version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the jester is taxable but it is not a Punjabi is false.
|
¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
sent1: if the sire is a prechlorination the fact that the euphonium reorders calamint but it is not a kind of an influence is not true. sent2: the jester does not sedate egality if the profiteer is taxable thing that is productive. sent3: the sire is not a prechlorination if the profiteer sedates egality and it is productive. sent4: that the profiteer is not productive is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the loggerhead does not aspirate chaetodon and is not an interview does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a prechlorination hold. sent7: the fact that the jester is taxable and a Punjabi is not correct. sent8: if something is not a kind of an interview it sedates sire and it does aspirate chaetodon. sent9: everything sedates egality and is not productive. sent10: the fact that the sire is a prechlorination but it does not sedate egality is false. sent11: the fact that the jester is a kind of taxable thing that is a Punjabi does not hold if the fact that there exists something such that it is not a prechlorination is not false. sent12: if the jester is not taxable then the sire is not taxable. sent13: if the jester is a prechlorination that is not productive then the sire is not taxable. sent14: the snatch is not taxable. sent15: everything does not interview. sent16: the sire is not productive if the profiteer does sedate egality and it is a prechlorination. sent17: if the fact that the loggerhead does not aspirate chaetodon and is not an interview is false it does aspirate chaetodon. sent18: the jester does not sedate skinny. sent19: everything is not productive. sent20: if there is something such that it is not a prechlorination then the fact that the jester is a kind of taxable thing that is not a Punjabi is false.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> ¬({BI}{eh} & ¬{DF}{eh}) sent2: ({B}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{b} sent3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{AB}{aa} sent5: ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent9: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent12: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent13: ({A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent14: ¬{B}{au} sent15: (x): ¬{F}x sent16: ({AA}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent17: ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> {E}{c} sent18: ¬{HK}{b} sent19: (x): ¬{AB}x sent20: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: the profiteer does sedate egality but it is not productive.;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
] |
the fact that the fact that the euphonium reorders calamint but it does not influence is not correct is right.
|
¬({BI}{eh} & ¬{DF}{eh})
|
[
"sent17 & sent5 -> int2: the loggerhead aspirates chaetodon.; int2 -> int3: something aspirates chaetodon.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the jester is taxable but it is not a Punjabi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sire is a prechlorination the fact that the euphonium reorders calamint but it is not a kind of an influence is not true. sent2: the jester does not sedate egality if the profiteer is taxable thing that is productive. sent3: the sire is not a prechlorination if the profiteer sedates egality and it is productive. sent4: that the profiteer is not productive is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the loggerhead does not aspirate chaetodon and is not an interview does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a prechlorination hold. sent7: the fact that the jester is taxable and a Punjabi is not correct. sent8: if something is not a kind of an interview it sedates sire and it does aspirate chaetodon. sent9: everything sedates egality and is not productive. sent10: the fact that the sire is a prechlorination but it does not sedate egality is false. sent11: the fact that the jester is a kind of taxable thing that is a Punjabi does not hold if the fact that there exists something such that it is not a prechlorination is not false. sent12: if the jester is not taxable then the sire is not taxable. sent13: if the jester is a prechlorination that is not productive then the sire is not taxable. sent14: the snatch is not taxable. sent15: everything does not interview. sent16: the sire is not productive if the profiteer does sedate egality and it is a prechlorination. sent17: if the fact that the loggerhead does not aspirate chaetodon and is not an interview is false it does aspirate chaetodon. sent18: the jester does not sedate skinny. sent19: everything is not productive. sent20: if there is something such that it is not a prechlorination then the fact that the jester is a kind of taxable thing that is not a Punjabi is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> int1: the profiteer does sedate egality but it is not productive.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the phenylbutazone does flutter.
|
{AB}{b}
|
sent1: the autoclave does reorder survivor. sent2: that something is a kind of a zooplankton but it is reliable is not right if the fact that it is a boss is correct. sent3: the moorwort is not a permission. sent4: if that something is a kind of a zooplankton but it is not undependable is wrong it is undependable. sent5: the phenylbutazone is a twelve. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does reorder fife and is admissible does not hold. sent7: the main-topmast is not oracular if the autoclave is not bony but it is impractical. sent8: the phenylbutazone is not a flutter if the fact that the moorwort does not flutter and/or it is not a kind of a permission is not right. sent9: the autoclave is both not bony and impractical if it reorders survivor. sent10: if the fact that something is undependable is not false that it is not a flutter and/or is not a permission is incorrect. sent11: the phenylbutazone is a twelve if the moorwort is not a permission.
|
sent1: {J}{d} sent2: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent5: {AA}{b} sent6: (Ex): ¬({G}x & {E}x) sent7: (¬{H}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent8: ¬(¬{AB}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} sent9: {J}{d} -> (¬{H}{d} & {I}{d}) sent10: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x v ¬{A}x) sent11: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{b}
|
[] |
[] |
the phenylbutazone does not flutter.
|
¬{AB}{b}
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: if the moorwort is undependable then that it is not a flutter or is not a permission or both is not right.; sent4 -> int2: the moorwort is undependable if the fact that it is a kind of a zooplankton and is not undependable is wrong.; sent2 -> int3: that if the moorwort is the boss that the moorwort is a kind of a zooplankton but it is not undependable does not hold is right.; sent9 & sent1 -> int4: the autoclave is both not bony and impractical.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the main-topmast is not oracular.;"
] | 9 | 2 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the phenylbutazone does flutter. ; $context$ = sent1: the autoclave does reorder survivor. sent2: that something is a kind of a zooplankton but it is reliable is not right if the fact that it is a boss is correct. sent3: the moorwort is not a permission. sent4: if that something is a kind of a zooplankton but it is not undependable is wrong it is undependable. sent5: the phenylbutazone is a twelve. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does reorder fife and is admissible does not hold. sent7: the main-topmast is not oracular if the autoclave is not bony but it is impractical. sent8: the phenylbutazone is not a flutter if the fact that the moorwort does not flutter and/or it is not a kind of a permission is not right. sent9: the autoclave is both not bony and impractical if it reorders survivor. sent10: if the fact that something is undependable is not false that it is not a flutter and/or is not a permission is incorrect. sent11: the phenylbutazone is a twelve if the moorwort is not a permission. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the vambrace is not a hardliner and it is not a kind of a pantaloon is not true if it reorders fieldworker.
|
{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
|
sent1: the fact that something is not a miso and is not a kind of a microbiology is incorrect if it is gerundial. sent2: if something does reorder fieldworker that it is a hardliner and it is not a pantaloon does not hold. sent3: if something is a Borago then it is not a devolution and it does not reorder variable. sent4: if something does reorder fieldworker that it is not a hardliner and is not a kind of a pantaloon is not right.
|
sent1: (x): {JE}x -> ¬(¬{EI}x & ¬{EE}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): {GK}x -> (¬{GT}x & ¬{BG}x) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vambrace is not a hardliner and it is not a kind of a pantaloon is not true if it reorders fieldworker. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a miso and is not a kind of a microbiology is incorrect if it is gerundial. sent2: if something does reorder fieldworker that it is a hardliner and it is not a pantaloon does not hold. sent3: if something is a Borago then it is not a devolution and it does not reorder variable. sent4: if something does reorder fieldworker that it is not a hardliner and is not a kind of a pantaloon is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the amphetamine does not aspirate resuscitator.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: the amphetamine is a scours if the candlemaker is a kind of a cosmetology. sent2: if something is a kind of a scours it does aspirate resuscitator. sent3: if the candlemaker is a Monnet then it is a cosmetology. sent4: something is a kind of a Monnet if it is a cosmetology. sent5: if something does scour it is both a Monnet and not a cosmetology. sent6: that the candlemaker is a Monnet is not false. sent7: if the amphetamine is not a kind of a Monnet the fact that the candlemaker is not a kind of a cosmetology and it does not scour is not correct.
|
sent1: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent2: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent5: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent6: {A}{a} sent7: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})
|
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the candlemaker is a cosmetology.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the amphetamine does scour.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that if the amphetamine scours then the amphetamine does aspirate resuscitator hold.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: {C}{b}; sent2 -> int3: {C}{b} -> {D}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the flotation is a cosmetology.
|
{B}{dg}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the amphetamine does not aspirate resuscitator. ; $context$ = sent1: the amphetamine is a scours if the candlemaker is a kind of a cosmetology. sent2: if something is a kind of a scours it does aspirate resuscitator. sent3: if the candlemaker is a Monnet then it is a cosmetology. sent4: something is a kind of a Monnet if it is a cosmetology. sent5: if something does scour it is both a Monnet and not a cosmetology. sent6: that the candlemaker is a Monnet is not false. sent7: if the amphetamine is not a kind of a Monnet the fact that the candlemaker is not a kind of a cosmetology and it does not scour is not correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the candlemaker is a cosmetology.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the amphetamine does scour.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that if the amphetamine scours then the amphetamine does aspirate resuscitator hold.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does reorder Satan and/or it is an undesirable is incorrect it is not a soar does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: if the Albanian reorders Satan or it is undesirable or both then it is not a kind of a soar. sent2: there is something such that if it either does reorder Satan or is an undesirable or both then it is not a soar. sent3: if that that the Albanian reorders Satan or it is an undesirable or both is true is wrong then it does soar. sent4: the compress does not reorder criterion if the fact that it does reorder slumber and/or it does soar does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that either it rouses or it does epoxy or both does not hold then that it does not mortise predomination is true. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it reorders precipitin or is acaudate or both is not correct it is not a nine. sent7: the aglet is not impenetrable if that it is cloudy and/or reorders Satan is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it either does reorder Satan or is not desirable or both does not hold then it does soar. sent9: something is not onside if the fact that it does reorder remove and/or it sedates genet does not hold. sent10: that there exists something such that if the fact that either it is a nine or it does reorder aglet or both is false it is not a kind of a M3 is not incorrect. sent11: if that the Albanian is a security and/or does reorder snakeblenny is not right then it is not innocuous. sent12: there exists something such that if that it epoxies and/or it is a hired is not right then it is not stingless. sent13: if the fact that the Albanian either reorders Satan or is undesirable or both is incorrect then it does not soar. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it does reorder criterion or is a protozoology or both is not true that it is not antimagnetic is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a permafrost and/or it is a kind of a trait is not true then it does not mortise buckskin. sent16: there exists something such that if that it mortises buckskin or it is hypodermic or both does not hold then it does not reorder Spenser. sent17: if the fact that the anaglyph is sensorineural and/or reorders Satan is incorrect then it does not sedate one-upmanship.
|
sent1: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: ¬({DE}{gg} v {B}{gg}) -> ¬{FD}{gg} sent5: (Ex): ¬({HG}x v {IJ}x) -> ¬{DH}x sent6: (Ex): ¬({AF}x v {AL}x) -> ¬{DK}x sent7: ¬({I}{hq} v {AA}{hq}) -> ¬{EP}{hq} sent8: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent9: (x): ¬({CD}x v {DC}x) -> ¬{AN}x sent10: (Ex): ¬({DK}x v {AC}x) -> ¬{HR}x sent11: ¬({BR}{aa} v {ID}{aa}) -> ¬{CI}{aa} sent12: (Ex): ¬({IJ}x v {HS}x) -> ¬{Q}x sent13: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent14: (Ex): ¬({FD}x v {T}x) -> ¬{IF}x sent15: (Ex): ¬({GA}x v {CJ}x) -> ¬{FM}x sent16: (Ex): ¬({FM}x v {CA}x) -> ¬{GO}x sent17: ¬({EG}{as} v {AA}{as}) -> ¬{IN}{as}
|
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the snakeblenny is not onside if the fact that it reorders remove and/or sedates genet does not hold.
|
¬({CD}{hb} v {DC}{hb}) -> ¬{AN}{hb}
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does reorder Satan and/or it is an undesirable is incorrect it is not a soar does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Albanian reorders Satan or it is undesirable or both then it is not a kind of a soar. sent2: there is something such that if it either does reorder Satan or is an undesirable or both then it is not a soar. sent3: if that that the Albanian reorders Satan or it is an undesirable or both is true is wrong then it does soar. sent4: the compress does not reorder criterion if the fact that it does reorder slumber and/or it does soar does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that either it rouses or it does epoxy or both does not hold then that it does not mortise predomination is true. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it reorders precipitin or is acaudate or both is not correct it is not a nine. sent7: the aglet is not impenetrable if that it is cloudy and/or reorders Satan is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it either does reorder Satan or is not desirable or both does not hold then it does soar. sent9: something is not onside if the fact that it does reorder remove and/or it sedates genet does not hold. sent10: that there exists something such that if the fact that either it is a nine or it does reorder aglet or both is false it is not a kind of a M3 is not incorrect. sent11: if that the Albanian is a security and/or does reorder snakeblenny is not right then it is not innocuous. sent12: there exists something such that if that it epoxies and/or it is a hired is not right then it is not stingless. sent13: if the fact that the Albanian either reorders Satan or is undesirable or both is incorrect then it does not soar. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it does reorder criterion or is a protozoology or both is not true that it is not antimagnetic is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a permafrost and/or it is a kind of a trait is not true then it does not mortise buckskin. sent16: there exists something such that if that it mortises buckskin or it is hypodermic or both does not hold then it does not reorder Spenser. sent17: if the fact that the anaglyph is sensorineural and/or reorders Satan is incorrect then it does not sedate one-upmanship. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the trailer is a kind of non-thermionics thing that is neuroglial.
|
(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b})
|
sent1: the trailer is not thermionics and is neuroglial if the scanner is not neuroglial. sent2: if that the ephemeron is a forgery is wrong that it reorders Riga and it sedates datum is false. sent3: the trailer is not thermionics. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does reorder Riga and it does sedate datum does not hold then the rumrunner does not sedate datum. sent5: if that the stratification does not reorder shuffleboard and is a Plano is not correct then the melter reorder shuffleboard. sent6: the fact that something does not reorder shuffleboard but it is a kind of a Plano does not hold if it is a convener. sent7: the stratification is a convener. sent8: the liman does not cohabit and is a axerophthol. sent9: the trailer is not thermionics but it is dumpy if the scanner is not dumpy. sent10: the trailer is not a jade. sent11: the scanner is not dumpy and/or it is a axerophthol. sent12: if the rumrunner does not sedate datum then the scanner is a Episcopalian and is thermionics. sent13: if there is something such that it does reorder shuffleboard then the ephemeron is not a forgery. sent14: if either the trailer is not neuroglial or it is dumpy or both then it is not a axerophthol. sent15: the scanner is not neuroglial if it is a axerophthol.
|
sent1: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent2: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬({E}{d} & {D}{d}) sent3: ¬{A}{b} sent4: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}{c} sent5: ¬(¬{G}{f} & {H}{f}) -> {G}{e} sent6: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) sent7: {I}{f} sent8: (¬{GL}{do} & {AB}{do}) sent9: ¬{AA}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {AA}{b}) sent10: ¬{BF}{b} sent11: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) sent12: ¬{D}{c} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) sent13: (x): {G}x -> ¬{F}{d} sent14: (¬{B}{b} v {AA}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{b} sent15: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{a}
|
[] |
[] |
the fact that the trailer is not thermionics and is neuroglial is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b})
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the fact that the stratification does not reorder shuffleboard but it is a kind of a Plano is not true if the fact that it is a convener is not false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the stratification does not reorder shuffleboard and is a Plano is wrong is not false.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the melter reorders shuffleboard.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it reorders shuffleboard.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the ephemeron is not a forgery.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the ephemeron does reorder Riga and sedates datum is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it reorders Riga and does sedate datum is not true.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the rumrunner does not sedate datum.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the scanner is a Episcopalian that is thermionics.; int9 -> int10: the scanner is thermionics.; int10 -> int11: something is thermionics.;"
] | 12 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the trailer is a kind of non-thermionics thing that is neuroglial. ; $context$ = sent1: the trailer is not thermionics and is neuroglial if the scanner is not neuroglial. sent2: if that the ephemeron is a forgery is wrong that it reorders Riga and it sedates datum is false. sent3: the trailer is not thermionics. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does reorder Riga and it does sedate datum does not hold then the rumrunner does not sedate datum. sent5: if that the stratification does not reorder shuffleboard and is a Plano is not correct then the melter reorder shuffleboard. sent6: the fact that something does not reorder shuffleboard but it is a kind of a Plano does not hold if it is a convener. sent7: the stratification is a convener. sent8: the liman does not cohabit and is a axerophthol. sent9: the trailer is not thermionics but it is dumpy if the scanner is not dumpy. sent10: the trailer is not a jade. sent11: the scanner is not dumpy and/or it is a axerophthol. sent12: if the rumrunner does not sedate datum then the scanner is a Episcopalian and is thermionics. sent13: if there is something such that it does reorder shuffleboard then the ephemeron is not a forgery. sent14: if either the trailer is not neuroglial or it is dumpy or both then it is not a axerophthol. sent15: the scanner is not neuroglial if it is a axerophthol. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is technical it is upland.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> {C}x
|
sent1: the floccule is virulent if that it is a amberjack hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does reorder Bushido then it sedates charm. sent3: there is something such that if it is Dickensian then it sedates toehold. sent4: the floccule is upland if it is technical. sent5: if the charm is upland then it is a organicism. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Cambrian then it is a kind of a glyph. sent7: if the floccule does seal then it is a technical. sent8: if something is a cuckoldom it is upland. sent9: if something is a kind of a top then that it reorders Bowdler is not false. sent10: there is something such that if it is scholarly then it is intertidal. sent11: if the floccule is upland it is not non-top. sent12: the palmetto sedates feminization if it is a kind of a snowshoe. sent13: if the pitchfork is a technical the fact that it is not residuary is not true. sent14: if the floccule is diametric then it is a vaccination.
|
sent1: {DU}{aa} -> {CB}{aa} sent2: (Ex): {ET}x -> {BP}x sent3: (Ex): {EK}x -> {GN}x sent4: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent5: {C}{fn} -> {DB}{fn} sent6: (Ex): {AS}x -> {AE}x sent7: {GC}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent8: (x): {HH}x -> {C}x sent9: (x): {HO}x -> {FE}x sent10: (Ex): {DO}x -> {F}x sent11: {C}{aa} -> {HO}{aa} sent12: {ER}{bs} -> {EU}{bs} sent13: {A}{ao} -> {CF}{ao} sent14: {FB}{aa} -> {CS}{aa}
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the floccule is upland if it is a cuckoldom.
|
{HH}{aa} -> {C}{aa}
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is technical it is upland. ; $context$ = sent1: the floccule is virulent if that it is a amberjack hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does reorder Bushido then it sedates charm. sent3: there is something such that if it is Dickensian then it sedates toehold. sent4: the floccule is upland if it is technical. sent5: if the charm is upland then it is a organicism. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Cambrian then it is a kind of a glyph. sent7: if the floccule does seal then it is a technical. sent8: if something is a cuckoldom it is upland. sent9: if something is a kind of a top then that it reorders Bowdler is not false. sent10: there is something such that if it is scholarly then it is intertidal. sent11: if the floccule is upland it is not non-top. sent12: the palmetto sedates feminization if it is a kind of a snowshoe. sent13: if the pitchfork is a technical the fact that it is not residuary is not true. sent14: if the floccule is diametric then it is a vaccination. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the de-iodinase does not relive.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: that the de-iodinase does not relive hold if the quickener mortises Meccano. sent2: the gazette is a kind of an intangible if that it does sedate megadeath and is not an intangible is wrong. sent3: that the quickener mortises Meccano but it is not a tetrose does not hold if it is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent4: the fact that the gazette does sedate megadeath and is not intangible is false. sent5: if the creep is tractable that the sandbox does not aspirate blackpoll and does relive is not right. sent6: something is a kind of a mortality if it is a kind of an intangible. sent7: the quickener is not negligent. sent8: the quickener is a Cyprinodontidae and does dodge if the de-iodinase is not a wassailer. sent9: the de-iodinase does not aspirate blackpoll if that it is not a wassailer and it does aspirate blackpoll is wrong. sent10: the quickener is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent11: the fact that the duce is not a Cyprinodontidae hold if the quickener is a Cyprinodontidae that does not ruffle. sent12: that the quickener mortises Meccano and is not a kind of a tetrose does not hold. sent13: something is not a Cyprinodontidae or it does not ruffle or both if it does not aspirate blackpoll. sent14: that the quickener does not mortise Meccano and it is not a tetrose is incorrect if it is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent15: the gallfly is a kind of tractable thing that reorders emery. sent16: the gazette does mortise Smitane. sent17: the fact that the quickener does not ruffle is true if there is something such that the fact that it does not aspirate blackpoll and does relive is false. sent18: the catchall does not mortise Meccano. sent19: if the gallfly is tractable then that the creep is tractable is correct.
|
sent1: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: ¬({L}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> {K}{f} sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬({L}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) sent5: {G}{d} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) sent6: (x): {K}x -> {H}x sent7: ¬{CP}{a} sent8: ¬{F}{b} -> ({A}{a} & {E}{a}) sent9: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent10: ¬{A}{a} sent11: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{gn} sent12: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent13: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) sent14: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent15: ({G}{e} & {J}{e}) sent16: {I}{f} sent17: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent18: ¬{AA}{ih} sent19: {G}{e} -> {G}{d}
|
[
"sent14 & sent10 -> int1: that that the quickener does not mortise Meccano and is not a tetrose is false is right.;"
] |
[
"sent14 & sent10 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a});"
] |
the duce is not a Cyprinodontidae.
|
¬{A}{gn}
|
[
"sent6 -> int2: the gazette is a kind of a mortality if it is an intangible.; sent2 & sent4 -> int3: that the gazette is intangible is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the gazette is a mortality.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the gazette does mortise Smitane and it is a mortality.; int5 -> int6: something mortises Smitane and it is a mortality.; sent15 -> int7: the gallfly is tractable.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the creep is tractable is not incorrect.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: that the sandbox does not aspirate blackpoll but it relives is not true.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not aspirate blackpoll and relives is false.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the quickener does not ruffle.;"
] | 9 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the de-iodinase does not relive. ; $context$ = sent1: that the de-iodinase does not relive hold if the quickener mortises Meccano. sent2: the gazette is a kind of an intangible if that it does sedate megadeath and is not an intangible is wrong. sent3: that the quickener mortises Meccano but it is not a tetrose does not hold if it is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent4: the fact that the gazette does sedate megadeath and is not intangible is false. sent5: if the creep is tractable that the sandbox does not aspirate blackpoll and does relive is not right. sent6: something is a kind of a mortality if it is a kind of an intangible. sent7: the quickener is not negligent. sent8: the quickener is a Cyprinodontidae and does dodge if the de-iodinase is not a wassailer. sent9: the de-iodinase does not aspirate blackpoll if that it is not a wassailer and it does aspirate blackpoll is wrong. sent10: the quickener is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent11: the fact that the duce is not a Cyprinodontidae hold if the quickener is a Cyprinodontidae that does not ruffle. sent12: that the quickener mortises Meccano and is not a kind of a tetrose does not hold. sent13: something is not a Cyprinodontidae or it does not ruffle or both if it does not aspirate blackpoll. sent14: that the quickener does not mortise Meccano and it is not a tetrose is incorrect if it is not a Cyprinodontidae. sent15: the gallfly is a kind of tractable thing that reorders emery. sent16: the gazette does mortise Smitane. sent17: the fact that the quickener does not ruffle is true if there is something such that the fact that it does not aspirate blackpoll and does relive is false. sent18: the catchall does not mortise Meccano. sent19: if the gallfly is tractable then that the creep is tractable is correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 & sent10 -> int1: that that the quickener does not mortise Meccano and is not a tetrose is false is right.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the carbonyl either sedates external or is not a brainwave or both is wrong.
|
¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})
|
sent1: the fact that the carbonyl sedates external and/or is not a kind of a brainwave is wrong. sent2: that the carbonyl mortises doorlock and/or it does not aspirate abomasum is wrong. sent3: that the handsaw is a Ligustrum or it is not a flexure or both is wrong. sent4: that either the bubbler is a kind of a gadgeteer or it does not sedate external or both is not true. sent5: if something is not a antediluvian then it is not a confidentiality and it is a kind of a cockfight. sent6: that the carbonyl is imperial and/or not a brainwave is false.
|
sent1: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ¬({IA}{a} v ¬{EQ}{a}) sent3: ¬({I}{ip} v ¬{FC}{ip}) sent4: ¬({IS}{ae} v ¬{AA}{ae}) sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) sent6: ¬({HD}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the carbonyl either sedates external or is not a brainwave or both.
|
({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})
|
[
"sent5 -> int1: the pulverization is both not a confidentiality and a cockfight if it is non-antediluvian.;"
] | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the carbonyl either sedates external or is not a brainwave or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the carbonyl sedates external and/or is not a kind of a brainwave is wrong. sent2: that the carbonyl mortises doorlock and/or it does not aspirate abomasum is wrong. sent3: that the handsaw is a Ligustrum or it is not a flexure or both is wrong. sent4: that either the bubbler is a kind of a gadgeteer or it does not sedate external or both is not true. sent5: if something is not a antediluvian then it is not a confidentiality and it is a kind of a cockfight. sent6: that the carbonyl is imperial and/or not a brainwave is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the wagonwright does not sedate maggot.
|
¬{B}{a}
|
sent1: the wagonwright is a oilcloth. sent2: if something is a pipeful it does sedate maggot. sent3: there is something such that that it is a Transcaucasia and/or it is minors is not right. sent4: the axseed sedates maggot. sent5: something does not sedate iniquity. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that it does not reorder Wyomingite hold. sent7: the fact that the wagonwright is a kind of a pipeful is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that either it does sedate iniquity or it reorders Wyomingite or both is not right. sent8: the wagonwright reorders Wyomingite. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that either it does sedate wassailer or it does sedate quadruplet or both is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that something mortises porphyry and does sedate maggot is incorrect it does not sedate maggot. sent11: there exists something such that that either it is a ornithopod or it mortises DO or both is false. sent12: if something is a ashlar then it is a kind of a whiffer. sent13: if something reorders reluctance then it is a bounce. sent14: if there is something such that that it is painful or is a pipeful or both does not hold then the ascoma is fiscal. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that either it sedates iniquity or it reorders Wyomingite or both is incorrect. sent16: the wassailer is opisthognathous if there is something such that the fact that it sedates maggot and/or it is a half-moon is false. sent17: there is something such that it sedates iniquity and/or does reorder Wyomingite. sent18: there exists something such that that it either is municipal or does sedate forgetfulness or both is false.
|
sent1: {AE}{a} sent2: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬({BG}x v {GS}x) sent4: {B}{ag} sent5: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent8: {AB}{a} sent9: (Ex): ¬({HD}x v {IM}x) sent10: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (Ex): ¬({GC}x v {GO}x) sent12: (x): {ES}x -> {IS}x sent13: (x): {BH}x -> {GQ}x sent14: (x): ¬({G}x v {A}x) -> {DQ}{i} sent15: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent16: (x): ¬({B}x v {AS}x) -> {GI}{em} sent17: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent18: (Ex): ¬({IG}x v {IK}x)
|
[
"sent15 & sent7 -> int1: the wagonwright is a kind of a pipeful.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the wagonwright sedates maggot hold if that it is a pipeful is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent15 & sent7 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent2 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the wagonwright does not sedate maggot.
|
¬{B}{a}
|
[
"sent10 -> int3: if that the wagonwright does mortise porphyry and does sedate maggot is not right then it does not sedate maggot.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the wagonwright does not sedate maggot. ; $context$ = sent1: the wagonwright is a oilcloth. sent2: if something is a pipeful it does sedate maggot. sent3: there is something such that that it is a Transcaucasia and/or it is minors is not right. sent4: the axseed sedates maggot. sent5: something does not sedate iniquity. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that it does not reorder Wyomingite hold. sent7: the fact that the wagonwright is a kind of a pipeful is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that either it does sedate iniquity or it reorders Wyomingite or both is not right. sent8: the wagonwright reorders Wyomingite. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that either it does sedate wassailer or it does sedate quadruplet or both is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that something mortises porphyry and does sedate maggot is incorrect it does not sedate maggot. sent11: there exists something such that that either it is a ornithopod or it mortises DO or both is false. sent12: if something is a ashlar then it is a kind of a whiffer. sent13: if something reorders reluctance then it is a bounce. sent14: if there is something such that that it is painful or is a pipeful or both does not hold then the ascoma is fiscal. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that either it sedates iniquity or it reorders Wyomingite or both is incorrect. sent16: the wassailer is opisthognathous if there is something such that the fact that it sedates maggot and/or it is a half-moon is false. sent17: there is something such that it sedates iniquity and/or does reorder Wyomingite. sent18: there exists something such that that it either is municipal or does sedate forgetfulness or both is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent15 & sent7 -> int1: the wagonwright is a kind of a pipeful.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the wagonwright sedates maggot hold if that it is a pipeful is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
if the gawker does not savage cephalothin then that it does not recoup Hamamelidoxylon and it promises hygrometer is not correct.
|
¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})
|
sent1: if something is not a half-intensity then it is not a kind of a outthrust and it does promise gawker. sent2: the gawker does not ambulate and does recoup Hamamelidoxylon if it is not a Lappic. sent3: the fact that something is not attentive but it promises launchpad is not true if it does recoup Buffalo. sent4: the gawker does not rationalize but it irradiates if it is not phylogenetic. sent5: that something is not appellate and does inscribe is not right if it savages needlebush. sent6: if the precipitin is not clinical it is not cytogenetic and it is a seismogram. sent7: that something is a Katsuwonus and is a stratosphere does not hold if it is not corneal. sent8: that the hygrometer is a side-glance and promises seedcake is wrong if it does not promise hygrometer. sent9: if something frequents the fact that it does not erupt Bathsheba and it is a heads-up is false. sent10: the affenpinscher does not promise expedition and promises cadmium if it does not savage cephalothin. sent11: something is not a kind of a paperclip but it is intervertebral if it is not anticlimactic. sent12: if something does not savage cephalothin the fact that it does not recoup Hamamelidoxylon and it does promise hygrometer is not right. sent13: the fact that something is not a everlastingness but it is a curmudgeon does not hold if it does not recoup flugelhorn. sent14: the fact that something does not recoup gawker but it is antiadrenergic is not true if it is an exile. sent15: that the graverobber is non-Dostoevskian thing that does savage cephalothin is false if it does promise launchpad. sent16: the fact that something is a kind of non-intervertebral thing that wets is not true if it is cytogenetic.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{HQ}x & {DE}x) sent2: ¬{BF}{aa} -> (¬{DN}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent3: (x): {HA}x -> ¬(¬{BK}x & {JB}x) sent4: ¬{AS}{aa} -> (¬{CA}{aa} & {O}{aa}) sent5: (x): {BE}x -> ¬(¬{EE}x & {FA}x) sent6: ¬{HD}{bb} -> (¬{N}{bb} & {BR}{bb}) sent7: (x): ¬{EG}x -> ¬({IC}x & {FS}x) sent8: ¬{AB}{hp} -> ¬({JE}{hp} & {CM}{hp}) sent9: (x): {CB}x -> ¬(¬{CP}x & {IA}x) sent10: ¬{A}{id} -> (¬{H}{id} & {AQ}{id}) sent11: (x): ¬{EA}x -> (¬{DA}x & {BC}x) sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent13: (x): ¬{EB}x -> ¬(¬{FF}x & {EN}x) sent14: (x): {AC}x -> ¬(¬{AK}x & {HH}x) sent15: {JB}{cj} -> ¬(¬{CF}{cj} & {A}{cj}) sent16: (x): {N}x -> ¬(¬{BC}x & {IL}x)
|
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = if the gawker does not savage cephalothin then that it does not recoup Hamamelidoxylon and it promises hygrometer is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a half-intensity then it is not a kind of a outthrust and it does promise gawker. sent2: the gawker does not ambulate and does recoup Hamamelidoxylon if it is not a Lappic. sent3: the fact that something is not attentive but it promises launchpad is not true if it does recoup Buffalo. sent4: the gawker does not rationalize but it irradiates if it is not phylogenetic. sent5: that something is not appellate and does inscribe is not right if it savages needlebush. sent6: if the precipitin is not clinical it is not cytogenetic and it is a seismogram. sent7: that something is a Katsuwonus and is a stratosphere does not hold if it is not corneal. sent8: that the hygrometer is a side-glance and promises seedcake is wrong if it does not promise hygrometer. sent9: if something frequents the fact that it does not erupt Bathsheba and it is a heads-up is false. sent10: the affenpinscher does not promise expedition and promises cadmium if it does not savage cephalothin. sent11: something is not a kind of a paperclip but it is intervertebral if it is not anticlimactic. sent12: if something does not savage cephalothin the fact that it does not recoup Hamamelidoxylon and it does promise hygrometer is not right. sent13: the fact that something is not a everlastingness but it is a curmudgeon does not hold if it does not recoup flugelhorn. sent14: the fact that something does not recoup gawker but it is antiadrenergic is not true if it is an exile. sent15: that the graverobber is non-Dostoevskian thing that does savage cephalothin is false if it does promise launchpad. sent16: the fact that something is a kind of non-intervertebral thing that wets is not true if it is cytogenetic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Ballistite does erupt hop-picker.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: the vinyl erupts hop-picker. sent2: the Ballistite does savage modeled. sent3: the muscle does erupt hop-picker. sent4: the omnibus erupts hop-picker. sent5: the Ballistite erupts hop-picker. sent6: the Ballistite does promise tangent. sent7: the Berber does erupt hop-picker. sent8: the Ballistite is a kind of a aberrance. sent9: the lamination does erupt hop-picker. sent10: The hop-picker erupts Ballistite. sent11: the Ballistite does promise croft. sent12: the salmi does erupt hop-picker.
|
sent1: {A}{er} sent2: {FB}{a} sent3: {A}{eh} sent4: {A}{go} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {HU}{a} sent7: {A}{bo} sent8: {ID}{a} sent9: {A}{bd} sent10: {AA}{aa} sent11: {HJ}{a} sent12: {A}{co}
|
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the Ballistite does erupt hop-picker. ; $context$ = sent1: the vinyl erupts hop-picker. sent2: the Ballistite does savage modeled. sent3: the muscle does erupt hop-picker. sent4: the omnibus erupts hop-picker. sent5: the Ballistite erupts hop-picker. sent6: the Ballistite does promise tangent. sent7: the Berber does erupt hop-picker. sent8: the Ballistite is a kind of a aberrance. sent9: the lamination does erupt hop-picker. sent10: The hop-picker erupts Ballistite. sent11: the Ballistite does promise croft. sent12: the salmi does erupt hop-picker. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the nifedipine is not a kind of an inhibition.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: the hairnet erupts hairnet. sent2: something that does hem is a kind of an inhibition. sent3: if the nifedipine is not sentient and is not a kind of a Bren it does erupt hairnet. sent4: the nifedipine is a credenza. sent5: if the nifedipine is not sentient but it is a Bren it does erupt hairnet. sent6: the nifedipine is not sentient and is not a Bren. sent7: the nifedipine does hem if that it does erupt hairnet is not wrong.
|
sent1: {B}{ce} sent2: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent3: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: {IS}{a} sent5: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}
|
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the nifedipine erupts hairnet.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the nifedipine is a kind of a hem.; sent2 -> int3: if the nifedipine is a hem it is an inhibition.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent7 -> int2: {A}{a}; sent2 -> int3: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the nifedipine is not a kind of an inhibition. ; $context$ = sent1: the hairnet erupts hairnet. sent2: something that does hem is a kind of an inhibition. sent3: if the nifedipine is not sentient and is not a kind of a Bren it does erupt hairnet. sent4: the nifedipine is a credenza. sent5: if the nifedipine is not sentient but it is a Bren it does erupt hairnet. sent6: the nifedipine is not sentient and is not a Bren. sent7: the nifedipine does hem if that it does erupt hairnet is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the nifedipine erupts hairnet.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the nifedipine is a kind of a hem.; sent2 -> int3: if the nifedipine is a hem it is an inhibition.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the decalescence is forcipate.
|
{C}{a}
|
sent1: if there exists something such that it is Lebanese and/or it is a Milvus the decalescence is forcipate. sent2: either the acrocarp is Lebanese or it is a kind of a Milvus or both.
|
sent1: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent2: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the fact that something is Lebanese or is a Milvus or both is not false.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x); int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the decalescence is forcipate. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is Lebanese and/or it is a Milvus the decalescence is forcipate. sent2: either the acrocarp is Lebanese or it is a kind of a Milvus or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the fact that something is Lebanese or is a Milvus or both is not false.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bise occurs.
|
{A}
|
sent1: the savaging zap happens. sent2: that not the mutationalness but the savaging unwariness happens is not true. sent3: if the Klondike occurs that the fact that the shimmying does not occur and/or the dowse does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the Klondike happens and the savaging Zingiber does not occur if the attentionalness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the fact that not the truncation but the anaplasticness occurs is not true is true. sent6: if the shimmying happens the bise happens. sent7: the attentionalness does not occur if the fact that the attentionalness and the thunk happens is not correct. sent8: the truncation brings about that the shimmying happens. sent9: the spasm occurs. sent10: if that the unreportableness does not occur but the refocusing occurs is not true then the percussing occurs. sent11: the bise does not occur if the fact that either the shimmy does not occur or the dowse does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: if the recouping chipboard occurs then the clobbering happens. sent13: if the recouping Maupassant occurs then the glissade occurs. sent14: the fact that not the plain but the toroidalness happens is not correct. sent15: that the truncation and the anaplasticness happens does not hold. sent16: if the bise does not occur then that both the non-Jordanianness and the promising crepe occurs is incorrect.
|
sent1: {AI} sent2: ¬(¬{GM} & {GB}) sent3: {D} -> ¬(¬{B} v ¬{C}) sent4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) sent5: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent6: {B} -> {A} sent7: ¬({F} & {H}) -> ¬{F} sent8: {AA} -> {B} sent9: {DL} sent10: ¬(¬{JH} & {AD}) -> {CB} sent11: ¬(¬{B} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} sent12: {FK} -> {EO} sent13: {GG} -> {BO} sent14: ¬(¬{CF} & {AF}) sent15: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent16: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{GO} & {AR})
|
[] |
[] |
the fact that the Jordanian does not occur but the promising crepe occurs is false.
|
¬(¬{GO} & {AR})
|
[] | 6 | 2 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the bise occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the savaging zap happens. sent2: that not the mutationalness but the savaging unwariness happens is not true. sent3: if the Klondike occurs that the fact that the shimmying does not occur and/or the dowse does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the Klondike happens and the savaging Zingiber does not occur if the attentionalness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the fact that not the truncation but the anaplasticness occurs is not true is true. sent6: if the shimmying happens the bise happens. sent7: the attentionalness does not occur if the fact that the attentionalness and the thunk happens is not correct. sent8: the truncation brings about that the shimmying happens. sent9: the spasm occurs. sent10: if that the unreportableness does not occur but the refocusing occurs is not true then the percussing occurs. sent11: the bise does not occur if the fact that either the shimmy does not occur or the dowse does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: if the recouping chipboard occurs then the clobbering happens. sent13: if the recouping Maupassant occurs then the glissade occurs. sent14: the fact that not the plain but the toroidalness happens is not correct. sent15: that the truncation and the anaplasticness happens does not hold. sent16: if the bise does not occur then that both the non-Jordanianness and the promising crepe occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the recreationalness happens and/or the heartbreaker does not occur.
|
({D} v ¬{C})
|
sent1: the unresentfulness occurs. sent2: if that the duodenalness and the congenericness occurs is not wrong then the heartbreaker does not occur. sent3: the congenericness does not occur if the fact that the heartbreaker does not occur and the recreationalness does not occur hold. sent4: the congenericness occurs. sent5: the duodenalness happens. sent6: the liturgicalness happens. sent7: that the fact that either the recreationalness occurs or the heartbreaker does not occur or both is not true hold if the duodenalness does not occur. sent8: the abhorring occurs or the eversion does not occur or both if the duodenalness does not occur.
|
sent1: {DH} sent2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent3: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} sent4: {B} sent5: {A} sent6: {H} sent7: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} v ¬{C}) sent8: ¬{A} -> ({AM} v ¬{HH})
|
[
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the duodenalness and the congenericness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the heartbreaker does not occur.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent2 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the recreationalness occurs and/or the heartbreaker does not occur does not hold.
|
¬({D} v ¬{C})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the recreationalness happens and/or the heartbreaker does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unresentfulness occurs. sent2: if that the duodenalness and the congenericness occurs is not wrong then the heartbreaker does not occur. sent3: the congenericness does not occur if the fact that the heartbreaker does not occur and the recreationalness does not occur hold. sent4: the congenericness occurs. sent5: the duodenalness happens. sent6: the liturgicalness happens. sent7: that the fact that either the recreationalness occurs or the heartbreaker does not occur or both is not true hold if the duodenalness does not occur. sent8: the abhorring occurs or the eversion does not occur or both if the duodenalness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the duodenalness and the congenericness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the heartbreaker does not occur.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it does not savage gracelessness and it does humanize it does not pleach is not correct.
|
¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: the snowberry does not surface if it does pleach and recoups fatality. sent2: the snowberry is a kind of a nick if it is not a ejaculator and it does savage boyfriend. sent3: there is something such that if it savages gracelessness and it humanizes then it does not pleach. sent4: if the snowberry does not savage gracelessness and does humanize it does pleach. sent5: something does not savage neuroblast if it is both not a RISC and humic. sent6: something is not a RISC if it does not savage disquiet and is experiential. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a licentiate and does promise snowberry it is not a gastromy. sent8: if the snowberry is a stemmatology and it does recoup Rigel then that it does not humanize hold. sent9: that the snowberry does not pleach hold if it does not savage gracelessness and does humanize. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it does not savage gracelessness and it does humanize then that it pleaches is correct is true. sent11: if the snowberry does savage gracelessness and does humanize then it does not pleach. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a mumble and is tracheal it is not an armchair. sent13: if the snowberry mumbles and it humanizes then it is not communal. sent14: if the incus is not holozoic but it is a lecturer it is Demosthenic.
|
sent1: ({B}{aa} & {AP}{aa}) -> ¬{FK}{aa} sent2: (¬{D}{aa} & {DF}{aa}) -> {DL}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (x): (¬{IA}x & {HM}x) -> ¬{JG}x sent6: (x): (¬{HP}x & {FE}x) -> ¬{IA}x sent7: (Ex): (¬{I}x & {BD}x) -> ¬{GD}x sent8: ({FT}{aa} & {BH}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent10: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent11: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent12: (Ex): ({DT}x & {DJ}x) -> ¬{GS}x sent13: ({DT}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{O}{aa} sent14: (¬{DN}{in} & {GO}{in}) -> {Q}{in}
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if it does not savage disquiet and is experiential it is not a RISC.
|
(Ex): (¬{HP}x & {FE}x) -> ¬{IA}x
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: if the proenzyme does not savage disquiet but it is experiential that it is not a RISC is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not savage gracelessness and it does humanize it does not pleach is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the snowberry does not surface if it does pleach and recoups fatality. sent2: the snowberry is a kind of a nick if it is not a ejaculator and it does savage boyfriend. sent3: there is something such that if it savages gracelessness and it humanizes then it does not pleach. sent4: if the snowberry does not savage gracelessness and does humanize it does pleach. sent5: something does not savage neuroblast if it is both not a RISC and humic. sent6: something is not a RISC if it does not savage disquiet and is experiential. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a licentiate and does promise snowberry it is not a gastromy. sent8: if the snowberry is a stemmatology and it does recoup Rigel then that it does not humanize hold. sent9: that the snowberry does not pleach hold if it does not savage gracelessness and does humanize. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it does not savage gracelessness and it does humanize then that it pleaches is correct is true. sent11: if the snowberry does savage gracelessness and does humanize then it does not pleach. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a mumble and is tracheal it is not an armchair. sent13: if the snowberry mumbles and it humanizes then it is not communal. sent14: if the incus is not holozoic but it is a lecturer it is Demosthenic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the diaphragm does not promise spirometer or it does savage pepper or both is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{B}{a} v {A}{a})
|
sent1: if the scut savages antiquary the shrike is a sackcloth. sent2: if something is not near the fact that it does not promise spirometer and/or it does savage pepper is not right. sent3: the diaphragm is an insurance. sent4: if the diaphragm does not promise invention but it is an insurance it does not promise spirometer. sent5: everything is not a Beerbohm and/or it recoups giving. sent6: the scut savages antiquary or it recoups health or both. sent7: the shrike is a sackcloth if the scut recoups health. sent8: something is not a Beerbohm if it either is not a Beerbohm or recoups giving or both. sent9: if the xenotime is Kiplingesque but it does not promise pravastatin that the shrike does not promise pravastatin is correct. sent10: if the fact that either something is not past or it does not promise xenotime or both is wrong it romanticizes. sent11: if a sackcloth does not promise pravastatin the spirometer is a adventuress. sent12: the diaphragm does not promise invention and is an insurance. sent13: the fact that either something is not a kind of a past or it does not promise xenotime or both does not hold if it is not a Beerbohm. sent14: the xenotime is a kind of Kiplingesque thing that does not promise pravastatin.
|
sent1: {O}{f} -> {I}{d} sent2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v {A}x) sent3: {AB}{a} sent4: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: (x): (¬{P}x v {R}x) sent6: ({O}{f} v {N}{f}) sent7: {N}{f} -> {I}{d} sent8: (x): (¬{P}x v {R}x) -> ¬{P}x sent9: ({M}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{L}x v ¬{K}x) -> {G}x sent11: (x): ({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> {H}{c} sent12: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent13: (x): ¬{P}x -> ¬(¬{L}x v ¬{K}x) sent14: ({M}{e} & ¬{J}{e})
|
[
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the diaphragm does not promise spirometer.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that that the diaphragm does not promise spirometer or it savages pepper or both does not hold is right.
|
¬(¬{B}{a} v {A}{a})
|
[
"sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the diaphragm is not near hold then the fact that it does not promise spirometer and/or it does savage pepper is not true.; sent10 -> int3: the spirometer romanticizes if the fact that either it is not past or it does not promise xenotime or both does not hold.; sent8 -> int4: if the leporide is not a Beerbohm and/or recoups giving then it is not a Beerbohm.; sent5 -> int5: the leporide is not a kind of a Beerbohm and/or it recoups giving.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the leporide is not a kind of a Beerbohm is correct.; int6 -> int7: that everything is not a Beerbohm is true.; int7 -> int8: the antiquary is not a Beerbohm.; sent13 -> int9: that the antiquary is not a past and/or it does not promise xenotime is not right if it is not a Beerbohm.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the antiquary is not past and/or it does not promise xenotime is false.; int10 -> int11: there is nothing that is not a past or does not promise xenotime or both.; int11 -> int12: the fact that that the spirometer is not past and/or it does not promise xenotime is not incorrect is not correct.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the spirometer does romanticize.; sent7 & sent1 & sent6 -> int14: the shrike is a sackcloth.; sent9 & sent14 -> int15: that the shrike does not promise pravastatin hold.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the shrike is a kind of a sackcloth that does not promise pravastatin.; int16 -> int17: something is a sackcloth and does not promise pravastatin.; sent11 & int17 -> int18: the spirometer is a kind of a adventuress.; int13 & int18 -> int19: the spirometer is a adventuress and does romanticize.;"
] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the diaphragm does not promise spirometer or it does savage pepper or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the scut savages antiquary the shrike is a sackcloth. sent2: if something is not near the fact that it does not promise spirometer and/or it does savage pepper is not right. sent3: the diaphragm is an insurance. sent4: if the diaphragm does not promise invention but it is an insurance it does not promise spirometer. sent5: everything is not a Beerbohm and/or it recoups giving. sent6: the scut savages antiquary or it recoups health or both. sent7: the shrike is a sackcloth if the scut recoups health. sent8: something is not a Beerbohm if it either is not a Beerbohm or recoups giving or both. sent9: if the xenotime is Kiplingesque but it does not promise pravastatin that the shrike does not promise pravastatin is correct. sent10: if the fact that either something is not past or it does not promise xenotime or both is wrong it romanticizes. sent11: if a sackcloth does not promise pravastatin the spirometer is a adventuress. sent12: the diaphragm does not promise invention and is an insurance. sent13: the fact that either something is not a kind of a past or it does not promise xenotime or both does not hold if it is not a Beerbohm. sent14: the xenotime is a kind of Kiplingesque thing that does not promise pravastatin. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the diaphragm does not promise spirometer.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something traipses and recoups germander.
|
(Ex): ({A}x & {B}x)
|
sent1: the captopril is worse. sent2: The germander recoups captopril. sent3: the paleographer does not erupt Vespasian but it is not non-weighty. sent4: the captopril is not amphitheatric if something is metrological and it savages captopril. sent5: there exists something such that it is a sniff. sent6: that the cero traipses is not false. sent7: there is something such that it is an exon. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not erupt Vespasian and is weighty the fact that the germander savages captopril is not false. sent9: the captopril recoups germander. sent10: something is dishonorable. sent11: the captopril traipses. sent12: there is something such that it recoups germander. sent13: the ameloblast does recoup germander. sent14: the germander is both metrological and a guardroom.
|
sent1: {HE}{a} sent2: {AA}{ab} sent3: (¬{H}{c} & {G}{c}) sent4: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: (Ex): {CN}x sent6: {A}{io} sent7: (Ex): {IR}x sent8: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) -> {E}{b} sent9: {B}{a} sent10: (Ex): {GC}x sent11: {A}{a} sent12: (Ex): {B}x sent13: {B}{et} sent14: ({D}{b} & {F}{b})
|
[
"sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the captopril traipses and it does recoup germander.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 & sent9 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the songstress does recoup germander hold.
|
{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent14 -> int2: the germander is metrological.; sent3 -> int3: something does not erupt Vespasian and is weighty.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the germander does savage captopril.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the germander is a kind of metrological thing that does savage captopril.; int5 -> int6: something is metrological and does savage captopril.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the captopril is non-amphitheatric.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not amphitheatric.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = something traipses and recoups germander. ; $context$ = sent1: the captopril is worse. sent2: The germander recoups captopril. sent3: the paleographer does not erupt Vespasian but it is not non-weighty. sent4: the captopril is not amphitheatric if something is metrological and it savages captopril. sent5: there exists something such that it is a sniff. sent6: that the cero traipses is not false. sent7: there is something such that it is an exon. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not erupt Vespasian and is weighty the fact that the germander savages captopril is not false. sent9: the captopril recoups germander. sent10: something is dishonorable. sent11: the captopril traipses. sent12: there is something such that it recoups germander. sent13: the ameloblast does recoup germander. sent14: the germander is both metrological and a guardroom. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the captopril traipses and it does recoup germander.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the nutrient is non-grapelike a tribology is not true.
|
¬(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c})
|
sent1: if the hyacinth is not a tribology then the nutrient either is an irreverence or promises pluralism or both. sent2: if something is an irreverence then the fact that it does not promise flatfish is right. sent3: that that either the hyacinth is grapelike or it is a tribology or both is not incorrect if the nutrient does not promise pluralism is true. sent4: there is something such that it is a Swazi or it is not weighty or both. sent5: if the football does not promise flatfish the hyacinth promises pluralism or it does not intrigue or both. sent6: the nutrient is not an irreverence if there is something such that it promises pluralism and/or it does not intrigue. sent7: if something is not a schlepper then that it promises vaporization and is an argentine is wrong. sent8: the fact that the hyacinth is an intrigue that is a tribology is not true. sent9: the fact that the football does not promise pluralism but it is a tribology does not hold if it does not promise flatfish. sent10: the fact that something is not grapelike but a tribology is false if it is not an irreverence. sent11: the fact that the football is both a focus and Eucharistic hold. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a radio-phonograph and/or it is not a kind of a dysprosium is right. sent13: something is grapelike or it does not promise flatfish or both. sent14: if something either promises flatfish or does not promise pluralism or both the hyacinth is not a tribology. sent15: that the nutrient does not promise pluralism and is grapelike is incorrect. sent16: the football is not intolerable. sent17: that the nutrient promises flatfish and it is a tribology does not hold. sent18: if something does not promise pluralism then the fact that it is an irreverence and promises flatfish is wrong. sent19: The fact that the flatfish does not promise football is not incorrect. sent20: if something is not a kind of a draw the fact that it is both not a germ and a Confederate is not correct. sent21: the fact that the nutrient is not a kind of an intrigue but it is an irreverence is incorrect. sent22: something is barometric and/or it does not erupt Ionian.
|
sent1: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{c} v {AA}{c}) sent2: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{AA}{c} -> ({D}{b} v {C}{b}) sent4: (Ex): ({HR}x v ¬{DL}x) sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) sent6: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}{c} sent7: (x): ¬{CN}x -> ¬({GQ}x & {AK}x) sent8: ¬({AB}{b} & {C}{b}) sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {C}{a}) sent10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) sent11: ({F}{a} & {G}{a}) sent12: (Ex): ({GJ}x v ¬{FN}x) sent13: (Ex): ({D}x v ¬{A}x) sent14: (x): ({A}x v ¬{AA}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent15: ¬(¬{AA}{c} & {D}{c}) sent16: ¬{E}{a} sent17: ¬({A}{c} & {C}{c}) sent18: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) sent19: ¬{AC}{aa} sent20: (x): ¬{EQ}x -> ¬(¬{HB}x & {DH}x) sent21: ¬(¬{AB}{c} & {B}{c}) sent22: (Ex): ({EG}x v ¬{GN}x)
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: that that the nutrient is not grapelike and is the tribology is not true if the nutrient is not an irreverence is right.;"
] |
[
"sent10 -> int1: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c});"
] |
the fact that the nutrient is not grapelike but it is a tribology hold.
|
(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c})
|
[
"sent2 -> int2: if the nutrient is an irreverence it does not promise flatfish.; sent11 -> int3: the fact that the football does focus is not wrong.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the football is a kind of non-intolerable a focus.; int4 -> int5: something is tolerable a focus.;"
] | 6 | 4 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the nutrient is non-grapelike a tribology is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hyacinth is not a tribology then the nutrient either is an irreverence or promises pluralism or both. sent2: if something is an irreverence then the fact that it does not promise flatfish is right. sent3: that that either the hyacinth is grapelike or it is a tribology or both is not incorrect if the nutrient does not promise pluralism is true. sent4: there is something such that it is a Swazi or it is not weighty or both. sent5: if the football does not promise flatfish the hyacinth promises pluralism or it does not intrigue or both. sent6: the nutrient is not an irreverence if there is something such that it promises pluralism and/or it does not intrigue. sent7: if something is not a schlepper then that it promises vaporization and is an argentine is wrong. sent8: the fact that the hyacinth is an intrigue that is a tribology is not true. sent9: the fact that the football does not promise pluralism but it is a tribology does not hold if it does not promise flatfish. sent10: the fact that something is not grapelike but a tribology is false if it is not an irreverence. sent11: the fact that the football is both a focus and Eucharistic hold. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a radio-phonograph and/or it is not a kind of a dysprosium is right. sent13: something is grapelike or it does not promise flatfish or both. sent14: if something either promises flatfish or does not promise pluralism or both the hyacinth is not a tribology. sent15: that the nutrient does not promise pluralism and is grapelike is incorrect. sent16: the football is not intolerable. sent17: that the nutrient promises flatfish and it is a tribology does not hold. sent18: if something does not promise pluralism then the fact that it is an irreverence and promises flatfish is wrong. sent19: The fact that the flatfish does not promise football is not incorrect. sent20: if something is not a kind of a draw the fact that it is both not a germ and a Confederate is not correct. sent21: the fact that the nutrient is not a kind of an intrigue but it is an irreverence is incorrect. sent22: something is barometric and/or it does not erupt Ionian. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 -> int1: that that the nutrient is not grapelike and is the tribology is not true if the nutrient is not an irreverence is right.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that that it does not assist and savages germander is not correct.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x)
|
sent1: if something does savage euphuism then it does promise cad and does not consubstantiate. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a foster-father and it is pentatonic is wrong. sent3: if something that promises cad does not consubstantiate it recoups Cognac. sent4: something does assist if it does overleap. sent5: if there exists something such that it does savage institute then the fact that the poltroon assists and it does savage germander is not correct. sent6: something is not an assist and does savage germander. sent7: if something does savage institute that it is not a ANG and it is a hydroxyproline is not right. sent8: that the poltroon does not fascinate and does savage strangeness does not hold if there is something such that it does not savage institute. sent9: there is something such that that it is a kind of an assist that does savage germander is not correct. sent10: something does savage institute. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not stenograph and it is a dekaliter is not true. sent12: that the poltroon does recoup Cognac and it savages institute does not hold. sent13: the fact that the poltroon is not an assist and savages germander is false if the fact that something savages institute is right. sent14: the germander does not savage institute if the promycelium does savage germander and/or it is an assist. sent15: the promycelium overleaps if the buttermilk does recoup Cognac.
|
sent1: (x): {H}x -> ({F}x & ¬{G}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{CI}x & {FB}x) sent3: (x): ({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> {E}x sent4: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent6: (Ex): (¬{B}x & {C}x) sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{EP}x & {CT}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AT}{a} & {AD}{a}) sent9: (Ex): ¬({B}x & {C}x) sent10: (Ex): {A}x sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{L}x & {HR}x) sent12: ¬({E}{a} & {A}{a}) sent13: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent14: ({C}{c} v {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent15: {E}{d} -> {D}{c}
|
[
"sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the poltroon is not a kind of an assist and does savage germander is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent10 & sent13 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that that the fact that it is not a kind of a ANG and it is a kind of a hydroxyproline is true is incorrect.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{EP}x & {CT}x)
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: if the poltroon savages institute then the fact that it is not a ANG and is a hydroxyproline is false.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not assist and savages germander is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does savage euphuism then it does promise cad and does not consubstantiate. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a foster-father and it is pentatonic is wrong. sent3: if something that promises cad does not consubstantiate it recoups Cognac. sent4: something does assist if it does overleap. sent5: if there exists something such that it does savage institute then the fact that the poltroon assists and it does savage germander is not correct. sent6: something is not an assist and does savage germander. sent7: if something does savage institute that it is not a ANG and it is a hydroxyproline is not right. sent8: that the poltroon does not fascinate and does savage strangeness does not hold if there is something such that it does not savage institute. sent9: there is something such that that it is a kind of an assist that does savage germander is not correct. sent10: something does savage institute. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not stenograph and it is a dekaliter is not true. sent12: that the poltroon does recoup Cognac and it savages institute does not hold. sent13: the fact that the poltroon is not an assist and savages germander is false if the fact that something savages institute is right. sent14: the germander does not savage institute if the promycelium does savage germander and/or it is an assist. sent15: the promycelium overleaps if the buttermilk does recoup Cognac. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the poltroon is not a kind of an assist and does savage germander is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the melanin promises twiddle.
|
{B}{a}
|
sent1: if the sinciput is a bilabial then that the puddler is not a graft and does erupt cadmium is false. sent2: the sinciput is not a stunt. sent3: the workpiece is a graft and modest. sent4: the melanin does promise twiddle and/or is modest if it is not a graft. sent5: the workpiece is a kind of a graft. sent6: if the fact that something erupts cadmium and is not modest is not correct it does not promise twiddle. sent7: if something that does not promise Concepcion is not a kind of a bilabial it does graft. sent8: if the cadmium promises twiddle the melanin is modest. sent9: that the Hawaiian promises twiddle is not false. sent10: if the fact that the cadmium does recoup bursary is not wrong the melanin does promise twiddle. sent11: if the melanin is modest but it does not promise twiddle then the Wiffle does promise twiddle. sent12: the melanin is modest but it does not promise twiddle if the workpiece does not erupt cadmium. sent13: something leaps or it does recoup bursary or both if it is immodest. sent14: if the cadmium does leap the melanin does promise twiddle. sent15: the fact that that the puddler is not antisatellite but it is bilabial is wrong is true. sent16: the fact that that the workpiece does not promise Concepcion is true if there is something such that it is not a stunt is right. sent17: the sinciput is not a stunt but bilabial if the fact that it is antisatellite is true.
|
sent1: {F}{d} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c}) sent2: ¬{G}{d} sent3: ({D}{b} & {A}{b}) sent4: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{a} v {A}{a}) sent5: {D}{b} sent6: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}x sent8: {B}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent9: {B}{ca} sent10: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent11: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{af} sent12: ¬{C}{b} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent14: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent15: ¬(¬{H}{c} & {F}{c}) sent16: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{E}{b} sent17: {H}{d} -> (¬{G}{d} & {F}{d})
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: the cadmium is a kind of a leap or does recoup bursary or both if it is not modest.;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa});"
] |
the Wiffle does promise twiddle and it savages Dominique.
|
({B}{af} & {DF}{af})
|
[] | 8 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the melanin promises twiddle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sinciput is a bilabial then that the puddler is not a graft and does erupt cadmium is false. sent2: the sinciput is not a stunt. sent3: the workpiece is a graft and modest. sent4: the melanin does promise twiddle and/or is modest if it is not a graft. sent5: the workpiece is a kind of a graft. sent6: if the fact that something erupts cadmium and is not modest is not correct it does not promise twiddle. sent7: if something that does not promise Concepcion is not a kind of a bilabial it does graft. sent8: if the cadmium promises twiddle the melanin is modest. sent9: that the Hawaiian promises twiddle is not false. sent10: if the fact that the cadmium does recoup bursary is not wrong the melanin does promise twiddle. sent11: if the melanin is modest but it does not promise twiddle then the Wiffle does promise twiddle. sent12: the melanin is modest but it does not promise twiddle if the workpiece does not erupt cadmium. sent13: something leaps or it does recoup bursary or both if it is immodest. sent14: if the cadmium does leap the melanin does promise twiddle. sent15: the fact that that the puddler is not antisatellite but it is bilabial is wrong is true. sent16: the fact that that the workpiece does not promise Concepcion is true if there is something such that it is not a stunt is right. sent17: the sinciput is not a stunt but bilabial if the fact that it is antisatellite is true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: the cadmium is a kind of a leap or does recoup bursary or both if it is not modest.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it does promise Regency then that it savages adulterer and it does not mop is incorrect.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Oklahoma then that it does savage cultism and is not a health is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it promises Regency hold then the fact that it savages adulterer and it mops is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a 1850s it is unlikely and it is successful. sent4: there is something such that if it is a paradiddle that it is part-time thing that does not erupt mealie is not right. sent5: if the oligosaccharide does promise Regency then it savages adulterer and it does not mop. sent6: there is something such that if it does recoup ani that it is a kind of a Lascar and it is archiepiscopal does not hold. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is indirect then it is octal and is not a Mullah is not false. sent8: if the fact that the oligosaccharide promises Regency is not incorrect then the fact that it savages adulterer and does not mop is not true. sent9: if the oligosaccharide is regenerate then it is a kind of Nilotic thing that does not savage adulterer.
|
sent1: (Ex): {BS}x -> ¬({DS}x & ¬{HO}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): {EP}x -> ({HR}x & ¬{CI}x) sent4: (Ex): {IP}x -> ¬({JE}x & ¬{FT}x) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): {GR}x -> ¬({IR}x & {JB}x) sent7: (Ex): {CT}x -> ({BL}x & ¬{DO}x) sent8: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: {DE}{aa} -> ({DG}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa})
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does promise Regency then that it savages adulterer and it does not mop is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Oklahoma then that it does savage cultism and is not a health is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it promises Regency hold then the fact that it savages adulterer and it mops is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a 1850s it is unlikely and it is successful. sent4: there is something such that if it is a paradiddle that it is part-time thing that does not erupt mealie is not right. sent5: if the oligosaccharide does promise Regency then it savages adulterer and it does not mop. sent6: there is something such that if it does recoup ani that it is a kind of a Lascar and it is archiepiscopal does not hold. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is indirect then it is octal and is not a Mullah is not false. sent8: if the fact that the oligosaccharide promises Regency is not incorrect then the fact that it savages adulterer and does not mop is not true. sent9: if the oligosaccharide is regenerate then it is a kind of Nilotic thing that does not savage adulterer. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the utensil is not a Lithocarpus or is not imitative or both.
|
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b})
|
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is illative a judge is wrong then the savarin is nonimitative. sent2: if something is not a wrester that it is illative and it is a kind of a judge is not true. sent3: if something is a Lithocarpus then it is monistic. sent4: everything is not a wrester. sent5: the Parisian is monistic. sent6: if the fact that the Parisian is monistic is not wrong it is a slingback. sent7: if there is something such that it is illative the fact that the Parisian is a judge that is not a slingback is incorrect. sent8: if the combustion is a kind of a wrester then the paleencephalon is not non-illative. sent9: if something is a kind of a slingback then it is a Lithocarpus. sent10: the utensil is not a Lithocarpus and/or it is imitative if the Parisian is a Lithocarpus.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}{hc} sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x & {E}x) sent3: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent4: (x): ¬{G}x sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent8: {G}{d} -> {F}{c} sent9: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent10: {C}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b})
|
[
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Parisian is a slingback is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: if the Parisian is a slingback then it is a Lithocarpus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Parisian is a Lithocarpus.;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent9 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a};"
] |
the savarin is a slingback.
|
{B}{hc}
|
[
"sent2 -> int4: if the utensil is not a wrester then the fact that it is illative and a judge is not right.; sent4 -> int5: the utensil is not a wrester.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the utensil is a kind of illative thing that is a judge is false.; int6 -> int7: there is nothing that is illative a judge.; int7 -> int8: that the Parisian is both not non-illative and a judge is not correct.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is illative and it is a judge is not right.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the savarin is not imitative.;"
] | 8 | 3 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the utensil is not a Lithocarpus or is not imitative or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is illative a judge is wrong then the savarin is nonimitative. sent2: if something is not a wrester that it is illative and it is a kind of a judge is not true. sent3: if something is a Lithocarpus then it is monistic. sent4: everything is not a wrester. sent5: the Parisian is monistic. sent6: if the fact that the Parisian is monistic is not wrong it is a slingback. sent7: if there is something such that it is illative the fact that the Parisian is a judge that is not a slingback is incorrect. sent8: if the combustion is a kind of a wrester then the paleencephalon is not non-illative. sent9: if something is a kind of a slingback then it is a Lithocarpus. sent10: the utensil is not a Lithocarpus and/or it is imitative if the Parisian is a Lithocarpus. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Parisian is a slingback is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: if the Parisian is a slingback then it is a Lithocarpus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Parisian is a Lithocarpus.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the conceiving does not occur.
|
¬{AB}
|
sent1: the Eucharisticness occurs but the conceiving does not occur if the lumbarness does not occur. sent2: the lumbarness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the conceiving occurs is not incorrect if the lumbarness occurs.
|
sent1: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬{A} sent3: {A} -> {AB}
|
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Eucharisticness but not the conceiving happens.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the conceiving happens.
|
{AB}
|
[] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the conceiving does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Eucharisticness occurs but the conceiving does not occur if the lumbarness does not occur. sent2: the lumbarness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the conceiving occurs is not incorrect if the lumbarness occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Eucharisticness but not the conceiving happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the tolerableness occurs.
|
{D}
|
sent1: the promising salesmanship happens if not the hypoglycemicness but the Timoreseness occurs. sent2: that the collect occurs and the promising salesmanship happens prevents that the tolerableness happens. sent3: the hypoglycemicness does not occur. sent4: if the automaticness occurs the collect happens. sent5: the automaticness occurs. sent6: if the movement does not occur then both the Timorese and the hypoglycemicness occurs. sent7: not the hypoglycemicness but the Timoreseness occurs.
|
sent1: (¬{F} & {E}) -> {C} sent2: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent3: ¬{F} sent4: {A} -> {B} sent5: {A} sent6: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent7: (¬{F} & {E})
|
[
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the collecting occurs.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the promising salesmanship happens is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the collecting and the promising salesmanship happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: {B}; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the tolerableness happens.
|
{D}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the tolerableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the promising salesmanship happens if not the hypoglycemicness but the Timoreseness occurs. sent2: that the collect occurs and the promising salesmanship happens prevents that the tolerableness happens. sent3: the hypoglycemicness does not occur. sent4: if the automaticness occurs the collect happens. sent5: the automaticness occurs. sent6: if the movement does not occur then both the Timorese and the hypoglycemicness occurs. sent7: not the hypoglycemicness but the Timoreseness occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the collecting occurs.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the promising salesmanship happens is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the collecting and the promising salesmanship happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that not the savaging follies but the unexpansiveness occurs does not hold.
|
¬(¬{AA} & {AB})
|
sent1: that the electroencephalographicness occurs is true. sent2: the lay does not occur. sent3: the frictionalness happens. sent4: the betterment does not occur. sent5: the fact that the savaging follies does not occur but the unexpansiveness happens is incorrect if the proposing does not occur. sent6: that the frictionalness happens is prevented by the savaging follies. sent7: the ready-made occurs. sent8: that the recouping usufructuary occurs and the recouping occurs does not hold. sent9: the chelonianness does not occur and the savaging blender happens. sent10: that that both the non-attritionalness and the hindrance happens is incorrect is correct. sent11: if that not the savaging follies but the unexpansiveness occurs is not correct then the frictionalness does not occur. sent12: if the proposing occurs the demolition does not occur and the erupting cerate happens. sent13: not the Slavonicness but the mimicry happens. sent14: the promising galax does not occur. sent15: that both the non-mildness and the ready-madeness occurs is not true. sent16: if the fact that the consequence does not occur but the recouping guided occurs is wrong then the dragging does not occur. sent17: that the overshooting does not occur is caused by the promising hop-picker. sent18: the unequalness does not occur. sent19: if the hindrance does not occur both the proposing and the frictionalness happens.
|
sent1: {FE} sent2: ¬{GF} sent3: {B} sent4: ¬{J} sent5: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent6: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent7: {AS} sent8: ¬({AJ} & {GO}) sent9: (¬{BA} & {FJ}) sent10: ¬(¬{GE} & {C}) sent11: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent12: {A} -> (¬{BR} & {BQ}) sent13: (¬{DC} & {M}) sent14: ¬{IJ} sent15: ¬(¬{FL} & {AS}) sent16: ¬(¬{HL} & {IB}) -> ¬{JF} sent17: {EA} -> ¬{BN} sent18: ¬{EU} sent19: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that that the savaging follies does not occur but the unexpansiveness happens is not false is not correct is not wrong.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the frictionalness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent11 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the savaging follies does not occur and the unexpansiveness occurs is not correct.
|
¬(¬{AA} & {AB})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the savaging follies but the unexpansiveness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the electroencephalographicness occurs is true. sent2: the lay does not occur. sent3: the frictionalness happens. sent4: the betterment does not occur. sent5: the fact that the savaging follies does not occur but the unexpansiveness happens is incorrect if the proposing does not occur. sent6: that the frictionalness happens is prevented by the savaging follies. sent7: the ready-made occurs. sent8: that the recouping usufructuary occurs and the recouping occurs does not hold. sent9: the chelonianness does not occur and the savaging blender happens. sent10: that that both the non-attritionalness and the hindrance happens is incorrect is correct. sent11: if that not the savaging follies but the unexpansiveness occurs is not correct then the frictionalness does not occur. sent12: if the proposing occurs the demolition does not occur and the erupting cerate happens. sent13: not the Slavonicness but the mimicry happens. sent14: the promising galax does not occur. sent15: that both the non-mildness and the ready-madeness occurs is not true. sent16: if the fact that the consequence does not occur but the recouping guided occurs is wrong then the dragging does not occur. sent17: that the overshooting does not occur is caused by the promising hop-picker. sent18: the unequalness does not occur. sent19: if the hindrance does not occur both the proposing and the frictionalness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that that the savaging follies does not occur but the unexpansiveness happens is not false is not correct is not wrong.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the frictionalness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the stammerer is unemployable.
|
{D}{a}
|
sent1: if the flowage is humanistic the discomycete is humanistic. sent2: the discomycete is a candytuft if it is humanistic. sent3: something is humanistic if it is both not a years and a feminist. sent4: that the flowage is not a strain hold. sent5: if something is unitary then it is a candytuft. sent6: something does not wail and is homiletics if it is not a strain. sent7: the stammerer is a tulle and unitary. sent8: if the flowage does not wail it is both not a years and a feminist. sent9: something is unemployable if it is a candytuft. sent10: that the microevolution is unitary and it is a tulle does not hold if there is something such that it is a candytuft.
|
sent1: {E}{d} -> {E}{c} sent2: {E}{c} -> {C}{c} sent3: (x): (¬{G}x & {F}x) -> {E}x sent4: ¬{J}{d} sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{H}x & {I}x) sent7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent8: ¬{H}{d} -> (¬{G}{d} & {F}{d}) sent9: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent10: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b})
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: the stammerer is not non-unitary.; sent5 -> int2: the stammerer is a candytuft if it is unitary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stammerer is a candytuft.; sent9 -> int4: if the stammerer is a candytuft it is unemployable.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a}; sent9 -> int4: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the stammerer is not unemployable.
|
¬{D}{a}
|
[
"sent3 -> int5: the flowage is humanistic if it is not a kind of a years and it is a feminist.; sent6 -> int6: the flowage does not wail but it is homiletics if it does not strain.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the flowage does not wail and is homiletics.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the flowage does not wail hold.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the flowage is not a years but it is a kind of a feminist.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the flowage is humanistic.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the discomycete is not non-humanistic hold.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the discomycete is a kind of a candytuft.; int12 -> int13: something is a candytuft.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the fact that the microevolution is unitary and it is a kind of a tulle is not true.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is unitary and it is a kind of a tulle does not hold.;"
] | 11 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the stammerer is unemployable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flowage is humanistic the discomycete is humanistic. sent2: the discomycete is a candytuft if it is humanistic. sent3: something is humanistic if it is both not a years and a feminist. sent4: that the flowage is not a strain hold. sent5: if something is unitary then it is a candytuft. sent6: something does not wail and is homiletics if it is not a strain. sent7: the stammerer is a tulle and unitary. sent8: if the flowage does not wail it is both not a years and a feminist. sent9: something is unemployable if it is a candytuft. sent10: that the microevolution is unitary and it is a tulle does not hold if there is something such that it is a candytuft. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: the stammerer is not non-unitary.; sent5 -> int2: the stammerer is a candytuft if it is unitary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stammerer is a candytuft.; sent9 -> int4: if the stammerer is a candytuft it is unemployable.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the cuckoopint is not a stunt.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: something is not a honkytonk if that it is a Webb but not a stunt is not correct. sent2: if the decentralization is a kind of a Webb then the pendant is not a Webb. sent3: the Parr is sacral. sent4: if something is not a honkytonk it is a frame and it is sacral. sent5: that the cuckoopint is a kind of a stunt is not wrong if the Spode is a honkytonk. sent6: if the antiperspirant is sacral then that the Spode is a honkytonk is right. sent7: the Spode is a kind of a honkytonk if the antiperspirant is a kind of a frame. sent8: if that the pendant is not sacral but a honkytonk is not correct the Spode does not stunt. sent9: the antiperspirant is a frame or it is sacral or both. sent10: that that something is a kind of non-sacral a honkytonk is not incorrect is not true if it is not a Webb.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent2: {E}{e} -> ¬{E}{d} sent3: {B}{ij} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: {C}{c} -> {D}{b} sent6: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} sent7: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent8: ¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent9: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) sent10: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x)
|
[
"sent9 & sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the Spode is a honkytonk.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent7 & sent6 -> int1: {C}{c}; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the whirler frames.
|
{A}{ak}
|
[
"sent4 -> int2: the whirler does frame and is sacral if the fact that it is not a honkytonk is true.; sent1 -> int3: the whirler is not a kind of a honkytonk if the fact that it is a kind of a Webb and does not stunt is incorrect.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the cuckoopint is not a stunt. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a honkytonk if that it is a Webb but not a stunt is not correct. sent2: if the decentralization is a kind of a Webb then the pendant is not a Webb. sent3: the Parr is sacral. sent4: if something is not a honkytonk it is a frame and it is sacral. sent5: that the cuckoopint is a kind of a stunt is not wrong if the Spode is a honkytonk. sent6: if the antiperspirant is sacral then that the Spode is a honkytonk is right. sent7: the Spode is a kind of a honkytonk if the antiperspirant is a kind of a frame. sent8: if that the pendant is not sacral but a honkytonk is not correct the Spode does not stunt. sent9: the antiperspirant is a frame or it is sacral or both. sent10: that that something is a kind of non-sacral a honkytonk is not incorrect is not true if it is not a Webb. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the Spode is a honkytonk.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the midgrass does erupt modesty and is coreferential.
|
({A}{a} & {B}{a})
|
sent1: the fact that something erupts modesty and is coreferential is not true if it is not a barker. sent2: the midgrass erupts modesty if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of chorionic thing that is not a loggerhead is not correct. sent3: everything does not promise go-getter. sent4: the midgrass erupts modesty if there is something such that it is not chorionic. sent5: the midgrass mediates and/or is a kind of a barker. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both chorionic and not a loggerhead is incorrect. sent7: the midgrass is coreferential if it does mediate. sent8: if the midgrass is a barker then it is coreferential.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent2: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{E}x sent4: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}{a} sent5: ({D}{a} v {C}{a}) sent6: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent7: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: {C}{a} -> {B}{a}
|
[
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the midgrass does erupt modesty hold.; sent5 & sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the midgrass is coreferential.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent5 & sent7 & sent8 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the midgrass does erupt modesty and it is coreferential does not hold.
|
¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})
|
[
"sent1 -> int3: that the midgrass does erupt modesty and it is coreferential is false if it is not a kind of a barker.; sent3 -> int4: the fact that the valency does not promise go-getter is true.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the midgrass does erupt modesty and is coreferential. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something erupts modesty and is coreferential is not true if it is not a barker. sent2: the midgrass erupts modesty if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of chorionic thing that is not a loggerhead is not correct. sent3: everything does not promise go-getter. sent4: the midgrass erupts modesty if there is something such that it is not chorionic. sent5: the midgrass mediates and/or is a kind of a barker. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both chorionic and not a loggerhead is incorrect. sent7: the midgrass is coreferential if it does mediate. sent8: if the midgrass is a barker then it is coreferential. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the midgrass does erupt modesty hold.; sent5 & sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the midgrass is coreferential.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the rig is a Pseudepigrapha.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: if that something is not a quadrennium and/or it is not cathodic is wrong then it is bolographic. sent2: the ozone is temperamental and it is a Roth. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not additive and/or does not recoup rig. sent4: the rig is not a Pseudepigrapha if the multi-billionaire savages chilblain. sent5: if the multi-billionaire is not a ritualist then the cattleship is a ritualist. sent6: something recoups Pictor if that it is not a intactness or it is not a colonization or both is not right. sent7: something is a Pseudepigrapha if the fact that it is not a command and/or is not a kind of a ritualist is not true. sent8: the rig is a cobblers. sent9: if the liturgist is not a Roth then the fact that the planarian is temperamental thing that does savage acerola is not correct. sent10: the uterus is not a toothpowder. sent11: that the idesia is not a command and/or it does not subject is incorrect. sent12: the terrorist is a command. sent13: if the uterus is not a kind of a toothpowder it does recoup Mohorovicic and it is a Eritrean. sent14: if that something does not recoup Togaviridae and/or does not savage Kauai is not true it is a waterskin. sent15: the multi-billionaire does not savage acerola if the fact that the fact that the planarian is temperamental and savage acerola is not wrong is not true. sent16: something savages chilblain if it does not savage acerola. sent17: the rig is a Pseudepigrapha if that either it commands or it is not a ritualist or both does not hold. sent18: if the fact that the Monsignor is not a kind of an ammonite and/or it is not a ritualist is false then it is a kind of an astronaut.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{DU}x v ¬{F}x) -> {CG}x sent2: ({E}{d} & {D}{d}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{BL}x v ¬{FA}x) sent4: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: ¬{AB}{a} -> {AB}{as} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{DM}x v ¬{AH}x) -> {AK}x sent7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent8: {AQ}{aa} sent9: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({E}{b} & {C}{b}) sent10: ¬{I}{e} sent11: ¬(¬{AA}{gs} v ¬{DI}{gs}) sent12: {AA}{ac} sent13: ¬{I}{e} -> ({G}{e} & {H}{e}) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{HC}x v ¬{BE}x) -> {CC}x sent15: ¬({E}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent16: (x): ¬{C}x -> {A}x sent17: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent18: ¬(¬{AS}{bi} v ¬{AB}{bi}) -> {FT}{bi}
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: if that the rig is not a command and/or is not a kind of a ritualist is not true then it is a Pseudepigrapha.;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
] |
the rig is not a Pseudepigrapha.
|
¬{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent16 -> int2: the multi-billionaire does savage chilblain if it does not savage acerola.; sent13 & sent10 -> int3: the uterus recoups Mohorovicic and is Eritrean.; int3 -> int4: the uterus does recoup Mohorovicic.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does recoup Mohorovicic.;"
] | 10 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the rig is a Pseudepigrapha. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a quadrennium and/or it is not cathodic is wrong then it is bolographic. sent2: the ozone is temperamental and it is a Roth. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not additive and/or does not recoup rig. sent4: the rig is not a Pseudepigrapha if the multi-billionaire savages chilblain. sent5: if the multi-billionaire is not a ritualist then the cattleship is a ritualist. sent6: something recoups Pictor if that it is not a intactness or it is not a colonization or both is not right. sent7: something is a Pseudepigrapha if the fact that it is not a command and/or is not a kind of a ritualist is not true. sent8: the rig is a cobblers. sent9: if the liturgist is not a Roth then the fact that the planarian is temperamental thing that does savage acerola is not correct. sent10: the uterus is not a toothpowder. sent11: that the idesia is not a command and/or it does not subject is incorrect. sent12: the terrorist is a command. sent13: if the uterus is not a kind of a toothpowder it does recoup Mohorovicic and it is a Eritrean. sent14: if that something does not recoup Togaviridae and/or does not savage Kauai is not true it is a waterskin. sent15: the multi-billionaire does not savage acerola if the fact that the fact that the planarian is temperamental and savage acerola is not wrong is not true. sent16: something savages chilblain if it does not savage acerola. sent17: the rig is a Pseudepigrapha if that either it commands or it is not a ritualist or both does not hold. sent18: if the fact that the Monsignor is not a kind of an ammonite and/or it is not a ritualist is false then it is a kind of an astronaut. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: if that the rig is not a command and/or is not a kind of a ritualist is not true then it is a Pseudepigrapha.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the phenomenon does not occur.
|
¬{F}
|
sent1: the deforestation is prevented by that the dorsiflexion happens and the alkaloticness occurs. sent2: the dorsiflexion occurs. sent3: the non-ischemicness and the tack occurs if the deforestation does not occur. sent4: the alkaloticness occurs.
|
sent1: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent2: {A} sent3: ¬{C} -> (¬{D} & {E}) sent4: {B}
|
[
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the dorsiflexion occurs and the alkaloticness happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the deforestation does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the non-ischemicness and the tacking occurs.;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent1 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C}; sent3 & int2 -> int3: (¬{D} & {E});"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the phenomenon does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the deforestation is prevented by that the dorsiflexion happens and the alkaloticness occurs. sent2: the dorsiflexion occurs. sent3: the non-ischemicness and the tack occurs if the deforestation does not occur. sent4: the alkaloticness occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the dorsiflexion occurs and the alkaloticness happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the deforestation does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the non-ischemicness and the tacking occurs.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if that it promises radio and is not publishable is false then it does not slack.
|
(Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does promise radio and is publishable is not true it is not a kind of a slacks. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not promise radio then it is not a slacks. sent3: if that the scheduler promises radio and it is not unpublishable does not hold then it is not a kind of a slacks. sent4: that the scheduler does not slack is right if it does not promise radio. sent5: there exists something such that if it promises radio and it is not publishable then it is not a slacks. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a facilitation and current does not hold then it is not a gob. sent7: if that the scheduler is publishable but it is not a gyneolatry is not true then it does not savage spirometer. sent8: if the fact that the scheduler promises radio and is unpublishable is not correct it is not a kind of a slacks. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does promise radio and it is unpublishable does not hold it does slack. sent10: the scheduler is not a kind of a slacks if it does promise radio and is not publishable. sent11: if that something is a sorcerer and is not surface-to-air is false then it does not promise radio. sent12: there is something such that if it is publishable it is not a kind of a slacks. sent13: if the fact that the scheduler does promise radio but it is not publishable is not true it is a slacks.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: (Ex): ¬({HL}x & ¬{IK}x) -> ¬{AT}x sent7: ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{EM}{aa}) -> ¬{P}{aa} sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent11: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent12: (Ex): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent13: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the round does not promise radio if that it is a sorcerer and it is not surface-to-air is not correct.
|
¬({D}{cm} & ¬{L}{cm}) -> ¬{AA}{cm}
|
[
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it promises radio and is not publishable is false then it does not slack. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does promise radio and is publishable is not true it is not a kind of a slacks. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not promise radio then it is not a slacks. sent3: if that the scheduler promises radio and it is not unpublishable does not hold then it is not a kind of a slacks. sent4: that the scheduler does not slack is right if it does not promise radio. sent5: there exists something such that if it promises radio and it is not publishable then it is not a slacks. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a facilitation and current does not hold then it is not a gob. sent7: if that the scheduler is publishable but it is not a gyneolatry is not true then it does not savage spirometer. sent8: if the fact that the scheduler promises radio and is unpublishable is not correct it is not a kind of a slacks. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does promise radio and it is unpublishable does not hold it does slack. sent10: the scheduler is not a kind of a slacks if it does promise radio and is not publishable. sent11: if that something is a sorcerer and is not surface-to-air is false then it does not promise radio. sent12: there is something such that if it is publishable it is not a kind of a slacks. sent13: if the fact that the scheduler does promise radio but it is not publishable is not true it is a slacks. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the attention occurs.
|
{D}
|
sent1: the fact that the recouping ambassadress does not occur but the savaging masseur happens is not right if that the fatalness occurs is not false. sent2: if the recouping ambassadress happens then the attention does not occur and the savaging masseur does not occur. sent3: the celebration occurs and the recouping ambassadress happens. sent4: the savaging masseur does not occur. sent5: that the attention does not occur is prevented by that the celebration does not occur.
|
sent1: {E} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) sent2: {B} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent3: ({A} & {B}) sent4: ¬{C} sent5: ¬{A} -> {D}
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: the recouping ambassadress happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the attention does not occur and the savaging masseur does not occur.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: {B}; sent2 & int1 -> int2: (¬{D} & ¬{C}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the attention occurs.
|
{D}
|
[] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the attention occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the recouping ambassadress does not occur but the savaging masseur happens is not right if that the fatalness occurs is not false. sent2: if the recouping ambassadress happens then the attention does not occur and the savaging masseur does not occur. sent3: the celebration occurs and the recouping ambassadress happens. sent4: the savaging masseur does not occur. sent5: that the attention does not occur is prevented by that the celebration does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: the recouping ambassadress happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the attention does not occur and the savaging masseur does not occur.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it does not recoup telescope and does not savage papain it is unimpressive is not correct.
|
¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: that there exists something such that if it is not a caparisoned and it is not unorthodox then it is a kind of a seeded is not false. sent2: the serow is corrigible if it does not savage papain and is a clavier. sent3: the serow does erupt paleographer if it is not a stentor and is not counterclockwise. sent4: that that the serow is not an extension is not right is right if it determines and does not follow. sent5: there is something such that if it is not residuary and it is not a kind of a clavier it savages Gershwin. sent6: there exists something such that if it does rip and it does not follow it is a kind of a Ephesian. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Hejaz and is not a pier then it is a mauve. sent8: the serow is unimpressive if it does erupt bodied and it does not savage Gershwin. sent9: if the serow does not recoup telescope and does not savage papain it is unimpressive. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a subsumption and it is not nonpregnant then it is a Heteromyidae. sent11: if the serow is not a Chamaemelum and is not unimpressive then it is a kind of a splitsville. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a chamosite and not a Heteromyidae is right then it erupts inclemency. sent13: if the cattleship does not savage deuteron and it is not obligatory it recoups telescope. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a Helichrysum does not recoup telescope then it is neonatal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is barometric and it does not recoup semifluidity then it is a Brazzaville. sent16: there is something such that if it does not erupt Amberboa and is Moravian then it does caparison.
|
sent1: (Ex): (¬{CM}x & ¬{FR}x) -> {BS}x sent2: (¬{AB}{aa} & {BG}{aa}) -> {AN}{aa} sent3: (¬{ES}{aa} & ¬{JK}{aa}) -> {AJ}{aa} sent4: ({DN}{aa} & ¬{IU}{aa}) -> {GK}{aa} sent5: (Ex): (¬{EK}x & ¬{BG}x) -> {BK}x sent6: (Ex): ({E}x & ¬{IU}x) -> {BF}x sent7: (Ex): (¬{CO}x & ¬{EO}x) -> {DL}x sent8: ({A}{aa} & ¬{BK}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({Q}x & ¬{AS}x) -> {K}x sent11: (¬{AE}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> {DG}{aa} sent12: (Ex): (¬{AQ}x & ¬{K}x) -> {BC}x sent13: (¬{GC}{bo} & ¬{BO}{bo}) -> {AA}{bo} sent14: (x): (¬{CG}x & ¬{AA}x) -> {EG}x sent15: (Ex): ({ID}x & ¬{CB}x) -> {JC}x sent16: (Ex): (¬{FK}x & {CR}x) -> {CM}x
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if the paleographer is not a Helichrysum and it does not recoup telescope it is neonatal.
|
(¬{CG}{di} & ¬{AA}{di}) -> {EG}{di}
|
[
"sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not recoup telescope and does not savage papain it is unimpressive is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that if it is not a caparisoned and it is not unorthodox then it is a kind of a seeded is not false. sent2: the serow is corrigible if it does not savage papain and is a clavier. sent3: the serow does erupt paleographer if it is not a stentor and is not counterclockwise. sent4: that that the serow is not an extension is not right is right if it determines and does not follow. sent5: there is something such that if it is not residuary and it is not a kind of a clavier it savages Gershwin. sent6: there exists something such that if it does rip and it does not follow it is a kind of a Ephesian. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Hejaz and is not a pier then it is a mauve. sent8: the serow is unimpressive if it does erupt bodied and it does not savage Gershwin. sent9: if the serow does not recoup telescope and does not savage papain it is unimpressive. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a subsumption and it is not nonpregnant then it is a Heteromyidae. sent11: if the serow is not a Chamaemelum and is not unimpressive then it is a kind of a splitsville. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a chamosite and not a Heteromyidae is right then it erupts inclemency. sent13: if the cattleship does not savage deuteron and it is not obligatory it recoups telescope. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a Helichrysum does not recoup telescope then it is neonatal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is barometric and it does not recoup semifluidity then it is a Brazzaville. sent16: there is something such that if it does not erupt Amberboa and is Moravian then it does caparison. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the sunlamp does not skittle.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a diphenylhydantoin if there exists something such that it is an orphan. sent2: the sunlamp is not a diphenylhydantoin if there is something such that it does skittle. sent3: the athlete does horripilate and it lumps. sent4: the cytoskeleton is an orphan. sent5: the sunlamp does not skittle if the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a diphenylhydantoin. sent6: if the sunlamp promises disentangler and it is an orphan then the cytoskeleton does not skittle. sent7: there is something such that that it does promise disentangler hold. sent8: the cytoskeleton does not promise disentangler. sent9: there exists something such that it is neural. sent10: that the grist does not recoup Balboa and it does not promise telescope does not hold if the athlete horripilates. sent11: the sunlamp does skittle if the arrival is an orphan.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ({G}{e} & {H}{e}) sent4: {A}{aa} sent5: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent6: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{D}{aa} sent7: (Ex): {B}x sent8: ¬{B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): {AI}x sent10: {G}{e} -> ¬(¬{E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent11: {A}{a} -> {D}{b}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: there is something such that it does orphan.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a kind of a diphenylhydantoin.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: (Ex): {A}x; int1 & sent1 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the sunlamp skittles.
|
{D}{b}
|
[
"sent3 -> int3: the athlete horripilates.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the grist does not recoup Balboa and does not promise telescope is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not recoup Balboa and it does not promise telescope is false.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the sunlamp does not skittle. ; $context$ = sent1: the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a diphenylhydantoin if there exists something such that it is an orphan. sent2: the sunlamp is not a diphenylhydantoin if there is something such that it does skittle. sent3: the athlete does horripilate and it lumps. sent4: the cytoskeleton is an orphan. sent5: the sunlamp does not skittle if the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a diphenylhydantoin. sent6: if the sunlamp promises disentangler and it is an orphan then the cytoskeleton does not skittle. sent7: there is something such that that it does promise disentangler hold. sent8: the cytoskeleton does not promise disentangler. sent9: there exists something such that it is neural. sent10: that the grist does not recoup Balboa and it does not promise telescope does not hold if the athlete horripilates. sent11: the sunlamp does skittle if the arrival is an orphan. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: there is something such that it does orphan.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the arrival does not promise disentangler and is a kind of a diphenylhydantoin.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it is bipedal and not aeromedical it does not savage acerola does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: if the brave is not non-Olympian but it is not a hotchpotch then it is not dogmatic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both bipedal and not aeromedical that it does savage acerola hold. sent3: if the brave is bipedal but it is not aeromedical then it savages acerola. sent4: if something is a Athenian that is inaccessible then it is not usual. sent5: if the brave is bipedal and is not aeromedical then it does not savage acerola. sent6: if the brave is Puranic and it is a kind of an enzyme then the fact that it is not arthromeric is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kibbutznik and is not female the fact that it is not a cardiopathy is true. sent8: there is something such that if it is both bipedal and aeromedical it does not savage acerola.
|
sent1: ({HK}{aa} & ¬{BS}{aa}) -> ¬{CF}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: (x): ({FK}x & ¬{HA}x) -> ¬{CG}x sent5: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: ({IU}{aa} & {HJ}{aa}) -> ¬{DD}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ({IT}x & ¬{DN}x) -> ¬{BU}x sent8: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if the brave is a Athenian that is inaccessible it is not usual.
|
({FK}{aa} & ¬{HA}{aa}) -> ¬{CG}{aa}
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is bipedal and not aeromedical it does not savage acerola does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brave is not non-Olympian but it is not a hotchpotch then it is not dogmatic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both bipedal and not aeromedical that it does savage acerola hold. sent3: if the brave is bipedal but it is not aeromedical then it savages acerola. sent4: if something is a Athenian that is inaccessible then it is not usual. sent5: if the brave is bipedal and is not aeromedical then it does not savage acerola. sent6: if the brave is Puranic and it is a kind of an enzyme then the fact that it is not arthromeric is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kibbutznik and is not female the fact that it is not a cardiopathy is true. sent8: there is something such that if it is both bipedal and aeromedical it does not savage acerola. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the nicotine does not erupt Park.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: that the nicotine erupts Park is not incorrect if the reactionary is a nibbed. sent2: something is a adventuress and it is covalent if it does not recoup ravine. sent3: something is not a decoration if it does not savage chilblain or it is asteroidal or both. sent4: if the reactionary is a adventuress then that the shellflower either does not savage chilblain or is not non-asteroidal or both is not false. sent5: if there is something such that that that it does erupt Park and it is not a kind of a skedaddle hold does not hold the nicotine is not non-vulvar. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is an amphibole and does not savage hypothermia is false then the reactionary is a kind of a nibbed. sent7: there exists something such that it is an amphibole and it does not savage hypothermia. sent8: that the reactionary is a nibbed and/or is a decoration does not hold if it does not savage chilblain. sent9: there is something such that that it is an amphibole and does not savage hypothermia is not true. sent10: the reactionary is a adventuress if the nicotine is a adventuress. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not copular and it recoups ravine is incorrect. sent12: something is a kind of a nibbed and does erupt Park if it is not a kind of a decoration. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a neuter that does not recoup blackout is not true the jugale is a Leucadendron.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) sent3: (x): (¬{D}x v {E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent4: {F}{a} -> (¬{D}{jd} v {E}{jd}) sent5: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{AQ}x) -> {HQ}{b} sent6: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} v {C}{a}) sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: {F}{b} -> {F}{a} sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{J}x & {H}x) sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent13: (x): ¬({FQ}x & ¬{GQ}x) -> {CI}{hi}
|
[
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the reactionary is a kind of a nibbed.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the shellflower is a nibbed.
|
{A}{jd}
|
[
"sent12 -> int2: the shellflower is a kind of a nibbed and it erupts Park if it is not a decoration.; sent3 -> int3: if the shellflower does not savage chilblain and/or is asteroidal it is not a decoration.; sent2 -> int4: the nicotine is a adventuress and is covalent if it does not recoup ravine.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the nicotine does not erupt Park. ; $context$ = sent1: that the nicotine erupts Park is not incorrect if the reactionary is a nibbed. sent2: something is a adventuress and it is covalent if it does not recoup ravine. sent3: something is not a decoration if it does not savage chilblain or it is asteroidal or both. sent4: if the reactionary is a adventuress then that the shellflower either does not savage chilblain or is not non-asteroidal or both is not false. sent5: if there is something such that that that it does erupt Park and it is not a kind of a skedaddle hold does not hold the nicotine is not non-vulvar. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is an amphibole and does not savage hypothermia is false then the reactionary is a kind of a nibbed. sent7: there exists something such that it is an amphibole and it does not savage hypothermia. sent8: that the reactionary is a nibbed and/or is a decoration does not hold if it does not savage chilblain. sent9: there is something such that that it is an amphibole and does not savage hypothermia is not true. sent10: the reactionary is a adventuress if the nicotine is a adventuress. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not copular and it recoups ravine is incorrect. sent12: something is a kind of a nibbed and does erupt Park if it is not a kind of a decoration. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a neuter that does not recoup blackout is not true the jugale is a Leucadendron. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the reactionary is a kind of a nibbed.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the archdiocesanness occurs is not false.
|
{B}
|
sent1: that the pharmacologicalness happens and the rheologicness happens does not hold. sent2: the archdiocesanness does not occur if the recouping shackle does not occur. sent3: the stylization does not occur if that both the deficientness and the savaging Photostat happens does not hold. sent4: the apteralness does not occur. sent5: the non-myrmecophyticness results in that the erupting slice does not occur. sent6: that the Gaboneseness does not occur is correct. sent7: if the savaging oxtail does not occur the archdiocesanness happens and the Gabonese happens. sent8: if the fact that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is wrong the fact that the archdiocesanness does not occur is correct. sent9: that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is not correct if the Gabonese does not occur. sent10: the purposing does not occur. sent11: that the layout occurs and the recouping funeral occurs is not correct if the apiarianness does not occur. sent12: if the erupting slice does not occur and the tastefulness does not occur then the savaging oxtail does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬({IA} & {EO}) sent2: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} sent3: ¬({FJ} & {EG}) -> ¬{CT} sent4: ¬{DH} sent5: ¬{H} -> ¬{E} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) sent8: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent10: ¬{JI} sent11: ¬{BQ} -> ¬({GT} & {FF}) sent12: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C}
|
[
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is incorrect hold.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: ¬({AA} & {AB}); sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the pharmacologicalness happens and the rheologicness happens does not hold.
|
¬({IA} & {EO})
|
[
" -> hypothesis;"
] | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that the archdiocesanness occurs is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pharmacologicalness happens and the rheologicness happens does not hold. sent2: the archdiocesanness does not occur if the recouping shackle does not occur. sent3: the stylization does not occur if that both the deficientness and the savaging Photostat happens does not hold. sent4: the apteralness does not occur. sent5: the non-myrmecophyticness results in that the erupting slice does not occur. sent6: that the Gaboneseness does not occur is correct. sent7: if the savaging oxtail does not occur the archdiocesanness happens and the Gabonese happens. sent8: if the fact that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is wrong the fact that the archdiocesanness does not occur is correct. sent9: that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is not correct if the Gabonese does not occur. sent10: the purposing does not occur. sent11: that the layout occurs and the recouping funeral occurs is not correct if the apiarianness does not occur. sent12: if the erupting slice does not occur and the tastefulness does not occur then the savaging oxtail does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the cucurbitaceousness and the recouping shackle occurs is incorrect hold.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the periodontist is not a color is correct.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
sent1: there is nothing such that it is Romany thing that is a kind of a giro. sent2: if that something is non-wetting a Syrian is wrong then it does promise spike. sent3: if the beverage is non-literal or it is not a color or both the toggle is not a color. sent4: if the drey is not ossiferous the toggle savages go-getter. sent5: the periodontist is not a kind of a giro if it does color. sent6: if the beverage is not wetting then the fact that the toggle is not Syrian and is literal is not right. sent7: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Romany and it is not a kind of a giro. sent8: the periodontist is not a kind of a giro. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-wetting thing that is a Syrian is not right if it savages go-getter. sent10: the beverage is not literal and/or it is not a color if it does savage calligrapher. sent11: if the fact that the toggle is not Syrian but it is literal is incorrect the periodontist is not Syrian. sent12: there exists nothing that is a kind of a giro that is not a color. sent13: the fact that the periodontist is a kind of a Romany and it is a giro does not hold. sent14: the numerologist colors. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the call-in does savage calligrapher and is not a Hymen is not false is incorrect then the beverage savage calligrapher. sent16: the fact that something savages calligrapher and is not a kind of a Hymen is not correct if it does not promise internship. sent17: something that is not a Syrian is a kind of color thing that does promise spike. sent18: the periodontist is a Romany and is not a giro if it does color. sent19: the drey is not ossiferous. sent20: the fact that the call-in is not non-wetting and it savages go-getter is false if it does not savage calligrapher.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) -> {B}x sent3: (¬{E}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent4: ¬{J}{e} -> {F}{b} sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent6: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: ¬{AB}{a} sent9: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) sent10: {G}{c} -> (¬{E}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) sent11: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: (x): ¬({AB}x & ¬{A}x) sent13: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent14: {A}{eb} sent15: ¬({G}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> {G}{c} sent16: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{I}x) sent17: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent18: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent19: ¬{J}{e} sent20: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬({D}{d} & {F}{d})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the periodontist is a kind of a color.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the periodontist is Romany but it is not a giro.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the periodontist is both not non-Romany and not a giro is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent7 -> int2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the periodontist savages xenotransplant.
|
{JI}{a}
|
[
"sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the toggle is non-wetting but it is a Syrian is not correct it does promise spike.; sent9 -> int5: that the toggle does not wet but it is a Syrian does not hold if it savages go-getter.; sent4 & sent19 -> int6: the toggle savages go-getter.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that that the toggle does not wet but it is Syrian is true is false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the toggle promises spike.; sent16 -> int9: the fact that the call-in savages calligrapher but it is not a Hymen does not hold if it does not promise internship.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the periodontist is not a color is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is Romany thing that is a kind of a giro. sent2: if that something is non-wetting a Syrian is wrong then it does promise spike. sent3: if the beverage is non-literal or it is not a color or both the toggle is not a color. sent4: if the drey is not ossiferous the toggle savages go-getter. sent5: the periodontist is not a kind of a giro if it does color. sent6: if the beverage is not wetting then the fact that the toggle is not Syrian and is literal is not right. sent7: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Romany and it is not a kind of a giro. sent8: the periodontist is not a kind of a giro. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-wetting thing that is a Syrian is not right if it savages go-getter. sent10: the beverage is not literal and/or it is not a color if it does savage calligrapher. sent11: if the fact that the toggle is not Syrian but it is literal is incorrect the periodontist is not Syrian. sent12: there exists nothing that is a kind of a giro that is not a color. sent13: the fact that the periodontist is a kind of a Romany and it is a giro does not hold. sent14: the numerologist colors. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the call-in does savage calligrapher and is not a Hymen is not false is incorrect then the beverage savage calligrapher. sent16: the fact that something savages calligrapher and is not a kind of a Hymen is not correct if it does not promise internship. sent17: something that is not a Syrian is a kind of color thing that does promise spike. sent18: the periodontist is a Romany and is not a giro if it does color. sent19: the drey is not ossiferous. sent20: the fact that the call-in is not non-wetting and it savages go-getter is false if it does not savage calligrapher. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the periodontist is a kind of a color.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the periodontist is Romany but it is not a giro.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the periodontist is both not non-Romany and not a giro is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the soap is not a kind of a delavirdine and is legless does not hold.
|
¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c})
|
sent1: the soap is not a kind of a delavirdine and is legless if the pass is not legless. sent2: the fact that the Republican is a Chelyabinsk and it is a Ellington is not true. sent3: that the pass is legless thing that is a kind of a care is wrong if the sporozoite is not a lwei. sent4: the Juneberry is a care. sent5: if the Juneberry is a kind of a care the fact that it is not usual but a picovolt does not hold. sent6: if the Juneberry is usual that the fact that it is a kind of a care and it is legless hold is not right. sent7: the pass is not legless if the fact that the Juneberry is not usual but a picovolt is not right.
|
sent1: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) sent2: ¬({FC}{aa} & {BT}{aa}) sent3: ¬{C}{d} -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent6: {AA}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}
|
[
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the Juneberry is not usual but it is a picovolt is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the pass is not legless is not false.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 & sent7 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the soap is not a delavirdine but legless is wrong.
|
¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the soap is not a kind of a delavirdine and is legless does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the soap is not a kind of a delavirdine and is legless if the pass is not legless. sent2: the fact that the Republican is a Chelyabinsk and it is a Ellington is not true. sent3: that the pass is legless thing that is a kind of a care is wrong if the sporozoite is not a lwei. sent4: the Juneberry is a care. sent5: if the Juneberry is a kind of a care the fact that it is not usual but a picovolt does not hold. sent6: if the Juneberry is usual that the fact that it is a kind of a care and it is legless hold is not right. sent7: the pass is not legless if the fact that the Juneberry is not usual but a picovolt is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the Juneberry is not usual but it is a picovolt is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the pass is not legless is not false.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Nyala is not Kiplingesque.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: something is not an alcoholic if it is not a get. sent2: the warehouse is a Aphididae and it is a kind of a tautology if it does not recoup alienage. sent3: if that the warehouse is a get but it is not a Epictetus does not hold then it is not a get. sent4: the curmudgeon is a cylindricality. sent5: the Nyala is Kiplingesque if a Neva is a kind of a cylindricality. sent6: the curmudgeon is a Neva. sent7: the fact that the warehouse is a get but it is not a Epictetus is not right if it is weightless. sent8: if the fact that something savages curmudgeon but it is not weightless is not true then it is weightless. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a cylindricality. sent10: if something is a tautology that that it does savage curmudgeon and it is not weightless hold is false. sent11: if something that is not a Neva is a cylindricality then it is not Kiplingesque. sent12: if the warehouse is not an alcoholic then the sustenance does not recoup cannabin and it does not golf. sent13: the Nyala is not a Neva but it is a kind of a cylindricality if the curmudgeon is not a kind of a Neophron. sent14: the warehouse does not recoup alienage. sent15: the ethernet is a Neva if something is a Neva and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent16: the fact that something is Kiplingesque is correct if that it is not a Neophron and it does golf is not right.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬{G}x sent2: ¬{N}{d} -> ({M}{d} & {K}{d}) sent3: ¬({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{d} sent4: {B}{a} sent5: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{b} sent6: {A}{a} sent7: {I}{d} -> ¬({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) sent8: (x): ¬({L}x & ¬{I}x) -> {I}x sent9: (Ex): {B}x sent10: (x): {K}x -> ¬({L}x & ¬{I}x) sent11: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: ¬{G}{d} -> (¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent13: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent14: ¬{N}{d} sent15: (x): ({A}x v {C}x) -> {A}{fk} sent16: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {C}x
|
[
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the curmudgeon is a Neva and it is a cylindricality.; int1 -> int2: something is a Neva and it is a cylindricality.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the ethernet is a cylindricality.
|
{B}{fk}
|
[
"sent16 -> int3: if that the curmudgeon is not a kind of a Neophron but it is a golf is not correct it is Kiplingesque.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Nyala is not Kiplingesque. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an alcoholic if it is not a get. sent2: the warehouse is a Aphididae and it is a kind of a tautology if it does not recoup alienage. sent3: if that the warehouse is a get but it is not a Epictetus does not hold then it is not a get. sent4: the curmudgeon is a cylindricality. sent5: the Nyala is Kiplingesque if a Neva is a kind of a cylindricality. sent6: the curmudgeon is a Neva. sent7: the fact that the warehouse is a get but it is not a Epictetus is not right if it is weightless. sent8: if the fact that something savages curmudgeon but it is not weightless is not true then it is weightless. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a cylindricality. sent10: if something is a tautology that that it does savage curmudgeon and it is not weightless hold is false. sent11: if something that is not a Neva is a cylindricality then it is not Kiplingesque. sent12: if the warehouse is not an alcoholic then the sustenance does not recoup cannabin and it does not golf. sent13: the Nyala is not a Neva but it is a kind of a cylindricality if the curmudgeon is not a kind of a Neophron. sent14: the warehouse does not recoup alienage. sent15: the ethernet is a Neva if something is a Neva and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent16: the fact that something is Kiplingesque is correct if that it is not a Neophron and it does golf is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the curmudgeon is a Neva and it is a cylindricality.; int1 -> int2: something is a Neva and it is a cylindricality.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the smorgasbord promises microfilm is right.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sassaby and it recoups crowd is not right then the smorgasbord is not an investment. sent2: the bobwhite recoups crowd if it is a parsley. sent3: something is not a boyfriend but it is a kind of a OPV. sent4: if something is not biochemical then the fact that it is not dipterous and it is a Lysichiton does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the smorgasbord is not a centesimo is correct it does promise microfilm. sent6: something is empyrean if that it is not a cholinesterase and is dumpy is not true. sent7: if something is not a kind of an investment then the fact that it is a kind of non-different a centesimo is not correct. sent8: if the smorgasbord does not miss that it does not savage bobwhite and it is not non-microeconomics is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a pasture that savages hoydenism does not hold. sent10: if something does recoup crowd then it is a kind of an investment. sent11: the comforts is a kind of an investment. sent12: something does not promise microfilm if that it is not an investment and is a kind of a sassaby does not hold. sent13: if there is something such that it is a sassaby the smorgasbord is not an investment. sent14: something promises microfilm if that it is both not different and a centesimo is not right.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent2: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (Ex): (¬{EE}x & {GK}x) sent4: (x): ¬{EU}x -> ¬(¬{CB}x & {GM}x) sent5: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{GI}x & {GQ}x) -> {HI}x sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: ¬{IB}{aa} -> ¬(¬{HJ}{aa} & {IM}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): ¬({FE}x & {GT}x) sent10: (x): {D}x -> {A}x sent11: {A}{bn} sent12: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent13: (x): {C}x -> ¬{A}{aa} sent14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: the fact that the smorgasbord is not different but a centesimo is not correct if it is not an investment.; sent14 -> int2: the smorgasbord promises microfilm if the fact that it is not different but a centesimo is wrong.;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent14 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
] |
the Mecca is empyrean if that it is not a cholinesterase and is dumpy is not correct.
|
¬(¬{GI}{eg} & {GQ}{eg}) -> {HI}{eg}
|
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the smorgasbord promises microfilm is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sassaby and it recoups crowd is not right then the smorgasbord is not an investment. sent2: the bobwhite recoups crowd if it is a parsley. sent3: something is not a boyfriend but it is a kind of a OPV. sent4: if something is not biochemical then the fact that it is not dipterous and it is a Lysichiton does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the smorgasbord is not a centesimo is correct it does promise microfilm. sent6: something is empyrean if that it is not a cholinesterase and is dumpy is not true. sent7: if something is not a kind of an investment then the fact that it is a kind of non-different a centesimo is not correct. sent8: if the smorgasbord does not miss that it does not savage bobwhite and it is not non-microeconomics is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a pasture that savages hoydenism does not hold. sent10: if something does recoup crowd then it is a kind of an investment. sent11: the comforts is a kind of an investment. sent12: something does not promise microfilm if that it is not an investment and is a kind of a sassaby does not hold. sent13: if there is something such that it is a sassaby the smorgasbord is not an investment. sent14: something promises microfilm if that it is both not different and a centesimo is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the smorgasbord is not different but a centesimo is not correct if it is not an investment.; sent14 -> int2: the smorgasbord promises microfilm if the fact that it is not different but a centesimo is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the schoolboy is vulvar.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: if that something does not promise northland and is vulvar does not hold then it is not vulvar. sent2: if a non-vulvar thing is not reputable then that it is a circularization hold. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not a commonality and it does promise Marche. sent4: that the opiate is both not a miscount and not alcoholic is not correct if the headman is not paleoanthropological. sent5: if something is a miscount then it is reputable. sent6: something is not paleoanthropological if the fact that it is not a rockcress and does not promise legislature is false. sent7: if the opiate promises northland then the cigarfish is non-vulvar and not reputable. sent8: if something is not reputable then it is a circularization. sent9: the shade does not erupt Erasmus. sent10: if that the schoolboy is both not a liquidation and a circularization is not right then it is a breach. sent11: that the fact that the precipitant is not a yardie but a wurtzite is correct is not correct. sent12: if that something is not a miscount and is not alcoholic is not correct it is a miscount. sent13: if the fact that something is not a swatter but it is a circularization does not hold then it is vulvar. sent14: the fact that the headman is not a rockcress and does not promise legislature is wrong if the shade does not erupt Erasmus. sent15: the fact that the schoolboy is not vulvar but it is a casting is wrong. sent16: the opiate is an alcoholic and is a miscount. sent17: there is nothing such that it is both not a swatter and a circularization. sent18: there exists nothing that does not recoup pinfold and admonishes. sent19: the schoolboy is vulvar if it is not a kind of a circularization. sent20: the opiate is a kind of a miscount or is an alcoholic or both if the headman is not paleoanthropological. sent21: if something is not a circularization then the fact that it is vulvar is correct.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AB}x sent3: (x): ¬(¬{DS}x & {FN}x) sent4: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent5: (x): {D}x -> {A}x sent6: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{F}x sent7: {C}{a} -> (¬{B}{hp} & ¬{A}{hp}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent9: ¬{I}{c} sent10: ¬(¬{EO}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {GP}{aa} sent11: ¬(¬{GM}{eg} & {FU}{eg}) sent12: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent14: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent15: ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {Q}{aa}) sent16: ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent17: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent18: (x): ¬(¬{FB}x & {CQ}x) sent19: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent20: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} v {E}{a}) sent21: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: if that the schoolboy is not a swatter and is a circularization is not true the fact that it is vulvar is not false.; sent17 -> int2: that the schoolboy is not a swatter but it is a kind of a circularization is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent17 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the rensselaerite is a kind of a circularization.
|
{AB}{fa}
|
[
"sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the rensselaerite is not reputable is not wrong it is a circularization.; sent16 -> int4: the opiate does miscount.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the schoolboy is vulvar. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not promise northland and is vulvar does not hold then it is not vulvar. sent2: if a non-vulvar thing is not reputable then that it is a circularization hold. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not a commonality and it does promise Marche. sent4: that the opiate is both not a miscount and not alcoholic is not correct if the headman is not paleoanthropological. sent5: if something is a miscount then it is reputable. sent6: something is not paleoanthropological if the fact that it is not a rockcress and does not promise legislature is false. sent7: if the opiate promises northland then the cigarfish is non-vulvar and not reputable. sent8: if something is not reputable then it is a circularization. sent9: the shade does not erupt Erasmus. sent10: if that the schoolboy is both not a liquidation and a circularization is not right then it is a breach. sent11: that the fact that the precipitant is not a yardie but a wurtzite is correct is not correct. sent12: if that something is not a miscount and is not alcoholic is not correct it is a miscount. sent13: if the fact that something is not a swatter but it is a circularization does not hold then it is vulvar. sent14: the fact that the headman is not a rockcress and does not promise legislature is wrong if the shade does not erupt Erasmus. sent15: the fact that the schoolboy is not vulvar but it is a casting is wrong. sent16: the opiate is an alcoholic and is a miscount. sent17: there is nothing such that it is both not a swatter and a circularization. sent18: there exists nothing that does not recoup pinfold and admonishes. sent19: the schoolboy is vulvar if it is not a kind of a circularization. sent20: the opiate is a kind of a miscount or is an alcoholic or both if the headman is not paleoanthropological. sent21: if something is not a circularization then the fact that it is vulvar is correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: if that the schoolboy is not a swatter and is a circularization is not true the fact that it is vulvar is not false.; sent17 -> int2: that the schoolboy is not a swatter but it is a kind of a circularization is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is not an elan and it is not a dragoman is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a sip then it does not savage hygrometer. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not promise programmer hold it is not an elan and is a dragoman. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not maxillodental then it does not recoup crackdown. sent4: if the fact that the hygrometer is not a Metroxylon is correct it is not a nuance and it promises programmer. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not credible then it is not flexible. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is not a dragoman. sent7: the hygrometer is not an elan and it is not a kind of a dragoman if the fact that it does not promise programmer hold. sent8: if the hygrometer is not a shark it is not uricosuric and it is a gelechiid. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Heyerdahl then it is not bionic. sent10: there is something such that if it is not profaned then it is not a strangeness. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a defibrillator it does promise swordfish and is not a kind of a slur. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a Buffalo then it is a strafe but not an undercut. sent13: the hygrometer does not erupt noddle and is not a kind of an ache if it is a dragoman. sent14: there is something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is an elan and it is not a dragoman. sent15: there is something such that if it pleaches then it is a kind of non-abasic thing that is not a right. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not right it is a mend that is not a unpointedness. sent17: the hygrometer is not an elan but it is a kind of a dragoman if it does not promise programmer. sent18: there exists something such that if it promises programmer it is not a kind of an elan and is not a dragoman. sent19: if the hygrometer does not promise programmer then it is non-innocuous thing that is not a defibrillator. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a strangeness it is monotheistic and it is not a Heyerdahl.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{CA}x -> ¬{EH}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬{BN}x -> ¬{DK}x sent4: ¬{FD}{aa} -> (¬{FO}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{BE}x -> ¬{DL}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent7: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent8: ¬{GH}{aa} -> (¬{DF}{aa} & {HH}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): ¬{HB}x -> ¬{GR}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{IO}x -> ¬{L}x sent11: (Ex): ¬{AP}x -> ({IA}x & ¬{DI}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬{CJ}x -> ({GG}x & ¬{G}x) sent13: {AB}{aa} -> (¬{AT}{aa} & ¬{M}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent15: (Ex): {ET}x -> (¬{BT}x & ¬{BO}x) sent16: (Ex): ¬{BO}x -> ({DH}x & ¬{GI}x) sent17: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent18: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent19: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{CQ}{aa} & ¬{AP}{aa}) sent20: (Ex): ¬{L}x -> ({EP}x & ¬{HB}x)
|
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is not an elan and it is not a dragoman is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a sip then it does not savage hygrometer. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not promise programmer hold it is not an elan and is a dragoman. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not maxillodental then it does not recoup crackdown. sent4: if the fact that the hygrometer is not a Metroxylon is correct it is not a nuance and it promises programmer. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not credible then it is not flexible. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is not a dragoman. sent7: the hygrometer is not an elan and it is not a kind of a dragoman if the fact that it does not promise programmer hold. sent8: if the hygrometer is not a shark it is not uricosuric and it is a gelechiid. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Heyerdahl then it is not bionic. sent10: there is something such that if it is not profaned then it is not a strangeness. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a defibrillator it does promise swordfish and is not a kind of a slur. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a Buffalo then it is a strafe but not an undercut. sent13: the hygrometer does not erupt noddle and is not a kind of an ache if it is a dragoman. sent14: there is something such that if it does not promise programmer then it is an elan and it is not a dragoman. sent15: there is something such that if it pleaches then it is a kind of non-abasic thing that is not a right. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not right it is a mend that is not a unpointedness. sent17: the hygrometer is not an elan but it is a kind of a dragoman if it does not promise programmer. sent18: there exists something such that if it promises programmer it is not a kind of an elan and is not a dragoman. sent19: if the hygrometer does not promise programmer then it is non-innocuous thing that is not a defibrillator. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a strangeness it is monotheistic and it is not a Heyerdahl. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the xenotime does raise.
|
{B}{b}
|
sent1: there exists nothing that minds and is weighty. sent2: if that the disentangler does promise doomed is correct then the xenotime does raise. sent3: something does not raise if it does promise doomed. sent4: something does mind if it does promise doomed.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x sent4: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the fact that that the birchbark is both a minded and not non-weighty is not false is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a minded and it is weighty does not hold.;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x);"
] |
the xenotime does not raise.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
[
"sent3 -> int3: if the xenotime promises doomed it is not a raise.;"
] | 4 | 4 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the xenotime does raise. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing that minds and is weighty. sent2: if that the disentangler does promise doomed is correct then the xenotime does raise. sent3: something does not raise if it does promise doomed. sent4: something does mind if it does promise doomed. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: the fact that that the birchbark is both a minded and not non-weighty is not false is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a minded and it is weighty does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the isohel is a kind of a spaced.
|
{B}{a}
|
sent1: The monocline does not promise isohel. sent2: the pituitary is not a kibbutznik if there exists something such that that it does not savage Murdoch or it is not a Son or both is not correct. sent3: the isohel does not promise monocline. sent4: the decal is parenteral if it is Arawakan and is not a headline. sent5: the soap does not promise monocline if there exists something such that that it promise monocline and it does space does not hold. sent6: the synchroflash does promise bodied if the monocline promise bodied. sent7: the monocline is a Edward if the Victrola is not a kind of a Edward and does not recoup pituitary. sent8: if the synchroflash promises bodied then the fact that it does not savage Murdoch or is not a Son or both does not hold. sent9: if the decal is parenteral the Victrola is not a kind of a Edward and does not recoup pituitary. sent10: if something is a Edward then it does promise bodied. sent11: everything is unargumentative. sent12: that the isohel is not a kind of a cradle and is not a kind of a helicopter does not hold if it does not promise monocline. sent13: if something is a helicopter then it is a kind of a spaced. sent14: if something is unargumentative it is Arawakan and is not a headline. sent15: if the isohel is a kind of a helicopter it is a spaced. sent16: something savages NIH if that it is not a infinitude and not a stunt is not correct. sent17: that the fact that the isohel does not cradle but it is a helicopter is correct is false. sent18: the headman promises monocline. sent19: something does space if that it is not a cradle and it is not a helicopter is not correct. sent20: if the isohel does not promise monocline then the fact that it is not a cradle but a helicopter does not hold.
|
sent1: ¬{AC}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: ({J}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> {H}{f} sent5: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}{cf} sent6: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} sent7: (¬{G}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) -> {G}{d} sent8: {F}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} v ¬{D}{c}) sent9: {H}{f} -> (¬{G}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) sent10: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent11: (x): {L}x sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent13: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x sent14: (x): {L}x -> ({J}x & ¬{K}x) sent15: {AB}{a} -> {B}{a} sent16: (x): ¬(¬{FB}x & ¬{EN}x) -> {FU}x sent17: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent18: {A}{hf} sent19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent20: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})
|
[
"sent12 & sent3 -> int1: that the isohel is not a kind of a cradle and it is not a helicopter is wrong.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the isohel does not cradle and it is not a helicopter is true is false then it does space.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent19 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the soap does not promise monocline.
|
¬{A}{cf}
|
[
"sent10 -> int3: if the monocline is a Edward it promises bodied.; sent14 -> int4: the propman is Arawakan and is not a headline if it is unargumentative.; sent11 -> int5: the propman is unargumentative.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the propman is Arawakan and not a headline.; int6 -> int7: everything is Arawakan thing that is not a headline.; int7 -> int8: the decal is both Arawakan and not a headline.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the decal is parenteral.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Victrola is not a kind of a Edward and it does not recoup pituitary is not wrong.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the monocline is a Edward.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the monocline promises bodied.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the synchroflash promises bodied.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the fact that the synchroflash does not savage Murdoch and/or is not a Son is not true.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it does not savage Murdoch or it is not a Son or both is not right.; int15 & sent2 -> int16: the pituitary is not a kibbutznik.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not a kibbutznik.;"
] | 16 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the isohel is a kind of a spaced. ; $context$ = sent1: The monocline does not promise isohel. sent2: the pituitary is not a kibbutznik if there exists something such that that it does not savage Murdoch or it is not a Son or both is not correct. sent3: the isohel does not promise monocline. sent4: the decal is parenteral if it is Arawakan and is not a headline. sent5: the soap does not promise monocline if there exists something such that that it promise monocline and it does space does not hold. sent6: the synchroflash does promise bodied if the monocline promise bodied. sent7: the monocline is a Edward if the Victrola is not a kind of a Edward and does not recoup pituitary. sent8: if the synchroflash promises bodied then the fact that it does not savage Murdoch or is not a Son or both does not hold. sent9: if the decal is parenteral the Victrola is not a kind of a Edward and does not recoup pituitary. sent10: if something is a Edward then it does promise bodied. sent11: everything is unargumentative. sent12: that the isohel is not a kind of a cradle and is not a kind of a helicopter does not hold if it does not promise monocline. sent13: if something is a helicopter then it is a kind of a spaced. sent14: if something is unargumentative it is Arawakan and is not a headline. sent15: if the isohel is a kind of a helicopter it is a spaced. sent16: something savages NIH if that it is not a infinitude and not a stunt is not correct. sent17: that the fact that the isohel does not cradle but it is a helicopter is correct is false. sent18: the headman promises monocline. sent19: something does space if that it is not a cradle and it is not a helicopter is not correct. sent20: if the isohel does not promise monocline then the fact that it is not a cradle but a helicopter does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: that the isohel is not a kind of a cradle and it is not a helicopter is wrong.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the isohel does not cradle and it is not a helicopter is true is false then it does space.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not recoup postponement and is thenal is incorrect then it does not erupt burgrass is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is not thenal then it does not erupt burgrass. sent2: there exists something such that if it recoups postponement then it does not erupt burgrass. sent3: the gorgonian does not erupt burgrass if the fact that it does not recoup postponement and it is thenal is wrong. sent4: if the fact that something is toothed thing that is thenal is wrong then it is not hypothermic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not recoup postponement and is thenal then it does not erupt burgrass. sent6: the gorgonian does not erupt burgrass if it does not recoup postponement and is thenal. sent7: the gorgonian erupts burgrass if that it does not recoup postponement and it is thenal is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does recoup postponement and is thenal is not correct it does not erupt burgrass.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{IT}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{FU}x sent5: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the headwater is not hypothermic if the fact that it is not toothless and is thenal is not right.
|
¬(¬{IT}{ii} & {AB}{ii}) -> ¬{FU}{ii}
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not recoup postponement and is thenal is incorrect then it does not erupt burgrass is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not thenal then it does not erupt burgrass. sent2: there exists something such that if it recoups postponement then it does not erupt burgrass. sent3: the gorgonian does not erupt burgrass if the fact that it does not recoup postponement and it is thenal is wrong. sent4: if the fact that something is toothed thing that is thenal is wrong then it is not hypothermic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not recoup postponement and is thenal then it does not erupt burgrass. sent6: the gorgonian does not erupt burgrass if it does not recoup postponement and is thenal. sent7: the gorgonian erupts burgrass if that it does not recoup postponement and it is thenal is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does recoup postponement and is thenal is not correct it does not erupt burgrass. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it orbs then that it is not a squaretail and not a pain is wrong is incorrect.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: if something is mammary the fact that it does not savage legality and is not a show-stopper is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a roll is right then the fact that it bares and it is not a pyrite does not hold. sent3: that the katharometer is prognathous and does not erupt katharometer is not correct if it is fissionable. sent4: the fact that the katharometer is not a squaretail and is not a pain does not hold if it orbs. sent5: the fact that the ozone is a kind of non-implicational thing that does orb is not right if it is a Honolulu. sent6: if the katharometer cantons it is not umbilical and it is not a stratosphere. sent7: if the katharometer orbs it is not a squaretail and it is not a pain. sent8: that the katharometer is not a squaretail and is not a kind of a Petauristidae is wrong if it does erupt spearmint. sent9: there exists something such that if it is fissionable it is a kind of non-alveolar thing that does not recoup mescaline. sent10: there is something such that if it is impenitent the fact that it laments and it is not a miniver is false. sent11: the fact that the exile is a squaretail but it is not electronics is not true if it does savage mealie. sent12: the superstrate does not orb and it is not a roll if it is a Concepcion. sent13: there is something such that if it promises Sitwell the fact that it is not a kind of a bilingual and recoups Bryan does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is dumpy then that it is not delicate and it is not extracellular is incorrect. sent15: if the custard is a kind of a peck then the fact that it is not multiphase and does not abound does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is an audiotape hold then the fact that it is not a cyst and does recoup pepper does not hold. sent17: if the katharometer promises Turkoman that it is both Hippocratic and not a squaretail is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the cerate is a kind of non-gothic a pince-nez is not true if it does recoup hop-picker. sent19: if the katharometer is a kind of a Mendelsohn that that it is unfortunate thing that does not savage unpointedness hold is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Khamti then it is not a kind of a Aztecan and does not recoup Bryan. sent21: that that the katharometer is not the pain and does promise flugelhorn is not true if the katharometer is a peck hold.
|
sent1: (x): {DC}x -> ¬(¬{GG}x & ¬{CU}x) sent2: (Ex): {EQ}x -> ¬({IH}x & ¬{BF}x) sent3: {HI}{aa} -> ¬({FR}{aa} & ¬{HP}{aa}) sent4: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: {GB}{ap} -> ¬(¬{JC}{ap} & {A}{ap}) sent6: {DN}{aa} -> (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{EE}{aa}) sent7: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent8: {DH}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{I}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): {HI}x -> (¬{ID}x & ¬{GT}x) sent10: (Ex): {DU}x -> ¬({DP}x & ¬{EB}x) sent11: {ES}{gp} -> ¬({AA}{gp} & ¬{GA}{gp}) sent12: {DF}{cb} -> (¬{A}{cb} & ¬{EQ}{cb}) sent13: (Ex): {JF}x -> ¬(¬{GP}x & {FN}x) sent14: (Ex): {H}x -> ¬(¬{CF}x & ¬{BR}x) sent15: {GK}{jj} -> ¬(¬{AK}{jj} & ¬{IM}{jj}) sent16: (Ex): {S}x -> ¬(¬{AC}x & {J}x) sent17: {HA}{aa} -> ¬({FJ}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent18: {HD}{fu} -> ¬(¬{JB}{fu} & {K}{fu}) sent19: {AI}{aa} -> ¬(¬{EG}{aa} & ¬{CN}{aa}) sent20: (Ex): {CQ}x -> (¬{FT}x & ¬{FN}x) sent21: {GK}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {IP}{aa})
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that if it is mammary then the fact that it does not savage legality and it is not a show-stopper is not correct.
|
(Ex): {DC}x -> ¬(¬{GG}x & ¬{CU}x)
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: if the second is mammary then the fact that that it does not savage legality and is not a show-stopper is true is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it orbs then that it is not a squaretail and not a pain is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is mammary the fact that it does not savage legality and is not a show-stopper is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a roll is right then the fact that it bares and it is not a pyrite does not hold. sent3: that the katharometer is prognathous and does not erupt katharometer is not correct if it is fissionable. sent4: the fact that the katharometer is not a squaretail and is not a pain does not hold if it orbs. sent5: the fact that the ozone is a kind of non-implicational thing that does orb is not right if it is a Honolulu. sent6: if the katharometer cantons it is not umbilical and it is not a stratosphere. sent7: if the katharometer orbs it is not a squaretail and it is not a pain. sent8: that the katharometer is not a squaretail and is not a kind of a Petauristidae is wrong if it does erupt spearmint. sent9: there exists something such that if it is fissionable it is a kind of non-alveolar thing that does not recoup mescaline. sent10: there is something such that if it is impenitent the fact that it laments and it is not a miniver is false. sent11: the fact that the exile is a squaretail but it is not electronics is not true if it does savage mealie. sent12: the superstrate does not orb and it is not a roll if it is a Concepcion. sent13: there is something such that if it promises Sitwell the fact that it is not a kind of a bilingual and recoups Bryan does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is dumpy then that it is not delicate and it is not extracellular is incorrect. sent15: if the custard is a kind of a peck then the fact that it is not multiphase and does not abound does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is an audiotape hold then the fact that it is not a cyst and does recoup pepper does not hold. sent17: if the katharometer promises Turkoman that it is both Hippocratic and not a squaretail is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the cerate is a kind of non-gothic a pince-nez is not true if it does recoup hop-picker. sent19: if the katharometer is a kind of a Mendelsohn that that it is unfortunate thing that does not savage unpointedness hold is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Khamti then it is not a kind of a Aztecan and does not recoup Bryan. sent21: that that the katharometer is not the pain and does promise flugelhorn is not true if the katharometer is a peck hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the promising strand happens.
|
{C}
|
sent1: if the promising strand does not occur that the conforming but not the lockup happens is incorrect. sent2: both the cards and the conforming happens. sent3: the promising strand happens if the conforming occurs. sent4: that the lockup occurs hold if the fact that the conforming happens and the lockup does not occur is wrong.
|
sent1: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{O}) sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: {B} -> {C} sent4: ¬({B} & ¬{O}) -> {O}
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the conforming occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the lockup occurs and the varying occurs.
|
({O} & {HT})
|
[] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the promising strand happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the promising strand does not occur that the conforming but not the lockup happens is incorrect. sent2: both the cards and the conforming happens. sent3: the promising strand happens if the conforming occurs. sent4: that the lockup occurs hold if the fact that the conforming happens and the lockup does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the conforming occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the erupting Arctocebus does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: that the erupting Arctocebus happens is triggered by the tapering. sent2: the angiography happens. sent3: both the bellows and the hardness happens. sent4: that the spamming happens hold if the charitableness occurs. sent5: the taper and the angiography happens. sent6: that the framing does not occur is prevented by that the savaging Chilomycterus occurs. sent7: the model and the tapering happens if the erupting Tillich does not occur.
|
sent1: {A} -> {C} sent2: {B} sent3: ({GL} & {GR}) sent4: {FB} -> {BE} sent5: ({A} & {B}) sent6: {DG} -> {BC} sent7: ¬{F} -> ({HG} & {A})
|
[
"sent5 -> int1: the taper happens.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> int1: {A}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the modeling occurs and the erupting Bryan occurs.
|
({HG} & {HF})
|
[] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the erupting Arctocebus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the erupting Arctocebus happens is triggered by the tapering. sent2: the angiography happens. sent3: both the bellows and the hardness happens. sent4: that the spamming happens hold if the charitableness occurs. sent5: the taper and the angiography happens. sent6: that the framing does not occur is prevented by that the savaging Chilomycterus occurs. sent7: the model and the tapering happens if the erupting Tillich does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> int1: the taper happens.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the plug-ugly does accept.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: that the plug-ugly savages Maja is right if the opsonization is not fibrillose but it does savage conk. sent2: the fact that the plug-ugly is not a sneak is not false if that the conk does not space and is a synergist is not correct. sent3: if something is tetanic then that it is not a kind of a spaced and it is a synergist is not correct. sent4: if something accepts then it is fibrillose. sent5: the opsonization is not fibrillose and savages conk. sent6: the fact that if something is not a spaced then it is a synergist and it is not a sneak is not false. sent7: if the bootblack does not bleed the fact that the conk is a wrack but it does not recoup Franck is wrong. sent8: that the opsonization does accept and it does recoup bootblack is incorrect if the plug-ugly is not a kind of a sneak. sent9: if that either the conk recoups Franck or it is a spaced or both is not correct the opsonization is not a spaced. sent10: if something recoups Franck then it is tetanic. sent11: the opsonization is fibrillose if it savages Maja. sent12: if the fact that something is a wrack and does not recoup Franck is incorrect it recoup Franck. sent13: if the fact that the opsonization does accept and/or does not savage Maja is wrong the plug-ugly does not accept. sent14: the bootblack does not bleed if the oxtail bleed. sent15: the opsonization is not fibrillose. sent16: if the opsonization is fibrillose thing that savages conk then the plug-ugly does savage Maja. sent17: something recoups bootblack if that it does savage Maja is not false. sent18: something does recoup bootblack if it is a synergist and it is not a sneak. sent19: the fact that the plug-ugly is fibrillose hold.
|
sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent3: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) sent4: (x): {C}x -> {AA}x sent5: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) sent7: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent8: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) sent9: ¬({H}{c} v {F}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent10: (x): {H}x -> {G}x sent11: {B}{a} -> {AA}{a} sent12: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {H}x sent13: ¬({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: {J}{e} -> ¬{J}{d} sent15: ¬{AA}{a} sent16: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent17: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent18: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {A}x sent19: {AA}{b}
|
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the plug-ugly savages Maja.; sent17 -> int2: the plug-ugly recoups bootblack if it savages Maja.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plug-ugly does recoup bootblack.;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent17 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {A}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {A}{b};"
] |
that the plug-ugly does not accept hold.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
[
"sent18 -> int4: if the opsonization is a kind of a synergist that does not sneak then it recoups bootblack.; sent6 -> int5: if the opsonization is not a spaced it is both a synergist and not a sneak.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the plug-ugly does accept. ; $context$ = sent1: that the plug-ugly savages Maja is right if the opsonization is not fibrillose but it does savage conk. sent2: the fact that the plug-ugly is not a sneak is not false if that the conk does not space and is a synergist is not correct. sent3: if something is tetanic then that it is not a kind of a spaced and it is a synergist is not correct. sent4: if something accepts then it is fibrillose. sent5: the opsonization is not fibrillose and savages conk. sent6: the fact that if something is not a spaced then it is a synergist and it is not a sneak is not false. sent7: if the bootblack does not bleed the fact that the conk is a wrack but it does not recoup Franck is wrong. sent8: that the opsonization does accept and it does recoup bootblack is incorrect if the plug-ugly is not a kind of a sneak. sent9: if that either the conk recoups Franck or it is a spaced or both is not correct the opsonization is not a spaced. sent10: if something recoups Franck then it is tetanic. sent11: the opsonization is fibrillose if it savages Maja. sent12: if the fact that something is a wrack and does not recoup Franck is incorrect it recoup Franck. sent13: if the fact that the opsonization does accept and/or does not savage Maja is wrong the plug-ugly does not accept. sent14: the bootblack does not bleed if the oxtail bleed. sent15: the opsonization is not fibrillose. sent16: if the opsonization is fibrillose thing that savages conk then the plug-ugly does savage Maja. sent17: something recoups bootblack if that it does savage Maja is not false. sent18: something does recoup bootblack if it is a synergist and it is not a sneak. sent19: the fact that the plug-ugly is fibrillose hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the plug-ugly savages Maja.; sent17 -> int2: the plug-ugly recoups bootblack if it savages Maja.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plug-ugly does recoup bootblack.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the clutch does liberalize.
|
{B}{a}
|
sent1: if something is a salmonid the serictery liberalizes and is a Edward. sent2: the escalator is a salmonid if the highboy does not savage Cordylus and is a kind of a pentecostalism. sent3: the macho is sidearm if the clutch is euclidian. sent4: if the serictery is not sidearm and liberalizes the clutch does not liberalizes. sent5: the biteplate liberalizes. sent6: if there are non-sidearm things then that the flybridge is diaphoretic is not false. sent7: something savages Cordylus if it is a pentecostalism. sent8: the clutch is sidearm. sent9: there is nothing such that it does not liberalize and it is euclidian. sent10: if the clutch is a salmonid but not a Edward then that it is not sidearm hold. sent11: something that savages Cordylus is both not a salmonid and a Edward. sent12: if something that is not a salmonid is a kind of a Edward it is not euclidian. sent13: the fact that the clutch is not non-sidearm and liberalizes is not false. sent14: something does not savage Cordylus but it is a pentecostalism if it is not sociolinguistic.
|
sent1: (x): {E}x -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: (¬{F}{d} & {G}{d}) -> {E}{c} sent3: {C}{a} -> {A}{ah} sent4: (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: {B}{ip} sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> {DK}{ac} sent7: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent8: {A}{a} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) sent10: ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent11: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & {D}x) sent12: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent13: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & {G}x)
|
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the macho is sidearm.
|
{A}{ah}
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: the emeritus does not savage Cordylus and is a kind of a pentecostalism if it is not sociolinguistic.;"
] | 11 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the clutch does liberalize. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a salmonid the serictery liberalizes and is a Edward. sent2: the escalator is a salmonid if the highboy does not savage Cordylus and is a kind of a pentecostalism. sent3: the macho is sidearm if the clutch is euclidian. sent4: if the serictery is not sidearm and liberalizes the clutch does not liberalizes. sent5: the biteplate liberalizes. sent6: if there are non-sidearm things then that the flybridge is diaphoretic is not false. sent7: something savages Cordylus if it is a pentecostalism. sent8: the clutch is sidearm. sent9: there is nothing such that it does not liberalize and it is euclidian. sent10: if the clutch is a salmonid but not a Edward then that it is not sidearm hold. sent11: something that savages Cordylus is both not a salmonid and a Edward. sent12: if something that is not a salmonid is a kind of a Edward it is not euclidian. sent13: the fact that the clutch is not non-sidearm and liberalizes is not false. sent14: something does not savage Cordylus but it is a pentecostalism if it is not sociolinguistic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the chrysotherapy does not occur.
|
¬{AA}
|
sent1: both the non-grossness and the promising goldenrod occurs if that the bossism occurs is true. sent2: the chrysotherapy does not occur but the endoergicness happens if the savaging Ebenaceae happens. sent3: the savaging Ebenaceae occurs. sent4: both the pickings and the savaging Ebenaceae happens if the grossness does not occur.
|
sent1: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent2: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent3: {A} sent4: ¬{B} -> ({DN} & {A})
|
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: not the chrysotherapy but the endoergicness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the pickings happens.
|
{DN}
|
[] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the chrysotherapy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-grossness and the promising goldenrod occurs if that the bossism occurs is true. sent2: the chrysotherapy does not occur but the endoergicness happens if the savaging Ebenaceae happens. sent3: the savaging Ebenaceae occurs. sent4: both the pickings and the savaging Ebenaceae happens if the grossness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: not the chrysotherapy but the endoergicness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the titrator is Dickensian and it is daisylike is not correct.
|
¬({D}{c} & {C}{c})
|
sent1: the pastry recoups Rupert if the tankard recoups Rupert. sent2: the fact that something is Dickensian and it is daisylike is false if it is not a sesquipedality. sent3: the pastry is a cryostat and it promises rockcress. sent4: the titrator is daisylike if the pastry is inanimate. sent5: the pastry is dizygotic and is a Holcus. sent6: the titrator is Dickensian if there exists something such that the fact that it recoups Rupert and it does promise gracelessness is not true. sent7: if the gunwale does not recoup spearmint and does promise oleaster that the shellflower does not rate hold. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it recoups Rupert and promises gracelessness is not right. sent9: if something recoups Rupert either it is inanimate or it is not a sesquipedality or both. sent10: the fact that the shellflower is not a hodoscope and promises hitch does not hold if it is not a rates. sent11: the pastry is Dickensian if there exists something such that that it is inanimate thing that is a sesquipedality does not hold. sent12: the titrator is Dickensian if there is something such that it does not recoup Rupert. sent13: the fact that the titrator is not a sesquipedality is right if the pastry is inanimate and/or it is not a sesquipedality. sent14: the pastry does forbid and it does promise gracelessness. sent15: if the fact that the shellflower is not a hodoscope but it promises hitch is not correct the paste does not promises hitch. sent16: if the pastry is a sesquipedality then the titrator is daisylike. sent17: the titrator is inanimate if the pastry is daisylike. sent18: the ripcord is a prosperity and daisylike. sent19: there is something such that it does recoup Rupert and does promise gracelessness. sent20: either the pastry is a sesquipedality or it is inanimate or both. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a sesquipedality and is Dickensian is not right then the titrator is inanimate.
|
sent1: {E}{b} -> {E}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & {C}x) sent3: ({JF}{a} & {M}{a}) sent4: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} sent5: ({IM}{a} & {DT}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) -> {D}{c} sent7: (¬{J}{f} & {K}{f}) -> ¬{I}{e} sent8: (Ex): ¬({E}x & {F}x) sent9: (x): {E}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x) sent10: ¬{I}{e} -> ¬(¬{H}{e} & {G}{e}) sent11: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> {D}{a} sent12: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}{c} sent13: ({B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent14: ({HS}{a} & {F}{a}) sent15: ¬(¬{H}{e} & {G}{e}) -> ¬{G}{d} sent16: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent17: {C}{a} -> {B}{c} sent18: ({DF}{ek} & {C}{ek}) sent19: (Ex): ({E}x & {F}x) sent20: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) sent21: (x): ¬({A}x & {D}x) -> {B}{c}
|
[
"sent20 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the titrator is daisylike.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the titrator is Dickensian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent20 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: {C}{c}; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: {D}{c}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the titrator is Dickensian and it is daisylike is wrong.
|
¬({D}{c} & {C}{c})
|
[
"sent2 -> int3: the fact that the titrator is Dickensian thing that is daisylike does not hold if it is not a sesquipedality.; sent9 -> int4: if the pastry recoups Rupert it is inanimate or it is not a sesquipedality or both.;"
] | 10 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the titrator is Dickensian and it is daisylike is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the pastry recoups Rupert if the tankard recoups Rupert. sent2: the fact that something is Dickensian and it is daisylike is false if it is not a sesquipedality. sent3: the pastry is a cryostat and it promises rockcress. sent4: the titrator is daisylike if the pastry is inanimate. sent5: the pastry is dizygotic and is a Holcus. sent6: the titrator is Dickensian if there exists something such that the fact that it recoups Rupert and it does promise gracelessness is not true. sent7: if the gunwale does not recoup spearmint and does promise oleaster that the shellflower does not rate hold. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it recoups Rupert and promises gracelessness is not right. sent9: if something recoups Rupert either it is inanimate or it is not a sesquipedality or both. sent10: the fact that the shellflower is not a hodoscope and promises hitch does not hold if it is not a rates. sent11: the pastry is Dickensian if there exists something such that that it is inanimate thing that is a sesquipedality does not hold. sent12: the titrator is Dickensian if there is something such that it does not recoup Rupert. sent13: the fact that the titrator is not a sesquipedality is right if the pastry is inanimate and/or it is not a sesquipedality. sent14: the pastry does forbid and it does promise gracelessness. sent15: if the fact that the shellflower is not a hodoscope but it promises hitch is not correct the paste does not promises hitch. sent16: if the pastry is a sesquipedality then the titrator is daisylike. sent17: the titrator is inanimate if the pastry is daisylike. sent18: the ripcord is a prosperity and daisylike. sent19: there is something such that it does recoup Rupert and does promise gracelessness. sent20: either the pastry is a sesquipedality or it is inanimate or both. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a sesquipedality and is Dickensian is not right then the titrator is inanimate. ; $proof$ =
|
sent20 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the titrator is daisylike.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the titrator is Dickensian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then that it is not a Angolan and/or it is not arthromeric is not true is wrong.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then that it is not a Angolan and/or it is arthromeric is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a lather the fact that either it is generational or it does not recoup ortolan or both is wrong. sent3: that the perigon is Angolan or it is not arthromeric or both is not correct if it recoups Salmonidae. sent4: if the perigon does recoup Salmonidae that it either is not a kind of a Angolan or is not arthromeric or both is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it does recoup Salmonidae then the fact that it is not non-Angolan is not false. sent6: that something does not recoup Salmonidae or does not erupt bow-wow or both is false if it is a haplosporidian. sent7: there is something such that if it does recoup Salmonidae the fact that it is a Angolan and/or it is not arthromeric is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it does savage spoilsport it is a piety. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a ornateness the fact that the fact that either it does savage respectability or it is not a kind of an official or both hold is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae it is arthromeric. sent11: the fact that the perigon is not a bus and/or it does recoup Salmonidae is not true if it does recoup takeoff. sent12: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then it is not Angolan or it is not arthromeric or both. sent13: there exists something such that if it does recoup auricle that it is either not archaeological or weightless or both is incorrect.
|
sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent2: (Ex): {FH}x -> ¬({IA}x v ¬{AO}x) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): {A}x -> {AA}x sent6: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{O}x) sent7: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent8: (Ex): {FF}x -> {JA}x sent9: (Ex): {DF}x -> ¬({CU}x v ¬{JE}x) sent10: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x sent11: {FM}{aa} -> ¬(¬{FQ}{aa} v {A}{aa}) sent12: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent13: (Ex): {R}x -> ¬(¬{GB}x v {BS}x)
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the flurazepam does not recoup Salmonidae or it does not erupt bow-wow or both is not correct if it is a kind of a haplosporidian.
|
{H}{eb} -> ¬(¬{A}{eb} v ¬{O}{eb})
|
[
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then that it is not a Angolan and/or it is not arthromeric is not true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then that it is not a Angolan and/or it is arthromeric is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a lather the fact that either it is generational or it does not recoup ortolan or both is wrong. sent3: that the perigon is Angolan or it is not arthromeric or both is not correct if it recoups Salmonidae. sent4: if the perigon does recoup Salmonidae that it either is not a kind of a Angolan or is not arthromeric or both is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it does recoup Salmonidae then the fact that it is not non-Angolan is not false. sent6: that something does not recoup Salmonidae or does not erupt bow-wow or both is false if it is a haplosporidian. sent7: there is something such that if it does recoup Salmonidae the fact that it is a Angolan and/or it is not arthromeric is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it does savage spoilsport it is a piety. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a ornateness the fact that the fact that either it does savage respectability or it is not a kind of an official or both hold is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae it is arthromeric. sent11: the fact that the perigon is not a bus and/or it does recoup Salmonidae is not true if it does recoup takeoff. sent12: there exists something such that if it recoups Salmonidae then it is not Angolan or it is not arthromeric or both. sent13: there exists something such that if it does recoup auricle that it is either not archaeological or weightless or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
either the groundhog is not feudatory or it is a kind of a quickest or both.
|
(¬{A}{b} v {B}{b})
|
sent1: if the fact that the Sculptor is not a Nung is true then the groundhog is not a Nung or it is feudatory or both. sent2: something is feudatory and it is a Ebenaceae. sent3: the fact that the fact that the Sculptor is a Ebenaceae and it is a kind of a Nung is not true is true. sent4: if the glider is not feudatory then the groundhog is not feudatory and/or it is a quickest.
|
sent1: ¬{AB}{aa} -> (¬{AB}{b} v {A}{b}) sent2: (Ex): ({A}x & {AA}x) sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} v {B}{b})
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Ebenaceae and it is a Nung is wrong.;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x);"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = either the groundhog is not feudatory or it is a kind of a quickest or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Sculptor is not a Nung is true then the groundhog is not a Nung or it is feudatory or both. sent2: something is feudatory and it is a Ebenaceae. sent3: the fact that the fact that the Sculptor is a Ebenaceae and it is a kind of a Nung is not true is true. sent4: if the glider is not feudatory then the groundhog is not feudatory and/or it is a quickest. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Ebenaceae and it is a Nung is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the camera does not savage snapper and is not a Vespasian does not hold.
|
¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
sent1: the Land is a Bordeaux. sent2: that the tideland savages snapper is wrong. sent3: if that the Land does not savage snapper is right the camera does not savage snapper and is not a Vespasian. sent4: the camera is not biaxial and it does not savage snapper. sent5: the Land is not a Vespasian. sent6: the Land does flocculate. sent7: the Land is biaxial but it does not savage snapper.
|
sent1: {BF}{a} sent2: ¬{B}{e} sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent4: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent5: ¬{C}{a} sent6: {DU}{a} sent7: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a})
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: the Land does not savage snapper.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that the camera does not savage snapper and is not a Vespasian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Land is a Bordeaux. sent2: that the tideland savages snapper is wrong. sent3: if that the Land does not savage snapper is right the camera does not savage snapper and is not a Vespasian. sent4: the camera is not biaxial and it does not savage snapper. sent5: the Land is not a Vespasian. sent6: the Land does flocculate. sent7: the Land is biaxial but it does not savage snapper. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: the Land does not savage snapper.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the ozone clocks.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: if the ozone does debouch then it is a clock. sent2: that the conk is not medieval hold if there is something such that that it promises vanilla and is a kind of a firm is false. sent3: if something is not a feeder then it does not erupt Paine and it is nacreous. sent4: the fact that the ozone is a clock and a chitchat is false if the splitworm is not a vestal. sent5: the fact that something does not glower but it is agential is not correct if it is not medieval. sent6: if the fact that something is both a clock and a chitchat is incorrect it is not a kind of a clock. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a vestal. sent8: the fact that the crankshaft promises vanilla and is a firm is not true if it is not a Kingstown. sent9: something promises cannabin if the fact that it does promise ophryon and does not erupt Paine does not hold. sent10: that the ozone is subtropical but it does not debouch is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is vestal is not incorrect. sent11: the crankshaft is not a kind of a Kingstown. sent12: if the conk does not erupt Paine but it is nacreous the proliferation is not nacreous. sent13: if the fact that something does not glower but it is not non-agential is false it is not a feeder. sent14: if the proliferation is a kind of a bornite and it is a chemical the preterist is not a bornite. sent15: that the ozone is a kind of subtropical thing that debouches does not hold if there exists something such that it is a vestal. sent16: something does clock if the fact that it is subtropical thing that does not debouch is false. sent17: something that is not nacreous is a bornite that is chemical. sent18: something is a kind of a rutted if it is a sniffler. sent19: that the diethylstilbesterol is vestal and it is a converter does not hold if something is not a bornite. sent20: that that the ozone is subtropical and it does debouch is wrong hold.
|
sent1: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬({M}x & {N}x) -> ¬{L}{e} sent3: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{I}x & {F}x) sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & {K}x) sent6: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: ¬{O}{f} -> ¬({M}{f} & {N}{f}) sent9: (x): ¬({GE}x & ¬{I}x) -> {HH}x sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent11: ¬{O}{f} sent12: (¬{I}{e} & {F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} sent13: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {K}x) -> ¬{H}x sent14: ({D}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent15: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent16: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent17: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {G}x) sent18: (x): {JE}x -> {BO}x sent19: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}{b} & {E}{b}) sent20: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent16 -> int1: the ozone is a clock if that it is subtropical and it does not debouch does not hold.; sent7 & sent10 -> int2: that the ozone is subtropical but it does not debouch is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent16 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent7 & sent10 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the ozone is not a clock.
|
¬{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent6 -> int3: if that the ozone is both a clock and a chitchat is incorrect it is not a clock.; sent17 -> int4: if the proliferation is not nacreous it is a bornite and it is a chemical.; sent3 -> int5: the conk does not erupt Paine but it is nacreous if the fact that it is not a feeder hold.; sent13 -> int6: if the fact that the conk does not glower but it is agential is incorrect it is not a feeder.; sent5 -> int7: that the conk does not glower and is agential does not hold if that it is not medieval hold.; sent8 & sent11 -> int8: the fact that the crankshaft promises vanilla and it is a firm is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does promise vanilla and is a firm is wrong.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the conk is not medieval.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the conk does not glower but it is agential is not true.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the conk is not a feeder.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the conk does not erupt Paine and is nacreous.; sent12 & int13 -> int14: the proliferation is not nacreous.; int4 & int14 -> int15: that the proliferation is a kind of a bornite that is not non-chemical is true.; sent14 & int15 -> int16: the preterist is not a bornite.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a bornite hold.; int17 & sent19 -> int18: the fact that the diethylstilbesterol is vestal a converter is not true.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that the fact that it is a vestal and it is a converter is incorrect.;"
] | 15 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the ozone clocks. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ozone does debouch then it is a clock. sent2: that the conk is not medieval hold if there is something such that that it promises vanilla and is a kind of a firm is false. sent3: if something is not a feeder then it does not erupt Paine and it is nacreous. sent4: the fact that the ozone is a clock and a chitchat is false if the splitworm is not a vestal. sent5: the fact that something does not glower but it is agential is not correct if it is not medieval. sent6: if the fact that something is both a clock and a chitchat is incorrect it is not a kind of a clock. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a vestal. sent8: the fact that the crankshaft promises vanilla and is a firm is not true if it is not a Kingstown. sent9: something promises cannabin if the fact that it does promise ophryon and does not erupt Paine does not hold. sent10: that the ozone is subtropical but it does not debouch is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is vestal is not incorrect. sent11: the crankshaft is not a kind of a Kingstown. sent12: if the conk does not erupt Paine but it is nacreous the proliferation is not nacreous. sent13: if the fact that something does not glower but it is not non-agential is false it is not a feeder. sent14: if the proliferation is a kind of a bornite and it is a chemical the preterist is not a bornite. sent15: that the ozone is a kind of subtropical thing that debouches does not hold if there exists something such that it is a vestal. sent16: something does clock if the fact that it is subtropical thing that does not debouch is false. sent17: something that is not nacreous is a bornite that is chemical. sent18: something is a kind of a rutted if it is a sniffler. sent19: that the diethylstilbesterol is vestal and it is a converter does not hold if something is not a bornite. sent20: that that the ozone is subtropical and it does debouch is wrong hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent16 -> int1: the ozone is a clock if that it is subtropical and it does not debouch does not hold.; sent7 & sent10 -> int2: that the ozone is subtropical but it does not debouch is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the promising schematization happens hold.
|
{A}
|
sent1: that the issue happens is right if the culmination does not occur. sent2: that the issue happens is triggered by that the culmination does not occur and/or the crouching does not occur. sent3: the culmination does not occur and/or the crouching does not occur. sent4: if either the middlingness does not occur or the developing does not occur or both the freelanceness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the rupture and the issuing happens is not right the promising schematization does not occur. sent6: if the official does not occur then that the rupture occurs and the issuing happens is not correct. sent7: the culmination happens or the crouching does not occur or both. sent8: the issue leads to the promising schematization.
|
sent1: ¬{AA} -> {B} sent2: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent3: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) sent4: (¬{CP} v ¬{EP}) -> {AE} sent5: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} sent6: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {B}) sent7: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent8: {B} -> {A}
|
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the issuing happens is right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: {B}; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the promising schematization does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
[] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the promising schematization happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the issue happens is right if the culmination does not occur. sent2: that the issue happens is triggered by that the culmination does not occur and/or the crouching does not occur. sent3: the culmination does not occur and/or the crouching does not occur. sent4: if either the middlingness does not occur or the developing does not occur or both the freelanceness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the rupture and the issuing happens is not right the promising schematization does not occur. sent6: if the official does not occur then that the rupture occurs and the issuing happens is not correct. sent7: the culmination happens or the crouching does not occur or both. sent8: the issue leads to the promising schematization. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the issuing happens is right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the syllabication does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: the centralness occurs. sent2: the proceduralness does not occur. sent3: the release does not occur. sent4: the syllabication does not occur if the recouping viremia happens. sent5: the peripheralness does not occur if the dullness does not occur but the factor occurs. sent6: if the non-centralness and/or the Armageddon happens then the non-central does not occur. sent7: if the recouping viremia or the centralness or both happens then the syllabication does not occur. sent8: the depilation does not occur. sent9: if the peripheral does not occur the discoloration occurs and the vacationing happens. sent10: the savaging semifluidity or the savaging gatherer or both prevents the prandialness. sent11: if the Armageddon occurs then the fact that the syllabication does not occur and the centralness happens does not hold. sent12: the Armageddon occurs and the vacationing happens if the discoloration does not occur. sent13: that the central does not occur and/or that the Armageddon occurs is caused by the vacationing. sent14: the recouping Cariamidae and/or the pet occurs.
|
sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{JJ} sent3: ¬{HT} sent4: {A} -> ¬{C} sent5: (¬{H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} sent6: (¬{B} v {D}) -> ¬{B} sent7: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} sent8: ¬{II} sent9: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) sent10: ({T} v {IJ}) -> ¬{FU} sent11: {D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {B}) sent12: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent13: {E} -> (¬{B} v {D}) sent14: ({AG} v {JD})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the recouping viremia or the central or both happens.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the syllabication happens.
|
{C}
|
[] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the syllabication does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the centralness occurs. sent2: the proceduralness does not occur. sent3: the release does not occur. sent4: the syllabication does not occur if the recouping viremia happens. sent5: the peripheralness does not occur if the dullness does not occur but the factor occurs. sent6: if the non-centralness and/or the Armageddon happens then the non-central does not occur. sent7: if the recouping viremia or the centralness or both happens then the syllabication does not occur. sent8: the depilation does not occur. sent9: if the peripheral does not occur the discoloration occurs and the vacationing happens. sent10: the savaging semifluidity or the savaging gatherer or both prevents the prandialness. sent11: if the Armageddon occurs then the fact that the syllabication does not occur and the centralness happens does not hold. sent12: the Armageddon occurs and the vacationing happens if the discoloration does not occur. sent13: that the central does not occur and/or that the Armageddon occurs is caused by the vacationing. sent14: the recouping Cariamidae and/or the pet occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: the recouping viremia or the central or both happens.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Dimetane does not burgeon.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: the fact that something does treadle is not false. sent2: if the Dimetane is a kind of a Helotium the azimuth is not a kind of an elan. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of an elan. sent4: the Dimetane does burgeon if that either the azimuth does not treadle or it is not a Helotium or both does not hold. sent5: that something is not a kind of a graphospasm and it is not a snit is incorrect if it does not moisten. sent6: if the azimuth is a Helotium the Dimetane does not burgeon. sent7: there exists something such that it is not grateful. sent8: the Dimetane does not recoup Abelmoschus if the azimuth burgeons. sent9: that the azimuth does not burgeon but it is a Helotium is not correct. sent10: the fact that the azimuth is both not a Helotium and an elan does not hold if something does not treadle. sent11: the Dimetane is not a kind of an elan if the azimuth does burgeon. sent12: if the fact that the salicylate is not a graphospasm and it is not a snit is wrong the micrometeorite is not a graphospasm. sent13: there is something such that it savages gasket. sent14: if the Dimetane is an elan then the azimuth does not burgeon. sent15: if there is something such that it does not burgeon then the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of a Helotium and is an elan is not true. sent16: the ironworker is not involucrate. sent17: the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of an elan but it burgeons is incorrect. sent18: that the Dimetane is not a kind of a isochrone and does recoup antibacterial is not right. sent19: something is a Helotium. sent20: there is something such that it is not an elan. sent21: something does not treadle.
|
sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: {B}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} sent3: (Ex): {C}x sent4: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) sent6: {B}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent7: (Ex): ¬{JJ}x sent8: {D}{a} -> ¬{CP}{b} sent9: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent11: {D}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent13: (Ex): {JF}x sent14: {C}{b} -> ¬{D}{a} sent15: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent16: ¬{GC}{eo} sent17: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) sent18: ¬(¬{BK}{b} & {BA}{b}) sent19: (Ex): {B}x sent20: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent21: (Ex): ¬{A}x
|
[
"sent21 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of a Helotium and is a kind of an elan is wrong.;"
] |
[
"sent21 & sent10 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a});"
] |
the Dimetane burgeons.
|
{D}{b}
|
[
"sent5 -> int2: if the text does not moisten then that it is not a kind of a graphospasm and it is not a snit does not hold.;"
] | 9 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Dimetane does not burgeon. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does treadle is not false. sent2: if the Dimetane is a kind of a Helotium the azimuth is not a kind of an elan. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of an elan. sent4: the Dimetane does burgeon if that either the azimuth does not treadle or it is not a Helotium or both does not hold. sent5: that something is not a kind of a graphospasm and it is not a snit is incorrect if it does not moisten. sent6: if the azimuth is a Helotium the Dimetane does not burgeon. sent7: there exists something such that it is not grateful. sent8: the Dimetane does not recoup Abelmoschus if the azimuth burgeons. sent9: that the azimuth does not burgeon but it is a Helotium is not correct. sent10: the fact that the azimuth is both not a Helotium and an elan does not hold if something does not treadle. sent11: the Dimetane is not a kind of an elan if the azimuth does burgeon. sent12: if the fact that the salicylate is not a graphospasm and it is not a snit is wrong the micrometeorite is not a graphospasm. sent13: there is something such that it savages gasket. sent14: if the Dimetane is an elan then the azimuth does not burgeon. sent15: if there is something such that it does not burgeon then the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of a Helotium and is an elan is not true. sent16: the ironworker is not involucrate. sent17: the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of an elan but it burgeons is incorrect. sent18: that the Dimetane is not a kind of a isochrone and does recoup antibacterial is not right. sent19: something is a Helotium. sent20: there is something such that it is not an elan. sent21: something does not treadle. ; $proof$ =
|
sent21 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the azimuth is not a kind of a Helotium and is a kind of an elan is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the duck does not recoup chancre.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
sent1: there is something such that it promises snowberry and it does cut. sent2: the fact that the snowberry promises snowberry is not false. sent3: there is something such that it does promise snowberry. sent4: if that the naboom is a FICA but it is not a kind of a pornographer is not true then the duck does not recoup chancre. sent5: something is not a kind of a pornographer if it is a Algren and/or it is not a pornographer. sent6: the duck does not recoup chancre if the naboom is a pornographer. sent7: there exists something such that it does promise snowberry and is not a cut. sent8: the duck does not promise snowberry. sent9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cut. sent10: the snowberry is a kind of a FICA if there exists something such that it promises snowberry and does not cut. sent11: if the snowberry is a kind of a FICA the fact that the naboom is a FICA and is not a pornographer is not correct. sent12: that the naboom is a kind of a FICA and it is a pornographer is wrong. sent13: the fact that the naboom is a kind of a FICA and it is a pornographer does not hold if the snowberry is a FICA.
|
sent1: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: {AA}{a} sent3: (Ex): {AA}x sent4: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent5: (x): ({D}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: {B}{b} -> ¬{C}{c} sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: ¬{AA}{c} sent9: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent10: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent11: {A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent12: ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent13: {A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b})
|
[
"sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the snowberry is a FICA.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that the naboom is a FICA but it is not a pornographer is false.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent10 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent11 & int1 -> int2: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the duck recoups chancre.
|
{C}{c}
|
[
"sent5 -> int3: the duck is not a kind of a pornographer if it is a Algren or is not a pornographer or both.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the duck does not recoup chancre. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it promises snowberry and it does cut. sent2: the fact that the snowberry promises snowberry is not false. sent3: there is something such that it does promise snowberry. sent4: if that the naboom is a FICA but it is not a kind of a pornographer is not true then the duck does not recoup chancre. sent5: something is not a kind of a pornographer if it is a Algren and/or it is not a pornographer. sent6: the duck does not recoup chancre if the naboom is a pornographer. sent7: there exists something such that it does promise snowberry and is not a cut. sent8: the duck does not promise snowberry. sent9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cut. sent10: the snowberry is a kind of a FICA if there exists something such that it promises snowberry and does not cut. sent11: if the snowberry is a kind of a FICA the fact that the naboom is a FICA and is not a pornographer is not correct. sent12: that the naboom is a kind of a FICA and it is a pornographer is wrong. sent13: the fact that the naboom is a kind of a FICA and it is a pornographer does not hold if the snowberry is a FICA. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the snowberry is a FICA.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that the naboom is a FICA but it is not a pornographer is false.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the remover is a border.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: the fact that the remover does not recoup modillion hold. sent2: the peroneus is not incautious. sent3: if the remover does not savage ammunition and is not unsurmountable then it is idiographic. sent4: the remover is not holy and it is not a schlepper if it is not a kind of a border. sent5: the upbraider is a schlepper. sent6: that the remover is anaphrodisiac is not wrong. sent7: the dogfighter is incautious. sent8: the fact that the remover is not unostentatious hold. sent9: if the remover is a Tho but it does not emit then the fact that it is a kind of a pushover is correct. sent10: the burnous is not a border. sent11: if that the Achaean does not border but it is incautious is not right then that the remover is unsurmountable hold. sent12: the remover is not incautious. sent13: if that something is a kind of a border but it is not incautious is not correct it is not a kind of a border. sent14: that something is not a border but incautious is incorrect if the fact that it is not bathyal hold. sent15: the spongioblast is incautious if it does please and is not a kind of a almsgiver. sent16: that the ammunition is not holy is correct. sent17: the remover is not a schlepper and is not unpeaceful.
|
sent1: ¬{U}{a} sent2: ¬{B}{ft} sent3: (¬{BQ}{a} & ¬{EG}{a}) -> {HJ}{a} sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: {AB}{r} sent6: {IA}{a} sent7: {B}{db} sent8: ¬{CP}{a} sent9: ({BK}{a} & ¬{GU}{a}) -> {JI}{a} sent10: ¬{A}{bu} sent11: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {EG}{a} sent12: ¬{B}{a} sent13: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent15: ({IE}{br} & ¬{IQ}{br}) -> {B}{br} sent16: ¬{AA}{dc} sent17: (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{JA}{a})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remover does not border.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the remover is not holy and it is not a schlepper.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a});"
] |
the remover is not a border.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent13 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the remover is not a kind of the border is not incorrect if that the remover border but it is not incautious is not correct is right.;"
] | 4 | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the remover is a border. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the remover does not recoup modillion hold. sent2: the peroneus is not incautious. sent3: if the remover does not savage ammunition and is not unsurmountable then it is idiographic. sent4: the remover is not holy and it is not a schlepper if it is not a kind of a border. sent5: the upbraider is a schlepper. sent6: that the remover is anaphrodisiac is not wrong. sent7: the dogfighter is incautious. sent8: the fact that the remover is not unostentatious hold. sent9: if the remover is a Tho but it does not emit then the fact that it is a kind of a pushover is correct. sent10: the burnous is not a border. sent11: if that the Achaean does not border but it is incautious is not right then that the remover is unsurmountable hold. sent12: the remover is not incautious. sent13: if that something is a kind of a border but it is not incautious is not correct it is not a kind of a border. sent14: that something is not a border but incautious is incorrect if the fact that it is not bathyal hold. sent15: the spongioblast is incautious if it does please and is not a kind of a almsgiver. sent16: that the ammunition is not holy is correct. sent17: the remover is not a schlepper and is not unpeaceful. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remover does not border.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the remover is not holy and it is not a schlepper.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the antimagneticness does not occur and the whipping happens.
|
(¬{B} & {C})
|
sent1: that the promising Mississippian does not occur is triggered by that the recouping razorblade does not occur. sent2: the recouping Opposition occurs. sent3: the activity happens if that the recouping Opposition happens is not false. sent4: if the devaluation does not occur then the wrecking and the counterclaiming occurs. sent5: if the fact that the recouping razorblade and the atmosphere occurs is incorrect then the recouping razorblade does not occur. sent6: if that the maritimeness does not occur and the immobileness does not occur does not hold the spirometry does not occur. sent7: the fact that the recouping razorblade and the atmosphere occurs is wrong if the destiny does not occur. sent8: both the recouping Opposition and the non-antimagneticness occurs. sent9: the fact that the assembly happens is not incorrect. sent10: the activity but not the consequence happens. sent11: that the origin occurs is not wrong. sent12: that both the macrobioticsness and the sarcasticness occurs is brought about by that the corporealness does not occur. sent13: if the sarcasticness happens the fact that the lacrosse does not occur but the devaluation happens is not true. sent14: that the promising Mississippian does not occur brings about that both the incorporealness and the dysplasticness occurs. sent15: if the royalness occurs that that the recouping Opposition does not occur but the assembly occurs hold is not right. sent16: if that the lacrosse does not occur and the devaluation occurs is not right then the devaluation does not occur. sent17: that the non-maritimeness and the non-immobileness occurs does not hold if the wreck happens. sent18: the fact that the assembly occurs and the royal happens is incorrect if the spirometry does not occur. sent19: the whipping does not occur if that both the assembly and the royal happens is not true. sent20: the recouping Opposition happens if that the recouping Opposition does not occur and the assembly happens is not correct.
|
sent1: ¬{R} -> ¬{Q} sent2: {A} sent3: {A} -> {ER} sent4: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) sent5: ¬({R} & {S}) -> ¬{R} sent6: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent7: ¬{T} -> ¬({R} & {S}) sent8: ({A} & ¬{B}) sent9: {D} sent10: ({ER} & ¬{CP}) sent11: {GA} sent12: ¬{O} -> ({N} & {M}) sent13: {M} -> ¬(¬{L} & {K}) sent14: ¬{Q} -> (¬{O} & {P}) sent15: {E} -> ¬(¬{A} & {D}) sent16: ¬(¬{L} & {K}) -> ¬{K} sent17: {I} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) sent18: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent19: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent20: ¬(¬{A} & {D}) -> {A}
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the antimagneticness does not occur.;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> int1: ¬{B};"
] |
the fact that the antimagneticness does not occur but the whipping occurs is not true.
|
¬(¬{B} & {C})
|
[] | 7 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the antimagneticness does not occur and the whipping happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the promising Mississippian does not occur is triggered by that the recouping razorblade does not occur. sent2: the recouping Opposition occurs. sent3: the activity happens if that the recouping Opposition happens is not false. sent4: if the devaluation does not occur then the wrecking and the counterclaiming occurs. sent5: if the fact that the recouping razorblade and the atmosphere occurs is incorrect then the recouping razorblade does not occur. sent6: if that the maritimeness does not occur and the immobileness does not occur does not hold the spirometry does not occur. sent7: the fact that the recouping razorblade and the atmosphere occurs is wrong if the destiny does not occur. sent8: both the recouping Opposition and the non-antimagneticness occurs. sent9: the fact that the assembly happens is not incorrect. sent10: the activity but not the consequence happens. sent11: that the origin occurs is not wrong. sent12: that both the macrobioticsness and the sarcasticness occurs is brought about by that the corporealness does not occur. sent13: if the sarcasticness happens the fact that the lacrosse does not occur but the devaluation happens is not true. sent14: that the promising Mississippian does not occur brings about that both the incorporealness and the dysplasticness occurs. sent15: if the royalness occurs that that the recouping Opposition does not occur but the assembly occurs hold is not right. sent16: if that the lacrosse does not occur and the devaluation occurs is not right then the devaluation does not occur. sent17: that the non-maritimeness and the non-immobileness occurs does not hold if the wreck happens. sent18: the fact that the assembly occurs and the royal happens is incorrect if the spirometry does not occur. sent19: the whipping does not occur if that both the assembly and the royal happens is not true. sent20: the recouping Opposition happens if that the recouping Opposition does not occur and the assembly happens is not correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> int1: the antimagneticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the compoundedness happens is not wrong.
|
{C}
|
sent1: if the fact that the swipe does not occur and/or the promising solarization does not occur is not correct the recouping sporran does not occur. sent2: the exoergicness does not occur. sent3: that the compounded happens is brought about by that the non-exoergicness and the non-competitiveness happens. sent4: the fact that the hoofing happens and the bastardization does not occur is wrong if the recouping sporran does not occur. sent5: the hoofing does not occur if the fact that that the hoofing but not the bastardization happens is not incorrect does not hold. sent6: the competitiveness does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{I} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent2: ¬{A} sent3: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {C} sent4: ¬{F} -> ¬({HR} & ¬{E}) sent5: ¬({HR} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{HR} sent6: ¬{B}
|
[
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the non-exoergicness and the noncompetitiveness happens.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: (¬{A} & ¬{B}); sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the hoofing does not occur and the peeping does not occur.
|
(¬{HR} & ¬{FT})
|
[] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the compoundedness happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the swipe does not occur and/or the promising solarization does not occur is not correct the recouping sporran does not occur. sent2: the exoergicness does not occur. sent3: that the compounded happens is brought about by that the non-exoergicness and the non-competitiveness happens. sent4: the fact that the hoofing happens and the bastardization does not occur is wrong if the recouping sporran does not occur. sent5: the hoofing does not occur if the fact that that the hoofing but not the bastardization happens is not incorrect does not hold. sent6: the competitiveness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the non-exoergicness and the noncompetitiveness happens.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the scheduler is papal but it is not a pastness.
|
({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
|
sent1: the scheduler is not a pastness if the logomach is papal. sent2: the scheduler does not embed. sent3: if something is not a lugger then it is a kind of a pastness. sent4: something is not a lugger if that it is papal and/or it is a generic is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a Amygdalus then the fact that that the uranyl is papal and/or is generic does not hold is true. sent6: the scheduler is a cystocele and bubonic if there is something such that it is residential. sent7: if the logomach is papal then the scheduler is papal but it is not a pastness. sent8: if something is bubonic the logomach is not a Amygdalus. sent9: that the logomach is papal is not false if it is a kind of nonastringent thing that is not a bone. sent10: the chlorofluorocarbon is residential. sent11: if the logomach is nonastringent and it is a pastness then it does bone.
|
sent1: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ¬{CI}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}x sent4: (x): ¬({B}x v {D}x) -> ¬{A}x sent5: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({B}{is} v {D}{is}) sent6: (x): {H}x -> ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) sent7: {B}{a} -> ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent8: (x): {F}x -> ¬{E}{a} sent9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent10: {H}{c} sent11: ({AA}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {AB}{a}
|
[] |
[] |
the uranyl is a pastness.
|
{C}{is}
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: if the uranyl is not a lugger it is a kind of a pastness.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the uranyl is not a lugger is true if that either it is papal or it is a kind of a generic or both is wrong.; sent10 -> int3: there are residential things.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the scheduler is a cystocele and bubonic is not false.; int4 -> int5: the scheduler is bubonic.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is bubonic.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the logomach is not a Amygdalus.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a Amygdalus is not false.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: that the uranyl is either not non-papal or a generic or both is false.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the uranyl is not a lugger.; int1 & int10 -> hypothesis;"
] | 9 | 2 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 |
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the scheduler is papal but it is not a pastness. ; $context$ = sent1: the scheduler is not a pastness if the logomach is papal. sent2: the scheduler does not embed. sent3: if something is not a lugger then it is a kind of a pastness. sent4: something is not a lugger if that it is papal and/or it is a generic is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a Amygdalus then the fact that that the uranyl is papal and/or is generic does not hold is true. sent6: the scheduler is a cystocele and bubonic if there is something such that it is residential. sent7: if the logomach is papal then the scheduler is papal but it is not a pastness. sent8: if something is bubonic the logomach is not a Amygdalus. sent9: that the logomach is papal is not false if it is a kind of nonastringent thing that is not a bone. sent10: the chlorofluorocarbon is residential. sent11: if the logomach is nonastringent and it is a pastness then it does bone. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Taraxacum but a watt-hour is wrong it is a hyson.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
sent1: the intussusception is a kind of a Crotalus if it is not a watt-hour. sent2: if the intussusception is not a kind of a watt-hour then it is a hyson. sent3: the intussusception is a kind of a hyson if the fact that it is not a kind of a Taraxacum and it is a kind of a watt-hour is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Taraxacum that is a kind of a watt-hour is incorrect then it is a kind of a hyson.
|
sent1: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent2: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Taraxacum but a watt-hour is wrong it is a hyson. ; $context$ = sent1: the intussusception is a kind of a Crotalus if it is not a watt-hour. sent2: if the intussusception is not a kind of a watt-hour then it is a hyson. sent3: the intussusception is a kind of a hyson if the fact that it is not a kind of a Taraxacum and it is a kind of a watt-hour is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Taraxacum that is a kind of a watt-hour is incorrect then it is a kind of a hyson. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an expanse then it does promise newt or is maturational or both is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x))
|
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not erupt owl is not incorrect then it savages motilin and/or is a quest. sent2: there is something such that if it is an expanse it either does promise newt or is maturational or both. sent3: the fire-bush savages neocolonialism and/or it is middling if it does not recoup Paxton. sent4: the props is spiritless and/or it is a kind of a mush if it is not a kind of a Bordeaux. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not savage auditor then the fact that it is a stout and/or it is rickettsial is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bluebonnet it is febrile and/or it is a frond. sent7: if the peacock is not a FAQ then either it savages doorway or it promises newt or both. sent8: the fire-bush promises newt or it is not non-maturational or both if that it is not an expanse hold. sent9: something is Pavlovian and/or it is maturational if it does not savage fire-bush. sent10: something does promise newt and/or it does mop if it is not a Beerbohm. sent11: if the fire-bush is an expanse it does promise newt and/or it is maturational. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a sequestration is right then either it does inflame or it is resistless or both. sent13: if the fire-bush is not a kind of an expanse it is a amniote or is a kind of a cell or both. sent14: if the fire-bush is not commutable then it recoups anvil and/or it is maturational. sent15: there is something such that if it is not unmusical it either is earless or is a bluebonnet or both. sent16: there is something such that if it does not socialize that it is Hitlerian or a blue or both hold. sent17: that there is something such that if it is not a stout then it does inflame and/or it hovers is correct. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a paleocerebellum it quests and/or it promises shopping. sent19: the fire-bush is a kind of a frond and/or does savage scandium if it is not maturational. sent20: the shopping is maturational and/or it is a kingdom if it does not recoup Paxton. sent21: there exists something such that if it is not infinite then it does savage wrester or is a flower-of-an-hour or both.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{BI}x -> ({FA}x v {HC}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent3: ¬{FU}{aa} -> ({BK}{aa} v {JF}{aa}) sent4: ¬{HJ}{gi} -> ({K}{gi} v {CG}{gi}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{FI}x -> ({FB}x v {BG}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{GI}x -> ({EU}x v {DG}x) sent7: ¬{CE}{j} -> ({JC}{j} v {AA}{j}) sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent9: (x): ¬{FD}x -> ({BU}x v {AB}x) sent10: (x): ¬{FL}x -> ({AA}x v {BP}x) sent11: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent12: (Ex): ¬{IC}x -> ({JB}x v {IG}x) sent13: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({BC}{aa} v {DU}{aa}) sent14: ¬{AM}{aa} -> ({BR}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent15: (Ex): ¬{O}x -> ({FJ}x v {GI}x) sent16: (Ex): ¬{GC}x -> ({ET}x v {HM}x) sent17: (Ex): ¬{FB}x -> ({JB}x v {I}x) sent18: (Ex): ¬{ER}x -> ({HC}x v {IH}x) sent19: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ({DG}{aa} v {DQ}{aa}) sent20: ¬{FU}{gh} -> ({AB}{gh} v {FH}{gh}) sent21: (Ex): ¬{JJ}x -> ({FP}x v {CA}x)
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the model is Pavlovian or is maturational or both if it does not savage fire-bush.
|
¬{FD}{hl} -> ({BU}{hl} v {AB}{hl})
|
[
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an expanse then it does promise newt or is maturational or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not erupt owl is not incorrect then it savages motilin and/or is a quest. sent2: there is something such that if it is an expanse it either does promise newt or is maturational or both. sent3: the fire-bush savages neocolonialism and/or it is middling if it does not recoup Paxton. sent4: the props is spiritless and/or it is a kind of a mush if it is not a kind of a Bordeaux. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not savage auditor then the fact that it is a stout and/or it is rickettsial is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bluebonnet it is febrile and/or it is a frond. sent7: if the peacock is not a FAQ then either it savages doorway or it promises newt or both. sent8: the fire-bush promises newt or it is not non-maturational or both if that it is not an expanse hold. sent9: something is Pavlovian and/or it is maturational if it does not savage fire-bush. sent10: something does promise newt and/or it does mop if it is not a Beerbohm. sent11: if the fire-bush is an expanse it does promise newt and/or it is maturational. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a sequestration is right then either it does inflame or it is resistless or both. sent13: if the fire-bush is not a kind of an expanse it is a amniote or is a kind of a cell or both. sent14: if the fire-bush is not commutable then it recoups anvil and/or it is maturational. sent15: there is something such that if it is not unmusical it either is earless or is a bluebonnet or both. sent16: there is something such that if it does not socialize that it is Hitlerian or a blue or both hold. sent17: that there is something such that if it is not a stout then it does inflame and/or it hovers is correct. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a paleocerebellum it quests and/or it promises shopping. sent19: the fire-bush is a kind of a frond and/or does savage scandium if it is not maturational. sent20: the shopping is maturational and/or it is a kingdom if it does not recoup Paxton. sent21: there exists something such that if it is not infinite then it does savage wrester or is a flower-of-an-hour or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the oligosaccharide does not promise answer.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: if the hydroelectricity is not a separation it is not a retrospective or it is angiospermous or both. sent2: either the oligosaccharide does not promise answer or it is a kind of a separation or both. sent3: if the oriel is a carpel it is a thrombolytic. sent4: the oligosaccharide does not erupt brachiopod or it is a separation or both. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not promise subscriber and it does not promise commensalism is false the flower is not a separation. sent6: if the hydroelectricity does not promise answer or is a retrospective or both the oligosaccharide is a separation. sent7: the nipa does not recoup naivete and/or it is angiospermous. sent8: the oligosaccharide promises answer if the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a retrospective or is angiospermous or both. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not savage bucktooth is not wrong then that the oriel does not promise subscriber and does not promise commensalism is not right. sent10: the oriel is a carpel. sent11: the hydroelectricity is not angiospermous or promises answer or both. sent12: the hydroelectricity is not a separation. sent13: if the fact that something savages bucktooth and is not aecial is wrong then it does not savages bucktooth. sent14: the fact that the hollow savages bucktooth but it is not aecial is incorrect. sent15: the flower is a kind of an insurance but it is not aecial if the oriel is a kind of a thrombolytic. sent16: the Boswell is not a kind of a separation. sent17: the oligosaccharide promises answer if the hydroelectricity is angiospermous. sent18: the oligosaccharide is not a retrospective. sent19: the hydroelectricity does not promise answer or it is a kind of a separation or both. sent20: if something is an insurance but it is not aecial then it does not savage bucktooth. sent21: the brachiopod is a separation and it does promise answer if that the hydroelectricity is not a spotlight is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the fact that that the oligosaccharide does not promise subscriber and does not promise commensalism is not wrong does not hold hold if the flower does not savage bucktooth.
|
sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) sent2: (¬{B}{b} v {A}{b}) sent3: {J}{d} -> {I}{d} sent4: (¬{EK}{b} v {A}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}{c} sent6: (¬{B}{a} v {AA}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent7: (¬{CP}{af} v {AB}{af}) sent8: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent10: {J}{d} sent11: (¬{AB}{a} v {B}{a}) sent12: ¬{A}{a} sent13: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent14: ¬({F}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) sent15: {I}{d} -> ({G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent16: ¬{A}{ej} sent17: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} sent18: ¬{AA}{b} sent19: (¬{B}{a} v {A}{a}) sent20: (x): ({G}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent21: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{ic} & {B}{ic}) sent22: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})
|
[
"sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the hydroelectricity either is not retrospective or is angiospermous or both.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent12 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}); sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the brachiopod is angiospermous.
|
{AB}{ic}
|
[
"sent20 -> int2: the flower does not savage bucktooth if it is an insurance and it is not aecial.; sent3 & sent10 -> int3: the oriel is a kind of a thrombolytic.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the flower is a kind of an insurance but it is not aecial.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the flower does not savage bucktooth.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the oligosaccharide does not promise subscriber and it does not promise commensalism is not true.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does not promise subscriber and it does not promise commensalism is not true.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the oligosaccharide does not promise answer. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hydroelectricity is not a separation it is not a retrospective or it is angiospermous or both. sent2: either the oligosaccharide does not promise answer or it is a kind of a separation or both. sent3: if the oriel is a carpel it is a thrombolytic. sent4: the oligosaccharide does not erupt brachiopod or it is a separation or both. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not promise subscriber and it does not promise commensalism is false the flower is not a separation. sent6: if the hydroelectricity does not promise answer or is a retrospective or both the oligosaccharide is a separation. sent7: the nipa does not recoup naivete and/or it is angiospermous. sent8: the oligosaccharide promises answer if the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a retrospective or is angiospermous or both. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not savage bucktooth is not wrong then that the oriel does not promise subscriber and does not promise commensalism is not right. sent10: the oriel is a carpel. sent11: the hydroelectricity is not angiospermous or promises answer or both. sent12: the hydroelectricity is not a separation. sent13: if the fact that something savages bucktooth and is not aecial is wrong then it does not savages bucktooth. sent14: the fact that the hollow savages bucktooth but it is not aecial is incorrect. sent15: the flower is a kind of an insurance but it is not aecial if the oriel is a kind of a thrombolytic. sent16: the Boswell is not a kind of a separation. sent17: the oligosaccharide promises answer if the hydroelectricity is angiospermous. sent18: the oligosaccharide is not a retrospective. sent19: the hydroelectricity does not promise answer or it is a kind of a separation or both. sent20: if something is an insurance but it is not aecial then it does not savage bucktooth. sent21: the brachiopod is a separation and it does promise answer if that the hydroelectricity is not a spotlight is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the fact that that the oligosaccharide does not promise subscriber and does not promise commensalism is not wrong does not hold hold if the flower does not savage bucktooth. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the hydroelectricity either is not retrospective or is angiospermous or both.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the naboom does not recoup mistranslation.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: the preterist does not savage Cachi if the lyreflower is not chancroidal and savage Cachi. sent2: something does recoup mistranslation if that it is not algolagnic and it is a oospore is false. sent3: the naboom is algolagnic. sent4: if something is chancroidal that the pitchfork does not savage Cachi and is not chancroidal is wrong. sent5: the lyreflower does promise Chagall. sent6: if the lyreflower does promise Chagall it is a kind of a welterweight. sent7: that the naboom is a kind of algolagnic thing that is a oospore does not hold. sent8: the fact that the naboom is not a aphasic but it does beard is wrong. sent9: that the fragment does not savage Cachi if the fact that that the pitchfork does not savage Cachi and it is not chancroidal is true is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: if something is a welterweight and does not recoup preterist then the preterist does not recoup bornite. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not archegonial is not wrong. sent12: the fragment is not algolagnic if something is not a oospore or not algolagnic or both. sent13: the lyreflower does not recoup preterist if that it is not a muzzler and recoup preterist does not hold. sent14: the preterist is archegonial and it is chancroidal if it does not recoup bornite. sent15: something is not a oospore and/or it is not algolagnic if it does not recoup mistranslation. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a dripping and recoups mistranslation is not correct the pitchfork does not recoups mistranslation. sent17: that the fragment drips and it is a kind of a oospore is true if it does not savage Cachi. sent18: the fact that the lyreflower is not a kind of a muzzler but it recoups preterist is wrong. sent19: the preterist does not savage Cachi. sent20: that the lysine is algolagnic is not incorrect. sent21: the fact that something is not a dripping but it recoups mistranslation is false if it does not savage Cachi.
|
sent1: (¬{F}{e} & {E}{e}) -> ¬{E}{d} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {C}x sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) sent5: {L}{e} sent6: {L}{e} -> {J}{e} sent7: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{HR}{a} & {FM}{a}) sent9: ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent10: (x): ({J}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{H}{d} sent11: (Ex): ¬{G}x sent12: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}{b} sent13: ¬(¬{K}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{I}{e} sent14: ¬{H}{d} -> ({G}{d} & {F}{d}) sent15: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) sent16: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}{c} sent17: ¬{E}{b} -> ({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent18: ¬(¬{K}{e} & {I}{e}) sent19: ¬{E}{d} sent20: {A}{bf} sent21: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x)
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the naboom is non-algolagnic but it is a kind of a oospore.; assump1 -> int1: the naboom is non-algolagnic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the naboom is not algolagnic and is a kind of a oospore is wrong.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the naboom is a kind of non-algolagnic a oospore is wrong then it recoups mistranslation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent2 -> int4: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the naboom does not recoup mistranslation.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
[
"sent6 & sent5 -> int5: the lyreflower is a welterweight.; sent13 & sent18 -> int6: the lyreflower does not recoup preterist.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the lyreflower is a kind of a welterweight but it does not recoup preterist.; int7 -> int8: something is a welterweight and does not recoup preterist.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the preterist does not recoup bornite.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the preterist is archegonial and it is chancroidal.; int10 -> int11: the preterist is chancroidal.; int11 -> int12: something is chancroidal.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: that the pitchfork does not savage Cachi and is not chancroidal is false.; sent9 & int13 -> int14: the fragment does not savage Cachi.; sent17 & int14 -> int15: the fragment is a dripping that is a oospore.; int15 -> int16: the fragment is a oospore.;"
] | 14 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the naboom does not recoup mistranslation. ; $context$ = sent1: the preterist does not savage Cachi if the lyreflower is not chancroidal and savage Cachi. sent2: something does recoup mistranslation if that it is not algolagnic and it is a oospore is false. sent3: the naboom is algolagnic. sent4: if something is chancroidal that the pitchfork does not savage Cachi and is not chancroidal is wrong. sent5: the lyreflower does promise Chagall. sent6: if the lyreflower does promise Chagall it is a kind of a welterweight. sent7: that the naboom is a kind of algolagnic thing that is a oospore does not hold. sent8: the fact that the naboom is not a aphasic but it does beard is wrong. sent9: that the fragment does not savage Cachi if the fact that that the pitchfork does not savage Cachi and it is not chancroidal is true is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: if something is a welterweight and does not recoup preterist then the preterist does not recoup bornite. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not archegonial is not wrong. sent12: the fragment is not algolagnic if something is not a oospore or not algolagnic or both. sent13: the lyreflower does not recoup preterist if that it is not a muzzler and recoup preterist does not hold. sent14: the preterist is archegonial and it is chancroidal if it does not recoup bornite. sent15: something is not a oospore and/or it is not algolagnic if it does not recoup mistranslation. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a dripping and recoups mistranslation is not correct the pitchfork does not recoups mistranslation. sent17: that the fragment drips and it is a kind of a oospore is true if it does not savage Cachi. sent18: the fact that the lyreflower is not a kind of a muzzler but it recoups preterist is wrong. sent19: the preterist does not savage Cachi. sent20: that the lysine is algolagnic is not incorrect. sent21: the fact that something is not a dripping but it recoups mistranslation is false if it does not savage Cachi. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the naboom is non-algolagnic but it is a kind of a oospore.; assump1 -> int1: the naboom is non-algolagnic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the naboom is not algolagnic and is a kind of a oospore is wrong.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the naboom is a kind of non-algolagnic a oospore is wrong then it recoups mistranslation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the horsetail is not a kind of a wish.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: The waver recoups dreadnought. sent2: something that is a sponge wishes. sent3: the dreadnought recoups waver. sent4: the horsetail sponges if the dreadnought does recoup waver.
|
sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}
|
[
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the horsetail is a sponge.; sent2 -> int2: if the horsetail sponges it is a wish.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent2 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the horsetail is not a kind of a wish. ; $context$ = sent1: The waver recoups dreadnought. sent2: something that is a sponge wishes. sent3: the dreadnought recoups waver. sent4: the horsetail sponges if the dreadnought does recoup waver. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the horsetail is a sponge.; sent2 -> int2: if the horsetail sponges it is a wish.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the perjury does not occur and the killing happens.
|
(¬{AA} & {AB})
|
sent1: that the improvement and the comparative happens prevents the sternalness. sent2: if the politicizing does not occur then the extravagance occurs and the recouping disentangler happens. sent3: that the snore occurs and the extinction happens is wrong. sent4: the attentionalness does not occur. sent5: the snoring does not occur if the extravagance and/or the fibbing happens. sent6: the fibbing occurs. sent7: the expounding does not occur. sent8: that the benefiting does not occur is caused by that the diurnalness and the erupting courlan happens. sent9: the frock does not occur if not the erupting jackstraws but the recouping bucktooth happens. sent10: the burping does not occur and the sympatricness happens. sent11: if the perjury does not occur and the killing happens the fibbing does not occur. sent12: the fact that both the non-obtuseness and the feudalness happens is not correct if the snore does not occur. sent13: not the countersubversion but the assignation happens. sent14: the cutting does not occur if not the unplayfulness but the erupting jackstraws happens. sent15: the countersubversion does not occur. sent16: the cardinal happens.
|
sent1: ({CI} & {FD}) -> ¬{AT} sent2: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent3: ¬({A} & {BT}) sent4: ¬{BE} sent5: ({C} v {B}) -> ¬{A} sent6: {B} sent7: ¬{CQ} sent8: ({HT} & {IA}) -> ¬{GC} sent9: (¬{DJ} & {EM}) -> ¬{CP} sent10: (¬{EH} & {L}) sent11: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent12: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{EF} & {FS}) sent13: (¬{O} & {GO}) sent14: (¬{BK} & {DJ}) -> ¬{FN} sent15: ¬{O} sent16: {ER}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perjury does not occur but the killing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the fibbing does not occur is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); sent11 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent6 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that both the non-obtuseness and the feudalness happens is wrong.
|
¬(¬{EF} & {FS})
|
[] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the perjury does not occur and the killing happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the improvement and the comparative happens prevents the sternalness. sent2: if the politicizing does not occur then the extravagance occurs and the recouping disentangler happens. sent3: that the snore occurs and the extinction happens is wrong. sent4: the attentionalness does not occur. sent5: the snoring does not occur if the extravagance and/or the fibbing happens. sent6: the fibbing occurs. sent7: the expounding does not occur. sent8: that the benefiting does not occur is caused by that the diurnalness and the erupting courlan happens. sent9: the frock does not occur if not the erupting jackstraws but the recouping bucktooth happens. sent10: the burping does not occur and the sympatricness happens. sent11: if the perjury does not occur and the killing happens the fibbing does not occur. sent12: the fact that both the non-obtuseness and the feudalness happens is not correct if the snore does not occur. sent13: not the countersubversion but the assignation happens. sent14: the cutting does not occur if not the unplayfulness but the erupting jackstraws happens. sent15: the countersubversion does not occur. sent16: the cardinal happens. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perjury does not occur but the killing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the fibbing does not occur is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fluvastatin is not a Xyris.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: if the scratch is aspectual but it is not biogeographic the synchroflash is not aspectual. sent2: the fluvastatin is a Xyris if the antiquark is not anthropogenetic but it is aspectual. sent3: the kinswoman is not a kind of a fable if there exists something such that that it is a Xyris hold. sent4: the antiquark is aspectual. sent5: there exists something such that it is a fable and does not recoup neurologist. sent6: the antiquark is not anthropogenetic if something that is a fable does not recoup neurologist.
|
sent1: ({B}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent2: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent3: (x): {C}x -> ¬{AA}{at} sent4: {B}{a} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the antiquark is not anthropogenetic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the antiquark is both non-anthropogenetic and not non-aspectual.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent6 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the kinswoman is not a fable but it is a eaglet.
|
(¬{AA}{at} & {AU}{at})
|
[] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fluvastatin is not a Xyris. ; $context$ = sent1: if the scratch is aspectual but it is not biogeographic the synchroflash is not aspectual. sent2: the fluvastatin is a Xyris if the antiquark is not anthropogenetic but it is aspectual. sent3: the kinswoman is not a kind of a fable if there exists something such that that it is a Xyris hold. sent4: the antiquark is aspectual. sent5: there exists something such that it is a fable and does not recoup neurologist. sent6: the antiquark is not anthropogenetic if something that is a fable does not recoup neurologist. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the antiquark is not anthropogenetic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the antiquark is both non-anthropogenetic and not non-aspectual.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that that it does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular is not correct is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x))
|
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mudder and it is not a self-improvement is not true. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does erupt oleaster and is vesicular does not hold. sent3: the fact that the bushing is not vesicular but it savages triangle is not correct. sent4: the fact that the bushing does erupt oleaster and it is vesicular does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a mudder and it is not a self-improvement is not true the actinopod is not a mudder. sent6: the Hell is not a displeasure. sent7: if the bushing is a salvinorin that it does erupt oleaster and it is not non-vesicular is not true. sent8: the fact that the actinopod does not savage magnetograph and is a kind of a charitableness is false if it is not a mudder. sent9: if that something does not savage magnetograph and is a kind of a charitableness does not hold it is not a kind of a charitableness. sent10: the bushing is undiplomatic and it is a Buchenwald if the actinopod is not a charitableness. sent11: that something is not a Montmartre but it is not non-sturdy is not true if it is not a salvinorin. sent12: the Frank is wheaten if there exists something such that it is not a displeasure. sent13: that the bushing is a kind of a salvinorin hold. sent14: that the bushing does not erupt oleaster but it is vesicular does not hold if it is a kind of a salvinorin. sent15: if something that is undiplomatic does promise designing it is not a salvinorin. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not a salvinorin and it does erupt oleaster is wrong. sent17: something does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular. sent18: that something is not a kind of a paycheck and it is not a luciferin is not incorrect if it is wheaten.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {GS}{a}) sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}{c} sent6: ¬{I}{d} sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: ¬{K}{c} -> ¬(¬{J}{c} & {H}{c}) sent9: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {H}x) -> ¬{H}x sent10: ¬{H}{c} -> ({B}{a} & {G}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{DE}x & {FS}x) sent12: (x): ¬{I}x -> {F}{b} sent13: {A}{a} sent14: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent15: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent16: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AA}x) sent17: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent18: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x)
|
[
"sent14 & sent13 -> int1: that the bushing does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 & sent13 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that the fact that it is not a Montmartre and it is sturdy is incorrect.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{DE}x & {FS}x)
|
[
"sent11 -> int2: if the bushing is not a kind of a salvinorin then the fact that it is not a Montmartre but sturdy is incorrect.; sent15 -> int3: the bushing is not a kind of a salvinorin if it is undiplomatic thing that does promise designing.; sent9 -> int4: if that the actinopod does not savage magnetograph and is a charitableness is not right it is not a charitableness.; sent1 & sent5 -> int5: the actinopod is not a mudder.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the actinopod does not savage magnetograph and is a charitableness is not true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the actinopod is not a kind of a charitableness is not wrong.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the bushing is undiplomatic and it is a kind of a Buchenwald.; int8 -> int9: the bushing is undiplomatic.; sent18 -> int10: the Frank is not a paycheck and it is not a kind of a luciferin if it is wheaten.; sent6 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a displeasure.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the Frank is wheaten.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the Frank is not a paycheck and is not a luciferin.; int13 -> int14: something is both not a paycheck and not a luciferin.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that that it does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mudder and it is not a self-improvement is not true. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does erupt oleaster and is vesicular does not hold. sent3: the fact that the bushing is not vesicular but it savages triangle is not correct. sent4: the fact that the bushing does erupt oleaster and it is vesicular does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a mudder and it is not a self-improvement is not true the actinopod is not a mudder. sent6: the Hell is not a displeasure. sent7: if the bushing is a salvinorin that it does erupt oleaster and it is not non-vesicular is not true. sent8: the fact that the actinopod does not savage magnetograph and is a kind of a charitableness is false if it is not a mudder. sent9: if that something does not savage magnetograph and is a kind of a charitableness does not hold it is not a kind of a charitableness. sent10: the bushing is undiplomatic and it is a Buchenwald if the actinopod is not a charitableness. sent11: that something is not a Montmartre but it is not non-sturdy is not true if it is not a salvinorin. sent12: the Frank is wheaten if there exists something such that it is not a displeasure. sent13: that the bushing is a kind of a salvinorin hold. sent14: that the bushing does not erupt oleaster but it is vesicular does not hold if it is a kind of a salvinorin. sent15: if something that is undiplomatic does promise designing it is not a salvinorin. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not a salvinorin and it does erupt oleaster is wrong. sent17: something does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular. sent18: that something is not a kind of a paycheck and it is not a luciferin is not incorrect if it is wheaten. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: that the bushing does not erupt oleaster and is vesicular is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the muscle is not shutting.
|
¬{F}{b}
|
sent1: there is something such that it is Napoleonic. sent2: if that the lugsail does savage pragmatic and it is balletic does not hold then the muscle is not shutting. sent3: that the lugsail is not a kind of a fire-eater and is not a wind hold if there is something such that it is a DPH. sent4: the fact that something is a DPH but it is not a kind of a fire-eater is not true if that it is not a wind is true. sent5: if the muscle is not balletic the lugsail is not a wind. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a DPH.
|
sent1: (Ex): {H}x sent2: ¬({E}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent5: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} sent6: (Ex): {A}x
|
[
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: that the lugsail is not a fire-eater and it is not a wind is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the lugsail is not a kind of a fire-eater.;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{B}{a};"
] |
the corporal is not shutting.
|
¬{F}{ap}
|
[
"sent4 -> int3: that the lugsail is a DPH that is not a fire-eater is not true if it is not a wind.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the muscle is not shutting. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is Napoleonic. sent2: if that the lugsail does savage pragmatic and it is balletic does not hold then the muscle is not shutting. sent3: that the lugsail is not a kind of a fire-eater and is not a wind hold if there is something such that it is a DPH. sent4: the fact that something is a DPH but it is not a kind of a fire-eater is not true if that it is not a wind is true. sent5: if the muscle is not balletic the lugsail is not a wind. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a DPH. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: that the lugsail is not a fire-eater and it is not a wind is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the lugsail is not a kind of a fire-eater.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the embryo is brachycephalic.
|
{C}{a}
|
sent1: something is a drollery if the fact that it is a kind of a self-flagellation and is not hairless is true. sent2: if the plat is undomestic then the embryo is a brachycephalic. sent3: the plat is a kind of a self-flagellation that is hairy.
|
sent1: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: {A}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the plat is a kind of a drollery if the fact that it is a self-flagellation and it is not hairless is not incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the plat is a drollery.;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: {B}{aa};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the embryo is brachycephalic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a drollery if the fact that it is a kind of a self-flagellation and is not hairless is true. sent2: if the plat is undomestic then the embryo is a brachycephalic. sent3: the plat is a kind of a self-flagellation that is hairy. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: the plat is a kind of a drollery if the fact that it is a self-flagellation and it is not hairless is not incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the plat is a drollery.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fundus is not dispensable.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
sent1: if that something is not a Levisticum and it is not a generosity is not correct it is not Senegalese. sent2: if something is not low-rise then it is not dispensable. sent3: the fact that the pyrrhotite does not savage lout and it is not a kind of a Senegalese is false. sent4: the pyrrhotite is not a Senegalese. sent5: the fact that that the anise does not savage lout and is a Sphecius is false hold. sent6: if the pyrrhotite is not a Senegalese then the fact that the anise does not savage lout and is not a kind of a Sphecius is not right. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Senegalese that it is low-rise and it is not dispensable is false. sent8: the fact that the fundus is not a Levisticum and it is not a kind of a generosity does not hold if the pyrrhotite is a kind of a Westinghouse. sent9: if the anise is a Sphecius then the fundus is not low-rise.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent4: ¬{A}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent8: {F}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent9: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{c}
|
[
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: that the anise does not savage lout and it is not a Sphecius is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the fundus is not dispensable if it is not low-rise.;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{C}{c};"
] |
the fundus is dispensable.
|
{C}{c}
|
[
"sent7 -> int3: if the fundus is not a kind of a Senegalese the fact that it is not non-low-rise and not dispensable is incorrect.; sent1 -> int4: the fundus is not a Senegalese if the fact that it is not a Levisticum and it is not a generosity does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fundus is not dispensable. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Levisticum and it is not a generosity is not correct it is not Senegalese. sent2: if something is not low-rise then it is not dispensable. sent3: the fact that the pyrrhotite does not savage lout and it is not a kind of a Senegalese is false. sent4: the pyrrhotite is not a Senegalese. sent5: the fact that that the anise does not savage lout and is a Sphecius is false hold. sent6: if the pyrrhotite is not a Senegalese then the fact that the anise does not savage lout and is not a kind of a Sphecius is not right. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Senegalese that it is low-rise and it is not dispensable is false. sent8: the fact that the fundus is not a Levisticum and it is not a kind of a generosity does not hold if the pyrrhotite is a kind of a Westinghouse. sent9: if the anise is a Sphecius then the fundus is not low-rise. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: that the anise does not savage lout and it is not a Sphecius is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the fundus is not dispensable if it is not low-rise.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the float is a Flemish.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: the scuffle is a sequestration. sent2: the scuffle is Flemish. sent3: the float is a kind of non-androgynous thing that promises round. sent4: the float is odorous. sent5: the carina is a kind of a preconditioned that is insubordinate. sent6: the fact that the float is a kind of a Carew and is not a shtikl is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the float is a kind of a Carew but it is not a shtikl is wrong then it does not pullulate. sent8: if something that is a sequestration is odorous then the float is a kind of a Flemish. sent9: that something is a kind of non-Flemish thing that is not a sequestration does not hold if it is not odorous. sent10: there exists something such that it is a sow and it is a kind of a symbol. sent11: the float does savage carina. sent12: that there exists something such that it is a kind of a sequestration is not false. sent13: something is a Flemish and is odorous. sent14: there is something such that it is odorous. sent15: the scuffle is a Flemish if there exists something such that it is odorous thing that is a kind of a sequestration. sent16: the float is odorous if there is something such that it is a sequestration and it is a Flemish.
|
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {C}{a} sent3: (¬{E}{b} & {H}{b}) sent4: {B}{b} sent5: ({HC}{hc} & {FG}{hc}) sent6: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent7: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent8: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{b} sent9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: (Ex): ({CQ}x & {GC}x) sent11: {FP}{b} sent12: (Ex): {A}x sent13: (Ex): ({C}x & {B}x) sent14: (Ex): {B}x sent15: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> {C}{a} sent16: (x): ({A}x & {C}x) -> {B}{b}
|
[] |
[] |
the round is a kind of a sequestration.
|
{A}{k}
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: if the scuffle is not odorous then the fact that it is both non-Flemish and not a sequestration is false.; sent3 -> int2: the float is not androgynous.; sent7 & sent6 -> int3: the float does not pullulate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the float is not androgynous and it does not pullulate.; int4 -> int5: something is a kind of non-androgynous thing that does not pullulate.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the float is a Flemish. ; $context$ = sent1: the scuffle is a sequestration. sent2: the scuffle is Flemish. sent3: the float is a kind of non-androgynous thing that promises round. sent4: the float is odorous. sent5: the carina is a kind of a preconditioned that is insubordinate. sent6: the fact that the float is a kind of a Carew and is not a shtikl is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the float is a kind of a Carew but it is not a shtikl is wrong then it does not pullulate. sent8: if something that is a sequestration is odorous then the float is a kind of a Flemish. sent9: that something is a kind of non-Flemish thing that is not a sequestration does not hold if it is not odorous. sent10: there exists something such that it is a sow and it is a kind of a symbol. sent11: the float does savage carina. sent12: that there exists something such that it is a kind of a sequestration is not false. sent13: something is a Flemish and is odorous. sent14: there is something such that it is odorous. sent15: the scuffle is a Flemish if there exists something such that it is odorous thing that is a kind of a sequestration. sent16: the float is odorous if there is something such that it is a sequestration and it is a Flemish. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something is synthetic and/or it does promise chervil.
|
(Ex): ({B}x v {C}x)
|
sent1: something is aortal or does promise chervil or both. sent2: if the by-catch is not a rennet it is robotic and/or it does not promise chervil. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a rennet or is anthropocentric or both then the by-catch is not a kind of a rennet. sent4: the relations is a kind of a meerkat. sent5: the fact that the relations is not a chambermaid and is a forestry is wrong if it is a meerkat. sent6: if the by-catch is not synthetic the boxwood is not a synthetic. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a chambermaid but it is a forestry is not right that it is a kind of a chambermaid is not incorrect. sent8: if the relations is a chambermaid then it is not a rennet and/or is anthropocentric. sent9: either the transmitter is a leprechaun or it is a parthenocarpy or both. sent10: the transmitter is non-aortal. sent11: a robotic thing is not a synthetic.
|
sent1: (Ex): ({A}x v {C}x) sent2: ¬{E}{c} -> ({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent3: (x): (¬{E}x v {G}x) -> ¬{E}{c} sent4: {H}{d} sent5: {H}{d} -> ¬(¬{F}{d} & {I}{d}) sent6: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {I}x) -> {F}x sent8: {F}{d} -> (¬{E}{d} v {G}{d}) sent9: ({FE}{a} v {IH}{a}) sent10: ¬{A}{a} sent11: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transmitter is not a synthetic.; assump1 -> int1: the transmitter is aortal and/or it is not a synthetic.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬{B}{a}; assump1 -> int1: ({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a});"
] |
the transmitter is a Mississippian.
|
{AF}{a}
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: if the fact that the relations is not a kind of a chambermaid but it is a kind of a forestry is wrong then it is a chambermaid.; sent5 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the relations is not a chambermaid but it is a forestry is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the relations is a chambermaid.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the relations is not a rennet or is anthropocentric or both.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that either it is not a rennet or it is anthropocentric or both.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the by-catch is not a rennet.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the by-catch is robotic or it does not promise chervil or both.; sent11 -> int9: if the by-catch is robotic then it is not synthetic.;"
] | 10 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = something is synthetic and/or it does promise chervil. ; $context$ = sent1: something is aortal or does promise chervil or both. sent2: if the by-catch is not a rennet it is robotic and/or it does not promise chervil. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a rennet or is anthropocentric or both then the by-catch is not a kind of a rennet. sent4: the relations is a kind of a meerkat. sent5: the fact that the relations is not a chambermaid and is a forestry is wrong if it is a meerkat. sent6: if the by-catch is not synthetic the boxwood is not a synthetic. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a chambermaid but it is a forestry is not right that it is a kind of a chambermaid is not incorrect. sent8: if the relations is a chambermaid then it is not a rennet and/or is anthropocentric. sent9: either the transmitter is a leprechaun or it is a parthenocarpy or both. sent10: the transmitter is non-aortal. sent11: a robotic thing is not a synthetic. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transmitter is not a synthetic.; assump1 -> int1: the transmitter is aortal and/or it is not a synthetic.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the bent does recoup repatriation is not wrong.
|
{A}{aa}
|
sent1: there is nothing that is a kind of afloat thing that is not a Montgolfier. sent2: that the marbling is a gravida and it is nutritional is not true if the willowware is not a shipowner. sent3: the fact that the scan does not impart and it does not savage Hermaphroditus is incorrect if that the freak is not a Kansas hold. sent4: if something is a kind of a Cyrillic then it does savage do. sent5: if the freak is a Order it does not savage funeral. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does not impart and does not savage Hermaphroditus is incorrect the bluetick is not a kind of a hatbox. sent7: if something is a SNP and does not recoup petard it is not a shipowner. sent8: if the bluetick is not a hatbox the willowware is a SNP and does not recoup petard. sent9: that the freak is a Order is not false if there exists something such that it is a Order or is not a positivity or both. sent10: something is a kind of a Order and/or it is not a positivity. sent11: the twice-pinnate is imprecise if the quadruplet is non-backward thing that is not imprecise. sent12: the fact that the bent is not afloat but it is a kind of a Montgolfier is not correct. sent13: there exists nothing that is a kind of non-afloat a Montgolfier. sent14: if that something is both not afloat and not a Montgolfier is false it does recoup repatriation. sent15: something is not a Kansas but it is a kind of a overexertion if it does not savage funeral. sent16: the rotogravure is a endoskeleton and/or it does not recoup repatriation if the twice-pinnate is imprecise. sent17: that the quadruplet is both not backward and not imprecise if something does recoup damsel is right. sent18: if the twice-pinnate is imprecise it is a kind of a endoskeleton. sent19: that the bent is afloat thing that is not a kind of a Montgolfier is false. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a gravida and it is nutritional is wrong the cadmium recoups damsel.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: ¬{H}{f} -> ¬({F}{e} & {G}{e}) sent3: ¬{N}{i} -> ¬(¬{M}{h} & ¬{L}{h}) sent4: (x): {JE}x -> {CT}x sent5: {Q}{i} -> ¬{P}{i} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}{g} sent7: (x): ({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}x sent8: ¬{K}{g} -> ({I}{f} & ¬{J}{f}) sent9: (x): ({Q}x v ¬{R}x) -> {Q}{i} sent10: (Ex): ({Q}x v ¬{R}x) sent11: (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> {C}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}x sent15: (x): ¬{P}x -> (¬{N}x & {O}x) sent16: {C}{b} -> ({B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) sent17: (x): {D}x -> (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent18: {C}{b} -> {B}{b} sent19: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent20: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> {D}{d}
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: if that the bent is both non-afloat and not a Montgolfier is incorrect it does recoup repatriation.;"
] |
[
"sent14 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{aa};"
] |
the bent does not recoup repatriation.
|
¬{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: if the willowware is a SNP that does not recoup petard it is not a shipowner.; sent15 -> int3: the freak is not a Kansas and is a overexertion if it does not savage funeral.; sent10 & sent9 -> int4: that the fact that the freak is not a kind of a Order is not true is not incorrect.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the freak does not savage funeral.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the freak is not a kind of a Kansas but it is a kind of a overexertion.; int6 -> int7: the freak is not a kind of a Kansas.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the scan does not impart and it does not savage Hermaphroditus is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not impart and it does not savage Hermaphroditus does not hold.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the bluetick is not a hatbox.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: the willowware is a SNP and does not recoup petard.; int2 & int11 -> int12: the willowware is not a kind of a shipowner.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: that the marbling is a gravida and is nutritional is not right.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is a gravida and is nutritional is not true.; int14 & sent20 -> int15: the cadmium does recoup damsel.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it recoups damsel.; int16 & sent17 -> int17: the quadruplet is not backward and not imprecise.; sent11 & int17 -> int18: the twice-pinnate is imprecise.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: either the rotogravure is a endoskeleton or it does not recoup repatriation or both.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is a kind of a endoskeleton and/or it does not recoup repatriation.;"
] | 18 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bent does recoup repatriation is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing that is a kind of afloat thing that is not a Montgolfier. sent2: that the marbling is a gravida and it is nutritional is not true if the willowware is not a shipowner. sent3: the fact that the scan does not impart and it does not savage Hermaphroditus is incorrect if that the freak is not a Kansas hold. sent4: if something is a kind of a Cyrillic then it does savage do. sent5: if the freak is a Order it does not savage funeral. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does not impart and does not savage Hermaphroditus is incorrect the bluetick is not a kind of a hatbox. sent7: if something is a SNP and does not recoup petard it is not a shipowner. sent8: if the bluetick is not a hatbox the willowware is a SNP and does not recoup petard. sent9: that the freak is a Order is not false if there exists something such that it is a Order or is not a positivity or both. sent10: something is a kind of a Order and/or it is not a positivity. sent11: the twice-pinnate is imprecise if the quadruplet is non-backward thing that is not imprecise. sent12: the fact that the bent is not afloat but it is a kind of a Montgolfier is not correct. sent13: there exists nothing that is a kind of non-afloat a Montgolfier. sent14: if that something is both not afloat and not a Montgolfier is false it does recoup repatriation. sent15: something is not a Kansas but it is a kind of a overexertion if it does not savage funeral. sent16: the rotogravure is a endoskeleton and/or it does not recoup repatriation if the twice-pinnate is imprecise. sent17: that the quadruplet is both not backward and not imprecise if something does recoup damsel is right. sent18: if the twice-pinnate is imprecise it is a kind of a endoskeleton. sent19: that the bent is afloat thing that is not a kind of a Montgolfier is false. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a gravida and it is nutritional is wrong the cadmium recoups damsel. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 -> int1: if that the bent is both non-afloat and not a Montgolfier is incorrect it does recoup repatriation.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it is not a interrogative but a conjugation then it does savage alienage is not true.
|
¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dysphasia and is a kind of a consumptive then it promises springer. sent2: there is something such that if it is not municipal and it is a kind of a usufructuary it is an undress. sent3: the tartan does savage alienage if it is a interrogative and it is a conjugation. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a studded and it is a kind of a drawee is not false it does savage spoilsport. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not four-wheel and is a kind of a Guatemalan then it is ametabolic. sent6: if the nucleoprotein is not a kind of a Assamese but it savages alienage it is a kind of a chivalry. sent7: the oscillator is a conjugation if it does not savage PWR and recoups ambassadress. sent8: if the tartan does not savage Bern and is useful it is a zeta. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a drivel and it is a swordfish it is a blindness. sent10: something is a mica if it is not a squeeze and is four-wheel. sent11: there is something such that if it is not an entity and drives then it is a kind of a planarian. sent12: the tartan savages alienage if it is non-interrogative thing that is a conjugation. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a nod and it is a zeta then it is a straight. sent14: there is something such that if it is interrogative and is a conjugation that it does savage alienage is not wrong. sent15: if the NSAID is not irreparable but it is interrogative it is a delavirdine. sent16: the tartan is onomastics if it does not promise blender and is a podzol. sent17: the costmary is a kind of a May if it is not a conjugation and is thermodynamics. sent18: if the tartan does not savage alienage and is a strengthener then it does promise Xyris. sent19: if the tartan is not vaginal but it is less then it savages immortelle. sent20: the tartan is afferent if that it is not elysian and does concur is true. sent21: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drawee and it is a camouflage then it is a kind of a Stoic.
|
sent1: (Ex): (¬{IJ}x & {AP}x) -> {AK}x sent2: (Ex): (¬{EJ}x & {IO}x) -> {IH}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): (¬{DJ}x & {HB}x) -> {EF}x sent5: (Ex): (¬{GA}x & {FS}x) -> {JI}x sent6: (¬{EL}{cp} & {B}{cp}) -> {DK}{cp} sent7: (¬{AO}{ja} & {DD}{ja}) -> {AB}{ja} sent8: (¬{CQ}{aa} & {BB}{aa}) -> {HG}{aa} sent9: (Ex): (¬{C}x & {GP}x) -> {HI}x sent10: (x): (¬{HE}x & {GA}x) -> {GG}x sent11: (Ex): (¬{IE}x & {J}x) -> {EK}x sent12: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent13: (Ex): (¬{DH}x & {HG}x) -> {R}x sent14: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent15: (¬{FO}{ge} & {AA}{ge}) -> {IT}{ge} sent16: (¬{CO}{aa} & {GR}{aa}) -> {HC}{aa} sent17: (¬{AB}{fk} & {GT}{fk}) -> {ER}{fk} sent18: (¬{B}{aa} & {FK}{aa}) -> {BD}{aa} sent19: (¬{BP}{aa} & {CJ}{aa}) -> {AJ}{aa} sent20: (¬{FG}{aa} & {GM}{aa}) -> {GN}{aa} sent21: (Ex): (¬{HB}x & {CN}x) -> {CU}x
|
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a squeeze and is four-wheel the fact that it is a mica hold.
|
(Ex): (¬{HE}x & {GA}x) -> {GG}x
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: if the serow does not squeeze and is four-wheel then the fact that it is a mica is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a interrogative but a conjugation then it does savage alienage is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dysphasia and is a kind of a consumptive then it promises springer. sent2: there is something such that if it is not municipal and it is a kind of a usufructuary it is an undress. sent3: the tartan does savage alienage if it is a interrogative and it is a conjugation. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a studded and it is a kind of a drawee is not false it does savage spoilsport. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not four-wheel and is a kind of a Guatemalan then it is ametabolic. sent6: if the nucleoprotein is not a kind of a Assamese but it savages alienage it is a kind of a chivalry. sent7: the oscillator is a conjugation if it does not savage PWR and recoups ambassadress. sent8: if the tartan does not savage Bern and is useful it is a zeta. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a drivel and it is a swordfish it is a blindness. sent10: something is a mica if it is not a squeeze and is four-wheel. sent11: there is something such that if it is not an entity and drives then it is a kind of a planarian. sent12: the tartan savages alienage if it is non-interrogative thing that is a conjugation. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a nod and it is a zeta then it is a straight. sent14: there is something such that if it is interrogative and is a conjugation that it does savage alienage is not wrong. sent15: if the NSAID is not irreparable but it is interrogative it is a delavirdine. sent16: the tartan is onomastics if it does not promise blender and is a podzol. sent17: the costmary is a kind of a May if it is not a conjugation and is thermodynamics. sent18: if the tartan does not savage alienage and is a strengthener then it does promise Xyris. sent19: if the tartan is not vaginal but it is less then it savages immortelle. sent20: the tartan is afferent if that it is not elysian and does concur is true. sent21: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drawee and it is a camouflage then it is a kind of a Stoic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the inexcusableness happens.
|
{C}
|
sent1: the recouping Gabon happens. sent2: the recouping Abelmoschus occurs. sent3: the inexcusableness does not occur if the recouping Gabon and the recouping Abelmoschus occurs. sent4: the thriving does not occur.
|
sent1: {A} sent2: {B} sent3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬{JE}
|
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the recouping Gabon and the recouping Abelmoschus happens.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the inexcusableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the recouping Gabon happens. sent2: the recouping Abelmoschus occurs. sent3: the inexcusableness does not occur if the recouping Gabon and the recouping Abelmoschus occurs. sent4: the thriving does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the recouping Gabon and the recouping Abelmoschus happens.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the cadmium is evangelical and an engine.
|
({B}{c} & {C}{c})
|
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is carvel-built and it is opaque is not true. sent2: if the beat is a kind of a Sabbatarian then either the Floridian is not evangelical or it does not promise astronaut or both. sent3: if the cadmium is a Tahiti and does not erupt tracheid then it erupts pinfold. sent4: something is a kind of a addax and/or it hums. sent5: if the lotus is not a kind of a Sabbatarian then the fact that the Floridian does volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both is not incorrect. sent6: if the beat is not a Saba then the cadmium is a Tahiti but it does not erupt tracheid. sent7: a Monodon promises astronaut. sent8: the Floridian recoups haven. sent9: if something is evangelical then it is a kind of a volunteer. sent10: something is a volunteer and/or is a responsibility. sent11: if something is not a volunteer and/or it is a responsibility the cadmium is evangelical. sent12: the fact that the lotus is not evangelical is not incorrect if the Floridian is not evangelical or it does not promise astronaut or both. sent13: the Floridian is a volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both. sent14: if something does citify it is a Chalcedon. sent15: if the fact that the Floridian does promise astronaut and is not a Cecidomyidae is correct then that the lotus is not a kind of an engine is not wrong. sent16: the cadmium is a Monodon. sent17: if the cadmium erupts pinfold the Floridian promises astronaut and is not a Cecidomyidae. sent18: the soap is a Monodon if either the lotus is evangelical or it is not a kind of a Sabbatarian or both. sent19: the Floridian is not a volunteer and/or it is a kind of a responsibility if the lotus is not a Sabbatarian. sent20: the lotus is not a Sabbatarian. sent21: the cadmium does savage skidpan and it is a rollover. sent22: the cadmium is evangelical if something does not volunteer. sent23: something that is not an engine is evangelical or not a Sabbatarian or both.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬({M}x & {N}x) sent2: {A}{d} -> (¬{B}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent3: ({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> {G}{c} sent4: (Ex): ({AP}x v {CK}x) sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent6: ¬{J}{d} -> ({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent7: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent8: {FP}{b} sent9: (x): {B}x -> {AA}x sent10: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent11: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}{c} sent12: (¬{B}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent13: ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent14: (x): {GN}x -> {CF}x sent15: ({D}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent16: {E}{c} sent17: {G}{c} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent18: ({B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {E}{gc} sent19: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent20: ¬{A}{a} sent21: ({JF}{c} & {L}{c}) sent22: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {B}{c} sent23: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x)
|
[
"sent19 & sent20 -> int1: the Floridian is not a volunteer and/or it is a kind of a responsibility.; int1 -> int2: either something does not volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the cadmium is evangelical.; sent7 -> int4: the cadmium promises astronaut if the fact that it is a Monodon is not wrong.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the cadmium does promise astronaut.;"
] |
[
"sent19 & sent20 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x); int2 & sent11 -> int3: {B}{c}; sent7 -> int4: {E}{c} -> {D}{c}; int4 & sent16 -> int5: {D}{c};"
] |
the soap is a kind of a Monodon.
|
{E}{gc}
|
[
"sent23 -> int6: the lotus is evangelical and/or it is not a Sabbatarian if it is not an engine.;"
] | 11 | 4 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the cadmium is evangelical and an engine. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is carvel-built and it is opaque is not true. sent2: if the beat is a kind of a Sabbatarian then either the Floridian is not evangelical or it does not promise astronaut or both. sent3: if the cadmium is a Tahiti and does not erupt tracheid then it erupts pinfold. sent4: something is a kind of a addax and/or it hums. sent5: if the lotus is not a kind of a Sabbatarian then the fact that the Floridian does volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both is not incorrect. sent6: if the beat is not a Saba then the cadmium is a Tahiti but it does not erupt tracheid. sent7: a Monodon promises astronaut. sent8: the Floridian recoups haven. sent9: if something is evangelical then it is a kind of a volunteer. sent10: something is a volunteer and/or is a responsibility. sent11: if something is not a volunteer and/or it is a responsibility the cadmium is evangelical. sent12: the fact that the lotus is not evangelical is not incorrect if the Floridian is not evangelical or it does not promise astronaut or both. sent13: the Floridian is a volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both. sent14: if something does citify it is a Chalcedon. sent15: if the fact that the Floridian does promise astronaut and is not a Cecidomyidae is correct then that the lotus is not a kind of an engine is not wrong. sent16: the cadmium is a Monodon. sent17: if the cadmium erupts pinfold the Floridian promises astronaut and is not a Cecidomyidae. sent18: the soap is a Monodon if either the lotus is evangelical or it is not a kind of a Sabbatarian or both. sent19: the Floridian is not a volunteer and/or it is a kind of a responsibility if the lotus is not a Sabbatarian. sent20: the lotus is not a Sabbatarian. sent21: the cadmium does savage skidpan and it is a rollover. sent22: the cadmium is evangelical if something does not volunteer. sent23: something that is not an engine is evangelical or not a Sabbatarian or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent19 & sent20 -> int1: the Floridian is not a volunteer and/or it is a kind of a responsibility.; int1 -> int2: either something does not volunteer or it is a kind of a responsibility or both.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the cadmium is evangelical.; sent7 -> int4: the cadmium promises astronaut if the fact that it is a Monodon is not wrong.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the cadmium does promise astronaut.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the attempt does not occur.
|
¬{D}
|
sent1: if the deceleration occurs then the attempt happens. sent2: the debriefing jostle occurs. sent3: the womanhood happens. sent4: that the gouging Giraudoux does not occur leads to that the attempt does not occur. sent5: the gouging Giraudoux does not occur if the womanhood occurs or the baby happens or both.
|
sent1: {E} -> {D} sent2: {EN} sent3: {A} sent4: ¬{C} -> ¬{D} sent5: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C}
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: the womanhood occurs and/or the baby occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the gouging Giraudoux does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); int1 & sent5 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
either the debriefing pegboard or the phonicsness or both happens.
|
({HR} v {R})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the attempt does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the deceleration occurs then the attempt happens. sent2: the debriefing jostle occurs. sent3: the womanhood happens. sent4: that the gouging Giraudoux does not occur leads to that the attempt does not occur. sent5: the gouging Giraudoux does not occur if the womanhood occurs or the baby happens or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: the womanhood occurs and/or the baby occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the gouging Giraudoux does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that either the nettle does not glower Doolittle or it is histological or both is not correct.
|
¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})
|
sent1: the fact that something does not glower Doolittle and/or is histological does not hold if it does crispen. sent2: there exists something such that it does not covet. sent3: if something does not covet then the nettle does crispen. sent4: the headrace is a kind of histological thing that does crispen if it does not covet.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}{aa} sent4: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AB}{a} & {A}{a})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the fact that the nettle does not glower Doolittle or it is histological or both is false if it crispens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the nettle does crispen.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the nettle either does not glower Doolittle or is histological or both.
|
(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})
|
[] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that either the nettle does not glower Doolittle or it is histological or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not glower Doolittle and/or is histological does not hold if it does crispen. sent2: there exists something such that it does not covet. sent3: if something does not covet then the nettle does crispen. sent4: the headrace is a kind of histological thing that does crispen if it does not covet. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the nettle does not glower Doolittle or it is histological or both is false if it crispens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the nettle does crispen.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the pediculicide is a signed.
|
{F}{d}
|
sent1: if the flare is prescriptive the R-2 does not articulate and is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent2: the fact that if the sludge does not diminish sack and does not own then that the enterokinase does not diminish sack hold hold. sent3: if that the enterokinase is a hydrozoan that is nonreversible does not hold the izar is not a Anguillan. sent4: if the flare is prescriptive then the R-2 does not articulate. sent5: the flare is not a kind of a Kwajalein and it does not articulate if the curbside is not a kind of a tracked. sent6: the fact that the enterokinase is a hydrozoan and it is nonreversible is not right if it does not diminish sack. sent7: the lawgiver either does glower flare or does gouge leatherback or both. sent8: the pediculicide does not gouge leatherback. sent9: if the flare is not a Kwajalein the R-2 is not prescriptive. sent10: if something is a dudeen it does debrief squatness. sent11: a non-topping thing blows and is not an extraterrestrial. sent12: that the curbside does not track hold if the ectomorph is both a blow and not an extraterrestrial. sent13: the pediculicide signs if the R-2 does not articulate but it is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent14: if the lawgiver glowers flare then the flare is not non-prescriptive. sent15: the fact that the lawgiver does not gouge leatherback and it does not glower flare is incorrect if the R-2 is not prescriptive. sent16: the patricide is a dudeen if the izar is not a Anguillan. sent17: if the pediculicide does gouge leatherback and is a signed then the R-2 is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent18: the sludge does not diminish sack and it does not own.
|
sent1: {C}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: (¬{P}{j} & ¬{R}{j}) -> ¬{P}{i} sent3: ¬({O}{i} & {N}{i}) -> ¬{M}{h} sent4: {C}{c} -> ¬{E}{b} sent5: ¬{G}{e} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent6: ¬{P}{i} -> ¬({O}{i} & {N}{i}) sent7: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) sent8: ¬{B}{d} sent9: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} sent10: (x): {L}x -> {K}x sent11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & ¬{I}x) sent12: ({H}{f} & ¬{I}{f}) -> ¬{G}{e} sent13: (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {F}{d} sent14: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent15: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent16: ¬{M}{h} -> {L}{g} sent17: ({B}{d} & {F}{d}) -> {D}{b} sent18: (¬{P}{j} & ¬{R}{j})
|
[] |
[] |
the pediculicide does not sign.
|
¬{F}{d}
|
[
"sent11 -> int1: if the ectomorph is not a kind of a topping then it is both a blow and not an extraterrestrial.; sent10 -> int2: if that the patricide is a dudeen is correct it does debrief squatness.; sent2 & sent18 -> int3: the enterokinase does not diminish sack.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the enterokinase is a kind of a hydrozoan and it is nonreversible does not hold.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the izar is not a kind of a Anguillan.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the patricide is a dudeen.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the patricide does debrief squatness.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it debriefs squatness.;"
] | 15 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the pediculicide is a signed. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flare is prescriptive the R-2 does not articulate and is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent2: the fact that if the sludge does not diminish sack and does not own then that the enterokinase does not diminish sack hold hold. sent3: if that the enterokinase is a hydrozoan that is nonreversible does not hold the izar is not a Anguillan. sent4: if the flare is prescriptive then the R-2 does not articulate. sent5: the flare is not a kind of a Kwajalein and it does not articulate if the curbside is not a kind of a tracked. sent6: the fact that the enterokinase is a hydrozoan and it is nonreversible is not right if it does not diminish sack. sent7: the lawgiver either does glower flare or does gouge leatherback or both. sent8: the pediculicide does not gouge leatherback. sent9: if the flare is not a Kwajalein the R-2 is not prescriptive. sent10: if something is a dudeen it does debrief squatness. sent11: a non-topping thing blows and is not an extraterrestrial. sent12: that the curbside does not track hold if the ectomorph is both a blow and not an extraterrestrial. sent13: the pediculicide signs if the R-2 does not articulate but it is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent14: if the lawgiver glowers flare then the flare is not non-prescriptive. sent15: the fact that the lawgiver does not gouge leatherback and it does not glower flare is incorrect if the R-2 is not prescriptive. sent16: the patricide is a dudeen if the izar is not a Anguillan. sent17: if the pediculicide does gouge leatherback and is a signed then the R-2 is a kind of a Kwajalein. sent18: the sludge does not diminish sack and it does not own. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the gouging Bramante does not occur.
|
¬{B}
|
sent1: the Aboriginalness does not occur if the fact that the loudness occurs and the fearfulness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the loudness and the fearfulness happens does not hold if the gouging catch does not occur. sent3: the glowering sale does not occur if the mutativeness does not occur. sent4: if that both the non-incidentalness and the gouging Bramante occurs is wrong then the gouging Bramante does not occur. sent5: the names does not occur. sent6: if the Aboriginalness does not occur the irruption and the diminishing moorfowl happens. sent7: that the umbellateness and the non-hymenalness happens is wrong if the buccalness does not occur. sent8: if the eyeful does not occur then the alphabetization and the photographicness happens. sent9: if the fact that the diminishing patriarch does not occur and the incidentalness occurs is not true the incidentalness does not occur. sent10: the cheep but not the angulation occurs if the debriefing sirrah occurs. sent11: if the alphabetization happens then the gladness and the non-activeness happens. sent12: if the diminishing moorfowl occurs then that the diminishing patriarch does not occur but the incidentalness happens is false. sent13: if the glowering sale happens but the uncial does not occur the gouging Bramante happens. sent14: if the glowering sale occurs then the debriefing sirrah occurs. sent15: the offsetting does not occur and the Mesozoicness does not occur if the disconnection does not occur. sent16: that the glowering sale does not occur and the uncialness does not occur is caused by the non-mutativeness. sent17: the non-symmetricalness and the non-dynamicsness occurs. sent18: the eyeful does not occur if that the umbellateness and the non-hymenalness happens is not correct. sent19: that the mutativeness does not occur is not wrong. sent20: if the fact that the gladness but not the active happens is not incorrect the gouging catch does not occur. sent21: the glowering sale does not occur. sent22: the buccalness does not occur if the cheep happens and the angulation does not occur. sent23: if that the glowering sale does not occur and the uncial does not occur is correct then the gouging Bramante happens.
|
sent1: ¬({I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} sent2: ¬{J} -> ¬({I} & {H}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent4: ¬(¬{C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬{ES} sent6: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) sent7: ¬{R} -> ¬({P} & ¬{Q}) sent8: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) sent9: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{C} sent10: {U} -> ({S} & ¬{T}) sent11: {M} -> ({L} & ¬{K}) sent12: {E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) sent13: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent14: {AA} -> {U} sent15: ¬{ED} -> (¬{AU} & ¬{CE}) sent16: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent17: (¬{IF} & ¬{DA}) sent18: ¬({P} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O} sent19: ¬{A} sent20: ({L} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{J} sent21: ¬{AA} sent22: ({S} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{R} sent23: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B}
|
[
"sent16 & sent19 -> int1: the glowering sale does not occur and the uncialness does not occur.; int1 & sent23 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent16 & sent19 -> int1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & sent23 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the gouging Bramante does not occur.
|
¬{B}
|
[] | 18 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the gouging Bramante does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Aboriginalness does not occur if the fact that the loudness occurs and the fearfulness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the loudness and the fearfulness happens does not hold if the gouging catch does not occur. sent3: the glowering sale does not occur if the mutativeness does not occur. sent4: if that both the non-incidentalness and the gouging Bramante occurs is wrong then the gouging Bramante does not occur. sent5: the names does not occur. sent6: if the Aboriginalness does not occur the irruption and the diminishing moorfowl happens. sent7: that the umbellateness and the non-hymenalness happens is wrong if the buccalness does not occur. sent8: if the eyeful does not occur then the alphabetization and the photographicness happens. sent9: if the fact that the diminishing patriarch does not occur and the incidentalness occurs is not true the incidentalness does not occur. sent10: the cheep but not the angulation occurs if the debriefing sirrah occurs. sent11: if the alphabetization happens then the gladness and the non-activeness happens. sent12: if the diminishing moorfowl occurs then that the diminishing patriarch does not occur but the incidentalness happens is false. sent13: if the glowering sale happens but the uncial does not occur the gouging Bramante happens. sent14: if the glowering sale occurs then the debriefing sirrah occurs. sent15: the offsetting does not occur and the Mesozoicness does not occur if the disconnection does not occur. sent16: that the glowering sale does not occur and the uncialness does not occur is caused by the non-mutativeness. sent17: the non-symmetricalness and the non-dynamicsness occurs. sent18: the eyeful does not occur if that the umbellateness and the non-hymenalness happens is not correct. sent19: that the mutativeness does not occur is not wrong. sent20: if the fact that the gladness but not the active happens is not incorrect the gouging catch does not occur. sent21: the glowering sale does not occur. sent22: the buccalness does not occur if the cheep happens and the angulation does not occur. sent23: if that the glowering sale does not occur and the uncial does not occur is correct then the gouging Bramante happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent16 & sent19 -> int1: the glowering sale does not occur and the uncialness does not occur.; int1 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Kigali it does not speak or it does equate or both is wrong.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x))
|
sent1: something is not a kind of a basidiocarp and/or it gouges orientalist if it is a kind of a petiolule. sent2: if the assignee is a Kigali then it does not speak and/or it equates. sent3: there is something such that if it resides then it is rabbinical or it is acrocentric or both.
|
sent1: (x): {AG}x -> (¬{CE}x v {DF}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): {IP}x -> ({II}x v {K}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if the orientalist is a petiolule then it is not a basidiocarp and/or it does gouge orientalist.
|
{AG}{bm} -> (¬{CE}{bm} v {DF}{bm})
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Kigali it does not speak or it does equate or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a basidiocarp and/or it gouges orientalist if it is a kind of a petiolule. sent2: if the assignee is a Kigali then it does not speak and/or it equates. sent3: there is something such that if it resides then it is rabbinical or it is acrocentric or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the cellblock glowers Myliobatidae.
|
{D}{a}
|
sent1: if that something is a salt that does glower Myliobatidae does not hold it does not glower Myliobatidae. sent2: that the fawn is a kind of a salt and it glowers Myliobatidae is wrong. sent3: if that something does not glower Myliobatidae is right then it is a kind of a welcoming and it is a disambiguator. sent4: something is a smilax and it is expressible if that it is not typographic hold. sent5: that something is a smilax is not wrong. sent6: the cellblock does glower Myliobatidae if it is expressible.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x sent2: ¬({F}{cq} & {D}{cq}) sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {AG}x) sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}
|
[] |
[] |
the fawn is expressible and it is a disambiguator.
|
({C}{cq} & {AG}{cq})
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: if that the fawn is a kind of a salt and it does glower Myliobatidae is not correct it does not glower Myliobatidae.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fawn does not glower Myliobatidae.; sent3 -> int3: if the fawn does not glower Myliobatidae then it is a welcoming and it is a kind of a disambiguator.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fawn is welcoming thing that is a disambiguator.; int4 -> int5: the fawn is a kind of a disambiguator.; sent4 -> int6: if the cellblock is not typographic it is a smilax and it is not inexpressible.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the cellblock glowers Myliobatidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a salt that does glower Myliobatidae does not hold it does not glower Myliobatidae. sent2: that the fawn is a kind of a salt and it glowers Myliobatidae is wrong. sent3: if that something does not glower Myliobatidae is right then it is a kind of a welcoming and it is a disambiguator. sent4: something is a smilax and it is expressible if that it is not typographic hold. sent5: that something is a smilax is not wrong. sent6: the cellblock does glower Myliobatidae if it is expressible. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the unfavorableness does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: the low-levelness happens. sent2: that the glomerularness occurs is prevented by that the toxicologicalness and the suit occurs. sent3: the objective does not occur if the gouging left-handedness does not occur. sent4: if the chastity does not occur then both the unfavorableness and the low-levelness occurs. sent5: if the suiting does not occur the objective and the gouging left-handedness occurs. sent6: if the objective occurs the unfavorableness occurs. sent7: both the profligacy and the glowering homunculus happens. sent8: if the actinometry does not occur the low-levelness occurs and the gouging moccasin occurs. sent9: if that the chastity and the actinometry happens does not hold then the chastity does not occur. sent10: if both the low-levelness and the chastity happens then the unfavorableness does not occur.
|
sent1: {A} sent2: ({FB} & {G}) -> ¬{AC} sent3: ¬{F} -> ¬{E} sent4: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent5: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent6: {E} -> {C} sent7: ({DR} & {HJ}) sent8: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {IM}) sent9: ¬({B} & {D}) -> ¬{B} sent10: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C}
|
[] |
[] |
that the unfavorableness happens is right.
|
{C}
|
[] | 8 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the unfavorableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the low-levelness happens. sent2: that the glomerularness occurs is prevented by that the toxicologicalness and the suit occurs. sent3: the objective does not occur if the gouging left-handedness does not occur. sent4: if the chastity does not occur then both the unfavorableness and the low-levelness occurs. sent5: if the suiting does not occur the objective and the gouging left-handedness occurs. sent6: if the objective occurs the unfavorableness occurs. sent7: both the profligacy and the glowering homunculus happens. sent8: if the actinometry does not occur the low-levelness occurs and the gouging moccasin occurs. sent9: if that the chastity and the actinometry happens does not hold then the chastity does not occur. sent10: if both the low-levelness and the chastity happens then the unfavorableness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the derrick does debrief aspirator.
|
{B}{b}
|
sent1: the fact that the lacing is a fulminate is not false if that it abstains and it does not fulminate is false. sent2: the derrick does debrief aspirator if the fact that the shelter is not non-antiseptic is true. sent3: everything is not cucurbitaceous. sent4: if something diminishes adience it is not Boeotian and is not handleless. sent5: that the derrick does not debrief aspirator if there is something such that that it does glower emoticon or it is antiseptic or both does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the halftone is a Carmelite if the socialite is not handleless. sent7: the fact that the shelter glowers ranger hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it debriefs aspirator and it is not an antiseptic is not true. sent9: that something abstains but it does not fulminate is wrong if it is not cucurbitaceous. sent10: if there exists something such that it is apneic that the shelter is an antiseptic hold. sent11: the socialite is not handleless if the lacing is not Boeotian and it is not handleless. sent12: there is something such that that it is both not apneic and not bracteal is wrong. sent13: the shelter is antiseptic if there exists something such that that that it is both not apneic and non-bracteal hold is not correct. sent14: if something does fulminate then it does diminish adience.
|
sent1: ¬({J}{f} & ¬{H}{f}) -> {H}{f} sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{I}x sent4: (x): {F}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{E}x) sent5: (x): ¬({C}x v {A}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent6: ¬{E}{e} -> {D}{d} sent7: {FM}{a} sent8: (Ex): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) sent9: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({J}x & ¬{H}x) sent10: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent11: (¬{G}{f} & ¬{E}{f}) -> ¬{E}{e} sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent14: (x): {H}x -> {F}x
|
[
"sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the shelter is a kind of an antiseptic.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent12 & sent13 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the derrick does not debrief aspirator.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
[
"sent4 -> int2: the lacing is non-Boeotian thing that is not handleless if it does diminish adience.; sent9 -> int3: that the wet-nurse does abstain and does not fulminate is not correct if it is not cucurbitaceous.; sent3 -> int4: the wet-nurse is not cucurbitaceous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the wet-nurse does abstain and is not a fulminate does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing that abstains and is not a fulminate.; int6 -> int7: that the lacing does abstain but it is not a fulminate does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the lacing does fulminate.; sent14 -> int9: the lacing does diminish adience if it is a fulminate.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the lacing diminishes adience is not wrong.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the lacing is non-Boeotian thing that is not handleless.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the socialite is not handleless.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the halftone is a Carmelite.;"
] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the derrick does debrief aspirator. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lacing is a fulminate is not false if that it abstains and it does not fulminate is false. sent2: the derrick does debrief aspirator if the fact that the shelter is not non-antiseptic is true. sent3: everything is not cucurbitaceous. sent4: if something diminishes adience it is not Boeotian and is not handleless. sent5: that the derrick does not debrief aspirator if there is something such that that it does glower emoticon or it is antiseptic or both does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the halftone is a Carmelite if the socialite is not handleless. sent7: the fact that the shelter glowers ranger hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it debriefs aspirator and it is not an antiseptic is not true. sent9: that something abstains but it does not fulminate is wrong if it is not cucurbitaceous. sent10: if there exists something such that it is apneic that the shelter is an antiseptic hold. sent11: the socialite is not handleless if the lacing is not Boeotian and it is not handleless. sent12: there is something such that that it is both not apneic and not bracteal is wrong. sent13: the shelter is antiseptic if there exists something such that that that it is both not apneic and non-bracteal hold is not correct. sent14: if something does fulminate then it does diminish adience. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the shelter is a kind of an antiseptic.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
both the toxicologicalness and the whip occurs.
|
({C} & {B})
|
sent1: if the gouging bow does not occur then the morphemicness occurs. sent2: the Haitianness occurs. sent3: that the stocktaking does not occur brings about that both the gouging figurehead and the debriefing halberd occurs. sent4: the celebration does not occur. sent5: the gouging liverwort occurs. sent6: the stocktaking does not occur. sent7: the Haitian does not occur if the gouging figurehead and the supposing occurs. sent8: the averaging does not occur. sent9: the toxicologicalness occurs and the Haitian occurs. sent10: if the fact that the Liberianness but not the supposing occurs is false then the supposing happens. sent11: the gouging branded happens and the squealing happens. sent12: the appealableness occurs. sent13: if the debriefing Murdoch does not occur the hoofing occurs. sent14: the whip happens if the celebration does not occur. sent15: the mixture occurs. sent16: the gouging indapamide occurs. sent17: that the Haitian does not occur leads to either that the toxicologicalness happens or that the whipping happens or both.
|
sent1: ¬{HK} -> {HP} sent2: {D} sent3: ¬{I} -> ({F} & {H}) sent4: ¬{A} sent5: {AU} sent6: ¬{I} sent7: ({F} & {G}) -> ¬{D} sent8: ¬{HS} sent9: ({C} & {D}) sent10: ¬({J} & ¬{G}) -> {G} sent11: ({AC} & {FM}) sent12: {JH} sent13: ¬{GM} -> {FQ} sent14: ¬{A} -> {B} sent15: {JG} sent16: {ER} sent17: ¬{D} -> ({C} v {B})
|
[
"sent14 & sent4 -> int1: the whipping occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the toxicologicalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 & sent4 -> int1: {B}; sent9 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the toxicologicalness occurs and the whipping happens is wrong.
|
¬({C} & {B})
|
[
" -> hypothesis;"
] | 0 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = both the toxicologicalness and the whip occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gouging bow does not occur then the morphemicness occurs. sent2: the Haitianness occurs. sent3: that the stocktaking does not occur brings about that both the gouging figurehead and the debriefing halberd occurs. sent4: the celebration does not occur. sent5: the gouging liverwort occurs. sent6: the stocktaking does not occur. sent7: the Haitian does not occur if the gouging figurehead and the supposing occurs. sent8: the averaging does not occur. sent9: the toxicologicalness occurs and the Haitian occurs. sent10: if the fact that the Liberianness but not the supposing occurs is false then the supposing happens. sent11: the gouging branded happens and the squealing happens. sent12: the appealableness occurs. sent13: if the debriefing Murdoch does not occur the hoofing occurs. sent14: the whip happens if the celebration does not occur. sent15: the mixture occurs. sent16: the gouging indapamide occurs. sent17: that the Haitian does not occur leads to either that the toxicologicalness happens or that the whipping happens or both. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 & sent4 -> int1: the whipping occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the toxicologicalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the diminishing legitimacy does not occur.
|
¬{B}
|
sent1: the tangibleness does not occur. sent2: not the heliotherapy but the diminishing legitimacy happens if the retrenching occurs. sent3: if the fact that the heliotherapy does not occur hold then that both the aquiculturalness and the phoneticness occurs is not correct. sent4: the sortition does not occur. sent5: that the christianness and the diminishing fanion happens is triggered by that the deputation does not occur. sent6: if that the fact that both the mintage and the glowering Pentecost happens is false is right then the diminishing glider does not occur. sent7: that the retrenching does not occur is prevented by that the diminishing fanion occurs. sent8: the impromptu does not occur. sent9: the perambulation does not occur. sent10: the apteralness does not occur. sent11: the fact that that the mutableness occurs and the basiscopicness happens is right is incorrect. sent12: if that the aquiculturalness and the phoneticness occurs is not correct the diminishing legitimacy does not occur. sent13: if the hypertonicness does not occur the fact that the fancying occurs and the debriefing Anomia happens is not correct. sent14: that the topping and the demagoguery happens is not correct. sent15: that the diminishing legitimacy does not occur is caused by that the phoneticness does not occur. sent16: the hajj does not occur if that the admitting and the breakfasting occurs is wrong. sent17: the heliotherapy does not occur. sent18: the debriefing Anomia does not occur.
|
sent1: ¬{JF} sent2: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{DN} sent5: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) sent6: ¬({HS} & {GP}) -> ¬{DO} sent7: {D} -> {C} sent8: ¬{HL} sent9: ¬{AD} sent10: ¬{AH} sent11: ¬({EP} & {DC}) sent12: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent13: ¬{GM} -> ¬({BE} & {DK}) sent14: ¬({DL} & {DF}) sent15: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} sent16: ¬({GH} & {GU}) -> ¬{DA} sent17: ¬{A} sent18: ¬{DK}
|
[
"sent3 & sent17 -> int1: that the aquiculturalness happens and the phoneticness happens is not right.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent17 -> int1: ¬({AA} & {AB}); sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the topping and the demagoguery happens is not correct.
|
¬({DL} & {DF})
|
[
" -> hypothesis;"
] | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the diminishing legitimacy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the tangibleness does not occur. sent2: not the heliotherapy but the diminishing legitimacy happens if the retrenching occurs. sent3: if the fact that the heliotherapy does not occur hold then that both the aquiculturalness and the phoneticness occurs is not correct. sent4: the sortition does not occur. sent5: that the christianness and the diminishing fanion happens is triggered by that the deputation does not occur. sent6: if that the fact that both the mintage and the glowering Pentecost happens is false is right then the diminishing glider does not occur. sent7: that the retrenching does not occur is prevented by that the diminishing fanion occurs. sent8: the impromptu does not occur. sent9: the perambulation does not occur. sent10: the apteralness does not occur. sent11: the fact that that the mutableness occurs and the basiscopicness happens is right is incorrect. sent12: if that the aquiculturalness and the phoneticness occurs is not correct the diminishing legitimacy does not occur. sent13: if the hypertonicness does not occur the fact that the fancying occurs and the debriefing Anomia happens is not correct. sent14: that the topping and the demagoguery happens is not correct. sent15: that the diminishing legitimacy does not occur is caused by that the phoneticness does not occur. sent16: the hajj does not occur if that the admitting and the breakfasting occurs is wrong. sent17: the heliotherapy does not occur. sent18: the debriefing Anomia does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent17 -> int1: that the aquiculturalness happens and the phoneticness happens is not right.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it is parturient then it is not a kind of a icecap and it is intracellular is not correct.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x))
|
sent1: there is something such that if it is parturient then it is intracellular. sent2: there is something such that if it lapidifies then it does alternate and it is a anchusa. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Christmasberry it is amethystine. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is parturient then it is not a kind of a icecap is not incorrect. sent5: the kat is not a darts but woolen if it is parturient. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Chardonnay it is not a hectograph. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a hectograph is not incorrect then it is not an installment. sent8: the kat is not closed but it is a kind of a Kamba if it is a princewood. sent9: there is something such that if it is parturient then it is a icecap and it is intracellular. sent10: there is something such that if it is permissive it is a kind of a feminist and gouges shipworm. sent11: if the kat is parturient it is intracellular. sent12: if the shelter is parturient it is not zoological. sent13: the kat is not a icecap but it is intracellular if the fact that it is parturient is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it glowers remarriage then it does dart and it is a thwart. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a catalog it does diminish ice. sent16: the eremite is a kind of non-Anglican thing that is humanitarian if the fact that it is parturient hold. sent17: something that is a chute is non-parturient thing that is .38-caliber. sent18: if the mammalogist is a drollery then it does not gouge atrium and is a stopwatch. sent19: that the kat is not a kind of a icecap is right if it is a drollery. sent20: if the kat is parturient it is a icecap and is intracellular.
|
sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x sent2: (Ex): {CJ}x -> ({BR}x & {T}x) sent3: (Ex): {HF}x -> {HS}x sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{BN}{aa} & {BP}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): {JE}x -> ¬{ED}x sent7: (Ex): {ED}x -> ¬{CH}x sent8: {JG}{aa} -> (¬{FB}{aa} & {AI}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: (Ex): {EG}x -> ({AJ}x & {N}x) sent11: {A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent12: {A}{is} -> ¬{GU}{is} sent13: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): {HJ}x -> ({BN}x & {GT}x) sent15: (Ex): {GH}x -> {GA}x sent16: {A}{er} -> (¬{IC}{er} & {HH}{er}) sent17: (x): {EB}x -> (¬{A}x & {FG}x) sent18: {CO}{id} -> (¬{GC}{id} & {HA}{id}) sent19: {CO}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent20: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if that the telephonist is not a chute is not right it is both not parturient and .38-caliber.
|
{EB}{al} -> (¬{A}{al} & {FG}{al})
|
[
"sent17 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is parturient then it is not a kind of a icecap and it is intracellular is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is parturient then it is intracellular. sent2: there is something such that if it lapidifies then it does alternate and it is a anchusa. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Christmasberry it is amethystine. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is parturient then it is not a kind of a icecap is not incorrect. sent5: the kat is not a darts but woolen if it is parturient. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Chardonnay it is not a hectograph. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a hectograph is not incorrect then it is not an installment. sent8: the kat is not closed but it is a kind of a Kamba if it is a princewood. sent9: there is something such that if it is parturient then it is a icecap and it is intracellular. sent10: there is something such that if it is permissive it is a kind of a feminist and gouges shipworm. sent11: if the kat is parturient it is intracellular. sent12: if the shelter is parturient it is not zoological. sent13: the kat is not a icecap but it is intracellular if the fact that it is parturient is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it glowers remarriage then it does dart and it is a thwart. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a catalog it does diminish ice. sent16: the eremite is a kind of non-Anglican thing that is humanitarian if the fact that it is parturient hold. sent17: something that is a chute is non-parturient thing that is .38-caliber. sent18: if the mammalogist is a drollery then it does not gouge atrium and is a stopwatch. sent19: that the kat is not a kind of a icecap is right if it is a drollery. sent20: if the kat is parturient it is a icecap and is intracellular. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the drink is not a Makataimeshekiakiak and does not clench.
|
(¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c})
|
sent1: the fact that the youth-on-age effects and is not a kind of a protectionist does not hold. sent2: the planarian does not clench if the youth-on-age is a kind of a aeroembolism and it is a dungeon. sent3: that the youth-on-age is a aeroembolism is right if the fact that it is both an effect and not a protectionist is not right. sent4: the drink is not a Makataimeshekiakiak and does not clench if the planarian does not clench. sent5: the youth-on-age is a dungeon if the fact that it is a Delacroix and is not cucurbitaceous does not hold.
|
sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent5: ¬({F}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> {A}{a}
|
[
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the youth-on-age is a kind of a aeroembolism.;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the drink is not a Makataimeshekiakiak and does not clench. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the youth-on-age effects and is not a kind of a protectionist does not hold. sent2: the planarian does not clench if the youth-on-age is a kind of a aeroembolism and it is a dungeon. sent3: that the youth-on-age is a aeroembolism is right if the fact that it is both an effect and not a protectionist is not right. sent4: the drink is not a Makataimeshekiakiak and does not clench if the planarian does not clench. sent5: the youth-on-age is a dungeon if the fact that it is a Delacroix and is not cucurbitaceous does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the youth-on-age is a kind of a aeroembolism.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the willowherb diminishes flyspeck is true.
|
{D}{a}
|
sent1: the gorgonzola is a neatness. sent2: the gorgonzola is not a teasing. sent3: everything is a chlorine. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a teasing and/or does lick is incorrect it is not a dipole. sent5: that the willowherb is a neatness that is not expiratory is not right if the gorgonzola is not a dipole. sent6: something is not a lick if the fact that it is both expiratory and a lick is false. sent7: there exists nothing that teases or is a lick or both. sent8: the ormolu is expiratory if something that is a dipole is not a neatness.
|
sent1: {C}{aa} sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} sent3: (x): {E}x sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬({A}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent8: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}{b}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: the gorgonzola is not a kind of a dipole if that it is a teasing and/or does lick is not true.; sent7 -> int2: that either the gorgonzola is a teasing or it licks or both is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gorgonzola is not a dipole.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the willowherb is a neatness but not expiratory is not right.;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent7 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent5 -> int4: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a});"
] |
the galax is not a lick.
|
¬{AB}{di}
|
[
"sent6 -> int5: the galax is not a lick if the fact that it is expiratory and it does lick is false.;"
] | 10 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the willowherb diminishes flyspeck is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the gorgonzola is a neatness. sent2: the gorgonzola is not a teasing. sent3: everything is a chlorine. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a teasing and/or does lick is incorrect it is not a dipole. sent5: that the willowherb is a neatness that is not expiratory is not right if the gorgonzola is not a dipole. sent6: something is not a lick if the fact that it is both expiratory and a lick is false. sent7: there exists nothing that teases or is a lick or both. sent8: the ormolu is expiratory if something that is a dipole is not a neatness. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: the gorgonzola is not a kind of a dipole if that it is a teasing and/or does lick is not true.; sent7 -> int2: that either the gorgonzola is a teasing or it licks or both is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gorgonzola is not a dipole.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the willowherb is a neatness but not expiratory is not right.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Mogul gouges composition and does beat.
|
({B}{a} & {C}{a})
|
sent1: that the kishke gouges Norvasc and is not ineligible is incorrect if it is protestant. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is seamless and is not a beats is false the Mogul is a beats. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is seamless and it is a beats is not true. sent4: the blizzard is a set if there exists something such that the fact that it is a beats that does gouge composition is not right. sent5: that the kishke is a beats and it gouges composition does not hold if that the knee-high gouges Norvasc is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is protestant and it is ineligible does not hold then the knee-high does not gouge Norvasc. sent7: everything is seamless and it is a kind of a Northamptonshire. sent8: the Mogul is a kind of a sipunculid and gouges composition. sent9: the Mogul does glower Corixidae. sent10: if that the fact that the kishke gouges Norvasc and is not ineligible is not right hold then the fact that it gouges Norvasc is false. sent11: the costermonger glowers jalousie and is a sipunculid. sent12: there is something such that it is not seamed and is not a beats. sent13: the fact that the anthozoan is a kind of protestant thing that is ineligible is not true. sent14: if there is something such that it is seamless then the blizzard is a kind of inconsistent a sipunculid. sent15: the composition is a sipunculid.
|
sent1: {F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {C}{a} sent3: (Ex): ¬({D}x & {C}x) sent4: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> {IL}{fj} sent5: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬({C}{b} & {B}{b}) sent6: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}{c} sent7: (x): ({D}x & {H}x) sent8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent9: {EL}{a} sent10: ¬({E}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent11: ({GT}{cp} & {A}{cp}) sent12: (Ex): ({D}x & ¬{C}x) sent13: ¬({F}{d} & {G}{d}) sent14: (x): {D}x -> ({AR}{fj} & {A}{fj}) sent15: {A}{de}
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the Mogul does gouge composition.;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] |
the blizzard does set and it is inconsistent.
|
({IL}{fj} & {AR}{fj})
|
[
"sent13 -> int2: there is something such that that it is protestant and it is ineligible is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the knee-high does not gouge Norvasc.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the kishke is a kind of a beats and gouges composition does not hold hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a beats and it gouges composition is not right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the blizzard is a kind of a set.; sent7 -> int7: the Mogul is seamless thing that is a Northamptonshire.; int7 -> int8: the Mogul is seamless.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is seamless.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the blizzard is a kind of inconsistent thing that is a sipunculid.; int10 -> int11: the blizzard is inconsistent.; int6 & int11 -> hypothesis;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the Mogul gouges composition and does beat. ; $context$ = sent1: that the kishke gouges Norvasc and is not ineligible is incorrect if it is protestant. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is seamless and is not a beats is false the Mogul is a beats. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is seamless and it is a beats is not true. sent4: the blizzard is a set if there exists something such that the fact that it is a beats that does gouge composition is not right. sent5: that the kishke is a beats and it gouges composition does not hold if that the knee-high gouges Norvasc is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is protestant and it is ineligible does not hold then the knee-high does not gouge Norvasc. sent7: everything is seamless and it is a kind of a Northamptonshire. sent8: the Mogul is a kind of a sipunculid and gouges composition. sent9: the Mogul does glower Corixidae. sent10: if that the fact that the kishke gouges Norvasc and is not ineligible is not right hold then the fact that it gouges Norvasc is false. sent11: the costermonger glowers jalousie and is a sipunculid. sent12: there is something such that it is not seamed and is not a beats. sent13: the fact that the anthozoan is a kind of protestant thing that is ineligible is not true. sent14: if there is something such that it is seamless then the blizzard is a kind of inconsistent a sipunculid. sent15: the composition is a sipunculid. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> int1: the Mogul does gouge composition.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the moonshining occurs.
|
{D}
|
sent1: the orderly occurs and the nonsignificantness happens. sent2: the fact that the debriefing birdbath does not occur and the perceptualness does not occur is false. sent3: the perceptualness occurs if the fact that the debriefing birdbath does not occur and the perceptualness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the moonshining does not occur is triggered by that both the nonsignificantness and the perceptualness happens.
|
sent1: ({A} & {B}) sent2: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{C}) sent3: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{C}) -> {C} sent4: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D}
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: the nonsignificantness occurs.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the perceptualness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nonsignificantness and the perceptualness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: {B}; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the moonshining occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the orderly occurs and the nonsignificantness happens. sent2: the fact that the debriefing birdbath does not occur and the perceptualness does not occur is false. sent3: the perceptualness occurs if the fact that the debriefing birdbath does not occur and the perceptualness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the moonshining does not occur is triggered by that both the nonsignificantness and the perceptualness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: the nonsignificantness occurs.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the perceptualness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nonsignificantness and the perceptualness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it is a lobster and is not a no it debriefs pfannkuchen does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: if a corrupting thing is not violable then it is a kind of a CSE. sent2: there is something such that if it is a camail and does not demulsify it is agrypnotic. sent3: the fathead debriefs pfannkuchen if it is a lobster but not a no. sent4: the fathead is a kind of a narcotraffic if it is an iceman and it is not a bombazine. sent5: if the fathead is a lobster and it is a kind of a no it debriefs pfannkuchen. sent6: if something gouges sacrifice but it does not diminish perithecium then it is no. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a lobster and it is a kind of a no then it does debrief pfannkuchen.
|
sent1: (x): ({GJ}x & ¬{T}x) -> {CA}x sent2: (Ex): ({FK}x & ¬{DH}x) -> {GT}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: ({DN}{aa} & ¬{FJ}{aa}) -> {DT}{aa} sent5: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (x): ({HL}x & ¬{CL}x) -> {AB}x sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the perithecium is a CSE if it corrupts and is not violable.
|
({GJ}{fk} & ¬{T}{fk}) -> {CA}{fk}
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a lobster and is not a no it debriefs pfannkuchen does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if a corrupting thing is not violable then it is a kind of a CSE. sent2: there is something such that if it is a camail and does not demulsify it is agrypnotic. sent3: the fathead debriefs pfannkuchen if it is a lobster but not a no. sent4: the fathead is a kind of a narcotraffic if it is an iceman and it is not a bombazine. sent5: if the fathead is a lobster and it is a kind of a no it debriefs pfannkuchen. sent6: if something gouges sacrifice but it does not diminish perithecium then it is no. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a lobster and it is a kind of a no then it does debrief pfannkuchen. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.