<p>Standard measure of productivity of any factor not just workers(labor) is output per input.</p>
<p>For workers that would be output per worker. By output here we mean the added value worker creates not just number of units. So if worker produces output with added value of 1000 euro per hour of labor that would be the worker’s productivity.</p>
<p>This is the most common way people use when data are available. There are other similar methods as well see <a href="https://www.oecd.org/sdd/productivity-stats/2352458.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this OECD</a> report.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-07-31T19:25:10.620Z
2023-07-31T19:25:10.620Z
1muflon1
<p>When a firm hires a worker, they have incomplete information on the workers' productivity. Firm's goal is to hire the most productive workers, and they estimate productivity of the workers given the observable characteristics in a resume/interview.</p>
<p>I have seen a paper that uses wage increase as a proxy for the workers' productivity. Presumably, the underlying assumption behind this choice is that once worker gets hired, employer can observe the productivity of the worker better, and 'rewards' the productive worker by increasing their wage. However, this is not a good proxy to use because wage increase can be due to many other reasons that have nothing to do with productivity (eg. racism, which is observable, and personality clash, which is not observable to econometrician).</p>
<p>Is there any other ways to measure the productivity of the workers in a data like NLSY? I cannot partial out the observable characteristics in wage change, because I'm trying to predict productivity of the workers given the observable characteristics.</p>

<labor-economics><productivity>
How do labor literature measure productivity of the worker?
Hosea
# How do labor literature measure productivity of the worker?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-07-31)

When a firm hires a worker, they have incomplete information on the workers' productivity. Firm's goal is to hire the most productive workers, and they estimate productivity of the workers given the observable characteristics in a resume/interview.

I have seen a paper that uses wage increase as a proxy for the workers' productivity. Presumably, the underlying assumption behind this choice is that once worker gets hired, employer can observe the productivity of the worker better, and 'rewards' the productive worker by increasing their wage. However, this is not a good proxy to use because wage increase can be due to many other reasons that have nothing to do with productivity (eg. racism, which is observable, and personality clash, which is not observable to econometrician).

Is there any other ways to measure the productivity of the workers in a data like NLSY? I cannot partial out the observable characteristics in wage change, because I'm trying to predict productivity of the workers given the observable characteristics.

**Tags:** labor-economics, productivity

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2023-07-31. Score: 1

Standard measure of productivity of any factor not just workers(labor) is output per input.

For workers that would be output per worker. By output here we mean the added value worker creates not just number of units. So if worker produces output with added value of 1000 euro per hour of labor that would be the worker’s productivity.

This is the most common way people use when data are available. There are other similar methods as well see [this OECD](https://www.oecd.org/sdd/productivity-stats/2352458.pdf) report.


---

