query: Peer-review in ‘fully peer-review journals’
positive_passages.docid: 46908
positive_passages.text: I believe I have solved a famous open problem. How do I convince people in the field that I am not a crank?
negative_passages.docid: 125685
negative_passages.text: Should you conform to journal formatting requirements for the initial submission?
negative_passages.docid: 24327
negative_passages.text: Bibliography with Metadata:
negative_passages.docid: 116119
negative_passages.text: Can I publish a paper with new proof but the same result?
negative_passages.docid: 42653
negative_passages.text: Citing sources of problems in assignments
negative_passages.docid: 17778
negative_passages.text: How to use results/ideas from a paper I reviewed?
negative_passages.docid: 64729
negative_passages.text: Why don't all disciplines follow a double-blind review system?
negative_passages.docid: 27923
negative_passages.text: Manuscript revision deadline: how strict are these [at Scientific Reports]
negative_passages.docid: 82641
negative_passages.text: Separating academic identity from social identity
negative_passages.docid: 138480
negative_passages.text: How to effectively address conflicting suggestions from reviewers
negative_passages.docid: 23990
negative_passages.text: How can I implement a comprehensive apa-style citation and bibliography
negative_passages.docid: 37918
negative_passages.text: Does retagging the question need peer reviews?
negative_passages.docid: 141800
negative_passages.text: Peer to Peer: Methods of Finding Peers
negative_passages.docid: 108565
negative_passages.text: Improved experience for users with review suspensions
negative_passages.docid: 41904
negative_passages.text: Steps for creating a scientific journal
negative_passages.docid: 24652
negative_passages.text: Multiple authors in a Journal style (llncs) Document
negative_passages.docid: 70480
negative_passages.text: Why should the scientific community avoid double submissions?