<p>It seems to me this seminal paper has looked at the question</p>

<p><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2228949?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Gary Becker - A Theory of the Allocation of Time</a></p>

<p>You can use economic intuition to establish the value of one hour of work in terms of one hour of life. Suppose you have a consumer/worker that has to choose how much time to devote to work or leisure. His total daily hours allotment is  </p>

<p><span class="math-container">$24=h+\ell$</span> </p>

<p>where <span class="math-container">$h$</span> is the number of hours worked and <span class="math-container">$\ell$</span> is the number of hours of leisure. He values leisure according to some utility function <span class="math-container">$u(\cdot)$</span> and his total utility also depends on the amount of goods <span class="math-container">$x$</span> consumed</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$U(x,\ell)=x+u(\ell)$</span></p>

<p>he earns a hourly wage <span class="math-container">$w$</span>. He spends all of his income in this single consumption good, which we assume has a nominal price of 1$. Therefore he has the following budget constraint</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$x=wh$</span></p>

<p>Then, if the consumer/worker is choosing optimally how much to work the margin, it must be true that, on the margin, one hour of leisure has the same value as one hour of work</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial\ell}=w$</span></p>

<p>In other words, he must be indifferent on the margin between working 
1 more minute or using it for leisure. </p>

<p>To know the value of every hour of leisure we need to know of course the function <span class="math-container">$u(\cdot)$</span>. But at least on the margin, if you want to know what's the value of one unit of time not spent on work - there you have it: it's the hourly wage rate.</p>

<p>Becker suggested you could use that intuition to include leisure and household production in GDP. You should weight all hours not spent on work by their respective wage rate.</p>

<p>With regards to your initial question: how many hours of "life" do you gain for every hour of work? It should be 1, otherwise you're not choosing your leisure time optimally.</p>

<p>R.I.P. Gary Becker, Nobel Prize in Economics. I had the privilege of attending his last Price Theory course at UChicago before he died. He lectured on this.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-15T17:31:04.180Z
"how many hours of "life" do you gain for every hour of work? It should be 1" So whenever I work for an hour I immediately use up the product of my previous hour by living while I work? What happens if I stop working, to  watch a movie or sleep?
Giskard
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-16T11:45:45.513Z
As I read the question it asks about _total_ hours (ratio of total hours "life" to total hours work etc, both per week), while your statement that "it should be 1" relates only to hours _at the margin_.
Adam Bailey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-15T17:21:04.813Z
2019-03-15T17:35:39.480Z
2019-03-15T17:35:39.480Z
bbecon
<p>With about 50 hours of productivity a week, including work, cooking, etc. I can complete the tasks and pay the expenses necessary to live about a week. Subtract maybe 5 hours of labor that goes into personal savings, and 45 hours of weekly work affords me 168 hours (1 week) of life.</p>

<p>Thus the number of hours of "life" that a single productivity hour buys me is about 3.7. I'd imagine in parts of the developing world, this can get as low as 2 or even 1.5, while for the best earners in the cheapest markets, this may exceed 1000, though obviously with very high earners, the meaning of "life expenses" is very much up to interpretation. But I just made this metric up.</p>

<p>Is there a formalized, existing metric for how many hours one gains from a single hour of "work"?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-15T17:33:51.643Z
The question is somewhat vague, because not everyone has the same living standards. E.g. perhaps the high earner could not sustain his present lifestyle for a 1000 years by having worked for 1 year, but he could probably sustain my lifestyle.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-09T03:05:40.067Z
@KennyLJ That's exactly why I'm asking the question. I'm looking for some sort of standardized measure, which picks (potentially arbitrarily) what is "necessary" for the purposes of comparison and provides quantitative statistics for comparing this value across populations. The exact choice of what to include as "necessary" isn't really relevant for comparison, so long as those criteria are identical in all populations measured, to keep things comparable. This could be a very useful metric for evaluating poverty, and the value of money in different economies.
TheEnvironmentalist
<econometrics><mathematical-economics><data-request><statistics>
Existing metric for personal productivity hours needed per life hour?
TheEnvironmentalist
# Existing metric for personal productivity hours needed per life hour?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-03-15)

With about 50 hours of productivity a week, including work, cooking, etc. I can complete the tasks and pay the expenses necessary to live about a week. Subtract maybe 5 hours of labor that goes into personal savings, and 45 hours of weekly work affords me 168 hours (1 week) of life.

Thus the number of hours of "life" that a single productivity hour buys me is about 3.7. I'd imagine in parts of the developing world, this can get as low as 2 or even 1.5, while for the best earners in the cheapest markets, this may exceed 1000, though obviously with very high earners, the meaning of "life expenses" is very much up to interpretation. But I just made this metric up.

Is there a formalized, existing metric for how many hours one gains from a single hour of "work"?

**Tags:** econometrics, mathematical-economics, data-request, statistics
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The question is somewhat vague, because not everyone has the same living standards. E.g. perhaps the high earner could not sustain his present lifestyle for a 1000 years by having worked for 1 year, but he could probably sustain my lifestyle.  
> **username_0**: @KennyLJ That's exactly why I'm asking the question. I'm looking for some sort of standardized measure, which picks (potentially arbitrarily) what is "necessary" for the purposes of comparison and provides quantitative statistics for comparing this value across populations. The exact choice of what to include as "necessary" isn't really relevant for comparison, so long as those criteria are identical in all populations measured, to keep things comparable. This could be a very useful metric for evaluating poverty, and the value of money in different economies.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-03-15. Score: 2

It seems to me this seminal paper has looked at the question

[Gary Becker - A Theory of the Allocation of Time](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2228949?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents)

You can use economic intuition to establish the value of one hour of work in terms of one hour of life. Suppose you have a consumer/worker that has to choose how much time to devote to work or leisure. His total daily hours allotment is

$24=h+\ell$

where $h$ is the number of hours worked and $\ell$ is the number of hours of leisure. He values leisure according to some utility function $u(\cdot)$ and his total utility also depends on the amount of goods $x$ consumed

$U(x,\ell)=x+u(\ell)$

he earns a hourly wage $w$. He spends all of his income in this single consumption good, which we assume has a nominal price of 1$. Therefore he has the following budget constraint

$x=wh$

Then, if the consumer/worker is choosing optimally how much to work the margin, it must be true that, on the margin, one hour of leisure has the same value as one hour of work

$\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial\ell}=w$

In other words, he must be indifferent on the margin between working
1 more minute or using it for leisure.

To know the value of every hour of leisure we need to know of course the function $u(\cdot)$. But at least on the margin, if you want to know what's the value of one unit of time not spent on work - there you have it: it's the hourly wage rate.

Becker suggested you could use that intuition to include leisure and household production in GDP. You should weight all hours not spent on work by their respective wage rate.

With regards to your initial question: how many hours of "life" do you gain for every hour of work? It should be 1, otherwise you're not choosing your leisure time optimally.

R.I.P. Gary Becker, Nobel Prize in Economics. I had the privilege of attending his last Price Theory course at UChicago before he died. He lectured on this.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: "how many hours of "life" do you gain for every hour of work? It should be 1" So whenever I work for an hour I immediately use up the product of my previous hour by living while I work? What happens if I stop working, to  watch a movie or sleep?  
> **username_3**: As I read the question it asks about _total_ hours (ratio of total hours "life" to total hours work etc, both per week), while your statement that "it should be 1" relates only to hours _at the margin_.  

---

