vsx-9040txh versus vsx-1019ah-k Has anyone done any research on how the VSX-9040 measures up to the VSX-1019? I saw in Drebit's comment that the 9040 has more "real" power than the 1019 and also comes with pre-outs. Also, I'm not sure if the 1019 has assignable HDMI inputs either whereas the 9040 does.I am in the market for a new AVR and I was almost sold on the 1019 based on reviews I read from others and also on Cnet. However, I just came across the 9040 and I am hearing good things about it. I will be researching this further before I purchase but I wondered if anyone else has done this and has additional feedback. vsx-9040txh versus vsx-1019ah-k Has anyone done any research on how the VSX-9040 measures up to the VSX-1019? I saw in Drebit's comment that the 9040 has more "real" power than the... » Read More vsx-9040txh versus vsx-1019ah-k Has anyone done any research on how the VSX-9040 measures up to the VSX-1019? I saw in Drebit's comment that the 9040 has more "real" power than the 1019 and also comes with pre-outs. Also, I'm not sure if the 1019 has assignable HDMI inputs either whereas the 9040 does.I am in the market for a new AVR and I was almost sold on the 1019 based on reviews I read from others and also on Cnet. However, I just came across the 9040 and I am hearing good things about it. I will be researching this further before I purchase but I wondered if anyone else has done this and has additional feedback. « Show Less
1763056
the only thing that stinks is that Pioneer will NOT honor the warranty if you buy online. You'd have to order buy phone and from one of these dealers. http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/FindStore/Pioneer+Home+Audio+Video+Authorized+Internet+Dealers
1763057
FYI,,, The VSX 21TXH is both Sirius & XM Satellite Radio Ready while the 1019 is only Sirius ready.This means that you only get the Best of XM with a Sirius subscription. The Best of XM does not include MLB.
1763058
Thanks for the info. The VSX-9040 is only $6 more. Let us know how you like it if you get it. I haven't decided yet.
1527058
I was wondering the same thing. I am thinking about buying the the 1019 and now I came accross the VSX-9049 and right now the difference is only around $20 in Amazon.
1763059
Well after much debate and searching for the best price, I finally pulled the trigger on the Elite VSX-21TXH. Found a deal on Ebay that was just too good to pass up ($510 shipped). And since the VSX-1019 was similarly priced, it was an easy decision to go with the 21TXH. BTW, both the 1019 and the 9040 are both still right around the $500 mark. I'm certain I'll be happy with performance of this elite AVR. =)
1763060
to all google search vsx-9040thx and go to pioneers link it will tell you all the specs then compare
1763061
That's pretty decent selection of online places to buy Pioneer for less with full warranty. Isn't it? It just doesn't apply to ELITE models. Pioneer will not warrant ELITE models purchased online. Pioneer will not warrant anything purchased on eBay. Period.So if any online seller offers VSX-21 "w/full 2yrs warranty" it just smells wrong. Go somewhere else. If you do care about warranty, buy VSX-9040 - same thing, no gold label, no glossy front, $200 save.
1763062
I just cancelled my Amazon order for the VSX-1019. Great reviews on Cnet, sure, but I've read complaints about the power really being 90 watts and, more importantly for me (cos its going into a enclosed unit) about the 1019 running really hot. Can anyone comment on the VSX-9040 re runnimg temperature??
1763063
FYI, I've learned that the VSX-9040 is the Canadian version of the VSX-21TXH. The only difference between the US version and the Canadian version is the Canadian version doesn't carry the "ELITE" emblem and I think the warranty period is shorter. However, the VSX-9040 has more power than the VSX-1019 and pretty much all the same features. So I am leaning toward either the VSX-9040 or the VSX-21TXH.
981061
Gamble, The other BIG difference is that the 65's HDMI inputs actually ACCEPT 1080p vs. being 1080p COMPATIBLE and scaling down to 1080i only to reformat it back to "P" like the 61. Go for the 65...I was in the same boat as you until I found that out reading my Crutchfield catalog. Only makes sense for HD-DVD (now a dead format) and Blu-Ray
1803802
Regarding the discontinuing of the 920, perhaps Sony is doing it so "quietly" is because it was too GOOD of a receiver for the price! The 920 was a GREAT value, as it offered a LOT of HD features for the $600 (or lower) cost. True HD, DTS-MA, GUI, FOUR hdmi inputs, etc. I returned my newly-purchased 520 unit the moment I saw the 920 go on sale for $450. I would wager than any comparable unit will be more expensive in the future.
1290836
Since the v4100 was replaced by the v5100 you can get a great deal if you can find one. My local ABC Warehouse still had one and I just picked up a KDL-46V4100 this week for $800. So far, it's great. One thing is, the screen is more reflective than my Toshiba, so be ready for some glare depending on the room it's in.
2157977
I have the same issue with the DG710 (only difference is one less HDMI and 10watt less per channel, otherwise, same unit) and the only solution was to set all outputs to "Bitstream" I spent an hour with Sony on the phone and could not get the receiver to play 5.1 PCM from any source but a PS3 game, why, I don't know, I tried 4 different Blu-Ray disk.I am exchanging mine through Amazon for a new one, I don't know what I'll do if the new one doesn't work. Some people have claimed the Lossless audio works great (lossless is PCM only) yet CNet reviewed and claimed it mixed all PCM to 2.1, which is what both of our units have done. Apparently it's a hit or miss issue, some work, some don't. I hope I get a good one next time. I have the same issue with the DG710 (only difference is one less HDMI and 10watt less per channel, otherwise, same unit) and the only solution was to set all outputs to "Bitstream" I spent an hour with Sony on the phone and could not get the receiver to play 5.1 PCM from any source but a PS3 game, why, I don't know, I tried 4 different Blu-Ray disk.I am exchanging mine through Amazon for a new one, I don't know what I'll do if the new one doesn't work. Some people have claimed the Lossless audio works great (lossless is PCM only) yet CNet reviewed and... » Read More I have the same issue with the DG710 (only difference is one less HDMI and 10watt less per channel, otherwise, same unit) and the only solution was to set all outputs to "Bitstream" I spent an hour with Sony on the phone and could not get the receiver to play 5.1 PCM from any source but a PS3 game, why, I don't know, I tried 4 different Blu-Ray disk.I am exchanging mine through Amazon for a new one, I don't know what I'll do if the new one doesn't work. Some people have claimed the Lossless audio works great (lossless is PCM only) yet CNet reviewed and claimed it mixed all PCM to 2.1, which is what both of our units have done. Apparently it's a hit or miss issue, some work, some don't. I hope I get a good one next time. « Show Less
2163031
I have the HD7084 and I love it. It powers two Zenith Over the air converter boxes and two LED TVs. I get a great clear picture. Even the 1080i broadcast come in great as well as 480. I would definitely recommend this unit. I have more channels than I new were out there. I live out about 25 miles away from the Chicago stations. I also get some Michigan and Indiana stations.
1537003
The 1020 uses much cheaper parts than the 9040, as the 9040 is the same as an Elite but without the Elite branding. The 1020 is also 80 watts x2 while the 9040 is 110 x2. The 1018 is even far superior to both the 1019
956150
I found it on the US site: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Shop/Home/AV-Receivers/Models/VSX-9040TXH
430736
Interesting comments. If the wiki article is right, TCL isn't such a "no name" brand after all - I live in the midwest and I have heard of RCA. They were a lot bigger in the days when tube tv's were really big, they sorta got quiet in the LCD/plasma revolution. But anyway, if TCL == RCA, I might end up choosing this TV. Target & BB have a Samsung this size on Black Fri for 328$, and it looks like Toshibas and Samsungs this size in general are the deal at 320ish this year - an extra fifty bucks off for the TCL is almost enough for a bluray player to go with it on Black Fri (yep, really). =) Interesting comments. If the wiki article is right, TCL isn't such a "no name" brand after all - I live in the midwest and I have heard of RCA. They were a lot bigger in the days when tube tv's were really big, they sorta got quiet in the LCD/plasma revolution. But anyway, if TCL == RCA, I might end up choosing this TV. Target & BB have a Samsung this size on Black Fri for 328$, and it looks like Toshibas and Samsungs this size in general are the deal at 320ish this year - an extra fifty bucks off for the TCL is almost enough for a bluray player to go with it on Black Fri (yep,... » Read More Interesting comments. If the wiki article is right, TCL isn't such a "no name" brand after all - I live in the midwest and I have heard of RCA. They were a lot bigger in the days when tube tv's were really big, they sorta got quiet in the LCD/plasma revolution. But anyway, if TCL == RCA, I might end up choosing this TV. Target & BB have a Samsung this size on Black Fri for 328$, and it looks like Toshibas and Samsungs this size in general are the deal at 320ish this year - an extra fifty bucks off for the TCL is almost enough for a bluray player to go with it on Black Fri (yep, really). =) « Show Less
183317
My big issue is all the negative discussion on the 750 "Halo" - light leak around the edges.Is this gone on the 850/860? The 850 is slightly cheaper at AZ, only because shippingis free. If the 750 really is a fine tv and the halo is all over statement, then thebetter sound actually helps me. Appreciate suggestions.
1220271
Likewise I just ordered a 9040 to replace my Onkyo 606 which has a bad HDMI board after 1.5yrs. Looking forward to hook it up to:50" 1080P Panasonic PlasmaDirecTV HR21-700 HD DVRPS3, XBOX350 & WiiPolk RM8's in 5.1 setup with a 10" Polk Sub.
2002256
This is EXACTLY the issue with me as well. Ironically, I also do not watch TV that much, and currently have a 27 inch (Panasonic) CRT that I am looking to replace. I have pretty much decided to go with the 550 model. I looked at the two side-by-side in a store and could not notice the difference (a common cable feed -- probably 720p or 1080i -- was going to both). I don't know if the 120 Hz was on for the 650, but reading many comments here and other sites, it seems like this isn't worth it unless you watch alot of sports (alot of people seem to keep it off). As for the better contrast ratio for the 650 (50000:1 compared to 30000:1), I don't believe I could tell the difference. Aside from video, the extras for the 650 don't really seem worth it. You get the so-called Infolink which gives you capability of RSS feeds (presumably a limited number, possibly more in the future). But I am a news junky and like to look at all the various newspapers on the internet -- I'll stick with my computer. If I want, I'll just hook my computer up to the TV to look on the big screen. Extra HDMI port -- big deal, can always buy a switch box for cheaper than the difference. Other extras, if they exist, usually can be gotten around by buying external devices, if you want or need them. Bottom line, if you're like me, go for the cheaper 550. addendum to my previous post: Got the 550 and it's beautiful. Will not fret over whether I should have gotten the 650 (gotta get on with life). I avoided paying an extra ~$300 by doing this.
288046
This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or... » Read More This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. « Show Less
170597
I found it on the US site:http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Shop/Home/AV-Receivers/Models/VSX-9040TXH
1775546
@ R. Barg. I directly compared the ZT with the F8500. The F8500's extra brightness was readily apparent in the high ambient light room I saw both sets set up in but I doubt you'd miss any brightness if you had the ZT or VT without a side by side direct comparison with the 8500. My ZT is plenty bright for my needs and during the day I have a bright living room in which its set up. In the very bright environment of the dealer's shop the ZT and VT Panasonics did look a little dimmer than the F8500 when they were all set to equal picture modes but the difference wasn't striking. The F8500 can be calibrated to be a lot brighter though if that's what someone is looking for. For me it was the ZT all the way. The VT60 and F8500 both looked really great no doubt about that and really they're all at the top performance wise but I wanted "the best" (to what I can afford) and from everything I've read, everything I saw when I saw them all in the same room and what I have experienced so far since purchasing the ZT, I made the right choice based on my preferences and how I watch TV. This TV displays gorgeous images, the better the source, the greater the picture quality. As for whites, they look truly white to my eyes on my ZT in all lighting environments, day/night. In the shop the whites did look "whiter" on the F8500 and the LCDs in the room but outside the direct comparison of that showroom, my ZT's white look brilliant. Hope that helps.
5168
There is a thread in avsforum dedicated to the xvt3 series. There have been some issues reported - RVR (random Vizio Reboot), Sets turning on by itself, occasional defective units. Not all TVs are affected and similar problems are not uncommon in other models. Vizio 's support has been prompt in most cases.Picture Quality wise - Vizio ranks highly - esp in pro reviews. There are the standard issues - blooming and some uniformity issues. Also the set does not handle 1080p/24 correctly according to pro reviews .. It uses 3:2 pulldown on 1080p/24 material (e.g. Blu Ray) which can lead to judder in some scenes, There is a thread in avsforum dedicated to the xvt3 series. There have been some issues reported - RVR (random Vizio Reboot), Sets turning on by itself, occasional defective units. Not all TVs are affected and similar problems are not uncommon in other models. Vizio 's support has been prompt in most cases.Picture Quality wise - Vizio ranks highly - esp in pro reviews. There are the standard issues - blooming and some uniformity issues. Also the set does not handle 1080p/24 correctly according to pro reviews .. It uses 3:2 pulldown on 1080p/24 material (e.g. Blu Ray) which can... » Read More There is a thread in avsforum dedicated to the xvt3 series. There have been some issues reported - RVR (random Vizio Reboot), Sets turning on by itself, occasional defective units. Not all TVs are affected and similar problems are not uncommon in other models. Vizio 's support has been prompt in most cases.Picture Quality wise - Vizio ranks highly - esp in pro reviews. There are the standard issues - blooming and some uniformity issues. Also the set does not handle 1080p/24 correctly according to pro reviews .. It uses 3:2 pulldown on 1080p/24 material (e.g. Blu Ray) which can lead to judder in some scenes, « Show Less
697195
I currently just purchased the VSX-33 Elite model and I am curious as to whether or not to switch for the VSX-1021 or not. Does anyone have extensive information as to why I should choose one over the other. Thank you....