query: Is there syntactic sugar to shorten the OnPropertyChanged construct?
positive_passages.docid: 26277
positive_passages.text: Automatically INotifyPropertyChanged
negative_passages.docid: 87042
negative_passages.text: Update/Create object properties dynamically
negative_passages.docid: 154165
negative_passages.text: Is there a better way to define more conventional if...then...else notations?
negative_passages.docid: 46715
negative_passages.text: Binding to time-dependent properties
negative_passages.docid: 127653
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to implement dynamic getters/setters in JavaScript?
negative_passages.docid: 151031
negative_passages.text: Dynamic Object Intellisense
negative_passages.docid: 135959
negative_passages.text: B extends A, but B.add populates A.prototype.property
negative_passages.docid: 65287
negative_passages.text: How to implement interface properties NOT in alphabetical order
negative_passages.docid: 136922
negative_passages.text: Any reason to use auto-implemented properties over manual implemented properties?
negative_passages.docid: 28056
negative_passages.text: Is there an equivalent of the __noSuchMethod__ feature for properties, or a way to implement it in JS?
negative_passages.docid: 11376
negative_passages.text: A better class to update property files?
negative_passages.docid: 80649
negative_passages.text: C#: Any way to skip over one of the base calls in polymorphism?
negative_passages.docid: 124078
negative_passages.text: generic function with a "has property X" constraint?
negative_passages.docid: 23237
negative_passages.text: How to convey LWC's complex Reactive property back to markup?
negative_passages.docid: 62198
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to pass properties as "out" or "ref" parameters?
negative_passages.docid: 60345
negative_passages.text: Is it possible to force an auto-property to use a readonly backing field?
negative_passages.docid: 19235
negative_passages.text: C# 3.0 auto-properties — useful or not?