is this electric version more powerful than the micro-pedi man?
378240
Don't know I've never tried the micro-pedi man. I'm truly impressed with this product though
378241
I don't know since I have not used the other but I can see the benefits of not being battery operated. I used this on my husband's very calloused feet and feel that for a big job like that the batteries would not have had the lasting power.
378242
I've had both electric & battery. Neither is more powerful than the other. How can anything be powerful when it runs off of 3 volts maximum? The battery units (AA or rechargeable) are more convenient because you can use them anywhere. I prefer to use it outdoors, weather permitting. The description says "spins at UP TO 47 rps", but I can't tell any difference between "UP TO" 47 and a real 30 rps.
378243
No but the battery operated version uses too many batteries. The strength is in the what I call Emory board or nail file part. In the long run the electric one saves $$.
378244
I bought the electric version because I assumed it would have more power/consistency than the battery powered version. So I cannot compaire, but I can say that this is my new favourite product...it's fantastic!
378245
This is the new version and spins at 47 rps, and not 30, as the current page says - so this is better.
2075954
I have both. Toro 51609 is more powerful and has a metal mulch blade like you said. The only one reason I got G-MAX DigiPro is because it's cordless.
1597353
I can't speak for the ENTIRE RC-Micro series, but I happen to have the Energy Take 5 Center Channel & the RC-Micro Center (not in the same setup of course) and I can say that the RC-Micro has got a better build than the Take Center Channel. In fact, I substituted the Take CC WITH the RC-Micro because it handles volume WAY better. But again, there's a whole thread on this question on www.avsforum.com
1878186
I can't tell you what the differences are as I am not acquainted with those models. However I love the one I have. It has plenty of power and is very user friendly. Switches easily for different cleaning needs. I have no regrets with this vacuum.
384351
I looked up the personal pedi, and yes they are similiar. I first saw the Emjoi Micro Pedi on QVC shopping channel. I ended up buying mine at Costco. I have bought a few for gifts on amazon. The prices range from 29 to 45.I like the handle that fits in your hand. The little minis probably are just a good and the cost is 20. I think to little. I have seen them at Walgreens. I am a huge fan. My feet are smooth and you cant overdo it. Enjoy. Hope that is helpful. I just ordered replacement cartridges for mine. Love it.
1854108
It's an elecrically powered brush (I believe), but since I don't have a physical separate plug-in (wired behind my wall) I can't be 100%. If I were a bettin' girl, I'd say it's elecrically powered.
1555454
I have both. The corded has by far the most power. It is bigger and heavier. I use the cordless around the house for small jobs and the corded for drilling steel and rotary files
1161631
No, they are not the same. The cube uses 6 5GH/S mini blades, not this full size 10GH/S blade which is twice the physical size of the mini blade, has a different power connector, etc.
1505442
There's no comparison. Compared to this, the Pedi Egg might as well be making your callouses worse. It's easier to hold and the blades are much more effective.
963369
There is a significant difference. Run time seems more than double. There seems to be more power. I've drilled a series of 4" deep holes in masonry with a 5/8 in bit and through 3/8" steel with a 3/8" bit. The impact driver runs a large part of a day hanging drywall or steel studs. I have both the older brushed and brushless tools. I would buy more brushless tools as they become available. As I've only used the brushless tools for a year but would assume that fewer moving parts would last longer. About the only repair to an electric motor today is brush replacement.
1602271
I think, NO. There are two types of this product: Proxxon Micromot 50/E or EF in plastic case with burs and power adapter and only Micromot. I think, that this is second.
2238554
It's a bit smaller all around, a smaller speaker and much less power. It's still amazingly loud, just not like it's older brother. The lower power also lets you run it off an external battery pack. For reference I own both.
1250100
Does not matter! Buy the gas powered one. It is so much better and will power thru about 6 inch limbs, Just remember to duck.
144226
The one I bought has variable speed, but probably not as much power as a plug in dremel or oster trimmer, but you really don't need more IMO. The plug in Peticure is much more powerful than the cordless one.
2071309
I have had it almost a year and it is still going strong. I think I prefer the previous one the LM175 6 1/2 amp. It is not a mulching mower like the MM275 and has a smaller motor, but it is 5 lb lighter and lasted 4 years in spite of real abuse. My yard is lumpy, root and cane stump laden. I have steep hill on a creek and swamp like conditions in half the backyard. My lot is 100 X 116 which requires 125 feet of power cord to reach the corners. Next time I will go back to the smaller, less powerful version. I am still quite happy with the performance of both.the LM 175
933121
I've used both. This "huge unattractive setup" is more powerful to begin with, as is the case of almost any 110 volt tool or appliance over a battery driven item. However, the force of the water can be easily adjusted from light to quite forceful as one desires from use to use. I also have found the water seal of the battery compartment on the cordless model to fail too soon. Generally, I have found the corded model to be more durably built than the cordless. Within my experience, the corded, 110 volt unit, will outlast the cordless model about four or five to one, which, to me, is more important than appearance.
1398315
There's a cord that plugs into the micro-pedi. Free info: this is wonderful and fast, you'll love it