<p>Looking to see if there's any game theory literature in which 2+ players play a game of incomplete information. One set of (informed) players gives Spence-like signals to the uninformed player(s). The uninformed players then devote resources to learn the validity of those signals.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-20T06:10:14.407Z
I would not use the word "validation" here, I personally associate it with econometrics. Currently I have no good suggestion for alternatives. (Spying? Researching? Refining information sets?)
Giskard
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-20T18:06:33.307Z
That's likely a better word for it; I'm thinking of a model of, e.g., background checks in gun control. You observe information on the applicant's sanity given the applicant's signal but then use the FBI as a third-party verification system
dazednconfused
<game-theory><bayesian-game><asymmetric-information><information>
Papers on signalling + validation?
dazednconfused
# Papers on signalling + validation?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2024-04-19)

Looking to see if there's any game theory literature in which 2+ players play a game of incomplete information. One set of (informed) players gives Spence-like signals to the uninformed player(s). The uninformed players then devote resources to learn the validity of those signals.

**Tags:** game-theory, bayesian-game, asymmetric-information, information
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I would not use the word "validation" here, I personally associate it with econometrics. Currently I have no good suggestion for alternatives. (Spying? Researching? Refining information sets?)  
> **username_0**: That's likely a better word for it; I'm thinking of a model of, e.g., background checks in gun control. You observe information on the applicant's sanity given the applicant's signal but then use the FBI as a third-party verification system  

---

## 0 answers

