Anyone have this and the BK9? if so what are your opinions.
1738214
Bought Hoodlum last year and is very light for backpacking. Had concerns about the notched blade but so far it's been great. Last used it in November to baton eight inch logs in twenty-nine degree weather. Worked like a charm. Can't find a bigger blade this light and for a great price.
1738215
As an overall survival knife I prefer the Buck Hoodlum. My first impression was how light it was for a big blade. Its more versatile and I like the sheath better. The BK9 is better for batoning and chopping in my opinion. I don't like the sheath and it doesn't have a finger choil so you can't choke up on it for more finer bushcraft work. Last time I checked the BK9 was about $20 or $30 cheaper.
565973
No, it is not an exact clone of the BK2... What it is is a very good knife for the money that is tough as nails! Condor makes very good knives.
921330
Ive had a L9k for over 5 yrs it great and still has good vid quality even though I have drp it a few times you may have gotten a bad unit I would suggest return it to the seller n try another one
2277463
Yes it is and I am very pleased with the Bk 7 . Very happy with this knife, would recommend this to everyone
1299231
I don't have a BK9, but I have a lot of other knives and I have not found one that it won't sharpen.
2133746
I own both. I prefer the BK2. I don't think anyone would dispute the differences in terms of quality. That being said the Schrade is really quite nice for the money. This Schrade is full tang .25" thick 1095 steel. Really can't go wrong for $40 bucks.
387637
I just pulled out my BK7 and BK11 and tested it for you, and NO it doesn't really work. The BK11 is too large for the secondary sheath insert that originally held the little BK? that used to ship for free with the larger BK7 and BK9. The BK11 sheath will slip inside the BK7's pouch, but the pouch flap is then in the way and needs to be tucked somewhere or cut off. IMO this pouch is better reserved for other gear like fire starting supplies and a sharpening stone. I personally think it's better to carry the BK11 around your neck, or in your pocket------------separately from the BK7. The knives serve different purposes, and I don't like to place all my eggs in one basket anyway. Hope this helps. :) W.W.
12749
I would say the handle is about the only difference in the two if you have larger hands the BK14 might be better, you loose the handy bottle opener that's on the BK11. There is a review on YouTube search BK11 vs BK14, maybe that would help.
853909
I own both and personally prefer the coated BK14. The coating prevents rust and covers up any rough grind spots that the BK24's stonewashed surface does not. I don't know if they changed the coating somewhere along the line but mine has not scraped off with use; not to say the coating will never scrape, but I'm personally glad it's there.
1537921
I would say they are very similar. Same handle materials & finish. I bought the BK22 Companion and the only difference is the blade shape & it is a little bit thicker & heavier. I hope this helps. Both knives I bought are great.
359954
This is a great resource AnthonyB. I think the review clearly favors the Panasonic but I am biased ;-) I'm with you on the noise issue but all else aside the improvement over the first generation is remarkable. I especially like the macro modes. Much better (see my review).
2034961
I personally like the iCharger line. I have a 106B that works great for my needs.
914365
Yeah but try to describe it, beyond saying it's "better". ThanksP.S. Interestingly, I just talked to their company this morning. It seems that they left the belt-clip out of my box, they're going to mail me one. A couple of months ago I went there to swap my old 400 for a newer 400 when its FM went out. Had I heard from you before that, I would have asked them if I could give the 210 another listen. Several months ago they let me sit and compare ALL the models.P.P.S. Surprisingly, today they told me that this is actually the manufacturer here (in El Monte CA). Yeah but try to describe it, beyond saying it's "better". ThanksP.S. Interestingly, I just talked to their company this morning. It seems that they left the belt-clip out of my box, they're going to mail me one. A couple of months ago I went there to swap my old 400 for a newer 400 when its FM went out. Had I heard from you before that, I would have asked them if I could give the 210 another listen. Several months ago they let me sit and compare ALL the models.P.P.S. Surprisingly, today they told me that this is actually the manufacturer here (in El Monte CA).
2133744
I like the SCHF9 because its a longr blade and a grippier handle with a blade just as thick as the bk2 for a lower price.
1995555
I agree with the previous responder. I believe that there is a problem with the e09K unit. Mine worked perfectly right out of the box and continues to output sounds that are normal for the music being played. I think it is a defective unit and should be returned. Don't be discouraged about this unusual problem as the the equipment is high quality and performs exceptionally when it is working properly. I would ask Amazon to replace it. I hope this helps you get a working e09k as you will be pleased with the results.
9630
BK 10 semi-clip point, thinner spine, lighter vs. BK 2 drop point, thicker spine, way heavier.
565976
it does resemble the bk2 in size and blade shape the bk2 is far better materials but for the money the rodan will get the job done all week and twice on sunday! killer knife that should last forever!