<p>There are two assumptions in your explanation that require change</p>

<p>1st of all, regading the seller</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The seller can sell some at a profit, and some at a loss, and as long
  as the loss and profit cancel out, he's on the supply curve.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The supply curve theoretical logic is that the seller will produce as much products as possible, at a rising cost, as long as the market price that he sees is higher than the last product he produced - the marginal product
Based on that, the seller will <em>always</em> sell at market price. the profit comes from the gap between the market price and the entire cost of production, which is cheaper than the marginal cost. he's initial products cost less</p>

<p>The supply curve is the average MC of all firms, which, in a competitive market model, share the same technology, since open information is available, so the average should be of identical firms</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-23T21:28:49.783Z
but in reality many companies produce at a loss, some times for years with the expectation that something will change. Not the ideal, and not entirely factored into the "curve"
another_allan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-24T09:51:46.277Z
companies that sell at a loss, go bankrupt. companies might sell some products as a loss, as marketing strategies, or sell with a very low margin, close to their average cost, but there are no real examples of companies that sell at a loss https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/24407/the-economics-of-continually-selling-a-product-for-under-its-market-value/24410#24410
Guy Louzon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-07-31T17:43:57.997Z
@GuyLouzon: It is not true that "the supply curve is the average MC of all firms".
smcc
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-24T17:06:58.120Z
2018-09-24T17:06:58.120Z
Guy Louzon
<p>Why is the marginal cost curve not the same as the supply curve?</p>

<p>My personal explanation is that since the marginal cost curve is cost of producing each new product, the supply curve just represents the break even point of selling a certain number of these products. The seller can sell some at a profit, and some at a loss, and as long as the loss and profit cancel out, he's on the supply curve. Thus the supply of producing x goods is just the average of the marginal cost curve from 0 to x.</p>

<p>This explanation seems logical to me, but I have been given an alternative explanation - the supply curve is that of the market, whereas the marginal cost curve is intrinsic to the firm. However, I am unsure as to why the market supply would be related to the marginal cost curve as the average of its integral.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-04-07T09:01:57.503Z
For the conditions under which MC curve is the same as the supply curve, you can also refer to: https://qr.ae/pGQTeO
Amit
<microeconomics>
Monopsony diagram curves
Yang
# Monopsony diagram curves

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-09-24)

Why is the marginal cost curve not the same as the supply curve?

My personal explanation is that since the marginal cost curve is cost of producing each new product, the supply curve just represents the break even point of selling a certain number of these products. The seller can sell some at a profit, and some at a loss, and as long as the loss and profit cancel out, he's on the supply curve. Thus the supply of producing x goods is just the average of the marginal cost curve from 0 to x.

This explanation seems logical to me, but I have been given an alternative explanation - the supply curve is that of the market, whereas the marginal cost curve is intrinsic to the firm. However, I am unsure as to why the market supply would be related to the marginal cost curve as the average of its integral.

**Tags:** microeconomics
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: For the conditions under which MC curve is the same as the supply curve, you can also refer to: https://qr.ae/pGQTeO  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-09-24. Score: 0

There are two assumptions in your explanation that require change

1st of all, regading the seller

> The seller can sell some at a profit, and some at a loss, and as long
> as the loss and profit cancel out, he's on the supply curve.

The supply curve theoretical logic is that the seller will produce as much products as possible, at a rising cost, as long as the market price that he sees is higher than the last product he produced - the marginal product
Based on that, the seller will *always* sell at market price. the profit comes from the gap between the market price and the entire cost of production, which is cheaper than the marginal cost. he's initial products cost less

The supply curve is the average MC of all firms, which, in a competitive market model, share the same technology, since open information is available, so the average should be of identical firms

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: but in reality many companies produce at a loss, some times for years with the expectation that something will change. Not the ideal, and not entirely factored into the "curve"  
> **username_2**: companies that sell at a loss, go bankrupt. companies might sell some products as a loss, as marketing strategies, or sell with a very low margin, close to their average cost, but there are no real examples of companies that sell at a loss https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/24407/the-economics-of-continually-selling-a-product-for-under-its-market-value/24410#24410  
> **username_4**: @GuyLouzon: It is not true that "the supply curve is the average MC of all firms".  

---

