query: Why is this result wrong for finding speed of a neutron in relation to deBroglie wavelength
positive_passages.docid: 28350
positive_passages.text: $\lambda=\frac{2h}{p}$ instead of $\lambda=\frac{h}{p}$?
negative_passages.docid: 91849
negative_passages.text: Why in the relativistic quantum mechanics $ \gamma_4$ name is not used instead of $ \gamma_5$?
negative_passages.docid: 100870
negative_passages.text: In De Broglie's Explanation for Bohr's Quantization Condition, why do we not use 2πr = n λ/2, why do we use 2πr = n λ?
negative_passages.docid: 57773
negative_passages.text: About the speed of light and gravity
negative_passages.docid: 73660
negative_passages.text: Relativistic Doppler effect derivation
negative_passages.docid: 27416
negative_passages.text: References on De Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory
negative_passages.docid: 33110
negative_passages.text: The origin of the value of speed of light in vacuum
negative_passages.docid: 59176
negative_passages.text: Amplitude of an electromagnetic wave containing a single photon
negative_passages.docid: 72129
negative_passages.text: Finding the correct units for the energy-momentum tensor?
negative_passages.docid: 122405
negative_passages.text: Why does the refractive index depend on wavelength?
negative_passages.docid: 86328
negative_passages.text: What is the relative speed of two near-light speed particles headed towards each other?
negative_passages.docid: 18541
negative_passages.text: What does a de Broglie wave look like?
negative_passages.docid: 57961
negative_passages.text: Some doubts about photons
negative_passages.docid: 69854
negative_passages.text: Why is there a minus sign in this wave equation derivation?
negative_passages.docid: 134164
negative_passages.text: What is wrong with the De Broglie–Bohm theory a.k.a "Causal Interpretation" of quantum theory?
negative_passages.docid: 67978
negative_passages.text: Huge confusion with Fermions and Bosons and how they relate to total spin of atom
negative_passages.docid: 147388
negative_passages.text: Why do these two ways of understanding constant acceleration give different results?