<p>No, you cannot clearly determine the individual cost functions. For example both the individual cost functions
<span class="math-container">$$
C_1(q_1) = 18q_1 + 3, \hskip 20pt
C_2(q_2) = 18q_2 + 2
$$</span>
and
<span class="math-container">$$
\hat{C}_1(q_1) = 18q_1 + 1, \hskip 20pt
\hat{C}_2(q_2) = 18q_2 + 4
$$</span>
would yield the same optimum and sum up to <span class="math-container">$C(Q) = 18Q + 5$</span>.</p>

<p>Fixed costs can be allocated to any items, they do not change production decisions. Even in accounting there are several methods for actually allocating common fixed costs between production units.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-01T09:26:36.760Z
2018-12-01T09:26:36.760Z
Giskard
<p>During imperfect price discrimination is it possible to determine profit per group. For example:</p>

<p>Aggregated Cost function: C(Q) = 18*Q + 5; where Q = q1 + q2</p>

<p>Aggregated Demand (AD) for group 1: q1(p1) = 8 - [(1/6)*p1]</p>

<p>AD for group 2: q2(P2) = 4 - [(1/6)*p2]</p>

<p>After finding the inverse demand function (p1 and p2), setting up the profit maximization, and solving for q*1 and q*2, p*1 and p*2, and profit max., can one compute the individual group profit for group 1 and 2?</p>

<p>In order to solve this condition one would need the aggregated cost for each group. Because the monopoly is creating and selling the same good the cost would be the same between the two groups. Is it possible to divide the aggregated market cost function by the number of groups (in this case by two) to find the group's aggregated cost function?</p>

<p>In the end, the sum of the profits from group 1 and 2 should equal the profit maximization solved earlier.</p>

<p>Any direction (i.g. books or research papers) would be great as well! Thank you in advance.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-30T20:54:18.897Z
"Aggregated Cost function: C(Q) = 18*Q + 5; **where Q = q1 + q2**"
Giskard
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-30T22:19:30.260Z
You can't use the aggregated cost function: C(Q) = (18*Q) + 5; where Q = q1 + q2 as the cost function for an individual group.
Nick
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-01T09:20:51.303Z
Oh I see. Sorry, I thought you wanted to solve the problem by getting the individual cost functions. If not, why do you want to calculate them?
Giskard
<microeconomics><monopoly><price-discrimination>
Imperfect Price Discrimination profit per group
Nick
# Imperfect Price Discrimination profit per group

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-30)

During imperfect price discrimination is it possible to determine profit per group. For example:

Aggregated Cost function: C(Q) = 18\*Q + 5; where Q = q1 + q2

Aggregated Demand (AD) for group 1: q1(p1) = 8 - [(1/6)\*p1]

AD for group 2: q2(P2) = 4 - [(1/6)\*p2]

After finding the inverse demand function (p1 and p2), setting up the profit maximization, and solving for q\*1 and q\*2, p\*1 and p\*2, and profit max., can one compute the individual group profit for group 1 and 2?

In order to solve this condition one would need the aggregated cost for each group. Because the monopoly is creating and selling the same good the cost would be the same between the two groups. Is it possible to divide the aggregated market cost function by the number of groups (in this case by two) to find the group's aggregated cost function?

In the end, the sum of the profits from group 1 and 2 should equal the profit maximization solved earlier.

Any direction (i.g. books or research papers) would be great as well! Thank you in advance.

**Tags:** microeconomics, monopoly, price-discrimination
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: "Aggregated Cost function: C(Q) = 18*Q + 5; **where Q = q1 + q2**"  
> **username_0**: You can't use the aggregated cost function: C(Q) = (18*Q) + 5; where Q = q1 + q2 as the cost function for an individual group.  
> **username_1**: Oh I see. Sorry, I thought you wanted to solve the problem by getting the individual cost functions. If not, why do you want to calculate them?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-12-01. Score: 0

No, you cannot clearly determine the individual cost functions. For example both the individual cost functions
$$
C\_1(q\_1) = 18q\_1 + 3, \hskip 20pt
C\_2(q\_2) = 18q\_2 + 2
$$
and
$$
\hat{C}\_1(q\_1) = 18q\_1 + 1, \hskip 20pt
\hat{C}\_2(q\_2) = 18q\_2 + 4
$$
would yield the same optimum and sum up to $C(Q) = 18Q + 5$.

Fixed costs can be allocated to any items, they do not change production decisions. Even in accounting there are several methods for actually allocating common fixed costs between production units.


---

