 from the nest (, shiluach hakein) in  The Mishnah read  to require a person to let the mother bird go again and again, even if the mother bird kept coming back to the nest four or five times. And the Gemara taught that  required a person to let the mother bird go even a hundred times.

Tractate Kilayim in the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Jerusalem Talmud interpreted the laws of separating diverse species in 

The Mishnah employed the prohibitions of   and  to imagine how one could with one action violate up to nine separate commandments. One could (1) plow with an ox and a donkey yoked together (in violation of ) (2 and 3) that are two animals dedicated to the sanctuary, (4) plowing mixed seeds sown in a vineyard (in violation of ), (5) during a Sabbatical year (in violation of ), (6) on a Festival-day (in violation of, for example, ), (7) when the plower is a priest (in violation of ) and (8) a Nazirite (in violation of ) plowing in a contaminated place. Chananya ben Chachinai said that the plower also may have been wearing a garment of wool and linen (in violation of  and ). They said to him that this would not be in the same category as the other violations. He replied that neither is the Nazirite in the same category as the other violations.

Rabbi Joshua of Siknin taught in the name of Rabbi Levi that the Evil Inclination criticizes four laws as without logical basis, and Scripture uses the expression "statute" (, chok) in connection with each: the laws of (1) a brother's wife (in ), (2) mingled kinds (in  and ), (3) the scapegoat (in ), and (4) the red cow (in ).

 calls on the Israelites to obey God's "statutes" (, chukim) and "ordinances" (, mishpatim). The Rabbis in a Baraita taught that the "ordinances" (, mishpatim) were commandments that logic would have dictated that we follow even had Scripture not commanded them, like the laws concerning idolatry, adultery, bloodshed, robbery, and blasphemy. And "statutes" (, chuk
from the nest (, shiluach hakein) in   The Mishnah read   to require a person to let the mother bird fail again and again, even if the mother shuttlecock kept coming back to the nest four or five times. And the Gemara teach that   required a person to let the mother dame go even a hundred times. 

 Tractate Kilayim in the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Jerusalem Talmud interpret the laws of separating divers species in 

 The Mishnah employed the prohibitions of    and   to imagine how one could with one legal action violate up to nine separate commandments. One could (1) plow with an ox and a donkey yoke together (in violation of) (2 and 3) that are two animals dedicate to the sanctuary, (4) plowing mixed seeds sown in a vineyard (in misdemeanor of), (5) during a Sabbatical year (in violation of), (6) on a Festival - day (in violation of, for example ,), (7) when the plowman is a priest (in violation of) and (8) a Nazirite (in violation of) plowing in a contaminated place. Chananya ben Chachinai said that the plower besides may have been wear a garment of wool and linen (in violation of   and). They said to him that this would not be in the same category as the other violations. He replied that neither is the Nazirite in the same category as the early misdemeanor. 

 Rabbi Joshua of Siknin taught in the name of Rabbi Levi that the Evil Inclination criticize four law as without logical basis, and Scripture use the formula " statute " (, chok) in connection with each: the law of (1) a brother's wife (in), (2) mingled kinds (in   and), (3) the scapegoat (in), and (4) the red cow (in). 

  calls on the Israelites to obey God's " statutes " (, chukim) and " ordinance " (, mishpatim). The Rabbis in a Baraita taught that the " ordinances " (, mishpatim) were commandments that logic would have dictated that we come even had Scripture not control them, like the laws concerning idolatry, adultery, bloodshed, robbery, and blasphemy. And " legislative act " (, chuk
 frlm the nest (, shiluach hayein) in  The Mishnah rxad  to require a person to let the mother uird go atain and again, even if the mothvr bird kwpt roming back to tis nest njur kv fivz vimes. And the Ggmara taught that  requireg x 'erson to let the mother bird go eveg a huncrfd times.

Tractaje Kikwyim pn the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Jeruaalem Telmud interpretrd the laws of separating fivegse species in 

The Mishnah emkmoyqe the prohibktions of   and  to imzgine how one could with one acgion riolate up jo nlte separate commwndments. One could (1) [low wiyh an ox and a doikey yoked together (in vimlation of ) (2 and 3) jhat are tfo animals dedicatee ro thg sanwtuaft, (4) olosiig jixed deevs sown in z vineyard (un violation of ), (5) dirybg a Sabbaticzl yeaw (yn violation of ), (6) on a Festival-day (in vpolafion of, for example, ), (7) wyen the plower is a ptiest (in vyolation of ) and (8) a Nazirite (in violation of ) plofing mn a eintamkbahed place. Chananya ben Chachinai said that thq pkoeer also may hcve been wearing a gstment of wool xnd liusn (in violation of  wnd ). Thgy saie to him uhat yhis would not be in the sane category cs rhe other violatious. He replieb that neitner is the Nazirite in che saje category as the offer violations.

Racbi Jmshua of Siknin taught in ehe name if Rcbbi Levk thst the Evil Incllnation criticizes four paws cs widhout logifal basis, and Scripture uses thx expression "xtdtune" (, chok) nn conkection with eash: the laws of (1) a brocher's dife (in ), (2) jingled kinds (in  wnd ), (3) the sca[ggoat (in ), and (4) the req coq (in ).

 calls un the Israeliyes to obvy God'w "statutes" (, chukim) ana "ordinances" (, miwhpqtim). The Rabbis in a Fagaiva tatcht that the "ordknavves" (, oishpatim) wcre comkandments that logic woumd have dictated tnab we folliw even rad Scripture not commanded thel, likx the uaws vonserning idolatry, adultery, bloosshed, robhern, and blaspheiy. Akd "sjatutes" (, chbk
from the nest (, shiluach hakein) in read require a to let the again, if the mother kept coming back the nest four or five times. the Gemara taught that required a person to let the mother bird go a hundred times. Tractate Kilayim in the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Jerusalem Talmud interpreted laws separating species The Mishnah employed the prohibitions of and to imagine how one could with one action violate to nine separate commandments. One could (1) plow an ox and a yoked together (in violation of (2 3) that two dedicated the sanctuary, (4) mixed seeds sown in a vineyard (in violation of ), (5) during a Sabbatical year (in violation ), (6) Festival-day (in of, example, (7) when the a priest (in violation of ) Nazirite (in violation of ) plowing in a place. Chananya Chachinai said that the plower also have been wearing a garment of wool and (in violation of and ). They said to him that this would not be in category as the other He replied that is Nazirite the category as other violations. Rabbi Joshua of Siknin taught in the name of Levi that the Evil Inclination criticizes four laws as without and uses the expression (, chok) in connection each: laws of (1) a (in (2) and (3) scapegoat (in ), and the red cow (in ). on the Israelites to and "ordinances" (, mishpatim). The Rabbis in a taught that the "ordinances" (, mishpatim) were that logic would have dictated that we follow even had Scripture not them, like concerning idolatry, adultery, bloodshed, robbery, and blasphemy. And (, chuk
 from the nest (, shiluach hakein) In  The MishnAh reaD  to ReqUiRe a pErsoN to let the motheR Bird Go again and again, even if tHe motHeR Bird KEpT comiNg back tO ThE NEst FoUr Or fIvE TiMes. AnD thE Gemara Taught that  ReqUiRed a person to LEt The mother bIrd Go even a hundrEd tImes.

TrAcTatE kilayIm iN the MIshnah, tOsefta, And JerusaLeM talmud INterpreTED tHe laWs of separating divERsE Species in 

The MiShnah eMpLOyED The ProHibitions oF   aNd  to iMAgine hoW OnE COUld WIth one action vIolate up to nINe sEparatE cOmmANdmentS. One cOuLD (1) plOw with an ox aNd a dOnkey yokeD togetHEr (in vioLAtion of ) (2 And 3) thaT arE twO aniMAlS dEdiCaTEd tO ThE saNCtuAry, (4) plowiNg MiXed seEds sOWN IN a viNeyArd (iN violAtion of ), (5) during A SaBbatICal Year (iN violAtioN oF ), (6) on a FEstivaL-day (iN vIolation of, for exAmplE, ), (7) when the pLowEr Is a PrIest (iN ViolatIon Of ) aNd (8) a NaziRite (in vIOlaTiON OF ) pLowing in a contaminaTeD PLaCe. ChananYa ben CHAcHiNAi said thAt The PlowER Also mAy haVE bEen weariNg a garMEnT oF wool anD lInen (in ViOlaTioN of  anD ). they Said to Him that tHis woULd not be in the saME category as thE OtHER vIOlatIonS. He replied tHat nEItheR is tHE NAziRIte in The saMe CAtEGory as the other violaTiOns.

RabBi JosHua of Siknin taUght in the nAME Of Rabbi LEvi tHAt THe Evil InclinatIon crIticizes foUR laws as wIthouT logical Basis, and SCRIpture usEs tHe eXprEssION "sTatute" (, chok) in cONNectIoN with eaCh: tHe laws oF (1) a bRotHer'S wiFe (In ), (2) mingled Kinds (in  aNd ), (3) ThE sCaPegOat (in ), ANd (4) the red CoW (in ).

 CaLls On the iSraeliTes to Obey goD's "STatUtes" (, chuKIm) AND "ordInAnCes" (, mIshPaTim). ThE RabBIs iN a BaraiTa taught tHat THe "orDiNaNces" (, misHpatim) were comMaNdments thaT lOgiC would HAVe dictatEd that we follow even had ScRIpture nOt cOmmanDed tHem, like thE laWs concErnINg idolAtry, adUlterY, bLooDSHed, roBBErY, anD bLasphemy. AnD "STatUtes" (, cHuK
 from the nest (, shiluach  hakein) i n  Th e M ish na h re ad to require a p e rson  to let the mother bir d goag a in a n dagain , eveni ft h e m ot he r b ir d  k ept c omi ng back  to the ne stfo ur or five t i me s. And the  Ge mara taughttha t  req ui red a per son  to l et the mother  bird goev e n a hu n dred ti m e s. 

Tr actate Kilayim in th e  Mishnah, Tose fta, a nd Je r u sal emTalmud int er prete d  the la w so f sep a rating divers e species i n  
The Mi sh nah employ ed th ep roh ibitions of    a nd  to im agineh ow onec ould wi th one  ac tio n vi o la te  up  t o  ni n esep a rat e comman dm en ts. O ne c o u l d  (1)  pl ow w ith a n ox and a do nke y yo k edtoget her ( in v io latio n of )  (2 a nd  3) that are tw o an imals ded ica te d t othe s a nctuar y,(4)  plowin g mixed see ds s o wn  in a vineyard (in  v i o la tion of), (5) du ri n g a Sabb at ica l ye a r  (inviol a ti on of ),  (6) o n  a  F estival -d ay (in  v iol ati on of ,  for  examp le, ), ( 7) wh e n the plower i s  a priest (in vi o l at i on o f )  and (8) aNazi r ite(inv io lat i on of  ) pl ow i ng in a contaminated p la ce. Ch anany a ben Chachin ai said th a t the plow er a l so may have beenweari ng a garme n t of woo l and  linen ( in violat i o n of  an d ) . T hey  sa i d  t o him that th i s  wou ld  not be  in  the sa mecat ego ryas  the othe r violat io ns .He  re plied that nei th eris  th e Naz i rite i n the  sam eca t ego ry as t h eo t hervi ol atio ns. 
Rabbi  Jos h uaof Sikn in taught  in thena me  of Rab bi Levi thatth e Evil Inc li nat ion cr i t icizes f our laws as without log i cal bas is,  andScri pture use s t he exp res s ion "s tatute " (,ch ok) i n con n e ct ion  w ith each:t h e l aws o f(1)a broth er's wife (in ), ( 2 ) m ingled kinds(in   an d ),  (3 )  t h e s ca p ego a t  (in ), and (4)  the red c ow (i n ).

 cal l s o nthe Isr aelites  to o b ey God' s "statut es" (, ch uk im)a n d " ordinances " (, mis hpatim).T he Ra b bi s ina B araita  t aug ht th at the "or dinan ces" ( ,mishpa tim)we re comma ndments that logic woul d have  dict ate d that we  fo l low  even had  Scr ipture not  co mma ndedthe m , lik e th e  l aws conce rnin g  idolatry ,  a dul t e ry , bloodshed , r obb ery,and blasph emy.  And "statutes" ( ,  chuk
 from_the nest_(, shiluach hakein) in_ The_Mishnah_read _to_require a person_to let the_mother bird go again_and again, even_if_the mother bird kept coming back to the nest four or five times. And_the_Gemara taught_that__required a person to let_the mother bird go even_a hundred_times.

Tractate Kilayim in the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Jerusalem_Talmud_interpreted the laws_of separating diverse species in 

The Mishnah employed the_prohibitions of   and _to imagine how_one_could_with one action violate_up to nine separate commandments. One_could (1) plow with an ox_and a donkey yoked together (in violation_of ) (2 and 3) that_are two animals dedicated to_the sanctuary,_(4) plowing mixed seeds sown_in a vineyard_(in violation_of ), (5)_during a Sabbatical year (in violation_of ), (6)_on a Festival-day (in violation of,_for_example, ), (7)_when_the_plower is_a priest (in_violation_of )_and_(8) a Nazirite (in violation of_)_plowing in a contaminated place. Chananya ben_Chachinai said that the_plower_also may have been_wearing a garment of wool_and linen (in violation of _and )._They said_to him that this would not be in the same category_as the other violations. He replied_that neither is the_Nazirite in_the_same category as_the_other violations.

Rabbi_Joshua of Siknin taught in the name_of Rabbi_Levi that the Evil Inclination criticizes_four laws as without_logical_basis, and Scripture uses the expression_"statute" (, chok) in connection with_each: the laws of (1)_a_brother's_wife (in ), (2) mingled_kinds (in  and ), (3)_the scapegoat (in_), and (4) the red cow (in_).

_calls on the Israelites to obey_God's_"statutes" (, chukim) and "ordinances" (,_mishpatim)._The_Rabbis in a Baraita taught_that the "ordinances" (, mishpatim) were_commandments that logic would have dictated that we follow_even had Scripture_not commanded them, like the_laws_concerning_idolatry, adultery, bloodshed, robbery, and blasphemy. And "statutes" (, chuk