<p>The argument is that if there are constant returns to scale then the marginal product of each factor of production is constant as total quantity changes. This makes the production function homogeneous in the first degree and it will look something like 
$$Q=\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial A}A +\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial B}B +\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial C}C$$</p>

<p>Then if each factor of production is paid at a rate equal to its marginal product, the complete value of the production will be distributed to the factors of production, since </p>

<p>$$PQ-\left(P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial A}A +P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial B}B +P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial C}C\right)=0$$</p>

<p>so there will be no economic rent or profit</p>

<p>The practical problem with this is that constant returns to scale is a very strong assumption.  The theoretical problem (at least for marginalist theories) is that there is no natural equilibrium for the level of production</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-06T09:02:09.143Z
Thanks for the response, this is a little more clear than the one given in the mankiw text book. I will be thankful if you could answer another question that I have asked relating to supply and demand(https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/20439/how-price-and-quantity-of-ice-cream-sold-changes-when-you-price-of-yogurt-reduce).
Piyush Divyanakar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-07T18:58:13.313Z
"The argument is that if there are constant returns to scale then the marginal product of each factor of production is constant as total quantity changes." - This is not true - what you need to do is take the production function $ Q(A, B, C) $ and look at the derivative with respect to $ t $ of $ Q(tA, tB, tC) = t Q(A, B, C) $ using the chain rule. The marginal product of each factor can change as the quantity supplied of that factor changes - no, not all constant returns to scale production functions are linear.
Ege Erdil
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-06T08:58:02.517Z
2018-02-06T08:58:02.517Z
Henry
<p>This was mentioned in my textbook <em>Macroeconomics-Gregory Mankiw</em>. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If the production function has the property of constant returns to scale, as is often thought to be the case, then economic profit must be zero. That is, nothing is left after the factors of production are paid.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It was mentioned that this comes out as a result of <em>Euler's Theorem</em>, but I don't quite understand it, can anyone please clarify this? </p>

<macroeconomics>
How constant returns to scale leads to zero economic profit?
Piyush Divyanakar
# How constant returns to scale leads to zero economic profit?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-02-06)

This was mentioned in my textbook *Macroeconomics-Gregory Mankiw*.

> If the production function has the property of constant returns to scale, as is often thought to be the case, then economic profit must be zero. That is, nothing is left after the factors of production are paid.

It was mentioned that this comes out as a result of *Euler's Theorem*, but I don't quite understand it, can anyone please clarify this?

**Tags:** macroeconomics

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-02-06. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

The argument is that if there are constant returns to scale then the marginal product of each factor of production is constant as total quantity changes. This makes the production function homogeneous in the first degree and it will look something like
$$Q=\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial A}A +\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial B}B +\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial C}C$$

Then if each factor of production is paid at a rate equal to its marginal product, the complete value of the production will be distributed to the factors of production, since

$$PQ-\left(P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial A}A +P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial B}B +P\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial C}C\right)=0$$

so there will be no economic rent or profit

The practical problem with this is that constant returns to scale is a very strong assumption. The theoretical problem (at least for marginalist theories) is that there is no natural equilibrium for the level of production

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for the response, this is a little more clear than the one given in the mankiw text book. I will be thankful if you could answer another question that I have asked relating to supply and demand(https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/20439/how-price-and-quantity-of-ice-cream-sold-changes-when-you-price-of-yogurt-reduce).  
> **username_2**: "The argument is that if there are constant returns to scale then the marginal product of each factor of production is constant as total quantity changes." - This is not true - what you need to do is take the production function $ Q(A, B, C) $ and look at the derivative with respect to $ t $ of $ Q(tA, tB, tC) = t Q(A, B, C) $ using the chain rule. The marginal product of each factor can change as the quantity supplied of that factor changes - no, not all constant returns to scale production functions are linear.  

---

