<p>Not by itself. The inflation generally depends on the following monetary relation:</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$ MV =PY$$</span></p>

<p>Where M is money supply, V velocity of money (how much one buck is used in economy), P is the price level (change in which is inflation), and Y is a real output.</p>

<p>Now solving for P so we can focus on inflation gives us:</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$P=\frac{MV}{Y}$$</span></p>

<p>Hence price level (and consequently) increases when money supply increases, velocity of money increases or output decreases.</p>

<p>Now let’s analyze giving money to those unemployed.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Is it newly created money? If not then money supply won’t increase. If yes then it would increase inflation rate.</p></li>
<li><p>Redistribution generally does not affect velocity of money much so we can skip that.</p></li>
<li><p>Does this change the output Y? Well not by much those people are already unemployed. If anything it could increase Y as unemployed have probably high marginal propensity to consume so in short run redistribution from a richer person with lower marginal propensity to consume will increase Y. Especially if this spending was not paid out of higher taxes but from debt.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>So a priori as long as it’s not financed through printing new money it should not really have effect on inflation. Inflation is ultimately a monetary phenomenon.</p>

<p>Also, yes it’s a redistribution mechanism like most of the things that UK government does. Any policy that uses government funds as a transfer to others, or fund non-public good services (like NHS for example) is a redistributive measure.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-28T17:26:40.803Z
Well, but if unemployed people do not produce anymore $Y$ is likely to decrease, and… we may need a kind of general equilibrium model with a labour and a commodity market in order to conclude (and some data as well).
Bertrand
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-28T17:31:33.687Z
@Bertrand yes but Y is down not due to government unemployment spending but due to corona virus. Low Y due to corona might as well lead to inflation but your question was about government unemployment spending due to corona not about economic impacts of corona which is completely (from economic perspective) unrelated question to asking about effect of pandemic on inflation.
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-26T10:52:54.333Z
2020-03-26T10:52:54.333Z
1muflon1
<p>UK government promises to pay 80% of wages for people unemployed due to coronavirus. I am not economist, so I am probably missing something, but shouldn’t paying wages to unemployed due to coronavirus result in inflation due to decreased products and services created by economy? Is that just a mechanism to redistribute wealth?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-28T16:45:54.300Z
We better hope it causes inflation, because the alternative is deflation which is much worse
Keith Knauber
<inflation><supply-and-demand><covid-19-crisis>
Won’t paying wages to temporarily unemployed due to Coronavirus result in inflation?
Tofig Hasanov
# Won’t paying wages to temporarily unemployed due to Coronavirus result in inflation?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-26)

UK government promises to pay 80% of wages for people unemployed due to coronavirus. I am not economist, so I am probably missing something, but shouldn’t paying wages to unemployed due to coronavirus result in inflation due to decreased products and services created by economy? Is that just a mechanism to redistribute wealth?

**Tags:** inflation, supply-and-demand, covid-19-crisis
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: We better hope it causes inflation, because the alternative is deflation which is much worse  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-03-26. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Not by itself. The inflation generally depends on the following monetary relation:

$$ MV =PY$$

Where M is money supply, V velocity of money (how much one buck is used in economy), P is the price level (change in which is inflation), and Y is a real output.

Now solving for P so we can focus on inflation gives us:

$$P=\frac{MV}{Y}$$

Hence price level (and consequently) increases when money supply increases, velocity of money increases or output decreases.

Now let’s analyze giving money to those unemployed.

1. Is it newly created money? If not then money supply won’t increase. If yes then it would increase inflation rate.
2. Redistribution generally does not affect velocity of money much so we can skip that.
3. Does this change the output Y? Well not by much those people are already unemployed. If anything it could increase Y as unemployed have probably high marginal propensity to consume so in short run redistribution from a richer person with lower marginal propensity to consume will increase Y. Especially if this spending was not paid out of higher taxes but from debt.

So a priori as long as it’s not financed through printing new money it should not really have effect on inflation. Inflation is ultimately a monetary phenomenon.

Also, yes it’s a redistribution mechanism like most of the things that UK government does. Any policy that uses government funds as a transfer to others, or fund non-public good services (like NHS for example) is a redistributive measure.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Well, but if unemployed people do not produce anymore $Y$ is likely to decrease, and… we may need a kind of general equilibrium model with a labour and a commodity market in order to conclude (and some data as well).  
> **username_2**: @Bertrand yes but Y is down not due to government unemployment spending but due to corona virus. Low Y due to corona might as well lead to inflation but your question was about government unemployment spending due to corona not about economic impacts of corona which is completely (from economic perspective) unrelated question to asking about effect of pandemic on inflation.  

---

