<p>Yes in this case producer surplus is <span class="math-container">$\\\$1$</span> and consumer surplus is <span class="math-container">$\\\$2$</span>. Your calculations are thus correct.</p>
<p>Generally, producer and consumer surplus are not just willingness to pay minus market price times quantity, and market price minus marginal cost times quantity, but in this case they are.</p>
<p>Generally producer and consumer surplus are defined as area under the demand curve and above market price (for consumer surplus) and area under market price but above supply curve for producer surplus (see Mankiw Principles of Economics for undergraduate explanation or Varian Microeconomic Analysis for more rigorous info on the definition). More rigorously they are given as:</p>
<p><span class="math-container">$$CS =  \int^{q_m}_0 D(q) dq − p_mq_m $$</span></p>
<p>where <span class="math-container">$D(q)$</span> is arbitrary demand curve, <span class="math-container">$p_m$</span> is price consumers have to pay in the market, and <span class="math-container">$q_m$</span> quantity sold at the market.</p>
<p><span class="math-container">$$PS =  p_mq_m - \int^{q_m}_0 S(q) dq $$</span></p>
<p>where <span class="math-container">$S(q)$</span> is arbitrary supply curve.</p>
<p>However, in your special case you can use formulas <span class="math-container">$CS=(W-p_m)\cdot q_m$</span> and <span class="math-container">$PS=(p_m-MC)\cdot q_m$</span>, because in your special case both CS and PS are rectangles and <em>area</em> of an rectangle is given by <span class="math-container">$ab$</span> and here the expressions in the brackets give you the hight of the rectangle (<span class="math-container">$a$</span>) and quantity gives you the base of rectangle <span class="math-container">$b$</span> (you could still use the integrals that would give you same results but it would be overkill and waste time in this simple case).  Graphically your problem looks like:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/cctj9.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/cctj9.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-09T14:32:18.427Z
Ah okay thank you! I was completely overcomplicating it in my head, especially the graph...thanks again for all the clarification!
idontknowanygoodusernames
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-09T09:31:12.870Z
2021-03-09T09:31:12.870Z
1muflon1
<p>Linda is willing to pay <code>$6</code> for a cereal box. Linda bought a cereal box for <code>$4</code>.  The marginal cost of producing that cereal box is <code>$3</code> per box. Assuming the price Linda paid was the equilibrium price, what is the producer surplus?</p>
<p>I've been wracking my head trying to wrap my head around this topic but I'm getting really confused, mostly about how this would look on a graph. My notes tell me Producer Surplus = (Market Price - Marginal Cost) * Quantity Sold, but I don't think it can be that easy...Producer Surplus is only <code>$1</code>, while Consumer Surplus would be <code>$2</code>? Could anyone please explain how this would look graphically? Thanks very much in advance!</p>

<supply-and-demand><self-study><producer-surplus><nonexpert>
What is the producer surplus given the price the consumer paid + price they are willing to pay, and the marginal cost of producing the product?
idontknowanygoodusernames
# What is the producer surplus given the price the consumer paid + price they are willing to pay, and the marginal cost of producing the product?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-03-09)

Linda is willing to pay `$6` for a cereal box. Linda bought a cereal box for `$4`. The marginal cost of producing that cereal box is `$3` per box. Assuming the price Linda paid was the equilibrium price, what is the producer surplus?

I've been wracking my head trying to wrap my head around this topic but I'm getting really confused, mostly about how this would look on a graph. My notes tell me Producer Surplus = (Market Price - Marginal Cost) \* Quantity Sold, but I don't think it can be that easy...Producer Surplus is only `$1`, while Consumer Surplus would be `$2`? Could anyone please explain how this would look graphically? Thanks very much in advance!

**Tags:** supply-and-demand, self-study, producer-surplus, nonexpert

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-03-09. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Yes in this case producer surplus is $\\\$1$ and consumer surplus is $\\\$2$. Your calculations are thus correct.

Generally, producer and consumer surplus are not just willingness to pay minus market price times quantity, and market price minus marginal cost times quantity, but in this case they are.

Generally producer and consumer surplus are defined as area under the demand curve and above market price (for consumer surplus) and area under market price but above supply curve for producer surplus (see Mankiw Principles of Economics for undergraduate explanation or Varian Microeconomic Analysis for more rigorous info on the definition). More rigorously they are given as:

$$CS = \int^{q\_m}\_0 D(q) dq − p\_mq\_m $$

where $D(q)$ is arbitrary demand curve, $p\_m$ is price consumers have to pay in the market, and $q\_m$ quantity sold at the market.

$$PS = p\_mq\_m - \int^{q\_m}\_0 S(q) dq $$

where $S(q)$ is arbitrary supply curve.

However, in your special case you can use formulas $CS=(W-p\_m)\cdot q\_m$ and $PS=(p\_m-MC)\cdot q\_m$, because in your special case both CS and PS are rectangles and *area* of an rectangle is given by $ab$ and here the expressions in the brackets give you the hight of the rectangle ($a$) and quantity gives you the base of rectangle $b$ (you could still use the integrals that would give you same results but it would be overkill and waste time in this simple case). Graphically your problem looks like:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/cctj9.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/cctj9.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Ah okay thank you! I was completely overcomplicating it in my head, especially the graph...thanks again for all the clarification!  

---

