query: C++ delete operator without "new"
positive_passages.docid: 34560
positive_passages.text: Calling delete on variable allocated on the stack
negative_passages.docid: 92903
negative_passages.text: Operator overload which permits capturing with rvalue but not assigning to
negative_passages.docid: 86897
negative_passages.text: Use of .apply() with 'new' operator. Is this possible?
negative_passages.docid: 72062
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to prevent stack allocation of an object and only allow it to be instantiated with 'new'?
negative_passages.docid: 48515
negative_passages.text: Destructors of builtin types (int, char etc..)
negative_passages.docid: 129738
negative_passages.text: Must new always be followed by delete?
negative_passages.docid: 48853
negative_passages.text: deleting a buffer through a different type of pointer?
negative_passages.docid: 68736
negative_passages.text: How do I erase an element from std::vector by index?
negative_passages.docid: 14116
negative_passages.text: Pure virtual destructor in C++
negative_passages.docid: 155164
negative_passages.text: size_t parameter new operator
negative_passages.docid: 115207
negative_passages.text: Replace symbols with values without evaluation
negative_passages.docid: 27974
negative_passages.text: Who deletes the memory allocated during a "new" operation which has exception in constructor?
negative_passages.docid: 152834
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to create a new operator in c#?
negative_passages.docid: 22463
negative_passages.text: C++: delete vs. free and performance
negative_passages.docid: 83668
negative_passages.text: How to remove duplicates from unsorted std::vector while keeping the original ordering using algorithms?
negative_passages.docid: 77387
negative_passages.text: Is there a simple way to delete a list element by value?
negative_passages.docid: 64389
negative_passages.text: Why do we even need the "delete[]" operator?