query: Less generic generics? A possible solution for arithmetic in C# generics
positive_passages.docid: 103
positive_passages.text: Is there a constraint that restricts my generic method to numeric types?
negative_passages.docid: 46847
negative_passages.text: Can C# generics have a specific base type?
negative_passages.docid: 122201
negative_passages.text: Generic constraints, where T : struct and where T : class
negative_passages.docid: 111200
negative_passages.text: Integer range based template specialisation
negative_passages.docid: 115894
negative_passages.text: Extend a generic type in Java
negative_passages.docid: 77381
negative_passages.text: Why don't Java Generics support primitive types?
negative_passages.docid: 8748
negative_passages.text: Why does C# forbid generic attribute types?
negative_passages.docid: 120505
negative_passages.text: Extension methods with generics
negative_passages.docid: 98931
negative_passages.text: Comparing the values of two generic Numbers
negative_passages.docid: 86324
negative_passages.text: Is there a C# type for representing an integer Range?
negative_passages.docid: 72662
negative_passages.text: Why does a generic type constraint result in a no implicit reference conversion error?
negative_passages.docid: 125893
negative_passages.text: Generic base class with multiple children
negative_passages.docid: 66938
negative_passages.text: A generic list of anonymous class
negative_passages.docid: 68277
negative_passages.text: Generic methods and method overloading
negative_passages.docid: 126476
negative_passages.text: Is there a complete IEquatable implementation reference?
negative_passages.docid: 19552
negative_passages.text: Can I Create a Dictionary of Generic Types?
negative_passages.docid: 16752
negative_passages.text: Overload resolution and virtual methods