<p>If we view "wealth" as the subjective experience of pleasure, then "wealth" can spring up <em>ex nihilo</em>: if people used to get two dollars' worth of pleasure from having a cup, but now they get ten dollars' worth, then in some sense eight dollars of wealth has come "out of nowhere". </p>

<p>However, it's more likely that at least one party has misvalued the cup. Perhaps the original seller was unaware that there was someone out there who would get ten dollars' worth of pleasure from the cup, or maybe the buyer has miscalculated how much pleasure they will get from the cup. In that case, wealth has not been created, it has simply been transferred to you.</p>

<p>A third possibility is that you have added value to the cup. Perhaps you own a retail store, and 2 dollars is the wholesale price while 10  dollars is the retail price. The person who paid 10  dollars for the cup doesn't want to buy in bulk like you do to get the wholesale price, and they don't want to deal with buying from the manufacturer. Maybe they bought a bunch of stuff from your store, and it would have been a lot of work to arrange purchases from all the different manufacturers. You've added to the end user's convenience, and therefore added wealth to the economy.</p>

<p>The issue of currency is a side matter. Currency is a measure of wealth; it isn't wealth in and of itself. If you had made the cup all by yourself, clearly you would have created wealth, even if no money changed hands. Money enables price signals to let other people know how much you value their activity, but that value exists independent of an explicit monetary figure been ascribed to it. If you create a cup and then sell it for 10 dollars, the wealth creation occurs when you make the cup. When you sell the cup, you are indeed not creating 10  dollars of wealth at that moment; it already has existed since you made the cup (however, depending on how one does the accounting, <em>some</em> of the wealth may be created when you transfer possession, if the person you sell it to has more of a use for it than you do, but it's the transferring possession, not the payment of currency, that causes the increase in wealth).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-13T22:29:05.737Z
2018-11-13T22:29:05.737Z
Acccumulation
<p>I'm trying to better understand wealth creation– let's use trade as an example. </p>

<p>I've bought a cup for \$2 and sold it for \$10. We've "created some new wealth" there– but without a net increase in actual dollars that exist, how has more wealth been created? Am I not just taking \$10 that already existed from someone who perhaps made it at their day job? Who's boss in turn took it from the sale of a bagel? Aren't these dollars that already exist? </p>

<p>How does this boil down into actual new wealth and money?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-15T21:40:31.847Z
If you sell the cup at a profit, you did take the dollars from the buyer. Retailers normally sell goods to consumers at a higher price than they themselves pay. That activity is not typically described as “wealth creation,” it’s just normal commercial activity. What wealth do you see being created?
Brian Romanchuk
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-15T21:51:50.473Z
@BrianRomanchuk It adds to GDP. This was a good answer: https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/17890/how-is-wealth-created/17895?noredirect=1#comment39978_17895
aroooo
<macroeconomics><economic-growth><money-supply><wealth>
Wealth Creation: Where does the money come from?
aroooo
# Wealth Creation: Where does the money come from?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-13)

I'm trying to better understand wealth creation– let's use trade as an example.

I've bought a cup for \$2 and sold it for \$10. We've "created some new wealth" there– but without a net increase in actual dollars that exist, how has more wealth been created? Am I not just taking \$10 that already existed from someone who perhaps made it at their day job? Who's boss in turn took it from the sale of a bagel? Aren't these dollars that already exist?

How does this boil down into actual new wealth and money?

**Tags:** macroeconomics, economic-growth, money-supply, wealth
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: If you sell the cup at a profit, you did take the dollars from the buyer. Retailers normally sell goods to consumers at a higher price than they themselves pay. That activity is not typically described as “wealth creation,” it’s just normal commercial activity. What wealth do you see being created?  
> **username_0**: @BrianRomanchuk It adds to GDP. This was a good answer: https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/17890/how-is-wealth-created/17895?noredirect=1#comment39978_17895  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-11-13. Score: 1

If we view "wealth" as the subjective experience of pleasure, then "wealth" can spring up *ex nihilo*: if people used to get two dollars' worth of pleasure from having a cup, but now they get ten dollars' worth, then in some sense eight dollars of wealth has come "out of nowhere".

However, it's more likely that at least one party has misvalued the cup. Perhaps the original seller was unaware that there was someone out there who would get ten dollars' worth of pleasure from the cup, or maybe the buyer has miscalculated how much pleasure they will get from the cup. In that case, wealth has not been created, it has simply been transferred to you.

A third possibility is that you have added value to the cup. Perhaps you own a retail store, and 2 dollars is the wholesale price while 10 dollars is the retail price. The person who paid 10 dollars for the cup doesn't want to buy in bulk like you do to get the wholesale price, and they don't want to deal with buying from the manufacturer. Maybe they bought a bunch of stuff from your store, and it would have been a lot of work to arrange purchases from all the different manufacturers. You've added to the end user's convenience, and therefore added wealth to the economy.

The issue of currency is a side matter. Currency is a measure of wealth; it isn't wealth in and of itself. If you had made the cup all by yourself, clearly you would have created wealth, even if no money changed hands. Money enables price signals to let other people know how much you value their activity, but that value exists independent of an explicit monetary figure been ascribed to it. If you create a cup and then sell it for 10 dollars, the wealth creation occurs when you make the cup. When you sell the cup, you are indeed not creating 10 dollars of wealth at that moment; it already has existed since you made the cup (however, depending on how one does the accounting, *some* of the wealth may be created when you transfer possession, if the person you sell it to has more of a use for it than you do, but it's the transferring possession, not the payment of currency, that causes the increase in wealth).


---

