<h2>Utility Trade-offs: Pareto Efficiency vs Equality</h2>

<p>While I tend to agree with the notion of Tragedy of the Commons as per the comments, I will provide an additional economic framework to answer your question. Perhaps this is something you already know, but is nonetheless useful for answering your question as per the <a href="/questions/tagged/welfare-economics" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;welfare-economics&#39;" rel="tag">welfare-economics</a> tag. As to the exact name of the policy, I'm not sure there is a name for the <em>policy</em>, but the underlying economic concept can be characterized as a utility trade-off and that's likely how a policy maker would approach this.</p>

<p>Consider the following social indifference curve, I just made it myself, don't scrutinize it too much:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/UctAz.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/UctAz.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>Assuming the First Theorem of Welfare Economics held before the tariff, then that point would have been on the pareto efficient curve which is the gray line in my graph. This curve is also known as the utility possibilities curve, which shows the highest utility one party can have without reducing another party's utility. </p>

<p>In your case, since the aluminum producers were worse off, then this is a utility trade-off. And we recall that society may be willing to trade off one group's utility for another's utility, sometimes on the grounds of equality, but for other reasons too.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-13T10:00:30.590Z
2018-12-13T10:14:12.570Z
2018-12-13T10:14:12.570Z
Arash Howaida
<p>Not exactly the name of an economic policy, but maybe you are searching for Public choice theory?</p>

<p>Diffused costs and concentrated benefits are famously described by Public choice as the results of rent seeking organisms able to effectuate political pressure to gain some form of regulatory capture or structural advantage over an otherwise free market. I'm not sure if I've heard a formal name for that kind of policy, without a judgement of the intentions embedded in the name that is. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-07T19:56:53.973Z
2018-11-07T19:56:53.973Z
NathanielBM
<p>I remember this came up around tariffs in the US on aluminum. They have a negligible effect on the price of an aluminum can, but aggregated across all the aluminum cans sold, it can have a significant impact for a handful of US aluminum producers.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-04T20:14:25.630Z
"concentrated interest" and "tragedy of commons" are two relevant concepts. Since concentrated interests more easily collude or collaborate for their personal gain, this is most often associated with legal and/or illegal forms of corruption which are bad for the economy as a whole and make some handful of people wealthier.
nathanwww
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-05T10:30:03.677Z
It is the often an important factor in rent-seeking.
JFugger_jr
<political-economy><welfare-economics><definition>
What's the term for an economic policy that has negligible effect for most, but a significant effect for a few?
David Ehrmann
# What's the term for an economic policy that has negligible effect for most, but a significant effect for a few?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-03)

I remember this came up around tariffs in the US on aluminum. They have a negligible effect on the price of an aluminum can, but aggregated across all the aluminum cans sold, it can have a significant impact for a handful of US aluminum producers.

**Tags:** political-economy, welfare-economics, definition
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: "concentrated interest" and "tragedy of commons" are two relevant concepts. Since concentrated interests more easily collude or collaborate for their personal gain, this is most often associated with legal and/or illegal forms of corruption which are bad for the economy as a whole and make some handful of people wealthier.  
> **username_2**: It is the often an important factor in rent-seeking.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-13. Score: 1

## Utility Trade-offs: Pareto Efficiency vs Equality

While I tend to agree with the notion of Tragedy of the Commons as per the comments, I will provide an additional economic framework to answer your question. Perhaps this is something you already know, but is nonetheless useful for answering your question as per the [welfare-economics](/questions/tagged/welfare-economics "show questions tagged 'welfare-economics'") tag. As to the exact name of the policy, I'm not sure there is a name for the *policy*, but the underlying economic concept can be characterized as a utility trade-off and that's likely how a policy maker would approach this.

Consider the following social indifference curve, I just made it myself, don't scrutinize it too much:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/UctAz.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/UctAz.png)

Assuming the First Theorem of Welfare Economics held before the tariff, then that point would have been on the pareto efficient curve which is the gray line in my graph. This curve is also known as the utility possibilities curve, which shows the highest utility one party can have without reducing another party's utility.

In your case, since the aluminum producers were worse off, then this is a utility trade-off. And we recall that society may be willing to trade off one group's utility for another's utility, sometimes on the grounds of equality, but for other reasons too.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-11-07. Score: 0

Not exactly the name of an economic policy, but maybe you are searching for Public choice theory?

Diffused costs and concentrated benefits are famously described by Public choice as the results of rent seeking organisms able to effectuate political pressure to gain some form of regulatory capture or structural advantage over an otherwise free market. I'm not sure if I've heard a formal name for that kind of policy, without a judgement of the intentions embedded in the name that is.


---

