_id
int64 2
1.77k
| generated_text
dict | score
stringclasses 4
values | reasoning
sequencelengths 1
4
⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|
280
|
{
"_id": 280,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the main points of the DOCUMENT. It lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads, as well as the nutritional values of the breads mentioned. The ANSWER also does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes. The ANSWER's focus on 'eating less processed foods with more wholegrains' is a generalization of the DOCUMENT's message but does not convey the nuances of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the main points of the DOCUMENT. It lacks specific details about the top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads, as well as the nutritional values of the breads mentioned. The ANSWER also does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) and its implications for weight gain and Type 2 diabetes. The ANSWER's focus on 'eating less processed foods with more wholegrains' is a generalization of the DOCUMENT's message but does not convey the nuances of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail make it seem like a condensed version of the DOCUMENT rather than a faithful summary.\""
] |
434
|
{
"_id": 434,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw joined Manchester United for £28m.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw feels this way.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw has played 19 times in all competitions for United this campaign.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as Eden Hazard joining Manchester United from Southampton for £28m, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw joined Manchester United for £28m.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the young English defender feels he has struggled to live up to his valuation at the club so far, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw feels this way.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Hazard has played only 19 games for United this season, when in fact the DOCUMENT states Luke Shaw has played 19 times in all competitions for United this campaign.\""
] |
39
|
{
"_id": 39,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. \n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of death, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.\n- The ANSWER only highlights Kayahan's contributions to pop music, whereas the DOCUMENT also mentions his accomplishments as a songwriter and guitarist.\n- The ANSWER fails to mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.\n- The ANSWER does not contain any information about the reaction of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to Kayahan's death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his most popular.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's final album release year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention other artists recording his material throughout his career.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's physical condition and how it changed over time.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's Eurovision Song Contest participation.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthplace or where he grew up.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's prime ministerial reaction to his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's death cause.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer return years.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's guitar accompaniment.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's vocal quality.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his final album release.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his cancer diagnosis.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer diagnosis year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthday.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthdate.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.</span> \n<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. \n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of death, which is a crucial piece of information in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER is incorrect about Kayahan's first cancer diagnosis year, stating 2005 instead of 1990.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately states that Kayahan most recently performed in February, whereas the DOCUMENT states he performed on Valentine's Day.\n- The ANSWER only highlights Kayahan's contributions to pop music, whereas the DOCUMENT also mentions his accomplishments as a songwriter and guitarist.\n- The ANSWER fails to mention Kayahan's full name, birthdate, and other key biographical details.\n- The ANSWER does not contain any information about the reaction of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to Kayahan's death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's love songs or his album 'I Made a Vow' as being his most popular.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's final album release year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention other artists recording his material throughout his career.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's physical condition and how it changed over time.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's Eurovision Song Contest participation.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthplace or where he grew up.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's prime ministerial reaction to his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's death cause.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer return years.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's guitar accompaniment.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's vocal quality.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his death.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his final album release.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's age at the time of his cancer diagnosis.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's cancer diagnosis year.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthday.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Kayahan's birthdate.\n\""
] |
417
|
{
"_id": 417,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"A thorough analysis of the DOCUMENT and ANSWER was performed to determine if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that 'roads around St Louis, Missouri, were deluged with rainwater following fierce thunderstorms' and 'areas of flash flooding were commonplace throughout St. Louis County'. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe DOCUMENT states that'several crashes followed the atrocious driving weather, though no injuries were immediately reported', but this detail is not mentioned in the ANSWER.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of mentioning flash floods and the severe weather, but it lacks other important details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"A thorough analysis of the DOCUMENT and ANSWER was performed to determine if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that 'roads around St Louis, Missouri, were deluged with rainwater following fierce thunderstorms' and 'areas of flash flooding were commonplace throughout St. Louis County'. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe DOCUMENT states that'several crashes followed the atrocious driving weather, though no injuries were immediately reported', but this detail is not mentioned in the ANSWER.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of mentioning flash floods and the severe weather, but it lacks other important details and does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions that St Louis was hit by flash floods, which is supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions that a nearby town had more than three inches of rain in less than half an hour, which is partially supported by the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the severe weather, roads, or other details mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
584
|
{
"_id": 584,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as it states 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over, whereas the DOCUMENT states 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Simon Green, who claims that 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that the manipulation of work diaries gives drivers the opportunity to drive in excess of their prescribed hours four times in a seven-day period and be non-prosecutable.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Truck drivers in Victoria are dealing drugs using codes over their radios.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"It has been reported that 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not accurately represent the figure of 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs when they are pulled over, as stated in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"According to a former truckie, the trend is more common that you think.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.</span>\", \"Many are rorting the system so they can drive for 16 hours a day.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours, or the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the extent of the problem, as it states 1 in 16 truck drivers are high when pulled over, whereas the DOCUMENT states 1 in 12 truck drivers test positive for drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the secretive codes over radio systems used by truck drivers, which is a key detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that ingesting substances impacts critically on one's ability to drive, observe, and control the vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole in the law that allows drivers to work a 16.25 hour day in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Simon Green, who claims that 10 per cent of drivers are using illicit substances.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alarming number of truck crashes on the road each year.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the views of Inspector Rankin, who states that the manipulation of work diaries gives drivers the opportunity to drive in excess of their prescribed hours four times in a seven-day period and be non-prosecutable.\""
] |
803
|
{
"_id": 803,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a brief description of the location and the families living near the landfill, but it lacks the detailed information about the birds and the photographer's experience.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the intelligence of the birds or the photographer's connection with the people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the photographer's past experiences or his reasons for choosing this project.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's description of the families' living conditions or their repurposing of materials.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the children's education or the photographer's efforts to help the people living in the landfill.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's background or his motivation for taking this project.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Lack of detailed information about the birds</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Missing description of the families' living conditions</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>No mention of the photographer's background or motivation</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a brief description of the location and the families living near the landfill, but it lacks the detailed information about the birds and the photographer's experience.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the intelligence of the birds or the photographer's connection with the people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the photographer's past experiences or his reasons for choosing this project.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's description of the families' living conditions or their repurposing of materials.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the children's education or the photographer's efforts to help the people living in the landfill.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the photographer's background or his motivation for taking this project.\""
] |
342
|
{
"_id": 342,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a general idea of the content of the DOCUMENT, but lacks specific details.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the exact amount of carbon emissions that the veggie balls will cut by half, nor does it mention the secret recipe of the veggie balls.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the veggie balls being available in the UK until May.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the cost of the veggie balls.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Lacks specific details about the veggie balls' secret recipe and exact carbon emissions reduction</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not provide information about the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Does not provide information about the cost of the veggie balls</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a general idea of the content of the DOCUMENT, but lacks specific details.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the exact amount of carbon emissions that the veggie balls will cut by half, nor does it mention the secret recipe of the veggie balls.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the veggie balls being available in the UK until May.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the international food fraud scandal in 2013.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the history of IKEA or its founder Ingvar Kamprad.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the flat-pack idea coming from shipping a table by rail.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any information about the cost of the veggie balls.\""
] |
834
|
{
"_id": 834,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the scope of the research, the specific finding of 'foreign DNA' in sweet potatoes, or the researchers' conclusions about the natural process of genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the widespread presence of Agrobacterium in sweet potatoes across different regions.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the implications of the natural process of genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantages and disadvantages of natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's findings on the transgenic process and its similarity to artificial processes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Dr. Lieve Gheysen's quote about the natural presence of Agrobacterium T-DNA in sweet potatoes and its stable inheritance during evolution.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings of sweet potato domestication in Peru.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the different parts of the sweet potato that are edible.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' focus on Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' capabilities.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the total number of samples studied (291) or the researchers' conclusion that Agrobacterium was found in all samples.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' statement that humans have been eating GM foods for much longer than they thought.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the name of the researchers or institutions involved in the study.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's conclusion that sweet potatoes all over the world contain this genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the implications of the natural process of genetic modification beyond human control.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantages of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification beyond control.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific quote from Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study's findings on the transgenic process and its similarity to artificial processes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' focus on Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' capabilities.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the total number of samples studied (291) or the researchers' conclusion that Agrobacterium was found in all samples.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the comparison between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' statement that humans have been eating GM foods for much longer than they thought.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the name of the researchers or institutions involved in the study.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention"
}
| null | null |
580
|
{
"_id": 580,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the context of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose. This is a significant difference in the information provided.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season. This information is crucial to understanding the DOCUMENT's content.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad. These points are essential to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information that is faithful to the DOCUMENT's context.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the context of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions that Tottenham will consider all summer offers for Danny Rose, but the DOCUMENT states that Tottenham will resist any offers for Rose. This is a significant difference in the information provided.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention Mauricio Pochettino's statement about Danny Rose being the best English left back this season. This information is crucial to understanding the DOCUMENT's content.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the interest from Manchester City or the fact that Rose has been called up to the England squad. These points are essential to the context of the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information that is faithful to the DOCUMENT's context.\"\n"
] |
536
|
{
"_id": 536,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. It lacks the quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality. \nThe ANSWER also fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER lacks quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality.\n* The ANSWER fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\n* The ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\n* The ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n* The ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\n* The ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\n*"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the essence of the DOCUMENT. It lacks the quotes from Andrew Thornton and Luke Harvey that provide insight into AP McCoy's unique riding style and personality. \nThe ANSWER also fails to mention the significance of McCoy's career, his two rides at Sandown, and the reaction of his colleagues to his retirement.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER contains incorrect information - AP McCoy is not getting married, and the Sandown track is not sold out.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT, it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a detailed analysis of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the tone and style of the DOCUMENT as it is more of a summary than an analysis.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any new insights into AP McCoy's career and personality.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a complete summary of the DOCUMENT as it only provides a brief overview of AP McCoy's final rides.\nThe ANSWER does not capture the essence of the DOCUMENT as it only scratches the surface of AP McCoy's career and personality.\n\""
] |
790
|
{
"_id": 790,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains several inaccuracies compared to the DOCUMENT. The couple allegedly locked the children in a closet, not a garage. The ANSWER also states that the children were fed from a bucket, but the DOCUMENT does not specify this. Furthermore, the ANSWER implies that the couple claimed the children were home-schooled, but the DOCUMENT states that Golden-Hazel claimed this, while the police did not find any books in the house. The ANSWER's statement that the boy was fed trash to eat is also consistent with the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER's overall tone and wording are not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a faithful summary either.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately represent the circumstances described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Florida couple Quincy Hazel and Sabrina Golden-Hazel 'locked up the 12-year-old girl and 17-year-old boy in a closet for days on end' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - locked in a garage)</span>, \n'They 'were eventually allowed to sleep on the floor of a bedroom but were fed from a bucket or found food to eat in the trash' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a bucket)</span>, \n'Their conditions emerged when the boy ran away from home last month and confided in a friend, who spoke to authorities <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a friend)</span>, \n'Golden-Hazel claimed she home schooled the children but there were no books in the home <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - Golden-Hazel claimed this, but police did not find any books)</span>]\""
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains several inaccuracies compared to the DOCUMENT. The couple allegedly locked the children in a closet, not a garage. The ANSWER also states that the children were fed from a bucket, but the DOCUMENT does not specify this. Furthermore, the ANSWER implies that the couple claimed the children were home-schooled, but the DOCUMENT states that Golden-Hazel claimed this, while the police did not find any books in the house. The ANSWER's statement that the boy was fed trash to eat is also consistent with the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER's overall tone and wording are not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a faithful summary either.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately represent the circumstances described in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Florida couple Quincy Hazel and Sabrina Golden-Hazel 'locked up the 12-year-old girl and 17-year-old boy in a closet for days on end' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - locked in a garage)</span>, \n'They 'were eventually allowed to sleep on the floor of a bedroom but were fed from a bucket or found food to eat in the trash' <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a bucket)</span>, \n'Their conditions emerged when the boy ran away from home last month and confided in a friend, who spoke to authorities <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - no mention of a friend)</span>, \n'Golden-Hazel claimed she home schooled the children but there were no books in the home <span style='background-color:yellow'>(Inaccurate - Golden-Hazel claimed this, but police did not find any books)</span>"
] |
141
|
{
"_id": 141,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow. \nThe ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen by Louis Vuitton, a fashion brand, rather than Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the storm night in the tri-state area or the rare formation of two double rainbows.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about the image being taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis' train was coming in to the station.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being posted on Twitter or the hundreds of shares it received.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Weather Channel interview with Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the New York City area or the Long Island Railroad station where the phenomenon was seen.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the order of the colors in the reflections.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the fact that Amanda Curtis was waiting for her commuter train when she took the picture.\",\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow. \nThe ANSWER incorrectly states that the phenomenon was seen by Louis Vuitton, a fashion brand, rather than Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the storm night in the tri-state area or the rare formation of two double rainbows.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about the image being taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis' train was coming in to the station.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being posted on Twitter or the hundreds of shares it received.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Weather Channel interview with Amanda Curtis.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the New York City area or the Long Island Railroad station where the phenomenon was seen.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the order of the colors in the reflections.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the fact that Amanda Curtis was waiting for her commuter train when she took the picture.\",\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Amanda Curtis, the founder of Nineteenth Amendment, as the person who took the picture of the quadruple rainbow.</span>\""
] |
630
|
{
"_id": 630,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT, including the date of the escape, the crime for which Moore was serving a sentence, and the reason for his capture.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide a detailed explanation of Moore's background and life after his escape.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"The ANSWER provides the essential details but lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"Despite this, the ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT and does not contradict any information provided.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER could be more comprehensive and provide more details about Moore's life after his escape.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved with additional information.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"* The ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides the essential details of the DOCUMENT, including the date of the escape, the crime for which Moore was serving a sentence, and the reason for his capture.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide a detailed explanation of Moore's background and life after his escape.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the name change of Moore to Ronnie Dickinson in 2009.\", \"The ANSWER also does not mention the contempt of court charge in Kentucky.\", \"The ANSWER provides the essential details but lacks some context and additional information from the DOCUMENT.\", \"Despite this, the ANSWER is faithful to the main points of the DOCUMENT and does not contradict any information provided.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER could be more comprehensive and provide more details about Moore's life after his escape.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved with additional information.\""
] |
72
|
{
"_id": 72,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides the same basic information as the DOCUMENT, but some minor details are missing or altered.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include all the details provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the description of Christine Davidson's condition, her accomplishments as a fighter, and the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal or the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful representation of the entire document.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of Christine Davidson's condition.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the description of the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific details about the jewellery store's offer of a $1000 reward.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides the same basic information as the DOCUMENT, but some minor details are missing or altered.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not include all the details provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the description of Christine Davidson's condition, her accomplishments as a fighter, and the family's emotional appeal.\", \"The ANSWER does not include the specific quote from Symantha about the family's online appeal or the description of the nursing home where Christine Davidson lived.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful representation of the entire document.\""
] |
712
|
{
"_id": 712,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide the full context of the heist, missing information about how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER also does not mention the value of the stolen items, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity of the heist, which was described in the DOCUMENT as a sophisticated crime that may have involved inside knowledge. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brevity and lack of detail may be seen as faithful to the DOCUMENT's concise language, but it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the heist.\nThe ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the heist, missing key details such as how the thieves gained access to the vault and what was stolen. The ANSWER's brev"
}
| null | null |
507
|
{
"_id": 507,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT and does not provide a direct quote.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[1]</span>\n- The ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[2]</span>\n- The ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[3]</span>\n- The ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it. <span style='background-color:green'>[4]</span>\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER also includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of Earth Day being meant to highlight climate change threats and the massive carbon footprint of the trip. This additional information is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes a phrase 'Engineer-turned-science-TV-host wrote to a White House pool reporter' which is not present in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER also includes the phrase 'Flights to the Florida Everglades and back will cover 1,836 miles and consume more than 9,180 gallons of fuel.' which is faithful to the DOCUMENT but is not a direct quote, the ANSWER paraphrased it.\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes additional information not present in the DOCUMENT and does not provide a direct quote.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- The ANSWER provides the same information as the DOCUMENT, including Bill Nye's quote about the smell of jet fuel and the details of the Earth Day trip, which is faithful to the DOCUMENT. <span style='background-color:yellow'>[1"
] |
543
|
{
"_id": 543,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Sean Hixon's team or the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, which are crucial details in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 887 statues, the 13ft average height, or the tuff and scoria used to carve the Moai, which are essential information in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the different methods proposed for raising the pukao, such as building a tower, using a pulley system, or putting the 'hat' on the statue before raising the whole statue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 100 pukao, the rounded oblong shape of the pukao, or the vertical marks and ring-shaped indentations on the side of the 'hats', which are key points in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the team's conclusion that less than 10 men could have rolled a 'hat' into place.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the erosion and damage to the sides of the pukao, which is an important detail in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the five-tonne replica of a statue, the dirt path in Hawaii, or the team's ability to move the replica upright with just a few ropes and 18 people.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' claims that the statues' bases were carved so they could lean forward to make them easier to transport.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the traditional storyline about the Rapa Nui people destroying their environment by cutting down trees.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the previous studies suggesting that a lost civilization chopped down trees on the island and laid the statues prone and rolled them into place using logs.\", \"The ANSWER only mentions the Rapa Nui people throwing red stone 'hats' on some of the statues, which is a very brief and incomplete summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT, but it is not faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT as a whole.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer a clear and concise summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as a whole.\", \"The ANSWER is not a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not a faithful representation of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear and concise summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a faithful representation of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the DOCUMENT.\","
}
| null | null |
530
|
{
"_id": 530,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some details not mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as the estimated price of £20,000, and the date of the auction (April 9), which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention the rarity of the cel, but the DOCUMENT states that experts have tipped the submarine cartoon to fetch £10,000. \nThe ANSWER does mention the success of Yellow Submarine, but it is not as detailed as in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does mention the handwritten notes, but the DOCUMENT does not elaborate on this point. \nThe ANSWER does mention the unique characteristics of the cel, but the DOCUMENT does not elaborate on this point. \nThe ANSWER does mention the rarity of colour model cels from the film, but the DOCUMENT states that colour model cels from this film are very rare, and this is one of the single best cels of the Yellow Submarine we have seen. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not strictly follow the context provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the name of the auction house (Heritage Auctions) as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the director of animation art at Heritage Auctions as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the original cel being sold for £10,000 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the Band Concert as the most expensive cel sold as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the animation being released in 1935 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the reported sale price of £280,000 in 1999 as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the message of the film being 'all you need is love' as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the animation being ground-breaking as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the celluloid sheets being sold off in high street stores as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the image being unusually large as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being one of the earliest final versions of the Yellow Submarine as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being used to help determine the final approved colour scheme of the yellow submarine as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being painted by the ink and paint department as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being a rare hand-painted colour model cel as the DOCUMENT does. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the cel being one of"
}
| null | null |
816
|
{
"_id": 816,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the full context of the situation, such as Kate Upton's statement about the 'Cat Daddy' video, and the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work in the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck, the model who claimed Terry asked her to take out her tampon for him to play with.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work, without mentioning his popularity within the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear conclusion or verdict on the situation.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a partial summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the full context of the situation, such as Kate Upton's statement about the 'Cat Daddy' video, and the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work in the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the allegations made against Terry Richardson, such as the incident with Jamie Peck, the model who claimed Terry asked her to take out her tampon for him to play with.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the models who have spoken out against Terry Richardson, such as Rie Rasmussen and Coco Rocha.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a balanced view of the situation, as it only mentions the controversy surrounding Terry Richardson's work, without mentioning his popularity within the fashion industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear conclusion or verdict on the situation.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a partial summary of the DOCUMENT, but it does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation.\""
] |
737
|
{
"_id": 737,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to determine if it is faithful to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER contains the correct location of the phenomenon (Glen Cove LIRR station) and the name of the person who took the picture (Amanda Curtis).\",\n\"The ANSWER also contains the correct information that Amanda Curtis is a fashion entrepreneur and the founder of a fashion company.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct date of the phenomenon (Tuesday), it contains Wednesday which is incorrect.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the storm night in the tri-state area, it does not mention it at all.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the order of the colors in the reflections.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Phenomenon formed of two separate double rainbows snapped on Wednesday.\", \n\"Fashion entrepreneur Amanda Curtis saw it at Glen Cove LIRR station.\", \n\"Phenomenon formed of two separate double rainbows\", \n\"Wednesday\", \n\"Storm night in the tri-state area\", \n\"Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station\", \n\"Order of the colors in the reflections\", \n\"Number of rainbows\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to determine if it is faithful to the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER contains the correct location of the phenomenon (Glen Cove LIRR station) and the name of the person who took the picture (Amanda Curtis).\",\n\"The ANSWER also contains the correct information that Amanda Curtis is a fashion entrepreneur and the founder of a fashion company.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct date of the phenomenon (Tuesday), it contains Wednesday which is incorrect.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the storm night in the tri-state area, it does not mention it at all.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about Amanda Curtis' decision to take the picture while her train was coming in to the station.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the order of the colors in the reflections.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contain the correct information about the number of rainbows, it only mentions two double rainbows, but the ANSWER says 'formed of two separate double rainbows'.\""
] |
70
|
{
"_id": 70,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains some incorrect information, such as the name 'Joann Callaway' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. This is a clear indication of the ANSWER being not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also mentions that the 61-year-old wanted to hand her ring down to her only granddaughter, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states that Christine Davidson wanted to give the ring to her 'only granddaughter who she was very close to - My daughter Jayda, 17'.\"], \"The ANSWER is faithful to the context provided in the DOCUMENT, as it correctly states that the family has launched an emotional public appeal to get the ring back and a local jewellery store has offered a $1000 reward for anyone providing information that leads to finding the missing ring.\"}, \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the name 'Joann Callaway' and the motivation behind Christine Davidson wanting to hand down the ring.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER incorrectly states that Christine Davidson wanted to hand down the ring to her only granddaughter.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains some incorrect information, such as the name 'Joann Callaway' which is not present in the DOCUMENT. This is a clear indication of the ANSWER being not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also mentions that the 61-year-old wanted to hand her ring down to her only granddaughter, which is incorrect as the DOCUMENT states that Christine Davidson wanted to give the ring to her 'only granddaughter who she was very close to - My daughter Jayda, 17'.\""
] |
165
|
{
"_id": 165,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team, Malaysian investigators, or the location of the crash site in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the plane was downed by a Thai mother with a passport.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the plane was downed on July 17, 2014, but it should be July 17, 2014 is mentioned in the ANSWER but the date is not.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the personal possessions found including jewellery and bracelets.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of 16 containers of fragments of the Malaysia Airlines plane.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch recovery mission or the head of the Dutch recovery mission Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the preliminary report that apportioned no blame or the investigation's focus on the repatriation mission, the criminal investigation, and prosecution.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch Justice Minister Ard van der Steur or the leaks suggesting regular troops were involved in the shooting of a BUK missile.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Kremlin's denial of involvement or the West's findings about the involvement of Russian forces.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) or the problems accessing the crash site.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the forensic experts in the Dutch city of Hilversum identifying bodies of 296 victims of the crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the two victims from the Netherlands remaining unidentified.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the probe team's report into the crash later this year.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch broadcaster RTL's report about shrapnel collected from the crash site matching the explosive charge of a ground-to-air BUK.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the alleged intercepted phone calls between rebels backing the version that the plane was downed by a BUK crew.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the problems accessing the crash site due to fighting between separatists and Ukrainian military forces.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the local official's statement about the smell of death hanging over the area nine months after the crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the vehicle carrying away debris from the site of the plane crash.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the sign indicating the entrance to the site in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery operation in November being delayed by fighting.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery operation in Kharkiv and the Netherlands.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the investigators' renewed search for body parts and debris in eastern Ukraine.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the relatives of Mabel Anthonysamy Soosai calling for urgent action to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice.\", \"The ANSWER does"
}
| null | null |
196
|
{
"_id": 196,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only states that Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday and that players that didn't start the clash returned to training on Wednesday. This information is present in the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER does not add any new details. \nThe ANSWER also does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the names of players who did not start the Champions League match, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not include information about the second leg of the Champions League match against Atletico, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This information is not present in the ANSWER, but it is relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it only provides information that is present in the DOCUMENT and does not add any new details or contradict any information.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday (ANSWER: Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday)\"\n]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only states that Real Madrid drew 0-0 with Atletico in the Champions League on Tuesday and that players that didn't start the clash returned to training on Wednesday. This information is present in the DOCUMENT, but the ANSWER does not add any new details. \nThe ANSWER also does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the names of players who did not start the Champions League match, which are mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \nHowever, the ANSWER does not include information about the second leg of the Champions League match against Atletico, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This information is not present in the ANSWER, but it is relevant to the context of the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it only provides information that is present in the DOCUMENT and does not add any new details or contradict any information.\"\n"
] |
294
|
{
"_id": 294,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names. The DOCUMENT states that the couple's names are Eamon Sullivan and Naomi Bass, while the ANSWER claims they are Eamon Sullivan and Bambi Tooth. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements. The DOCUMENT states that the couple met in Perth in 2011 and are now back in Perth, while the ANSWER claims they live with their three dogs in Perth.\nThe ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship. The DOCUMENT states that Eamon Sullivan previously dated fellow swimmer Stephanie Rice for two years, while the ANSWER claims he previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice. However, it is also stated in the ANSWER that he dated Stephanie Rice, so it is not incorrect.\nThe ANSWER does not contain any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the couple's names. The DOCUMENT states that the couple's names are Eamon Sullivan and Naomi Bass, while the ANSWER claims they are Eamon Sullivan and Bambi Tooth. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information about the couple's living arrangements. The DOCUMENT states that the couple met in Perth in 2011 and are now back in Perth, while the ANSWER claims they live with their three dogs in Perth.\nThe ANSWER contains incorrect information about Eamon Sullivan's previous relationship. The DOCUMENT states that Eamon Sullivan previously dated fellow swimmer Stephanie Rice for two years, while the ANSWER claims he previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice. However, it is also stated in the ANSWER that he dated Stephanie Rice, so it is not incorrect.\nThe ANSWER does not contain any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nHowever, the ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct details of the proposal, such as the exact location and the ring presented to Naomi Bass.\nThe ANSWER does not contain the correct age of Naomi Bass.\n\""
] |
588
|
{
"_id": 588,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.</span>\", \"<span style='color:blue'>The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.</span>\" ]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention Victoria as the location where truck drivers are dealing drugs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific distribution networks and meeting areas used by truck drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the number of truck drivers tested positive for drugs on Victoria's roads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Detective Inspector Bernie Rankin's statements about the distribution networks and the risks to other motorists.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the video that appeared online in February exposing a truck driver snorting drugs from behind the wheel of a heavy vehicle.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Simon Green's statements about the prevalence of drug use in the trucking industry.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the loophole that allows drivers to work 16.25 hour days in 24 hours.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the law regarding maximum driving hours for heavy vehicle drivers.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the impact of illicit substances on a driver's ability to drive.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
30
|
{
"_id": 30,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not match the DOCUMENT in several key points. \n- The DOCUMENT states that Arias was sentenced to life in prison, while the ANSWER claims she was sentenced to two years in prison.\n- The DOCUMENT explicitly states that Arias expressed remorse for her actions, which is also mentioned in the ANSWER.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly claims that Arias has no possibility for parole, whereas the DOCUMENT does not mention parole at all.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Travis Alexander's sisters giving their victim impact statements, which is a crucial part of the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER does not mention the death penalty being taken off the table due to a second jury being deadlocked, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\n- The ANSWER does not mention the Lumley Unit in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Perryville where Arias will serve her sentence.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Maricopa County Judge Sherry Stephens' decision to sentence Arias to life in prison.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was found guilty of first-degree murder in May 2013.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that a new jury was empanelled in October 2014 to decide Arias' fate, but they were also unable to reach a unanimous decision.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was 34 years old when she was sentenced.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander was brutally taken from his family and friends.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias' sisters are trying to block her brother from their lives.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Hillary Alexander said she's trying to block her brother from her life.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias said she wishes there was some way she could take it back.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was unable to reach a unanimous decision on whether she should live or die.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that the jury that convicted her found the murder was especially cruel.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander's family members gave their victim impact statements.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias will serve her sentence at the Lumley Unit in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Perryville near Goodyear, Arizona.\n- The ANSWER does not mention Maricopa County Judge Sherry Stephens' decision to sentence Arias to life in prison.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was found guilty of first-degree murder in May 2013.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that a new jury was empanelled in October 2014 to decide Arias' fate, but they were also unable to reach a unanimous decision.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Arias was 34 years old when she was sentenced.\n- The ANSWER does not mention that Travis Alexander was brutally taken from his family and"
}
| null | null |
291
|
{
"_id": 291,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article. \nThe ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries. \nHowever, the ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\nThe ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER seems to be missing some key points from the DOCUMENT, making it an incomplete summary.\", \n\"Given that the ANSWER is an incomplete summary and does not provide new information, the final verdict should be 'PASS' if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT and 'FAIL' if the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it does not provide a full summary of the article and misses some key points. \nHowever, since the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, the final verdict should be 'PASS'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, it appears that the ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article. \nThe ANSWER does not mention Theresa May's statement about negotiating a new deal with Europe or the plan to limit the appeal of coming to Britain from poorer parts of the EU. \nThe ANSWER also does not mention the proposed tax and national insurance payments, nor the ban on 'exporting' child benefit for children living in other EU countries. \nHowever, the ANSWER does mention the ban on in-work benefits for migrants for four years and the deportation of unemployed EU migrants if they do not get a job after six months.\nThe ANSWER does mention the net migration figure of 298,000, but this information is not unique to the ANSWER and can be found in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER seems to be missing some key points from the DOCUMENT, making it an incomplete summary.\", \n\"Given that the ANSWER is an incomplete summary and does not provide new information, the final verdict should be 'PASS' if the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT and 'FAIL' if the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT because it does not provide a full summary of the article and misses some key points. \nHowever, since the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, the final verdict should be 'PASS'.\""
] |
302
|
{
"_id": 302,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the study conducted by scientists from Ghent University in Belgium and the International Potato Institute (CIP) as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention the study conducted by scientists from Ghent University in Belgium and the International Potato Institute (CIP) as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the researchers' finding that sweet potatoes all over the world contain the genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that humans have been genetically engineering sweet potatoes for thousands of years.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the difference pointed out by the researchers between natural and artificial genetic modification.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the advantage of human-made GMOs over natural GMOs as stated by Dr. Lieve Gheysen.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the archeological findings in caves of the Cholca Canyon in Peru that are 8,000 to 10,000 years old.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the fact that sweet potatoes are not related to potatoes.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the edible parts of sweet potatoes other than the storage root.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the study focused around bacteria called Agrobacterium and its 'horizontal gene transfer' process.\""
] |
601
|
{
"_id": 601,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the key points mentioned. However, it lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars. \n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults. \n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but lacks specific details and additional context.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n* \"Bentleys and Porsches started bottom of reliability table of manufacturers\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"Cars were assessed on their failure rate, age, mileage and cost of repairs\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"Most reliable was Honda, with Suzuki second and Toyota in third place\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"The ANSWER lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars.\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction.\n* \"The ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction.\n* \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT\" - This is faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n* \"The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary\" - This is an omission, not a contradiction."
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in terms of the key points mentioned. However, it lacks specific details such as the range of prices for Bentleys, the joint fourth place of Chevrolet and Mazda, and the specific models of the most reliable and least reliable cars. \n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the common faults found in the cars, such as electrical and axle/suspension faults. \n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but lacks specific details and additional context.\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary.\""
] |
618
|
{
"_id": 618,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention a few budgeting tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as seating guests on larger tables and offering a signature cocktail menu.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season, calling on friends for help, and going online.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color: yellow'>The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season and going online.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully summarize the article, as it only mentions a few tips and omits others.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide the same information as the DOCUMENT, such as the cost of the wedding being £25,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does mention a few budgeting tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as seating guests on larger tables and offering a signature cocktail menu.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention some of the other tips mentioned in the DOCUMENT, such as shopping out of season, calling on friends for help, and going online.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER does not provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
23
|
{
"_id": 23,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the various changes made to the Boston Marathon route, the focus on family unification, the lessons learned from the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, or the need for police officers to be adequately trained for modern weapons. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does. It only mentions the timing of the Boston Marathon and the trial, without providing context.\n\nThe ANSWER does mention the author's opinion that it was good disaster response that kept the marathon bombing from being worse, which is a key point made in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic, nor does it acknowledge the complexities of the issue.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and does not fully capture the author's views on the topic.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER mentions the author's opinion on disaster response, but does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It does not mention the various changes made to the Boston Marathon route, the focus on family unification, the lessons learned from the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, or the need for police officers to be adequately trained for modern weapons. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does. It only mentions the timing of the Boston Marathon and the trial, without providing context.\n\nThe ANSWER does mention the author's opinion that it was good disaster response that kept the marathon bombing from being worse, which is a key point made in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic, nor does it acknowledge the complexities of the issue.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT, as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article and does not fully capture the author's views on the topic.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article in the same way the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER mentions the author's opinion on disaster response, but does not provide a clear explanation of the author's views on the topic.\""
] |
299
|
{
"_id": 299,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides an accurate summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points of the proposal, including the location, the proposal itself, and the couple's background.\nHowever, the ANSWER lacks the additional context provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the specific dates and details of the couple's relationship and the proposal.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes some information that is not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of the couple living with three dogs and Sullivan's previous relationship with Stephanie Rice.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but lacks some additional context and includes some extraneous information.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"\\\"Eamon Sullivan surprised his girlfriend Naomi Bass in Kyoto, Japan.\\\" <--- This is a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"The proposal took place under a cherry blossom tree filled with white doves.\\\" <--- This is also a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"Pair met in Perth in 2011, where they live with their three dogs.\\\" <--- This information is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"\\\"Sullivan previously dated fellow Olympic swimmer Stephanie Rice.\\\" <--- This information is not present in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides an accurate summary of the DOCUMENT, covering the key points of the proposal, including the location, the proposal itself, and the couple's background.\nHowever, the ANSWER lacks the additional context provided in the DOCUMENT, such as the specific dates and details of the couple's relationship and the proposal.\nAdditionally, the ANSWER includes some information that is not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the mention of the couple living with three dogs and Sullivan's previous relationship with Stephanie Rice.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\", \n\"Overall, the ANSWER provides a faithful summary of the main points in the DOCUMENT, but lacks some additional context and includes some extraneous information.\""
] |
86
|
{
"_id": 86,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary. The ANSWER lacks information about the 40ft long swimming pool, the 360 degree view, the 18-wheelers, and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects. The ANSWER also does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation and the structural integrity restoration with columns. The ANSWER does mention the roof deck, the two-story glass-paneled tower, and the use of shipping containers as a material, which is accurate. However, it does not provide the same level of detail as the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT. However, it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of detail and omission of certain key points may lead to a less accurate understanding of the DOCUMENT's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity and uniqueness of the PV14 home, as described in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions the roof deck (ANSWER: 'The home also boasts a 1,400 sq ft roof deck'), the two-story glass-paneled tower (ANSWER: 'Containers were also used to build a stunning two-story glass-paneled tower'), and the use of shipping containers as a material (ANSWER: 'He wanted to stay true to the materials and thus left the ceilings exposed to show the containers').\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the 360 degree view (ANSWER: 'The home also boasts a 1,400 sq ft roof deck and a 360 degree view of White Rock Lake and the city's downtown'), the 40ft long swimming pool (ANSWER: 'The home, dubbed 'PV14,' boasts a 40ft long swimming pool on the ground floor'), the 18-wheelers (ANSWER: '200 people watched as 18-wheelers transported the materials that would become this stunning three-bedroom home'), and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects (ANSWER: 'And after more than two years of design and construction, and a final tour for the Dallas chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the couple are finally preparing to move into their new home').\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation (ANSWER: 'Spray foam was also used between the building layers, to provide insulation that the containers can't provide, according to Inhabitat.') and the structural integrity restoration with columns (ANSWER: 'Because the walls of the shipping containers were removed, Gooden said columns had to be placed around the house to restore structural integrity to the materials.')\"}}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER partially summarizes the DOCUMENT but does not provide a comprehensive summary. The ANSWER lacks information about the 40ft long swimming pool, the 360 degree view, the 18-wheelers, and the final tour for the American Institute of Architects. The ANSWER also does not mention the use of spray foam for insulation and the structural integrity restoration with columns. The ANSWER does mention the roof deck, the two-story glass-paneled tower, and the use of shipping containers as a material, which is accurate. However, it does not provide the same level of detail as the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT. However, it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER's lack of detail and omission of certain key points may lead to a less accurate understanding of the DOCUMENT's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not fully capture the complexity and uniqueness of the PV14 home, as described in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
582
|
{
"_id": 582,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention Manchester City's consideration of Danny Rose as a transfer target, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, instead stating that Tottenham will resist 'any offers' for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the stats and performances that Mauricio Pochettino praised about Danny Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Manchester City have written off Danny Rose as a transfer target **(FAIL)**\", \"Rose is a rising star and City's squad is short of homegrown players **(FAIL)**\", \"But Spus boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of his left back **(FAIL)**\", \"Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose **(FAIL)**\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not mention Manchester City's consideration of Danny Rose as a transfer target, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, instead stating that Tottenham will resist 'any offers' for Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the stats and performances that Mauricio Pochettino praised about Danny Rose.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
359
|
{
"_id": 359,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the coin being smaller than a penny, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER does not mention the image of the goddess Tanit on one side and the horse's head on the reverse, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is also a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the village of Saltford being on a major trade route long before Roman times, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is another discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the find being the oldest dateable evidence of human activity found in Saltford and the West of England, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Professor David Mattingly's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Phil Harding's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the hoard of Roman and Late Iron Age coins found in Dovedale, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention National Trust archaeologist Rachael Hall's statement, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the cave in Dovedale being undisturbed for 2,000 years, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the Corieltavi tribe, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the River Avon flowing into the Bristol Channel, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the image of the horse's head and the Carthaginian goddess Tanit on the coin, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the coin being dated to between 300 BC and 264 BC, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the coin being one of the oldest coins ever to be found in England, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. This is a discrepancy and indicates the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT"
}
| null | null |
136
|
{
"_id": 136,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350), which is not present in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also states that Bollaert 'operated ugotposted.com, where anonymous users posted nudes without the subject's consent', which is present in the DOCUMENT but not in the ANSWER's exact wording. \nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Bollaert earned tens of thousands of dollars from running a site and that he was sentenced to 20 years, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also correctly states that prosecutors said Bollaert took pleasure in hurting women, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's claim that Bollaert was found guilty of 27 counts of identity theft and extortion is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he was found guilty of 21 counts of identity theft and six counts of extortion. \nThe ANSWER's statement that Judge said the sentence reflected the amount of victims is also not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that the judge said the sentence accurately reflected the amount of victims he hurt.\nThe ANSWER's statement that Bollaert 'then earned tens of thousands from running changemyreputation.com' is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he earned about $30,000 from victims.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\" * The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350)\"]\n}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER provides some additional information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the exact number of counts (27) and the range of fees ($300 to $350), which is not present in the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also states that Bollaert 'operated ugotposted.com, where anonymous users posted nudes without the subject's consent', which is present in the DOCUMENT but not in the ANSWER's exact wording. \nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Bollaert earned tens of thousands of dollars from running a site and that he was sentenced to 20 years, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT. \nThe ANSWER also correctly states that prosecutors said Bollaert took pleasure in hurting women, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER's claim that Bollaert was found guilty of 27 counts of identity theft and extortion is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he was found guilty of 21 counts of identity theft and six counts of extortion. \nThe ANSWER's statement that Judge said the sentence reflected the amount of victims is also not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that the judge said the sentence accurately reflected the amount of victims he hurt.\nThe ANSWER's statement that Bollaert 'then earned tens of thousands from running changemyreputation.com' is not supported by the DOCUMENT, which states that he earned about $30,000 from victims.\n\""
] |
447
|
{
"_id": 447,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney is the one who holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, not Sharon Courtney. \nLisa started collecting Pokemon at the age of 9 after being bullied at school, but the DOCUMENT does not explicitly state this.\nLisa spends 7 hours a week browsing the internet for new Pokemon releases, but the DOCUMENT does not mention'surfing the internet'. \nLisa's vast collection ranges from cuddly toys to exclusive merchandise, including items made in Japan.\nThe DOCUMENT does not mention cornflakes made in Japan as part of Lisa's collection.\nThe DOCUMENT states that Lisa's mother had to move from the largest room to the smallest room in their house to make room for her daughter's collection, but this detail is not present in the ANSWER.\nThe ANSWER does mention Lisa's mother, Sharon, and her love for Pokemon, but this information is not new and is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection (ANSWER: Sharon Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for largest collection)\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Lisa Courtney is the one who holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, not Sharon Courtney. \nLisa started collecting Pokemon at the age of 9 after being bullied at school, but the DOCUMENT does not explicitly state this.\nLisa spends 7 hours a week browsing the internet for new Pokemon releases, but the DOCUMENT does not mention'surfing the internet'. \nLisa's vast collection ranges from cuddly toys to exclusive merchandise, including items made in Japan.\nThe DOCUMENT does not mention cornflakes made in Japan as part of Lisa's collection.\nThe DOCUMENT states that Lisa's mother had to move from the largest room to the smallest room in their house to make room for her daughter's collection, but this detail is not present in the ANSWER.\nThe ANSWER does mention Lisa's mother, Sharon, and her love for Pokemon, but this information is not new and is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
736
|
{
"_id": 736,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyzing the ANSWER, it seems to have taken out some information that is present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees, and it does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate. \nHowever, the ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization. \nThe ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it has removed some crucial context and details.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information present in the DOCUMENT. It does not introduce any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the potential threat of jihadis and the EU passport issue is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not capture the full scope of Farage's comments, which include his opposition to EU action on migrant deaths in the Mediterranean and his criticism of the British political class.\", \n\"The ANSWER's omission of these details may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER's failure to capture the full scope of Farage's comments and the context of the European Parliament debate may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='background-color:yellow'>The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:yellow'>The ANSWER does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:blue'>The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.</span>\", \"<span style='background-color:red'>The ANSW"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analyzing the ANSWER, it seems to have taken out some information that is present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only mentions 'Asia' instead of 'Europe' when discussing the potential destination of refugees, and it does not mention 'Strasbourg' or the European Parliament debate. \nHowever, the ANSWER does capture the essence of Nigel Farage's comments, which are centered around the potential threat of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization. \nThe ANSWER also mentions Farage's concerns about EU passports allowing refugees to move to Britain, which is present in the DOCUMENT. \nOverall, the ANSWER seems to be faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it has removed some crucial context and details.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information present in the DOCUMENT. It does not introduce any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the potential threat of jihadis and the EU passport issue is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not capture the full scope of Farage's comments, which include his opposition to EU action on migrant deaths in the Mediterranean and his criticism of the British political class.\", \n\"The ANSWER's omission of these details may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not present in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER's focus on the core issue of jihadis entering Europe and posing a threat to civilization is consistent with the DOCUMENT's content.\", \n\"The ANSWER's brevity and lack of context may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\", \n\"The ANSWER's failure to capture the full scope of Farage's comments and the context of the European Parliament debate may make it seem less faithful to the DOCUMENT than it actually is.\""
] |
583
|
{
"_id": 583,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER reveals that it contains incorrect information. The ANSWER states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target, but the DOCUMENT does not mention Manchester United as a potential suitor. \nThe ANSWER also incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that Pochettino is a fan of Rose and does not intend to sell him.\nThe ANSWER correctly states that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, which aligns with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose.\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER reveals that it contains incorrect information. The ANSWER states that Manchester United have identified Danny Rose as a transfer target, but the DOCUMENT does not mention Manchester United as a potential suitor. \nThe ANSWER also incorrectly states that Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino is a big fan of Danny Rose, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that Pochettino is a fan of Rose and does not intend to sell him.\nThe ANSWER correctly states that Tottenham will resist all summer offers for Rose, which aligns with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
120
|
{
"_id": 120,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the age of Sherry Arnold at the time of her death (44, not 43), and the involvement of Lester Van Walters Jr in the crime (the DOCUMENT only mentions the name 'Lester Van Waters Jr'). The ANSWER also provides a slightly different phrasing for the events of the crime, but the overall details match the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT's text either.\", \"The ANSWER mentions that Spell did not understand the case against him and was mentally unfit to stand trial, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT, but it also adds that prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, which is not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span>Sherry Arnold, a 44-year-old math teacher from Sidney, Montana, was on a morning jog on January 7, 2012, when she was killed.</span> (not present in the DOCUMENT)\", \"<span>Michael Keith Spell, 25, of parachute, Colorado, confessed at the time to pulling her into a car while his friend, Lester Van Walters Jr, strangled her.</span> (not present in the DOCUMENT)\", \"<span>Defense experts said Spell did not understand the case against and was mentally unfit to stand trial.</span> (present in the DOCUMENT but slightly rephrased)\", \"<span>Prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, recommending 100 years prison.</span> (not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides information not present in the DOCUMENT, such as the age of Sherry Arnold at the time of her death (44, not 43), and the involvement of Lester Van Walters Jr in the crime (the DOCUMENT only mentions the name 'Lester Van Waters Jr'). The ANSWER also provides a slightly different phrasing for the events of the crime, but the overall details match the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the nuances of the DOCUMENT's text either.\", \"The ANSWER mentions that Spell did not understand the case against him and was mentally unfit to stand trial, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT, but it also adds that prosecutors agreed he was mentally ill but said he could stand trial, which is not explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
396
|
{
"_id": 396,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides an inaccurate description of the case's timeline, stating that the murder occurred between 2012 and 2013, when the DOCUMENT actually states that the murders occurred about a year apart (one in 2012 and one in 2013).\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim as Tim Barnack, when the DOCUMENT states that the first victim was Stephen Delicino. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica killed Delicino in self-defense when he attacked her, as the DOCUMENT states that Monica's claim of self-defense was disputed by the prosecution. Furthermore, the ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney, stating that she found him being eaten by her pigs and shot him out of mercy, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly highlights that Monica's cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card in jail with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County', when the DOCUMENT actually states that it was Monica's cellmate who testified about the birthday card, not that Monica signed it herself.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Haney, but the judge initially ignored her request.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER incorrectly describes the timeline of the case\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim and the circumstances of their death\", \"* The ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly highlights a different aspect of the testimony\", \"* The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides an inaccurate description of the case's timeline, stating that the murder occurred between 2012 and 2013, when the DOCUMENT actually states that the murders occurred about a year apart (one in 2012 and one in 2013).\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly identifies the first victim as Tim Barnack, when the DOCUMENT states that the first victim was Stephen Delicino. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica killed Delicino in self-defense when he attacked her, as the DOCUMENT states that Monica's claim of self-defense was disputed by the prosecution. Furthermore, the ANSWER misrepresents Monica's claim about Robert Haney, stating that she found him being eaten by her pigs and shot him out of mercy, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs, but the jurors did not believe her story.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly highlights that Monica's cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card in jail with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County', when the DOCUMENT actually states that it was Monica's cellmate who testified about the birthday card, not that Monica signed it herself.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Delicino, when the DOCUMENT actually states that Monica asked to demonstrate how she claimed she shot Haney, but the judge initially ignored her request.\""
] |
728
|
{
"_id": 728,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Basis of comparison: The ANSWER provides information about the Europa League semi-finals, including the teams and the dates of the semi-final and last-four ties. The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, the ANSWER does not provide information about the Champions League semi-final draw, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also does not mention the draw for the Europa League semi-finals being made at UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, as stated in the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER provides the teams for the Europa League semi-finals, which matches the information in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also provides the dates of the semi-final and last-four ties, which is consistent with the information in the DOCUMENT. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER does not mention the other tie between Napoli and Dnipro, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as taking place on May 27. The ANSWER also does not mention the National Stadium in Warsaw as the location of the semi-final, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. \n\nOverall, the ANSWER provides some information consistent with the DOCUMENT, but it is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n*\"The ANSWER does not provide information about the Champions League semi-final draw, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the draw for the Europa League semi-finals being made at UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, as stated in the DOCUMENT.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the other tie between Napoli and Dnipro, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT as taking place on May 27.*\", \n*\"The ANSWER does not mention the National Stadium in Warsaw as the location of the semi-final, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.*\""
}
|
PASS
| null |
733
|
{
"_id": 733,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player, and he did not score 36 tries on the World circuit. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it provides new and incorrect information.\",\n \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, specifically regarding the signing of Jeff Williams and the team's achievement in Tokyo.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player.\", \"The ANSWER states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER contains incorrect information: Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, not a player, and he did not score 36 tries on the World circuit. The ANSWER also incorrectly states that Bath signed Mike Ford, when in fact it was Jeff Williams who signed. Additionally, the ANSWER incorrectly states that the team won in Toyko, when in fact it was England Sevens that won in Tokyo earlier this month.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it provides new and incorrect information.\",\n \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, specifically regarding the signing of Jeff Williams and the team's achievement in Tokyo.\"\n"
] |
868
|
{
"_id": 868,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the DOCUMENT and ANSWER, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER is missing some crucial information from the DOCUMENT, such as the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6, which is a significant point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and only provides a summary of the key points. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved by including more details.\", \n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"* The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"* The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\"\"]"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the DOCUMENT and ANSWER, the ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT because it includes key points from the DOCUMENT, such as the ranking of manufacturers by reliability and the most reliable models. \n\nHowever, the ANSWER is missing some crucial information from the DOCUMENT, such as the range of list prices for Bentleys and the fact that Porsche finished bottom of the reliability table. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the most costly model to fix, the Audi RS6, which is a significant point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nDespite these omissions, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT and only provides a summary of the key points. \n\nTherefore, the ANSWER can be considered faithful to the DOCUMENT but could be improved by including more details.\", \n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \n\"The ANSWER does not include any incorrect information.\", \n\"The ANSWER provides a summary of the key points from the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
446
|
{
"_id": 446,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Lisa Courtney has the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, but does not mention her losing the record.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. However, the DOCUMENT does not specify the exact age at which she started collecting.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.\", \"The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but the lack of new information and the inaccuracies regarding the Guinness World Record and the age at which Lisa started collecting may impact the faithfulness of the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not specified exactly.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER claims Lisa Courtney lost the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that Lisa Courtney has the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of Pokemon items, but does not mention her losing the record.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa started amassing the items after being bullied aged nine, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT. However, the DOCUMENT does not specify the exact age at which she started collecting.\", \"The ANSWER states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet looking for new characters, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT but not exactly phrased as'surfing the internet'.\", \"The ANSWER states that the vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan, which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it does not offer new information beyond the context provided.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but the lack of new information and the inaccuracies regarding the Guinness World Record and the age at which Lisa started collecting may impact the faithfulness of the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
208
|
{
"_id": 208,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos, the impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance, and the parents' and experts' concerns about the normalization of this behavior. The ANSWER also fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue. The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not already present in the DOCUMENT. It does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT and sticks to the main theme of the article. However, it is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims. It lacks the depth and breadth of information that the DOCUMENT provides.\", \"The ANSWER's focus on the impact of 'hot-or-not' videos on the next generation is present, but it does not fully capture the complexity of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK, which is an important context for understanding the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos and their impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance.\", \"* The ANSWER fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"* The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims.\", \"* The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK.\", \"* The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\"\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not fully capture the content of the DOCUMENT. It lacks details about the context of the 'hot-or-not' videos, the impact on the children's self-esteem and academic performance, and the parents' and experts' concerns about the normalization of this behavior. The ANSWER also fails to mention the specific names and quotes from the DOCUMENT that illustrate the extent of the issue. The ANSWER does not provide a clear summary of the article's main points.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information that is not already present in the DOCUMENT. It does not contradict any information in the DOCUMENT and sticks to the main theme of the article. However, it is not faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not provide a comprehensive summary of the article's content.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any quotes or specific examples from the DOCUMENT to support its claims. It lacks the depth and breadth of information that the DOCUMENT provides.\", \"The ANSWER's focus on the impact of 'hot-or-not' videos on the next generation is present, but it does not fully capture the complexity of the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the American origin of the 'hot-or-not' phenomenon and its spread to the UK, which is an important context for understanding the issue.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight the concerns of experts such as Rachel Simmons and Rosalind Wiseman about the normalization of this behavior and its impact on children's social skills and empathy.\""
] |
311
|
{
"_id": 311,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not directly address the topic of surveys claiming to reveal what makes us most happy.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the author's personal opinions or feelings about the topic.\", \"The ANSWER is a direct quote from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a summary or an analysis of the article.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span>They claim to reveal what makes us happiest</span>. But are these generic lists really of any use to us?\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not directly address the topic of surveys claiming to reveal what makes us most happy.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the author's personal opinions or feelings about the topic.\", \"The ANSWER is a direct quote from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a summary or an analysis of the article.\""
] |
209
|
{
"_id": 209,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as required. It only states the main point of the DOCUMENT without elaboration. The ANSWER does not mention the effects of 'hot-or-not' videos on children's self-esteem, grades, or school attendance. The ANSWER also fails to mention the involvement of parents, societal pressures, and the normalization of cruelty on TV shows. The ANSWER does not provide a conclusion or a call to action as the DOCUMENT does. The ANSWER lacks depth and fails to address the complexities of the issue presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight any specific spans from the DOCUMENT as required. It only provides a brief statement about the main point of the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": []}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not summarize the article as required. It only states the main point of the DOCUMENT without elaboration. The ANSWER does not mention the effects of 'hot-or-not' videos on children's self-esteem, grades, or school attendance. The ANSWER also fails to mention the involvement of parents, societal pressures, and the normalization of cruelty on TV shows. The ANSWER does not provide a conclusion or a call to action as the DOCUMENT does. The ANSWER lacks depth and fails to address the complexities of the issue presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT. However, it does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not highlight any specific spans from the DOCUMENT as required. It only provides a brief statement about the main point of the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
721
|
{
"_id": 721,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a brief summary of the DOCUMENT, but it lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy. The ANSWER also does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage. The ANSWER does mention a water birth, which is present in the DOCUMENT, but it is not the main focus of the ANSWER. Overall, the ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it does not add any new information, but it is not faithful in the sense that it lacks specific details and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not contain any significant omissions or additions that would affect its faithfulness to the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT.\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER provides a brief summary of the DOCUMENT, but it lacks specific details and quotes from the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention Rebecca's Olympic achievements, her husband Harry, or her swimming and gym routine during pregnancy. The ANSWER also does not mention her concerns about becoming breathless or her family history of miscarriage. The ANSWER does mention a water birth, which is present in the DOCUMENT, but it is not the main focus of the ANSWER. Overall, the ANSWER is a very condensed version of the DOCUMENT and lacks the depth and context provided in the original text.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT in the sense that it does not add any new information, but it is not faithful in the sense that it lacks specific details and context.\", \"The ANSWER does not contain any significant omissions or additions that would affect its faithfulness to the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
298
|
{
"_id": 298,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the proposal, including the partner, location, and the presence of white doves.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the pair met in Perth and live there with their three dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Naomi Bass, the correct partner, or the details of the proposal as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, making it unfaithful to the original content.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Eamon Sullivan proposed to girlfriend Stephanie Rice</span> (incorrect partner)\", \"<span style='color:red'>The pair were out for an evening walk when he dropped to one knee</span> (incorrect proposal details)\", \"<span style='color:red'>Proposal took place under a cherry blossom tree filled with white doves</span> (incorrect details)\", \"<span style='color:red'>Pair met in Perth in 2011, where they live with their three dogs</span> (incorrect information about Naomi Bass and their relationship)\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information about the proposal, including the partner, location, and the presence of white doves.\", \"The ANSWER also incorrectly states that the pair met in Perth and live there with their three dogs.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Naomi Bass, the correct partner, or the details of the proposal as described in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT, making it unfaithful to the original content.\""
] |
534
|
{
"_id": 534,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER shows that it does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. The ANSWER only mentions AP McCoy's final two rides at Sandown and does not mention the rest of the information provided in the DOCUMENT. This lack of information indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER also includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location (Surrey instead of Sandown) and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out (this information is not present in the DOCUMENT).\n\nThe ANSWER does mention Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, which is a point present in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to outweigh the lack of information and incorrect details.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER fails to provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT due to its lack of information and incorrect details.\"\n], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\"\n\"* The ANSWER includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out.\"\n\"* The ANSWER mentions Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Analysis of the ANSWER shows that it does not provide a full summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION. The ANSWER only mentions AP McCoy's final two rides at Sandown and does not mention the rest of the information provided in the DOCUMENT. This lack of information indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER also includes incorrect information, such as AP McCoy's location (Surrey instead of Sandown) and the fact that the Sandown track is completely sold out (this information is not present in the DOCUMENT).\n\nThe ANSWER does mention Andrew Thornton's hopes for the day, which is a point present in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to consider the ANSWER faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but this is not enough to outweigh the lack of information and incorrect details.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER fails to provide a faithful summary of the DOCUMENT due to its lack of information and incorrect details.\"\n"
] |
44
|
{
"_id": 44,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a direct summary of the article as the QUESTION asks. However, it does address the main issue of the DOCUMENT, which is the police use of force and Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. It reiterates the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT, such as the police's narrative of the stop and the legal issues surrounding Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT, but it does address the main issue of the case.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"* The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"* The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"* The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT.\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not provide a direct summary of the article as the QUESTION asks. However, it does address the main issue of the DOCUMENT, which is the police use of force and Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. It reiterates the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT, such as the police's narrative of the stop and the legal issues surrounding Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. It sticks to the same analysis and arguments presented in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it does not introduce new information or contradict existing information.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear answer to the questions posed in the DOCUMENT, but it does address the main issue of the case.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police can be held liable for Freddie Gray's death.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear verdict on whether the police were correct in stopping Freddie Gray.\""
] |
394
|
{
"_id": 394,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"A thorough comparison of the ANSWER with the DOCUMENT reveals discrepancies in several key points. \n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Adnan Syed was on trial, whereas the DOCUMENT states that Susan Monica was on trial.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that Monica's former cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County.' In reality, the DOCUMENT states that a cellmate of Monica's testified that Monica signed the birthday card in accordance with the charges she was facing.\n- The ANSWER misrepresents the circumstances surrounding the remains of the two handymen. In the DOCUMENT, it is stated that the remains were found buried on Monica's farm with signs of being fed on by animals, whereas the ANSWER states that the remains were found with signs that they had been fed on by animals - most likely her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly reports that Monica killed the first man, Stephen Delicino, out of self-defense when he attacked her. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica told investigators that she killed Delicino when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica shot Robert Haney out of mercy when she found him being eaten by her pigs. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police. In reality, the DOCUMENT does not mention Monica reporting the deaths to police.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica of killing two handymen and feeding their bodies to her pigs.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"- Incorrect statement about Adnan Syed being on trial (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about Monica's former cellmate's testimony (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect representation of the remains' discovery (**ANSWER**)\n- Inaccurate representation of Monica's actions regarding Delicino and Haney (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about Monica reporting the deaths to police (**ANSWER**)\n- Incorrect statement about the jury's deliberation time (**ANSWER**)\n\"]"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"A thorough comparison of the ANSWER with the DOCUMENT reveals discrepancies in several key points. \n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Adnan Syed was on trial, whereas the DOCUMENT states that Susan Monica was on trial.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that Monica's former cellmate testified that she signed a birthday card with the phrase 'from the sweetest murderer in Jackson County.' In reality, the DOCUMENT states that a cellmate of Monica's testified that Monica signed the birthday card in accordance with the charges she was facing.\n- The ANSWER misrepresents the circumstances surrounding the remains of the two handymen. In the DOCUMENT, it is stated that the remains were found buried on Monica's farm with signs of being fed on by animals, whereas the ANSWER states that the remains were found with signs that they had been fed on by animals - most likely her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly reports that Monica killed the first man, Stephen Delicino, out of self-defense when he attacked her. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica told investigators that she killed Delicino when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica shot Robert Haney out of mercy when she found him being eaten by her pigs. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that Monica admitted to shooting Haney when she found him being attacked by her pigs.\n- The ANSWER incorrectly states that Monica never reported either of their deaths to police. In reality, the DOCUMENT does not mention Monica reporting the deaths to police.\n- The ANSWER inaccurately reports that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica. In reality, the DOCUMENT states that it took a jury just an hour to convict Monica of killing two handymen and feeding their bodies to her pigs.\n\""
] |
235
|
{
"_id": 235,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, the ANSWER does not include any direct quotes from the individuals involved, which are present in the DOCUMENT. This omission may indicate that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER also omits the specific amount of shares purchased (726,707) and the total cost of the purchase (€45million or £32.8m) in favor of a simplified statement of the deal's value (£45m). This simplification may be seen as not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nAdditionally, the ANSWER does not mention the need for two Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs) to ratify the deal, which is a crucial detail in the DOCUMENT. This omission may also be seen as not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nHowever, the ANSWER does accurately convey the main points of the DEAL itself, such as the percentage of ownership (20%) and the hope for the deal to develop the club in Asia. This suggests that the ANSWER is at least partially faithful to the DOCUMENT.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT due to the omissions of specific details and direct quotes.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"* The ANSWER omits direct quotes from individuals involved in the deal.\", \n\"* The ANSWER omits specific details about the purchase (number of shares, total cost).\", \n\"* The ANSWER omits the need for two EGMs to ratify the deal.\", \n\"* The ANSWER simplifies the deal's value to £45m without specifying the currency (€45million or £32.8m).\""
}
|
FAIL
| null |
445
|
{
"_id": 445,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, not the US News Record, so the answer contains incorrect information. \nThe answer mentions that Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9, but the DOCUMENT states she started collecting at age 9 when she saw a picture of Pikachu in a Nintendo magazine, and there's no mention of bullying at that time. \nThe answer states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet, which is correct, but the DOCUMENT also mentions that she visits car-boot sales and tries to save money, so the answer oversimplifies her online activities. \nThe answer highlights Lisa's vast hoard, but the DOCUMENT only mentions that her collection ranges from cuddly toys to models, clothing, badges, flannels, and posters, without mentioning cornflakes made in Japan.\"\n],\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for largest collection (incorrect information) \",\n\"Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9 (inaccurate context) \",\n\"Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet (oversimplifies her online activities) \",\n\"Lisa's vast hoard ranges from cuddly toys to cornflakes made in Japan (incorrect information)\""
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Lisa Courtney holds the Guinness World Record for the largest collection, not the US News Record, so the answer contains incorrect information. \nThe answer mentions that Lisa started amassing items after being bullied at age 9, but the DOCUMENT states she started collecting at age 9 when she saw a picture of Pikachu in a Nintendo magazine, and there's no mention of bullying at that time. \nThe answer states that Lisa spends seven hours a week surfing the internet, which is correct, but the DOCUMENT also mentions that she visits car-boot sales and tries to save money, so the answer oversimplifies her online activities. \nThe answer highlights Lisa's vast hoard, but the DOCUMENT only mentions that her collection ranges from cuddly toys to models, clothing, badges, flannels, and posters, without mentioning cornflakes made in Japan.\"\n"
] |
426
|
{
"_id": 426,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER provides some information from the DOCUMENT, but it does not fully capture the essence of the content. The ANSWER does not mention Brendan Rodgers' views on the team's chances of qualifying for the Champions League next season, which is a key point from the DOCUMENT. \n\nThe ANSWER also does not mention the FA Cup and its importance for the team, which is a crucial aspect of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER does not mention the Liverpool manager's views on Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to look at possibilities beyond the club, which is an important point from the DOCUMENT.\n\nHowever, the ANSWER does correctly state that Raheem Sterling won a penalty for Liverpool and that the team lost 4-1 to Arsenal. The ANSWER also correctly mentions that Sterling turned down a new £100,000-a-week deal.\n\nOverall, the ANSWER provides some information from the DOCUMENT, but it is not a faithful summary of the content.\", \n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n* The ANSWER does not mention Brendan Rodgers' views on the team's chances of qualifying for the Champions League next season.\n* The ANSWER does not mention the FA Cup and its importance for the team.\n* The ANSWER does not mention the Liverpool manager's views on Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to look at possibilities beyond the club.\n* The ANSWER correctly states that Raheem Sterling won a penalty for Liverpool and that the team lost 4-1 to Arsenal.\n* The ANSWER correctly mentions that Sterling turned down a new £100,000-a-week deal."
}
|
FAIL
| null |
361
|
{
"_id": 361,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is a key piece of information in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's location, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being in Los Angeles. This inaccuracy further indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER mentions the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's private outdoor roof space, which is a notable feature of the suite. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's design inspiration, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being inspired by Vivienne Westwood. This inaccuracy indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite. However, this is not a unique or exclusive feature of the ANSWER, as it is also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's location, but the DOCUMENT states that it is in Los Angeles, not The London West Hollywood. This inaccuracy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's design inspiration, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [ \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's cost, which is a key piece of information in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's location, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being in Los Angeles. This inaccuracy further indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER mentions the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's private outdoor roof space, which is a notable feature of the suite. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's design inspiration, which is explicitly stated in the DOCUMENT as being inspired by Vivienne Westwood. This inaccuracy indicates that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT. This omission suggests that the ANSWER is not faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite. However, this is not a unique or exclusive feature of the ANSWER, as it is also mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's location, but the DOCUMENT states that it is in Los Angeles, not The London West Hollywood. This inaccuracy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's size, but the DOCUMENT states that the suite is the largest in Los Angeles, not the largest in LA. This minor discrepancy is not a significant issue, but it still indicates that the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's design inspiration, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's features, such as the master bedroom suite, the media room, or the dining room, which are all explicitly described in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the exclusive shopping hour, which is a feature of the suite.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's designer, Vivienne Westwood, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention the suite's opening date, which is consistent with the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
527
|
{
"_id": 527,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER contains new information not present in the DOCUMENT, specifically the price of £280,000 which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states the price of the cel, when the DOCUMENT states it will fetch more than £10,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it does not mention the handwritten notes, the animation team, or the rarity of colour model cels.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear connection between the cel and the Band Concert, as the DOCUMENT does not mention this.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention the sale taking place in Dallas, Texas, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"£280,000\", \"The Band Concert\", \"Dallas, Texas\", \"handwritten notes\", \"animation team\", \"colour model cels\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER contains new information not present in the DOCUMENT, specifically the price of £280,000 which is not mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER incorrectly states the price of the cel, when the DOCUMENT states it will fetch more than £10,000.\", \"The ANSWER does not accurately represent the content of the DOCUMENT, as it does not mention the handwritten notes, the animation team, or the rarity of colour model cels.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide a clear connection between the cel and the Band Concert, as the DOCUMENT does not mention this.\", \"The ANSWER fails to mention the sale taking place in Dallas, Texas, which is a key point in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
137
|
{
"_id": 137,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to see if it provides new information not present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'.\",\n\"The ANSWER also states that the image was taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis was waiting for her train, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"]\n,\"SCORE\": \"PASS\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"Analyze the ANSWER to see if it provides new information not present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER mentions a 'phenomenon formed of three separate double rainbows', whereas the DOCUMENT states that the quadruple rainbow is'made of two pairs next to each other'.\",\n\"The ANSWER also states that the image was taken in a split second while Amanda Curtis was waiting for her train, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
218
|
{
"_id": 218,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath. The DOCUMENT states that Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, but it does not mention him joining the club. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win. The DOCUMENT states that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, but the ANSWER contains 'Toyko' which seems to be a typo or incorrect spelling.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about Williams' playing stint in France, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' father being English, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' experience with the sevens programme, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention England Sevens head coach Simon Amor's comments about Williams, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\n\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath.\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' father being English.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town.</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER does not provide information about Williams' experience with the sevens programme.</span>\", \"<span style='color: green'>The ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit.</span>\", \"<span style='color: green'>The ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens.</span>\"]}"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\n\"The ANSWER contains incorrect information regarding Mike Ford joining Bath. The DOCUMENT states that Mike Ford is the head coach of Bath, but it does not mention him joining the club. \nThe ANSWER also contains incorrect information regarding the location of the game where Williams helped England win. The DOCUMENT states that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, but the ANSWER contains 'Toyko' which seems to be a typo or incorrect spelling.\nThe ANSWER does not provide any information about Williams' playing stint in France, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' father being English, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' playing stint with the Hamiltons club in Cape Town, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention Williams' experience with the sevens programme, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does not mention England Sevens head coach Simon Amor's comments about Williams, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams scored 36 tries on the World Series circuit, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\nThe ANSWER does mention that Williams helped England win the Tokyo Sevens, which is correct according to the DOCUMENT.\n\""
] |
67
|
{
"_id": 67,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points of the story, including Christine's passing, the missing diamond engagement ring, and the family's appeal for its return.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived as the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER also omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"Despite these minor omissions, the ANSWER remains faithful to the overall content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a concise summary of the story without adding any new information or contradicting the facts presented in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"PASS\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived.\", \"The ANSWER omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\"] }"
}
|
PASS
|
[
"\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points of the story, including Christine's passing, the missing diamond engagement ring, and the family's appeal for its return.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide the exact date of Christine's passing as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Additionally, the ANSWER does not mention the specific nursing home where Christine lived as the DOCUMENT does.\", \"The ANSWER also omits some details such as the length of time the family tried to remove the ring and the reaction of the nurses.\", \"Despite these minor omissions, the ANSWER remains faithful to the overall content of the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not introduce any new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER also does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"Overall, the ANSWER provides a concise summary of the story without adding any new information or contradicting the facts presented in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
422
|
{
"_id": 422,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Brendan Rodgers' statement about Raheem Sterling being a 'big part' of the team's performance despite the loss is not present in the ANSWER. The ANSWER only mentions Sterling's starting position in the second half penalty and his interview with the BBC, which is not a direct quote from Rodgers. The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of the players, the team's form, or the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four. The ANSWER also omits the manager's statement about Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to explore possibilities beyond Liverpool. The ANSWER does mention the outcome of the game and the points gap, but this information is already present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not provide a faithful summary of the article. The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond what is already present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Lack of context and nuances</span>: The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Omission of key information</span>: The ANSWER omits the reaction of the players, the team's form, and the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four.\",\n\"<span style='background-color: yellow;'>Repetition of existing facts</span>: The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Brendan Rodgers' statement about Raheem Sterling being a 'big part' of the team's performance despite the loss is not present in the ANSWER. The ANSWER only mentions Sterling's starting position in the second half penalty and his interview with the BBC, which is not a direct quote from Rodgers. The ANSWER does not mention the reaction of the players, the team's form, or the manager's doubts about the team's chances of making the top four. The ANSWER also omits the manager's statement about Sterling's potential and the job of his advisors to explore possibilities beyond Liverpool. The ANSWER does mention the outcome of the game and the points gap, but this information is already present in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT, but it also does not provide a faithful summary of the article. The ANSWER does not capture the full context and nuances of Rodgers' statements, which are crucial to understanding the situation.\",\n\"The ANSWER does not provide any new information beyond what is already present in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER only repeats existing facts without adding any depth or analysis.\""
] |
365
|
{
"_id": 365,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, we can see that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. However, there are some minor omissions and inaccuracies.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels), which are all mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER also does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room, which are described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet), which are both mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" On the other hand, the ANSWER does correctly mention the suite's opening date (May), the English designer's involvement, and the exclusive shopping hour at Westwood's store.\",\n\" Overall, the ANSWER provides a basic summary of the Vivienne Westwood suite, but it lacks some essential details and fails to mention some key features of the suite.\",\n\" Despite these inaccuracies, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" Therefore, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it does not contain any major errors or contradictions.\",\n\" However, given the importance of accuracy and completeness, the ANSWER is still considered 'FAIL'.\"],\n\"SCORE\": 2,\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels).\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet).\"]"
}
|
2
|
[
"\n\"Comparing the ANSWER to the DOCUMENT, we can see that the ANSWER is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. However, there are some minor omissions and inaccuracies.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the suite's price ($25,000 a night), the hotel's renovation project, or the suite's location (11,000 square feet with two levels), which are all mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER also does not mention the master bedroom suite's features, such as the four poster bed, tapestry, and mirrored dressing room, which are described in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" The ANSWER does not mention the rooftop terrace's capacity (up to 300 people) or the private outdoor space's size (5,000 square feet), which are both mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" On the other hand, the ANSWER does correctly mention the suite's opening date (May), the English designer's involvement, and the exclusive shopping hour at Westwood's store.\",\n\" Overall, the ANSWER provides a basic summary of the Vivienne Westwood suite, but it lacks some essential details and fails to mention some key features of the suite.\",\n\" Despite these inaccuracies, the ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\" Therefore, the ANSWER is not entirely faithful to the DOCUMENT, but it does not contain any major errors or contradictions.\",\n\" However, given the importance of accuracy and completeness, the ANSWER is still considered 'FAIL'.\""
] |
281
|
{
"_id": 281,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) or its implications.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER does not provide a summary of the article as requested in the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention Susie Burrell or her top 5 most nutritious and least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the nutritional values of the breads listed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER does not provide new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not include any specific examples of breads as in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any quotes from Susie Burrell or Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the glycaemic index (GI) or its implications.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the trend of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not discuss the potential risks of cutting out whole food groups.\", \"The ANSWER does not mention the British Dietetic Association or its spokesperson Helen Bond.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any examples of the five most nutritious or least nutritious breads.\", \"The ANSWER does not provide any specific examples of the worst breads as listed in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
716
|
{
"_id": 716,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The answer does not mention the name of the book that Bunkie King wrote, 'Somebody I Used to Know: Love, Loss and Jack Thompson'. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the 1975 movie Scobie Malone, which Bunkie King appeared in with Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the salacious details of Bunkie King's 15-year affair with Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the unconventional arrangement of the three-way relationship between Bunkie King, Jack Thompson, and Leona. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's feelings of jealousy and problems caused by the relationship. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's revelation about her drug use, ranging from marijuana to acid to heroin. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King struggled to dampen her feelings for Jack Thompson despite her sister catching them kissing. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Jack Thompson felt 'like a bone being fought over by two dogs' when referring to his relationship with Bunkie King and Leona. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King fled Spain due to a serious showdown. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Bunkie King's current life, including her work in nursing and her divorced status. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention Leona's current life, including her relationship with Jack Thompson and their son Billy. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Jack Thompson was catapulted to sex symbol status overnight due to a pose emulating Titian's Venus d'Urbino. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King underwent three terminations due to pregnancy. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King was a virgin and struggled to dampen her feelings for Jack Thompson. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Leona did not know about Bunkie King's regular afternoon visits from Thompson at their mother's house. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Bunkie King felt bad for Leona and did not know how to give Jack Thompson up. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The answer does not mention the fact that Thompson and Leona are still in a relationship and live in regional NSW. This information is present in the DOCUMENT.\", \""
}
| null | null |
227
|
{
"_id": 227,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\n\"Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot, not Christiano Ronaldo, so the answer contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club, not the owners themselves.\",\n\"The answer inaccurately states that the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26 points, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the Seasiders are on 25 points and need one more point to be the lowest points tally ever accumulated by a team in the second tier.\",\n\"Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family.\",\n\"Blackpool's main reception at Bloomfield Road was pelted with eggs before their game with Reading, not the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26\"],\n\"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n\"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color:red'>Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot after just six minutes, but Christiano Ronaldo was not mentioned in the DOCUMENT</span>.\", \"<span style='color:red'>The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>The Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26, which is an inaccurate statement based on the DOCUMENT</span>\", \"<span style='color:red'>Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family</span>.\"] }"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n\"Jamie O'Hara scored from the penalty spot, not Christiano Ronaldo, so the answer contradicts information provided in the DOCUMENT.\",\n\"The answer incorrectly states that Blackpool fans protested against owners, the Oyston family, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the protesters were against the Oyston family's handling of the club, not the owners themselves.\",\n\"The answer inaccurately states that the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26 points, when in fact the DOCUMENT states that the Seasiders are on 25 points and need one more point to be the lowest points tally ever accumulated by a team in the second tier.\",\n\"Blackpool fans gathered outside Bloomfield Road to protest against the Oyston family, not against the owners, the Oyston family.\",\n\"Blackpool's main reception at Bloomfield Road was pelted with eggs before their game with Reading, not the Seasiders need two more points to pass Stockport's 26\""
] |
481
|
{
"_id": 481,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling.\", \"The ANSWER also contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\"], \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\", \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling ('She' instead of 'He')</span>\", \"<span style='color: red'>The ANSWER contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer (it mentions a £100,000-a-week contract for Sterling to stay, but the DOCUMENT states that Sterling turned down a new deal)</span>\"]}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\"The ANSWER is faithful to the DOCUMENT as it summarizes the main points discussed in the DOCUMENT.\", \"However, the ANSWER contains an error in the gender of Raheem Sterling.\", \"The ANSWER also contains an error in the information provided about the contract offer.\", \"The ANSWER does not contradict any information provided in the DOCUMENT.\", \"The ANSWER does not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT.\""
] |
168
|
{
"_id": 168,
"label": "FAIL",
"text": "{\n \"REASONING\": [\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that MH17 was shot down, not that it was downed.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that 305 people were killed on board MH17, when in fact it was 298.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of personal possessions, including jewellery, from the crash site, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team's efforts to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"\n ],\n \"SCORE\": \"FAIL\",\n \"HIGHLIGHTS\": [\n \"<span style='color:red'>MH17 was shot down, not downed</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Incorrect number of fatalities</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Missing recovery of personal possessions</span>\",\n \"<span style='color:red'>Missing details on site clearing efforts</span>\"\n ]\n}"
}
|
FAIL
|
[
"\n \"The ANSWER does not accurately summarize the DOCUMENT. The DOCUMENT states that MH17 was shot down, not that it was downed.\",\n \"The ANSWER incorrectly states that 305 people were killed on board MH17, when in fact it was 298.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the recovery of personal possessions, including jewellery, from the crash site, which is mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\",\n \"The ANSWER does not mention the Dutch-led team's efforts to clear the site, return items to bereaved families, and bring those responsible to justice, as mentioned in the DOCUMENT.\"\n "
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 10