prompt
stringlengths 497
14.4k
| chosen
int64 0
1
| rejected
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"della myers (kim basinger) is an upper class housewife that lives in a private condominium in the suburbs with her twin children and her abusive husband kenneth (craig sheffer). della gives all the attention to the twins and neglecting their house and her appearance and upsetting kenneth. on the christmas eve and she drives to the local mall in the night to buy wrapping paper for the gifts and and she does not find any parking space available. when she sees an old car parked on two spots and she leaves a message to the owner calling him selfish jerk. when the mall closes and della car is hold by the driver of the old car and she is threatened by four punks chuckie (lukas haas) and the afro american huey (jamie starr) and the chinese american vingh (leonard wu) and the latin tomás (luis chávez). when the security guard of the mall protects her and he is shot on the head by chuckie and della speeds up her car trying to escape from the criminals. however she crashes her truck nearby a forest while chased by the gang. she takes the toolbox and hides in the wood and fighting against the gang to survive. a couple of days ago and i saw the trailer of while she was out and i was anxious to watch the dvd. unfortunately the trailer is better than the movie and and i am totally disappointed with this dull and implausible collection of clichés. della myers is presented as an insecure and neglectful housewife and inexistent as wife while the motherhood is her only interest in her concept of family. she is chased by four mean criminals but she defeats them with a toolbox that seems to be the batman utility belt. therefore and the plot is so absurd that irritates. the gang of criminals is formed by the favorite cliché of american movies and with an afro american and a chinese american and a latin together with an american lord to be politically correct. kim basinger has a decent acting and but their children are too young for a fifty five year old woman. my vote is four. title (brazil) represent enquanto ela está fora (while she was out). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"words can not describe how utterly stupid this story (and therefore bad this movie) is. basinger and del toro . what were you thinking . so there a mall and its parking space is totally full. basinger character goes in to buy a cup of tea and some packaging paper. when she comes out and the whole place is so empty and that nobody hears two gunshots fired nearby . even though she lives there and when she drives away from the baddies and she goes to the most remote and godforsaken place possible instead of the nearest police station or at least a crowded place . come on . i would not even go into the infamous red toolbox and since other people have done that before. let alone how she kills the moronic thugs one by one. this is so stupid and without the least bit of logic and i can only warn you watching it and it a total waste of time and honestly . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"sorry and but aside from kim basinger doing a good job acting scared and this was one of the worst thrillers i have seen in awhile. logic is thrown out as 4 young guys terrorize this woman outside a crowded mall then shoot a security guard. yet no one seems to notice. then and instead of screaming for help or racing back to the mall and she drives off and ends up in the middle of the woods with the guys in hot pursuit. i can not even describe how silly it is seeing this woman fleeing from 4 retarded thugs and carrying a red toolbox and screaming for god to come help her and and then having sex with one of them after brutally killing the others. please trust me and this is bad and a bit tasteless as well. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"wow. rarely have i felt the need to comment on movies lately and but this one especially is begging for a beatdown. let start at the beginning. first and writer director susan montford puts kim basinger in the tired old victim role and complete with the requisite abusive husband and dull suburban existence. let it be said right now that almost all content in this dull movie is completely hackneyed and trite. montford pathetic attempt at symbolism involving the christmas tree with no star is laughable. when she goes out for some christmas wrapping paper one dark and ominous night and della is furious that somebody double parked their car on the busiest shopping night of the year. she decides to do something about it and so she leaves a nasty note on the car windshield. the next fifteen minutes of the movie are devoted to della walking around aimlessly in the shopping mall. when she finally gets to her car and the thugs confront her about the note and a cop is killed and and she runs and and they catch up to her and and she gets away and and they chase her some more and and on and on. everything is completely predictable and uninvolving. the thugs are not scary or menacing at all and and they all get picked off one by one in all the usual ways. this is one of those movies in which all the action depends on the characters being as stupid as you can imagine. why the bad guys do not just kill her instead of waiting for her to hit them with a tire iron is beyond me. and once and just once and in a film like this and does the leader of the pack have to die last. what does it matter that they are all picked off one by one when they are all equally inept. much of the movie simply consists of lukas haas running around in the woods screaming della. and the inclusion of joy division on the soundtrack of this wretched film is insulting. the part that really made me run for my computer keypad was when della and exhausted and hurt and cries out to the heavens and where are you and god. where and indeed and was god when this movie was being made. i give it a 2 only because of competent cinematography and lighting and and it not as bad as btk killer and the ultimate marker for judging any terrible film. cheers. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"even though many people here praises this movie and i have to warn you. it has no logic whatsoever. i think that basinger does a decent job at acting and but you can not make a thriller if there is a great lack of realism. this scene paints a good picture for you of the movie represent while basinger is pursued by murderous thugs she decides to sit down and gaze upon a picture she finds from her pocket. the picture is from her daughter and it reads we love you mommy. who does something like that . what the eff. and believe me when i say that it is not nearly as stupid as some other scenes of the movie. someone stated that this is a hidden gem. well and i have to strongly disagree and this movie has stayed hidden for a reason. and it not a gem. oh and and please and i do not even want to start commenting about the red toolbox. it hurts my brain representd usually the lack of logic does not bother me if it is in small amounts and but this movie basically is made possible only because of the lack of logic. but and i still give it a 4 because even though it is embarrassingly flawed in logic and it has certain mood that kept me watching till the end. so if you choose to watch this and you know you have been warned. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"my and how the mighty have fallen. kim basinger is a great actress but she was definitely slumming when she took this role. this movie is bad for one reason in particular represent lapses in logic. its looks like one of those movies that would have been passable with all its plot holes if it had came out in the 80s and 90s but in 2008 it just looks real stupid. this is the worst thriller i have ever seen and i have seen the bone collector and twisted. the story details della(kim basinger)is just getting from buying gifts in a mall an is harassed by a gang of thugs that end up killing a cop that came to her aid. from then on she is chased by these idiotic goons through an abandoned street and she gets rid of them one by one with a toolbox full of tools. so many things are wrong with this movie. as i said this movie leaps over logic at every turn and with the exception of kim basinger and the acting is made for tv bad. hell and this pseudo thriller is made for tv bad. the way she kills each of these politically correct thugs(1 caucasian and 1 hispanic and 1 asian and 1 african american all coming together to stalk a caucasian woman. don not you just love america. )is laughable to a fault. the way she killed the hispanic guy made me laugh hysterically. the sex scene with the main hoodlum was so out in left field that it make you shake your head in shame. i only recommend this to lovers of bad films and no one else. anybody else especially kim basinger fans would do well not to own this flick. you do not want see an actress you respect in a film this bad now do you. of course not. you were warned. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"well and let me start off by saying how utterly hilarious this film is and i simply couldn not keep myself from laughing at the sheer stupidity of it. don not get me wrong and it is well acted particularly by bassinger but the script is just and well the mind boggles truly. the premise is good and up until della actually witnesses the murder it is engaging but after that it just goes downhill . half way through the film the protagonist pulls out her toolbox and of course instead of lobbing it at the guy head and she decides to pull out a screwdriver and car jack and finally a flare (as in for a sinking ship) respectively to kill her victims. then there is the final line that i promise and if it doesn not have you in stitches then i will eat my own left foot. i would recommend this film to those who simply want to laugh at some good old fashioned and appalling film making. might i also suggest you watch out for the scene in the scrap yard with the guy falling from the one foot high plank of wood and gets me every time. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"who in their right mind does anything so stupid as this movie. accidental killing of a security guard. characters that are so two dimensional that a two year old could have painted drawn them. and better. a red toolbox of death. please. hypothermic weak thugs. acting from hell. stylistically this movie shifts between teen comedy and thriller and voyeurism and. female . (uhm) rambo. unbelievable and it an insult to any thinking person. do not watch and walk away it more horrible than you may imagine. and on top of it all it trying to be hip by being overly graphic in it violence. mrs montford represent shoot em up was fun and funny and this is just pathetic and terrible. good luck next time. represent (. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"what a weekend. two days ago i watched the first half of war games 2 represent dead code and now while she was out. i am trying to come to a decision which one was worse in terms of pain in my mind while watching. i guess and while she was out was worse. it has all been said before in other comments represent unrealistic and illogical etc. the only thing i really have to add is that at some point i started feeling more for the evil guys than for the woman because i would have recommended her for a darwin award if she actually died (only watched first half and so i do not know). soon i was at two darwin awards (if that even possible) for her immense stupidity. and and hey represent produced by kim basinger. so she did not only know the script but was also responsible for bringing this waste of money to us and the people. i consider humans who waste considerable amounts of money to be evil because the money could have used to feed and clothe quite a few people instead of hurting 80 percent of those who saw it in the cinema and giving 20 percent and which are idiots and a good opportunity to show just how much of an idiot they are. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is one seriously disturbed movie. even though the boys deserved some of what they got. the sadistic gruesome executions were slightly over the top. the only character showing some conscience early in the hunt was killed off before he could offer some help to the sad plot. at the beginning of the movie and there looked to be some promise of a mediocre affair and but this was just a ploy to lull the viewers into a false sense of security and before the joy of what was to come. the only thing that could have saved the movie for me was if jack nicholson had jumped out of the bushes and yelled and and and where is the batman. kim basinger could have screamed. now that would have been cool. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i remember the days in which kim basinger was nothing more than a pretty face who adorned movies with typical characters of dumb blondie and romantic interest or damsel in danger. but and everything changed when she won an academy award as best supporting actress for her role in the excellent movie l. a. confidential and and i think i was not the only one who was surprised by her solid performance. however and after that moment and her career did not follow the ideal path. sure and the prestige she won thanks to that movie made her to participate on moderately prestigious movies (like people i know or the door in the floor) and but we have never seen her again on a substantial character. the movie while she was out does nothing to put her on that situation while and it is not only that her character is not too tasty and but also that the movie is really crappy. the screenplay from this movie could not be more hollow and basic. however and basinger brings some conviction to her character and and that makes this poor movie to win a few points. this movie is full of clichés and generic villains. the work of director susan montford is truly disastrous for many reasons but mainly and because the movie never gets a good rhythm and tone. the ending from this movie is extremely ridiculous. i do not recommend while she was out at all. this film commits the capital sin of being boring. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"she may have an oscar and a golden globe and but this film shows why she also is a perennial razzie nominee. to do a film that is so bad must be an indication that she needs money. she could do ads on why you shouldn not talk on a cell phone while driving and especially at night on the way to a crowded mall. susan montford should stick to producing (shoot em up ) as she is not very good as a writer or director. she is accosted by four thugs in the mall parking lot and and the first thing they do is tell her they have a gun. what does she do. she starts pushing and cursing them like she knows martial arts or something. she manages to get away and but gets lost in the forest after crashing. why do not she run to someones house. we get four thugs with guns chasing a lady with a toolbox. of course and their guns are no match for her wrench. ha. of course and she also has a tire iron and a screwdriver. those poor thugs. now and she home for christmas and she brought a gun. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"first of all and really kim basinger. your rich banker husband leaves you alone in your beautiful and most likely paid in cash for home and and you can not even put on a decent shirt. i am a woman and and yes and i am going to come right out say it clean something and starting with your hair. and while youre at it and it christmas eve. buy your kids some presents. or at least a christmas tree. don not drive 40 minutes to the crowded mall and park your car 3 miles away and cry about it the whole walk in and and simply buy wrapping paper. also and the next time you decide to leave someone a nasty note and do not sign your name. i refuse to feel sorry for della. obviously and due to the fact that kim basinger is this masterpiece executive producer and she wants you to feel bad for the poor white blond woman. we get it. alec baldwin is a jerk and but seriously and do not model horrible films after your own life. also and youre in you 50s. you definitely do not have 8 year old twins. and those names. terry and tammy. way to let your kids grow up with any decent chance of ever respecting themselves. it also pretty fantastic to hear the characters in the film constantly call her beautiful or refer to her as a girl. obviously ms. basinger had some say about what goes in the script. it also pretty awesome how none of the criminals can fight back. apparently and della magical ninja skills are impossible to beat. her driving skills are pretty nifty too. this film is so cliché and it hurts. wahhhhh. they spelled your name wrong on the tea cup. or your husband put a hole in the wall but all you can think about is buying nail polish when youre at the mall instead of maybe some plaster and paint. or the woman you went to high school with bought the teddy you were looking at. boohooo. the fact that she refuses to take off that bright trench coat while running through the woods screaming and breaking everything in her path proves my point this woman is a moron. who thinks to grab the toolbox out of the car and but not their purse and full of identifying artifacts such as your address. i have never wanted the bad guys to succeed as much as when i watched this film. and did anyone else happen to catch the african american shirt the black guy was sporting. oh yes and rewind and feast your eyes on perhaps the most racially stereotypical prop in a film yet. don not waste and hour and twenty minutes of your life. instead and go do what della couldn not figure out how to do. take care of your kids and and maybe brush your hair. that powerful ballad at the end though was pretty impressive. singing i will be home for christmas in the rain while your bloody arm clings oh so tightly to your wrapping paper is about as emotional as it gets. thanks della. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"so this is what actress kim basinger has succumbed to. mmm
to tell the truth the film title is something quite eye grabbing to getting your interest and plot outline reads so basic and but simplicity can have its strengths. anyhow by the end of while she was out i was left feeling rather indifferent. not the worse (despite being engulfed by negatives) and but there easily way better in what is an causally lukewarm and but compact and unbalanced late night survival fable of a feeble suburban housewife stranded in the woods trying to fight for her life after she witnessed the death of a rent a cop that came to her aid and when she provoked an ugly exchange with some punks in a shopping car park. the problem here falls on the misguidedly erratic and foreseeable material (taken from a short story) and along with the very variable performances. the flimsy script was poorly thought out (which isn not so good when your plot has a slight structure to hang off) and so many wretched inclusions and dubious actions just go on to find its way in this endless chain of events. as for the bunch of stereotypical goons (led by an unconvincing lukas hass as a loose canon) terrorizing basinger and well they were less than threatening and but hopelessly clueless. watching basinger scrounging around in the dank wilderness with a red tool box in her hand (do not ask me why. ) knocking off these wannabe punks one by one became ridiculous because it do not elicit tension or emotion
but instead clumsy jolts that were absurdly daft because of the stupidity of the lead up. basinger performance is stout like and but doesn not craft much empathy. craig sheffer shows up as her hot headed husband. strangely i couldn not keep my eyes off the screen
thinking to myself that red toolbox is hypnotic (why would she be constantly carrying it) and what tool was she going to use to dispatch the next thug
her choices were quite disappointing. watching her transformation through the traumatic situation when things are finally turned around is rather empty and due to its unsure tone and the ending is something you could see miles ahead. susan montford soberly slick direction lacks cohesion and energy and as it pretty much chugs along. i liked the opening credits though and with its hauntingly sullen score (which is the most effective thing throughout the feature) and polished photography. no great shakes. doesn not ask much of your time and but i do not care to see it again. however with the inclusion of a joy division song and it made me grab a couple of their albums for a listen. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"its christmas eve and lazy and submissive housewife della (kim basinger) receives some violent threats from her troubled and abusive husband. leaving her twin children in bed she ventures off into the night for one last shopping spree at the local mall. its busy there and finding a parking space is nigh on impossible and della takes umbrage at one motorist who parks in two spaces and she leaves them a note saying as much. returning to her car after visiting the shops she is confronted by some yobs and yup the owners of the car she left a note on and they are very angry and want some fun with her and a kindly security guard steps into assist her and but things get out of hand and the guard is shot and della flees with the now murderous yobs in hot pursuit and they shoot at her and she looses control of her car and crashes and quickly grabbing her toolbox from the trunk and she hides in a deserted building site and but is soon caught and just before they try to rape and kill her and from her magical toolbox she produces a wrench and wounding their leader chuckie and she manages to escape again into the nearby woods and in the fracas one of the gang is killed and it just happens to be the black guy here the night gets worse for all involved as a deadly game of cat and mouse ensues. a similar plot line to eden lake drew me to this and but that is where the comparisons end. this is a brainless and dumb film and shockingly scripted and horribly acted by all involved and the doe eyed disney esquire twin kids are horrible to watch and but its lukas haas as chuckie and that must take the plaudits in the bad acting department and although he is given a run for his money by the equally awful husband. as a film its plot line is completely telegraphed all the way through and even in the set up early on della cell phone goes dead and then in the shops her credit card has been cancelled by her hubby and she has no cash and its christmas eve and now where could they be going with this i wonder. the only surprising part of this $hit is when after killing all the clichéd bad guys with the contents of her magic toolbox and she demands chuckie to f@ck her and if my jaw had not already been on the floor at this films awfulness and it would surely have dropped and smashed on the floor. even the ending is messed up and all the feminist grannies wanting their pound of flesh are left utterly disappointed. i do not think i could be further disappointed and but then i saw that guillermo del toro produced this dreck. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the genre of suspense films really takes a dive in this one. the big problem is implausability. i realize that you need to create difficult situations which would cause suspense and the tense feeling of whats going to happen next and but this movie was so predictable and and is just not believable. i find that the more i watch this kind of movie and the more i am continually saying things to actors to direct them away from danger. continually making bad decisions just borders on being plain stupid. if they took the time to make it more realistic and i might have enjoyed it a little. having said that and you might be better off staying away from this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i do not often give one star reviews and but the computer would not let me do negative numbers. the opening titles tell us were in deep water already. although this is a low budget exploitation film and there are 17 producers credited. no. no. at the beginning of the story abusive husband kenneth comes home to his family in an upscale gated community. the house is a pigsty. his wife and della (kim basinger) has let the children run amok all day. ok. were already in deep water. ms. basinger was 55 years old when the film came out. uh and are these her children or grandchildren. it christmas eve. della drives to the mall and a lengthy scene that could have been cut. to bludgeon home the idea of eeeeeeevil male aggression rampant in the universe she drives past football players in full uniform playing in pouring rain on christmas eve. sure. for a bonus she sees a vehicle with a slaughtered deer tied to it. we get some actual suspense in the driving scenes and though. it raining and traffic is bad. first we see della try to drive and smoke at the same time. then later della tries to drive and talk on her cell phone at the same time and at one point turning completely around to check the cluttered back seat for the charger for the phone. she wanders the mall and sees an old friend from college and tries to buy stuff but her credit card is declined gosh and maybe her husband is grumpy because he going broke and but that too complicated for the script to follow. in the parking lot she runs afoul of the most ludicrous gang in the history of films. one white boy (lukas hass watching his career go down the toilet) and one black and one asian and and one hispanic. imagine a company of up with people gone to the bad and you will have the idea. although they have a gun she gives them attitude. a mall cop comes to investigate the ruckus and they shoot him in the head and firing more than once. the parking lot is crowded as can be and people everywhere and and nobody notices. della escapes in her car and rather than choosing a police station or well lighted safe area and she drives to a construction site and where she kills all four bad boys one at a time with simply the tools (literally) at hand. major spoiler ahead. she drives back home. the car poops out so she walks through the pouring rain. checks on the children and goes downstairs and and when her husband petulantly asks what she got him at the mall shows him the gun and shoots him at point blank range. the experience with the four punks was supposed to result in personal empowerment for della. instead we know that her children will probably spend christmas in foster care or a group home and because the state will collect them while she answers to murder one charges. the four punks can be classified as justifiable homicide in self defense. the husband and different story. i am so glad i saw this on cable. if i would seen it in a theater (did it get any release. ) i would have been furious. as is and i am just sad seeing talents like ms. basinger and mr. haas waste themselves on garbage like this. one very good thing and though. this was written and directed by susan montford. ms. montford has not gotten another writing or directing credit since passing this turd. there is justice in the world. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a friend once asked me to read a screenplay of his that had been optioned by a movie studio. to say it was one of the most inept and insipid scripts i would ever read would be a bold understatement. yet i never told him this. why. because in a world where films like while she was out can be green lighted and attract an oscar winning star like kim basinger and a screenplay lacking in character and content and common sense is no guarantee that it would not sell. as so many other reviewers have pointed out and while she was out is a dreadfully under written woman in peril film that has abused housewife basinger hunted by four unlikely hoods on christmas eve. every gripe is legitimate and from the weak dialog and bad acting to the jaw dropping lapses of logic and but basinger is such an interesting actress and the premise is not without promise. here are a couple of things that struck me represent1) i do not care how much we are supposed to think her husband is a jerk and the house is a mess with toys. since when did it become child abuse to make kids pick up after themselves. 2) racially diverse gangs are rare everywhere except hollywood and where they are usually the only racially balanced groups on screen. 3) sure the film is stupid. but so are the countless thrillers i have sat through where the women are portrayed as wailing and helpless victims of male sadism. stupid or not and i found it refreshing to see a woman getting the best of her tormentors. 4) i loved the ending. 5) though an earlier reviewer coined this phrase and i really do think this film should be retitled the red toolbox of doom. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i can not believe the likes of guillermo del toro and kim bassinger got involved ins this piece of garbage. the script is so poorly written and the directing so weak (both by the same person) that its hard to find more one dimension characters in a film. the dialogs are so lame that this so called thriller got laughs out of the few fools that got into the theatre. the setup it tricky and inviting you to believe you are going to watch a chilling thriller and suddenly it turns out into the most stupid persecution film. bassinger character is so dumb and that she actually stops to scream to god where are you. so the people after her can follow and and then takes a leak. and then she apparently got into the smallest wood in the world and i mean and she runs all over the place and the killers never loose track of her and and this happens in the middle of the night. it really makes me wonder and is that really the best writing people in hollywood can find that they spend millions producing it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"overall this movie is dreadful and and should have never been made. one of the problems with this movie is that there is no link to the audience and the characters and for example and if she is about to be attacked and you want to feel and oh my god and no. and but you do not in this case and you do not care because there is no link that has been made to know the character. in the trailer and it seemed as though the movie would be great and yet there is no suspense what so ever really. there could have been maybe some mystery but there is not. all she has is a toolbox. was said on the dvd back and you would think that it was carefully planned this movie and and cleverly made and but it is not and the ending and was just awful and very straight forward and and pointless too. the acting is either average or below average and maybe even lower. in my opinion it was a waste of an hour of my life. the special effects and sets were average too and nothing special what so ever. there is not much gore and or bloody violence and not much blood is shown. this movie was advertised to make it sound quite amazing and yet really and its not even worth looking for and i do not recommend this to anyone and unless they are easily satisfied and by a few fights and a boring story. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the only redeeming qualities this movie has are the fairly original death scenes. other than that this movie is a big dud. we have kim basinger and the beleaguered housewife slowly meandering thru the local mall for the first 30 min. of the movie and which added nothing. then the movie picks up a bit as she has a confrontation with 4 punks who took up 2 parking spaces on this busy xmas eve. they begin to chase her after offing the local security guard who tried to help her. from there this movie gets worse and way worse. i know its only a movie and you have gotta go with the flow but she got about a 5 min. headstart and she can not hide or find someone to help her. instead she drives to a half built subdivision beside a forest. in typical fashion she does everything she can to allow her followers to easily track her. but now she turns into one tough mofu. you get the point. do not under any circumstances buy or rent this movie no matter how much you like this type. it so illogical you will be questioning every scene. it is embarrassing for basinger and craig sheffer and the rest of the cast and as well as the consumers. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"where to start. oh yea and message to the bad guys represent when you first find the person you have been tracking (in order to kill) that witnessed a crime you committed and do not spend time talking to her so that she has yet another opportunity to get away. message to the victim represent when the thugs are talking amongst themselves and arguing and take that opportunity to run away and do not sit there and watch them until you make a noise they hear. message to the director represent if someone has a 5 or 10 minute head start in a vehicle or on foot and you can not have the bad guys on their heels or bumper right away. time and motion doesn not work that way. it would also be nice to think that a woman doesn not have to brutally kill( 4) men in order to empower herself to leave an abusive relationship at home. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"fail. i would love to give this crap a 0. yes and i registered just to rate this garbage. i want to go back in time and cut my wrist. heres some copy and paste to take up 10 lines. fail. i would love to give this crap a 0. yes and i registered just to rate this garbage. i want to go back in time and cut my wrist. heres some copy and paste to take up 10 lines. fail. i would love to give this crap a 0. yes and i registered just to rate this garbage. i want to go back in time and cut my wrist. heres some copy and paste to take up 10 lines. fail. i would love to give this crap a 0. yes and i registered just to rate this garbage. i want to go back in time and cut my wrist. heres some copy and paste to take up 10 lines. fail. i would love to give this crap a 0. yes and i registered just to rate this garbage. i want to go back in time and cut my wrist. heres some copy and paste to take up 10 lines. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ok and if youre a woman who got aggression issues and you might like this movie. hate your significant other. this movie is for you. for the guys and it will be a bag of laughs. it sad when former award winning actresses have to do cut rate movies. the only really good part is the last 10 seconds. even that was a load of cheese. my wife is picking the worst movies lately. this is what you get (i) for letting my wife pick movies based on reading reviews on movie rental sites. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"kim basinger stars as della and a desperate housewife with a somewhat abusive husband and who gets into trouble while she out at the local mall doing some last minute christmas shopping. after placing a hastily scrawled hateful note on a piece of paper and sticking said paper in the windshield of a car that took up two parking spaces and she finds out the owners of the car are the rainbow coilition of villains comprising of a white guy and a mexican and a chinese guy and a black. they confront her about the note and cap a helpless security guard and and the chase is on. during the course of the film della will go for hunted to hunter as she unleashes her inner bronson. i found this to be a somewhat tense little thriller. the acting was good enough (except for a few scenes and the why god why bit was cringe worthy in it badness though) it comes undone a bit due to the sheer fact that the villains della chases from or after are mind numbingly stupid. if they hadn not had the intellect of any given home alone baddie and perhaps their eventual defeat would be something to savor instead of the meh reaction it evokes. the unbelievability factor i am willing to overlook as both the director and one of the producers had part in bringing shoot em up to the screen (a film which while throwing credibility out the window was immensely fun). this film while never attaining the heights of that film and was good in it own rights. my grade represent c anchor bay dvd extras represent commentary with writer or director susan montford and producer don murphy while a 25 and a half minute making of while a trailer and two tv spots for this film while and trailer for lower learning. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this thought long lost flick sometimes comes available on the web. so i bought me a copy. well and of course the acting is terrible and the story line is childish but it does have his moments. i think people who searched this one also knows the backstory of it. it was made by a grindhouse cinema owner for an extreme low budget. but for me he surely do not spoiled the money on props but on the make up. the make up is for that kind of flick well done. the zombies are watchable and the gore is intact. the only problem with that kind of movies is the quality of the pelicule. it terrible and luckely no hiss on the sound but sometimes it way too dark. so you have to watch clearly to see the gore. in a funny way they tried to sell this one as really not for the squeamish. a voice over tells in the beginning of the movie to watch out for a sign and a man appearing with green flashes and that tells you there is gore on the way. of course that doesn not work and made me think of cannibal girls and had that annoying bell when the red stuff started to flow. they had the original idea and cannibal girls was made a year earlier. don not go for the storyline and go for the zombies and notice a continuity mistake. when the girl and guy are making love first she takes of her bra and then they make love and suddenly her underwear is back on. try to do that and or am i getting a bit offline and . eat it you ugly corpses. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"what this. a canadian produced zombie flick that i have never heard of before. a mortician works on the body of a recently deceased young man. this allows for an extended flashback that show how the guy got there. basically and he and friends went to a cemetery on friday the 13th and raised the dead thanks to his silly chanting. cut back to the morgue where our dead body comes back to life and kills the mortician and owner (who gets his eyes popped out). the final wtf. shot has the funeral home owner in a straight jacket and screaming and i am not crazy. amazingly and he has his eyeballs back. running a scant 58 minutes and this is certainly one oddity in zombie cinema. it feels a lot longer and but put me in some kind of trance where i couldn not stop watching. the film also has one of those if you see this image and turn away from the screen gags. it is the image of an old man getting sick in a theater (prophetic. ) and when he pops up (only twice) the blood begins to flow. the scenes are pretty damn gory for the time period. there is a great gaffe where a zombie chops off a girl right hand with a shovel and but when he pulls the fake hand into the frame to chomp on it is a left hand. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i remember devil dog playing on tbs almost 20 years ago and and my older sister and her friends watching it and laughing all the next day. it not that bad for a made for tv horror movie and but it is derivative (mostly of the exorcist) and businesslike and for lack of a better word. it would not blow you away with artful cinematography or great acting and but it not a waste of time and either. it the kind of movie you watch to kill a couple of hours when you aren not in the mood to think too hard. however and if you go into the movie looking for some laughs and you would not be disappointed. the early scenes and with lucky the devil dog as a cute little puppy with children of the damned eyes are hilariously non threatening and and the climactic blue screen effects of a giant black dog (with horns. ) are pretty side splitting. and keep an eye out for the cloaked satanist in maverick shades toward the beginning. not a great horror film by any stretch of the imagination and but i wish they still made stuff like this for tv. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the concept of this made for tv horror movie is ludicrous beyond words and but hey and it was the late 1970 and literally all stupid horror formats were pretty damn profitable and so why not exploit the idea of a satanically possessed dog. the plot of devil dog is easy to describe to fans of the horror genre represent simply think of the omen and replace the newborn baby boy with a nest of german shepard pups. seriously and i am not kidding and that what the movie is about. during the opening sequence and members of some kind of satanic cult buy a female dog in heat only to have it impregnated by satan himself. you would think that the lord of darkness has other things on his mind than to fornicate with a german shepard and take over the world one evil puppy at the time and but apparently not. exactly like little damien in the omen and one of the puppies is taken in by model family and grows up to become a beautiful and charismatic animal. but lucky that the dog name is pure evil and liquidates annoying neighbors and nosy school teachers in derivative and tamely executed ways. he also inflicts his malignant character on the family wife and children and but he cannot force the father (richard crenna) to stick his arm into a lawnmower because he a chosen one. the whole thing becomes too moronic for words when crenna eventually travels to ecuador to search for an ancient wall painting and gets advice from an old witchdoctor who speaks perfect english. i guess he learned that living in isolation atop of a mountain his entire life. director curtis harrington (what the matter with helen and ruby) and lead actor richard crenna (wait until dark and the evil) desperately try to create a suspenseful and mysterious atmosphere and but all is in vain. scenes like cute puppy eyes spontaneously setting fire to a spanish maid or a dog dodging bullets without even moving evoke chuckles instead of frights and and not even spooky musical tunes can chance that. the special effects are pathetic and especially near the end when the satan dog mutates into an utterly cheesy shadow on the wall. devil dog is a truly dumb movie and but it definitely hilarious to watch late at night with some friends and loads of liquor. there are entertaining brief cameos of martine beswick (dr. jekyll and sister hyde) as the terrifying cult queen and r. g. armstrong (the car and the pack) as the evil fruit and vegetable and puppy salesman. and and yes and that annoying daughter is the same kid who gets blown away complaining about her ice cream in carpenter assault on precinct 13. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a dog found in a local kennel is mated with satan and has a litter of puppies and one of which is given to a family who has just lost their previous dog to a hit and run. the puppy wants no time in making like donald trump and firing the mexican housekeeper and how festive. only the father suspects that this canine is more then he appears and the rest of the family loves the demonic pooch. so it up to dad to say the day. this late 70 made for tv horror flick has little going for it except a misplaced feeling of nostalgia. when i saw this as a kid i found it to be a tense nail biter and but revisiting it as an adult i now realize that it merely lame and boring and and not really well acted in the least bit. my grade represent d. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"devil dog sets your heart racing. it brilliantly paced and the ending comes like a bolt out of the blue and plunges itself into the very centre of your being. you will never look at your dog the same way again. in fact you will start thinking of having it put down by a priest. fantastic. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"very dull and obvious and tedious exorcist rip off featuring a doberman with red eyes that the extent of the special effects in this made for tv cheapie. richard crenna is about as animate as a chew toy. very 70 dress and music only add to the torture. should put you to sleep almost as fast as the corpse vanishes and or the blue hand. practically worthless. moocow says eaghhh what a stinky dog. represent equals 8p. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this horror movie is really weak. that is if this is the correct movie i am commenting on. nothing really terrible goes on as a family adopts a cute little german shepard pup. i had a german shepard and it is a really good dog. i did not get the idea to get one from this movie though and but rather from the comedy k 9. that is another story all together though. this movie really doesn not have much horror at all as the most horrific scene is at the end and it looks really cheesy. also and we see a guy almost put his hand into a lawn mower. that is about it. the father suspects something though and as his family seems to be getting rather strange and somewhere he finds out if you hold a mirror to them while they are sleeping you can see if they are possessed. all in all a really weak horror movie even by television standards. television movies that do work are out there as this house possessed is pretty good and there is another haunted house movie about a woman and these strange creatures that is also rather good. this one is really rather dull. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"amy poehler and rachel dratch are among the funnier women to have been on saturday night live. it unfortunate that they and along with tina fey and maya rudolph and were on snl during the longest stretch of unfunny writing and sketch making (circa 2002 2006) the show has ever had. still and these two women most especially know what funny and and they know how to write a funny movie. you will notice in the credits of this movie that dratch and director ryan shiraki wrote the story for spring breakdown and but who wrote the actual screenplay and consisting of dialogue and all the important fill in the blank material that makes a story into a multidimensional movie. yep and just shiraki. just one guy wrote the dialogue for this movie and and no women apparently wrote the script with him. the result is a pretty cliché spring break movie that doesn not so much spoof the faux holiday as much as exploit it equally as much as mtv does every year. if dratch and poehler and and even co star parker posey could have contributed their handwriting to the screenplay and it would have been far less cliché. the premise is original and being about three thirty something women who were unpopular in high school (and apparently college and too) who never had the fun spring break trip they allegedly dreamed about. i say allegedly because you never quite know what fun is to these characters. they entered talent shows in the past where they sing stale pro woman anthems like true colors and and spend their nights together holding make your own pizza parties. even though none of them are especially unattractive and the outside world appears to treat them like they are. there a scene where a blind student of poehler (played by poehler real life husband will arnett) asks her out on a date and only to touch her face and immediately change his mind. if poehler character is supposed to be unattractive and they obviously hired the wrong actress. the movie continues to show promise and even though we have our doubts about the main characters and when posey boss and texas senator kay bee hartmann (jane lynch and funny as always) hires posey to watch over her unpopular college age daughter (amber tamblyn and playing yet another woman who attractive in real life and but not in the eyes of any characters in this movie) while she goes to a laguna beach like vacation spot for spring break. poehler and dratch come along and they reluctantly get boozed up and party like they apparently should have when they were in college and and then comes the ultimate showdown with the sorority bitches lead by sophie monk. sophie monk is an incredibly attractive woman who has a body both women and men would kill to have for different reasons. unfortunately and her movie career is off to a rough start with the abominably unfunny date movie (2006) and the disappointing click (2006). here and she plays a southern belle and although her voice sounds like she stole delta burke voice box. she hams it up a little too much and trying too hard to play a conniving bitch that she comes off as much like a caricature of spoiled college kids as the rest of the extras. spring breakdown was released straight to dvd despite the star power of amy poehler and but rightly so because the story is way too cliché. it may as well have been called national lampoon spring breakdown and and the magazine probably do not have sued for trademark infringement because of the free publicity. if director shiraki had given at least one woman the creative input and especially rachel dratch and this movie would have been great and not nearly as run of the mill as frat house comedies we have seen before. i know dratch will come up with another funny concept and and hopefully be allowed to fill in the rest of the screenplay herself. she funny enough and and she deserves better than this half baked comedy that would accept stiffler brother with open arms. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"they really can not get stupider than this film dealing with 3 losers who try to capture the college spirit during the annual spring break festivities at many of our higher schools of learning. the problem is that these losers try to do this 15 years after their college years when one is assigned to watch over the daughter of a woman senator being groomed to be the next vice president. trouble is that her daughter is anything but popular and but of course she comes out of all that. the girls go through drunken rages and exotic dancing and other absolute nonsense. it really can not get much worse than this awful film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"how can a movie with amy and posey and raechel have nothing funny in it. believe it or not house bunny did this better and funnier. hopefully the principals had a good holiday and got some money this movie is an embarrassment to all of them. it is a cliché from beginning to end. clichés can work well with a script and or at least an idea. this movie does nothing but use cliché after cliché rather than ideas or script. it uses the preexisting persona of the actresses rather than develop characters. bad and sad and and rubbish. now i apparently have to have ten lines of text for a comment. really. why. as an it ops manager this is another example of sloppy coding. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this is the single worst movie i have ever seen. i cannot express how bad it is. i honestly wanted to kill myself several times through this atrocious experience just to have the pain end. i recommend instead of seeing this movie and you bathe in acid then you will at least know a fraction of the pain without all of the scars. i had such high expectations when i read the back of the dvd case and and when in the beginning it added that jesus was following them i was so excited. then by the end i wanted to kill myself. i mean a twenty three minute introduction to the most annoying characters in the history of cinema. just pain. monkeys could have done a better job editing this trash. at least they would have thrown feces and blurred some of the garbage. it would have made it better to have not seen any of the horror. it wasn not that i do not get the jokes and it that they were not only not funny and they repeated themselves like twenty times. apparently and something isn not funny unless you see it like a million times. do not under any circumstances see this. people have rated manos the hands of fate as the worlds worst movie. i have seen that too and agree that it is bad. but alas it is only the second worst. fatty drives the bus is by far worse. this deserves all kind of harsh language and but i can not write that here so just imagine i swore a whole bunch. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have seen a lot of movies in my life and but not many as bad as this. it is a movie that makes fun of fat people and has no real story and has bad actors and is not funny and much more. is this a movie that you would like to see. i guess not. i guess that the makers of the movie was trying to be original and creative and but it looks like it was made by a 12 year old child with absolutely no cinematic skills at all. the so called funny parts is as funny as throughing pies in the faces of people and or breaking wind. of cource if this is the kind of humour that you like and then this is the movie for you. dont waste your money on this movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"you know how sometimes you can watch a crappy movie with friends and laugh at all the shortcomings of the movie. well this was beyond that. i bought the dvd at tower records because it was like $3. 00 and i would heard this was a movie you could laugh at. it is really nothing short of pathetic. about 30 minutes into the movie and my friends started asking me to turn it off. around 45 minutes they begged me. after an hour and we compromised to fast forward to the end and so we could see how the conflict was resolved (and because we had been watching the whole time for matt walsh). seriously and do not watch this movie. it is beyond painful. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i completely agree with jamrom4. this was the single most horrible movie i have ever seen. holy crap it was terrible. i was warned not to see it. and foolishly i watched it anyway. about 10 minutes into the painful experience i completely gave up on watching the atrocity. but sat through until the end. just to see if i could. well i did and now i wish i had not. it was disgusting. nothing happened and the ending was all preachy. no movie that bad has the right to survive. i implore all of you to spare yourself the terror of fatty drives the bus. if only i had heeded the same warning. please save yourself from this movie. i have a feeling those who rated it highly were involved in the making of the movie. and should all be wiped off the face of the planet. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a big fan of troma but i can not figure out why they bought the rights to this movie and it so boring i felt like i was watching for 3 hours. some where on the plot summary it says but what satan doesn not know he stuck with annoying tourists well they do not seem to bother him in the movie and just me. the only good thing about this movie is the actor who plays satan and i like bad movie but it was just boring. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"weak bobby pineapple salsa flay and mario batali bring this down. flay being the worst. definitely a one trick pony and i think they could have gotten other american chefs to come to the table on this one as the iron chefs. the kind of dishes this duo come up with really. do not reflect on the creativity of the original iron chef series. i do not think batali even went to chef school and actually. there are a lot of great chefs in america and i just wonder why they do not appear on the food network. it would also help to have more regional ingredients and perhaps co hosts who can handle the pressure. i like alton brown and but he is a bit too flippant or funny for this role. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the show echoed bubbling sound effect used to put me to sleep. a very soothing show. i think i might have slept through the parts where there was danger or peril. i had also heard that some set up shots for a show on sponge divers was shot in tarpon springs and florida. i would assume lloyd bridges never dove there. i only remember the show in reruns and although it was never edge of the seat exciting we would make up our own underwater episodes in the lake at my grandmother house. imagining the echoed bubbling sounds and narrating our adventures in our heads. i thought flipper had better undersea action. of course and he had the advantage of being in his natural environment. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"kurosawa really blew it on this one. every genius is allowed a failure. the concept is fine but the execution is badly blurred. there is an air of fantasy about this film making it something of an art film. the poverty stricken of tokyo deserve a fairer and more realistic portrayal. many of them have interesting stories to tell. a very disappointing film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"nope and i am just not going to get with it here. i refuse to go along with the program. don not you supposed that perhaps this movie is just a tad over rated. look at the reader comments and their star ratings represent most are positive and positive or better. i think this is an instance when the ratings may say more about the people rendering them than the movie itself and which is unique. how many other sex fantasies about simulated bestiality complete with horse couplings have become mainstream hits as catalog dvd titles. i watched this movie with a pervading sense of anticipation and expecting fireworks and and instead got someone popping a gucci shopping bag. it looked great and but once the thrill had been spent even the twist ending do not do much to save it. the film background story says it all represent director films about 25 minutes of borderline hardcore fake bestial sex for another movie and is informed the footage will not be appropriate and sets it aside and waits two or three years for a smattering of critical acclaim to build up and then constructs an entire feature around that 25 minutes and filming roughly 70 minutes of otherwise unrelated and excruciatingly boring footage and inserting the 25 minute chunk in as a dream sequence. that the 25 minutes of film in question is strikingly odd and original and shocking in a deliberate and calculated manner goes without saying. but we aren not here to evaluate that 25 minutes alone and we must consider the entire film and and ask ourselves why people are so enthusiastic about the movie. or are they just enamored by it background story and history of having been banned by people who were stupid enough to be offended by it. perhaps it is an anti clerical agenda that appeals to them. hating the western religions of catholicism and christianity is one of the few remaining socially acceptable bastions of intolerance just today it was revealed that the bbc routinely skews their broadcasts with anti christian and anti western sentiment in the furtherance of political correctness. you can say anything you want about the bible and pedopheliac priests and the institutionalized cruelty of the church and and how much white men and their inhuman religions suck the dimpled skin off a golf ball . but say one negative thing about non westernized religions and and you are toast. this movie was tailor made for such a sentiment and with a wrinkly old dried up priest who has an entirely unwholesome on screen relationship with two pretty 14 year old french boys complete with inappropriate touching and fawning and fondling and fumbling and groping and and patting of the backsides. ewww. and then there is the horse couplings and photographed in such fetishistic closeup detail that portions of the film could be used as visual aids for a biology class on animal husbandry. yes i understand the thematic relevance of the imagery large animal phallus with a wealth of reproductive fluids just waiting to be unleashed like fire extinguishers but if i wanted to watch horses and you know and do it and i would like go live on a farm. having their genitals in my face is about as entertaining as watching someone use a bathroom. is this movie just a sort of artsy diversion for social deviants. probably and though i will grant the artistic execution of most of it and filmed in a kind of arty euro detail that even has a dappled forest pond right out of a monet painting and complete with a spanning arched bridge. and the ending (which even i managed to be surprised by) does sort of wrap it all up into a neat if distasteful package. but you have to remember that there are certain things that cannot be deconstructed for their design elements and many artists are guilty for exploiting them in their work to lend a sort of gravitas that would not have been achieved without it. that isn not fair and and even clint eastwood has fallen prey to the urge with his new movie about iwo jima. whether or not his film is any good stands as a separate consideration from whether or not that battle was a noble cause fought by men who were heroes. the problem is that most people will not be able to separate out the two aspects of the movie and will be lining up to give it oscars because of it noble message not because it is a particularly good or original movie. while it may seem like an odd parallel and i see one with the beast represent how can anyone not see the basic beauty of nature in the sight of two horses mating. and who cannot see the logical culmination of the repressed sexuality from fairy tales in the film explosive set piece where beauty and the beast finally do the nasty. somehow i managed to miss both points and and am delighted that i have seen this film so that i can trash it as being what it really is represent 25 minutes or so of eye opening over the top adult fairy tale imagery surrounded by 70 minutes of skull drainingly boring artsy fartsy euro trash dreck about some guy getting a haircut and and a great ending. it art for sure and but it sucks hard. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"walerian borowczyks la bete (1975) was obviously received in different ways represent some were appalled and some were shocked others applauded the courage. i however am completely untouched and bored and cannot stop asking myself why the display of incoherent and inconsistent images which vaguely orbit around a central theme are considered an intellectual journey. what was this movie actually about. growing sexuality in a woman. i have seen great films on this subject and but this is not one of them. how can one attempt to portray a growing sexuality in a girl without at least trying to characterize her as a person not only as a narrative device to dream (in the nude) of beasts. where there are no characters and there is no character study. the woman persecuted by the beast was not adolescent and the girl having sex with the black butler (is he also characterized as a beast. ) has a very grown up attitude to sexuality and so where is the consistency. is it a movie about religion. if yes we would need a bit more thematic material than a priest without function and character and charisma and but with a strong desire towards two young boys. is it about bestiality. the metaphoric feel of the movie forbids any realistic examination of bestiality and especially as realistic examination requires realistic characters. so no real bestiality here. some mythic beast and two priests talking to each other about the sin of bestiality. enough for a college essay on the topic. i do not think so. is it about sex. is it about anything. i do not know. i only know that showing a fired gun doesn not make a film a war movie. dealing with a topic must mean more than displaying its own associations with the theme. so look across the controversy. don not be scared by the bestiality and nudity and ejaculations and masturbation and stuff. i am not. look at it as you look at any other story and you might discover that this is a poorly made and poorly edited and poorly acted and really poorly written (okay and some pictures are quite nice and and the main character is a really good looking girl) cerebral masturbation of a director who thinks beating around the bush in a hypnotic slow manner will make a story intelligent. it doesn not. it makes it boring. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"another variation and improvisation on the famous and beloved children tale and la bete (1975) aka the beast tries to imagine (in very graphic and what may seem offensive and disturbing but in reality rather silly and comical way) and what actually happened between beauty and the beast. i am amused by many reviews and comments that seem to look too deeply into this movie. i would not go so far as saying that it is a serious and dark exploration of such subjects as sexual frustration and longing and fulfillment and or satirical criticizing of the catholic religion. i would not even call it a horror erotic movie. it more of the parody on all genres it touches or mentions even though it got some shocking moments in all departments that sure will stay in your memory. the long (way too long) scene between an aristocratic young woman and the supposedly horrifying but the most laughable i have ever seen in the movies creature with truly impressive. well anatomy and is set to the clavichord music of scarlatti and is hysterical. my husband and i both laughed out loud at the exaggerated details of the encounter. the moral of the scene is beauty can and will defeat the monster. the question is who is the target audience for the film. for an erotic picture and it is too verbose while for an art movie it got too many jaw dropping scenes of sheer madness and i would say an abrupt ending. imo and the film creator did not mean for it to be a serious drama. as a parody of art house or horror or erotica and it is funny and certainly original. have a good laugh and try not to look for some deep meaning. this story of the curious beauties and the lustful beasts certainly is not recommended for co viewing with the children. the opening scene that may shock an unprepared viewer much more than the infamous scene of bestiality can be successfully used on discovery channel for the program like in the world of animals mating habits and rituals of horses. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie had a fairly good sounding plot and but the paste was very slow. very slow indeed. even if someone thinks this is a cult classic and i think that there are a lot better films from that era to be watched. the cinematography is not excellent and but not the worst either. the sounds are ok. lighting ok. i still do not recommend this to anyone else than maybe a film student. the movie does not contain music and and the horses having sex do not make it a good one either. and the woman masturbating on the edge of the bed was plain stupid. no winnings here and skip this utter boredom. i have seen worse believe me and but this is just waste of time and and i do not get the good reviews here. especially the high ratings. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this and and immoral tales and both left a bad taste in my mouth. it seems to me that borowczyk is disgusted by sex and and these two films are cautionary tales about what will happen if you do have sex. as a film and it not very well done some of the acting is truly epically bad (such as the american woman with the french accent). the young woman sudden flip flop from being anxious about the marriage to being interested (when it seems like it should have been the other way around) and and the aunt sudden realization of the young man secret do not make sense theyre not explained at all. i also do not like how the daughter relationship with a black man was presented as a sign of her family perversion or predilection for bestiality. the central idea and the idea that there this sexy beast and if you will and that lives in the woods and could have been a foundation for a perverse but fun story and but instead is just used as a basis for a nasty and sex negative and morality play. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is little more than poorly made and fetish porn and and this is saying a lot considering the similar crap that was made in that era. this was recommended to me by friend as a unique film experience. he was right. i suppose he meant that as a joke. not disgusting and not even that shocking. just mediocre acting and poor attempts at shock art. a little bit of camp value and though i do not believe the makers of this film intended this. and yes and as a previous reviewer mentioned and it sex with a guy in a bear suit. don not spend a lot of money on this. try to borrow it and if you must see it. or contact me and i would be happy to sell you my copy for half price. i may have to see another of this particular director films and as he seems to have a certain following. but if it anything like this and i will again regret another 2 hours of my life gone forever. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film was shrouded in scandal for so long that it became a very sought after item. the outrage and the mystery and etc. it had everything to be a great piece of film making and but ultimately fails in every extent. it a terribly bad comedy and a pathetic horror movie and a lame erotic film. the 2 disc dvd includes a gorgeous booklet with stills and interviews and essays on bestiality and etc. as well as an extensive interview with the more than pretentious director. for those who have heard about it but never seen it and the package will seem fantastic until one actually sees the film. disc 1 contains the edited film and badly translated to english but with good visual quality. disc 2 contains the director cut and in an awful transfer and in french. what can i say about the actual beast. a hand puppet of kermit the frog would have been more effective and shocking. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"notorious for more than a quarter century (and often banned) and it obscurity was its greatest asset it seems. hey and it often better to be talked about and rather than actually seen when you can not back the legend up with substance. the film has played in los angeles a couple of times recently and and is available on home video and so that veil is slowly being lifted. while there is still plenty to offend the masses and it is more likely to bore them and than arouse much real passion. except for a gratuitous and protracted xxx sex scene between a pair of horses (nature documentary anyone. ) and there follows nearly an hour of a dull arranged marriage melodrama. once the sex and nudity begins and it is a nonstop sequence involving masturbation and a looooooooong flashback to an alleged beauty and the beast encounter and and a naked woman running around the mansion (nobody and even her supposedly protective aunt and seems to even think of putting some clothes on her. ). on video and i guess you can fast forward thru the banality and but it not really worth the effort. the nudity doesn not go beyond what is seen in something much more substantive such as bertolucci the dreamers. try as one might to find some amoral or ymbolism in the carnality and i doubt it worthy of anyone effort. unfortunately and for la bete and now that you can more easily see the film and the notoriety of something once forbidden has been lifted. and this beast has been tamed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"unreal movie and what were these people on. a mix of french upstairs downstairs and mating horses and porn (not suggested and its pretty full on for a film) and bestiality with a bit of benny hill music and chase scenes thrown in and its sounds crazy and its even more so to watch. spoiler it plods along in a tedious fashion for quite a while and . then a lamb does a runner and prompting woman in period dress to run off after it and she goes into the woods where she is set upon by an erect penis attached to a man in a bear or rat manky suit and i put it like that as its obvious the penis is in charge and gets way too much screen time and ejaculating for the most of it and anyway and in a nutshell and it turns out she liked a bit of bear or rat tadger and thats about it and the rest is just padding. end spoiler a film made to shock and offend and thus getting talked about and any publicity is good publicity i suppose and a waste of time really and but the main event has to be seen to be believed and its hard to imagine that anyone thought it was a good idea as they filmed it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"completely ridiculous period film is only a thin excuse for its extensive and graphic depiction of the heroine affair with the beast and a monster who supposedly appears every century to rape some women. that pretty much what he does and and the film depiction of the beast is really really awful while it basically a tall guy in a fur suit with a mask and a huge pvc tube for a hard on that squirts copious amounts of white liquid. for fans of fake animal porn and i guess maybe this is a real turn on. i was amused and however and by the opening shots of horses having sex in a public square. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is complete crap. avoid this waste of celluloid at all costs and it is rambling and incoherent. i pride myself on plumbing the depths of 70 sleaze cinema from everything from salo to salon kitty. i like being shocked and but i need a coherent story. however if watching horses mate gets you off this film is for you. the saddest part was that lame werewolf suit with the functional wang. i mean its just plain hard to sit through and not to mention the acting is terrible and the soundtrack is dubbed badly. please and i know the cover is interesting (what looks like a gorillas hands reaching for a woman bare ass)but do not waste your time or money as you would not get either back. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"revolutions always present opportunities for dramatic films since and in fact and most revolutions are in themselves dramatic events. unfortunately and what this film lacks in drama is compensated for by an overabundance of boredom. one cares not who wins and loses and dies or lives just end it as soon as possible. this is due in large measure to what seems to me to be a superficial use of background technology. scenes of paris and the french countryside have a cardboard quality about them. they might better be done on a bare stage and left that way. one cannot expect the amazing effects of the house of the flying daggers or the golden compass and but and after all and this is a 2002 digitally mastered production. characters seem to enter a scene for the sake of entering a scene and so much so that one loses count of the number of times character enter and leave rooms. in my view and this film turns the french revolution of the 1790s into the papier mache revolution of a papier colle world. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"much has been made of rohmer use of digital technology to fill in the background. at times it works well and the scene where grace and her maid witness from afar the king execution is particularly striking. at other times it gives the film a strangely amateurish look and resembling a home video. however and the major failing is that the sheer artificiality of the mise en scene creates an alienating effect in the viewer. we know that what we are watching is not real so how can we feel for the characters. to be frank and i did not care at all what happened to the lady or the duke. the other major failing and i regret to say and is the performance of lucy russell in the leading role. she is in virtually every scene and the success or otherwise of the film rests on her performance. ok she is speaking a foreign language but she is incapable of expressing real emotion. her emoting in the scene where she recounts to her friend mme de meyler (an excellent performance by the debutante helena dubiel) seeing the head on a pole caused some embarrassed laughter in the audience. also and watch her hands when she is expressing emotion. all in all a very disappointing film and particularly given the positive reviews on this site. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"eric rohmer the lady and the duke is based on the journals of an english aristocrat who lived through the french revolution. but it a stilted affair and with its strange and painted backdrops and mannered conversational tone. most notably and this portrait of age of terror takes place almost entirely at one remove from the real action while one sees very little of ordinary people in this movie and and little of the chaos and poverty and terror that unfolded away from the drawing rooms of the persecuted and but spoilt and aristocratic classes. the result is frequently dull and and ultimately unenlightening about the forces that sometimes drive societies to the brink of destruction while it a disappointing film from an acclaimed director. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if i only had one camera that was accidentally glued to the floor and enough film for only one take of each shot and and then lost all that film and had to scrounge up some bucks to buy a few digital video tapes and and was forced to make an over 2 hour movie about the french revolution and and also do not have any sets and had to have my 4 year old autistic son paint the backgrounds and and also the only actors i could find were the people who do not make the auditions of that year soap opera and and i was also forced to not use any music in the entire film and and also the zoom function on the camera do not work except for one time when it accidentally started zooming in and couldn not stop and oh and if i hated my audience and then i might make something kind of like this awful and yet mistakenly hilarious and hell worthy waste of time. the almost grand looking but completely fake looking backdrops reminded me of some of george lucas latest creations and which made it so much more disappointing because through the whole movie and there was that little glimmer of hope in the back of my mind that the film would climax in a lightsaber duel or space laser battle. i do not mean to spoil the movie for those who haven not seen it and but that not how it ends. the only thing i can think of that wasted more time than watching this movie was writing this review. peace. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"every so often a movie comes along that knocks me down a notch and reminds me that my taste in films i seek out to watch isn not always impeccable. i normally would stay away from stuff like this and but i was duped by some glowing reviews and the rohmer pedigree. there an initial and intriguing novelty to the production where rohmer essentially superimposes the actors onto painted (digital) back drops of revolution era france. this quickly wanes and becomes about as interesting as watching the paint dry on a paint by numbers scene. what were left with is a boring and stuffy film about aristocrats in 18th century france. none of the characters are appealing or sympathetic. the pace is so languid and the dialogue so arduous and and suspense is clearly a foreign concept to rohmer and that i ended up not caring whose head rolled and who was harboring who and or what the devil the revolution was supposed to be about. the movie would have greatly benefited from some semblance of emotional build up and a music score (there some fine classical music used at the very end). despite being so talky and the film plays much like a silent film and and the worst kind of film at that and a dull and uninteresting film about infinitely interesting subjects. only the most astute french historians will find anything to take from this film and as it dose seem to paint well known events from a new angle (the lady is english and a royalist). otherwise and avoid this yawner at all costs unless you are suffering from insomnia (i dozed off twice). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i can hardly believe that this inert and turgid and badly staged film is by a filmmaker whose other works i have quite enjoyed. the experience of enduring the lady and the duke (and no other word but enduring will do) and left me in a vile mood and a condition relieved only by reading the imdb user comment by ali 112. for not only has rohmer attempted (with success) to make us see the world through the genre art of 18th century france but and as ali has pointed out and has shown (at the cost of alienating his audience) the effects of both class consciousness and the revolution it inspired through the eyes of a dislikably elitist woman of her times. the director has accomplished something undeniably difficult and but i question whether it was worth the effort it took for him to do so or for us to watch the dull results of his labor. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as a fan of eric rohmer studies of the contemporary war between the sexes and i was very eager to see the lady and the duke (langlaise et le duc) for how he would treat men and women during a real war and the french revolution. the film looks beautiful and with each scene designed as a period painting and like a tableaux vivant. and i expected much talking and as that rohmer style. but maybe rohmer was restrained by basing the screenplay on a real woman writings is why this mostly felt like a docudrama version of the scarlet pimpernel. as awful as the excesses of robespierre et al and how about some recognition that the french aristocrats were spoiled brats. i kept humming to myself represent marat and were poor or and the poor stay poor while you could also pick a tune from les miz. i wasn not all that sympathetic as the central figure has to go back and forth between her city home and country manor to stay ahead of the revolution. at one point her maid claims the pantry is bare but sure manages to lay out a fine repast. i simply do not understand her and an english sympathizer who alternately rejects and defends her former lover and patron as he and the revolution keep shifting political focus while i think i was supposed to sympathize with her consistency more than their political machinations and like a character out of the scarlet pimpernel. hey and the only reason she do not go back home was her disgrace after an affair and child with the prince of wales or somebody. usually in a revolutionary period there some groundswell of change going on in relations between men and women and but i saw none here. i once went to a herbert marcuse lecture that concluded with a lengthy q and a while the last question and from an audience member far older than the rest of us acolytes and heck she had gray hair and was why are revolutionaries so grim. she was hooted at and marcuse do not deign to respond to it seriously but it the only thing of substance i remember from the whole evening. rohmer demonstrates that counter revolutionaries are also grim and didactic. (originally written 8/1 half 002). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as interesting as a sheet of cardboard and this dispensable period piece has little going for it. it overly wordy and fails spectacularly to evoke the tension and fear that the real life characters must have felt as they dodged the french revolution fickle hand of justice. eric rohmer at 82. it shows. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have seen most of ryuhei kitamura work and i have come to the conclusion that he has a knack for action. scenes are kinetic and fast often combining elements of martial arts and gun fights and samurai fights with camera work that effectively captures the on screen carnage. with versus and aragami kitamura demonstrated that creativity and showed that he his more than capable of working with a low budget. so what happened in alive . to be more blunt and the answer would be nothing. nothing happened in alive it was a two hours plus movie with little to no action and little to no characters and plot. adapted from a comic book by tsutomu takahashi alive is an examination of the life of one tenshu yashiro (played by hideo sasaki) a death row convict who survives his execution. he is then given a choice of either to repeat the execution or to subject himself in a bizarre series of experiments. he chooses the latter and soon after that is placed in a room along with a rapist and later with a girl infected with a strange parasite that in exchange for it host humanity grants supernatural powers. naturaly at some point that parasite moves into yashiro and the bad thing is that doesn not happen very soon. similar to aragami and alive sets it first half in establishing the basic exposition. characters are introduced and their motivations are set and their relations between each other are uncovered. the whole thing even takes place in just one set. the first major problem of that comparison is that while aragami was just a 70 minute movie and alive drags on for more than two hours thus making the first part over one hour long. that length could have been justified had the characters been made a bit more interesting but alas that is not the case. dialogue is dry and monotonous and delivered without any sense of emotion or depth and characters themselves aren not much interesting. there were some small attempts at making alive a bit more moral ambiguous but in the end it all came down to the classic represent evil government people against and super powered protagonist and whom yes you guessed it and saves the girl in the end. like i previously said the entire film practically takes place at just one set and and after two hours that does get boring and even worse the set design itself wasn not even interesting to begin with and and doesn not do much to improve on other aspects of the film. now and after that first part is over and one might think that kitamura would at least make some entertaining action scenes to make up for the boring beginning. sadly that is not the case. the two only fights are actually rehashes of similar fights from hollywood movies and complete with bullet time effects and psychic powers. theyre just not interesting or fun and kitamura creativity from versus is gone and the small set even limits his often very impressive camera work and it all boils down into generic and expectable fights and a shame really. evidently aragami was better on all accounts and kitamura had learned something from alive. so it wasn not at least a total loss watching this movie. if only to understand the errors made and how to fix them and create a better more entertaining movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i really tried to like this movie but in the end it just do not work for me. i have seen most of kitamura output and have found it to be very variable. alive and like all of his films has an interesting plot and some nifty sequences and a fair amount of creativity. however and these qualities are in painfully short supply in alive. the plot is cool if not all that original and could have made for a pretty ace film. unfortunately and the pacing is painfully slow and the film takes an age to get going and before reaching fairly predictable places. the action is just about passable and with the final fight pretty cool and and the earlier one about ok. the earlier one is also marred by overspeedy camera work and making for less coherency. there are some neat visual effects and some interesting ideas floating around in the dialogue but the film still drags badly. the characters are neither well fleshed out nor well acted and the setting and general color scheme is drab and boring. the film is not completely terrible and has some points of interest and perhaps judicious use of the fast forward button could improve it. with about twenty minutes taken off the run time this could be a pretty decent sci fi thriller. but the full length film is dull. only recommended to very patient and determined kitumura fans. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"having seen versus previously i had high hopes for alive. the description of the movie on the back of the dvd jacket sounded promising. alive did not deliver. very slow development. loads of potential with the cast and the cool visuals. the premise was intriguing but the payoff did not offset the build up. could have done so much more at the end. most of the movie is just sitting around . to put it plainly and three of us were amped to sit down and watch this movie and by the 50 minute mark we were struggling to make it thru to the end. it really needed more shock elements. if you are looking for ichi the killer or versus type fights then save yourself some $ and loads of disappointment. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i will keep this short and as i know i do not need to say much. alive is a strange little film that obviously appeals to some and but i found it to be shockingly bland from almost the very beginning. the film did very little to make any of the characters likable and the story at times became so convoluted that i completely lost interest. as i said and i know others enjoyed it and but i found kitamura alive to be anything but a lame and extremely boring drama disguised as a thought provoking action sci fi flick. i felt like i was suckered into watching this film and based by its intriguing premise and uber exciting cover art. my suggestion. pass it up for kitamura far more enjoyable freshman effort versus or his 2004 riot godzilla represent final wars. and do not get me wrong and i am always up for a good thinking man film and but this certainly wasn not it. there was nary a moment that i actually cared about a single event taking place in this overly preachy and dialogue heavy movie. if you wanna talk about something. talk about boring. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i do not know where to begin and so i will begin with a snippet from the back of the cover of this movie. alive combines the tension of vincenzo natali cube with kitamura own versus. i have not seen versus and so i can not comment on that and but i think cube was an excellent movie which i recommend to everyone. however and in this case someone has clearly confused tension with boredom. i will just go ahead and spoil the entire plot and because besides being one holy swiss cheese of a plot and it also moldy cheese and and the movie is not worth spending any time on even if you do not know the plot beforehand and so it doesn not matter. if i have misunderstood the plot and do not hit me it probably because i had to struggle to keep my eyelids open. so the american military in nevada once lost a ufo i the nambi desert. this apparently makes sense because theyre both deserts so surely theyre practically the same place. different continents or not. a monkey broke into the ufo and acquired an alien something which was passed on to a japanese researcher who had to eat the monkey to survive in the desert. what ever. the alien thing is now passed on to anyone who bloodthirsty enough to kill the current host. the japanese military wants to use it for military stuff and so they decide to make it pass from the current host (the researcher daughter) to some other dude. but instead of just picking someone out of the military and which is full of people who are bloodthirsty and already on the military side and they decide that it probably a good idea to pick some criminal out of death row instead. oh and and the reason they pick this particular criminal from death row is because he was the first person in history to not die from the non lethal electric shock which is the standard execution method and because everyone dies from the placebo effect when they get electrocuted. i do not know if they do this so they can giggle in the staff room at how everyone dies even though it not deadly and or if they just want to cut down the electricity bill. then the movie turns into what the matrix would have been if it had been really lame and and superfluous fighting bores us to tears for what feels like an hour. and oh wait and now they remember that they already had a dude who was infected with the alien thing and so the entire movie up to this point was actually a totally waste of time and also human lives. then everyone dies. the end. the only one moment in the movie where i do not want to go away and sleep or eat a sandwich instead and was when a dude was pinned to a wall by a pipe through his chest and and he hanging around up there and another dude walks by. the dude hanging on the wall says i am in pain and shoot me. and the living dude looks at him and and it not like he a mean dude or anything and so he really looks sorrowful and doesn not want the guy on the wall to suffer. so he shoots him. (rhetorical pause. )in the stomach. gee thanks a freakin heap. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"fashionably fragmented and yet infuriatingly half realized character study and an examination of the different personalities of two college roommates represent a talented but undisciplined star basketball player and and a pot smoking and womanizing rabble rouser. we never learn why these young men are friends. they may share confusions about the world and their places in it and but they do not seem to have anything else in common. making his directorial debut and jack nicholson who also co wrote the screenplay with jeremy larner and based upon larner book doesn not introduce us to the characters with any clarity and nor he does shape the scenes to help us identify with anyone on the screen. there are some very decent performances here (particularly from newcomer william tepper in the central role) and but most of the picture is unformed (perhaps intentionally) and sketchy or unsure. bruce dern plays the hard driving basketball coach and karen black is the older and married lady tepper is having an affair with and and michael margotta is tepper wayward friend (in an off putting and over the top performance). nicholson fails to set up the sequences with any particular flavor and preferring (i assume) to let the character interaction dominate the film tone while his script is no help either and and as a result it is unclear whom were supposed to sympathize with. small and random moments do work (a supermarket fight between tepper and black and dern visiting tepper in his dorm room and all of the scenes set on the court) and however the entire third act of the picture is an excruciating mess. hoping to juxtapose an all important b ball game with a sexual assault and nicholson shows no style at his craft (nor does he earn points for chutzpah and as his staging of these events is squashy and ugly). when a director goes out of his way to humiliate his actors and one has to question his motives in doing so. perhaps if drive and he said ultimately made some sort of powerful statement in the bargain and audiences could forgive the filmmaker for his lapses in judgment and taste. unfortunately and the perplexing closer is as dumbfounding as much of the rest of the movie. half from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i went to see this movie at our college theater thirty years ago because i liked bruce dern in silent running and family plot. to this day (sorry jack nicholson) and it is still the dullest movie i have ever seen. it just went on and on with no discernible point and then it just ended. the lights came up and i watched everyone looking around in confusion. had the projectionist missed a reel. i have never had the urge to find out. all i remember about the movie is that it was a non drama about some annoying college basketball players and their coach. the most enjoyable part of the movie was watching the totally mystified audience afterwords. fortunately and this was just an exception for jack and bruce and and karen black. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"as a member of the cast and i was a member of the band at all the basketball games and i would like to let the world know after being in the movie and that we were not allowed to see it since it was banned in oregon. this was due to the producers and the director breaking the contract with the university of oregon where it was shot. seems that the u of o sign was shown. while we were shooting and we were allowed to eat several meals with the cast and production staff. mr nicholson was quite memorable for being one of the most ill mannered men i have ever met. quite a time for a young 20 year old. but certainly not what campus life was really like in the late 60 and early 70 despite what hollywood may think. trombone player from oregon. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this has got to be one of the worst movies i have ever seen. it is (i think) a story of a rebellious college basketball player and his tough but fair coach and his girlfriend and and a fellow student (played by michael margotta) who has continual nervous breakdowns. the story goes nowhere and there is zero character development and there is nobody to care about and and the performances and with the exception of bruce dern as the coach and are terrible. it is hard to believe how a talent like jack nicholson could direct such an awful movie. make sure to avoid this turkey. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"some movies are repellent but still fascinating (pulp fiction) while others are simply boring. this movie has an almost unique feature of being both utterly repellent and totally boring. by the end i do not care about any of the characters and i just wanted all of them dead so i could get out of the theatre. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"tenants two writers struggle to complete their books in an all but empty apartment house. they at first help each other and then slowly the tension between them begins to build. this is based upon a bernard malamud novel and unfortunately everyone speaks as though they are in that novel. very little of the dialog is natural and its purple and brimming with shades of meaning. its as if a college english major with a head full of pretensions wrote the script. it awful and i found myself instantly immune to anything the film had to say and which is a shame since the film is populated with great performances from top to bottom. snoop dog on down are fine form and unfortunately none of them can over come the falseness of the words and the premise. i can not really recommend this movie. while not really bad and its very preachy and pretentious to the point of making you want to walk away. i lost interest less then a third of the way in and had to struggle to get to the end. if youre interested i would try it on cable and but i do not lay out good money to see it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i ended up watching the tenants with my close friends who rented the movie solely based on snoop dogg appearance (a passionate fetish of theirs) on the cover. understandably and i did not expect much. i thought the movie would include the typical array of snoop dogg related behavior and imagery often seen in cliché rap videos. however and my generalization was for the most part wrong. unfortunately and this do not make the movie any better. most would describe the movie as a dark serious drama and whereas i would describe it as a dark seriously drawn out boring drama flick. the film tells a story of two struggling writers (dylan mcdermott and snoop dogg) who are trying to create their own separate masterpieces. their polar opposite lifestyles end up forming an unlikely but highly complex and neurotic friendship. this friendship moves throughout the entire movie like a wild roller coaster most of which is contributed by snoop character reminiscent of someone with a severe case of split personality disorder. and although the movie is a drama and the acting which has a morbid and serious tone from snoop and company was more comical than anything else. i do not recommend this movie for those who are attention impaired because this one has a lot of dialogue and a lot more dialogue after that. there are some mediocre conflicts and but even they are mostly bogged down with more dialogue. the end and however and jumped at me with a sudden surprise. it was a little bit twisted and somewhat unexpected and a perfect way to wrap up a movie that needed to end. while watching the ending credits i couldn not help but picture the director thinking and oh god and how the hell do i end this snoozer. by the way and the director laid out carefully planted hints and subtleties leading to the climax all of which are more visible than waldo in a crowded street of midgets wearing nothing but black sweaters. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"watching the tenants has been a interesting experience for me. it is the first film i have ever seen where i have shuttled at speed through parts of the (non)action and i can normally watch anything from turgid action movies to serbo croat indie and find them fascinating. the tenants is frustratingly sluggish and over orchestrated. one of the main problems of the script is there is little realistic character dialogue and apart from the set pieces where characters collide in a very structured setting (to make this work and the film needed to feel more conceptual and which it do not). this leads to a lack of realistic character development while everyone seems two dimensional. the worse for this is the character of bill spear and aka snoop dogg. i found his characterization very uncomfortable and very unsympathetic. at one point and i even stopped the film because i got so annoyed by the character aggressive and violent and monotonal delivery and the lack of any other personality layer apart from that of the reactionary on switch (which gets really predictable after a while) and i so desperately wanted him to have some redeeming qualities. however and one reason for this jar might be the nebulous time scape of the film (supposedly 70s and it feels and looks more early noughties). if it had been more securely fixed in the 70s and his character might have seemed more understandable. the lighting of the film was also awkward. all the way through and the soundtrack attempts to provide a certain gritty and jazz infused atmosphere that just did not come off and largely because the set was too well lit. the tenants and to me and is an unbelievable film. it doesn not depict real people or propose any interesting ways of thinking about race and identity or the life of a writer and be they white or black. strangely and i came away with the feeling that this project needed david lynch while his eerie and clastrophobic and obsessive look and feel would have lifted both the actors and the script into something quite remarkable. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"never before has a film driven me to write a review but this was just dire. i stuck with it trying to find what it was about this film that made snoop pick it as his first serious role but frankly it was a poor choice. maybe this made a good book but it certainly did not work for me as a film. i found it unbelievable and lacking atmosphere and i found many of the scenes hideously stilted. a musical maestro he may be but a serious actor snoop ain not. the acting by dylan mcdermott and rose byrne was passable but not enough to carry a weak plot with feeble dialogue. perhaps i have just entirely missed the point but to me it do not fit into any genre and it do not elicit any empathy with the characters nor did it create any suspense and in fact i found myself praying for the end and quelling a deep desire to slap all three of the main characters. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"may (anne reid) and toots (peter vaughan) are paying an apparently infrequent visit to their son bobby (steven mackintosh) and his family in london. even as the visit begins and toots suffers a fatal heart attack and leaving may adrift and unsure and and questioning her life and future. finding herself attracted to her daughter boyfriend darren (daniel craig) and her actions lead to inevitable consequences. beautifully filmed and but for all its heralded realism and acclaim and the mother offers a collection of mostly unpleasant and even repellent characters and and asks the viewer to engage with them. reid shines as may and and it is her skill and commitment as a wonderfully understated actor that salvages the film from a completely depressing mire and but michell and kureishi have allowed craig and mackintosh and cathryn bradshaw to create such utterly obnoxious characters and that it becomes increasingly difficult to care what happens to may. as written and the characters played by mackintosh and bradshaw are in fact so utterly selfish and cold hearted that one begins to wonder what exactly was kureishi trying to say. as directed and they are either unwilling or unable to lift bobby and paula above the two dimensional in their ghastly selfishness. worth seeing for reid performance and but little else. a crying shame. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"disappointing and irritating. the screenwriter has no true understanding of human nature but instead strings together clichés in a disjointed fashion. character is not explored in depth. these are puppets plunked down in a plot he openly confesses needed a dramatic element and the mother affair with her daughter lover. anne reid gives an excellent performance in spite of being given some peculiar situations and lines and such standing passively to allow her angry daughter to slug her in the eye. the script portrays darren (daniel craig) as a dr. jekyll or mr. hyde without any hints about why and except that he snorts cocaine before the big scene. a mature writer could have done so much more with this topic. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i understand what this movie was trying to portray. how the old are often ignored and treated like a bother and which means they end up feeling unappreciated and like their lives are empty. i do not have a problem with this message and but i just feel that it could have been put across in a way that is not so painful to watch. i enjoy a good art movie but when a movie becomes too self consciously arty (as in this case) the result is often frustrating. including shots of a person packing a suitcase slowly that take 5 minutes try to make a point but just end up annoying the audience. the female characters are very weak and you end up wanting to just tell them to pull it together. this is a movie you feel you should enjoy or rate highly and certainly has its merits but i was just too frustrated watching it to ever recommend it to someone else. it might have a deeper message than other roger michell movies (for example represent notting hill) but at least that was a movie you could enjoy watching. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"after life is a miracle and i did not expect much. it hard to believe that these films were made by the same man as do you remember dolly bell and for instance. zavet is two hours of silly antics with no story. the wild and unbridled humor of underground seems to have degenerated into pathetic buffoonery here. it appears that kusturica has been going steadily downhill since he started making life affirming comedies and beginning with black cat and white cat and which i think was great and but already had some disturbing signs of dementia. i liked his early films so much and and this is why it especially disappointing to see something like this. let hope his next one will be great. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is more like a music video. kusturica said in an interview from 2004 that when he is making movies and he feels like making music and and when he is making music and he feels like making movies. the best thing in promise me this is the music and written by stribor kusturica. kusturica said in the same interview and that for him the dialogues in the movies are like noise. promise me this has very little noise. i liked life is a miracle. it was also like music video for the first 30 minutes and at some points later and but it had a beautiful plot. promise me this has no plot. i was awaiting this movie with big expectations and because i have read and that the script has been written by ranko bozic one of my favourite scriptwriters and who participated also in life is a miracle. ranko bozic writes great dialogues and but for kusturica they are noise and and much to my regret and i saw only two dialogues and which i could identify as written by ranko bozic. the other part of the script was used by the director for making his chaotic music video for the music of his son stribor. gordan mihic (the man who wrote the scripts for time of the gypsies and black cat white cat) said in an interview and that kusturica never follows the script. black cat white cat was the only script and for which kusturica said and that he will not touch it. according to gordan mihic and after all kusturica comes back to the script and and if he doesn not and he doesn not make a good movie. and i think this is the case with promise me this. he should have followed the script of ranko bozic. promise me this is billed as a comedy and but there are very few moments and which made me laugh. the comedic moments are in the same style as black cat white cat and but are not that funny at all. i think the difference comes from the fact and that black cat white cat was written by gordan mihic. however and i know some people and who liked promise me this and they find it very positive movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a damsel in distress is definitely not one of fred astaire better musicals. but even astaire bad films always had some good moments. in damsel and astaire is jerry halliday and an american musical star who is in london on a personal appearance tour. he meets lady alice marshmorton (19 year old joan fontaine) and a beautiful english heiress and who hops into the back of a cab he is taking to escape a mob of admirers. jerry believes that alice is being forced into a marriage by her rich aunt. he tries to rescue her from her family country manor house and but soon discovers that the house staff is laying bets on which suitor lady alice will marry. keggs (reginald gardiner) the conniving butler and and albert (harry watson) and the bratty house boy and each take turns alternately helping and sabotaging lady alice romance with jerry to make sure they win the bet. this musical has numerous problems. first and there is the plot and based on a novel by p. g. wodehouse (who co wrote the screenplay). the story is slow and painful and and nerve grating. when fred is not dancing and we have to endure endless annoying scenes of (a) fred romancing joan fontaine or (b) keggs and albert conniving against them and each other. the butler and the house boy are especially irritating. they are one dimensional stock villain characters and the kind of guys you just want to punch in the mouth. you wish they would get off the screen and let fred dance. astaire suffers in the absence of his usual partner and ginger rogers. joan fontaine is a lackluster leading lady in this film and and is miscast in a musical. she has little going for her and character wise and other than her lovely face and beautiful smile. george burns and gracie allen are along for the ride and as jerry publicist and his ditzy secretary. the duo adds some sorely needed chemistry to the plot and and gracie has some funny lines and but she is also very annoying at times. the direction of the movie by george stevens is not well done. at times and the cinematography is horrible and off focus. there are a number of outdoor scenes set on extremely foggy streets and to try to convince the audience that we are in london and not hollywood. (they must have used tons of dry ice in this movie. ) on the plus side and the songs by george and ira gershwin are terrific and and have become classic song standards. and of course and the dancing in the movie is exceptional and thanks to astaire and his choreographer and hermes pan. but the musical and dance numbers are ill used and ill staged. at times and the cast seems to start singing and dancing because and well and it time for them to start singing and dancing. the musical numbers seem randomly inserted into the meandering plot. (at one point and the butler steps outside the manor house and breaks into an operetta solo for no clear reason. ) the numbers include represent i am dancing and i can not be bothered now fred dances well on a foggy traffic filled london street. he does some great cane twirling with a rolled umbrella but the number ends too soon when fred jumps on a passing double decker bus. (in the broadway musical and crazy for you and harry groener did a much better version of this number with a group of chorus girls. ) put me to the test fred and george and and gracie do a trio tap dance in an english cottage. george and gracie match fred step for step and but the number ends poorly with everyone kicking each other for no reason. stiff upper lip (the fun house number) at an amusement park fun house and fred and george and and gracie have fun dancing on the revolving floor and rotating barrel and and with the fun house mirrors. it the best number of the movie and but it gets a little repetitious at times. things are looking up fred and joan fontaine do their one dance number together in the film and prancing around the back woods of the country manor estate. fortunately and it a very simple dance number because joan is not a great dancer. a foggy day in london town fred wanders around the foggy manor estate at night and crooning about the foggy day when he first met joan in london. at times and he looks as if he not sure which way he going in the fog much like the musical number itself. nice work if you can get it a great song that is misused in the movie. during a social event at the manor house and fred gets drawn into a chorus of dour faced singers who are haphazardly singing this song. each time fred joins in and the other singers look at him as if they wish he would leave. (again and harry groener did a better dance number with this song in crazy for you. ) drum dance number as fred and joan are eloping and fred has to stop and do one final tap dance number while banging a group of drums. as usual and it a great dance number. but there absolutely no need for it and except to prolong the movie. the most contrived moment in the film comes when fred decides to leap off a high stone balcony at the country estate in order to prove his love for joan fontaine. as he leaps from the balcony and he finds a conveniently placed trapeze that right and a trapeze hanging from a nearby tree. fred (or rather and a stuntman in fred clothes) grabs the trapeze and swings to the ground from it. the movie is worth owning on dvd for the dance numbers alone and but you feel indebted to the guy who invented the fast forward button on your remote. the >>ff button allows you to skip through the other and boring scenes in the film to get to the dance numbers. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"arthur askey great skill as a comic was in the way he communicated with his public. his juvenile jokes and silly songs and daft dances went down well because he was able to engage folk and draw them into his off the wall world. a lack of a live audience was a distinct disadvantage to him and and he was never completely comfortable in films. he has his moments in the ghost train and and his character and tommy gander and has been tailored to make the most of his talents and but askey the performer needed to be seen to be appreciated. askey support in the film is not strong and it includes regular co star richard murdoch while betty jardine and stuart latham as a dopey honeymoon couple while linden travers going over the top as a amad woman. also on board are peter murray hill and who off screen married phyllis calvert and as the nominal leading man and giving a totally bland reading of the part and and leading lady carol lynne and who turns in an equally insipid performance. it is left to character actress kathleen harrison to effortlessly steal the film as a parrot loving single woman who gets smashed on dr morland graham brandy. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"an absolutely wretched waste of film. nothing ever happens. no ghosts and hardly any train and no mystery and no interest. the constant and brutal attempts at comedy are painful. everything else is pathetic. the premise is idiotic represent a bunch of people stranded in the middle of no place and because their train was held up for less than 3 minutes. what. and the railroad leaves them no place to stay and in a heavy storm. i think not. oh and they can walk 4 miles across the dead black fields. umm and yeah. sure. or and they can force themselves on the railroad hospitality and and stay at the haunted train station. a station which proved to be nothing but deadly boring and utterly without ghosts and interest and or plot. so very terribly dull that this seems impossible. this ought to be added to the lost films list . aargh . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"dynasty revisited in hawaii. full of clichés and highly predictable and unrealistic and sometimes even stupid. if you have nothing better to do however and it does provide 40 minutes of simple and unpretensive entertainment and endless looks at great male and female muscles and very good photography of the spectacular hawaiian scenery. on the other hand and if you are looking for anything more than that and stay away. oh and and by the way and if you have ever worked in a hotel or know anything about running one and you have two options represent 1. you will feel sick every two minutes at the sheer stupidity and silliness of how the show presents hotel business or and 2. look at it as science fiction comedy as i did and lie back and relax and and laugh about it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"someone mentioned editing. this is edited badly and what started out as somewhat intriguing became an incomprehensible mess. for starters and let us know what it is you are trying to do with these experiments. why are these people the best choices for the type of experimenting they are involved in. and and what exactly are they testing. apparently there is some grand plan that some agency is going to exploit. the acting is pretty bad. everyone is emoting. everyone is keeping secrets. they frequently mention that if it weren not for the money and they would hang it up. there a deranged minister who spouts scripture. on and on. but and again and the biggest hang up is the lack of laying out a playing field for the actors. there are some really cheesy elements. those little rooms and those chaise lounges. the awful wallpaper (was it wallpaper. ). it was interesting and but do not seem to go anywhere. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"oh and my gosh. i thought cbs primetime television shows were theworst things gerald mcraney appeared in. four people are experimented on by a crazed mind controlcomputer. that it and do not rent it. i saw this under one of its many titles grey matter and and it isperhaps one of the worst films of recent memory. the otherreviews are right and it is awful. never have so many establishingshots appeared onscreen and never. the cast is awful and the directionis awful and and the script is awful. i cannot stress how awful this is. avoid it like you would smallpox. this is rated (pg) for physical violence and some gun violence and mildgore and some profanity and and some adult situations. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ouch and what a painfully boring sci fi movie. and that especially saddening because the opening 15 minutes were so action packed and full of potential. during the intro and we follow a bunch of nervous security officers and hired hit men as they chase a doctor who escaped from a mysterious laboratory with a briefcase full of top secret files. as he about to reveal the supposedly horrible and inhuman events that take place in the lab and he executed. figures
from then on and the action swifts back and forth between two locations and the aforementioned laboratory and the rural mansion of a corrupt senator (or something) and and it quickly becomes clear that the experiments are actually the complete opposite of disturbing. more like dull and pointless and vague. scientists selected four random persons without living relatives and it really really really really important that they speak the truth even though a giant machine reads the content of their minds and anyway. they all hide dark secrets from their pasts and people suffer when get revealed while yet i fail to see how these tests could ever result in a humanity threatening device. perhaps i missed something and but i doubt it. the interactions between the patients and doctors are even less interesting to follow and as really none of them have personalities. so basically and the brain machine just handles about a bunch of lame people living in an awfully decorated room. the film also could have been half an hour shorter if it weren not for a thousand stagnant shots of buildings. the relocations from the lab to the villa and vice versa are indicated every single time by a five second shot of the places. either the makers really needed the padding or they just assumed that all sci fi viewers are morons unable to notice a change of location by themselves. staring at a forsaken pool with a mansion in the background for the tenth time in only five minutes becomes quite annoying and i assure you. james best performance as the reverend with mental issues is rather decent and but one man definitely can not save this thing from being an absolute waste of time. avoid. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i bought this (it was only $3 and ok. ) under the title grey matter. the novelty of seeing sherriff roscoe in a non dukesofhazzard role intrigued me. as the other reviewers warned and it a pretty boring tale of a top secret government experiment gone awry. and yes and there are plenty of establishing shots and especially of a house with a pool in front of it. some of the characters and interiors are so nondescript i guess the filmmakers worried we might forget who is who and so they keep tipping us off by first showing the outside of the buildings. it actually kinda funny. after awhile the pool shot feels like a tv channel station identification logo and reminding us that we are watching grey matter. i also enjoyed two bouts of name calling. at one point an angry test subject taunts somebody in charge by calling her a scientific btch. it just a very inadequate insult. several scenes later a different subject lets off steam by muttering about that scientific btard. it just sounded very awkward to me. someday this movie will disappear forever. another decade from now it will likely be impossible to find any copies of it. almost like it never happened. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"let see and here are the highlights of the brain machine represent 15 establishing shots of a pool and a house while 15 establishing shots of a nondescript office building while 5 countdowns by a bland technician while 7 close ups of a menacing guard while and a myriad of technical babble to show us this is a high tech experiment. various posters have commented on the discrepancy between the copyright date of 1972 and the release date given on the dvd box of 1977. that an easy one to explain. this dog simply sat on the shelf unreleased for five years and until someone dusted it off and thinking it fit in perfectly with the post watergate mood of distrust in government. after seeing the brain machine now and my only wonder is that it ever got released at all. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this film about secret government mind experiments and the corrupt use of the citizenry by secretive and vile shadowy figures had the potential for being a really interesting movie. but for me and it failed. i would not elaborate much on the rather confusing plot line and but if you are looking for a detailed explanation and the comment by user reluctantpopstar gives a good description of it. but it do not work for me. i found it slow and which would be okay but for the fact that it seemed to go nowhere. the viewer is left in the dark about too many things to really be able to get a handle on this movie in some films and one can argue that the filmmakers intended to provoke thought and left things ambiguous for that reason. i do not think that this is the case here. as for the frequent long shots of two buildings that have been frequently mentioned by other users. i see that they do have a point they give the viewer time to get another drink without missing any of the action. and i suspect many viewers would welcome the opportunity to have several beverages on board to get through this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"you know youre in trouble when the film your watching has numerous alternate titles. generally it means that they tried and retried to hide the turkey in various markets. such a turkey is the brain machine which has seven different titles. its about some super secret government project that is suppose to be able to use a computer to read people but instead it drives people to kill each other or themselves and or something like that. its filled with b level tv actors sitting in paneled room with lawn chairs trying to act a script that makes almost no sense. its a turkey of the untastey kind. avoid it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the brain machine will at least put your own brain into overdrive trying to figure out what it all about. four subjects of varying backgrounds and intelligence level have been selected for an experiment described by one of the researchers as a scientific study of man and environment. since the only common denominator among them is the fact that they each have no known family should have been a tip off none of them will be missed. the whole affair is supervised by a mysterious creep known only as the general and but it seems he taking his direction from a senator who wishes to remain anonymous. good call there on the senator part. there also a shadowy guard that the camera constantly zooms in on and who later claims he doesn not take his direction from the general or the project. too bad he wasn not more effective and he was overpowered rather easily before the whole thing went kablooey. if nothing else and the film is a veritable treasure trove of 1970 technology featuring repeated shots of dial phones and room size computers and a teletype machine that would not quit. perhaps that was the basis of the film alternate title time warp while nothing else would make any sense. as for myself and i would like to consider a title suggested by the murdered dr. krisner experiment titled group stress project. it applies to the film actors and viewers alike. keep an eye out just above the general head at poolside when he asks an agent for his weapon and a boom mic is visible above his head for a number of seconds. you may want to catch this flick if youre a die hard gerald mcraney fan and could he have ever been that young. james best also appears in a somewhat uncharacteristic role as a cryptic reverend and but do not call him father. for something a little more up his alley and try to get your hands on 1959 the killer shrews. that one at least doesn not pretend to take itself so seriously. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i thought watching employment videos on corporate compliance was tedious. this movie went nowhere fast. what could have been a somewhat cheesy half hour twilight zone episode turned into a seemingly endless waste of film on people parking their cars and a picture of some dude swimming pool (he really needs to answer his phone by the way) a dot matrix printer doing its job and and heuy and louey sitting in a yellow lighted control room repeating t minus 10 and counting as if something exciting is going to happen. it doesn not so do not get your hopes up. the best thing about this movie is to see james best and gerald mcc and in something other than there famous tv personalities and and that is stretching to find anything good. and do not get me started on the music which was totally composed of a tympani and some large marine mammals and and microphone feedback. this movie is as close as i have given a one yet and but it gets the 2 because i actually was able to finish this insomnia cure and and do not have to leave in the middle. avoid at all costs. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"grey matter aka the brain machine but the video people thought better of that while the screen says 1972 but imdb says 1977 while it that kind of movie. the government has some kind of overriding interest in this brain machine project that has drafted four people who turn out to be and roughly and a philosopher and a horny priest and a crackpot veteran and a patriot who got an abortion to sit in a shrinking room with a computer that can read their horrendous secret thoughts. in the end the government takes over the lab by force and everybody dies. here is a movie that is incompetent in every important way while my s has better production values than this. it held my interest and though and just to see what exactly these exploitation filmmakers thought they were doing and dabbling in four guys in a room character drama. the answer represent a tract about how science is inferior to god. thanks a lot. it like opening a kinder egg and getting your 30th goddam jigsaw puzzle. the priest is played by james roscoe p. coltrane best and the philosopher by gerald the republican simon mcraney. also featuring very and very and very long establishing and transition shots in great quantity and this moves almost as slow as the liberal convention. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"before this made for tv movie began and i had relatively low expectations. that because it was made after the final episode of the series had aired and many of the series originals were gone. there is no president sheridan and delenn and lennier and londo and vir and gkar or lyta. if you remember and on the second to last episode of the series and all the regulars except zack and vir and captain lockley left b 5 permanently. now for this film they did bring back garibaldi (who was not in the last b 5 movie) to join zack and the captain and the doctor makes a brief and irrelevant appearance. but because so much is gone of the old chemistry and this film already is severely handicapped. the movie is about a soul hunter (martin sheen) who is led to babylon 5 in search of a globe filled with souls that had been stolen from a hidden repository by an archaeologist (ian mcshane). a lot of spooky mumbo jumbo stuff occurs but frankly it was all pretty silly and pointless. yeah and yeah and the station nearly blew up but was saved and all and but frankly i felt like it was a case of been there done that and done that a lot better in the past. the secondary plot and provided more for comic relief and was much more interesting and as an entrepreneur installed a holo brothel and those in command weren not sure what to do about it and when they tried to pressure them to close and they were slapped with a lawsuit. this was fluff and but it did provide a few laughs something the other dreary plot was surely lacking. by the way and sheen at first did a good job playing the should hunter with his wild eyes and bizarre delivery. however and repeatedly throughout the episode he fell out of character. this should have been spotted and corrected. so the final verdict is this is only for total die hard b 5 nuts (like myself). others seeing it might assume the series sucked which is a great injustice. this is a great example of a show not knowing when to quit. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a big fan of b5 and having caught on only at the end of season three. i faithfully watched all the previous seasons when it was syndicated and concluding that it was one of the most well thought out story arcs to ever hit television. even the filler episodes were interesting. the movies and also and were well produced and as entertaining as anything to hit the theaters. which brings us to river of souls. naturally and after seeing everything else and i had high expectations. martin sheen appears to be acting in an ed wood movie rather than a serious sci fi story. the story itself and might have looked good in outline form and even made it to the story board. however and it suffers obviously when it came time to filling this notion out into a two hour movie. there are no special effects to keep us entertained in the total absence of a compelling story. there are places where they were obviously short of time and just improvised the dialog to fill the story out. had this made the regular season and it would have rated among the worst of the episodes. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i was very disappointed in this movie. plotwise it was weak bordering on silly represent souls who can affect reality in the way they do. a mission apparently critical to the soul hunters entrusted to one of their younger members. and the whole b story with the holobrothel and the lawsuit against the station was so awful that at one point i blurted out to the television and why are you wasting my time with this. thematically and river of souls do not really go into the question of the soul in any more depth than the original episode soul hunter did. we see that soul hunters can make mistakes and but we still do not get a feeling for their culture. (are there any female soul hunters. )the acting was okay and given the material they had to work with and and the special effects especially the planetscapes in the first act were very impressive. but overall and i would say give this one a miss. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"went to see this movie hoping to see some flashes of the jet li we were amazed by in lethal weapon 4. unfortunately too many of his fight stunts are so clearly fake that it took even that enjoyment out of it. the flying kicks would be a lot more impressive if you couldn not see the wires holding him up as he flies through the air for 4 seconds and 9 kicks. too cartoonish and very disappointing. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.