<p>The details of payments systems are complex, and vary by country. I am slightly familiar with how it works in Canada, and I believe that the principles would not be radically different in other developed countries. Here’s a primer on the Canadian payments systems: <a href="https://www.bankofcanada.ca/core-functions/financial-system/canadas-major-payments-systems/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">link</a>.</p>

<p>The advantage of Canada is that there are no reserve requirements, so it’s easier to explain. If you look at the balance sheet data published by the Bank of Canada, the Canadian banks normally have a balance of \$0 at the central bank at the end of the day. In fact, that is what is expected. (In practice, there are small misses of the zero balance; a lot of money sloshes through the payments system.) In a country with reserve requirements (like the U.S.), banks would like to have a target balance equal to their required reserves. (At present, the Fed has forced excess reserves into the system.)</p>

<p>The amount of interbank transactions are very large. They send amounts back and forth on the payments system based on various transactions - their own, and client transactions. The job of a Canadian bank Treasurer is to make sure that the net balance of all payments ends up at \$0 at the end of the day, so that the net position at the Bank of Canada is unchanged. (In a country with reserve requirements, they will want to hit at least the required reserves level.) They will achieve this by any number of methods:</p>

<ul>
<li>issue new securities;</li>
<li>borrow/lend in the interbank market;</li>
<li>buy or sell securities (mainly government bonds);</li>
<li>borrow/lend through repurchase agreements (repos);</li>
<li>if all else fails, run to the central bank and borrow against their assets. This option is <em>greatly</em> frowned upon, and will prompt an investigation from regulators as to why the bank cannot borrow in the markets. (This is termed a “lender-of-last resort” operation, and should only be necessary in a crisis).</li>
</ul>

<p>(Since you asked about bank lending in particular, it is achieved by Bank A wiring money to Bank B through the payments system, in exchange for a contractual obligation to make a reverse future operation with interest.)</p>

<p>The multiplicity of options means that we cannot trace exactly what happens when customers transfer funds to someone at another bank; all we know is that at the end of the day, all of the bank’s transactions with the payments system should net to zero.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-02T13:16:11.340Z
2018-11-02T13:16:11.340Z
Brian Romanchuk
<p>Suppose Alice wants to buy Bob's house but they use different banks. Alice gets a loan from bank A and needs to transfer her new deposits to Bob at bank B to pay for the house. Obviously Alice's deposits at bank A will decrease by the same amount that Bob's increases at bank B, but now bank B's liabilities have increased (more deposits) while bank A's have decreased (less deposits). How is this imbalance settled between the two banks?</p>

<p>I'm guessing bank A sends money to bank B through the central bank (since both banks have an account there), which means A is sending B some of its reserves. But it also seems possible to me that bank B could have an account at bank A that gets credited new deposits. </p>

<p>Similarly, when banks loan to each other to meet reserve requirements, do they loan money that the central bank credited to them or do they credit each other with the reserves they need? </p>

<banking>
Do banks pay each other from their reserves?
Jonah
# Do banks pay each other from their reserves?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-10-31)

Suppose Alice wants to buy Bob's house but they use different banks. Alice gets a loan from bank A and needs to transfer her new deposits to Bob at bank B to pay for the house. Obviously Alice's deposits at bank A will decrease by the same amount that Bob's increases at bank B, but now bank B's liabilities have increased (more deposits) while bank A's have decreased (less deposits). How is this imbalance settled between the two banks?

I'm guessing bank A sends money to bank B through the central bank (since both banks have an account there), which means A is sending B some of its reserves. But it also seems possible to me that bank B could have an account at bank A that gets credited new deposits.

Similarly, when banks loan to each other to meet reserve requirements, do they loan money that the central bank credited to them or do they credit each other with the reserves they need?

**Tags:** banking

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-11-02. Score: 2

The details of payments systems are complex, and vary by country. I am slightly familiar with how it works in Canada, and I believe that the principles would not be radically different in other developed countries. Here’s a primer on the Canadian payments systems: [link](https://www.bankofcanada.ca/core-functions/financial-system/canadas-major-payments-systems/).

The advantage of Canada is that there are no reserve requirements, so it’s easier to explain. If you look at the balance sheet data published by the Bank of Canada, the Canadian banks normally have a balance of \$0 at the central bank at the end of the day. In fact, that is what is expected. (In practice, there are small misses of the zero balance; a lot of money sloshes through the payments system.) In a country with reserve requirements (like the U.S.), banks would like to have a target balance equal to their required reserves. (At present, the Fed has forced excess reserves into the system.)

The amount of interbank transactions are very large. They send amounts back and forth on the payments system based on various transactions - their own, and client transactions. The job of a Canadian bank Treasurer is to make sure that the net balance of all payments ends up at \$0 at the end of the day, so that the net position at the Bank of Canada is unchanged. (In a country with reserve requirements, they will want to hit at least the required reserves level.) They will achieve this by any number of methods:

* issue new securities;
* borrow/lend in the interbank market;
* buy or sell securities (mainly government bonds);
* borrow/lend through repurchase agreements (repos);
* if all else fails, run to the central bank and borrow against their assets. This option is *greatly* frowned upon, and will prompt an investigation from regulators as to why the bank cannot borrow in the markets. (This is termed a “lender-of-last resort” operation, and should only be necessary in a crisis).

(Since you asked about bank lending in particular, it is achieved by Bank A wiring money to Bank B through the payments system, in exchange for a contractual obligation to make a reverse future operation with interest.)

The multiplicity of options means that we cannot trace exactly what happens when customers transfer funds to someone at another bank; all we know is that at the end of the day, all of the bank’s transactions with the payments system should net to zero.


---

