what is the difference between the BT10 and the BT46? I know the BT47 ones are the tall version.
1755392
BT10: extends 4.75" - 9.0", 12.7oz (in LW17 configuration)BT46: same as BT10, but 13.61oz. More durable, with non-rotating legs, strengthened leg boss, and inner leg constructed from T7075.BT47: same as BT46, but 15.13oz. Longer legs extend 7.0" to 13.0".V8: base model with permanent clamp for Picatinny railsLW17: quick release model with ADM 170-S lever for Picatinny rails.NC: No Clamp. Requires you have your own 17S size lever style mount.
1755393
The BT 46 has *Fore and Aft pivot limiting Bosses**Non-Rotating Legs**Strengthened Leg Boss**Inner Leg constructed from T7075*http://www.accu-shot.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=24&products;_id=68
1755394
Bt10 has quick release lever so you can use it on other weapons or choose not to carry it a round all the time on your rifle it is very light and very strong and very adjustable
1755395
BT10: extends 4.75" - 9.0", 12.7oz (in LW17 configuration) BT46: same as BT10, but 13.61oz. More durable, with non-rotating legs, strengthened leg boss, and inner leg constructed from T7075. BT47: same as BT46, but 15.13oz. Longer legs extend 7.0" to 13.0". V8: base model with permanent clamp for Picatinny rails LW17: quick release model with ADM 170-S lever for Picatinny rails. NC: No Clamp. Requires you have your own 17S size lever style mount.
1361630
The when troubleshooting connection issues, the user manual states "... We recommend a maximum distance of 10 metres (33 feet) with no solid objects in between." That implies class 2 (2.5mW (4dBm) 10M) As for the BT version, I'm gonna guess v2.1 (nothing in manual) based on product release date.
1804989
I'm not sure what that is bt I love this item and bought one for my daughter also.
1154322
This is my wife's watch. Never had the 220. Her 610 was stolen so bought the 620. She likes it better. Blue tooth is easier to upload and it locates a satellite much faster. Plus a little smaller & lighter. The 620 was 399 vs. 299 for last year's 610 model
1169326
I prefer the BTH6s to these, which I just returned to Amazon. The BTH3s have smaller ear cups so they press on my ears rather than surround them; since I wear glasses, the pressure ends up hurting the sides of my head after 30 minutes. Plus, the ear padding is much cushier on the BTH6s. That said, I wish the BTH6s would fold up like the BTH3s so that the storage case was flat rather than football-like. The cups on the BTH3s also rotate "left/right" so if your head would benefit from that kind of adjustment, bonus. On the other hand, the cups on the BTH6s rotate "up/down." I also prefer the aesthetics of the BTH3s since chrome isn't really my thing, especially when that "chrome" is plastic. The BTH6s sound nicer than the BTH3s. I'm being intentionally vague because I'm no audiophile; the best I can say is the sound is more substantial. (Though that may be because of the ear cup fit.) Ultimately, comfort trumps everything else for me. It doesn't hurt that the BTH6s dropped from $79.95 to 49.95, which makes them $10 less than the BTH3s. =)
226755
I replaced the 410 with the jabra 510 MS. It's like the 410 but adds bluetooth and batteries so it can function with your cell phone, even when it's unplugged. Awesome device. I carry it everywhere.
788945
Be careful because there are several similar models, the bluetooth version is MDR10RBT. That version works amazing in bluetooth and actually has more features than when you use them in wired mode (you can advance tracks, play/pause and adjust the volume remotely). There is an internal rechargeable battery and if it runs out you can simply plug the cable in and use them as wired headphones. I find the wired mode has better sound quality, in fact I find it excellent.
208286
Didn't know there was a new model...I received the BT10 LW17 quick release. I do love it!
373075
If you mean the BT-168 there does not seem to be any significant difference. I can tell you the BAT-200 works great.
687969
The only difference I see in the two models is the dimension and weight. The TRO480 is slightly bigger and heavier. TRO490: 18.1 x 13.3 x 10.8 inches ; 9 pounds TRO480: 18.1 x 13.3 x 15 inches ; 10.8 pounds The letters b and s represent the color. bs is for Black and Silver, while b is just black. Ranjana
498942
This one is featured with 40 Watts RMS ... New model says 20 Watts RMS.They really both sound absolutely great. The ONLY meaningful difference to me is that, the newer model has integrated Bluetooth, the older model does not.You have to decide how badly you want that Bluetooth function and ask yourself if it's worth the $150 extra (give and take) you're going to spend. I've got the old model in July of this year and it really achieve what I need. I listen to music from my tablet, my Ipod and connect it to my laptop to watch movie. I simply connect my audio cable every time. Long story short, they both sound formidable. One has Bluetooth. One doesn't. This one is featured with 40 Watts RMS ... New model says 20 Watts RMS.They really both sound absolutely great. The ONLY meaningful difference to me is that, the newer model has integrated Bluetooth, the older model does not.You have to decide how badly you want that Bluetooth function and ask yourself if it's worth the $150 extra (give and take) you're going to spend. I've got the old model in July of this year and it really achieve what I need. I listen to music from my tablet, my Ipod and connect it to my laptop to watch movie. I simply connect my audio cable every time. Long... » Read More This one is featured with 40 Watts RMS ... New model says 20 Watts RMS.They really both sound absolutely great. The ONLY meaningful difference to me is that, the newer model has integrated Bluetooth, the older model does not.You have to decide how badly you want that Bluetooth function and ask yourself if it's worth the $150 extra (give and take) you're going to spend. I've got the old model in July of this year and it really achieve what I need. I listen to music from my tablet, my Ipod and connect it to my laptop to watch movie. I simply connect my audio cable every time. Long story short, they both sound formidable. One has Bluetooth. One doesn't. « Show Less
284613
This one is bigger but lighter, and has bluetooth 4.0. I compare its sound to the one coming out from a mobile phone speaker. No bass, and as loud as a mobile phone.The B009N1RV9U is smaller, heavier and has an older bluetooth version, but it sounds 3 time better than the newer version, a lot louder and has bass. I recommend the B009N1RV9U.
789176
Bluetooth 4.0 is more energy efficient and has a faster throughput (more data at once). But these headphones already last long enough as it is (~10 hours) and the audio quality is great for the price. As far as these headphones go, Bluetooth 4.0 is largely unnecessary. Plus, the reason it's so cheap is probably because it only has 3.0, which is a worthy compromise, in my opinion.
1917217
In addition to BT 4.0, this one is supposedly has more base. The silver one has a different button layout, allowing you to sharpen treble, etc. BT 4.0 does not drain the battery as much.
1783711
I do not have both models to compare so I don't the Non-Japan Model. In my case, last year when I bought the first one, there was only one model #DR-BTN200 (Japanese version) on the list. I am very happy with this headset. So, I have bought the second one for my wife recently. Here are features that I am very pleased:- Battery is last very long as spec (40 hours, really)- Sound is pretty good- Bluetooth antenna is strong, no interruption when listening music- Voice commands via Bluetooth work very well for both Samsung "S-Voice" and "Google Now" using Samsung Galaxy S5 I do not have both models to compare so I don't the Non-Japan Model. In my case, last year when I bought the first one, there was only one model #DR-BTN200 (Japanese version) on the list. I am very happy with this headset. So, I have bought the second one for my wife recently. Here are features that I am very pleased:- Battery is last very long as spec (40 hours, really)- Sound is pretty good- Bluetooth antenna is strong, no interruption when listening music- Voice commands via Bluetooth work very well for both Samsung "S-Voice" and "Google Now"... » Read More I do not have both models to compare so I don't the Non-Japan Model. In my case, last year when I bought the first one, there was only one model #DR-BTN200 (Japanese version) on the list. I am very happy with this headset. So, I have bought the second one for my wife recently. Here are features that I am very pleased:- Battery is last very long as spec (40 hours, really)- Sound is pretty good- Bluetooth antenna is strong, no interruption when listening music- Voice commands via Bluetooth work very well for both Samsung "S-Voice" and "Google Now" using Samsung Galaxy S5 « Show Less
1642582
Yes, BT works fine, is the only function that works, the rest of the system is garbage... don't buy it. Spend a few bucks more but get something good. My system broke down after 6 months. No spare parts, in summary... stay away from Boss.
647674
The BT10 has 2 screws that clamp the bipod to the rail therefore non QD. The BT10LW17 is a QD bipod. Otherwise it's the same bipod..