RC Micro or "Classic" series... Any difference to make you choose one over the other?
1756974
Hi R. Dma:I don't see your review on these only on the Take Classic. The Micro's are now priced below the Classics. Wondering more in depth why you would recommend the Micro's Please let me know. Thanks!
1756975
the Micro is a much higher quality product also same size (8") but more powerful Sub (240 vs: 200 Watt).
1756976
I have had the chance to listen to both of them, I would definitively recommend the Energy Micro, better sound when compared to the classic, check my review of these set, also take a look at the pictures, I have side by side comparison of both sets.
1756977
Were you able to get them at 399? All the deals seem to have expired and I can only find them for 599.
1756978
I, too, had to choose between the RC Micro and the Classic. I worried the the RC Micro's were too small to provide a full sound. I ended up choosing the RC MIcro's. Here's why: 1. I scoured the different audio forums to get the opinion of people who knew more than me. In the AVS forum (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1153061), I found a posting by a member who posted frequently and who seemed to be highly respected by other forum members. This is what he wrote, "RC-Micro are smaller, with higher build quality and better drivers (than the Classic). They will have a more "refined" sound. The sub is a little better also. Whether it is "worth it" is strictly up to you and how critical you are in your bedroom listening. If you can afford the extra and are seeking the maximum sound quality from the smallest possible package, the RC-Micro will be great. If you aren't super critical and will only be doing casual, moderate volume listening, the Take Classic will probably be fine." 2. I called the tech help at Energy Speakers (they're very helpful, by the way). I told them I could buy the Classic or the RC Micro for the same price. Their tech guy said absolutely take the RC Micro's. 3. They sound better, they look better. I'm really happy with the RC Micro's. Hope that helps!
1597352
Go with the Take Classic! They are still tiny and you can hide them easily but the extra size compared to the micros give it a bit more omph!
1064868
I would skip the micro. The only real difference is that the brake on the micro is made of plastic. It's much more durable on this one. My son was three when he got this and did wonderfully on this one. Two years later it's still his favorite thing to ride.
1234457
They actually run on the same operating system, just the mini is smaller. I would reccomend the larger one. It's easier to read!
1636965
I have both. Both are solid performers. The G drive is much louder than the mini.
505216
I'm not familiar with either of the other loopers, what I can tell ya is that the RC300 doesn't seem to suck any tone or fidelity away. I'm running an Axe FX 2 to it, and I also used to have the Boss GT-100 & it worked well with that as well. It's a great looping station as far as I'm concerned & I like the advantage of all the foot switches. Those other two look pretty sweet as well, I'm just very familiar with the Boss stuff as I've owned the GT6, GT8, GT10 & GT100. I been playin guitar for 25 years fwiw. I went with the RC300 mostly cause I know very well how to navigate the Boss Menus and programming. However now that I have the Axe FX 2 I sold the GT. Hope I helped ya. I'm not familiar with either of the other loopers, what I can tell ya is that the RC300 doesn't seem to suck any tone or fidelity away. I'm running an Axe FX 2 to it, and I also used to have the Boss GT-100 & it worked well with that as well. It's a great looping station as far as I'm concerned & I like the advantage of all the foot switches. Those other two look pretty sweet as well, I'm just very familiar with the Boss stuff as I've owned the GT6, GT8, GT10 & GT100. I been playin guitar for 25 years fwiw. I went with the RC300 mostly cause I know very well how to navigate the Boss Menus... » Read More I'm not familiar with either of the other loopers, what I can tell ya is that the RC300 doesn't seem to suck any tone or fidelity away. I'm running an Axe FX 2 to it, and I also used to have the Boss GT-100 & it worked well with that as well. It's a great looping station as far as I'm concerned & I like the advantage of all the foot switches. Those other two look pretty sweet as well, I'm just very familiar with the Boss stuff as I've owned the GT6, GT8, GT10 & GT100. I been playin guitar for 25 years fwiw. I went with the RC300 mostly cause I know very well how to navigate the Boss Menus and programming. However now that I have the Axe FX 2 I sold the GT. Hope I helped ya. « Show Less
819184
If you looking for something in rc construction but not too worried about the overall functionality or strength, you could try the Hobby Engine brand. I bought one and personally didn't care for it so I sent it back. But if you want to spend some real money I hear that RC4WD makes a pretty good line of construction rc. But your talking a hole lotta bucks. If your just looking for a kid then just get the $54.00 1/18 scale one here on Amazon.
329697
Strictly speaking leader technically different boards. This would be the equivalent of an Arduino nano not a micro. The Nano has a nano USB port and an Arduino 328 processor. The micro has a micro USB port and Arduino 32u2 processor. Functionally however they're going to be very similar. Google should be able to give you any further differences.
928059
Not much. If any difference at all. However, the 500 RC unit is better, because hit has more functions
880065
I've used both and they both work great. I can't really tell the difference between them.
871030
I am very new to Quads and RC vehicles as a whole but I am learning fast. The Spektrum DX5e is a good controller and works great. I am now looking to get a controller with more bells and whistles such as electronic readouts on it such as timers, battery levels and various other things I've been told the higher end ones can do but I am still researching the DX7's and higher. The get kind of pricey so what comes in the RTF box is awesome....you can always upgrade later.
172885
micro. by the way, not that you were asking, I have found the speakers are not good. They are not loud enough. Not sure what to do with that....
508895
from what I've read the only difference is that the animal model come with the mini head. I never found them to be that useful in general. I was researching the same two option and I'm leaning towards the standard DC25
1643158
I had actually emailed polk tech support to ask that question before buying. They indicated that the MC80 was the better product line and used higher quality materials. I haven't personally listened to the RC80i and then the MC80 directly so I can't say exactly what the difference in quality of components means in terms of the sound - the MC80 sounds very lifelike with voice reproduction and i would guess it is slightly better than the RC80i.
2240628
I have both, as far as I can tell there is no difference. They both work the same. Buy whichever cost less. I think it's more of a style thing...
698925
Either should work. Same maker means polarity should match. M-Audio makes a smooth, real-feel pedal.
612112
I have both and they performed identically. It just comes down to your mounting and appearance preferences.