<p>Firstly, banks do pay interest on deposits. The rest is quite complicated in reality.</p>
<p>Your reasoning is based on the idea of a simple textbook example of fractional reserve banking: <code>If a bank receives deposits, it can make loans, but needs to keep reserves. For the banking system as a whole, the minimum reserve requirement determines the maximum amount of money that could be created.</code></p>
<p>Essentially, when a bank provides a loan, the borrower receives the amount in the form of a deposit which leads to an increase in credits on the assets side and in customer deposits on the liabilities side of the bank’s balance sheet. Almost always, the borrowers will immediately use their new money to buy the goods or service for which the loan was taken. This payment reduces the deposits again.</p>
<p>It will increase the deposits on the payment recipient’s account, which more often than not will be at a different bank. In an even more extreme example, think of a USD 1000 loan to buy a mobile phone from a local dealer. If the person taken the loan withdraws the money in cash, and pays the local dealer in cash, and the local dealer decides to keep this cash, nothing else happens anymore. One important aspect is that an individual commercial bank cannot use the granting of loans to ensure a lasting increase in the deposits it holds. Therefore, you cannot simply compute a net earning on some fictional maximum amount of deposits, even if that simply textbook logic would be how banking works.</p>
<p>Leaving this simplistic model aside, deposits and loans are not related much in modern banking. In fact, many countries, including the US do not (or no longer) have any reserve requirements. However, banks have to adhere to numerous capital requirements (e.g. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_adequacy_ratio" rel="nofollow noreferrer">capital adequacy ratio</a> computed as the percentage of a bank's capital to its risk-weighted assets), liquidity requirements (for example <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_stable_funding_ratio" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Net Stable funding ratio (NSFR)</a> and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR))  and reserve requirements. In essence, there is a whole set of requirements within the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_III" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Basel III</a> framework.</p>
<p>Lending does not automatically generate a profit because there will be defaults, changing interests rates and so forth. Sticking to the simple loans vs deposits example, loans are illiquid, long-term claims while deposits are liquid short-term liabilities. If you have a 10-year fixed rate loan for 1% in your books and interest rates increase such that deposits pay something like 5% in that 10 year period, you actually lose money as a bank.</p>
<p>You also do not need deposits for lending because you can issue bonds, get funds in the interbank market, via repos or by directly getting money from the central bank. For example, the ECB ceiling of potential refinancing operations now equals ~ €3.3 trillion according to the <a href="https://www.wifa.uni-leipzig.de/institut-fuer-wirtschaftspolitik/forschung/tltro-tracker#:%7E:text=2021%20%E2%82%AC22%20billion%20were,equal%20to%20%E2%82%AC3.4%20billion." rel="nofollow noreferrer">(T)LTRO tracker</a> of the Universität Leipzig.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-19T19:50:04.283Z
2023-03-19T19:50:04.283Z
AKdemy
<p>A bank takes in \$10 in deposits and makes \$100 in loans, creating \$90 of new money. They pay the depositor interest on the \$10 and earn interest on the $100 loan.</p>
<p>It looks to me like they don't pay any interest on the money they created, is this right?</p>
<p>Edit: Thanks for the comments, still looking for an official answer but I think I understand more now, example:</p>
<p>There is one bank in town and they start with \$10 investment (not a deposit). Through fractional reserve banking they make loans and get deposits to the point where they have made \$100 in loans and received \$100 in deposits.</p>
<p>Say the loan interest rate is 7% and the deposit interest rate is 4%, they earn \$7 and pay out \$4 in interest. Net earnings are 3 after 1 year. 30% return on investment (ie the interest margin gets multiplied by the fractional reserve ratio, 3% X 10 = 30%).</p>
<p>Seems they do effectively pay interest on the money they create, but it's at the deposit rate.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-15T21:55:43.803Z
How exactly do you connect a \$10 deposit with $100 in loans?
AKdemy
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-16T09:56:33.647Z
Why would you expect any lender to pay interest on money they *lend*?
BrsG
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-16T10:11:22.443Z
@AKdemy; 10% fractional reserve, and https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/explainers/how-is-money-created
SRed
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-16T11:26:44.533Z
Ok, so if you have 10% minimum reserve requirements and assume deposits are the only source of money that can be used for loans, you need to keep \$1 and can only lend out \$9 as a bank. Also, as @BrsG wrote, why should they pay interest? If you think of the banking system as a whole, every newly created deposit pays interest. That assumes the loans end up as a deposit somewhere else.
AKdemy
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-17T12:37:45.543Z
Interesting that this quite reasonable and apparently simple question has 52 views and no answer yet. It's a tricky issue and an added twist is that when interest rates are low, banks will offer free checking accounts *instead* of paying interest.  The first part of this video should help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI5CFQXJxcA ... BTW, the aswer to the question is YES.
Mick
<banking><interest>
Do banks pay interest on the money they create?
SRed
# Do banks pay interest on the money they create?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-03-15)

A bank takes in \$10 in deposits and makes \$100 in loans, creating \$90 of new money. They pay the depositor interest on the \$10 and earn interest on the $100 loan.

It looks to me like they don't pay any interest on the money they created, is this right?

Edit: Thanks for the comments, still looking for an official answer but I think I understand more now, example:

There is one bank in town and they start with \$10 investment (not a deposit). Through fractional reserve banking they make loans and get deposits to the point where they have made \$100 in loans and received \$100 in deposits.

Say the loan interest rate is 7% and the deposit interest rate is 4%, they earn \$7 and pay out \$4 in interest. Net earnings are 3 after 1 year. 30% return on investment (ie the interest margin gets multiplied by the fractional reserve ratio, 3% X 10 = 30%).

Seems they do effectively pay interest on the money they create, but it's at the deposit rate.

**Tags:** banking, interest
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: How exactly do you connect a \$10 deposit with $100 in loans?  
> **username_2**: Why would you expect any lender to pay interest on money they *lend*?  
> **username_0**: @AKdemy; 10% fractional reserve, and https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/explainers/how-is-money-created  
> **username_1**: Ok, so if you have 10% minimum reserve requirements and assume deposits are the only source of money that can be used for loans, you need to keep \$1 and can only lend out \$9 as a bank. Also, as @BrsG wrote, why should they pay interest? If you think of the banking system as a whole, every newly created deposit pays interest. That assumes the loans end up as a deposit somewhere else.  
> **username_3**: Interesting that this quite reasonable and apparently simple question has 52 views and no answer yet. It's a tricky issue and an added twist is that when interest rates are low, banks will offer free checking accounts *instead* of paying interest.  The first part of this video should help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI5CFQXJxcA ... BTW, the aswer to the question is YES.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2023-03-19. Score: 1

Firstly, banks do pay interest on deposits. The rest is quite complicated in reality.

Your reasoning is based on the idea of a simple textbook example of fractional reserve banking: `If a bank receives deposits, it can make loans, but needs to keep reserves. For the banking system as a whole, the minimum reserve requirement determines the maximum amount of money that could be created.`

Essentially, when a bank provides a loan, the borrower receives the amount in the form of a deposit which leads to an increase in credits on the assets side and in customer deposits on the liabilities side of the bank’s balance sheet. Almost always, the borrowers will immediately use their new money to buy the goods or service for which the loan was taken. This payment reduces the deposits again.

It will increase the deposits on the payment recipient’s account, which more often than not will be at a different bank. In an even more extreme example, think of a USD 1000 loan to buy a mobile phone from a local dealer. If the person taken the loan withdraws the money in cash, and pays the local dealer in cash, and the local dealer decides to keep this cash, nothing else happens anymore. One important aspect is that an individual commercial bank cannot use the granting of loans to ensure a lasting increase in the deposits it holds. Therefore, you cannot simply compute a net earning on some fictional maximum amount of deposits, even if that simply textbook logic would be how banking works.

Leaving this simplistic model aside, deposits and loans are not related much in modern banking. In fact, many countries, including the US do not (or no longer) have any reserve requirements. However, banks have to adhere to numerous capital requirements (e.g. [capital adequacy ratio](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_adequacy_ratio) computed as the percentage of a bank's capital to its risk-weighted assets), liquidity requirements (for example [Net Stable funding ratio (NSFR)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_stable_funding_ratio) and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)) and reserve requirements. In essence, there is a whole set of requirements within the [Basel III](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_III) framework.

Lending does not automatically generate a profit because there will be defaults, changing interests rates and so forth. Sticking to the simple loans vs deposits example, loans are illiquid, long-term claims while deposits are liquid short-term liabilities. If you have a 10-year fixed rate loan for 1% in your books and interest rates increase such that deposits pay something like 5% in that 10 year period, you actually lose money as a bank.

You also do not need deposits for lending because you can issue bonds, get funds in the interbank market, via repos or by directly getting money from the central bank. For example, the ECB ceiling of potential refinancing operations now equals ~ €3.3 trillion according to the [(T)LTRO tracker](https://www.wifa.uni-leipzig.de/institut-fuer-wirtschaftspolitik/forschung/tltro-tracker#:%7E:text=2021%20%E2%82%AC22%20billion%20were,equal%20to%20%E2%82%AC3.4%20billion.) of the Universität Leipzig.


---

