<p>It makes little sense to me either, but here are some possible reasons for buying a bond with negative interest rates rather than depositing the same amount in a bank:</p>

<ol>
<li>The deposit-taking bank may go bankrupt during the lifetime of the bond and your deposit would be too large to be guaranteed, with the cost of default insurance being higher than the the negative interest</li>
<li>The bank may start charging you for holding your deposit at some time during the lifetime of the bond, at a higher cost to you than the negative interest</li>
<li>You may be legally obliged to hold bonds, for example as a pension or insurance company</li>
<li>You run an Exchange Traded Fund or similar investment tracking a bond index and some of the bonds in the index have negative interest rates </li>
<li>You are a foreign investor who only cares about the combination of the current exchange rate, future exchange rate and interest rate, not any individual component of this triangle, or you believe currency appreciation will more than compensate for negative interest</li>
<li>You are a derivatives trader, and the market prices of derivatives lead to an arbitrage opportunity where you can only guarantee a profit by buying the bond </li>
<li>You believe that at some time in the future you may be able to sell the bond for more than you paid for it (i.e. an even more negative yield), perhaps to a central bank's quantitative easing programme</li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-10T15:51:51.410Z
2016-09-12T10:12:51.870Z
2016-09-12T10:12:51.870Z
Henry
<p>@Henry gives a good answer with lots of interesting reasons. However, there are lots macro-model setting where the demand for risk free assets is positive, even when the interest on savings is negative. Essentially, because risk is unpleasant and we don't have any good alternative  technology to the market for risk-less assets to move our savings through time, risk adverse entities will generally have a positive quantity of the risk-free asset regardless of the interest rate. </p>

<p>And, to some extent, this meshes with our intuition about how savings works. The poor medieval farmer puts away ("saves") food in the summer for winter knowing that much of it will spoil and there certainly won't be any more than he puts in ("negative interest") but because he doesn't have a bank or because agricultural prices are higher in the winter, he can't simply sell all his produce today, save the money, and buy the food later. </p>

<p>In fact, if you have log-utility preferences the income and substitution effects cancel (see for example <a href="http://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/Consumption2009-11-25.pdf" rel="nofollow">Jones chapter 20</a>) and no change in interest rates up or down changes the consumption and savings decision. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-21T19:53:33.780Z
2016-09-21T19:53:33.780Z
BKay
<p>Basically, every cut in interest rates discourages saving/holding bonds, also when the interest rate goes into negative territory</p>

<p>It was long believed that when interest rates are zero (or negative) nobody has an incentive to hold bonds/assets, as there is no opportunity cost in holding cash (and cash is more liquid).</p>

<p>However, it turned out that investors are still willing to hold bonds. The main reason is that negative interest rates are still cheaper than holding and securing cash (i.e. storage costs) and (to a lesser extent) that writing checks and withdrawing money from the ATM is still preferred to managing your cash holdings on your own.</p>

<p>Look at this <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/how-negative-can-rates-go/" rel="nofollow" title="blog entry">blog entry</a> for an interesting discussion on the topic.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-21T06:16:15.660Z
Do you see that behaviour of big players would be changing? I'll guess some CIO's are not very fond of negative rates and are actually considering other low-risk investments. Some companies have systematically changed their strategic allocation as rates have dropped.
Gspia
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-20T20:14:02.097Z
2016-09-20T20:14:02.097Z
Chris tie
<p>I don't get why central banks apply negative interest rates. They say that buy our bond and at the maturity, it will worth less than today. What is the policy outcome of such decision?
Why an investor still accepts this or is it just a mechanism to indirectly discourage bond sellings?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T11:19:49.363Z
On why an investor may accept negative yields: institutional investors may be stuck to low or negative yiels, because regulations force them to hold assets with long maturities. In addition, if even lower rates than today are expected in the future, investing in bonds with a negative yield may be expected to be profitable, because of an expected capital gain.
Wecon
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-10T14:18:29.803Z
In [this BBC article](http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35755100) it is suggested that investors buy "the bonds with a view to selling them later when the central bank goes into the market as part of its quantitative easing programme, which involves buying financial assets with newly created money. In other cases, banks have been more willing to buy bonds with negative returns because they are charged by the central bank if they deposit excess funds. In some cases, foreign investors think they can make money if the currency rises enough to compensate for the negative yield."
Jan Höffler
<monetary-policy><interest-rate><central-banking>
Why should I get a bond with negative interest instead of having a bank deposit account either zero interest or positive interest
user9386
# Why should I get a bond with negative interest instead of having a bank deposit account either zero interest or positive interest

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-02-11)

I don't get why central banks apply negative interest rates. They say that buy our bond and at the maturity, it will worth less than today. What is the policy outcome of such decision?
Why an investor still accepts this or is it just a mechanism to indirectly discourage bond sellings?

**Tags:** monetary-policy, interest-rate, central-banking
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: On why an investor may accept negative yields: institutional investors may be stuck to low or negative yiels, because regulations force them to hold assets with long maturities. In addition, if even lower rates than today are expected in the future, investing in bonds with a negative yield may be expected to be profitable, because of an expected capital gain.  
> **username_2**: In [this BBC article](http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35755100) it is suggested that investors buy "the bonds with a view to selling them later when the central bank goes into the market as part of its quantitative easing programme, which involves buying financial assets with newly created money. In other cases, banks have been more willing to buy bonds with negative returns because they are charged by the central bank if they deposit excess funds. In some cases, foreign investors think they can make money if the currency rises enough to compensate for the negative yield."  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-09-10. Score: 7

It makes little sense to me either, but here are some possible reasons for buying a bond with negative interest rates rather than depositing the same amount in a bank:

1. The deposit-taking bank may go bankrupt during the lifetime of the bond and your deposit would be too large to be guaranteed, with the cost of default insurance being higher than the the negative interest
2. The bank may start charging you for holding your deposit at some time during the lifetime of the bond, at a higher cost to you than the negative interest
3. You may be legally obliged to hold bonds, for example as a pension or insurance company
4. You run an Exchange Traded Fund or similar investment tracking a bond index and some of the bonds in the index have negative interest rates
5. You are a foreign investor who only cares about the combination of the current exchange rate, future exchange rate and interest rate, not any individual component of this triangle, or you believe currency appreciation will more than compensate for negative interest
6. You are a derivatives trader, and the market prices of derivatives lead to an arbitrage opportunity where you can only guarantee a profit by buying the bond
7. You believe that at some time in the future you may be able to sell the bond for more than you paid for it (i.e. an even more negative yield), perhaps to a central bank's quantitative easing programme


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2016-09-21. Score: 5

@Henry gives a good answer with lots of interesting reasons. However, there are lots macro-model setting where the demand for risk free assets is positive, even when the interest on savings is negative. Essentially, because risk is unpleasant and we don't have any good alternative technology to the market for risk-less assets to move our savings through time, risk adverse entities will generally have a positive quantity of the risk-free asset regardless of the interest rate.

And, to some extent, this meshes with our intuition about how savings works. The poor medieval farmer puts away ("saves") food in the summer for winter knowing that much of it will spoil and there certainly won't be any more than he puts in ("negative interest") but because he doesn't have a bank or because agricultural prices are higher in the winter, he can't simply sell all his produce today, save the money, and buy the food later.

In fact, if you have log-utility preferences the income and substitution effects cancel (see for example [Jones chapter 20](http://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/Consumption2009-11-25.pdf)) and no change in interest rates up or down changes the consumption and savings decision.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2016-09-20. Score: 3

Basically, every cut in interest rates discourages saving/holding bonds, also when the interest rate goes into negative territory

It was long believed that when interest rates are zero (or negative) nobody has an incentive to hold bonds/assets, as there is no opportunity cost in holding cash (and cash is more liquid).

However, it turned out that investors are still willing to hold bonds. The main reason is that negative interest rates are still cheaper than holding and securing cash (i.e. storage costs) and (to a lesser extent) that writing checks and withdrawing money from the ATM is still preferred to managing your cash holdings on your own.

Look at this [blog entry](http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/how-negative-can-rates-go/ "blog entry") for an interesting discussion on the topic.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: Do you see that behaviour of big players would be changing? I'll guess some CIO's are not very fond of negative rates and are actually considering other low-risk investments. Some companies have systematically changed their strategic allocation as rates have dropped.  

---

