<p>This is how indifference curves look :
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/5gkzI.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/5gkzI.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-09T10:42:45.777Z
2019-09-09T10:42:45.777Z
Amit
<p>The locus of kinks would follow x=y^2 but what would the arms look like?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-09T08:04:54.450Z
What have you tried to figure this out?
Giskard
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-09T18:42:41.527Z
@Giskard I started with finding out the locus of the kinks by taking √x = y. Then I took y=k and √x = k to find the arms of the IC but I was confused about the √x = k arm. I thought that it will be a non - linear arm but the answer below by Amit clarifies the confusion
Kautilya
<utility>
What would the indifference curve of min{√x,y} looks like?
Kautilya
# What would the indifference curve of min{√x,y} looks like?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-09-09)

The locus of kinks would follow x=y^2 but what would the arms look like?

**Tags:** utility
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What have you tried to figure this out?  
> **username_0**: @Giskard I started with finding out the locus of the kinks by taking √x = y. Then I took y=k and √x = k to find the arms of the IC but I was confused about the √x = k arm. I thought that it will be a non - linear arm but the answer below by Amit clarifies the confusion  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-09-09. Score: 3

This is how indifference curves look :
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/5gkzI.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/5gkzI.png)


---

