question: What would actually happen if you were to go through airport security with drugs drugs hidden up your vagina/anus?
comment: If you act nervous they'll probably pull you out of line. If they do a strip test and it's positive for drugs they'll search your bags and pockets, and potentially do a full cavity body search. If they don't the same thing can happen again at customs immigration at your destination. Wherever they do the FCBS you'll be charged with possession of a controlled substance and drug trafficking under local law.
passages: Body cavity searches may also be conducted at some international border crossings such as the U.S. Customs and Border Protection when they suspect international travelers of hiding contraband—such as drugs—in their alimentary canal (digestional tract).
  
  Section::::Procedure.
   Toby goes into the airplane restroom intending to flush the drugs, but he hesitates.
  
  Back at the terminal, he goes up to Customs, and makes it through. However, as they grab their luggage and are about to head out the terminal, DEA agents swarm him and thoroughly check his luggage, finding the cocaine he did not flush away. Toby is arrested, while a heartbroken Alex is led away.
   It has been determined that current personal protective equipment (PPE) does not provide adequate protection against workers handling hazardous drugs - NIOSH states that “... measurable concentrations of some hazardous drugs have been documented in the urine of health care workers who prepared or administered them − even after safety precautions had been employed.” Further, NIOSH recommends that institutions should "consider using devices such as closed-system transfer devices. Closed systems limit the potential for generating aerosols and exposing workers". Other guidelines outline that "As other products become available, they should meet the definition of a closed system drug transfer device established by NIOSH and should be required to demonstrate their effectiveness in independent studies". 
   Ruptured packets can be fatal and often require treatment as for a drug overdose and may require admission to an intensive care unit. Body packers are not always reliable sources of information about the contents of the packages (either because of fears about information being passed on to law enforcement agencies or because the mule genuinely does not know). Urine toxicology may be necessary to determine what drugs are being carried and what antidotes are needed.
  
  Section::::International incidents.
  
  Section::::International incidents.:China.
   In November 2010, Tammy Banovac, a 52-year-old woman who had been featured in "Playboy" when she was 42, wore only her bra and panties through a United States Transportation Security Administration checkpoint at Will Rogers World Airport. Banovac, who uses a wheelchair, is usually hand-searched. She said she felt violated by an intrusive search two weeks earlier. She said, "If it happened anywhere else, it would have been sexual assault." She failed to pass security when officers detected trace amounts of nitrates on her wheelchair. She returned to the airport the next morning, also wearing only a bra and panties, and put on clothing after passing through screening.
   As cavity searches have proven as an ineffective strategy in the total prevention of smuggling objects as it cannot detect objects in the intestines or stomach, as well as taking into consideration the intrusive nature and inherently humiliating or degrading procedure, it has become fairly normal for authorities to instead isolate individuals in a monitored environment until they pass excreta and/or x-ray the individual's pelvic area as it is less invasive and psychologically damaging.
  
  Section::::Legal standing.
   BULLET::::- It would be possible to explode a device concealed in the rectum.
  
  BULLET::::- Activation by radio-frequency seems to be likely.
  
  BULLET::::- Concealing an IED in the rectum would limit the amount of explosive available.
  
  Europol found as well—"should there be conclusive proof that the attack took place with an IED concealed inside the perpetrator’s body", it would definitely have an impact in aviation safety and the current standard operational procedures in place should be reviewed.
  
  Section::::Concept.:Tactical critiques and post-analysis.
   In the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp, the Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture documented instances of enemas being used by the Central Intelligence Agency in order to ensure "total control" over detainees. Enemas, officials said, are uncomfortable and degrading, The CIA forced nutrient enema on detainees who attempted hunger strikes, documenting “With head lower than torso … sloshing up the large intestines … [what] I infer is that you get a tube up as you can … We used the largest Ewal [sic] tube we had” wrote an officer, and "violent enemas" is how a detainee described what he received.
   In order to make anal sex safer, the couple must ensure that the anal area is clean and the bowel empty and the partner on whom anal penetration occurs should be able to relax. Regardless of whether anal penetration occurs by using a finger or the penis, the condom is the best barrier method to prevent transmission of STI. Enemas should be not be used as they can increase the risk of HIV infection and lymphogranuloma venereum proctitis.
   Section::::National Regulations in the United States.:Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal Act of 2010.
   Section::::Routes of administration.:Suppository.
  
  Little research has been focused on the suppository (anal insertion) or pessary (vaginal insertion) methods of administration, also known as "plugging". These methods of administration are commonly carried out using an oral syringe. Heroin can be dissolved and withdrawn into an oral syringe which may then be lubricated and inserted into the anus or vagina before the plunger is pushed. The rectum or the vaginal canal is where the majority of the drug would likely be taken up, through the membranes lining their walls.
  
  Section::::Adverse effects.
   Travelers at U.S. airports have complained that when they opted not to be scanned, they were subjected to a new type of invasive pat-down that one traveler in 2010 described as "probing and pushing ... in my genital area." Another traveler in the United States complained in 2010 that the TSA employee "inserted four fingers of both hands "inside" my trousers and ran his fingers all the way around my waist, his fingers extending at least 2–3 inches "below" my waistline."
   On Dec. 8, 2012, an American citizen was crossing the border to return home to the US and Customs and Border Protection officers stopped her. She presented her passport to them and did not have any illegal drugs or contraband. She was then taken into custody and repeatedly searched in an increasingly intrusive manner. According to court documents, "First, two female agents conducted a pat down. The agents found no drugs. The agents then held (her) for a K-9 search. The K-9 failed to alert to the presence of drugs. Two agents then took (her) to a restroom, where they ordered her to pull down her pants and underwear and bend over slightly. The agents conducted a visual inspection of (her) vaginal and anal area. Again, the agents found no drugs. Despite no evidence of drugs, the agents placed tape on (her) legs and abdomen, handcuffed her, and transported her to the University Medical Center (the “Hospital”) in El Paso. " There, two male doctors forced a pelvic exam, a rectal exam and an x-ray on her which she did not consent to, in front of other hospital personnel. At no time were drugs found. University Medical Center then charged her $5,000. The Fifth Court of Appeals found that the hospital staff had no liability under district court dismissing the Appellant’s claims based on qualified immunity. 
   There is a list of medications in which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends to be disposed of via flushing down the toilet if consumers are unable to take these drugs to a drug take-back program. These medications contain controlled substances that are dangerous to pets and other people in the home and should be disposed of immediately when no longer needed. Examples include Dilaudid (hydromorphone hydrochloride) tablets, fentanyl patches and morphine sulfate oral solution. These products should immediately flush due to high potential for abuse and overdose.
  
  Section::::Worldwide Drug Disposal Practices.
  
  Section::::Worldwide Drug Disposal Practices.:European Union.
   Safe handling refers to the process in which health care workers adhere to practices set forth by national health and safety organizations, that have been designed to eliminate or significantly reduce occupational exposure. Some of these practices include but are not limited to, donning of personal protective equipment such as a disposable gown, gloves, masks and the utilization of a closed-system drug transfer device. The key safe handling is to protect the health care worker throughout the three phases of contact with the hazardous drugs. These phases are drug preparation, administration and disposal. Some studies have shown that while compounding hazardous drugs in a Class II BSC in conjunction with a closed-system drug transfer device, a significant decrease in drug contaminants inside a Class II BSC has resulted. This led the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) to make the statement in 2003 that a closed-system drug transfer device is viewed as one of safest measures to prevent hazardous drug exposure in a clinician’s working environment. However, a Cochrane review published in 2018 that synthesized all available controlled studies found no evidence of a closed-system drug transfer device offering an additional decrease in contamination or exposure to safe handling practices alone.
   Some inmates and human rights activists argue that body cavity searches are done not so much to stop the flow of contraband but rather to harass and humiliate detainees. A visual inspection of the rectum will not reveal objects concealed deeply inside. Likewise, it is possible to circumvent detection during manual body cavity searches. In some instances, suspects swallow packages of drugs protected by condoms and allow them to pass through their digestive tract. Only diagnostic imaging will reveal the concealed contraband, invalidating the body cavity search.
   "United States v. Montoya de Hernandez" (1985) ruled that an individual can be subject to an intrusive search, such as a body cavity, if authorities see it fit for the safety of others or themselves. This ruling coincides with the fact that a person is subject to additional screening at any point throughout the airport if airport authorities feel it is necessary or suspect the risk of safety.
  
  Section::::Legality and precedence.:Illinois v. Caballes and United States v. Place.
   In this Amsterdam leather and fetish shop a surgery was held on Sunday afternoons. In this way Checkpoint hoped to reach more effectively the MSM who visited leather bars. This turned out not to be the case, but it was attractive for less well educated men who were taking high risks, regularly experimenting with recreational drugs and not resident in Amsterdam. The incidence rate among these clients was 5.6%.
  
  Oral fluid
   Travelers who undergo the pre-clearance procedures at one of these facilities in a foreign airport do not have to go through U.S. customs upon their arrival in the United States.
  
  Section::::Provisions of the bill.
  
  "This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source."
   Other risks include capture, death and torture.
  
  Section::::Plainclothes law enforcement.
   A component of the new rules include security risk assessment of individuals who have access to the select agents and toxins. It is intended to establish new requirements for registration of possession, use, and transfer of select agents and toxins that could pose a threat to human, animal, and plant safety and health. Any person who meets the criteria of a "restricted person" as defined in the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, must not be afforded access to these materials.
  
  Section::::Title I: National Preparedness for Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies.
   Some time later, I learned from my wife that the U.S. Embassy had passage prepared for me on an American plane and a group of security officers ready to transfer me to Washington. I also found out that during the airplane stops—at Rio de Janeiro, Madrid, Rome—police from various countries observed my presence in order to prevent any assault.
   BULLET::::- The United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico announces the indictment of 12 current and former airport and U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees for conspiring to smuggle s; 17.9 long tons) of cocaine through Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico, between 1998 and 2016. According to the indictment, baggage handlers took suitcases they knew to contain cocaine from check-in areas to X-ray machines manned by cooperating TSA personnel, then ensured the suitcase did not undergo inspection by counternarcotics agents and dogs while they were loaded aboard airliners.
  
  BULLET::::- 15 February
   In April 2012, an incident involving the president's security detail received international press attention. The incident involved 11 agents and personnel from four branches of the U.S. military; they allegedly engaged prostitutes while assigned to protect the U.S. president at the 6th Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia. As of April 24, 2012, nine employees had resigned or retired.
   Bill Gates has warned that bioterrorism could kill more people than nuclear war.
  
  In February 2018, a CNN employee discovered on an airplane a “sensitive, top-secret document in the seatback pouch explaining how the Department of Homeland Security would respond to a bioterrorism attack at the Super Bowl.”
  
  Section::::Response to bioterrorism incident or threat.:2017 U.S. budget proposal affecting bioterrorism programs.
  