<p>To find demand for labor, solve the firm's profit maximization problem :
\begin{eqnarray*} \max_N &amp; \ P(2N - 0.5N^2) - WN\end{eqnarray*}
Differentiating the objective with respect to $N$ and setting it equal to 0 yields the demand function for labor :
\begin{eqnarray*} N^d = 2 - \frac{W}{P}\end{eqnarray*}
Corresponding supply of output is</p>

<p>\begin{eqnarray*} Y = f\left(2 - \frac{W}{P}\right) = \left(2 - \frac{W}{P}\right)\left(1 + \frac{W}{2P}\right) =  2 - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{W}{P}\right)^2\end{eqnarray*}</p>

<p>Given the supply of labor is
\begin{eqnarray*} N^s = \frac{W}{P}\end{eqnarray*}</p>

<p>Equilibrium in the labor market occurs where $N^d = N^s$. Solving it, we get equilibrium employment, real wage, output, profits as follows :
\begin{eqnarray*} N^* &amp; = &amp; 1 \\ \left(\frac{W}{P}\right)^* &amp; = &amp; 1 \\ Y^* &amp; = &amp; 1.5 \\ \pi^* &amp; = &amp; 0.5 \end{eqnarray*}</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-09T22:18:22.720Z
Thanks a lot for your response @Amit. Can you please just clarify one thing. I understand the 'analytical' way by which you derived the Demand Function for labour using unconstrained optimization, but I know it can be derived using a more 'economic' method. I've read that the optimal demand for labour is attained when Marginal Revenue of Product = Real Wage. MRV is defined as Marginal Product of Labour times Price of product. But when I equal MRP and Real wage I don't get the same demand function. Only when I equal Marginal Product and Real Wage do I get the same function as you did. Why so?
Metrician
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-10T00:10:21.387Z
@Metrician You're making a mistake. Correct condition for optimality of employment decision is $\text{MRP} = W$, where $W$ is nominal wage. Here $\text{MRP} = P \times \text{MP}_N = P(2- N)$. Set it equal to $W$ and you'll get the labor demand.
Amit
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-10T00:27:02.370Z
I've read that condition on a lot of different sources, the one about $MPL = Real Wage$. Though I've read the condition you gave on other sources, too. When I did some computations of the condition that you gave, I realized that the two conditions *might* be both true. Since $P(2-N)=W$ (condition you gave) is equivalent to $(2-N)=W/P$ (condition I gave). Maybe that's why some sources say Marginal Product of Labour = Real Wage $W/P$. Could they be both right or is this case just some coincidence?
Metrician
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-10T00:33:35.583Z
This is the maximization problem you solve: $\max_N \ Pf(N) - WN$ These are two equivalent ways to write the condition for optimality : $P\times\text{MP}_N = W$ or $\text{MP}_N = \frac{W}{P}$. Here $\text{MP}_N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial N}$  is the Marginal Product of Labor.
Amit
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-09T04:29:44.800Z
2018-06-09T04:29:44.800Z
Amit
<p>I just started reviewing macroeconomic modeling for an upcoming entry exam, and I'm not sure about my answers in this application:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Suppose that the economy of a country has a representative firm with
  the following production function $y = f(N) = 2N - (1/2)N^2$ knowing
  that $N$ is the size of employment.</p>
  
  <p><strong>1)</strong> Write the profit of this firm knowing that the price of the good is $P$ and the wage is $W$.<br>
  <strong>2)</strong> Determine the demand for labour which is the optimal size of this firm. Comment on your results.<br>
  <strong>3)</strong> From the last question, deduce the optimal size of production which is the optimal supply in volume of the good produced by this
  firm. Comment on your results.<br>
  <strong>4)</strong> Suppose the total supply of labour is exogenous, and is given by: $N^o = (W/P)$. Define the notion of labour market equilibrium, and
  calculate the equilibrium real wage of this economy.<br>
  <strong>5)</strong> At this general equilibrium, calculate total production (in volume), the total real payroll, total real profits (profits deflated
  by the price), and comment on the distribution in this economy.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Admittingly, I'm still quite weak when it comes to macroeconomic modeling, I haven't yet found a good enough source so all my knowledge comes from scattered sources all over the web.  </p>

<p><strong>But here's my attempt:</strong>  </p>

<p><strong>1)</strong> I know profits are<br>
$$\pi = Revenue -Cost \equiv P.y - W.N$$
Where P is the price of the good, y the quantity produced, W the wage and N the size of employees.</p>

<p>Since the quantity produced is given as a function of N I re-wrote that expression into:  $$ P.y - W.N \equiv P. 2N-(1/2)N^2 - W.N$$</p>

<p>Which can simplify to: $$\pi = P.N(\dfrac{-N+4}{2}-w)$$</p>

<p>Not sure if this is what they mean but I stopped here.</p>

<p><strong>2)</strong> I've read somewhere that optimal demand for labour is reached when $Marginal Benefit = Marginal Cost$</p>

<p>Marginal Benefit is defined as $Marginal Product \times Price$ so in our case that should be the derivative of the Production Function (marginal product) times price, or $MB = (2-N)\times P$
I've read that Marginal Cost is the real wage $\dfrac{W}{P}$<br>
So at equilibrium $(2-N)P = \dfrac{W}{P}$ which after some computation we get $$N=-\dfrac{W-2P^2}{P^2}$$ which should be the demand for labour at equilibrium.  </p>

<p><strong>3)</strong> Since N we found is (supposedly) the optimal demand for labour, and production of the good is a function of N alone, I thought we'd get the optimal size of production by inputting the expression of $N$ we just found in the production function $y$ that was given to us. After some long computations, I got: $$y=-\dfrac{W^2}{2P^4}+2$$</p>

<p><strong>4)</strong> The real wage at equilibrium is obtained when Demand for Labour equals Supply for Labour. Using the exogenous expression for Labour Supply we were given this means:
$$\dfrac{W}{P}=-\dfrac{W-2P^2}{P^2}$$</p>

<p>Which when solved get $$p=1, w=1$$ and thus real wage would also be equal to $1$</p>

<p><strong>5)</strong> Replacing values in various expressions we derived in prior questions I got: $$N=1$$  $$y=\dfrac{3}{2}$$   $$payroll=\dfrac{W}{P}.N = 1$$ $$\pi =\dfrac{1}{2}$$</p>

<p>Now I'd be very surprised if I had any answer right since I'm very new to this, so I'd appreciate some feedback on my answers. Also, I'd appreciate some help with the comments on the answers especially the one about the distribution.</p>

<p>Thanks.</p>

<macroeconomics><microeconomics><labor-economics><unemployment><wages>
Labour Market: simple macroeconomic modeling
Metrician
# Labour Market: simple macroeconomic modeling

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-06-09)

I just started reviewing macroeconomic modeling for an upcoming entry exam, and I'm not sure about my answers in this application:

> Suppose that the economy of a country has a representative firm with
> the following production function $y = f(N) = 2N - (1/2)N^2$ knowing
> that $N$ is the size of employment.
>
> **1)** Write the profit of this firm knowing that the price of the good is $P$ and the wage is $W$.  
> **2)** Determine the demand for labour which is the optimal size of this firm. Comment on your results.  
> **3)** From the last question, deduce the optimal size of production which is the optimal supply in volume of the good produced by this
> firm. Comment on your results.  
> **4)** Suppose the total supply of labour is exogenous, and is given by: $N^o = (W/P)$. Define the notion of labour market equilibrium, and
> calculate the equilibrium real wage of this economy.  
> **5)** At this general equilibrium, calculate total production (in volume), the total real payroll, total real profits (profits deflated
> by the price), and comment on the distribution in this economy.

Admittingly, I'm still quite weak when it comes to macroeconomic modeling, I haven't yet found a good enough source so all my knowledge comes from scattered sources all over the web.

**But here's my attempt:**

**1)** I know profits are  
$$\pi = Revenue -Cost \equiv P.y - W.N$$
Where P is the price of the good, y the quantity produced, W the wage and N the size of employees.

Since the quantity produced is given as a function of N I re-wrote that expression into: $$ P.y - W.N \equiv P. 2N-(1/2)N^2 - W.N$$

Which can simplify to: $$\pi = P.N(\dfrac{-N+4}{2}-w)$$

Not sure if this is what they mean but I stopped here.

**2)** I've read somewhere that optimal demand for labour is reached when $Marginal Benefit = Marginal Cost$

Marginal Benefit is defined as $Marginal Product \times Price$ so in our case that should be the derivative of the Production Function (marginal product) times price, or $MB = (2-N)\times P$
I've read that Marginal Cost is the real wage $\dfrac{W}{P}$  
So at equilibrium $(2-N)P = \dfrac{W}{P}$ which after some computation we get $$N=-\dfrac{W-2P^2}{P^2}$$ which should be the demand for labour at equilibrium.

**3)** Since N we found is (supposedly) the optimal demand for labour, and production of the good is a function of N alone, I thought we'd get the optimal size of production by inputting the expression of $N$ we just found in the production function $y$ that was given to us. After some long computations, I got: $$y=-\dfrac{W^2}{2P^4}+2$$

**4)** The real wage at equilibrium is obtained when Demand for Labour equals Supply for Labour. Using the exogenous expression for Labour Supply we were given this means:
$$\dfrac{W}{P}=-\dfrac{W-2P^2}{P^2}$$

Which when solved get $$p=1, w=1$$ and thus real wage would also be equal to $1$

**5)** Replacing values in various expressions we derived in prior questions I got: $$N=1$$ $$y=\dfrac{3}{2}$$ $$payroll=\dfrac{W}{P}.N = 1$$ $$\pi =\dfrac{1}{2}$$

Now I'd be very surprised if I had any answer right since I'm very new to this, so I'd appreciate some feedback on my answers. Also, I'd appreciate some help with the comments on the answers especially the one about the distribution.

Thanks.

**Tags:** macroeconomics, microeconomics, labor-economics, unemployment, wages

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-06-09. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

To find demand for labor, solve the firm's profit maximization problem :
\begin{eqnarray\*} \max\_N & \ P(2N - 0.5N^2) - WN\end{eqnarray\*}
Differentiating the objective with respect to $N$ and setting it equal to 0 yields the demand function for labor :
\begin{eqnarray\*} N^d = 2 - \frac{W}{P}\end{eqnarray\*}
Corresponding supply of output is

\begin{eqnarray\*} Y = f\left(2 - \frac{W}{P}\right) = \left(2 - \frac{W}{P}\right)\left(1 + \frac{W}{2P}\right) = 2 - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{W}{P}\right)^2\end{eqnarray\*}

Given the supply of labor is
\begin{eqnarray\*} N^s = \frac{W}{P}\end{eqnarray\*}

Equilibrium in the labor market occurs where $N^d = N^s$. Solving it, we get equilibrium employment, real wage, output, profits as follows :
\begin{eqnarray\*} N^\* & = & 1 \\ \left(\frac{W}{P}\right)^\* & = & 1 \\ Y^\* & = & 1.5 \\ \pi^\* & = & 0.5 \end{eqnarray\*}

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks a lot for your response @Amit. Can you please just clarify one thing. I understand the 'analytical' way by which you derived the Demand Function for labour using unconstrained optimization, but I know it can be derived using a more 'economic' method. I've read that the optimal demand for labour is attained when Marginal Revenue of Product = Real Wage. MRV is defined as Marginal Product of Labour times Price of product. But when I equal MRP and Real wage I don't get the same demand function. Only when I equal Marginal Product and Real Wage do I get the same function as you did. Why so?  
> **username_1**: @Metrician You're making a mistake. Correct condition for optimality of employment decision is $\text{MRP} = W$, where $W$ is nominal wage. Here $\text{MRP} = P \times \text{MP}_N = P(2- N)$. Set it equal to $W$ and you'll get the labor demand.  
> **username_0**: I've read that condition on a lot of different sources, the one about $MPL = Real Wage$. Though I've read the condition you gave on other sources, too. When I did some computations of the condition that you gave, I realized that the two conditions *might* be both true. Since $P(2-N)=W$ (condition you gave) is equivalent to $(2-N)=W/P$ (condition I gave). Maybe that's why some sources say Marginal Product of Labour = Real Wage $W/P$. Could they be both right or is this case just some coincidence?  
> **username_1**: This is the maximization problem you solve: $\max_N \ Pf(N) - WN$ These are two equivalent ways to write the condition for optimality : $P\times\text{MP}_N = W$ or $\text{MP}_N = \frac{W}{P}$. Here $\text{MP}_N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial N}$  is the Marginal Product of Labor.  

---

