<p>This is my understanding, please confirm if the following explanations are correct:</p>
<p>Nash equilibrium is where if the other player plays 'a', then 'x' is always best, not 'y'. But if the other player plays 'b', then 'y' is always best, not 'x'.</p>
<p>Dominant strategy is where even if the other player plays 'a' or 'b', 'x' is always best and not 'y'.</p>
<p>Is this correct?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-12-23T14:45:10.507Z
Does this answer your question: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/43265/42?
Herr K.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-12-23T16:07:02.693Z
@HerrK. Yes it does, thanks
BeginnerCode776
<game-theory>
What is the difference between a nash equilibrium and a dominant strategy?
BeginnerCode776
# What is the difference between a nash equilibrium and a dominant strategy?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2024-12-22)

This is my understanding, please confirm if the following explanations are correct:

Nash equilibrium is where if the other player plays 'a', then 'x' is always best, not 'y'. But if the other player plays 'b', then 'y' is always best, not 'x'.

Dominant strategy is where even if the other player plays 'a' or 'b', 'x' is always best and not 'y'.

Is this correct?

Thanks

**Tags:** game-theory
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Does this answer your question: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/43265/42?  
> **username_0**: @HerrK. Yes it does, thanks  

---

## 0 answers

