Best walk around Canon lens for 1ds mark III I am going to get the 1ds mark III for my dad's birthday. I am using the 28-300 mm lens with my 1ds mark II but I think it's too heavy for him eventhough it covers everything, so what's the walk around lens? Best walk around Canon lens for 1ds mark III I am going to get the 1ds mark III for my dad's birthday. I am using the 28-300 mm lens with my 1ds mark II but I think it's too heavy for him... » Read More Best walk around Canon lens for 1ds mark III I am going to get the 1ds mark III for my dad's birthday. I am using the 28-300 mm lens with my 1ds mark II but I think it's too heavy for him eventhough it covers everything, so what's the walk around lens? « Show Less
384509
Get a 5d2 and 24-105 for lighter weight with similar versatility. The 1ds3 is much too big and too much camera if you're worried about slapping on a lens and are complaining about weight.
384510
The 5D2 with the 24-105 lense is a great walk-around combo. The vignetting is hardly noticeable. Good Choice!
1135874
Size wise this lens is definitely still relatively compact to walk around with. I personally love shooting with the lens, but it does tend to be a bit tight for my taste (crop factor brings it to closer to a 75mm) I'd prefer a 50. And since it's a prime (non zoom) lens you need to resort to old school "zoom" aka your feet. The improved image quality and ability to capture low light pictures give it advantages over the kit lens.I'd say if you don't mind occasionally being constrained by the fixed zoom and having to think of other ways to capture the scene its great Otherwise the kit lens will cover essentially the same range so stick with that. Size wise this lens is definitely still relatively compact to walk around with. I personally love shooting with the lens, but it does tend to be a bit tight for my taste (crop factor brings it to closer to a 75mm) I'd prefer a 50. And since it's a prime (non zoom) lens you need to resort to old school "zoom" aka your feet. The improved image quality and ability to capture low light pictures give it advantages over the kit lens.I'd say if you don't mind occasionally being constrained by the fixed zoom and having to think of other ways to capture the scene its... » Read More Size wise this lens is definitely still relatively compact to walk around with. I personally love shooting with the lens, but it does tend to be a bit tight for my taste (crop factor brings it to closer to a 75mm) I'd prefer a 50. And since it's a prime (non zoom) lens you need to resort to old school "zoom" aka your feet. The improved image quality and ability to capture low light pictures give it advantages over the kit lens.I'd say if you don't mind occasionally being constrained by the fixed zoom and having to think of other ways to capture the scene its great Otherwise the kit lens will cover essentially the same range so stick with that. « Show Less
1272575
I have both the Tamron 17-50 and the 28-75 as well as the Tamron 28-300 that I shoot with the Nikon D200. I can't say if I prefer the 17-50 over 28-75 but I love both of them and find I use them both depending on what I'm shooting. If I could afford only 1 lens it would probably be the 28-75 for my type of shooting. If you;'e shooting large groups of people or need the wider angle then I'm sure 17-50 may serve you better.
102792
You might want to look at the Canon 28-135mm lens. I shoot with a 350 D Rebel too, and was unhappy with 18-55mm lens that came with the camera. So after about 2 months of evaluating MANY lenses, I bought the 28-135mm and have NEVER looked back. I've had mine for nearly 6 months and it's a dynamic walk-around lens. It's decent macro to wide zoom and has proven to be fast enough to shoot at dusk and in the night to get full moon and fireworks shots. I am a fiend for shooting traffic late at night, this lens is GREAT for that as well. It's worth a 1st, 2nd and, 3rd look if you are in the market for great moderate priced lenses. You might want to look at the Canon 28-135mm lens. I shoot with a 350 D Rebel too, and was unhappy with 18-55mm lens that came with the camera. So after about 2 months of evaluating MANY lenses, I bought the 28-135mm and have NEVER looked back. I've had mine for nearly 6 months and it's a dynamic walk-around lens. It's decent macro to wide zoom and has proven to be fast enough to shoot at dusk and in the night to get full moon and fireworks shots. I am a fiend for shooting traffic late at night, this lens is GREAT for that as well. It's worth a 1st, 2nd and, 3rd look... » Read More You might want to look at the Canon 28-135mm lens. I shoot with a 350 D Rebel too, and was unhappy with 18-55mm lens that came with the camera. So after about 2 months of evaluating MANY lenses, I bought the 28-135mm and have NEVER looked back. I've had mine for nearly 6 months and it's a dynamic walk-around lens. It's decent macro to wide zoom and has proven to be fast enough to shoot at dusk and in the night to get full moon and fireworks shots. I am a fiend for shooting traffic late at night, this lens is GREAT for that as well. It's worth a 1st, 2nd and, 3rd look if you are in the market for great moderate priced lenses. « Show Less
189243
J. ONeill says: Did you make a decision? I am currently debating the same two lenses. I am leaning towards the Canon since it seems there are quite a few quality/AF issues with the Sigma. Any advice is appreciated. If you own a camera with micro focus adjustment like the 50D or 7D, Sigmas front or back focusing is a non-issue. Also, even if you don't own a camera with micro focus adjustment, if you get a Sigma lens that front or back focuses, you can send it to Sigma for calibration.
1736484
I have both the 18-200 and the 85 mm f/1.8 among others. These two are the lenses I most use (I photograph people and places). The 85 mm is great for head shots, particularly indoors without flash. If $450 is a reach, try eBay where you'll see lots of them.
80621
I realize your question is now 3 yrs old, but I may still be able to help someone else. My favorite lens for my T2i is the Tamron 118-270mm. Talk about versatile. I have the Canon 50mm and a zoom along with the standard kit lens, but none compare to the Tamron...no more changing the lens so often.
241545
If you are looking for a great portrait lens then go with the 85mm 1.4, it's fantastic. The 35 mm is a great lens too but better as a walkaround lens for general photography. You definitely want longer focal lengths for portraits.
568548
200 isn't a lot more reach, but it was enough to make the decision for me. If you're concerned about weight and bulk, I'd say stick to the 45-150. Someday you can get the 100-300mm for serious reach. I think both lenses are good, so the decision boils down to personal preference.
523656
15-85mm best walkaround outdoor lens.17-55 2.8 is if you want one lens to walkaround in and outdoors.
1561300
So now I am wondering just what I am missing with regards to buying this lens for use on a DSLR like the Canon EOS 5D versus the much more expensive "EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM for EOS SLR"???
582401
I used to have those 2 lenses and moving to a single 18-200mm gave me a whole new experience in photography. No more spending times switching lenses on-the-go, which saves me from missing shots and protects the camera a little further (in case you would need to switch lenses outside, like in a beach or something -- my case).
1713457
The 300 F2.8 is one of the best lens Nikon has ever made and is better. The added reach and the fact that the 300 F 2.8 works perfectly with 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 converters makes it the perfect choice. I have tried the 500 F4 and it is way to big to carry around or hold. The 300 f 2.8 is still large but can be handheld which is huge. Thanks for asking.
552637
I have the canon 17-85mm lens and it works great. You could also get the 40mm pancake or if you have a bit more of a buget, get the 24-105 mm canon lens, it is a sweet lens with a sharp image.
180261
I have a new 6D, and I have always used fixed fast lens. I think the 28mm f 1.8 USM is a better buy, its much faster and easier to get, and can find for 50 to 75 bucks less. the 35 and 50 are great, and a sleeper that easy to get is a 100mm f 2.0 it has taken some of my best photos, a great price too. Good Luck
182303
My recommendation would be the 50mm 1.8. Good standard focal length (although closer to 75mm with the smaller sensor). It is under $100.00 new. Short depth of field, great for portraits. Every Canon owner should have this lens. No zoom mind you, so it requires a little more work to get the shot you want. This lens is good, fast, and cheap.
1111392
I own a D7100 and use 4 lens on it, The 18-300mm is a little heavy but it's a "Can Do" lens for most things. Add the 10-24mm and you can really open a lot of WIDE doors. The 50mm f/1.4G is Awesome at night, you won't believe how great your shoots are. I also have the 35mm, great for a light weight great shooting day. These 4 you won't miss anything.