prompt
stringlengths 497
14.4k
| chosen
int64 0
1
| rejected
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"having read diamond book and i was slightly disappointed in the series and but all in all and it is quite informative. reading the other comments and it is comforting to know that the culture warriors are hard at work and seeing attacks on western civilization under every rug. is diamond a little preachy . sure. like a lot of academics and he sees his theory as the most important thing ever. he uses the phrase guns and germs and and steel at seemingly every opportunity during the series. we get it and after about the first 10 minutes. is diamond a little simplistic (in the series) . sure. the part about the spaniards in south america is particularly amusing and condensing some very long and complicated history down to mallpox and swords and and horses and wrapping up the whole conquest of south america in about 15 minutes. but the point remains valid these things did in fact contribute (but not totally define) the reasons for the spaniard success against the established cultures. is he preaching against western civilization in any way . nope. not a word. not to my ear. all he says is that luck played a large part in determining which cultures advanced more quickly and not that luck is the only reason. in the end and if youre looking for something that validates your own sense of superiority and then this series is not for you. but if you are interested in all of the factors than influence how societies succeed or fail and this series presents a useful interpretation of the historical evidence. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this series adds new information and background to the book and includes personal appearances by the author and by archaeologists and other anthropologists. it brings the book to life and makes even more sense of the author subsequent opus and collapse. diamond himself comes off as personable and caring and not just a disinterested or disengaged academic. this series makes it clear that his book was not just a response to a need to publish or perish and as the saying goes about academe and but a deeply considered answer to a question from someone he respects and why you white people got so much cargo and and we have so little. because he respected the intelligence of the questioner and his community and diamond looked for an answer that do not insult that intelligence or that community. i like to think of his answer in a very simple way and in the same spirit as south park blame canada represent blame wheat. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"jared diamond made a point in the first episode that other peoples of the world do not have animals to domesticate but europeans did and and that accounts for why we were able to make steel and invent complex machines. it is obvious that the person who wrote this comment hasn not understood the reasoning behind this documentary or the original book. please do not ruin this great piece by your simple mindedness. the reasons are far more complex than the single thing you mentioned. please read the book as is it a great source of information. i enjoyed it a lot. this book is even a taught as a text book at some universities. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"chuck jones hare conditioned is a fast paced and often hilarious cartoon. pitting bugs bunny against a strange and yellow skinned apartment store manager who wants to have him stuffed and hare conditioned takes full advantage of its multi purpose setting. the chase takes bugs and his pursuer through a variety of departments and leading to an inspired gag in which they quickly emerge from various departments wearing whatever clothes are associated with that part of the store. this great gag is trumped and however and by a truly inspired sequence involving elevators in which bugs and disguised as an elevator boy and tricks the store manager into relentlessly getting on or off elevators at the wrong time. it a brilliant climactic set piece which unfortunately gives way to a not very funny final gag. by that time and however and hare conditioned has made its mark as one of the great chase films and bursting with wild energy. as bugs was becoming more refined in some of the other cartoons from this period and hare conditioned showed that he could still be just as appealing as a more anarchic character. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"(warning represent minor spoilers)i ran into this one partway through and watched from there and not knowing what it was or what the plot was. it certainly held my attention while i do not know until the ending that it was based on a true story. the guy she used to do the dirty deed came out looking like a seriously nice guy who just got his head twisted around by a devious girl while i have to question how true to life that portrayal is. anyone who would murder a husband and wife as they slept just can not be entirely nice. still and i did have some sympathy for him and as he had been set up and taken advantage of while that much was made clear. my main complaint is with the ending (here comes the biggest spoiler. skip this paragraph if you do not want to learn it). a few minutes before it ended and there seemed no way for the truth to be discovered. the way it got discovered was in a sting operation and but my question is represent how did the police get convinced to go along with it. the movie do not show us that and and it seemed a bit too convenient absent the explanation of how they were persuaded to do it. i think the way they handled that was done for dramatic purposes and as the omission of the explanation lent an aura of suspense to the crucial scene which otherwise do not have been there (we would already have known what the scene was about and and what was going on with brad in it). otherwise and this is a pretty good film while i give it positive . it made me think. now i am interested to find out the facts of the real case. one more thing represent the movie was done in 1996. some of the reviews here seem to be treating it as a more recent movie. p. s. meadow sisto is lovely. i hadn not seen her before. she can act a little and too (always a plus in her line of work and lol). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"hi and im scott (a. k. a woody7739) i love the film twisted desire and and i love watching melissa joan hart on the t. v as i think she is fine. i am a real fan of sabrina the teenage witch too and so this helped my watch it (do not ask). i love the way that nicole plans out her parents murder very carfully and as she makes sure that someone else pulls the trigger and practices on the bottles and so she wont give away her fingerprints (a very well planned out idea) and back i guess it all backfired on nicole as she got caught as her old boyfriend comes along and puts a hidden camera under his shirt. i give this film a nine out of ten and and put it in my top 10 films list. and last but not least if anyone see this film in the shops please tell me as i seen it on tv and do not record it. bye. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i like the movie. twisted desire had jeremy jordan and one of my favorite and one of the cutest actors ever. melissa joan hart is a good actress. i have seen most of her movies but all of jeremy jordan . the thing i dislike about twisted desire is when nick gets arrested and jennifer rats him out. twisted desire is my second favorite movie. my first is the goonies. but i still love jeremy jordan. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is totally wicked. it really great to see mjh in a different role than her sabrina character. the plot is totally cool and and the characters are excellently written. definitely one of the best movies. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have seen it and i like it melissa plays her part well. it was actually believable. my brother in law saw it with my sister and i and when i mentioned to my sister that i forgot it was based on a true story (i had seen it a few years ago. ) he said just because its on lifetime you think its true and both my sister and i were like it was so anyway i was wondering if anyone knew what murder it was or like who was really involved was because i want to prove it to him. i love lifetime movies especially the ones that are true and or just the ones that teach a good lesson. i thought i saw something about it a week ago but i cant remember where any help would be appreciated. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have to say that this tv movie was the work that really showed how talented melissa joan hart is. we are so used to and now and seeing her in a sitcom and i really hope that a tv station will show this tv movie again soon as it will show the sabrina fans that mjh shines in a drama. seen as we have watched her on sabrina now for now 5 years and so to give the viewers a taste of her much unused talent would be a plus. melissa plays her role so well in this wanting her parents done away with so she can be with the guy she loves. one thing that all sabrina viewers will notice and melissa works with david lascher in this and well before he took the role of josh on sabrina. so it would be kind of neat to see this currently whenever it gets aired again. hopefully mjh gets some good roles in movies or even in more tv movies and sort of like kellie martin who has always shined in tv movies. lots of unused talent waiting to bust out when it comes to melissa joan hart and you shine always melissa. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"somewhere near the bottom of the film studio ladder you can find companies like u. f. o and troma and beneath them lie seduction cinema. seduction is a direct to video production company that specialize in lesbian themed and non hardcore erotic movies. it has developed a very dedicated fan base that purchase each new title as they are released but sadly the company has become too closely associated with frequent star misty mundae. i say sadly because recent mainstream interest and her appearance on the show masters of horrors has caused her to set her sights a little higher than the zero budget s. c efforts which forces the company to find a new identity. but back in their glory days they released this film on a very appreciative world. the gorgeous misty mundae is forced to attend a boarding school at the request of a absent father. at the school she meets her absurdly hot room mate played by ruby larocca who immediately has designs on her but the headmistress (barbara joyce) has other plans. in typical s. c style the movie stops every ten minutes for a extended sex scene but unlike most of their efforts this one has a somewhat interesting story and a couple of good performances. ms. larocca appears to be having a great time as the sexual predator who views misty as a tasty meal and darian caine makes a welcome (though brief) appearance as satan. this is the sort of film that jess franco would crank out in the 70s (although this one does not have the hardcore sex that franco was always willing to throw in for foreign sales) and fans of that madman work would be wise to give this one a go. to me and as a long time zero budget cinema fan (and troma worshiper) and i came across the seduction cinema films through their parody films (playmate of the apes and who wants to be a erotic billionaire) but i actually prefer their more original works. you either see past the low budget and occasionally weak acting or you get hung up on these things and just hate all of these films. for me the most obvious thing that unites these no budget movies is a real sense of fun. these low budget companies are able to create their own unique style which gives the viewer something very different from the bland and by the numbers and studio efforts that load up the multiplexes. if you have never seen a seduction cinema film either this or sin sisters (featuring both of the mundae sisters) are excellent choices to begin with. this one is a fun and fast paced film (although the frequent exterior shots of the school do get a little old) and the dvd is totally loaded with extras including a ton of previews of other company offerings and a great behind the scenes featurette and some deleted scenes including a alternate opening. i do recommend you pass on the disc bonus feature and the first film by director and as it is quite weak and not really worth viewing. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the good thing about this film is that it stands alone you do not have to have seen the original. unfortunately this is also it biggest drawback. it would have been nice to have included a few of the original characters in the new story and seen how their lives had developed. sinclair as in the original is excellent and provides the films best comic moments as he attempts to deal with awkward and embarrassing situations but the supporting cast is not as strong as in the original movie. forsyth is to be congratulated on a brave attempt to move the character on and create an original sequel but the film is ultimately flawed and lacks the warmth of the original. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a shift in outlook is neccesary to enjoy modern british films and one that somehow allows them to be seen in their own right and for their own qualities rather than by the criteria that american films are judged. britfilm has to try hard to be gritty and finds it hard to make it and but at warmth british films can lord it over their otherwise overwhelming competitor. this film fails not in its content but only in attaching itself to the predeccesor and so allowing it to be all to easily seen as the work of star and director somewhere near the end of their tethers. it a couple of decades later and gregory teaching and this time with two girls on his mind. he teaches at his school railing against human rights abuses. when students he fired up find abuses in their midst he must face whether he just all talk. this is a subversive film in that there not the usual worldly character of any american movie that you expect to do whatever he does and but a naive man boy who may still put everything on the line for principles. maybe. it certainly no protest by numbers though and being too warm. where u. s. film may seem realistic because theyre urban and gritty and this and other british films of recent years those that do not try to match america for visceral thrills are real because british humour reveals truths. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as a huge fan of the original and i avoided this film like the plague when the bad reviews started coming in eight years ago and but i just finished watching this film and found it to be a really pleasant surprise. okay and if you are looking for a retread of the original and youre in for a big disappointment and but if you are looking for something quite different and a bit edgy and political and then this is the film for you. gregory is now thirty four and works as a teacher at his old comprehensive school and where he being pursued by a fellow teacher and having sexual dreams about one of his students. when the student insists on meeting up with gregory and a series of misadventures ensue that include torture and breaking and entering and all manner of unexpected twists and turns that left me feeling elated and moved. if you are looking for something original and then i highly recommend this film. i only wish that more people had gone to see this when it was released and seen it for what it really is. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this hard hitting and often violent western in the peckinpah or leone tradition is surprisingly directed by andrew v. mclaglen and whose previous westerns (particularly those that starred john wayne) were mainly in the john ford mode. it is both surprisingly traditional (good guys or bad guys) and incredible up to date as well. heston portrays a former captain of the arizona territorial police who has been in retirement for a year and having turned over the law enforcement reins to a reform minded sheriff (michael parks) and finding his ways of enforcing the law being taken over by autos and telegraphs and telephones and and the railroad in the first years of the 20th century. but soon he is confronted with a menace from his past a half breed outlaw (coburn) that he put away more than a decade before for a train robbery that killed four guards. in a subsequent shootout and coburn wife was killed while and so coburn is out for a most nasty sort of revenge. it involves the kidnapping and and eventually and the rape of heston daughter (hershey) by him and his gang. the result is a taut and violent pursuit through the mountains and deserts of southern arizona. the last hard men and based on brian garfield novel gun down and is violent in many places and including the showdown between heston and coburn and and the rape scene involving hershey and two members of coburn gang (quade and paull) is probably every bit as questionable as similar scenes in straw dogs and deliverance. but that doesn not detract too terribly much from the film psychological approach to the western genre. mclaglen is able to handle the bloody story with significant panache and and heston performance as an aging lawman was probably the best one he ever gave in any of his 1970s films. coburn makes for an especially cold blooded heavy and and both parks and chris mitchum (as hershey intended husband) do good turns as well. the music here is cribbed from jerry goldsmith scores to 100 rifles and the 1966 remake of stagecoach and but it still works here. wisely filmed totally on location in southeastern arizona and and utilizing the old tucson set and the last hard men needs to be released by fox on vhs and or or dvd soon. it is a western that deserves nothing less. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the last hard men finds james coburn an outlaw doing a long sentence breaking free from a chain gang. do he and his friends head for the mexican border from jail and safety. no they do not because coburn has a mission of revenge. to kill the peace officer who brought him in and in the process killed his woman. that peace officer is charlton heston who is now retired and he knows what coburn is after. as he explains it to his daughter and barbara hershey and coburn was holed up in a shack and was involved in a waco like standoff. his indian woman was killed in the hail of bullets fired. it not something he proud of and she was a collateral casualty in a manhunt. lest we feel sorry for coburn he lets us know full well what an evil man he truly is. heston is his usual stalwart hero and but the acting honors in the last hard men go to james coburn. he blows everyone else off the screen when he on. coburn gets the bright idea of making sure heston trails him by kidnapping hershey and taking her to an indian reservation where the white authorities can not touch him. he knows that heston has to make it personal then. coburn gang includes and morgan paull and thalmus rasulala and john quade and larry wilcox and and jorge rivero. heston has chris mitchum along who is his son in law to be. the last hard men is one nasty and brutal western. andrew mclaglen directed it and i am thinking it may have been a project originally intended for sam peckinpaugh. it sure shows a lot of his influence with the liberal use of slow motion to accentuate the violence. of which there is a lot. for a little peckinpaugh lite and the last hard men is your film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have seen this film on sky cinema not too long ago. i must admit and it was a really good western which features 2 of the big names. on one side and there charlton heston and playing the infamous and retired lawman samuel burgade. on the other. the late james coburn playing the villainous zach provo. seeking revenge on burgade no matter what the cost. the good thing about this film was there was some really good characters. most of the actors played it out really well. especially james coburn and who i find that he was really mean in this film. but that how it was. christopher mitchum and who i have seen everywhere in other films. playing hal brickman. i felt his character was left out in the cold and but he manage to get himself back in by teaming up with burgade and to bring down provo posse . all in all and it was a great film. very good to watch. great score from the late jerry goldsmith. wonderful piece of western persona. positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"spoilers seething with hatred and revenge half breed zach provo and james coburn and had spent the last 11 years on a chain gang planing his escape. what provo want more then freedom is to even the score with the man who captured him and in the process and during a wild shootout and killed his navajo wife represent the former pima county sheriff sam burgade and charlton heston. making his escape after killing two prison guards provo makes his way towards yuma knowing that that not just where burgade lives but where his his young daughter susan and barbara hershey and resides as well. using his fellow escaped convicts to lure burgade into the vast arizona desert and by promising them $30 and 000. 00 in gold coins that he buried there and provo plans to exact his bloody vengeance on burgade. but only after having him witness his daughter being brutally raped by his fellow convicts or are and in not being with a woman for years and as horny as a rabbit during mating season. brutal and very effective western that updates the john wayne 1956 classic the searchers in a father searching through dangerous indian territory for his kidnapped daughter. charlton heston as the guilt ridden sam burgade in his felling somehow responsible for killing provo wife and then having to face the fact that the same thing can very well happen to his daughter susan is perfect in the role of the aging and retired sheriff. charles coburn as the vengeful half breed zach provo is also at his best as the obsessed with hatred and murder escaped convict. the man who escaped with provo are really not interest in his personal affairs but have no choice and in that he knows the territory like the back of his hand and but to go along with him. it only the thought of them having their way with susan and when provo gives them the green light and as well as the buried $30 and 000. 00 in gold coins that keeps them from breaking up and going their own way. also going along with burgade is susan boyfriend hal brickman and chris mitchum and who proves in the end that he as good as burgade is and who felt that he just do not have it in him and in both tracking down the escaped criminals as well as using common sense and which in this case burgade lacks and in doing it. spoilers the unbelievably brutal and blood splattered showdown between burgade and provo is almost too much to sit through. provo who hatred of burgade bordered on out right insanity wanted him to suffer a slow and excruciating death. it was that hatred that bugrade took advantage of and and after taking some half dozen bullets and thus ended up putting the crazed and blood thirsty and as well as mindless and lunatic away for good. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the last hard men is a typical western for the 70 . most of them seem to be inspired by sam peckinpah. also this one and but director andrew mclaglan is a john ford pupil and this can be obviously shown in many scenes. imo the beginning is very good. in a certain way mclaglan wanted to show the audience a travel from the civilization to the wilderness. in the third part there are some illogical flaws and i complain a bit about charlton heston. he has to play an old ex lawman named sam burgade but he is in a fantastic physical shape. i never got the feeling that he really has problems to climb on a horse or on a rock. for me he do not looks very motivated as he usual do in most of his epic movies. same goes to the beautiful barbara hershey who is playing the sheriff daughter. maybe both had troubles with the director or were unhappy with their roles. hershey and coburn are not showing their best but they are still good. if the scriptwriter had john wayne in their mind as sam burgade. also michael parks as modern sheriff is a bit underused in his role. on the other hand there is james coburn as outlaw zach provo. coburn is a really great villain in this one. he is portraying the bad guy between maniac hate and cleverness. his role and his acting is the best of the movie. landscapes and shootouts are terrific. the shootings scenes are bloody and the violence looks realistic. zach provo and his gang had some gory and violent scenes. what i miss is the typical western action in the middle of the movie. i would have appreciated a bank robbery or something similar. overall it an entertaining western flick. not a great movie but above the average because of a great coburn and a very good beginning and some gory and violent scenes. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"good western filmed in the rocky arizona wilds. lots of tough guys throughout while cobern character seemed to rock back and forth between a raging psycho and a laid back type. several holes appeared in the picture and but not enough to offset it being exciting and worth seeing. one really dumb scene shows heston emptying . 45 cases of their powder and collecting it in a sack for the purpose of starting a fire. a. to gather that much gunpowder he would have needed a pack mule to carry the ammo. b. the grass was obviously dry represent why not just drop a match on it and let er rip. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"thought at first this film would be your typical western film and however and it turned out to be very interesting and kept me spellbound right to the very end and which turned out very unusual. charlton heston and (sam burgade) and midway and 76 and had past experiences with james coburn and (zach provo) and deadfall and 93 and and zach never forgave sam and would stop at nothing to make sure he caught up with him and paid him back. unfortunately and barbara hershey and (susan burgade) and the portrait of a lady and 96 and managed to get caught up in this situation and found herself among sex starved men who never seemed to leave her alone. sam burgade had to make some very hard decisions and and i was quite surprised at the conclusion. this is a very entertaining film and the acting was outstanding. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is by far the most incredible movie i have seen in a long time. the actors gave wonderful portrayals of the characters in the movie. the story was accurately portrayed. the story starts out with a young woman from the british isles and her father traveling by steamboat to nauvoo and illinois. she has become a member of the lds church and he has not. he thinks she is ridiculous for making the trip and is discouraging. she encourages him to read about joseph smith and the prophet. this is where the story of the prophet joseph smith begins. the movie accurately portrays his life and some of the history of the lds church at the same time. it was graphic at times and but was needed. the emotional expression was very believable and which caused my emotions to spill out. filming was awesome. the way in which the story was presented was touching. after the movie was over and we just sat there unable to moved. i was stunned. for people who know very little of joseph smith and the mormon prophet and i would encourage you to see this. if nothing else but to gain some understanding of his life. for those who are members of the church and i would encourage you to see it. it will increase your testimony of this most incredible man. this is a must see. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"after reading the comments to this movie and seeing the mixed reviews and i decided that i would add my ten cents worth to say i thought the film was excellent and not only in the visual beauty and the writing and music score and acting and and directing and but in putting across the story of joseph smith and the road he traveled through life of hardship and persecution for believing in god the way he felt and knew to be his path. i am very pleased and indeed and to have had a small part in telling the story of this remarkable man. i recommend everyone to see this when the opportunity presents itself and no matter what religious path he or she may be walking and this only instills one with more determination to live the life that we should with true values of love and forgiveness as the savior taught us to do. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw it at the legacy theater in the joseph smith memorial building in salt lake city this morning. i am going to assume that one level of enjoyment during this movie will largely be based on one level of acceptance of joseph story. however and that aside it was very well made and well acted and and had a nice score. if you get to salt lake city and it is a must to see it in the legacy theater. i have never been in a nicer theater as far as picture quality and sound quality and ambiance in my entire life. i wonder if the church would let me watch batman begins there. being that i am lds and regard joseph as a prophet and i was touched in several places and was brought to tears quite a few times. which i presume is expected since they handed out tissues before the movie started. anyway and i am told that this film is available in several lds visitor centers around the globe and if you have 70 minutes check it out because whether you believe joseph smith or not and he tells a fascinating story. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am stunned at the negative comments that i have read and can only assume that the people making such comments were less than honest. this is the most moving and real portrayal of joseph smith that i have ever seen. it was well acted to the point that at times i forgot that i was watching a movie. it brought joseph life of hardship and good natured optimism and enduring faith in people and god and and ultimate sacrifice to life such in a way that frankly left me speechless and silent in awe. if anyone and of any christian religion can watch this movie without being touched in some positive way i would have to say it is a reflection of the individual and not the movie. i give the movie a 10 and encourage honest souls to view it. at the very least it is an extremely heart felt portrayal of man who gave everything he had for what he believed. in a world where values and beliefs are ridiculed and this movie stands as a enduring reminder of the kind of people we are supposed to be no matter what religious beliefs we hold. ann pruitt . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"warning represent mild spoilers. the story of joseph smith stands out as an amazing even moving episode in american history and world religious history. this movie portrays events in the life of joseph smith and whom mormons revere as the prophet of the restoration of the true church of jesus christ on the earth. i have so far seen the movie twice in its first month of public showing. joseph smith is shown first to be the youngest of a trio of brothers (alvin and hyrum and joseph) who and at a very young age and needed an operation. the operation and done without our modern conveniences and was bloody and difficult. the scene helped to show the cohesiveness of the smith family and the bonds between the brothers and between joseph and his parents. joseph religious confusion and subsequent praying which lead to what mormons call the first vision was interestingly portrayed. the face of jesus is never shown and but you see the unmistakable nail marks in his hands. the rejection by religious leaders and many in his small new york community is sweetened at least slightly by joseph marriage to emma. this movie does not clearly map out the events of mormon church history and but merely jumps from scene to scene. this is not a critique simply a note about the style. the practice of tarring and feathering is shown and and it is especially dramatic and moving when joseph delivers a sermon about the savior love with a scarred face from having recently been attacked. the movie masterfully portrays simultaneously the joy and growth of mormonism as an infant church and while at the same time the ever deepening opposition that spread into the heights of local governments. the film shows many scenes from joseph life and including a few beautiful moments portraying his relationship to emma. an attempt is made to show the depth and complexity of joseph life and including his fierce love for his wife and his endless love for children and his wit and his courage in the face of filthy and dangerous opposition and his religious sentiments and and his compassion. as joseph and hyrum ride to carthage and never to return home alive and most of the characters from throughout the movie and whose lives had been touched by joseph and are shown along the way and helping to reinforce what was already seen but setting up the final scene to be more powerful. at the end and the martyrdom of joseph and hyrum is portrayed and and moviegoers are left to ponder the events they just witnessed. when i first watched the movie i assumed it was made by the church to introduce joseph smith to non members. i no longer think that is the case and although i hope the movie can do just that. as an insider and i find that the film is a celebration of joseph and excellently reinforces the good things we already know about him. i am curious to see how outsiders will view the film whether they will simply see it as propagandic and an epic story of an american religious man and or something else. the film is beautifully shot and family friendly and moving and and hopefully and something good for everyone. that the events portrayed actually happened in these united states of america is interesting to ponder in light of the many aspects of our culture including freedom of religious expression and respect (generally) for the law we moderns take for granted. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i really thought they did an excellent job and there was nothing wrong with it at all and i do not know how the first commenter could have said it was terrible and it moved me to tears (i guess it moved about everyone to tears) but i try not to cry in a movie because it embarrassing but this one got me. it was sooo good. i hope they release it on dvd because i will definitely buy a copy. i feel like it renewed my faith and gave me a hope that i can not explain and it made me want to strive to be a better person and they went through so much and we kind of take that for granted and i guess. compared to that and i feel like our own trials are nothing. well and not nothing and but they hardly match what they had to go through. i loved it. who played emma. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie makes a statement about joseph smith and what he stood for and and what the lds church believes. with all the current media coverage of a certain fugitive people have confused the lds church with the flds church and criminal fugitive warren jeffs. jeffs is not associated with the lds church yet media groups internationally have asked for comments about jeffs from the lds church. jeffs is not mentioned in the movie at all but i think that it is ironic that this movie with all it points about joseph also point away from the fews of the flds church and their leader at this time in the media world. this is a movie about joseph smith and a great one at that. some of the most obvious differences between jeffs and joseph is portrayed in joseph humanity and acceptance and love. jeffs views and opinions differ greatly from joseph smith and the lds church and it is seen in this movie. jeffs thinks of the negro as devils. joseph smith knew they were children of god and gave up his wife favorite horse to a african american (former slave) to buy his son freedom. joseph is shown doing housework for his wife emma and is criticized by a member until joseph tells him that a man may lose his wife in the next life if she chooses not to stay with her husband and that doing chores is a way to help and cherish your wife. jeffs brought one of his polygamist wives to her knees in front of a class full of students by grabbing her braid and twisting it painfully till she came to her knees. lastly joseph participated with law enforcement and sought aid from the government at all times. jeffs thumbs his nose at government and flees at all times. i loved this movie and if you do not know much about joseph smith and what the lds church believes and then this is the movie to see. and if you had confused the lds church with the flds church then you really need to get your act together. we are not much different from anyone who believes in jesus christ and the sanctity of marriage and the family and as well a patriotic to our homeland and country. we are all different as well just like you can find different protestants and presbyterians and methodist and baptist and catholics. what important is our message and what we stand for. this movie trys to portray that but there is so much of joseph life that can not be covered in a mere 2 hour movie. this was a really great show. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is one of the most spiritual movies i have ever seen. i headed up with about 150 people to st. george and we saw this movie in the visiting center of the st. george temple. not one person had dry eyes in the audience. also and there were some non religious and anti mormon people in the audience who felt the spirit of the movie and were touched by the captivating music and reenactment of the story of the pioneers and the hardships they faced because of their beliefs. i recommend this movie for anyone who wishes to understand more about joseph and the hardships that the pioneers went through. after all and it is apart of american history. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the most amazing and spiritually uplifting movie about the restoration of the gospel. far better than any other film and or movie made about the restoration thus far. if you haven not seen it and hop on a plane to salt lake and see it now. you would not regret it. you truly get a sense of what the first saints had to struggle through and putting complete and total faith in there prophet joseph smith. you finally get some sort of comprehension of the things the prophet had to fight through and the persecutions he and his people faced. if you have any questions about the church of jesus christ of latter days saints and our humble beginnings just watch this movie and it will make complete and total sense afterward. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie was the best movie i have ever seen. being lds i highly recommend this movie because you are able to feel a more understanding about the life of joseph smith. although the movie was not made with highly acclaimed actors it is a remarkable and life changing movie that can be enjoyed and appreciated by everyone. i saw this movie with my family and i can bear witness that we have all had a change of heart. this movie allows people to really understand how hard the life was for the prophet and how much tribulation he was faced with. after i saw this movie and there was not a single dry eye in the entire room. everyone was touched by what they saw and i have not been the same since i have seen it. i highly recommend this movie for everyone. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film is a true and historical film. it is very useful to those researching the lds church and because it is 100% true. it is an excellent film and i recommend it. it is very factual and exciting and and motivational. there are some who think it is not factual and but it is. it is about the restoration of the church of jesus christ of latter day saints and and about the prophet and joseph smith and who restored it. it has such events in his life as the disease that he had when he was a small boy and his courting emma smith and emma and his wife and giving birth and and so on. but most importantly it reveals the restoration of the church. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as a convert into the church of jesus christ of latter day saints and i try to absorb as much as i can of my new religion history. i was invited to attend a showing of this film with my sons and the other young men and women as well as their families of our ward. on a beautiful spring evening and we drove to kirtland and ohio to the church historical village located there. we were to have had reservations at the vistor center to view this movie. since my movie viewing was limited to only a few church documentaries and i was intrigued. the only full length motion pictures of the church i had seen was legacy and my best two years and both which i thought were very well written and preformed. at the beginning and the missionary interpretor passed out tissues stating that several people had been deeply moved to the point of tears by this movie. i thought ok. but it takes a lot to move me to tears. imagine my surprise when i found myself sobbing. it truly is a very moving and inspirational testament to the prophet joseph smith. see it and believe in it powerful message. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"despite reading the initial comments from someone who curiously disliked the film (why is the only negative comment very first on the list. )it was very nice to note that virtually everyone else loved it. obviously the church wanted to stress certain points and portray the prophet joseph smith in a positive manner ~ thats the whole idea. and in fact and those points were extremely effective. we already know joseph smith was human. but despite that and and all of the horrific negative attempts stirred on by the adversary and it showed just how he was able to complete a remarkable and god given work. i would recommend it to anyone. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i do not know what movie some of these other people watched and but they must have seen a different joseph smith represent prophet of the restoration than the one i saw. i think the movie was both well done and inspiring. i think it definitely worth watching. it apparent from the outset that a lot of care went into the making of this film. the background scenery is beautiful. i think the film does a good job of portraying joseph smith both as a man and as a prophet. joseph spiritual experiences are portrayed with taste and reverence. i would definitely recommend watching this movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i think the film is educational. however and it fails to treat the issue which sparked so much controversy represent plural marriage. also and the film fails to reveal what the lds church espouses. big opportunity was missed to tell the world what they actually believe. i could not get a clear idea of what it is lds views are on central topics of religion. i have many lds friends and they are nice people. would have been nice to get a clearer picture of how they view their prophet more controversial statements. maybe these statements are just too controversial to be treated in a film format and but it would have been great to hear the whole story of joseph smith truly interesting life. after all and it gives insight into american thought on religion in the 18th century. hope they do some documentaries on this fascinating subject and allowing historians to comment on smith life. we may have a mormon president some day. after all and smith ran for president. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have seen this wonderful production and and i wonder if anyone can tell me anything about the actress who played the blacksmith wife i am not sure of her character name. i went to byu with her and lost touch with her her maiden name was kim luke and i wonder if anyone has any info on her. she is not listed in the credits. this production was outstanding and a tear jerker on all accounts and superb acting by all. i guess i do not even want to put it in the general category of acting and more like portraying with feeling the amazing events that led to the opening of the heavens for this the final dispensation. something like that. if anyone worked with kim or has a website or something please let me know. she was fantastic in her role and by the way. thanks and melissa thorne. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie was beautiful. it was full of memorable imagery and good acting and and touching subject matter. it would be very easy to write it off as being too sentimental and but that is the sentiments this type of a movie is trying to achieve. i was totally involved in the story unfolding and presentation. there were a few cheesy shots and but such is to be expected in a religious propaganda film. the only complaint i can conjure is there wasn not a ton of details. however and this movie wasn not created to explain every element of joseph smith life and ministry and triumphs and controversies and failures etc. while it was designed for a quick glimpse at a few highlights of one of the most amazing american and historical religious figures of all time. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"brilliant kung fu scenes and loads of melodrama and peculiar footwear symbolism and an unhappy (. ) end makes barefoot kid an unforgettable film. one of the silliest subtitles i have seen. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if you are viewing this show for the first time and you may start wondering if you are in an alternate reality. colorful and imaginative characters. entertaining dialogue. plots that seem to have some depth to them and even creating atmospheres of suspense and drama at times. i mean and this is a syndicated children show right. this is the same venue that has brought kids such drek as pokemon and pepper ann and mighty morphin power rangers and and vr troopers (please note that three of the titles mentioned above are crass japanese exports and courtesy of the fox network and saban entertainment). don not worry and you are just sampling some of the quality fare that was available to kids during the late 1980 and early 1990 . some examples of this period would be transformers and garfield and friends and captain power and and c. o. p. s. (a cartoon not to be confused with the live action show on fox). besides these prime examples and disney also returned to syndicated programs for kids and coming up with a lineup called the disney afternoon. aside from a dumbed down show called the gummi bears and early shows like darkwing duck and duck tales and and chip n dale rescue rangers gave credence to the disney animation teams that were also turning out theatrical classics like the little mermaid and beauty and the beast and the rescuers down under and and the great mouse detective. but above all these wonders shines talespin. the premiere of plunder and lightning was a two hour thrill ride and and won an emmy. much to my delight and the rest of the episodes were up to par on the promise of the premiere. while i enjoy the plots and dialogue and i guess for me the greatest attraction are the characters. there rebecca cunningham and an independent female and but still fallible while kit cloudkicker and full of pre teen angst and optimism while louie and with his loyalty and support while frank wildcat and the most entertaining engineer since scotty on the original star trek while molly cunningham and cute and witty and but with some depth that most child characters do not have and and of course in the middle of it all and there baloo and whom i would describe as a slobby version of james bond. this is because whenever there trouble and baloo saves the day with the assistance of his sleeker than most and fastest of all sea duck (read represent james bond aston martin). of course every great show has to have great villains and and talespin doesn not disappoint here either. from the megalomania of businesstiger shere kahn and to the vain and always failing air pirate don karnage and to the hilarious and inept soviet satirized thembrians. the animation is good and the music appropriate and and the episodes are (for me) the finest that children programming has ever had to offer. great fun for the whole family. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"spin it. the 90s opened up with a clever disney favorite and talespin and the tv cartoon series that featured characters from the jungle book. join baloo and kit cloudkicker as they fly the sea duck like you have never seen it before represent out of cape suzette and to louie and up mountains and through jungles and on water and in volcanoes and looking for adventure and looking for treasure and looking for fun and all in one action packed cartoon adventure. this was a favorite of mine as well as my family . this ran on the disney afternoon the entire first half of the 90s until the original cartoons moved to the old disney channel in 1995 and which i have seen on vacation once in 1996 before getting cable in march 1997. and good news represent today the dvds are here. relive the fun and excitement of dun and dun and dun and talespin. positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as for many on here i can not help but praise the cast and crew who developed talespin and others they made throughout my childhood and i as all who have commented here have thoroughly enjoyed the quality of not just the animation but the quality of the story lines and the characters. to class this work of art as a cartoon could never do talespin justice and in fact it an insult to class it as a cartoon and talespin is an animation and nothing less and it is evidently the greatest work of genius to be produced at disney to date and when disney pulled it from the air little did they realise what they did and i am sure their souls have been tortured by regret ever since. i will take a moment to explain and from the first which is ducktales to the last which i think is darkwing duck and disney has been plagued with failures due to political correctness and have taken a quantum leap backwards since and they prefer quantity over quality now not to mention the room full of monkey for the story and i couldn not have my children watching the mind numbing cartoons they throw out now in fear that they would all turn out to be homer simpson some time in the future and 50% of the blame would be on me for permitting them to watch it and i couldn not let that happen and which is why i have all of the shows from the late 80 to the mid 90 on a harddrive so one day my children couldn not be corrupted by the cartoon crap of today and to savour the last piece of childhood i have and to hold on to and i owe that all to talespin. talespin to me is without a doubt the best animation ever produced in the world on account of it depth and charm and wit and compassion and emotion and lack of truly bad quality and story lines of which many have today and do you see any of that content in say ed and edd and eddie or anything else you can think of. and the rubbish produced today can be likened to some 3 year old undecipherable hyroglyph depicting a picasso. the next time you watch an episode of talespin while take a look at the woodgrain on any wooden object or building such as higher for hire and salivate over the quality of workmanship and effort put into this animation and even the one shot backgrounds were done as though they would use them again and again and the buildings look true to the art deco movement which was popular in the time period depicted and even the vehicles are true to life and ok not all of the episodes were fantastic in animation but the lower grade scenes were covered up by the superior scenes so all in all it evened it all out by the end of the episode and you would probably never even notice at all unless you were focused and have an attention to detail. the one thing i love about this is what i like to call the deliberate mistakes or intended mistakes in each episode and some have two and for example in sheepskin deep where rebecca say youre up to something baloo and baloo replies who and me. and i am as innocent as a schoolboy take a look into rebecca eyes and i would not spoil the rest of the baloopers but just keep an eye out next time. everyone elses comment are bang on and 100% correct and i have nothing else to add that others haven not said already on here and disney and wake up and smell the coffee and you have been asleep for over a decade and stop producing rubbish and bring back quality into animations and stop producing cartoons and we have seen the proof of what you can do and we want it back as rapidly as possible. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"along with darkwing duck this is unfairly cancelled. disney has been in decline since tarzan and we need a show like this to get disney back on track. ed gilbert and jim cummings were perfect for the voices of louis and baloo (sounds familiar. ) the theme theme tune is also catchy. out of all the villains and which are all great on their own merits and tony jay stands out as shere kahn. louis and baloo actually sound very similar to the voice overs in the jungle book and which isn not a bad thing at all. as a matter of fact and it quite inspirational. the animation was spot on and and the script had plenty of wit that has been severely lacking in animations for years. please bring this show back. positive . bethany cox. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ever since i remember and i have loved airplanes and flying. i am now in college with a private pilot license and looking to become a commercial. i could never remember why i was so obsessed with the subject until i came across my old tail spin tapes in my basement at home and it hit me and this was it. my parents bought every single tape they had and this was the only show i would watch as a kid. i had the theme memorized as i grew up and i can still re cite it today. it is absolutely amazing and i plan on buying the dvd soon. it really is great for children and adults and is absolutely timeless. i cannot get enough of this show. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ahh and talespin. what can i say that hasn not already been said about this great show. nothing. this is without a doubt one of the most well written shows i have ever encountered and live action or animation. the newer stuff is way too dumbed down for my tastes and and some of the mature stuff i have to shoo kids out of the room for. but not talespin. the stories are engaging and very plausible. some of them could even be stretched out to an hour or two for a movie. episodes like stormy weather and her chance to dream are very dramatic while still being enjoyable for kids and adults alike. then there are the pure comedy episodes such as the bluest of the baloo bloods and stuck on you and where the emphasis is on hilarity. i can laugh myself to tears in a few choice ones. the drama aspect is very lacking in most shows nowadays(at least and those which aren not specifically geared toward it) and especially in cartoons. in the episode stormy weather for instance and kit cloudkicker decides that he going to join an air circus and but baloo believes that it would be too dangerous. in the biggest fight of the episode and baloo yells at kit to stay away from daring dan and to which kit screams no. you can not tell me what to do. yourre not my dad. and buries his face in his pillow. the next day he leaves for the air circus. this kind of drama is a rarity in a cartoon and and would be most welcome in the ones created nowadays. the characters have a lot of depth to them. baloo is pretty much the way he is in the jungle book and plus or minus a few degrees of laziness. rebecca is a cunning business woman whose ideas on getting money and while good in theory and are seldom good in practice. molly is a cute little girl and but you can not let that deceive you. she can be a real hellion sometimes. kit cloudkicker is a darker character than the rest. he doesn not trust adults much unless they appeal to him and and he has a tendency to break off relationships. watch his expression in plunder and lightning when he grabs the grappling hook represent he looks as though he prepared to put it right through a pirate. in the end and it the drama combined with the very real chemistry between the characters that makes this show #1 in my book. the relationship between baloo and kit is very real and almost father and son. this is demonstrated well in all whale that ends whale when baloo takes kit word for it that seymour is abusing the animals in his aquarium instead of siding with the other adults. baloo and becky relationship is also realistic and due to baloo motivation for working comes from wanting to buy back the ol sea duck and not necessarily a desire to help rebecca. but something tells me that if he did get the duck back he would still do jobs for rebecca. the sea duck and not to mention all the other planes in the series and is pretty realistically designed. the plane functions do not change once throughout the series(continuity like that is hard to come by also) and and unlike most other super planes of other cartoons and it doesn not have one single weapon on board(unless you count mangoes. ) and and relies instead on it cunning pilot great skill to get out of trouble. it hard to think of a hero vehicle that doesn not have some sort of gun turret and laser cannon and or even a handgun somewhere on board. and the fact that they use their heads to get out of trouble is so hard to find in a cartoon nowadays. plus it just such a darn cool design. this is definitely the best cartoon. ever. period. definitely worth all ten stars. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in the year 1990 and the world of disney tv cartoons was certainly at it prime. shows like chip n dale rescue rangers and ducktales and gummi bears was already popular and and now disney made another great cartoon and that cartoon brought the birth of the disney afternoon. that cartoon is called talespin. it about old jungle book character baloo the bear as he gets a job in the plane business. in the series he meets kit cloudkicker and former air pirate and good cloud surfer and business lady rebecca cunningham and her hyperactive daughter molly. this series is very funny and has tons of great puns that you may not understand as a kid but understand later on in life. this is one cleverly written series and it great to add to your dvd collection. parents and buy this for your kids rather letting them watch all of those horrible nickelodeon cartoons. if you liked talespin and then check out darkwing duck and goof troop. spin it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"thanks jymn magon and for creating disney 2 best cartoons ever. this show has improved very much over the years. as a kid and i do not like it because i thought it was a rip off of ducktales and which was my favorite disney thing at the time (like grandmoffromero). then later on though it was good but not great. but after reading the reviews here and i decided to give it another chance and bought the dvd set and watched the whole pilot the first day i got it and and was very pleasantly surprised. it still my favorite episode and although the series did live up to it. and by the end of disc 1 and i knew this was going to be a top tenner. the characters are so complex and charming. my favorite has got to be wildcat. he absolutely hilarious and sweet to boot. my next favorite is baloo and the best pilot on the show. i can see why ol jymn built the show around him. then it kit cloudkicker. he and baloo have the best relationship in the series. after that and louie. jim cummings did a perfect job of impersonating the original voice. after him and rebecca. she has made me laugh pretty hard and and i do believe she and baloo eventually marry. and finally(for the heroes) and molly. although she my least favorite and i still like her. i think she a very cute character(much better than webby from ducktales). and the villains were very original. don karnage and his air pirates always crack me up and kahn is ice cold and ruthless and and the thembrians are always at least amusing. as said before and the stories range from hilarious(time waits for no bear and romance of red chimp) to nothing short of touching(the old man and the seaduck and paradise lost) and to fun and funny and exciting adventures(in search of ancient blunders and my favorite for whom the bell klangs). these are only a few of my favorite episodes. anyway and talespin is disney best and aside from gummi bears some reasons for this. gb had a decent amount of my favorite character(cubbi) and while ts do not have enough of wildcat. but in the end talespin remains a classic. bottom line positive 6th best cartoon ever. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i used to watch this show when i was a little girl. when i think about it and i only remember it vaguely. if you ask me and it was a good show. two things i remember vaguely are the opening sequence and theme song. in addition to that and everyone was ideally cast. also and the writing was very strong. the performances were top grade and too. i hope some network brings it back so i can see every episode. before i wrap this up and i would like to say that i will always remember this show in my memory forever and even though i do not think i have seen every episode. now and in conclusion and if some network ever brings it back and i hope that you catch it one day before it goes off the air for good. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"since it has been some years since i reviewed this classic i have decided to go back and review it more in dept and but first some insider notes from a movie critic. this animated series is one of those that i grew up with and it made my childhood joyful and it made it awesome and miss some of this stuff today that we clearly do not see as much as we did back in the days and well on to the review. talespin and or luftens helte which it is called in denmark is a great animated series and it is much like chip and dale and ducktales and a lot of those old ones and so it has that weird feeling surrounding it and i cannot remember this series as much as i would like to remember it. but in my opinion it was very great and it came with some kind of message and not that wild of a message and however it is one of the old ones so that can be forgiven. now i do not want to sound old or anything but i feel like time slipped out of my hands with these cartoons and today we see something like ed edd and eddy or anything else weird like that and we have all these new or nearly new shows like hannah montana or something like that and yet i feel like that we do not have the same spirit in cartoons or real shows like we did in the early days. now maybe i am wrong but i feel like time has changed to much and to conclude i would be thrilled to see these series like talespin being released again to the tv screen instead of all the new ones and give me back my childhood cartoons and give them to the kids i have some day and give them again. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i watched speak easily one night and thought it was o. k. and but missing something. maybe buster keaton strangely speaking threw me off and or the labored line delivery of a leading lady. the next day i kept thinking about the movie and though. i couldn not get durante song out of my head and i kept trying to better remember thelma todd first scene and i considered that maybe keaton did do some funny falls and physical comedy. the next night i watched a scene with thelma todd as a conniving chorus girl trying to impress buster and jimmy with her sex appeal. a very funny scene and the actors excellent and their faces and their eyes and their silly expressions. so i watched another scene and their show is opening on broadway. buster in his blissful innocence botches every act. again and i was laughing out loud and appreciating keaton clowning and tumbling. so the next night i watched the whole movie again and and this time i see it for the first time represent it stupendous. it sensational. it sublime. three great comedians. todd dances. durante sings. keaton speaks. sure it ain not poifect. but there a lot of laughs in this picture. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am only 11 years old but i discovered full house when i was about five and watched it constantly until i was seven. then i grew older and figured full house could wait and that i had more important things to do. plus there was also the fact that my younger brother who watched it faithfully with me for those two years started to dislike it thinking it too girly. then i realized every afternoon at five it was on 23 and i once again became addicted to it. full house has made me laugh and cry. it made me realize how nice it would be if our world was like the world of full house plus a mom. i have heard people say full house is cheesy and unbelievable. but look at the big picture represent three girls whose mom was killed by a drunk driver. the sisters fight and get their feelings hurt. the three men who live with the girls can get into bickers at times. what any more real than that. if anything the show has lifted me up when i am down and brought me up even higher when i thought i was at the point of complete happiness. i have howled like a hyena at the show and gained a massive obsessiveness over mary kate and ashley olsen. (of course hilary duff has now taken that spot but they were literally the cutest babies i have ever seen. they are great actresses and seem to be very nice people. ). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have never seen a show as good as full house. full house puts all of the newer shows to shame and big time. anyone who has never seen it and which i do not see how it is possible and should see it. it is a great show for anyone of any age. full house will make you laugh and it will make you cry and it will amaze you. true and some people feel that there are some cheesy aspects to the show and but and the positive aspects out weigh all of the cheesy aspects. full house ran it first episode on september 22 and 1987 entitled our very first show and ran it last episode on may 23 and 1995 entitled michelle rides again part ii. the plot of the show is very believable. danny tanner (bob saget) losses his wife and pam and in an accident involving a drunk driver. danny has his brother in law and jesse katsopolis (john stamos) and which is pam younger brother and and danny also brings in his best friend joey gladstone (dave coulier) to help him raise his three daughters. danny daughters are named dj (candice cameron bure) and stephanie (jodie sweetin) and and michelle (mary kate and ashley olsen). joey and jesse plan on moving in with danny and his three girls for a few months just to help out and end up living with them for eight years while which is the number of years the show ran for. the following is a short description of some of the characters and the actor or actress who played him or her represent john stamos (jesse) represent john stamos is a great actor. he plays jesse. jesse is a rock star waiting to get his big break. in full house and john stamos does a great job portraying his character. he looked and played music like his idol and elvis presley. bob saget (danny) represent bob saget is also a great actor. he looses his wife in car accident involving a drunk driver. he has to raise three girls without a having the girl mother. bob saget does a great job portraying a single parent who works full time and still has time to raise his three girls. dave coulier (joey) represent one word can describe dave coulier and funny. he is great. playing the character of joey was perfect for him. he does a great job playing the stand up comedian waiting for his big break. candice cameron bure (dj) represent she is a tremendous actress. she plays the oldest sister and dj which is short for donna jo. she is one of the best actresses i have ever seen. her acting ability in full house was very believable. jodie sweetin (stephanie) represent two simple words can describe jodie sweetin and incredibly amazing. i wish i could say every thing that i would like to say about jodie and but and i would use up the 1 and 000 word maximum just on her. she got her start in a kids show called mother goose stories and when she came to full house and she blew the audience and creator mind. her great looks and absolutely amazing acting ability helped to make the show the success that it was. according to dave coulier and jodie was supposed to be the star of the show. it was supposed to be where she was going to get her big break. jodie and at five years old when the show first aired and could hit every line perfectly. she showed great enthusiasm. most young kids can not do this. as you can probably guess and jodie sweetin (stephanie) is my favorite character in full house. mary kate and ashley olsen (michelle) represent great actress. full house is where they got their start. they received the part of michelle because they were the only babies who did not cry while in front of a camera. there are many more cast members that should be recognized. these are the original characters from when the show first went on the air in 1987. the only negative thing that i can say is how full house became the michelle show towards the end. i think it was to focused on her towards the end. especially when i think jodie and candice were much better at acting. full house is a great show for everyone. it can teach you a lot. one of the biggest things it can teach you is that everyone can live a great life even if a tragedy and such as loosing a family member and occurs. full house continues to attract new fans. with all this said and there is only a couple things left to say while full house will never die and and and thank you and the cast of full house and for giving everyone a show that they can enjoy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this show has a great storyline. it very believable. a mans wife dies and he cant take care of his children alone so he calls on his brother in law his best friend and many others come later on in the show. such as rebeecca donaldson and and the lovable yet strong dog comet and nikki and alex who you can find out for yourself (i do not want to spoil it for you) and of coerce kimmy gibler. (the sidekick of dj) but the kids are wonderful too. this is mary kate and ashley first took off. and also you may know candace cameron bure from shows like st. elsewere punky brewster and that so raven. jodie sweetin plays steph the love able middle child who feels left out. really this is a very good show. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is how i feel about the show. i started watching the show in reruns in 2001. i enjoy the show but it had too many faults. i hate the michelle and joey characters. stealing story lines from old tv shows. they even stole from the partirdge family. then in 1 episode the partridge family was mentioned. actors playing different roles in different episodes. mtv martha quinn the most notable doing this and especially when she played herself in 1 episode. the michelle character could not take a joke but then they had this little kid act out revenge to her sisters for a joke by them on her. story lines that came and went in 1 episode. joey getting the tv show with frankie and annette and never heard from it again after that. danny all of a sudden playing the guitar. 1 episode he is coaching soccer and 1 episode he is coaching softball or baseball. 1 game and you are out huh danny. jesse and joey keep getting jobs really quickly with no experience. only in a tv show. i did like the d. j. and stephanie characters. wish jodie sweetin could have learned from candace cameron bure and had a clean non drug adult life. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house and in my opinion and is an absolute abc classic. i am not sure if i have never seen every episode and but i still enjoyed it. one of my favorite episodes is where jesse (john stamos) and rebecca (lori loughlin) get married. if you want to know how what made it so funny and you would have to have seen it for yourself. it was a two parter and so you would have to have seen both parts. another one of my favorite episodes is where jesse and stephanie (jodie sweetin) and and michelle (mary kate and ashley olsen) get locked in a gas station on michelle birthday. you would also have to have seen it for yourself if you want to know how and why that happened. i have many other ones that i like and too. everyone always gave a good performance and the production design was spectacular and the costumes were well designed and and the writing was always very strong. in conclusion and even though it can be seen in syndication now and i strongly recommend you catch it just in case it goes off the air for good. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house was and still is a great show. it a good show for people of all ages and is also a good family show. there really aren not any shows like it anymore. the kids are very cute and even though it a bit cheesy and it still good and especially for anyone who watched it when they were a kid. i would love to see the cast interviewed now. anyone that would like to see interviews of the cast and kind of like a where are they now type thing for the special features of the dvd and should go to the petition spot website and sign a petition titled full house reunion on dvd as there is a petition for this in hopes that the cast may want to do it. yay for full house. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i try to watch it everyday most of the time and and even though i have watched it for the past 4 years and i have not seen every episode. the show is about danny tanner who is guy who does news for sports. his wife is killed by a car accident from a drunk driver and he asks jesse and an elvis maniac with a motorcycle and has an obsession of his hair. joey and an adult kid who does comedy and does voices of cartoons all the time to take care of his three girls and donna joe and they call her d. j. and stephinie who is the second oldest and michelle and the youngest. they all live under one roof with no one to help them out. later in the show and jesse gets a girl friend and later is married to her and have twins and nicki and alex. (this starts to happen in the new seasons) this show is awesome and if you like the suite life of zack and cody and that so raven and boy meets world and and designing woman and you will love this. (it starts to get better in the ending seasons) watch it and you will love it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i love full house so much that i couldn not live without full house. why did it end. it upsets a lot of the fan of it. can we have a full house ii. oh and come on. but it is better that we have those dvd to help us. but i need those real ones to come up with another new episode. love and warmth are filled the house. all the characters are very cute and handsome. candace cameron and mary kate and ashley olsen and jodie sweetin and bob saget and dave coulier and and john stamos and loooooooove you. dj and michelle and stephanie and danny and joey and and jesse please come back to the screen please. how is michelle after falling down from a horse. how are nicky and alex. is joey alone or is he having a wife or at least a girlfriend. are they still living in the same house. i want to continue the life of full house. and please do not upset me. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ok. who brought the cheese. i love it. during it run it became a phenomenon. the anorexic twins became popular. bob saget started making a paycheck (instead of his really funny stand up). and people knew who dave coulier was. this is when life was good and simple. this is one of the great american classics. it was humorous and always brought home a good lesson. and this is where i differ from the norm represent i liked the last few seasons. like home improvement and when children get older there are a lot more you can do with the script. this is why i dare say. it could have gone much later than it did. but anyway. i gave it an positive because of its wholesome and funny story lines and and because of bob saget. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this show is about three little girls. (d. j and stephanie and and michelle) their mother is killed by a drunk driver so their father danny invites his brother in law (jesse) and his old friend(joey). so the whole show is about living life. the girls go through life troubles and have life lessons. they develop crushes and boyfriends and and many more. the whole show is basically about to go with the flow. you do not have to hold grudges you just have to let it go. i think this show is really good and fun to watch. i grew up watching this show and still watch it today. i am glad they still air this show on television. i watch it almost every day. i rate it positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house is a great family show. however and after watching some episodes over and over again i have realized that theyre incredibly boring and they seem to shelter themselves from the outside world a lot. yes and there is a lot of comedy and but there are times when it incredibly cheesy. it not like i hate it and but just do not watch them over and over again because they get old quick. probably the best season is the first. full house is about widower danny tanner(bob saget)and his three daughters d. j. (candace cameron) stephanie (jodie sweetin) and michelle (mary kate and ashley). when danny wife dies the he is in need of some help. so and his best friend joey (dave coulier) and the girls uncle jesse (john stamos) moves in with them. once they live there together they find they can not live without each other. full house reminds you just how important family is and that you can always go home again. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i really did not watch this show as often when i was a child but the first episode i remember ever seeing is the episode where kimmy gibbler pierced stephanie ears. when i started high school back in 2000. i had problems all through out high school and i would rather not get into that. but i used to always watch saved by the bell but that show really reminded me of the problems i faced at school and and it rarely showed the kids parents. saved by the bell is okay and but not a good family show. a few days after i graduated high school in 2004. i turned the tv to the family channel and day after day i got addicted to full house. i could even push the info button and see the year it came out and i would remember what i was doing during that time period. the episode was about to come on and it was titled birthday blues and to this day it is most favorite episode and it sad and with a happy ending and and you see kimmy gibbler in a way she doesn not act in other episodes and she actually shows her serious side. i have seasons 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 5 and and 6 on dvd and i am waiting for 7 and 8. i wished somehow they could have a documentary and some commentaries from the cast members. i do not why some people have a hatred for this show because you do not see trash and violence on this show. and for those who hate this show and i pray for you because you might have grown up in a dysfunctional family where there was no love. but full house in my opinion is a family living in heaven where everyone is happy and good things always happen. and the characters are so awesome. danny tanner reminds me of my mother and grandmother. joey is good natured and is always in a good mood. when i was a child i used to be just like jesse and he is the first actor on tv as a guy that is so obsessed with hair. somehow you can actually tell that dj is a california girl. i really like the episodes with kimmy gibbler because she always makes me smile and brightens my day when i watch her. and stephanie is so cool. also i have a hard time telling the olsen twins apart. i want my kids to watch it one day. but full house is my #1 favorite show and sabrina the teenage witch is my #2 favorite. one day and sometime before i die and i would really like to meet all the cast of full house in person. the first 3 seasons are kinda boring but they start getting better in the 4th season. i just wished they could have made a 9th season. they stopped making full house in 1995 and in the fall of 1996 sabrina the teenage witch came out (which is a similar family show)but full house is a very loving show and they have their good times and bad times and and yes and i understand and if your a wild trashy type person your going to hate this show but this is a show for happiness and it is also moral show. also i would like to say that the first 3 seasons is good kid shows but around the 4th and 5th seasons dj and stephanie become teenagers. also i noticed and not only with full house but a lot of shows and they never talk about the problems in the world and politics and like when full house was on the air during the gulf war in 1991 and during the time of the oklahoma city bombing in 1995 and they never mention anything about it. also steve was my favorite dj boyfriend and the ones with viper and nelson werent very interesting. but season 5 and 6 i think are the best. i just wished they would have made a 9th season because and it left a big question mark in my head and because on the last episode in the last minute and dj gets a surprise and goes to her prom with her ex boyfriend steve and i always wondered if they got back together. and i liked how in the final seasons and dj was always the responisible one and stephanie was always wanting to do something daring and like in the episode stephanie wild ride. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house is a wonderful sitcom that is about a dad and danny tanner and whose wife had just died in a car crash. so danny asks his brother in law and jesse katsopolis and and best friend and joey gladstone and to help raise his three girls and donna jo dj tanner and stephanie tanner and and michelle tanner. this is my favorite show ever and and i can watch it all day long. and something on full house is always making me laugh and there are sad parts also. there is never a dull moment in full house. the main characters are played by and bob saget(danny tanner) and john stamos(jesse katsopolis) and dave coulier(joey gladstone) and candace cameron(dj tanner) and jodie sweetin(stephanie tanner) and and mary kate and ashley olsen(michelle tanner). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i grew up watching full house as a child. i stopped watching it for years and but about two weeks ago i started back watching it again. now my kids watch the show and they love to watch it as well. my kids can not believe that dj and on the show and and i are the same age. i really love the show and because it is a show you can watch with your family. it has good teachings your kids can learn from. also there isn not any drugs and violence on it. also when the kids and on the show and have a problem they can always open up to their family for help. that the message kids should be getting from tv now a days and turn to your family for help and not to drugs. kids should be watching more shows like full house instead of half the mess on tv now a days. i also love the show because it makes you laugh and it is down to earth. it talks about real life problems and family matters. there is always a lesson you can learn from the show. i vote the show a 10. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i think the comments regarding the show being cheesy are a bit too exaggerated. when a person comes to watch a tv show and what does he look out for. it is to enjoy that he watches a show and unless he or she is a critic or a person who analyzes story. but most of us are not so and watch the shows to relax and enjoy. full house is an ideal show to watch after having a heavy day in the office or school. it makes you laugh and it is not just humor. yes and the tanner family is a perfect family and a perfectly hypothetical family. if any such family existed in real world and it would be a role model for us to follow. but this is a tv show and and not a real family and and there is nothing wrong in depicting a hypothetical family on television. the very fact that the show could run so long shows us that people enjoyed watching it and whatever be the comments later on. another good point about the show is that any person of any age would not only enjoy watching it and but would take back a message however childish that message be. those jesse talks with michelle are extremely touching and if one doesn not think of it as childish. overall i would say after watching every show of full house and there is a contentment in your heart that is rarely present after many other shows. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house came to me when i was about 9. i remember seeing re runs of america funniest home videos with bob saget and and one day my mom told me that he was also in a show called full house. one day and i was lucky enough to catch an episode while visiting family. it do not seem too interesting at first and but as i watched more and more and ever night at 9 represent00 and i would just be so into it. this show really makes you want to be there yourself and hang out with the girls and go places with them and and maybe even join in their little family sing alongs. the thing i like most about full house is that it a great show for kids and adults of all ages. there will be some parts that are more for adults and then parts that are meant for kids and so that the whole family will enjoy it. no matter how cheesy it can be and it still a great show and and i would definitely recommend it to anyone. positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i loved this show growing up and i still watch the first season dvd at age 19 today. what can i say. i grew up in a house much like the one on full house. i had a dad and two sisters and and a dog. i guess the only difference was that i did not live with my uncle and my dad best friend. also and i grew up with my mom in the house. i do not know what i would have done without full house on television. i think that stephanie (played by jodie sweetin) and d. j. (played by kirk cameron sister candace) and and michelle (played by mary kate and ashley olsen) are my favorite characters. i can relate to each of them because i am the middle child of my family like steph and i am a younger sister like michelle and and i am an older sister like d. j. i really like how the show always has moral values because i do not really like any of the o. c. like shows today. i like the comedy of full house and too. uncle jesse (john stamos) and joey (dave coulier) and and danny (bob saget) are hilarious as the girls uncle and dad friend and and dad and respectively. the story goes that and after the girls mom dies and danny best friend joey and his brother in law and jesse move in to help raise the kids. three men trying to raise three young girls equals hilarious. each character on full house is full of heart and funny and and genuinely believable. joey is an aspiring comedian with a kid heart and soul. jesse is the cool and motorcycle riding and tough guy uncle who is softened by his three nieces and and later and his wife becky (laurie laughlin and from summerville). both kids and adults will love this show. guaranteed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"full house is a great show. i am still today growing up on it. i started watching it when i was 8 and now i am 12 and still watching it. i fell in love with all of the characters and especially stephanie. she is my favorite. she had such a sense of humor. in case there are people on this sight that hardly watch the show and you should because you will get hooked on it. i became hooked on it after the first show i saw and which just happened to be the first episode and in 2002. it really is a good show. i really think that this show should go down to many generations in families. and it great too because it is an appropriate show for all ages. and for all parents and it teaches kids lessons on how to go on with their life. nothing terrible happens and like violence or swearing. it is just a really great sit com. i give it 5 out of 5 stars. what do you think. oh and the best time to watch it is when you are home sick from school or even the old office. it will make you feel a lot better. trust me i am hardly home sick but i still know that it will make you feel better. and to everybody that thinks the show is stupid and well that too bad for you because you would not get as far in life even if you are happy with your life. you really should watch it and you will get hooked on it. i am just telling you what happened to me and everybody else that started watching this awesome show. well i need must go to have some lunch. remember you must start watching full house and soon. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i do not know if this is a sitcom or not and but i agree that this is one of the greatest television shows ever. it great that this show still airs. and i love michelle. it cute on the episodes when she was a baby and she talked and and she sometimes said something funny. aw. this show can relate to children and teens and. well and families as they struggle through rough times and try to work it out as a family. i do not know who would ever turn down an opportunity to watch this show with someone. i love the episode when i think her name is dd. the older girl accidentally stole a sweatshirt and and she learned a lesson about stealing. that was a great episode. an example that this tv show shows the family working things out as a family. i recommend this show for everyone. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is a excellent series. you will laugh and you will cry and these wonderful people will be a part of your family. the way this family cares for one another and helps each other through their crisis sets a great example of the way we should live our lives. there are many good things they do and and a number of bad choices and but they never turn their backs on family and they work through problems. michelle and the youngest daughter and is the cutest thing i have seen. stephanie and the middle daughter and suffers with middle child syndrome and with the help of everyone in the family it better. dj and the oldest daughter and is growing up whether her dad wants it to happen or not. one thing they all share is they miss their mom. danny (dad) and joey and and uncle jesse love these kids so much and and it apparent in every episode. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"reading a wide variety of scoop reviews over the past few days and i walked into the theater prepared for a subpar outing from woody. happily and i couldn not have been more wrong. granted and woody the performer is slowing down a touch or two and but woody the writer or director is in fine form and found a credible way to integrate his 70 year old self into the story. judging from the laughter and guffaws and the audience ate up allen one liners and dialogue in a way that i haven not seen in several years. in a movie landscape dominated by software approved story arcs and twentysomething tastes and assembly line formula fare for kiddies and it a source of both satisfaction and inspiration to see allen pursuing his highly personal and still rewarding path. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i went to the movie theater this afternoon expecting to be underwhelmed by scoop. happily and the film exceeded expectations and at least a little bit. it nothing heavy and nothing deep and not anywhere as good as any number of real allen masterpieces but it also completely enjoyable as a light and bantering comedy. there something kind of simple and sweet about it. cute was the word i heard from people in the audience as they were walking out after the show. it doesn not feel like allen set out to create a masterpiece here and it feels like he wanted to make a little comedy and have fun doing it. compared to just about everything hollywood is producing and allen stuff has a tendency to charm. even the fluffy stuff. these days it just refreshing to go to a movie made by an actual human being. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"scoop is easily woody allen funniest film of the 2000 so far. allen and although finally looking his age and is at the top of his game as low brow magician sidney waterman. his one liners and demeanor are hilarious. don not let the critics sway your opinion. scoop is a top notch woody lite picture. the classical music score is an excellent compliment to the action on screen. scarlett johanson looks gorgeous in that bathing suit. jackman is dashing. the cinematography glows. scoop is wonderful escapist fare from start to finish. the last shot of the film alone is worth the admission price. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i was lucky enough to get a free pass to an advance screening of scoop last night. full house at the theatre and when the movie ended there was spontaneous applause. i do not speak to anyone who disliked scoop although two teenagers sitting next to me sighed and fidgeted uncomfortably for most of the film. they were the exception though because everyone else including myself really enjoyed themselves. scoop is a quickly paced murder mystery. a young female journalism student is unwittingly maneuvered by forces beyond her control into trying to catch a serial killer on the loose. plenty of hijinks ensue as she partners up with a traveling illusionist and falls in love with a frisky and charming young nobleman. scoop isn not a bad addition to the woody allen filmography. it isn not his best work but it is a very enjoyable and light hearted romp. i would say it fits quite comfortably into being an average woody allen film and right in the middle of the pack. if youre a woody allen fan you will probably enjoy yourself. if youre indifferent to his work then scoop might be enough to get you interested in seeing more. i do not think that anyone who dislikes his style of film making and acting are going to change their mind. woody plays the same kind of neurotic character we have grown so accustomed to although it borders dangerously close to forced and over the top in this film. while potentially aggravating for some who might find themselves wishing he would hurry up and just spit out the words and woody allen fans know what to expect. very good performances all around in my opinion although i found myself missing ian mcshane who is excellent and not on camera nearly enough. hugh jackman is great as the charming nobleman and i think woody allen has found a new regular star to work with in scarlett johansson. i think that with match point this is their second pairing and she just magic with the material that woody gives her. could be the beginning of a beautiful relationship. i am glad i saw the movie and definitely recommend it. more sophisticated comedy than movies like scary movie 4 so if your brand of comedy is the latter rather than the former and scoop probably isn not for you. if and on the other hand and you like a touch of class and sophistication and fun and scoop is for you. probably not the woody allen film i would introduce to a newcomer but all others should give it a try. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i thought this was a wonderful way to spend time on a too hot summer weekend and sitting in the air conditioned theater and watching a light hearted comedy. the plot is simplistic and but the dialogue is witty and the characters are likable (even the well bread suspected serial killer). while some may be disappointed when they realize this is not match point 2 represent risk addiction and i thought it was proof that woody allen is still fully in control of the style many of us have grown to love. this was the most i would laughed at one of woody comedies in years (dare i say a decade. ). while i have never been impressed with scarlet johanson and in this she managed to tone down her sexy image and jumped right into a average and but spirited young woman. this may not be the crown jewel of his career and but it was wittier than devil wears prada and more interesting than superman a great comedy to go see with friends. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"scoop is also the name of a late thirties evelyn waugh novel and and woody allen new movie and though set today and has a nostalgic charm and simplicity. it hasn not the depth of characterization and intense performances and suspense or shocking final frisson of allen penultimate effort match point and (argued by many and including this reviewer and to be a strong return to form) but scoop does closely resemble allen last outing in its focus on english aristocrats and posh london flats and murder and and detection. this time woody leaves behind the arriviste murder mystery genre and returns to comedy and and is himself back on the screen as an amiable vaudevillian and a magician called sid waterman and stage moniker the great splendini and who counters some snobs probing with and i used to be of the hebrew persuasion and but as i got older and i converted to narcissism. following a revelation in the midst of splendini standard dematerializing act and with scarlett johansson (as sondra pransky) the audience volunteer and the mismatched pair get drawn into a dead ace english journalist post mortem attempt to score one last top news story. on the edge of the styx joe strombel (ian mcshane) has just met the shade of one lord lyman son secretary and who says she was poisoned and and she told him the charming aristocratic bounder son peter lyman (hugh jackman) was the tarot card murderer and a london serial killer. sondra and sid immediately become a pair of amateur sleuths. with sid deadpan wit and sondra bumptious beauty they cut a quick swath through to the cream of the london aristocracy. woody isn not pawing his young heroine muse as in match point and johansson again as in the past. this time moreover scarlett not an ambitious sexpot and would be movie star. she morphed surprisingly into a klutzy and bespectacled but still pretty coed. sid and sondra have no flirtation and which is a great relief. they simply team up and more or less politely and to carry out strombel wishes by befriending lyman and watching him for clues to his guilt. with only minimal protests sid consents to appear as sondra dad. sondra and who captivated peter by pretending to drown in his club pool and re christens herself jade spence. mr. spence and i. e. and woody and keeps breaking cover by doing card tricks and but he amuses dowagers with these and beats their husbands at poker and spewing non stop one liners and all the while maintaining and apparently with success and that he in oil and precious metals and just as jade has told him to say. that about all there is to it and or all that can be told without spoiling the story by revealing its outcome. at first allen decision to make johansson a gauche and naively plainspoken and and badly dressed college girl seems not just unkind but an all around bad decision. but johansson and who has pluck and panache as an actress and miraculously manages to carry it off and helped by jackman and an actor who knows how to make any actress appear desirable and if he desires her. the film actually creates a sense of relationships and to make up for it limited range of characters represent sid and sondra spar in a friendly way and and peter and sondra have a believable attraction even though it artificial and tainted (she is and after all and going to bed with a suspected homicidal maniac). what palls a bit is allen again drooling over english wealth and class and things his brooklyn background seems to have left him and despite all his celebrity and with a irresistible hankering for. jackman is an impressive fellow and glamorous and dashing. his parents were english. but could this athletic musical comedy star raised in australia (x man wolverine) really pass as an aristocrat. only in the movies and perhaps (here and in kate and leopold). this isn not as strong a film as match point and but to say it a loser as some viewers have is quite wrong. it has no more depth than a half hour radio drama or a tv show and but woody jokes are far funnier and more original than you will get in any such media affair and and sometimes they show a return to the old wit and cleverness. it doesn not matter if a movie is silly or slapdash when it diverting summer entertainment. on a hot day you do not want a heavy meal. the whole thing deliciously evokes a time when movie comedies were really light escapist entertainment and without crude jokes or bombastic effects while without vince vaughan or owen wilson. critics are eager to tell you this is a return to the allen decline that preceded match point. don not believe them. he doesn not try too hard. why should he. he may be 70 and but verbally and he still light on his feet. and his body moves pretty fast too. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"greetings again from the darkness. remember all the what happened to woody allen. jokes. even mr. allen poked fun at the fans who wanted him to continue making his same funny films. as with any great artist and mr. allen craft evolved over the years and he lost some fans and while picking up others. last year masterpiece matchpoint showed he is still every bit as relevant and poignant as he was in the days of annie hall and manhattan. what is most striking to us 40 plus year fans is that mr. new york himself seems to have a bit of a crush on the mother country. apparently he actually likes england. while filming matchpoint and mr. allen became enamored with scarlett johansson and her real life spirit and sense of humor. this attraction motivated him to write his best comedy in years. scarlett and while risking overexposure and must be given credit for not just picking films that cast her in some glamorous light. she is unafraid to look and act like a real person. in scoop and she flashes some real on screen comedy chops and and in many scenes and delivers the real punchline to mr. allen straight man. of course and any time mr. allen decides to put himself in front of the camera and he will get more than his share of one liners and social commentaries in which is fine and because few do it better. very nice support work from ian mcshane and hugh jackman. in fact and mr. jackman provides a few glimpses into why many of us thought him the best choice to replace brosnan as the new bond. as with most of allen films and the star is the script and not the actors. although scarlett delivers superbly here and is a nice contrast to the polished allen and jackman and what makes this one crackle is the dialogue . especially the banter between allen and scarlett. if you are not a huge woody the actor fan and fear not. he does limit his screen time and he is quite effective and except in two or three brief scenes that almost seem out of place. another woodman tradition is a sparkling musical background and scoop is no exception . especially the strauss composition. scoop is a nice cross between annie hall and the best of the marx brothers films or the cary grant comedies. yes it is an adult comedy and but it is actually very cute . especially for a serial killer and talking ghost comedy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"first of all and let me comment that the audience loved it from the first moment. perhaps current events in the middle east led people to take the attitude and i came for a comedy and by george i am going to enjoy it. but for whatever reason and everybody seemed really into the comedy of it. the last few times woody has tried to do a straight comedy (small time crooks and curse of the jade scorpion and hollywood ending) i have felt like the one liners felt strained and a bit antiquated. i remember thinking at one point and that would have been funny in the early sixties. so going in to this movie and i was afraid woody was becoming tone deaf and however and in this one his comic sensibilities were in perfect tune. admittedly and there were plenty of my fellow aarp card carrying folks in the screening and but there were also plenty of 20 somethings and 30 somethings as well and and they all seemed to get it and give up the occasional belly laugh in addition to numerous guffaws and chuckles and the like. in many instances and the throw aways had people laughing so loud you missed the next line. thematically and woody was traipsing familiar ground. as i suspected from the trailer and this film had a lot of manhattan murder mystery in it and but then again and there was more than a smidgen of oedipus wrecks (new york stories) and alice and and even a little tribute to broadway danny rose at the very beginning. even with woody in the movie and scarlett and as sondra and was and at times the woody proxy and but her character was far from the nebbish that and say and will ferrell gave us in melinda and melinda or kenneth branaugh attempted in celebrity. instead of archetypal ticks and quirks and sondra nerdishness comes directly from the family history which she shares early on. on numerous occasions the family business leads her to malapropisms that we get as an audience and while the characters on the screen can only perceive them as strange non sequiturs. since we are all in on the joke and we can not help but laugh. but the laughs do not come from recognizing the woody nebbish and but truly from the character. to a great extent and unlike farrell and branaugh and cusack or even mia farrow before her and scarlett is not required to use the woody voice to evoke the woody role. thus and we do not find ourselves ripped out of the narrative as a woody voice suddenly emerges from someone else face. as my friend commented on the way out and sid and the character played by woody and is a supporting role and but more center stage than i was hoping going in. however and this time woody seems to have written a character that truly fits his current persona. unlike his ed dobel sage character in anything else and or his blind director in hollywood ending and this time the character is a comfortable fit. perhaps more importantly and this time the character works in the story. within the elevated circles they find themselves in and he is even more fish out of water than scarlett and which is used to great comedic effect throughout. sid is a declining and itinerant magician playing to small audiences and but the fact that he is from another era is placed front and center for our enjoyment. but what about jackman. what about ian (swearengen) mcshane. i liked both of them to the extent that they are used in the piece. i particularly liked mcshane short but effective turns. jackman is charming with the ease of old money that was so often portrayed in films from 50 years ago. (class echoes from purple rose of cairo. )so what did i think. short answer and maybe his best straight comedy since 1994 bullets over broadway. less stylized than mighty aphrodite. less caustic than deconstructing harry. less forced than small time crooks or hollywood ending. woody has finally found a comic voice that works in the 21st century. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"great woody allen. no. good woody allen. definitely. i found myself and along with the audience in attendance and laughing hard and often at some of the best woody allen lines we have heard in a while. the aging allen created an appropriate role for himself as scarlett johansson father . well and sort of. some have said johansson plays a young dianne keaton. i beg to differ. she plays woody dialogue and which and in his comedies and always has a very similar feel. like and well and a woody allen comedy. that fine for us woody appreciators. she certainly did woody dialogue far better than the young cast of his last comedy and melinda or melinda. some may find woody humor tiresome and but for those of us who love it when it done right and we look forward to the next. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i would even say some shades of hitchcock. this is clearly better than mmm and which is seen as a guilty pleasure by some if not most woody fans. by the way and did you know that annie hall was first conceived as a murder mystery. anyhow and woody reclaims some relevance in film comedy with this one. the plot turns are nice and tight. i will say that in the first 20 minutes or so and some of the actors are a little too hasty at delivering their lines and but stick around. scarlett johansson proves well cast in the diane keaton type role and and at no time is there any uncomfortable moments between her and the much older woody. no one could imagine a more perfect actor for the role of peter lyman than jackman. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"allow yourself to be transported to a different and old school kind of storytelling. scoop is classic woody allen. allen latest muse and scarlett johansson (who also appeared in last year match point and also by allen) and is surprisingly able to tone down her sultry sex kitten appeal and transform into a normal looking student type with the aid of nerdish glasses and outfits but still fails to make the audience believe how hugh jackman lordly character can be so smitten by her and given the royal background (do not worry and no spoilers here). there are no grand transformations for johansson character here and as she consistently plays the same character throughout despite the script saying otherwise. you even forgive her character apparent lack of logic and continuing an affair with a suspected serial killer and simply because he is his royal hotness jackman and who is refreshing to see sans the wolverine duds. if anything and consistency is what the 70 year old allen is all about. he continues to tell his stories on celluloid in the same way he always has while as if he never been exposed to modern film making and which is probably what makes his quiet and simple films appealing. they never seem to aim for a specific market while as if allen makes movies to his taste alone and whether the public likes it or not. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"great movie and enough laughs and action for any audience. since the last person who posted on this movie took it upon themselves to call woody allen incestuous and not comment on the film and here i am. the film follows an unlikely duo and johansson and allen and as they follow a tip given to them by the ghost of a recently deceased english reporter. their search takes them into the home of the killer and and eventually to a somewhat tragic end. but do not let the plot fool you and the film truly is hilarious and the acting is superb. it seems that as directors reach a certain age they really get things right. clint eastwood and allen and pollack all seem to making some of the most imaginative work of their respective careers. also and from watching the movie in a pact theater and you can just tell that people really love woody allen and are ready for him to really make a comeback. the second he walked on screen audience lit up. there just something about the man and he really shines in scoop. check it out and it worth the trip. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"coming immediately on the heels of match point (2005) and a fine if somewhat self repetitive piece of serious woody and scoop gives new hope to allen small but die hard band of followers (among whom i number myself) that the master has once again found his form. a string of disappointing efforts and culminating in the dreary melinda and melinda (2004) and the embarrassing anything else (2003) raised serious doubts that another first rate woody comedy and with or without his own participation as an actor and was in the cards. happily and the cards turn out to be a tarot deck that serves as scoop clever maguffin and proffers an optimistic reading for the future of woody allen comedy. even more encouraging and woody self casting sadly one of the weakest elements of his films in recent years is here an inspired bit of self parody as well as a humble recognition at last that he can no longer play romantic leads with women young enough to be his daughters or granddaughters. in scoop and allen astutely assigns himself the role of sid waterman and an aging magician with cheap tricks and tired stage patter who and much like woody himself and has brought his act to london and where audiences if not more receptive are at least more polite. like chaplin calvero in limelight (1952) and sid waterman affords allen the opportunity to don the slightly distorted mask of an artist whose art has declined and whose audience is no longer large or appreciative. moreover and because they seem in character and allen ticks and prolonged stammers are less distracting here than they have been in some time. waterman character also functions neatly in the plot. his fake magic body dissolving box becomes the ironically plausible location for visitations from joe strombel (ian mcshane) and a notorious journalistic muckraker and recent cardiac arrest victim. introduced on a river styx ferryboat to hades and strombel repeatedly jumps ship because he just can not rest in eternity without communicating one last scoop about the identity of the notorious tarot killer. unfortunately and his initial return from the dead leads him to waterman magic show and the only conduit for his hot lead turns out to be a journalism undergraduate and sondra pransky (scarlett johansson) and who has been called up from the audience as a comic butt for the magician climactic trick. sondra enthusiastically seizes the journalistic opportunity and drags the reluctant waterman into the investigation to play the role of her millionaire father. as demonstrated in lost in translation and johansson has a talent for comedy and and the querulous by play between her and allen is very amusing and all the more so for never threatening to become a prelude to romance. scoop serial killer plot and involving grisly murders of prostitutes and an aristocratic chief suspect and peter lyman (hugh jackman) and is the no doubt predictable result of allen lengthy sabbatical exposure to london ubiquitous jack the ripper landmarks and lore. yet other facets of scoop (as of match point) also derive from woody late life encounter with english culture. its class structure and manners and idiom and dress and architecture and and and yes and peculiar driving habits give woody fresh new material for wry observation of human behavior as well as sharp social satire. when and for instance and sondra is trying to ingratiate herself with peter lyman at a ritzy private club and waterman observes from his point of view were scum. a good deal of humor is also generated by the contretemps of stiffly reserved british social manners encountering waterman insistent borscht belt jewish plebeianism. and and then and of course and there is waterman hilarious exit in a smart car he can not remember to drive on the left side of the road. as usual and allen humor in scoop includes heavy doses of in jokes and taking the form of sly allusions to film and literary sources as well as and increasingly and references to his own filmography. in addition to the pervasive jack the ripper references and for instance and the film soundtrack is dominated by an arrangement of grieg the hall of the mountain king and compulsively whistled by hans beckert in m and the first masterpiece of the serial killer genre. the post funeral gathering of journalists who discuss the exploits of newly departed joe strombel clearly mimics the opening of broadway danny rose (1984). references to deconstructing harry (1997) include the use of death as a character (along with his peculiar voice and costume) and the use of mandelbaum as a character name and and the mention of adair university (harry alma mater and where sondra is now a student). moreover and the systematic use of greek mythology in the underworld river cruise to hades recalls the use of greek gods and a chorus in mighty aphrodite (1995). as to quotable gags and allen scripts rely less on one liners than they did earlier in his career and but scoop does provides at least a couple of memorable ones. to a question about his religion and waterman answers represent i was born in the hebrew persuasion and but later i converted to narcissism. and sondra snaps off this put down of waterman wannabe crime detecting represent if we put our heads together you will hear a hollow noise. all in all and scoop is by far woody allen most satisfying comedy in a decade. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"scoop out of woody allen is definitely not my favorite director and but i enjoyed match point. it was an excellent dark romantic thriller that luckily did not star woody allen. it did have the beautiful scarlett johansson in it. scoop is woody allen latest film and though he appears in this one and it ok. it also features scarlett johansson and the two of them work perfect together. johansson plays sondra pransky and a young college journalist who gets the scoop of a life time from the ghost of joe strombel (ian mcshane. ) joe heard the scoop while on a boat with the grim reaper and a bunch of other souls the reaper has taken. one of those souls is the secretary of peter lyman (hugh jackman. ) she tells joe that peter may be the serial killer roaming the streets of england. joe and with the scoop of a life time and travels back to the living and gives this info to sondra and during a magic act. sondra is at some magic show with magician sid waterman (woody allen. ) she becomes a volunteer to go in a disappearing box and while she is in the box and she gets the visit from joe. not knowing what to do and she enlists the help of sid waterman to help her crack the case. this film has a nice light hearted feel to it compared to match point and yet it all works. johansson and allen work great together. allen humor fits perfect for this story and role. hugh jackman is terrific as peter layman and the suspected serial killer. this is a fun little movie to see if your ever looking for one to watch. the cast ensemble works well together and the story flows and you sometimes forget that your watching woody allen be himself. i say give it a chance because you just might like it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"something happens to sondra pransky when she enters the magician box on the stage of a london theater. little does sondra know the spirit of newly departed journalist joe strombel materializes to ask her to investigate the man someone has told him and on his voyage to another dimension and is the infamous tarot killer that has been on a binge of crime in london. the only problem is the man accused is and for all appearances and a respectable upper class man. when sondra tells her experience to the great splendini and who is a. k. a. sid waterman and the magician is stunned and but decides to go along. the two would be p. i. s conjure an invitation to a club where peter lyman goes to swim. sondra and who fakes she is drowning and catches the attention of this hunk and who wants to see more of her. needless to say and the two of them will get into all kinds of funny situations until the mystery is revealed at the end of the film. little does the real tarot killer think he can fool a resolute sondra who proves herself to be more resourceful than he gave her credit for. the result is a perfect summer film with a lot of laughs that is just what one needs to get out of the heat into a perfect time in a cool theater. woody allen has done better and and yet and this sunny comedy will vindicate him for past failures. in scoop and mr. allen has taken himself from the romantic lead pawing his gorgeous leading lady. his trade mark gesticulating is something this funny man will never get rid of and since it appears to be his trade mark. the film has some funny one liners that will go over the head of the viewers that might not be paying attention. scarlett johansson and the beautiful star of scoop and seems to be the perfect foil for woody allen. she plays the straight part while mr allen does his shtick and a perfect combination. both are excellent in their banter throughout the film. ms. johansson is a knockout beauty in her red bathing suit and although they have dressed her so dowdy in most of the costumes she wears on the screen. hugh jackman is seen as peter lyman a sophisticated man about town with the right pedigree. he makes a good appearance in the movie as the man pursuing ms. johansson. ian mcshane plays the dead fleet street journalist on his way to eternity. scoop is a light film for the hot and humid summer thanks to woody allen. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i went into this movie knowing nothing about it and and ended up really enjoying it. it lacked authenticity and believability some of the things that the characters said and did were completely bizarre and and a lot of the script seemed like it was ad libbed (perhaps this is typical of woody allen. excuse my ignorance) but the whole audience in the theater was laughing so hard. it wasn not even at the jokes in the movie per se and but at the whole movie itself. the acting reminded me of seinfeld acting and where he tries not to laugh at his own jokes they are corny and but if you do not take the movie too seriously and you can really appreciate the humour of the actors and not the characters. if youre looking for a random movie and and you like woody allen and i would definitely recommend it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"woody allen second movie set in london. tha tarot card murderer is killing prostitutes in london. aspiring journalist sondra pransky (scarlett johansson) gets a tip that he may be lord peter lyman (hugh jackman). she starts to romance him but quickly falls in love. she helped by stage magician sid waterman (woody allen) who doesn not like what he sees. i like this better than the over rated match point from last year. it was shorter and moved much more quickly. the plot is old but i was entertained and it kept me guessing till the very end. it not really a comedy but a mystery with a few very good comedic lines (all from allen of course). it not one of allen best but it far better than his worst. the acting is and for the most part and very good. allen is bad but he played this character a million times before and it gotten tiresome. but johansson and jackman are just great they look fantastic and give two very appealing believable performances. also allen (surprisingly) works on their sex appeal there is a sequence where theyre both in the their bathing suits to show off their nice bodies. the only real debit is that allen still seems unsure on how to shot london. he not as off as he was on match point though maybe he will just get better as he goes along. worth seeing. i give it an 8. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"match point and now scoop have both convinced me that not only is woody allen doing a neat job making movies in england (and that scarlett johansson is the right cast member) and but corroborated what i have known for years represent he shouldn not focus on neurotic rich new yorkers. in this case and johansson plays journalism student sondra pransky and whom magician sid waterman (allen) puts in his disappearing box and where she meets the ghost of murdered reporter joe strombel (ian mcshane) and who tells her that the serial killings that have plagued london were committed by millionaire peter lyman (hugh jackman). so and she gets to know him and and. well and i do not know how much i can tell you without giving it away. but i can say that this is probably allen funniest movie in years. there his ubiquitous unique style of humor (especially the line about his religion). so and youre sure to like this movie. if nothing else and it will make you fall in love with london. but mostly and it just so damn hilarious. even if you do not like woody allen and you gotta love this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"simply well written and directed and acted. woody best of the 2000 if not his best since the 80 . hugh jackman was the perfect pick for his roll. scarlett johansson banter with woody proves how well rounded an actress she has become. it refreshing to not being in a romance on screen with the leading lady. he plays the perfect bumbling magician. there have been a few reviews maligning this movie. don not let them stop you from seeing the wonderfully done film. people in the crowd i saw this with were laughing so loud at some lines i missed the next line. if you like woody allen films of the 70 and you will regret missing this one. i suggest you go to watch this film with an open mind and if you do and you might walk out smiling. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
" half scarlett johansson and woody allen and hugh jackman and ian mcshane and romola garia. directed by woody allen. just after his work with johansson on match point the two return for scoop a corky and zany and fun comic ride. when a student reporter (johansson) finds out a new scoop from a deceased reporter (mcshane) when she enters the materializer of a lame magician (allen). the scoop being of the new tarot card killer in london who might be preppy peter lyman (jackman) while while sondra and sid are playing detective sondra falls in love for the handsome would be killer. allen has finally hit a mark and not as good as match point but definitely more fun. i laughed a lot more than i expected and one of the years must sees. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"do you still love woody allen humor and sense of the absurd. do you wait patiently for movies that get the plot going in the first five minutes instead of making you wait around. if so and you will adore this comedic murder mystery. it has all the elements of a good mystery represent sharp plot and a handsome suspect and romance and and intrigue and mixed together with enough laughs and winks at fate to keep even the most jaded of movie goers happy. with beautiful people and gorgeous homes and landscapes to ogle and this frothy movie is just the thing to take your minds off your troubles. as woody might say and what not to like. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i was going to give it an 8 and but since you people made 6. 5 out of a lot better votes and i had to up my contribution. the river styx was pure genius. sure and woody was his perennial stuff and but at least his role was appropriate. the first half hour was really hilarious and and then the rest of the movie was easy to watch. the dialog was clever enough and and woody card tricks at the parties and along with the reaction from the upper crust and were fun to watch. this was much better than the newspaper critics made it sound out to be. and a plus and a little sorcerer apprentice to go along with it. and of course and did you notice that johansen is getting a bit frumpy. charles dance is always entertaining and as was hugh jackman. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a huge woody allen fan and so when i saw that this was playing at the cinema i couldn not help myself. i wanted to see how allen would follow up his magnificent film match point seeing as this is another one of his films shot in g. b. (which is unique among allen work) along with what seems to be his new muse scarlett johanson. scoop is much lighter than mp and the humor is scoop most enjoyable aspect. the plot revolves around johanson character (a journalism student) who gets a tip on a hot story from beyond the grave. she falls in love with a suspected serial killer (jackman) and she must decide whether the truth is worth finding. oh and all of this is done with the help of a bumbling magician turned detective played by allen. i must say that i thoroughly enjoyed johanson performance but i am a bit bias and i could watch a three hour film with johanson in ever frame and remain enchanted. she plays a ditsy and yappy and bumbling sweetheart that is kind of a variation in a sense of allen stereotypical neurosis stricken character. she adds appropriate body language for comic effect. needless to say almost anyone who sees this will find johanson character sickeningly cute and that is a plus. allen is allen. he is still playing the same character much like chaplin and his little tramp character. something that occur in this film makes me wonder if i will see the neurotic little hypochondriac again however. he is not in the cast of his next picture and has been spending more time exclusively behind the camera as of late. jackman is also enjoyable as the suave and millionaire murder suspect. i cannot say that jackman does anything in particular to make the role his but he suits his character none the less. in terms of the plot i cannot help but feel that this is fresh. in fact it stinks of curse of the jade scorpion. johanson and allen are more detective like than anything. however i must applaud allen on his ending because it is a bit more clever than your typical unoutstanding hollywood version of this film. instead of everything being black and white and things are painted in shades of gray. being entirely innocent has nothing to do with it nor does unequivocal guilt. though the plot seemed old woody still has a knack for one liners. i did find his allusions to his last film interesting. come for the humor and laugh and be merry. needless to say if you enjoy allen work watch it. if not watch something else. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in the funeral of the famous british journalist joe strombel (ian mcshane) and his colleagues and friends recall how obstinate he was while seeking for a scoop. meanwhile the deceased joe discloses the identity of the tarot card serial killer of london. he cheats the reaper and appears to the american student of journalism sondra pransky (scarlett johansson) and who is on the stage in the middle of a magic show of the magician sidney waterman (woody allen) in london and and tells her that the murderer is the aristocrat peter lyman (hugh jackman). sondra drags sid in her investigation and seeking for evidences that peter is the killer. however and she falls in love with him and questions if joe strombel is right in his scoop. scoop is another great woody allen comedy outside manhattan and actually again in london. his ironic and witty lines are simply fantastic and and i laughed a lot inclusive with his fate of hero in a country where people drive in the wrong side. sid waterman is extremely funny and woody allen is in an excellent shape as comedian. however and his present muse scarlett johansson and of whom i am a big fan and has over acting and is annoying in many moments and changing inclusive her accent to a histrionic pronunciation. her character is absolutely silly and promiscuous and and i was quite disappointed with her performance (probably for the first time in her filmography). but this supernatural comedy is still a hilarious and worthwhile entertainment. my vote is eight. title (brazil) represent scoop o grande furo (scoop the big scoop). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"theyre not jawing journalists cary grant and rosalind russell from his girl friday or witty detective william powell and sassy lady myrna loy from thin man and but woody allen and scarlett johansson are surprisingly charming as amateur sleuths in scoop. their screwball repartee is more postmodern than post depression and allen writing filled with ironic self deprecation and plain old new york angst. shades of the old wit occur rarely and such as when he and as sid and the great splendini magician and responds about his background represent i was born into the hebrew persuasion and but when i got older i converted to narcissism. johansson and fresh from allen match point as a bad girl and here gets to be a relatively good and sometimes ditsy journalism student caught in a murder mystery suitable for london represent a serial killer. the plot is a reworking of his recent london based thriller match point and right down to the upper class sins and the american tragedy or place in the sun boating accident. as a matter of fact and allen is reworking manhattan murder mystery and purple rose of cairo to name just a couple of other examples. i care not if he reworks while i would like the new material to be at least the equal of the originals and and and alas and it is just a reflection of his younger greatness. allen as director and actor can not hide his love for the actress and as he couldn not for diane keaton and and therefore takes a middling comedy into an appropriate place down the allen canon and not great but amusing and at times brilliantly satirical represent about the suspected upper class murderer and sid (allen) quips and i would be very surprised if he killed one person. this is vintage allen humor. while there are barely any bright literary allusions as in most of his film and he lards scoop with music from grieg and tchaikovsky and and strauss to let us know the woodman has not lost his touch of class. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as a baseball die hard and this movie goes contrary to what i expect in a sports movie represent authentic looking sports action and believable characters and and an original story line. while angels in the outfield fails miserably in the first category and it succeeds beautifully in the latter two. angels weaves the story of roger and j. p. and two anaheim foster kids in love with baseball but searching for a family and with that of the woebegone angels franchise and struggling to draw fans and win games. pushed by his deadbeat father promise that they would be a family only when the angels win the pennant and roger asks for some heavenly help and and gets it in the form of diamond dwelling spirits bent on reversing the franchise downward spiral. and and when short fused manager george knox (portrayed by danny glover) begins believing in what roger sees and the team suddenly has hope for turning their season around and roger and j. p. find something to believe in. glover in particular gives a nice performance and and tony danza and playing a washed up pitcher and also does well and despite clearly having zero idea of how to pitch out of the windup. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have always like this great baseball movie. it has a good cast including two tremendous actors and two of my favorites danny glover and christopher lloyd. also in this movie is ben johnson and brenda fricker and big tony longo and tony danza and and matthew mcconaughey. also jay o. sanders and dermot mulroney. the film has great special effects and acting from all of the film actors. the baseball scenes are all realistic. the music by composer randy edelman is very good and it fits the film very well. some of the actors who reminded me the actual baseball personalities. stoney jackson ray mitchell character reminded me royce clayton and mcconaughey character reminded me of steve finley and and jay o. sanders commentator in my opinion resembled how al hrabosky looks today. this is a fantastic movie for non and baseball fans and i strongly recommend this film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i enjoy movies like this for their spirit and no pun intended. its a decent and clean movie about a baseball team that falling behind and and a young fan wishes for them to win and since his deadbeat dad said that was the only way he would come back for him. the spirit shines through in two ways represent a funny cast with danny glover and a young joseph gordon levitt and and the heavenly herald al and taking the dynamic form of christopher lloyd. its an energetic movie. it gets you smiling and and really involves you in the sport. therein lies my gripe. the one thing that kinda bugs me is these sports movies that kind of turn you into an unexpecting fan for the team. there absolutely nothing wrong with that. i just find it odd that i should come away from the movie thinking the angels are a strong and cool team and when really my base loyalty and such as it is and lies with the toronto blue jays. it interesting and really. if it just a movie about an underdog kids team and then its okay. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"that was definitely the case with angels in the outfield. it was on tv last night and i believe i hadn not seen the film since my sophomore year in high school and i am now in my 4th year of college. although the film has many flaws and it is just so touching that you can not help but sit down and watch it and and enjoy yourself. it is also hilarious. danny glover ranting is just so over the top that you can not help but laugh out loud at him at most time. it adds to the film and i am sure it exactly what the director wanted. you actually feel for the characters in the film even though the development isn not the best. a must see. i highly recommend. positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i really enjoyed this movie as a young kid. at that age i thought that the silly baseball antics were funny and that the movie was cool because of it about sports. now and several years later and i can look back and see what a well designed movie this was. this movie opened my eyes as a small child to the struggles other children dealt with and real world issues. that kind of exposure is largely lacking in kids movies these days which i do not think is to our society benefit. sure the baseball antics seem really dumb now and but they drew kids in. no seven year old is going to ask to see a movie about foster children and but they will ask to see a movie about baseball. disney realized this fact and took advantage of it to teach these children an important lesson about the world. as a young adult the performance of al and the other angels seems far less impressive and however i will give credit to the actors playing both children and danny glover who all did a fantastic job. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 1 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.