What is the range of image size and quality? I have an older Sony that has a range of VGA to 3.1M.
366268
50x and 20.1MP, I have taken pics of the moon and the resolution and details are excellents, plus it is easy and friendly
366269
20 mp - 5184 x 2920. I am getting incredible pics in jungle & forest shooting (Costa Rica) of wildlife and plants. The zoom is credible, 50 Optical 100 digital. Get a big chip or two, 32-64 gig. 6-8 mb files are typical. This combo pack is very nice, very good tripod, filters and chip reader.
1924990
I just got mine in the mail today and tried a few small videos around the house and am having video quality issues as well. I would say I'm not even getting 480i quality. The image is incredibly speckly (non-static blotches moving around in the darks). Looks the same whether I play it on my HDTV or on my computer (plenty fast for HD video). What am I doing wrong? Tried wiping the lens with a lens cloth...no effect. Batteries weren't charged yet, but since it's digital, not sure that should make a difference.Also, as a side note, do the people who are getting good quality use the digital zoom at all, or does it degrade your resolution by half? I just got mine in the mail today and tried a few small videos around the house and am having video quality issues as well. I would say I'm not even getting 480i quality. The image is incredibly speckly (non-static blotches moving around in the darks). Looks the same whether I play it on my HDTV or on my computer (plenty fast for HD video). What am I doing wrong? Tried wiping the lens with a lens cloth...no effect. Batteries weren't charged yet, but since it's digital, not sure that should make a difference.Also, as a side note, do the people who are getting good quality use the... » Read More I just got mine in the mail today and tried a few small videos around the house and am having video quality issues as well. I would say I'm not even getting 480i quality. The image is incredibly speckly (non-static blotches moving around in the darks). Looks the same whether I play it on my HDTV or on my computer (plenty fast for HD video). What am I doing wrong? Tried wiping the lens with a lens cloth...no effect. Batteries weren't charged yet, but since it's digital, not sure that should make a difference.Also, as a side note, do the people who are getting good quality use the digital zoom at all, or does it degrade your resolution by half? « Show Less
1783142
Yes, that is true! i have this projector at 1 year ago with 2 viewsonic active shutter glasses and a PS3 320Gb (move) with the last fw 3.56 for 3D support and NEVER, "NEVER" can see in 3D... grrrrrr!!! i do try softwares to generate 3D with the laptop like Tridef, etc with no lucky... i am an experimented technical user and reading a lot about this think the last thing to do is wait the last presentation of Viewsonic, the VP3D1 3D converter box to use with the projector... is the same of the Optoma 3D-XL, but i hope the VP3D1 are cheapest! sorry my bad english! :)
2080449
This is not an HD projector. It is XGA resoution (1024 X 768). If you send an HD video to it, it will be downsized and have a black strip on the top and bottom of the image.
1193220
I would have to say about 25 to 30 inches and the picture quality is low as well Cynthia. I would say look for a good refurbished BenQ or something of that sort. I found one for a little over $500 and it was very worth it. Hope that helps you out, just really think the Vigrand is a cheaply made unit and not worth buying so I advise against it.
922585
According to their web site: UXGA (1600 x 1200 pixels) at 1 fps This is only available through the Admin account; not Friend accounts. VGA (640 x 480 pixels) at 4 fps QVGA (320 x 240 pixels) at 8 fps
1438619
That's what I do and I'm happy with the resolution. Obviously, the quality of the TV's image is the limiting factor. Don't expect the picture to be the same as one of those beautiful (and expensive) Apple monitors. HDMI vs. FIREWIRE? I don't know the specs.
684030
120 basically doubles the refresh rate of the images. That is very good especially if you like sports. .. I had a Sony that I returned because it said it was 1080 pixels but it was really only 720... don't you hate being lied to? I do...
2238264
Bill, Only because you asked, I tried four different screens -- a 42" plasma flatscreen, a 42" lcd flatscreen, a regular old-style TV and an lcd computer monitor. The old-style TV, I wasn't surprised, was "grainy," to use an old-fashioned term. The plasma was disappointing. The particular model I own didn't allow me to shrink the video to its natural size, so the picture was blown up edge to edge and that caused the picture to degrade. (DVDs on that TV are great, by the way.) Your plasma might operate differently and therefore, offer better results. The lcd TV allowed viewing the videos at natural (large) size, best quality of all, although even full size it looked great. And the computer monitor was great, too. If your potential gift recipient is a casual videographer as most of us are, they won't be disappointed. Fancy themselves as the next Baz Luhrmann and the Flip will promptly find itself on the return pile. I will post these results to the review I already made in case it's of interest to others. Good luck, Bill!
1240050
The 4 video input that it has are RCA composite for analog cameras. It has true 640x480 VGA output with max of 704x576. Frame rate of 25 fps. The company at one time provided the info to program it. It has potential, but the original programming has bugs. There is a group that has updates that had improved it.
1720292
I had an overscan problem with this set as well with PC to HDMI and the soulution was using the VGA PC input. I know HDMI sounds like a better choice but in this case it is not. With the HDMI port I was only getting something like 1768 x 992 resolution and text was a TINY bit blurred. But with the VGA input I'm getting tne full 1920 x 1080 resolution with no overscan and the images it produces are clearer. Try for yourself!
2094747
Dear Friend, Thanks for your inquiry. The input the item supported: Input: VGA/AV/USB/SD/HDMI (Support PC Laptop VGA input) In addition, please note: the Native Resolution of this item is: 320 x 240; the Supported resolution of this item is: 1024 x 768. Thanks a lot.
2184498
To get the best image quality, make sure to get a DVI to HDMI cable or adapter.These are almost always MUCH cheaper from amazon than at a local store.HDMI is digital (like DVI-D), while VGA is analog (like DVI-A and "component video").VGA is likely to look a little blurry and have image ghosting compared to digital.More information at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVI-D
1646568
If you have 8 GB Memory Card, and Image Quality set as FHD: 29 min. 37 sec; or set as HD get 42 min. 09 sec; or set as VGA get 1 hr. 28 min. 53 sec.If you have a 32 GB Memory Card and Image Quality set at FHD=1 hr. 59 min. 41 sec; or set at HD= 2 hr. 50 min. 17 sec; or set at VGA= 5hr. 59 min. 05 sec
1970361
I am running the cable straight from my desktop PC across the room to my Sony flat screen w/o a booster. I have not experienced any problems thus far. Picture is clear, bright, and w/o degradation. I'm guessing that equipment types may be a source of any reported problems; For what it's worth, I am using a PNY NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Graphics card.
664287
I just set this up w/ a 110" screen @ a throw distance of 10.5 ft. Some pixellation is noticeable at 720p but very minor. It really depends on your source. 1080p looks amazing. The projector is a light cannon and picture is amazing. You won't regret it.
598653
The VGA quality is related to the clock speed (of both the monitor or TV and the video card). If both these factors are capable and satisfy the resolution you are wanting, this splitter will display images of up to 2048 x 1536 pixels. It only provides a way to boost the existing signal while allowing you to utilize multiple viewing devices. Hope this helps.