query: Could "that have and will be" be correct?
positive_passages.docid: 327
positive_passages.text: Is "has or will read" grammatical?
negative_passages.docid: 30141
negative_passages.text: Can we use WHOSE for things? (or should I use 'that' or 'which'?)
negative_passages.docid: 46651
negative_passages.text: There has vs. There have
negative_passages.docid: 82540
negative_passages.text: "Should" versus "would"
negative_passages.docid: 88444
negative_passages.text: "That is" vs. "i.e."
negative_passages.docid: 78889
negative_passages.text: ''will'' or ''going to''
negative_passages.docid: 113787
negative_passages.text: Usage of "would have been"
negative_passages.docid: 109836
negative_passages.text: Is "of" instead of "have" correct?
negative_passages.docid: 67549
negative_passages.text: The form of future implication: be-deletion
negative_passages.docid: 93308
negative_passages.text: "happen to be" and "happen to have" - expressions of probability?
negative_passages.docid: 36210
negative_passages.text: "That... be" construction
negative_passages.docid: 59596
negative_passages.text: What does "can be said to do / to be" something mean?
negative_passages.docid: 16297
negative_passages.text: When to use "have" and "have got"
negative_passages.docid: 155516
negative_passages.text: Do I need to mention 'has' ( present perfect tense) twice when connecting the sentences with and?
negative_passages.docid: 98158
negative_passages.text: Usage of 'should' versus 'would'
negative_passages.docid: 123959
negative_passages.text: "would" and "will"
negative_passages.docid: 21794
negative_passages.text: Correct use of will & would?