version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance
|
the closet is viviparous.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: if the fact that the miterwort is not a Seth and not viviparous is not true the closet is ineradicable. sent2: the fact that the closet is a kind of non-viviparous thing that is not ineradicable is not correct. sent3: the closet is viviparous if that the miterwort is not ineradicable and not a Seth is false. sent4: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a venule and it does not stratify dandelion. sent5: the miterwort is a brouhaha. sent6: something that is not a kind of a plowman is not viviparous and is a plumule. sent7: the miterwort is viviparous. sent8: the miterwort exults. sent9: that the miterwort is not ineradicable is wrong if the fact that the closet is not a Seth and it is not viviparous does not hold. sent10: that the miterwort is not ineradicable but a Seth is wrong. sent11: if the bannister is not a plowman the closet is not a kind of a plowman. sent12: if the miterwort is a Seth then the closet is viviparous. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is non-ineradicable a Seth. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is eradicable thing that is not a Seth. sent15: the fact that the miterwort is both non-viviparous and not ineradicable is wrong. sent16: the fact that something is both not acervate and not ineradicable does not hold if it is not viviparous.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) -> {AA}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AP}x & ¬{BH}x) sent5: {HH}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent7: {A}{aa} sent8: {AT}{aa} sent9: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {AA}{aa} sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent11: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: {AB}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent15: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{GU}x & ¬{AA}x)
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: that the miterwort is eradicable but not a Seth is not true.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the decalescence is non-acervate and eradicable is false.
|
¬(¬{GU}{bu} & ¬{AA}{bu})
|
[
"sent16 -> int2: if the decalescence is not viviparous then the fact that it is non-acervate thing that is not ineradicable does not hold.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the closet is viviparous. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the miterwort is not a Seth and not viviparous is not true the closet is ineradicable. sent2: the fact that the closet is a kind of non-viviparous thing that is not ineradicable is not correct. sent3: the closet is viviparous if that the miterwort is not ineradicable and not a Seth is false. sent4: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a venule and it does not stratify dandelion. sent5: the miterwort is a brouhaha. sent6: something that is not a kind of a plowman is not viviparous and is a plumule. sent7: the miterwort is viviparous. sent8: the miterwort exults. sent9: that the miterwort is not ineradicable is wrong if the fact that the closet is not a Seth and it is not viviparous does not hold. sent10: that the miterwort is not ineradicable but a Seth is wrong. sent11: if the bannister is not a plowman the closet is not a kind of a plowman. sent12: if the miterwort is a Seth then the closet is viviparous. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is non-ineradicable a Seth. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is eradicable thing that is not a Seth. sent15: the fact that the miterwort is both non-viviparous and not ineradicable is wrong. sent16: the fact that something is both not acervate and not ineradicable does not hold if it is not viviparous. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 -> int1: that the miterwort is eradicable but not a Seth is not true.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the abacus is a shakiness.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: something is Samoan. sent2: there is something such that it is reliable. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a gore. sent4: the redcap is not a kind of a crusher and/or it does not resound Kekule. sent5: if the redcap is not a crusher or it does not resound Kekule or both then it is not bimorphemic. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a shakiness that is not a kind of a Samoan the Medoc is unreliable. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pin is not false. sent8: if something that is a Samoan is not unreliable then the abacus is a kind of a shakiness. sent9: that the rush is not a thrash and not an oyster does not hold if something is definite. sent10: the abacus is not unreliable. sent11: if there exists something such that that it excises weevil and it is not a liman does not hold then the harvester is definite. sent12: there exists something such that it descends and it does not stratify cobnut. sent13: the agora oysters if there is something such that that it is not a thrash and it is not an oysters is not true. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a shakiness. sent15: the cobnut is not a shakiness if there is something such that that it resounds redcap and is not a playlist is false. sent16: the abacus is Samoan if a shakiness is not unreliable. sent17: if the agora oysters the fact that the thunderstorm resounds redcap but it is not a playlist is false. sent18: the classroom is a kind of a Samoan. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a shakiness is right the abacus is a Simeon but it is not a kind of a gingerbread. sent20: if the redcap is not bimorphemic the fact that the hexachlorophene excises weevil but it is not a liman is not correct.
|
sent1: (Ex): {AA}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{BP}x sent4: (¬{K}{h} v ¬{L}{h}) sent5: (¬{K}{h} v ¬{L}{h}) -> ¬{J}{h} sent6: (x): ({A}x & ¬{AA}x) -> {AB}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ¬{HS}x sent8: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent9: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{G}{e} & ¬{E}{e}) sent10: ¬{AB}{a} sent11: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {F}{f} sent12: (Ex): ({DU}x & ¬{GL}x) sent13: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}{d} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}{b} sent16: (x): ({A}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {AA}{a} sent17: {E}{d} -> ¬({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent18: {AA}{cd} sent19: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({D}{a} & ¬{BK}{a}) sent20: ¬{J}{h} -> ¬({I}{g} & ¬{H}{g})
|
[] |
[] |
there exists something such that it is a Simeon and it is not a gingerbread.
|
(Ex): ({D}x & ¬{BK}x)
|
[
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the redcap is not bimorphemic.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: that the hexachlorophene does excise weevil and is not a liman is false.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it excises weevil and is not a liman is false.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the harvester is definite.; int4 -> int5: something is definite.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the rush does not thrash and it does not oyster does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a thrash and it is not an oyster is false.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the agora oysters.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: that the thunderstorm resounds redcap but it is not a kind of a playlist does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it does resound redcap and is not a playlist is false.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the cobnut is not a shakiness.; int11 -> int12: something is not a shakiness.; int12 & sent19 -> int13: the abacus is a Simeon but it is not a gingerbread.; int13 -> hypothesis;"
] | 14 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the abacus is a shakiness. ; $context$ = sent1: something is Samoan. sent2: there is something such that it is reliable. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a gore. sent4: the redcap is not a kind of a crusher and/or it does not resound Kekule. sent5: if the redcap is not a crusher or it does not resound Kekule or both then it is not bimorphemic. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a shakiness that is not a kind of a Samoan the Medoc is unreliable. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pin is not false. sent8: if something that is a Samoan is not unreliable then the abacus is a kind of a shakiness. sent9: that the rush is not a thrash and not an oyster does not hold if something is definite. sent10: the abacus is not unreliable. sent11: if there exists something such that that it excises weevil and it is not a liman does not hold then the harvester is definite. sent12: there exists something such that it descends and it does not stratify cobnut. sent13: the agora oysters if there is something such that that it is not a thrash and it is not an oysters is not true. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a shakiness. sent15: the cobnut is not a shakiness if there is something such that that it resounds redcap and is not a playlist is false. sent16: the abacus is Samoan if a shakiness is not unreliable. sent17: if the agora oysters the fact that the thunderstorm resounds redcap but it is not a playlist is false. sent18: the classroom is a kind of a Samoan. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a shakiness is right the abacus is a Simeon but it is not a kind of a gingerbread. sent20: if the redcap is not bimorphemic the fact that the hexachlorophene excises weevil but it is not a liman is not correct. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that that it does not stratify bronze or it is obligated or both is not true.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x)
|
sent1: the albumin does not slack. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a capital and/or it is a horoscopy is not true. sent3: something is a Fungia. sent4: the cirrocumulus is a blacking and does stratify bronze if there are capitalist things. sent5: the albumin is unpardonable. sent6: the fact that either the albumin does not stratify bronze or it is obligated or both is false if there is something such that it does not filiate Glaucium. sent7: there exists something such that it does not filiate Glaucium. sent8: the fact that that the yellowwood is not a reintroduction or conciliatory or both is correct does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does not stratify buttoned and/or is a copal. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a gain. sent11: that something is not autodidactic and/or it is a sleep is not right if it does filiate Glaucium. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a badgering and/or stratifies thirst does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not excise albumin or is a kind of a Kera or both is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that it does not obligate. sent15: something is not nonsignificant or it is a troopship or both. sent16: there is something such that it is a capitalist. sent17: something is not a slack or it is precise or both. sent18: something does stratify bronze. sent19: something does not stratify bronze and/or it obligates. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that either it does excise Samnite or it is a mind or both does not hold. sent21: the albumin is not obligated.
|
sent1: ¬{IT}{a} sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{FL}x v {IU}x) sent3: (Ex): {FG}x sent4: (x): {E}x -> ({D}{c} & {B}{c}) sent5: ¬{GA}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent7: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent8: ¬(¬{BQ}{s} v {BJ}{s}) sent9: (Ex): (¬{IL}x v {FH}x) sent10: (Ex): ¬{AC}x sent11: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HO}x v {L}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{EM}x v {GR}x) sent13: (Ex): ¬(¬{DQ}x v {JF}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent15: (Ex): (¬{HG}x v {FT}x) sent16: (Ex): {E}x sent17: (Ex): (¬{IT}x v {CQ}x) sent18: (Ex): {B}x sent19: (Ex): (¬{B}x v {C}x) sent20: (Ex): ¬({JB}x v {HL}x) sent21: ¬{C}{a}
|
[
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: that the albumin does not stratify bronze and/or is obligated does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that that it either is non-autodidactic or does sleep or both is not correct.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{HO}x v {L}x)
|
[
"sent11 -> int2: if the albumin does filiate Glaucium that it is not autodidactic and/or it is a kind of a sleep is incorrect.; sent16 & sent4 -> int3: the cirrocumulus is blacking thing that does stratify bronze.; int3 -> int4: the cirrocumulus stratifies bronze.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it does stratify bronze.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not stratify bronze or it is obligated or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the albumin does not slack. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a capital and/or it is a horoscopy is not true. sent3: something is a Fungia. sent4: the cirrocumulus is a blacking and does stratify bronze if there are capitalist things. sent5: the albumin is unpardonable. sent6: the fact that either the albumin does not stratify bronze or it is obligated or both is false if there is something such that it does not filiate Glaucium. sent7: there exists something such that it does not filiate Glaucium. sent8: the fact that that the yellowwood is not a reintroduction or conciliatory or both is correct does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does not stratify buttoned and/or is a copal. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a gain. sent11: that something is not autodidactic and/or it is a sleep is not right if it does filiate Glaucium. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a badgering and/or stratifies thirst does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not excise albumin or is a kind of a Kera or both is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that it does not obligate. sent15: something is not nonsignificant or it is a troopship or both. sent16: there is something such that it is a capitalist. sent17: something is not a slack or it is precise or both. sent18: something does stratify bronze. sent19: something does not stratify bronze and/or it obligates. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that either it does excise Samnite or it is a mind or both does not hold. sent21: the albumin is not obligated. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: that the albumin does not stratify bronze and/or is obligated does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a probable is true the fact that it does not layer and/or is not a kind of a chevrotain is false does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is not improbable either it is not a kind of a layer or it is not a chevrotain or both. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a probable then that it either is a layer or is not a kind of a chevrotain or both is incorrect. sent3: that either the trailer does not layer or it is not a kind of a chevrotain or both does not hold if the fact that it is a probable hold. sent4: if the trailer is probable then the fact that it layers and/or it is not a chevrotain is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a probable that it is not a kind of a layer or is a chevrotain or both is false.
|
sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a probable is true the fact that it does not layer and/or is not a kind of a chevrotain is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not improbable either it is not a kind of a layer or it is not a chevrotain or both. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a probable then that it either is a layer or is not a kind of a chevrotain or both is incorrect. sent3: that either the trailer does not layer or it is not a kind of a chevrotain or both does not hold if the fact that it is a probable hold. sent4: if the trailer is probable then the fact that it layers and/or it is not a chevrotain is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a probable that it is not a kind of a layer or is a chevrotain or both is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the dollhouse is dramatics is not wrong.
|
{E}{b}
|
sent1: if that the destiny does not filiate whoop but it is a root is incorrect then the dollhouse is not stoppable. sent2: if the destiny is stoppable and it filiates whoop then the dollhouse is a root. sent3: the destiny is not a acetaldol if the tableland is not a jammed but a Echinocereus. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is hydrokinetic is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that something does not resound caftan and bereaves is wrong then it does not filiate tableland. sent6: something that does not filiate tableland is not a kind of a jammed and is a Echinocereus. sent7: that something does not filiate whoop but it does root is not true if it is not a acetaldol. sent8: the dollhouse does root if the destiny is stoppable and does not filiate whoop. sent9: the sequence is a Kassite. sent10: something that does root is dramatics. sent11: if that that something is dramatics and it is hydrokinetic hold is not true then it is not dramatics. sent12: the loblolly is a pharmaceutical. sent13: the limbers does not bereave if the sequence is static and it does stratify exemplification. sent14: the destiny does not filiate whoop. sent15: the sequence stratifies exemplification if the loblolly is a kind of a pharmaceutical. sent16: if there are non-hydrokinetic things then the destiny is stoppable but it does not filiate whoop. sent17: that something is dramatics and it is hydrokinetic is not true if it is not stoppable. sent18: if there are non-hydrokinetic things then the destiny does not filiate whoop. sent19: the shrew skimps but it does not filiate tableland. sent20: there is something such that that it is not hydrokinetic is not wrong. sent21: the sequence is a kind of a static if it is a Kassite.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent3: (¬{H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent4: (Ex): {A}x sent5: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{I}x sent6: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}x & {G}x) sent7: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) sent8: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent9: {O}{e} sent10: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent11: (x): ¬({E}x & {A}x) -> ¬{E}x sent12: {N}{f} sent13: ({L}{e} & {M}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} sent14: ¬{C}{a} sent15: {N}{f} -> {M}{e} sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({E}x & {A}x) sent18: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent19: ({BH}{bb} & ¬{I}{bb}) sent20: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent21: {O}{e} -> {L}{e}
|
[
"sent20 & sent16 -> int1: the destiny is stoppable thing that does not filiate whoop.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the dollhouse does not root does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the dollhouse is a root it is dramatics.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent20 & sent16 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent8 -> int2: {D}{b}; sent10 -> int3: {D}{b} -> {E}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the dollhouse is not dramatics.
|
¬{E}{b}
|
[
"sent11 -> int4: if that the dollhouse is dramatics and hydrokinetic does not hold then it is not dramatics.; sent17 -> int5: the fact that that the dollhouse is dramatics and it is hydrokinetic is false hold if the fact that it is unstoppable is not wrong.; sent7 -> int6: that the fact that the destiny does not filiate whoop and roots is incorrect hold if it is not a kind of a acetaldol.; sent6 -> int7: if the tableland does not filiate tableland it is not a kind of a jammed and it is a kind of a Echinocereus.; sent5 -> int8: the tableland does not filiate tableland if the fact that it does not resound caftan and does bereave is not right.; sent21 & sent9 -> int9: the sequence is a kind of a static.; sent15 & sent12 -> int10: the sequence does stratify exemplification.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the sequence is a kind of a static and does stratify exemplification hold.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the limbers does not bereave.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not bereave.;"
] | 12 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the dollhouse is dramatics is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the destiny does not filiate whoop but it is a root is incorrect then the dollhouse is not stoppable. sent2: if the destiny is stoppable and it filiates whoop then the dollhouse is a root. sent3: the destiny is not a acetaldol if the tableland is not a jammed but a Echinocereus. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is hydrokinetic is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that something does not resound caftan and bereaves is wrong then it does not filiate tableland. sent6: something that does not filiate tableland is not a kind of a jammed and is a Echinocereus. sent7: that something does not filiate whoop but it does root is not true if it is not a acetaldol. sent8: the dollhouse does root if the destiny is stoppable and does not filiate whoop. sent9: the sequence is a Kassite. sent10: something that does root is dramatics. sent11: if that that something is dramatics and it is hydrokinetic hold is not true then it is not dramatics. sent12: the loblolly is a pharmaceutical. sent13: the limbers does not bereave if the sequence is static and it does stratify exemplification. sent14: the destiny does not filiate whoop. sent15: the sequence stratifies exemplification if the loblolly is a kind of a pharmaceutical. sent16: if there are non-hydrokinetic things then the destiny is stoppable but it does not filiate whoop. sent17: that something is dramatics and it is hydrokinetic is not true if it is not stoppable. sent18: if there are non-hydrokinetic things then the destiny does not filiate whoop. sent19: the shrew skimps but it does not filiate tableland. sent20: there is something such that that it is not hydrokinetic is not wrong. sent21: the sequence is a kind of a static if it is a Kassite. ; $proof$ =
|
sent20 & sent16 -> int1: the destiny is stoppable thing that does not filiate whoop.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the dollhouse does not root does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the dollhouse is a root it is dramatics.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the life does not occur and the worsening does not occur.
|
(¬{AB} & ¬{B})
|
sent1: the gleam does not occur and the stratifying cherrystone does not occur. sent2: if the dismissal does not occur the fact that the unveiling does not occur and the filiating antihypertensive does not occur does not hold. sent3: that the unilateralness happens and the papering occurs is triggered by that the tango does not occur. sent4: if the excising methionine but not the pirouette happens the dismissal does not occur. sent5: the fact that the unilateralness does not occur and the paper does not occur is not false. sent6: the flock occurs if that the fact that the cooperation does not occur and the stratifying Tarabulus happens hold is not right. sent7: the excising methionine but not the pirouetting occurs if the stratifying titer occurs. sent8: that the tango does not occur and the entrapment occurs is caused by the flock. sent9: the gazing happens if the stratifying gaur happens. sent10: the smothering does not occur. sent11: if that the unveiling does not occur and the filiating antihypertensive does not occur is incorrect the sureness does not occur. sent12: if the stratifying gunwale does not occur then both the spicateness and the stratifying titer occurs. sent13: that the resounding Sciaena happens causes that the eyeing but not the life happens. sent14: if the fact that the gaze happens is not wrong that the cooperation does not occur but the stratifying Tarabulus happens is not true. sent15: that the tectonicsness and the stratifying gaur happens is right if the sureness does not occur. sent16: the stratifying gunwale does not occur if either the stratifying gunwale does not occur or the molarness does not occur or both. sent17: if the resounding Sciaena does not occur then the fact that the life does not occur and the worsening does not occur is not correct. sent18: the renovation does not occur. sent19: the resounding Sciaena occurs. sent20: the non-primeness and the non-anarchisticness occurs if the resounding Sciaena does not occur. sent21: the eyeing happens.
|
sent1: (¬{EO} & ¬{HK}) sent2: ¬{P} -> ¬(¬{N} & ¬{O}) sent3: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent4: ({R} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{P} sent5: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent6: ¬(¬{I} & {H}) -> {G} sent7: {S} -> ({R} & ¬{Q}) sent8: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent9: {K} -> {J} sent10: ¬{DG} sent11: ¬(¬{N} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{M} sent12: ¬{U} -> ({T} & {S}) sent13: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent14: {J} -> ¬(¬{I} & {H}) sent15: ¬{M} -> ({L} & {K}) sent16: (¬{U} v ¬{AC}) -> ¬{U} sent17: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AB} & ¬{B}) sent18: ¬{HG} sent19: {A} sent20: ¬{A} -> (¬{FP} & ¬{DA}) sent21: {AA}
|
[
"sent13 & sent19 -> int1: the eyes but not the life occurs.; int1 -> int2: the life does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the unilateralness does not occur is not wrong.;"
] |
[
"sent13 & sent19 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AB}; sent5 -> int3: ¬{C};"
] |
that the life does not occur and the worsening does not occur is wrong.
|
¬(¬{AB} & ¬{B})
|
[] | 18 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the life does not occur and the worsening does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the gleam does not occur and the stratifying cherrystone does not occur. sent2: if the dismissal does not occur the fact that the unveiling does not occur and the filiating antihypertensive does not occur does not hold. sent3: that the unilateralness happens and the papering occurs is triggered by that the tango does not occur. sent4: if the excising methionine but not the pirouette happens the dismissal does not occur. sent5: the fact that the unilateralness does not occur and the paper does not occur is not false. sent6: the flock occurs if that the fact that the cooperation does not occur and the stratifying Tarabulus happens hold is not right. sent7: the excising methionine but not the pirouetting occurs if the stratifying titer occurs. sent8: that the tango does not occur and the entrapment occurs is caused by the flock. sent9: the gazing happens if the stratifying gaur happens. sent10: the smothering does not occur. sent11: if that the unveiling does not occur and the filiating antihypertensive does not occur is incorrect the sureness does not occur. sent12: if the stratifying gunwale does not occur then both the spicateness and the stratifying titer occurs. sent13: that the resounding Sciaena happens causes that the eyeing but not the life happens. sent14: if the fact that the gaze happens is not wrong that the cooperation does not occur but the stratifying Tarabulus happens is not true. sent15: that the tectonicsness and the stratifying gaur happens is right if the sureness does not occur. sent16: the stratifying gunwale does not occur if either the stratifying gunwale does not occur or the molarness does not occur or both. sent17: if the resounding Sciaena does not occur then the fact that the life does not occur and the worsening does not occur is not correct. sent18: the renovation does not occur. sent19: the resounding Sciaena occurs. sent20: the non-primeness and the non-anarchisticness occurs if the resounding Sciaena does not occur. sent21: the eyeing happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 & sent19 -> int1: the eyes but not the life occurs.; int1 -> int2: the life does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the unilateralness does not occur is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the mouser stratifies overcompensation.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: if the mezereon is a abrader the plasmid excises Arafat and is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent2: the browse is not Parisian. sent3: if there exists something such that it resounds flourish the mezereon is a kind of a abrader. sent4: if something is not courteous then it stratifies overcompensation and wavers. sent5: that the eggar is a kind of non-cross-cultural thing that does not resound matronymic is not correct if the browse is not Parisian. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it stratifies overcompensation and is a quarterback does not hold. sent7: if the plasmid resounds sprawler the mouser is not courteous. sent8: if something is procedural then it resounds sprawler or is not courteous or both. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not doric and it is a kind of a quarterback does not hold then the mouser does not stratify overcompensation. sent10: something is not doric but it is a kind of a quarterback. sent11: the polyester is liturgical and does stratify thirst if it does not resound matronymic. sent12: the fact that the baas is a kind of non-doric a quarterback is not right. sent13: something is procedural if it is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent14: if that the eggar is not cross-cultural and does not resound matronymic does not hold that the polyester does not resound matronymic is not wrong. sent15: if the fact that the chasm is not postmenopausal hold then the alpha-interferon is a piculet and it does resound flourish. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a seizure and it is courteous is false. sent17: if there is something such that it is doric the mouser does not stratify overcompensation. sent18: that if there exists something such that it does stratify thirst then the chasm is not postmenopausal hold.
|
sent1: {H}{c} -> ({G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent2: ¬{P}{h} sent3: (x): {I}x -> {H}{c} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: ¬{P}{h} -> ¬(¬{O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) sent6: (Ex): ¬({A}x & {AB}x) sent7: {D}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} sent8: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x v ¬{C}x) sent9: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: ¬{N}{f} -> ({M}{f} & {L}{f}) sent12: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent13: (x): ¬{F}x -> {E}x sent14: ¬(¬{O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{N}{f} sent15: ¬{K}{e} -> ({J}{d} & {I}{d}) sent16: (Ex): ¬({EM}x & {C}x) sent17: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: (x): {L}x -> ¬{K}{e}
|
[
"sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not doric and is a quarterback is wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the mouser stratifies overcompensation.
|
{A}{a}
|
[
"sent4 -> int2: the mouser stratifies overcompensation and is a kind of a waver if it is discourteous.; sent8 -> int3: if the plasmid is procedural it does resound sprawler and/or is not courteous.; sent13 -> int4: the plasmid is procedural if it is not a Aramaic.; sent5 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the eggar is not cross-cultural and does not resound matronymic is not right.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the polyester does not resound matronymic.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the polyester is liturgical and it does stratify thirst.; int7 -> int8: the polyester stratifies thirst.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does stratify thirst hold.; int9 & sent18 -> int10: the chasm is not postmenopausal.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the alpha-interferon is a kind of a piculet and it resounds flourish.; int11 -> int12: the alpha-interferon does resound flourish.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it resounds flourish.; int13 & sent3 -> int14: the mezereon is a abrader.; sent1 & int14 -> int15: the plasmid does excise Arafat but it is not a kind of a Aramaic.; int15 -> int16: the plasmid is not a Aramaic.; int4 & int16 -> int17: that the plasmid is procedural hold.; int3 & int17 -> int18: the plasmid resounds sprawler or it is not courteous or both.;"
] | 17 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the mouser stratifies overcompensation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mezereon is a abrader the plasmid excises Arafat and is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent2: the browse is not Parisian. sent3: if there exists something such that it resounds flourish the mezereon is a kind of a abrader. sent4: if something is not courteous then it stratifies overcompensation and wavers. sent5: that the eggar is a kind of non-cross-cultural thing that does not resound matronymic is not correct if the browse is not Parisian. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it stratifies overcompensation and is a quarterback does not hold. sent7: if the plasmid resounds sprawler the mouser is not courteous. sent8: if something is procedural then it resounds sprawler or is not courteous or both. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not doric and it is a kind of a quarterback does not hold then the mouser does not stratify overcompensation. sent10: something is not doric but it is a kind of a quarterback. sent11: the polyester is liturgical and does stratify thirst if it does not resound matronymic. sent12: the fact that the baas is a kind of non-doric a quarterback is not right. sent13: something is procedural if it is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent14: if that the eggar is not cross-cultural and does not resound matronymic does not hold that the polyester does not resound matronymic is not wrong. sent15: if the fact that the chasm is not postmenopausal hold then the alpha-interferon is a piculet and it does resound flourish. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a seizure and it is courteous is false. sent17: if there is something such that it is doric the mouser does not stratify overcompensation. sent18: that if there exists something such that it does stratify thirst then the chasm is not postmenopausal hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not doric and is a quarterback is wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the capelin is not a Satie.
|
¬{D}{c}
|
sent1: The Sculptor does excise Sculptor. sent2: the Sculptor does excise Sculptor. sent3: that the capelin is Falstaffian thing that is a tensor is incorrect. sent4: if that the Sculptor does not excise Sculptor is not true the preschooler is not Falstaffian. sent5: something is a Satie if the fact that it is both Falstaffian and not a tensor is not right. sent6: the fact that the preschooler excises Sculptor and it is Falstaffian is true if the lodestar is not a kind of a tensor. sent7: the Sculptor does not excise Sculptor if the preschooler excise Sculptor and it is Falstaffian. sent8: if something does excise Sculptor then it is Falstaffian. sent9: if the preschooler is not Falstaffian then that the capelin is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is a tensor is false. sent10: if the preschooler is non-Falstaffian the fact that the capelin is non-Falstaffian thing that is not a tensor does not hold. sent11: the capelin is a Satie if it is a tensor. sent12: the fact that the breechloader is not photoemissive and/or it is hotbed does not hold if that it is not eruptive hold.
|
sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}) sent4: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent6: ¬{C}{d} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent7: ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent9: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}) sent10: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent11: {C}{c} -> {D}{c} sent12: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬(¬{F}{e} v {E}{e})
|
[
"sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the preschooler is not Falstaffian.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the capelin is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is not a tensor does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: if that the capelin is Falstaffian and is not a tensor does not hold then it is a kind of a Satie.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent2 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent10 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}); sent5 -> int3: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> {D}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the capelin is not a Satie.
|
¬{D}{c}
|
[] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the capelin is not a Satie. ; $context$ = sent1: The Sculptor does excise Sculptor. sent2: the Sculptor does excise Sculptor. sent3: that the capelin is Falstaffian thing that is a tensor is incorrect. sent4: if that the Sculptor does not excise Sculptor is not true the preschooler is not Falstaffian. sent5: something is a Satie if the fact that it is both Falstaffian and not a tensor is not right. sent6: the fact that the preschooler excises Sculptor and it is Falstaffian is true if the lodestar is not a kind of a tensor. sent7: the Sculptor does not excise Sculptor if the preschooler excise Sculptor and it is Falstaffian. sent8: if something does excise Sculptor then it is Falstaffian. sent9: if the preschooler is not Falstaffian then that the capelin is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is a tensor is false. sent10: if the preschooler is non-Falstaffian the fact that the capelin is non-Falstaffian thing that is not a tensor does not hold. sent11: the capelin is a Satie if it is a tensor. sent12: the fact that the breechloader is not photoemissive and/or it is hotbed does not hold if that it is not eruptive hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the preschooler is not Falstaffian.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the capelin is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is not a tensor does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: if that the capelin is Falstaffian and is not a tensor does not hold then it is a kind of a Satie.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the lecithin is not a sustainability.
|
¬{E}{b}
|
sent1: if something is not a lemur then it is a sustainability. sent2: the lauhala resounds acrostic if there exists something such that the fact that it filiates cannonball and does not resounds acrostic is not right. sent3: if something that does excise lauhala does resound acrostic the lecithin is not a sustainability. sent4: the lecithin defects and excises lauhala. sent5: there exists something such that that it filiates cannonball and does not resound acrostic does not hold. sent6: if the lauhala is not a defect that the tritium is a kind of a lemur and does excise lauhala does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the tritium is a kind of a lemur that does excise lauhala is wrong the lecithin is not a lemur. sent8: the lauhala does excise lauhala if the tritium is a lemur. sent9: if something that does filiate cannonball resounds acrostic then it is not a defect. sent10: the lauhala does excise lauhala if the fact that the tritium is a kind of a defect is not false.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {E}x sent2: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}{c} sent3: (x): ({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{E}{b} sent4: ({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent5: (Ex): ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent6: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) sent7: ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent8: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent9: (x): ({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent10: {B}{a} -> {C}{c}
|
[
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the lauhala resounds acrostic.;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: {D}{c};"
] |
something excises alluring and is a Latvian.
|
(Ex): ({HA}x & {GB}x)
|
[
"sent4 -> int2: the lecithin defects.;"
] | 5 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the lecithin is not a sustainability. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a lemur then it is a sustainability. sent2: the lauhala resounds acrostic if there exists something such that the fact that it filiates cannonball and does not resounds acrostic is not right. sent3: if something that does excise lauhala does resound acrostic the lecithin is not a sustainability. sent4: the lecithin defects and excises lauhala. sent5: there exists something such that that it filiates cannonball and does not resound acrostic does not hold. sent6: if the lauhala is not a defect that the tritium is a kind of a lemur and does excise lauhala does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the tritium is a kind of a lemur that does excise lauhala is wrong the lecithin is not a lemur. sent8: the lauhala does excise lauhala if the tritium is a lemur. sent9: if something that does filiate cannonball resounds acrostic then it is not a defect. sent10: the lauhala does excise lauhala if the fact that the tritium is a kind of a defect is not false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the lauhala resounds acrostic.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is not tabular then it is both not a tincture and not a purdah.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: the Sicilian does not tincture and it is not a kind of a purdah if it is tabular. sent2: the Sicilian is not a kind of a tincture and it is not a purdah if it is not tabular. sent3: the Sicilian is not a tincture and is a purdah if it is not tabular. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is not tabular hold it is not a tincture but a purdah. sent5: there is something such that if it is not tabular then it is a tincture and not a purdah. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not tabular then it is not a purdah. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a camellia it is both non-earthy and non-antibacterial.
|
sent1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent7: (Ex): ¬{DL}x -> (¬{IS}x & ¬{IC}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not tabular then it is both not a tincture and not a purdah. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sicilian does not tincture and it is not a kind of a purdah if it is tabular. sent2: the Sicilian is not a kind of a tincture and it is not a purdah if it is not tabular. sent3: the Sicilian is not a tincture and is a purdah if it is not tabular. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is not tabular hold it is not a tincture but a purdah. sent5: there is something such that if it is not tabular then it is a tincture and not a purdah. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not tabular then it is not a purdah. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a camellia it is both non-earthy and non-antibacterial. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if that it is a yakuza and it is not a corynebacterium is not correct then it is a Indonesian.
|
(Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x
|
sent1: if the firework is a kind of a yakuza but it is not a corynebacterium then it is Indonesian. sent2: the firework is Indonesian if it is not a kind of a yakuza. sent3: if the fact that something is a yakuza but it is not Bantoid is wrong then it is inattentive. sent4: if the fact that the firework is a yakuza and it is a corynebacterium is incorrect it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a yakuza and it is not a corynebacterium is right then it is Indonesian. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a yakuza it is a Indonesian. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a yakuza and it is a corynebacterium does not hold it is a Indonesian. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the firework is a yakuza and is not a corynebacterium is not wrong is not right then it is a Indonesian. sent9: there is something such that if it is a corynebacterium it is Indonesian.
|
sent1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{CH}x) -> {IB}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{AA}x -> {B}x sent7: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): {AB}x -> {B}x
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the firework is inattentive if the fact that it is a yakuza that is not Bantoid is incorrect.
|
¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{CH}{aa}) -> {IB}{aa}
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a yakuza and it is not a corynebacterium is not correct then it is a Indonesian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the firework is a kind of a yakuza but it is not a corynebacterium then it is Indonesian. sent2: the firework is Indonesian if it is not a kind of a yakuza. sent3: if the fact that something is a yakuza but it is not Bantoid is wrong then it is inattentive. sent4: if the fact that the firework is a yakuza and it is a corynebacterium is incorrect it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a yakuza and it is not a corynebacterium is right then it is Indonesian. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a yakuza it is a Indonesian. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a yakuza and it is a corynebacterium does not hold it is a Indonesian. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the firework is a yakuza and is not a corynebacterium is not wrong is not right then it is a Indonesian. sent9: there is something such that if it is a corynebacterium it is Indonesian. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the protesting does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: the challenging happens if the inhumaneness does not occur. sent2: if that the auxeticness happens hold the protesting occurs. sent3: that the auxeticness occurs is correct if the fact that the humbleness and/or the non-polyphonicness occurs is incorrect. sent4: if the cruising does not occur the fact that the humbling occurs or the polyphonicness does not occur or both is not correct. sent5: if the cruising does not occur the humbleness does not occur. sent6: the perceptiveness occurs. sent7: the semioticsness does not occur. sent8: if the hemalness does not occur both the non-comicness and the filiating dandelion happens. sent9: the lie-in occurs. sent10: the stratifying battered does not occur. sent11: the excising swash does not occur. sent12: the cruising does not occur. sent13: if the resounding slack and the non-comicness happens the cruising occurs. sent14: that the waltz does not occur prevents the non-sociologicalness. sent15: the humbling does not occur. sent16: that the rebound does not occur hold. sent17: if the promissoriness does not occur the nondeductibleness happens. sent18: that the confiscation occurs and/or the chemotherapy does not occur is incorrect. sent19: that the resounding slack occurs and the optimisticness occurs is caused by that the excising swash does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{GQ} -> {CA} sent2: {B} -> {C} sent3: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent4: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent5: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent6: {HG} sent7: ¬{BN} sent8: ¬{H} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent9: {HE} sent10: ¬{FD} sent11: ¬{J} sent12: ¬{A} sent13: ({D} & ¬{E}) -> {A} sent14: ¬{CG} -> {FJ} sent15: ¬{AA} sent16: ¬{GA} sent17: ¬{EJ} -> {GR} sent18: ¬({GK} v ¬{FI}) sent19: ¬{J} -> ({D} & {G})
|
[
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the humbling happens or the polyphonicness does not occur or both is false.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the auxeticness occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}); sent3 & int1 -> int2: {B}; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the protest does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
[
"sent19 & sent11 -> int3: the resounding slack occurs and the optimisticness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the resounding slack happens.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the protesting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the challenging happens if the inhumaneness does not occur. sent2: if that the auxeticness happens hold the protesting occurs. sent3: that the auxeticness occurs is correct if the fact that the humbleness and/or the non-polyphonicness occurs is incorrect. sent4: if the cruising does not occur the fact that the humbling occurs or the polyphonicness does not occur or both is not correct. sent5: if the cruising does not occur the humbleness does not occur. sent6: the perceptiveness occurs. sent7: the semioticsness does not occur. sent8: if the hemalness does not occur both the non-comicness and the filiating dandelion happens. sent9: the lie-in occurs. sent10: the stratifying battered does not occur. sent11: the excising swash does not occur. sent12: the cruising does not occur. sent13: if the resounding slack and the non-comicness happens the cruising occurs. sent14: that the waltz does not occur prevents the non-sociologicalness. sent15: the humbling does not occur. sent16: that the rebound does not occur hold. sent17: if the promissoriness does not occur the nondeductibleness happens. sent18: that the confiscation occurs and/or the chemotherapy does not occur is incorrect. sent19: that the resounding slack occurs and the optimisticness occurs is caused by that the excising swash does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the humbling happens or the polyphonicness does not occur or both is false.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the auxeticness occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the agonist does not filiate Lilliputian hold.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
sent1: something does not filiate Lilliputian if that it is a commitment and it is not libidinal is not true. sent2: the catalyst is unfair. sent3: the fact that the agonist is a commitment is right. sent4: the molt is libidinal. sent5: the griseofulvin vulcanizes if that the catalyst is unfair hold. sent6: if the fact that the superstrate is libidinal is not false the molt is a commitment. sent7: something is a commitment or does filiate Lilliputian or both if it is not pleural. sent8: the Lilliputian does filiate Lilliputian. sent9: that if the embezzler is a commitment then the molt is not a commitment is right. sent10: if something does excise Milk it is masochistic and it is not fenestral. sent11: the fact that something is fenestral and is not masochistic is false if it excises Milk. sent12: the rush is not fenestral if something vulcanizes or it does excise Milk or both. sent13: if the molt is a commitment then the agonist does filiate Lilliputian. sent14: if something is masochistic then it is pleural. sent15: the molt is congenial. sent16: if the rush is not fenestral that the thunderstorm is both not pleural and masochistic is not correct. sent17: the superstrate is libidinal. sent18: if the fact that the molt does filiate Lilliputian is correct then the agonist is a commitment. sent19: if the superstrate is a kind of a commitment the molt is libidinal. sent20: if that the anole is not non-fenestral and not masochistic does not hold it is not pleural. sent21: that the four-wheeler filiates Lilliputian is not false. sent22: the fact that the agonist is a commitment but it is not libidinal is incorrect if the fact that the superstrate is pleural hold.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent2: {I}{h} sent3: {B}{c} sent4: {A}{b} sent5: {I}{h} -> {H}{g} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x v {C}x) sent8: {C}{ge} sent9: {B}{d} -> ¬{B}{b} sent10: (x): {G}x -> ({E}x & ¬{F}x) sent11: (x): {G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent12: (x): ({H}x v {G}x) -> ¬{F}{f} sent13: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent14: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent15: {AB}{b} sent16: ¬{F}{f} -> ¬(¬{D}{e} & {E}{e}) sent17: {A}{a} sent18: {C}{b} -> {B}{c} sent19: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent20: ¬({F}{eo} & ¬{E}{eo}) -> ¬{D}{eo} sent21: {C}{i} sent22: {D}{a} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c})
|
[
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the molt is a commitment.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the agonist does not filiate Lilliputian.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
[
"sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the agonist is a commitment but it is not libidinal is wrong then it does not filiate Lilliputian.; sent14 -> int3: if that the superstrate is masochistic hold it is not non-pleural.; sent10 -> int4: the superstrate is a kind of masochistic thing that is not fenestral if it does excise Milk.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the agonist does not filiate Lilliputian hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not filiate Lilliputian if that it is a commitment and it is not libidinal is not true. sent2: the catalyst is unfair. sent3: the fact that the agonist is a commitment is right. sent4: the molt is libidinal. sent5: the griseofulvin vulcanizes if that the catalyst is unfair hold. sent6: if the fact that the superstrate is libidinal is not false the molt is a commitment. sent7: something is a commitment or does filiate Lilliputian or both if it is not pleural. sent8: the Lilliputian does filiate Lilliputian. sent9: that if the embezzler is a commitment then the molt is not a commitment is right. sent10: if something does excise Milk it is masochistic and it is not fenestral. sent11: the fact that something is fenestral and is not masochistic is false if it excises Milk. sent12: the rush is not fenestral if something vulcanizes or it does excise Milk or both. sent13: if the molt is a commitment then the agonist does filiate Lilliputian. sent14: if something is masochistic then it is pleural. sent15: the molt is congenial. sent16: if the rush is not fenestral that the thunderstorm is both not pleural and masochistic is not correct. sent17: the superstrate is libidinal. sent18: if the fact that the molt does filiate Lilliputian is correct then the agonist is a commitment. sent19: if the superstrate is a kind of a commitment the molt is libidinal. sent20: if that the anole is not non-fenestral and not masochistic does not hold it is not pleural. sent21: that the four-wheeler filiates Lilliputian is not false. sent22: the fact that the agonist is a commitment but it is not libidinal is incorrect if the fact that the superstrate is pleural hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the molt is a commitment.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the harshness does not occur is not wrong.
|
¬{D}
|
sent1: the resounding down-bow does not occur. sent2: the incuriousness does not occur if the demobilization does not occur and the fadeout does not occur. sent3: the impersonating does not occur and the stalemating occurs. sent4: the wheeling does not occur. sent5: the entericness does not occur. sent6: the Holocaust occurs. sent7: the wharfing does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the caecilianness does not occur is not false then the demobilization does not occur. sent9: that the harshness happens is prevented by that the demobilization does not occur. sent10: if the incuriousness does not occur then the caecilian and the harshness occurs. sent11: the passive does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{AE} sent2: (¬{C} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B} sent3: (¬{IH} & {EF}) sent4: ¬{HT} sent5: ¬{DN} sent6: {HE} sent7: ¬{DM} sent8: ¬{A} -> ¬{C} sent9: ¬{C} -> ¬{D} sent10: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {D}) sent11: ¬{GC}
|
[] |
[] |
the harshness happens.
|
{D}
|
[] | 7 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the harshness does not occur is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the resounding down-bow does not occur. sent2: the incuriousness does not occur if the demobilization does not occur and the fadeout does not occur. sent3: the impersonating does not occur and the stalemating occurs. sent4: the wheeling does not occur. sent5: the entericness does not occur. sent6: the Holocaust occurs. sent7: the wharfing does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the caecilianness does not occur is not false then the demobilization does not occur. sent9: that the harshness happens is prevented by that the demobilization does not occur. sent10: if the incuriousness does not occur then the caecilian and the harshness occurs. sent11: the passive does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the mezereon does excise epee.
|
{C}{a}
|
sent1: something is a kind of a two-piece and does not tidy if it is a electroplater. sent2: that the mezereon does not excise epee and it does not excise pepperwort is not true if the exhibitor does filiate one-fifth. sent3: if there exists something such that it is tubercular the fact that the jasper does stratify headstream or it is not ratty or both is not right. sent4: there exists something such that it is tubercular. sent5: something does excise epee if it does stratify Vienne. sent6: if something excises pepperwort the mezereon does stratify Vienne. sent7: there is something such that it excises pepperwort. sent8: the queenfish is a electroplater if there is something such that that it stratifies headstream or it is not ratty or both is not right.
|
sent1: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent2: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent3: (x): {J}x -> ¬({I}{d} v ¬{H}{d}) sent4: (Ex): {J}x sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: (x): ¬({I}x v ¬{H}x) -> {G}{c}
|
[
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the mezereon does stratify Vienne.; sent5 -> int2: if the mezereon does stratify Vienne it does excise epee.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the buster does stratify Vienne.
|
{B}{ck}
|
[
"sent1 -> int3: if the queenfish is a electroplater it is a kind of a two-piece and is not tidy.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: that the jasper does stratify headstream and/or is non-ratty is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it either stratifies headstream or is not ratty or both is wrong.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the queenfish is a electroplater.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the queenfish is a two-piece that is not a tidy.; int7 -> int8: something is a two-piece and untidy.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the mezereon does excise epee. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a two-piece and does not tidy if it is a electroplater. sent2: that the mezereon does not excise epee and it does not excise pepperwort is not true if the exhibitor does filiate one-fifth. sent3: if there exists something such that it is tubercular the fact that the jasper does stratify headstream or it is not ratty or both is not right. sent4: there exists something such that it is tubercular. sent5: something does excise epee if it does stratify Vienne. sent6: if something excises pepperwort the mezereon does stratify Vienne. sent7: there is something such that it excises pepperwort. sent8: the queenfish is a electroplater if there is something such that that it stratifies headstream or it is not ratty or both is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the mezereon does stratify Vienne.; sent5 -> int2: if the mezereon does stratify Vienne it does excise epee.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the thallophyticness does not occur and the resounding Monitor does not occur.
|
(¬{C} & ¬{B})
|
sent1: that not the times but the unusualness happens prevents that the self-defense occurs. sent2: not the crucialness but the discontinuing happens if that the excising highroad happens is true. sent3: the excising Talpidae does not occur but the excising Redford occurs if the controversialness does not occur. sent4: if that not the resounding Monitor but the diazoness occurs does not hold the DINK does not occur. sent5: the resounding lavishness happens if the inextinguishableness occurs. sent6: if the diazoness does not occur then that the thallophyticness does not occur and the resounding Monitor does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the fact that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur is wrong is correct if the diazoness occurs. sent8: if the tellurianness occurs the timing does not occur and the unusualness occurs. sent9: the diazoness occurs. sent10: both the inextinguishableness and the craniometricness happens if the self-defense does not occur. sent11: that the emphysematousness happens and the excising highroad occurs is triggered by that the excising Talpidae does not occur. sent12: if that the Donneanness and/or the resounding Citellus occurs is wrong the controversialness does not occur. sent13: the resounding Monitor does not occur if the resounding lumbering happens. sent14: if the resounding lavishness happens the thallophyticness occurs. sent15: the thallophyticness does not occur if the discontinuing occurs. sent16: if that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur does not hold the resounding Monitor does not occur. sent17: that the importunity occurs is prevented by that the non-crucialness and the discontinuing occurs. sent18: both the crucialness and the discontinuing happens. sent19: the discontinuing but not the diazoness occurs if the crucialness does not occur. sent20: the reallocation occurs.
|
sent1: (¬{R} & {Q}) -> ¬{N} sent2: {F} -> (¬{E} & {D}) sent3: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) sent4: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{BO} sent5: {L} -> {K} sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) sent7: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent8: {S} -> (¬{R} & {Q}) sent9: {A} sent10: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {M}) sent11: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) sent12: ¬({P} v {O}) -> ¬{J} sent13: {AB} -> ¬{B} sent14: {K} -> {C} sent15: {D} -> ¬{C} sent16: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent17: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{EN} sent18: ({E} & {D}) sent19: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{A}) sent20: {GA}
|
[
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the resounding Monitor does not occur.; sent18 -> int3: the discontinuing happens.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the thallophyticness does not occur is not false.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & sent16 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent18 -> int3: {D}; sent15 & int3 -> int4: ¬{C}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the DINK does not occur and the importunity does not occur.
|
(¬{BO} & ¬{EN})
|
[] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the thallophyticness does not occur and the resounding Monitor does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the times but the unusualness happens prevents that the self-defense occurs. sent2: not the crucialness but the discontinuing happens if that the excising highroad happens is true. sent3: the excising Talpidae does not occur but the excising Redford occurs if the controversialness does not occur. sent4: if that not the resounding Monitor but the diazoness occurs does not hold the DINK does not occur. sent5: the resounding lavishness happens if the inextinguishableness occurs. sent6: if the diazoness does not occur then that the thallophyticness does not occur and the resounding Monitor does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the fact that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur is wrong is correct if the diazoness occurs. sent8: if the tellurianness occurs the timing does not occur and the unusualness occurs. sent9: the diazoness occurs. sent10: both the inextinguishableness and the craniometricness happens if the self-defense does not occur. sent11: that the emphysematousness happens and the excising highroad occurs is triggered by that the excising Talpidae does not occur. sent12: if that the Donneanness and/or the resounding Citellus occurs is wrong the controversialness does not occur. sent13: the resounding Monitor does not occur if the resounding lumbering happens. sent14: if the resounding lavishness happens the thallophyticness occurs. sent15: the thallophyticness does not occur if the discontinuing occurs. sent16: if that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur does not hold the resounding Monitor does not occur. sent17: that the importunity occurs is prevented by that the non-crucialness and the discontinuing occurs. sent18: both the crucialness and the discontinuing happens. sent19: the discontinuing but not the diazoness occurs if the crucialness does not occur. sent20: the reallocation occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: that the melodizing does not occur and the resounding lumbering does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the resounding Monitor does not occur.; sent18 -> int3: the discontinuing happens.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the thallophyticness does not occur is not false.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if that it is not a Mohave and/or is a speck is not correct then it is not a coachwhip.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: if that the cordon is not a kind of a Mohave or does speck or both is incorrect it is not a kind of a coachwhip. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not a Mohave and/or is a kind of a speck is not correct it is a coachwhip. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a Mohave or it does speck or both is false it is not a coachwhip. sent4: there is something such that if it is either not a Mohave or a speck or both it is not a coachwhip.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a Mohave and/or is a speck is not correct then it is not a coachwhip. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the cordon is not a kind of a Mohave or does speck or both is incorrect it is not a kind of a coachwhip. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not a Mohave and/or is a kind of a speck is not correct it is a coachwhip. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a Mohave or it does speck or both is false it is not a coachwhip. sent4: there is something such that if it is either not a Mohave or a speck or both it is not a coachwhip. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the bookbinder is a FTC hold.
|
{A}{c}
|
sent1: the bookbinder is a FTC if the alyssum is Honduran. sent2: if the fact that the alyssum is not a Honduran and is a FTC is false the bookbinder smashes. sent3: that the spinet does not smash but it does excise Homer is not true. sent4: if that something is a FTC but not unfortunate is wrong it is not a FTC. sent5: that something is a kind of a FTC that is not unfortunate is not true if it is a kind of a Honduran.
|
sent1: {B}{b} -> {A}{c} sent2: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {AA}{c} sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent5: (x): {B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x)
|
[] |
[] |
the bookbinder is not a FTC.
|
¬{A}{c}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: if that the bookbinder is a kind of a FTC and is not unfortunate does not hold that it is not a FTC hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the bookbinder is a Honduran then that it is a FTC and it is not unfortunate is wrong.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the bookbinder is a FTC hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bookbinder is a FTC if the alyssum is Honduran. sent2: if the fact that the alyssum is not a Honduran and is a FTC is false the bookbinder smashes. sent3: that the spinet does not smash but it does excise Homer is not true. sent4: if that something is a FTC but not unfortunate is wrong it is not a FTC. sent5: that something is a kind of a FTC that is not unfortunate is not true if it is a kind of a Honduran. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the mesentery is a longanberry.
|
{B}{b}
|
sent1: that the Lasso does not filiate transferability and is a peak is not right. sent2: that the sulfisoxazole filiates moreen and it is a peak is incorrect. sent3: the sulfisoxazole does not filiate moreen if it is not a quadratics and it is not cerous. sent4: if something either does not filiate moreen or is not a longanberry or both it is a throe. sent5: if there is something such that it filiates transferability then that the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen is true. sent6: there exists something such that that it does peak and it filiates moreen is not correct. sent7: if that the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen and is a longanberry is false the mesentery is not a kind of a longanberry. sent8: there is something such that that it does not filiate moreen and is a longanberry is not right. sent9: there is something such that it does not filiate moreen and is a kind of a longanberry. sent10: the mesentery peaks. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not filiate transferability and it is a kind of a peak does not hold the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen. sent12: the sulfisoxazole is a longanberry.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬({A}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent3: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> {CQ}x sent5: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent6: (Ex): ¬({AB}x & {A}x) sent7: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent8: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent9: (Ex): (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent10: {AB}{b} sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent12: {B}{a}
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not filiate transferability and does peak is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the sulfisoxazole filiates moreen.;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent11 -> int2: {A}{a};"
] |
the fact that the mediastinum is not a throe but a goldenseal is not right.
|
¬(¬{CQ}{bp} & {CB}{bp})
|
[
"sent4 -> int3: the sulfisoxazole is a throe if it does not filiate moreen or it is not a longanberry or both.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the mesentery is a longanberry. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Lasso does not filiate transferability and is a peak is not right. sent2: that the sulfisoxazole filiates moreen and it is a peak is incorrect. sent3: the sulfisoxazole does not filiate moreen if it is not a quadratics and it is not cerous. sent4: if something either does not filiate moreen or is not a longanberry or both it is a throe. sent5: if there is something such that it filiates transferability then that the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen is true. sent6: there exists something such that that it does peak and it filiates moreen is not correct. sent7: if that the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen and is a longanberry is false the mesentery is not a kind of a longanberry. sent8: there is something such that that it does not filiate moreen and is a longanberry is not right. sent9: there is something such that it does not filiate moreen and is a kind of a longanberry. sent10: the mesentery peaks. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not filiate transferability and it is a kind of a peak does not hold the sulfisoxazole does filiate moreen. sent12: the sulfisoxazole is a longanberry. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not filiate transferability and does peak is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the sulfisoxazole filiates moreen.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it does not excise nephrite the fact that it is presentational and it is not a abidance is not true.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: that the fact that the raspberry is a kind of thallophytic thing that is not a copal does not hold is not wrong if it is a cosmology. sent2: if the blastema is not inspiratory that it is a abidance and it is not an alligator is not correct. sent3: that that the blastema is presentational but it is not the abidance does not hold if the blastema does not excise nephrite hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does stratify decolletage then that it is Tahitian and it does not forgive is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the blastema is a kind of a abidance and it is unofficial is incorrect if it is not rh-positive. sent6: if the blastema is not a Kolam that it is pharyngeal and it excises nephrite is not correct. sent7: that the blastema is a scaup that does not excise nephrite is wrong if it excises Ziziphus. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a hind that it is adynamic and it does not excise biliousness is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is ascetic the fact that it excises biliousness and does not resound Klee is false. sent10: that the blastema is a kind of a bureaucrat that does not excise chador is not correct if the fact that it is not a Cenozoic is true. sent11: that the blastema is presentational and is not a abidance is false if it excises nephrite. sent12: the fact that the Lilliputian does resound hob but it is not presentational does not hold if it does not stratify cheese. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not excise raspberry is not incorrect then it is rh-positive and does not stratify insensibility. sent14: the fact that if the blastema is not the copal then the fact that the blastema is not non-presentational but non-Cenozoic is not true is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it is not fisheye then it excises basement and it is not mortuary. sent16: the fact that something is a abidance and does not excise buffalofish does not hold if it is not a cork. sent17: the deep-freeze is corporate and does not excrete if the fact that it does not excise nephrite is not wrong.
|
sent1: {IR}{s} -> ¬({FK}{s} & ¬{GS}{s}) sent2: ¬{BJ}{aa} -> ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{FC}{aa}) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): {EN}x -> ¬({ES}x & ¬{BN}x) sent5: ¬{EP}{aa} -> ¬({AB}{aa} & {ER}{aa}) sent6: ¬{EJ}{aa} -> ¬({CN}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent7: {HP}{aa} -> ¬({FQ}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent8: (Ex): {DO}x -> ¬({HI}x & ¬{AE}x) sent9: (Ex): {JD}x -> ¬({AE}x & ¬{IO}x) sent10: ¬{GH}{aa} -> ¬({DC}{aa} & ¬{AF}{aa}) sent11: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent12: ¬{GJ}{h} -> ¬({IS}{h} & ¬{AA}{h}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{BT}x -> ({EP}x & ¬{HG}x) sent14: ¬{GS}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{GH}{aa}) sent15: (Ex): ¬{JJ}x -> ({IF}x & ¬{N}x) sent16: (x): ¬{BQ}x -> ¬({AB}x & ¬{BK}x) sent17: ¬{A}{gs} -> ({U}{gs} & ¬{FO}{gs})
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the vaulter is a abidance and does not excise buffalofish is not correct if it does not cork.
|
¬{BQ}{co} -> ¬({AB}{co} & ¬{BK}{co})
|
[
"sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not excise nephrite the fact that it is presentational and it is not a abidance is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the raspberry is a kind of thallophytic thing that is not a copal does not hold is not wrong if it is a cosmology. sent2: if the blastema is not inspiratory that it is a abidance and it is not an alligator is not correct. sent3: that that the blastema is presentational but it is not the abidance does not hold if the blastema does not excise nephrite hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does stratify decolletage then that it is Tahitian and it does not forgive is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the blastema is a kind of a abidance and it is unofficial is incorrect if it is not rh-positive. sent6: if the blastema is not a Kolam that it is pharyngeal and it excises nephrite is not correct. sent7: that the blastema is a scaup that does not excise nephrite is wrong if it excises Ziziphus. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a hind that it is adynamic and it does not excise biliousness is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is ascetic the fact that it excises biliousness and does not resound Klee is false. sent10: that the blastema is a kind of a bureaucrat that does not excise chador is not correct if the fact that it is not a Cenozoic is true. sent11: that the blastema is presentational and is not a abidance is false if it excises nephrite. sent12: the fact that the Lilliputian does resound hob but it is not presentational does not hold if it does not stratify cheese. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not excise raspberry is not incorrect then it is rh-positive and does not stratify insensibility. sent14: the fact that if the blastema is not the copal then the fact that the blastema is not non-presentational but non-Cenozoic is not true is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it is not fisheye then it excises basement and it is not mortuary. sent16: the fact that something is a abidance and does not excise buffalofish does not hold if it is not a cork. sent17: the deep-freeze is corporate and does not excrete if the fact that it does not excise nephrite is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not cantonal is true it is a half is wrong.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> {C}x)
|
sent1: if the swearer is a kind of a metasequoia it is a half. sent2: the swearer is a kind of a piper if it is not a half. sent3: if the swearer is a headcount it is a kind of a bridal. sent4: there is something such that if it is not chromatic it is a kind of a EW. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a Shockley it swans. sent6: that the swearer is a half hold if it is non-cantonal. sent7: there is something such that if that it is not postwar is not incorrect then it is a Dias. sent8: something is a kind of a half if it is not a isoagglutinogen. sent9: there exists something such that if it is on-street then it thins. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not non-thin it is Australasian. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a depositor it is acoustics. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a nybble then it extirpates. sent13: the swearer is cantonal if it is not a acidimetry.
|
sent1: {GQ}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent2: ¬{C}{aa} -> {CO}{aa} sent3: {BR}{aa} -> {BC}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ¬{FU}x -> {HH}x sent5: (Ex): ¬{HK}x -> {EP}x sent6: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ¬{CI}x -> {BS}x sent8: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {C}x sent9: (Ex): {FB}x -> {HL}x sent10: (Ex): {HL}x -> {O}x sent11: (Ex): ¬{JD}x -> {U}x sent12: (Ex): ¬{HD}x -> {ET}x sent13: ¬{IT}{aa} -> {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the ballpark is a half if it is not a isoagglutinogen.
|
¬{AA}{gf} -> {C}{gf}
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not cantonal is true it is a half is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the swearer is a kind of a metasequoia it is a half. sent2: the swearer is a kind of a piper if it is not a half. sent3: if the swearer is a headcount it is a kind of a bridal. sent4: there is something such that if it is not chromatic it is a kind of a EW. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a Shockley it swans. sent6: that the swearer is a half hold if it is non-cantonal. sent7: there is something such that if that it is not postwar is not incorrect then it is a Dias. sent8: something is a kind of a half if it is not a isoagglutinogen. sent9: there exists something such that if it is on-street then it thins. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not non-thin it is Australasian. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a depositor it is acoustics. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a nybble then it extirpates. sent13: the swearer is cantonal if it is not a acidimetry. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the intertwining occurs.
|
{C}
|
sent1: the resounding hygroscope happens. sent2: the resounding blepharospasm does not occur if the fact that the Dickensianness does not occur and the resounding blepharospasm happens does not hold. sent3: if the filiating tugrik happens and the pardonableness does not occur the practice does not occur. sent4: the intertwining and the fudging happens if the resounding hygroscope does not occur. sent5: if the fudge and the resounding hygroscope happens then the intertwining does not occur. sent6: if the fudging does not occur then the replacement happens. sent7: the molestation does not occur if the resounding cuddy but not the stratifying Redford occurs. sent8: the fudge happens. sent9: if the excising formication does not occur the idleness happens but the stratifying Redford does not occur. sent10: the filiating tugrik but not the pardonableness happens. sent11: if the fact that the hooking and the stratifying orphenadrine occurs is false then the stratifying debilitation does not occur. sent12: that the molestation does not occur and the stratifying debilitation does not occur prevents the resounding hygroscope. sent13: if the resounding blepharospasm does not occur the fact that the fact that the hook and the stratifying orphenadrine occurs does not hold hold. sent14: if the trophicness does not occur then that the fact that the non-Dickensianness and the resounding blepharospasm happens does not hold is not wrong. sent15: the titrating is brought about by that the stratifying Klee does not occur and the muscularness does not occur. sent16: the resounding looking happens and the excising formication does not occur if the titrating happens. sent17: the stratifying Klee does not occur and the muscularness does not occur. sent18: the resounding cuddy occurs and the self-discovery occurs if the practice does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the molestation happens but the stratifying orphenadrine does not occur does not hold then that the molestation does not occur hold.
|
sent1: {B} sent2: ¬(¬{J} & {H}) -> ¬{H} sent3: ({U} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{Q} sent4: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent5: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: ¬{A} -> {BL} sent7: ({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{E} sent8: {A} sent9: ¬{N} -> ({M} & ¬{L}) sent10: ({U} & ¬{T}) sent11: ¬({F} & {G}) -> ¬{D} sent12: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} sent13: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & {G}) sent14: ¬{I} -> ¬(¬{J} & {H}) sent15: (¬{AB} & ¬{AC}) -> {AA} sent16: {AA} -> ({P} & ¬{N}) sent17: (¬{AB} & ¬{AC}) sent18: ¬{Q} -> ({K} & {O}) sent19: ¬({E} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{E}
|
[
"sent8 & sent1 -> int1: both the fudging and the resounding hygroscope happens.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent1 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the intertwining happens.
|
{C}
|
[
"sent3 & sent10 -> int2: the practicing does not occur.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: the resounding cuddy and the self-discovery occurs.; int3 -> int4: the resounding cuddy occurs.; sent15 & sent17 -> int5: the titrating occurs.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the resounding looking occurs and the excising formication does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the excising formication does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the idleness but not the stratifying Redford occurs.; int8 -> int9: that the stratifying Redford occurs does not hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the resounding cuddy happens and the stratifying Redford does not occur.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the molestation does not occur.;"
] | 11 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the intertwining occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the resounding hygroscope happens. sent2: the resounding blepharospasm does not occur if the fact that the Dickensianness does not occur and the resounding blepharospasm happens does not hold. sent3: if the filiating tugrik happens and the pardonableness does not occur the practice does not occur. sent4: the intertwining and the fudging happens if the resounding hygroscope does not occur. sent5: if the fudge and the resounding hygroscope happens then the intertwining does not occur. sent6: if the fudging does not occur then the replacement happens. sent7: the molestation does not occur if the resounding cuddy but not the stratifying Redford occurs. sent8: the fudge happens. sent9: if the excising formication does not occur the idleness happens but the stratifying Redford does not occur. sent10: the filiating tugrik but not the pardonableness happens. sent11: if the fact that the hooking and the stratifying orphenadrine occurs is false then the stratifying debilitation does not occur. sent12: that the molestation does not occur and the stratifying debilitation does not occur prevents the resounding hygroscope. sent13: if the resounding blepharospasm does not occur the fact that the fact that the hook and the stratifying orphenadrine occurs does not hold hold. sent14: if the trophicness does not occur then that the fact that the non-Dickensianness and the resounding blepharospasm happens does not hold is not wrong. sent15: the titrating is brought about by that the stratifying Klee does not occur and the muscularness does not occur. sent16: the resounding looking happens and the excising formication does not occur if the titrating happens. sent17: the stratifying Klee does not occur and the muscularness does not occur. sent18: the resounding cuddy occurs and the self-discovery occurs if the practice does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the molestation happens but the stratifying orphenadrine does not occur does not hold then that the molestation does not occur hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent1 -> int1: both the fudging and the resounding hygroscope happens.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the ceriman is a kind of a Court.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: the fact that something does not resound thorite and is a amine is incorrect if it is a Court. sent2: the ceriman is a Court if there exists something such that it does resound thorite and it is not a kind of a amine. sent3: that the undergraduate does not stratify Pollock hold if that it does stratify Pollock and it is false is not right. sent4: the thorite resounds thorite. sent5: The thorite resounds thorite. sent6: something is a Talpidae if the fact that it is not a kind of a Talpidae and it is not a epicanthus does not hold. sent7: the ceriman does not resound thorite and it is not a kind of a amine if the thorite is a kind of a Talpidae. sent8: if the branchiopod is not a brasserie then the fact that the undergraduate stratifies Pollock and it is false does not hold. sent9: that the trazodone is both not a keratinization and a Belsen is not right. sent10: something does not resound insulation and is not chlamydial if it does not stratify Pollock. sent11: if that the trazodone is not a keratinization but it is a Belsen is wrong then it does excise skincare. sent12: if something that does not resound insulation is not chlamydial then it is not a kind of a yaws. sent13: if something that does not resound thorite is not a amine then it is not a Court. sent14: the branchiopod is not a brasserie if something that is not Nordic is not a micelle. sent15: that the trazodone is not Nordic and it is not the micelle if the trazodone does excise skincare hold. sent16: the thorite is not a kind of a amine.
|
sent1: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent2: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}{b} sent3: ¬({I}{c} & {K}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {AA}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x sent7: {D}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent8: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬({I}{c} & {K}{c}) sent9: ¬(¬{O}{e} & {P}{e}) sent10: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) sent11: ¬(¬{O}{e} & {P}{e}) -> {N}{e} sent12: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent13: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent14: (x): (¬{M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{J}{d} sent15: {N}{e} -> (¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) sent16: ¬{B}{a}
|
[
"sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the thorite does resound thorite but it is not a kind of a amine.; int1 -> int2: something does resound thorite and is not a amine.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent16 -> int1: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x & ¬{B}x); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the ceriman does not resound thorite.
|
¬{A}{b}
|
[
"sent1 -> int3: that the undergraduate does not resound thorite and is a amine is wrong if it is a Court.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the ceriman is a kind of a Court. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not resound thorite and is a amine is incorrect if it is a Court. sent2: the ceriman is a Court if there exists something such that it does resound thorite and it is not a kind of a amine. sent3: that the undergraduate does not stratify Pollock hold if that it does stratify Pollock and it is false is not right. sent4: the thorite resounds thorite. sent5: The thorite resounds thorite. sent6: something is a Talpidae if the fact that it is not a kind of a Talpidae and it is not a epicanthus does not hold. sent7: the ceriman does not resound thorite and it is not a kind of a amine if the thorite is a kind of a Talpidae. sent8: if the branchiopod is not a brasserie then the fact that the undergraduate stratifies Pollock and it is false does not hold. sent9: that the trazodone is both not a keratinization and a Belsen is not right. sent10: something does not resound insulation and is not chlamydial if it does not stratify Pollock. sent11: if that the trazodone is not a keratinization but it is a Belsen is wrong then it does excise skincare. sent12: if something that does not resound insulation is not chlamydial then it is not a kind of a yaws. sent13: if something that does not resound thorite is not a amine then it is not a Court. sent14: the branchiopod is not a brasserie if something that is not Nordic is not a micelle. sent15: that the trazodone is not Nordic and it is not the micelle if the trazodone does excise skincare hold. sent16: the thorite is not a kind of a amine. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the thorite does resound thorite but it is not a kind of a amine.; int1 -> int2: something does resound thorite and is not a amine.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the lauhala is not a kind of the collectible if that the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable thing that is antecedent is incorrect is false.
|
¬(¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa})
|
sent1: if that something does heterodyne and it fumbles is not right it is not celebratory. sent2: something is not telephonic if the fact that it intumesces and it does resound Padda is incorrect. sent3: something is not a emmenagogue if the fact that it resounds lauhala and it is a kind of a Megaloptera is not true. sent4: if the fact that the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable an antecedent is wrong then it is a collectible. sent5: something is a collectible if the fact that it is unpreventable and an antecedent is not right. sent6: if that the lauhala is a collectible and it is female is not true it is not adiabatic. sent7: if something is preventable then it is not a kind of a collectible. sent8: if that something excises Duralumin and is a kind of a hypnotism is not correct it does not mint. sent9: something is not a kind of a ritual if the fact that it is both a quarters and a bowing is not correct. sent10: if something that is unpreventable is a kind of an antecedent then it is not a collectible. sent11: if that something is a fumble and is a nastiness is not right then that it is not a marten is true. sent12: if that something is both unpreventable and antecedent is not true then it is not a collectible. sent13: if the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable an antecedent then it is not a collectible. sent14: the lauhala does not vitrify if that it is autocatalytic and it is an antecedent is false. sent15: if that the lauhala is not unpreventable is correct that it is not a collectible is not wrong.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({DA}x & {DI}x) -> ¬{EP}x sent2: (x): ¬({JD}x & {I}x) -> ¬{FB}x sent3: (x): ¬({IP}x & {EN}x) -> ¬{CM}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: ¬({B}{aa} & {G}{aa}) -> ¬{AI}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent8: (x): ¬({BP}x & {EH}x) -> ¬{FS}x sent9: (x): ¬({AP}x & {FH}x) -> ¬{M}x sent10: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (x): ¬({DI}x & {IE}x) -> ¬{P}x sent12: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent13: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent14: ¬({DU}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{AG}{aa} sent15: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the lauhala is not a kind of the collectible if that the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable thing that is antecedent is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does heterodyne and it fumbles is not right it is not celebratory. sent2: something is not telephonic if the fact that it intumesces and it does resound Padda is incorrect. sent3: something is not a emmenagogue if the fact that it resounds lauhala and it is a kind of a Megaloptera is not true. sent4: if the fact that the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable an antecedent is wrong then it is a collectible. sent5: something is a collectible if the fact that it is unpreventable and an antecedent is not right. sent6: if that the lauhala is a collectible and it is female is not true it is not adiabatic. sent7: if something is preventable then it is not a kind of a collectible. sent8: if that something excises Duralumin and is a kind of a hypnotism is not correct it does not mint. sent9: something is not a kind of a ritual if the fact that it is both a quarters and a bowing is not correct. sent10: if something that is unpreventable is a kind of an antecedent then it is not a collectible. sent11: if that something is a fumble and is a nastiness is not right then that it is not a marten is true. sent12: if that something is both unpreventable and antecedent is not true then it is not a collectible. sent13: if the lauhala is a kind of unpreventable an antecedent then it is not a collectible. sent14: the lauhala does not vitrify if that it is autocatalytic and it is an antecedent is false. sent15: if that the lauhala is not unpreventable is correct that it is not a collectible is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the hygroscope is not unairworthy.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: if that the anus is a kind of a annihilator and it is Moldovan is not correct the FM is not unairworthy. sent2: the hygroscope is not non-adamantine if it is unairworthy. sent3: if the hygroscope is pure it is adamantine. sent4: if there exists something such that it is pure that the hygroscope is not a converse and it is not adamantine is incorrect. sent5: the anus is adamantine. sent6: if something is not a kind of a converse and is adamantine it is not pure. sent7: the anus is pure if that the triacetate is a kind of a annihilator that is not Moldovan is not correct. sent8: if the anus is adamantine then it converses. sent9: if the anus is a converse then the hygroscope is not pure. sent10: the hygroscope is not unairworthy and it is not pure if the anus is a kind of a converse. sent11: if the hygroscope is not a Notonectidae then it is not a annihilator and it does not resound hygroscope. sent12: something that is not unairworthy does not converse and is not non-adamantine. sent13: the hygroscope is not pure.
|
sent1: ¬({F}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{D}{ec} sent2: {D}{b} -> {A}{b} sent3: {C}{b} -> {A}{b} sent4: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent5: {A}{a} sent6: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent7: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {C}{a} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent10: {B}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent11: ¬{H}{b} -> (¬{F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent12: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) sent13: ¬{C}{b}
|
[
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the anus does converse.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the hygroscope is not unairworthy and it is not pure.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent10 -> int2: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the hygroscope is unairworthy.
|
{D}{b}
|
[] | 11 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the hygroscope is not unairworthy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the anus is a kind of a annihilator and it is Moldovan is not correct the FM is not unairworthy. sent2: the hygroscope is not non-adamantine if it is unairworthy. sent3: if the hygroscope is pure it is adamantine. sent4: if there exists something such that it is pure that the hygroscope is not a converse and it is not adamantine is incorrect. sent5: the anus is adamantine. sent6: if something is not a kind of a converse and is adamantine it is not pure. sent7: the anus is pure if that the triacetate is a kind of a annihilator that is not Moldovan is not correct. sent8: if the anus is adamantine then it converses. sent9: if the anus is a converse then the hygroscope is not pure. sent10: the hygroscope is not unairworthy and it is not pure if the anus is a kind of a converse. sent11: if the hygroscope is not a Notonectidae then it is not a annihilator and it does not resound hygroscope. sent12: something that is not unairworthy does not converse and is not non-adamantine. sent13: the hygroscope is not pure. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the anus does converse.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the hygroscope is not unairworthy and it is not pure.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the verticalness does not occur is true.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: the fact that the excising tor occurs is correct. sent2: if the neurosurgery does not occur the fact that the fact that the reentry does not occur and the symptomaticness does not occur is incorrect is not wrong. sent3: the vertical happens. sent4: the fact that the bareboating occurs hold. sent5: the resounding timbre happens. sent6: the minimization occurs. sent7: the skeet occurs if that the symptomaticness and the non-verticalness occurs is not right. sent8: the excising rat happens. sent9: the words occurs. sent10: that the symptomaticness and the non-verticalness occurs is not correct if the reentry does not occur. sent11: the verticalness does not occur if the fact that the reentry does not occur and the symptomaticness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the high-techness occurs. sent13: the restraint occurs. sent14: the excising conduit happens. sent15: the cervineness happens. sent16: the inroad happens. sent17: the qualifying occurs.
|
sent1: {IU} sent2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) sent3: {A} sent4: {FP} sent5: {IF} sent6: {EQ} sent7: ¬({B} & ¬{A}) -> {AU} sent8: {EK} sent9: {GU} sent10: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) sent11: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} sent12: {IJ} sent13: {CN} sent14: {BL} sent15: {ID} sent16: {BO} sent17: {EH}
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the skeet happens.
|
{AU}
|
[] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the verticalness does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the excising tor occurs is correct. sent2: if the neurosurgery does not occur the fact that the fact that the reentry does not occur and the symptomaticness does not occur is incorrect is not wrong. sent3: the vertical happens. sent4: the fact that the bareboating occurs hold. sent5: the resounding timbre happens. sent6: the minimization occurs. sent7: the skeet occurs if that the symptomaticness and the non-verticalness occurs is not right. sent8: the excising rat happens. sent9: the words occurs. sent10: that the symptomaticness and the non-verticalness occurs is not correct if the reentry does not occur. sent11: the verticalness does not occur if the fact that the reentry does not occur and the symptomaticness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the high-techness occurs. sent13: the restraint occurs. sent14: the excising conduit happens. sent15: the cervineness happens. sent16: the inroad happens. sent17: the qualifying occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the rotenone is not a kind of a Loire.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: if something is not a kind of a Ellsworth then the fact that it is limnological and it is not tactical does not hold. sent2: something resounds Seriola if the fact that it is mortuary and it does not resounds Seriola does not hold. sent3: that either the rotenone excises sprigged or it does not resound Seriola or both is false if the archenteron is not breathless. sent4: that the rotenone is mortuary but it does not resound Seriola is not correct if it is not breathless. sent5: the firebox assembles and does not filiate argentine. sent6: if there is something such that it assembles and does not filiate argentine the rotenone does not excise sprigged. sent7: the archenteron is not breathless if the masseuse is non-mortuary. sent8: the rotenone is breathing. sent9: if there is something such that it does assemble and it does filiate argentine the rotenone does not excise sprigged.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{DD}x -> ¬({BG}x & ¬{FQ}x) sent2: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent3: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent4: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent5: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent7: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬{D}{b} sent8: ¬{D}{a} sent9: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent5 -> int1: something does assemble but it does not filiate argentine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the rotenone does not excise sprigged.; sent2 -> int3: if that the rotenone is mortuary and does not resound Seriola does not hold it resound Seriola.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: that the rotenone is mortuary but it does not resound Seriola does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rotenone does resound Seriola.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the rotenone does not excise sprigged but it does resound Seriola.;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> int1: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; sent2 -> int3: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{a}; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int3 & int4 -> int5: {B}{a}; int2 & int5 -> int6: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a});"
] |
the rotenone is a kind of a Loire.
|
{C}{a}
|
[] | 6 | 4 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the rotenone is not a kind of a Loire. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Ellsworth then the fact that it is limnological and it is not tactical does not hold. sent2: something resounds Seriola if the fact that it is mortuary and it does not resounds Seriola does not hold. sent3: that either the rotenone excises sprigged or it does not resound Seriola or both is false if the archenteron is not breathless. sent4: that the rotenone is mortuary but it does not resound Seriola is not correct if it is not breathless. sent5: the firebox assembles and does not filiate argentine. sent6: if there is something such that it assembles and does not filiate argentine the rotenone does not excise sprigged. sent7: the archenteron is not breathless if the masseuse is non-mortuary. sent8: the rotenone is breathing. sent9: if there is something such that it does assemble and it does filiate argentine the rotenone does not excise sprigged. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> int1: something does assemble but it does not filiate argentine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the rotenone does not excise sprigged.; sent2 -> int3: if that the rotenone is mortuary and does not resound Seriola does not hold it resound Seriola.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: that the rotenone is mortuary but it does not resound Seriola does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rotenone does resound Seriola.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the rotenone does not excise sprigged but it does resound Seriola.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the chickadee does not gall.
|
¬{A}{b}
|
sent1: if the leipoa uniforms but it does not stratify seafood the chickadee is a Jong. sent2: the fact that the leipoa uniforms and does not stratify seafood is right. sent3: the egocentric is a Jong. sent4: if something is a Jong then it does gall. sent5: the leipoa is neuroanatomic thing that does not resound gecko. sent6: the leipoa is a kind of a Jong. sent7: something is a kind of a uniform if that it does not stratify seafood does not hold. sent8: something is not non-forte if it is a rhinencephalon.
|
sent1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: {B}{ib} sent4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent5: ({HC}{a} & ¬{DC}{a}) sent6: {B}{a} sent7: (x): {AB}x -> {AA}x sent8: (x): {BD}x -> {IP}x
|
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the chickadee is a Jong is correct.; sent4 -> int2: if the chickadee is a kind of a Jong it is a gall.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent4 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {A}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the chickadee does not gall. ; $context$ = sent1: if the leipoa uniforms but it does not stratify seafood the chickadee is a Jong. sent2: the fact that the leipoa uniforms and does not stratify seafood is right. sent3: the egocentric is a Jong. sent4: if something is a Jong then it does gall. sent5: the leipoa is neuroanatomic thing that does not resound gecko. sent6: the leipoa is a kind of a Jong. sent7: something is a kind of a uniform if that it does not stratify seafood does not hold. sent8: something is not non-forte if it is a rhinencephalon. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the chickadee is a Jong is correct.; sent4 -> int2: if the chickadee is a kind of a Jong it is a gall.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the convalescent excises IAEA and/or it is a destalinization is not correct.
|
¬({A}{a} v {B}{a})
|
sent1: something does not participate but it is a place-kicker. sent2: the convalescent excises IAEA if there is something such that that it does not participate and it is a place-kicker does not hold. sent3: that something excises pentahedron and does not excise IAEA if it is a kind of a destalinization is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a destalinization and it excises IAEA is not correct. sent5: the convalescent is euphonious and/or it is a Gibraltarian. sent6: if the fact that the proliferation is a hero is correct then that the corbel is a kind of a shipyard is not incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does participate and it is a place-kicker is not correct. sent8: there is something such that that it does not participate and it is a place-kicker does not hold. sent9: the proliferation is a kind of a hero if there is something such that it stratifies tor and does not dim. sent10: the crayfish resounds headstream but it is not tartaric. sent11: if something does participate then the convalescent does excise IAEA. sent12: the convalescent is a Piaget. sent13: if the fact that the crayfish is a trade and/or is not a shipyard is not correct the corbel is a trade. sent14: the convalescent is a ecclesiology if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a nelson and does stratify Chordospartium is not correct. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does not excise IAEA and is a kind of a destalinization is false. sent16: there is something such that it stratifies tor and it is not dim. sent17: that the convalescent is not dim but it is Attic does not hold if the inset does excise IAEA. sent18: something is a kind of a destalinization if it is a trade. sent19: the inset excises IAEA if the corbel does excise pentahedron but it does not excises IAEA.
|
sent1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent3: (x): {B}x -> ({C}x & ¬{A}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) sent5: ({BD}{a} v {FN}{a}) sent6: {H}{e} -> {E}{c} sent7: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent9: (x): ({J}x & ¬{I}x) -> {H}{e} sent10: ({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent11: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent12: {IJ}{a} sent13: ¬({D}{d} v ¬{E}{d}) -> {D}{c} sent14: (x): ¬(¬{AS}x & {GD}x) -> {GL}{a} sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent16: (Ex): ({J}x & ¬{I}x) sent17: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{I}{a} & {GN}{a}) sent18: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent19: ({C}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) -> {A}{b}
|
[
"sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the convalescent excises IAEA.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent2 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the convalescent either does excise IAEA or is a kind of a destalinization or both does not hold.
|
¬({A}{a} v {B}{a})
|
[
"sent16 & sent9 -> int2: the proliferation is a hero.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the corbel is a shipyard is not false.; sent10 -> int4: something resounds headstream but it is not tartaric.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the convalescent excises IAEA and/or it is a destalinization is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not participate but it is a place-kicker. sent2: the convalescent excises IAEA if there is something such that that it does not participate and it is a place-kicker does not hold. sent3: that something excises pentahedron and does not excise IAEA if it is a kind of a destalinization is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a destalinization and it excises IAEA is not correct. sent5: the convalescent is euphonious and/or it is a Gibraltarian. sent6: if the fact that the proliferation is a hero is correct then that the corbel is a kind of a shipyard is not incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does participate and it is a place-kicker is not correct. sent8: there is something such that that it does not participate and it is a place-kicker does not hold. sent9: the proliferation is a kind of a hero if there is something such that it stratifies tor and does not dim. sent10: the crayfish resounds headstream but it is not tartaric. sent11: if something does participate then the convalescent does excise IAEA. sent12: the convalescent is a Piaget. sent13: if the fact that the crayfish is a trade and/or is not a shipyard is not correct the corbel is a trade. sent14: the convalescent is a ecclesiology if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a nelson and does stratify Chordospartium is not correct. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does not excise IAEA and is a kind of a destalinization is false. sent16: there is something such that it stratifies tor and it is not dim. sent17: that the convalescent is not dim but it is Attic does not hold if the inset does excise IAEA. sent18: something is a kind of a destalinization if it is a trade. sent19: the inset excises IAEA if the corbel does excise pentahedron but it does not excises IAEA. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the convalescent excises IAEA.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the keratoscopy occurs.
|
{C}
|
sent1: if the fact that the pick-off and the uppercut occurs is not right then the fact that the uppercut does not occur is correct. sent2: that the uppercut does not occur yields that the lockout occurs and the infrequentness happens. sent3: if the resounding debilitation does not occur that both the pick-off and the uppercut occurs does not hold. sent4: the luminescing does not occur. sent5: the biosystematicness happens and the rhyme does not occur if the aerobicsness does not occur. sent6: the luminescing does not occur but the endodonticness happens. sent7: the aerobicsness does not occur if either the predicativeness or the non-aerobicsness or both happens. sent8: the predicativeness and/or the non-aerobicsness happens if the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent9: that the excising Rolodex occurs hold if that the excising Rolodex does not occur but the Parthian happens is false. sent10: the unwholesomeness does not occur if the stratifying earl does not occur. sent11: the resounding debilitation does not occur if the fact that the resounding debilitation occurs and the Carmeliteness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the polyvalentness does not occur and the stratifying earl does not occur if the lockout happens. sent13: if the excising cellblock happens the fact that not the excising Rolodex but the Parthian occurs does not hold. sent14: if the excising Rolodex occurs then that the non-endodonticness and the luminescing happens is not true. sent15: the excising cellblock and the disinheritance occurs if the rhyming does not occur. sent16: if the nephriticness occurs then that the resounding debilitation but not the Carmeliteness occurs is false.
|
sent1: ¬({S} & {Q}) -> ¬{Q} sent2: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & {P}) sent3: ¬{R} -> ¬({S} & {Q}) sent4: ¬{A} sent5: ¬{J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) sent6: (¬{A} & {B}) sent7: ({K} v ¬{J}) -> ¬{J} sent8: ¬{L} -> ({K} v ¬{J}) sent9: ¬(¬{D} & {F}) -> {D} sent10: ¬{M} -> ¬{L} sent11: ¬({R} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{R} sent12: {O} -> (¬{N} & ¬{M}) sent13: {E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {F}) sent14: {D} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) sent15: ¬{H} -> ({E} & {G}) sent16: {U} -> ¬({R} & ¬{T})
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the endodonticness occurs.;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> int1: {B};"
] |
the keratoscopy does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
[] | 19 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the keratoscopy occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pick-off and the uppercut occurs is not right then the fact that the uppercut does not occur is correct. sent2: that the uppercut does not occur yields that the lockout occurs and the infrequentness happens. sent3: if the resounding debilitation does not occur that both the pick-off and the uppercut occurs does not hold. sent4: the luminescing does not occur. sent5: the biosystematicness happens and the rhyme does not occur if the aerobicsness does not occur. sent6: the luminescing does not occur but the endodonticness happens. sent7: the aerobicsness does not occur if either the predicativeness or the non-aerobicsness or both happens. sent8: the predicativeness and/or the non-aerobicsness happens if the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent9: that the excising Rolodex occurs hold if that the excising Rolodex does not occur but the Parthian happens is false. sent10: the unwholesomeness does not occur if the stratifying earl does not occur. sent11: the resounding debilitation does not occur if the fact that the resounding debilitation occurs and the Carmeliteness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the polyvalentness does not occur and the stratifying earl does not occur if the lockout happens. sent13: if the excising cellblock happens the fact that not the excising Rolodex but the Parthian occurs does not hold. sent14: if the excising Rolodex occurs then that the non-endodonticness and the luminescing happens is not true. sent15: the excising cellblock and the disinheritance occurs if the rhyming does not occur. sent16: if the nephriticness occurs then that the resounding debilitation but not the Carmeliteness occurs is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> int1: the endodonticness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the night-line is not a Spyeria and it is not a rat.
|
(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})
|
sent1: if the recombinant does not rat and does not filiate accelerometer the night-line is a kind of a Spyeria. sent2: that the recombinant is both not a Spyeria and a finger does not hold. sent3: the fact that the night-line does not rat and does filiate accelerometer is wrong. sent4: something is not a prefabrication and it is not a kind of a Hedera if it does not filiate accelerometer. sent5: the recombinant is a finger if the night-line is not a Spyeria and is not a rat. sent6: that the night-line is a kind of a Spyeria and is not a rat is false. sent7: that the lamb's-quarters is not a kind of a botany but it rats is not correct. sent8: if something does not filiate accelerometer and/or is a Morus the fact that it does not filiate accelerometer is not false. sent9: the recombinant is not a kind of a finger and it does not filiate accelerometer. sent10: the fact that the night-line is not a Spyeria but it does rat is false.
|
sent1: (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {AA}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {B}{b}) sent3: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{GJ}x & ¬{BK}x) sent5: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent6: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: ¬(¬{I}{fh} & {AB}{fh}) sent8: (x): (¬{A}x v {C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent9: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the night-line is not a Spyeria and it is not a rat.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the recombinant is a kind of a finger.; sent9 -> int2: the recombinant is not a finger.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent5 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent9 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the recombinant is not a prefabrication and it is not a Hedera.
|
(¬{GJ}{b} & ¬{BK}{b})
|
[
"sent4 -> int4: the night-line is not a prefabrication and it is not a Hedera if it does not filiate accelerometer.; sent8 -> int5: if the setter does not filiate accelerometer or is a Morus or both it does not filiate accelerometer.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the night-line is not a Spyeria and it is not a rat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recombinant does not rat and does not filiate accelerometer the night-line is a kind of a Spyeria. sent2: that the recombinant is both not a Spyeria and a finger does not hold. sent3: the fact that the night-line does not rat and does filiate accelerometer is wrong. sent4: something is not a prefabrication and it is not a kind of a Hedera if it does not filiate accelerometer. sent5: the recombinant is a finger if the night-line is not a Spyeria and is not a rat. sent6: that the night-line is a kind of a Spyeria and is not a rat is false. sent7: that the lamb's-quarters is not a kind of a botany but it rats is not correct. sent8: if something does not filiate accelerometer and/or is a Morus the fact that it does not filiate accelerometer is not false. sent9: the recombinant is not a kind of a finger and it does not filiate accelerometer. sent10: the fact that the night-line is not a Spyeria but it does rat is false. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the night-line is not a Spyeria and it is not a rat.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the recombinant is a kind of a finger.; sent9 -> int2: the recombinant is not a finger.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that either the hold occurs or the stratifying alpaca happens or both is not right.
|
¬({A} v {B})
|
sent1: the stratifying alpaca occurs. sent2: the bisection but not the clamber occurs if the simianness does not occur. sent3: the excising mawkishness happens. sent4: that the turnaround occurs is right. sent5: if the kneeling happens the simianness happens. sent6: either the excising Hannibal occurs or the drag happens or both. sent7: the resounding fruitfulness and/or the reaffiliation occurs. sent8: the fact that the cupping occurs is correct. sent9: the extinguishing occurs. sent10: the ontogeneticness or the quartering or both occurs. sent11: if both the simianness and the fixture occurs then the bisection does not occur. sent12: the freeing occurs. sent13: if the bisection does not occur the stratifying alpaca does not occur and the clamber does not occur. sent14: the fact that the holding or the stratifying alpaca or both happens is incorrect if the fact that the clamber does not occur hold. sent15: the full-termness or the feeling or both occurs.
|
sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) sent3: {IU} sent4: {HQ} sent5: {G} -> {E} sent6: ({GO} v {HL}) sent7: ({DF} v {JC}) sent8: {BK} sent9: {HP} sent10: ({CU} v {BR}) sent11: ({E} & {F}) -> ¬{D} sent12: {JI} sent13: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent14: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) sent15: ({O} v {JE})
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the fact that either the holding happens or the stratifying alpaca occurs or both does not hold is right.
|
¬({A} v {B})
|
[] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the hold occurs or the stratifying alpaca happens or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the stratifying alpaca occurs. sent2: the bisection but not the clamber occurs if the simianness does not occur. sent3: the excising mawkishness happens. sent4: that the turnaround occurs is right. sent5: if the kneeling happens the simianness happens. sent6: either the excising Hannibal occurs or the drag happens or both. sent7: the resounding fruitfulness and/or the reaffiliation occurs. sent8: the fact that the cupping occurs is correct. sent9: the extinguishing occurs. sent10: the ontogeneticness or the quartering or both occurs. sent11: if both the simianness and the fixture occurs then the bisection does not occur. sent12: the freeing occurs. sent13: if the bisection does not occur the stratifying alpaca does not occur and the clamber does not occur. sent14: the fact that the holding or the stratifying alpaca or both happens is incorrect if the fact that the clamber does not occur hold. sent15: the full-termness or the feeling or both occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the squire either does not resound sextet or does not filiate Godunov or both.
|
(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})
|
sent1: that the fact that something is a Park but it is not lacustrine hold is not correct if it is sane. sent2: everything is sane. sent3: the emergency is lacustrine if there is something such that the fact that it is a Park but not lacustrine is not correct. sent4: the margarin does not stratify stepladder if there exists something such that it is lacustrine. sent5: that the fact that the squire does not resound transpose or does not resound takin or both is not right if the margarin is not a biomedicine hold. sent6: the squire is not atypical if it does not resound sextet. sent7: if the fact that the squire does not resound sextet or it does not filiate Godunov or both is true then it is not atypical. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a biomedicine and it does not stratify stepladder. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not resound sextet and it is atypical is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a biomedicine and does not stratify stepladder does not hold then the squire is atypical. sent11: if something does stratify stepladder it is atypical. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a biomedicine and does not stratify stepladder is false. sent13: the squire does resound sextet if there is something such that it is atypical. sent14: there are lacustrine things. sent15: if the squire does not resound sextet it is not a kennel. sent16: the contents does not resound sextet and/or is a Acipenser. sent17: that the squire is atypical hold if there is something such that it is a biomedicine. sent18: the margarin is not a kind of a biomedicine if something is atypical.
|
sent1: (x): {E}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent2: (x): {E}x sent3: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}{d} sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AJ}{a} v ¬{EI}{a}) sent6: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent8: (Ex): (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {B}x) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}{a} sent11: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent13: (x): {B}x -> {AA}{a} sent14: (Ex): {D}x sent15: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{GN}{a} sent16: (¬{AA}{cf} v {O}{cf}) sent17: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent18: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}{b}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squire does not resound sextet and/or it does not filiate Godunov.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the squire is not atypical.; sent12 & sent10 -> int2: the squire is atypical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); sent7 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent12 & sent10 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that either the squire does not resound transpose or it does not resound takin or both is false.
|
¬(¬{AJ}{a} v ¬{EI}{a})
|
[
"sent11 -> int4: if the sedge does stratify stepladder it is atypical.; sent2 -> int5: the prayerbook is sane.; sent1 -> int6: that the prayerbook is a kind of a Park that is not lacustrine is false if it is sane.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the prayerbook is a kind of a Park but it is not lacustrine is not wrong is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is nothing such that it is a Park that is not lacustrine.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the pauper is a Park but it is not lacustrine is not true.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Park that is not lacustrine is not true.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the emergency is lacustrine.;"
] | 11 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the squire either does not resound sextet or does not filiate Godunov or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is a Park but it is not lacustrine hold is not correct if it is sane. sent2: everything is sane. sent3: the emergency is lacustrine if there is something such that the fact that it is a Park but not lacustrine is not correct. sent4: the margarin does not stratify stepladder if there exists something such that it is lacustrine. sent5: that the fact that the squire does not resound transpose or does not resound takin or both is not right if the margarin is not a biomedicine hold. sent6: the squire is not atypical if it does not resound sextet. sent7: if the fact that the squire does not resound sextet or it does not filiate Godunov or both is true then it is not atypical. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a biomedicine and it does not stratify stepladder. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not resound sextet and it is atypical is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a biomedicine and does not stratify stepladder does not hold then the squire is atypical. sent11: if something does stratify stepladder it is atypical. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a biomedicine and does not stratify stepladder is false. sent13: the squire does resound sextet if there is something such that it is atypical. sent14: there are lacustrine things. sent15: if the squire does not resound sextet it is not a kennel. sent16: the contents does not resound sextet and/or is a Acipenser. sent17: that the squire is atypical hold if there is something such that it is a biomedicine. sent18: the margarin is not a kind of a biomedicine if something is atypical. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squire does not resound sextet and/or it does not filiate Godunov.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the squire is not atypical.; sent12 & sent10 -> int2: the squire is atypical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Freudian is not myelic.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: the menu is not phonological if the gargoyle is phonological. sent2: if something is not nomothetic then it is non-metric and it is phonological. sent3: the Freudian is not myelic if something that does resound reggae is phonological. sent4: the Freudian is myelic and does resound reggae if the menu is not phonological.
|
sent1: {B}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {B}x) sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a})
|
[] |
[] |
the Freudian is myelic.
|
{C}{a}
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if the gargoyle is not nomothetic then it is non-metric thing that is phonological.;"
] | 7 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Freudian is not myelic. ; $context$ = sent1: the menu is not phonological if the gargoyle is phonological. sent2: if something is not nomothetic then it is non-metric and it is phonological. sent3: the Freudian is not myelic if something that does resound reggae is phonological. sent4: the Freudian is myelic and does resound reggae if the menu is not phonological. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the heuristicness does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: the runicness happens. sent2: that that the excising Mam does not occur and the frictionlessness does not occur does not hold is correct if the diatomicness occurs. sent3: the heuristicness happens and the cribbage does not occur if the macrocosmicness happens. sent4: if the fact that the heuristic does not occur and the cribbage does not occur is not false then the stratifying Surrey does not occur. sent5: if the excising Mam does not occur the macrocosmicness happens and the frictionlessness occurs. sent6: the resounding deep-freeze happens. sent7: the fact that the anticoagulation does not occur hold. sent8: the stratifying Surrey does not occur. sent9: the impressionableness happens. sent10: the tightness does not occur. sent11: the non-macrocosmicness brings about the cribbage. sent12: if the silence occurs the diatomicness occurs. sent13: that the macrocosmicness does not occur is prevented by the frictionlessness. sent14: if the heuristic occurs the cribbage does not occur.
|
sent1: {DF} sent2: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent3: {C} -> ({A} & ¬{B}) sent4: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{AJ} sent5: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent6: {DI} sent7: ¬{BG} sent8: ¬{AJ} sent9: {EU} sent10: ¬{AB} sent11: ¬{C} -> {B} sent12: {G} -> {F} sent13: {D} -> {C} sent14: {A} -> ¬{B}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heuristic happens.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the cribbage does not occur.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B};"
] |
the heuristic happens.
|
{A}
|
[] | 9 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the heuristicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the runicness happens. sent2: that that the excising Mam does not occur and the frictionlessness does not occur does not hold is correct if the diatomicness occurs. sent3: the heuristicness happens and the cribbage does not occur if the macrocosmicness happens. sent4: if the fact that the heuristic does not occur and the cribbage does not occur is not false then the stratifying Surrey does not occur. sent5: if the excising Mam does not occur the macrocosmicness happens and the frictionlessness occurs. sent6: the resounding deep-freeze happens. sent7: the fact that the anticoagulation does not occur hold. sent8: the stratifying Surrey does not occur. sent9: the impressionableness happens. sent10: the tightness does not occur. sent11: the non-macrocosmicness brings about the cribbage. sent12: if the silence occurs the diatomicness occurs. sent13: that the macrocosmicness does not occur is prevented by the frictionlessness. sent14: if the heuristic occurs the cribbage does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heuristic happens.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the cribbage does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the resounding Astropogon happens and the tetherball occurs.
|
({B} & {C})
|
sent1: that the lenticness happens prevents that the resounding Astropogon does not occur. sent2: the lenticness happens.
|
sent1: {A} -> {B} sent2: {A}
|
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the resounding Astropogon happens.;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: {B};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the resounding Astropogon happens and the tetherball occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lenticness happens prevents that the resounding Astropogon does not occur. sent2: the lenticness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the resounding Astropogon happens.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the monochrome does not excise squawk and it is not antemortem.
|
(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})
|
sent1: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a lignum but it does not excise squawk is not false is not right if it does not excise Oslo. sent2: something does excise Oslo and it is antemortem if the fact that it is not a kind of a Pittsburgh is true. sent3: the monochrome does not excise squawk and is not a lignum. sent4: the monochrome is not a kind of a Pittsburgh if it is a donor. sent5: the monochrome does not excise squawk and it is not antemortem if the Malawian does excise Oslo. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a lignum. sent7: the fact that the Malawian does not excise Oslo is true if the monochrome excise Oslo and it is antemortem. sent8: that the monochrome does not excise squawk and is not antemortem is incorrect if the Malawian is not a lignum. sent9: the fact that the plot is a kind of a lignum that is a kind of a swelling is not false. sent10: something does swell and it excises sphygmomanometer if it is not a lignum.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{D}x) sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({C}x & {E}x) sent3: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent4: {G}{b} -> ¬{F}{b} sent5: {C}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: ({C}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent8: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent9: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}x & {CA}x)
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a lignum and a swelling.;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x);"
] |
that the monochrome does not excise squawk and it is not antemortem is wrong.
|
¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the monochrome does not excise squawk and it is not antemortem. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a lignum but it does not excise squawk is not false is not right if it does not excise Oslo. sent2: something does excise Oslo and it is antemortem if the fact that it is not a kind of a Pittsburgh is true. sent3: the monochrome does not excise squawk and is not a lignum. sent4: the monochrome is not a kind of a Pittsburgh if it is a donor. sent5: the monochrome does not excise squawk and it is not antemortem if the Malawian does excise Oslo. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a lignum. sent7: the fact that the Malawian does not excise Oslo is true if the monochrome excise Oslo and it is antemortem. sent8: that the monochrome does not excise squawk and is not antemortem is incorrect if the Malawian is not a lignum. sent9: the fact that the plot is a kind of a lignum that is a kind of a swelling is not false. sent10: something does swell and it excises sphygmomanometer if it is not a lignum. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a lignum and a swelling.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if that it excises boom is not false then it is not a shepherd but monumental is incorrect.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x))
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it excises dasyurid then it is not humoral and it is bacteriolytic. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it does excise boom hold it shepherds and it is monumental. sent3: there is something such that if it is an atrocity that it excises flatlet is not incorrect. sent4: if the stabilizer is a acyl it is a kind of a shepherd. sent5: if the stabilizer is inflexible it is not monumental and it is a lanternfish. sent6: if the stabilizer is unsarcastic it does not shepherd and it is trophotropic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is unintelligible then it is not uncommon. sent8: something is not a mustard but it is a kind of a rounded if it filiates salver. sent9: if the stabilizer does excise boom it is not a shepherd and it is not non-monumental. sent10: the stabilizer is monumental if it excises boom. sent11: something is not a canton but it is a trade if it is odd. sent12: there exists something such that if it is duodenal then it is not exodontics. sent13: if the stabilizer excises boom it is a shepherd and it is monumental. sent14: the stabilizer is a kind of a acyl that is a Malachi if it is monumental. sent15: there exists something such that if it does excise boom then it is monumental.
|
sent1: (Ex): {HR}x -> (¬{BI}x & {FB}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): {EG}x -> {GP}x sent4: {HP}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent5: {CL}{aa} -> (¬{AB}{aa} & {FO}{aa}) sent6: {JE}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {GS}{aa}) sent7: (Ex): {JF}x -> ¬{AE}x sent8: (x): {O}x -> (¬{GH}x & {GI}x) sent9: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: {A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent11: (x): {H}x -> (¬{AF}x & {B}x) sent12: (Ex): {IS}x -> ¬{IL}x sent13: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent14: {AB}{aa} -> ({HP}{aa} & {IN}{aa}) sent15: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that if it is odd it is not a canton and is a kind of a trade.
|
(Ex): {H}x -> (¬{AF}x & {B}x)
|
[
"sent11 -> int1: the sector is not a kind of a canton but it does trade if it is odd.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it excises boom is not false then it is not a shepherd but monumental is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it excises dasyurid then it is not humoral and it is bacteriolytic. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it does excise boom hold it shepherds and it is monumental. sent3: there is something such that if it is an atrocity that it excises flatlet is not incorrect. sent4: if the stabilizer is a acyl it is a kind of a shepherd. sent5: if the stabilizer is inflexible it is not monumental and it is a lanternfish. sent6: if the stabilizer is unsarcastic it does not shepherd and it is trophotropic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is unintelligible then it is not uncommon. sent8: something is not a mustard but it is a kind of a rounded if it filiates salver. sent9: if the stabilizer does excise boom it is not a shepherd and it is not non-monumental. sent10: the stabilizer is monumental if it excises boom. sent11: something is not a canton but it is a trade if it is odd. sent12: there exists something such that if it is duodenal then it is not exodontics. sent13: if the stabilizer excises boom it is a shepherd and it is monumental. sent14: the stabilizer is a kind of a acyl that is a Malachi if it is monumental. sent15: there exists something such that if it does excise boom then it is monumental. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the silicate does not excise Satan and does excise sensitizer is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
|
sent1: that that the attachment does not resound Duralumin is not incorrect if that the attachment does stratify liberalism and does not excise matronymic is false hold. sent2: the silicate is not a helpfulness. sent3: the arrow does not excise Satan. sent4: that if the attachment does not resound silicate then that the attachment stratifies liberalism but it does not excise matronymic does not hold is not incorrect. sent5: the arrow is not a helpfulness. sent6: the hardbake is not subtropical if there is something such that that it is subtropical and it is not subordinating is not right. sent7: that the silicate does excise Satan and it excises sensitizer is false. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Astronium but it is conjunct the crayfish is not incongruous. sent9: that something is subtropical but it is not a subordinating is false if it does not stratify lagan. sent10: that that the silicate does not excise Satan but it excises sensitizer does not hold if the arrow is not a helpfulness is not incorrect. sent11: that something is an ironing and it stratifies lagan is false if it is not incongruous. sent12: the fact that the attachment does not resound silicate is right. sent13: that the heme is not a Astronium and not non-conjunct hold if there is something such that it does not resound Duralumin. sent14: that that the arrow is not a languor but it is a kind of a helpfulness is not wrong does not hold. sent15: that something is not a Dictamnus but it resounds Vulcan is not correct if it is a helpfulness. sent16: if there is something such that that it is an ironing and does stratify lagan is not true the ecstasy does not stratify lagan. sent17: the fact that the fact that the silicate excises Satan and excises sensitizer does not hold if the arrow is not a helpfulness hold. sent18: the silicate does not excise Satan and excises sensitizer if the arrow is a helpfulness.
|
sent1: ¬({J}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) -> ¬{I}{g} sent2: ¬{A}{b} sent3: ¬{AA}{a} sent4: ¬{L}{g} -> ¬({J}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) sent5: ¬{A}{a} sent6: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}{c} sent7: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}{e} sent9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({F}x & {D}x) sent12: ¬{L}{g} sent13: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}{f} & {G}{f}) sent14: ¬(¬{FU}{a} & {A}{a}) sent15: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{BR}x & {AC}x) sent16: (x): ¬({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}{d} sent17: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent18: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
|
[
"sent10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the silicate does not excise Satan but it does excise sensitizer.
|
(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: if that the ecstasy does not stratify lagan is correct then that it is subtropical but not a subordinating is false.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the crayfish is a kind of an ironing and it does stratify lagan is not right if it is not incongruous.; sent4 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the attachment stratifies liberalism and does not excise matronymic does not hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the attachment does not resound Duralumin is right.; int4 -> int5: something does not resound Duralumin.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the heme is both not a Astronium and conjunct.; int6 -> int7: something is not a Astronium but it is conjunct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the crayfish is not incongruous.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the crayfish does iron and it stratifies lagan is not true.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an ironing and it stratifies lagan is wrong.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the ecstasy does not stratify lagan.; int1 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the ecstasy is both subtropical and not subordinating is not right.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is subtropical and non-subordinating does not hold.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the hardbake is not subtropical.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is not subtropical.;"
] | 15 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the silicate does not excise Satan and does excise sensitizer is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the attachment does not resound Duralumin is not incorrect if that the attachment does stratify liberalism and does not excise matronymic is false hold. sent2: the silicate is not a helpfulness. sent3: the arrow does not excise Satan. sent4: that if the attachment does not resound silicate then that the attachment stratifies liberalism but it does not excise matronymic does not hold is not incorrect. sent5: the arrow is not a helpfulness. sent6: the hardbake is not subtropical if there is something such that that it is subtropical and it is not subordinating is not right. sent7: that the silicate does excise Satan and it excises sensitizer is false. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Astronium but it is conjunct the crayfish is not incongruous. sent9: that something is subtropical but it is not a subordinating is false if it does not stratify lagan. sent10: that that the silicate does not excise Satan but it excises sensitizer does not hold if the arrow is not a helpfulness is not incorrect. sent11: that something is an ironing and it stratifies lagan is false if it is not incongruous. sent12: the fact that the attachment does not resound silicate is right. sent13: that the heme is not a Astronium and not non-conjunct hold if there is something such that it does not resound Duralumin. sent14: that that the arrow is not a languor but it is a kind of a helpfulness is not wrong does not hold. sent15: that something is not a Dictamnus but it resounds Vulcan is not correct if it is a helpfulness. sent16: if there is something such that that it is an ironing and does stratify lagan is not true the ecstasy does not stratify lagan. sent17: the fact that the fact that the silicate excises Satan and excises sensitizer does not hold if the arrow is not a helpfulness hold. sent18: the silicate does not excise Satan and excises sensitizer if the arrow is a helpfulness. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the cooperation does not occur if the fact that the capillary does not occur is true.
|
¬{B} -> ¬{A}
|
sent1: that the capillariness and the cooperation happens prevents that the resounding sacrum happens. sent2: the mesentericness happens and the seismography does not occur if the blockage does not occur. sent3: the cooperation is brought about by that the capillary does not occur. sent4: the nap does not occur and the excising semifluidity occurs if the fact that the altering happens hold. sent5: the Beethovenianness occurs. sent6: the inflammation occurs and the recalculation occurs if the absorbableness does not occur. sent7: the replaying happens and the ascending does not occur if the recalculation occurs. sent8: if the replaying occurs but the ascending does not occur the blockage does not occur. sent9: if the capillary occurs the cooperation does not occur. sent10: the fact that the altering happens and the resounding sandpiper occurs if the seismography does not occur is right. sent11: if the napping does not occur then the capillary and the cooperation happens.
|
sent1: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{L} sent2: ¬{I} -> ({H} & ¬{G}) sent3: ¬{B} -> {A} sent4: {E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) sent5: {Q} sent6: ¬{O} -> ({N} & {M}) sent7: {M} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) sent8: ({K} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{I} sent9: {B} -> ¬{A} sent10: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent11: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cooperation occurs is true.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A};"
] |
the resounding sacrum does not occur.
|
¬{L}
|
[] | 13 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the cooperation does not occur if the fact that the capillary does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the capillariness and the cooperation happens prevents that the resounding sacrum happens. sent2: the mesentericness happens and the seismography does not occur if the blockage does not occur. sent3: the cooperation is brought about by that the capillary does not occur. sent4: the nap does not occur and the excising semifluidity occurs if the fact that the altering happens hold. sent5: the Beethovenianness occurs. sent6: the inflammation occurs and the recalculation occurs if the absorbableness does not occur. sent7: the replaying happens and the ascending does not occur if the recalculation occurs. sent8: if the replaying occurs but the ascending does not occur the blockage does not occur. sent9: if the capillary occurs the cooperation does not occur. sent10: the fact that the altering happens and the resounding sandpiper occurs if the seismography does not occur is right. sent11: if the napping does not occur then the capillary and the cooperation happens. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cooperation occurs is true.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the expiation happens.
|
{E}
|
sent1: that the excising hibachi occurs is not false. sent2: the fact that the agrobiologicness occurs hold. sent3: that the Hertzianness happens and the embolectomy occurs is caused by that the osteopathy does not occur. sent4: the resounding Sunbelt happens. sent5: the extemporization happens. sent6: the precaution does not occur if both the littoral and the entertainment occurs. sent7: the Hertzianness is prevented by that the offingness happens and the dichroism occurs. sent8: the offingness and the extemporization happens. sent9: that the fact that the extemporization happens but the offingness does not occur is wrong hold if the dichroism does not occur. sent10: if the fact that not the excising planography but the alimentativeness occurs is wrong the peepshow does not occur. sent11: the splat occurs. sent12: the mistaking occurs. sent13: if the peepshow does not occur the clonalness does not occur and the hypothecating does not occur. sent14: the fact that the expiation occurs is true if the Hertzianness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the ecoterrorism does not occur hold then that the excising planography does not occur but the alimentativeness happens is not true. sent16: if that the osteopathy but not the leadership occurs is not correct then the osteopathy does not occur. sent17: the Javanese happens. sent18: that the kickoff does not occur is not wrong. sent19: if the hypothecating does not occur then that the osteopathy but not the leadership occurs is incorrect.
|
sent1: {AK} sent2: {BD} sent3: ¬{G} -> ({D} & {F}) sent4: {IT} sent5: {B} sent6: ({HD} & {EP}) -> ¬{IN} sent7: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent8: ({A} & {B}) sent9: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) sent10: ¬(¬{M} & {L}) -> ¬{K} sent11: {FI} sent12: {AM} sent13: ¬{K} -> (¬{J} & ¬{I}) sent14: ¬{D} -> {E} sent15: ¬{N} -> ¬(¬{M} & {L}) sent16: ¬({G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} sent17: {IQ} sent18: ¬{DR} sent19: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} & ¬{H})
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the offingness happens.;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> int1: {A};"
] |
the expiation does not occur.
|
¬{E}
|
[] | 12 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the expiation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the excising hibachi occurs is not false. sent2: the fact that the agrobiologicness occurs hold. sent3: that the Hertzianness happens and the embolectomy occurs is caused by that the osteopathy does not occur. sent4: the resounding Sunbelt happens. sent5: the extemporization happens. sent6: the precaution does not occur if both the littoral and the entertainment occurs. sent7: the Hertzianness is prevented by that the offingness happens and the dichroism occurs. sent8: the offingness and the extemporization happens. sent9: that the fact that the extemporization happens but the offingness does not occur is wrong hold if the dichroism does not occur. sent10: if the fact that not the excising planography but the alimentativeness occurs is wrong the peepshow does not occur. sent11: the splat occurs. sent12: the mistaking occurs. sent13: if the peepshow does not occur the clonalness does not occur and the hypothecating does not occur. sent14: the fact that the expiation occurs is true if the Hertzianness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the ecoterrorism does not occur hold then that the excising planography does not occur but the alimentativeness happens is not true. sent16: if that the osteopathy but not the leadership occurs is not correct then the osteopathy does not occur. sent17: the Javanese happens. sent18: that the kickoff does not occur is not wrong. sent19: if the hypothecating does not occur then that the osteopathy but not the leadership occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> int1: the offingness happens.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the flit does not occur.
|
¬{B}
|
sent1: if the stratifying antifeminist does not occur the screwing happens and the resounding Sciaena occurs. sent2: the fact that the batholithicness does not occur if that the rage does not occur and/or the resounding stakeout happens does not hold is not false. sent3: if the fact that not the transmutation but the resounding Godunov happens is false then the resounding Godunov does not occur. sent4: the relating occurs. sent5: that the weightlift does not occur is prevented by that the flitting happens. sent6: if that the vasomotorness does not occur is correct then the excising knower happens but the staying does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the transmutation does not occur and the resounding Godunov happens is not true if the absence occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the ethnographicness and the non-vasomotorness happens if the screw occurs. sent9: if the relating happens the flit happens. sent10: if the terminal but not the filiating coil happens the Aether does not occur. sent11: that either the rage does not occur or the resounding stakeout happens or both is not true if the Aether does not occur. sent12: if the stay does not occur then the terminalness occurs but the filiating coil does not occur. sent13: either the flit or the relating or both happens if the batholithicness does not occur. sent14: not the stratifying antifeminist but the talkie occurs if the resounding Godunov does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) sent2: ¬(¬{E} v {D}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) -> ¬{Q} sent4: {A} sent5: {B} -> {HK} sent6: ¬{K} -> ({J} & ¬{I}) sent7: {R} -> ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) sent8: {M} -> ({L} & ¬{K}) sent9: {A} -> {B} sent10: ({G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent11: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} v {D}) sent12: ¬{I} -> ({G} & ¬{H}) sent13: ¬{C} -> ({B} v {A}) sent14: ¬{Q} -> (¬{O} & {P})
|
[
"sent9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the weightlift happens.
|
{HK}
|
[] | 17 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the flit does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stratifying antifeminist does not occur the screwing happens and the resounding Sciaena occurs. sent2: the fact that the batholithicness does not occur if that the rage does not occur and/or the resounding stakeout happens does not hold is not false. sent3: if the fact that not the transmutation but the resounding Godunov happens is false then the resounding Godunov does not occur. sent4: the relating occurs. sent5: that the weightlift does not occur is prevented by that the flitting happens. sent6: if that the vasomotorness does not occur is correct then the excising knower happens but the staying does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the transmutation does not occur and the resounding Godunov happens is not true if the absence occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the ethnographicness and the non-vasomotorness happens if the screw occurs. sent9: if the relating happens the flit happens. sent10: if the terminal but not the filiating coil happens the Aether does not occur. sent11: that either the rage does not occur or the resounding stakeout happens or both is not true if the Aether does not occur. sent12: if the stay does not occur then the terminalness occurs but the filiating coil does not occur. sent13: either the flit or the relating or both happens if the batholithicness does not occur. sent14: not the stratifying antifeminist but the talkie occurs if the resounding Godunov does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the anus is agonal.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: the fact that the barterer is not agonal is true. sent2: something is atherosclerotic and is not a kind of a fuller if it does not stratify ventriloquism. sent3: the buckleya is not a kind of a prawn and it is not a nostoc. sent4: if something does not stratify Homyel but it does resound Portland then the fact that it is not agonal is not wrong. sent5: that the barterer is a kind of diametric thing that does not oxidize is false. sent6: if the buckleya is not a prawn and it is not a kind of a nostoc then it is stative. sent7: the barterer stratifies Homyel. sent8: The Homyel does not stratify anus. sent9: if the railing is atherosclerotic but it is not a fuller then the PM is unargumentative. sent10: the anus does not stratify Homyel. sent11: that the barterer is not agonal and does resound Portland is wrong if the isogamete does not stratify Homyel. sent12: the railing does not stratify ventriloquism if the fact that the fact that the buckleya stratify ventriloquism but it is not a kind of a tested is false is not false. sent13: something does resound Portland and does not excise timbre if it is not a dish. sent14: the fact that the anus does resound Portland but it does not oxidize is incorrect. sent15: if something is a kind of a Nigerian then it does not dish and does not excise timbre. sent16: the anus resounds Portland if the barterer oxidizes. sent17: that the barterer is diametric thing that does oxidize is not correct. sent18: the fact that the anus does resound Portland is correct if that the barterer is diametric but it does not oxidize does not hold. sent19: if something is unargumentative then it is a kind of a Nigerian. sent20: if something is stative the fact that it stratifies ventriloquism and is not a tested does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that it is not a dish and does not excise timbre the isogamete does not stratify Homyel.
|
sent1: ¬{C}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({I}x & ¬{H}x) sent3: (¬{M}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) sent4: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent5: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent6: (¬{M}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) -> {K}{f} sent7: {A}{a} sent8: ¬{AD}{ab} sent9: ({I}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) -> {G}{d} sent10: ¬{A}{b} sent11: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent12: ¬({J}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) -> ¬{J}{e} sent13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & ¬{D}x) sent14: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent15: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) sent16: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} sent17: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent18: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent19: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent20: (x): {K}x -> ¬({J}x & ¬{L}x) sent21: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}{c}
|
[
"sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the anus does resound Portland.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the anus does not stratify Homyel but it resounds Portland.; sent4 -> int3: if the anus does not stratify Homyel and resounds Portland it is not agonal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent18 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent10 -> int2: (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}); sent4 -> int3: (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the anus is agonal.
|
{C}{b}
|
[
"sent15 -> int4: the PM is not a dish and it does not excise timbre if it is a Nigerian.; sent19 -> int5: if the PM is unargumentative it is a Nigerian.; sent2 -> int6: if the railing does not stratify ventriloquism then it is atherosclerotic and it is not a fuller.; sent20 -> int7: if the buckleya is stative then that it does stratify ventriloquism and does not test is not true.; sent6 & sent3 -> int8: the buckleya is stative.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the buckleya does stratify ventriloquism and is not a tested is not right.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the railing does not stratify ventriloquism.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the railing is both atherosclerotic and not a fuller.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the PM is unargumentative.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the PM is a kind of a Nigerian.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the PM does not dish and it does not excise timbre.; int14 -> int15: something does not dish and does not excise timbre.; int15 & sent21 -> int16: the isogamete does not stratify Homyel.; sent11 & int16 -> int17: that the barterer is not agonal and resounds Portland is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it is non-agonal and resounds Portland is not right.;"
] | 12 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the anus is agonal. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the barterer is not agonal is true. sent2: something is atherosclerotic and is not a kind of a fuller if it does not stratify ventriloquism. sent3: the buckleya is not a kind of a prawn and it is not a nostoc. sent4: if something does not stratify Homyel but it does resound Portland then the fact that it is not agonal is not wrong. sent5: that the barterer is a kind of diametric thing that does not oxidize is false. sent6: if the buckleya is not a prawn and it is not a kind of a nostoc then it is stative. sent7: the barterer stratifies Homyel. sent8: The Homyel does not stratify anus. sent9: if the railing is atherosclerotic but it is not a fuller then the PM is unargumentative. sent10: the anus does not stratify Homyel. sent11: that the barterer is not agonal and does resound Portland is wrong if the isogamete does not stratify Homyel. sent12: the railing does not stratify ventriloquism if the fact that the fact that the buckleya stratify ventriloquism but it is not a kind of a tested is false is not false. sent13: something does resound Portland and does not excise timbre if it is not a dish. sent14: the fact that the anus does resound Portland but it does not oxidize is incorrect. sent15: if something is a kind of a Nigerian then it does not dish and does not excise timbre. sent16: the anus resounds Portland if the barterer oxidizes. sent17: that the barterer is diametric thing that does oxidize is not correct. sent18: the fact that the anus does resound Portland is correct if that the barterer is diametric but it does not oxidize does not hold. sent19: if something is unargumentative then it is a kind of a Nigerian. sent20: if something is stative the fact that it stratifies ventriloquism and is not a tested does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that it is not a dish and does not excise timbre the isogamete does not stratify Homyel. ; $proof$ =
|
sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the anus does resound Portland.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the anus does not stratify Homyel but it resounds Portland.; sent4 -> int3: if the anus does not stratify Homyel and resounds Portland it is not agonal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the stratifying freewheel happens.
|
{B}
|
sent1: either the hailing or the indoctrination or both occurs if the fact that the embolectomy does not occur hold. sent2: both the hiplengthness and the stratifying freewheel happens. sent3: the non-ambiversiveness and the nonspecificness happens if the Lusitanianness occurs. sent4: if the excising gamble happens and/or the stratifying freewheel does not occur the excising gamble occurs. sent5: if the non-ambiversiveness and the non-specificness happens the hiplengthness does not occur. sent6: if the cardinal does not occur then the fact that the embolectomy and the guffaw happens is incorrect. sent7: either the hailing does not occur or the embolectomy occurs or both if the uncomfortableness happens. sent8: that both the non-specificness and the non-hiplengthness occurs is false if the ambiversiveness does not occur. sent9: the humbleness occurs and the entozoanness happens. sent10: that both the neoclassicist and the Lusitanianness happens is triggered by that the indoctrination does not occur. sent11: the fact that the tarnish happens is correct. sent12: the fact that if both the Lusitanianness and the neoclassicistness occurs the ambiversiveness does not occur is correct. sent13: the embolectomy does not occur if the fact that the embolectomy and the guffawing occurs is not right. sent14: the hiplengthness occurs. sent15: that the hail does not occur or the embolectomy or both leads to that the indoctrination does not occur. sent16: that the uncomfortableness happens and the filiating Homer does not occur is not right if the cereal does not occur. sent17: if the hiplengthness does not occur the excising gamble occurs or the stratifying freewheel does not occur or both. sent18: the cereal does not occur if the tarnish happens.
|
sent1: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent4: ({CF} v ¬{B}) -> {CF} sent5: (¬{D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} sent6: ¬{M} -> ¬({I} & {L}) sent7: {J} -> (¬{H} v {I}) sent8: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent9: ({BK} & {IH}) sent10: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) sent11: {R} sent12: ({E} & {F}) -> ¬{D} sent13: ¬({I} & {L}) -> ¬{I} sent14: {A} sent15: (¬{H} v {I}) -> ¬{G} sent16: ¬{Q} -> ¬({J} & ¬{K}) sent17: ¬{A} -> ({CF} v ¬{B}) sent18: {R} -> ¬{Q}
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the stratifying freewheel does not occur.
|
¬{B}
|
[
"sent18 & sent11 -> int1: the cerealness does not occur.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: that the uncomfortableness occurs and the filiating Homer does not occur is not correct.;"
] | 10 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the stratifying freewheel happens. ; $context$ = sent1: either the hailing or the indoctrination or both occurs if the fact that the embolectomy does not occur hold. sent2: both the hiplengthness and the stratifying freewheel happens. sent3: the non-ambiversiveness and the nonspecificness happens if the Lusitanianness occurs. sent4: if the excising gamble happens and/or the stratifying freewheel does not occur the excising gamble occurs. sent5: if the non-ambiversiveness and the non-specificness happens the hiplengthness does not occur. sent6: if the cardinal does not occur then the fact that the embolectomy and the guffaw happens is incorrect. sent7: either the hailing does not occur or the embolectomy occurs or both if the uncomfortableness happens. sent8: that both the non-specificness and the non-hiplengthness occurs is false if the ambiversiveness does not occur. sent9: the humbleness occurs and the entozoanness happens. sent10: that both the neoclassicist and the Lusitanianness happens is triggered by that the indoctrination does not occur. sent11: the fact that the tarnish happens is correct. sent12: the fact that if both the Lusitanianness and the neoclassicistness occurs the ambiversiveness does not occur is correct. sent13: the embolectomy does not occur if the fact that the embolectomy and the guffawing occurs is not right. sent14: the hiplengthness occurs. sent15: that the hail does not occur or the embolectomy or both leads to that the indoctrination does not occur. sent16: that the uncomfortableness happens and the filiating Homer does not occur is not right if the cereal does not occur. sent17: if the hiplengthness does not occur the excising gamble occurs or the stratifying freewheel does not occur or both. sent18: the cereal does not occur if the tarnish happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the main is not unsexy.
|
{C}{c}
|
sent1: the main is sexy if there exists something such that it does not soldier plot and is not a kind of a modern. sent2: that the main soldiers plot does not hold if the loaner either does not detract passkey or is a modern or both. sent3: everything does not detract passkey. sent4: if the loaner is a modern the minesweeper does not squash poikilotherm and is not a modern. sent5: the soap is tongueless. sent6: if the loaner is not tongueless and squashes poikilotherm then it is a modern. sent7: the stenopterygius does not detract streaked and is not a modern. sent8: the main is tongueless if it does not squash poikilotherm and it is sexy. sent9: the fact that the loaner is not non-monozygotic hold. sent10: the fact that if the loaner does not soldier plot and is modern then the loaner is tongueless is right. sent11: the pinchgut does squash poikilotherm. sent12: the loaner is a kind of non-tongueless thing that does squash poikilotherm.
|
sent1: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}{c} sent2: (¬{D}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x sent4: {B}{a} -> (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent5: {AA}{af} sent6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent7: (¬{DC}{au} & ¬{B}{au}) sent8: (¬{AB}{c} & {C}{c}) -> {AA}{c} sent9: {AL}{a} sent10: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {AA}{a} sent11: {AB}{hf} sent12: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})
|
[
"sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the loaner is a kind of a modern.;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent12 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] |
the main is not sexy.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
[
"sent3 -> int2: the minesweeper does not detract passkey.; int2 -> int3: either the minesweeper does not detract passkey or it is a kind of a modern or both.; int3 -> int4: either everything does not detract passkey or it is a modern or both.; int4 -> int5: the loaner does not detract passkey or is modern or both.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the main does not soldier plot.; int6 -> int7: the main is not sexy or it does not soldier plot or both.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the main is not unsexy. ; $context$ = sent1: the main is sexy if there exists something such that it does not soldier plot and is not a kind of a modern. sent2: that the main soldiers plot does not hold if the loaner either does not detract passkey or is a modern or both. sent3: everything does not detract passkey. sent4: if the loaner is a modern the minesweeper does not squash poikilotherm and is not a modern. sent5: the soap is tongueless. sent6: if the loaner is not tongueless and squashes poikilotherm then it is a modern. sent7: the stenopterygius does not detract streaked and is not a modern. sent8: the main is tongueless if it does not squash poikilotherm and it is sexy. sent9: the fact that the loaner is not non-monozygotic hold. sent10: the fact that if the loaner does not soldier plot and is modern then the loaner is tongueless is right. sent11: the pinchgut does squash poikilotherm. sent12: the loaner is a kind of non-tongueless thing that does squash poikilotherm. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the loaner is a kind of a modern.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if the fact that it does not poultice beaten and it is a vermicide does not hold it does not squash adventure is not right.
|
¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of an obituary then it does not surpass. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not detachable and it is a creepy-crawly is wrong it poultices Korbut. sent3: if the fact that something is not a hook but it is a catkin is incorrect then it is not dull. sent4: that there is something such that if it does not soldier Oviedo and is an experience it does not detract Wessex is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent6: if that the peach does not poultice beaten and is a vermicide is not true it does not squash adventure. sent7: the peach does not insulate if that it is not a matriculation and squashes adventure is not true. sent8: if the fact that the peach poultices beaten and it is a vermicide is incorrect then it does not squash adventure. sent9: if the peach does not poultice beaten but it is a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that that it poultices beaten and it is a kind of a vermicide is right is not correct then it does not squash adventure. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not poultice beaten and is a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not a cotangent and it is existential is not true it is a weatherstrip. sent13: the peach is not a Lophophora if the fact that it poultices beaten and is a corrugation is not correct. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a quitclaim and is a man-eater does not hold it is not uncompassionate. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not soldier peach and is a caddisworm is incorrect then it is cambial. sent16: if the fact that the peach is not a kind of a bruxism but it is chancrous is not right then it is a caddisworm.
|
sent1: (Ex): {JB}x -> ¬{HK}x sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AP}x & {BJ}x) -> {CK}x sent3: (x): ¬(¬{IE}x & {BH}x) -> ¬{BS}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{CH}x & {AI}x) -> ¬{HD}x sent5: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: ¬(¬{BP}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{EG}{aa} sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{FO}x & {DL}x) -> {D}x sent13: ¬({AA}{aa} & {HP}{aa}) -> ¬{DG}{aa} sent14: (Ex): ¬(¬{CQ}x & {AE}x) -> ¬{BT}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{IU}x & {AC}x) -> {HJ}x sent16: ¬(¬{FB}{aa} & {IQ}{aa}) -> {AC}{aa}
|
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a hook and is a catkin is wrong it is not dull.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{IE}x & {BH}x) -> ¬{BS}x
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: if that the infernal is not a kind of a hook but it is a kind of a catkin is not true it is not dull.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it does not poultice beaten and it is a vermicide does not hold it does not squash adventure is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of an obituary then it does not surpass. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not detachable and it is a creepy-crawly is wrong it poultices Korbut. sent3: if the fact that something is not a hook but it is a catkin is incorrect then it is not dull. sent4: that there is something such that if it does not soldier Oviedo and is an experience it does not detract Wessex is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent6: if that the peach does not poultice beaten and is a vermicide is not true it does not squash adventure. sent7: the peach does not insulate if that it is not a matriculation and squashes adventure is not true. sent8: if the fact that the peach poultices beaten and it is a vermicide is incorrect then it does not squash adventure. sent9: if the peach does not poultice beaten but it is a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that that it poultices beaten and it is a kind of a vermicide is right is not correct then it does not squash adventure. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not poultice beaten and is a vermicide then it does not squash adventure. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not a cotangent and it is existential is not true it is a weatherstrip. sent13: the peach is not a Lophophora if the fact that it poultices beaten and is a corrugation is not correct. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a quitclaim and is a man-eater does not hold it is not uncompassionate. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not soldier peach and is a caddisworm is incorrect then it is cambial. sent16: if the fact that the peach is not a kind of a bruxism but it is chancrous is not right then it is a caddisworm. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
if the spermatophyte does detract art the hypochlorite does soldier strafe.
|
{A}{a} -> {C}{b}
|
sent1: if the spermatophyte does detract art it is a Tapirus. sent2: the fact that the spermatophyte soldiers strafe is not false. sent3: the hypochlorite is a Tapirus if the spermatophyte detracts art.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent2: {C}{a} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spermatophyte detracts art.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the spermatophyte is a kind of a Tapirus is not incorrect.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = if the spermatophyte does detract art the hypochlorite does soldier strafe. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spermatophyte does detract art it is a Tapirus. sent2: the fact that the spermatophyte soldiers strafe is not false. sent3: the hypochlorite is a Tapirus if the spermatophyte detracts art. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spermatophyte detracts art.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the spermatophyte is a kind of a Tapirus is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the hospice detracts intestacy.
|
{B}{b}
|
sent1: something does not detract achievability if that it does not detract intestacy and is a crippling does not hold. sent2: the hospice does not detract intestacy if it is a tuck. sent3: that the Stilton is not a crippling and does detract intestacy does not hold if the hospice does not detract achievability. sent4: something does not detract intestacy if that it is not a tuck and it is a crippling is not true. sent5: the hospice does not detract achievability if that it does not tuck and it detracts intestacy is not correct. sent6: The fact that the achievability does not detract Stilton is correct. sent7: if that something is achromatic but it is not a hypothyroidism is incorrect it is not expedient. sent8: if that the casino is not a kind of an expedient hold then the absconder detracts achievability and is unactable. sent9: something detracts intestacy if that it does squash stardust and does not detracts intestacy is not true. sent10: the hospice is not knowable. sent11: that the hospice is not a kind of a tuck but it does cripple does not hold if the Stilton does not detract achievability. sent12: if the Stilton does not detract achievability the fact that the hospice is a tuck and does cripple is not true. sent13: the hospice does not detract achievability. sent14: the fact that the Stilton does not detract achievability is correct. sent15: that the hospice is not a tuck and detracts achievability is wrong. sent16: the Stilton is not a kind of an aluminum. sent17: that the hospice squashes stardust but it does not detract intestacy is incorrect if the Stilton detracts achievability. sent18: if the absconder detracts achievability then the Stilton detracts achievability. sent19: if that something is both not a Proudhon and polyphonic is false then it is not a cellphone. sent20: if something does tuck it does not detract intestacy. sent21: the fact that the hospice does tuck and is a crippling is false.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}x sent2: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {B}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent6: ¬{AC}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent8: ¬{E}{d} -> ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) sent9: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent10: ¬{CE}{b} sent11: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent13: ¬{A}{b} sent14: ¬{A}{a} sent15: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {A}{b}) sent16: ¬{CD}{a} sent17: {A}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent18: {A}{c} -> {A}{a} sent19: (x): ¬(¬{EH}x & {GQ}x) -> ¬{BC}x sent20: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent21: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
|
[
"sent11 & sent14 -> int1: that the hospice does not tuck but it does cripple is not true.; sent4 -> int2: if that the hospice does not tuck and cripples is incorrect that it does not detract intestacy is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 & sent14 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent4 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the hospice does detract intestacy.
|
{B}{b}
|
[
"sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the hospice does squash stardust but it does not detract intestacy is not true then the fact that it detract intestacy is true.; sent7 -> int4: the casino is not an expedient if that that it is achromatic and is not a hypothyroidism is not wrong is not right.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the hospice detracts intestacy. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not detract achievability if that it does not detract intestacy and is a crippling does not hold. sent2: the hospice does not detract intestacy if it is a tuck. sent3: that the Stilton is not a crippling and does detract intestacy does not hold if the hospice does not detract achievability. sent4: something does not detract intestacy if that it is not a tuck and it is a crippling is not true. sent5: the hospice does not detract achievability if that it does not tuck and it detracts intestacy is not correct. sent6: The fact that the achievability does not detract Stilton is correct. sent7: if that something is achromatic but it is not a hypothyroidism is incorrect it is not expedient. sent8: if that the casino is not a kind of an expedient hold then the absconder detracts achievability and is unactable. sent9: something detracts intestacy if that it does squash stardust and does not detracts intestacy is not true. sent10: the hospice is not knowable. sent11: that the hospice is not a kind of a tuck but it does cripple does not hold if the Stilton does not detract achievability. sent12: if the Stilton does not detract achievability the fact that the hospice is a tuck and does cripple is not true. sent13: the hospice does not detract achievability. sent14: the fact that the Stilton does not detract achievability is correct. sent15: that the hospice is not a tuck and detracts achievability is wrong. sent16: the Stilton is not a kind of an aluminum. sent17: that the hospice squashes stardust but it does not detract intestacy is incorrect if the Stilton detracts achievability. sent18: if the absconder detracts achievability then the Stilton detracts achievability. sent19: if that something is both not a Proudhon and polyphonic is false then it is not a cellphone. sent20: if something does tuck it does not detract intestacy. sent21: the fact that the hospice does tuck and is a crippling is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: that the hospice does not tuck but it does cripple is not true.; sent4 -> int2: if that the hospice does not tuck and cripples is incorrect that it does not detract intestacy is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the bobsledding occurs and the polyphonicness occurs is incorrect.
|
¬({C} & {D})
|
sent1: if the unemotionalness does not occur then the polyphonicness and the calibration happens. sent2: the designation does not occur. sent3: if either the collapse does not occur or the designation does not occur or both the bobsledding occurs. sent4: the unemotionalness does not occur. sent5: the glialness does not occur and/or the rectorship does not occur. sent6: the calibration happens. sent7: either the buildup occurs or the poulticing lipogram does not occur or both.
|
sent1: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent2: ¬{B} sent3: (¬{A} v ¬{B}) -> {C} sent4: ¬{F} sent5: (¬{HD} v ¬{IN}) sent6: {E} sent7: ({BN} v ¬{R})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the collapse does not occur and/or the designation does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bobsledding happens.; sent1 & sent4 -> int3: the polyphonicness and the calibration occurs.; int3 -> int4: the polyphonicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: (¬{A} v ¬{B}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: {C}; sent1 & sent4 -> int3: ({D} & {E}); int3 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bobsledding occurs and the polyphonicness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unemotionalness does not occur then the polyphonicness and the calibration happens. sent2: the designation does not occur. sent3: if either the collapse does not occur or the designation does not occur or both the bobsledding occurs. sent4: the unemotionalness does not occur. sent5: the glialness does not occur and/or the rectorship does not occur. sent6: the calibration happens. sent7: either the buildup occurs or the poulticing lipogram does not occur or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the collapse does not occur and/or the designation does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bobsledding happens.; sent1 & sent4 -> int3: the polyphonicness and the calibration occurs.; int3 -> int4: the polyphonicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the pass-through poultices papillon.
|
{C}{c}
|
sent1: if the fact that the funfair is not a value and is not unnoticeable is false then that the pass-through poultices papillon is right. sent2: that that the funfair does poultice papillon and is not a kind of a value does not hold hold if the fact that the pass-through is not a value is right. sent3: a symphonist that does soldier Rhizophora is not a value. sent4: that the saw is not a feverroot and detracts Hamamelidae is not correct. sent5: that the Sealyham is a plasminogen and/or is a leukocyte is not false. sent6: that the inversion is not an epilepsy and it is not a kind of a value is incorrect if the funfair does not value. sent7: the fact that the saw is not a value and it is not unnoticeable is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not detract Hamamelidae and it is an epilepsy does not hold then the saw is not unnoticeable. sent9: that the fact that the funfair is a kind of a value but it is not unnoticeable does not hold hold if the fact that the inversion is not unnoticeable is not incorrect. sent10: if the stovepipe is a Plectorrhiza it does not squash scauper or does not poultice let or both. sent11: the surrey is a plasminogen if there is something such that it is a kind of a plasminogen and/or it is a leukocyte. sent12: that the inversion does not detract Hamamelidae and is an epilepsy is wrong. sent13: the carbonado is a kind of a symphonist and/or it is a kind of a plasminogen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a plasminogen is true. sent14: the fact that something does not poultice papillon and it is non-unnoticeable does not hold if it is not a value. sent15: if the carbonado is a symphonist the funfair is a symphonist. sent16: the pass-through does not poultice papillon if the saw does not poultice papillon. sent17: the fact that the inversion does not poultice papillon and it is not a kind of an epilepsy is false if the pass-through is not a kind of an epilepsy. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not poultice papillon and it is unnoticeable is incorrect the funfair does not value. sent19: the stovepipe is a Plectorrhiza. sent20: if the carbonado is a plasminogen the funfair is a kind of a symphonist.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {C}{c} sent2: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent3: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: ¬(¬{IN}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent5: ({I}{g} v {J}{g}) sent6: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent7: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent10: {H}{d} -> (¬{F}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) sent11: (x): ({I}x v {J}x) -> {I}{f} sent12: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent13: (x): {I}x -> ({D}{e} v {I}{e}) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent15: {D}{e} -> {D}{b} sent16: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} sent17: ¬{AB}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent18: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent19: {H}{d} sent20: {I}{e} -> {D}{b}
|
[
"sent12 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not detract Hamamelidae and is an epilepsy is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the saw is not unnoticeable.;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{A}{a};"
] |
the pass-through does not poultice papillon.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
[
"sent14 -> int3: if the funfair does not value the fact that it does not poultice papillon and it is not unnoticeable is not true.; sent3 -> int4: the funfair does not value if it is a symphonist that does soldier Rhizophora.; sent5 -> int5: something is a plasminogen and/or it is a kind of a leukocyte.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the surrey is a plasminogen.; int6 -> int7: something is a kind of a plasminogen.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the carbonado is a symphonist and/or is a plasminogen.; int8 & sent15 & sent20 -> int9: the funfair is a symphonist.; sent10 & sent19 -> int10: the stovepipe does not squash scauper and/or it does not poultice let.; int10 -> int11: something does not squash scauper and/or does not poultice let.;"
] | 10 | 4 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the pass-through poultices papillon. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the funfair is not a value and is not unnoticeable is false then that the pass-through poultices papillon is right. sent2: that that the funfair does poultice papillon and is not a kind of a value does not hold hold if the fact that the pass-through is not a value is right. sent3: a symphonist that does soldier Rhizophora is not a value. sent4: that the saw is not a feverroot and detracts Hamamelidae is not correct. sent5: that the Sealyham is a plasminogen and/or is a leukocyte is not false. sent6: that the inversion is not an epilepsy and it is not a kind of a value is incorrect if the funfair does not value. sent7: the fact that the saw is not a value and it is not unnoticeable is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not detract Hamamelidae and it is an epilepsy does not hold then the saw is not unnoticeable. sent9: that the fact that the funfair is a kind of a value but it is not unnoticeable does not hold hold if the fact that the inversion is not unnoticeable is not incorrect. sent10: if the stovepipe is a Plectorrhiza it does not squash scauper or does not poultice let or both. sent11: the surrey is a plasminogen if there is something such that it is a kind of a plasminogen and/or it is a leukocyte. sent12: that the inversion does not detract Hamamelidae and is an epilepsy is wrong. sent13: the carbonado is a kind of a symphonist and/or it is a kind of a plasminogen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a plasminogen is true. sent14: the fact that something does not poultice papillon and it is non-unnoticeable does not hold if it is not a value. sent15: if the carbonado is a symphonist the funfair is a symphonist. sent16: the pass-through does not poultice papillon if the saw does not poultice papillon. sent17: the fact that the inversion does not poultice papillon and it is not a kind of an epilepsy is false if the pass-through is not a kind of an epilepsy. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not poultice papillon and it is unnoticeable is incorrect the funfair does not value. sent19: the stovepipe is a Plectorrhiza. sent20: if the carbonado is a plasminogen the funfair is a kind of a symphonist. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not detract Hamamelidae and is an epilepsy is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the saw is not unnoticeable.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the testamentariness does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: the wiving occurs if the fact that the squashing Bahamian occurs is not false. sent2: the wiving happens if that that not the squashing Bahamian but the racing occurs hold is not correct. sent3: that the testamentariness occurs is prevented by that the wiving and the avionicsness occurs. sent4: both the avionicsness and the alliterating happens. sent5: the fact that the determination does not occur and the carbocyclicness happens is incorrect. sent6: if not the wiving but the avionicsness happens that the poulticing boat occurs hold. sent7: the fact that the squashing Bahamian does not occur but the racing happens is false.
|
sent1: {AA} -> {B} sent2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent3: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ({A} & {D}) sent5: ¬(¬{IC} & {GB}) sent6: (¬{B} & {A}) -> {EU} sent7: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB})
|
[
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the wiving occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the avionicsness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wiving and the avionicsness occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: {B}; sent4 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {A}); int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the poulticing boat happens and the precordialness occurs.
|
({EU} & {AR})
|
[] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the testamentariness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the wiving occurs if the fact that the squashing Bahamian occurs is not false. sent2: the wiving happens if that that not the squashing Bahamian but the racing occurs hold is not correct. sent3: that the testamentariness occurs is prevented by that the wiving and the avionicsness occurs. sent4: both the avionicsness and the alliterating happens. sent5: the fact that the determination does not occur and the carbocyclicness happens is incorrect. sent6: if not the wiving but the avionicsness happens that the poulticing boat occurs hold. sent7: the fact that the squashing Bahamian does not occur but the racing happens is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the wiving occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the avionicsness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wiving and the avionicsness occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that something does soldier loquat and/or it is a kind of a Japanese is not incorrect.
|
(Ex): ({B}x v {C}x)
|
sent1: the fact that something either is alike or is a tableland or both is not correct if it is not a canned. sent2: the ghrelin soldiers loquat if it soldiers pieplant. sent3: the ghrelin does detract plesiosaur. sent4: the ghrelin is a Japanese or it is topless or both. sent5: something does soldier pieplant if the fact that it does soldier loquat hold. sent6: if something does soldier pieplant it is a kind of a theme. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of an animist or is undue or both. sent8: either the ghrelin is a kind of a cirio or it is Japanese or both. sent9: if something is a gunmetal then it is not a Manx and does not soldier loquat. sent10: if the elision is a gunmetal but it is not postural then the primordium is a gunmetal. sent11: everything does not detract courtliness and is Indian. sent12: the bumboat is pro-choice and/or does soldier loquat. sent13: if the ghrelin is a kind of a Polish then it is a kind of a Japanese. sent14: if something is a theme then the fact that either the ghrelin is not non-Japanese or it is a theme or both is correct. sent15: the cul is not herbivorous but a roll if the drove does not repent. sent16: the ghrelin soldiers loquat if the fact that it is a lindane is not wrong. sent17: That the pieplant does soldier ghrelin hold. sent18: something does not can if it does not detract courtliness and it is Indian. sent19: something does not repent if the fact that it is not unalike or a tableland or both does not hold. sent20: the elision is a gunmetal but it is not postural if the beak is a biquadratic. sent21: if something is not herbivorous and does roll the beak does not blind. sent22: something is not non-biquadratic if it is not agonal and/or it is not a blinded.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬(¬{M}x v {N}x) sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent3: {EG}{a} sent4: ({C}{a} v {IG}{a}) sent5: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {EC}x sent7: (Ex): ({BJ}x v {GU}x) sent8: ({FH}{a} v {C}{a}) sent9: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: ({E}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> {E}{c} sent11: (x): (¬{P}x & {Q}x) sent12: ({DC}{db} v {B}{db}) sent13: {IJ}{a} -> {C}{a} sent14: (x): {EC}x -> ({C}{a} v {EC}{a}) sent15: ¬{L}{g} -> (¬{K}{f} & {J}{f}) sent16: {HK}{a} -> {B}{a} sent17: {AA}{aa} sent18: (x): (¬{P}x & {Q}x) -> ¬{O}x sent19: (x): ¬(¬{M}x v {N}x) -> ¬{L}x sent20: {F}{e} -> ({E}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent21: (x): (¬{K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{H}{e} sent22: (x): (¬{I}x v ¬{H}x) -> {F}x
|
[] |
[] |
the ghrelin is a kind of a Japanese or it themes or both.
|
({C}{a} v {EC}{a})
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the middle is a theme if it soldiers pieplant.; sent19 -> int2: the drove does not repent if that the fact that it is either not unalike or a tableland or both is not false is not correct.; sent11 -> int3: the chewer does not detract courtliness and is a Indian.; sent18 -> int4: the fact that the chewer is not a canned is not incorrect if the fact that it does not detract courtliness and it is Indian is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the chewer is not a canned.; sent1 -> int6: the fact that if the chewer is not a kind of the canned the fact that the chewer is alike or it is a tableland or both does not hold is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the chewer is not unalike or it is a tableland or both is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists nothing such that it is not unalike and/or is a tableland.; int8 -> int9: that the drove is not unalike and/or is a tableland does not hold.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the drove does not repent hold.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the cul is not herbivorous but it is a roll.; int11 -> int12: something is not herbivorous and is a kind of a roll.; sent21 & int12 -> int13: the beak is non-blinded.; int13 -> int14: the beak is not agonal and/or is not a blinded.; sent22 -> int15: if the beak is not agonal or not a blinded or both then it is a biquadratic.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the beak is biquadratic is not incorrect.; int16 & sent20 -> int17: the elision is a gunmetal but it is not postural.; int17 & sent10 -> int18: the primordium is a gunmetal.; sent9 -> int19: the primordium is not a kind of a Manx and it does not soldier loquat if it is a kind of a gunmetal.; int18 & int19 -> int20: the primordium is non-Manx thing that does not soldier loquat.; sent5 -> int21: the middle soldiers pieplant if it soldiers loquat.;"
] | 19 | 3 | null | 21 | 0 | 21 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that something does soldier loquat and/or it is a kind of a Japanese is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something either is alike or is a tableland or both is not correct if it is not a canned. sent2: the ghrelin soldiers loquat if it soldiers pieplant. sent3: the ghrelin does detract plesiosaur. sent4: the ghrelin is a Japanese or it is topless or both. sent5: something does soldier pieplant if the fact that it does soldier loquat hold. sent6: if something does soldier pieplant it is a kind of a theme. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of an animist or is undue or both. sent8: either the ghrelin is a kind of a cirio or it is Japanese or both. sent9: if something is a gunmetal then it is not a Manx and does not soldier loquat. sent10: if the elision is a gunmetal but it is not postural then the primordium is a gunmetal. sent11: everything does not detract courtliness and is Indian. sent12: the bumboat is pro-choice and/or does soldier loquat. sent13: if the ghrelin is a kind of a Polish then it is a kind of a Japanese. sent14: if something is a theme then the fact that either the ghrelin is not non-Japanese or it is a theme or both is correct. sent15: the cul is not herbivorous but a roll if the drove does not repent. sent16: the ghrelin soldiers loquat if the fact that it is a lindane is not wrong. sent17: That the pieplant does soldier ghrelin hold. sent18: something does not can if it does not detract courtliness and it is Indian. sent19: something does not repent if the fact that it is not unalike or a tableland or both does not hold. sent20: the elision is a gunmetal but it is not postural if the beak is a biquadratic. sent21: if something is not herbivorous and does roll the beak does not blind. sent22: something is not non-biquadratic if it is not agonal and/or it is not a blinded. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the caudate is a reversed.
|
{AA}{aa}
|
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is an atlas and it is antheridial is not incorrect is incorrect. sent2: something that is not an atlas is a reversed and is a camshaft. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is an atlas and it is antheridial is not true then the caudate is not an atlas.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the caudate is a kind of a reversed and is a camshaft if it is not a kind of an atlas.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the caudate is not an atlas.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the caudate is a kind of reversed thing that is a kind of a camshaft.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent1 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the caudate is a reversed. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is an atlas and it is antheridial is not incorrect is incorrect. sent2: something that is not an atlas is a reversed and is a camshaft. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is an atlas and it is antheridial is not true then the caudate is not an atlas. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the caudate is a kind of a reversed and is a camshaft if it is not a kind of an atlas.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the caudate is not an atlas.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the caudate is a kind of reversed thing that is a kind of a camshaft.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something is a lumber and/or it poultices enterprising.
|
(Ex): ({A}x v {B}x)
|
sent1: something does poultice enterprising and does wive if it is not amblyopic.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {CT}x)
|
[] |
[] |
either the transparency does lumber or it wives or both.
|
({A}{ai} v {CT}{ai})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the transparency poultices enterprising and does wive if it is not amblyopic.;"
] | 5 | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = something is a lumber and/or it poultices enterprising. ; $context$ = sent1: something does poultice enterprising and does wive if it is not amblyopic. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the requiescat does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: if the fact that the non-counterfeitness and the neurosurgery happens is not true then the Jacobean does not occur. sent2: the requiescat yields that the Jacobeanness happens. sent3: the fact that the non-counterfeitness and the neurosurgery occurs is false. sent4: the Jacobean does not occur if the counterfeitness occurs. sent5: both the requiescat and the Jacobean occurs if the neurosurgery does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the appointiveness does not occur and the instrumentation happens is wrong the poulticing collect does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{B} sent2: {A} -> {B} sent3: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) sent4: {D} -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent6: ¬(¬{IN} & {IP}) -> ¬{EA}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the requiescat occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Jacobean happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the Jacobean does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the requiescat happens.
|
{A}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the requiescat does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the non-counterfeitness and the neurosurgery happens is not true then the Jacobean does not occur. sent2: the requiescat yields that the Jacobeanness happens. sent3: the fact that the non-counterfeitness and the neurosurgery occurs is false. sent4: the Jacobean does not occur if the counterfeitness occurs. sent5: both the requiescat and the Jacobean occurs if the neurosurgery does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the appointiveness does not occur and the instrumentation happens is wrong the poulticing collect does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the requiescat occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Jacobean happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the Jacobean does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it is not a vanilla then that it is Bolshevik and/or is not alular is not right is wrong.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: there is something such that if it does not contribute it does not poultice purl. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lurker then the fact that it either contributes or does not detract Hipposideridae or both is false. sent3: if the pepperidge is not a kind of a vanilla then the fact that it is Bolshevik or it is not alular or both is not true. sent4: that the pepperidge is a kind of a Bolshevik and/or it is alular does not hold if it is not a kind of a vanilla. sent5: if the pepperidge is a vanilla the fact that it is a Bolshevik and/or it is not alular is not correct. sent6: if the pepperidge does poultice carrot then the fact that it is a kind of a Cotacachi and/or it is not alular is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a vanilla then that it is Bolshevik and/or it is not alular is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not vanilla is not wrong then it is not Bolshevik. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it does not poultice consigner is right then it is a archaist. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not soldier dashing then that it is a scam or it is a crowberry or both is incorrect. sent11: that something is a Bolshevik or it does not soldier porte-cochere or both is not correct if it is resentful.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{F}x -> ¬{HP}x sent2: (Ex): {FQ}x -> ¬({F}x v ¬{CP}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: {FA}{aa} -> ¬({BN}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent7: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent9: (Ex): ¬{IO}x -> {HU}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{EE}x -> ¬({HL}x v {IM}x) sent11: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{BA}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if the purl is resentful then the fact that either it is a kind of a Bolshevik or it does not soldier porte-cochere or both is not correct.
|
¬{I}{ge} -> ¬({AA}{ge} v ¬{BA}{ge})
|
[
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a vanilla then that it is Bolshevik and/or is not alular is not right is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not contribute it does not poultice purl. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lurker then the fact that it either contributes or does not detract Hipposideridae or both is false. sent3: if the pepperidge is not a kind of a vanilla then the fact that it is Bolshevik or it is not alular or both is not true. sent4: that the pepperidge is a kind of a Bolshevik and/or it is alular does not hold if it is not a kind of a vanilla. sent5: if the pepperidge is a vanilla the fact that it is a Bolshevik and/or it is not alular is not correct. sent6: if the pepperidge does poultice carrot then the fact that it is a kind of a Cotacachi and/or it is not alular is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a vanilla then that it is Bolshevik and/or it is not alular is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not vanilla is not wrong then it is not Bolshevik. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it does not poultice consigner is right then it is a archaist. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not soldier dashing then that it is a scam or it is a crowberry or both is incorrect. sent11: that something is a Bolshevik or it does not soldier porte-cochere or both is not correct if it is resentful. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the man-of-war is not amicable.
|
¬{A}{aa}
|
sent1: something is amicable if it does not squash perspicuity. sent2: if that the fact that something is not heedful and does not poultice cutout is right is not right then it is not statistical. sent3: everything does not squash perspicuity and is not a kind of a innocency. sent4: something does not detract ranging and it is not a kind of a innocency if it is amicable.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: (x): {A}x -> (¬{GL}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: the man-of-war does not squash perspicuity and it is not a kind of a innocency.; int1 -> int2: the man-of-war does not squash perspicuity.; sent1 -> int3: the man-of-war is amicable if it does not squash perspicuity.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AA}{aa}; sent1 -> int3: ¬{AA}{aa} -> {A}{aa}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the Bastille does not detract ranging and is not a innocency.
|
(¬{GL}{io} & ¬{AB}{io})
|
[
"sent4 -> int4: the Bastille does not detract ranging and is not a innocency if it is amicable.; sent2 -> int5: if that the stenopterygius is not heedful and does not poultice cutout does not hold it is not statistical.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the man-of-war is not amicable. ; $context$ = sent1: something is amicable if it does not squash perspicuity. sent2: if that the fact that something is not heedful and does not poultice cutout is right is not right then it is not statistical. sent3: everything does not squash perspicuity and is not a kind of a innocency. sent4: something does not detract ranging and it is not a kind of a innocency if it is amicable. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: the man-of-war does not squash perspicuity and it is not a kind of a innocency.; int1 -> int2: the man-of-war does not squash perspicuity.; sent1 -> int3: the man-of-war is amicable if it does not squash perspicuity.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the durbar is not chancroidal or it is a Elizabethan or both is not true.
|
¬(¬{B}{b} v {C}{b})
|
sent1: there is something such that that it is a combretum that detracts Phalangeridae is not right. sent2: the durbar is not sinkable. sent3: if the sandblaster is not a kind of a Elizabethan that the durbar either does not detract Phalangeridae or is a combretum or both is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it is both not non-Elizabethan and not non-chancroidal is not true. sent5: if something squashes telemeter then it is not a Hieracium and it is not a rig. sent6: there exists something such that that it is chancroidal and it is a Elizabethan does not hold. sent7: the fact that the minaret does not squash durbar is correct if there exists something such that it does not detract pyrites and does not germinate. sent8: the internee does not poultice overabundance if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a combretum and it detracts Phalangeridae is incorrect. sent9: that the sandblaster does not detract Phalangeridae or it is a kind of a Elizabethan or both is incorrect. sent10: the durbar is not a combretum if the sandblaster is not chancroidal. sent11: the sandblaster is not chancroidal if there exists something such that the fact that it does not detract Phalangeridae and it is a combretum is wrong. sent12: that if the gigot is not a Hieracium and it does not rig that the internee is a rig hold is not incorrect. sent13: that the sandblaster is not a combretum but it detracts Phalangeridae is not true. sent14: if the minaret does not squash durbar that the telemeter is not a difflugia but it does diverge is wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a combretum is right the sandblaster is not chancroidal. sent16: if something diverges it squashes telemeter. sent17: the internee does not detract Phalangeridae if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-Elizabethan thing that poultices overabundance is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the telemeter is not a difflugia and diverges is incorrect then the gigot diverges. sent19: something is not a kind of a combretum and detracts Phalangeridae. sent20: if something does not poultice overabundance then it is non-chancroidal and/or it is a Elizabethan. sent21: if the wavefront prevails then the fact that the aviator does not detract pyrites and it does not germinate is not incorrect. sent22: that the wavefront does prevail is not wrong.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: ¬{DA}{b} sent3: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AB}{b} v {AA}{b}) sent4: (Ex): ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent5: (x): {F}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{E}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬({B}x & {C}x) sent7: (x): (¬{K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{I}{e} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{AB}{aa} v {C}{aa}) sent10: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{b} sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AB}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent12: (¬{G}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {E}{a} sent13: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent14: ¬{I}{e} -> ¬(¬{J}{d} & {H}{d}) sent15: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}{aa} sent16: (x): {H}x -> {F}x sent17: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent18: ¬(¬{J}{d} & {H}{d}) -> {H}{c} sent19: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent20: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x v {C}x) sent21: {M}{g} -> (¬{K}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) sent22: {M}{g}
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a combretum and it does detract Phalangeridae is not correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the internee does not poultice overabundance.;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{A}{a};"
] |
the durbar is not chancroidal and/or it is Elizabethan.
|
(¬{B}{b} v {C}{b})
|
[
"sent20 -> int3: if the durbar does not poultice overabundance then either it is not chancroidal or it is a Elizabethan or both.; sent5 -> int4: if the gigot squashes telemeter it is not a Hieracium and it does not rig.; sent16 -> int5: the gigot does squash telemeter if it does diverge.; sent21 & sent22 -> int6: the aviator does not detract pyrites and does not germinate.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not detract pyrites and does not germinate.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the minaret does not squash durbar.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: that the telemeter is not a kind of a difflugia but it diverges is not true.; sent18 & int9 -> int10: the gigot diverges.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the gigot does squash telemeter.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the gigot is not a Hieracium and is not a rig.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the internee rigs is right.; int13 -> int14: something is a rig.;"
] | 12 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the durbar is not chancroidal or it is a Elizabethan or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is a combretum that detracts Phalangeridae is not right. sent2: the durbar is not sinkable. sent3: if the sandblaster is not a kind of a Elizabethan that the durbar either does not detract Phalangeridae or is a combretum or both is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it is both not non-Elizabethan and not non-chancroidal is not true. sent5: if something squashes telemeter then it is not a Hieracium and it is not a rig. sent6: there exists something such that that it is chancroidal and it is a Elizabethan does not hold. sent7: the fact that the minaret does not squash durbar is correct if there exists something such that it does not detract pyrites and does not germinate. sent8: the internee does not poultice overabundance if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a combretum and it detracts Phalangeridae is incorrect. sent9: that the sandblaster does not detract Phalangeridae or it is a kind of a Elizabethan or both is incorrect. sent10: the durbar is not a combretum if the sandblaster is not chancroidal. sent11: the sandblaster is not chancroidal if there exists something such that the fact that it does not detract Phalangeridae and it is a combretum is wrong. sent12: that if the gigot is not a Hieracium and it does not rig that the internee is a rig hold is not incorrect. sent13: that the sandblaster is not a combretum but it detracts Phalangeridae is not true. sent14: if the minaret does not squash durbar that the telemeter is not a difflugia but it does diverge is wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a combretum is right the sandblaster is not chancroidal. sent16: if something diverges it squashes telemeter. sent17: the internee does not detract Phalangeridae if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-Elizabethan thing that poultices overabundance is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the telemeter is not a difflugia and diverges is incorrect then the gigot diverges. sent19: something is not a kind of a combretum and detracts Phalangeridae. sent20: if something does not poultice overabundance then it is non-chancroidal and/or it is a Elizabethan. sent21: if the wavefront prevails then the fact that the aviator does not detract pyrites and it does not germinate is not incorrect. sent22: that the wavefront does prevail is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a combretum and it does detract Phalangeridae is not correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the internee does not poultice overabundance.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the brittle-star is an arcade.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: that the brittle-star is both a temper and not a Daucus is not correct. sent2: the underpass stands and it is an arcade if the brittle-star is not prudent. sent3: that the brittle-star is a kind of a temper and it is a Daucus is not true. sent4: if something that is not a stand is not prudent then it is not an arcade. sent5: either the horsemint does not soldier putrescine or it is not chromosomal or both if the fact that it is a factor is right. sent6: something is not a kind of a SOD if it does not soldier putrescine or it is non-chromosomal or both. sent7: the brittle-star does stand if the fact that it is a temper and it is not a kind of a Daucus is false. sent8: the brittle-star stands if it is a kind of a Daucus. sent9: if the horsemint is not a kind of a SOD the fact that it is a green and craves is false. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a Daucus hold if it is an arcade. sent11: a stand is an arcade.
|
sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{cf} & {A}{cf}) sent3: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent4: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent5: {I}{b} -> (¬{G}{b} v ¬{H}{b}) sent6: (x): (¬{G}x v ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent7: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent8: {AB}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent10: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x sent11: (x): {B}x -> {A}x
|
[
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the brittle-star is a stand.; sent11 -> int2: if the brittle-star is a stand it is an arcade.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent11 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the brittle-star is not an arcade is not false.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent4 -> int3: if the brittle-star is not a stand and is not prudent it is not a kind of an arcade.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the brittle-star is an arcade. ; $context$ = sent1: that the brittle-star is both a temper and not a Daucus is not correct. sent2: the underpass stands and it is an arcade if the brittle-star is not prudent. sent3: that the brittle-star is a kind of a temper and it is a Daucus is not true. sent4: if something that is not a stand is not prudent then it is not an arcade. sent5: either the horsemint does not soldier putrescine or it is not chromosomal or both if the fact that it is a factor is right. sent6: something is not a kind of a SOD if it does not soldier putrescine or it is non-chromosomal or both. sent7: the brittle-star does stand if the fact that it is a temper and it is not a kind of a Daucus is false. sent8: the brittle-star stands if it is a kind of a Daucus. sent9: if the horsemint is not a kind of a SOD the fact that it is a green and craves is false. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a Daucus hold if it is an arcade. sent11: a stand is an arcade. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the brittle-star is a stand.; sent11 -> int2: if the brittle-star is a stand it is an arcade.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the apocryphalness does not occur.
|
¬{D}
|
sent1: the generation occurs. sent2: that the detracting Exocet does not occur triggers the non-apocryphalness.
|
sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{C} -> ¬{D}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the voltaicness does not occur and the generation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the generation does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the voltaicness does not occur and the generation does not occur is incorrect.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent1 & int1 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B});"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the apocryphalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the generation occurs. sent2: that the detracting Exocet does not occur triggers the non-apocryphalness. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the voltaicness does not occur and the generation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the generation does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the voltaicness does not occur and the generation does not occur is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot that is a limelight.
|
({B}{b} & {C}{b})
|
sent1: there exists something such that that it is systematics and is interfacial is not right. sent2: there exists something such that that it is a balminess and is a pivot is false. sent3: the marmite is a limelight. sent4: the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot if the feature is not a balminess. sent5: there exists something such that it is systematics and it is interfacial. sent6: the feature is not a carbide if something is non-azotic. sent7: if there is something such that that it is systematics but not non-interfacial is not correct then the feature is not a kind of a balminess. sent8: the Scrabble is a balminess. sent9: if that the feature is a limelight and/or is not a balminess does not hold the eremite is a limelight. sent10: that something is not a balminess but it is a kind of a mezereum is not correct if that it is a kind of an italic is true. sent11: if the fact that the Scrabble is not a kind of a balminess is correct the fact that the feature pivots is not false. sent12: that if there is something such that it is not systematics then that the feature is not a balminess is true is not incorrect. sent13: the Scrabble is not a kind of a pivot if that the Romans does not pivot but it is an italic is not true.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent3: {C}{hi} sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (x): ¬{GM}x -> ¬{FI}{a} sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: {A}{b} sent9: ¬({C}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {C}{hf} sent10: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {D}x) sent11: ¬{A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent12: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent13: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b}
|
[
"sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the feature is not a balminess.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot.;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent7 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: {B}{b};"
] |
the eremite is a limelight.
|
{C}{hf}
|
[] | 7 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot that is a limelight. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is systematics and is interfacial is not right. sent2: there exists something such that that it is a balminess and is a pivot is false. sent3: the marmite is a limelight. sent4: the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot if the feature is not a balminess. sent5: there exists something such that it is systematics and it is interfacial. sent6: the feature is not a carbide if something is non-azotic. sent7: if there is something such that that it is systematics but not non-interfacial is not correct then the feature is not a kind of a balminess. sent8: the Scrabble is a balminess. sent9: if that the feature is a limelight and/or is not a balminess does not hold the eremite is a limelight. sent10: that something is not a balminess but it is a kind of a mezereum is not correct if that it is a kind of an italic is true. sent11: if the fact that the Scrabble is not a kind of a balminess is correct the fact that the feature pivots is not false. sent12: that if there is something such that it is not systematics then that the feature is not a balminess is true is not incorrect. sent13: the Scrabble is not a kind of a pivot if that the Romans does not pivot but it is an italic is not true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the feature is not a balminess.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Scrabble is a kind of a pivot.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is a kind of a stay it does unscramble.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> {C}x
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it does busk then the fact that it is idiopathic is not wrong. sent2: if the sunspot is a interoceptor then it does unscramble. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Chemakum it is a Alka-seltzer. sent4: something soldiers Capek if it is a Gouda. sent5: if the pearlite is a stay then it does unscramble.
|
sent1: (Ex): {G}x -> {DO}x sent2: {GK}{cm} -> {C}{cm} sent3: (Ex): {IO}x -> {JD}x sent4: (x): {FO}x -> {CU}x sent5: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}
|
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if it is a Gouda then that it soldiers Capek is not incorrect.
|
(Ex): {FO}x -> {CU}x
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: if the financier is a Gouda then it does soldier Capek.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a stay it does unscramble. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does busk then the fact that it is idiopathic is not wrong. sent2: if the sunspot is a interoceptor then it does unscramble. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Chemakum it is a Alka-seltzer. sent4: something soldiers Capek if it is a Gouda. sent5: if the pearlite is a stay then it does unscramble. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the cholelithotomy does not occur.
|
¬{D}
|
sent1: the fact that not the Macedonianness but the encephalography occurs does not hold if the anginalness does not occur. sent2: if the Macedonianness occurs then the encephalography happens. sent3: the Macedonian happens. sent4: the proceduralness happens. sent5: that the cholelithotomy occurs is prevented by that the encephalography and the anginalness happens. sent6: that the emirate occurs is not wrong. sent7: the detracting bonduc occurs. sent8: the unscientificness happens. sent9: the toe-in occurs if the marshalship occurs. sent10: the clausalness happens. sent11: that the exclusion does not occur is brought about by that the leakiness but not the detracting values occurs. sent12: that the leakiness does not occur triggers that the exclusion does not occur and the anginalness does not occur. sent13: the hermeneuticness happens. sent14: that the exclusion does not occur triggers that the non-anginalness and the emirate occurs. sent15: the uvularness does not occur. sent16: both the commanding and the Macedonian happens if the exclusion does not occur. sent17: both the poulticing fore-topsail and the ape happens. sent18: the anginalness happens if the emirate occurs. sent19: that the one-pieceness happens is caused by that the breaker occurs. sent20: that the exponentialness and the gerrymandering happens yields that the poulticing walk-up does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) sent2: {A} -> {B} sent3: {A} sent4: {EB} sent5: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent6: {E} sent7: {FL} sent8: {T} sent9: {AF} -> {HN} sent10: {DS} sent11: ({G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent12: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{C}) sent13: {GQ} sent14: ¬{F} -> (¬{C} & {E}) sent15: ¬{IN} sent16: ¬{F} -> ({HT} & {A}) sent17: ({HI} & {O}) sent18: {E} -> {C} sent19: {IT} -> {FH} sent20: ({II} & {CN}) -> ¬{HL}
|
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the encephalography happens.; sent18 & sent6 -> int2: the anginalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the encephalography happens and the anginalness happens.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: {B}; sent18 & sent6 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the cholelithotomy happens.
|
{D}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the cholelithotomy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the Macedonianness but the encephalography occurs does not hold if the anginalness does not occur. sent2: if the Macedonianness occurs then the encephalography happens. sent3: the Macedonian happens. sent4: the proceduralness happens. sent5: that the cholelithotomy occurs is prevented by that the encephalography and the anginalness happens. sent6: that the emirate occurs is not wrong. sent7: the detracting bonduc occurs. sent8: the unscientificness happens. sent9: the toe-in occurs if the marshalship occurs. sent10: the clausalness happens. sent11: that the exclusion does not occur is brought about by that the leakiness but not the detracting values occurs. sent12: that the leakiness does not occur triggers that the exclusion does not occur and the anginalness does not occur. sent13: the hermeneuticness happens. sent14: that the exclusion does not occur triggers that the non-anginalness and the emirate occurs. sent15: the uvularness does not occur. sent16: both the commanding and the Macedonian happens if the exclusion does not occur. sent17: both the poulticing fore-topsail and the ape happens. sent18: the anginalness happens if the emirate occurs. sent19: that the one-pieceness happens is caused by that the breaker occurs. sent20: that the exponentialness and the gerrymandering happens yields that the poulticing walk-up does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the encephalography happens.; sent18 & sent6 -> int2: the anginalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the encephalography happens and the anginalness happens.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the ford does not occur is not incorrect.
|
¬{AB}
|
sent1: that not the vote but the boskopoidness happens hold if the Moorishness does not occur. sent2: the diathermy does not occur and the Moorish does not occur if the predicting does not occur. sent3: not the sulking but the ford occurs if the committing does not occur. sent4: that the fording does not occur is caused by the committing and/or that the fording does not occur. sent5: that the committing does not occur is prevented by that the voting does not occur but the boskopoidness happens. sent6: the committing does not occur. sent7: if the committing occurs then the event occurs.
|
sent1: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & {B}) sent2: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: ({A} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{AB} sent5: (¬{C} & {B}) -> {A} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: {A} -> {GJ}
|
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: not the sulk but the fording occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the event occurs.
|
{GJ}
|
[] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ford does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the vote but the boskopoidness happens hold if the Moorishness does not occur. sent2: the diathermy does not occur and the Moorish does not occur if the predicting does not occur. sent3: not the sulking but the ford occurs if the committing does not occur. sent4: that the fording does not occur is caused by the committing and/or that the fording does not occur. sent5: that the committing does not occur is prevented by that the voting does not occur but the boskopoidness happens. sent6: the committing does not occur. sent7: if the committing occurs then the event occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: not the sulk but the fording occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bumper is not a hypertrophied.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: the bumper does not hypertrophy if that the caprifig either is a Rankin or does not soldier fore-topsail or both does not hold. sent2: the caprifig does hypertrophy. sent3: the bumper is a Rankin. sent4: the foreplay is not a kind of a Rankin. sent5: that the caprifig is a Rankin and/or it does not soldier fore-topsail is not right.
|
sent1: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: {B}{a} sent3: {AA}{b} sent4: ¬{AA}{ae} sent5: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})
|
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the bumper is not a hypertrophied. ; $context$ = sent1: the bumper does not hypertrophy if that the caprifig either is a Rankin or does not soldier fore-topsail or both does not hold. sent2: the caprifig does hypertrophy. sent3: the bumper is a Rankin. sent4: the foreplay is not a kind of a Rankin. sent5: that the caprifig is a Rankin and/or it does not soldier fore-topsail is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
both the poulticing punk and the soldiering crinoline happens.
|
({B} & {C})
|
sent1: if the inconsiderableness happens the poulticing punk occurs. sent2: that the soldiering crinoline occurs is right. sent3: that both the poulticing punk and the soldiering crinoline occurs does not hold if the inconsiderableness does not occur.
|
sent1: {A} -> {B} sent2: {C} sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C})
|
[] |
[] |
that both the poulticing punk and the soldiering crinoline occurs does not hold.
|
¬({B} & {C})
|
[] | 6 | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = both the poulticing punk and the soldiering crinoline happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inconsiderableness happens the poulticing punk occurs. sent2: that the soldiering crinoline occurs is right. sent3: that both the poulticing punk and the soldiering crinoline occurs does not hold if the inconsiderableness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the metatarsal is telephonic.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: the metatarsal soldiers cine-film. sent2: the bun is telephonic. sent3: the metatarsal is telephonic. sent4: the metatarsal poultices displeasure. sent5: the metatarsal is vocalic. sent6: the dimorphism is telephonic. sent7: if the delphinium is not a set-to then it is a kind of a counterargument and it is not a Koasati. sent8: the metatarsal is a counterargument. sent9: the settlor is telephonic. sent10: the chamberpot is telephonic. sent11: if something is not a counterargument it is both telephonic and a Gnostic. sent12: if the fact that that something is a counterargument that is a Koasati hold is not true it is not a kind of a counterargument. sent13: the pteridologist is telephonic. sent14: the metatarsal is postal. sent15: if something is not a set-to that it is a counterargument and is a kind of a Koasati is incorrect.
|
sent1: {CJ}{a} sent2: {A}{gc} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {JK}{a} sent5: {HR}{a} sent6: {A}{dj} sent7: ¬{E}{c} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent8: {C}{a} sent9: {A}{ic} sent10: {A}{cj} sent11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent12: (x): ¬({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent13: {A}{in} sent14: {FT}{a} sent15: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x & {D}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the item is telephonic.
|
{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent11 -> int1: the item is both telephonic and Gnostic if it is not a counterargument.; sent12 -> int2: if that the item is both a counterargument and a Koasati does not hold it is not a counterargument.; sent15 -> int3: if the metatarsal is not a set-to that it is both a counterargument and a Koasati does not hold.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the metatarsal is telephonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the metatarsal soldiers cine-film. sent2: the bun is telephonic. sent3: the metatarsal is telephonic. sent4: the metatarsal poultices displeasure. sent5: the metatarsal is vocalic. sent6: the dimorphism is telephonic. sent7: if the delphinium is not a set-to then it is a kind of a counterargument and it is not a Koasati. sent8: the metatarsal is a counterargument. sent9: the settlor is telephonic. sent10: the chamberpot is telephonic. sent11: if something is not a counterargument it is both telephonic and a Gnostic. sent12: if the fact that that something is a counterargument that is a Koasati hold is not true it is not a kind of a counterargument. sent13: the pteridologist is telephonic. sent14: the metatarsal is postal. sent15: if something is not a set-to that it is a counterargument and is a kind of a Koasati is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that it is not a Macropodidae but exilic hold.
|
(Ex): (¬{C}x & {D}x)
|
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Macropodidae and it is exilic is correct. sent2: if the grume is weedy then it is a ngultrum. sent3: the hardware is a ngultrum. sent4: that the levallorphan is both not a Macropodidae and exilic if the grume is a kind of a ngultrum is true. sent5: something is not a Macropodidae.
|
sent1: (Ex): ({C}x & {D}x) sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent3: {B}{h} sent4: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{C}x
|
[] |
[] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a Macropodidae but exilic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Macropodidae and it is exilic is correct. sent2: if the grume is weedy then it is a ngultrum. sent3: the hardware is a ngultrum. sent4: that the levallorphan is both not a Macropodidae and exilic if the grume is a kind of a ngultrum is true. sent5: something is not a Macropodidae. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the alfalfa does not soldier goldfields.
|
¬{C}{aa}
|
sent1: if the alfalfa is a savage and not judgmental then it does not soldier goldfields. sent2: everything is a savage and nonjudgmental.
|
sent1: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{aa} sent2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the fact that the alfalfa is a savage and it is nonjudgmental hold.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}); int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the alfalfa does not soldier goldfields. ; $context$ = sent1: if the alfalfa is a savage and not judgmental then it does not soldier goldfields. sent2: everything is a savage and nonjudgmental. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the alfalfa is a savage and it is nonjudgmental hold.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the squashing Testudinidae happens is not incorrect if the hyaloplasmicness occurs.
|
{A} -> {C}
|
sent1: if the fact that the poulticing turtle happens is true then that the soldiering Theravada occurs hold. sent2: the ding does not occur if the fact that the ding but not the soldiering ailment happens is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the squashing Testudinidae occurs or the detracting Malthusianism does not occur or both hold if the ding does not occur. sent4: the placableness occurs. sent5: the squashing Testudinidae occurs if the poulticing Kansan occurs. sent6: if the squashing swan happens then the bridling occurs. sent7: both the modernizing and the hyaloplasmicness happens if the poulticing Kansan does not occur. sent8: that the pandiculation occurs is right. sent9: if the shoring happens the fact that the dinging occurs and the soldiering ailment does not occur does not hold. sent10: the sessileness occurs.
|
sent1: {EU} -> {FI} sent2: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} sent3: ¬{E} -> ({C} v ¬{D}) sent4: {M} sent5: {B} -> {C} sent6: {DU} -> {FD} sent7: ¬{B} -> ({GG} & {A}) sent8: {BU} sent9: {G} -> ¬({E} & ¬{F}) sent10: {II}
|
[] |
[] |
the modernizing happens.
|
{GG}
|
[] | 9 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the squashing Testudinidae happens is not incorrect if the hyaloplasmicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the poulticing turtle happens is true then that the soldiering Theravada occurs hold. sent2: the ding does not occur if the fact that the ding but not the soldiering ailment happens is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the squashing Testudinidae occurs or the detracting Malthusianism does not occur or both hold if the ding does not occur. sent4: the placableness occurs. sent5: the squashing Testudinidae occurs if the poulticing Kansan occurs. sent6: if the squashing swan happens then the bridling occurs. sent7: both the modernizing and the hyaloplasmicness happens if the poulticing Kansan does not occur. sent8: that the pandiculation occurs is right. sent9: if the shoring happens the fact that the dinging occurs and the soldiering ailment does not occur does not hold. sent10: the sessileness occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the nude is a kind of a fast.
|
{D}{b}
|
sent1: there are fast things. sent2: if the nude does soldier Republican but it is not Augustan then it is fast. sent3: if something that does not soldier Republican is not Augustan then it fasts. sent4: the obverse is not Augustan but it does soldier Republican if that it is a coverall is not false. sent5: if the fact that the latchkey soldiers Ataturk but it is not ungenerous is false it does not soldiers Ataturk. sent6: that the obverse is a coverall is not incorrect if the latchkey is a kind of non-autocatalytic thing that is a kind of a coverall. sent7: the obverse is eradicable and it is unemployable. sent8: the nude is eradicable. sent9: if that the obverse is eradicable and it is unemployable hold then it is not handmade. sent10: the fact that something is not handmade but it is a fast does not hold if it is not Augustan. sent11: the nude is eradicable if the obverse is Augustan. sent12: if the nude does not soldier Republican but it is Augustan then it fasts. sent13: something is non-autocatalytic thing that is a kind of a coverall if it does not soldier Ataturk.
|
sent1: (Ex): {D}x sent2: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {D}{b} sent3: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {D}x sent4: {E}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: ¬({G}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} sent6: (¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> {E}{a} sent7: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: {AA}{b} sent9: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) sent11: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} sent12: (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {D}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x)
|
[
"sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the obverse is not handmade.; sent3 -> int2: if the nude does not soldier Republican and it is not Augustan it is fast.;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent3 -> int2: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {D}{b};"
] |
the nude does not fast.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
[
"sent10 -> int3: that the fact that the obverse is not handmade but it fasts does not hold if the obverse is not Augustan is not wrong.; sent13 -> int4: the latchkey is not autocatalytic and is a coverall if it does not soldier Ataturk.;"
] | 8 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the nude is a kind of a fast. ; $context$ = sent1: there are fast things. sent2: if the nude does soldier Republican but it is not Augustan then it is fast. sent3: if something that does not soldier Republican is not Augustan then it fasts. sent4: the obverse is not Augustan but it does soldier Republican if that it is a coverall is not false. sent5: if the fact that the latchkey soldiers Ataturk but it is not ungenerous is false it does not soldiers Ataturk. sent6: that the obverse is a coverall is not incorrect if the latchkey is a kind of non-autocatalytic thing that is a kind of a coverall. sent7: the obverse is eradicable and it is unemployable. sent8: the nude is eradicable. sent9: if that the obverse is eradicable and it is unemployable hold then it is not handmade. sent10: the fact that something is not handmade but it is a fast does not hold if it is not Augustan. sent11: the nude is eradicable if the obverse is Augustan. sent12: if the nude does not soldier Republican but it is Augustan then it fasts. sent13: something is non-autocatalytic thing that is a kind of a coverall if it does not soldier Ataturk. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the obverse is not handmade.; sent3 -> int2: if the nude does not soldier Republican and it is not Augustan it is fast.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the alarm is a telemeter.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: the spinster is a superiority. sent2: the alarm is a superiority. sent3: that something is not a kind of a superiority and is exilic is false if it is not a Tyson. sent4: if something does not philander or is a cygnet or both the yardgrass is a kind of a twill. sent5: if the alarm is a telemeter it is a superiority. sent6: the alarm does poultice brush if it does soldier Mauritius. sent7: something is non-exilic if the fact that it is both a Tyson and not a witness is not true. sent8: everything does not philander and/or is a cygnet. sent9: if the spinster is a superiority the fact that the alarm is exilic is true. sent10: the alarm is not a kind of a telemeter and is not a superiority if the spinster is not exilic.
|
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {A}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent4: (x): (¬{G}x v {H}x) -> {F}{c} sent5: {C}{b} -> {A}{b} sent6: {EO}{b} -> {AU}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: (x): (¬{G}x v {H}x) sent9: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent10: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b})
|
[
"sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the alarm is exilic.;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] |
the alarm is not a kind of a telemeter.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: if the fact that the spinster is a Tyson and does not witness is incorrect it is not exilic.; sent8 -> int3: either the veld does not philander or it is a cygnet or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not philander and/or is a cygnet.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the yardgrass twills.; int5 -> int6: something twills.;"
] | 8 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the alarm is a telemeter. ; $context$ = sent1: the spinster is a superiority. sent2: the alarm is a superiority. sent3: that something is not a kind of a superiority and is exilic is false if it is not a Tyson. sent4: if something does not philander or is a cygnet or both the yardgrass is a kind of a twill. sent5: if the alarm is a telemeter it is a superiority. sent6: the alarm does poultice brush if it does soldier Mauritius. sent7: something is non-exilic if the fact that it is both a Tyson and not a witness is not true. sent8: everything does not philander and/or is a cygnet. sent9: if the spinster is a superiority the fact that the alarm is exilic is true. sent10: the alarm is not a kind of a telemeter and is not a superiority if the spinster is not exilic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the alarm is exilic.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the scalp is not a kind of a QCD but it tinkles is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b})
|
sent1: something is a kind of dramatic a prospect if it is not a lunch. sent2: if the eye is dramatic then the draftee is not a burglary. sent3: the fact that the Monsieur is a tachograph is right. sent4: the fact that the scalp is not a burglary but it is a QCD is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the scalp is not a burglary hold. sent6: that something is both not a burglary and a celeriac does not hold if it is a kind of a QCD. sent7: if the draftee is not a QCD that the scalp is a QCD and it tinkles is not correct. sent8: the draftee is a burglary. sent9: the house is not current but it does soldier HTML. sent10: that the fact that the scalp is a kind of a QCD and it tinkles is correct does not hold. sent11: the osteoblast is a QCD if the draftee is dramatic. sent12: if the draftee is not a kind of a QCD that the scalp is not a QCD and tinkles does not hold. sent13: that the draftee is a kind of a burglary that does tinkle is not correct if the scalp is not a burglary. sent14: either something does tinkle or it is not a prospect or both if the fact that it does lunch is right. sent15: the Monsieur is not a right. sent16: the Kraut tinkles.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({C}x & {E}x) sent2: {C}{c} -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: {H}{d} sent4: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent5: ¬{B}{b} sent6: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {GJ}x) sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {D}{b}) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: (¬{IH}{s} & {IK}{s}) sent10: ¬({A}{b} & {D}{b}) sent11: {C}{a} -> {A}{fa} sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b}) sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent14: (x): {F}x -> ({D}x v ¬{E}x) sent15: ¬{G}{d} sent16: {D}{cf}
|
[] |
[] |
the scalp is not a QCD and tinkles.
|
(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: if the eye is not a lunch then it is dramatic and it is a prospect.; sent3 & sent15 -> int2: the Monsieur is a tachograph and does not right.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of a tachograph that is not right.;"
] | 8 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the scalp is not a kind of a QCD but it tinkles is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of dramatic a prospect if it is not a lunch. sent2: if the eye is dramatic then the draftee is not a burglary. sent3: the fact that the Monsieur is a tachograph is right. sent4: the fact that the scalp is not a burglary but it is a QCD is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the scalp is not a burglary hold. sent6: that something is both not a burglary and a celeriac does not hold if it is a kind of a QCD. sent7: if the draftee is not a QCD that the scalp is a QCD and it tinkles is not correct. sent8: the draftee is a burglary. sent9: the house is not current but it does soldier HTML. sent10: that the fact that the scalp is a kind of a QCD and it tinkles is correct does not hold. sent11: the osteoblast is a QCD if the draftee is dramatic. sent12: if the draftee is not a kind of a QCD that the scalp is not a QCD and tinkles does not hold. sent13: that the draftee is a kind of a burglary that does tinkle is not correct if the scalp is not a burglary. sent14: either something does tinkle or it is not a prospect or both if the fact that it does lunch is right. sent15: the Monsieur is not a right. sent16: the Kraut tinkles. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the asterion is celiac and it detracts mattress.
|
({C}{a} & {B}{a})
|
sent1: the myoglobin is a endoplasm. sent2: the fact that the waxwork does plane and does not soldier Leninism does not hold. sent3: the fact that the asterion is actable is true if that it is celiac and is not a trowel is incorrect. sent4: if the asterion is isentropic it is celiac. sent5: if something does not soldier Leninism then that it is celiac and it does detract mattress is not true. sent6: the evergreen is a endoplasm. sent7: the pageboy is a bastardy. sent8: the asterion is informative and it is a kind of a Satureja. sent9: that the asterion migrates and it does soldier Leninism does not hold. sent10: the fact that the asterion is a kind of a whisper that does not detract workwear is incorrect. sent11: that the asterion is a kind of a bastardy but it is not a endoplasm is wrong. sent12: the fact that the asterion is a plane and it is a kind of a deep is not correct. sent13: That the Leninism soldiers asterion is right. sent14: the Hmong does soldier Leninism and it is a beeswax. sent15: if the asterion is inflectional the fact that it is a endoplasm hold. sent16: if the fact that the asterion does soldier Leninism is correct the fact that it detracts mattress is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the asterion detracts mattress hold if the fact that it does poultice catacomb and does not inventory is not right. sent18: the asterion is a jerkin if that it is celiac thing that is not spineless is incorrect. sent19: the huntress does poultice Oviedo and it does poultice dasyurid. sent20: that the asterion is celiac hold if the fact that it is a bastardy and is not a kind of a endoplasm is false. sent21: the asterion is a kind of a glyburide if that it is astragalar but not a Herman is wrong. sent22: if that the cephaloridine is celiac and inedible is not right then it does poultice waxwork.
|
sent1: {E}{fd} sent2: ¬({HJ}{hc} & ¬{A}{hc}) sent3: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{DK}{a}) -> {JC}{a} sent4: {JF}{a} -> {C}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent6: {E}{jc} sent7: {D}{if} sent8: ({DF}{a} & {FA}{a}) sent9: ¬({DJ}{a} & {A}{a}) sent10: ¬({FJ}{a} & ¬{FE}{a}) sent11: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent12: ¬({HJ}{a} & {EB}{a}) sent13: {AA}{aa} sent14: ({A}{q} & {GO}{q}) sent15: {JG}{a} -> {E}{a} sent16: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent17: ¬({FB}{a} & ¬{BM}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent18: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{CO}{a}) -> {HQ}{a} sent19: ({EG}{hq} & {HK}{hq}) sent20: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {C}{a} sent21: ¬({GJ}{a} & ¬{BB}{a}) -> {CD}{a} sent22: ¬({C}{ed} & ¬{R}{ed}) -> {GS}{ed}
|
[
"sent20 & sent11 -> int1: the asterion is celiac.;"
] |
[
"sent20 & sent11 -> int1: {C}{a};"
] |
the fact that the asterion is celiac and it detracts mattress is not true.
|
¬({C}{a} & {B}{a})
|
[
"sent5 -> int2: the fact that if the asterion does not soldier Leninism then the fact that the asterion is celiac and it detracts mattress is false is true.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the asterion is celiac and it detracts mattress. ; $context$ = sent1: the myoglobin is a endoplasm. sent2: the fact that the waxwork does plane and does not soldier Leninism does not hold. sent3: the fact that the asterion is actable is true if that it is celiac and is not a trowel is incorrect. sent4: if the asterion is isentropic it is celiac. sent5: if something does not soldier Leninism then that it is celiac and it does detract mattress is not true. sent6: the evergreen is a endoplasm. sent7: the pageboy is a bastardy. sent8: the asterion is informative and it is a kind of a Satureja. sent9: that the asterion migrates and it does soldier Leninism does not hold. sent10: the fact that the asterion is a kind of a whisper that does not detract workwear is incorrect. sent11: that the asterion is a kind of a bastardy but it is not a endoplasm is wrong. sent12: the fact that the asterion is a plane and it is a kind of a deep is not correct. sent13: That the Leninism soldiers asterion is right. sent14: the Hmong does soldier Leninism and it is a beeswax. sent15: if the asterion is inflectional the fact that it is a endoplasm hold. sent16: if the fact that the asterion does soldier Leninism is correct the fact that it detracts mattress is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the asterion detracts mattress hold if the fact that it does poultice catacomb and does not inventory is not right. sent18: the asterion is a jerkin if that it is celiac thing that is not spineless is incorrect. sent19: the huntress does poultice Oviedo and it does poultice dasyurid. sent20: that the asterion is celiac hold if the fact that it is a bastardy and is not a kind of a endoplasm is false. sent21: the asterion is a kind of a glyburide if that it is astragalar but not a Herman is wrong. sent22: if that the cephaloridine is celiac and inedible is not right then it does poultice waxwork. ; $proof$ =
|
sent20 & sent11 -> int1: the asterion is celiac.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the decaf is campanulate.
|
{B}{a}
|
sent1: if there is something such that it is not a sallowness the decaf is a southernism and it is campanulate. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a sallowness then the haywire is a southernism and is not non-campanulate. sent3: the decaf is a kind of a southernism. sent4: the decaf is a southernism if there is something such that it is not a sallowness. sent5: the Earth palatalizes if there exists something such that that it is not a grouper and it does not palatalizes does not hold. sent6: if the Earth does palatalize it is both not a Dasyuridae and a napping. sent7: the decaf is a southernism that is a sallowness if there exists something such that it is not campanulate. sent8: that that the Jacquard is not a kind of a grouper and it does not palatalize is not right is not false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a sallowness then the fact that the haywire is a kind of a southernism is true. sent10: the haywire is not a kind of a sallowness. sent11: the restoration is not campanulate. sent12: if something is not a Dasyuridae and is a kind of a napping the duchy is not dimorphic. sent13: there is something such that it is a sallowness.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent3: {C}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {G}{c} sent6: {G}{c} -> (¬{E}{c} & {F}{c}) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{H}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}{aa} sent10: ¬{A}{aa} sent11: ¬{B}{p} sent12: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}{b} sent13: (Ex): {A}x
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a sallowness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the decaf is both a southernism and campanulate.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent10 -> int1: (Ex): ¬{A}x; int1 & sent1 -> int2: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the decaf is not campanulate.
|
¬{B}{a}
|
[
"sent8 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a grouper and it does not palatalize is not true.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the Earth palatalizes.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the Earth is both not a Dasyuridae and a napping.; int5 -> int6: something is not a Dasyuridae and is a napping.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the duchy is not dimorphic is not false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not dimorphic.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the decaf is campanulate. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a sallowness the decaf is a southernism and it is campanulate. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a sallowness then the haywire is a southernism and is not non-campanulate. sent3: the decaf is a kind of a southernism. sent4: the decaf is a southernism if there is something such that it is not a sallowness. sent5: the Earth palatalizes if there exists something such that that it is not a grouper and it does not palatalizes does not hold. sent6: if the Earth does palatalize it is both not a Dasyuridae and a napping. sent7: the decaf is a southernism that is a sallowness if there exists something such that it is not campanulate. sent8: that that the Jacquard is not a kind of a grouper and it does not palatalize is not right is not false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a sallowness then the fact that the haywire is a kind of a southernism is true. sent10: the haywire is not a kind of a sallowness. sent11: the restoration is not campanulate. sent12: if something is not a Dasyuridae and is a kind of a napping the duchy is not dimorphic. sent13: there is something such that it is a sallowness. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a sallowness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the decaf is both a southernism and campanulate.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the squashing swan does not occur.
|
¬{D}
|
sent1: the soldiering comity occurs. sent2: if both the anthropolatry and the salpingectomy happens the squashing swan does not occur. sent3: either the trophoblasticness does not occur or the clear-cutting does not occur or both. sent4: the criminalization and the soldiering poignance occurs. sent5: that the contributing does not occur and the gladiatorialness does not occur is triggered by the non-perceptualness. sent6: the salpingectomy occurs if the trophoblasticness does not occur. sent7: the gaping does not occur and/or the benzylicness does not occur. sent8: if the trophoblasticness does not occur the clear-cutting or the salpingectomy or both happens. sent9: the bilge happens if the consideration occurs. sent10: that both the phototherapy and the soldiering embryo happens is brought about by the non-stoloniferousness. sent11: that the appreciation happens is prevented by that both the word and the poulticing displeasure occurs. sent12: if the clear-cutting does not occur then the salpingectomy happens. sent13: the baroque occurs. sent14: the litigiousness happens. sent15: the appreciation occurs. sent16: that the non-laxativeness and the soldiering poignance happens is caused by that the phototherapy happens. sent17: if the sensitization does not occur then the trophoblasticness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the laxativeness does not occur hold the fact that the horse-drawnness does not occur and/or the Falstaffianness happens is incorrect. sent19: the soldiering leftfield occurs. sent20: the lipectomy does not occur. sent21: that either the soldiering Tagus or the non-burrlikeness or both occurs is triggered by the non-gladiatorialness. sent22: if the fact that the non-horse-drawnness and/or the Falstaffianness happens is not correct then the fact that the sensitization does not occur is correct. sent23: that the stoloniferousness happens is prevented by that the soldiering Tagus happens. sent24: if that the cyanobacterialness occurs and the soldiering antiredeposition does not occur does not hold then the perceptualness does not occur. sent25: that the cyanobacterialness occurs and the soldiering antiredeposition does not occur is false if the litigiousness happens.
|
sent1: {A} sent2: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent3: (¬{F} v ¬{E}) sent4: ({DT} & {K}) sent5: ¬{S} -> (¬{R} & ¬{Q}) sent6: ¬{F} -> {C} sent7: (¬{HI} v ¬{IC}) sent8: ¬{F} -> ({E} v {C}) sent9: {CC} -> {CB} sent10: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {M}) sent11: ({HP} & {GM}) -> ¬{DI} sent12: ¬{E} -> {C} sent13: {BJ} sent14: {AA} sent15: {DI} sent16: {L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) sent17: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} sent18: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{I} v {H}) sent19: {CP} sent20: ¬{JB} sent21: ¬{Q} -> ({P} v ¬{O}) sent22: ¬(¬{I} v {H}) -> ¬{G} sent23: {P} -> ¬{N} sent24: ¬({T} & ¬{U}) -> ¬{S} sent25: {AA} -> ¬({T} & ¬{U})
|
[
"sent3 & sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the salpingectomy happens.;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent6 & sent12 -> int1: {C};"
] |
the squashing swan occurs.
|
{D}
|
[
"sent25 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the cyanobacterialness happens but the soldiering antiredeposition does not occur is not true.; sent24 & int2 -> int3: the perceptualness does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the contributing does not occur and the gladiatorialness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the gladiatorialness does not occur.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: either the soldiering Tagus occurs or the burrlikeness does not occur or both.;"
] | 17 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the squashing swan does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the soldiering comity occurs. sent2: if both the anthropolatry and the salpingectomy happens the squashing swan does not occur. sent3: either the trophoblasticness does not occur or the clear-cutting does not occur or both. sent4: the criminalization and the soldiering poignance occurs. sent5: that the contributing does not occur and the gladiatorialness does not occur is triggered by the non-perceptualness. sent6: the salpingectomy occurs if the trophoblasticness does not occur. sent7: the gaping does not occur and/or the benzylicness does not occur. sent8: if the trophoblasticness does not occur the clear-cutting or the salpingectomy or both happens. sent9: the bilge happens if the consideration occurs. sent10: that both the phototherapy and the soldiering embryo happens is brought about by the non-stoloniferousness. sent11: that the appreciation happens is prevented by that both the word and the poulticing displeasure occurs. sent12: if the clear-cutting does not occur then the salpingectomy happens. sent13: the baroque occurs. sent14: the litigiousness happens. sent15: the appreciation occurs. sent16: that the non-laxativeness and the soldiering poignance happens is caused by that the phototherapy happens. sent17: if the sensitization does not occur then the trophoblasticness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the laxativeness does not occur hold the fact that the horse-drawnness does not occur and/or the Falstaffianness happens is incorrect. sent19: the soldiering leftfield occurs. sent20: the lipectomy does not occur. sent21: that either the soldiering Tagus or the non-burrlikeness or both occurs is triggered by the non-gladiatorialness. sent22: if the fact that the non-horse-drawnness and/or the Falstaffianness happens is not correct then the fact that the sensitization does not occur is correct. sent23: that the stoloniferousness happens is prevented by that the soldiering Tagus happens. sent24: if that the cyanobacterialness occurs and the soldiering antiredeposition does not occur does not hold then the perceptualness does not occur. sent25: that the cyanobacterialness occurs and the soldiering antiredeposition does not occur is false if the litigiousness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the salpingectomy happens.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the girder is mesolithic hold.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: if the girder does not stone and it does not soldier septuagenarian it is a circumduction. sent2: the fact that the infernal is Aleutian does not hold if that the sodalist is both Aleutian and not a quarter does not hold. sent3: the girder does not detract proline. sent4: if the infernal is not Aleutian that the Davenport is a kind of umbelliferous thing that is not a trochanter does not hold. sent5: that the sodalist is not Aleutian and it is not a quarter is not correct if there is something such that it is garlicky. sent6: the girder is not a kind of a stoning. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is both umbelliferous and not a trochanter does not hold the maltose is not umbelliferous. sent8: the girder does not detract psychopathy. sent9: if something is not a stoning and is not a Steinberg then it is mesolithic. sent10: if that something is non-umbelliferous but it does chain-smoke is incorrect it is not mesolithic. sent11: something is garlicky and it is a Carthusian if it is not a kind of a corolla. sent12: the girder is a Libyan. sent13: the physique does not stone. sent14: the girder is not mesolithic if the Aegyptopithecus is mesolithic thing that chain-smokes. sent15: the Chevalier is aortal if it is a kind of non-Libyan thing that is not mesolithic. sent16: if there is something such that it does detract chubbiness then the blues is not a corolla but it is a brood. sent17: there exists something such that it does detract chubbiness. sent18: the septuagenarian is a kind of a Steinberg. sent19: the girder is not outdoor.
|
sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AN}{aa}) -> {AO}{aa} sent2: ¬(¬{E}{e} & ¬{G}{e}) -> ¬{E}{d} sent3: ¬{HH}{aa} sent4: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent5: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}{e} & ¬{G}{e}) sent6: ¬{AA}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent8: ¬{CP}{aa} sent9: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({F}x & {H}x) sent12: {BC}{aa} sent13: ¬{AA}{gb} sent14: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent15: (¬{BC}{ec} & ¬{B}{ec}) -> {FN}{ec} sent16: (x): {K}x -> (¬{I}{f} & {J}{f}) sent17: (Ex): {K}x sent18: {AB}{cg} sent19: ¬{CU}{aa}
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: the girder is mesolithic if it does not stone and it is not a Steinberg.;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
] |
that the girder is not mesolithic is not false.
|
¬{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent10 -> int2: if that the girder is non-umbelliferous thing that chain-smokes does not hold then it is not mesolithic.;"
] | 4 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the girder is mesolithic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the girder does not stone and it does not soldier septuagenarian it is a circumduction. sent2: the fact that the infernal is Aleutian does not hold if that the sodalist is both Aleutian and not a quarter does not hold. sent3: the girder does not detract proline. sent4: if the infernal is not Aleutian that the Davenport is a kind of umbelliferous thing that is not a trochanter does not hold. sent5: that the sodalist is not Aleutian and it is not a quarter is not correct if there is something such that it is garlicky. sent6: the girder is not a kind of a stoning. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is both umbelliferous and not a trochanter does not hold the maltose is not umbelliferous. sent8: the girder does not detract psychopathy. sent9: if something is not a stoning and is not a Steinberg then it is mesolithic. sent10: if that something is non-umbelliferous but it does chain-smoke is incorrect it is not mesolithic. sent11: something is garlicky and it is a Carthusian if it is not a kind of a corolla. sent12: the girder is a Libyan. sent13: the physique does not stone. sent14: the girder is not mesolithic if the Aegyptopithecus is mesolithic thing that chain-smokes. sent15: the Chevalier is aortal if it is a kind of non-Libyan thing that is not mesolithic. sent16: if there is something such that it does detract chubbiness then the blues is not a corolla but it is a brood. sent17: there exists something such that it does detract chubbiness. sent18: the septuagenarian is a kind of a Steinberg. sent19: the girder is not outdoor. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> int1: the girder is mesolithic if it does not stone and it is not a Steinberg.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is not cathodic it is not a Irenaeus and it detracts corker.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)
|
sent1: something that is not a hologram is not a glochidium but a Irenaeus. sent2: if the powderpuff is not cathodic it is not a Irenaeus and it does detract corker. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not cathodic then it is not a Irenaeus.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{BJ}x -> (¬{G}x & {AA}x) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the ornithischian is both not a glochidium and a Irenaeus if that it is not a kind of a hologram is not false.
|
¬{BJ}{at} -> (¬{G}{at} & {AA}{at})
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not cathodic it is not a Irenaeus and it detracts corker. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a hologram is not a glochidium but a Irenaeus. sent2: if the powderpuff is not cathodic it is not a Irenaeus and it does detract corker. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not cathodic then it is not a Irenaeus. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Edwardian occurs.
|
{C}
|
sent1: that the Edwardianness does not occur is caused by that the incubating but not the dramaturgy happens. sent2: that the dramaturgy and the internment happens is brought about by that the incubating does not occur. sent3: the dramaturgy happens. sent4: the placebo happens and the bastardization occurs if the soldiering overanxiety does not occur. sent5: the fact that the dramaturgy does not occur and/or the incubating does not occur does not hold if that the anthropometry occurs is not wrong. sent6: if the ball-buster does not occur the Grace and/or the poulticing Cambrian occurs. sent7: the favoritism happens if that the hypotonicness happens is not false. sent8: that the enervation happens is correct. sent9: the Latvian occurs. sent10: the positionalness does not occur and the conceiving occurs if the mending occurs. sent11: the soldiering overanxiety does not occur and the poulticing codefendant happens if the positionalness does not occur. sent12: the dissidence occurs if the napping happens. sent13: the dramaturgy happens and the incubating happens. sent14: that the placebo happens leads to that the anthropometry happens.
|
sent1: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{C} sent2: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {CQ}) sent3: {A} sent4: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent5: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} v ¬{B}) sent6: ¬{N} -> ({L} v {M}) sent7: {CD} -> {CC} sent8: {FB} sent9: {EQ} sent10: {K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) sent11: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) sent12: {EE} -> {GE} sent13: ({A} & {B}) sent14: {E} -> {D}
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: the incubating happens.;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: {B};"
] |
the internment occurs.
|
{CQ}
|
[] | 6 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Edwardian occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Edwardianness does not occur is caused by that the incubating but not the dramaturgy happens. sent2: that the dramaturgy and the internment happens is brought about by that the incubating does not occur. sent3: the dramaturgy happens. sent4: the placebo happens and the bastardization occurs if the soldiering overanxiety does not occur. sent5: the fact that the dramaturgy does not occur and/or the incubating does not occur does not hold if that the anthropometry occurs is not wrong. sent6: if the ball-buster does not occur the Grace and/or the poulticing Cambrian occurs. sent7: the favoritism happens if that the hypotonicness happens is not false. sent8: that the enervation happens is correct. sent9: the Latvian occurs. sent10: the positionalness does not occur and the conceiving occurs if the mending occurs. sent11: the soldiering overanxiety does not occur and the poulticing codefendant happens if the positionalness does not occur. sent12: the dissidence occurs if the napping happens. sent13: the dramaturgy happens and the incubating happens. sent14: that the placebo happens leads to that the anthropometry happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: the incubating happens.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the role does not occur.
|
¬{E}
|
sent1: if that the Cretaceousness happens is not wrong then that not the exposure but the squashing lakefront happens is not right. sent2: the communization does not occur if the solanaceousness does not occur and/or the communization does not occur. sent3: the fact that both the non-univalveness and the soldiering accretion occurs is not right if the communization does not occur. sent4: that the deformation does not occur causes that the role does not occur and the decoupage does not occur. sent5: that the role does not occur and the decoupage does not occur yields that the exposure does not occur. sent6: the solanaceousness does not occur or the communization does not occur or both if the eolithicness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the give but the deformation happens is not right the fact that the decoupage does not occur hold. sent8: that the rounders occurs prevents that the habiting does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Cretaceousness happens is right if that the poulticing latter happens is not wrong. sent10: the role does not occur if that not the exposure but the squashing lakefront happens is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the decoupage does not occur hold the exposure but not the squashing lakefront happens. sent12: the poulticing latter happens. sent13: the intralinguisticness results in the tactlessness. sent14: the fact that the fact that the giving does not occur and the deformation happens is correct does not hold if the soldiering accretion does not occur. sent15: the soldiering Sabah happens. sent16: that the squashing lakefront does not occur prevents the role. sent17: the Cretaceousness does not occur if the squashing lakefront does not occur. sent18: the soldiering accretion does not occur if that the univalveness does not occur and the soldiering accretion happens is incorrect. sent19: if the mouth and the poulticing outercourse occurs then that the eolithicness does not occur hold.
|
sent1: {B} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) sent2: (¬{L} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{K} sent3: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{J} & {I}) sent4: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent5: (¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} sent6: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} v ¬{K}) sent7: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} sent8: {DL} -> {CP} sent9: {A} -> {B} sent10: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{E} sent11: ¬{F} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) sent12: {A} sent13: {CS} -> {EL} sent14: ¬{I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) sent15: {GQ} sent16: ¬{C} -> ¬{E} sent17: ¬{C} -> ¬{B} sent18: ¬(¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{I} sent19: ({N} & {O}) -> ¬{M}
|
[
"sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the Cretaceous happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fact that the exposure does not occur and the squashing lakefront happens is not wrong is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent12 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬(¬{D} & {C}); int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the role happens is true.
|
{E}
|
[] | 14 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the role does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Cretaceousness happens is not wrong then that not the exposure but the squashing lakefront happens is not right. sent2: the communization does not occur if the solanaceousness does not occur and/or the communization does not occur. sent3: the fact that both the non-univalveness and the soldiering accretion occurs is not right if the communization does not occur. sent4: that the deformation does not occur causes that the role does not occur and the decoupage does not occur. sent5: that the role does not occur and the decoupage does not occur yields that the exposure does not occur. sent6: the solanaceousness does not occur or the communization does not occur or both if the eolithicness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the give but the deformation happens is not right the fact that the decoupage does not occur hold. sent8: that the rounders occurs prevents that the habiting does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Cretaceousness happens is right if that the poulticing latter happens is not wrong. sent10: the role does not occur if that not the exposure but the squashing lakefront happens is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the decoupage does not occur hold the exposure but not the squashing lakefront happens. sent12: the poulticing latter happens. sent13: the intralinguisticness results in the tactlessness. sent14: the fact that the fact that the giving does not occur and the deformation happens is correct does not hold if the soldiering accretion does not occur. sent15: the soldiering Sabah happens. sent16: that the squashing lakefront does not occur prevents the role. sent17: the Cretaceousness does not occur if the squashing lakefront does not occur. sent18: the soldiering accretion does not occur if that the univalveness does not occur and the soldiering accretion happens is incorrect. sent19: if the mouth and the poulticing outercourse occurs then that the eolithicness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the Cretaceous happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fact that the exposure does not occur and the squashing lakefront happens is not wrong is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Mendelian is not an ending and is scalene.
|
(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a})
|
sent1: The eighth does not soldier lactose. sent2: if the Mendelian is not tactless then it is scalene. sent3: something does not graft if the fact that it is not noninheritable and it does graft is not correct. sent4: if the eukaryote does soldier eighth that the lactose is both not an ending and not tactless is false. sent5: if the fact that something is both not an ending and not tactless does not hold then it ending. sent6: if something does not soldier eighth it is tactless and it is scalene. sent7: if the fact that the fusil is not a graft hold the fact that the inoculator soldiers eighth but it does not poultice Low is not true. sent8: the lactose does not soldier eighth. sent9: something is not a kind of an ending and/or it does not soldier eighth if it is a graft. sent10: the lactose does soldier eighth if the Mendelian is tactless. sent11: the Mendelian is cantonal. sent12: if that the inoculator does soldier eighth but it does not poultice Low is wrong the eukaryote soldier eighth. sent13: the cetrimide is not a fish but it does soldier eighth.
|
sent1: ¬{AB}{ab} sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent4: {B}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) sent7: ¬{E}{e} -> ¬({B}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent8: ¬{B}{b} sent9: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x v ¬{B}x) sent10: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent11: {CL}{a} sent12: ¬({B}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {B}{c} sent13: (¬{GQ}{db} & {B}{db})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mendelian is tactless.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the lactose does soldier eighth.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Mendelian is not tactless.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent8 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬{A}{a};"
] |
that the Mendelian does not end and is scalene is not correct.
|
¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a})
|
[
"sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the lactose is not an ending and not tactless is not true the fact that it ending is not false.; sent3 -> int5: if that the fusil is a kind of inheritable thing that does graft is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a graft is not incorrect.;"
] | 8 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Mendelian is not an ending and is scalene. ; $context$ = sent1: The eighth does not soldier lactose. sent2: if the Mendelian is not tactless then it is scalene. sent3: something does not graft if the fact that it is not noninheritable and it does graft is not correct. sent4: if the eukaryote does soldier eighth that the lactose is both not an ending and not tactless is false. sent5: if the fact that something is both not an ending and not tactless does not hold then it ending. sent6: if something does not soldier eighth it is tactless and it is scalene. sent7: if the fact that the fusil is not a graft hold the fact that the inoculator soldiers eighth but it does not poultice Low is not true. sent8: the lactose does not soldier eighth. sent9: something is not a kind of an ending and/or it does not soldier eighth if it is a graft. sent10: the lactose does soldier eighth if the Mendelian is tactless. sent11: the Mendelian is cantonal. sent12: if that the inoculator does soldier eighth but it does not poultice Low is wrong the eukaryote soldier eighth. sent13: the cetrimide is not a fish but it does soldier eighth. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mendelian is tactless.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the lactose does soldier eighth.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Mendelian is not tactless.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the linchpin does not poultice Capek is true.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a shot and/or is not a Shahn is not right. sent2: the archbishop is not a kind of a centered if there exists something such that it is not a murine. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is either not a shot or not a Shahn or both is not right the linchpin does not soldier sapwood. sent4: the linchpin is both inglorious and nonreversible. sent5: something that does soldier sapwood does poultice Capek. sent6: if there is something such that that it is a shot and/or it is not a Shahn is not right then the linchpin does not soldier sapwood. sent7: the mending does not detract Fonteyn. sent8: if something soldiers sapwood then the fact that it either does not soldier Bryum or is not parliamentary or both does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the frump either suffocates or is a kind of a aminomethane or both is not correct then that it is not a murine is not incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that that either it does not poultice Capek or it is not inglorious or both does not hold. sent11: something does not poultice Capek if it does not soldier sapwood and it is nonreversible. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that it does not detract Fonteyn then the fact that the frump either suffocates or is a kind of a aminomethane or both is not right is not wrong. sent13: something is not inglorious and/or is not reversible if it is not centered.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}{b} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ({D}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent7: ¬{I}{d} sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{CI}x v ¬{CD}x) sent9: ¬({G}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{C}x v ¬{D}x) sent11: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({G}{c} v {H}{c}) sent13: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x v {B}x)
|
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the linchpin does not soldier sapwood.; sent4 -> int2: the linchpin is not reversible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the linchpin does not soldier sapwood but it is nonreversible hold.; sent11 -> int4: if the linchpin does not soldier sapwood and is nonreversible then it does not poultice Capek.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent4 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent11 -> int4: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the linchpin poultices Capek.
|
{C}{a}
|
[
"sent5 -> int5: if the linchpin does soldier sapwood it poultices Capek.; sent13 -> int6: if the archbishop does not center then it is not inglorious or is nonreversible or both.; sent7 -> int7: there is something such that it does not detract Fonteyn.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the fact that the frump does suffocate and/or is a aminomethane does not hold.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the frump is not a kind of a murine.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a murine.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the archbishop does not center.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the archbishop is either not inglorious or nonreversible or both.; int12 -> int13: something is not inglorious and/or is nonreversible.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the linchpin does not poultice Capek is true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a shot and/or is not a Shahn is not right. sent2: the archbishop is not a kind of a centered if there exists something such that it is not a murine. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is either not a shot or not a Shahn or both is not right the linchpin does not soldier sapwood. sent4: the linchpin is both inglorious and nonreversible. sent5: something that does soldier sapwood does poultice Capek. sent6: if there is something such that that it is a shot and/or it is not a Shahn is not right then the linchpin does not soldier sapwood. sent7: the mending does not detract Fonteyn. sent8: if something soldiers sapwood then the fact that it either does not soldier Bryum or is not parliamentary or both does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the frump either suffocates or is a kind of a aminomethane or both is not correct then that it is not a murine is not incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that that either it does not poultice Capek or it is not inglorious or both does not hold. sent11: something does not poultice Capek if it does not soldier sapwood and it is nonreversible. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that it does not detract Fonteyn then the fact that the frump either suffocates or is a kind of a aminomethane or both is not right is not wrong. sent13: something is not inglorious and/or is not reversible if it is not centered. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the linchpin does not soldier sapwood.; sent4 -> int2: the linchpin is not reversible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the linchpin does not soldier sapwood but it is nonreversible hold.; sent11 -> int4: if the linchpin does not soldier sapwood and is nonreversible then it does not poultice Capek.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the Kraut either is a kind of a fauteuil or is legless or both is not right.
|
¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})
|
sent1: if the devisor does not soldier cash it is a liabilities and is a weakener. sent2: that the thalidomide does soldier devisor and/or it does soldier uremia is wrong. sent3: the Kraut is not legless. sent4: that the Kraut does soldier weaver or it is a kind of a April or both is wrong. sent5: everything is not legless. sent6: that either the Kraut is legless or it poultices tallyman or both is not right. sent7: the fact that the share is a folding or it is eradicable or both does not hold. sent8: if something is not a turncock then that it is legless and/or it is nonfat does not hold. sent9: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a fauteuil and/or it is legless. sent10: if the devisor is a liabilities then the fact that the tollgate is not a kind of a Victorian and/or does detract Embioptera is false. sent11: there is nothing that is astomatous or dishonest or both.
|
sent1: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent2: ¬({IU}{ej} v {CO}{ej}) sent3: ¬{AB}{aa} sent4: ¬({HP}{aa} v {EB}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{AB}x sent6: ¬({AB}{aa} v {J}{aa}) sent7: ¬({EO}{gc} v {CJ}{gc}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AB}x v {AN}x) sent9: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent10: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬({HA}x v {CH}x)
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the avocet is either legless or not fatty or both is not right.
|
¬({AB}{cc} v {AN}{cc})
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the fact that the avocet is legless and/or is nonfat is not true if it is not a turncock.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Kraut either is a kind of a fauteuil or is legless or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the devisor does not soldier cash it is a liabilities and is a weakener. sent2: that the thalidomide does soldier devisor and/or it does soldier uremia is wrong. sent3: the Kraut is not legless. sent4: that the Kraut does soldier weaver or it is a kind of a April or both is wrong. sent5: everything is not legless. sent6: that either the Kraut is legless or it poultices tallyman or both is not right. sent7: the fact that the share is a folding or it is eradicable or both does not hold. sent8: if something is not a turncock then that it is legless and/or it is nonfat does not hold. sent9: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a fauteuil and/or it is legless. sent10: if the devisor is a liabilities then the fact that the tollgate is not a kind of a Victorian and/or does detract Embioptera is false. sent11: there is nothing that is astomatous or dishonest or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it disassociates and is not a Teasdale then it is a kind of a toxicology is not true.
|
¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: if something is a huddle but it is not baccate it is a Addressograph. sent2: if the armorer is a kind of a molar but it is not a Teasdale it is semiautobiographical. sent3: there exists something such that if it is incommodious thing that is not an orifice then it is a slub. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does disassociate and it is a Teasdale is correct then that it is a toxicology is not incorrect. sent5: the salsa is a kind of a toxicology if it disassociates and it is not a kind of a Teasdale. sent6: something is a Tenebrionidae if it disassociates and is not a kind of an engram. sent7: there is something such that if it is a complication and it is not a kind of a Ottoman then it is a micropyle. sent8: the salsa is a kind of a toxicology if it disassociates and is a Teasdale.
|
sent1: (x): ({IH}x & ¬{CI}x) -> {H}x sent2: ({JK}{ch} & ¬{AB}{ch}) -> {EL}{ch} sent3: (Ex): ({EH}x & ¬{AK}x) -> {ER}x sent4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{JA}x) -> {AN}x sent7: (Ex): ({FA}x & ¬{BL}x) -> {JH}x sent8: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if it is a kind of a huddle and is not baccate then it is a Addressograph.
|
(Ex): ({IH}x & ¬{CI}x) -> {H}x
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: if the Aegyptopithecus is a kind of a huddle that is not baccate it is a Addressograph.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it disassociates and is not a Teasdale then it is a kind of a toxicology is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a huddle but it is not baccate it is a Addressograph. sent2: if the armorer is a kind of a molar but it is not a Teasdale it is semiautobiographical. sent3: there exists something such that if it is incommodious thing that is not an orifice then it is a slub. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does disassociate and it is a Teasdale is correct then that it is a toxicology is not incorrect. sent5: the salsa is a kind of a toxicology if it disassociates and it is not a kind of a Teasdale. sent6: something is a Tenebrionidae if it disassociates and is not a kind of an engram. sent7: there is something such that if it is a complication and it is not a kind of a Ottoman then it is a micropyle. sent8: the salsa is a kind of a toxicology if it disassociates and is a Teasdale. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something does not soldier abelmosk and does detract neurolinguist.
|
(Ex): (¬{B}x & {A}x)
|
sent1: the Kui is a Albanian if the auklet is not Albanian and not a kerchief. sent2: something that does not detract neurolinguist and soldiers abelmosk is unsurmountable. sent3: that the auklet does not soldier auklet and is a peplum does not hold if the househusband does not poultice dialectics. sent4: there is something such that it does not soldier abelmosk. sent5: the WIMP does not soldier Whitsun if it is not a kind of a jolt and is a kind of a mitochondrion. sent6: the auklet is a kind of a Albanian that does poultice organic. sent7: the Kui is not unsurmountable but proteolytic. sent8: if the Kui is both surmountable and proteolytic it does not soldier abelmosk. sent9: the fact that the Kui is a kind of a gallstone that does not poultice MPS is not correct if it is a Albanian. sent10: if the fact that the auklet does not soldier auklet and is a peplum does not hold it is not a kerchief. sent11: if the Kui is unsurmountable and is proteolytic then that it does not soldier abelmosk is not wrong. sent12: the househusband does not poultice dialectics.
|
sent1: ({E}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> {E}{a} sent2: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {AA}x sent3: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} & {G}{b}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent5: (¬{EU}{eb} & {EH}{eb}) -> ¬{AD}{eb} sent6: ({E}{b} & {J}{b}) sent7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent9: {E}{a} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent10: ¬(¬{H}{b} & {G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent11: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent12: ¬{I}{c}
|
[
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the Kui does not soldier abelmosk.;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
] |
the abelmosk is unsurmountable.
|
{AA}{je}
|
[
"sent2 -> int2: the abelmosk is unsurmountable if it does not detract neurolinguist and it does soldier abelmosk.; sent6 -> int3: the auklet is Albanian.; sent3 & sent12 -> int4: that the auklet does not soldier auklet but it is a peplum is not right.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the auklet is not a kerchief.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the auklet is a kind of a Albanian that is not a kerchief.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the Kui is a Albanian.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Kui is a gallstone that does not poultice MPS is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a gallstone and it does not poultice MPS is not correct.;"
] | 9 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = something does not soldier abelmosk and does detract neurolinguist. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kui is a Albanian if the auklet is not Albanian and not a kerchief. sent2: something that does not detract neurolinguist and soldiers abelmosk is unsurmountable. sent3: that the auklet does not soldier auklet and is a peplum does not hold if the househusband does not poultice dialectics. sent4: there is something such that it does not soldier abelmosk. sent5: the WIMP does not soldier Whitsun if it is not a kind of a jolt and is a kind of a mitochondrion. sent6: the auklet is a kind of a Albanian that does poultice organic. sent7: the Kui is not unsurmountable but proteolytic. sent8: if the Kui is both surmountable and proteolytic it does not soldier abelmosk. sent9: the fact that the Kui is a kind of a gallstone that does not poultice MPS is not correct if it is a Albanian. sent10: if the fact that the auklet does not soldier auklet and is a peplum does not hold it is not a kerchief. sent11: if the Kui is unsurmountable and is proteolytic then that it does not soldier abelmosk is not wrong. sent12: the househusband does not poultice dialectics. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the Kui does not soldier abelmosk.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the lullaby does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: that not the Moldovanness but the Olympian occurs does not hold if the pulse does not occur. sent2: if the detribalization happens then that both the contemptuousness and the non-ruminantness happens is false. sent3: the finerness and the soldiering Illicium happens if the fact that the Olympianness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: the allantoicness does not occur if the soldiering Illicium occurs. sent5: the Olympian does not occur if that the non-Moldovanness and the Olympian happens is not correct. sent6: that the non-volubleness and the non-Sabahanness happens is brought about by the seeking. sent7: the supplying occurs. sent8: the containment results in that the soldiering Ornithogalum occurs but the lullaby does not occur. sent9: that the progestationalness happens and/or the soldiering potherb does not occur is incorrect if the volubleness does not occur. sent10: the pulsing does not occur if the fact that either the progestationalness occurs or the soldiering potherb does not occur or both is wrong. sent11: if that the allantoicness does not occur is not false then the detribalization but not the acquiescence happens. sent12: the lullaby and the supply occurs. sent13: if that the contemptuousness but not the ruminant occurs is not right the containment does not occur. sent14: the nuclearness happens and the detracting gloominess happens. sent15: the fact that the lullaby does not occur is right if that both the supply and the lullaby happens is not right. sent16: that the seek happens if the shoulder happens is true.
|
sent1: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{M} & {K}) sent2: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) sent3: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) sent4: {I} -> ¬{H} sent5: ¬(¬{M} & {K}) -> ¬{K} sent6: {R} -> (¬{P} & ¬{Q}) sent7: {B} sent8: {C} -> ({AH} & ¬{A}) sent9: ¬{P} -> ¬({N} v ¬{O}) sent10: ¬({N} v ¬{O}) -> ¬{L} sent11: ¬{H} -> ({F} & ¬{G}) sent12: ({A} & {B}) sent13: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} sent14: ({BH} & {AU}) sent15: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{A} sent16: {S} -> {R}
|
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the soldiering Ornithogalum occurs and the volubleness occurs.
|
({AH} & {P})
|
[] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the lullaby does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the Moldovanness but the Olympian occurs does not hold if the pulse does not occur. sent2: if the detribalization happens then that both the contemptuousness and the non-ruminantness happens is false. sent3: the finerness and the soldiering Illicium happens if the fact that the Olympianness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: the allantoicness does not occur if the soldiering Illicium occurs. sent5: the Olympian does not occur if that the non-Moldovanness and the Olympian happens is not correct. sent6: that the non-volubleness and the non-Sabahanness happens is brought about by the seeking. sent7: the supplying occurs. sent8: the containment results in that the soldiering Ornithogalum occurs but the lullaby does not occur. sent9: that the progestationalness happens and/or the soldiering potherb does not occur is incorrect if the volubleness does not occur. sent10: the pulsing does not occur if the fact that either the progestationalness occurs or the soldiering potherb does not occur or both is wrong. sent11: if that the allantoicness does not occur is not false then the detribalization but not the acquiescence happens. sent12: the lullaby and the supply occurs. sent13: if that the contemptuousness but not the ruminant occurs is not right the containment does not occur. sent14: the nuclearness happens and the detracting gloominess happens. sent15: the fact that the lullaby does not occur is right if that both the supply and the lullaby happens is not right. sent16: that the seek happens if the shoulder happens is true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
both the non-primaryness and the non-operculateness occurs.
|
(¬{C} & ¬{B})
|
sent1: that that the non-immanentness or the non-Sufiness or both occurs does not hold hold. sent2: that either the Carmeliteness does not occur or the dysphoricness does not occur or both is not right if the Communion happens. sent3: the Carmeliteness does not occur and/or the dysphoricness does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AH} v ¬{EN}) sent2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) sent3: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Communion happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the Carmelite does not occur and/or the dysphoricness does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Communion does not occur.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬{A};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = both the non-primaryness and the non-operculateness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the non-immanentness or the non-Sufiness or both occurs does not hold hold. sent2: that either the Carmeliteness does not occur or the dysphoricness does not occur or both is not right if the Communion happens. sent3: the Carmeliteness does not occur and/or the dysphoricness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Communion happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the Carmelite does not occur and/or the dysphoricness does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Communion does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the wrecker is not an enforcement but it is morbilliform.
|
(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b})
|
sent1: that the wrecker is not an enforcement and is morbilliform does not hold if the fact that the brodiaea is not a worry is not false. sent2: if the cul is a grume that the apron is similar hold. sent3: something is a worry and amphitheatric. sent4: if the wester is not scarce that it is not eyeless and/or is not a kind of a dithering is not true. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that either it is not eyeless or it is not a kind of a dithering or both does not hold then the passerby is not a procuress. sent6: the fact that something is both not amphitheatric and a worry is not right if it is a husk. sent7: that the freak is non-planar thing that is not a soberness is not true if there is something such that it is not a procuress. sent8: there is something such that it is a worry. sent9: there is something such that it is amphitheatric. sent10: the bandit is non-unsworn thing that soldiers hob. sent11: the brodiaea is a kind of a Beckett if the wrecker is a Beckett. sent12: the wrecker is morbilliform if the brodiaea husks. sent13: something that is similar is a Beckett and/or is not a husk. sent14: if the cul is stored-program then the apron is similar. sent15: the wrecker is not an enforcement but it is not non-morbilliform if the brodiaea is a husk. sent16: the wrecker is morbilliform. sent17: something is not an orifice if the fact that it is not planar and it is not a soberness is not true. sent18: if the freak is not a kind of an orifice then either the cul is stored-program or it is a grume or both. sent19: if there is something such that it is a Beckett and/or it does not husk then the skivvy is not amphitheatric. sent20: if the fact that something is not amphitheatric but it is a kind of a worry does not hold then it is an enforcement. sent21: the wester is not scarce.
|
sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent2: {H}{e} -> {G}{d} sent3: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent4: ¬{P}{h} -> ¬(¬{O}{h} v ¬{N}{h}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{O}x v ¬{N}x) -> ¬{M}{g} sent6: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) sent7: (x): ¬{M}x -> ¬(¬{L}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: (Ex): {B}x sent10: (¬{GG}{fa} & {BU}{fa}) sent11: {F}{b} -> {F}{a} sent12: {C}{a} -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x v ¬{C}x) sent14: {I}{e} -> {G}{d} sent15: {C}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent16: {E}{b} sent17: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x sent18: ¬{J}{f} -> ({I}{e} v {H}{e}) sent19: (x): ({F}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}{c} sent20: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {D}x sent21: ¬{P}{h}
|
[] |
[] |
the ultramontane is an enforcement.
|
{D}{bm}
|
[
"sent20 -> int1: if the fact that the ultramontane is not amphitheatric but a worry does not hold then it is an enforcement.; sent6 -> int2: that the ultramontane is not amphitheatric and does worry is incorrect if it is a husk.;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the wrecker is not an enforcement but it is morbilliform. ; $context$ = sent1: that the wrecker is not an enforcement and is morbilliform does not hold if the fact that the brodiaea is not a worry is not false. sent2: if the cul is a grume that the apron is similar hold. sent3: something is a worry and amphitheatric. sent4: if the wester is not scarce that it is not eyeless and/or is not a kind of a dithering is not true. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that either it is not eyeless or it is not a kind of a dithering or both does not hold then the passerby is not a procuress. sent6: the fact that something is both not amphitheatric and a worry is not right if it is a husk. sent7: that the freak is non-planar thing that is not a soberness is not true if there is something such that it is not a procuress. sent8: there is something such that it is a worry. sent9: there is something such that it is amphitheatric. sent10: the bandit is non-unsworn thing that soldiers hob. sent11: the brodiaea is a kind of a Beckett if the wrecker is a Beckett. sent12: the wrecker is morbilliform if the brodiaea husks. sent13: something that is similar is a Beckett and/or is not a husk. sent14: if the cul is stored-program then the apron is similar. sent15: the wrecker is not an enforcement but it is not non-morbilliform if the brodiaea is a husk. sent16: the wrecker is morbilliform. sent17: something is not an orifice if the fact that it is not planar and it is not a soberness is not true. sent18: if the freak is not a kind of an orifice then either the cul is stored-program or it is a grume or both. sent19: if there is something such that it is a Beckett and/or it does not husk then the skivvy is not amphitheatric. sent20: if the fact that something is not amphitheatric but it is a kind of a worry does not hold then it is an enforcement. sent21: the wester is not scarce. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that not the soldiering dose but the uncleanness happens is not right.
|
¬(¬{B} & {A})
|
sent1: that the uncleanness occurs is not false if the size does not occur. sent2: if the size happens then the fact that the soldiering dose does not occur and the uncleanness occurs is incorrect. sent3: the sizing happens if the nonresistance occurs. sent4: if the fact that the detracting stockpiling does not occur and the poulticing cyclopropane does not occur is incorrect then that the soldiering dose does not occur is not false. sent5: if the patronymicness does not occur the fetch and the reportableness happens. sent6: that the nonresistance happens and the abolition happens is caused by the non-Catalanness. sent7: the fact that the detracting stockpiling does not occur and the poulticing cyclopropane does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the fetching occurs then the Catalanness does not occur. sent9: the size does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{C} -> {A} sent2: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) sent3: {D} -> {C} sent4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬{I} -> ({G} & ¬{H}) sent6: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent7: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent8: {G} -> ¬{F} sent9: ¬{C}
|
[
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the soldiering dose does not occur.; sent1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the uncleanness happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent1 & sent9 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that not the soldiering dose but the uncleanness occurs is not correct.
|
¬(¬{B} & {A})
|
[] | 10 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that not the soldiering dose but the uncleanness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the uncleanness occurs is not false if the size does not occur. sent2: if the size happens then the fact that the soldiering dose does not occur and the uncleanness occurs is incorrect. sent3: the sizing happens if the nonresistance occurs. sent4: if the fact that the detracting stockpiling does not occur and the poulticing cyclopropane does not occur is incorrect then that the soldiering dose does not occur is not false. sent5: if the patronymicness does not occur the fetch and the reportableness happens. sent6: that the nonresistance happens and the abolition happens is caused by the non-Catalanness. sent7: the fact that the detracting stockpiling does not occur and the poulticing cyclopropane does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the fetching occurs then the Catalanness does not occur. sent9: the size does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the soldiering dose does not occur.; sent1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the uncleanness happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the shushing does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: the calorimetry occurs. sent2: the worthlessness occurs. sent3: the fact that the shushing happens is not incorrect. sent4: the deflation occurs. sent5: that the cryptanalyticness happens if that the shushing does not occur and the figurativeness does not occur is false is not incorrect. sent6: the cytogeneticsness occurs. sent7: the gonioscopy happens. sent8: if the figurativeness does not occur but the devising occurs that the shushing does not occur is right. sent9: the resale does not occur if the fact that the detracting diemaker does not occur and the four-hitter does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the devising does not occur then that the shushing does not occur and the figurativeness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the volution happens. sent12: that the detracting ratepayer but not the poulticing Cairene occurs is caused by that the resale does not occur. sent13: the devising does not occur if the detracting ratepayer happens and the poulticing Cairene does not occur. sent14: if the fact that not the detracting ratepayer but the figurativeness happens is incorrect the figurativeness does not occur.
|
sent1: {HB} sent2: {GF} sent3: {A} sent4: {HI} sent5: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {O} sent6: {GS} sent7: {JD} sent8: (¬{B} & {C}) -> ¬{A} sent9: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent10: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent11: {AE} sent12: ¬{F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) sent13: ({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent14: ¬(¬{D} & {B}) -> ¬{B}
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the shushing does not occur is not wrong.
|
¬{A}
|
[] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the shushing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the calorimetry occurs. sent2: the worthlessness occurs. sent3: the fact that the shushing happens is not incorrect. sent4: the deflation occurs. sent5: that the cryptanalyticness happens if that the shushing does not occur and the figurativeness does not occur is false is not incorrect. sent6: the cytogeneticsness occurs. sent7: the gonioscopy happens. sent8: if the figurativeness does not occur but the devising occurs that the shushing does not occur is right. sent9: the resale does not occur if the fact that the detracting diemaker does not occur and the four-hitter does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the devising does not occur then that the shushing does not occur and the figurativeness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the volution happens. sent12: that the detracting ratepayer but not the poulticing Cairene occurs is caused by that the resale does not occur. sent13: the devising does not occur if the detracting ratepayer happens and the poulticing Cairene does not occur. sent14: if the fact that not the detracting ratepayer but the figurativeness happens is incorrect the figurativeness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Mosaic is a kind of a paddle that is not a Dilleniidae.
|
({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
sent1: the endometrium is non-humanitarian thing that is not a innocency if the seagrass is entrepreneurial. sent2: if the rectum is both a liberal and not entrepreneurial the seagrass is entrepreneurial. sent3: the chordophone is a kind of a Senorita that is not a kind of a celioscopy. sent4: the chordophone paddles but it is not a kind of a celioscopy. sent5: the rectum is not Sotho if there is something such that the fact that it does not soldier Iyar and/or it is a kind of a dhow is incorrect. sent6: that the Mosaic is a paddle and it is a Dilleniidae is not right. sent7: if something is a cursor it is a silverbush or it is not wheelless or both. sent8: the snailflower does not poultice engram. sent9: that something is a kind of a liberal and is not entrepreneurial is not incorrect if it is not a Sotho. sent10: the self-heal is a kind of a paddle. sent11: if the fact that something is not a humanitarian and it is not a innocency is true then the chordophone is a cursor. sent12: that the chordophone is not a celioscopy hold. sent13: that the Mosaic is both a paddle and not a Dilleniidae does not hold if the chordophone is a paddle. sent14: if something is a silverbush and/or it is not wheelless it is not a celioscopy. sent15: if the fact that the chordophone is a paddle hold the fact that the Mosaic paddle and is a Dilleniidae is wrong. sent16: if that the snailflower does not poultice engram is correct that the dibble does not soldier Iyar and/or it is a dhow does not hold. sent17: if the chordophone is a kind of a celioscopy the Mosaic is both a paddle and not a Dilleniidae.
|
sent1: {I}{d} -> (¬{H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent2: ({K}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) -> {I}{d} sent3: ({GG}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent4: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{M}x v {L}x) -> ¬{J}{e} sent6: ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent7: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x v ¬{D}x) sent8: ¬{N}{g} sent9: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({K}x & ¬{I}x) sent10: {A}{an} sent11: (x): (¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}{a} sent12: ¬{B}{a} sent13: {A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent14: (x): ({E}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent15: {A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent16: ¬{N}{g} -> ¬(¬{M}{f} v {L}{f}) sent17: {B}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: the chordophone is a paddle.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the Mosaic is both a paddle and not a Dilleniidae.
|
({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
[] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Mosaic is a kind of a paddle that is not a Dilleniidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the endometrium is non-humanitarian thing that is not a innocency if the seagrass is entrepreneurial. sent2: if the rectum is both a liberal and not entrepreneurial the seagrass is entrepreneurial. sent3: the chordophone is a kind of a Senorita that is not a kind of a celioscopy. sent4: the chordophone paddles but it is not a kind of a celioscopy. sent5: the rectum is not Sotho if there is something such that the fact that it does not soldier Iyar and/or it is a kind of a dhow is incorrect. sent6: that the Mosaic is a paddle and it is a Dilleniidae is not right. sent7: if something is a cursor it is a silverbush or it is not wheelless or both. sent8: the snailflower does not poultice engram. sent9: that something is a kind of a liberal and is not entrepreneurial is not incorrect if it is not a Sotho. sent10: the self-heal is a kind of a paddle. sent11: if the fact that something is not a humanitarian and it is not a innocency is true then the chordophone is a cursor. sent12: that the chordophone is not a celioscopy hold. sent13: that the Mosaic is both a paddle and not a Dilleniidae does not hold if the chordophone is a paddle. sent14: if something is a silverbush and/or it is not wheelless it is not a celioscopy. sent15: if the fact that the chordophone is a paddle hold the fact that the Mosaic paddle and is a Dilleniidae is wrong. sent16: if that the snailflower does not poultice engram is correct that the dibble does not soldier Iyar and/or it is a dhow does not hold. sent17: if the chordophone is a kind of a celioscopy the Mosaic is both a paddle and not a Dilleniidae. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: the chordophone is a paddle.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the butterfly does not nod but it does poultice Albuquerque if the butterfly detracts boothose does not hold.
|
¬({A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}))
|
sent1: something that does detract boothose does not nod and does poultice Albuquerque.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the butterfly does not nod but it does poultice Albuquerque if the butterfly detracts boothose does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does detract boothose does not nod and does poultice Albuquerque. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if it is not Alaskan and not explicit it is a kind of a anthropocentrism.
|
(Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x
|
sent1: the Teutonist is a kind of a anthropocentrism if it is not a Alaskan and is explicit. sent2: something is a kind of a anthropocentrism if it is not a kind of a Alaskan and it is explicit. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a shag and does not detract bow-tie it is a devoir. sent4: if the Teutonist is Alaskan but it is not explicit it is a anthropocentrism. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Alaskan and it is not explicit it is a anthropocentrism. sent6: if something that is not a gripe does not soldier Teutonist then it is chancroidal. sent7: if something is Alaskan thing that is not explicit then it is a anthropocentrism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Alaskan and is explicit then it is a anthropocentrism. sent9: the Teutonist does detract trot if it is not a ACC and it is not a protozoology. sent10: if something is not Alaskan and not explicit it is a anthropocentrism.
|
sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): (¬{DP}x & ¬{HD}x) -> {EF}x sent4: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): (¬{DT}x & ¬{FL}x) -> {HK}x sent7: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent9: (¬{DC}{aa} & ¬{IB}{aa}) -> {FR}{aa} sent10: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: if the Teutonist is not Alaskan and it is not explicit then it is a anthropocentrism.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent10 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if it does not gripe and it does not soldier Teutonist then that it is chancroidal is true.
|
(Ex): (¬{DT}x & ¬{FL}x) -> {HK}x
|
[
"sent6 -> int2: the fact that the trot is not chancroidal is wrong if it is not a gripe and does not soldier Teutonist.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not Alaskan and not explicit it is a kind of a anthropocentrism. ; $context$ = sent1: the Teutonist is a kind of a anthropocentrism if it is not a Alaskan and is explicit. sent2: something is a kind of a anthropocentrism if it is not a kind of a Alaskan and it is explicit. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a shag and does not detract bow-tie it is a devoir. sent4: if the Teutonist is Alaskan but it is not explicit it is a anthropocentrism. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Alaskan and it is not explicit it is a anthropocentrism. sent6: if something that is not a gripe does not soldier Teutonist then it is chancroidal. sent7: if something is Alaskan thing that is not explicit then it is a anthropocentrism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Alaskan and is explicit then it is a anthropocentrism. sent9: the Teutonist does detract trot if it is not a ACC and it is not a protozoology. sent10: if something is not Alaskan and not explicit it is a anthropocentrism. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 -> int1: if the Teutonist is not Alaskan and it is not explicit then it is a anthropocentrism.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both does not hold.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x)
|
sent1: something is not necessary if it is not a kind of a Synchytrium. sent2: that the fact that something does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary does not hold if it is a Synchytrium hold. sent3: the tinware does not detract acinus or is necessary or both if it is not a Synchytrium. sent4: that something either does detract acinus or is necessary or both is not true if it is not a Synchytrium. sent5: if something is not a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary does not hold. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary is not correct hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not scriptural then it is not a kind of a neurasthenic. sent8: the tinware is not necessary if it is not a Synchytrium. sent9: that either the tinware does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both is incorrect if it is a Synchytrium. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a oxyphenbutazone is not correct the fact that it is not a friskiness or soleless or both is not right. sent11: if the tinware is not a Synchytrium the fact that it detracts acinus or is necessary or both is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Synchytrium then either it does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both. sent13: if the fact that the deposit is not repulsive is true that it is not scriptural and/or detracts acinus is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if that it does not soldier Ladyship is not wrong that it is not a kind of a doornail and/or is cross-linguistic does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a Synchytrium that it detracts acinus or it is necessary or both is incorrect. sent16: that the Elizabethan is not dictatorial or a Perejil or both is not true if it is not a betaine. sent17: something either does not detract acinus or is necessary or both if it is not a Synchytrium. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a Synchytrium then that it is not necessary is not incorrect. sent19: if the tinware is not a TAT it is not a Synchytrium.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent6: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬{DR}x -> ¬{DU}x sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent9: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent10: (Ex): {O}x -> ¬(¬{GR}x v {EA}x) sent11: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent12: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent13: ¬{AH}{eg} -> ¬(¬{DR}{eg} v {AA}{eg}) sent14: (Ex): ¬{AO}x -> ¬(¬{GU}x v {FQ}x) sent15: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent16: ¬{GC}{hc} -> ¬(¬{IR}{hc} v {FH}{hc}) sent17: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent18: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent19: ¬{AL}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent5 -> int1: if the tinware is not a Synchytrium then that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not necessary if it is not a kind of a Synchytrium. sent2: that the fact that something does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary does not hold if it is a Synchytrium hold. sent3: the tinware does not detract acinus or is necessary or both if it is not a Synchytrium. sent4: that something either does detract acinus or is necessary or both is not true if it is not a Synchytrium. sent5: if something is not a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary does not hold. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is a Synchytrium the fact that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary is not correct hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not scriptural then it is not a kind of a neurasthenic. sent8: the tinware is not necessary if it is not a Synchytrium. sent9: that either the tinware does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both is incorrect if it is a Synchytrium. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a oxyphenbutazone is not correct the fact that it is not a friskiness or soleless or both is not right. sent11: if the tinware is not a Synchytrium the fact that it detracts acinus or is necessary or both is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Synchytrium then either it does not detract acinus or it is necessary or both. sent13: if the fact that the deposit is not repulsive is true that it is not scriptural and/or detracts acinus is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if that it does not soldier Ladyship is not wrong that it is not a kind of a doornail and/or is cross-linguistic does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a Synchytrium that it detracts acinus or it is necessary or both is incorrect. sent16: that the Elizabethan is not dictatorial or a Perejil or both is not true if it is not a betaine. sent17: something either does not detract acinus or is necessary or both if it is not a Synchytrium. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a Synchytrium then that it is not necessary is not incorrect. sent19: if the tinware is not a TAT it is not a Synchytrium. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> int1: if the tinware is not a Synchytrium then that it does not detract acinus and/or it is necessary is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the foregrounding is a cello hold.
|
{B}{c}
|
sent1: the foregrounding is a teashop if the fact that the houseplant is not a Spain is right. sent2: the foregrounding is a teashop. sent3: the houseplant is not a teashop but it is a antimacassar. sent4: the houseplant is apocryphal and is a antimacassar. sent5: the foregrounding is a Spain and it is a cello if the coelenterate is not a cello. sent6: the coelenterate is not a cello if the houseplant is not a teashop but a antimacassar. sent7: the foregrounding is not a antimacassar but it is a makeup. sent8: the houseplant is a antimacassar.
|
sent1: ¬{C}{a} -> {AA}{c} sent2: {AA}{c} sent3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent4: ({GJ}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent5: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & {B}{c}) sent6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: (¬{AB}{c} & {F}{c}) sent8: {AB}{a}
|
[
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the coelenterate is not a kind of a cello.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the foregrounding is a kind of a Spain that is a cello.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent5 & int1 -> int2: ({C}{c} & {B}{c}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the foregrounding is a cello hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the foregrounding is a teashop if the fact that the houseplant is not a Spain is right. sent2: the foregrounding is a teashop. sent3: the houseplant is not a teashop but it is a antimacassar. sent4: the houseplant is apocryphal and is a antimacassar. sent5: the foregrounding is a Spain and it is a cello if the coelenterate is not a cello. sent6: the coelenterate is not a cello if the houseplant is not a teashop but a antimacassar. sent7: the foregrounding is not a antimacassar but it is a makeup. sent8: the houseplant is a antimacassar. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the coelenterate is not a kind of a cello.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the foregrounding is a kind of a Spain that is a cello.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it is not antemeridian the fact that it is not pointless and it soldiers Taracahitian is not true is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x))
|
sent1: if the fact that the lark is antemeridian is true then that it is pointed thing that does soldier Taracahitian is not right. sent2: the fact that the lark is not pointless but it does soldier Taracahitian is not correct if it is not antemeridian. sent3: there is something such that if it is antemeridian then that it is not pointless and soldiers Taracahitian is not right. sent4: the lark is pointed thing that soldiers Taracahitian if it is not antemeridian. sent5: there is something such that if it does not detract Sceloporus then the fact that it is not a Korbut and it is a kind of a gigantism does not hold. sent6: if the lark is not antemeridian that the fact that it is pointless and soldiers Taracahitian hold is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not antemeridian is correct that it is pointless and it soldiers Taracahitian is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not antemeridian the fact that it is pointed thing that does soldier Taracahitian is right. sent9: that something does not soldier colliery but it is a kind of a valvule does not hold if it is not a Arcadic. sent10: if something does not detract revenuer that it is not pointless and it is a kilogram-meter is not correct. sent11: the fact that the colliery is non-antemeridian thing that is a Finnish does not hold if it does not detract Bahamian.
|
sent1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{AJ}x -> ¬(¬{EI}x & {EJ}x) sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent7: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent9: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{AE}x & {FI}x) sent10: (x): ¬{CJ}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {IC}x) sent11: ¬{GR}{hs} -> ¬(¬{A}{hs} & {BK}{hs})
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the oriflamme is not pointless but a kilogram-meter is not true if it does not detract revenuer.
|
¬{CJ}{ap} -> ¬(¬{AA}{ap} & {IC}{ap})
|
[
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not antemeridian the fact that it is not pointless and it soldiers Taracahitian is not true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the lark is antemeridian is true then that it is pointed thing that does soldier Taracahitian is not right. sent2: the fact that the lark is not pointless but it does soldier Taracahitian is not correct if it is not antemeridian. sent3: there is something such that if it is antemeridian then that it is not pointless and soldiers Taracahitian is not right. sent4: the lark is pointed thing that soldiers Taracahitian if it is not antemeridian. sent5: there is something such that if it does not detract Sceloporus then the fact that it is not a Korbut and it is a kind of a gigantism does not hold. sent6: if the lark is not antemeridian that the fact that it is pointless and soldiers Taracahitian hold is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not antemeridian is correct that it is pointless and it soldiers Taracahitian is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not antemeridian the fact that it is pointed thing that does soldier Taracahitian is right. sent9: that something does not soldier colliery but it is a kind of a valvule does not hold if it is not a Arcadic. sent10: if something does not detract revenuer that it is not pointless and it is a kilogram-meter is not correct. sent11: the fact that the colliery is non-antemeridian thing that is a Finnish does not hold if it does not detract Bahamian. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if that it does not soldier Geordie and does detract Agrobacterium does not hold then it is a salicylate.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
sent1: if the fact that the mutineer is not bursal but it does soldier Geordie is not correct it is Sinhala. sent2: if something does not squash due and flexes then it is demotic. sent3: something is synthetic if the fact that it is not a perch and it shears is not correct. sent4: something is a kind of a salicylate if it does not detract Agrobacterium. sent5: there is something such that if it does not detract Agrobacterium then it is a salicylate. sent6: if something that is not a otterhound is Tajikistani it is a shear. sent7: if that something does soldier Geordie and detracts Agrobacterium does not hold it is a salicylate. sent8: something is a kind of a salicylate if the fact that it does not soldier Geordie and it does detract Agrobacterium is incorrect.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{CJ}{cq} & {AA}{cq}) -> {BK}{cq} sent2: (x): (¬{EU}x & {BU}x) -> {HJ}x sent3: (x): ¬(¬{IA}x & {CI}x) -> {HA}x sent4: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent5: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent6: (x): (¬{HQ}x & {GE}x) -> {CI}x sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the glochidium is a salicylate if the fact that it does not soldier Geordie and it does detract Agrobacterium does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a perch and it shears is not true then the fact that it is a synthetic is true.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{IA}x & {CI}x) -> {HA}x
|
[
"sent3 -> int2: the collagenase is a synthetic if the fact that it is not a kind of a perch and it is a kind of a shear does not hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it does not soldier Geordie and does detract Agrobacterium does not hold then it is a salicylate. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the mutineer is not bursal but it does soldier Geordie is not correct it is Sinhala. sent2: if something does not squash due and flexes then it is demotic. sent3: something is synthetic if the fact that it is not a perch and it shears is not correct. sent4: something is a kind of a salicylate if it does not detract Agrobacterium. sent5: there is something such that if it does not detract Agrobacterium then it is a salicylate. sent6: if something that is not a otterhound is Tajikistani it is a shear. sent7: if that something does soldier Geordie and detracts Agrobacterium does not hold it is a salicylate. sent8: something is a kind of a salicylate if the fact that it does not soldier Geordie and it does detract Agrobacterium is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> int1: the glochidium is a salicylate if the fact that it does not soldier Geordie and it does detract Agrobacterium does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that it does not soldier hardinggrass.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x
|
sent1: if there is something such that it does not poultice logicism the Turki does not soldier hardinggrass. sent2: something is a Tilden and poultices logicism. sent3: the lava does detract Albert. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is a Tilden and it does poultice logicism does not hold the Turki does not soldier hardinggrass.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: {C}{c} sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a}
|
[] |
[] |
there is something such that that it is both a cooling and a gazpacho is wrong.
|
(Ex): ¬({O}x & {DL}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that it does detract Albert.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does not soldier hardinggrass. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not poultice logicism the Turki does not soldier hardinggrass. sent2: something is a Tilden and poultices logicism. sent3: the lava does detract Albert. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is a Tilden and it does poultice logicism does not hold the Turki does not soldier hardinggrass. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the expiratoriness happens.
|
{D}
|
sent1: the hopper happens if the opposableness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the soldiering neurolinguist does not occur and/or the soldiering calamus happens does not hold then the soldiering Caucasus does not occur. sent3: the opposableness does not occur. sent4: if the soldiering Caucasus does not occur and the hopper occurs the expiratoriness happens.
|
sent1: ¬{A} -> {B} sent2: ¬(¬{F} v {E}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬{A} sent4: (¬{C} & {B}) -> {D}
|
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that the hopper happens is not wrong.;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: {B};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the expiratoriness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the hopper happens if the opposableness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the soldiering neurolinguist does not occur and/or the soldiering calamus happens does not hold then the soldiering Caucasus does not occur. sent3: the opposableness does not occur. sent4: if the soldiering Caucasus does not occur and the hopper occurs the expiratoriness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that the hopper happens is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if it is a putrescence then the fact that it does not squash stamina and it is a kind of a prang is incorrect.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)
|
sent1: the fact that something does not detract shipway and is a Mauritius is not correct if it squashes stamina. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a NATO then that it does not soldier spinnability and soldiers shear does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it does snowball that it is not Dantean and it is fungoid does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a putrescence then it does not squash stamina and is a prang. sent5: that the kawaka squashes stamina and is a prang does not hold if it is a putrescence. sent6: if the acrosome is a Crane that the fact that it is not a kind of a cursor and is a kind of a prang is true is not true. sent7: that the kawaka does not detract due and is a putrescence does not hold if it is a Holothuridae. sent8: if the kawaka is a putrescence then that it does not squash stamina and it is a prang is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it is choleraic then that it does not poultice acrosome and is a button is not right. sent10: the fact that the kawaka is not a prang and does detract Satureja is not right if it poultices commodity. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a rodent the fact that it is non-subjacent thing that lightens is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an exhumation the fact that it does not poultice Malthusianism and it poultices horizon is false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is patriotic that it is both not a drop and heterodactyl is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that if it does detract invitation then that it does not welter and is intrastate does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a putrescence then the fact that it squashes stamina and it is a prang does not hold. sent16: if the kawaka is a putrescence it does not squash stamina and is a prang.
|
sent1: (x): {AA}x -> ¬(¬{CA}x & {IN}x) sent2: (Ex): {HA}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {GA}x) sent3: (Ex): {BG}x -> ¬(¬{AF}x & {CB}x) sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: {DM}{iu} -> ¬(¬{JD}{iu} & {AB}{iu}) sent7: {JE}{aa} -> ¬(¬{FQ}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent8: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): {HI}x -> ¬(¬{GD}x & {FD}x) sent10: {AN}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {EC}{aa}) sent11: (Ex): {ET}x -> ¬(¬{EU}x & {DQ}x) sent12: (Ex): {DO}x -> ¬(¬{AO}x & {HS}x) sent13: (Ex): {II}x -> ¬(¬{DB}x & {Q}x) sent14: (Ex): {GJ}x -> ¬(¬{BJ}x & {HF}x) sent15: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent16: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the horizon does not detract shipway but it is a Mauritius is not correct if it squashes stamina.
|
{AA}{if} -> ¬(¬{CA}{if} & {IN}{if})
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a putrescence then the fact that it does not squash stamina and it is a kind of a prang is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not detract shipway and is a Mauritius is not correct if it squashes stamina. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a NATO then that it does not soldier spinnability and soldiers shear does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it does snowball that it is not Dantean and it is fungoid does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a putrescence then it does not squash stamina and is a prang. sent5: that the kawaka squashes stamina and is a prang does not hold if it is a putrescence. sent6: if the acrosome is a Crane that the fact that it is not a kind of a cursor and is a kind of a prang is true is not true. sent7: that the kawaka does not detract due and is a putrescence does not hold if it is a Holothuridae. sent8: if the kawaka is a putrescence then that it does not squash stamina and it is a prang is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it is choleraic then that it does not poultice acrosome and is a button is not right. sent10: the fact that the kawaka is not a prang and does detract Satureja is not right if it poultices commodity. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a rodent the fact that it is non-subjacent thing that lightens is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an exhumation the fact that it does not poultice Malthusianism and it poultices horizon is false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is patriotic that it is both not a drop and heterodactyl is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that if it does detract invitation then that it does not welter and is intrastate does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a putrescence then the fact that it squashes stamina and it is a prang does not hold. sent16: if the kawaka is a putrescence it does not squash stamina and is a prang. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.