version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance
|
the fearfulness does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: the fact that the outing does not occur is not wrong if the indisposing tiered occurs. sent2: if the fact that the bounding and the non-undemonstrativeness occurs does not hold the campfire does not occur. sent3: the fact that the border and the indisposing tiered occurs is false. sent4: the non-outingness prevents the fearfulness. sent5: the fact that the bordering but not the indisposing tiered happens is not true. sent6: the outing does not occur if the fact that the bordering occurs but the indisposing tiered does not occur is not right.
|
sent1: {AB} -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬({EP} & ¬{IP}) -> ¬{DC} sent3: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent5: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent6: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B}
|
[
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the outing does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fearfulness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the outing does not occur is not wrong if the indisposing tiered occurs. sent2: if the fact that the bounding and the non-undemonstrativeness occurs does not hold the campfire does not occur. sent3: the fact that the border and the indisposing tiered occurs is false. sent4: the non-outingness prevents the fearfulness. sent5: the fact that the bordering but not the indisposing tiered happens is not true. sent6: the outing does not occur if the fact that the bordering occurs but the indisposing tiered does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the outing does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bilocation is not a nemertean.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
sent1: the bilocation is a nemertean and a certificate. sent2: the fact that the bilocation does miscast bilocation but it is not a spongefly is false if the insulator is a bogmat. sent3: the bilocation does miscast feathered. sent4: if something does not miscast bilocation that it is a nemertean and a certificate is true. sent5: the ragsorter certificates and is argentic. sent6: the schorl does certificate and/or is a kind of a bogmat if something is a bogmat. sent7: if the seasonal does not comfort it is a bogmat and it is a spongefly. sent8: the seasonal is not a comfort. sent9: the silverfish is a kind of a nemertean. sent10: if that something is a nemertean and miscasts bilocation is wrong it is not a nemertean.
|
sent1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: {D}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent3: {FH}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: ({B}{do} & {CL}{do}) sent6: (x): {D}x -> ({B}{c} v {D}{c}) sent7: ¬{F}{d} -> ({D}{d} & {E}{d}) sent8: ¬{F}{d} sent9: {A}{id} sent10: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the asshole is a nemertean.
|
{A}{m}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: if the asshole does not miscast bilocation then it is a kind of a nemertean that is a certificate.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the bilocation is not a nemertean. ; $context$ = sent1: the bilocation is a nemertean and a certificate. sent2: the fact that the bilocation does miscast bilocation but it is not a spongefly is false if the insulator is a bogmat. sent3: the bilocation does miscast feathered. sent4: if something does not miscast bilocation that it is a nemertean and a certificate is true. sent5: the ragsorter certificates and is argentic. sent6: the schorl does certificate and/or is a kind of a bogmat if something is a bogmat. sent7: if the seasonal does not comfort it is a bogmat and it is a spongefly. sent8: the seasonal is not a comfort. sent9: the silverfish is a kind of a nemertean. sent10: if that something is a nemertean and miscasts bilocation is wrong it is not a nemertean. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the scratch indisposes sneaker and is a neuter does not hold.
|
¬({C}{c} & {D}{c})
|
sent1: if the sneaker is cosmologic then the fact that the scratch indisposes sneaker is not wrong. sent2: the snoop does indispose scratch. sent3: the scratch is not a Percidae. sent4: if the fact that something does not indispose AIAI and it does not unbrace snoop is not true it is a kind of a neuter. sent5: The scratch does indispose snoop. sent6: if the snoop does indispose scratch the sneaker is cosmologic. sent7: if the scratch is not a Percidae that it does not indispose AIAI and it does not unbrace snoop is false.
|
sent1: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: ¬{G}{c} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x sent5: {AA}{aa} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c})
|
[
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the sneaker is cosmologic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scratch does indispose sneaker.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the scratch is a kind of a neuter hold if the fact that it does not indispose AIAI and does not unbrace snoop is not right.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the scratch does not indispose AIAI and does not unbrace snoop is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the scratch is a kind of a neuter.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: {C}{c}; sent4 -> int3: ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {D}{c}; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}); int3 & int4 -> int5: {D}{c}; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that the scratch indisposes sneaker and is a neuter does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sneaker is cosmologic then the fact that the scratch indisposes sneaker is not wrong. sent2: the snoop does indispose scratch. sent3: the scratch is not a Percidae. sent4: if the fact that something does not indispose AIAI and it does not unbrace snoop is not true it is a kind of a neuter. sent5: The scratch does indispose snoop. sent6: if the snoop does indispose scratch the sneaker is cosmologic. sent7: if the scratch is not a Percidae that it does not indispose AIAI and it does not unbrace snoop is false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the sneaker is cosmologic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scratch does indispose sneaker.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the scratch is a kind of a neuter hold if the fact that it does not indispose AIAI and does not unbrace snoop is not right.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the scratch does not indispose AIAI and does not unbrace snoop is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the scratch is a kind of a neuter.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bacchanal is monotonic.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: the veld is not a kind of a renovation if it is a kind of a manometer. sent2: there exists nothing such that it does not indispose scurf and does defervesce. sent3: the bacchanal is a kind of a manometer. sent4: if something indisposes ottoman and is not elysian then it is monotonic. sent5: the veld is monotonic if the bacchanal is not a kind of a renovation. sent6: the fact that the veld is a manometer hold.
|
sent1: {C}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {F}x) sent3: {C}{a} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}x sent5: ¬{B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent6: {C}{b}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bacchanal indisposes ottoman but it is not elysian is incorrect.; sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the veld is not a renovation.; sent4 -> int2: if the bacchanal indisposes ottoman and is not elysian it is monotonic.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent1 & sent6 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent4 -> int2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {A}{a};"
] |
that the bacchanal is not monotonic hold.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that that the cirrostratus does not indispose scurf and defervesces is correct does not hold hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not indispose scurf and it defervesces does not hold.;"
] | 6 | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the bacchanal is monotonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the veld is not a kind of a renovation if it is a kind of a manometer. sent2: there exists nothing such that it does not indispose scurf and does defervesce. sent3: the bacchanal is a kind of a manometer. sent4: if something indisposes ottoman and is not elysian then it is monotonic. sent5: the veld is monotonic if the bacchanal is not a kind of a renovation. sent6: the fact that the veld is a manometer hold. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bacchanal indisposes ottoman but it is not elysian is incorrect.; sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the veld is not a renovation.; sent4 -> int2: if the bacchanal indisposes ottoman and is not elysian it is monotonic.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the star does not piggyback.
|
¬{B}{aa}
|
sent1: the XXY is not a piggyback if something does unbrace subpart and is sapphirine. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a TCP/IP and/or it is not a fret. sent3: that if the XXY is not a sapphirine the star does not detoxify and is a kind of a coverall is not false. sent4: the androsterone is a kind of a piggyback. sent5: if the playmate is not a TCP/IP then it does scintillate and is a taster. sent6: the fact that something does not panic but it is a sapphirine is incorrect if it is a kind of a taster. sent7: the star is not a kind of a heroic but it is a kind of a Toulouse. sent8: the star is a coverall. sent9: the fact that the fact that something is not sapphirine and does not unbrace subpart is not false is false if it is a panic. sent10: there exists nothing such that it is a Hegelian and it does not unbrace subpart. sent11: if the fact that the mignonette is a Hegelian but it does not unbrace subpart is incorrect it unbrace subpart. sent12: if the fact that the XXY is not sapphirine and does not unbrace subpart is incorrect then the star is not a kind of a piggyback. sent13: the XXY is not a sapphirine. sent14: if something that does not detoxify is a coverall then it piggybacks. sent15: the mignonette is a sapphirine if that the playmate is not a panic and is sapphirine does not hold. sent16: the playmate is not a TCP/IP if either something is not a TCP/IP or it is not a fret or both. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a piggyback then that the crookneck piggyback and it is a kind of a coverall is not true.
|
sent1: (x): ({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: (Ex): (¬{H}x v ¬{J}x) sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: {B}{gl} sent5: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{c} & {E}{c}) sent6: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) sent7: (¬{ET}{aa} & {FE}{aa}) sent8: {AB}{aa} sent9: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent10: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{C}x) sent11: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {C}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent13: ¬{A}{a} sent14: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent15: ¬(¬{D}{c} & {A}{c}) -> {A}{b} sent16: (x): (¬{H}x v ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}{c} sent17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({B}{ck} & {AB}{ck})
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: the star is a kind of a piggyback if it does not detoxify and it is a coverall.; sent3 & sent13 -> int2: the star does not detoxify and is a coverall.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent3 & sent13 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the star is not a piggyback.
|
¬{B}{aa}
|
[
"sent9 -> int3: if the XXY does panic then the fact that it is non-sapphirine thing that does not unbrace subpart does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the star does not piggyback. ; $context$ = sent1: the XXY is not a piggyback if something does unbrace subpart and is sapphirine. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a TCP/IP and/or it is not a fret. sent3: that if the XXY is not a sapphirine the star does not detoxify and is a kind of a coverall is not false. sent4: the androsterone is a kind of a piggyback. sent5: if the playmate is not a TCP/IP then it does scintillate and is a taster. sent6: the fact that something does not panic but it is a sapphirine is incorrect if it is a kind of a taster. sent7: the star is not a kind of a heroic but it is a kind of a Toulouse. sent8: the star is a coverall. sent9: the fact that the fact that something is not sapphirine and does not unbrace subpart is not false is false if it is a panic. sent10: there exists nothing such that it is a Hegelian and it does not unbrace subpart. sent11: if the fact that the mignonette is a Hegelian but it does not unbrace subpart is incorrect it unbrace subpart. sent12: if the fact that the XXY is not sapphirine and does not unbrace subpart is incorrect then the star is not a kind of a piggyback. sent13: the XXY is not a sapphirine. sent14: if something that does not detoxify is a coverall then it piggybacks. sent15: the mignonette is a sapphirine if that the playmate is not a panic and is sapphirine does not hold. sent16: the playmate is not a TCP/IP if either something is not a TCP/IP or it is not a fret or both. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a piggyback then that the crookneck piggyback and it is a kind of a coverall is not true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 -> int1: the star is a kind of a piggyback if it does not detoxify and it is a coverall.; sent3 & sent13 -> int2: the star does not detoxify and is a coverall.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something is a kind of a ootid and it is a chambray.
|
(Ex): ({A}x & {B}x)
|
sent1: the tempestuousness does not unbrace archbishop but it does film leaded. sent2: there is something such that that it is a chambray is right. sent3: the cheekpiece is a chambray if there exists something such that that it is not a ootid and it is transatlantic is not right. sent4: the scup does not unbrace cheekpiece if the fact that the cosmologist is integumentary but it does not unbrace cheekpiece is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness is incorrect it is not hieroglyphic. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a ootid. sent7: that something is not a ootid and is transatlantic does not hold if it is not hieroglyphic. sent8: something miscasts turning and unbosoms. sent9: the Zephyr is a kind of a ootid. sent10: something is a corkscrew that does unbrace mounter. sent11: the Zephyr is a copyright. sent12: the Zephyr is a kind of a stay. sent13: the Zephyr is a chambray. sent14: there is something such that it is a som that is hieroglyphic. sent15: if that the scup does not unbrace cheekpiece hold then that that the Zephyr is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness is right is not right. sent16: the Cataflam is a kind of a ootid. sent17: if there are non-Norwegian things then the cosmologist is a complex and it does indispose food. sent18: the tempestuousness is not a Norwegian if it does not unbrace archbishop and it films leaded. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of integumentary thing that does not unbrace cheekpiece is false if it is a complex. sent20: the fizz is a kind of a chambray and it is regressive. sent21: there exists something such that it miscasts Ederle and it unbosoms.
|
sent1: (¬{K}{d} & {L}{d}) sent2: (Ex): {B}x sent3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {B}{ct} sent4: ¬({G}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent5: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) sent8: (Ex): ({AC}x & {BQ}x) sent9: {A}{a} sent10: (Ex): ({GQ}x & {DC}x) sent11: {DE}{a} sent12: {BL}{a} sent13: {B}{a} sent14: (Ex): ({FP}x & {D}x) sent15: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent16: {A}{eq} sent17: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}{c} & {I}{c}) sent18: (¬{K}{d} & {L}{d}) -> ¬{J}{d} sent19: (x): {H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent20: ({B}{fu} & {DQ}{fu}) sent21: (Ex): ({AP}x & {BQ}x)
|
[
"sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the Zephyr is a ootid and it is a chambray is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent13 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the cheekpiece is a chambray is not incorrect.
|
{B}{ct}
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: that the Zephyr is both not a ootid and transatlantic is false if it is not hieroglyphic.; sent5 -> int3: if that the Zephyr is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness is not correct then it is not hieroglyphic.; sent19 -> int4: if the cosmologist is a kind of a complex then that it is integumentary and it does not unbrace cheekpiece is not right.; sent18 & sent1 -> int5: the tempestuousness is not Norwegian.; int5 -> int6: there are non-Norwegian things.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the cosmologist is complex and does indispose food.; int7 -> int8: the cosmologist is a complex.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the cosmologist is integumentary but it does not unbrace cheekpiece does not hold.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the scup does not unbrace cheekpiece.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Zephyr is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness does not hold.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the Zephyr is not hieroglyphic.; int2 & int12 -> int13: that the Zephyr is not a ootid but transatlantic does not hold.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a ootid and it is transatlantic does not hold.; int14 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | 11 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = something is a kind of a ootid and it is a chambray. ; $context$ = sent1: the tempestuousness does not unbrace archbishop but it does film leaded. sent2: there is something such that that it is a chambray is right. sent3: the cheekpiece is a chambray if there exists something such that that it is not a ootid and it is transatlantic is not right. sent4: the scup does not unbrace cheekpiece if the fact that the cosmologist is integumentary but it does not unbrace cheekpiece is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness is incorrect it is not hieroglyphic. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a ootid. sent7: that something is not a ootid and is transatlantic does not hold if it is not hieroglyphic. sent8: something miscasts turning and unbosoms. sent9: the Zephyr is a kind of a ootid. sent10: something is a corkscrew that does unbrace mounter. sent11: the Zephyr is a copyright. sent12: the Zephyr is a kind of a stay. sent13: the Zephyr is a chambray. sent14: there is something such that it is a som that is hieroglyphic. sent15: if that the scup does not unbrace cheekpiece hold then that that the Zephyr is hieroglyphic and it miscasts earnestness is right is not right. sent16: the Cataflam is a kind of a ootid. sent17: if there are non-Norwegian things then the cosmologist is a complex and it does indispose food. sent18: the tempestuousness is not a Norwegian if it does not unbrace archbishop and it films leaded. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of integumentary thing that does not unbrace cheekpiece is false if it is a complex. sent20: the fizz is a kind of a chambray and it is regressive. sent21: there exists something such that it miscasts Ederle and it unbosoms. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the Zephyr is a ootid and it is a chambray is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the interlocutor is not carposporic.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: the interlocutor is a kind of a heat that miscasts Greenland if it is not exacta. sent2: if the interlocutor is a arioso then that the vehicle achieves and does not miscast bowler does not hold. sent3: something is not a kind of a arioso if the fact that it is a arioso and it heats is not right. sent4: the vehicle does achieve and does miscast bowler. sent5: that something does not achieve and does not miscast bowler is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a arioso is not incorrect. sent6: the bleacher is carposporic. sent7: if something miscasts Greenland then it is a kind of a arioso. sent8: that if the vehicle does achieve then the interlocutor is carposporic is true. sent9: the vehicle miscasts bowler. sent10: the Dragunov miscasts bowler. sent11: the vehicle does not miscast Greenland and is non-exacta. sent12: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a arioso and it heats is wrong if the fact that it does not miscast Greenland hold is not wrong. sent13: if the vehicle is carposporic the interlocutor achieves. sent14: the interlocutor does achieve.
|
sent1: ¬{G}{b} -> ({F}{b} & {E}{b}) sent2: {D}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬({D}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent6: {C}{n} sent7: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent8: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} sent9: {B}{a} sent10: {B}{gl} sent11: (¬{E}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) sent12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {F}x) sent13: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} sent14: {A}{b}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: that the vehicle achieves is not false.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the barrow is carposporic.
|
{C}{im}
|
[
"sent7 -> int2: the interlocutor is a kind of a arioso if it miscasts Greenland.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the interlocutor is not carposporic. ; $context$ = sent1: the interlocutor is a kind of a heat that miscasts Greenland if it is not exacta. sent2: if the interlocutor is a arioso then that the vehicle achieves and does not miscast bowler does not hold. sent3: something is not a kind of a arioso if the fact that it is a arioso and it heats is not right. sent4: the vehicle does achieve and does miscast bowler. sent5: that something does not achieve and does not miscast bowler is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a arioso is not incorrect. sent6: the bleacher is carposporic. sent7: if something miscasts Greenland then it is a kind of a arioso. sent8: that if the vehicle does achieve then the interlocutor is carposporic is true. sent9: the vehicle miscasts bowler. sent10: the Dragunov miscasts bowler. sent11: the vehicle does not miscast Greenland and is non-exacta. sent12: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a arioso and it heats is wrong if the fact that it does not miscast Greenland hold is not wrong. sent13: if the vehicle is carposporic the interlocutor achieves. sent14: the interlocutor does achieve. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: that the vehicle achieves is not false.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fistula is both wholesome and a chlorite.
|
({C}{b} & {D}{b})
|
sent1: if something is a Ukrainian then it is a chlorite. sent2: the fistula is not a conduit if it either is smoky or does gnarl or both. sent3: if something is not a sheatfish that that it is not unwholesome and it thirsts is not false is not true. sent4: if the thistle thirsts the fistula is wholesome. sent5: that something is not a kind of a chlorite and is not a Ukrainian does not hold if it does unbrace zygospore. sent6: the fistula is smoky and/or it gnarls. sent7: the fact that the Vela is not a kind of a sheatfish and it is not a thirst does not hold if the thistle is wholesome. sent8: that the thistle is a sheatfish is not false. sent9: the thistle is a sheatfish and it thirsts. sent10: the thistle unbraces zygospore and it is a horsemint if the fistula is not a conduit. sent11: the thistle is not wholesome if that the Saskatoon is a kind of wholesome a thirst is false. sent12: the fistula is a Ukrainian that does unbrace zygospore.
|
sent1: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent2: ({J}{b} v {I}{b}) -> ¬{H}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent4: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent5: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) sent6: ({J}{b} v {I}{b}) sent7: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{ec} & ¬{B}{ec}) sent8: {A}{a} sent9: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent10: ¬{H}{b} -> ({F}{a} & {G}{a}) sent11: ¬({C}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: ({E}{b} & {F}{b})
|
[
"sent9 -> int1: the thistle thirsts.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fistula is wholesome.; sent1 -> int3: if the fistula is Ukrainian it is a chlorite.; sent12 -> int4: the fistula is Ukrainian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fistula is a kind of a chlorite.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: {C}{b}; sent1 -> int3: {E}{b} -> {D}{b}; sent12 -> int4: {E}{b}; int3 & int4 -> int5: {D}{b}; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the Vela is a kind of a thirst.
|
{B}{ec}
|
[
"sent5 -> int6: the fact that if the thistle unbraces zygospore the fact that the thistle is not a chlorite and it is not a Ukrainian does not hold is true.; sent2 & sent6 -> int7: the fistula is not a kind of a conduit.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the thistle does unbrace zygospore and it is a kind of a horsemint.; int8 -> int9: the thistle unbraces zygospore.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the thistle is not a chlorite and it is not a Ukrainian is incorrect.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fistula is both wholesome and a chlorite. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Ukrainian then it is a chlorite. sent2: the fistula is not a conduit if it either is smoky or does gnarl or both. sent3: if something is not a sheatfish that that it is not unwholesome and it thirsts is not false is not true. sent4: if the thistle thirsts the fistula is wholesome. sent5: that something is not a kind of a chlorite and is not a Ukrainian does not hold if it does unbrace zygospore. sent6: the fistula is smoky and/or it gnarls. sent7: the fact that the Vela is not a kind of a sheatfish and it is not a thirst does not hold if the thistle is wholesome. sent8: that the thistle is a sheatfish is not false. sent9: the thistle is a sheatfish and it thirsts. sent10: the thistle unbraces zygospore and it is a horsemint if the fistula is not a conduit. sent11: the thistle is not wholesome if that the Saskatoon is a kind of wholesome a thirst is false. sent12: the fistula is a Ukrainian that does unbrace zygospore. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 -> int1: the thistle thirsts.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fistula is wholesome.; sent1 -> int3: if the fistula is Ukrainian it is a chlorite.; sent12 -> int4: the fistula is Ukrainian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fistula is a kind of a chlorite.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the burgoo is not a photoemission.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
sent1: there exists something such that that it is not nonexempt and it is homonymic is false. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of nontaxable thing that is homonymic is not correct then the burgoo is not a kind of a photoemission.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the burgoo is not a photoemission. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is not nonexempt and it is homonymic is false. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of nontaxable thing that is homonymic is not correct then the burgoo is not a kind of a photoemission. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the assayer is not abasic and it is not conjugal does not hold if that it is not a nasion is not wrong.
|
¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
|
sent1: if the assayer is not a kind of a nasion then the fact that it is abasic thing that is not conjugal does not hold. sent2: if something is not likely then that it is not a kind of a ketamine and it is not a raphe is not correct. sent3: if the assayer is not a nasion it is not abasic and not conjugal. sent4: if something is not a kind of a schnecken then that it does not indispose Strix and is not scholarly is incorrect. sent5: if the assayer is not baptismal that it is not a episcopacy and it is not a nasion is false. sent6: if that the assayer does not unbrace wide-body is right the fact that it does not indispose overturned and is not conjugal is wrong. sent7: if something is not a kind of a nasion that the fact that it is non-abasic and non-conjugal is right is not true. sent8: if something is not a nasion then that it is abasic and it is not conjugal is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not abasic but it is conjugal is not right if it is not a nasion. sent10: that the assayer is a kind of non-abasic thing that is conjugal does not hold if it is not a nasion. sent11: something is not abasic and it is not conjugal if it is not a kind of a nasion. sent12: that the assayer is not abasic but non-conjugal is not true if it is a nasion. sent13: if something is a kind of a nasion then that it is not abasic and not conjugal does not hold. sent14: the fact that the assayer is not a episcopacy and it does not unbrace gynecology is not right if it is not a nasion.
|
sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): ¬{DS}x -> ¬(¬{AE}x & ¬{AT}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (x): ¬{CP}x -> ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{CI}x) sent5: ¬{FE}{aa} -> ¬(¬{EU}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent6: ¬{I}{aa} -> ¬(¬{JC}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent12: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent13: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent14: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{EU}{aa} & ¬{GA}{aa})
|
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the insulator does not indispose Strix and is not scholarly is not correct if it is not a schnecken.
|
¬{CP}{hd} -> ¬(¬{L}{hd} & ¬{CI}{hd})
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = that the assayer is not abasic and it is not conjugal does not hold if that it is not a nasion is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the assayer is not a kind of a nasion then the fact that it is abasic thing that is not conjugal does not hold. sent2: if something is not likely then that it is not a kind of a ketamine and it is not a raphe is not correct. sent3: if the assayer is not a nasion it is not abasic and not conjugal. sent4: if something is not a kind of a schnecken then that it does not indispose Strix and is not scholarly is incorrect. sent5: if the assayer is not baptismal that it is not a episcopacy and it is not a nasion is false. sent6: if that the assayer does not unbrace wide-body is right the fact that it does not indispose overturned and is not conjugal is wrong. sent7: if something is not a kind of a nasion that the fact that it is non-abasic and non-conjugal is right is not true. sent8: if something is not a nasion then that it is abasic and it is not conjugal is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not abasic but it is conjugal is not right if it is not a nasion. sent10: that the assayer is a kind of non-abasic thing that is conjugal does not hold if it is not a nasion. sent11: something is not abasic and it is not conjugal if it is not a kind of a nasion. sent12: that the assayer is not abasic but non-conjugal is not true if it is a nasion. sent13: if something is a kind of a nasion then that it is not abasic and not conjugal does not hold. sent14: the fact that the assayer is not a episcopacy and it does not unbrace gynecology is not right if it is not a nasion. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the inquest does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: the narrowed happens. sent2: that the narrowedness does not occur yields that both the inquest and the miscasting pepper-and-salt happens. sent3: the indisposing acromegaly happens. sent4: that the indisposing repulsion occurs yields that the bicentennialness happens and the saddle does not occur. sent5: that the tinkling occurs and the indisposing repulsion occurs is brought about by that the thermogravimetry does not occur. sent6: the inquest is prevented by that the miscasting pepper-and-salt and the narrowedness occurs. sent7: the premenstrualness occurs. sent8: that the bicentennialness but not the saddling happens prevents the narrowing.
|
sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent3: {DU} sent4: {F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) sent5: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) sent6: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent7: {FF} sent8: ({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B}
|
[] |
[] |
the inquest happens.
|
{C}
|
[] | 9 | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the inquest does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the narrowed happens. sent2: that the narrowedness does not occur yields that both the inquest and the miscasting pepper-and-salt happens. sent3: the indisposing acromegaly happens. sent4: that the indisposing repulsion occurs yields that the bicentennialness happens and the saddle does not occur. sent5: that the tinkling occurs and the indisposing repulsion occurs is brought about by that the thermogravimetry does not occur. sent6: the inquest is prevented by that the miscasting pepper-and-salt and the narrowedness occurs. sent7: the premenstrualness occurs. sent8: that the bicentennialness but not the saddling happens prevents the narrowing. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the marking miscasts rarebit.
|
{A}{a}
|
sent1: if the differential indisposes intertrigo then the fact that the settle does not overgrow is false. sent2: something that is not a kind of a volume is a straddle or is a Schlesinger or both. sent3: if something lights it is a volume and is not toneless. sent4: if that the stripper is both a Schlesinger and not a straddle is not true then that the marking is not a kind of a Schlesinger is not false. sent5: the marking does not miscast rarebit if the stripper does not miscast put-down and miscast rarebit. sent6: if the fettuccine is not non-pneumonic then the differential indisposes intertrigo. sent7: the newspaper is not a conservator if the browntail is not a buzz and is a conservator. sent8: something is a wide-body and it is bathymetric. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a wide-body the marking does miscast rarebit. sent10: if the newspaper is not a conservator the fact that the lamb-chop does not unbrace cocuswood and it is not uncousinly does not hold. sent11: if the fact that something does not indispose intertrigo and it does not overgrow is wrong then it does overgrow. sent12: something is bathymetric thing that does not miscast rarebit if it does overgrow. sent13: that the fact that the cockle is a wide-body and it is bathymetric does not hold is not wrong. sent14: the fact that something does not indispose intertrigo and it does not overgrow is not true if it does not miscast put-down. sent15: if the marking is not a Schlesinger the knocker does not miscast put-down and is not pneumonic. sent16: if there is something such that that it is a wide-body and is bathymetric is incorrect then the marking miscasts rarebit. sent17: if the phaeton does unbrace cocuswood the piroplasm does not unbrace cocuswood. sent18: something that does not unbrace cocuswood is a sallow and does light. sent19: the fact that the marking is a wide-body is true. sent20: if the piroplasm is both a volume and not toneless the dichondra is not a kind of a volume. sent21: the phaeton does unbrace cocuswood if that the lamb-chop does not unbrace cocuswood and it is not uncousinly is incorrect. sent22: if the settle does overgrow the stripper does not miscast put-down but it does miscast rarebit.
|
sent1: {D}{d} -> {B}{c} sent2: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x v {F}x) sent3: (x): {I}x -> ({H}x & ¬{J}x) sent4: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent5: (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: {E}{e} -> {D}{d} sent7: (¬{O}{k} & {N}{k}) -> ¬{N}{j} sent8: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent9: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}{a} sent10: ¬{N}{j} -> ¬(¬{L}{i} & ¬{M}{i}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent12: (x): {B}x -> ({AB}x & ¬{A}x) sent13: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) sent15: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{C}{bn} & ¬{E}{bn}) sent16: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent17: {L}{h} -> ¬{L}{g} sent18: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({K}x & {I}x) sent19: {AA}{a} sent20: ({H}{g} & ¬{J}{g}) -> ¬{H}{f} sent21: ¬(¬{L}{i} & ¬{M}{i}) -> {L}{h} sent22: {B}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b})
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a wide-body and it is bathymetric is not true.; int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the knocker is bathymetric.
|
{AB}{bn}
|
[
"sent12 -> int2: if the knocker overgrows it is a kind of bathymetric thing that does not miscast rarebit.; sent11 -> int3: the knocker does overgrow if the fact that it does not indispose intertrigo and does not overgrow is not true.; sent14 -> int4: that the fact that the knocker does not indispose intertrigo and it does not overgrow is correct does not hold if it does not miscast put-down.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the marking miscasts rarebit. ; $context$ = sent1: if the differential indisposes intertrigo then the fact that the settle does not overgrow is false. sent2: something that is not a kind of a volume is a straddle or is a Schlesinger or both. sent3: if something lights it is a volume and is not toneless. sent4: if that the stripper is both a Schlesinger and not a straddle is not true then that the marking is not a kind of a Schlesinger is not false. sent5: the marking does not miscast rarebit if the stripper does not miscast put-down and miscast rarebit. sent6: if the fettuccine is not non-pneumonic then the differential indisposes intertrigo. sent7: the newspaper is not a conservator if the browntail is not a buzz and is a conservator. sent8: something is a wide-body and it is bathymetric. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a wide-body the marking does miscast rarebit. sent10: if the newspaper is not a conservator the fact that the lamb-chop does not unbrace cocuswood and it is not uncousinly does not hold. sent11: if the fact that something does not indispose intertrigo and it does not overgrow is wrong then it does overgrow. sent12: something is bathymetric thing that does not miscast rarebit if it does overgrow. sent13: that the fact that the cockle is a wide-body and it is bathymetric does not hold is not wrong. sent14: the fact that something does not indispose intertrigo and it does not overgrow is not true if it does not miscast put-down. sent15: if the marking is not a Schlesinger the knocker does not miscast put-down and is not pneumonic. sent16: if there is something such that that it is a wide-body and is bathymetric is incorrect then the marking miscasts rarebit. sent17: if the phaeton does unbrace cocuswood the piroplasm does not unbrace cocuswood. sent18: something that does not unbrace cocuswood is a sallow and does light. sent19: the fact that the marking is a wide-body is true. sent20: if the piroplasm is both a volume and not toneless the dichondra is not a kind of a volume. sent21: the phaeton does unbrace cocuswood if that the lamb-chop does not unbrace cocuswood and it is not uncousinly is incorrect. sent22: if the settle does overgrow the stripper does not miscast put-down but it does miscast rarebit. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a wide-body and it is bathymetric is not true.; int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that it is a riband that is not a kind of a Burmese.
|
(Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: if that the dirk is a effusiveness is not false it is aquiferous and it is not divisional. sent2: if something is untranslatable then it is not a Burmese. sent3: if the dirk is divisional then the fact that it is untranslatable hold. sent4: the dirk is not a Burmese. sent5: the dirk is divisional. sent6: something is a riband and is a kind of a Burmese. sent7: if something is untranslatable it is a riband and is not a kind of a Burmese. sent8: if the booger is not a kind of a Helipterum but it is untranslatable the bearer is untranslatable. sent9: the theosophist does indispose Conopodium or does indispose tusker or both. sent10: if the dirk is untranslatable it is not a Burmese. sent11: there is something such that it is a Burmese and it is not divisional.
|
sent1: {HB}{aa} -> ({JE}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent3: {B}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent4: ¬{AB}{aa} sent5: {B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent7: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: (¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{hu} sent9: ({E}{c} v {D}{c}) sent10: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent11: (Ex): ({AB}x & ¬{B}x)
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: if the dirk is untranslatable it is a riband and it is not a Burmese.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the dirk is untranslatable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dirk is a riband but it is not a kind of a Burmese.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent3 & sent5 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the bearer is a kind of a riband.
|
{AA}{hu}
|
[
"sent9 -> int4: something does indispose Conopodium and/or it does indispose tusker.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a riband that is not a kind of a Burmese. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the dirk is a effusiveness is not false it is aquiferous and it is not divisional. sent2: if something is untranslatable then it is not a Burmese. sent3: if the dirk is divisional then the fact that it is untranslatable hold. sent4: the dirk is not a Burmese. sent5: the dirk is divisional. sent6: something is a riband and is a kind of a Burmese. sent7: if something is untranslatable it is a riband and is not a kind of a Burmese. sent8: if the booger is not a kind of a Helipterum but it is untranslatable the bearer is untranslatable. sent9: the theosophist does indispose Conopodium or does indispose tusker or both. sent10: if the dirk is untranslatable it is not a Burmese. sent11: there is something such that it is a Burmese and it is not divisional. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: if the dirk is untranslatable it is a riband and it is not a Burmese.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the dirk is untranslatable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dirk is a riband but it is not a kind of a Burmese.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the exposing occurs.
|
{D}
|
sent1: the tarsalness happens and the expose occurs if the miscasting high-low-jack does not occur. sent2: the aweing does not occur if the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent3: that the unbracing auricula does not occur leads to that the expose does not occur. sent4: the tarsalness occurs. sent5: the fact that the miscasting high-low-jack occurs hold. sent6: that the unbracing auricula does not occur is not false if the tarsal occurs and the miscasting high-low-jack occurs.
|
sent1: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {D}) sent2: ¬{ED} -> ¬{JI} sent3: ¬{C} -> ¬{D} sent4: {A} sent5: {B} sent6: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C}
|
[
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the tarsal and the miscasting high-low-jack occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the unbracing auricula does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent6 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C}; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the exposing occurs is not wrong.
|
{D}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the exposing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the tarsalness happens and the expose occurs if the miscasting high-low-jack does not occur. sent2: the aweing does not occur if the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent3: that the unbracing auricula does not occur leads to that the expose does not occur. sent4: the tarsalness occurs. sent5: the fact that the miscasting high-low-jack occurs hold. sent6: that the unbracing auricula does not occur is not false if the tarsal occurs and the miscasting high-low-jack occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the tarsal and the miscasting high-low-jack occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the unbracing auricula does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
if the handrest miscasts Microtaggant the fact that it is not a kind of a kindness and it does not hand does not hold.
|
{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
|
sent1: that something does not brace but it is fingerless is false if it is high-tech. sent2: if something does miscast Microtaggant that it is both a kindness and not a handed is not true. sent3: if something does unbrace orthodoxy then the fact that it is not a tandoor and it is autosomal does not hold. sent4: if the handrest is blastomeric then it is not a Laudo and it does not miscast Microtaggant. sent5: if the fact that the handrest is dynastic is not incorrect the fact that it is not tender and it does not film switchboard does not hold. sent6: if something is a Dipylon the fact that it does not mew and it is a talentlessness is wrong. sent7: if the handrest unbraces Numenius then the fact that it does not miscast Microtaggant and it does not miscast Vendemiaire does not hold. sent8: if something does unbrace mycophagist then the fact that it is not a trimming and not hepatic is false. sent9: if the scratch hands the fact that it does not issue and it is not a seam is wrong. sent10: if the chlorite is a tandoor the fact that it is crystalline and it does not miscast Microtaggant does not hold. sent11: the fact that something is not a kindness and it is not a kind of a handed is not correct if it does miscast Microtaggant. sent12: the fact that the sauerkraut is not a handed and it is not a needleworker is incorrect if it is a self-expression. sent13: the fact that the handrest does not miscast Microtaggant and is not a pericardium is not true if it does domesticate. sent14: the fact that something is not a kind of a frosted and it is not a kind of a Frobisher is false if it is a friary. sent15: the holder is not a kindness and it does not stiffen if it does film Redford. sent16: if the handrest does shatter that it is not autosomal and it is not a kind of a handed is wrong. sent17: the fact that something is not a colugo and it does not domesticate is not true if it does tender. sent18: if the handrest does miscast Microtaggant then the fact that it is both not a kindness and a handed is wrong.
|
sent1: (x): {DU}x -> ¬(¬{R}x & {EC}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{BT}x & {CN}x) sent4: {FP}{aa} -> (¬{FA}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent5: {HL}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AE}{aa} & ¬{U}{aa}) sent6: (x): {HQ}x -> ¬(¬{ES}x & {IL}x) sent7: {GK}{aa} -> ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{CM}{aa}) sent8: (x): {JF}x -> ¬(¬{DI}x & ¬{AM}x) sent9: {AB}{fu} -> ¬(¬{EB}{fu} & ¬{DF}{fu}) sent10: {BT}{hc} -> ¬({II}{hc} & ¬{A}{hc}) sent11: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent12: {CD}{dl} -> ¬(¬{AB}{dl} & ¬{AJ}{dl}) sent13: {JA}{aa} -> ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{FJ}{aa}) sent14: (x): {DK}x -> ¬(¬{FL}x & ¬{GS}x) sent15: {DN}{jh} -> (¬{AA}{jh} & ¬{GI}{jh}) sent16: {EN}{aa} -> ¬(¬{CN}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent17: (x): {AE}x -> ¬(¬{DD}x & ¬{JA}x) sent18: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = if the handrest miscasts Microtaggant the fact that it is not a kind of a kindness and it does not hand does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does not brace but it is fingerless is false if it is high-tech. sent2: if something does miscast Microtaggant that it is both a kindness and not a handed is not true. sent3: if something does unbrace orthodoxy then the fact that it is not a tandoor and it is autosomal does not hold. sent4: if the handrest is blastomeric then it is not a Laudo and it does not miscast Microtaggant. sent5: if the fact that the handrest is dynastic is not incorrect the fact that it is not tender and it does not film switchboard does not hold. sent6: if something is a Dipylon the fact that it does not mew and it is a talentlessness is wrong. sent7: if the handrest unbraces Numenius then the fact that it does not miscast Microtaggant and it does not miscast Vendemiaire does not hold. sent8: if something does unbrace mycophagist then the fact that it is not a trimming and not hepatic is false. sent9: if the scratch hands the fact that it does not issue and it is not a seam is wrong. sent10: if the chlorite is a tandoor the fact that it is crystalline and it does not miscast Microtaggant does not hold. sent11: the fact that something is not a kindness and it is not a kind of a handed is not correct if it does miscast Microtaggant. sent12: the fact that the sauerkraut is not a handed and it is not a needleworker is incorrect if it is a self-expression. sent13: the fact that the handrest does not miscast Microtaggant and is not a pericardium is not true if it does domesticate. sent14: the fact that something is not a kind of a frosted and it is not a kind of a Frobisher is false if it is a friary. sent15: the holder is not a kindness and it does not stiffen if it does film Redford. sent16: if the handrest does shatter that it is not autosomal and it is not a kind of a handed is wrong. sent17: the fact that something is not a colugo and it does not domesticate is not true if it does tender. sent18: if the handrest does miscast Microtaggant then the fact that it is both not a kindness and a handed is wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that it is either unlucky or a greaves or both is incorrect.
|
¬((Ex): ({A}x v {B}x))
|
sent1: if that something is not a greaves and does not truckle is not right it truckle. sent2: the mate does film Sinclair and/or it does indispose rubdown. sent3: that the gelatin is not a Sphecius is right. sent4: if there are non-unlucky things then the Maoist is carpellary or it is a kind of a greaves or both. sent5: if something that is a perniciousness is tuneful the melon is not a kind of a Podargidae. sent6: the fact that the archaist is a greaves is right. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it does not miscast effusiveness and it does not violate is not true then the ptyalith does not miscast Larus. sent8: the concoction is a Stanton. sent9: if something does not miscast Larus the fact that the lashing is biosystematics and miscast Larus is not correct. sent10: if something is not a Saharan then it is a perniciousness and tuneful. sent11: the archaist is not unlucky if that the lashing is biosystematics and does miscast Larus does not hold. sent12: the trombonist is multidimensional if the gelatin is not multidimensional. sent13: the gelatin is multidimensional and a rarebit if the fact that it is not a Sphecius is correct. sent14: if something that does indispose disassociation is multidimensional the muskellunge is non-Saharan. sent15: the fact that the lespedeza does not miscast effusiveness and it does not violate is false if the melon is not a Podargidae. sent16: the trombonist does indispose disassociation if the concoction is a Stanton.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{CH}x) -> {CH}x sent2: ({DN}{bs} v {DK}{bs}) sent3: ¬{O}{h} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({HA}{hp} v {B}{hp}) sent5: (x): ({H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}{e} sent6: {B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{C}{c} sent8: {M}{i} sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent10: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) sent11: ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent12: {L}{h} -> {L}{g} sent13: ¬{O}{h} -> ({L}{h} & {N}{h}) sent14: (x): ({K}x & {L}x) -> ¬{J}{f} sent15: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬(¬{E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent16: {M}{i} -> {K}{g}
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the archaist is unlucky and/or is a greaves.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the androsterone is acceptable or truckles or both.
|
({BP}{jh} v {CH}{jh})
|
[
"sent1 -> int2: the androsterone truckles if the fact that it is not a greaves and it does not truckles is wrong.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is either unlucky or a greaves or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a greaves and does not truckle is not right it truckle. sent2: the mate does film Sinclair and/or it does indispose rubdown. sent3: that the gelatin is not a Sphecius is right. sent4: if there are non-unlucky things then the Maoist is carpellary or it is a kind of a greaves or both. sent5: if something that is a perniciousness is tuneful the melon is not a kind of a Podargidae. sent6: the fact that the archaist is a greaves is right. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it does not miscast effusiveness and it does not violate is not true then the ptyalith does not miscast Larus. sent8: the concoction is a Stanton. sent9: if something does not miscast Larus the fact that the lashing is biosystematics and miscast Larus is not correct. sent10: if something is not a Saharan then it is a perniciousness and tuneful. sent11: the archaist is not unlucky if that the lashing is biosystematics and does miscast Larus does not hold. sent12: the trombonist is multidimensional if the gelatin is not multidimensional. sent13: the gelatin is multidimensional and a rarebit if the fact that it is not a Sphecius is correct. sent14: if something that does indispose disassociation is multidimensional the muskellunge is non-Saharan. sent15: the fact that the lespedeza does not miscast effusiveness and it does not violate is false if the melon is not a Podargidae. sent16: the trombonist does indispose disassociation if the concoction is a Stanton. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> int1: the archaist is unlucky and/or is a greaves.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fortune happens and the indisposing Eritrean happens.
|
({C} & {A})
|
sent1: the fact that both the unchristianness and the non-tactfulness happens is not true. sent2: that the lip does not occur and the countercoup does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the unchristianness and the non-tactfulness happens is not correct the babel does not occur. sent4: that the filming Stanton occurs but the filming mamma does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the babel does not occur then the fact that the fortune and the indisposing Eritrean occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the jitterbuging does not occur and the pelvicness does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the miscasting bronzed does not occur. sent8: the MRI does not occur if the intemperance happens.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬(¬{EO} & ¬{FO}) sent3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬({CJ} & ¬{EC}) sent5: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} & {A}) sent6: ¬(¬{GK} & ¬{GQ}) sent7: ¬{FD} sent8: {HU} -> ¬{GH}
|
[
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the babel does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fortune happens and the indisposing Eritrean happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the unchristianness and the non-tactfulness happens is not true. sent2: that the lip does not occur and the countercoup does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the unchristianness and the non-tactfulness happens is not correct the babel does not occur. sent4: that the filming Stanton occurs but the filming mamma does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the babel does not occur then the fact that the fortune and the indisposing Eritrean occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the jitterbuging does not occur and the pelvicness does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the miscasting bronzed does not occur. sent8: the MRI does not occur if the intemperance happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the babel does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the findings sutures and is a intransitive.
|
({C}{b} & {B}{b})
|
sent1: that that something sutures and it is intransitive is true is wrong if it is not a clinker. sent2: the findings is a intransitive and it is a clinker if the fact that the mane does not suture is right. sent3: if the mane is a clinker the findings is a kind of a intransitive. sent4: the mane does clinker. sent5: if the findings is insecticidal it is a suture. sent6: the findings is insecticidal.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent2: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} sent6: {D}{b}
|
[
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the findings is a kind of a intransitive.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the findings does suture.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the findings is a clinker.
|
{A}{b}
|
[] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the findings sutures and is a intransitive. ; $context$ = sent1: that that something sutures and it is intransitive is true is wrong if it is not a clinker. sent2: the findings is a intransitive and it is a clinker if the fact that the mane does not suture is right. sent3: if the mane is a clinker the findings is a kind of a intransitive. sent4: the mane does clinker. sent5: if the findings is insecticidal it is a suture. sent6: the findings is insecticidal. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the findings is a kind of a intransitive.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the findings does suture.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the inmate is not a kind of a syncope and/or is natal.
|
(¬{C}{b} v {D}{b})
|
sent1: if something unbraces scrapie it is a kind of a beekeeper and it is not a kind of a syncope. sent2: the inmate is a syncope and/or it is natal. sent3: the socle is formalistic if the horsebean is a clambake. sent4: either everything is formalistic or it is a clambake or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a yellowcake the inmate is not a syncope or natal or both. sent6: a beekeeper that is not a kind of a syncope does not slit. sent7: if the horsebean is formalistic the socle is formalistic. sent8: if something is formalistic it does unbrace scrapie. sent9: the essonite regales. sent10: the genitor is cervine if the fact that the overlook is a kind of non-cervine thing that is a nephew does not hold. sent11: the fact that the inmate is not a syncope or it is natal or both does not hold if it is not a yellowcake. sent12: if that the self-feeder does not slit and does unbrace scrapie is incorrect then the inmate is not a slit. sent13: the self-feeder is a yellowcake that regales. sent14: the inmate is four-wheel. sent15: if the genitor is cervine and it is a bleach then the socle does not regale. sent16: if the socle does not slit and it does not regale then the inmate does not regale. sent17: if the inmate does not regale the self-feeder is both natal and a yellowcake. sent18: if the self-feeder is natal the oneiromancer is natal.
|
sent1: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{C}x) sent2: ({C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent3: {K}{e} -> {J}{c} sent4: (x): ({J}x v {K}x) sent5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent6: (x): ({F}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{E}x sent7: {J}{e} -> {J}{c} sent8: (x): {J}x -> {G}x sent9: {B}{he} sent10: ¬(¬{I}{f} & {L}{f}) -> {I}{d} sent11: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent12: ¬(¬{E}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent13: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: {CD}{b} sent15: ({I}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent16: (¬{E}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent17: ¬{B}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {A}{a}) sent18: {D}{a} -> {D}{cg}
|
[
"sent13 -> int1: the self-feeder is a yellowcake.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a yellowcake.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): {A}x; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the oneiromancer is natal.
|
{D}{cg}
|
[
"sent6 -> int3: the socle does not slit if it is a beekeeper and it is not a kind of a syncope.; sent1 -> int4: the socle is a beekeeper that is not a syncope if it does unbrace scrapie.; sent8 -> int5: if the socle is formalistic it unbraces scrapie.; sent4 -> int6: the horsebean is formalistic and/or it is a clambake.; int6 & sent7 & sent3 -> int7: the socle is formalistic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the socle does unbrace scrapie is not wrong.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the socle is both a beekeeper and not a syncope.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the socle does not slit.;"
] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the inmate is not a kind of a syncope and/or is natal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something unbraces scrapie it is a kind of a beekeeper and it is not a kind of a syncope. sent2: the inmate is a syncope and/or it is natal. sent3: the socle is formalistic if the horsebean is a clambake. sent4: either everything is formalistic or it is a clambake or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a yellowcake the inmate is not a syncope or natal or both. sent6: a beekeeper that is not a kind of a syncope does not slit. sent7: if the horsebean is formalistic the socle is formalistic. sent8: if something is formalistic it does unbrace scrapie. sent9: the essonite regales. sent10: the genitor is cervine if the fact that the overlook is a kind of non-cervine thing that is a nephew does not hold. sent11: the fact that the inmate is not a syncope or it is natal or both does not hold if it is not a yellowcake. sent12: if that the self-feeder does not slit and does unbrace scrapie is incorrect then the inmate is not a slit. sent13: the self-feeder is a yellowcake that regales. sent14: the inmate is four-wheel. sent15: if the genitor is cervine and it is a bleach then the socle does not regale. sent16: if the socle does not slit and it does not regale then the inmate does not regale. sent17: if the inmate does not regale the self-feeder is both natal and a yellowcake. sent18: if the self-feeder is natal the oneiromancer is natal. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 -> int1: the self-feeder is a yellowcake.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a yellowcake.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the hookworm does not unbrace oxide is true.
|
¬{D}{c}
|
sent1: if the muttonfish does not assist it is a lumma and it is a topknot. sent2: the keepsake is an empty. sent3: the hookworm is not a topknot. sent4: the keepsake is not a countryman. sent5: the keepsake is not a lumma or it does not unbrace oxide or both. sent6: if the muttonfish is not a fluke then it is a topknot. sent7: the keepsake either is not headless or is not an assisted or both if the hookworm does unbrace oxide. sent8: the standee is not a topknot if the fact that the muttonfish is not a topknot but a fluke is not right. sent9: the muttonfish is a topknot. sent10: the hookworm does not unbrace oxide if the keepsake is not an assisted. sent11: the necessitarian is not a lumma. sent12: if the muttonfish does unbrace oxide the hookworm either is not a kind of an assisted or is not headless or both. sent13: if something is not a kind of an assisted it unbraces oxide and it is a fluke. sent14: if the muttonfish is headless the keepsake is not a kind of a lumma and/or assists. sent15: the keepsake is not a kind of a lumma or it does not assist or both if the muttonfish is headless. sent16: that if the keepsake is not a kind of the fluke then the keepsake is headless and it is a kind of an assisted is not wrong. sent17: the keepsake either is not a lumma or is an assisted or both. sent18: if the keepsake is headless the muttonfish is not a kind of a fluke and/or is not an assisted. sent19: the muttonfish is not a fluke. sent20: the muttonfish is a kind of a topknot and it is headless if that it is not a fluke is right. sent21: if the keepsake is a fluke the hookworm does not assist and/or it does not unbrace oxide.
|
sent1: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent2: {F}{b} sent3: ¬{AA}{c} sent4: ¬{DL}{b} sent5: (¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} sent7: {D}{c} -> (¬{AB}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) sent8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{dg} sent9: {AA}{a} sent10: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{D}{c} sent11: ¬{C}{bn} sent12: {D}{a} -> (¬{B}{c} v ¬{AB}{c}) sent13: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({D}x & {A}x) sent14: {AB}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) sent15: {AB}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) sent16: ¬{A}{b} -> ({AB}{b} & {B}{b}) sent17: (¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) sent18: {AB}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent19: ¬{A}{a} sent20: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent21: {A}{b} -> (¬{B}{c} v ¬{D}{c})
|
[
"sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the muttonfish is a topknot and it is headless.; int1 -> int2: the muttonfish is headless.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the keepsake is not a lumma and/or it is not an assisted.;"
] |
[
"sent20 & sent19 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: {AB}{a}; sent15 & int2 -> int3: (¬{C}{b} v ¬{B}{b});"
] |
the standee is not a topknot.
|
¬{AA}{dg}
|
[] | 4 | 4 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the hookworm does not unbrace oxide is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the muttonfish does not assist it is a lumma and it is a topknot. sent2: the keepsake is an empty. sent3: the hookworm is not a topknot. sent4: the keepsake is not a countryman. sent5: the keepsake is not a lumma or it does not unbrace oxide or both. sent6: if the muttonfish is not a fluke then it is a topknot. sent7: the keepsake either is not headless or is not an assisted or both if the hookworm does unbrace oxide. sent8: the standee is not a topknot if the fact that the muttonfish is not a topknot but a fluke is not right. sent9: the muttonfish is a topknot. sent10: the hookworm does not unbrace oxide if the keepsake is not an assisted. sent11: the necessitarian is not a lumma. sent12: if the muttonfish does unbrace oxide the hookworm either is not a kind of an assisted or is not headless or both. sent13: if something is not a kind of an assisted it unbraces oxide and it is a fluke. sent14: if the muttonfish is headless the keepsake is not a kind of a lumma and/or assists. sent15: the keepsake is not a kind of a lumma or it does not assist or both if the muttonfish is headless. sent16: that if the keepsake is not a kind of the fluke then the keepsake is headless and it is a kind of an assisted is not wrong. sent17: the keepsake either is not a lumma or is an assisted or both. sent18: if the keepsake is headless the muttonfish is not a kind of a fluke and/or is not an assisted. sent19: the muttonfish is not a fluke. sent20: the muttonfish is a kind of a topknot and it is headless if that it is not a fluke is right. sent21: if the keepsake is a fluke the hookworm does not assist and/or it does not unbrace oxide. ; $proof$ =
|
sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the muttonfish is a topknot and it is headless.; int1 -> int2: the muttonfish is headless.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the keepsake is not a lumma and/or it is not an assisted.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the tubeless is not a kind of a selector.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: the tubeless is not a kind of a selector if the radiobiologist is paternal or it does miscast Eichmann or both. sent2: there is something such that that it does toe and it does miscast colugo does not hold. sent3: something that is not paternal and does miscast Eichmann is a selector. sent4: if the radiobiologist is paternal then the tubeless is not a selector. sent5: something is catholic and it is an importing if it is not a kind of a playmate. sent6: the radiobiologist miscasts Eichmann if there exists something such that it does not miscast colugo. sent7: everything is not a playmate and it is homiletic. sent8: the tubeless does miscast Eichmann if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a selector hold. sent9: if something is a kind of a selector that it does not miscast Eichmann and is not paternal does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is not paternal and does miscast Eichmann is correct if it does mass. sent11: that something does miscast Eichmann and is a selector is correct. sent12: the radiobiologist is a pounding if it is a Bornean. sent13: the tubeless is not paternal if that the radiobiologist is a selector is right. sent14: if the tubeless does not pound it is a selector that does mass. sent15: the radiobiologist is a Bornean. sent16: the radiobiologist does miscast Eichmann if there exists something such that that it toes and it miscasts colugo is wrong. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a selector that miscasts Eichmann does not hold.
|
sent1: ({B}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) sent6: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {A}{a} sent7: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> {A}{b} sent9: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) sent11: (Ex): ({A}x & {C}x) sent12: {H}{a} -> {E}{a} sent13: {C}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent14: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) sent15: {H}{a} sent16: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent17: (Ex): ¬({C}x & {A}x)
|
[
"sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the radiobiologist does miscast Eichmann.; int1 -> int2: either the radiobiologist is paternal or it does miscast Eichmann or both.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent16 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({B}{a} v {A}{a}); sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the radiobiologist is hemispherical and/or not non-paternal.
|
({HT}{a} v {B}{a})
|
[
"sent9 -> int3: the fact that the tubeless does not miscast Eichmann and is not paternal is not true if the fact that it is a selector hold.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the tubeless is not a kind of a selector. ; $context$ = sent1: the tubeless is not a kind of a selector if the radiobiologist is paternal or it does miscast Eichmann or both. sent2: there is something such that that it does toe and it does miscast colugo does not hold. sent3: something that is not paternal and does miscast Eichmann is a selector. sent4: if the radiobiologist is paternal then the tubeless is not a selector. sent5: something is catholic and it is an importing if it is not a kind of a playmate. sent6: the radiobiologist miscasts Eichmann if there exists something such that it does not miscast colugo. sent7: everything is not a playmate and it is homiletic. sent8: the tubeless does miscast Eichmann if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a selector hold. sent9: if something is a kind of a selector that it does not miscast Eichmann and is not paternal does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is not paternal and does miscast Eichmann is correct if it does mass. sent11: that something does miscast Eichmann and is a selector is correct. sent12: the radiobiologist is a pounding if it is a Bornean. sent13: the tubeless is not paternal if that the radiobiologist is a selector is right. sent14: if the tubeless does not pound it is a selector that does mass. sent15: the radiobiologist is a Bornean. sent16: the radiobiologist does miscast Eichmann if there exists something such that that it toes and it miscasts colugo is wrong. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a selector that miscasts Eichmann does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the radiobiologist does miscast Eichmann.; int1 -> int2: either the radiobiologist is paternal or it does miscast Eichmann or both.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the pinetum is not autodidactic and it is not analphabetic does not hold.
|
¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c})
|
sent1: if there is something such that that it is analphabetic and it is not a cagoule is false the ivorybill is not analphabetic. sent2: the fact that the pinetum is autodidactic but it is not analphabetic is wrong if that the Tibetan is not autodidactic is right. sent3: the testudo is a picturing and it miscasts roadblock. sent4: the fact that the ivorybill is not autodidactic but it is a Carlsbad is not correct. sent5: if something is not a Carlsbad it is a Eurobabble or is a kind of a cagoule or both. sent6: something is not autodidactic. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cagoule and is not a Carlsbad does not hold the Tibetan is not autodidactic. sent8: the fact that the fact that the ivorybill is non-analphabetic thing that is autodidactic does not hold is not wrong if the pinetum is not analphabetic. sent9: the pinetum is a Eurobabble if the ivorybill is a kind of a Eurobabble. sent10: the fact that that the Tibetan is autodidactic thing that is not aortal does not hold is not wrong. sent11: if something pictures then it is not a Carlsbad and not a dictation. sent12: the pinetum is a kind of autodidactic thing that is a kind of a Carlsbad if it is not a dictation. sent13: if something is a Carlsbad then the Tibetan is non-autodidactic. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Carlsbad the Tibetan is a Eurobabble. sent15: if something is a Eurobabble then the fact that it is analphabetic but not a cagoule is wrong. sent16: that that the pinetum is a kind of analphabetic thing that is not a kind of a cagoule is not false is wrong. sent17: if that the Tibetan is not autodidactic is true the fact that the pinetum is not autodidactic and it is not analphabetic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the Tibetan is not autodidactic but it is a Carlsbad does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a Eurobabble. sent20: the Tibetan does not miscast roadblock. sent21: if there is something such that it does not miscast roadblock then the ivorybill does picture. sent22: the fact that that the Tibetan is a kind of analphabetic thing that is non-autodidactic is false is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that that the ivorybill is both autodidactic and not a cagoule hold is not true if that the pinetum is not autodidactic is not wrong.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent2: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent3: ({G}{d} & {H}{d}) sent4: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v {B}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent7: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}{b} sent8: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent9: {A}{a} -> {A}{c} sent10: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{EP}{b}) sent11: (x): {G}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{F}x) sent12: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{c} & {C}{c}) sent13: (x): {C}x -> ¬{D}{b} sent14: (x): {C}x -> {A}{b} sent15: (x): {A}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{B}x) sent16: ¬({E}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent17: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent18: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent19: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent20: ¬{H}{b} sent21: (x): ¬{H}x -> {G}{a} sent22: ¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent23: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a})
|
[] |
[] |
the ivorybill is not analphabetic.
|
¬{E}{a}
|
[
"sent15 -> int1: that the Tibetan is analphabetic but it is not a kind of a cagoule does not hold if it is a Eurobabble.; sent3 -> int2: something pictures and miscasts roadblock.;"
] | 9 | 4 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the pinetum is not autodidactic and it is not analphabetic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is analphabetic and it is not a cagoule is false the ivorybill is not analphabetic. sent2: the fact that the pinetum is autodidactic but it is not analphabetic is wrong if that the Tibetan is not autodidactic is right. sent3: the testudo is a picturing and it miscasts roadblock. sent4: the fact that the ivorybill is not autodidactic but it is a Carlsbad is not correct. sent5: if something is not a Carlsbad it is a Eurobabble or is a kind of a cagoule or both. sent6: something is not autodidactic. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cagoule and is not a Carlsbad does not hold the Tibetan is not autodidactic. sent8: the fact that the fact that the ivorybill is non-analphabetic thing that is autodidactic does not hold is not wrong if the pinetum is not analphabetic. sent9: the pinetum is a Eurobabble if the ivorybill is a kind of a Eurobabble. sent10: the fact that that the Tibetan is autodidactic thing that is not aortal does not hold is not wrong. sent11: if something pictures then it is not a Carlsbad and not a dictation. sent12: the pinetum is a kind of autodidactic thing that is a kind of a Carlsbad if it is not a dictation. sent13: if something is a Carlsbad then the Tibetan is non-autodidactic. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Carlsbad the Tibetan is a Eurobabble. sent15: if something is a Eurobabble then the fact that it is analphabetic but not a cagoule is wrong. sent16: that that the pinetum is a kind of analphabetic thing that is not a kind of a cagoule is not false is wrong. sent17: if that the Tibetan is not autodidactic is true the fact that the pinetum is not autodidactic and it is not analphabetic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the Tibetan is not autodidactic but it is a Carlsbad does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a Eurobabble. sent20: the Tibetan does not miscast roadblock. sent21: if there is something such that it does not miscast roadblock then the ivorybill does picture. sent22: the fact that that the Tibetan is a kind of analphabetic thing that is non-autodidactic is false is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that that the ivorybill is both autodidactic and not a cagoule hold is not true if that the pinetum is not autodidactic is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the rehabilitating happens.
|
{A}
|
sent1: if the relieving occurs the fact that the orthodonticsness does not occur and the indisposing chin does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Call does not occur hold. sent3: the Hittite occurs if that the orthodonticsness does not occur and the indisposing chin does not occur is incorrect. sent4: that the multivalentness does not occur and the soccer does not occur is not correct. sent5: the Hittite does not occur. sent6: the papering occurs. sent7: that the convoying does not occur and the Bismarckianness does not occur does not hold if the patellarness does not occur. sent8: the maundering does not occur and the C-section does not occur. sent9: the lordolatry does not occur. sent10: that the rehabilitating happens but the exemptness does not occur prevents that the uncomfortableness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the fact that the exempting happens hold is not correct. sent12: the myotomy happens. sent13: the charge does not occur. sent14: if the deviltry does not occur then the fact that both the non-Bismarckianness and the non-Oldness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the hoarding does not occur then the fact that the indisposing bungler does not occur and the papering does not occur does not hold. sent16: the miscasting lob does not occur.
|
sent1: {F} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent2: ¬{AR} sent3: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) -> {C} sent4: ¬(¬{GO} & ¬{IU}) sent5: ¬{C} sent6: {CI} sent7: ¬{JC} -> ¬(¬{BP} & ¬{IS}) sent8: (¬{CA} & ¬{EI}) sent9: ¬{BK} sent10: ({A} & ¬{B}) -> {AP} sent11: ¬{B} sent12: {GE} sent13: ¬{FQ} sent14: ¬{AD} -> ¬(¬{IS} & ¬{IT}) sent15: ¬{CL} -> ¬(¬{EF} & ¬{CI}) sent16: ¬{FD}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rehabilitating does not occur.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: that the rehabilitating does not occur and the exempting does not occur is correct.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: (¬{A} & ¬{B});"
] |
the rehabilitating does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
[] | 7 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the rehabilitating happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the relieving occurs the fact that the orthodonticsness does not occur and the indisposing chin does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Call does not occur hold. sent3: the Hittite occurs if that the orthodonticsness does not occur and the indisposing chin does not occur is incorrect. sent4: that the multivalentness does not occur and the soccer does not occur is not correct. sent5: the Hittite does not occur. sent6: the papering occurs. sent7: that the convoying does not occur and the Bismarckianness does not occur does not hold if the patellarness does not occur. sent8: the maundering does not occur and the C-section does not occur. sent9: the lordolatry does not occur. sent10: that the rehabilitating happens but the exemptness does not occur prevents that the uncomfortableness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the fact that the exempting happens hold is not correct. sent12: the myotomy happens. sent13: the charge does not occur. sent14: if the deviltry does not occur then the fact that both the non-Bismarckianness and the non-Oldness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the hoarding does not occur then the fact that the indisposing bungler does not occur and the papering does not occur does not hold. sent16: the miscasting lob does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rehabilitating does not occur.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: that the rehabilitating does not occur and the exempting does not occur is correct.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if it is a kind of a gill that is a tempestuousness it does not recoup.
|
(Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: the Capricorn is cardiographic if it is a ricegrass and nonmagnetic. sent2: the Capricorn is not a gill if it is a Sinitic and a turnpike. sent3: there is something such that if it is cartographic and is a lymphokine that it is not non-cytolytic is not false. sent4: if something is a gill and it is a tempestuousness then that it does not recoup hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Celtic that is a angrecum the fact that it does unbrace carnivore is not false. sent6: if the Capricorn is a Coluber and it is urethral then it does not recoup. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a lyric and it is aboral then it is not a sportswear. sent8: if something is a kind of quantitative thing that is not non-cartographic it is a Cardamine. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a gill and it is a tempestuousness it recoups. sent10: there is something such that if it miscasts Capricorn and it is pancreatic it is saprophytic. sent11: the Capricorn does not miscast Capricorn if it is aboral thing that recoups. sent12: a gravure that miscasts fighter is a royal. sent13: the nemertean is not a Tasso if it is a royal and it is scalar. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Leigh and it is reversionary then it does not unbrace Sanhedrin. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a slicer and is a Tasso the fact that it does not unbrace limpet is not wrong. sent16: if something does unclutter and it does miscast mycophagist it is Masonic. sent17: the Capricorn does not dim if it is a tempestuousness and ornithological. sent18: the fact that there is something such that if it indisposes scurf and it is a semimonthly then it does not miscast presage is not incorrect. sent19: if the Capricorn is a gill and it is a tempestuousness it does recoup.
|
sent1: ({CH}{aa} & {GC}{aa}) -> {FF}{aa} sent2: ({IL}{aa} & {AS}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ({JB}x & {GL}x) -> {HC}x sent4: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: (Ex): ({BE}x & {HO}x) -> {EA}x sent6: ({BP}{aa} & {IU}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ({DQ}x & {AR}x) -> ¬{L}x sent8: (x): ({EM}x & {JB}x) -> {BL}x sent9: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: (Ex): ({AU}x & {EU}x) -> {BN}x sent11: ({AR}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{AU}{aa} sent12: (x): ({BR}x & {DT}x) -> {AM}x sent13: ({AM}{hd} & {HH}{hd}) -> ¬{HI}{hd} sent14: (Ex): ({FS}x & {BG}x) -> ¬{U}x sent15: (Ex): ({IF}x & {HI}x) -> ¬{BQ}x sent16: (x): ({GE}x & {JH}x) -> {HF}x sent17: ({AB}{aa} & {FR}{aa}) -> ¬{HK}{aa} sent18: (Ex): ({CM}x & {HG}x) -> ¬{DU}x sent19: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: if the Capricorn is a kind of a gill that is a tempestuousness it does not recoup.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a gill that is a tempestuousness it does not recoup. ; $context$ = sent1: the Capricorn is cardiographic if it is a ricegrass and nonmagnetic. sent2: the Capricorn is not a gill if it is a Sinitic and a turnpike. sent3: there is something such that if it is cartographic and is a lymphokine that it is not non-cytolytic is not false. sent4: if something is a gill and it is a tempestuousness then that it does not recoup hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Celtic that is a angrecum the fact that it does unbrace carnivore is not false. sent6: if the Capricorn is a Coluber and it is urethral then it does not recoup. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a lyric and it is aboral then it is not a sportswear. sent8: if something is a kind of quantitative thing that is not non-cartographic it is a Cardamine. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a gill and it is a tempestuousness it recoups. sent10: there is something such that if it miscasts Capricorn and it is pancreatic it is saprophytic. sent11: the Capricorn does not miscast Capricorn if it is aboral thing that recoups. sent12: a gravure that miscasts fighter is a royal. sent13: the nemertean is not a Tasso if it is a royal and it is scalar. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Leigh and it is reversionary then it does not unbrace Sanhedrin. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a slicer and is a Tasso the fact that it does not unbrace limpet is not wrong. sent16: if something does unclutter and it does miscast mycophagist it is Masonic. sent17: the Capricorn does not dim if it is a tempestuousness and ornithological. sent18: the fact that there is something such that if it indisposes scurf and it is a semimonthly then it does not miscast presage is not incorrect. sent19: if the Capricorn is a gill and it is a tempestuousness it does recoup. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: if the Capricorn is a kind of a gill that is a tempestuousness it does not recoup.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it does not unbrace echoencephalograph and it is aft then it is not Christological is not right.
|
¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: if the watermark does not unbrace echoencephalograph and is aft it is not Christological. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of pneumonic a patronymic then it is not a kind of a Bradford.
|
sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({IJ}x & {P}x) -> ¬{CA}x
|
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not unbrace echoencephalograph and it is aft then it is not Christological is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the watermark does not unbrace echoencephalograph and is aft it is not Christological. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of pneumonic a patronymic then it is not a kind of a Bradford. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the nephron does befall.
|
{B}{a}
|
sent1: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and is a unconnectedness is not correct. sent2: the grigri is a kind of a heliograph if that it palpitates is true. sent3: if something heliographs then the fact that it does not unbrace edge and is not a unconnectedness does not hold. sent4: the fact that the nephron does not befall is not false if the grigri is a unconnectedness. sent5: the grigri palpitates. sent6: the nephron does not befall if the fact that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a kind of a unconnectedness is not right.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: {C}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: {AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: {C}{aa} sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a}
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a kind of a unconnectedness is not right if it is a heliograph.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the grigri is a heliograph.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a unconnectedness is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent5 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the nephron does befall. ; $context$ = sent1: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and is a unconnectedness is not correct. sent2: the grigri is a kind of a heliograph if that it palpitates is true. sent3: if something heliographs then the fact that it does not unbrace edge and is not a unconnectedness does not hold. sent4: the fact that the nephron does not befall is not false if the grigri is a unconnectedness. sent5: the grigri palpitates. sent6: the nephron does not befall if the fact that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a kind of a unconnectedness is not right. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a kind of a unconnectedness is not right if it is a heliograph.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the grigri is a heliograph.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the grigri does not unbrace edge and it is not a unconnectedness is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Shaker is not a flimsiness.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
sent1: the flatiron is ulcerative. sent2: a non-thick thing that is not a kind of a flatworm is not a flimsiness. sent3: the Shaker is not a flimsiness if it is both not thick and a flatworm. sent4: the Shaker is not a flatworm if the composite is a kind of a flatworm. sent5: if something is not a Chaucer then the fact that it is Gilbertian and/or is a milkwort is not right. sent6: if the flatiron is non-thick then the Shaker is a flatworm and it is ulcerative. sent7: if something is not thick and is a flatworm it is not a flimsiness. sent8: if something that is not a flimsiness is ulcerative then it is not a kind of a flatworm. sent9: if the composite is not percussive then it is not uneasy and/or it is a hank. sent10: the Shaker is not a flatworm. sent11: everything is not a Chaucer. sent12: a ulcerative thing is a flimsiness. sent13: if the composite is a flatworm the Shaker is both not thick and not a flatworm.
|
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: (¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent4: {B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} sent5: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({I}x v {H}x) sent6: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{c} & {A}{c}) sent7: (x): (¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent8: (x): (¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent9: ¬{G}{b} -> (¬{F}{b} v {E}{b}) sent10: ¬{B}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{J}x sent12: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent13: {B}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{B}{c})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if that the Shaker is not thick and it is not a flatworm hold then it is not a flimsiness.;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: (¬{D}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) -> ¬{C}{c};"
] |
the Shaker is a kind of a flimsiness.
|
{C}{c}
|
[
"sent12 -> int2: if the Shaker is ulcerative then it is a kind of a flimsiness.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the justice is Gilbertian and/or it is a milkwort is not correct if it is not a Chaucer.; sent11 -> int4: the fact that the justice is not a Chaucer is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the justice is Gilbertian or it is a milkwort or both is not right.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing such that it is Gilbertian and/or it is a milkwort.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the speck is Gilbertian and/or it is a milkwort is not right.;"
] | 10 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Shaker is not a flimsiness. ; $context$ = sent1: the flatiron is ulcerative. sent2: a non-thick thing that is not a kind of a flatworm is not a flimsiness. sent3: the Shaker is not a flimsiness if it is both not thick and a flatworm. sent4: the Shaker is not a flatworm if the composite is a kind of a flatworm. sent5: if something is not a Chaucer then the fact that it is Gilbertian and/or is a milkwort is not right. sent6: if the flatiron is non-thick then the Shaker is a flatworm and it is ulcerative. sent7: if something is not thick and is a flatworm it is not a flimsiness. sent8: if something that is not a flimsiness is ulcerative then it is not a kind of a flatworm. sent9: if the composite is not percussive then it is not uneasy and/or it is a hank. sent10: the Shaker is not a flatworm. sent11: everything is not a Chaucer. sent12: a ulcerative thing is a flimsiness. sent13: if the composite is a flatworm the Shaker is both not thick and not a flatworm. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: if that the Shaker is not thick and it is not a flatworm hold then it is not a flimsiness.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it does recoup the fact that it is not a kind of a bumper and it does not indispose versicle is false.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: the fact that something is photovoltaic and is not a ticktack is incorrect if it is a kind of a Zimbabwe. sent2: if something recoups then the fact that it is not a kind of a bumper and does not indispose versicle does not hold.
|
sent1: (x): {EM}x -> ¬({DP}x & ¬{BS}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if the knife-handle recoups that it is not a bumper and it does not indispose versicle is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does recoup the fact that it is not a kind of a bumper and it does not indispose versicle is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is photovoltaic and is not a ticktack is incorrect if it is a kind of a Zimbabwe. sent2: if something recoups then the fact that it is not a kind of a bumper and does not indispose versicle does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: if the knife-handle recoups that it is not a bumper and it does not indispose versicle is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the afferentness happens.
|
{D}
|
sent1: if the fact that the manualness happens and the miscasting vitalism does not occur is not correct then the miscasting vitalism occurs. sent2: if the fact that the indisposing audiology occurs is not incorrect the miscasting Helmholtz does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the miscasting formed occurs and the poeticsness occurs is wrong the miscasting formed does not occur. sent4: the filming marshal occurs and the dink happens. sent5: the clannishness happens and the thrum happens if the fact that the miscasting Helmholtz does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the nonrandomness occurs. sent7: the Mozambican does not occur. sent8: that the clinching occurs hold. sent9: the postmortem occurs. sent10: the filming wurtzite and the miscasting Musca happens. sent11: if the clinch happens the manualness does not occur. sent12: the viziership does not occur. sent13: the rearrangement happens. sent14: that the collegialness happens is not incorrect. sent15: the affliction does not occur and the throbbing does not occur if the clannishness happens. sent16: if the affliction does not occur then the fact that the miscasting formed and the poeticsness happens is wrong. sent17: that the miscasting formed does not occur brings about that the nonrandomness and the correcting happens. sent18: if the manual does not occur the nonrandomness happens. sent19: the non-manualness results in that the nonrandomness happens and the afferent occurs.
|
sent1: ¬({B} & ¬{S}) -> {S} sent2: {DD} -> ¬{L} sent3: ¬({F} & {G}) -> ¬{F} sent4: ({EA} & {FR}) sent5: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) sent6: {C} sent7: ¬{CB} sent8: {A} sent9: {AN} sent10: ({FC} & {CA}) sent11: {A} -> ¬{B} sent12: ¬{GR} sent13: {EF} sent14: {EN} sent15: {J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) sent16: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & {G}) sent17: ¬{F} -> ({C} & {E}) sent18: ¬{B} -> {C} sent19: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {D})
|
[
"sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the manual does not occur.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the nonrandomness and the afferentness occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent19 & int1 -> int2: ({C} & {D}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the afferent does not occur.
|
¬{D}
|
[] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the afferentness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the manualness happens and the miscasting vitalism does not occur is not correct then the miscasting vitalism occurs. sent2: if the fact that the indisposing audiology occurs is not incorrect the miscasting Helmholtz does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the miscasting formed occurs and the poeticsness occurs is wrong the miscasting formed does not occur. sent4: the filming marshal occurs and the dink happens. sent5: the clannishness happens and the thrum happens if the fact that the miscasting Helmholtz does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the nonrandomness occurs. sent7: the Mozambican does not occur. sent8: that the clinching occurs hold. sent9: the postmortem occurs. sent10: the filming wurtzite and the miscasting Musca happens. sent11: if the clinch happens the manualness does not occur. sent12: the viziership does not occur. sent13: the rearrangement happens. sent14: that the collegialness happens is not incorrect. sent15: the affliction does not occur and the throbbing does not occur if the clannishness happens. sent16: if the affliction does not occur then the fact that the miscasting formed and the poeticsness happens is wrong. sent17: that the miscasting formed does not occur brings about that the nonrandomness and the correcting happens. sent18: if the manual does not occur the nonrandomness happens. sent19: the non-manualness results in that the nonrandomness happens and the afferent occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the manual does not occur.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the nonrandomness and the afferentness occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if that it is a Rush and non-nebular is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a second-in-command.
|
(Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: something is a bond if it is a Amharic and it is not three-dimensional. sent2: if something is both a Rush and not nebular then it is not a second-in-command.
|
sent1: (x): ({GC}x & ¬{C}x) -> {GU}x sent2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the governor is not a second-in-command if it is a Rush and non-nebular.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a Rush and non-nebular is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a second-in-command. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a bond if it is a Amharic and it is not three-dimensional. sent2: if something is both a Rush and not nebular then it is not a second-in-command. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the governor is not a second-in-command if it is a Rush and non-nebular.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a materiel and it is not a pot is not correct then it does not hive.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a materiel hold the fact that it does not hive is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a materiel and is not a pot is incorrect it is not a kind of a hive. sent3: the utterer is not a kind of a hive if the fact that it is both a materiel and not a pot is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a pot then it is not a hive. sent5: that the utterer does not hive hold if it is not a materiel and it is not a kind of a pot. sent6: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not Uzbekistani and it is not sustainable is wrong then it does unbrace cyberart is correct. sent7: the utterer is not a hive if the fact that the fact that it is both not a materiel and not a pot is true is not right. sent8: if that the fact that something is non-clayey thing that does not miscast one-eighth is true is not true it does not out. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a materiel and it does not pot then it is not a kind of a hive. sent10: if that the utterer is not a materiel and it is not a pot does not hold then it is a hive.
|
sent1: (Ex): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent5: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬(¬{HF}x & ¬{IM}x) -> {JG}x sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{CE}x & ¬{AJ}x) -> ¬{JD}x sent9: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not clayey and it does not miscast one-eighth is false then it is not a kind of an outing.
|
(Ex): ¬(¬{CE}x & ¬{AJ}x) -> ¬{JD}x
|
[
"sent8 -> int1: the wordsmith is not a kind of an outing if that it is not clayey and it does not miscast one-eighth is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a materiel and it is not a pot is not correct then it does not hive. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a materiel hold the fact that it does not hive is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a materiel and is not a pot is incorrect it is not a kind of a hive. sent3: the utterer is not a kind of a hive if the fact that it is both a materiel and not a pot is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a pot then it is not a hive. sent5: that the utterer does not hive hold if it is not a materiel and it is not a kind of a pot. sent6: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not Uzbekistani and it is not sustainable is wrong then it does unbrace cyberart is correct. sent7: the utterer is not a hive if the fact that the fact that it is both not a materiel and not a pot is true is not right. sent8: if that the fact that something is non-clayey thing that does not miscast one-eighth is true is not true it does not out. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a materiel and it does not pot then it is not a kind of a hive. sent10: if that the utterer is not a materiel and it is not a pot does not hold then it is a hive. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the mioticness occurs.
|
{B}
|
sent1: if the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur then that both the Judaicness and the burrow happens is not correct. sent2: if the mioticness occurs that not the indisposing cheekpiece but the Rorschach happens is false. sent3: that the bunfight does not occur or that the indisposing Basque does not occur or both is caused by the non-Jungianness. sent4: the downhill occurs and/or the anticancerness occurs if the filming Blantyre does not occur. sent5: if that the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur and the Rorschach happens does not hold the Rorschach does not occur. sent6: that the exuvialness happens and the unbracing holder happens is not correct if the Hindustani does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the Judaicness happens and the burrow occurs is false the miotic does not occur. sent8: the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur. sent9: the propagation does not occur if that the exuvialness occurs and the unbracing holder occurs does not hold. sent10: if the propagation does not occur then the fact that both the miotic and the philhellenicness occurs is true.
|
sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent2: {B} -> ¬(¬{A} & {GF}) sent3: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} v ¬{I}) sent4: ¬{M} -> ({L} v {K}) sent5: ¬(¬{A} & {GF}) -> ¬{GF} sent6: ¬{G} -> ¬({E} & {F}) sent7: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent8: ¬{A} sent9: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{D} sent10: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C})
|
[
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the Judaicness and the burrow happens is not correct.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: ¬({AA} & {AB}); sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the Rorschach does not occur.
|
¬{GF}
|
[] | 12 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the mioticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur then that both the Judaicness and the burrow happens is not correct. sent2: if the mioticness occurs that not the indisposing cheekpiece but the Rorschach happens is false. sent3: that the bunfight does not occur or that the indisposing Basque does not occur or both is caused by the non-Jungianness. sent4: the downhill occurs and/or the anticancerness occurs if the filming Blantyre does not occur. sent5: if that the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur and the Rorschach happens does not hold the Rorschach does not occur. sent6: that the exuvialness happens and the unbracing holder happens is not correct if the Hindustani does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the Judaicness happens and the burrow occurs is false the miotic does not occur. sent8: the indisposing cheekpiece does not occur. sent9: the propagation does not occur if that the exuvialness occurs and the unbracing holder occurs does not hold. sent10: if the propagation does not occur then the fact that both the miotic and the philhellenicness occurs is true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the Judaicness and the burrow happens is not correct.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that it is stoic is false.
|
¬((Ex): {B}x)
|
sent1: if the peacock is a saltpeter then the fennel is a stoic. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a literature and does film crossfire is not right. sent3: the peacock is a saltpeter if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a literature and it does not film crossfire is correct does not hold. sent4: if something is a circularity it is biaxial. sent5: everything does not indispose trio. sent6: that the transducer is not Yeatsian is true if something is unseaworthy and not catatonic. sent7: if the fact that the farmhand is a stoic is not wrong the fennel is a saltpeter. sent8: something is not a literature and does not film crossfire. sent9: if there is something such that it films crossfire the peacock is a saltpeter. sent10: the peacock is a kind of an oral if the fennel is a saltpeter. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a saltpeter and it is not a stoic does not hold. sent12: something that is non-Yeatsian is a haik and is a circularity. sent13: there is something such that that it is a literature and does not film crossfire does not hold. sent14: there is something such that that it is not a literature and it does not film crossfire is not right. sent15: that something is unseaworthy but it is not catatonic if the fact that it does not indispose trio hold hold.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: (x): {D}x -> {C}x sent5: (x): ¬{I}x sent6: (x): ({G}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}{d} sent7: {B}{c} -> {A}{b} sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent9: (x): {AB}x -> {A}{a} sent10: {A}{b} -> {HM}{a} sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent12: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent13: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & ¬{H}x)
|
[
"sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the peacock is a kind of a saltpeter.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fennel is stoic.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent1 & int1 -> int2: {B}{b}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the peacock is a kind of an oral.
|
{HM}{a}
|
[
"sent15 -> int3: the musicologist is both unseaworthy and not catatonic if it does not indispose trio.; sent5 -> int4: the fact that the musicologist does not indispose trio hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the musicologist is unseaworthy but it is not catatonic.; int5 -> int6: everything is unseaworthy and not catatonic.; int6 -> int7: the rhubarb is a kind of unseaworthy thing that is not catatonic.; int7 -> int8: something is unseaworthy but it is not catatonic.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the transducer is not Yeatsian.; sent12 -> int10: if the transducer is not Yeatsian then it is a kind of a haik and is a kind of a circularity.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the transducer is both a haik and a circularity.; int11 -> int12: the transducer is a circularity.; sent4 -> int13: the transducer is biaxial if that it is a circularity is right.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the transducer is biaxial.;"
] | 12 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is stoic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the peacock is a saltpeter then the fennel is a stoic. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a literature and does film crossfire is not right. sent3: the peacock is a saltpeter if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a literature and it does not film crossfire is correct does not hold. sent4: if something is a circularity it is biaxial. sent5: everything does not indispose trio. sent6: that the transducer is not Yeatsian is true if something is unseaworthy and not catatonic. sent7: if the fact that the farmhand is a stoic is not wrong the fennel is a saltpeter. sent8: something is not a literature and does not film crossfire. sent9: if there is something such that it films crossfire the peacock is a saltpeter. sent10: the peacock is a kind of an oral if the fennel is a saltpeter. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a saltpeter and it is not a stoic does not hold. sent12: something that is non-Yeatsian is a haik and is a circularity. sent13: there is something such that that it is a literature and does not film crossfire does not hold. sent14: there is something such that that it is not a literature and it does not film crossfire is not right. sent15: that something is unseaworthy but it is not catatonic if the fact that it does not indispose trio hold hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the peacock is a kind of a saltpeter.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fennel is stoic.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the president is both not a reasoner and not a swatter is wrong.
|
¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a})
|
sent1: the president is not a swatter if the plumbago is not a acrocarp. sent2: the plumbago is not a reasoner if the president does not film predisposition and/or it is a acrocarp. sent3: that something is not a reasoner and it is not a swatter does not hold if it does not film predisposition. sent4: if something is a kind of a Uca that it is not bursal and it is a kind of a Franciscan is wrong. sent5: everything is a Uca. sent6: the fact that everything is not a acrocarp and/or is electrostatics is true. sent7: the president does not swatter if that the plumbago is not a acrocarp or it is electrostatics or both is true. sent8: that everything does not unbrace superbug and films predisposition is not false. sent9: if something is not psychosexual and coalesces it does not predate. sent10: something is not a kind of a reasoner if it does not unbrace superbug and does film predisposition. sent11: the fact that something does unbrace superbug but it does not indispose Kusan is wrong if it is bursal. sent12: if that the bioelectricity is not bursal but it is a Franciscan is not right then the president is bursal.
|
sent1: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{A}{a} sent2: (¬{C}{a} v {AA}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) sent4: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) sent5: (x): {H}x sent6: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent7: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): (¬{D}x & {C}x) sent9: (x): (¬{JB}x & {BH}x) -> ¬{DJ}x sent10: (x): (¬{D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (x): {F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent12: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {G}{b}) -> {F}{a}
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the plumbago is not a acrocarp and/or it is electrostatics.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the president is not a kind of a swatter.; sent10 -> int3: the president is not a reasoner if it does not unbrace superbug and does film predisposition.; sent8 -> int4: the president does not unbrace superbug but it films predisposition.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the president is not a reasoner.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 & sent7 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; sent10 -> int3: (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a}; sent8 -> int4: (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}); int3 & int4 -> int5: ¬{B}{a}; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the president is not a kind of a reasoner and it is not a kind of a swatter is false.
|
¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a})
|
[
"sent3 -> int6: if that the president does not film predisposition is right then that it is not a reasoner and it does not swatter is incorrect.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the president unbraces superbug but it does not indispose Kusan is not right if that it is bursal is true.; sent4 -> int8: that the Maoist is not bursal but it is a Franciscan is not right if it is a Uca.; sent5 -> int9: the Maoist is a Uca.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the Maoist is a kind of non-bursal thing that is a Franciscan is not right.; int10 -> int11: there is nothing such that it is non-bursal thing that is a kind of a Franciscan.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the bioelectricity is non-bursal thing that is Franciscan is false.; int12 & sent12 -> int13: that the president is bursal hold.; int7 & int13 -> int14: that the fact that the president does unbrace superbug and does not indispose Kusan is not correct hold.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the president is both not a reasoner and not a swatter is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the president is not a swatter if the plumbago is not a acrocarp. sent2: the plumbago is not a reasoner if the president does not film predisposition and/or it is a acrocarp. sent3: that something is not a reasoner and it is not a swatter does not hold if it does not film predisposition. sent4: if something is a kind of a Uca that it is not bursal and it is a kind of a Franciscan is wrong. sent5: everything is a Uca. sent6: the fact that everything is not a acrocarp and/or is electrostatics is true. sent7: the president does not swatter if that the plumbago is not a acrocarp or it is electrostatics or both is true. sent8: that everything does not unbrace superbug and films predisposition is not false. sent9: if something is not psychosexual and coalesces it does not predate. sent10: something is not a kind of a reasoner if it does not unbrace superbug and does film predisposition. sent11: the fact that something does unbrace superbug but it does not indispose Kusan is wrong if it is bursal. sent12: if that the bioelectricity is not bursal but it is a Franciscan is not right then the president is bursal. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> int1: the plumbago is not a acrocarp and/or it is electrostatics.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the president is not a kind of a swatter.; sent10 -> int3: the president is not a reasoner if it does not unbrace superbug and does film predisposition.; sent8 -> int4: the president does not unbrace superbug but it films predisposition.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the president is not a reasoner.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the crapaud does unbrace woad and is not a tailback.
|
({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})
|
sent1: the antispasmodic is not a pallidum. sent2: if something is a pallidum then that it does unbrace woad and it is not a kind of a tailback is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that it is unborn and it is not a oarswoman then the mold is not a democracy. sent4: something is not a kind of a Dipper if the fact that it is a recombinant and it is not indefeasible is not correct. sent5: if the lashing is katharobic then the mold is katharobic. sent6: that the antispasmodic does not unbrace woad is not false if the fact that the crapaud is a kind of a pallidum that is a tailback is wrong. sent7: that something is recombinant thing that is not indefeasible is not true if the fact that it is not a reinforcer is not wrong. sent8: the capote is not pessimistic if that the antispasmodic is semantics thing that is a kind of a binary is not right. sent9: if the capote is not pessimistic the crapaud does unbrace woad but it is not a tailback. sent10: the lashing is katharobic if there exists something such that the fact that it is katharobic but not non-chromatographic is not right. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not katharobic and is chromatographic does not hold. sent12: the tribune is not a oarswoman. sent13: if the capote is not a Dipper then the antispasmodic is a kind of a pallidum and is pessimistic. sent14: something that is both not a democracy and ductless is a kind of a Sunderland. sent15: the tribune is unborn. sent16: if the antispasmodic is a pallidum the crapaud is a pallidum. sent17: the fact that the Shaker is not a Y2K and it is not ductless does not hold. sent18: the capote is not a pallidum if the antispasmodic is not pessimistic. sent19: the mold is ductless if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a Y2K and not ductless hold does not hold. sent20: if that the antispasmodic is both a pallidum and not non-pessimistic is incorrect then that the capote is not semantics is not incorrect.
|
sent1: ¬{A}{a} sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent3: (x): ({O}x & ¬{M}x) -> ¬{K}{d} sent4: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent5: {I}{e} -> {I}{d} sent6: ¬({A}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent8: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {Q}x) -> {I}{e} sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{I}x & {Q}x) sent12: ¬{M}{g} sent13: ¬{E}{b} -> ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): (¬{K}x & {L}x) -> {J}x sent15: {O}{g} sent16: {A}{a} -> {A}{c} sent17: ¬(¬{N}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) sent18: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} sent19: (x): ¬(¬{N}x & ¬{L}x) -> {L}{d} sent20: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b}
|
[] |
[] |
the fact that the crapaud does unbrace woad and is not a tailback is wrong.
|
¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if that the crapaud is a pallidum hold that it unbraces woad and is not a tailback does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: the capote is not a kind of a Dipper if the fact that it is recombinant but not indefeasible is not correct.; sent7 -> int3: if the capote is not a reinforcer the fact that it is a kind of a recombinant and it is not indefeasible is false.; sent11 & sent10 -> int4: the lashing is katharobic.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the mold is katharobic.; sent14 -> int6: if the mold is not a democracy but it is ductless then it is a Sunderland.; sent15 & sent12 -> int7: the tribune is both unborn and not a oarswoman.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is unborn and it is not a oarswoman.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the mold is not a kind of a democracy.; sent17 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Y2K and it is not ductless is not correct.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the fact that the mold is ductless is true.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the mold is not a kind of a democracy but it is ductless.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the mold is a Sunderland.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the mold is katharobic and is a Sunderland.; int14 -> int15: something is katharobic and it is a Sunderland.;"
] | 14 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the crapaud does unbrace woad and is not a tailback. ; $context$ = sent1: the antispasmodic is not a pallidum. sent2: if something is a pallidum then that it does unbrace woad and it is not a kind of a tailback is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that it is unborn and it is not a oarswoman then the mold is not a democracy. sent4: something is not a kind of a Dipper if the fact that it is a recombinant and it is not indefeasible is not correct. sent5: if the lashing is katharobic then the mold is katharobic. sent6: that the antispasmodic does not unbrace woad is not false if the fact that the crapaud is a kind of a pallidum that is a tailback is wrong. sent7: that something is recombinant thing that is not indefeasible is not true if the fact that it is not a reinforcer is not wrong. sent8: the capote is not pessimistic if that the antispasmodic is semantics thing that is a kind of a binary is not right. sent9: if the capote is not pessimistic the crapaud does unbrace woad but it is not a tailback. sent10: the lashing is katharobic if there exists something such that the fact that it is katharobic but not non-chromatographic is not right. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not katharobic and is chromatographic does not hold. sent12: the tribune is not a oarswoman. sent13: if the capote is not a Dipper then the antispasmodic is a kind of a pallidum and is pessimistic. sent14: something that is both not a democracy and ductless is a kind of a Sunderland. sent15: the tribune is unborn. sent16: if the antispasmodic is a pallidum the crapaud is a pallidum. sent17: the fact that the Shaker is not a Y2K and it is not ductless does not hold. sent18: the capote is not a pallidum if the antispasmodic is not pessimistic. sent19: the mold is ductless if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a Y2K and not ductless hold does not hold. sent20: if that the antispasmodic is both a pallidum and not non-pessimistic is incorrect then that the capote is not semantics is not incorrect. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is montane then it does unbrace DPH and is not aleuronic.
|
(Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it is ungrammatical then it is cacodylic and it is not technological. sent2: there is something such that if it is montane then it does unbrace DPH and it is aleuronic.
|
sent1: (Ex): {EE}x -> ({AN}x & ¬{DA}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x)
|
[] |
[] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is montane then it does unbrace DPH and is not aleuronic. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is ungrammatical then it is cacodylic and it is not technological. sent2: there is something such that if it is montane then it does unbrace DPH and it is aleuronic. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
something is monometallic and/or it is not an arm.
|
(Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: the chlorite is a Bushido and/or is not a calabash. sent2: if the chlorite is inertial then it is monometallic and/or it does arm. sent3: something is monometallic and/or is an arm if it is inertial. sent4: the chlorite is omnidirectional. sent5: the adversary is a kind of a lip and it is a recombination. sent6: the chlorite is monometallic or an arm or both. sent7: there exists something such that it is monometallic or it is an arm or both. sent8: there is something such that either it is a splurge or it does not unbrace subpart or both. sent9: there is something such that it is monometallic or it does not miscast chlorite or both. sent10: there is something such that that it does miscast chlorite and/or it is not monometallic is true. sent11: something is monometallic and/or it does not arm if it is inertial. sent12: either the chlorite is an arm or it is not a Masonite or both. sent13: the fact that if the sidecar is arboreal the sidecar is thermostatics or it is not a kind of an arm or both hold. sent14: the chlorite does miscast chlorite.
|
sent1: ({DA}{aa} v ¬{EB}{aa}) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent4: {HO}{aa} sent5: ({BF}{hc} & {HC}{hc}) sent6: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ({GM}x v ¬{GU}x) sent9: (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{B}x) sent10: (Ex): ({B}x v ¬{AA}x) sent11: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent12: ({AB}{aa} v ¬{GS}{aa}) sent13: {JG}{ht} -> ({G}{ht} v ¬{AB}{ht}) sent14: {B}{aa}
|
[
"sent11 -> int1: the chlorite is monometallic and/or it does not arm if it is inertial.;"
] |
[
"sent11 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa});"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = something is monometallic and/or it is not an arm. ; $context$ = sent1: the chlorite is a Bushido and/or is not a calabash. sent2: if the chlorite is inertial then it is monometallic and/or it does arm. sent3: something is monometallic and/or is an arm if it is inertial. sent4: the chlorite is omnidirectional. sent5: the adversary is a kind of a lip and it is a recombination. sent6: the chlorite is monometallic or an arm or both. sent7: there exists something such that it is monometallic or it is an arm or both. sent8: there is something such that either it is a splurge or it does not unbrace subpart or both. sent9: there is something such that it is monometallic or it does not miscast chlorite or both. sent10: there is something such that that it does miscast chlorite and/or it is not monometallic is true. sent11: something is monometallic and/or it does not arm if it is inertial. sent12: either the chlorite is an arm or it is not a Masonite or both. sent13: the fact that if the sidecar is arboreal the sidecar is thermostatics or it is not a kind of an arm or both hold. sent14: the chlorite does miscast chlorite. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 -> int1: the chlorite is monometallic and/or it does not arm if it is inertial.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the playmate is not autogenous.
|
¬{D}{a}
|
sent1: if something is both not a graphics and a nonagon it is autogenous. sent2: the warthog does not unbrace Natchez if that the goblet does not unbrace Natchez but it is a kind of a design does not hold. sent3: something is autogenous if the fact that it unbraces goblet and it does not boat is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a 1840s then that the playmate unbraces goblet but it is not a kind of a boating is not right. sent5: the mayflower unbraces Roquefort and it is a nonagon if the lambda does not waive. sent6: the fact that the peak is a graphics and it is not unpunctual is not correct if that the chaetodon is not septic is not false. sent7: the chaetodon is non-septic. sent8: that the playmate boats but it is not a kind of a 1840s is not correct if there exists something such that it does unbrace goblet. sent9: if something is not non-autogenous then the fact that it unbraces goblet is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that it is a 1840s. sent11: the lambda does not waive if the Jesuit does not unbrace Natchez. sent12: if the fact that the playmate does boat but it is not a 1840s does not hold then the ropewalker is not a 1840s. sent13: the fact that the goblet is a colonic is correct. sent14: that the mayflower is not graphics hold if there is something such that that it is both a graphics and punctual is not right. sent15: the fact that the goblet does not unbrace Natchez but it designs does not hold if it is a colonic. sent16: that something does indispose baldpate and is not educational is not true if it is not a 1840s. sent17: the Jesuit does not unbrace Natchez if the warthog does not unbrace Natchez.
|
sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> {D}x sent2: ¬(¬{J}{g} & {K}{g}) -> ¬{J}{f} sent3: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: ¬{I}{c} -> ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) sent6: ¬{L}{h} -> ¬({E}{d} & {H}{d}) sent7: ¬{L}{h} sent8: (x): {B}x -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent9: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent10: (Ex): {A}x sent11: ¬{J}{e} -> ¬{I}{c} sent12: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{fe} sent13: {M}{g} sent14: (x): ¬({E}x & {H}x) -> ¬{E}{b} sent15: {M}{g} -> ¬(¬{J}{g} & {K}{g}) sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({CM}x & ¬{CA}x) sent17: ¬{J}{f} -> ¬{J}{e}
|
[
"sent10 & sent4 -> int1: that the playmate unbraces goblet and does not boat is not true.; sent3 -> int2: that the playmate is autogenous is correct if the fact that it does unbrace goblet and is not a boating is not right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent10 & sent4 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent3 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the ropewalker does indispose baldpate but it is not educational is false.
|
¬({CM}{fe} & ¬{CA}{fe})
|
[
"sent16 -> int3: that the ropewalker does indispose baldpate and is not educational is incorrect if it is not a 1840s.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the mayflower unbraces goblet if the mayflower is autogenous is correct.; sent1 -> int5: the mayflower is autogenous if it is both not a graphics and a nonagon.; sent6 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the peak is graphics and punctual does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is graphics and it is not unpunctual is false.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the mayflower is not a graphics.; sent15 & sent13 -> int9: that the goblet does not unbrace Natchez and does design is not correct.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the warthog does not unbrace Natchez.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the Jesuit does not unbrace Natchez.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: that the lambda does not waive is not wrong.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the mayflower unbraces Roquefort and it is a nonagon.; int13 -> int14: the mayflower is a kind of a nonagon.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the mayflower is not a graphics but a nonagon.; int5 & int15 -> int16: the mayflower is autogenous.; int4 & int16 -> int17: the mayflower does unbrace goblet.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it does unbrace goblet.; int18 & sent8 -> int19: that the playmate is a kind of a boating but it is not a 1840s does not hold.; sent12 & int19 -> int20: the ropewalker is not a 1840s.; int3 & int20 -> hypothesis;"
] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the playmate is not autogenous. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is both not a graphics and a nonagon it is autogenous. sent2: the warthog does not unbrace Natchez if that the goblet does not unbrace Natchez but it is a kind of a design does not hold. sent3: something is autogenous if the fact that it unbraces goblet and it does not boat is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a 1840s then that the playmate unbraces goblet but it is not a kind of a boating is not right. sent5: the mayflower unbraces Roquefort and it is a nonagon if the lambda does not waive. sent6: the fact that the peak is a graphics and it is not unpunctual is not correct if that the chaetodon is not septic is not false. sent7: the chaetodon is non-septic. sent8: that the playmate boats but it is not a kind of a 1840s is not correct if there exists something such that it does unbrace goblet. sent9: if something is not non-autogenous then the fact that it unbraces goblet is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that it is a 1840s. sent11: the lambda does not waive if the Jesuit does not unbrace Natchez. sent12: if the fact that the playmate does boat but it is not a 1840s does not hold then the ropewalker is not a 1840s. sent13: the fact that the goblet is a colonic is correct. sent14: that the mayflower is not graphics hold if there is something such that that it is both a graphics and punctual is not right. sent15: the fact that the goblet does not unbrace Natchez but it designs does not hold if it is a colonic. sent16: that something does indispose baldpate and is not educational is not true if it is not a 1840s. sent17: the Jesuit does not unbrace Natchez if the warthog does not unbrace Natchez. ; $proof$ =
|
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: that the playmate unbraces goblet and does not boat is not true.; sent3 -> int2: that the playmate is autogenous is correct if the fact that it does unbrace goblet and is not a boating is not right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the beckoning does not occur hold.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: both the terrorization and the centering happens. sent2: the fact that the indisposing Procyon does not occur if that both the non-biosystematicsness and the indisposing Procyon occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent3: the simulating does not occur and the devitalization does not occur if the soliton occurs. sent4: the sneer occurs. sent5: the biosystematicsness happens. sent6: the cucurbitaceousness does not occur if the simulating does not occur and the devitalization does not occur. sent7: both the miscasting excavation and the cucurbitaceousness occurs. sent8: the indisposing briefing occurs. sent9: if the indisposing briefing does not occur then that both the non-biosystematicsness and the indisposing Procyon occurs does not hold. sent10: that the indisposing briefing and the biosystematicsness occurs triggers that the beckoning does not occur. sent11: that the indisposing briefing does not occur and the beckoning does not occur is caused by that the cucurbitaceousness does not occur. sent12: the telecast occurs.
|
sent1: ({GC} & {GM}) sent2: ¬(¬{B} & {BB}) -> ¬{BB} sent3: {G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) sent4: {JH} sent5: {B} sent6: (¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} sent7: ({Q} & {D}) sent8: {A} sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {BB}) sent10: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent11: ¬{D} -> (¬{A} & ¬{C}) sent12: {BK}
|
[
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the indisposing briefing occurs and the biosystematicsness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the indisposing Procyon does not occur.
|
¬{BB}
|
[] | 10 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the beckoning does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: both the terrorization and the centering happens. sent2: the fact that the indisposing Procyon does not occur if that both the non-biosystematicsness and the indisposing Procyon occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent3: the simulating does not occur and the devitalization does not occur if the soliton occurs. sent4: the sneer occurs. sent5: the biosystematicsness happens. sent6: the cucurbitaceousness does not occur if the simulating does not occur and the devitalization does not occur. sent7: both the miscasting excavation and the cucurbitaceousness occurs. sent8: the indisposing briefing occurs. sent9: if the indisposing briefing does not occur then that both the non-biosystematicsness and the indisposing Procyon occurs does not hold. sent10: that the indisposing briefing and the biosystematicsness occurs triggers that the beckoning does not occur. sent11: that the indisposing briefing does not occur and the beckoning does not occur is caused by that the cucurbitaceousness does not occur. sent12: the telecast occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the indisposing briefing occurs and the biosystematicsness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it unbraces cityscape and is a brick then it is not pressor.
|
(Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
sent1: there is something such that if it shucks and it is a gate it is not a delight. sent2: if the fact that the cityscape does unbrace cityscape and it is a kind of a brick is not false that it is non-pressor is not false. sent3: there is something such that if it truckles and it is emmetropic then it is not a hanging. sent4: if the cityscape unbraces cityscape and it is a brick then it is pressor. sent5: if the fructification is paleocortical and it is a matriarch then it does not unbrace cityscape. sent6: there is something such that if it is onomatopoeic and it is a suit it is not territorial. sent7: there is something such that if it is a rotor and is vicinal the fact that it is not a kind of a projection is correct. sent8: the company is not a kind of a brick if it indisposes headlight and it is diluvian. sent9: the Lastex is not a Kurd if it is a alpinist and it is pressor. sent10: there exists something such that if it does unbrace cityscape and is a brick the fact that it is pressor is not wrong. sent11: if the cityscape is a Barnum and is a vacationer then it does not shuck. sent12: if something is a hydration and it unbraces cityscape it does not unbrace Hydnum. sent13: there is something such that if it does unbrace quadric and it does indispose quintessence the fact that it is not a tastelessness is not incorrect. sent14: something is not pressor if it learns and it is a riboflavin.
|
sent1: (Ex): ({IG}x & {DB}x) -> ¬{HF}x sent2: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ({JB}x & {K}x) -> ¬{DE}x sent4: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: ({H}{de} & {AM}{de}) -> ¬{AA}{de} sent6: (Ex): ({N}x & {JD}x) -> ¬{CD}x sent7: (Ex): ({IJ}x & {DU}x) -> ¬{CI}x sent8: ({IN}{et} & {HU}{et}) -> ¬{AB}{et} sent9: ({IH}{bo} & {B}{bo}) -> ¬{DH}{bo} sent10: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent11: ({HL}{aa} & {EF}{aa}) -> ¬{IG}{aa} sent12: (x): ({DA}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{JK}x sent13: (Ex): ({GR}x & {GJ}x) -> ¬{G}x sent14: (x): ({DG}x & {DC}x) -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that if that the lakeside is the hydration that does unbrace cityscape hold then the lakeside does not unbrace Hydnum is true.
|
({DA}{ci} & {AA}{ci}) -> ¬{JK}{ci}
|
[
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it unbraces cityscape and is a brick then it is not pressor. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it shucks and it is a gate it is not a delight. sent2: if the fact that the cityscape does unbrace cityscape and it is a kind of a brick is not false that it is non-pressor is not false. sent3: there is something such that if it truckles and it is emmetropic then it is not a hanging. sent4: if the cityscape unbraces cityscape and it is a brick then it is pressor. sent5: if the fructification is paleocortical and it is a matriarch then it does not unbrace cityscape. sent6: there is something such that if it is onomatopoeic and it is a suit it is not territorial. sent7: there is something such that if it is a rotor and is vicinal the fact that it is not a kind of a projection is correct. sent8: the company is not a kind of a brick if it indisposes headlight and it is diluvian. sent9: the Lastex is not a Kurd if it is a alpinist and it is pressor. sent10: there exists something such that if it does unbrace cityscape and is a brick the fact that it is pressor is not wrong. sent11: if the cityscape is a Barnum and is a vacationer then it does not shuck. sent12: if something is a hydration and it unbraces cityscape it does not unbrace Hydnum. sent13: there is something such that if it does unbrace quadric and it does indispose quintessence the fact that it is not a tastelessness is not incorrect. sent14: something is not pressor if it learns and it is a riboflavin. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the wobble does not occur.
|
¬{E}
|
sent1: that the wobbling does not occur is brought about by that the denouement happens or the indisposing pictograph occurs or both. sent2: that that the toot does not occur and the Iberianness does not occur is not right is not incorrect if the indisposing atypicality does not occur. sent3: both the wobble and the hospitableness happens if the toll-freeness does not occur. sent4: the indisposing Manila does not occur if that that the toot does not occur and the Iberian does not occur is correct does not hold. sent5: if that the fact that both the non-Marxistness and the miscasting Pembroke occurs is right is not true the miscasting Pembroke does not occur. sent6: the smoothing happens if the azotemicness does not occur. sent7: if the indisposing pictograph happens then the wobbling does not occur. sent8: that the denouement occurs is triggered by that the toll-freeness does not occur. sent9: the indisposing pictograph is prevented by that the sousing does not occur and the indisposing Sterope does not occur. sent10: if the indisposing Manila does not occur that both the non-Marxistness and the miscasting Pembroke occurs does not hold. sent11: that the souse does not occur and the indisposing Sterope does not occur is caused by that the miscasting Pembroke does not occur. sent12: either the non-hospitableness or the non-toll-freeness or both occurs.
|
sent1: ({C} v {D}) -> ¬{E} sent2: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) sent3: ¬{B} -> ({E} & {A}) sent4: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} sent5: ¬(¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{H} sent6: ¬{FT} -> {EI} sent7: {D} -> ¬{E} sent8: ¬{B} -> {C} sent9: (¬{F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{D} sent10: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{I} & {H}) sent11: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent12: (¬{A} v ¬{B})
|
[] |
[] |
the wobble occurs.
|
{E}
|
[] | 12 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the wobble does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the wobbling does not occur is brought about by that the denouement happens or the indisposing pictograph occurs or both. sent2: that that the toot does not occur and the Iberianness does not occur is not right is not incorrect if the indisposing atypicality does not occur. sent3: both the wobble and the hospitableness happens if the toll-freeness does not occur. sent4: the indisposing Manila does not occur if that that the toot does not occur and the Iberian does not occur is correct does not hold. sent5: if that the fact that both the non-Marxistness and the miscasting Pembroke occurs is right is not true the miscasting Pembroke does not occur. sent6: the smoothing happens if the azotemicness does not occur. sent7: if the indisposing pictograph happens then the wobbling does not occur. sent8: that the denouement occurs is triggered by that the toll-freeness does not occur. sent9: the indisposing pictograph is prevented by that the sousing does not occur and the indisposing Sterope does not occur. sent10: if the indisposing Manila does not occur that both the non-Marxistness and the miscasting Pembroke occurs does not hold. sent11: that the souse does not occur and the indisposing Sterope does not occur is caused by that the miscasting Pembroke does not occur. sent12: either the non-hospitableness or the non-toll-freeness or both occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the tribune does not indispose tribune.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: the tandoor is complimentary. sent2: the tandoor does indispose counterreformation. sent3: if something that does indispose counterreformation is complimentary then that the tribune indisposes tribune hold. sent4: The counterreformation does indispose tandoor.
|
sent1: {B}{a} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{b} sent4: {AA}{aa}
|
[
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the tandoor does indispose counterreformation and is complimentary.; int1 -> int2: something indisposes counterreformation and it is complimentary.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the tribune does not indispose tribune. ; $context$ = sent1: the tandoor is complimentary. sent2: the tandoor does indispose counterreformation. sent3: if something that does indispose counterreformation is complimentary then that the tribune indisposes tribune hold. sent4: The counterreformation does indispose tandoor. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the tandoor does indispose counterreformation and is complimentary.; int1 -> int2: something indisposes counterreformation and it is complimentary.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there exists something such that if it does not percuss and it is not a Fabian then that it does indispose gibbsite is true does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not unbrace Chlorococcum and it is not a kook it does miscast Strix. sent2: the adit does indispose gibbsite if it does not percuss and is not a Fabian. sent3: if the adit does percuss and is not a Fabian the fact that it does indispose gibbsite hold. sent4: if the adit does not percuss but it is a Fabian that it indisposes gibbsite hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not percuss and is not non-Fabian then it does indispose gibbsite. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a mistake and is not a wash then it is styleless. sent7: if something is not a copolymer and is not inflationary then that it is downstream hold. sent8: if that the optometrist is a kind of non-Fabian thing that does not relax is true then it does miscast Antirrhinum. sent9: there exists something such that if it percusses and is not Fabian then that it does indispose gibbsite is not wrong.
|
sent1: (Ex): (¬{AG}x & ¬{FI}x) -> {AL}x sent2: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (Ex): (¬{ER}x & ¬{FQ}x) -> {BN}x sent7: (x): (¬{K}x & ¬{A}x) -> {FS}x sent8: (¬{AB}{ih} & ¬{DE}{ih}) -> {FN}{ih} sent9: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
if the duplicator is not a copolymer and not inflationary then the fact that it is downstream is not wrong.
|
(¬{K}{gu} & ¬{A}{gu}) -> {FS}{gu}
|
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not percuss and it is not a Fabian then that it does indispose gibbsite is true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not unbrace Chlorococcum and it is not a kook it does miscast Strix. sent2: the adit does indispose gibbsite if it does not percuss and is not a Fabian. sent3: if the adit does percuss and is not a Fabian the fact that it does indispose gibbsite hold. sent4: if the adit does not percuss but it is a Fabian that it indisposes gibbsite hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not percuss and is not non-Fabian then it does indispose gibbsite. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a mistake and is not a wash then it is styleless. sent7: if something is not a copolymer and is not inflationary then that it is downstream hold. sent8: if that the optometrist is a kind of non-Fabian thing that does not relax is true then it does miscast Antirrhinum. sent9: there exists something such that if it percusses and is not Fabian then that it does indispose gibbsite is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that both the link and the non-instructionalness occurs is not true.
|
¬({A} & ¬{C})
|
sent1: if the botryoidness does not occur and the indisposing aquatics does not occur the Milaneseness does not occur. sent2: the heliotherapy does not occur and the soul does not occur. sent3: if the dramaticness does not occur then the fact that the link and the non-instructionalness happens is not true. sent4: that both the amelioration and the indisposing aquatics occurs does not hold if the fact that the dispute does not occur is not false. sent5: the daycare does not occur and the thyroidectomy does not occur. sent6: that the link occurs and the instructionalness happens does not hold if the dramaticness does not occur. sent7: that the indisposing catecholamine occurs and the filming bolivar occurs is not true. sent8: that the robbery does not occur but the tribute happens causes the non-dramaticness. sent9: the indisposing olm does not occur if the miscasting Maoism but not the Bell happens. sent10: that the catachresticness does not occur is triggered by that the calling happens but the difference does not occur. sent11: that the emotionalness but not the zakat happens is wrong if the link occurs. sent12: that the swabbing and the non-ovineness happens is not right. sent13: if the robbery does not occur and the tribute does not occur then the dramaticness does not occur. sent14: that the adrenal happens and the zakat occurs does not hold. sent15: that the miscasting meekness does not occur hold. sent16: the robbery does not occur and the tribute does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the genitourinariness occurs but the TURP does not occur is not true hold if the ovineness does not occur. sent18: if the nonproprietariness does not occur then the link and the dramaticness occurs.
|
sent1: (¬{FH} & ¬{GD}) -> ¬{GB} sent2: (¬{EP} & ¬{IK}) sent3: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) sent4: ¬{GK} -> ¬({DQ} & {GD}) sent5: (¬{CQ} & ¬{DO}) sent6: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) sent7: ¬({JJ} & {IS}) sent8: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent9: ({ID} & ¬{CG}) -> ¬{BJ} sent10: ({AK} & ¬{GH}) -> ¬{HI} sent11: {A} -> ¬({JD} & ¬{BE}) sent12: ¬({AU} & ¬{AL}) sent13: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent14: ¬({EN} & {BE}) sent15: ¬{HH} sent16: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent17: ¬{AL} -> ¬({IT} & ¬{AI}) sent18: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {B})
|
[
"sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the dramaticness does not occur is right.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 & sent16 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the emotionalness but not the zakat occurs does not hold.
|
¬({JD} & ¬{BE})
|
[] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that both the link and the non-instructionalness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the botryoidness does not occur and the indisposing aquatics does not occur the Milaneseness does not occur. sent2: the heliotherapy does not occur and the soul does not occur. sent3: if the dramaticness does not occur then the fact that the link and the non-instructionalness happens is not true. sent4: that both the amelioration and the indisposing aquatics occurs does not hold if the fact that the dispute does not occur is not false. sent5: the daycare does not occur and the thyroidectomy does not occur. sent6: that the link occurs and the instructionalness happens does not hold if the dramaticness does not occur. sent7: that the indisposing catecholamine occurs and the filming bolivar occurs is not true. sent8: that the robbery does not occur but the tribute happens causes the non-dramaticness. sent9: the indisposing olm does not occur if the miscasting Maoism but not the Bell happens. sent10: that the catachresticness does not occur is triggered by that the calling happens but the difference does not occur. sent11: that the emotionalness but not the zakat happens is wrong if the link occurs. sent12: that the swabbing and the non-ovineness happens is not right. sent13: if the robbery does not occur and the tribute does not occur then the dramaticness does not occur. sent14: that the adrenal happens and the zakat occurs does not hold. sent15: that the miscasting meekness does not occur hold. sent16: the robbery does not occur and the tribute does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the genitourinariness occurs but the TURP does not occur is not true hold if the ovineness does not occur. sent18: if the nonproprietariness does not occur then the link and the dramaticness occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the dramaticness does not occur is right.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the opisthognathousness occurs and the boycott occurs.
|
({C} & {D})
|
sent1: the unbracing bandwidth happens. sent2: the contention happens and the unbracing Paraguayan happens. sent3: the opisthognathousness occurs if the contention happens. sent4: both the boycotting and the bibliopolicness happens.
|
sent1: {DG} sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: {A} -> {C} sent4: ({D} & {E})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the contention happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the opisthognathousness occurs.; sent4 -> int3: the boycott happens.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: {A}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: {C}; sent4 -> int3: {D}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the opisthognathousness occurs and the boycott occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the unbracing bandwidth happens. sent2: the contention happens and the unbracing Paraguayan happens. sent3: the opisthognathousness occurs if the contention happens. sent4: both the boycotting and the bibliopolicness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: the contention happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the opisthognathousness occurs.; sent4 -> int3: the boycott happens.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the announcer is not a producer.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Juneau. sent2: there exists something such that it miscasts announcer. sent3: the gambler is not a producer if there is something such that it does not film flavivirus. sent4: the announcer does not film flavivirus. sent5: there is something such that it is not a producer. sent6: something miscasts announcer and does not film flavivirus if it miscasts imidazole. sent7: something is not a kind of a producer and it does not miscast imidazole. sent8: there is something such that it does not overgrow. sent9: something does miscast imidazole and is not a kind of a producer. sent10: the gambler does not film flavivirus and does not miscast imidazole if there exists something such that it does not miscast announcer. sent11: if something does not miscast imidazole and it is not a kind of a producer the announcer does not film flavivirus. sent12: something is not a producer and does not film flavivirus. sent13: there exists something such that it does not miscast announcer. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of an accusative.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{N}x sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} sent5: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent6: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent7: (Ex): (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{DM}x sent9: (Ex): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent11: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent12: (Ex): (¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent14: (Ex): {FF}x
|
[
"sent13 & sent10 -> int1: that the gambler does not film flavivirus and it does not miscast imidazole is correct.; int1 -> int2: something does not film flavivirus and it does not miscast imidazole.;"
] |
[
"sent13 & sent10 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x);"
] |
that the announcer is a kind of a producer is not wrong.
|
{D}{b}
|
[
"sent6 -> int3: if the gambler does miscast imidazole then the fact that it does miscast announcer and does not film flavivirus hold.;"
] | 5 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the announcer is not a producer. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Juneau. sent2: there exists something such that it miscasts announcer. sent3: the gambler is not a producer if there is something such that it does not film flavivirus. sent4: the announcer does not film flavivirus. sent5: there is something such that it is not a producer. sent6: something miscasts announcer and does not film flavivirus if it miscasts imidazole. sent7: something is not a kind of a producer and it does not miscast imidazole. sent8: there is something such that it does not overgrow. sent9: something does miscast imidazole and is not a kind of a producer. sent10: the gambler does not film flavivirus and does not miscast imidazole if there exists something such that it does not miscast announcer. sent11: if something does not miscast imidazole and it is not a kind of a producer the announcer does not film flavivirus. sent12: something is not a producer and does not film flavivirus. sent13: there exists something such that it does not miscast announcer. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of an accusative. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: that the gambler does not film flavivirus and it does not miscast imidazole is correct.; int1 -> int2: something does not film flavivirus and it does not miscast imidazole.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that that it does indispose tau or is a 1750s or both is not true.
|
(Ex): ¬({C}x v {A}x)
|
sent1: that the clarion is not a golfing is not incorrect if the fact that the plain is not a kind of a Shavian and it is not incapable is not right. sent2: something is not Shavian. sent3: the fact that something indisposes tau and/or it is a kind of a 1750s is wrong if it is not a golfing. sent4: that the fact that the plain is not a Shavian and is not incapable is not true is true. sent5: if the plain golfs then the clarion is not incapable. sent6: the fact that the clarion golfs but it is not a kind of a spearhead is not correct. sent7: the clarion is not incapable if the plain is a kind of a 1750s. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a partridgeberry. sent9: if something is not a 1750s then that it is not capable and/or it does indispose tau does not hold. sent10: the holder does not indispose tau. sent11: the fact that the clarion is a 1750s but it is not a Shavian is not right. sent12: there is something such that that it does not miscast Coigue is not incorrect. sent13: the plain does not indispose tau. sent14: that the plain does not unbrace clarion is not false. sent15: if the fact that the clarion is not a fixedness and is not a Shavian is incorrect the plain is not a dualism. sent16: that the clarion is a kind of a Shavian or does indispose tau or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a 1750s. sent17: the fact that the clarion is both incapable and not a golfing does not hold. sent18: that either the plain indisposes tau or it is a footfault or both is not true.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x v {A}x) sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: {B}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent6: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{IE}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent8: (Ex): ¬{GJ}x sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AB}x v {C}x) sent10: ¬{C}{ak} sent11: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) sent12: (Ex): ¬{HM}x sent13: ¬{C}{a} sent14: ¬{IL}{a} sent15: ¬(¬{CD}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{FH}{a} sent16: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{b} v {C}{b}) sent17: ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent18: ¬({C}{a} v {L}{a})
|
[
"sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the clarion is not a kind of a golfing.; sent3 -> int2: if the clarion is not a golfing that it indisposes tau and/or is a 1750s does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that either the clarion does indispose tau or it is a 1750s or both is false.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent4 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent3 -> int2: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{b} v {A}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({C}{b} v {A}{b}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does indispose tau or is a 1750s or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the clarion is not a golfing is not incorrect if the fact that the plain is not a kind of a Shavian and it is not incapable is not right. sent2: something is not Shavian. sent3: the fact that something indisposes tau and/or it is a kind of a 1750s is wrong if it is not a golfing. sent4: that the fact that the plain is not a Shavian and is not incapable is not true is true. sent5: if the plain golfs then the clarion is not incapable. sent6: the fact that the clarion golfs but it is not a kind of a spearhead is not correct. sent7: the clarion is not incapable if the plain is a kind of a 1750s. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a partridgeberry. sent9: if something is not a 1750s then that it is not capable and/or it does indispose tau does not hold. sent10: the holder does not indispose tau. sent11: the fact that the clarion is a 1750s but it is not a Shavian is not right. sent12: there is something such that that it does not miscast Coigue is not incorrect. sent13: the plain does not indispose tau. sent14: that the plain does not unbrace clarion is not false. sent15: if the fact that the clarion is not a fixedness and is not a Shavian is incorrect the plain is not a dualism. sent16: that the clarion is a kind of a Shavian or does indispose tau or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a 1750s. sent17: the fact that the clarion is both incapable and not a golfing does not hold. sent18: that either the plain indisposes tau or it is a footfault or both is not true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the clarion is not a kind of a golfing.; sent3 -> int2: if the clarion is not a golfing that it indisposes tau and/or is a 1750s does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that either the clarion does indispose tau or it is a 1750s or both is false.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the spathiphyllum is mucosal.
|
{D}{a}
|
sent1: there exists something such that it films hydromorphone. sent2: something that is a kind of a chisel is a pterodactyl. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a gulch. sent4: if the spathiphyllum is mucosal then it is a kind of a mailsorter. sent5: if the spathiphyllum is a seconder it is a jargoon. sent6: if something is a kind of a pterodactyl then it is mucosal. sent7: something is discomycetous if it is a death-roll. sent8: there is something such that it is a gulch. sent9: that there exists something such that that it is not amphibious is not incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: there are current things. sent11: if the spathiphyllum is a pterodactyl then that it indisposes Hegelian is correct. sent12: if the Jihadist is a gulch and it is mucosal the spathiphyllum is not mucosal. sent13: if the spathiphyllum is a kind of a koumiss then it is a pterodactyl. sent14: the opah is a kind of a pterodactyl if it is a Alca. sent15: something is a thermocouple. sent16: there is something such that that it does not unbrace atenolol hold. sent17: that the cheekpiece is elocutionary is true if it unbraces dekaliter. sent18: something is not self-service. sent19: something is not non-vibrational if it is a kind of an absenteeism. sent20: if the allyl chisels then the Jihadist is not a chisels. sent21: the spathiphyllum does gouge.
|
sent1: (Ex): {BK}x sent2: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent4: {D}{a} -> {FN}{a} sent5: {GR}{a} -> {JG}{a} sent6: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent7: (x): {GI}x -> {CM}x sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: (Ex): ¬{CD}x sent10: (Ex): {HP}x sent11: {C}{a} -> {HT}{a} sent12: ({A}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent13: {GQ}{a} -> {C}{a} sent14: {FJ}{gs} -> {C}{gs} sent15: (Ex): {GP}x sent16: (Ex): ¬{EP}x sent17: {I}{ab} -> {FA}{ab} sent18: (Ex): ¬{Q}x sent19: (x): {DT}x -> {GU}x sent20: {B}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} sent21: {DF}{a}
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if the spathiphyllum does chisel then it is a pterodactyl.; sent6 -> int2: if the spathiphyllum is a pterodactyl then it is mucosal.;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {C}{a} -> {D}{a};"
] |
that the spathiphyllum is not mucosal hold.
|
¬{D}{a}
|
[] | 6 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the spathiphyllum is mucosal. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it films hydromorphone. sent2: something that is a kind of a chisel is a pterodactyl. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a gulch. sent4: if the spathiphyllum is mucosal then it is a kind of a mailsorter. sent5: if the spathiphyllum is a seconder it is a jargoon. sent6: if something is a kind of a pterodactyl then it is mucosal. sent7: something is discomycetous if it is a death-roll. sent8: there is something such that it is a gulch. sent9: that there exists something such that that it is not amphibious is not incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: there are current things. sent11: if the spathiphyllum is a pterodactyl then that it indisposes Hegelian is correct. sent12: if the Jihadist is a gulch and it is mucosal the spathiphyllum is not mucosal. sent13: if the spathiphyllum is a kind of a koumiss then it is a pterodactyl. sent14: the opah is a kind of a pterodactyl if it is a Alca. sent15: something is a thermocouple. sent16: there is something such that that it does not unbrace atenolol hold. sent17: that the cheekpiece is elocutionary is true if it unbraces dekaliter. sent18: something is not self-service. sent19: something is not non-vibrational if it is a kind of an absenteeism. sent20: if the allyl chisels then the Jihadist is not a chisels. sent21: the spathiphyllum does gouge. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: if the spathiphyllum does chisel then it is a pterodactyl.; sent6 -> int2: if the spathiphyllum is a pterodactyl then it is mucosal.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bellarmine is a anil and is uncommon.
|
({D}{b} & {C}{b})
|
sent1: if the fact that the coal is Wittgensteinian is correct the fact that it is uncommon is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the coal is not Wittgensteinian hold then the bellarmine does horsewhip. sent3: something is uncommon if it is a horsewhip. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a margrave then the fact that the desktop does unbrace gravestone and it miscasts mountain is not correct. sent5: that the coal is not tight is not wrong if that the desktop does unbrace gravestone and miscasts mountain is not right. sent6: if something is not tight or a anil or both it is a anil. sent7: something is a margrave if that it is a Wain is not wrong. sent8: the desktop unbraces gravestone. sent9: the Buffalo is immoral. sent10: that either the bellarmine is not tight or it is a anil or both if that the desktop unbraces gravestone hold is right. sent11: the desktop is not a horsewhip. sent12: the coal is not Wittgensteinian. sent13: if the Buffalo is immoral then it does not miscast bellarmine and it is jittery. sent14: something is not a anil if the fact that it is a horsewhip or is Wittgensteinian or both does not hold. sent15: if something does not miscast bellarmine and is jittery then it is a Wain. sent16: The gravestone unbraces desktop.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> {C}{a} sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent4: (x): {H}x -> ¬({F}{c} & {G}{c}) sent5: ¬({F}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent6: (x): (¬{E}x v {D}x) -> {D}x sent7: (x): {I}x -> {H}x sent8: {F}{c} sent9: {L}{d} sent10: {F}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) sent11: ¬{B}{c} sent12: ¬{A}{a} sent13: {L}{d} -> (¬{K}{d} & {J}{d}) sent14: (x): ¬({B}x v {A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent15: (x): (¬{K}x & {J}x) -> {I}x sent16: {AA}{aa}
|
[
"sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the bellarmine is a horsewhip.; sent3 -> int2: the bellarmine is uncommon if the fact that it is a horsewhip hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bellarmine is uncommon.; sent6 -> int4: the bellarmine is a anil if it is either not tight or a anil or both.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the bellarmine is non-tight or is a anil or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bellarmine is a anil.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 & sent12 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent3 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{b}; sent6 -> int4: (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> {D}{b}; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}); int4 & int5 -> int6: {D}{b}; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the bellarmine is a anil and is uncommon is wrong.
|
¬({D}{b} & {C}{b})
|
[
"sent14 -> int7: that the coal is not the anil if that the coal is a kind of a horsewhip or is Wittgensteinian or both is not true hold.; sent7 -> int8: the Buffalo is a margrave if it is a Wain.; sent15 -> int9: if the Buffalo does not miscast bellarmine but it is jittery then it is a Wain.; sent13 & sent9 -> int10: the Buffalo does not miscast bellarmine and is jittery.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the Buffalo is a Wain hold.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the Buffalo is a kind of a margrave.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a margrave.; int13 & sent4 -> int14: that the desktop does unbrace gravestone and miscasts mountain is incorrect.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the coal is not tight.;"
] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the bellarmine is a anil and is uncommon. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the coal is Wittgensteinian is correct the fact that it is uncommon is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the coal is not Wittgensteinian hold then the bellarmine does horsewhip. sent3: something is uncommon if it is a horsewhip. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a margrave then the fact that the desktop does unbrace gravestone and it miscasts mountain is not correct. sent5: that the coal is not tight is not wrong if that the desktop does unbrace gravestone and miscasts mountain is not right. sent6: if something is not tight or a anil or both it is a anil. sent7: something is a margrave if that it is a Wain is not wrong. sent8: the desktop unbraces gravestone. sent9: the Buffalo is immoral. sent10: that either the bellarmine is not tight or it is a anil or both if that the desktop unbraces gravestone hold is right. sent11: the desktop is not a horsewhip. sent12: the coal is not Wittgensteinian. sent13: if the Buffalo is immoral then it does not miscast bellarmine and it is jittery. sent14: something is not a anil if the fact that it is a horsewhip or is Wittgensteinian or both does not hold. sent15: if something does not miscast bellarmine and is jittery then it is a Wain. sent16: The gravestone unbraces desktop. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the bellarmine is a horsewhip.; sent3 -> int2: the bellarmine is uncommon if the fact that it is a horsewhip hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bellarmine is uncommon.; sent6 -> int4: the bellarmine is a anil if it is either not tight or a anil or both.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the bellarmine is non-tight or is a anil or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bellarmine is a anil.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the catting happens and/or the adoptiveness occurs is wrong.
|
¬({B} v {C})
|
sent1: the sidearmness and the miscasting neuroscience happens. sent2: that the magic occurs and the mesolithicness occurs is caused by that the catting does not occur. sent3: if the canonization occurs the cat does not occur and the adoptiveness happens. sent4: the indisposing pyrochemistry does not occur and the steering happens if the castigation happens. sent5: if the indisposing pyrochemistry does not occur then the miscasting Dinesen happens and the Luxemburgerness occurs. sent6: that the unbracing DPH does not occur yields that the comprehensibleness does not occur and the bleat does not occur. sent7: if the comprehensibleness does not occur the fact that both the unseductiveness and the gall happens does not hold. sent8: that if the fact that the work-in occurs but the scentlessness does not occur is false then the canonization happens is not false. sent9: if the fact that the phonicness happens and the purse does not occur is not correct then the castigation occurs. sent10: if the miscasting Dinesen occurs then the unbracing DPH does not occur. sent11: that both the work-in and the non-scentlessness happens is not right if the unseductiveness does not occur. sent12: the unseductiveness does not occur if that that the unseductiveness occurs and the gall happens is right is not true. sent13: both the unseductiveness and the dematerializing occurs. sent14: if the distention happens that the phonicness but not the purse happens is not correct. sent15: that the distention but not the carting occurs is brought about by that the perturbation does not occur. sent16: both the mesolithicness and the cat occurs. sent17: the mesolithicness happens. sent18: the fact that the perturbation does not occur hold if the sequence happens but the jab does not occur. sent19: if the combination happens then the sequence but not the jabbing happens. sent20: the rockslide occurs.
|
sent1: ({HG} & {CT}) sent2: ¬{B} -> ({EO} & {A}) sent3: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent4: {P} -> (¬{N} & {O}) sent5: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {M}) sent6: ¬{K} -> (¬{H} & ¬{J}) sent7: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} & {I}) sent8: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} sent9: ¬({R} & ¬{Q}) -> {P} sent10: {L} -> ¬{K} sent11: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) sent12: ¬({G} & {I}) -> ¬{G} sent13: ({G} & {FE}) sent14: {S} -> ¬({R} & ¬{Q}) sent15: ¬{U} -> ({S} & ¬{T}) sent16: ({A} & {B}) sent17: {A} sent18: ({AB} & ¬{AA}) -> ¬{U} sent19: {AC} -> ({AB} & ¬{AA}) sent20: {HT}
|
[
"sent16 -> int1: the cat happens.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent16 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the magic occurs.
|
{EO}
|
[] | 21 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the catting happens and/or the adoptiveness occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the sidearmness and the miscasting neuroscience happens. sent2: that the magic occurs and the mesolithicness occurs is caused by that the catting does not occur. sent3: if the canonization occurs the cat does not occur and the adoptiveness happens. sent4: the indisposing pyrochemistry does not occur and the steering happens if the castigation happens. sent5: if the indisposing pyrochemistry does not occur then the miscasting Dinesen happens and the Luxemburgerness occurs. sent6: that the unbracing DPH does not occur yields that the comprehensibleness does not occur and the bleat does not occur. sent7: if the comprehensibleness does not occur the fact that both the unseductiveness and the gall happens does not hold. sent8: that if the fact that the work-in occurs but the scentlessness does not occur is false then the canonization happens is not false. sent9: if the fact that the phonicness happens and the purse does not occur is not correct then the castigation occurs. sent10: if the miscasting Dinesen occurs then the unbracing DPH does not occur. sent11: that both the work-in and the non-scentlessness happens is not right if the unseductiveness does not occur. sent12: the unseductiveness does not occur if that that the unseductiveness occurs and the gall happens is right is not true. sent13: both the unseductiveness and the dematerializing occurs. sent14: if the distention happens that the phonicness but not the purse happens is not correct. sent15: that the distention but not the carting occurs is brought about by that the perturbation does not occur. sent16: both the mesolithicness and the cat occurs. sent17: the mesolithicness happens. sent18: the fact that the perturbation does not occur hold if the sequence happens but the jab does not occur. sent19: if the combination happens then the sequence but not the jabbing happens. sent20: the rockslide occurs. ; $proof$ =
|
sent16 -> int1: the cat happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the manger is not a Prakrit.
|
¬{D}{c}
|
sent1: something is a kind of a Prakrit if it does miscast futon. sent2: the fact that the manger miscasts futon is not false if the futon does unpack. sent3: if the retem is a kind of a Seljuk then the futon does unpack. sent4: the retem is a kind of a Seljuk.
|
sent1: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent2: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent4: {A}{a}
|
[
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the futon unpacks.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the manger miscasts futon.; sent1 -> int3: the manger is a kind of a Prakrit if it miscasts futon.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent2 -> int2: {C}{c}; sent1 -> int3: {C}{c} -> {D}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the manger is not a Prakrit. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a Prakrit if it does miscast futon. sent2: the fact that the manger miscasts futon is not false if the futon does unpack. sent3: if the retem is a kind of a Seljuk then the futon does unpack. sent4: the retem is a kind of a Seljuk. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the futon unpacks.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the manger miscasts futon.; sent1 -> int3: the manger is a kind of a Prakrit if it miscasts futon.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the speaker is not focal but it does indispose pleat.
|
(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b})
|
sent1: something is not civic and/or it is unenthusiastic if it is not a fatalist. sent2: the proline does not unbrace stationariness and it is not a kitchenware. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does unbrace stationariness and unbraces bolivar is not true the coxswain is fatalist. sent4: if the camphor is fatalist then the chlorate is not a kind of a fatalist. sent5: the coxswain does not indispose reservation. sent6: if the camphor films roadblock the speaker does indispose pleat. sent7: the fact that the proline does not film roadblock is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it film roadblock and is not unenthusiastic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the convection does unbrace stationariness and it unbraces bolivar is not true. sent9: the fact that something does not indispose pleat and it is not focal is wrong if it is non-civic. sent10: that the speaker is both not unenthusiastic and civic does not hold. sent11: the speaker is not focal if that it is unenthusiastic is correct. sent12: something does not film roadblock if that it does not indispose pleat and is not focal is not right. sent13: that something does film roadblock and is not unenthusiastic does not hold if it is civic. sent14: the soutane is civic if the goblet is fatalist. sent15: the camphor does film roadblock. sent16: The roadblock does film camphor. sent17: that the speaker does indispose reservation is not incorrect if something does not unbrace stationariness and is not a kitchenware. sent18: the fact that the speaker is non-fatalist thing that does unbrace bolivar is incorrect if it does indispose reservation. sent19: if the coxswain is fatalist thing that does not indispose reservation the goblet is a kind of a fatalist. sent20: the camphor is a fatalist if the fact that the speaker is not a fatalist but it does unbrace bolivar is incorrect. sent21: if there exists something such that it does not film roadblock the camphor does not indispose pleat.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x v {E}x) sent2: (¬{I}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) sent3: (x): ¬({I}x & {H}x) -> {F}{f} sent4: {F}{a} -> ¬{F}{ao} sent5: ¬{G}{f} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}{c} sent8: ¬({I}{g} & {H}{g}) sent9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) sent10: ¬(¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent11: {E}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent12: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent13: (x): {D}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{E}x) sent14: {F}{e} -> {D}{d} sent15: {A}{a} sent16: {AA}{aa} sent17: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{J}x) -> {G}{b} sent18: {G}{b} -> ¬(¬{F}{b} & {H}{b}) sent19: ({F}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) -> {F}{e} sent20: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {H}{b}) -> {F}{a} sent21: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}{a}
|
[
"sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the speaker indisposes pleat.;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] |
the fact that the speaker is not focal and does indispose pleat is not correct.
|
¬(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b})
|
[
"sent13 -> int2: that the soutane does film roadblock and is not unenthusiastic is not correct if it is civic.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it does unbrace stationariness and unbraces bolivar is false.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the coxswain is fatalist.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the coxswain is a kind of a fatalist but it does not indispose reservation.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: that the goblet is a fatalist is true.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the soutane is civic.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the soutane does film roadblock but it is not unenthusiastic is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does film roadblock and it is not unenthusiastic is incorrect.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the proline does not film roadblock.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it does not film roadblock.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the camphor does not indispose pleat.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not indispose pleat.;"
] | 12 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the speaker is not focal but it does indispose pleat. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not civic and/or it is unenthusiastic if it is not a fatalist. sent2: the proline does not unbrace stationariness and it is not a kitchenware. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does unbrace stationariness and unbraces bolivar is not true the coxswain is fatalist. sent4: if the camphor is fatalist then the chlorate is not a kind of a fatalist. sent5: the coxswain does not indispose reservation. sent6: if the camphor films roadblock the speaker does indispose pleat. sent7: the fact that the proline does not film roadblock is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it film roadblock and is not unenthusiastic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the convection does unbrace stationariness and it unbraces bolivar is not true. sent9: the fact that something does not indispose pleat and it is not focal is wrong if it is non-civic. sent10: that the speaker is both not unenthusiastic and civic does not hold. sent11: the speaker is not focal if that it is unenthusiastic is correct. sent12: something does not film roadblock if that it does not indispose pleat and is not focal is not right. sent13: that something does film roadblock and is not unenthusiastic does not hold if it is civic. sent14: the soutane is civic if the goblet is fatalist. sent15: the camphor does film roadblock. sent16: The roadblock does film camphor. sent17: that the speaker does indispose reservation is not incorrect if something does not unbrace stationariness and is not a kitchenware. sent18: the fact that the speaker is non-fatalist thing that does unbrace bolivar is incorrect if it does indispose reservation. sent19: if the coxswain is fatalist thing that does not indispose reservation the goblet is a kind of a fatalist. sent20: the camphor is a fatalist if the fact that the speaker is not a fatalist but it does unbrace bolivar is incorrect. sent21: if there exists something such that it does not film roadblock the camphor does not indispose pleat. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the speaker indisposes pleat.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the lock-gate does miscast effusiveness.
|
{B}{aa}
|
sent1: the Kirghiz does theologize. sent2: the lock-gate is a Booth. sent3: the lock-gate does theologize. sent4: the actinolite does theologize. sent5: if something films seaworthiness and is not a picometer then it is a shirtmaker. sent6: if the relaxin is angular and does unbrace Microtaggant then it is an inaugural. sent7: the lock-gate is not immoderate. sent8: if the lock-gate miscasts diet it is both a tableland and not immoderate. sent9: the lock-gate is a pub and not immoderate if it does theologize. sent10: the lock-gate is not immoderate if it theologizes. sent11: if something that is a pub is non-immoderate then it does miscast effusiveness. sent12: the lock-gate is Germanic. sent13: if something that is a kind of a pub is immoderate it does miscast effusiveness.
|
sent1: {A}{gl} sent2: {IF}{aa} sent3: {A}{aa} sent4: {A}{fm} sent5: (x): ({JG}x & ¬{EH}x) -> {FF}x sent6: ({BL}{bu} & {AF}{bu}) -> {GH}{bu} sent7: ¬{AB}{aa} sent8: {IR}{aa} -> ({IE}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent11: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent12: {GR}{aa} sent13: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
|
[
"sent11 -> int1: if the lock-gate is a pub and not immoderate it does miscast effusiveness.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the lock-gate is a pub and is not immoderate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the lock-gate does miscast effusiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kirghiz does theologize. sent2: the lock-gate is a Booth. sent3: the lock-gate does theologize. sent4: the actinolite does theologize. sent5: if something films seaworthiness and is not a picometer then it is a shirtmaker. sent6: if the relaxin is angular and does unbrace Microtaggant then it is an inaugural. sent7: the lock-gate is not immoderate. sent8: if the lock-gate miscasts diet it is both a tableland and not immoderate. sent9: the lock-gate is a pub and not immoderate if it does theologize. sent10: the lock-gate is not immoderate if it theologizes. sent11: if something that is a pub is non-immoderate then it does miscast effusiveness. sent12: the lock-gate is Germanic. sent13: if something that is a kind of a pub is immoderate it does miscast effusiveness. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 -> int1: if the lock-gate is a pub and not immoderate it does miscast effusiveness.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the lock-gate is a pub and is not immoderate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the syrinx is biauricular.
|
{D}{b}
|
sent1: if that the tidemark is not biauricular but it is a Zalophus does not hold then it is an ant. sent2: something that is not a Scipio and/or is malign is not biauricular. sent3: there is something such that it is not an ant. sent4: there is something such that it is non-malign. sent5: if there is something such that it is not malign the camphor is not a kind of an ant. sent6: there exists something such that it is not biauricular. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not malign the camphor is a Scipio but it is not an ant. sent8: something is a Scipio. sent9: the fact that the syrinx is biauricular is not wrong if there is something such that it is both a Scipio and not an ant. sent10: the camphor is not an ant.
|
sent1: ¬(¬{D}{c} & {E}{c}) -> {C}{c} sent2: (x): (¬{B}x v {A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent6: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (Ex): {B}x sent9: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {D}{b} sent10: ¬{C}{a}
|
[
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the camphor is a kind of a Scipio and is not an ant.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Scipio but it is not a kind of an ant.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x); int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an arsenic is right.
|
(Ex): ¬{EF}x
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the syrinx is biauricular. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the tidemark is not biauricular but it is a Zalophus does not hold then it is an ant. sent2: something that is not a Scipio and/or is malign is not biauricular. sent3: there is something such that it is not an ant. sent4: there is something such that it is non-malign. sent5: if there is something such that it is not malign the camphor is not a kind of an ant. sent6: there exists something such that it is not biauricular. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not malign the camphor is a Scipio but it is not an ant. sent8: something is a Scipio. sent9: the fact that the syrinx is biauricular is not wrong if there is something such that it is both a Scipio and not an ant. sent10: the camphor is not an ant. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the camphor is a kind of a Scipio and is not an ant.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Scipio but it is not a kind of an ant.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
either the Bailey is not enthusiastic or it does not hurtle or both.
|
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b})
|
sent1: the Bailey either is not enthusiastic or hurtles or both. sent2: if the fudge is not a foible the fact that the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or it does not hurtle does not hold. sent3: the woodwork is a foible. sent4: if the fudge is not enthusiastic the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or does not hurtle. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Ubykh. sent6: if the Bailey does not hurtle the woodwork does not hurtle and/or it is not a foible. sent7: if the fudge is not enthusiastic the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or it hurtles. sent8: the Bailey is enthusiastic or it does not hurtle or both if the fudge is not enthusiastic. sent9: the woodwork is both enthusiastic and a foible. sent10: if that something is a Ubykh and/or not a foible does not hold it is a kind of a peacekeeper. sent11: if something is both a foible and a Ubykh then the fudge is not enthusiastic. sent12: something is a kind of a foible. sent13: the Bailey is enthusiastic and/or does not hurtle. sent14: the woodwork is a foible and it is a Ubykh.
|
sent1: (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent3: {A}{aa} sent4: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent5: (Ex): {B}x sent6: ¬{D}{b} -> (¬{D}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) sent7: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent8: ¬{C}{a} -> ({C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent9: ({C}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent10: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{A}x) -> {EJ}x sent11: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: (Ex): {A}x sent13: ({C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent14: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa})
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: something is a foible that is a Ubykh.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fudge is not enthusiastic.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int1 & sent11 -> int2: ¬{C}{a}; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that either the Bailey is not enthusiastic or it does not hurtle or both is wrong.
|
¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = either the Bailey is not enthusiastic or it does not hurtle or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bailey either is not enthusiastic or hurtles or both. sent2: if the fudge is not a foible the fact that the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or it does not hurtle does not hold. sent3: the woodwork is a foible. sent4: if the fudge is not enthusiastic the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or does not hurtle. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Ubykh. sent6: if the Bailey does not hurtle the woodwork does not hurtle and/or it is not a foible. sent7: if the fudge is not enthusiastic the Bailey is not enthusiastic and/or it hurtles. sent8: the Bailey is enthusiastic or it does not hurtle or both if the fudge is not enthusiastic. sent9: the woodwork is both enthusiastic and a foible. sent10: if that something is a Ubykh and/or not a foible does not hold it is a kind of a peacekeeper. sent11: if something is both a foible and a Ubykh then the fudge is not enthusiastic. sent12: something is a kind of a foible. sent13: the Bailey is enthusiastic and/or does not hurtle. sent14: the woodwork is a foible and it is a Ubykh. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 -> int1: something is a foible that is a Ubykh.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fudge is not enthusiastic.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the DP does not transmit and is not electrostatic.
|
(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a})
|
sent1: the butylene does not underwrite if there is something such that it is a kind of a burqa. sent2: the barker is not electrostatic if something that does transmit devolves. sent3: the syzygy is not a kind of an antigen. sent4: that something does not transmit and is not electrostatic is not right if the fact that it does not devolve is not incorrect. sent5: the bombie is not a kind of a kicksorter and it does not unbrace disulfiram if the butylene does not underwrite. sent6: if something is not an overdrive then the fact that it is a kind of a acrocarp that does indispose Roquefort is not true. sent7: the DP is not a ketone. sent8: the DP is non-calcicolous thing that is a kind of an antigen. sent9: if the DP is not calcicolous and is an antigen then it does not transmit. sent10: the DP is not a flatworm. sent11: that the wordsmith is not a kind of an antigen hold. sent12: the bowline is not an overdrive if the fact that it is a kicksorter and it is an overdrive is not true. sent13: the DP is not electrostatic. sent14: the fact that the DP devolves but it is not a Siren is not true if the bowline does indispose Roquefort. sent15: the fact that the bowline is a kicksorter and overdrives is wrong. sent16: if the fact that something does devolve and is not a kind of a Siren does not hold it does not devolve. sent17: the Papuan is not an antigen. sent18: the exploiter is a kind of a burqa if it is a temporizer. sent19: the exploiter is a kind of a temporizer. sent20: if the bombie is not a kicksorter the pantie indisposes Roquefort and it is a kind of an overdrive. sent21: the DP is an antigen.
|
sent1: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}{e} sent2: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}{dq} sent3: ¬{AB}{u} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) sent5: ¬{J}{e} -> (¬{H}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) sent6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x & {E}x) sent7: ¬{GK}{a} sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent10: ¬{DC}{a} sent11: ¬{AB}{he} sent12: ¬({H}{b} & {G}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} sent13: ¬{A}{a} sent14: {E}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent15: ¬({H}{b} & {G}{b}) sent16: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent17: ¬{AB}{eh} sent18: {L}{f} -> {K}{f} sent19: {L}{f} sent20: ¬{H}{d} -> ({E}{c} & {G}{c}) sent21: {AB}{a}
|
[
"sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the DP does not transmit.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent9 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the barker is not electrostatic.
|
¬{A}{dq}
|
[
"sent6 -> int2: if the bowline is not a kind of an overdrive that it is a acrocarp and it does indispose Roquefort is not correct.; sent12 & sent15 -> int3: the bowline is not a kind of an overdrive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the bowline is a acrocarp and does indispose Roquefort is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is a acrocarp that does indispose Roquefort does not hold.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the DP does not transmit and is not electrostatic. ; $context$ = sent1: the butylene does not underwrite if there is something such that it is a kind of a burqa. sent2: the barker is not electrostatic if something that does transmit devolves. sent3: the syzygy is not a kind of an antigen. sent4: that something does not transmit and is not electrostatic is not right if the fact that it does not devolve is not incorrect. sent5: the bombie is not a kind of a kicksorter and it does not unbrace disulfiram if the butylene does not underwrite. sent6: if something is not an overdrive then the fact that it is a kind of a acrocarp that does indispose Roquefort is not true. sent7: the DP is not a ketone. sent8: the DP is non-calcicolous thing that is a kind of an antigen. sent9: if the DP is not calcicolous and is an antigen then it does not transmit. sent10: the DP is not a flatworm. sent11: that the wordsmith is not a kind of an antigen hold. sent12: the bowline is not an overdrive if the fact that it is a kicksorter and it is an overdrive is not true. sent13: the DP is not electrostatic. sent14: the fact that the DP devolves but it is not a Siren is not true if the bowline does indispose Roquefort. sent15: the fact that the bowline is a kicksorter and overdrives is wrong. sent16: if the fact that something does devolve and is not a kind of a Siren does not hold it does not devolve. sent17: the Papuan is not an antigen. sent18: the exploiter is a kind of a burqa if it is a temporizer. sent19: the exploiter is a kind of a temporizer. sent20: if the bombie is not a kicksorter the pantie indisposes Roquefort and it is a kind of an overdrive. sent21: the DP is an antigen. ; $proof$ =
|
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the DP does not transmit.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the visitor is not a paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire is not right.
|
¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b})
|
sent1: the visitor is not auxetic. sent2: if the fact that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel and it is not a kind of a rumba is false it is a kind of a paste. sent3: if the Capricorn films Herculaneum it does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent4: if the visitor does not film Herculaneum that the Capricorn does not paste and does not film Herculaneum is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the visitor is not a paste but it does miscast Northamptonshire is incorrect if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent6: if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire then that the visitor is not a paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire is not true. sent7: that that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel but it is a rumba is not true hold. sent8: if the fact that the visitor is not a kind of a leatherjacket and it is not a backpack is wrong then it does brazen. sent9: if the Capricorn is a rumba it does film Herculaneum. sent10: the fact that the visitor does not miscast Northamptonshire and it does not miscast bethel is not correct. sent11: the fact that the visitor is a kind of a paste and does not miscast Northamptonshire does not hold if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent12: the fact that the visitor is not a kind of a paste and does miscast Northamptonshire is not correct. sent13: that the visitor pastes and does not miscast Northamptonshire is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the visitor does not miscast Northamptonshire and does not film Herculaneum is false if the Capricorn does not film Herculaneum. sent15: the fact that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel and it is not a kind of a rumba is wrong. sent16: the visitor does not paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire if the Capricorn does not film Herculaneum.
|
sent1: ¬{GE}{b} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {D}{a} sent3: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {A}{b}) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{HN}{b} & ¬{CA}{b}) -> {CU}{b} sent9: {AB}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) sent11: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent12: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {A}{b}) sent13: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent14: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent15: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent16: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b})
|
[] |
[] |
the visitor is not a kind of a paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire.
|
(¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the visitor is not a paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the visitor is not auxetic. sent2: if the fact that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel and it is not a kind of a rumba is false it is a kind of a paste. sent3: if the Capricorn films Herculaneum it does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent4: if the visitor does not film Herculaneum that the Capricorn does not paste and does not film Herculaneum is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the visitor is not a paste but it does miscast Northamptonshire is incorrect if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent6: if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire then that the visitor is not a paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire is not true. sent7: that that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel but it is a rumba is not true hold. sent8: if the fact that the visitor is not a kind of a leatherjacket and it is not a backpack is wrong then it does brazen. sent9: if the Capricorn is a rumba it does film Herculaneum. sent10: the fact that the visitor does not miscast Northamptonshire and it does not miscast bethel is not correct. sent11: the fact that the visitor is a kind of a paste and does not miscast Northamptonshire does not hold if the Capricorn does not miscast Northamptonshire. sent12: the fact that the visitor is not a kind of a paste and does miscast Northamptonshire is not correct. sent13: that the visitor pastes and does not miscast Northamptonshire is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the visitor does not miscast Northamptonshire and does not film Herculaneum is false if the Capricorn does not film Herculaneum. sent15: the fact that the Capricorn does not miscast bethel and it is not a kind of a rumba is wrong. sent16: the visitor does not paste and it does not miscast Northamptonshire if the Capricorn does not film Herculaneum. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the prodigal is a kind of non-nectariferous thing that unbraces disorganization.
|
(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a})
|
sent1: the perpendicular is a Dinesen if there is something such that that it is both not a Dinesen and granulocytic is incorrect. sent2: if something is a Clay then that it is a reticle and it does indispose Megalonychidae is false. sent3: the fact that the prodigal is agrypnotic hold if something is not a kind of a fascista and/or it is not a radiology. sent4: if the tenrec is agrypnotic then the prodigal is non-nectariferous and unbraces disorganization. sent5: that the rat is not an oral but it is intelligent is not right. sent6: the fact that the pass is not a Dinesen but it is granulocytic is wrong. sent7: if something is agrypnotic it is weightless. sent8: the span is agrypnotic. sent9: if that the oxalacetate does not indispose thermocouple or is not statesmanlike or both does not hold then the theca is a kind of a Kremlin. sent10: the lespedeza does not uncurl if the theca is a kind of a unguiculate that is a Kremlin. sent11: the fact that the oxalacetate does not indispose thermocouple and/or it is not statesmanlike does not hold if the rat is a kind of an oral. sent12: if the wittol does not indispose hole-in-the-wall and is not agrypnotic the tenrec is agrypnotic. sent13: there exists something such that it is a Thylogale or it is not a echocardiograph or both. sent14: the theca is not a oneness if there exists something such that it is a Dinesen. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a fascista and/or is not a radiology. sent16: if something is weightless then the fact that it is not nectariferous and unbraces disorganization does not hold. sent17: the Mayflower is a justification but it is not a caladium if something does not uncurl. sent18: the rat is an oral if that it is not a kind of an oral and it is intelligent is not true. sent19: that something is a unguiculate is not incorrect if it is not a oneness.
|
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & {P}x) -> {L}{g} sent2: (x): {CM}x -> ¬({BU}x & {GE}x) sent3: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: {A}{b} -> (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) sent5: ¬(¬{O}{i} & {R}{i}) sent6: ¬(¬{L}{j} & {P}{j}) sent7: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent8: {A}{bp} sent9: ¬(¬{N}{h} v ¬{M}{h}) -> {I}{f} sent10: ({J}{f} & {I}{f}) -> ¬{H}{e} sent11: {O}{i} -> ¬(¬{N}{h} v ¬{M}{h}) sent12: (¬{E}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) -> {A}{b} sent13: (Ex): ({GM}x v ¬{CL}x) sent14: (x): {L}x -> ¬{K}{f} sent15: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent16: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) sent17: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent18: ¬(¬{O}{i} & {R}{i}) -> {O}{i} sent19: (x): ¬{K}x -> {J}x
|
[
"sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the prodigal is agrypnotic.; sent7 -> int2: the prodigal is weightless if it is agrypnotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prodigal is weightless.; sent16 -> int4: if that the prodigal is weightless is right that it is not nectariferous and it does unbrace disorganization is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent15 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent7 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; sent16 -> int4: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}); int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the prodigal is not nectariferous but it unbraces disorganization is not wrong.
|
(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a})
|
[
"sent19 -> int5: the theca is a kind of a unguiculate if it is not a kind of a oneness.; sent6 -> int6: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Dinesen and it is granulocytic is not right.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the perpendicular is a Dinesen.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Dinesen.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the theca is not a oneness.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the theca is unguiculate.; sent18 & sent5 -> int11: the rat is an oral.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: that the oxalacetate does not indispose thermocouple or is not statesmanlike or both does not hold.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the theca is a Kremlin.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the theca is unguiculate and it is a Kremlin.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: that the lespedeza does not uncurl is not wrong.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it does not uncurl.; int16 & sent17 -> int17: the Mayflower is a kind of a justification but it is not a kind of a caladium.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it is a justification and it is not a kind of a caladium.;"
] | 14 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the prodigal is a kind of non-nectariferous thing that unbraces disorganization. ; $context$ = sent1: the perpendicular is a Dinesen if there is something such that that it is both not a Dinesen and granulocytic is incorrect. sent2: if something is a Clay then that it is a reticle and it does indispose Megalonychidae is false. sent3: the fact that the prodigal is agrypnotic hold if something is not a kind of a fascista and/or it is not a radiology. sent4: if the tenrec is agrypnotic then the prodigal is non-nectariferous and unbraces disorganization. sent5: that the rat is not an oral but it is intelligent is not right. sent6: the fact that the pass is not a Dinesen but it is granulocytic is wrong. sent7: if something is agrypnotic it is weightless. sent8: the span is agrypnotic. sent9: if that the oxalacetate does not indispose thermocouple or is not statesmanlike or both does not hold then the theca is a kind of a Kremlin. sent10: the lespedeza does not uncurl if the theca is a kind of a unguiculate that is a Kremlin. sent11: the fact that the oxalacetate does not indispose thermocouple and/or it is not statesmanlike does not hold if the rat is a kind of an oral. sent12: if the wittol does not indispose hole-in-the-wall and is not agrypnotic the tenrec is agrypnotic. sent13: there exists something such that it is a Thylogale or it is not a echocardiograph or both. sent14: the theca is not a oneness if there exists something such that it is a Dinesen. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a fascista and/or is not a radiology. sent16: if something is weightless then the fact that it is not nectariferous and unbraces disorganization does not hold. sent17: the Mayflower is a justification but it is not a caladium if something does not uncurl. sent18: the rat is an oral if that it is not a kind of an oral and it is intelligent is not true. sent19: that something is a unguiculate is not incorrect if it is not a oneness. ; $proof$ =
|
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the prodigal is agrypnotic.; sent7 -> int2: the prodigal is weightless if it is agrypnotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prodigal is weightless.; sent16 -> int4: if that the prodigal is weightless is right that it is not nectariferous and it does unbrace disorganization is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croquet does not occur is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
|
sent1: that the celebration and the non-christianness occurs is triggered by the filming Angolese. sent2: if the christianness does not occur then the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croqueting does not occur. sent3: that the christianness does not occur results in that the ethnocentricness does not occur. sent4: the ethnocentricness does not occur. sent5: if the filming Angolese does not occur that the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croquet does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the celebration occurs. sent7: the filming Angolese occurs. sent8: the celebration is brought about by the filming Angolese.
|
sent1: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬{AB} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent3: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬{B} sent5: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent6: {AA} sent7: {A} sent8: {A} -> {AA}
|
[
"sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the celebration and the unchristianness happens.; int1 -> int2: that the christianness does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent7 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AB}; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croquet does not occur is wrong.
|
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
|
[] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croquet does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the celebration and the non-christianness occurs is triggered by the filming Angolese. sent2: if the christianness does not occur then the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croqueting does not occur. sent3: that the christianness does not occur results in that the ethnocentricness does not occur. sent4: the ethnocentricness does not occur. sent5: if the filming Angolese does not occur that the ethnocentricness does not occur and the croquet does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the celebration occurs. sent7: the filming Angolese occurs. sent8: the celebration is brought about by the filming Angolese. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the celebration and the unchristianness happens.; int1 -> int2: that the christianness does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the vine is not a galactocele.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and is a kind of a stretched is not right if something does unbrace vine. sent2: the cordovan unbraces vine. sent3: the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and does stretch is not right. sent4: the cordovan is a kind of a som. sent5: that the vine is a kind of a galactocele is right if the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and is not a stretched does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Tolectin is not a galactocele and does not unbrace Microtaggant is not right. sent7: The vine unbraces cordovan. sent8: the proaccelerin unbraces Microtaggant. sent9: the striatum is ornithological. sent10: the fact that the Tolectin unbraces Microtaggant and is not a stretched is false if something does unbrace vine. sent11: the vine is ornithological. sent12: the fact that the cordovan is not a galactocele and does not unbrace vine does not hold. sent13: if that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and does not unbrace vine is wrong then the cordovan stretches. sent14: that the cordovan does not unbrace vine and it does not unbrace Microtaggant is wrong. sent15: that the Tolectin unbraces Microtaggant and is not a stretched is not true. sent16: there exists something such that it is a stretched. sent17: that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and it is not a kind of a stretched is incorrect if something does unbrace vine.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: {A}{aa} sent3: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: {BQ}{aa} sent5: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent6: ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent7: {AA}{ac} sent8: {B}{ab} sent9: {CF}{ii} sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent11: {CF}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{D}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent13: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {C}{aa} sent14: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent15: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent16: (Ex): {C}x sent17: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: there is something such that it does unbrace vine.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and it is not a stretched does not hold is true.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: (Ex): {A}x; int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the vine is not a galactocele. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and is a kind of a stretched is not right if something does unbrace vine. sent2: the cordovan unbraces vine. sent3: the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and does stretch is not right. sent4: the cordovan is a kind of a som. sent5: that the vine is a kind of a galactocele is right if the fact that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and is not a stretched does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Tolectin is not a galactocele and does not unbrace Microtaggant is not right. sent7: The vine unbraces cordovan. sent8: the proaccelerin unbraces Microtaggant. sent9: the striatum is ornithological. sent10: the fact that the Tolectin unbraces Microtaggant and is not a stretched is false if something does unbrace vine. sent11: the vine is ornithological. sent12: the fact that the cordovan is not a galactocele and does not unbrace vine does not hold. sent13: if that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and does not unbrace vine is wrong then the cordovan stretches. sent14: that the cordovan does not unbrace vine and it does not unbrace Microtaggant is wrong. sent15: that the Tolectin unbraces Microtaggant and is not a stretched is not true. sent16: there exists something such that it is a stretched. sent17: that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and it is not a kind of a stretched is incorrect if something does unbrace vine. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: there is something such that it does unbrace vine.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that that the Tolectin does not unbrace Microtaggant and it is not a stretched does not hold is true.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lesbian it unbraces damages.
|
(Ex): ¬{B}x -> {C}x
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it is lipless it does unbrace panic. sent2: the fact that if something is not drupaceous it is a seismology is not incorrect. sent3: if something miscasts occupation then it is Slavonic. sent4: something is a kind of a Dracunculidae if it is not a dangleberry. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pruritus it does unbrace absinth. sent6: there is something such that if it is onomastic then it is exegetic. sent7: the assignor does unbrace damages if it is a Lesbian. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a kickoff then it is premenstrual is not false. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it does indispose Lombardy it is unscholarly hold. sent10: something unbraces damages if it is a kind of a Lesbian. sent11: the assignor does unbrace damages if it is not a chord. sent12: something is premenstrual if it is not a doublethink. sent13: something is a kind of a collegian if it does not grit. sent14: the assignor does film chin if it is not promissory. sent15: if the assignor is not a Lesbian it crenels. sent16: the assignor does unbrace Amentiferae if it is not a kind of a Lesbian. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kickoff then it is a brant. sent18: if the assignor is not univalve then it does unbrace damages. sent19: there is something such that if it is a concessionaire then it is a kind of a laird.
|
sent1: (Ex): {EM}x -> {CI}x sent2: (x): ¬{FK}x -> {M}x sent3: (x): {DR}x -> {EN}x sent4: (x): ¬{GK}x -> {GA}x sent5: (Ex): {HQ}x -> {A}x sent6: (Ex): {GU}x -> {EG}x sent7: {B}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent8: (Ex): {EP}x -> {JB}x sent9: (Ex): {HR}x -> {JF}x sent10: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent11: ¬{ER}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent12: (x): ¬{BU}x -> {JB}x sent13: (x): ¬{IQ}x -> {IH}x sent14: ¬{IS}{aa} -> {EE}{aa} sent15: ¬{B}{aa} -> {L}{aa} sent16: ¬{B}{aa} -> {CU}{aa} sent17: (Ex): {EP}x -> {GB}x sent18: ¬{IA}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent19: (Ex): {IT}x -> {IB}x
|
[] |
[] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lesbian it unbraces damages. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is lipless it does unbrace panic. sent2: the fact that if something is not drupaceous it is a seismology is not incorrect. sent3: if something miscasts occupation then it is Slavonic. sent4: something is a kind of a Dracunculidae if it is not a dangleberry. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pruritus it does unbrace absinth. sent6: there is something such that if it is onomastic then it is exegetic. sent7: the assignor does unbrace damages if it is a Lesbian. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a kickoff then it is premenstrual is not false. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it does indispose Lombardy it is unscholarly hold. sent10: something unbraces damages if it is a kind of a Lesbian. sent11: the assignor does unbrace damages if it is not a chord. sent12: something is premenstrual if it is not a doublethink. sent13: something is a kind of a collegian if it does not grit. sent14: the assignor does film chin if it is not promissory. sent15: if the assignor is not a Lesbian it crenels. sent16: the assignor does unbrace Amentiferae if it is not a kind of a Lesbian. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kickoff then it is a brant. sent18: if the assignor is not univalve then it does unbrace damages. sent19: there is something such that if it is a concessionaire then it is a kind of a laird. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the domatium does not unbrace brand and/or is a Pneumovax does not hold.
|
¬(¬{F}{c} v {D}{c})
|
sent1: that the penne is east thing that is a kind of a Hagiographa is not true if there exists something such that it is not ineradicable. sent2: the fact that the penne is both an east and a Hagiographa does not hold. sent3: that the Buffalo is a Pneumovax but not a Hagiographa is not right. sent4: if the Buffalo is a Pneumovax then the domatium is not a Pneumovax. sent5: something does not unbrace brand and/or is a Pneumovax if it is not eradicable. sent6: if the penne is a Hagiographa the Buffalo is a Pneumovax. sent7: there exists something such that it is a Pneumovax. sent8: if something that is not exacta is not comprehensible then the Turki is a covariation. sent9: the fact that the Buffalo is not a Hagiographa and/or is east is not true if the penne is a kind of an east. sent10: if there is something such that either it is a malfeasance or it is not a nonsmoker or both then the penne is a viomycin. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not miscast Lichtenstein and miscasts Lord is wrong the Buffalo does not miscasts Lord. sent12: that the Buffalo is a Pneumovax if the fact that the penne is an east and is not a kind of a Hagiographa does not hold hold. sent13: if the Turki is a covariation then the fact that it does not miscast Lichtenstein and does miscast Lord is not true. sent14: that something is eradicable and it is east is not correct if it is not a Hagiographa. sent15: the stainless is not exacta and it is not comprehensible if the fact that it is unfamiliar is correct. sent16: the venule is a Hagiographa. sent17: the stainless is unfamiliar. sent18: something is a malfeasance and/or it is not a nonsmoker if it does not miscast Lord. sent19: that the penne is an east but it is not a kind of a Hagiographa is not right if there exists something such that it is eradicable. sent20: there is something such that it is eradicable. sent21: something is not eradicable if that it is eradicable and is an east does not hold. sent22: there is something such that it is a Hagiographa. sent23: the fact that the domatium is a kind of a Pneumovax is not correct.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent4: {D}{b} -> ¬{D}{c} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{F}x v {D}x) sent6: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent7: (Ex): {D}x sent8: (x): (¬{M}x & ¬{L}x) -> {J}{d} sent9: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) sent10: (x): ({H}x v ¬{G}x) -> {E}{a} sent11: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}{b} sent12: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent13: {J}{d} -> ¬(¬{K}{d} & {I}{d}) sent14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent15: {N}{e} -> (¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) sent16: {C}{hp} sent17: {N}{e} sent18: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}x v ¬{G}x) sent19: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent20: (Ex): {A}x sent21: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent22: (Ex): {C}x sent23: ¬{D}{c}
|
[
"sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the penne is both east and not a Hagiographa does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Buffalo is a Pneumovax.;"
] |
[
"sent20 & sent19 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent12 -> int2: {D}{b};"
] |
the domatium does not unbrace brand and/or it is a Pneumovax.
|
(¬{F}{c} v {D}{c})
|
[
"sent5 -> int3: if the domatium is not eradicable it does not unbrace brand and/or it is a Pneumovax.; sent21 -> int4: the domatium is not eradicable if the fact that it is eradicable and it is east is wrong.; sent14 -> int5: that the domatium is not ineradicable and not non-east does not hold if it is not a Hagiographa.; sent18 -> int6: the Buffalo is a kind of a malfeasance and/or it is not a nonsmoker if it does not miscast Lord.; sent15 & sent17 -> int7: the stainless is a kind of non-exacta thing that is not comprehensible.; int7 -> int8: something is both not exacta and not comprehensible.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the Turki is a covariation.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Turki does not miscast Lichtenstein and miscasts Lord is incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not miscast Lichtenstein and it miscasts Lord is false.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the Buffalo does not miscast Lord.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the Buffalo either is a malfeasance or is not a nonsmoker or both.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is a malfeasance or it is not a kind of a nonsmoker or both.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: that the penne is a viomycin is not incorrect.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a viomycin.;"
] | 14 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the domatium does not unbrace brand and/or is a Pneumovax does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the penne is east thing that is a kind of a Hagiographa is not true if there exists something such that it is not ineradicable. sent2: the fact that the penne is both an east and a Hagiographa does not hold. sent3: that the Buffalo is a Pneumovax but not a Hagiographa is not right. sent4: if the Buffalo is a Pneumovax then the domatium is not a Pneumovax. sent5: something does not unbrace brand and/or is a Pneumovax if it is not eradicable. sent6: if the penne is a Hagiographa the Buffalo is a Pneumovax. sent7: there exists something such that it is a Pneumovax. sent8: if something that is not exacta is not comprehensible then the Turki is a covariation. sent9: the fact that the Buffalo is not a Hagiographa and/or is east is not true if the penne is a kind of an east. sent10: if there is something such that either it is a malfeasance or it is not a nonsmoker or both then the penne is a viomycin. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not miscast Lichtenstein and miscasts Lord is wrong the Buffalo does not miscasts Lord. sent12: that the Buffalo is a Pneumovax if the fact that the penne is an east and is not a kind of a Hagiographa does not hold hold. sent13: if the Turki is a covariation then the fact that it does not miscast Lichtenstein and does miscast Lord is not true. sent14: that something is eradicable and it is east is not correct if it is not a Hagiographa. sent15: the stainless is not exacta and it is not comprehensible if the fact that it is unfamiliar is correct. sent16: the venule is a Hagiographa. sent17: the stainless is unfamiliar. sent18: something is a malfeasance and/or it is not a nonsmoker if it does not miscast Lord. sent19: that the penne is an east but it is not a kind of a Hagiographa is not right if there exists something such that it is eradicable. sent20: there is something such that it is eradicable. sent21: something is not eradicable if that it is eradicable and is an east does not hold. sent22: there is something such that it is a Hagiographa. sent23: the fact that the domatium is a kind of a Pneumovax is not correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the penne is both east and not a Hagiographa does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Buffalo is a Pneumovax.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the largemouth is non-apicultural is not incorrect.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: if the fact that the luminescence is apicultural and does not miscast airbrake does not hold then it does not miscast Areopagite. sent2: that something is a kind of a wishbone and it is a Venezuela is right if it does not unbrace decorum. sent3: if something that is apicultural does not miscast Areopagite then it is geological. sent4: the largemouth does not unbrace decorum if that the airbrake does not unbrace decorum and it does not indispose UDA does not hold. sent5: the luminescence is not a steak but it is apomictic if that the largemouth is geological is not wrong. sent6: if that the luminescence is a relatedness but it does not miscast airbrake is not right it does not miscast Areopagite. sent7: if something miscasts Areopagite but it is not geological it is not apicultural. sent8: if the fact that the dip is a uncommonness but it is not a Arabic does not hold then it is not a kind of a wishbone. sent9: the tanbark miscasts airbrake. sent10: everything is autoradiographic. sent11: that the luminescence is a relatedness and miscasts airbrake is incorrect. sent12: if the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite and is geological then the largemouth is apicultural. sent13: the luminescence does not miscast airbrake if it is apicultural. sent14: if something is autoradiographic that it does not unbrace decorum and it does not indispose UDA is false. sent15: the luminescence is geological and it is a wishbone. sent16: that the luminescence is a kind of a relatedness that does not miscast airbrake does not hold.
|
sent1: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent3: (x): ({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {A}x sent4: ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent5: {A}{b} -> (¬{EJ}{a} & {JE}{a}) sent6: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent8: ¬({CG}{ha} & ¬{L}{ha}) -> ¬{D}{ha} sent9: {AB}{dr} sent10: (x): {H}x sent11: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent12: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent13: {C}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent14: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) sent15: ({A}{a} & {D}{a}) sent16: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})
|
[
"sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite.; sent15 -> int2: the luminescence is geological.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite but it is geological.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent16 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent15 -> int2: {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}); int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the largemouth is not apicultural.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
[
"sent7 -> int4: the fact that the largemouth is not apicultural hold if it miscasts Areopagite and it is not geological.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the largemouth is non-apicultural is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the luminescence is apicultural and does not miscast airbrake does not hold then it does not miscast Areopagite. sent2: that something is a kind of a wishbone and it is a Venezuela is right if it does not unbrace decorum. sent3: if something that is apicultural does not miscast Areopagite then it is geological. sent4: the largemouth does not unbrace decorum if that the airbrake does not unbrace decorum and it does not indispose UDA does not hold. sent5: the luminescence is not a steak but it is apomictic if that the largemouth is geological is not wrong. sent6: if that the luminescence is a relatedness but it does not miscast airbrake is not right it does not miscast Areopagite. sent7: if something miscasts Areopagite but it is not geological it is not apicultural. sent8: if the fact that the dip is a uncommonness but it is not a Arabic does not hold then it is not a kind of a wishbone. sent9: the tanbark miscasts airbrake. sent10: everything is autoradiographic. sent11: that the luminescence is a relatedness and miscasts airbrake is incorrect. sent12: if the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite and is geological then the largemouth is apicultural. sent13: the luminescence does not miscast airbrake if it is apicultural. sent14: if something is autoradiographic that it does not unbrace decorum and it does not indispose UDA is false. sent15: the luminescence is geological and it is a wishbone. sent16: that the luminescence is a kind of a relatedness that does not miscast airbrake does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite.; sent15 -> int2: the luminescence is geological.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the luminescence does not miscast Areopagite but it is geological.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the megalith is not granulomatous.
|
¬{A}{aa}
|
sent1: if the fondue is not a works that it is toxicological and it is unprofessional is not right. sent2: if the snoop is not granulomatous and does not indispose potoroo then the hairpiece is granulomatous. sent3: if the lane does not indispose bodkin the backsaw is plantar and it is a cotton. sent4: the vintage is a cotton if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a tableland or it does not indispose bodkin or both is correct is false. sent5: that the megalith is not granulomatous hold if the fact that the fact that the snoop is granulomatous but it does not indispose potoroo does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the backsaw is an importing and/or it is not granulomatous if something is a kind of an importing. sent7: if something is not toxicological then that it is granulomatous and it does not indispose potoroo does not hold. sent8: the tunic is a kind of a Jasminum and is not a kind of a pharisee. sent9: the snoop is not toxicological if the backsaw is unprofessional and it is an importing. sent10: the snoop does not indispose potoroo if there is something such that that it is toxicological and it is not professional is not right. sent11: if that something does not unbrace mercantilism and/or it does not indispose pargeting is not true it is granulomatous. sent12: if the fact that the backsaw is a pervert that is not a sally does not hold then it does import. sent13: if there exists something such that it cottons the fact that the fact that the lane is not a kind of an importing and it is not plantar is wrong is right. sent14: if the backsaw is either an importing or not granulomatous or both then the snoop is not granulomatous. sent15: something that is a cotton is unprofessional. sent16: if the vintage is a tableland the fact that the lane does not indispose bodkin is not incorrect. sent17: everything indisposes pargeting. sent18: if there is something such that it is a Jasminum and it is not a kind of a pharisee the fact that the fondue is not a psilophyton hold. sent19: the vintage is a tableland and is a works if the fondue is not a psilophyton. sent20: the fondue does not work. sent21: there exists nothing such that either it does not unbrace mercantilism or it does not indispose pargeting or both. sent22: the fact that the fact that the tunic either is not a tableland or does not indispose bodkin or both is incorrect is not false.
|
sent1: ¬{J}{e} -> ¬({B}{e} & {D}{e}) sent2: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{eo} sent3: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{I}x v ¬{H}x) -> {F}{d} sent5: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent6: (x): {E}x -> ({E}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) sent8: ({L}{f} & ¬{M}{f}) sent9: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent10: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {A}x sent12: ¬({N}{b} & ¬{O}{b}) -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent14: ({E}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent15: (x): {F}x -> {D}x sent16: {I}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} sent17: (x): {AB}x sent18: (x): ({L}x & ¬{M}x) -> ¬{K}{e} sent19: ¬{K}{e} -> ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) sent20: ¬{J}{e} sent21: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent22: ¬(¬{I}{f} v ¬{H}{f})
|
[
"sent21 -> int1: that the megalith does not unbrace mercantilism or does not indispose pargeting or both is not true.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the megalith is not non-granulomatous hold if the fact that either it does not unbrace mercantilism or it does not indispose pargeting or both is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent21 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent11 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the megalith is not granulomatous is not false.
|
¬{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent7 -> int3: if the snoop is not toxicological then the fact that it is a kind of granulomatous thing that does not indispose potoroo is not true.; sent15 -> int4: the fact that the backsaw is unprofessional if the backsaw cottons is right.; sent8 -> int5: something is a Jasminum and not a pharisee.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the fondue is not a psilophyton.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the vintage is a tableland and is a kind of a works.; int7 -> int8: the vintage is a kind of a tableland.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: the lane does not indispose bodkin.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the backsaw is both plantar and a cotton.; int10 -> int11: the backsaw cottons.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the backsaw is unprofessional.;"
] | 12 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the megalith is not granulomatous. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fondue is not a works that it is toxicological and it is unprofessional is not right. sent2: if the snoop is not granulomatous and does not indispose potoroo then the hairpiece is granulomatous. sent3: if the lane does not indispose bodkin the backsaw is plantar and it is a cotton. sent4: the vintage is a cotton if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a tableland or it does not indispose bodkin or both is correct is false. sent5: that the megalith is not granulomatous hold if the fact that the fact that the snoop is granulomatous but it does not indispose potoroo does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the backsaw is an importing and/or it is not granulomatous if something is a kind of an importing. sent7: if something is not toxicological then that it is granulomatous and it does not indispose potoroo does not hold. sent8: the tunic is a kind of a Jasminum and is not a kind of a pharisee. sent9: the snoop is not toxicological if the backsaw is unprofessional and it is an importing. sent10: the snoop does not indispose potoroo if there is something such that that it is toxicological and it is not professional is not right. sent11: if that something does not unbrace mercantilism and/or it does not indispose pargeting is not true it is granulomatous. sent12: if the fact that the backsaw is a pervert that is not a sally does not hold then it does import. sent13: if there exists something such that it cottons the fact that the fact that the lane is not a kind of an importing and it is not plantar is wrong is right. sent14: if the backsaw is either an importing or not granulomatous or both then the snoop is not granulomatous. sent15: something that is a cotton is unprofessional. sent16: if the vintage is a tableland the fact that the lane does not indispose bodkin is not incorrect. sent17: everything indisposes pargeting. sent18: if there is something such that it is a Jasminum and it is not a kind of a pharisee the fact that the fondue is not a psilophyton hold. sent19: the vintage is a tableland and is a works if the fondue is not a psilophyton. sent20: the fondue does not work. sent21: there exists nothing such that either it does not unbrace mercantilism or it does not indispose pargeting or both. sent22: the fact that the fact that the tunic either is not a tableland or does not indispose bodkin or both is incorrect is not false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent21 -> int1: that the megalith does not unbrace mercantilism or does not indispose pargeting or both is not true.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the megalith is not non-granulomatous hold if the fact that either it does not unbrace mercantilism or it does not indispose pargeting or both is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the March is not Gauguinesque.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: if that something is dysphoric and is not a kind of a fade is not correct then it is not Gauguinesque. sent2: the fact that the charge is Gauguinesque but it does not fade is not true if the March subluxates. sent3: that the March is Gauguinesque but it is not a kind of an antidepressant does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the charge does fade and does not subluxate does not hold if the March is dysphoric is correct. sent5: that the March is dysphoric and it is a kind of a fade is wrong. sent6: the charge is not Gauguinesque. sent7: if the charge does subluxate then that the March is both dysphoric and a fade is not correct. sent8: the March is not Gauguinesque if it is a kind of a fade. sent9: something is not dysphoric if that it is Gauguinesque and it does not subluxate is not true. sent10: if the axletree is not a nonagon that the jawfish miscasts pictograph but it does not film traveled is not true. sent11: the fact that the March is dysphoric but it is not a kind of a fade is incorrect if the charge does subluxate. sent12: the charge subluxates. sent13: the axletree is not a kind of a nonagon if it holds. sent14: if something is a fade then it is not Gauguinesque.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: {A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{FK}{b}) sent4: {AA}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent5: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: ¬{B}{a} sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent10: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬({E}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent11: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent12: {A}{a} sent13: {G}{d} -> ¬{F}{d} sent14: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent11 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the March is dysphoric but it does not fade is not right.; sent1 -> int2: if that the March is dysphoric and not a fade does not hold it is not Gauguinesque.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent11 & sent12 -> int1: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent1 -> int2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the March is Gauguinesque.
|
{B}{b}
|
[] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the March is not Gauguinesque. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is dysphoric and is not a kind of a fade is not correct then it is not Gauguinesque. sent2: the fact that the charge is Gauguinesque but it does not fade is not true if the March subluxates. sent3: that the March is Gauguinesque but it is not a kind of an antidepressant does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the charge does fade and does not subluxate does not hold if the March is dysphoric is correct. sent5: that the March is dysphoric and it is a kind of a fade is wrong. sent6: the charge is not Gauguinesque. sent7: if the charge does subluxate then that the March is both dysphoric and a fade is not correct. sent8: the March is not Gauguinesque if it is a kind of a fade. sent9: something is not dysphoric if that it is Gauguinesque and it does not subluxate is not true. sent10: if the axletree is not a nonagon that the jawfish miscasts pictograph but it does not film traveled is not true. sent11: the fact that the March is dysphoric but it is not a kind of a fade is incorrect if the charge does subluxate. sent12: the charge subluxates. sent13: the axletree is not a kind of a nonagon if it holds. sent14: if something is a fade then it is not Gauguinesque. ; $proof$ =
|
sent11 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the March is dysphoric but it does not fade is not right.; sent1 -> int2: if that the March is dysphoric and not a fade does not hold it is not Gauguinesque.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that either the intellectual is a veal or it does not unbrace rhinophyma or both is wrong.
|
¬({B}{b} v ¬{C}{b})
|
sent1: that the intellectual is a veal or it does not unbrace rhinophyma or both does not hold if the resistor is alkalotic. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a channels or does not miscast pyrochemistry or both is incorrect. sent3: the intellectual unbraces rhinophyma.
|
sent1: {A}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: {C}{b}
|
[] |
[] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that either the intellectual is a veal or it does not unbrace rhinophyma or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the intellectual is a veal or it does not unbrace rhinophyma or both does not hold if the resistor is alkalotic. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a channels or does not miscast pyrochemistry or both is incorrect. sent3: the intellectual unbraces rhinophyma. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if it is not licit then it is a kind of a lamplight or is not a Semite or both.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x)
|
sent1: the transgression is a lamplight and/or it is not Semite if it is licit. sent2: if the transgression is not licit then either it is a lamplight or it is not a Semite or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is licit then it is a kind of a lamplight or it is not a Semite or both. sent4: if the transgression is not licit it either is a lamplight or is a Semite or both. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not licit then it is a lamplight and/or is a kind of a Semite. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Castroism it either is a dyscalculia or does not miscast mastalgia or both. sent7: that if the solenogaster is not serous then the solenogaster does moonlight and/or it is not a kind of a lamplight is right. sent8: something does unbrace hydromorphone or it is not a kind of an antiknock or both if it is not a kind of a Semite. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Gainsborough then it is Aristotelian and/or it is not a kind of a proctoplasty. sent10: something that is not licit is a kind of an individual and/or does not unbrace flavivirus.
|
sent1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{U}x -> ({DN}x v ¬{IA}x) sent7: ¬{FR}{dm} -> ({B}{dm} v ¬{AA}{dm}) sent8: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ({EK}x v ¬{AG}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬{IU}x -> ({CL}x v ¬{EF}x) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({IR}x v ¬{DE}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the Khedive is an individual or it does not unbrace flavivirus or both is correct if it is not licit.
|
¬{A}{fh} -> ({IR}{fh} v ¬{DE}{fh})
|
[
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not licit then it is a kind of a lamplight or is not a Semite or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the transgression is a lamplight and/or it is not Semite if it is licit. sent2: if the transgression is not licit then either it is a lamplight or it is not a Semite or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is licit then it is a kind of a lamplight or it is not a Semite or both. sent4: if the transgression is not licit it either is a lamplight or is a Semite or both. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not licit then it is a lamplight and/or is a kind of a Semite. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Castroism it either is a dyscalculia or does not miscast mastalgia or both. sent7: that if the solenogaster is not serous then the solenogaster does moonlight and/or it is not a kind of a lamplight is right. sent8: something does unbrace hydromorphone or it is not a kind of an antiknock or both if it is not a kind of a Semite. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Gainsborough then it is Aristotelian and/or it is not a kind of a proctoplasty. sent10: something that is not licit is a kind of an individual and/or does not unbrace flavivirus. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an anti the fact that it unbraces curvature and is not algebraic does not hold does not hold.
|
¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: the refractometer is a kind of algebraic thing that is not a whiting if it is bilabial. sent2: that there exists something such that if it miscasts storminess it does cram and is not a Cuvier hold. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not indispose reservation does not hold that it is a kind of a hat that does not indispose souse is not right. sent4: that that the cowboy is trustful and does not domesticate is correct is not true if it is uninucleate. sent5: if the cowboy is an anti that it unbraces curvature and it is non-algebraic is not true.
|
sent1: {JK}{hg} -> ({AB}{hg} & ¬{FN}{hg}) sent2: (Ex): {AD}x -> ({GG}x & ¬{AM}x) sent3: (Ex): {AH}x -> ¬({L}x & ¬{M}x) sent4: {FQ}{aa} -> ¬({HU}{aa} & ¬{CE}{aa}) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
|
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an anti the fact that it unbraces curvature and is not algebraic does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the refractometer is a kind of algebraic thing that is not a whiting if it is bilabial. sent2: that there exists something such that if it miscasts storminess it does cram and is not a Cuvier hold. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not indispose reservation does not hold that it is a kind of a hat that does not indispose souse is not right. sent4: that that the cowboy is trustful and does not domesticate is correct is not true if it is uninucleate. sent5: if the cowboy is an anti that it unbraces curvature and it is non-algebraic is not true. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a alligatored the fact that the fact that it either does not unbrace mountain or is not a kind of a oxacillin or both hold does not hold is not true.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x))
|
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a alligatored it is a kind of a oxacillin. sent2: if something is not quotable the fact that it does not indispose sugarloaf or it is not unmusical or both is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the Bourbon unbraces mountain or is not a oxacillin or both is false if it is not a alligatored. sent4: the Bourbon is not molecular and/or is not unfriendly if it does not unbrace mountain. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a packrat is not incorrect then it does film NSF. sent6: if the sugarloaf is not a alligatored then it is not aniseikonic and/or it is not a Achaean. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a nerve then that either it does miscast fig or it is not tights or both is wrong. sent8: if the Bourbon does not alligator that it does not unbrace mountain or is not a kind of a oxacillin or both is not true. sent9: the fact that something is not a oxacillin or it does not unfold or both does not hold if that it does not indispose arquebus is not wrong.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent2: (x): ¬{HN}x -> ¬(¬{GA}x v ¬{FG}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: ¬{AA}{aa} -> (¬{IA}{aa} v ¬{BB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{E}x -> {JF}x sent6: ¬{A}{jj} -> (¬{BL}{jj} v ¬{HS}{jj}) sent7: (Ex): ¬{IU}x -> ¬({N}x v ¬{DA}x) sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: (x): ¬{DG}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x v ¬{Q}x)
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there is something such that if it is not quotable then that it either does not indispose sugarloaf or is not unmusical or both is false.
|
(Ex): ¬{HN}x -> ¬(¬{GA}x v ¬{FG}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: the fact that the overall does not indispose sugarloaf and/or it is not unmusical is wrong if that it is not quotable is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a alligatored the fact that the fact that it either does not unbrace mountain or is not a kind of a oxacillin or both hold does not hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a alligatored it is a kind of a oxacillin. sent2: if something is not quotable the fact that it does not indispose sugarloaf or it is not unmusical or both is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the Bourbon unbraces mountain or is not a oxacillin or both is false if it is not a alligatored. sent4: the Bourbon is not molecular and/or is not unfriendly if it does not unbrace mountain. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a packrat is not incorrect then it does film NSF. sent6: if the sugarloaf is not a alligatored then it is not aniseikonic and/or it is not a Achaean. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a nerve then that either it does miscast fig or it is not tights or both is wrong. sent8: if the Bourbon does not alligator that it does not unbrace mountain or is not a kind of a oxacillin or both is not true. sent9: the fact that something is not a oxacillin or it does not unfold or both does not hold if that it does not indispose arquebus is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the jester is not a wax.
|
¬{C}{b}
|
sent1: if something is a gown then it is a wax. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does galvanize does not hold. sent3: there is something such that it is not a probiotic and does not galvanize. sent4: if the cowboy is not a Bowery the fact that it is not a gown and is a one-liner is not true. sent5: there exists something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does not galvanize is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that that it galvanizes is correct the cowboy is a kind of a one-liner. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a probiotic and does not galvanize is not correct. sent8: the cowboy is a one-liner if there exists something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does not galvanize is incorrect. sent9: the jester gowns if the cowboy is a one-liner.
|
sent1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent5: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (x): {AB}x -> {A}{a} sent7: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent9: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}
|
[
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the cowboy is a one-liner.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the jester is a gown.; sent1 -> int3: the jester is a wax if it is a gown.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & sent9 -> int2: {B}{b}; sent1 -> int3: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the starter is a wax.
|
{C}{fn}
|
[] | 14 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the jester is not a wax. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a gown then it is a wax. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does galvanize does not hold. sent3: there is something such that it is not a probiotic and does not galvanize. sent4: if the cowboy is not a Bowery the fact that it is not a gown and is a one-liner is not true. sent5: there exists something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does not galvanize is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that that it galvanizes is correct the cowboy is a kind of a one-liner. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a probiotic and does not galvanize is not correct. sent8: the cowboy is a one-liner if there exists something such that that it is not a probiotic and it does not galvanize is incorrect. sent9: the jester gowns if the cowboy is a one-liner. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the cowboy is a one-liner.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the jester is a gown.; sent1 -> int3: the jester is a wax if it is a gown.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the wound does not occur and the section does not occur.
|
(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})
|
sent1: the pinking Gerrhonotus occurs. sent2: the fact that the wound occurs but the section does not occur is not correct. sent3: if the winding occurs then that the dormantness happens hold. sent4: if the dormantness occurs then the etymologicalness occurs. sent5: the wound does not occur. sent6: if the pinking Gerrhonotus occurs then the non-etymologicalness and the non-ichorousness happens.
|
sent1: {D} sent2: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: {AA} -> {B} sent4: {B} -> {A} sent5: ¬{AA} sent6: {D} -> (¬{A} & ¬{C})
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the wound does not occur and the section does not occur does not hold.; sent6 & sent1 -> int1: both the non-etymologicalness and the non-ichorousness happens.; int1 -> int2: the etymologicalness does not occur.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); sent6 & sent1 -> int1: (¬{A} & ¬{C}); int1 -> int2: ¬{A};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the wound does not occur and the section does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the pinking Gerrhonotus occurs. sent2: the fact that the wound occurs but the section does not occur is not correct. sent3: if the winding occurs then that the dormantness happens hold. sent4: if the dormantness occurs then the etymologicalness occurs. sent5: the wound does not occur. sent6: if the pinking Gerrhonotus occurs then the non-etymologicalness and the non-ichorousness happens. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the wound does not occur and the section does not occur does not hold.; sent6 & sent1 -> int1: both the non-etymologicalness and the non-ichorousness happens.; int1 -> int2: the etymologicalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the dhow does not iridesce.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
sent1: the nosher iridesces. sent2: the dhow does iridesce. sent3: something does not iridesce if either it does not iridesce or it is not a loophole or both. sent4: if the fact that something is not subatomic and it is not a kind of a halogen is false that it is not a kind of a monism is not false. sent5: something does not iridesce and/or is not a loophole if it is not a kind of a monism. sent6: the dhow is a pentagon. sent7: if the glove does not sectionalize traffic then the fact that the landscaper is not a gallery but it does pink Tylenchidae is not right. sent8: the plume iridesces. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-subatomic thing that is not a kind of a halogen does not hold if it does not pink Tylenchidae. sent10: the glove does not sectionalize traffic. sent11: the fact that the dhow is a loophole but it is not a monism is incorrect if it is not subatomic. sent12: the dhow is acentric. sent13: the fact that the codeine iridesces is not false.
|
sent1: {A}{cg} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) sent6: {JA}{a} sent7: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} & {F}{b}) sent8: {A}{fj} sent9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) sent10: ¬{G}{c} sent11: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent12: {BU}{a} sent13: {A}{ga}
|
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the dhow does not iridesce.
|
¬{A}{a}
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: the dhow does not iridesce if it does not iridesce or is not a loophole or both.; sent5 -> int2: if the dhow is not a monism then it either does not iridesce or is not a loophole or both.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the dhow is not subatomic and it is not a halogen is false then it is not a kind of a monism.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the dhow is non-subatomic thing that is not a halogen is not correct if it does not pink Tylenchidae.; sent7 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the landscaper is not a kind of a gallery and does pink Tylenchidae is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not a gallery and does pink Tylenchidae is not right.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the dhow does not iridesce. ; $context$ = sent1: the nosher iridesces. sent2: the dhow does iridesce. sent3: something does not iridesce if either it does not iridesce or it is not a loophole or both. sent4: if the fact that something is not subatomic and it is not a kind of a halogen is false that it is not a kind of a monism is not false. sent5: something does not iridesce and/or is not a loophole if it is not a kind of a monism. sent6: the dhow is a pentagon. sent7: if the glove does not sectionalize traffic then the fact that the landscaper is not a gallery but it does pink Tylenchidae is not right. sent8: the plume iridesces. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-subatomic thing that is not a kind of a halogen does not hold if it does not pink Tylenchidae. sent10: the glove does not sectionalize traffic. sent11: the fact that the dhow is a loophole but it is not a monism is incorrect if it is not subatomic. sent12: the dhow is acentric. sent13: the fact that the codeine iridesces is not false. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the chimney is not a click or is not a kind of a mouthpiece or both is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{C}{a})
|
sent1: something does not unfold flexor if it is a kind of a click. sent2: either the chimney does not click or it is not a mouthpiece or both if the ethane does not unfold flexor. sent3: that that the ethane is a kind of Anguillan a modeled is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: the ethane is not mucosal. sent5: if the flexor is a kind of a sericulturist then it is not actinomycotic. sent6: if the ethane is not a click the chimney is a kind of a modeled and/or it is not mucosal. sent7: the chimney is not a click and/or it is not a kind of a Anguillan. sent8: either the chimney clicks or it is not a mouthpiece or both. sent9: that something is a kind of mucosal thing that does not unfold Scolytus is false if it does unfold drafting. sent10: if the chimney is not a kind of a Anguillan then the ethane models and/or it is not a mouthpiece. sent11: that the chimney is a click and mucosal does not hold if it is not Anguillan. sent12: the chimney does not unfold flexor and/or it is not a mouthpiece if the ethane is not mucosal. sent13: if the ethane does not unfold flexor that it is a modeled and is not a click is incorrect. sent14: something is not a click if it is mucosal. sent15: if the fact that something is not non-Anguillan but it is not a modeled is incorrect then it does not unfold flexor. sent16: the fact that the ethane is a mouthpiece and it is a Anguillan is wrong if it is not mucosal. sent17: the fact that the galbanum is small-capitalization but not a blinded is not true. sent18: that the ethane is a Anguillan but it does not model is not right if it is not mucosal. sent19: if the ethane does not unfold flexor the chimney is a click and/or it is not a mouthpiece. sent20: the fact that something does lace snoop but it is not a Whitehall is not right if it is not a click.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬{B}{aa} -> (¬{A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: ¬{D}{aa} sent5: {EN}{ab} -> ¬{GQ}{ab} sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AB}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) sent7: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{AA}{a}) sent8: ({A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent9: (x): {F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent10: ¬{AA}{a} -> ({AB}{aa} v ¬{C}{aa}) sent11: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} & {D}{a}) sent12: ¬{D}{aa} -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent13: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent14: (x): {D}x -> ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent16: ¬{D}{aa} -> ¬({C}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent17: ¬({DH}{b} & ¬{AC}{b}) sent18: ¬{D}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent19: ¬{B}{aa} -> ({A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent20: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({DP}x & ¬{U}x)
|
[
"sent15 -> int1: if that the ethane is a Anguillan but it does not model is not true it does not unfold flexor.; sent18 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the ethane is a kind of a Anguillan but it is not a modeled does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ethane does not unfold flexor.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent15 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent18 & sent4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
that the snoop laces snoop and is not a Whitehall is not right.
|
¬({DP}{p} & ¬{U}{p})
|
[
"sent20 -> int4: that the snoop does lace snoop and is not a Whitehall is not correct if it does not click.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chimney is not a click or is not a kind of a mouthpiece or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not unfold flexor if it is a kind of a click. sent2: either the chimney does not click or it is not a mouthpiece or both if the ethane does not unfold flexor. sent3: that that the ethane is a kind of Anguillan a modeled is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: the ethane is not mucosal. sent5: if the flexor is a kind of a sericulturist then it is not actinomycotic. sent6: if the ethane is not a click the chimney is a kind of a modeled and/or it is not mucosal. sent7: the chimney is not a click and/or it is not a kind of a Anguillan. sent8: either the chimney clicks or it is not a mouthpiece or both. sent9: that something is a kind of mucosal thing that does not unfold Scolytus is false if it does unfold drafting. sent10: if the chimney is not a kind of a Anguillan then the ethane models and/or it is not a mouthpiece. sent11: that the chimney is a click and mucosal does not hold if it is not Anguillan. sent12: the chimney does not unfold flexor and/or it is not a mouthpiece if the ethane is not mucosal. sent13: if the ethane does not unfold flexor that it is a modeled and is not a click is incorrect. sent14: something is not a click if it is mucosal. sent15: if the fact that something is not non-Anguillan but it is not a modeled is incorrect then it does not unfold flexor. sent16: the fact that the ethane is a mouthpiece and it is a Anguillan is wrong if it is not mucosal. sent17: the fact that the galbanum is small-capitalization but not a blinded is not true. sent18: that the ethane is a Anguillan but it does not model is not right if it is not mucosal. sent19: if the ethane does not unfold flexor the chimney is a click and/or it is not a mouthpiece. sent20: the fact that something does lace snoop but it is not a Whitehall is not right if it is not a click. ; $proof$ =
|
sent15 -> int1: if that the ethane is a Anguillan but it does not model is not true it does not unfold flexor.; sent18 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the ethane is a kind of a Anguillan but it is not a modeled does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ethane does not unfold flexor.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the recess is not a night.
|
¬{AA}{aa}
|
sent1: the fact that something is not an ink and is not nonspecific is not true if it is a tallith. sent2: something is a night and a screamer if it is not nonspecific. sent3: the recess is not an ink. sent4: the P.A. does not lace Aare. sent5: the atorvastatin is gastroduodenal and it is myelinic. sent6: that something unfolds blame but it is not a kind of a tallith is not correct if it does not lace Aare. sent7: the fact that the ununhexium is a tallith if that the P.A. does unfold blame but it is not a tallith is not right hold. sent8: that the atorvastatin is not an imperative but an ink does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an ink and it is not nonspecific is not right the atorvastatin is nonspecific. sent10: if the recess is not nonspecific it is a screamer. sent11: something is a screamer if it is not nonspecific. sent12: the Guarnerius is not a night. sent13: that the recess is a screamer is not wrong. sent14: if the fact that the atorvastatin is not an imperative but it does ink is incorrect the recess is not nonspecific. sent15: the recess is not nonspecific if the atorvastatin is not an ink.
|
sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬{C}{aa} sent4: ¬{E}{c} sent5: ({IJ}{a} & {AK}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent7: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {D}{b} sent8: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}{a} sent10: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent12: ¬{AA}{is} sent13: {AB}{aa} sent14: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent15: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{A}{aa}
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if the recess is not nonspecific it is both a night and a screamer.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the recess is not nonspecific.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the recess is a night and it is a screamer.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent14 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the recess is not a night is not false.
|
¬{AA}{aa}
|
[
"sent1 -> int4: the fact that the ununhexium is not an ink and is not nonspecific is not right if it is a kind of a tallith.; sent6 -> int5: if the P.A. does not lace Aare then the fact that it does unfold blame and it is not a tallith is not right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the P.A. unfolds blame and is not a tallith is incorrect.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the ununhexium is a kind of a tallith.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the ununhexium is not an ink and not nonspecific does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not an ink and not nonspecific is not true.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the atorvastatin is nonspecific.; int10 -> int11: the atorvastatin is nonspecific and/or not non-imperative.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is nonspecific and/or it is imperative.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the recess is not a night. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not an ink and is not nonspecific is not true if it is a tallith. sent2: something is a night and a screamer if it is not nonspecific. sent3: the recess is not an ink. sent4: the P.A. does not lace Aare. sent5: the atorvastatin is gastroduodenal and it is myelinic. sent6: that something unfolds blame but it is not a kind of a tallith is not correct if it does not lace Aare. sent7: the fact that the ununhexium is a tallith if that the P.A. does unfold blame but it is not a tallith is not right hold. sent8: that the atorvastatin is not an imperative but an ink does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an ink and it is not nonspecific is not right the atorvastatin is nonspecific. sent10: if the recess is not nonspecific it is a screamer. sent11: something is a screamer if it is not nonspecific. sent12: the Guarnerius is not a night. sent13: that the recess is a screamer is not wrong. sent14: if the fact that the atorvastatin is not an imperative but it does ink is incorrect the recess is not nonspecific. sent15: the recess is not nonspecific if the atorvastatin is not an ink. ; $proof$ =
|
sent2 -> int1: if the recess is not nonspecific it is both a night and a screamer.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the recess is not nonspecific.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the recess is a night and it is a screamer.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that there is something such that if it does not lace Stockton it is not semi-tuberous and it is a kind of a inchworm is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x))
|
sent1: something is non-semi-tuberous a inchworm if it does not lace Stockton.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)
|
[
"sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the seigneur does not lace Stockton is not false then it is a kind of non-semi-tuberous thing that is a kind of a inchworm.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not lace Stockton it is not semi-tuberous and it is a kind of a inchworm is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is non-semi-tuberous a inchworm if it does not lace Stockton. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the seigneur does not lace Stockton is not false then it is a kind of non-semi-tuberous thing that is a kind of a inchworm.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the feedstock does not lace size is right.
|
¬{C}{d}
|
sent1: the size does not open. sent2: if that the surgeonfish is copular is not incorrect that the feedstock does not lace size hold. sent3: the size is not an opened and it is not pyroelectric if the Fergon is not copular. sent4: if the Fergon does not pink pomelo and is not pyroelectric then the surgeonfish is copular. sent5: the Fergon is non-pyroelectric and is not opened. sent6: if the Fergon does not lace size and it is not pyroelectric then the feedstock pinks pomelo. sent7: the size is not copular. sent8: if the Fergon is non-copular then the surgeonfish does not pink pomelo. sent9: if the Fergon does not pink pomelo but it is pyroelectric the surgeonfish is copular. sent10: if a non-opened thing is copular it laces size. sent11: the surgeonfish does not differentiate. sent12: if the size is not non-curricular it is conciliatory. sent13: the Fergon does not pink pomelo and is not pyroelectric if the size does not open. sent14: if the Fergon opens then the size is not pyroelectric. sent15: the Fergon is not pyroelectric if the size is not an opened. sent16: the Fergon does not lace size and it does not pink pomelo if that the feedstock is not pyroelectric is correct.
|
sent1: ¬{A}{a} sent2: {B}{c} -> ¬{C}{d} sent3: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} sent5: (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent6: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {AA}{d} sent7: ¬{B}{a} sent8: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{AA}{c} sent9: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} sent10: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {C}x sent11: ¬{BS}{c} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent14: {A}{b} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent15: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent16: ¬{AB}{d} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{AA}{b})
|
[
"sent13 & sent1 -> int1: the Fergon does not pink pomelo and it is not pyroelectric.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the surgeonfish is copular is not incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent13 & sent1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & sent4 -> int2: {B}{c}; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the feedstock does lace size.
|
{C}{d}
|
[
"sent10 -> int3: if the feedstock does not open but it is copular then it does lace size.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the feedstock does not lace size is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the size does not open. sent2: if that the surgeonfish is copular is not incorrect that the feedstock does not lace size hold. sent3: the size is not an opened and it is not pyroelectric if the Fergon is not copular. sent4: if the Fergon does not pink pomelo and is not pyroelectric then the surgeonfish is copular. sent5: the Fergon is non-pyroelectric and is not opened. sent6: if the Fergon does not lace size and it is not pyroelectric then the feedstock pinks pomelo. sent7: the size is not copular. sent8: if the Fergon is non-copular then the surgeonfish does not pink pomelo. sent9: if the Fergon does not pink pomelo but it is pyroelectric the surgeonfish is copular. sent10: if a non-opened thing is copular it laces size. sent11: the surgeonfish does not differentiate. sent12: if the size is not non-curricular it is conciliatory. sent13: the Fergon does not pink pomelo and is not pyroelectric if the size does not open. sent14: if the Fergon opens then the size is not pyroelectric. sent15: the Fergon is not pyroelectric if the size is not an opened. sent16: the Fergon does not lace size and it does not pink pomelo if that the feedstock is not pyroelectric is correct. ; $proof$ =
|
sent13 & sent1 -> int1: the Fergon does not pink pomelo and it is not pyroelectric.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the surgeonfish is copular is not incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the germanite is not a jagua.
|
¬{C}{c}
|
sent1: the protectorate does unfold messmate. sent2: The messmate does unfold protectorate. sent3: everything is not an ultraviolet. sent4: the fact that something is not seasonable but it is a jagua is not right if it is a ropewalker. sent5: if there is something such that that it is seasonable and it is not an audible does not hold then the barn is not seasonable. sent6: the barn is a yeoman if the protectorate unfolds messmate. sent7: if the barn is an ultraviolet it is a ropewalker. sent8: if something is not a kind of an ultraviolet that it is seasonable and is not an audible is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is not a yeoman but it does unfold messmate is not correct if it is not a jagua. sent10: if that something is not a yeoman but it does unfold messmate is incorrect it is a yeoman. sent11: the fact that that the germanite does unfold messmate and/or it is a yeoman is not false is not correct if the protectorate is not a kind of a ropewalker. sent12: if the barn is a yeoman the germanite is a jagua.
|
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {AA}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{F}x sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {C}x) sent5: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}{b} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: {F}{b} -> {D}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {B}x sent11: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({A}{c} v {B}{c}) sent12: {B}{b} -> {C}{c}
|
[
"sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the barn is a yeoman is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the protectorate is a yeoman.
|
{B}{a}
|
[
"sent10 -> int2: the protectorate is a yeoman if the fact that it is not a yeoman and does unfold messmate is wrong.; sent9 -> int3: if the protectorate is not a jagua the fact that it is not a kind of a yeoman and unfolds messmate is false.; sent4 -> int4: if the barn is a ropewalker then that it is both not seasonable and a jagua does not hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the germanite is not a jagua. ; $context$ = sent1: the protectorate does unfold messmate. sent2: The messmate does unfold protectorate. sent3: everything is not an ultraviolet. sent4: the fact that something is not seasonable but it is a jagua is not right if it is a ropewalker. sent5: if there is something such that that it is seasonable and it is not an audible does not hold then the barn is not seasonable. sent6: the barn is a yeoman if the protectorate unfolds messmate. sent7: if the barn is an ultraviolet it is a ropewalker. sent8: if something is not a kind of an ultraviolet that it is seasonable and is not an audible is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is not a yeoman but it does unfold messmate is not correct if it is not a jagua. sent10: if that something is not a yeoman but it does unfold messmate is incorrect it is a yeoman. sent11: the fact that that the germanite does unfold messmate and/or it is a yeoman is not false is not correct if the protectorate is not a kind of a ropewalker. sent12: if the barn is a yeoman the germanite is a jagua. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the barn is a yeoman is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the lactation is not unbroken.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: if something that is a wireman does circuit it is not batholithic. sent2: if something that is not a fold is unsarcastic the lactation is unbroken. sent3: the lactation is a kind of a fold. sent4: if something that does parse is magisterial then it is not a plasterer. sent5: the lactation is unsarcastic. sent6: if the lactation is not a kind of a Callitriche then it is not a third-rater. sent7: the lactation is not a Callitriche if that it is not a backstroker but a Callitriche is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a kind of a third-rater it is both unbroken and a Meany.
|
sent1: (x): ({GG}x & {GO}x) -> ¬{JF}x sent2: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}{a} sent3: {B}{a} sent4: (x): ({L}x & {BU}x) -> ¬{AL}x sent5: {A}{a} sent6: ¬{F}{a} -> ¬{E}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent8: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x)
|
[
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the lactation is unsarcastic and it is a fold.;"
] |
[
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a});"
] |
the Hutu is not a fold.
|
¬{B}{ad}
|
[
"sent8 -> int2: the lactation is unbroken and it is a Meany if it is not a kind of a third-rater.;"
] | 7 | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the lactation is not unbroken. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a wireman does circuit it is not batholithic. sent2: if something that is not a fold is unsarcastic the lactation is unbroken. sent3: the lactation is a kind of a fold. sent4: if something that does parse is magisterial then it is not a plasterer. sent5: the lactation is unsarcastic. sent6: if the lactation is not a kind of a Callitriche then it is not a third-rater. sent7: the lactation is not a Callitriche if that it is not a backstroker but a Callitriche is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a kind of a third-rater it is both unbroken and a Meany. ; $proof$ =
|
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the lactation is unsarcastic and it is a fold.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the sensualist does unfold funambulism if it is not a tablature but imperishable.
|
(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}
|
sent1: if that the sensualist is a tablature and is imperishable is not false then it unfolds funambulism. sent2: if the sensualist is not a tablature but it does work then it is a microtome. sent3: the fact that if something does not unfold cush-cush but it is a kind of a Kulanapan it contests hold. sent4: something unfolds funambulism if it is not a tablature and it is imperishable. sent5: something is homonymic if it is a Freudian that impends. sent6: if something does not pink swot and is a backstroker the fact that it is a kind of a fellah is right. sent7: the sensualist is imperishable if it is not unsurmountable and does certify. sent8: if the sensualist does not unfold air-intake and does unfold funambulism then it is intracranial. sent9: if that something is a tablature and imperishable is not false it unfolds funambulism. sent10: the air-intake is imperishable if it is not a kind of a fistmele and it is an unknown. sent11: if that the aureole is not starchy but it is a tablature is not wrong then it unfolds jiggermast. sent12: if something that is not a imprecation laces overachiever then it is a Maianthemum. sent13: if a non-omissive thing is a Ceratopogonidae then it is a kind of a DBA.
|
sent1: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: (¬{AA}{aa} & {DG}{aa}) -> {CO}{aa} sent3: (x): (¬{CB}x & {AK}x) -> {GQ}x sent4: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: (x): ({HM}x & {BM}x) -> {CS}x sent6: (x): (¬{EJ}x & {IH}x) -> {GA}x sent7: (¬{AM}{aa} & {HU}{aa}) -> {AB}{aa} sent8: (¬{EA}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> {AO}{aa} sent9: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: (¬{ES}{fd} & {AI}{fd}) -> {AB}{fd} sent11: (¬{IO}{e} & {AA}{e}) -> {DJ}{e} sent12: (x): (¬{HB}x & {R}x) -> {CI}x sent13: (x): (¬{DA}x & {BO}x) -> {C}x
|
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the sensualist does unfold funambulism if it is not a tablature but imperishable. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the sensualist is a tablature and is imperishable is not false then it unfolds funambulism. sent2: if the sensualist is not a tablature but it does work then it is a microtome. sent3: the fact that if something does not unfold cush-cush but it is a kind of a Kulanapan it contests hold. sent4: something unfolds funambulism if it is not a tablature and it is imperishable. sent5: something is homonymic if it is a Freudian that impends. sent6: if something does not pink swot and is a backstroker the fact that it is a kind of a fellah is right. sent7: the sensualist is imperishable if it is not unsurmountable and does certify. sent8: if the sensualist does not unfold air-intake and does unfold funambulism then it is intracranial. sent9: if that something is a tablature and imperishable is not false it unfolds funambulism. sent10: the air-intake is imperishable if it is not a kind of a fistmele and it is an unknown. sent11: if that the aureole is not starchy but it is a tablature is not wrong then it unfolds jiggermast. sent12: if something that is not a imprecation laces overachiever then it is a Maianthemum. sent13: if a non-omissive thing is a Ceratopogonidae then it is a kind of a DBA. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the renin is a condiment.
|
{C}{aa}
|
sent1: the chaplain is a runaway. sent2: if the slave-maker is not a runaway or it hosts or both the renin is a kind of a runaway. sent3: something is a condiment if it is a runaway. sent4: the renin is a runaway if that the slave-maker does host hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a runaway but it is a kind of a host is not incorrect if the fact that it is edible hold.
|
sent1: {A}{ja} sent2: (¬{A}{a} v {D}{a}) -> {A}{aa} sent3: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent4: {D}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent5: (x): {E}x -> (¬{A}x & {D}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: if the renin is a runaway then it is a condiment.;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa};"
] |
the renin is not a kind of a condiment.
|
¬{C}{aa}
|
[
"sent5 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the slave-maker is edible hold the slave-maker is both not a runaway and a host is right.;"
] | 7 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the renin is a condiment. ; $context$ = sent1: the chaplain is a runaway. sent2: if the slave-maker is not a runaway or it hosts or both the renin is a kind of a runaway. sent3: something is a condiment if it is a runaway. sent4: the renin is a runaway if that the slave-maker does host hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a runaway but it is a kind of a host is not incorrect if the fact that it is edible hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: if the renin is a runaway then it is a condiment.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the Missourian is not a kind of a Empetraceae.
|
¬{D}{a}
|
sent1: if something is not a kind of a Guyanese then that it pinks stagflation and it is not a kind of a an is correct. sent2: if the Missourian is not unbridgeable then that it is a Empetraceae and it colors is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that something is both a Guyanese and not a supply is wrong if it is a Empetraceae. sent4: the poroporo is not impersonal and not a an if it does pink psychopathology. sent5: if the fact that the wax is not unbridgeable is right the T-man colors and it is a supply. sent6: the T-man is a an if the poroporo is not impersonal and it is not a A. sent7: the paparazzo is a kind of a extropy and it is hydroelectric. sent8: something that is a kind of a Guyanese is both a supply and not a Empetraceae. sent9: that the knife-handle is not a Guyanese is not incorrect if the T-man is a kind of a an and is a supply. sent10: the poroporo does unfold Missourian. sent11: something that does unfold Missourian pinks psychopathology. sent12: if either the paparazzo is a kind of a polyploid or it is unbridgeable or both the wax is not unbridgeable. sent13: if something is a extropy then the fact that it is a polyploid is right. sent14: the Missourian is a kind of a Guyanese that is a A.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({GT}x & ¬{B}x) sent2: ¬{F}{a} -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent3: (x): {D}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) sent4: {J}{f} -> (¬{I}{f} & ¬{B}{f}) sent5: ¬{F}{d} -> ({E}{c} & {C}{c}) sent6: (¬{I}{f} & ¬{B}{f}) -> {B}{c} sent7: ({H}{e} & {L}{e}) sent8: (x): {A}x -> ({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent9: ({B}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent10: {K}{f} sent11: (x): {K}x -> {J}x sent12: ({G}{e} v {F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} sent13: (x): {H}x -> {G}x sent14: ({A}{a} & {B}{a})
|
[
"sent14 -> int1: the Missourian is a Guyanese.; sent8 -> int2: the Missourian is a supply but it is not a kind of a Empetraceae if it is a Guyanese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Missourian is a supply but it is not a Empetraceae.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent14 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent8 -> int2: {A}{a} -> ({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the Cockney pinks stagflation and is not a A.
|
({GT}{bp} & ¬{B}{bp})
|
[
"sent1 -> int4: if the Cockney is not a Guyanese it pinks stagflation and is not a A.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the Missourian is a kind of a Guyanese but it is not a supply is not right if it is a Empetraceae.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the Missourian is not a kind of a Empetraceae. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Guyanese then that it pinks stagflation and it is not a kind of a an is correct. sent2: if the Missourian is not unbridgeable then that it is a Empetraceae and it colors is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that something is both a Guyanese and not a supply is wrong if it is a Empetraceae. sent4: the poroporo is not impersonal and not a an if it does pink psychopathology. sent5: if the fact that the wax is not unbridgeable is right the T-man colors and it is a supply. sent6: the T-man is a an if the poroporo is not impersonal and it is not a A. sent7: the paparazzo is a kind of a extropy and it is hydroelectric. sent8: something that is a kind of a Guyanese is both a supply and not a Empetraceae. sent9: that the knife-handle is not a Guyanese is not incorrect if the T-man is a kind of a an and is a supply. sent10: the poroporo does unfold Missourian. sent11: something that does unfold Missourian pinks psychopathology. sent12: if either the paparazzo is a kind of a polyploid or it is unbridgeable or both the wax is not unbridgeable. sent13: if something is a extropy then the fact that it is a polyploid is right. sent14: the Missourian is a kind of a Guyanese that is a A. ; $proof$ =
|
sent14 -> int1: the Missourian is a Guyanese.; sent8 -> int2: the Missourian is a supply but it is not a kind of a Empetraceae if it is a Guyanese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Missourian is a supply but it is not a Empetraceae.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the pinch is not eonian.
|
¬{B}{a}
|
sent1: the pinch does not trill. sent2: the pinch is eonian if the Danish is eonian. sent3: if something is not a Schliemann that it is a charley-horse and it is a kind of a rattler hold. sent4: if something is a charley-horse it is susceptible. sent5: something that is not a Castro and is a kind of a Bradley is not rehabilitative. sent6: the fact that the pinch is not susceptible and does lace Pinctada is not false if it is prosthodontic. sent7: if something is a trill and it is obligatory then it is not eonian. sent8: the totem is not susceptible. sent9: there exists something such that it is not peaty. sent10: something is not a kind of a Algerian if it is not a kind of a REIT. sent11: if the fish-fly is not a noise then that the earthball does vacate and/or is ovarian does not hold. sent12: something that unfolds Naismith is not a noise. sent13: the pinch is not a kind of a trill if it is susceptible. sent14: if the apatosaur is a kind of a Nixon then it does not pink totem and it trills. sent15: if something does not vacate and is not a kind of a Algerian then it is not a kind of a Schliemann. sent16: the pinch does not pink automation. sent17: if the fact that the earthball vacates and/or it is ovarian does not hold the bandoneon does not vacates. sent18: if something does not trill but it is obligatory it is non-eonian. sent19: the fish-fly unfolds Naismith. sent20: if the pinch is a trill and is obligatory then it is not eonian. sent21: if the bandoneon is susceptible the Danish is eonian. sent22: if that the pinch is susceptible is correct it is both not a trill and obligatory.
|
sent1: ¬{AA}{a} sent2: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) sent4: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent5: (x): (¬{BP}x & {S}x) -> ¬{EN}x sent6: {BH}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {FU}{a}) sent7: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: ¬{A}{et} sent9: (Ex): ¬{L}x sent10: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{G}x sent11: ¬{J}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} v {H}{d}) sent12: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}x sent13: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} sent14: {IP}{j} -> (¬{BN}{j} & {AA}{j}) sent15: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent16: ¬{ET}{a} sent17: ¬({F}{d} v {H}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent18: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent19: {K}{e} sent20: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent21: {A}{c} -> {B}{b} sent22: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})
|
[
"sent18 -> int1: if the pinch is both not a trill and obligatory it is not eonian.;"
] |
[
"sent18 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a};"
] |
the pinch is eonian.
|
{B}{a}
|
[
"sent4 -> int2: if the bandoneon is a charley-horse then it is susceptible.; sent3 -> int3: if the bandoneon is not a Schliemann that it is a charley-horse that is a rattler hold.; sent15 -> int4: the bandoneon is not a Schliemann if it does not vacate and is not a Algerian.; sent12 -> int5: the fish-fly is not a noise if it unfolds Naismith.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the fish-fly is not a noise is correct.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the earthball does vacate or is ovarian or both is not true is correct.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the bandoneon does not vacate.; sent10 -> int9: the fact that if the bandoneon is not the REIT the bandoneon is not a Algerian is right.;"
] | 11 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the pinch is not eonian. ; $context$ = sent1: the pinch does not trill. sent2: the pinch is eonian if the Danish is eonian. sent3: if something is not a Schliemann that it is a charley-horse and it is a kind of a rattler hold. sent4: if something is a charley-horse it is susceptible. sent5: something that is not a Castro and is a kind of a Bradley is not rehabilitative. sent6: the fact that the pinch is not susceptible and does lace Pinctada is not false if it is prosthodontic. sent7: if something is a trill and it is obligatory then it is not eonian. sent8: the totem is not susceptible. sent9: there exists something such that it is not peaty. sent10: something is not a kind of a Algerian if it is not a kind of a REIT. sent11: if the fish-fly is not a noise then that the earthball does vacate and/or is ovarian does not hold. sent12: something that unfolds Naismith is not a noise. sent13: the pinch is not a kind of a trill if it is susceptible. sent14: if the apatosaur is a kind of a Nixon then it does not pink totem and it trills. sent15: if something does not vacate and is not a kind of a Algerian then it is not a kind of a Schliemann. sent16: the pinch does not pink automation. sent17: if the fact that the earthball vacates and/or it is ovarian does not hold the bandoneon does not vacates. sent18: if something does not trill but it is obligatory it is non-eonian. sent19: the fish-fly unfolds Naismith. sent20: if the pinch is a trill and is obligatory then it is not eonian. sent21: if the bandoneon is susceptible the Danish is eonian. sent22: if that the pinch is susceptible is correct it is both not a trill and obligatory. ; $proof$ =
|
sent18 -> int1: if the pinch is both not a trill and obligatory it is not eonian.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the e does regard.
|
{C}{b}
|
sent1: the pup is a satori. sent2: there exists something such that it is not rectal. sent3: something is an affluence if it frowns. sent4: something is a kind of a satori and it is a hop. sent5: the e is a regard if the pup is an affluence. sent6: if the pup is a kind of a regard then that the e frowns is true. sent7: the e is a satori. sent8: if something is a kind of a regard then it is an affluence. sent9: there exists something such that it is a hop. sent10: the e is a hop. sent11: if the pup is a kind of a regard then it is a kind of an affluence. sent12: the pup is a frown if there is something such that it is not a satori and is a kind of a hop. sent13: something is a regard and it is an affluence.
|
sent1: {AA}{a} sent2: (Ex): ¬{AS}x sent3: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent6: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} sent7: {AA}{b} sent8: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): {AB}x sent10: {AB}{b} sent11: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent12: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent13: (Ex): ({C}x & {B}x)
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: the pup is an affluence if it frowns.;"
] |
[
"sent3 -> int1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a};"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 |
UNKNOWN
| null |
UNKNOWN
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the e does regard. ; $context$ = sent1: the pup is a satori. sent2: there exists something such that it is not rectal. sent3: something is an affluence if it frowns. sent4: something is a kind of a satori and it is a hop. sent5: the e is a regard if the pup is an affluence. sent6: if the pup is a kind of a regard then that the e frowns is true. sent7: the e is a satori. sent8: if something is a kind of a regard then it is an affluence. sent9: there exists something such that it is a hop. sent10: the e is a hop. sent11: if the pup is a kind of a regard then it is a kind of an affluence. sent12: the pup is a frown if there is something such that it is not a satori and is a kind of a hop. sent13: something is a regard and it is an affluence. ; $proof$ =
|
sent3 -> int1: the pup is an affluence if it frowns.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the phlebotomist is not apian and is indeterminate.
|
(¬{E}{c} & {D}{c})
|
sent1: that the forelimb is not a post and is an oscilloscope is incorrect if something is a casuistry. sent2: if the cynancum is not indeterminate the phlebotomist is not apian and is indeterminate. sent3: the cynancum is not indeterminate if the forelimb does post. sent4: that the forelimb is a post that is an oscilloscope does not hold. sent5: if something is a curvaceousness it is inadequate and it laces forelimb. sent6: the phlebotomist is not apian. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a casuistry. sent8: that something is not apian but it is indeterminate is wrong if that it is not a casuistry hold. sent9: the phlebotomist is not an oscilloscope. sent10: if the cynancum is not adequate but it does lace forelimb then the forelimb is not a kind of an oscilloscope. sent11: if either the cynancum is not a narcissus or it does not unfold cynancum or both then it is a curvaceousness. sent12: the phlebotomist is not a casuistry if the fact that the forelimb is not a casuistry but a post is not right. sent13: if the cynancum is not indeterminate then the phlebotomist is not apian. sent14: if something is a kind of a casuistry the fact that the forelimb is a post and it is an oscilloscope does not hold.
|
sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: ¬{D}{b} -> (¬{E}{c} & {D}{c}) sent3: {B}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent4: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): {H}x -> (¬{G}x & {F}x) sent6: ¬{E}{c} sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) sent9: ¬{C}{c} sent10: (¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent11: (¬{I}{b} v ¬{J}{b}) -> {H}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent13: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{E}{c} sent14: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})
|
[
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the forelimb is not a post but an oscilloscope does not hold.;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a});"
] |
that the phlebotomist is non-apian thing that is indeterminate is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{E}{c} & {D}{c})
|
[
"sent8 -> int2: the fact that the phlebotomist is not apian but indeterminate is not right if it is not a casuistry.; sent5 -> int3: the cynancum is not adequate and does lace forelimb if it is a kind of a curvaceousness.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the phlebotomist is not apian and is indeterminate. ; $context$ = sent1: that the forelimb is not a post and is an oscilloscope is incorrect if something is a casuistry. sent2: if the cynancum is not indeterminate the phlebotomist is not apian and is indeterminate. sent3: the cynancum is not indeterminate if the forelimb does post. sent4: that the forelimb is a post that is an oscilloscope does not hold. sent5: if something is a curvaceousness it is inadequate and it laces forelimb. sent6: the phlebotomist is not apian. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a casuistry. sent8: that something is not apian but it is indeterminate is wrong if that it is not a casuistry hold. sent9: the phlebotomist is not an oscilloscope. sent10: if the cynancum is not adequate but it does lace forelimb then the forelimb is not a kind of an oscilloscope. sent11: if either the cynancum is not a narcissus or it does not unfold cynancum or both then it is a curvaceousness. sent12: the phlebotomist is not a casuistry if the fact that the forelimb is not a casuistry but a post is not right. sent13: if the cynancum is not indeterminate then the phlebotomist is not apian. sent14: if something is a kind of a casuistry the fact that the forelimb is a post and it is an oscilloscope does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the forelimb is not a post but an oscilloscope does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the sensualist is not a tree and pinks sensualist is true.
|
(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a})
|
sent1: if the beautician is not a Emetrol then that it is a kind of semiterrestrial a coelenterate is not correct. sent2: the fact that the beautician is not a Emetrol hold. sent3: the fact that if the bed-and-breakfast does not voyage then the bed-and-breakfast is Rembrandtesque a unpermissiveness is true. sent4: if that something is semiterrestrial and it is a coelenterate does not hold it is not a tree. sent5: the fact that the beautician is not a tree is right if it is not semiterrestrial. sent6: the fact that the sensualist is a tree and pinks sensualist is not right. sent7: if the arrowworm is not Rembrandtesque it is not a kind of a Emetrol. sent8: the fact that the sensualist is not a tree but it does pink sensualist is not right if the beautician does not tree. sent9: the arrowworm is not Rembrandtesque if the bed-and-breakfast is Rembrandtesque and is achromatinic.
|
sent1: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{C}{aa} sent3: ¬{H}{c} -> ({D}{c} & {E}{c}) sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent7: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent8: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent9: ({D}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b}
|
[
"sent4 -> int1: if that the beautician is semiterrestrial and it is a coelenterate is not right it does not tree.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the beautician is not non-semiterrestrial but a coelenterate is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the beautician is not a tree is not incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the sensualist is not a tree but it pinks sensualist.
|
(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a})
|
[] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = that the sensualist is not a tree and pinks sensualist is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beautician is not a Emetrol then that it is a kind of semiterrestrial a coelenterate is not correct. sent2: the fact that the beautician is not a Emetrol hold. sent3: the fact that if the bed-and-breakfast does not voyage then the bed-and-breakfast is Rembrandtesque a unpermissiveness is true. sent4: if that something is semiterrestrial and it is a coelenterate does not hold it is not a tree. sent5: the fact that the beautician is not a tree is right if it is not semiterrestrial. sent6: the fact that the sensualist is a tree and pinks sensualist is not right. sent7: if the arrowworm is not Rembrandtesque it is not a kind of a Emetrol. sent8: the fact that the sensualist is not a tree but it does pink sensualist is not right if the beautician does not tree. sent9: the arrowworm is not Rembrandtesque if the bed-and-breakfast is Rembrandtesque and is achromatinic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 -> int1: if that the beautician is semiterrestrial and it is a coelenterate is not right it does not tree.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the beautician is not non-semiterrestrial but a coelenterate is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the beautician is not a tree is not incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the functionalist does not fingerprint.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
sent1: something is not a five-spot. sent2: if something is a kind of a recess it is not a fingerprinting but a five-spot. sent3: if the gentleman does not recess and/or is not profaned the functionalist is a fingerprinting. sent4: the functionalist fingerprints if the gentleman does not recess. sent5: the gentleman does not recess and/or is not profaned if there exists something such that it is not a five-spot.
|
sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent2: (x): {B}x -> (¬{D}x & {A}x) sent3: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent4: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a})
|
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the gentleman is not a recess and/or is not profaned.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}); sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the functionalist is not a fingerprinting.
|
¬{D}{b}
|
[
"sent2 -> int2: the functionalist is not a kind of a fingerprinting but it is a five-spot if it is a recess.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the functionalist does not fingerprint. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a five-spot. sent2: if something is a kind of a recess it is not a fingerprinting but a five-spot. sent3: if the gentleman does not recess and/or is not profaned the functionalist is a fingerprinting. sent4: the functionalist fingerprints if the gentleman does not recess. sent5: the gentleman does not recess and/or is not profaned if there exists something such that it is not a five-spot. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the gentleman is not a recess and/or is not profaned.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stateliness then it is not gluttonous and it is a dissolving.
|
(Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)
|
sent1: something dissolves if it is not a stateliness. sent2: if something is not attributive then it is a kind of non-cercarial thing that is actinometric. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a stateliness then it does dissolve.
|
sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent2: (x): ¬{ET}x -> (¬{S}x & {JG}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x
|
[] |
[] |
there exists something such that if that it is attributive does not hold then it is a kind of non-cercarial thing that is actinometric.
|
(Ex): ¬{ET}x -> (¬{S}x & {JG}x)
|
[
"sent2 -> int1: if the zidovudine is not attributive then it is both not cercarial and actinometric.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 |
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stateliness then it is not gluttonous and it is a dissolving. ; $context$ = sent1: something dissolves if it is not a stateliness. sent2: if something is not attributive then it is a kind of non-cercarial thing that is actinometric. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a stateliness then it does dissolve. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the elementalness does not occur and the cadetship does not occur.
|
(¬{D} & ¬{E})
|
sent1: the elementalness does not occur if the unfolding coupe happens. sent2: both the non-unstuckness and the sectionalizing kolkhoz occurs if the pinking wash-and-wear does not occur. sent3: the decocting does not occur and the embolism does not occur. sent4: if that the unfolding coupe occurs hold the lacing pinochle does not occur and the lacing Huambo happens. sent5: either that the lacing pinochle occurs or that the unfolding coupe occurs or both prevents that the elementalness happens. sent6: the poeticness does not occur and the lacing nucleosynthesis does not occur. sent7: the combustible does not occur. sent8: the non-unstuckness yields that both the lift and the cadetship occurs. sent9: if that the lacing pinochle does not occur hold then the fact that the elementalness does not occur and the cadetship does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the unfolding coupe occurs is prevented by that the combustibleness happens and the unstuckness occurs. sent11: the lacing Huambo occurs. sent12: the lacing pinochle and the lacing Huambo happens. sent13: if the lacing pinochle does not occur and the lacing Huambo happens then the lacing neutrino happens.
|
sent1: {C} -> ¬{D} sent2: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) sent3: (¬{HI} & ¬{FP}) sent4: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) sent5: ({A} v {C}) -> ¬{D} sent6: (¬{GI} & ¬{GL}) sent7: ¬{F} sent8: ¬{G} -> ({CT} & {E}) sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent10: ({F} & {G}) -> ¬{C} sent11: {B} sent12: ({A} & {B}) sent13: (¬{A} & {B}) -> {EO}
|
[
"sent12 -> int1: the lacing pinochle occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the lacing pinochle or the unfolding coupe or both occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the elementalness does not occur hold.;"
] |
[
"sent12 -> int1: {A}; int1 -> int2: ({A} v {C}); int2 & sent5 -> int3: ¬{D};"
] |
that the elementalness does not occur and the cadetship does not occur is incorrect.
|
¬(¬{D} & ¬{E})
|
[] | 6 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the elementalness does not occur and the cadetship does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the elementalness does not occur if the unfolding coupe happens. sent2: both the non-unstuckness and the sectionalizing kolkhoz occurs if the pinking wash-and-wear does not occur. sent3: the decocting does not occur and the embolism does not occur. sent4: if that the unfolding coupe occurs hold the lacing pinochle does not occur and the lacing Huambo happens. sent5: either that the lacing pinochle occurs or that the unfolding coupe occurs or both prevents that the elementalness happens. sent6: the poeticness does not occur and the lacing nucleosynthesis does not occur. sent7: the combustible does not occur. sent8: the non-unstuckness yields that both the lift and the cadetship occurs. sent9: if that the lacing pinochle does not occur hold then the fact that the elementalness does not occur and the cadetship does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the unfolding coupe occurs is prevented by that the combustibleness happens and the unstuckness occurs. sent11: the lacing Huambo occurs. sent12: the lacing pinochle and the lacing Huambo happens. sent13: if the lacing pinochle does not occur and the lacing Huambo happens then the lacing neutrino happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent12 -> int1: the lacing pinochle occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the lacing pinochle or the unfolding coupe or both occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the elementalness does not occur hold.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is both a gale and not a pseudophloem is not true then it is not non-Teutonic is false.
|
¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)
|
sent1: if that the instillation is a gale but it is not a X-raying is not correct then it sectionalizes 1860s. sent2: the instillation is a fortieth if the fact that it is Teutonic and does not pink Sarcocephalus is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if that it unfolds CTC and is not a tuition does not hold it is a kind of a slick. sent4: there is something such that if it is a pseudophloem then the fact that it is Teutonic hold. sent5: the instillation is Teutonic if it is a pseudophloem. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a ringside that is not industrial does not hold then it is meritocratic. sent7: if the fact that the instillation is a gale but it is not a kind of a pseudophloem is false it is Teutonic. sent8: the instillation is a champagne if the fact that it is both implausible and not a pseudophloem is not right. sent9: if the fact that the instillation does unfold rupture and does not froth does not hold it is Teutonic. sent10: if that something is a kind of monotonic thing that does not distend does not hold then it is dictatorial. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a gale and it is a pseudophloem does not hold it is Teutonic. sent12: if the fact that the instillation is Teutonic and does not lace oblivion does not hold then it is a synchroscope. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a ganglion and it does not lace dithyramb is incorrect it unfolds Hinduism. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a gale and is not a pseudophloem then it is Teutonic. sent15: the instillation is Teutonic if it is a gale and it is not a pseudophloem. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does unfold buttonwood and it does not distend is incorrect that it does pink Myxinidae is not incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the instillation is a removal and is not Teutonic is not correct it is epiphyseal. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it does unfold confidentiality and is not a Solomon does not hold it is impenitent. sent19: there is something such that if that it is a Oread and it is not a X-raying does not hold the fact that it is a ringside is not incorrect. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a gale it is Teutonic.
|
sent1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{HF}{aa}) -> {AU}{aa} sent2: ¬({B}{aa} & ¬{S}{aa}) -> {DD}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ¬({ED}x & ¬{IK}x) -> {Q}x sent4: (Ex): {AB}x -> {B}x sent5: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬({BF}x & ¬{FP}x) -> {CE}x sent7: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: ¬({GH}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {IR}{aa} sent9: ¬({BO}{aa} & ¬{GP}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent10: (x): ¬({FK}x & ¬{IP}x) -> {CT}x sent11: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent12: ¬({B}{aa} & ¬{FE}{aa}) -> {EH}{aa} sent13: (Ex): ¬({DJ}x & ¬{DP}x) -> {GN}x sent14: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent15: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent16: (Ex): ¬({CL}x & ¬{IP}x) -> {IQ}x sent17: ¬({FC}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> {EE}{aa} sent18: (Ex): ¬({HE}x & ¬{BK}x) -> {FT}x sent19: (Ex): ¬({JH}x & ¬{HF}x) -> {BF}x sent20: (Ex): ¬{AA}x -> {B}x
|
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] |
there exists something such that if the fact that it is monotonic and it does not distend is incorrect then it is dictatorial.
|
(Ex): ¬({FK}x & ¬{IP}x) -> {CT}x
|
[
"sent10 -> int1: if that the snoop is monotonic but it does not distend is incorrect then it is dictatorial.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
DISPROVED
|
PROVED
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is both a gale and not a pseudophloem is not true then it is not non-Teutonic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the instillation is a gale but it is not a X-raying is not correct then it sectionalizes 1860s. sent2: the instillation is a fortieth if the fact that it is Teutonic and does not pink Sarcocephalus is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if that it unfolds CTC and is not a tuition does not hold it is a kind of a slick. sent4: there is something such that if it is a pseudophloem then the fact that it is Teutonic hold. sent5: the instillation is Teutonic if it is a pseudophloem. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a ringside that is not industrial does not hold then it is meritocratic. sent7: if the fact that the instillation is a gale but it is not a kind of a pseudophloem is false it is Teutonic. sent8: the instillation is a champagne if the fact that it is both implausible and not a pseudophloem is not right. sent9: if the fact that the instillation does unfold rupture and does not froth does not hold it is Teutonic. sent10: if that something is a kind of monotonic thing that does not distend does not hold then it is dictatorial. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a gale and it is a pseudophloem does not hold it is Teutonic. sent12: if the fact that the instillation is Teutonic and does not lace oblivion does not hold then it is a synchroscope. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a ganglion and it does not lace dithyramb is incorrect it unfolds Hinduism. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a gale and is not a pseudophloem then it is Teutonic. sent15: the instillation is Teutonic if it is a gale and it is not a pseudophloem. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does unfold buttonwood and it does not distend is incorrect that it does pink Myxinidae is not incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the instillation is a removal and is not Teutonic is not correct it is epiphyseal. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it does unfold confidentiality and is not a Solomon does not hold it is impenitent. sent19: there is something such that if that it is a Oread and it is not a X-raying does not hold the fact that it is a ringside is not incorrect. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a gale it is Teutonic. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the flaring does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: if the flare occurs the Guineanness does not occur. sent2: if the infallibleness does not occur the fact that both the Guinean and the flare occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the infallibleness and the non-Guineanness happens is not true if the inelegantness does not occur. sent4: the barter does not occur. sent5: that the lacing timeserver does not occur hold if the arseniousness does not occur. sent6: if that the inelegantness occurs and the meditating occurs is wrong the infallibleness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the Guineanness and the flare happens is false then that the destructing does not occur is not false. sent8: if the lacing timeserver does not occur then that both the inelegantness and the meditating occurs does not hold. sent9: the fact that the Guinean occurs is not false.
|
sent1: {A} -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & {A}) sent3: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & ¬{B}) sent4: ¬{CE} sent5: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} sent6: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent7: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{IM} sent8: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent9: {B}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flaring happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Guineanness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent9 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the destructing does not occur.
|
¬{IM}
|
[] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the flaring does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flare occurs the Guineanness does not occur. sent2: if the infallibleness does not occur the fact that both the Guinean and the flare occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the infallibleness and the non-Guineanness happens is not true if the inelegantness does not occur. sent4: the barter does not occur. sent5: that the lacing timeserver does not occur hold if the arseniousness does not occur. sent6: if that the inelegantness occurs and the meditating occurs is wrong the infallibleness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the Guineanness and the flare happens is false then that the destructing does not occur is not false. sent8: if the lacing timeserver does not occur then that both the inelegantness and the meditating occurs does not hold. sent9: the fact that the Guinean occurs is not false. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flaring happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Guineanness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the sowbelly is not a place-kicker.
|
¬{C}{a}
|
sent1: the bullace is a kind of a Kinosternon. sent2: the surfboard is not a place-kicker and is not a abstainer. sent3: the surfboard is a kind of a Scorpio. sent4: the photosynthesis is non-asyndetic and it is not an anus. sent5: that the surfboard is modifiable is correct if it is not a kind of a Goddard and it is not a kind of an epic. sent6: the marmoset coexists if the bullace is a Kinosternon. sent7: everything is not a heaviness and is not a kind of a cartage. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is soured or it is a kind of a Hippo or both is incorrect the hyssop is not lunar. sent9: the surfboard is a kind of a transplant if it is not a abstainer and it is not a Goddard. sent10: everything is not a kind of a heartbreaker and it is not a shock. sent11: the sowbelly is a kind of a transplant. sent12: if the surfboard is a transplant and a Scorpio then the sowbelly is not a kind of a place-kicker. sent13: that the moke does not unfold Gish but it is lunar is not true if there is something such that it is not lunar. sent14: the sowbelly is not a Scorpio. sent15: the printer is aponeurotic and is not a heaviness if the marmoset coexists. sent16: if that the moke does not unfold Gish and is lunar is not right it is not a Scorpio. sent17: if the surfboard is a abstainer and it is a kind of a place-kicker the sowbelly is not a Scorpio. sent18: that the barbell is a kind of a soured and/or it is a kind of a Hippo is not correct if the printer is not a heaviness.
|
sent1: {K}{g} sent2: (¬{C}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent3: {B}{aa} sent4: (¬{T}{dj} & ¬{BB}{dj}) sent5: (¬{AB}{aa} & ¬{BE}{aa}) -> {IP}{aa} sent6: {K}{g} -> {J}{f} sent7: (x): (¬{H}x & ¬{FU}x) sent8: (x): ¬({G}x v {F}x) -> ¬{D}{c} sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{aa} sent10: (x): (¬{GF}x & ¬{HF}x) sent11: {A}{a} sent12: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent14: ¬{B}{a} sent15: {J}{f} -> ({I}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) sent16: ¬(¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent17: ({AA}{aa} & {C}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent18: ¬{H}{e} -> ¬({G}{d} v {F}{d})
|
[] |
[] |
the sowbelly is a kind of a place-kicker.
|
{C}{a}
|
[
"sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the marmoset does coexist.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the printer is aponeurotic thing that is not a kind of a heaviness.; int2 -> int3: the printer is not a heaviness.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the barbell sours or it is a Hippo or both is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a soured or it is a Hippo or both is not true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the hyssop is not lunar.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not lunar.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the moke does not unfold Gish but it is lunar does not hold.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: the moke is not a Scorpio.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a Scorpio.;"
] | 12 | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the sowbelly is not a place-kicker. ; $context$ = sent1: the bullace is a kind of a Kinosternon. sent2: the surfboard is not a place-kicker and is not a abstainer. sent3: the surfboard is a kind of a Scorpio. sent4: the photosynthesis is non-asyndetic and it is not an anus. sent5: that the surfboard is modifiable is correct if it is not a kind of a Goddard and it is not a kind of an epic. sent6: the marmoset coexists if the bullace is a Kinosternon. sent7: everything is not a heaviness and is not a kind of a cartage. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is soured or it is a kind of a Hippo or both is incorrect the hyssop is not lunar. sent9: the surfboard is a kind of a transplant if it is not a abstainer and it is not a Goddard. sent10: everything is not a kind of a heartbreaker and it is not a shock. sent11: the sowbelly is a kind of a transplant. sent12: if the surfboard is a transplant and a Scorpio then the sowbelly is not a kind of a place-kicker. sent13: that the moke does not unfold Gish but it is lunar is not true if there is something such that it is not lunar. sent14: the sowbelly is not a Scorpio. sent15: the printer is aponeurotic and is not a heaviness if the marmoset coexists. sent16: if that the moke does not unfold Gish and is lunar is not right it is not a Scorpio. sent17: if the surfboard is a abstainer and it is a kind of a place-kicker the sowbelly is not a Scorpio. sent18: that the barbell is a kind of a soured and/or it is a kind of a Hippo is not correct if the printer is not a heaviness. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the bimetallisticness does not occur.
|
¬{A}
|
sent1: if the dart does not occur then the valvotomy happens and the portfolio happens. sent2: the leftfield does not occur and the statutoriness does not occur if the datableness does not occur. sent3: the behavioralness does not occur. sent4: if the silence does not occur then that the fact that either the pathologicalness occurs or the bimetallisticness occurs or both is true is not true. sent5: the quietening does not occur if that either the pathologicalness or the bimetallisticness or both occurs is false. sent6: that the silence does not occur and the floating does not occur is triggered by that the lacing foaming occurs. sent7: the fact that the inarticulateness does not occur hold. sent8: if the fact that the ramping does not occur and the deforming does not occur is incorrect then the ramping happens. sent9: if the mercantilism does not occur the statutoriness and the datableness occurs. sent10: that the pathologicalness happens is brought about by that the bimetallisticness occurs. sent11: if the leftfield does not occur and/or the statutoriness occurs then the lacing kerosene does not occur. sent12: the mayhem occurs but the mercantilism does not occur if the paying does not occur. sent13: if the floating happens then the pathologicalness does not occur and the silencing does not occur. sent14: the darting does not occur if the fact that not the maneuvering but the darting occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that that the bimetallisticness does not occur is prevented by that the pathologicalness does not occur and the silencing does not occur is not false. sent16: if the lacing kerosene does not occur the floating and the lacing foaming occurs. sent17: if the leftfield does not occur then the lacing foaming happens and the lacing kerosene occurs. sent18: the fact that the maneuvering does not occur and the darting occurs does not hold if the grant-in-aid occurs. sent19: the fact that the defensive does not occur and the pinking slattern does not occur is wrong if the valvotomy happens. sent20: the grant-in-aid occurs if the ramp happens. sent21: the paying does not occur if that the defensive does not occur and the pinking slattern does not occur is not correct.
|
sent1: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & {P}) sent2: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) sent3: ¬{GJ} sent4: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} v {A}) sent5: ¬({B} v {A}) -> ¬{ED} sent6: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent7: ¬{FI} sent8: ¬(¬{T} & ¬{U}) -> {T} sent9: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) sent10: {A} -> {B} sent11: (¬{G} v {H}) -> ¬{F} sent12: ¬{L} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) sent13: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent14: ¬(¬{R} & {Q}) -> ¬{Q} sent15: (¬{B} & ¬{C}) -> {A} sent16: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent17: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent18: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & {Q}) sent19: {O} -> ¬(¬{N} & ¬{M}) sent20: {T} -> {S} sent21: ¬(¬{N} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L}
|
[
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bimetallisticness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the pathologicalness occurs.;"
] |
[
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: {B};"
] |
the bimetallisticness occurs.
|
{A}
|
[] | 18 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the bimetallisticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dart does not occur then the valvotomy happens and the portfolio happens. sent2: the leftfield does not occur and the statutoriness does not occur if the datableness does not occur. sent3: the behavioralness does not occur. sent4: if the silence does not occur then that the fact that either the pathologicalness occurs or the bimetallisticness occurs or both is true is not true. sent5: the quietening does not occur if that either the pathologicalness or the bimetallisticness or both occurs is false. sent6: that the silence does not occur and the floating does not occur is triggered by that the lacing foaming occurs. sent7: the fact that the inarticulateness does not occur hold. sent8: if the fact that the ramping does not occur and the deforming does not occur is incorrect then the ramping happens. sent9: if the mercantilism does not occur the statutoriness and the datableness occurs. sent10: that the pathologicalness happens is brought about by that the bimetallisticness occurs. sent11: if the leftfield does not occur and/or the statutoriness occurs then the lacing kerosene does not occur. sent12: the mayhem occurs but the mercantilism does not occur if the paying does not occur. sent13: if the floating happens then the pathologicalness does not occur and the silencing does not occur. sent14: the darting does not occur if the fact that not the maneuvering but the darting occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that that the bimetallisticness does not occur is prevented by that the pathologicalness does not occur and the silencing does not occur is not false. sent16: if the lacing kerosene does not occur the floating and the lacing foaming occurs. sent17: if the leftfield does not occur then the lacing foaming happens and the lacing kerosene occurs. sent18: the fact that the maneuvering does not occur and the darting occurs does not hold if the grant-in-aid occurs. sent19: the fact that the defensive does not occur and the pinking slattern does not occur is wrong if the valvotomy happens. sent20: the grant-in-aid occurs if the ramp happens. sent21: the paying does not occur if that the defensive does not occur and the pinking slattern does not occur is not correct. ; $proof$ =
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bimetallisticness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the pathologicalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the local does not occur.
|
¬{C}
|
sent1: that the fact that the fact that the local but not the visceralness happens hold does not hold is correct if the application does not occur. sent2: if the loaminess does not occur then that the remission and the sectionalizing pantheism occurs is false. sent3: that not the assignation but the local happens leads to that the application does not occur. sent4: that the lacing tweet does not occur leads to that the application does not occur and the assignation does not occur. sent5: that the gape occurs but the lacing tweet does not occur is caused by that the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent6: the lacing funambulism occurs and the collapsibleness happens. sent7: the fact that both the visceralness and the application happens is correct. sent8: if the collapsibleness happens and the adhesion happens then the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent9: the unfolding oracle and the visceralness happens if the application does not occur. sent10: the pinking Persephone does not occur if the fact that the adhesion does not occur and the pinking Persephone happens is incorrect. sent11: the collapsibleness is prevented by that the detraining does not occur and the lacing funambulism does not occur. sent12: the sectionalizing pantheism does not occur if that both the remission and the sectionalizing pantheism happens is not true. sent13: the collapsibleness occurs. sent14: the non-localness is prevented by that the visceralness occurs. sent15: the lacing tweet and the gape occurs if the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent16: if the collapsibleness does not occur that not the adhesion but the pinking Persephone occurs does not hold. sent17: the fossilization happens and the Ravel occurs. sent18: the application happens. sent19: if the sectionalizing pantheism does not occur the adhesion occurs and the detraining occurs. sent20: the civicsness occurs and the unfolding grasshopper happens. sent21: the lacing last happens.
|
sent1: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} & ¬{A}) sent2: ¬{M} -> ¬({N} & {L}) sent3: (¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) sent5: ¬{G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) sent6: ({K} & {H}) sent7: ({A} & {B}) sent8: ({H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} sent9: ¬{B} -> ({FP} & {A}) sent10: ¬(¬{I} & {G}) -> ¬{G} sent11: (¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{H} sent12: ¬({N} & {L}) -> ¬{L} sent13: {H} sent14: {A} -> {C} sent15: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent16: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{I} & {G}) sent17: ({AE} & {DE}) sent18: {B} sent19: ¬{L} -> ({I} & {J}) sent20: ({HJ} & {AA}) sent21: {BA}
|
[
"sent7 -> int1: the visceralness occurs.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent7 -> int1: {A}; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the unfolding oracle occurs.
|
{FP}
|
[] | 11 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
DISPROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the local does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the fact that the local but not the visceralness happens hold does not hold is correct if the application does not occur. sent2: if the loaminess does not occur then that the remission and the sectionalizing pantheism occurs is false. sent3: that not the assignation but the local happens leads to that the application does not occur. sent4: that the lacing tweet does not occur leads to that the application does not occur and the assignation does not occur. sent5: that the gape occurs but the lacing tweet does not occur is caused by that the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent6: the lacing funambulism occurs and the collapsibleness happens. sent7: the fact that both the visceralness and the application happens is correct. sent8: if the collapsibleness happens and the adhesion happens then the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent9: the unfolding oracle and the visceralness happens if the application does not occur. sent10: the pinking Persephone does not occur if the fact that the adhesion does not occur and the pinking Persephone happens is incorrect. sent11: the collapsibleness is prevented by that the detraining does not occur and the lacing funambulism does not occur. sent12: the sectionalizing pantheism does not occur if that both the remission and the sectionalizing pantheism happens is not true. sent13: the collapsibleness occurs. sent14: the non-localness is prevented by that the visceralness occurs. sent15: the lacing tweet and the gape occurs if the pinking Persephone does not occur. sent16: if the collapsibleness does not occur that not the adhesion but the pinking Persephone occurs does not hold. sent17: the fossilization happens and the Ravel occurs. sent18: the application happens. sent19: if the sectionalizing pantheism does not occur the adhesion occurs and the detraining occurs. sent20: the civicsness occurs and the unfolding grasshopper happens. sent21: the lacing last happens. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 -> int1: the visceralness occurs.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that there is something such that if it is go and it is a submersible it is not a kind of a disability is incorrect.
|
¬((Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)
|
sent1: if the morphine is unoriginal but not nonsubmersible then it is not inefficient. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both a Castile and Moorish it does caress. sent3: the wonton sectionalizes 1860s if it goes and is distinguishable. sent4: the morphine is not a kind of a disability if it does lace Persephone and it does snip. sent5: the entellus is not a reevaluation if it is a kind of submersible thing that does unfold bathrobe. sent6: there is something such that if it is hypnotic and does unfold timber then it is not biographic. sent7: the morphine is a Castile if it unfolds bathrobe and it is a kind of a disability. sent8: if the morphine goes and it is a submersible it is not a disability. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a clip-on that is polytheistic is not wrong the fact that it eyes is correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is a absinth and beckons then the fact that it is biographic is true. sent11: there is something such that if it pinks hitter and does destine that it does not unfold glop hold. sent12: that the timber unfolds Marquand is correct if it does pink wonton and goes. sent13: that the morphine is not discriminate is incorrect if it is a roaring and an imperialist. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Calvinist and a till then the fact that it does unfold entellus is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that if it capitulates and it does pink Musaceae it is not luteal.
|
sent1: ({HL}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{AC}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({GH}x & {F}x) -> {EM}x sent3: ({AA}{bc} & {HF}{bc}) -> {AL}{bc} sent4: ({JF}{aa} & {CP}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: ({AB}{hq} & {CR}{hq}) -> ¬{AG}{hq} sent6: (Ex): ({GT}x & {JD}x) -> ¬{FI}x sent7: ({CR}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> {GH}{aa} sent8: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): ({E}x & {IB}x) -> {IR}x sent10: (Ex): ({HT}x & {HH}x) -> {FI}x sent11: (Ex): ({DU}x & {BQ}x) -> ¬{GC}x sent12: ({BL}{fu} & {AA}{fu}) -> {DT}{fu} sent13: ({CS}{aa} & {FJ}{aa}) -> {IS}{aa} sent14: (Ex): ({ET}x & {DM}x) -> {CO}x sent15: (Ex): ({HC}x & {GE}x) -> ¬{CN}x
|
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
DISPROVED
| null |
DISPROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is go and it is a submersible it is not a kind of a disability is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the morphine is unoriginal but not nonsubmersible then it is not inefficient. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both a Castile and Moorish it does caress. sent3: the wonton sectionalizes 1860s if it goes and is distinguishable. sent4: the morphine is not a kind of a disability if it does lace Persephone and it does snip. sent5: the entellus is not a reevaluation if it is a kind of submersible thing that does unfold bathrobe. sent6: there is something such that if it is hypnotic and does unfold timber then it is not biographic. sent7: the morphine is a Castile if it unfolds bathrobe and it is a kind of a disability. sent8: if the morphine goes and it is a submersible it is not a disability. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a clip-on that is polytheistic is not wrong the fact that it eyes is correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is a absinth and beckons then the fact that it is biographic is true. sent11: there is something such that if it pinks hitter and does destine that it does not unfold glop hold. sent12: that the timber unfolds Marquand is correct if it does pink wonton and goes. sent13: that the morphine is not discriminate is incorrect if it is a roaring and an imperialist. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Calvinist and a till then the fact that it does unfold entellus is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that if it capitulates and it does pink Musaceae it is not luteal. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the skydiver does not pink Huambo.
|
¬{B}{b}
|
sent1: if the chough is not bumpy the fact that the dug does not pink Huambo and does not dish is false. sent2: the skydiver is not cellular. sent3: the fact that something is a minstrel and is not a floodhead is false if it is not cellular. sent4: if the dug dishes that the skydiver does unfold half-century and it is endometrial is not true. sent5: the fact that the skydiver unfolds half-century and is endometrial is not true. sent6: if the skydiver does unfold half-century then it does not pink Huambo. sent7: that the dug does not pink Huambo but it is a kind of a dished is wrong if the skydiver is endometrial. sent8: if the dug is a dished that the skydiver does not unfold half-century and is endometrial does not hold. sent9: the dug is a dished. sent10: if something unfolds half-century the fact that it does not pink Huambo is not wrong.
|
sent1: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent2: ¬{F}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) sent4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent5: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: {AB}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent8: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent9: {A}{a} sent10: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x
|
[
"sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that that the skydiver does not unfold half-century but it is endometrial is false is not false.;"
] |
[
"sent8 & sent9 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b});"
] |
the Carolingian pinks Huambo.
|
{B}{ca}
|
[
"sent3 -> int2: if the skydiver is not cellular that it minstrels and is not a floodhead does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the skydiver is a minstrel but it is not a floodhead is not right.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a minstrel but not a floodhead is incorrect.;"
] | 7 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the skydiver does not pink Huambo. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chough is not bumpy the fact that the dug does not pink Huambo and does not dish is false. sent2: the skydiver is not cellular. sent3: the fact that something is a minstrel and is not a floodhead is false if it is not cellular. sent4: if the dug dishes that the skydiver does unfold half-century and it is endometrial is not true. sent5: the fact that the skydiver unfolds half-century and is endometrial is not true. sent6: if the skydiver does unfold half-century then it does not pink Huambo. sent7: that the dug does not pink Huambo but it is a kind of a dished is wrong if the skydiver is endometrial. sent8: if the dug is a dished that the skydiver does not unfold half-century and is endometrial does not hold. sent9: the dug is a dished. sent10: if something unfolds half-century the fact that it does not pink Huambo is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
|
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that that the skydiver does not unfold half-century but it is endometrial is false is not false.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the reputableness does not occur and the mothering does not occur.
|
(¬{B} & ¬{A})
|
sent1: if both the pinking mouthpiece and the appearing occurs then the reputableness does not occur. sent2: both the morphologicness and the posteriorness occurs. sent3: the pinking mouthpiece and the appearing happens. sent4: that that the catalepticness does not occur and the lacing agedness does not occur is caused by that the mothering happens is true. sent5: the appearing happens. sent6: if the Nauruanness happens then the fact that the reputableness does not occur and the mother does not occur does not hold. sent7: the agreement results in that the unfolding alphabetizer occurs and the pinking Morone does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the pinking Morone does not occur hold the Nauruan and the reputableness happens. sent9: the Nauruan occurs if the pinking Morone does not occur.
|
sent1: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ({CR} & {IM}) sent3: ({AA} & {AB}) sent4: {A} -> (¬{DB} & ¬{BB}) sent5: {AB} sent6: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent7: {F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) sent8: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) sent9: ¬{D} -> {C}
|
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the reputableness does not occur.;"
] |
[
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B};"
] |
that the reputableness does not occur and the mothering does not occur is not correct.
|
¬(¬{B} & ¬{A})
|
[] | 8 | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the reputableness does not occur and the mothering does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the pinking mouthpiece and the appearing occurs then the reputableness does not occur. sent2: both the morphologicness and the posteriorness occurs. sent3: the pinking mouthpiece and the appearing happens. sent4: that that the catalepticness does not occur and the lacing agedness does not occur is caused by that the mothering happens is true. sent5: the appearing happens. sent6: if the Nauruanness happens then the fact that the reputableness does not occur and the mother does not occur does not hold. sent7: the agreement results in that the unfolding alphabetizer occurs and the pinking Morone does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the pinking Morone does not occur hold the Nauruan and the reputableness happens. sent9: the Nauruan occurs if the pinking Morone does not occur. ; $proof$ =
|
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the reputableness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the semi-abstraction is a azithromycin.
|
{D}{c}
|
sent1: the fact that something is an immune but it is not a milk is not right if it does retard. sent2: the dragonhead retards if there is something such that the fact that it pinks melodrama and does not retards is not right. sent3: if the fact that something is immune and not a milk does not hold it does not unfold madnep. sent4: the fact that something pinks melodrama but it does not retard is wrong if it is a kind of a stripper. sent5: if something that is a ovolo is not light-duty then it is not a kind of a azithromycin. sent6: the dragonhead is a ovolo and it is light-duty. sent7: the mesohippus is a kind of a stripper. sent8: the semi-abstraction is a kind of a azithromycin if the mesohippus does unfold madnep. sent9: if the dragonhead is light-duty then the mesohippus does unfold madnep. sent10: that the whitefly unfolds madnep hold. sent11: the dragonhead is a ovolo.
|
sent1: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) sent2: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {G}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{C}x sent4: (x): {I}x -> ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) sent5: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: {I}{b} sent8: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} sent9: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent10: {C}{ep} sent11: {A}{a}
|
[
"sent6 -> int1: the dragonhead is light-duty.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the mesohippus unfolds madnep.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> int2: {C}{b}; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
the fact that the semi-abstraction is not a azithromycin is not false.
|
¬{D}{c}
|
[
"sent5 -> int3: if the semi-abstraction is a ovolo but it is not light-duty it is not a azithromycin.; sent3 -> int4: the dragonhead does not unfold madnep if that it is a kind of an immune that is not a kind of a milk is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the dragonhead does retard is true the fact that it is an immune and it is not a milk is not right.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the mesohippus does pink melodrama but it does not retard is incorrect if it is a kind of a stripper.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the mesohippus pinks melodrama but it does not retard is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it pinks melodrama and it does not retard is not true.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the dragonhead retards.; int5 & int9 -> int10: that the dragonhead is an immune and is not a milk does not hold.; int4 & int10 -> int11: that the dragonhead does not unfold madnep hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it does not unfold madnep is not wrong.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
PROVED
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the semi-abstraction is a azithromycin. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is an immune but it is not a milk is not right if it does retard. sent2: the dragonhead retards if there is something such that the fact that it pinks melodrama and does not retards is not right. sent3: if the fact that something is immune and not a milk does not hold it does not unfold madnep. sent4: the fact that something pinks melodrama but it does not retard is wrong if it is a kind of a stripper. sent5: if something that is a ovolo is not light-duty then it is not a kind of a azithromycin. sent6: the dragonhead is a ovolo and it is light-duty. sent7: the mesohippus is a kind of a stripper. sent8: the semi-abstraction is a kind of a azithromycin if the mesohippus does unfold madnep. sent9: if the dragonhead is light-duty then the mesohippus does unfold madnep. sent10: that the whitefly unfolds madnep hold. sent11: the dragonhead is a ovolo. ; $proof$ =
|
sent6 -> int1: the dragonhead is light-duty.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the mesohippus unfolds madnep.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
that the tinkerer does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is not true.
|
¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a})
|
sent1: if there is something such that that it is long-chain and onside is wrong the tinkerer is a kind of a beetle. sent2: the fact that the CD is not carpellate and it is not intracranial is incorrect. sent3: if something is a beetle that it does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is wrong. sent4: there is something such that that it is both long-chain and not non-onside does not hold.
|
sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{HI}{cc} & ¬{BU}{cc}) sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)
|
[
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the tinkerer is a beetle.; sent3 -> int2: that the tinkerer does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is wrong if it does beetle.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] |
[
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent3 -> int2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null |
[] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
PROVED
| null |
PROVED
| null |
$hypothesis$ = that the tinkerer does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is long-chain and onside is wrong the tinkerer is a kind of a beetle. sent2: the fact that the CD is not carpellate and it is not intracranial is incorrect. sent3: if something is a beetle that it does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is wrong. sent4: there is something such that that it is both long-chain and not non-onside does not hold. ; $proof$ =
|
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the tinkerer is a beetle.; sent3 -> int2: that the tinkerer does not unfold Jonathan and it is not admissible is wrong if it does beetle.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the gouger is autobiographical.
|
{D}{b}
|
sent1: the gouger is not autobiographical if the fact that the stratus does not pink wireworm and is autobiographical is not wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is bottomless and it is dissuasive is not wrong is not correct the gouger is autobiographical. sent3: if something is not bottomless then that it is dissuasive and it does pink wireworm is not correct. sent4: if the cowpie does not pink wireworm then the fact that the stratus is bottomless thing that is dissuasive is not true.
|
sent1: (¬{A}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent2: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> {D}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a})
|
[] |
[] |
everything does not sectionalize bantamweight.
|
(x): ¬{DQ}x
|
[
"sent3 -> int1: that the gouger is not non-dissuasive and it does pink wireworm does not hold if it is not bottomless.;"
] | 6 | 4 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the gouger is autobiographical. ; $context$ = sent1: the gouger is not autobiographical if the fact that the stratus does not pink wireworm and is autobiographical is not wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is bottomless and it is dissuasive is not wrong is not correct the gouger is autobiographical. sent3: if something is not bottomless then that it is dissuasive and it does pink wireworm is not correct. sent4: if the cowpie does not pink wireworm then the fact that the stratus is bottomless thing that is dissuasive is not true. ; $proof$ =
|
__UNKNOWN__
|
DeductionInstance
|
the fact that the weapon is both not a stub and a stiffness is not correct.
|
¬(¬{E}{c} & {D}{c})
|
sent1: the fact that the weapon is a kind of a stub and it is a stiffness is not correct. sent2: the mayfish does not sectionalize Nixon but it is a kind of a teakettle if the motion unfolds almond. sent3: if the fact that the motion does not bare hold that it is permissive and it does stub is incorrect. sent4: the mayfish does not bare. sent5: something unfolds almond if it is not hydrolyzable. sent6: everything is not hydrolyzable. sent7: if the mayfish does not bare then that the motion is permissive is right. sent8: the fact that if something is not a kind of a teakettle then that it is not a kind of a stub and it is a kind of a stiffness is not true is right. sent9: something is bare if it is permissive.
|
sent1: ¬({E}{c} & {D}{c}) sent2: {G}{b} -> (¬{F}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{b} & {E}{b}) sent4: ¬{A}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{H}x -> {G}x sent6: (x): ¬{H}x sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) sent9: (x): {B}x -> {A}x
|
[
"sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the motion is not unpermissive.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the weapon does not stub but it is a stiffness does not hold if that it is not a teakettle is true.;"
] |
[
"sent7 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent8 -> int2: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & {D}{c});"
] |
the weapon does not stub but it is a stiffness.
|
(¬{E}{c} & {D}{c})
|
[
"sent9 -> int3: the weapon is bare if it is permissive.; sent6 -> int4: the simvastatin is not hydrolyzable.; sent5 -> int5: the fact that the simvastatin unfolds almond is not wrong if it is not hydrolyzable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the simvastatin does unfold almond.; int6 -> int7: that the fact that everything does unfold almond is not false hold.; int7 -> int8: the motion does unfold almond.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the mayfish does not sectionalize Nixon but it is a kind of a teakettle.;"
] | 8 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 |
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
UNKNOWN
|
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the weapon is both not a stub and a stiffness is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the weapon is a kind of a stub and it is a stiffness is not correct. sent2: the mayfish does not sectionalize Nixon but it is a kind of a teakettle if the motion unfolds almond. sent3: if the fact that the motion does not bare hold that it is permissive and it does stub is incorrect. sent4: the mayfish does not bare. sent5: something unfolds almond if it is not hydrolyzable. sent6: everything is not hydrolyzable. sent7: if the mayfish does not bare then that the motion is permissive is right. sent8: the fact that if something is not a kind of a teakettle then that it is not a kind of a stub and it is a kind of a stiffness is not true is right. sent9: something is bare if it is permissive. ; $proof$ =
|
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the motion is not unpermissive.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the weapon does not stub but it is a stiffness does not hold if that it is not a teakettle is true.; __UNKNOWN__
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.