What's the difference between the m-223 and p-223 series? Couldn't find much of a description.
395120
P 223 isn't offered in 4×16 power. M223 has better optics for low light than p223. M223 has better eye relief. Distance your eye needs to be from the scope. Also depends on how much zoom you want. P223 highest magnification is 3-9.
395121
If I remember correct the M-223 is higher quality. I found most answers at the manufacturer website. I really like my M-223.
395122
The P223 is considered a medium range scope and the m223 is a long range scope..if you are just going to be plinking go with the P series, but if you want a good all around scope the M series is awesome..but either way you can't go wrong with a Nikon, be sure to get the Nikon scope mount as well and you will have a good setup.
395123
Build quality mostly. The M-223 (Monarch) series boasts superior optics and coatings and adjustment features. The P-223 (Prostaff) series is more or less Nikon's entry level optic for the AR-15 platform. Nikon makes great glass so you can't go wrong with either of these models. Let your wallet make the final decision.
395124
The P-223 scope is more of Nikon's entry level AR scope, where the M-223 scope is the same quality as their Monarch line. Also, the P-223 has no manual parallax adjustment and the M-223 does.
395125
The cliff notes version is that the "P" is for more carbine- type applications. Faster handling, etc... The "M" is geared more towards longer barreled, acquire at a distance shooting. I think if you look at the dimensions it'll be a little more self explanatory.
2272949
M57 appears to have a larger capacity, is heavier (more metal parts I believe). I switched from the M53 to the M57 with no problem in the sump pit in my basement. I figured the bigger capacity might make it last longer. Both are very quiet and efficient.
333471
Ballistic charts reveal at 600 yards (zero @ 100 yds) trajectory for 5.56 with 55 grain FMJ drops 80.3 inches at 600 yards, and .308 winchester with 150 grain FMJ drops 86.3 inches. Windage, on the other hand is the biggest difference. Data is based on 24 inch barrels. I believe the Matech sight is based on a 20 inch 5.56 infantry barrel. You might want to check on that. Good shooting.
1384329
the p-223 was designed for the 223 round with 55g and 3250fps.......nikon has other scopes that may be better?
1443330
I put this scope on a m&p; 15-22, not a .223, it did return to zero at 50yards, however it is limited. It is not a powerful scope, we use it for squirrels and plinking at no more then 50 to 60 yards past that its not good.
1222397
.223 is about .003" bigger than .22, I think it'll be fine for cleaning.....
944544
The P-223 is perfect for me as I rarely shoot over 100yds in hunting applications. Occasionally I do shoot out to 300yds on targets. The P-223 has great turrets with real crisp adjustments. The ProStaff that you mentioned is a good scope too so it really depends on what you are trying to do with it.
1726586
I don't have a P series 4-12, but have the lower magnification, I believe 2 -7 or something like that. (sorry at work not at home where I can look). The reticle on my P scope is much thicker than my M series scope, which is much better at the higher magnification. And really like the BDC circles as they don't cover the target. I wish I had another M series with lower mag versus the P series I have now. Love the M series scope. has quickly become my favorite.
427587
Hi, you can see the difference in this review...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4gd49nLqZY I guees there is a lot of difference between m-80s & m-100s in isolation.
1444575
That is a negative. If you have seen the .223 round you will see the casing of the .223 is 2 3/4 inches long and 3/8 inch round. The .22LR is more than 5X smaller than the .223 (which is the size of the bullet).
478368
Yes, the form factor of 223 and 556 is the same. The difference is the powder load. Since you are using this die set you must be a re loader. If your powder loads are as recommended your "semi" automatic will just work fine.
1383984
I bought one of these and it was .177. They make both the .22 and .177 either caliber will satisfy. Hope that helps.
1075386
I have both and I cannot tell any long range difference. The sound from the bullet is directed down range and not to the sides and there is a difference in report. I think it got me to think about other additions for the rifle and I have a few that are really cool.
1526206
5.56 to 308 and many in between. I have M39EMR, a AR10 in 300AAC, a LR308, and a AR15 in 5.56 - cleans all. That means anything from 7mm down to 223.
576210
Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could be quite a bit of difference in trajectory. In that case, buy an appropriate scope. Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could... » Read More Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could be quite a bit of difference in trajectory. In that case, buy an appropriate scope. « Show Less
1504696
Sorry I do not know. I was able to mount this scope on a 223 and got an impressive pattern at 200 yards. This seems like a great scope to me. I saw some negative reviews and was surprised. For the price, I am very happy.
1492541
Of course the .177 is faster and more range I find it more accurate, but does not have the knock-down power as the .22. But with the .177 hollow points they seem to do pretty well. I prefer the cheaper crossman hollow points. There just as good and cost a fraction of some of the others.