query: Trouble with a truth table for an inference in propositional logic
positive_passages.docid: 141814
positive_passages.text: Proofs using theorems instead of axioms
negative_passages.docid: 68880
negative_passages.text: propositional calculus problem, how to prove this right or wrong?
negative_passages.docid: 111797
negative_passages.text: Without computers, how can you conjecture the (in)validity of a long convoluted argument in Predicate Logic?
negative_passages.docid: 150451
negative_passages.text: Logic soundness and completeness
negative_passages.docid: 101741
negative_passages.text: Selection of logical connectives {¬,∨,∧,⇒,⇔} in set theory?
negative_passages.docid: 140194
negative_passages.text: Using natural deduction to prove that $p \implies q \vdash \lnot p \lor q$
negative_passages.docid: 578
negative_passages.text: In classical logic, why is $(p\Rightarrow q)$ True if both $p$ and $q$ are False?
negative_passages.docid: 93742
negative_passages.text: Show that the conditional statement is a tautology without using a truth table
negative_passages.docid: 4303
negative_passages.text: Enumerating inside a proposition and inside a proof
negative_passages.docid: 102824
negative_passages.text: Countable set of truth assignments satisfying set of well formed formulas
negative_passages.docid: 12186
negative_passages.text: How does predicate logic handle contradictory statements about something that does not exist?
negative_passages.docid: 31299
negative_passages.text: Using the Fitch system, how do I prove $((p \implies q) \implies p)\implies p$?
negative_passages.docid: 141952
negative_passages.text: Is there a decision procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic?
negative_passages.docid: 105221
negative_passages.text: Confusion about Satisfiability by a denumerable sequence.
negative_passages.docid: 103653
negative_passages.text: Interpretations and models in propositional logic
negative_passages.docid: 158016
negative_passages.text: Help understanding predicate logic question/proof
negative_passages.docid: 87928
negative_passages.text: Proof of logical equivalence of biconditional and other proposition