query: Computer Science (Database/ Data Mining) Conference Evaluation
positive_passages.docid: 144369
positive_passages.text: How to choose to which conference submit a scientific paper?
negative_passages.docid: 104031
negative_passages.text: Database design for dentists
negative_passages.docid: 126595
negative_passages.text: Does feature selection help improve the performance of machine learning?
negative_passages.docid: 115584
negative_passages.text: Dataset transformation for clustering after PCA
negative_passages.docid: 97516
negative_passages.text: Evaluating logistic regression and interpretation of Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit
negative_passages.docid: 56208
negative_passages.text: Cell evaluation and parallel kernels
negative_passages.docid: 63996
negative_passages.text: How to derive a ranking function by analysing feature correlations
negative_passages.docid: 38367
negative_passages.text: Towards a Stackexchange-like comment/reputation system for research papers
negative_passages.docid: 122851
negative_passages.text: Improving the Quality of Reviews: Project Honeypot
negative_passages.docid: 11449
negative_passages.text: How can I determine whether a conference is reputable?
negative_passages.docid: 128434
negative_passages.text: Datasets constructed for a purpose similar to that of Anscombe's quartet
negative_passages.docid: 42824
negative_passages.text: understanding the documentation of the standard evaluation sequence: own values
negative_passages.docid: 85059
negative_passages.text: Tool for generating correlated data sets
negative_passages.docid: 77476
negative_passages.text: Estimating database size
negative_passages.docid: 129118
negative_passages.text: Improving Review Queues - Design overview II: Changing review bans and other new features
negative_passages.docid: 28414
negative_passages.text: Clustering on the output of t-SNE
negative_passages.docid: 111170
negative_passages.text: Testing large dataset for normality - how and is it reliable?