How does this compare to the FVS318G?
395367
You can do a comparison by going to the Netgear website. Basically the 336 has 2wan/4lan, whereas the 318 has 1wan/8lan. The 336 has a significantly higher wan-to-lan throughput (250 compared to 350 mbps), more tunnels, more concurrent connections, etc. If you have a spare PC, you may want to look into smoothwall or PFSense downloads which can turn a pc into a powerful, customizable router.
990747
depends on your usage, i'd say the 35mm f1.8g because its a better all rounder and is a lot sharper than the 55-200 ( i have both of these ) the 35mm is great for indoors i chose the 35mm 1.8 over the 50mm 1.8 because its wider. The build quality is not that great on the 55-200 and the vr motor gives a noise also the focusing speed is slow on the 55-200mm
111042
Hi Fursuit, approximately almost 100% difference. If NPFV30 can record continuously for 95 minutes, then the NPFV50 can do 180 minutes. -Vincent
419042
Not sure since I only have the 550 model. But I imagine not a big difference. 550 is very durable
1591092
I believe the primary difference is that the XF228 is for larger/heavier screens ( > 65", > 135 pounds). I presume the higher cost reflects sturdier construction.
1698699
I have used a similar battery to replace batteries in 3 ups. The most important thing are the dimensions. Terminals can be a problem but width differences can be handled with different connectors. The f2 is about 1/4 inch wide. The 1280 is an upgrade from the 1272 battery.
2091073
HG21 has a better sensor(1/3.2") than the HF20/200 (1/4"). Also, it still has the flash card option to record video, in addition to the hard drive. Not to mention, the HG21 also includes a viewfinder, which is missing in the HF20/200. I would definitely pick the HG21.
1301570
Not familiar with the other model. My requirements were extremely basic - provide a flute to multiple grandchildren who were fighting over a single one and for that the 20BG was perfect!
2007393
Not great with the stock FV50 battery. Almost everyone recommends upgrading to the FV70 (fits the battery cavity best) or the FV100 (lots of life but a bit bulky). I'd also recommend buying Sony brand since the knock off seemingly cheaper batteries don't seem to be the best quality. I have the FV70 and am quite happy with it and I still have the FV50 as a backup. There is a multitude of information here: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1220588
1490178
The ASUSs with "-A#" have longer battery lives than the ones with "-X#" The UL30VT has a better graphics card (dedicated card in addition to an intergrated one) than the UL30A which just has integrated graphics.
1484866
compares very well as far as I can tell. I really like mine. Seems to have all the same available features.
1587855
Thanks. So if the 1120 and the VSX-31 are almost exactly the same price, it sounds like I should go for the 1120.
1236911
I researched both before I purchased mine and determined that there wasn't a significant difference. I'm currently happy with this (but I guess I wouldn't know if something large enough to be damaging has occurred since I installed it). The specs and ratings looked functionally similar, however the more expensive one has a lifetime limited vs 10 year warranty and the $25k equipment coverage.
91284
I compared specs of this against the newer FFRS1222Q1 and the only difference seems to be the CFM (cubic feet per minute) airflow rate at highest speed, being 500 on this one and 339 on the new one. Additionally this one claims to cool 640 sq ft, while newer one is just 550 sq ft, probably a result of a lower fan speed. Not sure why they would make a new model just to lower fan speed. Maybe it's quieter, but there's nothing in the specs for that.
1521606
From a connectivity stand point, there are no differences between the units. I have found the descriptions posted by Amazon can be very vague. I find myself needing to do more research before buying and usually on the mfg. website.
678610
I had the f4 version, and sold it to a friend to buy the F2.8II. Frankly, the increase in IQ is there but very slight. I would have no qualms about going back to the F4 version, it's a stunning lens. So unless you have a specific need for F2.8 (weddings for example as others mention), the added weight of the 2.8 to me is hard to justify. These are both exceptional lenses, the difference is like comparing a Bentley and a Rolls-Royce.
736774
Given the high ISO capability and the noise-handling of current softwares (LR4!), I see no compelling reason for the extra stop, weight, bulk and expense of the f 2.8 version. It is NO sharper than its little brother. And you already have the 85 f 1.8.