<p>The price of petrol / gasoline is surely a major reason, offsetting the effect of longer distances.  In many European countries it is more than twice as high as in the US, mainly because of differences in tax rates, as shown <a href="http://www.aip.com.au/pricing/internationalprices.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>. </p>

<p>Given consumer rationality, the price of fuel might be expected to impact on fuel efficiency via choice between car models of different efficiency at the time of purchase.  But do people actually behave rationally in this situation?  <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421506001200" rel="nofollow">Turrentine &amp; Kurani</a> (2007) found from interviews with households that consumers lacked the knowledge and understanding needed to estimate savings in fuel costs over time.  Although their sample was small (57), this finding seems plausible.  However, even if individual consumers do not behave rationally, it remains possible that the price of fuel is still for many an influencing factor, albeit imperfectly assessed, and that the aggregate effect of decisions by many consumers approximates to what might be expected given rational behaviour.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.mitpressjournals.org/action/doSearch?Contrib=Allcott%2C%20H" rel="nofollow">Allcott &amp; Wozny</a> (2014) tested the hypothesis that consumers, on average, are willing to pay \$1 more to buy a car with \$1 less in discounted future fuel costs.  They used panel data relating to purchases of different car models in the US over the period 1999-2008, relying on changes in gasoline prices over time (rather than differences between countries) to permit a test of the hypothesis.  Their sample was impressively large, including 86 million transactions.  Purchases were assumed to be informed by assumptions on future fuel costs. On their base specification, willingness to pay for \$1 less in discounted future fuel costs was estimated as \$0.76.  Alternative specifications with different assumptions on discount rates and the basis for forecasting future fuel costs yielded willingness to pay figures in the range \$0.42 to \$1.01.  Given the large sample, the standard errors of these results were small, at most \$0.06, even after clustering by model and age was allowed for.</p>

<p>The above strongly suggests that the price of fuel has influenced fuel efficiency in the US. I haven't seen a similarly rigorous study for Europe, or comparing the US and Europe, but it seems plausible that this finding would extrapolate, if only approximately, to a cross-sectional inter-country comparison.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T23:23:26.727Z
2015-02-04T14:05:22.147Z
2015-02-04T14:05:22.147Z
Adam Bailey
<p>According to this figure from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, US, Canada, or Australia car fuel efficiencies are considerably lower than those for Europe or Japan:</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ihnZj.jpg" alt="Fuel efficiencies"></p>

<p>At the same time, cities in US, Canada, and Australia, are far more spread out than in Europe or Japan.  There is more car dependency and people drive more and longer distances in North America.</p>

<p>Then why are fuel efficiencies so much lower?  I would think that it makes sense to market the most fuel efficient cars in the market where people drive the largest distances.  And as the automobile market is quite globalised, even if it's European regulations requiring manufacturers to develop cars with higher fuel efficiencies than North American regulations, it would make economic sense to sell the same cars in North America.</p>

<p>What is the economic reason for the observed pattern?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T19:07:38.220Z
(I'm not quite sure if this is really an economics question.  I'm happy to migrate to Sustainable Living if appropriate.)
gerrit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T20:14:55.797Z
No, this is a perfectly fine economics question.
jmbejara
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T20:42:37.903Z
Because the long distance isn't the only factor - maybe smaller cars look uncool, maybe the pickup truck bed is wanted, ...
user45891
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T20:49:58.007Z
Consider the costs of fuel in the US relative to costs of fuel throughout Europe, island nations etc. Perhaps Americans are not as efficiency-conscious because we've always had access to cheaper gasoline than many of those nations. Personal preferences and also utilitarian necessity would factor into this. Perhaps you might also look into regulations imposed by different nations. Perhaps there is less stringent regulation in the US and so firms avoid incurring the higher costs associated with increased fuel efficiency to produce cars for the US market. These sorts of things...
123
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-02T23:34:35.467Z
@user45891 Isn't the idea that manuals are more efficient than automatics outdated?  And, wow @ "prius repellents"...
gerrit
<energy-economics>
If Americans drive more and consume more oil, why are cars less efficient?
gerrit
# If Americans drive more and consume more oil, why are cars less efficient?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-02-02)

According to this figure from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, US, Canada, or Australia car fuel efficiencies are considerably lower than those for Europe or Japan:

![Fuel efficiencies](https://i.sstatic.net/ihnZj.jpg)

At the same time, cities in US, Canada, and Australia, are far more spread out than in Europe or Japan. There is more car dependency and people drive more and longer distances in North America.

Then why are fuel efficiencies so much lower? I would think that it makes sense to market the most fuel efficient cars in the market where people drive the largest distances. And as the automobile market is quite globalised, even if it's European regulations requiring manufacturers to develop cars with higher fuel efficiencies than North American regulations, it would make economic sense to sell the same cars in North America.

What is the economic reason for the observed pattern?

**Tags:** energy-economics
> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: (I'm not quite sure if this is really an economics question.  I'm happy to migrate to Sustainable Living if appropriate.)  
> **username_1**: No, this is a perfectly fine economics question.  
> **username_2**: Because the long distance isn't the only factor - maybe smaller cars look uncool, maybe the pickup truck bed is wanted, ...  
> **username_3**: Consider the costs of fuel in the US relative to costs of fuel throughout Europe, island nations etc. Perhaps Americans are not as efficiency-conscious because we've always had access to cheaper gasoline than many of those nations. Personal preferences and also utilitarian necessity would factor into this. Perhaps you might also look into regulations imposed by different nations. Perhaps there is less stringent regulation in the US and so firms avoid incurring the higher costs associated with increased fuel efficiency to produce cars for the US market. These sorts of things...  
> **username_0**: @user45891 Isn't the idea that manuals are more efficient than automatics outdated?  And, wow @ "prius repellents"...  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-02-02. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

The price of petrol / gasoline is surely a major reason, offsetting the effect of longer distances. In many European countries it is more than twice as high as in the US, mainly because of differences in tax rates, as shown [here](http://www.aip.com.au/pricing/internationalprices.htm).

Given consumer rationality, the price of fuel might be expected to impact on fuel efficiency via choice between car models of different efficiency at the time of purchase. But do people actually behave rationally in this situation? [Turrentine & Kurani](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421506001200) (2007) found from interviews with households that consumers lacked the knowledge and understanding needed to estimate savings in fuel costs over time. Although their sample was small (57), this finding seems plausible. However, even if individual consumers do not behave rationally, it remains possible that the price of fuel is still for many an influencing factor, albeit imperfectly assessed, and that the aggregate effect of decisions by many consumers approximates to what might be expected given rational behaviour.

[Allcott & Wozny](http://www.mitpressjournals.org/action/doSearch?Contrib=Allcott%2C%20H) (2014) tested the hypothesis that consumers, on average, are willing to pay \$1 more to buy a car with \$1 less in discounted future fuel costs. They used panel data relating to purchases of different car models in the US over the period 1999-2008, relying on changes in gasoline prices over time (rather than differences between countries) to permit a test of the hypothesis. Their sample was impressively large, including 86 million transactions. Purchases were assumed to be informed by assumptions on future fuel costs. On their base specification, willingness to pay for \$1 less in discounted future fuel costs was estimated as \$0.76. Alternative specifications with different assumptions on discount rates and the basis for forecasting future fuel costs yielded willingness to pay figures in the range \$0.42 to \$1.01. Given the large sample, the standard errors of these results were small, at most \$0.06, even after clustering by model and age was allowed for.

The above strongly suggests that the price of fuel has influenced fuel efficiency in the US. I haven't seen a similarly rigorous study for Europe, or comparing the US and Europe, but it seems plausible that this finding would extrapolate, if only approximately, to a cross-sectional inter-country comparison.


---

