Updated with model response and example
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -29,6 +29,23 @@ This model is a fine-tuned version of [vicgalle/gpt2-open-instruct-v1](https://h
|
|
| 29 |
It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
|
| 30 |
- Loss: 2.1534
|
| 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
## Model description
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
GPT2 open instruct was trained on the open-instruct dataset fully. The reimagines one LM head as a partial rhlf adapter, with subtle reinforcements.
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
|
| 30 |
- Loss: 2.1534
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
This model responds to the 'Human:' or 'Assistant:' prompt pretty well in conversation situations.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
The shorter responses are better suited. Keep generation length to a reasonable subset. Left to its own devices it will have some pretty esoteric responses.
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
These include fairly uncensored remarks and at times violent outbursts. Especially if asking questions.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Needs vetting for other textual uses.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
'''
|
| 41 |
+
Human: Insane clown posse says...
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
Human: Should we look for a woman?
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
Assistant: It’s okay if you’re having a tough time finding what you are looking for. It’s a common question people might come up with for an argument or misunderstanding. What are you looking for, and what kind of woman would you have?
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Human: Are you trying to find someone to argue
|
| 48 |
+
'''
|
| 49 |
## Model description
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
GPT2 open instruct was trained on the open-instruct dataset fully. The reimagines one LM head as a partial rhlf adapter, with subtle reinforcements.
|