Would it be possible to observe pondwater at 400x on this?
1756675
Depends on what you mean by "observe." At the highest magnification, a one millimeter object takes up almost the entire field. You could see the parts of a fruitfly, or tick, but I doubt that you could see a protozoa or amoeba or other small creature. I think the 400 power claim is a bit of a stretch. Actually, a lot.
1756676
Using the software at the following website science4all.nl/?Microscopy_and_Photography___MICAM you can see certain microbes... would not say cells... the max resolution of 1280 pixels and calibrating 1/64" = 397 micrometers what I measure on screen I see less approximately 175x
8606
I could not find an answer on the instructions. Try www.filterstream.com and perhaps they could answer the question.
1409128
There is a chart on K&H;'s web site that you can use to fugure out what size watts you need for your pond and area.Good luck.
244012
Probably not. I don't know how many gallons my pond is, maybe 90-100. It does a good job, but when the water starts really warming up I have to clean the filter every other day. I think you need something bigger.
1049787
Really wouldn't know how to test for that. There are a lot of color calibration options so i can't imagine you would have a problem. This is really a game-changing monitor, its that large and hi-res.
1422924
I believe so. I am going to get another for my pond. Currently it is running some eight pumps and three airstone devices in my tanks and I've had to put valves on my two ten-gallon tanks to keep it from blowing the water out of the tank. Great blast - I just had to learn to control it. With a pond your size I see no problem.
608636
There is a hole in the bottom that is plugged with a silicone plug. Silicone can handle 400F typically.
718274
Yes....And you can use much larger pump too. I've got a 4K in it, and it could handle right much more.
565460
I don't have an internal UV in my filter but if you are talking about adding on an external UV then:You want a direct connect from pump-to-filter but from the filter to the pond you have lots of options. My experience is that for a UV to work you need to have the recommended flow rate going to through the UV. Too much water too fast won't work. If this is what you are doing I would split the flow ... 1/2 directly from filter to pond and 1/2 to the UV and then to the pond.
1533031
Depending upon the magnification, many "things" can be seen in a drop of pond water. http://www.microworldsphotography.com/Galleries/Microscopic-Creatures/i-cKDFwMC
350942
I believe you can,if you check out u tube you'll find a myriad of ideas about setup ect.including a guy that added an inline carbon filter.The video shows a gentleman getting water from the edge of a lake,I think he may have been from the UK.
691650
I don't have the info you requested, however, I do know that this is not very high powered. I still anything beyond 50 feet enlarged. I would not purchase this one if you want to really see anything.
1954777
I live next to a state park. I have only watched the stars & moon, land animals, and anything on top of the water. If you are talking about underwater, I think it would have to be the clearest of waters.
626775
It could, although it probably wouldn't be the greatest quality and you'll need a powerful enough GPU to drive the extra pixels at high frame rates. It is made more for static image displays. There is an answer to this question on the Displaylink website
281114
My pond is cement so I really couldn't answer that question honestly. Sorry.
2215224
It's a fairly large unit and processes a large amount of water every hour... I could see it working for a small pond.
636131
Possible, but probably be a too steep. I have it on 4.5ft. it's great. highly recommended.