<p>There are many ways of calculating public sector finances.</p>

<p>One approach is similar to corporate accounting and the UK Treasury publishes <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/whole-of-government-accounts" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Whole of Government Accounts</a>.  </p>

<p>Those are different in construction to the <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicsectorfinance" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Public Sector Finances statistics</a> published by the Office for National Statistics, who follow international National Accounts methodology  </p>

<p>In respect of your question of what happens when these bonds mature and are in effect rolled over, does not lead to a difference in treatment: in both cases the repayment is not treated as government expenditure but of finance, and if the new bonds cover the same amount as the old bonds then in effect nothing changes and Government debt stays the same.</p>

<p>The translation from expenditure and revenue to borrowing and changes in debt is not simple.  The ONS produced an <a href="http://visual.ons.gov.uk/the-debt-and-deficit-of-the-uk-public-sector-explained/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">explanatory article</a>. Separately the ONS published this diagram as part of <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicsectorfinance/bulletins/publicsectorfinances/march2016" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a bulletin last year</a> which illustrates some of the calculations they did for the 2015/16 financial year:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/6qbG3.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/6qbG3.png" alt="enter image description here"></a> </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-10T12:58:50.107Z
2017-02-10T12:58:50.107Z
Henry
<p>My background in economics is non-existant, I'm just doing some research before the UK general elections and am having some difficulty in understanding certain data.</p>

<p>Assuming the figures found in <a href="http://www.ukpublicrevenue.co.uk/year_revenue_2014UKbt_14bc1n_G0#ukgs302" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> and <a href="http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/year_spending_2014UKbn_14bc1n#ukgs302" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> link are accurate, the UK government spent £714 Billion in the 2014 fiscal year. They generated £619.8 billion in public revenue in the same year. I'd assume the difference between these figures, £94.2 billion, is what they needed to borrow to make up the difference. But the website lists the UK national debt to be of magnitude £1258 billion in 2014 and £1185 the year before, meaning that only a total of £73 billion was borrowed in reality. </p>

<p>Moreover, the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/330717/PESA_2014_-_print.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">HM treasury PESA</a> (page 19) gives public sector current expenditure in 2014 to be ~£666 billion, which is over £45 billion more than what they generated from public revenue. Even if the statistic of £619.2 billion is incorrect, and the government actually generated exactly the £666 billion spent, the difference £714-£666 billion=£48 billion is less than the amount by which the national debt rose in the 2014 fiscal year. I can't get the figures to match up!</p>

<p>Finally, from what I've learned today, government borrowing works by having banks etc. purchase bonds which the government pay interest on, and then in a certain number of agreed years pay the purchaser back what they paid. The statistics for government spending in the second link above show £47.4 billion being spent on interest. However, I can't find any account of the original loans being paid back. That is, surely some of the bonds the government sold should mature each year, requiring them to pay the owner of the bond the original amount they sold it for?</p>

<p>Apologies for my economic naivety.  </p>

<debt><government><interest-rate><government-debt>
Government spending/borrowing difference/ national debt increase disparity
Lammey
# Government spending/borrowing difference/ national debt increase disparity

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-04)

My background in economics is non-existant, I'm just doing some research before the UK general elections and am having some difficulty in understanding certain data.

Assuming the figures found in [this](http://www.ukpublicrevenue.co.uk/year_revenue_2014UKbt_14bc1n_G0#ukgs302) and [this](http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/year_spending_2014UKbn_14bc1n#ukgs302) link are accurate, the UK government spent £714 Billion in the 2014 fiscal year. They generated £619.8 billion in public revenue in the same year. I'd assume the difference between these figures, £94.2 billion, is what they needed to borrow to make up the difference. But the website lists the UK national debt to be of magnitude £1258 billion in 2014 and £1185 the year before, meaning that only a total of £73 billion was borrowed in reality.

Moreover, the [HM treasury PESA](https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/330717/PESA_2014_-_print.pdf) (page 19) gives public sector current expenditure in 2014 to be ~£666 billion, which is over £45 billion more than what they generated from public revenue. Even if the statistic of £619.2 billion is incorrect, and the government actually generated exactly the £666 billion spent, the difference £714-£666 billion=£48 billion is less than the amount by which the national debt rose in the 2014 fiscal year. I can't get the figures to match up!

Finally, from what I've learned today, government borrowing works by having banks etc. purchase bonds which the government pay interest on, and then in a certain number of agreed years pay the purchaser back what they paid. The statistics for government spending in the second link above show £47.4 billion being spent on interest. However, I can't find any account of the original loans being paid back. That is, surely some of the bonds the government sold should mature each year, requiring them to pay the owner of the bond the original amount they sold it for?

Apologies for my economic naivety.

**Tags:** debt, government, interest-rate, government-debt

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-02-10. Score: 2

There are many ways of calculating public sector finances.

One approach is similar to corporate accounting and the UK Treasury publishes [Whole of Government Accounts](https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/whole-of-government-accounts).

Those are different in construction to the [Public Sector Finances statistics](https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicsectorfinance) published by the Office for National Statistics, who follow international National Accounts methodology

In respect of your question of what happens when these bonds mature and are in effect rolled over, does not lead to a difference in treatment: in both cases the repayment is not treated as government expenditure but of finance, and if the new bonds cover the same amount as the old bonds then in effect nothing changes and Government debt stays the same.

The translation from expenditure and revenue to borrowing and changes in debt is not simple. The ONS produced an [explanatory article](http://visual.ons.gov.uk/the-debt-and-deficit-of-the-uk-public-sector-explained/). Separately the ONS published this diagram as part of [a bulletin last year](https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicsectorfinance/bulletins/publicsectorfinances/march2016) which illustrates some of the calculations they did for the 2015/16 financial year:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/6qbG3.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/6qbG3.png)


---

