<p>Taking a variable as given comes from the assumptions of the model and cannot result from any optimisation problem (think simply that when a variable is taken as given it is treated as a constant in your problem so one cannot lead to the other). Here, taking the public good as given means the household is not able to choose the level of public good to maximize their discounted lifetime utility, and instead this is taken as given (i.e. for a given level of public good I can simply choose my lifetime consumption and bond holdings path to maximize my utility). As for why this is assumed it really depends on the model you are looking at (the level of public good might be fixed (although note that in your problem there is a time subscript) or any individual might be to "small" to exert any influence on the level, etc.) but unless you are looking to endogenously determine the optimal amount of the public good the taken as given assumption is pretty standard.  </p>

<p>As for the maximization problem, what is exactly your doubt? Have you tried setting up the Lagrangian and obtaining the FOCs to get the consumption Euler equation? </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T15:07:21.060Z
Thank you for your reply ! I was only confused about the public good. It is all fine now. I got the same result. Thanks!
Kamel Ismaël
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T15:09:03.560Z
No problem! If this clarified now can you mark the question as solved?
Ali
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T22:08:42.957Z
Sure ! But actually, I do not know how to do it. I am a complete newbie
Kamel Ismaël
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T22:18:47.663Z
You should have some checkmark somewhere to the left!
Ali
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T13:35:02.843Z
2019-05-08T13:35:02.843Z
Ali
<p>Can someone please help me with the Lagragian and the derivation of the following objective function ? Beneath I provide the objective function, the constraint and the Euler equation that results from the maximization. Your help is very much appreciated !! </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/bl6tM.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/bl6tM.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/2ZU7r.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/2ZU7r.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Q3hQU.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Q3hQU.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>Thanks !</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-08T12:49:20.263Z
The author mentions before the Euler equation that the household takes the public good as given! I would like to know is this a result from the derivation ? I.e. after the derivation we are left only with the private consumption c ? Or it means that from the beginning we consider the public consumption and constant  ?
Kamel Ismaël
<macroeconomics><mathematical-economics><labor-economics><optimization><dynamic-optimization>
Maximization problem FOC and Euler equation
Kamel Ismaël
# Maximization problem FOC and Euler equation

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-05-08)

Can someone please help me with the Lagragian and the derivation of the following objective function ? Beneath I provide the objective function, the constraint and the Euler equation that results from the maximization. Your help is very much appreciated !!

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/bl6tM.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/bl6tM.png)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/2ZU7r.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/2ZU7r.png)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Q3hQU.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/Q3hQU.png)

Thanks !

**Tags:** macroeconomics, mathematical-economics, labor-economics, optimization, dynamic-optimization
> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The author mentions before the Euler equation that the household takes the public good as given! I would like to know is this a result from the derivation ? I.e. after the derivation we are left only with the private consumption c ? Or it means that from the beginning we consider the public consumption and constant  ?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-05-08. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Taking a variable as given comes from the assumptions of the model and cannot result from any optimisation problem (think simply that when a variable is taken as given it is treated as a constant in your problem so one cannot lead to the other). Here, taking the public good as given means the household is not able to choose the level of public good to maximize their discounted lifetime utility, and instead this is taken as given (i.e. for a given level of public good I can simply choose my lifetime consumption and bond holdings path to maximize my utility). As for why this is assumed it really depends on the model you are looking at (the level of public good might be fixed (although note that in your problem there is a time subscript) or any individual might be to "small" to exert any influence on the level, etc.) but unless you are looking to endogenously determine the optimal amount of the public good the taken as given assumption is pretty standard.

As for the maximization problem, what is exactly your doubt? Have you tried setting up the Lagrangian and obtaining the FOCs to get the consumption Euler equation?

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you for your reply ! I was only confused about the public good. It is all fine now. I got the same result. Thanks!  
> **username_1**: No problem! If this clarified now can you mark the question as solved?  
> **username_0**: Sure ! But actually, I do not know how to do it. I am a complete newbie  
> **username_1**: You should have some checkmark somewhere to the left!  

---

