query: Are there some needs to prove that object function can be reduced to cost function?
positive_passages.docid: 148749
positive_passages.text: Objective function, cost function, loss function: are they the same thing?
negative_passages.docid: 127643
negative_passages.text: Using function compositions to determine variable values
negative_passages.docid: 3571
negative_passages.text: Equivalent implicit operators: why are they legal?
negative_passages.docid: 9968
negative_passages.text: First-order logic advantage over second-order logic
negative_passages.docid: 62709
negative_passages.text: Functions that are sets of all function - proofs
negative_passages.docid: 102450
negative_passages.text: Are nested functions a bad thing in gcc ?
negative_passages.docid: 65615
negative_passages.text: Pure function with attributes of arbitrary number of arguments: Is it possible?
negative_passages.docid: 21391
negative_passages.text: Proving Functions are Surjective
negative_passages.docid: 88603
negative_passages.text: verify equicontinuous functions
negative_passages.docid: 129308
negative_passages.text: What are the compiled costs of each Formula function
negative_passages.docid: 56156
negative_passages.text: Composition and Onto Functions
negative_passages.docid: 30330
negative_passages.text: How can I prove that this function is bounded using the given 2 hints?
negative_passages.docid: 10614
negative_passages.text: Why should the minimal class be avoided?
negative_passages.docid: 39161
negative_passages.text: What characterizes a function that is easy to learn?
negative_passages.docid: 107595
negative_passages.text: Iteratively minimizing the function
negative_passages.docid: 97763
negative_passages.text: Is reversible work a point function?
negative_passages.docid: 60306
negative_passages.text: Natural class of functions whose $\mathcal O$-sets are linearly ordered