query: No need for an auxiliary verb in a sentence with 'related to'?
positive_passages.docid: 107851
positive_passages.text: passive Vs active or omission of 'which is'
negative_passages.docid: 67690
negative_passages.text: Is it ok to combine two independent clauses into just one sentence?
negative_passages.docid: 4292
negative_passages.text: "Relation" versus "relationship"
negative_passages.docid: 43018
negative_passages.text: "Dare" with and without "to"
negative_passages.docid: 141402
negative_passages.text: Omission of verbs
negative_passages.docid: 131253
negative_passages.text: Why doesn't the auxiliary will qualify as future tense?
negative_passages.docid: 54575
negative_passages.text: "any other verbs then being located in VP" -- is this acceptable?
negative_passages.docid: 151248
negative_passages.text: Extraposed clauses
negative_passages.docid: 66907
negative_passages.text: Can relative clauses be combined with adverbial clauses other than if-clauses?
negative_passages.docid: 98727
negative_passages.text: "to not" vs "not to"
negative_passages.docid: 131188
negative_passages.text: When should you use "to" following a "why"?
negative_passages.docid: 40419
negative_passages.text: So, Can linking verbs be used with "continuous tenses"?
negative_passages.docid: 134809
negative_passages.text: fused relatives versus interrogatives
negative_passages.docid: 38733
negative_passages.text: When can one omit "that" from a sentence?
negative_passages.docid: 3435
negative_passages.text: Using a verb as subject of a sentence
negative_passages.docid: 99167
negative_passages.text: What is the difference between "owing to" and "due to"?
negative_passages.docid: 31573
negative_passages.text: Advanced rules for shortening relative clauses with a participle?