query: Deduction from past form of " have (got) to "
positive_passages.docid: 150264
positive_passages.text: Is this correct: "I'd have to have had..."
negative_passages.docid: 152805
negative_passages.text: Using have gone to / been to / been in
negative_passages.docid: 83439
negative_passages.text: Why is "can I get" replacing "could I have"?
negative_passages.docid: 54834
negative_passages.text: Emphatic do-form with do as main verb
negative_passages.docid: 45224
negative_passages.text: Inversion + past tense
negative_passages.docid: 141601
negative_passages.text: Past-tense verb + that clause: clause has to use past tense?
negative_passages.docid: 151460
negative_passages.text: Difference between "was to . . ." and "was to have"
negative_passages.docid: 114784
negative_passages.text: Gerunds:Having+past participle and being+past participle
negative_passages.docid: 46651
negative_passages.text: There has vs. There have
negative_passages.docid: 49025
negative_passages.text: Can the past simple or the present perfect fit in this example with yet
negative_passages.docid: 100002
negative_passages.text: Past Simple vs. Present Perfect
negative_passages.docid: 23936
negative_passages.text: Is it appropriate to use short form of "have" ('ve) when it means possession?
negative_passages.docid: 53989
negative_passages.text: "have" vs."have got" in American and British English
negative_passages.docid: 23177
negative_passages.text: Tense change: previous actions on something that's currently true
negative_passages.docid: 40247
negative_passages.text: Use of "Have" in questions "Do you have" or "Have you"
negative_passages.docid: 63068
negative_passages.text: Question about reduced relative clauses: Can "having..." mean both "which had... " and "which have..."?
negative_passages.docid: 3266
negative_passages.text: Inversion in "only [adverb] have they"