query: Why do symplectic form need to be closed in classical mechanics?
positive_passages.docid: 155597
positive_passages.text: Why closed in the definition of a symplectic structure?
negative_passages.docid: 117819
negative_passages.text: Why is first fundamental form considered intrinsic
negative_passages.docid: 62218
negative_passages.text: Why should Conservative forces have their curl equal to zero?(intuition)
negative_passages.docid: 55700
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to recover Classical Mechanics from Schrödinger's equation?
negative_passages.docid: 44747
negative_passages.text: Finding the effective Hamiltonian in a certain subspace
negative_passages.docid: 158526
negative_passages.text: Finding a "Principle of Least Action" equivalent statement for Hamiltonian Mechanics
negative_passages.docid: 52198
negative_passages.text: Why is every selfadjoint operator closed?
negative_passages.docid: 158973
negative_passages.text: Why is this a non-holonomic constraint?
negative_passages.docid: 44282
negative_passages.text: How do I show that there exists variational/action principle for a given classical system?
negative_passages.docid: 48068
negative_passages.text: Any good resources for Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics?
negative_passages.docid: 103613
negative_passages.text: Two Claims about Symplectic Group Actions
negative_passages.docid: 121389
negative_passages.text: Why is quantum mechancis is not content with symmetric operators, but wants self-adjoint operators?
negative_passages.docid: 16510
negative_passages.text: Classical mechanics without coordinates book
negative_passages.docid: 51268
negative_passages.text: Why can't a Meredith Graph be Hamiltonian?
negative_passages.docid: 48930
negative_passages.text: Least-action classical electrodynamics without potentials
negative_passages.docid: 115139
negative_passages.text: Use my example to explain why loop diagram will not occur in classical equation of motion?
negative_passages.docid: 36380
negative_passages.text: Why not use the Lagrangian, instead of the Hamiltonian, in nonrelativistic QM?