2nd generation differences I have never used any of the pocket type product. Is there anything different about this next generation that will justify around an extra 80 bucks. I was also wondering how this product compares the Flip MinoHD Camcorder. Has anyone used both that can share their opinions and experience?Diane 2nd generation differences I have never used any of the pocket type product. Is there anything different about this next generation that will justify around an extra 80 bucks. I was also... » Read More 2nd generation differences I have never used any of the pocket type product. Is there anything different about this next generation that will justify around an extra 80 bucks. I was also wondering how this product compares the Flip MinoHD Camcorder. Has anyone used both that can share their opinions and experience?Diane « Show Less
1753950
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr5iXO1pD4E&feature;=fvw (copy & paste the link if it's not live)Here is a review of the 3 best pocket HD cancorders including the Flip MinoHD and the Vado wins!!!You can actually click a link in the video and actually see the vid and audio of each one.Although none of these camcorders are perfect in every way, in my opinion the Vado is the best overall...
1753951
Yes this camcorder does take excellent action shots, and for the other post you get the MAC software from the Creative site and it works with the original Vado HD.You can buy the original V-HD with 8 gig for less than the newer version. No difference other than color, memory and software. You can get the software you need from Creative.
1753952
Good website. Thanks again for sharing your knowledge. I will probably go with the first one an get the software if needed. good advice. The new one looks pretty, gut I don't spend money if there isn't enough upgrade to justify the added espense.
1753953
This is a joke. It's the same exact camera for more money. The 4 gig is more expensive than the old 8 gig, lol. I had a reg. vado and am thinking of getting the old 8 gig. The original Vado was terrible in low light situations. Tried to capture video of a tv when the room was only moderately lit and all you could see was light intense light from the tv. How is the HD vado in low light situations? Anyone?
1753954
Would this work well for recording athletic events - higher speed action shots?
1753955
Creative's Vado HD (2nd Gen) Pocket Video Cam. Now available in a glossy finish, the lightweight Vado HD (2nd Gen) comes in a 8GB capacity (black) and a 4GB capacity (white). They also have the MAC software preinstalled.You can get the 1st Gen with 8 gb of memory for less than $120 on Amazon and then download the Mac software from the Creative site if you need it.Right now the best bang for the buck is the original black Vado HD with 8gb of memory.I have 2 of the original Vado HD with 8gb and they are great, there were no other things done to the new ones except the color and choice of 4 or 8gb and the MAC software. Creative's Vado HD (2nd Gen) Pocket Video Cam. Now available in a glossy finish, the lightweight Vado HD (2nd Gen) comes in a 8GB capacity (black) and a 4GB capacity (white). They also have the MAC software preinstalled.You can get the 1st Gen with 8 gb of memory for less than $120 on Amazon and then download the Mac software from the Creative site if you need it.Right now the best bang for the buck is the original black Vado HD with 8gb of memory.I have 2 of the original Vado HD with 8gb and they are great, there were no other things done to the new ones except the color... » Read More Creative's Vado HD (2nd Gen) Pocket Video Cam. Now available in a glossy finish, the lightweight Vado HD (2nd Gen) comes in a 8GB capacity (black) and a 4GB capacity (white). They also have the MAC software preinstalled.You can get the 1st Gen with 8 gb of memory for less than $120 on Amazon and then download the Mac software from the Creative site if you need it.Right now the best bang for the buck is the original black Vado HD with 8gb of memory.I have 2 of the original Vado HD with 8gb and they are great, there were no other things done to the new ones except the color and choice of 4 or 8gb and the MAC software. « Show Less
1177439
I have both and I think the difference in picture quality is significant, especially for indoor shooting where you often have low light situations. After shooting HD videos, I was surprised how much grainier my older videos from Flip looked in comparison. The compression format is also different from the older Flip which helps compress the video despite the HD quality. The HD videos look so much better on my 17" LCD laptop than the older Flip videos. I also have Creative Vado HD, which I like due to the larger capacity and larger screen size for the same price range.
560626
Thanks Kin.Actually, I'm looking for something smaller than a reflex on which I could occasionnaly use my nikon lenses.After using a bit an oly e-p2, i'm a bit confused ; it's better than I thought, and has the IS build in.Does anyone know if nikon will release a micro 4/3 camera soon ?
320129
The zoom here is digital zoom not optical zoom so going much over 2x is pretty useless as quality plummets quickly. The Flip is the only camera Id recommend but the zoom is not too useful. Zooming in and out on any of the cameras is going to be rough and shaky at best. Cameras like this are super easy to operate and give fantastic results. Id say stick with flip and go ultra then if its not your bag resell it as theres a hungry market to buy from you. I have used flip for most all the videos at 90secondsuccess and will be buying another one any day now. Hope this helps. rb
119912
the higher the number the better the picture, you may get a few glitches or choppiness when you play back a scan 2 or simply the fact that it takes the 2 a bit longer to focus,playback or load...honestly overall....there's not a lot of difference so you are still fine (personally) I have the both and a I'm taking photos every day and really can't tell THAT much of a difference. hope this helped.
1507428
Sorry, I can't offer any feedback, but I found it funny that someone else is having the same dilemna with the same 2 cameras. So I will also be intersted in hearing any input as well. Is the video capability really worth it?
767158
I too am looking at the HD, but for a different main purpose. I will be using it to capture my 3 and 1-year olds and editing videos on iMovie. What do people think about the MinoHD vs. Mino vs. Ultra for this purpose?
887262
I did some research on this a couple of years ago and as I recall there is a different model for HD. I do not have the HD camera so did not need the HD version. The HD version was a bit higher in price.
875036
Audio quality on the Ultra model is superb. I do not have the older models, I waited for this one. I recorded jam of acoustic guitars and two part harmonies from 5-10 feet away, perfect. The video quality in lamp light is fuzzy, have to edit in Power Director, render it and save it as 30 fps H.264 file back to flipshare as an import and boom, edited movies are played back in/on Ultra Flip. Sorry, gave you more than the answer. Mikey Blue is coming soon for Ultra Flip, the external microphone that fits the Flip port on the Ultra Model. Have a concert coming in May I must record with optimum sound and that'll do it...Supposed to be out Mid to Late March for the Mikey Blue for Flip.
575221
I agree and have noticed that as well. I bought the older version and have been pleased with it. I have also not read complaints about the newer version. It may be as simple as supply and demand or something we are not aware of. You might check review sites just to make sure the version 2 is well rated and then go for it if it's cheaper. The 20MM has been a great lens, I have received compliments about my photo's and 9 times out of 10, it's taken with the 20mm.
601957
Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire hd from amazon. They are on sale right now for a $124. If $50 is all you then you cant go wrong with the Cx2. Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire... » Read More Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire hd from amazon. They are on sale right now for a $124. If $50 is all you then you cant go wrong with the Cx2. « Show Less
547374
I don't know about Kaossilator 1, it's out dated though and I love my Kaossilator 2. I played with it just yesterday for an hour and a half and I've had it for nearly a year and a half. I researched the first one thouroughly before I bought Kaos 2, there are many advantages. I think you'd be disappointed if you put your money toward the first generation. Get #2, you'll be amazed!!!
347544
I keep thinking the price will drop on the D90, just like the Canon did. Canon 50D doesn't offer the video recording does it? My worse fear is always buying a portable item at this price point, losing or dropping it. There is a certain amount of loss I can afford.I am not waiting too much longer to buy, the video option is weighing less on my mind since I just bought the wife a Panasonic Lumix (Tz50?) for quick pics. It was a HD video capture option, much better than the D90's, higher resolution, and the ability to zoom while recording. Cheap at $237.
1609774
PD,Thanks for a really informative review. I'm in the process of trying to make this decision. I'm getting a 70-200. I just don't know which one. On your 2.8 w/o IS, and adding a 1.4 teleconverter, do you miss the IS? I know you said you use a tripod or monopod a lot. Is that how you overcome that? Or do you find yourself still able to shoot hand-held? I'd love to get that combination of the 200 + 1.4tc.Thanks!
160800
Thanks, John. Now if only I had pockets big enough both to purchase the S5 IS *and* to hold its bulk. :-/ So I guess I'm still wondering: Just what the heck IS the reason none of the pocket-size digi-cams seem to allow zooming in video mode? Too expensive? Too noisy? Simply not possible due to some technical constraint? If anyone has a good answer, I'd still like to know. Thanks for the good discussion so far...
1447681
I didn't see any difference. I am very happy with mine, it woulds like I believe it should. There was only one issue with the viewfinder which in my opinion become too easily detached, but I am sure that's only my model. I would say do more research on this 1d in comparison to others. You can always buy and return it to if you don't mind spending a few bucks on shipping it back if you don't like it.
722138
Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell... » Read More Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) « Show Less