<p>The response to this question depends on what you assume about AD (a point which is also made by @ Holger I Meinhardt). </p>

<p>For example Blanchard's textbook (my best guess of what you are using) builds an AS-AD model on top of an IS-LM. The AD equation is a summary of all IS-LM equilibria for corresponding  price levels <span class="math-container">$P$</span>. In such a setting a secular decrease of consumption shifts the underlying IS-curve to the left, which yields a new set of IS-LM-equilibria (one for each level of <span class="math-container">$P$</span>) that are all to the left of the equilibria for the corresponding <span class="math-container">$P$</span> before the secular change in  <span class="math-container">$C$</span>. I.e. the AD-curve shifts to the left.</p>

<p>This would mean that you are missing the fact that your IS-LM has some way to go before it reaches an equilibrium after the initial shock to <span class="math-container">$C$</span>, but I am just guessing here since you didn't provide info on your assumptions.</p>

<p>In any case the question should make it clear that the decrease in <span class="math-container">$C$</span> is secular - i.e. not caused by a change of another variable in the model. Otherwise it may well be a move along the curve. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-08-01T14:59:13.433Z
2019-08-01T15:05:35.620Z
2019-08-01T15:05:35.620Z
Grada Gukovic
<p>You mention here a crucial point that falls nowadays more and more in oblivion, that is the well-known aggregation issue across consumers. The described behavior of the individual and aggregate demand curve can only be expected to be observed when the essential properties of the individual demand functions can be bequeathed to the aggregated demand function. For this case one needs a particular type of utility function, it must be of Gorman form, that is, the utility functions of consumers must be quasi-linear, or to put it differently, they must be linear in the numeraire good to get an aggregate demand function that inherits their properties from the individual demand functions (cf. Varian Microeconomic Analysis 1992, third edition, pp.152-154).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-08-01T11:53:33.143Z
2019-08-01T11:53:33.143Z
Holger I. Meinhardt
<p>Studying macroeconomics I began to wonder about the validity of a certain statement that I couldn't find a clear answer to: </p>

<p>"When Consumption decreases, Aggregate Demand curve will shift to the left."</p>

<p>First I thought this was obviously right. However, considering the components of AD (C, I, G, NX), when consumption decreases that would directly lead to the same amount of increase in Inventory, which results in the increase of Investment (I). So since the decrease in consumption is directly offset by the increase in Investment, Aggregate Demand wouldn't shift, and GDP wouldn't change at all right? At least, this is the answer I came up with.</p>

<p>If this statement ("When Consumption decreases, Aggregate Demand curve will shift to the left.") was one of the choices for an AP Macroeconomics question where you had to choose the right/wrong answer choice, would this statement be true, or false? </p>

<p>I couldn't get my head around this statement, and the above logic (Consumption decrease ---> Investment/Inventory increase by same amount ----> GDP unchanged) was the only one I could think of after pondering for hours. </p>

<p>Is there a clear answer to this statement if this were in an AP Macroeconomics question? Would a decrease in consumption really directly shift the AD curve to the left, or would it remain unchanged due to my logic? I would really appreciate a good explanation! :) </p>

<gdp>
Does consumption decrease directly lead to a shift in Aggregate Demand curve to the left?
Robin
# Does consumption decrease directly lead to a shift in Aggregate Demand curve to the left?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-08-01)

Studying macroeconomics I began to wonder about the validity of a certain statement that I couldn't find a clear answer to:

"When Consumption decreases, Aggregate Demand curve will shift to the left."

First I thought this was obviously right. However, considering the components of AD (C, I, G, NX), when consumption decreases that would directly lead to the same amount of increase in Inventory, which results in the increase of Investment (I). So since the decrease in consumption is directly offset by the increase in Investment, Aggregate Demand wouldn't shift, and GDP wouldn't change at all right? At least, this is the answer I came up with.

If this statement ("When Consumption decreases, Aggregate Demand curve will shift to the left.") was one of the choices for an AP Macroeconomics question where you had to choose the right/wrong answer choice, would this statement be true, or false?

I couldn't get my head around this statement, and the above logic (Consumption decrease ---> Investment/Inventory increase by same amount ----> GDP unchanged) was the only one I could think of after pondering for hours.

Is there a clear answer to this statement if this were in an AP Macroeconomics question? Would a decrease in consumption really directly shift the AD curve to the left, or would it remain unchanged due to my logic? I would really appreciate a good explanation! :)

**Tags:** gdp

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-08-01. Score: 0 | Accepted answer

The response to this question depends on what you assume about AD (a point which is also made by @ Holger I Meinhardt).

For example Blanchard's textbook (my best guess of what you are using) builds an AS-AD model on top of an IS-LM. The AD equation is a summary of all IS-LM equilibria for corresponding price levels $P$. In such a setting a secular decrease of consumption shifts the underlying IS-curve to the left, which yields a new set of IS-LM-equilibria (one for each level of $P$) that are all to the left of the equilibria for the corresponding $P$ before the secular change in $C$. I.e. the AD-curve shifts to the left.

This would mean that you are missing the fact that your IS-LM has some way to go before it reaches an equilibrium after the initial shock to $C$, but I am just guessing here since you didn't provide info on your assumptions.

In any case the question should make it clear that the decrease in $C$ is secular - i.e. not caused by a change of another variable in the model. Otherwise it may well be a move along the curve.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-08-01. Score: 0

You mention here a crucial point that falls nowadays more and more in oblivion, that is the well-known aggregation issue across consumers. The described behavior of the individual and aggregate demand curve can only be expected to be observed when the essential properties of the individual demand functions can be bequeathed to the aggregated demand function. For this case one needs a particular type of utility function, it must be of Gorman form, that is, the utility functions of consumers must be quasi-linear, or to put it differently, they must be linear in the numeraire good to get an aggregate demand function that inherits their properties from the individual demand functions (cf. Varian Microeconomic Analysis 1992, third edition, pp.152-154).


---

