query: Correct or justify the argument below
positive_passages.docid: 148389
positive_passages.text: Test the convergence of the series with alternating signs
negative_passages.docid: 73231
negative_passages.text: Why in implication, if premise is false then implication is true?
negative_passages.docid: 125830
negative_passages.text: Is it correct to say "The reason is because ..."?
negative_passages.docid: 32804
negative_passages.text: 'Should have' in a factual sense
negative_passages.docid: 122015
negative_passages.text: "This statement is false" - Propositional Logic
negative_passages.docid: 148502
negative_passages.text: Two accepted answers
negative_passages.docid: 89938
negative_passages.text: Is the Formula Logically Valid?
negative_passages.docid: 63490
negative_passages.text: Can I use "reasonable" in place of "plausible" in the following context?
negative_passages.docid: 61093
negative_passages.text: wordbreaking, justification and ttfamily
negative_passages.docid: 12019
negative_passages.text: Can we use the present perfect in this case?
negative_passages.docid: 123647
negative_passages.text: Is "Michael here" correct?
negative_passages.docid: 69236
negative_passages.text: Adjective meaning "argumentative for argument's sake"?
negative_passages.docid: 57672
negative_passages.text: Trying to get all this terminology straight in logic
negative_passages.docid: 85559
negative_passages.text: Full Justification in ttfamily
negative_passages.docid: 35628
negative_passages.text: What article should be used in such sentences?
negative_passages.docid: 118069
negative_passages.text: Here's -- Plurality Question
negative_passages.docid: 136577
negative_passages.text: In formal logic, how is it possible for an argument with a contradictory conclusion to be valid?