the difference in performance between the ANT1600R and the ANT1650R
395913
A simple search on the internet revealed that the ANT1650R includes a amplifier. If you don't have an amplifier, this might be a better choice for you. http://voices.yahoo.com/product-review-rca-indoor-digital-flat-antenna-11785777.html I had one already, so I used my signal amplifier when I used the ANT1600 and it was the only way I could stop the pixilating that occurred from time to time when I used it without amplifying the signal. Digital signals are more demanding than the old analog was. I know of one person who actually mounted this outside on his roof to get better reception.
395914
I talked to RCA about that and did not get any useable response. According to their website description of those antennas (they have 3 similar ones, amplifier/not amplified/superior reception). I would think that an amplified would allow you to get good reception when having a weak signal, but that would be the only benefit.We know have the antenna sitting in a bookshelf at the bottom, behind some pictures, hardly noticeable. Reception is the same, flawless. And no external power supply needed. Keep in mind that thanks to Amazon's great business policies, you can return the item within 30 days in case you are dissatisfied. I talked to RCA about that and did not get any useable response. According to their website description of those antennas (they have 3 similar ones, amplifier/not amplified/superior reception). I would think that an amplified would allow you to get good reception when having a weak signal, but that would be the only benefit.We know have the antenna sitting in a bookshelf at the bottom, behind some pictures, hardly noticeable. Reception is the same, flawless. And no external power supply needed. Keep in mind that thanks to Amazon's great business policies, you can return the item... » Read More I talked to RCA about that and did not get any useable response. According to their website description of those antennas (they have 3 similar ones, amplifier/not amplified/superior reception). I would think that an amplified would allow you to get good reception when having a weak signal, but that would be the only benefit.We know have the antenna sitting in a bookshelf at the bottom, behind some pictures, hardly noticeable. Reception is the same, flawless. And no external power supply needed. Keep in mind that thanks to Amazon's great business policies, you can return the item within 30 days in case you are dissatisfied. « Show Less
395915
A simple search on the internet revealed that the ANT1650R includes a amplifier. If you don't have an amplifier, this might be a better choice for you. http://voices.yahoo.com/product-review-rca-indoor-digital-flat-antenna-11785777.htmlI had one already, so I used my signal amplifier when I used the ANT1600 and it was the only way I could stop the pixilating that occurred from time to time when I used it without amplifying the signal. Digital signals are more demanding than the old analog was. I know of one person who actually mounted this outside on his roof to get better reception. A simple search on the internet revealed that the ANT1650R includes a amplifier. If you don't have an amplifier, this might be a better choice for you. http://voices.yahoo.com/product-review-rca-indoor-digital-flat-antenna-11785777.htmlI had one already, so I used my signal amplifier when I used the ANT1600 and it was the only way I could stop the pixilating that occurred from time to time when I used it without amplifying the signal. Digital signals are more demanding than the old analog was. I know of one person who actually mounted this outside on his roof to get... » Read More A simple search on the internet revealed that the ANT1650R includes a amplifier. If you don't have an amplifier, this might be a better choice for you. http://voices.yahoo.com/product-review-rca-indoor-digital-flat-antenna-11785777.htmlI had one already, so I used my signal amplifier when I used the ANT1600 and it was the only way I could stop the pixilating that occurred from time to time when I used it without amplifying the signal. Digital signals are more demanding than the old analog was. I know of one person who actually mounted this outside on his roof to get better reception. « Show Less
1013790
It just has a couple more features that really are not that impressive, and it has more issues than the 1609. The 16.12 can show the temperature, but does that really matter? The 1609 had everything I needed and I am a sponsored triathlete and picked this up for my road bike. Almost 3 years later it still works great.
798562
The specifications for each are online. One has greater wattage and runtime and projects a longer distance. You can compare to determine which one would suit your intended application.
1125010
Much longer battery life, support to ant+ sensors (heart rate, speed, cadence and power), navigation, rain proof, much smaller footprint, easier operation while riding...
271064
No, this computer is not ANT+ compatible. The new Sigma Rox 10.0 GPS Ant+ is.
257393
The answer Janice Buckley gave is exactly what Actron's website gives for the difference between models.The additional features served me well already and I believe are definetly worth having. Dale Graefnitz
840118
Yes it is. One measurement per day only. Ant+ on the 910XT and 510 work fine.
509230
Yes! Heating speed AND program consistency. Are you also having difficulty with this? Thanks!
1218415
Patrick, The other differences are; the 5150 Unleashed has both WiFi Wireless and Gigabit Wired Networking while the Borg-Q has only Gigabit Wired; the 5150 Unleashed has one more USB 2.0 port than the Borg-Q; chassis design (including number and type of drive bays, both total and available), the Borg-Q has a 450 Watt power supply vs. a 400 Watt in the 5150 Unleashed.
682862
I think the CPU speed is 600mhz and RAM amount (not speed) is 64 mb. Buffallo's Linkstation Duo is 1.6ghz and 254 menory.
720691
This is a type of speed rating given to the ram as they develope newer models. judging by the types given here there isn't enough difference to call. you would be talking millions of a second now you could spend more money on the newer types but for every day use in home or business you would not see any difference. Now if you are trying to devolop some type of robotic instrument then the more power the better.
1635371
I use the Alien Bee 400. I would actually like a bit more power, though, so I'd say go for the 800. Paulcbuff.com!
1439503
It looks like the Celeron M353 at 900 MHz beats a 1.3GHz Atom Z520, according to: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=it&sl=it&tl=en&u=http://notebookitalia.it/msi-wind-pc-vs-asus-eee-pc-test-comparativi-2333.html
845345
I used this CPU to replace my Pentium D 2.8GHz CPU. My desktop boots faster roughly by about 15 seconds. Also overall its is more responsive. Though its not earth shattering but that was a welcome change to this older desktop. Is it fast? Not very fast but I am happy with this cheap upgrade. Also it depends on which processor you are comparing to.
1024177
I bought a compatible Ant+ cadence sensor that works fine. It doesn't have to be the same brand. Ant+ is a standard.
1336893
I can't speak to the performance differences (if any). I purchased the CPM1084 because I needed a replacement. I bought my receiver used and the microphone that came with it was not functioning properly.
1732303
any comparisons you gotta make can be done through benchmark sites. https://www.cpubenchmark.net/ ^ that's t he one i usehappy shopping