<p>In general, a demand function (for a certain good) gives the demanded quantity as a function of the price of the good and a set of other variables. These other variables include things like prices of the other goods, income, weather, etc.</p>
<p>If we consider a framework of two goods and if we excluding all other variables, except for the prices this gives two demand equations:
<span class="math-container">$$
q_1 = d_1(p_1, p_2),\\
q_2 = d_2(p_1, p_2).
$$</span>
Usually, it is assumed that the law of demand holds, which means that demand is decreasing in own prices. If so, <span class="math-container">$\frac{\partial q_1}{\partial p_1} &lt; 0$</span> and <span class="math-container">$\frac{\partial q_2}{\partial p_2} &lt; 0$</span>.
An interesting question is how the demand for good 1 changes if the price of good 2 changes. In a first setting, it might be that the two goods are subsitutes (e.g. apples and pears), in this case, we should have that <span class="math-container">$$
\frac{\partial q_1}{\partial p_2} &gt; 0.
$$</span>
the reasoning is the following. If the price of good 2 increases, its demand decreases and, in turn, the demand for good 1 increases. The idea is that consumers will buy less of the more expensive good and will (at least partially) compensate this by buying more of good 1.</p>
<p>A second setting is where the two goods are complements (i.e. consumed together like coffee and milk). In this case, one can expect that <span class="math-container">$\frac{\partial q_1}{\partial p_2} &lt; 0$</span>. If good <span class="math-container">$2$</span> becomes more expensive then the consumer will not only buy less of good 2 (due to its higher price) but also less of good 1.</p>
<p>One particular specification that is frequently used (for example in theoretical work) is the linear specification:
<span class="math-container">$$
q_1 = a_1 + b_1 p_1 + c_1 p_2\\
q_2 = a_2 + b_2 p_1 + c_2 p_2.
$$</span>
If <span class="math-container">$b_1 &lt; 0, c_1 &gt; 0, b_2 &gt; 0$</span> and <span class="math-container">$c_2 &lt; 0$</span>, this gives the correct signs to have substitutes:
<span class="math-container">$$
\frac{\partial q_1}{\partial p_1} = b_1 &lt; 0 \text{ and }\frac{\partial q_1}{\partial p_2} = c_1 &gt; 0\\
\frac{\partial q_2}{\partial p_1} = b_2 &gt; 0 \text{ and } \frac{\partial q_2}{\partial p_2}  = c_2 &lt; 0
$$</span></p>
<ul>
<li>In practice we are not really interested in the exact values of the parameters <span class="math-container">$a_1, a_2, b_1, b_2, c_1$</span> and <span class="math-container">$c_2$</span>, but only their signs, because this determines whether the law of demand holds and whether the goods are substitutes or complements. You can think of the values of <span class="math-container">$|c_1|$</span> and <span class="math-container">$|b_2|$</span> as the degree of substitutability (of complementarity)</li>
<li>Demand functions do not include something like the value of the good. You are correct that &quot;the value of the good&quot; is usually captured by the utility of the consumer (from buying the good). The amount of goods that gives the highest utility for the give prices is what determines the demand. So the values determine the demand, but they are not an argument of the demand functions themselves.</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T17:37:02.640Z
2021-04-26T17:37:02.640Z
tdm
<p>I am struggling with this question that should be simple for economists (I am not an economist at all):</p>
<p>There is a market with a limited number of (heterogenous) consumers with two firms, each offering a product. The two products are ‘partially’ substitutable. I am looking for demand functions to show how the two products interplay in terms of price and demand.</p>
<p>I remember there were some traditional models in microeconomics showing something like this:</p>
<p>d1= a1 – b1.p1 + c1.p2</p>
<p>d2= a2 + b2.p1 – c2.p2</p>
<p>where d and d2 show the demands and p1 and p2 denote prices of products 1 and 2 respectively.</p>
<p>The issues with these functions are that:</p>
<ul>
<li>They include many unknown parameters (i.e., a1, b1, c1, a2, b2, c2);</li>
<li>They do not directly consider ‘partial’ substitutability;</li>
<li>They include prices identified by the firms, but ideally, I would also like to include ‘values’ of products (v1 and v2) identified by consumers regardless of their prices (perhaps, this is similar to what utility functions consider).</li>
</ul>
<p>Is there any way to solve these issues by using stronger functions?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>

<microeconomics><utility><consumer-theory>
Demand function for partially subsumable products
Reza Farahani
# Demand function for partially subsumable products

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-04-22)

I am struggling with this question that should be simple for economists (I am not an economist at all):

There is a market with a limited number of (heterogenous) consumers with two firms, each offering a product. The two products are ‘partially’ substitutable. I am looking for demand functions to show how the two products interplay in terms of price and demand.

I remember there were some traditional models in microeconomics showing something like this:

d1= a1 – b1.p1 + c1.p2

d2= a2 + b2.p1 – c2.p2

where d and d2 show the demands and p1 and p2 denote prices of products 1 and 2 respectively.

The issues with these functions are that:

* They include many unknown parameters (i.e., a1, b1, c1, a2, b2, c2);
* They do not directly consider ‘partial’ substitutability;
* They include prices identified by the firms, but ideally, I would also like to include ‘values’ of products (v1 and v2) identified by consumers regardless of their prices (perhaps, this is similar to what utility functions consider).

Is there any way to solve these issues by using stronger functions?

Thank you

**Tags:** microeconomics, utility, consumer-theory

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-04-26. Score: 1

In general, a demand function (for a certain good) gives the demanded quantity as a function of the price of the good and a set of other variables. These other variables include things like prices of the other goods, income, weather, etc.

If we consider a framework of two goods and if we excluding all other variables, except for the prices this gives two demand equations:
$$
q\_1 = d\_1(p\_1, p\_2),\\
q\_2 = d\_2(p\_1, p\_2).
$$
Usually, it is assumed that the law of demand holds, which means that demand is decreasing in own prices. If so, $\frac{\partial q\_1}{\partial p\_1} < 0$ and $\frac{\partial q\_2}{\partial p\_2} < 0$.
An interesting question is how the demand for good 1 changes if the price of good 2 changes. In a first setting, it might be that the two goods are subsitutes (e.g. apples and pears), in this case, we should have that $$
\frac{\partial q\_1}{\partial p\_2} > 0.
$$
the reasoning is the following. If the price of good 2 increases, its demand decreases and, in turn, the demand for good 1 increases. The idea is that consumers will buy less of the more expensive good and will (at least partially) compensate this by buying more of good 1.

A second setting is where the two goods are complements (i.e. consumed together like coffee and milk). In this case, one can expect that $\frac{\partial q\_1}{\partial p\_2} < 0$. If good $2$ becomes more expensive then the consumer will not only buy less of good 2 (due to its higher price) but also less of good 1.

One particular specification that is frequently used (for example in theoretical work) is the linear specification:
$$
q\_1 = a\_1 + b\_1 p\_1 + c\_1 p\_2\\
q\_2 = a\_2 + b\_2 p\_1 + c\_2 p\_2.
$$
If $b\_1 < 0, c\_1 > 0, b\_2 > 0$ and $c\_2 < 0$, this gives the correct signs to have substitutes:
$$
\frac{\partial q\_1}{\partial p\_1} = b\_1 < 0 \text{ and }\frac{\partial q\_1}{\partial p\_2} = c\_1 > 0\\
\frac{\partial q\_2}{\partial p\_1} = b\_2 > 0 \text{ and } \frac{\partial q\_2}{\partial p\_2} = c\_2 < 0
$$

* In practice we are not really interested in the exact values of the parameters $a\_1, a\_2, b\_1, b\_2, c\_1$ and $c\_2$, but only their signs, because this determines whether the law of demand holds and whether the goods are substitutes or complements. You can think of the values of $|c\_1|$ and $|b\_2|$ as the degree of substitutability (of complementarity)
* Demand functions do not include something like the value of the good. You are correct that "the value of the good" is usually captured by the utility of the consumer (from buying the good). The amount of goods that gives the highest utility for the give prices is what determines the demand. So the values determine the demand, but they are not an argument of the demand functions themselves.


---

