There are sizes listed below size 18 that have no numbers only-x-long, long, short, etc. does that mean they are larger than a size 18?
58106
All I see is a 22W larger than a size 18 and they are marked with the length! I CAN say these are the BEST pants I could have purchased for my safari. They are wonderful, the material is very nice and they do stretch! Good Luck
58107
No. The long, short are the length of the leg. The x, it seems, means nothing. I ordered a 10x and it fit just as any 10 size pant would fit me. It seems only the long, regular and short have impact on the actual length of the pant.
1315371
I don't know, but I will say these are much smaller than what I was anticipating. I had searched for a size and Amazon linked me over to these (smaller ones) automatically and I didn't realize the difference. Just be sure this is what you really want.
1040795
You know, I'm really not sure! I would just assume it's showing the box the different sizes come in? Perhaps you should stick with the Large - it actually shows the picture of the stockings. Every time I bought some, I just clicked the Large!
872509
Whenever I bought them, There was always some sort of chart showing you exactly what size range corresponds to which letter. I have never purchased them without finding that proportional scale. Either the store/distributor, or the manufacturer has to giver you that information.
911543
I can only speak about L and XL as that's all I have. This is the description given:LARGE SHORT/REGULAR (Chest: 41" to 45"; Height: 71" and Under).Size: LARGE LONG (Chest: 41" to 45"; Height: 71" and Over).Size: EXTRA LARGE SHORT/REGULAR (Chest: Over 45"; Height: 71" and Under).Size: EXTRA LARGE LONG (Chest: Over 45"; Height: 71" and Over).If I'm not mistaken, they are made short so they end at the top of the boot.
150374
Yes. According to their sizing chart, Underarmour rates their size-large sock as fitting both men 9-12.5 and women 11-13.http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/size-charts
411031
The sizes are marked on the packaging. When I bought them I was given a code on the web site, a, b, c, etc., that corresponded to specific sizes. And by the way, I never go anyplace without them -- they really work. After wearing them for several years, I have a more pronounced arch. I theorize they are similar to bracers in that you should plan to wear them, pretty much, indefinitely. I never get any "stitch" in my arch when I run since I began wearing them.
861540
!!!Ask!!! If you buy one, it will say on the comments section on your order, NEVER on the order page. I sent mine back because it was an XL (stated in the comments section that the buyer NEVER sees until receipt of item) and I needed a Small. DO NOT ORDER without asking.
1882328
Their sizes corresponds to shoe sizes. Just look on the chart that is provided. They run true to size.
2030098
I have no idea...I just bought reg and they fit. I didn't know there were XL.
1882976
I found that you can't go by the large number. Example my dog has exactly a 17" waist and I bought the XXS/XS to begin with. Well the band is exactly 17" so there is NOTHING to fold over to fasten. So saying it fits XX-XX inch waist is deceiving. You need to allow extra inches to double over to fasten - I had to order the S-M instead.
208046
I am normally between a 4 and a 6 and I got the 26. I am very happy with the way they have held up. I do not out them in the dryer........this might be my favorite pair because I find them very sliming ( I'm not tall so any help I can get looking taller is my goal). I hope this helps and best of luck in your riding!
1307187
From me? No size. I am a buyer like you. I have repeatedly bought size XL and they work for mens feet sized up to 14. Beyond that, they would not stretch. For shoe of lesser size and width, the size XL still "works" with the cover fitting more loosely as the size and width decreases. I personally wear a size 10-1/2 to 11 W shoe and these covers fit me just fine. Hope this helps.
134648
There is but it doesn't really apply to small, medium, large. It gives sizes translations ie: 28 waist is size 4... The best thing to do is to google sizes for these pants. Even on the Columbia site the reviews showed them running small. I'm a small medium and I'm talking jeans sizes... (6/28 is snug, 8/29 is loose) and they are snug. So if you're a large medium, go with the large.
116381
The best I can tell from the sizing chart, L, L2 &L3 refer to Large Short, Large Regular & Large Long. I don't remember mine being listed this way. Mine says L/R on the tag.
34144
That's correct. I believe 9 to 11.5 is considered "Large". With other brands you might consider going a size down to ensure a snug fit, but my experience has been that you don't need to do that with these socks. They fit pretty snug by themselves.
1255248
Well, I'm sure they'd be close to correct for you. A women's size 11 is equal (roughly) to a men's size 9. I don't recall the size range for the large/x-large socks but if size 9 is covered, they should be fine. There are much fewer color and design choices in men's and little color.