<p>According to <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4064850?casa_token=fMRP0GkgsFwAAAAA:zCteek7BAmlxZJIUSEpiolzbO9L4Ev_4QfCILcpnaQB_vMt1Vp4KgdbgQpxOqONch3DvpCvWBH8cLw" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Bissell (2007)</a>,  MONIAC was based on a simple, first-order model of the dynamics of an economy (but authors also mention it could be recalibrated to higher-order models):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Let <span class="math-container">$u$</span> be the production flow, <span class="math-container">$v$</span> the consumption flow, <span class="math-container">$w$</span> the stocks and <span class="math-container">$p$</span> the price, all measured, for simplicity, from a base at which the system is in equilibrium. We have then, by definition, the identity</p>
<p><span class="math-container">$$U-V={dw\over dt}$$</span>
and three hypotheses,
<span class="math-container">$$\eqalignno{&amp;\ \ u=lp\cr &amp;v=mp}$$</span>
and
<span class="math-container">$$w=np$$</span>
where <span class="math-container">$l$</span> <span class="math-container">$m$</span>, and <span class="math-container">$n$</span> are parameters.
If at time <span class="math-container">$t=0$</span>, from equilibrium, there is a spontaneous change, <span class="math-container">$\Delta v$</span> in
consumption, then
<span class="math-container">$${dW\over dt}=u-(v+\Delta v)=(l-m)p-\Delta v$$</span>
Also,
<span class="math-container">$${dp\over dq}={1\over n}$$</span>
Therefore [after some manipulation] […]
<span class="math-container">$$n{dp\over dt}-(1-m)p+\Delta v=0$$</span>
The solution of this equation,
<span class="math-container">$$p={\Delta v\over l-m}(1-{e}^{{l-m \over n}t})$$</span>
gives the path of the induced price change. […]</p>
<p>This simple model could be further developed, in particular by making a distinction between working and liquid stocks, introducing lags into the production and consumption functions, and linking the demand curve for liquid stocks to the rate of change of price […].</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The above is in its essence based on the idea of circular flow combined with some canonical Keynesian macroeconomics.</p>
<p>For example, just compare the diagram representation of MONIAC (picture on left from <a href="http://mediaarchaeology.pbworks.com/w/page/105614919/The%20Phillips%20%28hydraulic%29%20computer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Media Archealogy wiki</a>) to the circular flow diagram from contemporary Krugman's macro textbook (picture on the right). You will notice that there is some resemblance although they are not exactly the same.</p>
<p>This being said both MONIAC and circular flow diagram are didactic tools (MONIAC was used by central banks for some time, but the machine was originally intended just for classroom use). Hence the actual models do not directly build on this ideas even though they are connected.</p>
<p>Modern models that try to model economy such as dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, relate to the MONIAC model only very superficially and don't build upon MONIAC model directly.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/cbw1jm.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/cbw1jm.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/TucjAm.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/TucjAm.jpg" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-02T15:47:10.137Z
2020-12-02T15:47:10.137Z
1muflon1
<p>Phillips designed a hydraulic computer to model the UK economy in 1949; 12-14 copies were built. What model did it compute with? How have modern models of the UK built on that work?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-02T14:39:37.960Z
I heard the basic principle of the Moniac was actions and feedbacks between different variables. One of these relationships being the Phillips curve (the original one, relating nominal wage acceleration with unemployment). So the formal equivalent would be a 'general disequilibrium' aggregate model described by a differential system. So something very different from general equilibrium and closer to the work of Semmler (https://ideas.repec.org/e/pse120.html) or Flaschel (https://ideas.repec.org/e/pfl107.html).
I would be very interested in a more informed answer.
user11629
<macroeconomics><mathematical-economics>
What model did the MONIAC use?
J.G.
# What model did the MONIAC use?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-03-01)

Phillips designed a hydraulic computer to model the UK economy in 1949; 12-14 copies were built. What model did it compute with? How have modern models of the UK built on that work?

**Tags:** macroeconomics, mathematical-economics
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I heard the basic principle of the Moniac was actions and feedbacks between different variables. One of these relationships being the Phillips curve (the original one, relating nominal wage acceleration with unemployment). So the formal equivalent would be a 'general disequilibrium' aggregate model described by a differential system. So something very different from general equilibrium and closer to the work of Semmler (https://ideas.repec.org/e/pse120.html) or Flaschel (https://ideas.repec.org/e/pfl107.html). I would be very interested in a more informed answer.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-12-02. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

According to [Bissell (2007)](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4064850?casa_token=fMRP0GkgsFwAAAAA:zCteek7BAmlxZJIUSEpiolzbO9L4Ev_4QfCILcpnaQB_vMt1Vp4KgdbgQpxOqONch3DvpCvWBH8cLw), MONIAC was based on a simple, first-order model of the dynamics of an economy (but authors also mention it could be recalibrated to higher-order models):

> Let $u$ be the production flow, $v$ the consumption flow, $w$ the stocks and $p$ the price, all measured, for simplicity, from a base at which the system is in equilibrium. We have then, by definition, the identity
>
> $$U-V={dw\over dt}$$
> and three hypotheses,
> $$\eqalignno{&\ \ u=lp\cr &v=mp}$$
> and
> $$w=np$$
> where $l$ $m$, and $n$ are parameters.
> If at time $t=0$, from equilibrium, there is a spontaneous change, $\Delta v$ in
> consumption, then
> $${dW\over dt}=u-(v+\Delta v)=(l-m)p-\Delta v$$
> Also,
> $${dp\over dq}={1\over n}$$
> Therefore [after some manipulation] […]
> $$n{dp\over dt}-(1-m)p+\Delta v=0$$
> The solution of this equation,
> $$p={\Delta v\over l-m}(1-{e}^{{l-m \over n}t})$$
> gives the path of the induced price change. […]
>
> This simple model could be further developed, in particular by making a distinction between working and liquid stocks, introducing lags into the production and consumption functions, and linking the demand curve for liquid stocks to the rate of change of price […].

The above is in its essence based on the idea of circular flow combined with some canonical Keynesian macroeconomics.

For example, just compare the diagram representation of MONIAC (picture on left from [Media Archealogy wiki](http://mediaarchaeology.pbworks.com/w/page/105614919/The%20Phillips%20%28hydraulic%29%20computer)) to the circular flow diagram from contemporary Krugman's macro textbook (picture on the right). You will notice that there is some resemblance although they are not exactly the same.

This being said both MONIAC and circular flow diagram are didactic tools (MONIAC was used by central banks for some time, but the machine was originally intended just for classroom use). Hence the actual models do not directly build on this ideas even though they are connected.

Modern models that try to model economy such as dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, relate to the MONIAC model only very superficially and don't build upon MONIAC model directly.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/cbw1jm.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/cbw1jm.png)[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/TucjAm.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/TucjAm.jpg)


---

