What are the differences between the different size variations for ex 410 and 440 is it better arch support or something else? Thanks!
371195
The 440 is designed for my foot size, 10 wide. The 410 is designed for my wife's foot; size 6.
2136183
The bigger one...if you feel you don't get enough spring in them you can always return them for the lower weight ones... that is what my husband did... he ordered the 158-198 and is around 170Ibs.. he got the lower pair instead and he can tell that he jumps higher with the lower ones... so it depends if you want to use them as stunts or just to have fun.. it is a leg workout though.
1037848
They are radically different. You need to find a store that has a dr. Scholl's kiosk that measurese the pressure on your foot (it's free) and you will get an analysis of which orthotic fits you best. There are about 20 different choices, so don't guess. This product saved my feet!
1037852
I didn't notice much of a difference between them. I used to wear custom fit orthotics and was looking for something similar to that. These didn't meet that.
127049
I order the 430 for my husband as that is what the Dr. Scholl's machine said he needed. I have never noticed that it said compare to 440 so not sure if they sent you the incorrect pair or if I just never saw that on the packaging. The two pair I have previously ordered have a distict 430 on the packaging.
735974
Since I have not ordered from this very link, I can't say for sure whether there is any difference. Nevertheless if you look at the Everestshoulderrest.com, you can find only EC-4 (and not EC). By comparing the descriptions provided by amazon, one could think of some differences, from which the only apparent one is that what I have bought is adjustable for 4/4 and 3/4, but your link says it has all the sizes from 4/4 - 1/2. Perhaps you would like to ask the company.
1234600
The 310 should have space in front of the 50s in the standard 210 base, the 410 upgrade comes with its own base. Some bowflex models cannot be upgraded.
1508103
Neither, I tried them and they are worthless. That's my opinion. I need an orthotic arch support and these were not the answer - I emphasize - for me. But, go bigger than smaller!
1863725
I own the 960 and the main difference I can see is the table, the 950 does not have the split table that can take the lumbar support and acupressure nubs. Also the hand rails are different, the 960 has longer rails for stretching.
110577
10 1/2 is usually 43/44. I think 44 should be ok. That's about 10.75", you can always mesure your feet and see :). I hope this helps
481934
Very similar, especially in the smaller sizes. The main difference is the construction of the lower par . No huge difference but worth a good look at the pics to see if you have a preferenc . I think if you are going to have standing water in the bottom the Exo Terra may be better. These will have a tendency to leak out the front vent.
187293
The 1st number "4" references foot pressure detail & characteristics. The second set of numbers represents foot size. So the highest number "40" is for the largest foot, i.e., size 10 and higher
575041
I wear a US 9 shoe, B width. The 40 fits just right. I don't whether this insert at a 39 will fit into such a narrow shoe. It is a rigid insert that is leather covered and I have not found it to be very comfortable. I have also used the Pedag Comfort and have had good success with it. As a matter of fact, I have more than 1 pair so I don't have to keep taking them out of shoes to put into another pair. I, originally, bought the "Comfort" for plantar fasciitis and it worked very well. It is more flexible and can conform to the shoe shape better.
208034
Thanks Brent...The only big differences I could tell were some of the extras in the packaging and differences in the ear cuff construction.But they seemed to be the same setup otherwise.I went ahead and bought the 428s since, like you mentioned, they were at a price I couldn't pass up.Thanks for the assist!
288046
This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or... » Read More This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. « Show Less
1504937
I don't know. That is not my problem. My foot problem is a High arch and plantar fascitis. I have to have a rigid high arch insole and have always used superfeet. I went with yours this time because your advertisement said they were comparable to superfeet. They were not for my high arch problem. Thank you.
1395298
I currently have both the 430 ex II and 270 ex , I am thinking hard about returning the 430 ex II. In P , AV, or manual mode the only real difference I see is the range, the 430 is about 16 feet better. And the 270 does bounce it does not rotate.