Eye-one Display 2: Does anyone know if there is a difference between the Eye-One Display 2 from GRETAGMACBETH and the Eye-One Display 2 sold by Pantone?
279827
Pantone is the older version and is no longer supported. Purchase the Gretag Macbeth version
755059
Hmm, I don't link the anti-glare products as they add a grainy look to it. Not as sharp as the HD one.
2048881
Hello Tiggerstech. I'm happy to inform you that the display you're looking at will work in both the 1012 and 1011. I hope this solves your issue and makes you happy.
118948
Hi D.A laughlin, yes we do have the Matte Display version with HD resolution and faster specs (2.2Ghz Quad Core i7 and 750GB HDD) and that would be the MC723LL/A model (an upgraded from MC721LL/A for this listing). Check it out here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0017HSZWK/ref=olp_tab_refurbished&seller;=AVKQQV5S6AOR9
1206722
Yes & that is the version I own. Some people get confused with the B1 in the name, even a YouTube reviewer that I've seen. I believe that the company intends to release different types of monitors & the B1 refers to a type, not version. They should drop the B1 nonsense or just call it B1.
2238250
yep, I believe the only difference is the name. Had to replace mine after a bear destroyed the original screen. The shade screen was identical to the original.
1436254
Dear Rosa,Thre main difference between these two models is that the EFC-1G5SGECXAR is a newer model that gives you a 2 angles viewing stand segured by magnets.
1390905
Same as previous answer. Helps a bit, maybe. No real noticeable difference as far as glare is concerned. HOWEVER, there is a MATTE FINISH Illumishield that is probably better. I tried to cancel my order for the original but it had already shipped. I think the matte finish is specifically designed to reduce glare.
358408
The only diffrence that I can see is that the triple head 2go you can have a diffrent program opened in each monitor and has a DVI connection compared to the VGA in the Dual Head 2go.
1303548
They both have natural displays. Maybe the non plus version is more expensive because it's about to be discontinued and there are only a few suppliers who still have it.
581081
I have no experience with the Apple display. Compared to every other display I have used, the Viewsonic is superior. Excellent image quality, colors and not a single dead pixel. I would not hesitate to buy it again. The clarity of the text on the Viewsonic relative to the more expensive Dell 3011 that I use at work is noticeable.
1037226
Sorry I'm not sure on the # you gave. I bought my gazebo the first time at Big Lots I went by that and the picture. There is only one that looks like the pic. It fit my frame great, however there is no screen with it.
3437
I don't know. Both mine stopped working after a few months and that was a while ago. If I had to guess, with all the movement and such, they were a little hard to read without my glasses, but my eyes weren't as bad as they are now.
202879
Just recieved ours a week ago and it has a matte screen. I totally forgot that it never asked for my preference when I was ordering! So I think you are right, Amazon doesn't offer the glossy.I personally like the matte better, less annoying reflection, though I've heard the glossy screens have better color, personal preference.
2080013
Honestly, even though I purchased a Holy Grail screen protector previously, it was too much money. It eventually broke and I found one similar to it for about $5.00 on EBay that works just as well. In fact, the 'button' piece is shaped better than it was on the HG. By the way, I just tossed the HG rather than present it as a warranty issue. I figured that whatever they charged me for postage would have been more than the new EBay item.
855904
I don't know, it's not from what I can tell. I called amazon to tell them that the one I ordered and received was the same one as the $44.99 one and the credited me. I think it's more only because of the eye cover thing that they give you? Go for the other one dual speed.
1688428
I wondered about this myself, so I did a little research. The odd thing is, the Creative Zen Vision (no M, no W) is actually more expensive and OLDER than the newer Zen Vision W. AND the Vision W has a wider screen and SLIGHTLY different specs. I did a product comparison on the Creative.com site and discovered they were very similar. http://www.creative.com/products/comparechart/comparechart.asp So I don't understand Creative's logic in making a "lesser" product more expensive. I even went to Creative.com's discussion forum looking for an answer, but it didn't seem that anyone had a reasonable explanation for this. Actually, others are wondering the same thing. My recommendation is buy the Vision W, not the Vision. Creative.com does have a 'contact us' link for support if this doesn't help. One thing I did notice on Amazon's product description for Vision:W was that it had "Other features include a personal organizer that you sync with Microsoft Outlook". Oddly, the Vision doesn't mention this, so I'm assuming it does not have that capability. The Zen Vision 30GB is the same cost as the Vision: W 60GB on Target.com, and virtually the same on Amazon, if the one weren't on "clearance". Any logical differences between the two, for that kind of price difference, eludes me.