<p>I am also finding it difficult to understand what are the fundamental differences between analysing optimal bundles between concave and convex functions ?</p>

<p>Does it also happen that the optimal bundle in strictly concave function is <span class="math-container">$not $</span> a boundary condition ?
Thanks.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-04T20:29:12.533Z
Why do you include a quasi-linear form of utility function in the title? Is quasi-linearity supposed to have any significance in your question? By "boundary condition" did you mean "corner solution"?
Herr K.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-05T20:10:20.877Z
When you ask about the optimal bundle as a function, you probably mean as a function of parameters, but which parameters are you considering?
Regio
<microeconomics><consumer-theory><optimization>
Finding the optimal consumption bundle given the strictly concave utility function $v(x,y) = U(x) +y$?
metrics24
# Finding the optimal consumption bundle given the strictly concave utility function $v(x,y) = U(x) +y$?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-06-04)

I am also finding it difficult to understand what are the fundamental differences between analysing optimal bundles between concave and convex functions ?

Does it also happen that the optimal bundle in strictly concave function is $not $ a boundary condition ?
Thanks.

**Tags:** microeconomics, consumer-theory, optimization
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Why do you include a quasi-linear form of utility function in the title? Is quasi-linearity supposed to have any significance in your question? By "boundary condition" did you mean "corner solution"?  
> **username_2**: When you ask about the optimal bundle as a function, you probably mean as a function of parameters, but which parameters are you considering?  

---

## 0 answers

