<p>Macroeconomics is the part of interest to fixed income hedge funds, and a secondary concern for other parts of finance. It is also the area with the greatest theoretical splits. I am in the post-Keynesian economics camp. Within post-Keynesian economics, I would list two books as a good starting point.</p>

<p>(I would guess that “mainstream” economists are in the majority for answering questions here. I would let them list what they view as the best introductions to macroeconomics; I have obvious theoretical reservations about the mainstream texts that I have read.)</p>

<p>The text <em>Monetary Economics</em> by Wynne Godley and Marc Lavoie is an introduction to stock-flow consistent modelling. It is aimed at undergraduates, and gives an overview of post-Keynesian economics from a mathematical perspective. The models themselves are simple, but a lot of key information is embedded in the text itself. It explains the post-Keynesian critiques of the theoretical mainstream. My background was in applied mathematics, and the treatment in <em>Monetary Economics</em> made the most sense to me; the mathematical conventions used by economists elsewhere are somewhat non-obvious to outsiders.</p>

<p>The next book is <em>Stabilizing a Unstable Economy</em> by Hyman Minsky. It’s more of a popular book than a textbook (largely non-mathematical), but it provides a readable introduction to Hyman Minsky’s views on the relationship between finance and the economy. The 2008 Financial Crisis was labelled a “Minsky Moment,” reflecting Minsky’s popularity among financial market commentators. <em>Stabilizing an Unstable Economy</em> may not be Minsky’s best book (collections of his articles might be better), but it offers the best overview.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-04T16:13:28.383Z
2018-07-04T16:13:28.383Z
Brian Romanchuk
<p>While economics is an important field, at the undergraduate level, very little depending on what you are wanting to do with the knowledge.  For example, if you wanted to understand the economics of hedge fund contracts, that would be under microeconomics and financial economics.  If you wanted to understand top-down portfolio management then you would study general macroeconomics and financial economics.  You would be better off reading in finance than economics.</p>

<p>Economics is the study of how people make choices given limited resources.  Finance is the study of how to get the right amount of money to the right place at the right time and to account for risks to those strategies.  Both are important, but finance would likely matter more unless your concern is policy related or behavioral.</p>

<p>1) To some extent, all of them, but primarily financial and monetary economics.  Financial economics is the study of the deferring of consumption from today into the future.  Monetary economics is the study of how fixed contracts (such as money) impact the real economy and so includes financial intermediation.</p>

<p>2) I would start with Bolstad's Introduction to Bayesian Statistics and Dennis Lindley's book "Making Decisions,"  and a follow up on Bayesian Econometrics.  Lindley's textbook is what I call a 13th-grade book.  It isn't college, it isn't high school, but it gives you a feel for the thinking.  You will need calculus through multivariate integration to get through Bolstad's book.  You should also separately read any introductory statistics text and a standard econometrics text.  I am recommending the Bayesian first because it will make a lot more sense as it is likely how you think about the world now and it is more useful in the hedge fund world.  Frequentist statistics are somewhat backward to how people view the world.  These would be your preparatory courses.  </p>

<p>After that, I would either pick up a game theory textbook for non-mathematicians or have you pick up any introduction to set theory textbook plus a rigorous game theory book for economists.  If you get the basics of sets and orderings, then game theory is mostly just a set of fixed point theorems.  I would then have you read Parmigiani's textbook on Decision Theory.</p>

<p>Once you have done that, it depends upon what you are wanting to do with the knowledge.  For example, you could look at "Financial Economics," by Jurgen Eichenberger.  Again, it all depends on what you want to complete by doing this.  Hedge funds and the like are rarely taught at the undergraduate level unless they are taught as special topics to any meaningful depth.  In the giant scope of all human behavior, they are actually a very small subset.  Actually, in terms of behavior, they probably fall into the preposterously small subset.  It is such a small group of people, although they may be important, that the economics of stamp collecting may represent a larger group of people.  Undergraduate education is broad and general because nobody knows ahead of time which elements will be important.</p>

<p>Hedge funds, unless you are interested in regulatory aspects which would also involve the economics of legal systems, are a very narrow topic.  If you are looking for a job, you are better off getting a graduate degree.  But I will warn you, in the related field of venture capital, they asked someone what the job was like.  Their response was "it was like coming in every morning and climbing a mountain made of broken glass on your hands and knees."  That will be true in hedge funds as well, maybe even more so.</p>

<p>To get a better answer, you need to think through what your real underlying question is.  If it is to learn the economics enough to get a job, then make sure you have one semester of computer programming and differential equations.  You should also get two semesters of introductory accounting textbooks.  If you are just curious about a policy topic, such as the impact of hedge funds on national systems of production, then that is a very different set of books.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T05:42:48.310Z
2018-07-02T05:42:48.310Z
Dave Harris
<p>I have had  relatively little exposure to economics( nothing more than EC101) and would greatly appreciate help in answering the following questions: </p>

<ol>
<li><p>Which sections of economics are more or less very relevant related to the hedge fund/ private equity fields?</p></li>
<li><p>Which books would one recommend that would help one get a solid grasp(almost to the level of an economics undergraduate) of the sections in 1. ?</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Thanks</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T15:28:57.183Z
“Hedge funds” is vague. A global macro fund invests on a completely different basis than a fund trading the relative value of options. Macroeconomics will come come up in discussions almost everywhere in finance, but most hedge funds are actually supposed to be hedging out macro risks.
Brian Romanchuk
<finance><financial-economics><soft-question><books>
Reading list for physics undergrad who'd like to cover the economics related to the hedge fund/ private equity field
stochasticmrfox
# Reading list for physics undergrad who'd like to cover the economics related to the hedge fund/ private equity field

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-01)

I have had relatively little exposure to economics( nothing more than EC101) and would greatly appreciate help in answering the following questions:

1. Which sections of economics are more or less very relevant related to the hedge fund/ private equity fields?
2. Which books would one recommend that would help one get a solid grasp(almost to the level of an economics undergraduate) of the sections in 1. ?

Thanks

**Tags:** finance, financial-economics, soft-question, books
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: “Hedge funds” is vague. A global macro fund invests on a completely different basis than a fund trading the relative value of options. Macroeconomics will come come up in discussions almost everywhere in finance, but most hedge funds are actually supposed to be hedging out macro risks.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-07-04. Score: 2

Macroeconomics is the part of interest to fixed income hedge funds, and a secondary concern for other parts of finance. It is also the area with the greatest theoretical splits. I am in the post-Keynesian economics camp. Within post-Keynesian economics, I would list two books as a good starting point.

(I would guess that “mainstream” economists are in the majority for answering questions here. I would let them list what they view as the best introductions to macroeconomics; I have obvious theoretical reservations about the mainstream texts that I have read.)

The text *Monetary Economics* by Wynne Godley and Marc Lavoie is an introduction to stock-flow consistent modelling. It is aimed at undergraduates, and gives an overview of post-Keynesian economics from a mathematical perspective. The models themselves are simple, but a lot of key information is embedded in the text itself. It explains the post-Keynesian critiques of the theoretical mainstream. My background was in applied mathematics, and the treatment in *Monetary Economics* made the most sense to me; the mathematical conventions used by economists elsewhere are somewhat non-obvious to outsiders.

The next book is *Stabilizing a Unstable Economy* by Hyman Minsky. It’s more of a popular book than a textbook (largely non-mathematical), but it provides a readable introduction to Hyman Minsky’s views on the relationship between finance and the economy. The 2008 Financial Crisis was labelled a “Minsky Moment,” reflecting Minsky’s popularity among financial market commentators. *Stabilizing an Unstable Economy* may not be Minsky’s best book (collections of his articles might be better), but it offers the best overview.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-07-02. Score: 0

While economics is an important field, at the undergraduate level, very little depending on what you are wanting to do with the knowledge. For example, if you wanted to understand the economics of hedge fund contracts, that would be under microeconomics and financial economics. If you wanted to understand top-down portfolio management then you would study general macroeconomics and financial economics. You would be better off reading in finance than economics.

Economics is the study of how people make choices given limited resources. Finance is the study of how to get the right amount of money to the right place at the right time and to account for risks to those strategies. Both are important, but finance would likely matter more unless your concern is policy related or behavioral.

1) To some extent, all of them, but primarily financial and monetary economics. Financial economics is the study of the deferring of consumption from today into the future. Monetary economics is the study of how fixed contracts (such as money) impact the real economy and so includes financial intermediation.

2) I would start with Bolstad's Introduction to Bayesian Statistics and Dennis Lindley's book "Making Decisions," and a follow up on Bayesian Econometrics. Lindley's textbook is what I call a 13th-grade book. It isn't college, it isn't high school, but it gives you a feel for the thinking. You will need calculus through multivariate integration to get through Bolstad's book. You should also separately read any introductory statistics text and a standard econometrics text. I am recommending the Bayesian first because it will make a lot more sense as it is likely how you think about the world now and it is more useful in the hedge fund world. Frequentist statistics are somewhat backward to how people view the world. These would be your preparatory courses.

After that, I would either pick up a game theory textbook for non-mathematicians or have you pick up any introduction to set theory textbook plus a rigorous game theory book for economists. If you get the basics of sets and orderings, then game theory is mostly just a set of fixed point theorems. I would then have you read Parmigiani's textbook on Decision Theory.

Once you have done that, it depends upon what you are wanting to do with the knowledge. For example, you could look at "Financial Economics," by Jurgen Eichenberger. Again, it all depends on what you want to complete by doing this. Hedge funds and the like are rarely taught at the undergraduate level unless they are taught as special topics to any meaningful depth. In the giant scope of all human behavior, they are actually a very small subset. Actually, in terms of behavior, they probably fall into the preposterously small subset. It is such a small group of people, although they may be important, that the economics of stamp collecting may represent a larger group of people. Undergraduate education is broad and general because nobody knows ahead of time which elements will be important.

Hedge funds, unless you are interested in regulatory aspects which would also involve the economics of legal systems, are a very narrow topic. If you are looking for a job, you are better off getting a graduate degree. But I will warn you, in the related field of venture capital, they asked someone what the job was like. Their response was "it was like coming in every morning and climbing a mountain made of broken glass on your hands and knees." That will be true in hedge funds as well, maybe even more so.

To get a better answer, you need to think through what your real underlying question is. If it is to learn the economics enough to get a job, then make sure you have one semester of computer programming and differential equations. You should also get two semesters of introductory accounting textbooks. If you are just curious about a policy topic, such as the impact of hedge funds on national systems of production, then that is a very different set of books.


---

