What is the difference between the Brother 4570 and the Brother 4070?
360287
The difference is quite a bit. The 4070 is a discontinued printer. Both are duplex wireless and color ( their last initials dictate this cdw). The 4570 and the 4150 both use the same engine and toner not sure about the 4070 engine but the duty cycle on the 4070 is quite a bit less per month on that model. If you are looking for cheaper and don't need a 60,000 page per month duty cycle I would go with the 4150 and not the end of life 4070. The page per minute is 30 on the 4570 and 21on the 4070, it is 25 on the 4150. All three have iprint. Good luck and happy shopping.
683145
Coconut, I'm facing the same decision. Have you learned anything yet that you could share?I'm leaning toward the smaller printer just because it seems less cumbersome, but I'd be happy to put up with the larger bulk of the 5370 if I thought it was better in some significant way. Would love to hear any info about differences in quality or reliability.
1427631
4150 has no network-ready Ethernet port on the back, so it can't be connected to a home or office network for printing from various PCs. However, 4270 and 4690 each has an ethernet port in the back, and you can connect the printer to a router. Any computers connected to the router can then access the printer and issue a print command. I think 4150 can be part of a network using the share folder in "my computer." This means that you're sharing the printer through the computer that's hooked up to the printer. To print, the hooked-up computer must be turned on for other computers to access it. Print commands can then be relayed via the hooked-up computer to the printer. Otherwise, buy a print server for 4150. Silex C-6700WG Print Server would work. Basically the 4150 is the basic unit. 4270 and 4690 do everything 4150 does and additionally: 4270 is network, and the 4690 is network w/ SMB (Small message Box) and IFax. However, neither the 4270 nor the 4670 has network *scanning* (they both can do network printing and fax, but not scanning). However, the 4690 has additional scan to features: scan directly to email, USB memory stick, and file server. In my opinions, I feel that these features are to compensate for the fact that 4690 doesn't have network scanning and are unnecessary if 4270 and 4690 have network scannning. But if you use the print server Silex c-6700wg (the Axis 1650 does not have the Fax feature for the 4150) with the mf4150, then this combination would afford you all the 4150 printer's capabilities on the network: network printing, faxing, and *also scanning*. I had verified with the Canon tech support about this.
1706689
According to Brother's web site, you are going to want either an LC71 or LC75 (high yield). See https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies/accessoryList.aspx?Model=MFCJ435W#.Uxc7N_ldVZV .
1806370
well, unfortunately, i dunno the difference between the two. i own the 70711. it's been great except for the included blade, prolly should have gotten a new/better one at the start and leave the included one as spare. The only real complaint i have is the rotating table, and the 0 point on it is not equivalent between a rotation to the right and the rotation to the left. I had to learn where the 0 was when i turned it. This is a simple and efficient tool for cutting some items for small jobs. If you need "exacting" quality, i would look elsewhere. GREAT for the price. Would imagine a slightly "newer" model might be better? Sorry, cannot comment on the 70716.
1560894
They are essentially the same, slightly different processors (i5-4200U vs i5-4210U).
2188986
First off, the 4960x came out in September 2013, and the 3970x was released in Nov 2012! They are both unlocked, so on that level they are the same. The 4960x is a 3.6Ghz (Turbo 4GHz), the 3970x is a 3.5Ghz (turbo 4GHz), so the 4960x is a LITTLE faster Ghz wise on standard setting, not turbo mode. The 3970x can be overclocked a little more than 4960x. 4960x Overclock Speed (4.75GHz) vs. 3970x Overclock Speed (4.99GHz). HOWEVER, The 4960x single core & multi core performance is better than the 3970x. The 4960x uses slightly less power (105.63w) vs the 3970x (121.88w). When all is said and done, the 4960x is slightly better than the 3960x. IF you have the money, I'd go with the 4960x as it is slightly better on MOST benchmarking programs. As you can see they are VERY, VERY SIMILAR. The 4960x is better, but only slightly! I know its a lot of money, but I'd go with the 4960x if you have the money to spend... If not, then I'd stick with the 3970x! I hope this is useful and helps! Thanks, Andrew PS. The first time I answered the question I thought you said 1960x, so I had to redo the answer - sorry about that. Hope that didn't create a problem for you. If you have any other questions, you are more than welcome to go to my website and ask me a question there: cuttingedgellc dot biz. Go to the contact portion of the site and I'm happy to give you the tech spec's sheet that I have on those 2 proc's and a lot more info if needed! Again, sorry for the trouble!
73344
I finally posted my review. I did see the reviews for the iP5200. The most important factor to me between these two concerned the inks - the iP5200 with two blacks, cyan, magenta, and yellow compared to the iP6700 with black, cyan, magenta, light cyan, light magenta, and yellow). That gives me the impression that the iP5200 is intended for general home network printing and the iP6700 is more geared towards workstation-serious photo printing. The only way to tell for sure, though, is to test these two printers side by side.
329581
The one that I received does not indicate that it is a Brother product, but it still works great!
1732912
Try this page for information: http://www.brother-usa.com/mfc/BW_Monochrome_Laser_Multifunction/ Duplex is available only with the 8000 series.
1408500
Really nothing, only difference between the 2 is the core clock, wich if you overclock at all you could overclock the 1 to match the other. But basically the 770 is a charged up 680. Its same chip GK104, the 770 has a better memory clock than the 680 and the 770 has gpu 2.0 boost wich the 680 doesn't. but all in all there the same. I ve got the FTW myself and its been great, no problems here.
2052065
The 4520 has 2 more channels and 25 watts more on each channel, also a lot bigger, so if you don't need all the channels and want a smaller foot print, save the cash and get the x4000
683144
Thanks Coconut. I'll check it out in a sec.BTW, I read the review on CNET of the 2270DW, and they said it prints terrible graphics, but is otherwise excellent.So, I called Brother and asked someone there whether there's any difference in graphics quality between the two models. The Brother rep said that the 5370 is better because it has "1200 by 1200 depth per integer".DEPTH PER INTEGER???I asked him whether he meant dots per inch, and he said, "oh yeah...dots per inch. My bad."Yikes.
1106971
The difference is in the accessories and the number of patterns that come with it. Except for the color, there isn't any difference that I can see between the machines themselves.
1132749
Can't compare the two models, but I can report on the 5100. This is my dream sewing machine. I've sewn on Singer, Brother and Home. I've liked my Singers, but the Janome is my dream. I'm recently retired and plan to keep my Janome's pedal "to the metal."
979769
Yes, I noticed that as well. There are a few other differences that I personally noticed- cord length- hose length- floor surface settings- one looks better than the otherI ended up going with the 3920 just because it was what was available, plus because of what the cust serv rep told me. But I'm not sure it was worth the extra $20-$30 that I paid.I ended up going with the 3920
1495909
Coconut and others, Sorry I forgot to write back. I purchased the 5370DW shortly after my earlier post, mostly because I believed it would have better graphics handling. I cannot compare it to the 2270, but I have to say I'm extremely pleased with the 5370DW. Love it. The print quality is fine, and the convenience is outstanding. I leave it tucked away in the next room where it's not in the way. We can print from any of the computers in the house (PCs and a Mac) wirelessly. The duplex feature is fantastic--I use it for all multi-page print jobs, and I haven't noticed any resultant page curl. One minor caveat: I did find the initial wireless setup to be confusing--and I'm fairly experienced with this sort of thing. I had to call Brother for help. Their tech support was outstanding. If not especially friendly, they were extremely efficient and had me up-and-running in no time. I've not had to touch any settings since--the printer just works all the time. After that initial setup, my other computers didn't even need a driver installation; they just saw the printer immediately and were able to print--that includes PCs and a Mac. Anyway, I just figured I should post something here to let people know that I'm finding this printer to be perfect. I notice that it's currently priced 33% higher than when I purchased it from Amazon.