<p>They enter through the output. By definition the labor share of GDP is: <span class="math-container">$w/Y$</span> where <span class="math-container">$w$</span> is factor income that is by statisticians assigned to the labor. Note  this does not necessarily correspond to the economic concept of labor as the statistical labor share of GDP calculation lumps together multiple factors of production and calls them labor - the same way as ‘capital’ share lumps together returns to land, capital, entrepreneurial labor etc.</p>
<p>Now the labor share of income is derived from incomes, but at the macroeconomic aggregate level all spending must be equal all income (although statistically there might be discrepancies due to measurement error). So the numerator can be replaced by total spending in the economy giving us:</p>
<p><span class="math-container">$$\frac{w}{Y}=\frac{w}{C+I+G+NX}$$</span></p>
<p>Where <span class="math-container">$C$</span> is consumption spending, <span class="math-container">$I$</span> is investment spending, <span class="math-container">$G$</span> is government spending and <span class="math-container">$NX$</span> is spending on net exports. Now expenditure on rent is included in the <span class="math-container">$C$</span> part so that is how these expenditures enter the labor share of income calculation.</p>
<p>However, the back of an envelope calculation at the bottom of your question is not correct for several reasons.</p>
<p>First, If the labor income is 30k then that 30k is already the result of multiplying GDP by labor share i.e. it is <span class="math-container">$\frac{w}{Y }(Y)=w=30k$</span></p>
<p>Second if the labor income per year is 30k and rent is 10k and we assume that there is nothing else going on in the economy,  then it is the 10k that goes to the capital income and  calculation of its share. To be more precise here the total output by income approach would be 40k (30k wages 10k rent - this would by the way be also equal to all spending where rent would be part of <span class="math-container">$C$</span> and the other income also part of <span class="math-container">$C$</span> or other components of aggregate spending) so the labor share would be 30k/40k or <span class="math-container">$75\%$</span> while the capital share would be 10k/40k or <span class="math-container">$25\%$</span>.</p>
<p>Lastly, using that <span class="math-container">$30\%$</span> statistics in this case is not really appropriate to begin with. All factors of production are provided by households, and that statistics is an average across both labor and capital providing households. Some capital providing households will just pay that income to another capital providing households (not even mentioning that large share of households empirically provides both). In addition, even though you specify that the 30k is only from a labor income of a households, I don’t think it is reasonable to assume that capital and labor providing households spend the same share of income on housing. The numbers for such household would likely be different from this average.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-17T00:01:41.730Z
2020-12-17T00:15:42.573Z
2020-12-17T00:15:42.573Z
1muflon1
<p>The labour share of GDP in the UK is around 55% (<a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/uksectoraccounts/adhocs/006610labourshareofgdpandprivatenonfinancialcorporationgrossoperatingsurpluscorporateprofitabilitycurrentpricesquarter1jantomar1997toquarter3julytosept2016" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Source</a>).</p>
<p>Presumably all labour is supplied by households and all households need a house.</p>
<p>The average percentage of total monthly household income spent on private rent is around 30% (<a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/housing/datasets/percentageoftotalmonthlyhouseholdincomespentonprivaterentengland2012to2018" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Source</a>). For the sake of simplicity I assume that this percentage is the same for the imputed rent of owner-occupiers.</p>
<p>How do housing costs enter into the factor shares of GDP?</p>
<p>If a household earns 30k/year from labour and pays 10k/year rent, does that result in 30k x 0.7 = 21k towards labour share of GDP and 30k x 0.3 = 9k towards land/capital share of GDP?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-17T09:39:59.613Z
The simple answer is no: the whole "compensation of employees" (including employers' social security contributions) counts towards the income measure of GDP.  Meanwhile rents (including owner-occupied imputed rents they notionally pay to themselves) separately count in the income measure of GDP as part of "total operating surplus".  This is part of the reason why the two percentages in your first link add up to something like 75% rather than 100%
Henry
<macroeconomics><gdp>
How are housing costs reflected in factor shares of GDP?
sba222
# How are housing costs reflected in factor shares of GDP?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-12-16)

The labour share of GDP in the UK is around 55% ([Source](https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/uksectoraccounts/adhocs/006610labourshareofgdpandprivatenonfinancialcorporationgrossoperatingsurpluscorporateprofitabilitycurrentpricesquarter1jantomar1997toquarter3julytosept2016)).

Presumably all labour is supplied by households and all households need a house.

The average percentage of total monthly household income spent on private rent is around 30% ([Source](https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/housing/datasets/percentageoftotalmonthlyhouseholdincomespentonprivaterentengland2012to2018)). For the sake of simplicity I assume that this percentage is the same for the imputed rent of owner-occupiers.

How do housing costs enter into the factor shares of GDP?

If a household earns 30k/year from labour and pays 10k/year rent, does that result in 30k x 0.7 = 21k towards labour share of GDP and 30k x 0.3 = 9k towards land/capital share of GDP?

**Tags:** macroeconomics, gdp
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The simple answer is no: the whole "compensation of employees" (including employers' social security contributions) counts towards the income measure of GDP.  Meanwhile rents (including owner-occupied imputed rents they notionally pay to themselves) separately count in the income measure of GDP as part of "total operating surplus".  This is part of the reason why the two percentages in your first link add up to something like 75% rather than 100%  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-12-17. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

They enter through the output. By definition the labor share of GDP is: $w/Y$ where $w$ is factor income that is by statisticians assigned to the labor. Note this does not necessarily correspond to the economic concept of labor as the statistical labor share of GDP calculation lumps together multiple factors of production and calls them labor - the same way as ‘capital’ share lumps together returns to land, capital, entrepreneurial labor etc.

Now the labor share of income is derived from incomes, but at the macroeconomic aggregate level all spending must be equal all income (although statistically there might be discrepancies due to measurement error). So the numerator can be replaced by total spending in the economy giving us:

$$\frac{w}{Y}=\frac{w}{C+I+G+NX}$$

Where $C$ is consumption spending, $I$ is investment spending, $G$ is government spending and $NX$ is spending on net exports. Now expenditure on rent is included in the $C$ part so that is how these expenditures enter the labor share of income calculation.

However, the back of an envelope calculation at the bottom of your question is not correct for several reasons.

First, If the labor income is 30k then that 30k is already the result of multiplying GDP by labor share i.e. it is $\frac{w}{Y }(Y)=w=30k$

Second if the labor income per year is 30k and rent is 10k and we assume that there is nothing else going on in the economy, then it is the 10k that goes to the capital income and calculation of its share. To be more precise here the total output by income approach would be 40k (30k wages 10k rent - this would by the way be also equal to all spending where rent would be part of $C$ and the other income also part of $C$ or other components of aggregate spending) so the labor share would be 30k/40k or $75\%$ while the capital share would be 10k/40k or $25\%$.

Lastly, using that $30\%$ statistics in this case is not really appropriate to begin with. All factors of production are provided by households, and that statistics is an average across both labor and capital providing households. Some capital providing households will just pay that income to another capital providing households (not even mentioning that large share of households empirically provides both). In addition, even though you specify that the 30k is only from a labor income of a households, I don’t think it is reasonable to assume that capital and labor providing households spend the same share of income on housing. The numbers for such household would likely be different from this average.


---

