How does this camera compares in terms of optical quality for example likethe Fujica X20.
1745459
This lens is nothing less than superb; it is a 24mm f/1.4 at its lowest zoom setting and maximum aperture, and the optical resolution will virtually run rings around anything else in its class.
1745460
Hello Mario,In my opinion the Leica would have better image quality but the X20 is a slightly faster in focusing. The Leica has a 1.4 at 24mm, which is quite nice for shooting in museums and such. I use a D-Lux 6 and am quite happy with it, as a pocket camera. After all people really like a Leica. Regards,RoozbehOC camera
883521
I've never owned a Panny FZ70, but I did own a Panny FZ40 and I will say the FZ40 is a fine camera with excellent image quality. That being said, I love the image quality on the X-S1 and overall I think it is a better camera. I don't know about anybody else, but I had a problem with dust and dirt getting inside of the FZ40 camera's lens and it made the camera unusable. The X-S1 is an amazing camera and it is built very solid with many metal fittings instead of plastic pieces that you find on a lot of cameras. I love the manual zoom as well, it's got a pro-camera feel about it, I wouldn't trade my X-S1 camera for any other out there. The filter size is 62mm which I highly recommend getting to protect your lens. I bought a Fujicon clear UV filter lens and a Sigma polarized lens as well for bright sunlight days. I couldn't be happier with my X-S1 camera.
1698623
the ex210 has a 40x optical zoom also an 80 and 200x digital zoom. the greater the distance the lesser the quality of the image. how ever it is amazing. but note well, when zooming at great distance a tripod is need to stabilize the image. I am a police detective and I use it for surveillance and it is great.
1813819
Excellent at 1080P at these frame rates:60/50/30/25/24p I am more into still photos than video. Video changes too often (Video film/super8/vhs/digital/full HD and now Quad HD is starting) Still photos last if you back them up. I use video for short films to be combined for children/grandchildren. Image quality depends on the sensor and the lens. The better the lens the better the quality. Technique and your level of competence matter most. Many pros used cheaper cameras, but they knew just how to get the best results.This is a very good mid-level camera. Any model that is more expensive is in the professional category.
354771
Picture quality is pretty good. I have a Canon EOS which is amazing. But this camcorder is pretty good.
1344846
Yes i've had a FS 200 for about 4 years it just died, but it lived on the dash ofv my car. I have a concealed carry permit, and i started car and turned it on for four years.It was never taken out ,left AS is, in sun in texas 165 degrees+ in car. pictures at 70 mph chrisp clear and in focus inside a RX-7, it failed because a sd card stuck inside it and after getting it out I damaged switch telling it, sd card was in place, I broke it trying to repair. For the price they are the best i've seen, and with the 2000x zoom and 4000 by3000 higher resolution,ie tripod full moon take a picture of the moon not 1080i but the max resolution camera has , well above that,and you can blow it up like crazy and lose no focus that 2000x is worth it's weight in gold on this camera becxause it has the deep resolution to use it,.You can see things on the Moon you wouldn't believe , thats why i'm looking for another one ...Totallty AWESOME I have a Nikon 510 with same resolution as Cannon and it gets awesome results when put in photo pgm to zoom and blow up photo.but not as easy to use , the canon is so simple and does a magnificent job, massive resolution is almost as good as maginfication, because with real professional resolution depth ,when you blow it up in photo shop etc, you see more, more,more clear crisp pic and you zoom in, I'm looking for another canon fs 200 2000x because i have seen the proof, my friends were blown away. Awesome Rich.
1442809
more importantly, how will the image quality be and will it be worth owning? reviews of the P80 were not kind. I'm hoping they have fixed this issue.
120624
Thank you very much, ALT, I really appreciate your feedback. Yesterday I ordered the Fuji S1000fd instead. For $231 the 10MP and 12X optical zoom was just unbeatable. Now I've got to find out if I can use filters on it, too. Thank you!
291182
I don't expect this to be a very difficult camera to use. There's always the auto mode to fall back on. The key point to take note of is really how good and fast the autofocus is. You'll want to wait for reviews to appear before making your decision. I've the X100 and the autofocus performance there wasn't up to my expectation - it wasn't as fast and accurate as I like.
486892
Yes, the image is very clear. The camera you select will also influence image quality.
85337
Check this:http://snapsort.com/compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-x20-vs-Fujifilm-X10
823530
This page should give you the answers you are looking for.. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms8000fd/page4.asp
1253597
Strictly image quality, Nothing a non professional would notice. The lens is much more sturdy and the IS has saved me on more than one occasion, especially in low light. The IS version is worth it IMHO
1606032
I never had the original, but the image quality is very very close to that of my 5DmkIII's. I have only used it in raw, not jpg, but I am blown away with the quality both at the base and at higher ISO's
1263424
I also have the X-M1. The IQ is about the same, but the 18-55 is a bit better. Focus speed is also about same between the two cameras.
1183337
We returned it so I don't know. IT just didn't take pictures good enough. Loved the shape but that was about it. Got the Fuji X60 in case you want to compare. We LOVE that camera! Sorry I couldn't help you.
626653
The camera has the exact same image sensor as the D80 and A100, so the 'native' image quality is the same, as you will find if you shoot RAW and process in the same converter (e.g. Adobe Camera Raw). Thus, any differences are simply in the built-in JPEG processor and its settings. What Phil Askey at DPReview.com found is that the K10D's image processor chooses to not apply that much sharpening to the image in its default 'Natural' setting. Even turning the sharpening parameter to its maximum in this mode does not produce a very sharpened image. However, the K10D also has another mode, 'Bright'. This mode boosts the saturation and sharpening to provide pleasing consumer-quality JPEGs 'out of the box'. On Pentax' cheaper cameras, 'Bright' is the default. I think Pentax expects that more serious photographers prefer a less enhanced image that's more suitable for post-processing, so that's the default mode. If you'd rather have a consumer-type bright, sharpened image, 'Bright' mode is available. As far as I can tell, 'Bright' images are comparable to out-of-the-camera JPEGs from Sony Alpha and Nikon. As to image noise, the K10D JPEG processor controls noise better than the A100 but not as much as the D80. However, it also retains more detail. From what I've seen, the K10D exceeds the A100 in JPEG quality; whether you prefer the D80 or K10D depends on your noise-handling preference. The XTi has a sensor that's a little better at ISO 1600 than the Sony sensor used by the others. However, I personally prefer the color and overall image look of the other cameras, and the build quality of all three Sony-sensor cameras is better than the XTi.