<p>It is not immediately clear which GDP numbers you are referring to, so here is a selection from the <a href="https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/index.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">IMF World Econonic Outlook</a></p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/OENUW.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/OENUW.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>I would therefore guess that your numbers were GDP at current prices measured in US dollars (Germany up 8%, USA up 35% from 2009 to 2017).  The main cause of this difference seems to be the change in the USD/EUR exchange rate over the eight years, largely driven by higher interest rates in the US. Measured in national currencies the results are more similar (Germany up 33%, USA up 35%).</p>

<p>A better measure might be the real change in GDP measured at constant prices in national currency so as to adjust for domestic inflation (Germany up 19%, USA up 19%).  Indeed, allowing for faster population growth in the USA, GDP per capita measured at constant prices in national currency has grown slightly faster in Germany than the USA (Germany up 15%, USA up 12%)    </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-22T16:32:26.027Z
2018-12-22T16:32:26.027Z
Henry
<p>Part of the answer is definitely population growth. If a country is becoming more productive on average, its residents will produce more GDP per capita. (If you consider GDP a good metric of this.) If a country gets more residents while GDP per capita is unchanged, that will also increase the GDP. If GDP per capita is increasing while population is also increasing, the two effects add up.</p>

<p>Most European nations do not have population growth rates comparable to that of the US.</p>

<p>See US-German population growth rate comparison <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW?end=2017&amp;locations=US-DE&amp;name_desc=true&amp;start=2009" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

<p>Therefore the US GDP growth rate has a component - population growth - that is missing from the European growth rates. This may not make the differences go away entirely, but it does make them smaller.</p>

<p>See US-German GDP growth rate comparison <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2017&amp;locations=US-DE&amp;name_desc=true&amp;start=2009&amp;view=chart" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

<p>See US-German GDP per capita growth rate comparison <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?end=2017&amp;locations=US-DE&amp;name_desc=true&amp;start=2009" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-21T11:32:24.900Z
2018-12-21T11:32:24.900Z
Giskard
<p>For example, while Germany’s GDP increased by about thirteen percent, the US’s GDP has increased by more than a third of its GDP in 2009.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-22T22:31:47.327Z
It is too generic a question, also, why don't you provide a link to the data you are referring to? I think you should study the data on value added by sector:https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp
london
<macroeconomics><gdp>
How did the US gain such a large increase in GDP compared to other industrial nations within the last decade?
user394536
# How did the US gain such a large increase in GDP compared to other industrial nations within the last decade?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-12-21)

For example, while Germany’s GDP increased by about thirteen percent, the US’s GDP has increased by more than a third of its GDP in 2009.

**Tags:** macroeconomics, gdp
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: It is too generic a question, also, why don't you provide a link to the data you are referring to? I think you should study the data on value added by sector:https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-12-22. Score: 2

It is not immediately clear which GDP numbers you are referring to, so here is a selection from the [IMF World Econonic Outlook](https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/index.aspx)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/OENUW.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/OENUW.png)

I would therefore guess that your numbers were GDP at current prices measured in US dollars (Germany up 8%, USA up 35% from 2009 to 2017). The main cause of this difference seems to be the change in the USD/EUR exchange rate over the eight years, largely driven by higher interest rates in the US. Measured in national currencies the results are more similar (Germany up 33%, USA up 35%).

A better measure might be the real change in GDP measured at constant prices in national currency so as to adjust for domestic inflation (Germany up 19%, USA up 19%). Indeed, allowing for faster population growth in the USA, GDP per capita measured at constant prices in national currency has grown slightly faster in Germany than the USA (Germany up 15%, USA up 12%)


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-21. Score: -1

Part of the answer is definitely population growth. If a country is becoming more productive on average, its residents will produce more GDP per capita. (If you consider GDP a good metric of this.) If a country gets more residents while GDP per capita is unchanged, that will also increase the GDP. If GDP per capita is increasing while population is also increasing, the two effects add up.

Most European nations do not have population growth rates comparable to that of the US.

See US-German population growth rate comparison [here](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW?end=2017&locations=US-DE&name_desc=true&start=2009).

Therefore the US GDP growth rate has a component - population growth - that is missing from the European growth rates. This may not make the differences go away entirely, but it does make them smaller.

See US-German GDP growth rate comparison [here](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2017&locations=US-DE&name_desc=true&start=2009&view=chart).

See US-German GDP per capita growth rate comparison [here](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?end=2017&locations=US-DE&name_desc=true&start=2009).


---

