3 3 11 10 B&W
77 3 87 10 QUALITY
15 4 74 9 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTION OUR MISSION IS SUPERIOR CONSUMER SATISFACTION
16 9 73 10 Highest Quality. Teamwork, Do Right Things Right The First Time
29 11 60 13 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
65 14 82 16 Quality Coord Only
32 16 43 18 R&D Library
6 16 19 17 June 21, 1993
18 16 29 17 DEPARTMENT:
1 16 6 17 DATE:
71 16 80 19 6/ 21/ 93
59 17 69 19 Date Rec'd
70 19 82 21 93- 0301
18 19 34 20 Carol S. Lincoln
59 19 69 20 QIP Log #1
1 19 13 20 SUBMITTED BY:
66 20 73 22 EQPR
59 20 63 22 Type
19 21 29 23 407- 64- 3484
59 22 71 23 Status (1993)
1 22 16 23 SUBMITTER'S SS#:
59 23 73 25 Keywords (1993)
1 27 46 29 SUGGESTION: (Describe Current Situation and Idea)
4 30 89 43 The current system of managing records is too complex. The trend seems to be increasingly specific, when we should be getting more general. Right now, people must work to understand the system. We must spend too much time adninistering the system, labeling and cleaning our files. Complying is a real burden, both for the individual and for the records coordinators.
1 47 39 49 Describe Possible Solutions And Benefits
4 50 47 51 1. Drop the category specifications altogether.
4 52 33 54 2. Use moregeneral categories.
4 54 85 60 hote: I have passed this to Scott Appleton for the task force to use in streamlining the records management program.
1 59 19 60 PROFIT IMPROVEMENT:
19 59 34 60 (If Applicable)
53 64 62 66 ☐ Pending
39 64 45 66 ☐ Yes
47 64 52 66 ☐ No
1 64 12 66 RESPOND HERE
64 64 68 66 Date
28 64 37 66 Implement:
83 77 85 89 632120763
7 87 29 89 Approval Signature/ Date
55 87 69 88 Responder/ Date
34 87 54 90 Sign & Print Names) (See Instructions On Back)
