query: Is there any part omitted in the following sentence?
positive_passages.docid: 6257
positive_passages.text: Are there rules about using "that" to join two clauses?
negative_passages.docid: 11532
negative_passages.text: "Dangling Participles"
negative_passages.docid: 48529
negative_passages.text: Is the following word order acceptable?
negative_passages.docid: 71137
negative_passages.text: Why is using only one "a" enough in this sentence?
negative_passages.docid: 128967
negative_passages.text: "Not only..., but also" without "but"
negative_passages.docid: 109836
negative_passages.text: Is "of" instead of "have" correct?
negative_passages.docid: 107851
negative_passages.text: passive Vs active or omission of 'which is'
negative_passages.docid: 87348
negative_passages.text: Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?
negative_passages.docid: 56168
negative_passages.text: "To include" vs. "including"
negative_passages.docid: 31034
negative_passages.text: Comma before which
negative_passages.docid: 151650
negative_passages.text: An article before the word "Equation"
negative_passages.docid: 21796
negative_passages.text: Why is "that"/"which" omitted in this sentence?
negative_passages.docid: 79644
negative_passages.text: Extra }, or forgotten \right
negative_passages.docid: 86245
negative_passages.text: Is it acceptable to omit "I" when it's the subject?
negative_passages.docid: 89900
negative_passages.text: What is the difference in meaning among these sentences?
negative_passages.docid: 146875
negative_passages.text: Usage of "for" in this passage
negative_passages.docid: 144319
negative_passages.text: Is "to" really part of the infinitive?