Is it fix for Canon 6D with len 24-105mm? Do you have any recommend? i am trying to find some case like this for my camera 6d with len 24-105. Thanks
1734809
24-105 with hood does not fit into case at all. Without hood it is a very tight squeeze for lens and the body sticks out. Velcro will lock, barely. I would not call it a fit, but adequate for some uses.
1591088
I don't know if it fits. I bought it for the Canon 7D, have owned it for about a year and used it less than 10 times. I liked it at first, but now it's useless. It doesn't click securely, so it easily falls off. Even the eye piece you're supposed to open and close doesn't click and stay closed either. For this reason, I no longer recommend it. Too bad because if it stayed on, it would be useful. I tried taping it, but that was a mess.
357031
The compact fits a 6d with 24-105, barely. Had to go the bigger one for 70-300.
1988632
I have used this tripod with my 6D and the Canon 25 -105 mm with no problems. So I really think you will be fine with your two lenses. It 's a very solid tripod.
1264608
I have had no problems with all my old canon lenses working on the 6D. I've had the camera since December and absolutely love it compared to my 60D.
1785448
I see the Lumix is the same shape as my Canon. I did a slight modification for my long Lens and instead of going with the way it is Stock(up and down) can only be accessed my fully unzipping the Back. I put one of the Dividers on the Left Side sideways therefore I can access it from the Quick Access panel and I get additional 4" length If I had a longer Lens. If you would like a photograph of how I did it send me your Email.
455221
I shoot Canon but....in this bag I fit the 6D with battery grip and with 24-105 mounted, a 70-300L, a 100 macro L, a 430 EXII flash, two tripod rings, a spare battery pack for the grip, a pair of circular polarizing filters a large Giotto rocket blaster and misc small stuff.
1116971
I have a 7D (and formerly a 50D) with a 70-200 f/2.8L II IS mounted to it in the center of the pack and there's still room for a 24-105 at the bottom. When the pack is laying flat the body/lens is sitting base down, and the extra lens is sitting on its lens cap. Maybe that's what the other reviewer meant? I just have to rotate the tripod ring 180 degrees so the foot is on the top of the lens when stored in the bag. You MIGHT squeeze a 60D with grip in there like that. I leave Manfrotto Rapid Connect plates on each of my bodies (and the tripod ring of the 70-200), which adds a little extra height to them. I tried my 5DII with grip in one of the side pockets and it is slightly too tall, even without the Manfrotto plate attached, so I leave the grip in a box in the trunk of my car until I need to attach it to the body for a shoot. I don't have a grip for the 50D which I recently upgraded with the 7D, and haven't tried the grip for the 7D to see if it will fit in the bag. I also carry a 430EXII, a 28-135 (Don't ask me why, it rarely gets used), a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 (great lens on the crop bodies), a 50 f/1.4, an extra bodycap/rear lens cap set and a "rocket" type blower in the main compartment. There's plenty of room in the other pockets for batteries, CF cards, spare lens caps, cleaning supplies, etc. I've had mine almost two years and it is still in great shape. I've been VERY pleased with it.
1907930
It's an L Series lens that comes with the camera as opposed to being a 'kit lens' and is awesome when combined with the Canon 6D. The 24-100 L IS gives you a great shooting range, has Image Stabilisation which gives you the 'extra stops' in low light and basically a is a great all round lens. So yes, it is very much worth getting with the camera.
1810762
Yes, it will fit the Canon 70D w/24-105mm lens. Just simply reverse the hood on the lens for a great fit. I also store an additional battery in the zipper net located within the bag. It's actually perfect for light transport of many DSLR cameras and a extended lens.
1320220
It fits my 6D canon. 6D is a bit compact than the Canon 3D. If you want to use the bracket for a flash, you will need a cable that connects your flash with the camera
979389
Actually, I was asked a similar question recently about a different lens/camera body from another potential customer. Regretfully, I am not an expert on the dimensions of other camera bodies and other lenses. This camera case happens to work great for us but I did take risk in ordering it. Amazon has a pretty liberal return policy so I would encourage you to try it and see if it fits. If it does fit, I guarantee you will love it. Otherwise, send it back. Keep all the tags on it before trying it out. This process isn't a big deal. Best of luck.
1661638
I only have canon cameras but my 7d and mark cameras fit. It's a great case for hiking in to sites. The only thing I added was a strap across my chest and an extra strap for my full size tri-pod.
1955732
I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for several arrangements or can be removed as needed. There are no exterior straps made to hold a really long lens in the 12" to 15" length on the outside. I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for... » Read More I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for several arrangements or can be removed as needed. There are no exterior straps made to hold a really long lens in the 12" to 15" length on the outside. « Show Less
1465640
I don't have a 6d, but the bag has no problem swallowing a combo of 7d or 5d3 with a lens or two. I suspect the 6d being a smaller camera would fit even with a 24-70mm lens. The interior padding can be removed for increased volume however you lose the protection.
1414142
Hi,Seems to match.in some extremely wide angle lenses ultra thin filter is used, as far as I know it is not required for 24 mm.I use it on canon 18-200 (cropped sensor).Thanks.Guy
1258627
I keep a couple of lenses in my bag. I keep a Tamron 24-70 2.8 on my camera nearly on all the time and it fits in the middle very nicely. I've posted a couple images with a ruler so you get a sense of size and capacity.Overall, I like the bag. However, it is not much good shifting it to the right shoulder. I wished there was a more universal solution. Left shoulder only!http://imgur.com/enE5F05http://imgur.com/7FGRmKPGood luck!