DP-02 or DP-008? Anyone familiar with both units and has a good breakdown of why one is better than the other?
1734987
Hey Kelly, I have had a DP-008 for a while now, and it is a great device. Unfortunately I don't own a DP-02, so I can only go by what I've read and explain some key differences, which may or may not be helpful. The main difference between the devices is that the DP-008 uses SD memory cards, while the DP-02 records to an internal mechanical hard drive. With the SD cards, you can swap cards up to 32MB in and out of the unit. SD/SDHC cards are pretty standard, and you can use them in lots of different devices (digital cameras in particular. And most modern computers will have an SDHC slot, or you can get a USB-to-SDHC adapter for dirt cheap). With the DP-02, the hard drive is 40GB, and is not nearly as plug-and-play (you can hook up the device to your computer, but to say that it would be inconvenient to swap the drive in and out would be the understatement of the week). Plus the DP-008 runs on battery power for added portability. The caveat being that the power supply is sold separately, but it's not that expensive. The device works well on AA batteries, but for extended recording, invest in the adapter. Note that there is a newer TASCAM recorder -- the TASCAM DP-03 -- which is basically a DP-008 with extra bells and whistles. These include a built-in CD burner (along the lines of the DP-02), faders instead of knobs for track levels, compatibility with the TASCAM multi-function foot controller, and stereo (TRS) 1/4" inputs. (The DP-008 uses unbalanced TS connections on the 1/4" inputs, unless I am mistaken.) The DP-008 does not have a drum machine built-in. It does have a basic metronome, but that's as fancy as it gets in that respect. You can either hook up your standalone drum machine, or use computer software to lay out your rhythm and then record it using the DP. Hope this helps, and if you think of anything else you want to know, lay it on me and I'll help where I can.
1650631
I have a A2 and the DG720 and they work very well together!! TrueHD is amazing!!
571788
I love the size of the 780 but keep reading about audible motor noise in videos it records. However, when I read about the 940, no one seems to report this issue. There's an excellent deal on the 780 right now and I'd love to pick one up, but not if the 940 avoids the noise issue. Can anyone here speak from experience on this? I can scour specs and reviews, but some real-use feedback would be helpful from SD940 owners.
1797493
Matt, in my opinion you can't go wrong with either one but from what I have read, the 7008 is a step above the Denon. Here is a link to a review I read: http://www.audioholics.com/av-receiver-reviews/marantz-sr5008-sr6008-sr7008 I have not installed a new 7008 so I cannot give you an opinion based on personal experience... Hope this helps. Brad
444161
Hello, I queried this myself with Grace Digital before purchase and discovered that the 800 is a later model than the 200 and is 'Control 4' compliant. As far as I understand it this allows you to to control the unit over a local network and allows 2-way communication with the unit, however I am no expert on this and have not used the feature myself so you should research further if you are interested. In all other respects the two units are identical and mine works well as an Internet radio. I found that actually the 800 was being retailed slightly cheaper than the earlier 200 as well so of course I bought the 800. Hope that helps. Hello, I queried this myself with Grace Digital before purchase and discovered that the 800 is a later model than the 200 and is 'Control 4' compliant. As far as I understand it this allows you to to control the unit over a local network and allows 2-way communication with the unit, however I am no expert on this and have not used the feature myself so you should research further if you are interested. In all other respects the two units are identical and mine works well as an Internet radio. I found that actually the 800 was being retailed slightly cheaper than the earlier 200 as well so... » Read More Hello, I queried this myself with Grace Digital before purchase and discovered that the 800 is a later model than the 200 and is 'Control 4' compliant. As far as I understand it this allows you to to control the unit over a local network and allows 2-way communication with the unit, however I am no expert on this and have not used the feature myself so you should research further if you are interested. In all other respects the two units are identical and mine works well as an Internet radio. I found that actually the 800 was being retailed slightly cheaper than the earlier 200 as well so of course I bought the 800. Hope that helps. « Show Less
1214635
I happen to own both the DA5800 and the DA2800 (both <1 year old). Both are great units. The 5800 is 9.2 channels and the 2800 is 7.2 channels. There are other differences, primarily around number of inputs/outputs, higher power, and more features. The Sony.Com site has a great side by side comparison tool for specifics. I use one in a theater room with a projector and the other in a family room. Depending on your needs either are excellent options.
756625
I believe they are both 2.0; not sure; I returned the unit as it did not play flac or some of my movie files. The sellers were very helpful, and even sent me a second set, but same problems. My mp3 files played, but the first few seconds it was a static noise. A shame, because the unit looks great.
1403706
I had the NAD D3020 replaced via warranty. Sold the replacement unit eBay. And I purchased a Peachtree Decco 65. What an amazing amp! Beautiful to look at, and even more beautiful to listen to!
1441555
I looked at both just now on Amazon and aside from a $20 difference (the D50AP is cheaper) I don't see anything that jumps out at me as being different. The dehumidifier has been plug in for over 4 months now and now that the weather has gotten sticky it's been going nonstop without a hitch. The pump is working fine but it's a bit noisy still it's better than emptying a bucket every day!
1010304
The HD in the name of the units refer to display only, and not to sharpness of detail that you would get with a HD transducer, which does not come with the 698 . I KNOW it is confusing . The larger displays come with a longer, slim (HD) transducers that show better detail . And that includes the 900 series and up. You can get a HD ducer for the 899 that does not come with it . The small display (5 inch and under) units come with the compact side scan ducer. and do not have the software to use the HD ducer. This helps keep the price lower.
1794232
question a bit perplexing while in use? volume of paper? or when not in use? have not timed my unit after using it can you be more specific I have not had any problems with this unit so far dcp is there a specific problem?
488179
You are correct in thinking I am a dope but I am and I have not a clue about DPI. However, I can say this: this is a fabulous product. It does everything I asked of it. To date I have converted 2500 slides onto digital, seen each one on screen and am delighted with the results. I am now embarking on about 4000 photos. Now, I'll give some tech details. 14 mega pixels CMOS sensor. External memory-SD/MMC card. Data conversion-12 bits per colour channel. Powered from computer USB port or /5V adapter wall outlet. It is as easy as pie (otherwise I would be lost), very quick once you get the hang of it. You can put 4 slides through in about 30 secs. (except loading and unloading of course). If oyu are looking to do slides, just follow the instructions for film. Odd that they advertise it as a slide convertor and then don't mention it in the instructions. I had bought a cheap competitor and it was useless. This is a winner. I think I should join them as a salesman. Would do well. Hope to have helped. a pleasure.
681935
My understanding is that the hardware is identical, but the Channel Master has better, updated software. Very happy with my DTVPal-DVR and am glad I got it while available.
1468274
Somewhere I read that the DGX version has better anti-reflective coatings than the DG version...supposedly better for digital cams. Whether that is true or not I do not know...
2239542
Felix best I can tell the 110 Advanced is exactly the same unit and box contents, just cost $10 more. I think it may have been an earlier packaging promotion or something like that. My first order was an "Advanced" and it died after 30 minutes. Amazon promptly refunded my money and I then ordered the ADVC-110 and it looks exactly the same, only difference is box does not say "Advanced" on the outside.
699193
We have sold both units you're asking about for years and they are both wonderful! Both have good pre-amps and are built well. And both work well with all of the current DAWs. Don't stress, either will serve you well!
1621548
I have the PSW505 and I love it, watching movies you actually feel like the room is shaking. I would advise taking the PSW505, now that being said, I have not heard or had the PL-200. Hope this helps.