<p>Largely <a href="https://www.eaere.org/statement/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the same statement</a> was issued by the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, around the same time, so no doubt there was some coordination there.</p>
<p>In any case, border carbon adjustments are often discussed at EAERE conferences. This year's conference had a full session on their effects on international agreements (I cannot seem to provide a link to that session directly, but if you go <a href="http://www.fleximeets.com/eaere2020/?p=programme" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> to day 5 it should be listed at the top). From a quick search most conferences before that have at least one or two papers on the topic.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-18T12:49:07.823Z
2020-09-18T12:49:07.823Z
Maarten Punt
<p>I found some references that might help you explore this topic. Other topics like game theory can also be applied to border carbon adjustments.</p>
<p>LSE: <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-global-consumer-incidence-of-carbon-pricing/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-global-consumer-incidence-of-carbon-pricing/</a>
This is an excerpt from the website: &quot;the author investigates complementing the EU ETS with a carbon price on traded goods, through so-called Border Carbon Adjustments (BCA), and finds this would most affect the poorest as well as the richest consumers in the EU. This is the first estimate of the EU-wide consumer incidence of BCA to complement the EU ETS.&quot; They have a working paper you can download.</p>
<p>LSE: <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Trade-climate-change-game-theory-border-carbon-adjustments.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Trade-climate-change-game-theory-border-carbon-adjustments.pdf</a>
Here is an excerpt from the abstract: &quot;This paper
advances two arguments. First, it argues that the conventional view of Border Carbon Adjustments (BCAs) as a “dirty” trade barrier should be turned on its head. Rather, the absence of a carbon price comprises an implicit subsidy to dirtier production in non-regulated markets. Second, BCAs could act as a gamechanger when climate policy negotiations move at a glacial pace, if at all. Materially stronger progress could be achieved indirectly from the threat of unilateral trade policies. The paper shows how this could come about, using a simple political game theory model.&quot;</p>
<p>Vivid Economics: <a href="https://www.vivideconomics.com/casestudy/border-carbon-adjustments-and-industrial-competitiveness-in-a-european-green-deal/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.vivideconomics.com/casestudy/border-carbon-adjustments-and-industrial-competitiveness-in-a-european-green-deal/</a>
Here is an excerpt from the website: &quot;Driving industrial decarbonisation while safeguarding international competitiveness is a major policy challenge. As part of the European Green Deal, the EU is considering the introduction of a Border Carbon Adjustment (BCA) to ensure that the price of imports into the EU more accurately reflects the environmental costs of their carbon content. BCAs could be an alternative to free allocation to emissions-intensive trade-exposed sectors as a measure to address the risk of carbon leakage in the EU’s ETS.&quot; They have a report you can download too.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-18T10:53:28.597Z
Thank you and welcome to the site.
Adam Bailey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-18T13:45:36.813Z
These links look temporary. Can you write down what is said? Otherwise this is a link-only answer which are usually not accepted here.
Bayesian
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-18T13:56:44.277Z
@Bayesian Thank you for letting me know. I made the changes.
Drashti Shah
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-18T06:33:04.893Z
2020-09-18T13:54:30.723Z
2020-09-18T13:54:30.723Z
Drashti Shah
<p>A large number of US economists have signed a <a href="https://www.econstatement.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Statement on Carbon Dividends</a>, advocating a revenue neutral carbon tax as the best policy measure to reduce carbon emissions and so mitigate climate change.  The statement also advocates (para IV) a <em>border carbon adjustment system</em> to ensure that such a carbon tax would not encourage carbon leakage (ie transfer of production to another country with a laxer carbon regime) and damage US competitiveness.  </p>

<p>What are good sources explaining how a border carbon adjustment system might work, the pros and cons of such a system, and lessons from attempts (if any, anywhere in the world) to operate such a system?</p>

<reference-request><environmental-economics>
Sources on Border Carbon Adjustment
Adam Bailey
# Sources on Border Carbon Adjustment

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-02-18)

A large number of US economists have signed a [Statement on Carbon Dividends](https://www.econstatement.org/), advocating a revenue neutral carbon tax as the best policy measure to reduce carbon emissions and so mitigate climate change. The statement also advocates (para IV) a *border carbon adjustment system* to ensure that such a carbon tax would not encourage carbon leakage (ie transfer of production to another country with a laxer carbon regime) and damage US competitiveness.

What are good sources explaining how a border carbon adjustment system might work, the pros and cons of such a system, and lessons from attempts (if any, anywhere in the world) to operate such a system?

**Tags:** reference-request, environmental-economics

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-09-18. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

I found some references that might help you explore this topic. Other topics like game theory can also be applied to border carbon adjustments.

LSE: <https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-global-consumer-incidence-of-carbon-pricing/>
This is an excerpt from the website: "the author investigates complementing the EU ETS with a carbon price on traded goods, through so-called Border Carbon Adjustments (BCA), and finds this would most affect the poorest as well as the richest consumers in the EU. This is the first estimate of the EU-wide consumer incidence of BCA to complement the EU ETS." They have a working paper you can download.

LSE: <https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Trade-climate-change-game-theory-border-carbon-adjustments.pdf>
Here is an excerpt from the abstract: "This paper
advances two arguments. First, it argues that the conventional view of Border Carbon Adjustments (BCAs) as a “dirty” trade barrier should be turned on its head. Rather, the absence of a carbon price comprises an implicit subsidy to dirtier production in non-regulated markets. Second, BCAs could act as a gamechanger when climate policy negotiations move at a glacial pace, if at all. Materially stronger progress could be achieved indirectly from the threat of unilateral trade policies. The paper shows how this could come about, using a simple political game theory model."

Vivid Economics: <https://www.vivideconomics.com/casestudy/border-carbon-adjustments-and-industrial-competitiveness-in-a-european-green-deal/>
Here is an excerpt from the website: "Driving industrial decarbonisation while safeguarding international competitiveness is a major policy challenge. As part of the European Green Deal, the EU is considering the introduction of a Border Carbon Adjustment (BCA) to ensure that the price of imports into the EU more accurately reflects the environmental costs of their carbon content. BCAs could be an alternative to free allocation to emissions-intensive trade-exposed sectors as a measure to address the risk of carbon leakage in the EU’s ETS." They have a report you can download too.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you and welcome to the site.  
> **username_3**: These links look temporary. Can you write down what is said? Otherwise this is a link-only answer which are usually not accepted here.  
> **username_2**: @Bayesian Thank you for letting me know. I made the changes.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-09-18. Score: 1

Largely [the same statement](https://www.eaere.org/statement/) was issued by the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, around the same time, so no doubt there was some coordination there.

In any case, border carbon adjustments are often discussed at EAERE conferences. This year's conference had a full session on their effects on international agreements (I cannot seem to provide a link to that session directly, but if you go [here](http://www.fleximeets.com/eaere2020/?p=programme) to day 5 it should be listed at the top). From a quick search most conferences before that have at least one or two papers on the topic.


---

