no major piece of energy legislation will be passed this year. As you can see from the attached congressional update for the DE Task Force prepared by Bev Jones (former VP for Consolidated Natural Gas), Jimmy Hayes (former Member of Congress, and Nancy Etkin (former head of Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition), there is every indication that legislation is going to get bottled up in the Senate. I agree with the assessment. Moreover, the legislation that is being considered has almost nothing in it of direct relevance to "getting it right" in regard to restructuring. Without pressure, I expect no federal leadership on restructuring issues. While I do agree that commissions are usually a stalling tactic, both Ken and I are dismayed at the lack of focus, resources (i.e., DOE has devoted almost nothing of any sort to restructuring) and lack of qualified personnel directed at promoting more competition in the energy market. While you and I may have some idea of what is necessary (and that is a stretch for me -- given the complexity of the challenges), I can safely say the vast majority of folks have no idea what to do -- especially about the tricky jurisdictional questions involved. I personally think one way to craft a "new federalism" on restructuring is to bribe the states into more action. The federal government does this with education, housing, etc. Why not with restructuring? A carrot for those states which are moving forward, linked to definite metrics of progress and openness. I also strongly believed that state PUCS and federal agencies like FERC are being pushed to the limit about what they can accomplish given declining budgets and personnel. I further think that this slows the whole process down. Think about it -- telephone deregulation, a growing crisis in regard to water, record levels of mergers and acquisitions, historic changes in regard to natural gas and electric regulation -- all piled on top of each other for these folks. Good catch on the numbering of the recommendations cited in the letter. This has been corrected. I look forward to seeing you in September at the Board meeting. Jamie P.S. Speaking of the DE Task Force, have you and Bob Frank made a decision yet to participate? I hope you do, but I need to know as soon as possible. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:25 AM To: Jamie Wimberly (E-mail) Cc: Shelk, John Subject: Letter from Leadership Council to Bush WH Jamie -- Thank you for keeping me in the loop on your activities. While I am always supportive of more public statements pushing competition, neither I nor Enron can sign on to the letter. First, I am concerned that having Enron sign on will distract from your messages. Enron is a "hot button" in DC and will change the proper focus. In addition, I would argue that the recommendation for a national commission is out of place with the current timing of FERC and Congressional action -- which is imminent -- while a commission would delay action on the Hill and at FERC, thus supporting the forces against competition. Let's not study this too much - we know what to do. Move away from the commission. Also, I'm not sure how providing federal grant money only to states that promote competition supports our efforts. Making GA pay for PA is a distraction from the main fights at FERC and on the Hill. Finally, I would guess that more funds to FERC and other agencies will only be used to increase enforcement against those in the industry. While Enron wants markets that work well, the core problem is that we haven't deregulated enough - not that markets aren't working. Also, I don't know where the recommendation numbers from the Bush/Cheney plan came from -- I think it was an earlier document -- there are no such numbers in the final printed version of the report that I have. If you want to talk, please let me know. Thanks, Jim ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. ********************************************************************** - DE leg update Aug 27.doc
455,794
kean-s/all_documents/442.
Instructions for EnFile upgrade , Effective April 2, EnFile has been moved to a new server. If you are an EnFile user, you will have to upgrade your Netscape plugin, or you will be unable to access EnFile. If you are not an EnFile user, please disregard this message. Attached below are two different files, Communicator.exe and Navigator.exe. If you are using Netscape Communicator, you will need to use Communicator.exe. If you are using Netscape Navigator, you will need to use Navigator.exe. To upgrade your computer: 1. Double-click on the appropriate attachment. 2. Click "Launch" in the window that will pop up. 3. You will be presented with a WinZip dialog box. Click "Unzip", and the upgraded plugin will be installed on your computer. 4. Click "OK" in the confirmation dialog box. 5. Click "Close" in the WinZip dialog box to exit. If you experience problems, please contact Tech Support at 1-888-853-9797.
229,135
kaminski-v/_sent_mail/1403.
Btu Weekly , ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 11:34 AM --------------------------- "Btu" <[email protected]> on 11/22/2000 03:57:15 PM To: "Btu Weekly" <> cc: Subject: Btu Weekly Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly. e-mail: [email protected] phone: 732-758-8222 fax: 732-758-8286 - wg112700.pdf
199,342
shapiro-r/texas/38.
RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT , Here are a couple of clarifying points: The congestion charges that have been incurred are 55.6 million or 137 million depending on the methodology used to calculate the charge. If you look purely at the scheduled MWs then it is 137 MM based upong the ERCOT protocols. The actual cost to redispach and clear congestion as of Sept. 22, 2001 was 55.6 MM. Both obviously are very high considering it is for one month of operation. When the 20 MM trigger was hit August 14, 2001, ERCOT has 6 month by Protocol and reaffirmed in the commission order to implement the full zonal model. This means that there will no longer be an uplift of interzonal congestion, rather a direct assignment of the charge. The charge may be partially offset by the TCR that will be auctioned. The PUCT has indicated an interest to move to direct assignment prior to the development and implementation of a TCR instrument as a hedge. I am chairing the congestion management working group that is deciding the TCR issue and will be dealing with the local congestion issues when that trigger has been hit. It would be difficult to know if Pat Wood will try to push the ERCOT congestion management model as the model of choice. The staff and Brett Pearman have been in favor of a movement to an LMP model as a fall back position initially, but have been more concerned with retail acess as of late rather than the ERCOT congestion. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 12:53 PM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Twiggs, Thane Cc: Robertson, Linda Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT Thane -- Based on Wood's statements while at the PUCT, what issues will most likely drive his choice of a congestion management model? My understanding is that Shumel Oren is on the panel at FERC, has he said anything recently that would argue that ERCOT may not be effective? Finally, what are the minor changes to the ERCOT protocols to overcome the current obstacles so that if adopted we could use across the country? Jim Jim -----Original Message----- From: Nicolay, Christi L. Sent: Fri 10/5/2001 12:22 PM To: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Twiggs, Thane Cc: Robertson, Linda Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT Pat Profeta of Northridge Assoc. (Entergy's congestion management consultants) told me this too and said that Michael Schnitzer of Northridge has been asked to be on the congestion management panel for RTO week. Michael is a strong advocate of the "SPP cornerstones" that are largely the basis of the "LMP/financial congestion hedge" model (initial model!) advocated in the SE RTO mediation report. They are going to contact Thane to get more information about ERCOT -- they recognize that ERCOT has some problems. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:38 AM To: Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard Cc: Nicolay, Christi L.; Robertson, Linda Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT Agreed. In fact, my understanding is that the ERCOT protocols state that if congestion is greater than $20 MM / year the model would change. The market has reached $100 MM. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Novosel, Sarah Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:27 AM To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D. Cc: Nicolay, Christi L.; Robertson, Linda Subject: FERC Looking at ERCOT This is just a rumor we're hearing, but we heard that FERC wants someone who knows ERCOT congestion management on the congestion management panel for RTO Week because FERC (presumably Pat Wood) wants to use the ERCOT congestion management system as the standard CMS throughout the country. From what I know about ERCOT (which isn't much and I have a call in to Thane to get an update), this wouldn't be a good thing for us. We'll keep you posted.
440,169
kaminski-v/_sent_mail/1211.
Thursday visit , Shirley, FYI Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 08:18 AM --------------------------- "Francis X. Diebold" <[email protected]> on 12/18/2000 07:02:46 AM To: Vince Kaminski <[email protected]> cc: [email protected] Subject: Thursday visit Hi Vince, Looking forward to seeing you Thursday.? I arrive at Houston-Bush on USAir 1769 at 10:55 AM.? Please let me know where to go.? I also want to verify that you have booked me a hotel? for Thurs night.? Many thanks, and see you soon, Frank -- Francis X. Diebold WP Carey Professor Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania 3718 Locust Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297 [email protected] http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold (215) 898-1507? telephone (215) 573-4217? fax ?
199,129
jones-t/all_documents/2649.
Re: Northville Industries Corp. , It is not on any of my FERC approved lists. Genia Tana Jones 07/13/2000 09:40 AM To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Northville Industries Corp. London Legal called and the referenced US counterparty has come through the London Credit based list, and they need to know if they have a US power marketing license. Can you let me know? Thanks!
183,122
kean-s/all_documents/278.
TVA letter , We plan to send this out Friday. Cynthia will provide copies to the Hill as she sees appropriate. Any comments?
228,953
hyvl-d/all_documents/973.
Re: FW: AGL Guaranty to Enron , Veronica, She did not make the changes you requested to cover both contract and non-contract transactions. What do you want me to do. Her language works so long as we have a written contract covering each of the physical obligations. Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate 02/27/2001 03:30 PM To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: AGL Guaranty to Enron Carol and Dan-- Per the message and attachments below, please take a final look to see whether their comments to our proposed revisions are acceptable to both of you. Thanks again, Veronica Espinoza -----Original Message----- From: "Margaret Joslin" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Margaret+20Joslin+22+20+3Cmjoslin+40lanlaw+2Ecom+3E+40EN [email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:17 PM To: Espinoza, Veronica Cc: [email protected] Subject: AGL Guaranty to Enron Veronica - As I mentioned on the telephone, I have revised the AGL Guaranty Agreement to Enron and it is attached. Also attached is a highlighted version showing the changes. To the extent your lawyers have further comments, I would be happy to talk with them directly. I understand that you are revising your proposed Guaranty Agreement to AGL to include both financial derivatives and commodities (both of which will be executed with Enron North America Cop. as the counterparty) and to add a $50,000,000 limit. We look forward to getting that from you. Maggie Margaret M. Joslin Long Aldridge & Norman LLP 303 Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30308 404-527-8360 404-527-4198 (fax) - AGL Guaranty to Enron - AGL Energy Services.DOC - REDEnronGuaranty.DOC
177,333
white-s/deleted_items/439.
RE: Sequoia Adv. Pro.: Draft Stipulation and Order , Thanks!! -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
504,421
watson-k/sent_items/405.
RE: Agave Plant , How about Friday about 10:00 ro 10:30? Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Cabrera, Reyna Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:58 AM To: Watson, Kimberly; Neville, Sue Subject: Agave Plant Kim, Per our conversation yesterday after the morning meeting, Sue and I would like to get together with you to go over Agave's plan for a future Park & Ride agreement. Would you let us know what time is good for you? Thanks. Reyna Cabrera (713) 853-3072
496,224
steffes-j/sent_items/690.
DAILY FERC REFUND CALL? , Linda -- I thought that Ray set up a daily call regarding the CA and Pacific Northwest Refund litigation at FERC? It's not on my calendar. Can you please call Bernadette Hawkins to verify and put on my calendar? Jim
456,238
kaminski-v/all_documents/2818.
IAFE Membership , Dear Colleague: We are pleased to report that we had a very exciting and productive year with dozens of activities around the world. As we enter our 10th year of operations, the IAFE has additional membership options available to you. Please take a moment to look at the attached membership form with the 2001 rate schedule. Based on member requests, a Premium Membership is now being offered that includes the Annual Conference at a 30% discount, the Financial Engineer of the Year dinner, plus a subscription to the Journal of Derivatives (JOD). The Full membership remains as in previous years. The new Regular membership includes all membership benefits except JOD. Membership is based on the calendar year January 1 - December 31, 2001. Membership is also available on our secured membership registration form at our website http://www.iafe.org/about/join.ihtml. While on our website, please take a moment to visit our calendar listing upcoming events for the new year. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Regards, Donna Jacobus IAFE Office Manager - 2001 Membership Application.pdf
205,217
cuilla-m/deleted_items/405.
Extended Websaver continues through November , <html><head></head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff"><font color="#000000"> <IMG SRC="http://www.aircanada.ca/images/websvrle50.gif" ALT="Websaver" WIDTH="194" HEIGHT="71"> <pre> ********PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE************ ******************************************************************** AIR CANADA'S EXTENDED WEBSAVER(TM)CONTINUES THROUGH NOVEMBER ******************************************************************** It's time to stretch your weekends! Extended Websaver continues through November. You can enjoy our low Websaver fares for longer stays. Depart as early as Thursday and stay as late as the following Wednesday. That's up to 7 days! And now you can enjoy Websaver fares for about twice as many destinations! Air Canada's WEBSAVER* specials are only valid for travel originating in Canada and/or the United States. To enjoy WEBSAVER specials, flights must be booked online or with your Travel Agent. For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now go on-line at: <a href="https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html"> https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html</a> Also, to stay informed of any changes to your flight status, register a request for a flight notification at: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html</a> and automatically receive alerts through your text enabled phone/pager or email address. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Air Canada Vacations offers great package deals to its newest destination, Cuba. Please click on the following link to view our latest specials: <a href="http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm"> http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm</a> --------------------------------------------------------------------- <b>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html</a></b> _____________________________________________________________________ *****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SPECIAL OFFERS**************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 22, 2001 through November 24, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted November 26, 2001 through November 28, 2001 inclusive - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - New York (EWR) 199.00 153.94 352.94 GP-54GSJN _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 22, 2001 through December 7, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted November 29, 2001 through December 14, 2001 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by December 14, 2001 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Halifax - London (LHR) 409.00 83.80 492.80 GP-54GJ24 St.John's - London (LHR) 409.00 83.80 492.80 GP-54GJ25 _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 22, 2001 through December 13, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted November 26, 2001 through November 26, 2001 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by November 26, 2001 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Calgary - Frankfurt 549.00 46.04 595.04 GP-54GJ3J Montreal - Frankfurt 499.00 33.20 532.20 GP-54GJ3K _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 25, 2001 through November 25, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted December 6, 2001 through December 7, 2001 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by December 7, 2001 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Montego Bay 399.00 60.60 459.60 GP-54GPJV _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 27, 2001 through November 30, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted December 5, 2001 through December 7, 2001 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by December 7, 2001 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Bermuda 299.00 56.50 355.50 GP-54GPGY _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : November 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted November 28, 2001 through November 28, 2001 inclusive Inbound: permitted December 9, 2001 through December 9, 2001 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by December 9, 2001 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Sao Paulo 799.00 104.10 903.10 GP-54GPJY _____________________________________________________________________ *****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR WEEKEND FARES***************** ************************HOTELS & CAR RENTALS************************* _____________________________________________________________________ Air Canada's WEBSAVER* and Partners offer great discounts for last minute travel to selected destinations each week. The fares listed are valid for new reservations only and for travel this weekend only; you must depart on Thursday November 22, 2001, Friday November 23, 2001 or on Saturday November 24, 2001 returning anytime the following Monday November 26, 2001, Tuesday November 27 ,2001 or Wednesday November 28, 2001. Please note that not all flights are available for Friday departures. For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now book on-line at: <a href="https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html"> https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html</a> or call your Travel Agent between Wednesday and Friday. If you are booking through your Travel Agent, please be sure to give them the coupon number, and mention Air Canada's WEBSAVER* fares. For hotels and car rentals please follow the instructions listed below with each respective offer. ***** TRAVEL FARES ARE QUOTED AS ROUND-TRIP AND MAY ORIGINATE ***** ********* IN EITHER CITY OF THE FOLLOWING PAIRS ************ For GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS regarding Air Canada's WEBSAVER, Partner Hotels and Car Rentals, please click the address below: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html</a> - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Baie-Comeau - Montreal 199.00 94.31 293.31 GP-54EQQZ Calgary - Cranbrook 138.00 82.42 220.42 GP-54EQMC Calgary - Kamloops 99.00 79.69 178.69 GP-54EQN3 Calgary - Kelowna 99.00 85.04 184.04 GP-54EQMH Calgary - Ottawa 255.00 101.31 356.31 GP-54EQRV Calgary - Regina 136.00 92.98 228.98 GP-54EQN4 Calgary - Saskatoon 136.00 87.63 223.63 GP-54EQNC Calgary - Toronto 288.00 103.62 391.62 GP-54EQRT Calgary - Winnipeg 159.00 94.59 253.59 GP-54EQNU Campbell River - Vancouver 98.00 66.78 164.78 GP-54EQNP Charlottetown - Halifax 149.00 98.25 247.25 GP-54EQQ9 Comox - Vancouver 98.00 66.78 164.78 GP-54EQNM Cranbrook - Vancouver 138.00 69.58 207.58 GP-54EQMV Dawson Creek - Vancouver 209.00 74.55 283.55 GP-54EQMX Deer Lake - St.John's 154.00 99.00 253.00 GP-54EQQ8 Edmonton - Winnipeg 159.00 92.45 251.45 GP-54EQNY Fort St. John B - Vancouver 209.00 74.55 283.55 GP-54EQMK Fredericton - Toronto 219.00 121.75 340.75 GP-54EQPJ Halifax - St.John's 199.00 117.25 316.25 GP-54EQP9 Halifax - Toronto 189.00 114.95 303.95 GP-54EQP6 Kelowna - Vancouver 98.00 72.13 170.13 GP-54EQM6 Montreal - Rouyn / Noranda 199.00 94.31 293.31 GP-54EQR8 North Bay - Toronto 109.00 78.25 187.25 GP-54EQKN Ottawa - Winnipeg 199.00 95.25 294.25 GP-54EQP5 Penticton - Vancouver 99.00 66.85 165.85 GP-54EQM8 Prince George - Vancouver 209.00 74.55 283.55 GP-54EQMP Prince Rupert - Vancouver 209.00 74.55 283.55 GP-54EQML Quebec City - Toronto 199.00 116.51 315.51 GP-54EQS4 Regina - Toronto 279.00 100.85 379.85 GP-54EQRJ Regina - Winnipeg 146.00 91.54 237.54 GP-54EQN9 Saint John - Toronto 219.00 107.95 326.95 GP-54EQPL Sandspit BC - Vancouver 229.00 75.95 304.95 GP-54EQMR Sarnia - Toronto 79.00 76.15 155.15 GP-54EQL6 Saskatoon - Toronto 279.00 95.50 374.50 GP-54EQRK Saskatoon - Winnipeg 136.00 85.49 221.49 GP-54EQNA Sault Ste.Marie - Toronto 129.00 85.00 214.00 GP-54EQKV St.John's - Toronto 259.00 125.45 384.45 GP-54EQP7 Terrace - Vancouver 209.00 74.55 283.55 GP-54EQMU Thunder Bay - Toronto 209.00 85.25 294.25 GP-54EQS5 Thunder Bay - Winnipeg 169.00 82.45 251.45 GP-54EQRN Toronto - Victoria 299.00 96.90 395.90 GP-54EQRZ Toronto - Winnipeg 189.00 94.55 283.55 GP-54EQP3 Vancouver - Whitehorse 199.00 73.85 272.85 GP-54EQNW Calgary - Chicago (ORD) 277.00 163.93 440.93 GP-54EQT8 Calgary - Phoenix 199.00 156.08 355.08 GP-54EQSH Calgary - San Francisco 229.00 160.57 389.57 GP-54EQSC Edmonton - Los Angeles 292.00 160.45 452.45 GP-54EQSU Halifax - Boston 199.00 154.74 353.74 GP-54EQUA Montreal - Chicago (ORD) 204.00 145.98 349.98 GP-54EQT6 Montreal - Fort Lauderdale 299.00 150.24 449.24 GP-54EQU6 Montreal - Los Angeles 319.00 151.64 470.64 GP-54EQSS Montreal - Manchester 183.00 142.12 325.12 GP-54EQUQ Montreal - Miami 299.00 150.24 449.24 GP-54EQTX Montreal - New York (LGA) 183.00 142.12 325.12 GP-54EQW2 Montreal - Philadelphia 193.00 145.21 338.21 GP-54EQW9 Ottawa - Boston 193.00 153.52 346.52 GP-54EQWQ Ottawa - Chicago (ORD) 224.00 158.08 382.08 GP-54EQTE Ottawa - New York (LGA) 183.00 152.82 335.82 GP-54EQVL Ottawa - Washington(IAD) 193.00 155.91 348.91 GP-54EQVN Toronto - Atlanta 249.00 159.83 408.83 GP-54EQWZ Toronto - Baltimore 194.00 153.59 347.59 GP-54EQV4 Toronto - Charleston SC 239.00 151.96 390.96 GP-54EQTJ Toronto - Charlotte 229.00 151.26 380.26 GP-54EQSY Toronto - Chicago (ORD) 193.00 155.91 348.91 GP-54EQTC Toronto - Denver 288.00 162.56 450.56 GP-54EQX5 Toronto - Greensboro 209.00 149.86 358.86 GP-54EQTN Toronto - Kansas City 262.00 158.35 420.35 GP-54EQWU Toronto - Los Angeles 309.00 161.64 470.64 GP-54EQSR Toronto - Manchester 199.00 153.94 352.94 GP-54EQUR Toronto - Miami 299.00 160.94 459.94 GP-54EQU5 Toronto - Milwaukee 168.00 151.77 319.77 GP-54EQWG Toronto - Minneapolis 219.00 157.73 376.73 GP-54EQWN Toronto - Nashville 239.00 156.74 395.74 GP-54EQWJ Toronto - New Orleans 259.00 158.14 417.14 GP-54EQWX Toronto - New York (LGA) 199.00 153.94 352.94 GP-54EQVZ Toronto - Orlando 329.00 163.04 492.04 GP-54EQTU Toronto - Pittsburgh 177.00 152.40 329.40 GP-54EQV8 Toronto - Providence 193.00 153.52 346.52 GP-54EQV5 Toronto - Raleigh-Durham 219.00 150.56 369.56 GP-54EQT2 Toronto - Rochester 154.00 150.79 304.79 GP-54EQUE Toronto - San Diego 329.00 163.04 492.04 GP-54EQSJ Toronto - Seattle 323.00 165.01 488.01 GP-54EQSL Toronto - St. Louis 224.00 155.69 379.69 GP-54EQWE Toronto - Tampa 319.00 162.34 481.34 GP-54EQTS Toronto - Washington(DCA) 193.00 155.91 348.91 GP-54EQVV Toronto - West Palm Beach 339.00 163.74 502.74 GP-54EQU3 Vancouver - Boston 459.00 161.44 620.44 GP-54EQT4 Vancouver - Chicago (ORD) 308.00 153.26 461.26 GP-54EQTB Vancouver - Los Angeles 200.00 143.31 343.31 GP-54EQSW Vancouver - Phoenix 199.00 143.24 342.24 GP-54EQSA Vancouver - San Francisco 156.00 142.62 298.62 GP-54EQSE Vancouver - Seattle 108.00 139.26 247.26 GP-54EQVE Winnipeg - Chicago (ORD) 231.00 158.57 389.57 GP-54EQTH - From USA in (USD $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Atlanta - Toronto 162.00 84.80 246.80 GP-54EQX2 Baltimore - Toronto 126.00 80.60 206.60 GP-54EQV3 Boston - Halifax 129.00 81.32 210.32 GP-54EQUB Boston - Ottawa 125.00 80.52 205.52 GP-54EQWR Boston - Vancouver 298.00 86.84 384.84 GP-54EQT5 Charleston SC - Toronto 155.00 79.77 234.77 GP-54EQTK Charlotte - Toronto 149.00 79.32 228.32 GP-54EQSZ Chicago (ORD) - Calgary 180.00 87.49 267.49 GP-54EQT7 Chicago (ORD) - Montreal 133.00 75.96 208.96 GP-54EQT9 Chicago (ORD) - Ottawa 145.00 83.52 228.52 GP-54EQTF Chicago (ORD) - Toronto 125.00 82.02 207.02 GP-54EQTD Chicago (ORD) - Vancouver 200.00 80.99 280.99 GP-54EQTA Chicago (ORD) - Winnipeg 150.00 83.90 233.90 GP-54EQTG Denver - Toronto 187.00 86.67 273.67 GP-54EQX4 Fort Lauderdale - Montreal 194.00 79.04 273.04 GP-54EQU7 Greensboro - Toronto 136.00 78.35 214.35 GP-54EQTP Kansas City - Toronto 170.00 83.90 253.90 GP-54EQWV Los Angeles - Edmonton 190.00 87.76 277.76 GP-54EQSV Los Angeles - Montreal 207.00 80.01 287.01 GP-54EQST Los Angeles - Toronto 201.00 86.22 287.22 GP-54EQSQ Los Angeles - Vancouver 130.00 74.24 204.24 GP-54EQSX Manchester - Montreal 119.00 73.41 192.41 GP-54EQUP Manchester - Toronto 129.00 80.82 209.82 GP-54EQUS Miami - Montreal 194.00 79.04 273.04 GP-54EQTY Miami - Toronto 194.00 85.70 279.70 GP-54EQTW Milwaukee - Toronto 109.00 79.32 188.32 GP-54EQWH Minneapolis - Toronto 142.00 83.30 225.30 GP-54EQWP Nashville - Toronto 155.00 82.77 237.77 GP-54EQWK New Orleans - Toronto 168.00 83.75 251.75 GP-54EQWY New York (LGA) - Montreal 119.00 73.41 192.41 GP-54EQW3 New York (LGA) - Ottawa 119.00 80.07 199.07 GP-54EQVM New York (LGA) - Toronto 129.00 80.82 209.82 GP-54EQVY Orlando - Toronto 214.00 87.20 301.20 GP-54EQTV Philadelphia - Montreal 125.00 75.36 200.36 GP-54EQW8 Phoenix - Calgary 129.00 82.16 211.16 GP-54EQSD Phoenix - Vancouver 129.00 74.16 203.16 GP-54EQSB Pittsburgh - Toronto 115.00 79.77 194.77 GP-54EQV7 Providence - Toronto 125.00 80.52 205.52 GP-54EQV6 Raleigh-Durham - Toronto 142.00 78.80 220.80 GP-54EQT3 Rochester - Toronto 100.00 78.65 178.65 GP-54EQUF San Diego - Toronto 214.00 87.20 301.20 GP-54EQSK San Francisco - Calgary 149.00 85.16 234.16 GP-54EQS6 San Francisco - Vancouver 101.00 73.56 174.56 GP-54EQSF Seattle - Toronto 210.00 88.40 298.40 GP-54EQSM Seattle - Vancouver 70.00 71.24 141.24 GP-54EQVF St. Louis - Toronto 145.00 82.02 227.02 GP-54EQWF Tampa - Toronto 207.00 86.67 293.67 GP-54EQTT Washington(DCA) - Toronto 125.00 82.02 207.02 GP-54EQVU Washington(IAD) - Ottawa 125.00 82.02 207.02 GP-54EQVP West Palm Beach - Toronto 220.00 87.65 307.65 GP-54EQU4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- For Car & Hotel specials, click here: <a href=http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html</a> Delta Hotels & Resorts Hilton Hotels & Resorts Marriott Hotels Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Westin, Sheraton, St. Regis, Four Points by Sheraton & W Hotels Holiday Inn Radisson Hotels Budget Canada Hertz Avis Thrifty --------------------------------------------------------------------- <A HREF="http://www.aircanada.ca"> <IMG SRC="http://www.aircanada.ca/images/main/000.gif" ALT="Air Canada Logo" WIDTH="240" HEIGHT="40" BORDER="0"></A> ________________________________________ Air Canada - <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca"> http://www.aircanada.ca</a> <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html"> <b>Subscribe/Unsubscribe ... http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html</b> </a> <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html"> GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS ... http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html</a> </pre></font></body></html>
54,832
lokay-m/all_documents/2124.
eRequest , For some reason, the eRequests that you filled out never made it to EnronOnline. Please re-submit your request following the instructions on the attached document. Remember that you need to specify what applications you need user ids and passwords to access (example: external website-EnronOnline, Citrix Terminal Server Client, reports access). Call me at x-53854 if you have any questions. Carl
285,076
skilling-j/inbox/121.
Conference Call Info , ---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Connolly/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 09:50 AM --------------------------- Joannie Williamson@ENRON 04/30/2001 09:35 AM To: Lisa Connolly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Fire Chief Selection Committee Conference Call - Monday, April 30 @ Noon Lisa, information to distribute for the call today. HFD Conference Call Monday, April 30 - 12:00 - 12:30p Dial-in: 612-332-0820 Confirmation: 585060 Thanks, Joannie
444,806
lay-k/_sent/188.
Re: Telephonic Board Meeting , Hi Tom - this would be good as Ken Lay will not be able to attend next week. He will be out of the country. Rosalee "Siekman, Tom" <[email protected]> on 03/15/2001 10:25:53 AM To: "Capellas, Michael D." <[email protected]>, "Lawrence T. Babbio Jr. (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Kenneth L. (Ken) Lay (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Kenneth (Ken) Roman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Lucie Salhany (E-mail)" <[email protected]> cc: "Auwers, Linda" <[email protected]> Subject: Telephonic Board Meeting Thank you for making yourself available this afternoon. We want to apprise you of recent developments and our planned responses. The regular Board Meeting is scheduled for next week. This may not be required in view of the discussions we'll have this afternoon. We'll confirm this afternoon whether the Board Meeting is required.
267,911
whalley-g/_sent_mail/3.
Whalley's Budget Meeting , Subject: Enron Wholesale Budget Meeting Date: Tuesday, June 19 Time: 11:00 a.m. CST Location: EB32C2
498,475
donohoe-t/deleted_items/28.
Highlights from this morning's ENE/DYN analyst conference call , Listened in on the analyst call this morning. Here are my notes. Did not yet have a chance to organize them, so they're simply in chronological order. The call began with Watson, Bergstrom, and Whalley reading from prepared statements. Watson spoke for c. 10 minutes, Bergstrom for 5, and Whalley spoke for perhaps 30 seconds. Dynegy management was noticeably in control of the call. Enron executives spoke when questions were directed to them. Specific points: EES will be a part of the new company. Enron assets will be revalued at closing. The investment in Northern Natural takes the form of convertible preferred. If the merger does not go through, Dynegy has the right to acquire Northern for 'very little' additional consideration. If DYN terminates the merger and ENE 'has sufficient liquidity', ENE has right to repurchase the convertible preferred. Debt/equity of combined company expected to be <45%. Both companies will remain on RatingsWatch negative. ChevronTexaco will hold 169MM shares out of a total 650MM shares of the post-merger entity. Watson reiterates that going forward, the new entity will be run with a focus on transparent and clear financial structure and disclosure, with a significant reduction in on- and off-balance-sheet leverage. In what was termed a "new approach", the new entity will be run with a focus on cash flow rather than earnings. Rumors that Dynegy did the deal because of an unhedged exposure to Enron are not true. Dynegy owed Enron <$50MM. Lay says that Enron had other options, 'particularly financial'. All of the discussion and activity has taken place over the last two weeks. Lay acknowledges that the number for exposure to securities lawsuits may be 'pretty big', but that the companies feel they're able to appropriately value this exposure. Lay says we have nothing else to hide, but internal investigation still under way. Lay: had the SPEs been capitalized with perhaps $30MM more of risk capital, there would have been no question that they would have qualified for off-balance-sheet treatment and there would have been no need to restate earnings last week to reflect consolidation of the SPEs. Dynegy says that 'several' internal investigations continue at Enron, and thus DYN/ENE cannot say with certainty that there's absolutely nothing else out there. Doty (Dynegy CFO) says that late last week, ENE had 'close to a billion' in cash. Osprey will be unwound late next summer. Marlin will be unwound after closing. Many of the off-balance-sheet structures, including the credit-linked notes, are expected to be unwound/redeemed or at least significantly reduced prior to closing. With regard to ENE asset dispositions, these will be accelerated to the extent possible. However, Doty says that 'our backs are not against the wall', and the company will continue to focus on getting value for its assets as well as cash. ENE will renew its 364-day facility (believe this is the $3Bn facility that we drew down a couple of weeks ago) within the next 6-8 weeks. BBB-flat most likely rating for combined entity, according to initial comments from ratings agencies. McMahon says 'no comment' to WSJ article indicating that ENE's banks are preparing to make an equity infusion into ENE in the next few weeks. Consolidation of trading activity: Mid- and back-office consolidation will see substantial progress prior to closing, such that only the front office / trading books will need to be combined at closing. EES, NNG and TW have no real overlap with existing DYN activity, so there won't be much integration work required there. The big integration effort will be ENA. Watson says that the 'creative financing' surrounded non-core assets. Doty adds that, 'frankly', DYN assigned zero economic value to non-core businesses in their valuation model. They bracketed the maximum expected exposure from the non-core assets/businesses and left it at that. Watson mentions that DYN would not have gotten involved with Enron had they not been approached by 'Enron's top three executives', who said that they thought a combination with Dynegy made the most strategic sense for both companies. Says that their approach evidenced a willingness to work with DYN to integrate the two companies that made a big difference in Dynegy's deliberations on proceeding with the merger. Watson/Doty said that they're NOT 100% sure that no surprises remain in Enron's books--but that the risk/reward offered by the combination was compelling. The deal does have material-adverse-change outs for Dynegy, covering any MAC regarding Enron's assets or businesses. Dynegy's lawyers indicated that the MAC language was a 'blunt instrument' under which it would be difficult to bring a case, so Dynegy inserted a specific paragraph that gives Dynegy the right to terminate the merger if the Enron's total legal liability (from any source or cause of action) tops $3.5Bn prior to closing. McMahon adds that there 'could' be more restatements, but he 'does not expect' there to be more restatements. ENE international hard assets definitely on the asset disposition list. The merger structure calls for a new entity to take over Enron. Enron is planning to hold an Enron-specific conference call in the next few days, tentatively scheduled for Wednesday. Initial reaction of ratings agencies 'very positive' to combined entities. McMahon acknowledges that Enron would have had to have an additional equity infusion prior to year-end, had the merger not materialized. Dynegy's earnings guidance places Enron-related earnings accretion at $0.90-0.95, which represents a '25% haircut' to Enron internal estimates. Doty says that this is all operating earnings--figure does not include any amounts from expected synergies. Doty says that both Enron and Dynegy's books, as far as he understands, are relatively short-term in weight, and this will continue to be the weighting of the new entity. Says a 'very very substantial' portion of future trading earnings will be expected to be cash. ChevronTexaco's investment in Dynegy was calculated at a 5% discount to public prices on the date of negotiation (not disclosed). Given the runup in Dynegy stock last week, ChevronTexaco's investment is now at a 'more substantial' discount to market prices. ChevronTexaco has provision to get 'different prices at closing if those prices are substantially better'. (No further clarification given). Whalley believes that 'we'll retain' the Enron traders and marketers. They're used to being part of a winning team, and the combined entity will definitely be a winner. They have talked with most of the Enron business leaders, and they are 'very excited' by the combination. They will be working with the Enron business leaders to ensure talent is retained. Whalley was asked if there will be any key employee retention provisions. He says that 'to the extent necessary, yes.' Watson says that the trading strategy of the combined entity will be a combination of DYN and ENE--there will be more of an asset-backed trading focus, but by the same token the new Dynegy will be involved in much more financial market-making trading than the Dynegy of today. Watson says that if there were to be any change in culture, he's a strong team player. He does not want to see an individual do well if the company or division does not do well. Give me a call if you'd like me to try to clarify any of these comments. Patrick Tucker x3-3055
95,269
watson-k/sent_items/574.
Accepted: FTS2 discussion and Energas , Mark, Will Maria or Dorothy be able to attend and provide their historical knowledge? I've got it booked on my calendar. Thanks, Kim.
496,408
rogers-b/deleted_items/375.
Local Reliability???? , On Saturday, 11/17, the Operational Announcements state that both Roseton units would be committed for Local Reliability on Sunday. I have two questions concerning this commitment; 1) What happened after SCUC ran that required two 600 mw units be put on at minimum? 2) Since the local Transmission Owner didn't request these units on, why is it referred to as Local Reliability? There is a substantial amount of uplift generated ( no pun intended ) by this decision and when the term Local Reliability is used it raises a question as to the allocation of this cost.
378,053
sanders-r/all_documents/1333.
EWS/Enron Global Markets Litigation Update , Attached is the EWS/Enron Global Markets Litigation Update. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.
392,784
weldon-c/all_documents/222.
Ft. Pierce , ---------------------- Forwarded by Edith Cross/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:56 AM --------------------------- John Griffith@ENRON 11/09/2000 03:22 PM To: Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Howley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Ft. Pierce Just a small correction. The demand number of $.85 is actually $.8215, commodity is $.0307 and fuel is 3%. The unofficial in service date is 5/03. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. John
497,112
martin-t/inbox/44.
Pipelines , The pipeline meeting with the UBS lawyers was moved to Friday at 3:00. Power jumped ahead of us.
323,528
cuilla-m/deleted_items/148.
Assessing the post September 11 Landscape: CERA's New Global Energy , Assessing the post September 11 Landscape: CERA's New Global Energy Initiative The uncertainties created by the attack on September 11 and the global response have created turmoil for near-term energy planning and investment decision making. Circumstances demand rapid reassessments of near-term risks and strategies. In response to client requests, CERA is undertaking a comprehensive, new initiative to develop a framework for understanding potential energy futures and their implications. This special multiclient project will include interactive analyses, face-to-face workshops, and real-time updates. It will draw on CERA's broad industry and regional expertise, offering participants both a framework and a robust tool for evaluating strategies across all sectors of the energy business and all geographies. The focus will be on creating new and highly relevant insights into the energy future and the political and economic context. It will highlight both key trends and probable discontinuities -- and assess urgent issues in a setting that will promote thoughtful and informed dialogue. By emphasizing both virtual and in-person exchanges among participating members and CERA experts, we will establish a three-year road map for decision makers across the energy business, to complement CERA's industry-specific and shorter-term analyses. In addition, the process will offer a unique opportunity to interact with others across the energy spectrum and to share ideas and experiences. * Could the economic slowdown be prolonged and inflation be rekindled? * What is the impact on energy demand -- does the fuel mix shift? * How great are the risks for disruptions of supply? In which countries and for which fuels? * How would disruptions play out? And how tumultuous will they be for energy companies? * How will energy policies change -- relative to energy security, environmental trade-offs, and fuel strategies? * Will the global coalition hold, or are we moving to a more divided and more fractured world? * How profound will be the changes for the energy business? This timely series provides a three-year horizon that draws on the framework established in CERA's longer-term scenarios. It uses the clash between the "Fragmentation" and "Globality" scenarios as the starting point for assessing the new world in which energy-decision makers will operate and the critical choices they will face. The first workshop will be held in Houston on November 15, in conjunction with CERA's Fall Roundtable series. Additional workshops, both in Houston and other cities and via online technologies, will follow. We will announce the entire schedule, with events and deliverables, soon. The process will deliver a clear framework for anticipating the future, and conclusions for energy strategy. For more information, please contact Steve Haggett at [email protected], or +617 441 2646.
54,605
dasovich-j/all_documents/28327.
Enron Mentions - 07/05/01 , Wall Street Reporter Interviews George A. Kast, President & CEO of Global Water Technologies Business Wire, 07/05/01 Developments in California's energy crisis Associated Press Newswires, 07/05/01 UK: ANALYSIS-Where have all the LME volumes gone? Reuters English News Service, 07/05/01 USA: UPDATE 1-New Power adds customers with two deals. Reuters English News Service, 07/05/01 Factiva Energy Digest Factiva Energy Digest, 07/05/01 India Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2) Bloomberg, 07/05/01 California Seeks Cheaper Long-Term Power Contracts, Paper Says Bloomberg, 07/05/01 USA: U.S. Cash LPG-Propane firms on bullish crude oil fundamentals. Reuters English News Service, 07/05/01 Wall Street Reporter Interviews George A. Kast, President & CEO of Global Water Technologies 07/05/2001 Business Wire (Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire) GOLDEN, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 5, 2001--Global Water Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: GWTR), a full-service cooling water company utilizing advanced technologies and engineered solutions to provide process cooling water to power plants, process industry and municipalities, worldwide, today announced that George A. Kast, President and CEO, has been featured in an interview by Wall Street Reporter. In the interview, Kast discussed industry trends, market potential and growth opportunities in the markets that the Company has cultivated. The interview was conducted on Tuesday, July 3, 2001, at 1:00 p.m. (MT) by Matt Cleary, and is currently audibly available, on the Wall Street Reporter's web site, www.wallstreetreporter.com, by clicking on the CEO Interviews link. Commenting on this interview, George Kast, President and CEO stated: "We are very pleased to be featured in an interview by the Wall Street Reporter. This is a very exciting time for Global Water Technologies, Inc. and we are excited that this forum gives us the opportunity to present our story to the investment community." The interview primarily covered the most recent corporate events and the Company's efforts to implement its business strategy, capitalizing on its competitive advantages in the rapidly expanding power, energy and utility sector. The Wall Street Reporter is a leading information source for professional investors seeking new investment ideas. Their in-depth interviews of CEOs with leading public companies are geared toward sophisticated investors who demand an unbiased, unscripted, first-hand perspective that enables them to make informed investment decisions. About Global Water Technologies Global Water Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: GWTR) is a company with major interests in the areas of power, energy and water. The company utilizes its proprietary technology to enhance power production by providing cold, clean water to increase operating efficiencies, reduce water use and operating costs. Through this process, GWTR is able to increase their client's power output by up to 10% depending upon age, design and efficiency of the plant. GWTR's client base includes, but is not limited to, the following companies: General Electric (NYSE: GE), Enron subsidiary companies (NYSE: ENE), Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN), Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM), British Petroleum Amoco, Mitsubishi, Mobil, Texaco (NYSE: TX), Duke Fluor Daniel, Kerr McGee (NYSE: KMD) and Calpine (NYSE: CPN). Forward-Looking Statement This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company may experience significant fluctuations in future operating results due to a number of economic, competitive and other factors, including, among other things, the size and timing of customer orders, changes in laws, new or increased competition, delays in new products, production problems, changes in market demand, market acceptance of new products, seasonal in product purchases, and changes in foreign exchange rates. These factors, and other factors, which could materially affect the Company and its operations are included in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated herein. CONTACT: Global Water Technologies, Inc. Steve Rash, 303/215-1100, Ext. 192 [email protected] www.gwtr.com or Equity Growth & Management Tom Waite, 407/444-0375 12:00 EDT JULY 5, 2001 Developments in California's energy crisis By The Associated Press 07/05/2001 Associated Press Newswires Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. Developments in California's energy crisis: THURSDAY: - No power alerts as electricity reserves stay above 7 percent. - The Senate Judiciary Committee continues its debate at a hearing over Gov. Gray Davis' proposal to aid financially strapped Southern California Edison. - Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante and Assemblywoman Barbara Matthews introduce two additional whistleblowers from power plant operated by Duke Energy. - The grand jury that will probe criminal charges of price gouging by energy generators will convene this week in Sacramento. The 19 new members of the Sacramento County grand jury were assigned by State Attorney General Bill Lockyer and will assess the results of several government investigations. - The U.S. Trustee argues again in bankruptcy court that ratepayers should have a committee to represent their interests in the Pacific Gas & Electric Co. bankruptcy proceedings. WEDNESDAY: - No power alerts as electricity reserves stay above 7 percent. WHAT'S NEXT: - The Senate committee investigating possible price manipulation in California's energy market meets Tuesday. The committee will vote on contempt citations against generators Mirant and Enron who failed to comply with subpoenas for documents. Six other suppliers have until Tuesday to turn over documents. THE PROBLEM: High demand, high wholesale energy costs, transmission glitches and a tight supply worsened by scarce hydroelectric power in the Northwest and maintenance at aging California power plants are all factors in California's electricity crisis. Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas and Electric say they've lost nearly $14 billion since June 2000 to high wholesale prices the state's electricity deregulation law bars them from passing on to consumers. PG&E, saying it hasn't received the help it needs from regulators or state lawmakers, filed for federal bankruptcy protection April 6. Electricity and natural gas suppliers, scared off by the companies' poor credit ratings, are refusing to sell to them, leading the state in January to start buying power for the utilities' nearly 9 million residential and business customers. The state is also buying power for a third investor-owned utility, San Diego Gas & Electric, which is in better financial shape than much larger Edison and PG&E but also struggling with high wholesale power costs. The Public Utilities Commission has approved average rate increases of 37 percent for the heaviest residential customers and 38 percent for commercial customers, and hikes of up to 49 percent for industrial customers and 15 percent or 20 percent for agricultural customers to help finance the state's multibillion-dollar power buys. Track the state's blackout warnings on the Web at www.caiso.com/SystemStatus.html. UK: ANALYSIS-Where have all the LME volumes gone? By Martin Hayes 07/05/2001 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters Limited 2001. LONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - Years of rising business on the London Metal Exchange (LME) could be over, after volume dropped in the first half of 2001, and many in the world's largest industrial metals market say the growth may never be recaptured. Senior traders cite several factors behind the 16 percent decline in business in the first six months - prices are depressed, rival electronic systems have sprung up, global economies are weak. "The problem is the general conditions that are prevailing at the moment - we are seeing recessionary signs that are dampening the market. It is cyclical, and that is the worry because the cycle is lasting some time," one said. Since 1991, volumes have risen from 16.93 million lots to 2000's record 66.44 million. There have previously been troughs in the business and price cycle, but these did not markedly affect volumes - the 1994/1995 decline was some 500,000 lots. So the concern now is that this downturn is different. "That (lower volume) is horrible. Some business is undoubtedly going off the market, but a lot of people are not making proprietary positions anymore - they are not making any money," a director at an LME associate broker said. "It is going to get a lot worse - it is a bleak picture at the moment for next year. A lot of people will have to ask: 'Is it worth being in the business?'," a manager at another broker said. The LME said this week that total futures and options turnover during Jan/June 2001 fell to 29.899 million lots, down from Jan/June 2000, when volume rose 18 percent to 35.440 million. Traded options turnover has virtually halved, falling to 1.481 million lots from 2.784 million. LME data showed that this half-year was still the third highest on record, only tailing 1999 by 100,000 lots. "(this)...clearly illustrates the continuing health of the LME and the essential part it plays as a hedging medium to the global metal market, despite the current economic environment," the LME said on Thursday. SWITCHED ON SCREENS BLUR THE PICTURE The major factor that emerged last year is electronic trading, either web-based or specific screen-based platforms. Competitors such as Enron Online and Spectron Metals have grabbed business while the LME has also sanctioned and launched its own system, LME Select. Many of these trade LME contracts, so the turnovers are still being incorporated into the Exchange's volumes. But the ethos of screen-trading has implications for broker costs and revenues. "You are seeing more business going towards the screens - and some platforms will offer a less-regulated OTC (over-the-counter) market," the manager said. LME ring-dealers and associate brokers now face even lower commissions. Costs will fall when screens offer straight-through processing, embracing back-office functions such as matching. "In an electronic market, the cost of serving a client drops dramatically and if a customer has direct access to the market, which could happen, he gets direct control," he said. In London's soft commodity markets, which migrated away from trading floors to screens in 2000, commissions have fallen sharply, he noted. For the moment, the LME retains a traditional open-outcry floor - it and London's International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) are the last bastions of this form of trading. Business is also transacted in offices over telephones. But this is also changing with the advent of screens. "In some ways the screens, whoever they belong to, may be the problem," a senior trader said. "In the old days, you used to talk to people more, get a feel for the market, and take a punt. Not so much now - the big boys still chat, but not as much, and with the screens it is almost a 'matched bargain' situation," he said. METAL INDUSTRY SHYING AWAY The malaise affecting prices is not helping, especially as there is little incentive for consumers to buy, while a falling market always sees less speculative activity. Most of this year has seen prices progressively weaker, with copper at its lowest since July 1999, zinc and tin at levels last seen nearly eight years ago, lead at a 12-month low-point and nickel and aluminium at two-month lows. Although prices have been softer, there have been occasions when tightness has prevailed. When the market moves from contango, when nearby prices are cheaper than forward, into backwardation, which is the opposite, hedging dries up. Although the LME derives much of its liquidity from speculators, the bulk of its trade comes from the metals industry - hedging and price protection. "There is routine hedging taking place, but what one would call the strategic positioning is just not happening at the moment," the manager said. MARKET CONTRACTION LIKELY If volumes continue to fall, and there is the pressure on commissions, then further contraction and consolidation in the market appears likely. There are now only 12 ring-dealing members of the LME - those who alone are entitled to trade on the open-outcry floor - down from nearly 30 in the mid-1980s. "There is too much capacity in the market even now, and these ongoing rumours do not help. For months one RDM has supposedly been taking over another. It is about time they got on with it," the senior trader said. "A base metal trading operation may eventually come down to a few people sitting at the end of a treasury desk," the associate broker director said. USA: UPDATE 1-New Power adds customers with two deals. 07/05/2001 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters Limited 2001. NEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) - New Power Co., a national energy provider partly owned by powerhouse Enron Corp. , said on Thursday it plans to make two separate acquisitions that would increase its customer base by about 20 percent and raise its visibility in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Financial terms of the agreements with AES Direct, the retail marketing subsidiary of independent power company AES Corp. , and with CoEnergy, a unit of Michigan-based DTE Energy , were not disclosed. Purchase, New York-based New Power, a unit of NewPower Holdings Inc. , which was formed to take advantage of electricity deregulation, said the deals would add a total of 121,000 electric and natural gas customers. At the end of the first quarter, it had about 631,000 customers, a company spokeswoman said. New Power said it signed an agreement to buy AES Direct's customer base and related assets, including natural gas inventory, supply and transportation contracts as well as billing and customer service operations. It also is buying Ohio-based customers from CoEnergy, gaining entry into service areas of four additional utilities. Shares of New Energy were unchanged at $8.75 in morning New York Stock Exchange trade, the low end of a 52-week range of $4.63 to $28.69. Factiva Energy Digest - July 5, 2001. 07/05/2001 Factiva Energy Digest Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive Ltd., trading as Factiva. POWER & UTILITY *German Utilities Should Expand Abroad, Consultant Says COLOGNE, Germany (Reuters) - Germany's top utilities lag far behind major foreign rivals in the share of revenues derived internationally, which could limit future growth, a consultant told an industry conference on Thursday. "Germany's market leaders lag behind in their market presence in Europe and the rest of the world," said Volker Flegel, a European energy expert at consultancy A.T. Kearney's Munich office. "If they don't act fast, the gap will widen....They have to adopt more of a pan-European perspective," he said, singling out Spain as the most attractive investment target. Flegel said revenues generated outside Germany by the country's top four utilities ranged between 3.0% of turnover at HEW, to 11% at E.ON, 11.7% at RWE (RWEG.DE) and 15.1% at EnBW. By comparison, the shares of foreign sales at U.S. energy groups TXU and Enron were 36% and 18.6%. Foreign sales contributed 18.6% to turnover at French/Belgian group Electrabel and 18.3% at France's EdF. *New Power Adds 20% to Customer Base With Two Deals NEW YORK(Reuters) - New Power Co., a national energy provider partly owned by powerhouse Enron Corp., on Thursday increased its customer base by about 20% and its visibility in Pennsylvania and Ohio with two separate acquisitions. Financial terms were not disclosed. New Power, a unit of NewPower Holdings Inc., which was formed to take advantage of electricity deregulation, added a total of 121,000 electric and natural gas customers to its customer base of about 615,000. New Power said it signed an agreement to buy the customer base and related assets of AES Direct, the retail marketing subsidiary of independent power company AES Corp., which includes natural gas inventory, supply and transportation contracts as well as billing and customer service operations. It also bought Ohio-based customers from CoEnergy, a unit of Michigan-based DTE Energy, gaining entry into service areas of four additional utilities. Full versions of these and other energy stories are available from Dow Jones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing Factiva Contact: Marc Donatiello, +1 609-627-2659, [email protected]. (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.). India Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2) 2001-07-05 09:12 (New York) India Risks Lower Rating If Deficits Grow, S&P Says (Update2) (Adds minister's comment starting in 19th paragraph.) New York, July 5 (Bloomberg) -- India must cap its federal and state government budget deficits or risk having its credit rating lowered, a Standard & Poor's analyst said. India's ``BB'' rating, which is two notches below investment grade, may be cut if the combined deficits widen to more than 10 percent of gross domestic product from nine percent now, Joydeep Mukherji, S&P's associate director and India analyst, said in an interview. ``We continue to watch the fiscal problem very closely as that is the most vulnerable area that could lead to a negative rating action,'' Mukherji said. The warning comes as the government plans to increase spending to bolster a slowing economy. A lower rating would raise the cost of borrowing for the government and Indian companies, already among the highest in Asia. India's benchmark 10-year bond yield is 9.6 percent, higher than 6.5 percent for comparable Chinese bonds and 6.8 percent for South Korean bonds, both of which have an investment grade rating. S&P lowered the outlook on India's rating to ``stable'' from ``positive'' in October. The agency cited India's failure to meet deadlines for sales of state-owned companies. The rating is among the lowest in the region. Last week, an analyst for Moody's Investors Service said India must step up sales of state assets and trim its budget deficit to avoid a reduction in the outlook on its debt. Moody's ``Ba2'' rating, also two notches below investment grade, has a ``positive'' outlook, meaning it may be raised. Growing Debt Fitch cut India's long-term sovereign rating outlook to ``negative'' from ``stable'' on May 31. Fitch, which rates India ``BB+,'' one notch below investment grade, cited ``concerns about fiscal policy, privatization and a deterioration in the investment climate.'' ``Any downward change in the country's rating or outlook will adversely impact investments in India,'' said Kalpana Morparia, executive director of lender ICICI Ltd., which borrowed about $100 million in international markets last year. Years of budget deficits have saddled India with 14 trillion rupees ($297 billion) of debt, equal to about 63 percent of GDP. Servicing the debt leaves little money to invest in schools, hospitals or other projects that could improve the well-being of Indians and raise the rate of economic growth in the world's second most-populous country. Slowdown The economy expanded 3.8 percent in the quarter ended March 31 from a year earlier, down from 5 percent growth the previous quarter and the slowest pace in nearly three years, as a two-year drought pruned rural incomes. In response, Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha said last week he would step up government spending to stimulate the economy. ``Lower growth may mean lower tax revenue and increased pressure on governments to raise spending that could enlarge the combined deficits of the central and state governments beyond 10 percent of GDP this year, potentially weakening the rating,'' Mukherji said. Investors too are getting concerned with the government's profligacy. In the first two months of the fiscal year, the central government's budget deficit has reached a quarter of the target for the year as a whole. ``The growing deficit bothers me,'' said Bharat Shah, who manages 33 billion rupees at Birla Sun Life Asset Management in Mumbai. ``There's a need for a sharp reduction in expenditure that will call for political consensus, which I don't think is in place.'' Without pruning deficits, the government can't hope to lower interest rates. Higher interest rates in India damp the government's plan of attracting more foreign companies to set up businesses locally. Overseas Investment ``The most important thing to do is to get more foreign direct investment, which is the mother of all solutions,'' Shah said. Last year, India managed to attract $4.5 billion in foreign investment, a tenth of what China took in. India's program to sell state assets, reduce tariffs and otherwise free the economy from government interference hasn't moved as fast as expected, Mukherji said. ``India has had about 3 years' worth of economic reforms spread out over the last 10 years,'' he said. For example, the government said it planned to raise 120 billion rupees by selling stakes in more than 20 state-run companies in the fiscal year that began April 1. So far this year, it hasn't sold a single stake. Privatization Privatization minister Arun Shourie said delays in selling stakes in companies such as national carrier Air India Ltd. and state-run hotel chain India Tourism Development Corp. were not unusual and investors need to be patient. ``We are proceeding methodically,'' Shourie told reporters at a news conference late last night. ``Have faith in the process.'' S&P isn't convinced. If the government's economic program fails to gather speed, the country may slip to its pre-1990s growth rate of 3.5 percent a year from an average of more than 7 percent in the 1990s, Mukherji said. The dispute between the Maharashtra State Electricity Board and Enron Corp., the country's biggest foreign investor, which has set up a $3 billion power plant, is a ``long-term disaster'' and a ``bad, loud and clear signal to potential foreign investors,'' Mukherji said. The state electricity board has refused to pay 3 billion rupees for power supplied by Enron's local unit, Dabhol Power Co. India hasn't delivered on guarantees to pay for the power. The dispute is widely seen as a litmus test for foreign investment in India. ``The Indian private sector is used to bad politics and failed economic policies, such as energy reforms, but the foreign private sector is not,'' Mukherji said. --Gautam Chakravorthy in the Mumbai newsroom (91-22) 233-9027 or at [email protected], with reporting by Anindya Mukherjee, Abhay Singh and Arijit Ghosh in New Delhi/clw/pv/nmn California Seeks Cheaper Long-Term Power Contracts, Paper Says 2001-07-05 14:44 (New York) Washington, July 5 (Bloomberg) -- California Governor Gray Davis said the state would consider accepting some of the $8.9 billion he says energy companies overcharged the state for electricity in the form of lower rates on long-term contracts, the San Jose Mercury News reported. While the money doesn't have to be paid in cash, it ``has to net out to $8.9 billion,'' Davis told the paper. Energy companies such as Duke Power Corp., Enron Corp. and Williams Cos. have said their prices were fair, with some saying the state owes them money. The companies' response to Davis's offer wasn't clear, the paper said. Settlement talks are scheduled to end Monday in Washington, the paper said. Few details have emerged because the overseeing judge imposed a gag rule on the discussions. (San Jose Mercury News 7-3) See {SJMN <GO>} for the San Jose Mercury News Web site. --Russell Hubbard in the Princeton newsroom at (609) 279-4131, or at [email protected]/jjs Story illustration: See {PMATSPSP <INDEX> GP D <GO>} to graph the Bloomberg PowerMatch Index of Southern California power prices. USA: U.S. Cash LPG-Propane firms on bullish crude oil fundamentals. 07/05/2001 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters Limited 2001. NEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) - U.S. cash liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) strengthened on bullish crude oil fundamentals early Thursday, traders said. Mont Belvieu, Texas propane gained a penny to trade at 35.88 and 36.00 cents a gallon, while Conway product traded 0.50 cent higher at 40.50 cents a gallon, traders said. U.S. national crude supplies fell by 4.0 million barrels last week, according to the American Petroleum Institute (API), while the Energy Information (EIA) reported a bigger draw of 4.8 million barrels. Crude oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) were up 58 cents to $26.82 a barrel midday on the inventory numbers, while weighing the effect of Iraq resuming exports, which it stopped a month ago in protest of U.N. sanction discussions. Meanwhile, natural gas futures fell 8.10 cents go $3.120 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) amid stronger cash values. Ethanes tracked the strength, with Belvieu purity up 0.50 cent to trade at 26.50 cents a gallon, and mix up 0.63 cents to trade at 25.63 cents a gallon, dealers said. Conway mix talked steady at 24.25/24.88 cents a gallon. In Belvieu, normal butane fell a penny to talk at 41.88/42.50 cents a gallon, isobutane firmed 0.25 cent to trade at 43.25 cents a gallon, and natural gasoline fell 0.50 cent to trade at 51.12 cents a gallon for Dynegy barrels and 52.50 cents a gallon for Enron barrels, dealers said. No deals were heard on the heavies on Conway. Normal butane talked steady at 41.50/41.63 cents a gallon, isobutane down a penny at 50.00/51.50 cents a gallon and natural gasoline up 0.50 cent to be offered at 53.50 cents a gallon, traders said. - ((Soo Youn, New York Energy Desk, 646-223-6057, [email protected])).
61,433
kitchen-l/_americas/esvl/562.
RE: Bengalla Biz , Jez our concerns are not just an internal approval issue. Under Australian Law the Directors of ECAPPL need to be satisfied when a company incurs a debt that it can be paid. Failure to discharge this duty can mean the directors would be personally for the debt. If the Coal Group is comfortable to make to enter into these commitments then that is the obvious way forward. One of the Coal Group in the Sydney office (presumably Paul McPhee) could replace Heidi Mason as resident director. -----Original Message----- From: Peters, Jez Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 9:33 AM To: Suttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Minns, David; Mason, Heidi Cc: Skinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam; Bradford, William S.; Nimmo, Matthew; Mcclellan, George; Staley, Stuart; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: Bengalla Biz We seem to be going round in circle's here and hence hopefully all the relevant people are now on copy of this e-mail so we can resolve swiftly. This cargo is due to be shipped in seven days with the coal already being railed to port. It is coal which will be shipped to service European commitments and represents the cheapest way to do so taking all costs into account (including financing). Needless to say if we pull out of this deal at this stage it will have huge ramifications with our customer and send all the wrong signals to our counterparties in this part of the world. Last but not least we will need to look elsewhere to procure coal for these European sales at what is likely to be a higher price. Appreciate the green light. Thks Jez -----Original Message----- From: Suttle, John Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 9:21 AM To: Miyai, Tark; Minns, David; Mason, Heidi Cc: Peters, Jez; Skinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam; Bradford, William S.; Nimmo, Matthew Subject: RE: Bengalla Biz It has been made clear to me that Jeff Shankman needs to clear this transaction through Bill Bradford and Louise Kitchen prior to any capital going out the door. It is my understanding that this has not been done. John -----Original Message----- From: Miyai, Tark Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM To: Minns, David; Mason, Heidi; Suttle, John Cc: Peters, Jez; Skinner, Fiona; Bauer, Adam Subject: FW: Bengalla Biz David, See below Jeff Shankman's ok to proceed as usual. Tax has come back with ok. Coal is being delivered to port. Bengalla has oked to our draft as well. Pls review and comment asap. Credit, any comment on Bengalla? Tark -----Original Message----- From: Staley, Stuart Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:57 AM To: Peters, Jez; Miyai, Tark; Pielop, Stuart; Skinner, Fiona Subject: FW: Bengalla Biz FYR... -----Original Message----- From: Shankman, Jeffrey A. Sent: 12 November 2001 15:02 To: Mcclellan, George Cc: Price, Brent A.; Staley, Stuart Subject: RE: Bengalla I would proceed as business as usual. -----Original Message----- From: Mcclellan, George Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:59 AM To: Shankman, Jeffrey A. Cc: Price, Brent A. Subject: FW: Bengalla Guys - we need to address this - can we discuss during our lunch meeting today. -----Original Message----- From: Staley, Stuart Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:05 AM To: Mcclellan, George Cc: Bradley, Peter; Maley, Paul Subject: FW: Bengalla George: Details on the cargo we are loading out of Newcastle. Sailing time is roughly 45 days. Cargo to be sold to ARA/German customers, most with payment terms 5 days post delivery. Also - it would help to get an idea of how diificult this exercise will be in the coming months, as we have a couple more loading before year end. Work it, Stu -----Original Message----- From: Miyai, Tark Sent: 12 November 2001 02:12 To: Staley, Stuart; Bradley, Peter Cc: Peters, Jez Subject: Bengalla Stu, I refer to your e-mail to Jez last week and advise you the expected payment value and timing etc. Vessel name: MV "Cotsworld" ETA: 21/Nov ETS: 22/Nov Loading tonnage: approx. 128kmt (9kmt from Stratford and 119kmt from Bengalla) Payment value and timing : Value Timing Bengalla: US$3.3mil(*) 19th (**) Stratford: US$0.2mil(*) 26th * Inclusive of 10% GST ** Bengall has already delivered 49kmt of coal to port and will complete the delivery on 15th. The contract is based on FIS and the invoice weight and quality be determined by the inbound analysis while they take des/dem risk. Because of their concern over our credit Bengalla has insisted on our payment by TT against the presentation of documents. Docs are likely to be presented on 16th or 19th at the latest. The draft contract which Bengalla has confirmed has a provision that the invoice weight is determined based on B/L quantity instead of inbound rail weight if we take 100% of Bengalla coal onto our vessel. If we do that, they can not present their docs until the vessel has compeleted the loading and our payment date would be say 26th instead. Regards, Tark
257,680
donohoe-t/all_documents/170.
Weekend Outage for 10-27-00 through 10-30-00 , ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y F O R October 27, 2000 5:00pm through October 30, 2000 12:00am ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages. EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. EDI SERVER: Impact: EDI Time: Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:00:00 PM thru Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:15:00 PM Outage: Migrate EDI servers to diverse switches Environments Impacted: EDI, three to four seconds per connection. Purpose: To provide diverse paths in case of switch failure. Will migrate the EDI connections from 192.168.63.11 switch to the 192.168.28.4 and .5 switches. Backout: Move back to old connections Contact(s): Vincent Fox 713-853-5337 ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: Impact: EES Time: Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:15:00 PM thru Sat 10/28/2000 at 11:30:00 PM Outage: Port Channel for EES Switches Environments Impacted: EES Purpose: The connections between the two boxes is running near capacity. Want to install fast etherchannel connections between the two EES switches to increase bandwidth between the two units. Backout: Turn off etherchannel Contact(s): Vincent Fox 713-853-5337 FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages. INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages. LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages. MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages. NT: No Scheduled Outages. OS/2: No Scheduled Outages. OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages. SITARA: No Scheduled Outages. SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages. TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages. UNIFY: No Scheduled Outages. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- FOR ASSISTANCE (713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center (713) 853-5536 Information Risk Management Specific Applications Help: Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager] Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager] RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager] OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager] CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager] EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager] All Other Systems (713) 563-5797 [Pager] or (713) 563-5987 [Pager]
95,137
germany-c/bankrupt/transport/sonat/11.
RE: Sonat Park & Loan , 3/14/02 10:25 am Barbara Gilbert, my scheduling rep. at Sonat, informed me that the attorneys in Sonat's Houston office will be contacting Enron's attorneys to set up a meeting to address the PAL issue. . Christina Sanchez -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:08 AM To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; '[email protected]' Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan 3/14/02 9:50 AM Per Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent. Tammi spoke to Lisa Guthrie (205-325-3816) at Sonat to find out what flexibility Sequent would have taking out the parked gas. Lisa said she didn't know if Enron could sell the gas. -----Original Message----- From: McMichael Jr., Ed Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:29 PM To: Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; '[email protected]' Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan Thanks for the information. Sell, Sell, Sell! Sell it all to Sequent for March if you can get a good bid and have them agree to pay the moment we/they get confirmation on the nomination. Try to get other bids to validate as best you can. Do not talk to Sonat unless you have to - - asking permission is not advisable. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:38 PM To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; '[email protected]' Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail); Dhont, Margaret Subject: Sonat Park & Loan Ruth Concannon told me we want to try and sell the parked gas on Sonat. This is what we have found out over the last 2 days. ENA no longer has the ability to do nominations on Sonat's scheduling Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) believes that under normal conditions, we can sell the parked gas on Sonat without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would nominate the gas away from a specific PAL meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream contract. Today I spoke with Tammi Depaolis at Sequent - she is interested in buying the gas and she might prepay for it. I need to know; 1. What volume to sell, I assume we are talking about 188,949 dth on deal #1222, which means we ignore the loaned volume of 96,000 dth on deal #1424. 2. What period do I sell the gas for? All out by March 31st subject to the operational conditions on the pipeline? Or base load in April? I prefer all out by March 31st but I would like to ask the pipeline if that's ok? 3. How many bids do I need to get? I called Sequent because I know they are active on Sonat. 4. This may not matter but did Sonat ever pay us for the gas ENA sold them in January 2002 (see items in red down below). Tammi will probably check with the pipeline to see if its ok to take our gas. I don't want to sell gas to someone then find out the pipeline will not let them take it. All of my previous notes are shown below in blue. Summary: Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001. According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay. Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th. 2/19/02 History - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat ENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat. All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001. Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract. Deal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back. ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth. The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002, SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system. Deal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002. Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth. In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th. That left a balance of 188,949 dth. On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001. According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424]. According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets. According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account. ENA should have paid some bigger amount when the gas was parked in August. Other items; ENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001. ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42. According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy. ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087). ENA used 77,292 dth of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park. ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January. Sonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696). I left a message for Patti to call me. 2/20/02 Patti Frances returned my call. Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th. I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) that ENA did supply. Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay. I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed. She will check on it and call me back. 2/25/02 Per Kay Mann - Mark Ellenberg is the legal counsel assigned to this contract. 1:10 PM. Left a follow-up message for Patti Frances regarding our conversation on 2/20/02. 3/11/02 Per Ruth - Mark Ellenberg wants us to try and pull the gas out of the Sonat Pal. Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) will find out 1) if we still have access to Sonat's EBB and 2) if we can nominate the gas out of the PAL's. 3/13/02 Per Christina - ENA's ID's and passwords have been cancelled. Christina called Barbara Gilbert (205-325-7310), ENA's account rep at Sonat - Barbara said she would talk about this issue with Sonat's legal counsel and see if its ok to set up ENA with an ID. Christina also believes we could sell the gas without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would use a specific PAL's meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream. 3:30 PM Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent is interested in buying this gas and she might prepay to get it. She will see if they can take the gas without ENA doing a nomination. I need to verify the volume parked and when I want Sonat to take it out. 3:40 PM Barbara is waiting to hear from Sonat's legal department.
128,361
lavorato-j/calendar/82.
Mtg: Richard Lewis - General Europe/Focus on UK , Topic for John on Monday - for me to tell him what's going on in Europe, particularly the UK. R -----Original Message----- From: McCormack, Tracie Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:39 AM To: Hillis, Kimberly Subject: RE: Richard Lewis Visist May 14th 9-10am is great for Richard. Does John have his own office? If not, would you book them a room for an hour or so. Richard didn't mentioned a topic for the meeting, I think it's just a general catch-up. Do let me know the room number, or the location of John's office. Many thanks Kim, Tracie
264,705
rodrique-r/_sent_mail/623.
Re: , Why did you send my message back to me with no reply of your own???
372,369
jones-t/all_documents/3113.
NSTAR Companies , Tana, Will you be providing a full legal profile for this c/p (8/1 approval list)? Thanks, Stephanie ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 04:31 PM --------------------------- From: Frank L Davis 08/08/2000 04:10 PM To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: NSTAR Companies ---------------------- Forwarded by Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 04:10 PM --------------------------- Leslie Hansen 08/08/2000 02:37 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: NSTAR Companies NSTAR Companies is authorized to buy US power via EOL -- thus, this CP shoudl be set up for ENRON SALES only pursuant to the on-line GTCs. Thanks, Leslie
183,632
stepenovitch-j/inbox/121.
, ----- Forwarded by Joe Stepenovitch/EMT/FPL on 10/01/2001 02:21 PM ----- Marty Mennes To: Joe Stepenovitch/EMT/FPL@FPL 10/01/2001 cc: 02:11 PM Subject: FYI I wanted to drop you a note to let you know that after 6.5 years I have left Dynegy. It has been an honor for me to work w/ you over the last several years in my various roles there. I will taking a little time off to recharge my batteries but will be back soon enough in a new role. Will update you when things are finalized. If you want to contact me please call me @ 713-828-2237. Thank you and God Bless you and your family! J. Jolly Hayden
457,324
beck-s/_sent_mail/1047.
Re: Credit Watch List--12/27/00 , Can you put a referenced as of date on the spreadsheet itself? If you print the spreadsheet for reference after receiving the e:mail, there is no as of date that appears on the print out of the spreadsheet. Your attachment includes the date as the name of the file, but this does not appear when you simply print our the attached spreadsheet. Thanks. --Sally Beck From: Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON 12/27/2000 10:10 AM To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lovvorn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Winston Cheng/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzy Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry G Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Halgren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jung-Suk Suh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Joseph Graham/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Horowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barend VanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, James R Barker/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES, Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Eubanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Martin O'Leary/HOU/EES@EES, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jay Knoblauh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned Higgins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan McCairns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ragan Bond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Greer/NA/Enron@Enron, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Mandola/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Cowan/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Kyle/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Lantz Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Green/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Seibel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, rmservices@Enron, Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES, Todd W Lambert/HOU/EES@EES, Morgan Babin/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Laura R Arnold/HOU/EES@EES, Jay Blaine/HOU/EES@EES, Zarin Imam/HOU/EES@EES, Jesus Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Bangle/HOU/EES@EES, Rhonda Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Pendegraft/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Credit Watch List--12/27/00 Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing. If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report. To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002. For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.
20,576
guzman-m/all_documents/839.
Deal Changes - Add Comments , This is also directed at us... Please take this under consideration where possible. Bill ---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 03:10 PM --------------------------- Kate Symes 03/08/2001 02:50 PM To: Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Samantha Law/PDX/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Deal Changes - Add Comments Melissa Murphy would like us to begin adding a note in the comments section of all the deals we change. I know most of you already do this when you make big changes to deals, but she'd like to see more comments more often. Of course this mostly applies to me, but I thought I'd pass it along just in case. See the attached e-mail, and let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Kate ---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 02:52 PM --------------------------- Melissa Ann Murphy 03/08/2001 02:20 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Hello Hi, I was wondering if it would too time consuming for you to add a note in the comments box inside deal entry when you change a deal. We always try to put a note in the comments box so it is easier to research what has changed on a trade in the future. If you could add notes it would help us out when we are researching past deals. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Melissa
147,759
kitchen-l/_americas/mexico/59.
RE: Stealth , Louise, Steve and I conferenced with Joe Galan this week. He is heading to Washington DC for the remainder of this week. I am planning to talk to him Monday and set something up for next week. I sent him the Mexican bank contacts and hopefully by next week he will have a better feel for what is in the realm of do-able. I will let you know when we plan to meet next week. Matt Matthew Duffy Enron de Mexico Phone: From the US - 011 528 152 2417 Inside Mexico - (8) 152-2417 Louise Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate 07/11/2001 05:38 PM To: Matthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: RE: Stealth Had another conversation with Joe - he is not very confident about getting financing through traditional methods - are you still arranging the meeting? -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Duffy Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 2:00 PM To: Louise Kitchen Cc: Steve Irvin; Victor M Gonzalez Subject: Re: Stealth Louise, I know that Steve has brought this up with the folks who are working the Vitro selldown. In other words we are not banking on a single entity to make this happen, we are considering other buyers. Matt Matthew Duffy Enron de Mexico Phone: From the US - 011 528 152 2417 Inside Mexico - (8) 152-2417 Louise Kitchen@ECT 07/05/2001 03:12 PM To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Matthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Stealth << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> Probably didn't make myself clear enough - sorry its been a long day. Have we thought about flipping to another developer (other than your millionaire guy), you probably have pursued others apart from him but others may be interested - we are finding buyers for Alamac which is surprizing. Steve Irvin 07/05/2001 02:28 PM To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Matthew Duffy/NA/Enron@Enron, Victor M Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Stealth << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> Louise, The earnings strategy of all "Stealth" projects is to sell of the majority of the equity in the project to a third party. I don't think we know yet whether someone like Transalta would be interested in a project of this size and at this location but we would certainly welcome any and all interested buyers of the project to a selldown process. We do think that most buyers would place a premium on their offer for the equity in these projects if financing has already occurred or is assurred, but we are not married to the idea. As to the financing fees, we have assumed US$ 750,000 as a minimum up front fee a bank would charge for the project to be worth their time. Brian Kerrigan provided me with that cost assumption for a one-off financing for a project of this size, prior to his leaving. Thanks, Steve <Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
258,623
dasovich-j/sent_items/538.
More Amusing News from California , Davis devises new borrowing plan His executive order could speed up $12.5 billion in bond sales and bypass PUC oversight of repayment mechanism. SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Gray Davis is crafting a new plan to expedite the long-delayed borrowing of $12.5 billion to repay the sagging California state budget for emergency electricity it bought during the energy crisis. The plan -- which could be contained in an executive order as early as next week -- would minimize the role of the state's top power regulator, the Public Utilities Commission, which enraged Davis last week when it declined to sign off on his original plan. With enough power now under contract to avert blackouts and plans in place for the recovery of the two state's largest utilities, the repayment to the state treasury would resolve one of the last remaining issues of the energy crisis. "That is one scenario," Davis spokeswoman Hilary McLean said Wednesday when asked about the proposal. "There are a number of different scenarios being considered. Nothing has jelled yet that is ready to be publicly announced." Most involved in the debate have long agreed that the state should sell $12.5 billion in revenue bonds, most of which, about $9.6 billion, would go back into the state treasury. The issue was how to lock in a mechanism by which the bonds would be repaid - a critical step before they could be marketed to investors. Davis wanted the PUC to approve a plan that would repay the bonds and cover the state's energy costs through the revenues collected from ratepayers. But the PUC said the administration's proposal might prove inadequate over time, leading to future rate hikes. The PUC also said the administration's plan gave too much authority to the Davis-controlled Department of Water Resources, by allowing the department to raise electricity rates to get more revenue. The PUC, which is set up to be an independent board with the sole responsibility for setting utility rates, did not want to cede that authority. It rejected the Davis plan Oct. 2 on a 4-1 vote, led by its president, Davis appointee Loretta Lynch. Davis earlier said the commission's approval was necessary to reassure investors and get the bonds to market. The plan now under review, however, would bypass that. The DWR would not directly set rates, but under the Davis plan it would be charged with identifying how the money coming in from customers' utility bills over the next 20 years would be allocated - in effect, guaranteeing that paying back the bonds would have equal priority with paying back the suppliers of the energy. Proponents of the plan believe that would satisfy Wall Street. The administration believes it would require no additional rate hikes. Lynch said Wednesday that she had not been involved in the latest negotiations, but questioned whether Davis had the authority to issue an executive order allowing the DWR to get involved in setting rates. "I've been told for six months that the PUC was needed to pass a rate agreement. If the DWR can get the bonds sold by themselves, then great," Lynch said. "But to dedicate rates, it takes a financing order from the PUC or a statutory change in law, a statutory set-aside. It takes one of those two things." The governor is likely to announce the plan sometime following his expected veto of the bill that lays out the Legislature's version of the payback plan. By law, the governor has until Sunday to act on SB18xx, by Senate Leader John Burton, D-San Francisco. Davis opposes Burton's bill because it gives bond buyers priority in getting paid, followed by the energy suppliers. The power companies' contracts contain provisions giving them payment priority, which Davis believes could throw the contracts into legal dispute. If Davis signs the order soon, the bonds could go to market early next year. Having the proceeds in the state treasury by then is considered by some critical with the state facing a projected $4 billion to $6 billion shortfall in other income.
79,181
kaminski-v/all_documents/4816.
Resume-Jeff Andrews , Vince, Attached is the evaluation form and resume for your interview w/ Jeff Andrews this afternoon at 5pm. I will bring him to your office at that time. Jeff is interviewing for a research position within the coal group. Please feel free to contact if there are any questions. Thanks Chris Williams ENA Staffing x39866
207,155
taylor-m/sent_items/133.
FW: For hours of endless revenge.......... , This one has sound so be careful..... -----Original Message----- From: Sayre, Frank Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:38 PM To: Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Taylor, Mark E (Legal) Subject: FW: For hours of endless revenge.......... -----Original Message----- From: Graham Wandrag [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:13 AM To: Henrik Karlberg; Ian Gadd; Paddy Hodson; Jonathan Foster; Keiran Hale; Stephen Terry; Bob Smillie; Darryl Baldwin; Dave Knight; Dave Knight; Sayre, Frank; James Galowski; Marc Murph Morrison Subject: For hours of endless revenge.......... http://www.fieler.com/terror/
483,613
tycholiz-b/inbox/102.
Supervisor Evaluation Forms , TYCHOLIZ, BARRY L: Attached below you will find the final Evaluation forms for your direct reports; these forms have been pre-populated with your employees' basic data. If you have already completed your employees' final Evaluations, you may disregard these forms. When completing the Evaluation, carefully consider employee input, consolidated feedback and your observations of their performance and contribution, and encourage employee participation in the evaluation discussion. For many employees, this will be the only formal opportunity to discuss their performance with their supervisor. Final Evaluations should be completed and returned to your HR representative by August 17 (July 31 for all those in Business Units reporting to Enron Europe) for employees in job groups below Vice President level. If you have any questions, please contact your HR representative or the PEP help desk at x34777, option 4. We recommend saving all the below attachment[s] at once in the following manner: Outlook Users: Go to File -> Save Attachments, click OK if prompted, then choose which directory to save the documents under. Lotus Notes Users: Go to Attachment -> Detach All, then choose which directory to save the documents under.
490,423
maggi-m/deleted_items/1436.
RE: , can you dance -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:30 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: i can't sing. that was a joke. -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:29 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: well you made me laugh, i want to here you sing -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:24 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: I think that this is what I said: You better be in a great mood today! It's turkey eve, it's cold outside and perfect weather for hot chocolate! Then I started to sing you some song, but I can't remember which one. It was a christmas song. and I told you that you were missing out because you have ever heard me sing. it was dumb, but funny at the time.
297,929
dasovich-j/all_documents/8253.
Fw: R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032: Comments of the Independent Energy , In case you did not receive the final version, here is the IEP Filed Comments at the CPUC on criteria for forward contracting. ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Janssen <[email protected]> To: Andy Brown <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:27 PM Subject: R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032: Comments of the Independent Energy Producers Association in Response to D.00-12-065 > Greetings: attached please find the Comments of the Independent Energy > Producers Association which were filed at the PUC this afternoon. The > document is in Word 97 format. > <<010108 IEP Cmts Frwd Criteria FINAL.doc>> > > Eric Janssen > Legal Assistant > Ellison, Schneider & Harris > 2015 H Street > Sacramento, California 95814 > Tel: (916) 447-2166 > Fax: (916) 447-3512 > Email: [email protected] > > - 010108 IEP Cmts Frwd Criteria FINAL.doc
65,393
kaminski-v/_sent_mail/4819.
Introduction , ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 07:55 AM --------------------------- <[email protected]> on 06/20/2000 03:12:53 PM To: "Vince J Kaminski" <[email protected]> cc: [email protected] Subject: Introduction Vince: As way of introduction, I wanted to write a bit about Mars inc. and then about CDS, the unit I head. Mars is a private company, considered to be the largest privately owned manufacturing company in the world. Mars is not in the habit of disclosing its finances, so the best I could do is refer to Forbes' estimate of $15 Billion annual revenue and to the profit margins of similar companies between 5-12%. Mars is in the business of manufacturing confectionery (m&m, Dove bar, skittles, twix, - all (R)) food (Uncle Ben rice (R)) pet food (Pedigree, Whiskas Waltham (R)) and other products. Mars has prospered during the years because of a unique philosophy that emphasizes the long term goals of the company. Part of the philosophy is to look for win-win solutions with its suppliers, customers and partners. As can be understood from the nature of the company, a large chunk of its expenses goes towards purchasing commodity like products, and hence the history of researching those commodities and the weather that influences their supply and the demand (people eat less ice cream in the winter and less chocolate in the summer). CDS has a history of few decades in forecasting weather and has been very successful, with an envious track record, in helping Mars get a competitive advantage in these arenas. CDS is a global group (in 4 countries across two continents) which supports the purchasing function and the corporate at large in these and other arenas. It is a multidiscipline and multinational team with a lot to offer. Not having a ready access to the energy markets, and with a risk profile based on manufacturing expertise, Mars has decided to look for potential partners in this area. Enron presence in the market place certainly makes it an interesting party to talk to. In talking to Enron, we are careful to suggest that Mars is not committing to anything at this point, and all we are after is to find out if there is an interest to pursue the opportunity we discussed in the future. I am looking forward to our video conference call. Kind regards, Avi --------------------------------------- Avi I. Hauser PhD MBA CDS Director 100 International Drive Mt Olive NJ 07828-1383 + 1 973 691 3664 (office) + 1 973 347 8189 (fax) + 1 973 727 3622 (car + slow paging) [email protected]
201,778
campbell-l/all_documents/1172.
November Bills , [email protected] writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants, The November invoices will not be posted today; they are expected to be posted tomorrow, Friday, November 8. Customer Relations 518-356-6060
40,385
white-s/all_documents/33.
Power LTD Rec , Attached is the November LTD reconciliation. Due to the quick turn around of this report, some items still require further research. If you notice an item that needs changing, please let me know. As you know, I will be out until after the first of the year. Hope you all have a Happy Holidays!
503,774