What are the USB 2.0 read / write speeds on this one?
1764980
Not sure. I have a Dell XPS 420 with dual core and it takes about 6 min to transfer around a 2 gig movie to it.
1695363
I'm surprised most people have not noticed this being USB 2.0. To achieve anything close to advertised AC speeds you need 3.0 at best.
1952348
From: PC: Intel Core2 CPU 6600 @ 2.4GHz (Windows 7, 64-bit) Port: USB 2.0 Card Reader/Writer: Kingston's MobileLite G3 To: SanDisk Extreme Pro 16 gb And an IMG file (2,478,505,984 bytes) I can reach 27 mb/second Note 1: maybe with a USB 3.0 port you can reach a best speed. Note 2: maybe without an adapter you can reach a best speed.
2192337
IT seems it is USB 2. I have had no delays or problems loading up 15 gig thumb drives or with other USB devices.
517758
Not sure I fully understand your question. The SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 is a Flash Drive that plugs into and out of any USB port. If the port is 3.0, the transfer rate will be circa 10 X faster than a 2.0 Flash Drive. The Extreme model is the fastest. SanDisk sells an Ultra model too, found at Wally-World. And there is probably a Standard USB 3.0. The Extreme model writes at about 190MB/sec. All 3.0 Flash Drives are compatable with 2.0 USB ports on your computer.
1856768
I bought it 2 weeks ago from Amazon and got the U3 version, I got up to 90mb/s reading speed reading through a usb3.0 port on my laptop.
1420325
It's faster, but unless you know that your computer has a 3.0 USB port,better get the 2.0 reader.
1374222
It claims 3.0 but the read speed is determined by the card you put in it more than the 3.0 USB. I get similar speeds on either bus.
1573103
Yes, it is backward-compatible with USB 2.0 and works on USB 3.0 ports. Your read and write speeds will be lower on a USB 2.0 port, but this will work fine with either USB version.
1392810
Absolutely. I've found that, while it's not as fast as on USB 3.0, obviously, it's still faster on USB 2 ports than many other USB memory sticks!
405395
I'm not 100% tech savvy, but I think the major difference would be speed, if I'm not mistaken. 3.0 is the latest standard, isn't it? I think the transfer speed makes the difference, in which case I don't mind this one because I don't have any 3.0 USB items....I'm not much help in this matter, I just needed extra ports because I've downsized from a desktop to a laptop temporarily, so when I saw this I just grabbed it. It works quite well for what it's worth. I'm sorry if it this doesn't help.
211692
I dont remember read/write speeds, but it is fast. This is msata; there isnt room for an adapter internal. Adapter would work external while cloning.
1960039
This particular drive is USB2. You'll get about 16 megabytes per second write, 20 to 30 read, depending on file size, fragmentation, etc.
1629028
The Write speed was between 9.83 MB/s and 14.43 MB/s The Read speed was between 64 MB/s and 78 MB/s I have the 16 gb and I used usbflashspeed for benchmark
2063634
my experince i bought on butmine has been down,but i don't believe even usb 2.0 worked good but i could be very wrong,as can't remeber for sure sorry but don't believe you would have usb speeds going into a 2.0 usb
2013204
I am getting between 50-80MBps writes and slightly higher reads. Overall I am very happy with this card. My only complaint, if you can even call it that, is that the USB ports are not as tight as I like my ports to be. Not a big deal at all however and for the price, the performance is certainly right!
847174
Peter is right. It will be faster than most usb 2.0 flashdrives in a USB 2.0 port but it will not be as fast as if you used it with a USB 3.0 port. Either way it should be faster than any flashdrives that you currently have even in a USB 2.0 port.