Is this a high speed USB 2.0 card?
1748009
Yes this is a high speed USB 2 card. It works great on my older HP laptop running windows 7 My laptop only had 2 usb ports and I wanted to add a couple more ports to it.
1748010
Like the title says...USB 2.0...is high speed port...just not as fast as the new USB 3.0. My computer only had 1, USB 1.0 port, I thought this would bring it up to speed, but I could not get the software to work with my very old Gateway laptop, so returned it. It also requires a different USB cable as these are very thin plugs.
2189677
I'm running a 2.something card so I'm not 100% sure. If it doesn't say so in the specs I'd keep looking for one that specifies 3.0
1121338
I understand the card slot is SD and not SDX speed so it is the equal of USB2. I've tried a VMWare 64bit XP on the card and it was sluggish with Visio. Light usage would be OK but I'd say no to any serious VM use.
1681186
I wanted to go ahead and state this here in case anyone else is looking for an answer to this question that they can be rest assured, It Works Great on my Windows 7 x64 OS and on the package it comes in states this "High Speed USB 2.0 Mobile Card Reader/Writer" Yes writer and writes very well to my smart media card, if i known this ahead of time it could have saved me money from purchasing a separate unit that had writer labeled on in its title.
241947
Might be, if you have Windows 7.Didn't work on mine. Transfer rate was exactly the same as usb 2.0.
1514136
Stay away from this company and their products... this is not a high speed card
1236262
If it has an express card slot, then yes. Make sure you download the RENESAS-USB3-Host-Driver-20200-Setup-x86-x64-Binary drivers. My card worked fine for a while, though the connection was always a little touchy - you had to make sure the card was all the way home. (The card tends to come out when you unplug). Now it really doesn't work at all but I think it's more to do with the fact that it's not making a solid connection on all pins. I've just gone back to USB 2.0 regular ports.
600117
I am running two UHS-1 cards -SanDisk Ultra 64 GB MicroSDXC Class 10 UHS-1 Memory I have not formally benchmarked them but transfer using a USB 3.0 port is much faster than a 2.0 port.
842370
The box only mentions USB 2.0. I would guess a USB 3.0 should be ok, just won't get the 3.0's speed rate for data.
678141
No. The motherboard header you are plugging into is USB 2.0 then that will cap you transfer speed.
1489205
Hi Nigel G. It is backward compatible with USB 2.0, but the speed will be restricted by the USB 2.0 port as well. Anker Team1-800-988-7973 support@ianker.com Mon-Fri 9am to 5pm(pst)
1374222
It claims 3.0 but the read speed is determined by the card you put in it more than the 3.0 USB. I get similar speeds on either bus.
621341
Yes, it is USB 2.0 compatible. However, data transfer rate will be much slower than with Thunderbolt or USB 3. If you are using it strictly with USB 2.0, there are cheaper alternatives.
190234
Based on when this was introducer, I doubt it's USB 3. If your internal storage is either flash or SD, it really doesn't make much difference whether you have USB 2 or USB 3 port speed - the storage element write speed will be the gateing item.
1154458
usb 3.0 is only avaibly through usb 3.0 slot. The card reader is through serial ATA.
1932908
That's pretty much a given. If ur using usb 2.0 to connect you can't have speeds higher than the usb 2 limit.
2016591
The card is a PCI-e 3.0, but like all PCIe 3.0 GPUs, it is compatible with a 2.0 slot on a motherboard. You just don't get the advantage of the faster speeds offered by 3.0