How is this lens for shooting video?
1732772
I shot interviews for a photoshoot using the 18-35 1.8 and a 70D. Here's the first of them. http://youtu.be/mkfEvYeCIEE The front / stationary angle is the 18-35 1.8. I also used it for handheld shots and with a steady enough hand you almost don't miss IS. Though I'd probably opt for something with IS like the Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC if you have shaky hands.
1732773
Really good actually better than it is for stills (a little) but phenomenal for the price! You will not see the quality in this lens in any other even close to its price range...
1732774
Excellent. The lens is solidly built, low light capabilities are amazing and the zoom and focus ring are smooth. I had a canon 17-40 4L and this lens is miles better and the quality of the image is on par with the canon 24 1.4L. Beware though, this lens will not work on a full frame camera.
1732775
Not sure, our camera does not have a video option, but the pictures are great.
2242944
It performs well in low light, sometimes throws a shadow, but I think that is my inexperience as a user. Wonderful lens!
626723
This lens is great for low light. The F/2.8 aperture is fast and there is little need for a tripod.
782910
If you are going to shoot where there will be plenty of light, then yes this lens will be okay. Here I hope these videos helps you, since I am still experimenting with this lens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap0NQfWuKKEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5wZAvUmPUA
900105
I am using it one a 5D MIII and am quite happy with the lens. I got it for time-lapse with the manual aperture feature. So far very happy with the lens for the price.
1372849
I use this video in fairly high end video production on my Red Scarlet. It is not too bulky, but I believe in having a bit of weight to improve the quality of shots. The focus is pretty darn smooth for a non-manual lens! I would give the smoothness a b+ where most slr lenses are a d+. And the images on this are spectacular.
19800
It has performed very well for me in low light situations. I have been startled a few times by the brightness of the recorded image. I usually use a Pentax 18-250mm lens.
2131312
I've never used it for Video but for sports action and wild life, it's plenty fast. Any f/2.8 is a fast lens. You might also do a little research on the new Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8. It's also a very good lens with excellent reviews.
648859
While its completely up to you, I will say that this lens is the best for the price in my personal opinion. I feel its a perfect walk about lens and is great for portraiture. I have used it for video but unless you have an external mic, you will be able to hear the motor. I also agree that the auto focus can be slow so I tend to use this one manually. It's not perfect but for someone who lives on a tight budget, it works great for me :)
884487
It is an excellent lens, i use it a lot for video, the stabilizer is the best, the macros are impressive, i have a Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite to be a winner.
1709380
It's a solid lens with good range. If you plan on using it outside, then the lighting should be ample to take the type of shots you're seeking. I have found that indoor shooting is not its strength. But the shots I've gotten are clear and I've been pleased with it. The additional range has come in handy.
877962
I have no problem with lens, it zooms well. I have made many videos with the Canon FS300 and it really works well.
1165952
Yes it works well. Decent lens for size. Bit of telescoping on corners until you zoom it slightly
575222
I would like to add to the comment made about the AF. Yes, it's a little loud going back and forth a little. I knew that going in and in fact Lumix warns of it on the older version, and I would not suggest this lens for video. I use it for still photo's on a Lumix and have no other issues. Perhaps the new version is not as so?
2181348
The zoom button is easy to work. Very smooth and responsive. I don't shoot much video, but this my most used lens and I am very happy with it.
970969
I am using this lens with my Cannon 6D which works very well in low light anyway. I use this lens with a tripod for landscape 90 % of the time and I love it !! It is an F4 so it is not as fast as a 2.8 or less. But For the price difference and a little speed loss maybe, the quality is excellent. If you plan to take allot of low light pictures without a tripod you may want to spend the extra money and go for a 2.8 or less. I just love the quality of the photos with this lens. It is fast enough, light weight and takes great pictures.
2181344
To be honest, I have never tried a video, but I haven't been totally satisfied with the performance of the lens. Zooming in and out of taking photos, it seems to go through more adjustments than my Sony lens. It does not seem to zoom that far for me.