<p>The fiscal multiplier in (iv) would arise from</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$ Y = C+I+G$$</span></p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$ Y = a + c(Y-T)-d\alpha Y +G+I.$$</span></p>

<p>This can be rearranged as </p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$Y(1-c+d\alpha)=a-cT+G+I,$$</span></p>

<p>and, therefore, the fiscal multiplier would be</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$\frac{1}{1-c+d\alpha}.$$</span></p>

<p>In order for this to equal <span class="math-container">$1$</span>, you just need <span class="math-container">$d\alpha=c.$</span></p>

<p>Note that setting <span class="math-container">$d\alpha=c$</span> in your "multiplier" does not yield 1:</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$\frac{1}{1-c}+\frac{1}{1-d\alpha}=\frac{1}{1-c}+\frac{1}{1-c}=\frac{2}{1-c}.$$</span></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T19:02:52.327Z
Thank you! This is very helpful. 
As for the balanced budget multiplier, am I correct to think that it is equal to 1 (the fiscal multiplier) + c (the multiplier associated with an increase in T)?
That is, balanced budget multiplier is 1 + c?
Dila
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T11:30:17.413Z
2019-01-04T11:30:17.413Z
Patricio
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/HyylL.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/HyylL.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>Hi! I am trying to understand the problem above, and was wondering if someone could help me with the last question. I think I am fine with all other questions. </p>

<p>Here is my attempt: </p>

<p>(i)
The fiscal multiplier is <span class="math-container">$\frac{1}{1-c} \Delta G$</span>, as it is the infinite sum <span class="math-container">$ \Delta G + c\Delta G + c^2\Delta G + ... $</span>. </p>

<p>Depends on c because the increase in government spending first leads to an increase in Y, which leads to an increase in C, which then leads to another increase in Y, but this time the increase in only <span class="math-container">$cY$</span>, as part of the income is saved. </p>

<p>(ii) Balanced budget multiplier is 1, as <span class="math-container">$\Delta Y = \frac{1}{1-c} \Delta G + \frac{-c}{1-c} \Delta T$</span> with <span class="math-container">$ \Delta T = \Delta G$</span></p>

<p>This means that an increase in government spending that is matched by an identical increase in lump sum taxed increases output by the same amount as the increase in G (and T).</p>

<p>(iii) <span class="math-container">$$\Delta Y = \frac{\Delta X}{0.01} = 100$$</span> </p>

<p>This means that giving me an additional unit of currency will increase total income by 100, as it feeds back into income and consumption infinitely. </p>

<p>(iv) This is the question where I would like some guidance. Here is my work so far: </p>

<p>We have: 
<span class="math-container">$$ C= a + c(Y-T) - d\alpha Y$$</span></p>

<p>The multiplier associated with an increase in G should now be: 
<span class="math-container">$$\frac{1}{1-c} + \frac{1}{1-d\alpha}$$</span>
The first part is the "old multiplier, the second is the effect of the new part of the consumption function? I am not sure that this is correct, happy to receive comments!</p>

<p>This would mean that <span class="math-container">$c=d\alpha$</span>.</p>

<p>And then, the multiplier associated with an increase in T:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>1st round: Y increases by <span class="math-container">$c\Delta T$</span></p></li>
<li><p>2nd round: C increases by <span class="math-container">$c^2\Delta T + d\alpha \Delta T = 2 c^2\Delta T$</span></p></li>
<li><p>Then Y increases by <span class="math-container">$2 c^2\Delta T$</span></p></li>
<li><p>3rd round: C increases by <span class="math-container">$4 c^3\Delta T$</span></p></li>
</ul>

<p>Does this mean that the multiplier is this sum: <span class="math-container">$$2^0C^1\Delta T + 2^1C^2\Delta T + 2^2C^2\Delta T + ... $$</span></p>

<p>And then the balanced budget multiplier would be this last result + 1 (the other multiplier, from the increase in G)? </p>

<p>I'd be super grateful to anyone who could help me with question (iv)! </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T18:01:39.597Z
This question would be improved by converting the picture at the beginning into text.
Kitsune Cavalry
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T19:06:54.593Z
Sorry about this, I will definitely covert pictures into text next time I post a question. Thank you for the feedback.
Dila
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-25T02:58:54.410Z
The balanced budget multiplier is 1 if you assume that all of the increase in income becomes disposable income but that is often not the case, due to taxes, transfers, as well as depreciation payments. If we assume that the proportion of the increase in income that results in the increase in disposable income is $d_0$, then the balanced budget multiplier is $\frac{1 - c}{1 - cd_0}$ where c is the marginal propensity to consume.
Tan Yong Boon
<macroeconomics><keynesian-economics>
Keynesian Cross and Balanced Budget Multiplier
Dila
# Keynesian Cross and Balanced Budget Multiplier

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-01-03)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/HyylL.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/HyylL.png)

Hi! I am trying to understand the problem above, and was wondering if someone could help me with the last question. I think I am fine with all other questions.

Here is my attempt:

(i)
The fiscal multiplier is $\frac{1}{1-c} \Delta G$, as it is the infinite sum $ \Delta G + c\Delta G + c^2\Delta G + ... $.

Depends on c because the increase in government spending first leads to an increase in Y, which leads to an increase in C, which then leads to another increase in Y, but this time the increase in only $cY$, as part of the income is saved.

(ii) Balanced budget multiplier is 1, as $\Delta Y = \frac{1}{1-c} \Delta G + \frac{-c}{1-c} \Delta T$ with $ \Delta T = \Delta G$

This means that an increase in government spending that is matched by an identical increase in lump sum taxed increases output by the same amount as the increase in G (and T).

(iii) $$\Delta Y = \frac{\Delta X}{0.01} = 100$$

This means that giving me an additional unit of currency will increase total income by 100, as it feeds back into income and consumption infinitely.

(iv) This is the question where I would like some guidance. Here is my work so far:

We have:
$$ C= a + c(Y-T) - d\alpha Y$$

The multiplier associated with an increase in G should now be:
$$\frac{1}{1-c} + \frac{1}{1-d\alpha}$$
The first part is the "old multiplier, the second is the effect of the new part of the consumption function? I am not sure that this is correct, happy to receive comments!

This would mean that $c=d\alpha$.

And then, the multiplier associated with an increase in T:

* 1st round: Y increases by $c\Delta T$
* 2nd round: C increases by $c^2\Delta T + d\alpha \Delta T = 2 c^2\Delta T$
* Then Y increases by $2 c^2\Delta T$
* 3rd round: C increases by $4 c^3\Delta T$

Does this mean that the multiplier is this sum: $$2^0C^1\Delta T + 2^1C^2\Delta T + 2^2C^2\Delta T + ... $$

And then the balanced budget multiplier would be this last result + 1 (the other multiplier, from the increase in G)?

I'd be super grateful to anyone who could help me with question (iv)!

**Tags:** macroeconomics, keynesian-economics
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: This question would be improved by converting the picture at the beginning into text.  
> **username_0**: Sorry about this, I will definitely covert pictures into text next time I post a question. Thank you for the feedback.  
> **username_2**: The balanced budget multiplier is 1 if you assume that all of the increase in income becomes disposable income but that is often not the case, due to taxes, transfers, as well as depreciation payments. If we assume that the proportion of the increase in income that results in the increase in disposable income is $d_0$, then the balanced budget multiplier is $\frac{1 - c}{1 - cd_0}$ where c is the marginal propensity to consume.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-01-04. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

The fiscal multiplier in (iv) would arise from

$$ Y = C+I+G$$

$$ Y = a + c(Y-T)-d\alpha Y +G+I.$$

This can be rearranged as

$$Y(1-c+d\alpha)=a-cT+G+I,$$

and, therefore, the fiscal multiplier would be

$$\frac{1}{1-c+d\alpha}.$$

In order for this to equal $1$, you just need $d\alpha=c.$

Note that setting $d\alpha=c$ in your "multiplier" does not yield 1:

$$\frac{1}{1-c}+\frac{1}{1-d\alpha}=\frac{1}{1-c}+\frac{1}{1-c}=\frac{2}{1-c}.$$

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you! This is very helpful.  As for the balanced budget multiplier, am I correct to think that it is equal to 1 (the fiscal multiplier) + c (the multiplier associated with an increase in T)? That is, balanced budget multiplier is 1 + c?  

---

