<ol>
<li><p>At market both price (in this case exchange rate) and quantity are endogenous ('dependent') variables.</p>
</li>
<li><p>You are confusing two completely distinct phenomena. Movement along demand curve and shifts in demand curve.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>When exchange rate increases demand will be lower because we are moving along given demand curve - but increase in exchange rate <strong>does not</strong> cause shift in a demand curve.</p>
<p>In your second example when you talk about 'demand rising' you must be implicitly talking about <em>shift</em> in demand curve otherwise the rest of the paragraph would not make sense.</p>
<p>So  you are actually talking about two distinct concepts. When we talk about movements along demand curve even if you reverse the relationship and 'make the exchange rate dependent variable' there will still be inverse relationship between the two.  For example, if the relationship between demand for currency <span class="math-container">$(D)$</span> and exchange rate <span class="math-container">$(E)$</span> would be given by:
<span class="math-container">$$D= 100 - E$$</span></p>
<p>Then 'making exchange rate the dependent variable' would mean you have to solve <span class="math-container">$E$</span> which would give you:</p>
<p><span class="math-container">$$E=100-D$$</span></p>
<p>As you can see the relationship is still inverse.</p>
<p>However, you are not doing the above when you talk about 'making exchange rate dependent variable' and then asking what would happen when demand raises - you are really talking about what happens when demand shifts right which in this case would happen if in the equation <span class="math-container">$D=\alpha-E$</span> the parameter <span class="math-container">$\alpha$</span> which used to be in the above example  <span class="math-container">$100$</span> would increase.</p>
<p>See the graph below from Mankiw's Principles of Economics that showcases the distinction between the shifts in demand and movement along demand. The graph is not about exchange rate market but you could as well just change y-axis label to exchange rate and x-axis label to quantity of currency and the point would be the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Wb9SN.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Wb9SN.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-27T13:44:21.627Z
2020-09-27T15:09:05.780Z
2020-09-27T15:09:05.780Z
1muflon1
<p>My high-school Macroeconomics textbook states that 'There is an <em><strong>inverse</strong></em> relationship between the price of foreign currency, or exchange rate, and demand for foreign exchange. When the exchange rate rises, demand for foreign exchange falls and vice versa'</p>
<p>Is there any particular reason for making the exchange rate the <em><strong>dependent</strong></em> variable in this scenario? I believe if I take demand to be the independent variable; that is- when demand rises, the foreign exchange rate rises. This case exhibits a <em><strong>direct</strong></em> and not an <em><strong>inverse</strong></em> relation and, hence, creates a contradiction.
All in all, I want to know if there is any procedure to decide what becomes the dependant variable. Or both of the cases are distinct and valid in their own.</p>

<macroeconomics><currency><exchange-rates>
Demand Curve of Foreign Exchange
Sahaj
# Demand Curve of Foreign Exchange

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-09-27)

My high-school Macroeconomics textbook states that 'There is an ***inverse*** relationship between the price of foreign currency, or exchange rate, and demand for foreign exchange. When the exchange rate rises, demand for foreign exchange falls and vice versa'

Is there any particular reason for making the exchange rate the ***dependent*** variable in this scenario? I believe if I take demand to be the independent variable; that is- when demand rises, the foreign exchange rate rises. This case exhibits a ***direct*** and not an ***inverse*** relation and, hence, creates a contradiction.
All in all, I want to know if there is any procedure to decide what becomes the dependant variable. Or both of the cases are distinct and valid in their own.

**Tags:** macroeconomics, currency, exchange-rates

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-09-27. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

1. At market both price (in this case exchange rate) and quantity are endogenous ('dependent') variables.
2. You are confusing two completely distinct phenomena. Movement along demand curve and shifts in demand curve.

When exchange rate increases demand will be lower because we are moving along given demand curve - but increase in exchange rate **does not** cause shift in a demand curve.

In your second example when you talk about 'demand rising' you must be implicitly talking about *shift* in demand curve otherwise the rest of the paragraph would not make sense.

So you are actually talking about two distinct concepts. When we talk about movements along demand curve even if you reverse the relationship and 'make the exchange rate dependent variable' there will still be inverse relationship between the two. For example, if the relationship between demand for currency $(D)$ and exchange rate $(E)$ would be given by:
$$D= 100 - E$$

Then 'making exchange rate the dependent variable' would mean you have to solve $E$ which would give you:

$$E=100-D$$

As you can see the relationship is still inverse.

However, you are not doing the above when you talk about 'making exchange rate dependent variable' and then asking what would happen when demand raises - you are really talking about what happens when demand shifts right which in this case would happen if in the equation $D=\alpha-E$ the parameter $\alpha$ which used to be in the above example $100$ would increase.

See the graph below from Mankiw's Principles of Economics that showcases the distinction between the shifts in demand and movement along demand. The graph is not about exchange rate market but you could as well just change y-axis label to exchange rate and x-axis label to quantity of currency and the point would be the same.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Wb9SN.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/Wb9SN.png)


---

