<p>It happened because expectations of future profitability were downgraded.</p>

<p>No, it's not equivalent to \$2tn of goods sinking to the bottom of the ocean, for two reasons. Firstly, there's no effect on any present tangible material. And secondly, the change could be reversed by some other change in expectations of future profitability.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-28T09:20:27.627Z
2016-06-28T09:31:34.220Z
2016-06-28T09:31:34.220Z
410 gone
<p>The two trillion they refer to is Market CAP of public traded companies, thus they literally say it devalued the stock market for two trillion dollars. </p>

<p>Read an explainer about Market CAP <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/031703.asp" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><strong>Market Capitalization Defined</strong> </a>.</p>

<p>Anyways, there was a lot of leveraged speculation involved and / or institutional investors, i strongly doubt the average joe sat awake at night (in Europe) and just waited to press sell (and everybody in the same 5 minutes).</p>

<p>Joking by side - my indicators drew the picture that in majority only stocks included in indices where sold off. </p>

<p>In the end it appears that leveraged speculation wiped of a large part of that stack (to speak in that language), even "solid" names dropped on EU open up to minus 20% (villeroy &amp; boch ag for example, just to climb back to minus 2% (FLASH CRASH INDEED) ) -- it also appeared that leveraged speculators sold pound vs gold once it was clear that leave wins the vote..</p>

<p>Of course while the initial reaction appears to be facilitated by leveraged HFT, the brexit is expected to have negative consequences for trade in the UK and for EU countries. There is no fixed plan how the brexit would happen and if tariffs and trade deals change in a negative way for the economy. For the long run there are also talks about loss of GDP between ~ 6-9% (All speculation, the guy with the crystal ball please raise your hand). </p>

<p>Bottom line, lowered economic outlook, uncertainty and speculation very likely worked in a combined manner to "Wipe OFF" .</p>

<p>Heres a screenshot of a chart from a portfolio that relocated into oversold solid stocks on the dip on EU market open, went from roughly minus 10% in the green...
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/VT9Hr.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/VT9Hr.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-26T07:00:38.050Z
This answers the question "what type of stocks lost value?" and not the question posted above.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-26T07:32:27.300Z
Please read the last paragraph "In the end it appears" im about to add a paragraph.
Aurigae
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-26T12:24:53.910Z
You seem to be going into more and more details about what exactly happened in the stock market. That is nice and correct as far as I can tell, but it does not seem to address the question. I think the OP is not a finance professional, so in my opinion the question is: What does it mean if the stocks dropped, totaling a loss of $2 trillion? See last sentence of the question.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-26T12:34:39.957Z
Ill have a look to rephrase later on, tried to answer in best effort.
Aurigae
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-26T01:15:08.967Z
2016-06-26T12:38:35.627Z
2016-06-26T12:38:35.627Z
Aurigae
<p>Think about it this way:</p>

<p>You own 100 houses on a private island in Italy. These houses could be sold for $1 million each. </p>

<p>All of a sudden, the Italian prime minister outlaws all boats. There is now no way to get onto the island apart from swimming.</p>

<p>Since you can no longer get onto the island by boat, and have to swim, no one wants to live in your houses, and thus no one wants to buy them for \$1 million. Your houses are still quite nice, though, so people instead will offer to buy them for $200,000. </p>

<p>Your houses were originally worth \$100 million in total (that's how much you would have got if you sold them) but are now only worth $20 million. You have 'lost' \$80 million. </p>

<p>In Brexit, instead of houses, we have stocks. These stocks were originally worth a certain amount of money. When Brexit occurred, people no longer wanted to buy or own British things, because they thought that they would be worth less. The total value of British things dropped by $2 trillion. It's important to note that the things are still there (the stocks didn't disappear!) but are simply valued less to investors. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-27T13:56:19.507Z
2016-06-27T13:56:19.507Z
Kontorus
<p>I read here (<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2016/jun/24/global-markets-ftse-pound-uk-leave-eu-brexit-live-updates">https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2016/jun/24/global-markets-ftse-pound-uk-leave-eu-brexit-live-updates</a>) and elsewhere that Brexit wiped \$2tr off world markets.</p>

<p>How did that happen?</p>

<p>Is this equivalent to \$2tr worth of a certain good, sinking to the bottom of the ocean?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-25T22:31:19.470Z
In short, I would say there's an expectations adjustment, just like in any other financial asset valuation. They updated their expected returns, after the negative shock of Brexit.
An old man in the sea.
<macroeconomics>
How did Brexit wipe $2 trillion off world markets?
Kostas
# How did Brexit wipe $2 trillion off world markets?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-06-25)

I read here (<https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2016/jun/24/global-markets-ftse-pound-uk-leave-eu-brexit-live-updates>) and elsewhere that Brexit wiped \$2tr off world markets.

How did that happen?

Is this equivalent to \$2tr worth of a certain good, sinking to the bottom of the ocean?

**Tags:** macroeconomics
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: In short, I would say there's an expectations adjustment, just like in any other financial asset valuation. They updated their expected returns, after the negative shock of Brexit.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2016-06-27. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

Think about it this way:

You own 100 houses on a private island in Italy. These houses could be sold for $1 million each.

All of a sudden, the Italian prime minister outlaws all boats. There is now no way to get onto the island apart from swimming.

Since you can no longer get onto the island by boat, and have to swim, no one wants to live in your houses, and thus no one wants to buy them for \$1 million. Your houses are still quite nice, though, so people instead will offer to buy them for $200,000.

Your houses were originally worth \$100 million in total (that's how much you would have got if you sold them) but are now only worth $20 million. You have 'lost' \$80 million.

In Brexit, instead of houses, we have stocks. These stocks were originally worth a certain amount of money. When Brexit occurred, people no longer wanted to buy or own British things, because they thought that they would be worth less. The total value of British things dropped by $2 trillion. It's important to note that the things are still there (the stocks didn't disappear!) but are simply valued less to investors.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-06-28. Score: 4

It happened because expectations of future profitability were downgraded.

No, it's not equivalent to \$2tn of goods sinking to the bottom of the ocean, for two reasons. Firstly, there's no effect on any present tangible material. And secondly, the change could be reversed by some other change in expectations of future profitability.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-06-26. Score: 0

The two trillion they refer to is Market CAP of public traded companies, thus they literally say it devalued the stock market for two trillion dollars.

Read an explainer about Market CAP [**Market Capitalization Defined**](http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/031703.asp) .

Anyways, there was a lot of leveraged speculation involved and / or institutional investors, i strongly doubt the average joe sat awake at night (in Europe) and just waited to press sell (and everybody in the same 5 minutes).

Joking by side - my indicators drew the picture that in majority only stocks included in indices where sold off.

In the end it appears that leveraged speculation wiped of a large part of that stack (to speak in that language), even "solid" names dropped on EU open up to minus 20% (villeroy & boch ag for example, just to climb back to minus 2% (FLASH CRASH INDEED) ) -- it also appeared that leveraged speculators sold pound vs gold once it was clear that leave wins the vote..

Of course while the initial reaction appears to be facilitated by leveraged HFT, the brexit is expected to have negative consequences for trade in the UK and for EU countries. There is no fixed plan how the brexit would happen and if tariffs and trade deals change in a negative way for the economy. For the long run there are also talks about loss of GDP between ~ 6-9% (All speculation, the guy with the crystal ball please raise your hand).

Bottom line, lowered economic outlook, uncertainty and speculation very likely worked in a combined manner to "Wipe OFF" .

Heres a screenshot of a chart from a portfolio that relocated into oversold solid stocks on the dip on EU market open, went from roughly minus 10% in the green...
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/VT9Hr.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/VT9Hr.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: This answers the question "what type of stocks lost value?" and not the question posted above.  
> **username_3**: Please read the last paragraph "In the end it appears" im about to add a paragraph.  
> **username_4**: You seem to be going into more and more details about what exactly happened in the stock market. That is nice and correct as far as I can tell, but it does not seem to address the question. I think the OP is not a finance professional, so in my opinion the question is: What does it mean if the stocks dropped, totaling a loss of $2 trillion? See last sentence of the question.  
> **username_3**: Ill have a look to rephrase later on, tried to answer in best effort.  

---

