<p>A more simple analysis would be to suggest that the firm is a monopolist operating with a profit function $F_1=\Pi^m(q)$
That is, $mc=0$
Price is a downward sloping function of Q</p>

<p>$P=A-q$</p>

<p>The constraint is that</p>

<p>$\Pi^m\geq 0$</p>

<p>and</p>

<p>$\Pi^m(q)=(A-q)q-C$</p>

<p>which is price times quantity minus fixed cost.</p>

<p>Looking at this simple model, an increase in the proportion of people evading fares, would result in a lower q. This essentially reduces the profit for the firm but does not impact supply.</p>

<p>This could be adjusted to include a marginal cost in the profit function ($P=A-q-c$)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-08T02:27:58.450Z
2015-04-08T02:27:58.450Z
Jamzy
<p>The way to get the demand curve is by deriving the utility function.</p>

<p>First, the utility function needs to be defined.</p>

<p>$E(u)=(u(0)(r)+u(200)(1-r))$</p>

<p>In this case, the expected utility is the utility of spending \$0 on the fare vs the utility if you get a \$200 fine. in this case, r is the probability of getting away with it.</p>

<p>If this is greater than the utility of paying the fare, the fare will be evaded.</p>

<p>$E(u)=(u(0)r+u(200)(1-r))\geq {u(5)}$</p>

<p>The exact utility function can take many forms. Popular choices are Decreasing Absolute Risk Aversion (DARA), Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA) or others. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_aversion" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> is OK on this.</p>

<p>The next steps in this analysis are to decide on a utility function.
You will need inputs on risk of getting caught and fines.</p>

<p>After defining the utility function you will be able to derive the demand curve.</p>

<p>You will also need to define the supply curve. If the fare is something like a train ride, you may be able to set up the marginal cost=0. That allows you to only worry about the fixed cost.</p>

<p>A useful resource will be the wiki article mentioned earlier. This <a href="http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0195073401" rel="nofollow">Mas Collel</a> book is a very popular graduate text. I think it treats risk aversion relatively well, although I did find it not incredibly accessible.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-08T02:08:17.233Z
2015-04-08T02:08:17.233Z
Jamzy
<p>Consider the demand curve for fare evasion on a train. The price (I suppose) would be the average amount of money paid per ride in fines, and the quantity would be the average number of fare evaders caught. The supply curve would quantify the target number of fare evaders to catch.</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/z7pZy.png" alt="Typical supply and demand curve"></p>

<p>Normally technological advances push the supply curve rightward. This would correspond with more people getting caught. </p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/0KPJy.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>But this obviously isn't right. If it were easier to catch fare evaders, you'd intuitively expect that the average price in fines per ride for a rider would be higher, thus, quantity would go down.</p>

<p>What does the supply/demand curve really look like for fare evasion and what would be the effect of a rightward supply curve shift?</p>

<supply-and-demand>
What does a supply+demand curve look like for fare evasion?
JSideris
# What does a supply+demand curve look like for fare evasion?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-08)

Consider the demand curve for fare evasion on a train. The price (I suppose) would be the average amount of money paid per ride in fines, and the quantity would be the average number of fare evaders caught. The supply curve would quantify the target number of fare evaders to catch.

![Typical supply and demand curve](https://i.sstatic.net/z7pZy.png)

Normally technological advances push the supply curve rightward. This would correspond with more people getting caught.

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/0KPJy.png)

But this obviously isn't right. If it were easier to catch fare evaders, you'd intuitively expect that the average price in fines per ride for a rider would be higher, thus, quantity would go down.

What does the supply/demand curve really look like for fare evasion and what would be the effect of a rightward supply curve shift?

**Tags:** supply-and-demand

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-04-08. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The way to get the demand curve is by deriving the utility function.

First, the utility function needs to be defined.

$E(u)=(u(0)(r)+u(200)(1-r))$

In this case, the expected utility is the utility of spending \$0 on the fare vs the utility if you get a \$200 fine. in this case, r is the probability of getting away with it.

If this is greater than the utility of paying the fare, the fare will be evaded.

$E(u)=(u(0)r+u(200)(1-r))\geq {u(5)}$

The exact utility function can take many forms. Popular choices are Decreasing Absolute Risk Aversion (DARA), Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA) or others. [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_aversion) is OK on this.

The next steps in this analysis are to decide on a utility function.
You will need inputs on risk of getting caught and fines.

After defining the utility function you will be able to derive the demand curve.

You will also need to define the supply curve. If the fare is something like a train ride, you may be able to set up the marginal cost=0. That allows you to only worry about the fixed cost.

A useful resource will be the wiki article mentioned earlier. This [Mas Collel](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0195073401) book is a very popular graduate text. I think it treats risk aversion relatively well, although I did find it not incredibly accessible.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-04-08. Score: 0

A more simple analysis would be to suggest that the firm is a monopolist operating with a profit function $F\_1=\Pi^m(q)$
That is, $mc=0$
Price is a downward sloping function of Q

$P=A-q$

The constraint is that

$\Pi^m\geq 0$

and

$\Pi^m(q)=(A-q)q-C$

which is price times quantity minus fixed cost.

Looking at this simple model, an increase in the proportion of people evading fares, would result in a lower q. This essentially reduces the profit for the firm but does not impact supply.

This could be adjusted to include a marginal cost in the profit function ($P=A-q-c$)


---

