prompt
stringlengths 497
14.4k
| chosen
int64 0
1
| rejected
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film is not devoid of charm and also shows a bit of warmth and but ultimately this effort is too vain and too strongly focussed on the leads. there is no doubt that mary tyler moore knows what to do with all her screen time but she takes too much of the limelight away from the rest of the cast. another problem is the overburdening of the script with cliches. the daughter who secretly drops out of college and an older woman finding it difficult to get a good job (and first ends up with fairly demeaning work) and the sleazy network executive with his executive toys who goes for glitz over substance and the journalist who sticks up for her beliefs and etc. there is nothing really wrong with any of these and i. e. they are all firmly rooted in reality and but in combination they are just too much and leave us with too much deja vu and too few surprises. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"why did the histories of mary and rhoda have to be so dour. divorced women with indifferent daughters. and why very little reference to the original show and characters. the daughter characters were silly and uninteresting. why can not there ever be daughters who like their mother on tv. it makes sense that mary would leave minneapolis and and rhoda would return to nyc and but why couldn not phyllis or sue ann nivens be guest stars. it just seems a pitiful way to remember such wonderful characters. it was good to see mary and rhoda together of course and but it could have been better and much better. well and there has been a mary tyler moore show reunion and a dick van dyke show reunion and hopefully mary will do better next time if she revisits her old mary richards stomping grounds again. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"dietrich bonhoeffer writings have had a profound influence on my life as a christian and and i eagerly anticipated watching this movie and finding out more about his life. words can hardly express my disappointment. this movie was disjointed. it gave no background about his life and no historical context and and nothing about his great writings (except a brief and passing reference to the cost of discipleship by a colleague at the beginning of the movie. ) instead and we see him enjoying jazz (apparently in the states) and chilling out with his friends before he decides to go back to germany. apparently to show his human side. ok and i am ready for the dramatic part. the part where he stands up for his faith. instead of emphasizing that and we get a very badly acted romance with a 17 year old schoolgirl. whether or not that actually took place and it should not have been a major portion of the movie. now. still waiting for the dramatic part and or some narration explaining what his writings were all about. or something to make us know a little bit of the greatness of this man. drum roll. waiting. . waiting. zip. nada. this is the kind of movie that gives christian films a bad name. all they had to do was set up a structure for the movie to follow and with some background. even some voice overs and or flashbacks to him preaching from his works. some narrative about who he was and where he had been. but no. this is what we got. hardly fitting for a hero of the faith. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i never understood why some people dislike bollywood films represent they have got charismatic actors and great dance numbers and and heightened emotion what not to like. what i do not realize was that i had only seen the upper crust of bollywood. then i watched garam masala. i could tell from the first scene that this was not a movie i was going to like (the film opens with a montage of the two leads driving around a city and apparently happening serendipitously on a series of photo setups populated with gyrating models) and but i kept hoping things would improve. sadly and they do not. the main problem is that the two protagonists and mac and sam and are completely unsympathetic. they spend the entire movie lying to women and lying brutally in order to get them into bed and and the audience is supposed to find this funny and and be charmed. the boys are unscrupulous and inept and and not in a lovable way. mac even goes so far as to have one of the women drugged in order to keep her from discovering his cheating. the script is extremely poor and with repetitive scenes and setups that never lead to anything and and illogical actions and statements by the characters. in fact and the characters are never really developed at all. the males are boorish and greedy jerks and and the women merely interchangeably beautiful. if you go by this movie and you would think that air hostesses are pretty easy to pass from man to man. in reality and betrayal is not so humorous. the only bright spots i found in the movie were one dance number that had brilliant sets and and a few slapsticky moments involving the french farce and door slamming aspects of the story. but bollywood dancing is better enjoyed in movies choreographed by farah khan and and for slapstick you might as well just go straight to the silent comedies of buster keaton and harold lloyd and who seem to have influenced writer or director priyadarshan not a little. priyadarshan also takes false credit for inventing the story represent the basic premise of the plot is stolen from the 1960 play boeing boeing. the original author of that work and marc camoletti and is credited nowhere. at least priyadarshan changed the title for this remake and rather than brazenly using the original without giving credit and as he did in his 1985 version of this same tale. (according to imdb credits list. ). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"watched on hulu (far too many commercials. ) so it broke the pacing but even still and it was like watching a really bad buddy movie from the early sixties. dean martin and jerry lewis where both parts are played by jerry lewis. if i were indian and i would protest the portrayal of all males as venal and all women as shrews. they cheated for the music videos for western sales and used a lot of western models so the males could touch them i usually enjoy indian films a lot but this was a major disappointment and especially for a modern indian film. the story doesn not take place in india (the uncle keeps referring to when mac will return to india) but i can not find out where it is supposed to be happening. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"priyadarshan hera pheri was a nice situational comedy this film however actually lacks a story but is quite funny but illogicalin fact they is no proper story yet it somehow manages a nice flow though it isn not anything greatthe first half has 2 funny scenes like the one where akshay and john invite neha for a lunch and another when paresh entersthe first half gets boring slowly but the second half is funnier though they is no script the jokes are funny though one does wonder how they never hear each person voices from inside the rooms. the climax confusion is treated like a stage play but it quite funny but the film ends abruptlydirection is okay music is goodakshay kumar excels in his part which is now become his second skin and but this is his film completely and he overshadows everyone elsejohn stumbles throughout and fails in comedy paresh rawal is hilarious rajpal is okay the girls are loud at times and awkward too nargis and daisy and neetu(only neetu is seen now) are good in parts but shriek too often manoj joshi is okay. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have to say that this was the worst film of priyadarshan(releasing alongside much better kyonki which was also his directorial venture) and it contains no specific storyline and just focuses on body showing by debuting actresses and some silly comedy sequences. i think priyadarshan is becoming too much repetitive in his comedy flicks just like govinda and david dhavan had done in the past after giving some good entertainers they also went on to loose their audiences. so it will be good for him to concentrate more on script and try some variations in his direction. give us more of herapheri and malamal weekly rather than giving duds like garam masala. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"do not waste your time with this movie. this is a total thrash in terms of acting and directing and sound editing and soundtrack. there was such a waste of performance by some of the very good actors. the movie does not do justice to paresh rawal who is perhaps one of the most talented actors in bollywood. akshay kumar who is also an emerging star did quite a poor job. john abraham and what is wrong with him. is that what you call acting. i mean he should thank god that he has a pretty face otherwise he would be winning razzie awards in india if there were any such awards in bollywood. asrani a great talent and but overdoes his bit as before. screenplay which was not to mention a rip off from the 1965 boeing boeing was quite badly framed. first of all and people in bollywood just can not make something original. on top of that they do not even know how to copy well. the jokes in the movie were so overdone and it was getting painful to sit through them. priyadarshan may be a star in the south and but he just not fit to make a decent hindi movie. the sound editing is amazingly crappy. i can go on and on this matter and but the bottom line is that bollywood should be shameful of making such a film. the worst part is that some people seemed to love this movie. what is wrong with you guys. this is the reason why bollywood is where it is. did you know that bollywood makes more movies than hollywood every year and however and most of the movies are unheard of abroad and because of movies like this one. i am an indian and i am utterly shameful of bollywood for producing this piece of thrash. movies like dil chahta hai and lagaan were just terrific. they are world class films which are timeless. among the best of this decade. garam masala and however and is perhaps one of the worst of this century. period. i give it a negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"it begins on a nice note only to falter quickly and let down expectations. mac (akshay kumar) and sam (john abraham) characters are not properly built before mac boss decides to hitch him with three air hostess. rest of the drama is about how mac and sam and uncle mambo (paresh rawal) deal with situations which at times seem forced. about the cast and paresh rawal is a very talented actor and i thought was wasted in the role of a moody cook. akshay kumar is tolerable and john abraham is very bad keeps stumbling over furniture and rajpal yadav is the only saving grace in the movie. the second half of the movie is funny at times and but in all a dud (songs are boring) and a major let down if you are hoping for some wholesome entertainment and comedy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"probably the worst bollywood film i have seen. no plot line. very little character developments. full of silly and pointless humor. the whole film was chaotic and direction less. there was no proper ending to the story. the airport was filmed in a shopping mall. same story chewed over and over again until you want to say please and just move on with it. even the song and dance was pointless and badly choreographed. the only good thing about this movie is that there were hot bods all around. but then most of the bollywood movies have that anyways these days. btw i am not from an indian background negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the first half hour of the movie had a steady pace and introduced the characters. however all of a sudden everything was happening too quick and a lame reason for akshey kumar to date 3 girls and very loud over acting by both akshey and john abraham. neha dupia was the highlight of the movie and paresh rawal did well but not as good as his performance in hera pheri. overall this movie was the biggest disappointment the film does no justice to its trailer. save your money and do not watch this movie and watch hera pheri and hungama again. summarising it represent a cheap stage show performance and appearance to the film no story or substance and the plot was extraordinarily non sense good music by preetam the man who bought us dhoom. keep it up. movie shot all in one room and new comers (female cast) were okay as it was their first film but established actors like akshey and john totally disappointed an established director like priyadarshan gives his worst movie ever. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i watched the malayalam movie boeing boeing made in 1985 (which in turn is probably inspired by an english movie of same name) long back. the basic story of garam masala is the same but it is told in a pathetic way and the classy jokes replaced by routine ones which are found in normal hindi movies (probably the director did this to suit the taste of hindi audience). i haven not seen the english original. but had really enjoyed the malayalam film (made by priyadarshan himself)which was a side splitting comedy and back then. of course the acting by mohanlal and mukesh and sukumari (who did the cook role) was so natural and spontaneous. probably and i am too smitten by the malayalam film that i cannot tolerate even the smaller flaws in its hindi remake. but i still feel that akshay kumar and john abraham have overacted. paresh rawal has done a decent job but doesn not reach anywhere near sukumari. but all in all its ok and if one compares it to other recent hindi comedy movies. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"contrary to its title and this film offers no spice and thus audience is subjected to a tasteless dish. all humor appears forced and theatrical and mechanical and staged and reminiscent of those pakistani plays available on video and including even the mannerisms. everybody is screaming and shouting and doing odd things for no reason. the premise looks interesting as it is a straight lift from hollywood boeing boeing. john abraham who is so natural in almost all his films is a complete misfit here. if we keep morality factor aside and even then the bizarre events looks trite. akshay kumar and paresh rawal and two experienced stalwarts try hard to lift the film by being natural but in vain. at least and the characters of three girls should be made contrasting in order to bring some interesting elements but sadly here too all of them appears those brainless and buxomed bimbettes (3bs) who talk and behave and even scream in quite similar fashion. the major hole in the plot is what made the protagonist keep the three girls at his same home pretending that they will never get to know about each other. just to do some sex and what else. the same could be done in hundreds of other ways. therefore so much dramabaazi for no reason is not something audience will digest easily. but surely and great flesh show and tempting promos always gives such films a great initial. now for those who call it a situational comedy and i call it a pathetic taste. sense of humor of such cinema going audience is surely gone corrupted and demented to the extent that they are connecting to a sadistic and weird and maddening type of humor and where it is not the characters that they laugh at but rather at themselves and at their own frustrations that look how senseless we have become that in order to laugh we have to bear with such things. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"well and maybe i am just having a bad run with hindi movies lately. i asked the video store guy for apharan (prakash jha) but being a new release and wasn not available yet. so i had to settle for this one. it turned out to be the stupidest hindi movie i have seen (and i have seen quite a few). no wonder bollywood is the laughing stock of the whole world. if imdb had negative ratings and i would give garam masala a 10. i remember seeing a tv show about the jazzy premiere they had for its release in mumbai. all the usual celebs and their sideys showed up. for some strange reason and people expect good stuff from piyadarashan. i did not like hulchul and hungama and or his other films. hulchul and probably dubbed from tamil or telugu and came across as very loud and in your face fare that again do not make much sense except in a bollywood flick. this latest piece of utter cxxp proved that this guy has no brains. who made him a director and even a bollywood director at that. anyhow and to the film now. what starts off as a romantic escapade turns into a non sensical woman hunt. two fashion photographers working for a magazine share an apartment (isn not it similar to no entry where the 2 dudes work for a gossip magazine and share an office. jezuz christ and now theyre copying their own stories. ) well anyways and there some cook or chef that tries to help one of the dodos in his quest for multi lateral love (aka multi tasking plus multi timing). what happened in the end and i have no idea. i switched off mid way. what ridiculous junk. i can not believe they even released it. and how sadistic to wallow in their own filth. for which audience did they make it the poor illiterate indian masses (700 mil at last count) or the well heeled nri desis staying in phoren. either ways it doesn not matter. neither group has any clue what makes a good movie and probably deserves such god awful stuff. its a short review because there nothing to write about but the usual bag of f grade garbage. bollywood should change its name to follywood. and yes and this review is much better than the movie itself. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the priyadarshan or paresh rawal combo has been golden before with the likes of hera pheri and hungama so i went into the movie (at an indian multiplex) with high hopes and especially after the slick promos. unfortunately and like hulchul before it and this movie was a huge disappointment. like others have commented and the premise of the movie and which was already stale to begin with and just gets stretched on and on without any development or additional layering. after a while and you just want the movie to end so you can go home (if i had been watching this at home and it would have been much easier to cut my losses). akshay kumar performance is average at best and john abraham should not try doing comedy again. the comedy aspects of the movie overall were pretty week. i only remember giggling like twice the entire movie. definitely no sidesplitting belly laughs that consumed me in hera pheri or even to a lesser extent in awara paagal deewana. paresh rawal had a few of his expected classic moments and but overall and because his role and character wasn not given much room to grow and he do not make much of an impact in this film. neha dhupia and who makes only an appearance in the movie and was fun to look at while she was on screen. and some of the songs are fun. especially the opening and closing songs of ada and kiss me baby and respectively. otherwise and youre better off just passing on this movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the movie was a huge disappointment. especially since it was directed by priyadarshan and it was sad to see such dismal standards. poor screenplay(almost non existent) and song sequences with bad songs every minute and at the most odd times killed whatever humor the movie could offer. some of the scenes were funny and but it amounted to probably only 5 mins of the whole duration. the editing was pathetic. dismal. overall the movie disappointed as the lack of story was only too evident. in fact only a few people stayed to watch the second half of the movie after the interval. one do not miss anything at all if you do not watch the movie. not worth spending valuable ticket money on this movie. wait till it appears on tv. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"watching that lady in ermine i was wondering what betty grable was doing in a project that seemed to be aimed for marlene dietrich to do. someone over at 20th century fox may have decided one sex symbol is as good as another. darryl f. zanuck should have known better. betty plays a 19th century italian countess whose domain has been invaded by a troop of hungarian hussars captained by douglas fairbanks and jr. her ghostly ancestor whose portrait hangs in the palace hall along with the rest of her distinguished family tree and sees no small resemblance in doug now and another invader some 300 years earlier whom she dealt with when armies failed. besides that the current betty has just been married to cesar romero and the invasion has come at a most inopportune moment and before things have been consummated. that going to give anyone a bad attitude and i guarantee. fresh and wholesome all american betty is not the actress to do seductive and mysterious. marlene dietrich might have put this over and but with betty it falls flatter than yesterday presidential candidate. she and fairbanks have no chemistry at all and though doug is as charming as ever and someone i can watch in anything. frederick hollander and leo robin wrote the score for this film and this is the moment got an oscar nomination for best song. that lady in ermine one chance for oscar glory fell to buttons and bows. ernest lubitsch died midway during the film and otto preminger finished that lady in ermine. i can not believe lubitsch had grable in mind for the lead here. neither will you if you see that lady in ermine. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this miserable film is a remake of a 1927 film. they should have let it remain that way. what a colossal bomb. douglas fairbanks displays absolutely no charisma here. cesar romero is subjected to a role as a real jerk and bette grable sings with a chorus what i will do to that hungarian. the ridiculous plot deals with a picture of a woman in a castle in 1561 rome that saved the day by killing a conqueror. (fairbanks) now and let fast forward to 300 years later and where grable and just married to the count romero and faces a similar situation and when on her wedding night and there is an invasion by hungarian soldiers. romero acts cowardly and flees before the army arrives. he disguises himself as a gypsy and is made to remain at the castle when his violin playing pleases fairbanks. the ending is worse than the entire wretched film when grable meets fairbanks to tell him the good news an enraged romero has annulled the marriage. this poor imitation of a movie was made in 1948. as harry davenport and a veteran supporting player who is in it and died in 1949 while this must have been his last film. what a bomb to go out with after such a distinguished career. walter abel co stars but he can do little with such poor writing. the costumes look more like those that would come out of the stone age. i can not fathom what fairbanks was wearing. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the final film for ernst lubitsch and completed by otto preminger after lubitsch untimely death during production and is a juggling act of sophistication and silliness and romance and music and fantasy and costume dramatics. in a 19th century castle in southeastern europe and a countess falls for her sworn enemy and the leader of the hungarian revolt while she aided by her ancestor and whose painted image magically comes to life. betty grable and in a long blonde wig adorned with flowers and has never been more beautiful and and her songs are very pleasant. unfortunately and this script (by samson raphaelson and taken from an operetta by rudolf schanzer and e. welisch) is awash with different ideas that fail to mesh or entertain. the results are good looking and but unabsorbing. half from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"let me start out by saying that i used to really like betty grable and particularly from down argentine way and but by the time she got around to this disaster and she had also got round and frankly the whole film was an embarrassment. costarred with douglas fairbanks jnr (who must have been fairly desperate) the story was bad and the colours good and and the film far too long. it had some of the old standbys in it like harry davenport and reginald gardiner to try and stimulate interest but with no success. the music score was woeful and and i have to say not one tune was memorable in any way. as i was such a fan of miss grable and i always wish i had never seen this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i get the feeling that the producers of this mess were out to make the most painful and ridiculous western ever made. painful is the best word i can think of to describe it. on the plus side you have nice color photography and beautiful and well spoken rhonda fleming. my sympathy goes to jacques aubuchon (who played the cripple) and who acted well enough in an annoying role and written so atrociously that no actor could give an enjoyable performance. the production values were quite good and which only served to highlight the terrible story and screenplay. things i hated represent stewart granger looked so little like a western figure and what with his british accent and neat tailored outfit and and silly immaculate always white kerchief tied around his neck. it got tiresome the way the townspeople and his son were constantly haranguing and insulting granger and and he never spoke up or replied back. i know we are supposed to suspend disbelief and appreciate westerns as symbolic morality plays and but this one broke the spell with it laughably unrealistic and predictable scenes and the worst being at the end where granger miraculously and speedily and single handedly plants dynamite around a canyon pass that the bad guy cattle will pass through and and then granger plants himself in the perfect spot so he can shoot the dynamite from a very far distance to create rock slides to bury and spook the cattle and bad guys and seemingly destroying them all and save the two main bad guys. next worst is everything about the plot and which is loaded with soap opera scenes. nothing in the movie seemed believable represent i couldn not believe what all the conflict was about. the bad guy was driving his herd through to market and wanted the cows to chew some grass along the way while i do not see why something couldn not have been worked out. you need a land ownership dispute for that. don not bother to see it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a big fan of the old westerns and and do not believe that hollywood is capable of capturing its old glory. but not even ronda fleming and stewart granger can help this 1957 movie which carries nearly all the trite characteristics of westerns of the reformed gunfighter turned good guy. fallen but virtuous woman and bigoted townspeople who must turn to gunfighter for salvation and etc. i can not help but notice the last names of the writer and young actor who plays granger son. any nepotism there. i have seen better acting in high school plays. chill wills plays a cartoon characterization of chill wills. have i reached the 1000 words yet. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"saps at sea aspect ratio represent 1. 37 represent1sound format represent mono(black and white)suffering from hornophobia and ollie embarks on a restful boat trip and but he and stan get mixed up with an escaped convict (rychard cramer). chaos ensues. this feature length comedy an ok entry which nonetheless unspools like a mere imitation of laurel and hardy best work marked the final collaboration between l and h and producer hal roach. episodic in structure and the movie culminates in a memorable ocean voyage after the boys are taken hostage by villainous cramer (who shoots a seagull to prove how tough he is. ). the gags are ok and but inspiration is lacking and perhaps due to the recruitment of actor turned director gordon douglas and previously responsible for ollie first solo effort in the sound era (zenobia and produced in 1939) and but whose work here lacks a measure of pzazz. fair and but nothing special. l and h regulars charlie hall and james finlayson make guest appearances. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"stan laurel and oliver hardy are the most famous comedy duo in history and and deservedly so and so i am happy to see any of their films. basically a man at a horn factory is the fourth to crack and and soon enough ollie cracks with all the horn noises. he is resting at home with stan by his side and needing quiet and and the doctor (james finlayson) phones to say he is coming over to check on ollie. after realising plumbing and electricity is muddled up by a cross eyed repairman and the doctor comes in for a check up and and after some tests and he recommends drinking goat milk and getting some sea air on the ocean. after stan practises some trumpet playing and hanging out the window by the phone cord and a car crash and he and ollie to a dock to rent a boat. they keep the boat on the dock trying to milk a goat and and stan has brought his trumpet. meanwhile and the newspaper front page reads that killer nick grainger escaped convict (richard cramer) has escaped and and he sneaks onto the boys boat while they are sleeping and and the goat chews through the boat rope and drifting out to sea. in the morning and the see their location and and the killer comes out demanding something to eat and and he spots stan and ollie making fake food and e. g. string for spaghetti and soap for cheese and belt for bacon and sponge for meatballs and and he forces them to eat it. when ollie starts choking on something and stan blows his trumpet to help and and ollie rage gets him punching the killer and and it keeps going till the police arrive and only to have ollie rage get them put in prison too. there were the tiniest moments of comedy and but it isn not a great black and white film. well and here another nice mess you have gotten me into. was number 60 on 100 years and 100 quotes and and stan laurel and oliver hardy were number 7 on the comedians comedian. okay. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the twilight zone has achieved a certain mythology about it much like star trek. that because there are many devoted lovers of the show that no matter what think every episode was a winner. they are the ones who score each individual show a 10 and cannot objectively evaluate the show. because of this and a while back i reviewed all the original star trek episodes (the good and the bad) because the overall ratings and reviews were just too positive. now and it time to do the same for the twilight zone. while i have scored many episodes 10 and this one gets a 3 simply because it was bad. the writing was in fact embarrassingly bad. two people from opposing sides in a great war are seen wandering about through the entire episode. after a while and it apparent that they are the only two people left on earth as you learn in the really stupid and totally unconvincing conclusion. usually the twist at the end makes the episode great this one killed it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"firstly i would like to point out that i only know of the show due to my younger sister always watching it. i find it the most annoying program on tv. there is nothing funny about any of the jokes and the canned laughter is unbearable. the show would work much better if filmed in front of a live audience. that way the laughter would show just how unfunny the show is. however i give credit to the acting talents of the young cast. it sickens me however to think that they will look back on the show in the future and see how bad their first tv show was. the show links in well with the overall annoying voices and style of the cbbc presenters. why the youth of today need to be shouted at so much is beyond me. that is all. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
". and how they bore you right out of your mind. the crater lake monster is one of the classic bad films from the 70 made with no actors of any note and an embarrassing script and woeful direction and and a tireless desire to fuse horror with light comedy. this movie introduces a paleontologist who finds drawings of an aquatic dinosaur underneath crater lake. a meteor falls from the sky and and an aquatic dinosaur of the claymation variety begins to terrorize and eat the inhabitants surrounding crater lake. the whole matter is taken care of by steve our local sheriff. much of the film when not showing pools of blood left behind from what we imagine must have been the beast dining is spent following the bumbling antic of two guys named arnie and mitch who run a boat rental place. they try so bad to be funny and that we get lines like and looking at a business sign and mitch saying to arnie you spelled bait wrong and it spelled b a t e. the laughs were rather scarce here. we then see them get drunk together and imagine a tree trunk to be the dinosaur. laurel and hardy watch out. the dinosaur looks fake and but the movie is fun in a bad way. and at the very least and the lake is beautiful. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"don not read this review if you want the shocking conclusion of the crater lake monster to be a total surprisea claymation plesiosaur rises from the depths of crater lake to wreak havoc on a group of local rednecks and not to mention your fast forward button. to call the crater lake monster amateurish is to overstate the obvious. if you aren not a fan of low budget drive in films and you probably do not be looking here in the first place. the problem with the movie is that when there no monster action going on and it really sucks and goes nowhere. the script is very ed wood ish and in that it utterly contrived in the way it sets up the main action sequences. nothing is too outlandish for the crater lake monster. it explains its dinosaur by having a meteor crash into crater lake and uperheating the water to the point where it incubates a dinosaur egg that has apparently been resting at the bottom of the lake for millennia. even if we could accept that the egg could have been lying there for so long and remained uncovered and viable and do not superheating the water to such a high temperature cause most of the lake to evaporate. other than some token fog in one or two scenes and we see no evidence of the water being hot and other than a few lines in the script. the script is padded rather obviously in a few sequences and and it will do anything to get the characters near the lake so that they can be menaced by the claymation dino. a couple just passing through experiences car trouble and while their automobile is being serviced and they decide to rent a boat and head out into crater lake. hmmmm. do you think these strangers in the story could be there so they would run into our title monstrosity. in a sequence that just plain bizarre and a drunk robs a liquor store and decides to murder the cashier and a bystander instead of paying four dollars for a bottle of booze. a car chase ensues and and do not ya know it. they end up right by the lake. snack time for cratey. yeah and it not hard to figure out and and youre so far ahead of the script that youre irritated when it takes another ten minutes for these scenes to unfold. the shamelessness of it all is endearing and and i really want to like the crater lake monster. i just can not do it. there not enough here to go on and and this is more of a movie to put on during a party and because you could talk right over it and it do not matter. the film has a slim list of the things going for it and the most important being the dinosaur itself and which appears in three forms represent a shadow puppet and a large model head that is dragged woodenly through the water and and a fully realized claymation insert that actually looks pretty good. there are also a pair of lovable hicks in it and and they carry the majority of the intentional humor in the movie. a downbeat ending leaves us mourning the death of both the monster and one of our beloved hicks and so every good thing about this film is dead by the end of it. why was i so affected by this conclusion. was it the mournful song played over the closing credits. or was i just weeping inwardly for the time that i waste watching films like this. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"we have a lake. we have an animated meteor crashing. we have a killer stop motion dinosaur with flippers. okay and so let call this movie the crater lake monster. what else can we add. hmm and two idiots called arnie and mitch to define the ultimate definition of comic relief. we also got to have a sheriff who doesn not really do a damn thing in this film and whom nobody listens to. aw crap and were over halfway through the movie and we forgot to insert a bad guy. no worries and let introduce some guy with a moustache and have him rob a store to indicate he a bad guy and then have him pop up somewhere near the lake and have him chased through the woods and all this for the sole purpose of him ending up as dinosaur snack food. that should work. a complete and clumsy mess and this film. its logic will twist your mind to force laughter out of you. the first film to feature dave allen as a stop motion supervisor. after this one and he joined forces with charles band for several years until the the mid nineties and when band ran out of money to pay him and i guess. the dinosaur effects are charming and the whole film is pretty damn unintentionally funny. unfortunately and that about the only good thing that can be said for it. good badness. yes. the mind bending logic in the narrative should be enough reason to put it on the list. if not and arnie and mitch will do the trick. negative and positive . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"well and what are the odds. at the exact right moment that a few redneck amateur scientists discover cave paintings indicating that some type of dinosaur monster might have inhabited the area thousands of years ago and a burning meteor crashes into the lake and spontaneously hatches a monster egg that has been lying there
for over a thousand years and i suppose. the crater lake monster is a movie that literally must be seen to be believed and but you better do so in the company of many friends and a pile of ganja in order to make the wholesome a little bit easier to digest. yes and this is a terrible film with the utmost ramshackle screenplay imaginable and numerous irrelevant padding interludes that are downright embarrassing and but it also irresistibly charming and so clumsily put together that you simply have to cherish some kind of fondness for it. half of the film at least revolves on the wacky adventures of arnie and mitch. these two local yokels own and run a boat renting shop near the lake and but spend most of their days picking their noses and quarreling over fascinating stuff like to spell the word bait. it is mostly during their prototypic laurel and hardy situations that new puddles of blood or decapitated heads are discovered in the lake. steve hanson and the heroic but not exactly sharp sheriff is on the case and but only if he not too busy chasing big city thugs traveling through the area. halfway through the film and there suddenly is an abrupt scene about a thug robbing a liquor store and killing two people in the process. this textbook wtf moment appears to take on the complete other side of the country and like in new york city or something and and has absolutely nothing to do with the events going on at crater lake. only like twenty minutes later the robber pops up again in hicksville and there an exhilarating chase through the woods and ending in the dino hungry muzzle. the absurd little details in the crater lake monster are too numerous to mention. for example and this is probably the only creature feature in which the players discover the obligatory gigantic footprint after they already spotted the actual monster. the goofs in continuity should be legendary as far as i am concerned. it like everybody forgot to pay attention to it. night turns into twilight into day and back into twilight
all during one and the same diurnal course. the monster is undeniably the best aspect about the film and especially since it accomplished through good old fashioned and adorable stop motion effects. the cute critter is a plesiosaur while meaning an aquatic dinosaur looking like a crossbreed between denver the last dinosaur and an alligator. crater lake monster is a unique and unforgettable movie experience that i can only encourage to track down. the miserable negative rating is just out of principle (and because basically and this is a very bad film) should be put into perspective and because i might as well could have given it positive for sheer entertainment value. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
" the movie opens with a meteor crashing into a lake. unbeknownst to the locals and a dinosaur egg is also at the bottom of the lake. the meteor heats the lake and turning it into a giant incubator. you guessed it and the egg hatches releasing a dinosaur that proceeds to terrorize the community. what utter garbage. it not that i mind the stop motion clay dinosaur and it everything else about the movie that bothers me. the acting is atrocious. the dialogue is utterly ridiculous. the comic relief is anything but comic. logic is non existent. any similarity between the scientists in this movie and an actual scientist is purely coincidental. i could go on for an eternity on the bad aspects of this movie and but you get the idea. i feel it fairly safe to call this disaster mst3k worthy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
". and it is this film. i imagine that if indeed there is a negative afterlife and damned souls are tied to a rather uncomfortable couch and forced to watch this movie on a continuous loop for all eternity. okay and maybe it not that bad and but it is probably the worst film i have ever seen next to manos and the hands of fate. and i have seen a lot of bad movies and believe you me. this is just a crummy b movie and bad film making at it finest(or is it worst. ) the thing i really do not like about this movie is the moronic duo they threw in for comedy relief. now and a little comedy relief is a good thing and but most of the movie is focused on the adventures of these two morons and rather than on the heroes of this film and who are actually in it for less time than them. to be fair and crown international really destroyed the movie by adding bad music and doing a poor job editing. but honestly and this was probably a bad film to begin with and so crown really couldn not have done that much to hurt it. this really needs to be in the bottom 100 list. i do not wish this one on my worst enemy. actually and it my kind of campy b movie. it was bad and but i still liked it and despite my one star rating. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"man and what a scam this turned out to be. not because it wasn not any good (as i wasn not really expecting anything from it) but because i was misled by the dvd sleeve which ignorantly paraded its stars as being stuart whitman and stella stevens and tony bill. sure enough and their names did not appear in the film opening credits and much less themselves in the rest of it. as it turned out and the only movie which connects those three actors together is the equally obscure las vegas lady (1975) but what that one has to do with the crater lake monster is anybody guess
even so and since i paid $1. 50 for its rental and i was in a monster movie mood anyhow and i elected to watch the movie regardless and and yup and it stunk. apart from the fact that it had a no name cast and an anonymous crew and an unmistakably amateurish air was visible from miles away and the most i could do with it is laugh at the jaws like pretensions and and intentionally so and at the resistible antics of two moronic layabouts cum boat owners who frequently squabble among themselves with the bemused local sheriff looking on. the creature itself a plesiosaur i. e. half dinosaur or half fish is imperfectly realized (naturally) but and as had been the case with the giant claw (1957) which i have also just seen and this do not seem to bother the film makers none as they flaunt it as much as they can and especially during the movie second half. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is one of the worst movies i have ever seen it extremely boring with lots of boring dialog and has some very annoying characters and a laughable looking creature. the only reason i watched this piece of garbage is because it was on that 8 disc horror set i got. the plot is preposterous and totally stupid as is the finale. no blood what so ever except a few bloody marks on the creature and and a couple of bloody gunshot wounds. the acting is terrible. richard cardella is terrible as the sheriff and was quite laughable plus his character is annoying. glen roberts is the comic relief and was not funny at all. mark siegel is extremely annoying and was also not funny. bob hyman is decent but not much more then that. richard garrison is annoying and had no chemistry with kacey cobb what so ever. kacey cobb is so so here and had no chemistry with richard. overall avoid this piece of garbage at all costs. bomb out of 5. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a meteor hit crater lake (hence our title) and awakening a plesiosaur and who proceed to snack on the hick population (in california and that hick capital of the world. ) there bad movies and and then there the crater lake monster and which somehow managed to escape mst3k. featuring grating acting and a decent stop motion beast and and more and this is a dreadful piece of 1970 low budget exploitation or monster movie dreck. while the movie is guilty of many crimes and the biggest one is arnie and mitch and two obnoxious rednecks who serve as our comic relief. they bumble around and fight to stock banjo music and ogle women and and act like pathetic excuses of humanity. the characters are so bad and they should count as a crime against humanity. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a handful of nonprofessional actors are terrorized by a prehistoric creature. this creature appears in about thirty seconds of marginal stop motion animation and but oh how you will long for that margin when for the rest of the movie the animation is replaced by production assistants waving around an inner tube with teeth. no time for terror when this movie is hijacked halfway through by these comic relief boat rental doofuses and who suddenly become the lead characters while but again you gotta admit watching them try to be funny is better than plodding around after the sheriff. only at the end one of them gets eaten and the other one is left sitting on a rock crying tears of loneliness that no fun. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the crater lake monster is easily one of the most awful and amateurish film i have ever seen ranking right up there with manos and the hands of fate in terms of poor acting and useless direction and and kindergarten level production values. in this movie a silly looking claymation or stop motion animated dinosaur wakes up after a meteor hits a lake in bumblebum and ca and and begins dining on the local hayseeds. in the thrilling climax and the creature and described by one local as a giant alligator with flippers and drags it ponderous bulk over the ground to chase its would be lunch and before a bulldozer bumps it a couple of times and it dies from boredom. every character in this moovie is a complete moron. one pointless subplot shows a hick go into a liquor store to purchase a $4. 75 pint of ripple while instead of simply buying the bottle and the idiot shoots the cashier and another bystander and shoots at a cop and gets chased towards the lake and all so that he can eaten by the monster. unfortunate close ups of the monster reveal it to be nothing more than a piece of styrofoam. there a fake magician struggling with a phony british accent (to make him seem more legit) and two overly bumbling redneck boat renters and some cheesy pre historic cave art done in crayon and and annoying banjo pickin background moosic. in one painful scene and the fake magician and his dopey wife or girlfriend or accomplice manage to pad the movie an extra 4 minutes by cowmenting on how may stars they can see in the night sky and even though it is clearly day time still. even on constant fast forward and this moovie hurts and and hurts bad. moocow says call the fumigators and cause this cow pie really stinks. represent equals 8p. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have read a few books about bonnie and clyde and and this is definitely more accurate than the beatty or dunaway version and in that its costumes and locales echo actual photographs taken of the gang. particularly well done is the death of buck barrow and and the capture of his wife blanche. this actress looks looks exactly like the photographs taken that day of blanche grieving over her dying husband. however and this movie is still hollywood and and our anti heroes stay pretty to the end and even after being shot full of holes (in life and bonnie was badly burned in an auto accident the year before their famous ambush and and did not look like a perky cheerleader at the time of her death). the script is tedious and and the acting is poor and particularly the leads. very disappointing. stick with beatty and dunaway. their may not be the true story and but it a great film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"here we have 2 misunderstood kids who never stood a chance against a cruel and poverty riddled existence represent robin hoods singled out by the police for persecution because they were a trifle wild at times. gad. according to this crap bonnie was the sweetest little thing west of the missouri who was taught to be a psychopathic murderer by a fun loving boyfriend who do not really want to hurt anybody. he just wanted things without putting a lot of energy into getting them. badly acted and poorly filmed and unbelievable dialogue and unrealistic use of weaponry and gore that looked more like grape jelly than the real thing. avoid this bilgewater. thumbs down. 5 stars. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"even though this was a made for tv production and there absolutely no excuse for the rock bottom results of the finished product. this movie did have a budget and it had a casting department and so and if youre going to make a movie about a true life story and and actually put the true story in the title and shouldn not some effort be put forward to try and capture some realism . first of all and this movie is absurdly cast. these actors belong in daytime television soaps and or in those ridiculous lifetime channel movies and and not in a real life gangster or criminal tale. everything about them and from their looks to their mannerisms and just screams of the 90 shopping mall alt rock listening generation. what about the script . two words describes it stupid and insulting and and again it way too 90ish sounding. i do not think the real clyde barrow ever uttered the words i am outta here. it as if a bunch of new kids on the block fans got together and decided to make a really kewl flick about bonnie and clyde and you know and one that would be totally rad and rockin. well and this sticker doesn not even rank on the rad and rockin scale. everything that can be wrong with any kind of film is wrong here and from the casting and acting to the editing and music. every single thing is grossly wrong. and it infuriating that the parties responsible for this atrocious turkey had the nerve to put the true story in the title. it certainly not the true story and but even worse and it not even remotely entertaining as a mindless popcorn flick that accepted on its own terms. like i stated in my heading and it simply horrible beyond words and on every level imaginable. trust me on this and or watch at your own risk. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"while it contains facts that are not widely reported and it is not exactly the truth. they took a lot of liberties in rearranging events and excluding people and and using sets that do not meet the facts of their lives in the 30 . there were more than just bonnie and clyde and and w. d. in the gang at various times and and those people had as much to do with the facts as those included. buck and blanche went to convince clyde to go straight much earlier than the one shootout and and in fact got drawn back into crime. some of the events that were portrayed in daylight actually took place at night. bonnie wound was much more severe and never healed right. it was so bad she had to be carried around by someone until it healed up and and even then it stiffened up so she walked stiffly. clyde also walked with a limp because while in prison he cut off a big toe. i know and i am being nit picky and and it was a tv movie and but even without these factual errors in this true story and the movie moves too fast from event to event and comes across more as several separate snapshots of their lives and rather than being a cohesive flowing story. i would recommend reading a book or seeing a documentary if you want to get closer to the truth. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"once again a film classic has been pointlessly remade with predictably disastrous results. the title is false as is everything about this film. the period is not persuasively rendered and and the leads seem way too young and too vapid to even be criminals. arthur penn film had style and humor and a point of view and and was made by talented people. even if the 1967 version do not exist this would still be an unnecessary film. the 1967 version strayed from the facts and presented a glamorized version of bonnie and clyde and but it was exciting and and innovative for 1967 and and it had some outstanding performances that allowed you to care. this 1992 remake seems culled from the original film rather than the truth as known and the actors in this version are callow and unappealing and and not the least bit interesting. by all means skip this one and hope the 2010 version will be better. could it possibly be worse. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if you haven not seen zombie bloodbath and you haven not. a contest like amake your own horror movie in one day could not possibly come up with a entry than this outrage of an insult on any viewer intelligence. mr. sheets forgot a story and a plot and proper dialog and the fact that people need some basic acting talents and the credited lighting designer obviously forgot to show up. it seems to be recorded on the crummiest of handycams and and copied on even worse equipment. make up effect consist of black mascara for the zombies and yoghurt being poured over people heads in order to simulate their skin melting. this is nothing more than a home movie and and a really bad one as well. only fun to watch for the friends and familymembers and neighbours that were willing to show up for the filming. i cannot for the life of me understand why this mockery of a product is listed in any serious film magazine or website i have home movies of wedding parties that are way better and more interesting. a total waste of time and money and energy. the sequel zombie bloodbath ii is just more of the same rubbish. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if todd sheets were to come out and admit that this movie was intended to spoof the zombie genre and i would change my rating to an eight. try to imagine a movie where every scene and line and and even every acting nuance was designed to be a parody. i could probably crap out alphabet soup and rearrange what was left of the letters and and still have a better script. two scenes in particular come to mind when i think of this movie. spoiler alert. one is when mike dad and the other dad walk and i repeat walk down a staircase jam packed with zombies. this is a small staircase and even though they brush up against the flailing undead and nothing happens to them. when they reach the end and the ex marine turns around and says god youre a horny bastard and and shoots only one. the other is in the military complex. the girl stabs a zombie with a machete and is immediately surrounded. the camera moves around her for roughly forty seconds and while she is surrounded by zombies at an arm length away. she then almost casually runs out from the crowd and joins the other humans. spoiler alert over. these scenes must be seen to be believed. still and i enjoy this movie as much as almost any comedy just because it so damn funny. kudos to todd sheets for getting so many people in his movie and having the drive to make it but not really for anything else. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"well and i bought the zombie bloodbath trilogy thinking it would be mindless gory fun. that what it is and without the fun. this film truly is mindless and it is absent of any plot or character development and or any sort of storyline. the basic problem with this movie is the kills and gore. basically and every kill looks exactly the same. zombies ripping someone apart. yeah and that okay and but you need some original kills too. i mean it got really lame and every kill looked exactly the same and filmed exactly the same way. thats what killed me. i love gore and and the gore in this film did nothing for me. it was just boring. no storyline and just the same lame scene over and over again with a different person. i wanted to like this movie and too. i love shot on video gore movies. like redneck zombies. but i couldn not kid myself. this film has it good points and but none of those are in the film. i understand that many of the zombies helped out with the flood and there were like over 100 zombies and which is pretty cool how they got so many people involved and helped out in the world. but overall and this is a terrible film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"every once in a while and a group of friends and with a minimal budget but bags of enthusiasm and talent and will create a low budget masterpiece that takes the world of horror by storm. raimi and co. did it with the evil dead and jackson and pals succeeded with bad taste while and myrick and sanchez made a mint with the blair witch project. director todd sheets and his chums and however and are destined to wallow forever in relative obscurity if zombie bloodbath is anything to go by. a lesson in how not to make a cheapo horror and this miserable effort (about a plague of flesh eating zombiesnatch) serves as a reminder that and whilst many people these days have access to a video camera and most shouldn not take that as their cue to try their hand at making a full length movie. it not that sheets hasn not got an eye for a nicely framed shot (some of his camera angles and movements are actually pretty good) and but rather that a) he has a lousy script b) he has a lousy cast and and c) he doesn not realise that he has a lousy script and cast. which means that the final film is amateurish in the extreme and and unlikely to be watched in its entirety by anyone other than zombie film completists (like me) or members of the cast and crew (like those who have given the film favourable comments). zombie bloodbath is obviously aimed at undiscriminating gore hounds and and sheets (who currently has an incredible 34 titles under his belt as a director) certainly goes out of his way to please and with buckets of offal and blood thrown about at every opportunity. but whilst these moments are undeniably yucky and they aren not particularly convincing and and soon get rather tedious. so and to summarise and this is a really bad film and with almost no redeeming features. except for two representfirstly and it features the single greatest mullet in the history of film and as sported by jerry angell and who plays larry (as well as several zombies). the magnificence of his barnet (coupled with a fetching moustache) is reason alone to watch this film. secondly and it has pathetic stealth zombies represent flesh eating corpses that lie in wait for unfortunate victims to wander by and before leaping from their hiding place to launch a feeble attack and which requires almost no effort to escape from. best known for lurking behind a door for hours waiting for someone to open it and pathetic stealth zombies also occasionally hide behind low walls and or sit in churches posing as members of the congregation. normally a film this bad would get negative for me and but and in celebration of jerry angell flowing locks and i will generously raise my rating to negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i got myself a copy of this film thinking it was the 1964 film with zombie bloodbath as one of it alternative titles. perversely and this film actually has a better rating on this site than the aforementioned title while which may mean that the other one is really bad. this film is pretty bad too while obviously you cant go into a film that calls itself zombie bloodbath and expect to see a masterpiece and and in fairness it does live up to the title with the amount of gore on display. but it all feels very old and tired and which isn not helped by the atrocious acting and stupid plot line. it just your average nuclear spill causing people to turn into zombies etc etc. the film kicks off with a sequence that sees people melting and that pretty much lets you know what youre in for while low quality zombie garbage. there plenty of gore in the film and and it a real good job otherwise the film would have been really boring. zombie bloodbath looks really cheap too and and was clearly put together by inexperienced filmmakers. the main influence seemed to be romero superior day of the dead and although it could really be just about anything that features zombies and gore. it all boils down to a typically predictable and pointless ending and overall i can not say i was impressed with it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ok and i really do not have too much to say about this film and other than this represent i have seen over 4 and 000 films in my life and and more than 2 and 300 of those were horror films. while i have some difficulty deciding which is the best (as opposed to my favourite and which i can tell you is george a. romero dawn of the dead) and i can tell you without the slightest hesitation that todd sheets zombie bloodbath is the absolute worst horror film i have ever seen. there is simply nothing positive i can say about this film. the acting and the dialogue and the directing and the make up and the music. every aspect of this film is simply so far below what is acceptable that it boggles my mind that this was ever even released. even if you are a horror or zombie movie completist and please heed my warning and do not waste your time on this garbage. there is no pleasure to be gotten from viewing this. you would not even get any laughs out of the utter ineptitude on display. trust me. please. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"and a 30 and 000$ budget and this movie still looks like it was made for 50$. you can tell from the first frame to the last that he do not care one bit about the movies continuity or plot and he was just happy to be making a zombie movie. what the end result shows is a lazy film maker who loves zombie movies. it could have been great if he just had of given a care. the end result is endless zoom ins on poorly done gore and and even more poorly produced metal plays over it. what happens when you combine high hopes and big dreams and a decent budget and hard work and and one idiot behind the camera. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"wow and this was a very bad movie. as read in other comments this movie has no plot and no character development and they possibly had some kind of script but it difficult to tell based on the actual end result. the editing of this movie was really non existent and it tends to jump from scene to scene without any connection or anything to assist the viewer in determining what is actually happening. all in all this is simply a low budget zombie flick that was not thought out at all and has bad acting and bad dialogue and bad everything. the only thing that saves this movie from a 1 or 2 is the gore factor and i think this must be where they spent whatever money they had to try to justify making this. unless you are (like me) dedicated to finding and watching all the zombie flicks you can find and do not watch this. period. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a terrible amateur movie director (no and not todd sheets) and his new friend and sister explore a cave. the friend and sister fall in and get rescued. meanwhile a gang of horribly acted girls are defending their turf. whatever the heck that means. this film and i use the term very loosely is so bad that it . well bad. the humor is painfully unfunny and the action merely sad. now i have seen some atrociously awful horror films in my time and failed to grow jaded in my approach to watching low budget films and yet i still weep openly for anyone who choose to sit through this. only for the most hardened maschocists amongst you. but the rest run away fast. my grade represent f. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"you do not expect a movie like this to be good and and it isn not. it a no budget and ultra violent zombie movie filmed with a bad looking hand held camera. and it hilarious. the actors obviously have never acted before and it shows in their terrible hilarious readings. there is no plot to be seen. the little plot i could find seemed to be that a government experiment escaped and a group of zombie seems to be terrorizing a couple families. the gore effects are actually some of the most sickening i have ever seen. it seems the gore effects people raided a butcher shop for all the body parts and and many scenes involve zombies dismembering people and eating their organs. it a funny and sickening film and and it about as bad as you can get in terms of any movie. my rating represent bomb or . 90 mins. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a vietnam vet decides to take over a backwater town run amok and and anyone who steps in his path is eliminated (including women). released to theaters just prior to a star is born and which turned his career around and this action drama mishmash starring kris kristofferson is wildly off kilter and thoughtless and mean spirited. filmed in simi valley and ca and the results are truly unseemly and with redneck clichés and mindless violence making up most of director george armitage script. armitage has gathered a most curious 70s cast for his film and including jan michael vincent and victoria principal and bernadette peters and and and in a bit and loni anderson while however and the center of the whole thing is kristofferson and who is gruff and rude throughout. it deserves points i suppose for being a completely unsympathetic drive in thriller and but the bad vibes (and the ridiculous climax) coat the whole project like an ugly stain. half from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"let be honest here represent the only reason anyone bought this and the only reason anyone reviewed this and and the only reason anyone could possibly claim to enjoy this is because david lynch made it and because you want to have david lynch children. but guess what. even david lynch can produce a piece of crap. maybe lynch wanted you to transcend normality and experience absurdity in itself as a pure subject of knowing. maybe the atrocious and cacophonist sounds and and chicken scratch visuals are supposed to imply something about humanity place in the world and about our relation to the real and about the absurdity of it all. instead and it just says one thing to me represent i just lost $20. if i wanted offensive for the sake of offensive and i could crank hansen on high and let me ears bleed. if i wanted absurd for the sake of absurd and i could just take a dump on a plate and watch that for 33 minutes. there is a single redeeming quality to dumbland it is meta and meta funny. that is and it is so bad that it isn not even funny because it so bad. this fact and however and is a little funny. if you hate yourself and hate your money and then buy dumbland. if not and spare yourself the agony. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"david lynch crude and crudely drawn take on south park presents us with a nightmare of disturbing clichés about suburban middle class families. the father is a hideous monster with three teeth and a disproportionately large circular mouth hole from which are uttered the most horrendous guttural noises and the son and mother are permanently horrified and incoherent creatures for whom terror is a way of life. a number of equally absurd characters are introduced throughout the series. lynch is not famous for his comedies (i. e. on the air and aspects of wild at heart) and and i am not particularly fond of comedies in general. however and there were a couple of scenes in dumbland which made me laugh out loud. there are some clever bits of animated cinematography where lynch conveys wide ranges of reaction in his characters through a syntactical arrangement of shots as opposed to facial expressions (which never really vary in dumbland). i believe lynch was really trying to give his audience a straight forward and if disturbing and animated comedy here. interestingly and he chose to follow in the footsteps of the recent wave of ultra low brow humor (i. e. most will farrell films) while adding elements of vicious social critique and classic cartoon violence and gross out humor. while the blend doesn not really work very well here and it is nothing if not lynchian. worth seeing by lynch fans. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in film and i feel as though it should be more than just art. i think it should be more than that and a way to tell a story on screen. this short from david lynch tells a story but not much of one. i felt that it was funny but too bizarre to be a comedy. it is good film making but there really isn not anything else to it. as i have said before and i am a huge david lynch fan but i get frustrated by some of his work because i do not see a need for it at all. this is definitely my least favorite thing he has done so far but i know he still got a ton of talent and i am excited to see what he has in store for us in the future. if you like lynch and check this out but do not be surprised when you do not like it very much. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am somewhat of a fan of lynche work and so i was excited when i found this dvd. unfortunately and i was very let down. it a series of short cartoons which attempt to show a disturbing and disgusting sort of humor. the animation is very crude and no doubt done using macromedia. each cartoon has a big fat guy beating up his family and generally acting like a jerk to everyone he knows. for people who are not familiar with this vein of animation and they will probably be somewhat impressed by it. however and if you have spent much time on newgrounds. com and like me and then these cartoons will be no different than any of the other stuff you have seen before. many of the popular amateur artists on newgrounds are doing much better work than what was shown on this dvd. if lynch submitted this work to the website and then he would blend in perfectly with some of the better of newgrounds artists. but and since i saw this on dvd and instead of on newgrounds and i give it a negative and instead of a positive and as i would have otherwise. these cartoons are fit for the internet and but with a name like david lynch on it and i expected better quality both in story and in animation. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"lynch. the man has some really great stuff. he knows how to disturb us and then reward us by getting us think in different ways. this and however and is altogether different. dumbland reward is 1% absurd comedy and earned by enduring 99% stupidity. i may have laughed once and but somewhere around episode 4 i just started watching on fast forward. didn not miss a thing. i felt relieved when it ended and and that part of the point with this series. it an annoying series about annoying characters in annoying situations and rounded out with annoying animation and voices and sound. but recognizing this and its other absurdist qualities still fails to make dumbland worthwhile. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a great fan of david lynch and have everything that he made on dvd except for hotel room and the 2 hour twin peaks movie. so and when i found out about this and i immediately grabbed it and. and. what is this. it a bunch of crudely drawn black and white cartoons that are loud and foul mouthed and unfunny. maybe i do not know what good and but maybe this is just a bunch of crap that was foisted on the public under the name of david lynch to make a few bucks and too. let me make it clear that i do not care about the foul language part but had to keep adjusting the sound because my neighbors might have. all in all this is a highly disappointing release and may well have just been left in the deluxe box set as a curiosity. i highly recommend you do not spend your money on this. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i hate to throw out lines like this and but in this case i feel like i have to represent the american remake of the grudge is by far the worst film i have seen in theaters in the last 5 years. there and i said it. and now that i have gotten that out of my system and please let me explain why. when someone dies in the grip of a powerful rage and a curse is born. the curse gathers in that place of death. those who encounter it will be consumed by its fury. that is the premise of the grudge and i will admit it sounds intriguing. unfortunately and the filmmakers take it no further. those who encounter the curse are indeed consumed by its fury and that is all you get. you want more. well too bad. some critics and fans are pointing out that the sole purpose of the grudge is to scare you. the problem is that when there is no plot to speak of and creepy images and sounds can only go so far. director takashi shimizu and pulling a george sluizer and remaking his own original film(s) and valiantly attempts to build atmosphere in the first hour by repeating the same scene over and over and over and over. it pretty much unfolds like this represent person walks into house something flashes by the camera and or or a strange sound is heard person goes to investigate sound starts to get loud person sees a ghost loud scream and or or cat screech cut to blackbefore the audience is even given a hint of plot and this exact same scenario unfolds 5 times in the first hour. the first time was actually somewhat creepy. each subsequent use became laughable as the film went on. by the time the end of the film rolled around and my friend and i were laughingly wondering if this scene would end with a loud scream and a cut to black. we were never proved wrong. the film has no liner storyline and instead unfolding in a series of vignettes that leave the audience jumbled. i have no problem with non linear storytelling when it is done right. the film jumps from time period to time period with no rhyme or reason. i haven not seen a movie in such a state since the opening of the theatrical version of highlander 2. and this storytelling technique mars any sort of mystery that film could have possibly had. if you already know the ghosts have scared two characters to death and how is it shocking when their bodies are found in the attic. and why should we care when a detective tries to investigate the mysterious disappearances when we already know what happened to everyone. obviously greenlit the second the american version of the ring made $15 million its first weekend and the grudge is nothing but calculated imitation disguised as an actual movie. the scariest things about the grudge are that it made $40 million dollars its first weekend and some people consider it the scariest movie ever made. i wonder what happens to those who get consumed by the fury of paying to see the grudge. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ok when i saw the previews for this movie i thought it looked really scary and was quite excited to see it as were the group i was with. now living in america especially during this election i see some very deceiving things but i have to say these previews were towards the top of list. i do not see how so many people could be scared by this movie. i only really noticed two real jump scenes and only jumped at one. the whole movie was extremely predictable and perhaps that messed up some of the jump scenes for me. as for the sound effects so many to be so frightened of i thought they were comical at best. oh and the uhh catboy where did that come from and why. the worst noise in the whole movie had to be the weird groaning. how does that scare someone. i can make that noise easily. now do not get me wrong i have always loved all those really bad scary movies that your just laughing the whole way through but i do not even think this one had that going for it it was just plain out bad. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie may seem scary on commercials and but the actual movie was a reason to vomit. this is a below below average and (even lower than that) and has no plot. i mean every house can make you feel scared and sure and a dead japanese woman would scare the poop out of you and but so what. make a movie that would appeal to watchers and not just show images of scared people and some hair (dead japanese woman). can you say horrible rip off of samara (the ring). don not get me started with the dead child. not even that scary. so what. he has a cat and he can imitate it and big freaking deal. just bury the poor zombies and save some lives that have the potential of being harmed by the grudge. negative . yuck. >. <. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"my husband and i went to see this movie and being the horror movie buffs that we are. two hours later i found myself wanting both my money and time back. i was so disappointed. the teasers for this film basically contained the best points of the film. there was nothing very scary about the film other than good timing on surprise entrances and etc. i found most of the cary parts to be more comical than anything. after viewing other movies based on the works of japanese writers and i have to conclude that what is deemed frightening in japan is not what is frightening here in the us. my advice represent if you are a fan of true horror movies and save yourself the pain of sitting through this one. i can not really say that i would recommend renting it either and unless you have a free rental coming to you. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"okay and if you have seen the ring and you have basically seen the grudge. it trying to be scary by just having freaky camera work and loud sounds and but it fails miserably. the plot and if you can call it that and is weak and rather full of holes and for instance and how would the care center have known that yoko do not show up for work when the people who lived in the house were not there. and it not really clear what bill pullman character had to do with anything. he just kind of came out of nowhere to advance the plot. it do not make a lot of sense what happened to the original family. who was hanging in the room and the little boy or the dad. and was yoko alive or dead when the care center guy found her. there were too many unanswered questions and i was too bored to think about it more. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is really nothing besides an admittedly well crafted series of tense sequences punctuated with an inevitable gotcha. at the end of each. really and there is no character development and no real plot to speak of. there are only the most skeletal of motivations for the characters to do anything while they trudge forward to their unavoidable dooms. it all just an excuse to show a creepy ghost kid (who seems to have gotten some of the family cat mixed up in his ectoplasm) and his ghost mom (with long black hair hanging in her face kind of like the ring) take down a bunch of cardboard cut out and two dimensional excuses for human characters. this english language version of the grudge is the equivalent of cinematic junk food while satisfying momentarily and but not really what you ought to be living on. not recommended. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie was horrible. i could barely stay awake through it. i would never see this movie again if i were payed to. the so called horror scenes in it were increadably predictable and over played. there was really nothing about this movie that would have made it original or worth the $7. 50 i payed to see it. don not go see it and do not rent it and do not read about it online because any of these things would be a complete waste of your time. sarah michelle geller gave a lackluster performance and really should be ashamed of herself for sullying her good name with this movie. shame on you sarah for being associated with this horrible and horrible movie. horrible movie and no need to ever see it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"wow and what a total let down. the fact people think this film is scary is ridiculous. the special effects were a direct rip off of the ring. the story. was there one. not in my opinion. just a bunch of flashy imaging. the entire film was a boring and stupid and mess. i guess there is always a market for bad films with good marketing campaigns. however and this is the worst horror film i have seen in years. and that buffy chick. well and she a bad actress. as plastic as barbie and just as talented. no and wait and that would be an insult to the talents of barbie. i suppose many kiddies helped this film at the box office as it was pg 13 and and had it been rated r and it would have bombed imo. stupid movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"gee and what a crappy movie this was. i cannot understand what people find so scary about the grudge. the director plays one trick (i would have to admit a very good one and that is brought to life very stylized) and then he repeats it for the rest of the movie over and over again. as a consequence i startled a few times in the first quarter of the movie and but once i knew the drill i practically fell asleep as the grudge grew more and more predictable by the minute. to conclude and i can say that there are a lot better movies in the genre to begin with and that the so called predecessor the ring was way scarier and that buying a ticket for the grudge is a waste of money. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if you go see this movie you will be holding a grudge against the movie theatre and the director and the producer and the actors and the person that told you to go see it. shame on you and sarah michelle geller and for putting your name and face to this poor excuse of a movie. it may have been more scary if the japanese actors would have just spoken in japanese instead of attempting to act in english. i wanted to boo when the movie ended. a true disappointment after all of the hype on tv and movie trailers promoting this lame money maker. sarah michelle really do not have to act at all to make this movie. she just practiced her frowning skills. don not waste your time or money on this film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"imagine that you are asked by your date what movie you wanted to see and and you remember seeing a rather intriguing trailer about the grudge. so and in good faith and you recommend seeing that movie. it is the halloween season and after all. and it did boffo box office this past weekend and so it must be pretty good. so you go. and youre actually in a state of shock when the movie ends the way it does and and you hear yourself audibly saying and that can not be the end of the movie. but and alas and it is. and imagine coming out of the movie theater being embarrassed and ashamed for recommending such a dog of a movie. you think that your date thinks youre a bonehead for suggesting such an atrocity and and your suggestion will certainly end a promising relationship. actually and it was so bad that both of us cracked up laughing at how bad it was. i see no future for miss gellar in the movies and and suggest that she sticks to television in the future. actually and it would not be long before she is consigned to flea market conventions selling buffy memorabilia and and it can not happen soon enough and if you ask me. horrible and horrible and horrible. the plot do not make sense while continuity was terrible. it apparent that the whole ending was contrived to have a grudge ii the return of cat boy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"all the kids aged from 14 16 want to see this movie (although you are only allowed at 18). they have heard it is a very scary movie and they feel so cool when they watched it. i feel very sad kids can not see what a good movie is and and what a bad movie is. this was one of the worst movies i saw in months. every scene you see in this movie is a copy from another movie. and the end. it an open ending. why. because it is impossible to come up with a decent en for such a stupid story. this movie is just made to make you scared and and if you are a bit smart and know some about music and you exactly know when you will be scared. when the movie was finished and i turned to my friend and told (a bit to loud) him that this was a total waste of money and some stupid kid looked strange at me. these day i could make an oscar with a home video of my goldfish and if only i use the right marketing. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"spoilersspoilersspoilersspoilersthere are bad movies and then there are movies which are so awful that they become affectionately comical in their ineptness. such is the case with columbia pictures the grudge. this cinematic atrocity began when an otherwise well intentioned american saw a japanese made for tv film ju on and was inspired to remake the movie in english. this began a virtual tsunami of bad decisions which circumnavigated the globe until it washed ashore in orlando on october 21 and 2004. the premise and and i use the word loosely and involves a house in tokyo haunted by a skinny momma ghost who looks like a cross between margaret cho and alanis morrisette and along with her ghastly sidekick a chubby and rambunctious but evil second grader. is there anything scarier than a creepy 8 year old japanese boy. sure there is. count chocula comes to mind. with this whimsical bunch we must add a mysterious black cat who i have affectionately named chim chim. (remember speed racer. ) as you have already guessed and they were murdered in this domicile of doom and now desire to kill everyone who enters the premises. you see and as explained by a japanese detective and when someone dies in a rage their ghost seeks revenge on everyone who steps on the property lines as defined by the county commissioner or something like that and i forget. the story begins innocently enough with acclaimed thespian bill pullman leaping to his death from a balcony. my guess is bill pullman got this job because of his kids begged him for a trip to tokyo disneyland. next we endure the mildly interesting saga of nurse yoko and oh no do not go in there screams the audience and but alas she heeds not the dire warnings and is predictably snuffed out like a magic lantern. about 30 minutes into the movie we finally see its american heroine sarah michelle gellar as karen. sarah michelle gellar might be a competent actress but i could not help thinking of buffy the vampire slayer and so much so that it was distracting. it is the equivalent to having jennifer anniston star in a movie about the adventures of six friends in new york. try as you may and you just can not stop thinking about the other project which made her famous. but i digress and karen and the nurse is hired as a replacement for the original care giver who disappeared at spooks r us. she snoops around and meets the ghosts and coma lady dies and and some other stuff happens. watching the fair haired vixen searching for clues i half expected her to find the ghost and pull its mask off to reveal it was actually old man gower who owned the abandoned amusement park. i would have gotten away with it too if it weren not for you meddling kids and that dog of yours. director takashi shimizu and who is vying to be the ed wood of asia and made two unfortunate decisions involving sound. first and he choose to use a soundtrack only when someone is about to be killed. this is an excellent devise for obliterating any suspense because the audience gets a two minute warning to prepare for another miserably predictable murder. second and he gave the ghosts a bizarre guttural noise that sounds like a gargling gopher. after the movie and i heard several people exiting the theatre making the sound and laughing. sarah michelle gellar ends up being the sole survivor. and of course we learn that the fire she set to burn down the house was extinguished in time for the obligatory next chapter. however and considering the humorous reactions of the audience and they did not want a sequel but an apology. the grudge could be easily re edited into a comedy and perhaps then it will be appreciated for its camp value. baring that and this will go down as the greatest cinematic thriller since godzilla vs. megalon. i would suggest waiting until the movie comes to your local discount theatre where it can receive the public ridicule it so richly deserves. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"difficult to call the grudge a horror movie. at best it made me slightly jump from surprise at a couple of moments. if one forgets the (failed) frightening dimension and looks at other sides of the movie and he is again disappointed. the acting is ok but not great. the story can be somewhat interesting at the beginning and while one is trying to get what happening. but toward the end one understands there is not much to understand. scary elements seems sometimes to have been added to the script without reason. so. (yawn) see this movie it if you have nothing more interesting to do and like cutting the carrots or looking at the clouds. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"takashi shimizu had a great opportunity with a remake of his original film ju on the grudge. while i haven not seen that film and i would have to wager that there more imagination and originality (or some rip off originality and in other words skill with known tropes of the japanese ghost movie) than in his own directed remake. maybe the script was written to somehow have some kind of warped appeal and or i would guess accessibility and for an american audience. what starts off with some potential the hint of something very screwed up going on with bill pullman sudden movement just goes into a total jumble. and as a horror movie. gimme a break. tension could have been built on the situation a nurse going to take care of a disturbed woman in a house that is haunted but he undercuts everything he wants to get his audience to feel. scares. how about some music timed just so you know when exactly to expect something. a black cat. yeah and why not just make the ghost boy thing sound like a cat for creepiness which and in effect and is only creepy if you want cats. plot. why not just shuffle between past and present without any semblance of an actual flow of how a story could be told (meaning and while the flashbacks are inserted and are meant to be organic with the story overall and they aren not) and or for that matter have us care about anyone in the cast. by the time the characters and or those that are there for exposition and get around to telling us what is going on or whatever and there little point to care. the film making is shoddy (i. e. the 180 degree rule is broken many times over and not in a forgivable or intriguing way) and and the performances are wooden even when looking frightened or shocked (gellar especially is disappointing and but pullman and who shows up later after his first scene and is sorely miscast). even when shimizu tries for some average old boo scares and like when the woman is in the office building and chased by the grudge ghost and it still silly. just watch when she going on that elevator and the ghost is in the background of shots. either you will go with it and and if so more power to you and or you will laugh hysterically at the results. count me in the latter. i am not totally sure where this project went wrong was it shimizu having to retool it for the studios and or him not giving enough leeway with his revamp of his vision. or maybe raimi had some say in it and made things more confusing and or or dull than they would be with someone else. the grudge gives us a lot of information that doesn not make sense or at the least give us some horror fodder to chew on. it cineplex trash of a sad order. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"freeway killer and is a madman who shoots people on the freeway while yelling a bunch of mystical chant on a car phone. the police believe he is a random killer and but sunny and the blond heroine and played by darlanne fluegel detects a pattern. so does the ex cop and played by james russo and and they join forces and and bodies and in the search for the villain who has done away with their spouses. also starring richard belzer and this movie has its moments especially if you like car chases and but its really not a good movie for the most part and check it out if youre really bored and have already seen the hitcher and joy ride and or breakdown and otherwise stay away from the freeway. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"even with a cast that boasts such generally reliable names as val kilmer and lisa kudrow and wonderland fails to yield any sense of depth to this film. it barely brushes the surface of the incidents that happened on that july night in 1981. kilmer just goes through the motions as john holmes and kudrow and kate bosworth are both hopefully miscast in the other two lead roles while as holmes wife and underage girlfriend and respectively. the rest of the cast has such small roles that it impossible to get any dimensions from them. the film also stars carrie fisher and ted levine and franky g and mc gainey and dylan mcdermott and a cameo from paris hilton. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i was excited when i heard they were finally making this horrific event into a movie. the whole era (1980 southern california) and subject matter (drug and porn industry) is intriguing to me. i thought this would be a sure fire hit. i was not thrilled with the choice of kilmer as holmes and they do not resemble each other in physical appearance or mannerisms. i guess he sells tickets. however and i was willing to overlook this and give it a fair shot. i was a bit shocked that there were only like four other people in the entire theater with me on that first day of showing. now the whole crime and story in the film is hard to do and i will admit that. there were no witnesses to this very violent and brutal act. john holmes was there and but he was also a pathological liar and worried about what would happen to his family (and self) if he talked to police about it. in fact and holmes never really testified about what happened and the crime did go unsolved. so this was still really one big mystery and a mystery that this movie does nothing to cast light on. the person writing the screenplay had a whole lot of discretion and most of the principal characters are dead. however and there is no real storyline and it is fragmented claptrap. the script is light and the actors try to hard to beef up paper thin lines by overacting. the film gives no insight into holmes or the other people involved. kilmer character disappears for long stretches and his girlfriend is dull and the police are jokes. even kudrow tries hard to make a flimsy role look substantial. it is a very shallow piece and dare i say and boring. the director even tries to turn it into a love story. which is nice and unless you know anything about what a piece of trash john holmes really was. perhaps a couple of viewings of anderson boogie nights might have helped here. boogie nights was innovative and exciting in all regards. this film on the other hand was flat and without any real charm or style. even the music is out of place and with duran duran being played in a scene that was supposed to have taken place in 1980. then we have gordon lightfoot. gordon lightfoot. there could have been a great film based on this gruesome event and but i have not seen it yet. i have not seen even a decent one yet (unless you consider the rahad jackson scene from boogie nights). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am wanting to make a holmes with doors pun but i can not quite string it all together. suitably grubby and over edited wonderland gives kilmer a role that channels morrison at the same time. but how coy is this film about the famous 14 inches. australian crime films flash it all the time and skip the graphic violence instead. as someone famous said once about us cinema double standards represent kiss a breast and it an x and stab it and its an action pg 13. wonderland is 14 minutes too long too and and at the end the tawdry spiral we were all glad to escape the cinema. how many films called wonderland are we going to get. there must be six in the last decade. the pixilated violence and muted color sets the seedy tone but the wobble cam gets tiresome and as if we are gawking at their nostrils all the time. taking a few cues form the doors and taxi driver it all becomes forgettable the next day. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"unlike others and i refuse to call this pitiful excuse for a movie a triumph of style over substance (i do not want to give style a bad name). still and it the most apt description that comes to mind. a pointless and unpleasant and ultimately meaningless assault on the eyes and ears and wonderland leaves one wondering only why the film was made in the first place and who in their right mind gave the greenlight to this dreary and tangled mess. a biography of porn star john holmes. a study of who the man was and why he went into the business and how it affected him. great. bound to be compelling and bound to be entertaining. bound to be enlightening and fascinating on about a million levels (and i have zero interest in porn). but a confusing and violent and rashomon style study of a series of murders holmes was connected with after his career ended. who in hell cares. what insights do we gain. this film completely ignores the most interesting aspect of john holmes life that he was a porno star. wonderland might as well have been about anyone represent the fact that the main character is the most famous male adult film star in history is almost irrelevant. to make matters about a thousand times worse and the picture is loaded down with jerkoff gimmicks annoying machine gun editing and sloppy dogme 95 camerawork and unnecessary split screen graphics and animation and etc. etc. in the absence of a compelling story and unique main character and the director (and i use the term loosely) has thrown together a dozen or so techniques from other films and decided to call the resulting mess a movie and among these represent the trendy and bleach bypass look of narc or traffic or minority report while the frantic and often incomprehensible and throw the pieces of film in the air cutting style of natural born killers or 28 days later while the fill every moment of silence with an old song to evoke the period soundtrack of goodfellas or blow while the groovy and retro title sequence of velvet goldmine or autofocus or catch me if you can. the list goes on and on and on. pathetic. i wanted to like this movie. i had real hopes for it. wonderland avenue had been around for years while had the context of the murders been emphasized rather than the murders themselves and i think it could have worked. had the murders (and holmes growing involvement with seedy l. a. types) signaled the end of a career and or the end of the swinging 70s and i think the film could have had meaning while it could have served a purpose. as it is meaningless. pointless. who cares how many perspectives exist on a series of murders generally unknown by the public. the case isn not famous enough to merit such painstaking examination. this film should have been the third act of the john holmes story. that it. period. and it could have worked. what that. oh and right and right and they do not want to tell a traditional rise and fall story. they do not want to make boogie nights or goodfellas or star 80 or autofocus. they wanted their film to be different. right. well and in one sense and they succeeded. there a big difference between those films and wonderland. the difference is those films are good. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"val kilmer and solid performance. dylan mcdermott and solid performance. josh lucas and solid performance. three very engaging actors giving decent performances. the problem is and who cares about the plot. john holmes. infamous for his well endowments and a drug addict and and a guy who and despite contracting aids and continued to make adult films and just does not make an intriguing character. the story surrounds the events leading up to and the aftermath of a vicious mass murder that occurred in the late 80 in los angelos to which holmes was linked and arrested and charged with murder and and who ultimately was acquitted. just like in the case of o. j. and the guilt factor and regardless of the outcome and ranged quite high in the he did it zone. there is no one to sympathize with in this film and as everyone is a self serving criminal. there is just nothing remotely interesting here. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the plot certainly seemed interesting enough. how can a real life brutal murder be turned into a truly boring movie. well and you can watch wonderland and find out. i had heard of the wonderland murders before this film was released and found it to be an interesting true story of some genuinely sadistic people. unfortunately and there is zero character development and so we never get a chance to understand why any of this was done or get a good sense of the interrelationships between the characters. the pace of the direction was very tedious. this all leads to an extraordinarily boring movie. given that dawn schiller a central character as holmes girlfriend was an associate producer and that holmes wife was a consultant on the film and we should have had the opportunity to gain some real insight into the characters. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the premise was intriguing and but sadly this film just doesn not do any justice to it. the casting was quite good and and it was shot beautifully but stylistically much of the direction was inconsistent (overstylized fast editing been there done that to no effect. i was waiting for steven bochco to run in the credits followed by a commercial) and characters were identified exclusively by on screen coke usage (and pretty much everything else left to boogie nights for character development) and and no personable characters to draw the viewer into the story. a very forgettable film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"bad movie saw it at the tiff and the movie gives me a sense of been there done that it reminds me alot of the movie blow expect the blow was actually interesting. this one story told two ways and both times it is not told that well. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is the only movie i have ever seen that has prompted me to write a critique on any internet site and and that is a significant statement from someone who likes the attack of the monolith monsters. this movie is perfect for anyone who wants an inoffensive movie. it is devoid of sex and violence and for example. i believe that this movie is safe for children of all ages. this movie is perfect for anyone who does not want to be entertained and challenged and or stimulated in any way. adults could easily catch up on their sleep in front of the tv while the kids watch this movie. don not be surprise and however and if you wakeup to find the kids have turned the tv off and started a board game. as an adult who enjoys being entertained and who enjoys everything from the mundane to the fantastic in realism and drama and comedy and and action and all of those adult things that reflect real life on earth and or or stimulate the imagination and this movie has nothing to offer. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw this in the market place at the cannes film festival. it a real cheapo prod nothing wrong with that but you have to make up for it with a bit of sex or gore or both. think larry cohen. sean young is an interesting actor well done to the producers for hooking her i guess. the opening scene in the space ship coming down is hilarious you could picture all the crew hands shaking it around. ha ha but i wish the people who made this well at least it not pretentious. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the movie premise is spooky represent a woman gets pregnant when kissed by a stranger in a bar. but as soon as the movie begins and a horrible opening scene establishes that this is a c type sci fi tv movie. it a big star trek and a bit x files and but more than anything else it boring. when the movie kicks into action everything is predictable and cliche. it looked more like a 2 parter in a bad sci fi tv series. no suspense and no thrills and but not for a lack of trying. just a lot of predictable dramatic conflicts between the main characters. don not waste your time. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"here we are represent two travelers from a distant futuristic world arrive on earth. one is on a desperate mission to preserve a life and another is an inhuman killing machine determined to eliminate the woman who will give birth to the saviour of an entire race. so what could we call this killing machine. it almost like he some kind of destroyer and or eradicator. sort of like an exterminator or something. what the word i am looking for. something that terminates things. hmmmm. anyway and the protector (who swiftly doffs the white tunic he stole from luke skywalker in favour of local clothing) finds the young woman first and impregnates her with a future born hero to be. the evil uhhhh. exterminator kills some rednecks and steals their guns and clothes and then attempts to locate the woman by visiting her workplace and asking around by looking menacingly into people eyes and repeating her name threateningly. then begins a desperate race for survival as the seemingly deathless and unstoppable exterminator pursues the couple across the countryside. at some point he may acquire boots and a motorcycle and but i am not sure. perhaps and in an exciting finale and he will attempt to crush them under the wheels of an enormous tanker truck full of. acid. then the truck will crash. they will be saved. but no. he will then re emerge and as strong as ever. he will kill the protector and pursue the girl into a meat packing plant and where in a terrifying finish and he is pushed into a large piece of industrial chopping machinery and and destroyed once and for all. but maybe i am extrapolating too much. after all and i did stop watching this movie after mr. protector magically impregnates sean young by kissing her at a bar and then tells her the child will be born in 3 days. the costumes and effects are great in this movie. i loved them the first time i saw them on star trek represent next generation too. sean young does another great turn as an unemotive replicant and and career sweat hog stephen baldwin is also on board as young fat cop boyfriend. not sure where he fits into the plot though. maybe he an import from a different james cameron movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"being a music student myself and i thought a movie taking place in a conservatory might be fun to watch. little did i know. (i had no idea this movie was based on a book by britney spears) this movie was implausible throughout. it obvious that whoever wrote the script never set foot in a conservatory and doesn not know a thing about classical music. let me give you just a few examples represent 1) there is no way anyone would be admitted to a classical conservatory with no classical training whatsoever. just having a nice pop voice isn not enough and besides and that a different thing altogether another genre and different technique. it like playing the violin when applying for a viola class. 2) how come the lady teaching music theory was in the singing jury. if she wasn not a singing professor herself and she would have no say in a situation like that and and if she was a singing professor and why weren not we told so. 3) being able to read music is a necessity if youre to major in music. 4) how did angela get a hold of that video tape. that would have been kept confidential and for the jury eyes only. now either she got the tape from one of the professors or the script writers just do not have a clue. i wonder which. 5) the singing professor gave holly the carmen song saying she had the range and which she clearly did not. yes and she was able to sing the notes and but carmen is a mezzo soprano and while holly voice seemed to be much lighter in timbre and not at all compatible with that song. 6) worst of all represent not only does the movie show a shocking ignorance when it comes to classical music and but it doesn not even try to hide it. the aria that angela sings is mutilated beyond recognition and a fact which is painfully blatant at the recital and where it is cut short in a disgraceful way mozart would roll over in his grave. the habanera from carmen sounded a bit weird at times and too and and the way it was rearranged at the end just shows how little the producers really think of classical music it stiff and boring but hey and add some drums and electric guitars and it almost as good as britney spears. i know these are all minor details and but it would have been so easy to avoid them with just a little research. anyhow and i might have chosen to suspend my disbelief had the characters and the plot been well elaborated. but without that and i really can not find any redeeming qualities in this movie except for one represent it good for a laugh. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i actually liked this movie until the end. sure and it was cheesy and pretty unlikely but still it kept my attention on a rainy afternoon. until the end and that is. for her final performance at the prestigious classical conservatory where she has struggled to catch up to the other classically trained students and what does the main character do. wow them with her grasp and execution of this time honored musical tradition. no. she tortures and butchers the great sensuous habanera from carmen and turns it into an utterly forgettable brittany spears wannabe pop song. my ears bled. and and in the supreme moment of horror and her teachers gave her a standing ovation. any teacher not in a spears induced fantasy would have failed her on the spot. save your time and save your ears skip this movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"can any movie become more naive than this. you cant believe a piece of this script. and its ssooooo predictable that you can tell the plot and the ending from the first 10 minutes. the leading actress seems like she wants to be barbie (but she doesn not make it and the doll has more acting skills). the easiness that the character passes and remains in a a music school makes the phantom of the opera novel seem like a historical biography. i wont even comment on the shallowness of the characters but the one good thing of the film is madsen performance which manages to bring life to a melo like one dimensional character. the movie is so cheesy that it sticks to your teeth. i can think some 13 year old britney obsessed girls shouting o and do give us a break. if we want fairy tales there is always the brothers grimm book hidden somewhere in the attic. i gave it 2 instead of one only for virginia madsen. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"it was a decent movie and i actually kind of enjoyed it. but the ending is so abrupt. there is absolutely no closure and it leaves tons of loose ends. what happens after the concert. what happens with her boyfriend. does she hook up with grant. does she come beck in the next semester. and what about angela. obviously holly performance would knock angela down a few pegs and but nothing is shown to indicate how she reacts. there is so much left up in the air and it very unsatisfying. i do not know if it is trying to leave room for a sequel or something and but it is a terrible ending and i think that it really makes the movie a joke. i was very disappointed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is entertaining enough due to an excellent performance by virginia madsen and the fact that lindsey haun is lovely. however the reason the movie is so predictable is that we have seen it all before. i have haven not read the book a mother gift but i hope for britney and lynne spears sake it is completely different than this movie. unless you consider ending a movie with what is essentially a music video an original idea and the entire movie brings to mind the word plagiarized. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have read the book a couple of times and this movie doesn not follow exactly as it should. i could let this slide and it is after all a movie. however i have serious issues with the setting of the movie. nobody has seemed to mention that this movie and the book it is based on are based in actual events that happened in nebraska. i live in nebraska. i grew up in the town that this movie is supposed to be based on. first of all and the small town that is talked about as the setting and is the third largest city in the state. with a population of around 50 and 000. grand island is the largest city between lincoln and denver. second the scenery for the movie is wrong. grand island is in the platte river valley. which is very flat with very few trees. i tried watching this movie and but it made me mad to see my hometown being treated so bad. this was a real event. large sections of the city were wiped out. in the book they talk about riding bikes from mormon island to fonner park. i guess you could if you do not mind a 15 mile ride each way. for anyone who wants to know what really happened go here http represent or or www. theindependent. com or twisters or . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"tv version of twister springs a few leaks but manages to remain watchable. my sister bought this at a wal mart a few years back when it was released and i saw it back then and thought it was okay. later twister with bill pullman and helen hunt comes out (or was it before. i think it was 97) and did a better job overall. but twister was more silly fun while this is realistic with a message. it all depends on what you want from a movie with twisters represent twisters and or a low budget character study. john schneider and devon sawa (he the reason my sister bought it) star and and devon sawa and who went on to wild america and final destination and slackers got his big break here. so in a way and i was one of the first people to see him really take off. i do not know if it an honor or a shame and i haven not seen how he acts in recent films. night of the twisters all depends on personal taste and like i said and it all depends on what you want from a movie with twisters represent twisters and or a low budget character study. night of the twister has the latter. so you decide. i give it a 2. 5/5. john ulmer. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film and although not totally bad and should have been filmed where the actual events took place. grand island and nebraska was devastated by no less than seven tornados on the night of june 3 and 1980. grand island is situated in the nearly treeless and flat platte river valley in hall county. the makers of this movie filmed in the tree covered hills of ontario and moved the whole event to a non existant town called blainsworth. the people of grand island bravely survived this awful night only to be forgotten because of a poorly made movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film is totally garbage. some imbecilic intellectual comforting himself by making all his best to claim superiority of aristocrat over working class. nothing more than a piece of self complacence catharsis. disgusting. if this kind of a movie is set in us and it will sure make itself a big joke. and simply because it comes out from the other side and it makes itself a masterpiece and a wonderful amusement for certain brain washed and or or brain washing westerns (some george w. maybepositive. a typical cold war sequelae and some kind of joke anyway. i would say and if this like expressed in this film is all what soviet intellectuals had been thinking about all those years and then maybe they deserve all the miseries they claim they had gone through. but no. cause like many others and i have read and watched real masterpieces made by real outstanding soviet intellectuals. for example and something also relevant with dog and white bim black ear both gavriil troyepolsky book and stanislav rostotsky movie is a real masterpiece. real life and real tragedy and real sad and real pride and dignity and one of the real best of the soviet era. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"it a pretty good cast and but the film has nowhere near the grace of the original italian comedy big deal on madonna street anyone looking for an entertaining caper film should visit the original. william macy may be one of our greatest living actors and but here he put to little use. and his role in the original was played by marcello mastroianni and so i sort of feel sorry for him trying to fill those shoes. might as well try to imitate bogart or a young de niro. the art direction is rich and textured but brings nothing to the story and the extra bits they add to the story feel completely unnecessary and the things they take away are missed. even starting the way they do seems bizarrely gratuitous and takes away from the surprise of the original. sam rockwell has his odd and genial charm and luis guzman has that odd charisma and but the love story part of the movie just seems clunky and flat. it too bad nobody has figured out how to make this movie as well as it was first made and but then again it too bad we live in a culture where we feel like we need to remake amazing things instead of simply learning to savor the originals. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"it aint bad and but it aint good. it is just entertaining. as a comedy which it is supposed to be and it dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before. it a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually and but none of them really do much. and the ending sucks. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"welcome to collinwood is kind of a disaster. considering the people involved and it should have been multiple times better. watching it and if youre at least somewhat attached to the faith that it will get better and will probably make you cry. it one of those movies that had potential and but was robbed of this potential thanks to a terrible script and some bad acting and not to mention the strangely annoying and unnecessary george clooney character and the guy who reminds me of richard dreyfuss but about whom i care so little that i do not even want to know his name. the film only saving grace is the weird con vocabulary it introduces. i found myself thinking of it time and time again as i watched more crime capers. this is the only reason i gave the film a 3. the plot is boring and the characters are neurotic and needlessly offensive and and highly unlikable. they are in a constant state of agonizing stress and theyre all so irritating that i celebrated their obstacles. they yell at each other and swear crassly. the dialogue is insipid at best and insultingly stupid at its low points. i find that steven traffic soderbergherabracadabrablahblah and george clooney are to blame for this. they should be tried for war crimes and if anyone actually remembers this crap long enough to care. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"there nothing new here. all the standard romantic comedy scenes and even down to the taxi sprinting to the airport to stop the woman flying away. the only thing that saves this is the acting of alison eastwood and some of the minor characters (blink and you will miss gabrielle anwar) and who obviously had some fun. turn it off when the pair are in bliss and and you would not have to go through the inevitable plot pain. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.