query: Why are constant terms irrelevant in Lagrangians in quantum field theory?
positive_passages.docid: 153727
positive_passages.text: Constant term in Lagrangian
negative_passages.docid: 157191
negative_passages.text: Conjugate Variables, Noether's Theorem and QM
negative_passages.docid: 89528
negative_passages.text: Formalizing Quantum Field Theory
negative_passages.docid: 36380
negative_passages.text: Why not use the Lagrangian, instead of the Hamiltonian, in nonrelativistic QM?
negative_passages.docid: 124393
negative_passages.text: How to understand "analytical continuation" in the context of instantons?
negative_passages.docid: 151199
negative_passages.text: Is there a formulation of Noether’s theorem for the path integral formalism?
negative_passages.docid: 18054
negative_passages.text: Is there a proof from the first principle that the Lagrangian L = T - V?
negative_passages.docid: 56614
negative_passages.text: Why do the counterterms in renormalized $\phi^4$-theory with power two in fields give vertices and not propagators?
negative_passages.docid: 11358
negative_passages.text: Eigenvalues of the Lagrangian?
negative_passages.docid: 113610
negative_passages.text: Spinor field normalisation from poles in the propagator
negative_passages.docid: 62387
negative_passages.text: What are independent parameters in Hellmann–Feynman theorem?
negative_passages.docid: 20208
negative_passages.text: Why are anticommutators needed in quantization of Dirac fields?
negative_passages.docid: 7555
negative_passages.text: Why do we consider Lagrangian densities in field theory (as opposed to Lagrangians as in point mechanics)?
negative_passages.docid: 114672
negative_passages.text: Why do we use the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian instead of other related functions?
negative_passages.docid: 61603
negative_passages.text: Why is the Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem so fundamental?
negative_passages.docid: 26125
negative_passages.text: Does the canonical commutation relation fix the form of the momentum operator?
negative_passages.docid: 83917
negative_passages.text: How can I prove that the following Lagrangian is Lorentz-invariant iff the axionic field is a pseudoscalar?