Decide between E2 and E1 I am trying to decide which one to buy. E2 is a new model that has CMOS 8MP sensor, 60fps video, and face detection. E1 is an old model that CCD 6MP sensor and 30fps. Reviews for E1 are all here and they are excellent. The first expert reviews on web for E2 are discouraging, specifically referring to poor blocky videos and unremarkable soft photos despite 60fps vs 30fps. Review in Personal Computer World attributes the problem to bad choice in sensor. So I am having a real hard time here. I wanted naturally to get a second generation model in E2 but if its sensor sucks in comparison with less MP CCD sensor of E1 which many here say take great pictures, then I'll get the older model. I need to decide fast before all the E1s are gone! Review for E2 is here http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/hardware/2223319/review-sanyo-xacti-dmx-ca8 Decide between E2 and E1 I am trying to decide which one to buy. E2 is a new model that has CMOS 8MP sensor, 60fps video, and face detection. E1 is an old model that CCD 6MP sensor and 30fps. ... » Read More Decide between E2 and E1 I am trying to decide which one to buy. E2 is a new model that has CMOS 8MP sensor, 60fps video, and face detection. E1 is an old model that CCD 6MP sensor and 30fps. Reviews for E1 are all here and they are excellent. The first expert reviews on web for E2 are discouraging, specifically referring to poor blocky videos and unremarkable soft photos despite 60fps vs 30fps. Review in Personal Computer World attributes the problem to bad choice in sensor. So I am having a real hard time here. I wanted naturally to get a second generation model in E2 but if its sensor sucks in comparison with less MP CCD sensor of E1 which many here say take great pictures, then I'll get the older model. I need to decide fast before all the E1s are gone! Review for E2 is here http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/hardware/2223319/review-sanyo-xacti-dmx-ca8 « Show Less
382108
Check this review someone did, very nice about the comparison of the two:http://www.amazon.com/review/R12DMNOO8GC42G/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
382109
Hi D. Brodsky. I'm having a hard time deciding which one to get. What did you end up getting, E1 or E2? What's your opinioin? Thanks, Tony
382110
Well I actually was the one who did a review of E2 and comparison, if you go to E2 this would be the most popular review. Please note though that more than 6 months passed, and I think Sanyo have updated E2 with yet another model, WH1. I have not tried WH1 so I have no idea about how it stucks up to E2 and E1.
948238
Yes, back to your original post. I guess the sx1 is for those wanting the benfits of a CMOS sensor, greater zoom (over the sx200 which looks like a great pocket camera), true 1080p HD video, and standard AA battery usage (rechargable, of course, but standard in a pinch), and RAW+JPEG, all things I like very much.p.s. on that review site above the image quality of the rebel xsi is quite inferior to either the sx1 or sx10!
478989
I have the E4, and a friend who wanted one like mine ended up with the E5 as it was only $6 more. All the features are the same. They are both working great months (mine 7, his 3 or 4) later. Unfortunately the only device we have in common is the phone, and his laptop is even a smaller screen, so we really can't tell if the extra 2000 makes much difference.
825688
I have owned both cameras, and did not find much difference in E520. And no it does not take videos. Frankly I have found my iPhone to be more useful. Nonetheless the Evolts are decent instruments.
922254
I have the S8100 and have found it very fast for start-up, between shots and for focusing. It is not the best camera in on earth (I have a Nikon DSLR that takes better images) but having compared it against the Canon S90 and Canon SX210 I think it is among the best P&S; options on the market. The S8100 has several metering options as well as both Single and Full-Time AF for both photos and video. Knowing how they work might have possibly improved performance if that is not something you already had a grasp of.The camera does have focusing noise that can be heard on video if the scene is quiet, but so do all cameras without an external mic.Canon makes great cameras. Good luck with your elph. I have the S8100 and have found it very fast for start-up, between shots and for focusing. It is not the best camera in on earth (I have a Nikon DSLR that takes better images) but having compared it against the Canon S90 and Canon SX210 I think it is among the best P&S; options on the market. The S8100 has several metering options as well as both Single and Full-Time AF for both photos and video. Knowing how they work might have possibly improved performance if that is not something you already had a grasp of.The camera does have focusing noise that can be heard on video if the... » Read More I have the S8100 and have found it very fast for start-up, between shots and for focusing. It is not the best camera in on earth (I have a Nikon DSLR that takes better images) but having compared it against the Canon S90 and Canon SX210 I think it is among the best P&S; options on the market. The S8100 has several metering options as well as both Single and Full-Time AF for both photos and video. Knowing how they work might have possibly improved performance if that is not something you already had a grasp of.The camera does have focusing noise that can be heard on video if the scene is quiet, but so do all cameras without an external mic.Canon makes great cameras. Good luck with your elph. « Show Less
1896653
The s6800 has a CMOS sensor; and the s4--- models do not. The CMOS sensor is better as far as picture quality (incl. better low light pictures). It took me 1 minute to realize the s4-whatever model was not for me and I immediately started looking for cameras with the CMOS sensor. I do not know all about cameras so I have been doing tons and tons of research (probably overkill) to make sure I pick the right one (for me). If you can, pick a model with the CMOS sensor. And congratulations!
1542164
Lets face it the Canon EOS-iD Mark II was released in 2004, and Clearly the Canon 1D2 was the very best for its time. Its now 10 years later, and there are many cameras that have FAR SUPERIOR low light and color rendition that a device engineered 12 years ago. Knowing that one can buy the 1D2 for under $500, your money is much better spent on a Canon 7D, which has excellent low-light performance. I highly recomment that you do NOT buy any 10 year old digital camera. It seems that every 2 year there are amazing improvements, so take advantage of the most current model. Todays Canon REBEL is superior to the 1D2 in Color and Low light capability. Currently my pick for the most optimal cost/performance Digital is Canon's EOS 5D Mark III. Marilyn and I covered an auto show last weekend, take a look at the shots taken with a 5D and Canon D650, the link is www.416-1100.com Later this year I will likely move back to the 1D cameras as I miss the Audio file for captioning images. I cannot take notes when I'm covering an event, and the 1D record button lets one attach an audio file to each image, or any image... I changed to the 5D3 because it was lighter and more compact, but I always use the Battery grip, so that defeats the size/weight consideration. Jim.Wilson
59304
I'm also on the fence on deciding between with these 2 cameras. Any input would be appreciated, thanks.
176622
How do you do, Mr. Ryan. I call it Suzuki, the staff of a bell. Thank you for your consideration. Since this mail is using the translator, it has made a mistake in it, and although it may be an acatalepsy, please allow it. Although I am carrying out simultaneous sale of this camera also in the store in Tokyo, it is still in stock. It is a late model of XP series of FUJIFILM. In order of XP60 -&gt;XP150 -&gt;XP200, it is the most expensive and performance is also the most wonderful. Is it an answer of the question? Moreover, please do not hesitate to ask a question.
1064894
I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features, 16MP & the price I would choose the GE again! I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features,... » Read More I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features, 16MP & the price I would choose the GE again! « Show Less
1222502
The E-PL3 is a good camera but it has been superseded by the the much better (in every way) E-PL5. Both cameras suffer from not having a viewfinder and in bright light the screen can be very hard to see. I have had both cameras and in my opinion the E-PL3 was worse in this regard than the E-PL5. You can get a detachable electronic viewfinder but they are expensive. If I were you I would spend the extra money and go for the E-PL5 (I don't use the EVF half as much as I did with the E-PL3). They are both super fast in focusing and are genuinely small as regards portability. They are really cameras to use and the finished results are really great. The E-PL3 is a good camera but it has been superseded by the the much better (in every way) E-PL5. Both cameras suffer from not having a viewfinder and in bright light the screen can be very hard to see. I have had both cameras and in my opinion the E-PL3 was worse in this regard than the E-PL5. You can get a detachable electronic viewfinder but they are expensive. If I were you I would spend the extra money and go for the E-PL5 (I don't use the EVF half as much as I did with the E-PL3). They are both super fast in focusing and are genuinely small as regards portability. They are really... » Read More The E-PL3 is a good camera but it has been superseded by the the much better (in every way) E-PL5. Both cameras suffer from not having a viewfinder and in bright light the screen can be very hard to see. I have had both cameras and in my opinion the E-PL3 was worse in this regard than the E-PL5. You can get a detachable electronic viewfinder but they are expensive. If I were you I would spend the extra money and go for the E-PL5 (I don't use the EVF half as much as I did with the E-PL3). They are both super fast in focusing and are genuinely small as regards portability. They are really cameras to use and the finished results are really great. « Show Less
1936972
It depends on what is more important to you and how you shoot? The 7D has lots more AF points. Would you be using them? Do you currently rely on a crop sensor to get that extra focal length in your EF lenses? How used were you to shooting 35mm? Personally I can see the merits of having both. I love my 6D and full frame, but there are times absolute real estate of the sensor size isn't necessary and I'm looking to replace my aging, but solid, 40D. The 7d has a larger buffer, more processing power by 100%, dual slots, but a smaller sensor size for MP size. Are you shooting more video than stills? The 1st 7D excelled at that. I personally will always steer towards sensor size. I have images from a 11MP 1Ds that beat 15MP crop sensor cameras (not to mention 1 2/3" sensor 15MP cameras) simply because the MP weren't constrained to a small sensor size. I realize this really doesn't help answer your question and only asks more. But the camera is a tool, and it's very rare that a camera comes along that is that swiss army of cameras that does everything better than all the rest. Good luck in your decision.
748241
"There are other cameras in this class that are faster and have far better sensors with far better ISO capability."You failed to list these cameras and their prices. Could you please post some links? Maybe there are some models I am not aware of.
444930
Greg...thanks for the great comments on the E510. You have confirmed my own research. Seems to pretty much be the best value in the DSLR group at this level. I really appreciate you taking the time to help us out. Based on your comments and some others, we have ordered the E510 from Amazon. We will check out the pics you took. Great help! regards Dar
102677
The ES is over a year old and the UN55F7500 is much faster and better all around.You won't like the response time of the ES.
1556511
For about $30 difference, the 330 is a much better buy, and for several reasons. First, the CMOS sensor with only 12 megapixel in the 330 is so much better than the CCD sensor with 16mp (remember, in small sensors like this camera, less megapixels is actually better than more!) Also the range is much better, the 330 has a wide-angle lens of 24mm, and the 130 starts from 28mm. And it's also longer, 10x optical zoom on the 330 vs. 8x on the 130. Then you have the Digic5 processor on the 330, which has many advantages over the older Digic4 processor on the 130. Video on the 130 is maxing out at 25 fps, not good enough in my book. The HS330 had 30fps, much more smooth.
1114593
For a good listing of the traits that the two cameras have, use the comparison function, see this comparison table at dpreview.com - http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras;=sony_dsch1%2Csony_dsch2%2Csony_dsch5&show;=allor add your own cameras for comparison here:www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.aspAlso - see the Sony talk forum over there for more in-depth questions. Very basically, the H2 has been found to perform very well. There appears to be less high ISO noise from the 6mp sensor on the H2. The screen is smaller, but the lens appears to have the same, or at least very similar, great qualities as the H1 lens. For a good listing of the traits that the two cameras have, use the comparison function, see this comparison table at dpreview.com - http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras;=sony_dsch1%2Csony_dsch2%2Csony_dsch5&show;=allor add your own cameras for comparison here:www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.aspAlso - see the Sony talk forum over there for more in-depth questions. Very basically, the H2 has been found to perform very well. There appears to be less high ISO noise from the 6mp sensor on the H2. The screen is... » Read More For a good listing of the traits that the two cameras have, use the comparison function, see this comparison table at dpreview.com - http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras;=sony_dsch1%2Csony_dsch2%2Csony_dsch5&show;=allor add your own cameras for comparison here:www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.aspAlso - see the Sony talk forum over there for more in-depth questions. Very basically, the H2 has been found to perform very well. There appears to be less high ISO noise from the 6mp sensor on the H2. The screen is smaller, but the lens appears to have the same, or at least very similar, great qualities as the H1 lens. « Show Less