<p>Prior to any trasnformation:</p>

<ol>
<li>Energy consumption is a per capita variable, specifically "Kgr per capita"</li>
<li>Real GDP is a per capita variable</li>
<li>Trade Openness is a per capita variable</li>
<li>Energy price is a unit price of "crude oil"</li>
</ol>

<p>I see two problems: Is "Energy Price" the "price per Kgr" -because usually oil prices are not quoted per Kilogram. But it should expressed here "per Kgr" so as to stand for the price of the dependent variable.</p>

<p>If it does, it is only natural to consider the logarithms of the variables, dependent variable included.</p>

<p>But one more thing that needs clarification is what $Y$ stands for. The authors write "$Y$(economic growth)". If this is the case then for this variable you don't just take the logarithm of real GDP but the first-difference of the logarithm  (which approximates the rate of growth).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T16:52:58.230Z
It appears to be the price of crude oil per barrel in USD. Also, the paper does not look like refereed properly. It is available here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514000986
london
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T17:35:47.530Z
@london I will have a look at the paper, thanks for the link. Why are you doubting the peer-review process? You doubt the journal or something specific to the article?
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T18:18:40.583Z
The quantitative methods applied without considering or motivating the research question within an economic context, the text gives limited information about the variables and units of measurement are not clear and the overall structure. Energy demand is measured in heat content, but not the price, and the price is actually oil price, not energy price. Anyway, it appears to be poorly edited paper.
london
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T15:22:18.673Z
2016-05-17T17:36:29.890Z
2016-05-17T17:36:29.890Z
Alecos Papadopoulos
<p>i'm applying a panel data analysis. I
 have four variables; real GDP, trade openness, energy price and energy consumption. I took ln (log)of trade openness,real GDP and energy price. but i cannot decide whether ln(log) of energy consumption should be taken or not. please inform me on this. Thank you </p>

<p>Note: Kg of oil equivalent per capita is used to measure energy consumption.</p>

<p>EN= energy consumption</p>

<p>Y=Economic growth</p>

<p>T= trade openness</p>

<p>EP=energy price</p>

<p>W= country fixed effect
EN=f(Y,T,EP,W)</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/xG6yU.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/xG6yU.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/auWnW.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/auWnW.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>Thank  you. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-26T13:12:26.220Z
Why are you considering the logarithms in the first place? What is the reason? Why you have no hesitation in taking the log of trade openness for example, (and for all the other variables), but you have doubts especially about energy consumption? You should include such information in your question, not as a comment-reply, because as it stands your question cannot be answered and should be closed.
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-26T14:49:47.637Z
Except from energy consumption, other variables are price. But, energy consumption is not price. if unit of variables is price, I have to take log. But, I dont have applied before such a variable, unit of whose is different from price. Thus, I'm confused. Please inform me on this topic. thanks @AlecosPapadopoulos
studentp
<macroeconomics><econometrics><time-series><self-study><paneldata>
ln(log) of energy consumption in a econometric analysis
studentp
# ln(log) of energy consumption in a econometric analysis

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-11-26)

i'm applying a panel data analysis. I
have four variables; real GDP, trade openness, energy price and energy consumption. I took ln (log)of trade openness,real GDP and energy price. but i cannot decide whether ln(log) of energy consumption should be taken or not. please inform me on this. Thank you

Note: Kg of oil equivalent per capita is used to measure energy consumption.

EN= energy consumption

Y=Economic growth

T= trade openness

EP=energy price

W= country fixed effect
EN=f(Y,T,EP,W)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/xG6yU.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/xG6yU.jpg)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/auWnW.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/auWnW.jpg)

Thank you.

**Tags:** macroeconomics, econometrics, time-series, self-study, paneldata
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Why are you considering the logarithms in the first place? What is the reason? Why you have no hesitation in taking the log of trade openness for example, (and for all the other variables), but you have doubts especially about energy consumption? You should include such information in your question, not as a comment-reply, because as it stands your question cannot be answered and should be closed.  
> **username_0**: Except from energy consumption, other variables are price. But, energy consumption is not price. if unit of variables is price, I have to take log. But, I dont have applied before such a variable, unit of whose is different from price. Thus, I'm confused. Please inform me on this topic. thanks @AlecosPapadopoulos  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-05-17. Score: 1

Prior to any trasnformation:

1. Energy consumption is a per capita variable, specifically "Kgr per capita"
2. Real GDP is a per capita variable
3. Trade Openness is a per capita variable
4. Energy price is a unit price of "crude oil"

I see two problems: Is "Energy Price" the "price per Kgr" -because usually oil prices are not quoted per Kilogram. But it should expressed here "per Kgr" so as to stand for the price of the dependent variable.

If it does, it is only natural to consider the logarithms of the variables, dependent variable included.

But one more thing that needs clarification is what $Y$ stands for. The authors write "$Y$(economic growth)". If this is the case then for this variable you don't just take the logarithm of real GDP but the first-difference of the logarithm (which approximates the rate of growth).

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: It appears to be the price of crude oil per barrel in USD. Also, the paper does not look like refereed properly. It is available here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514000986  
> **username_1**: @london I will have a look at the paper, thanks for the link. Why are you doubting the peer-review process? You doubt the journal or something specific to the article?  
> **username_2**: The quantitative methods applied without considering or motivating the research question within an economic context, the text gives limited information about the variables and units of measurement are not clear and the overall structure. Energy demand is measured in heat content, but not the price, and the price is actually oil price, not energy price. Anyway, it appears to be poorly edited paper.  

---

