Guess I'll have to ask this question about all ski pants, but...... Where does the waist fall? Are they low, mid, or high-rise?
81256
They seem to fall at your natural waist which feels a little high but is still very comfortable. I'd be afraid that a lower rise would make you more prone to get snow someplace you don't want it.
1565196
I bought them specifically as some "cheap" snow pants. We were visiting family in Chicago, and were going to go sledding. we were only out for an hour, and they didn't really keep snow out, especially the pockets, which means your top layer doesn't keep you dry and I would expect you'd eventually get cold. They worked short term, but I wouldn't use them to ski
432290
Hi George - Oh the days when I had a 30 inch waist! I agree with the other posters here. I'd opt for small. I will also say that I've wear my pants at least three or four days a week. I've hiked in them, done yoga in them and they are really resilient. I have a small ember burn on one leg, but outsaide of that they are fairly indestructible.
557920
Mid rise, in this case, I think, refers to the length. Below the knee yet a little higher than mid calf. Personally, just right for hiking in a warm climate. On me, they fasten at the waist. Hope this helps. I am 5ft 6in. tall.
1571433
Ski pants tend to be hard to size right. I would try a Medium first, but they might be long on you.
1318206
I am a mom, 5'6" in stature & wear my Patagonia wool long johns under this article. I was dry & warm while skiing out west last spring! Enjoy!
888514
Maggie F. -I think what will help you the most is to first look at the Columbia sizing information here: http://www.columbia.com/Men's-Silver-Ridge™-Convertible-Pant/AM8004,default,pd.html#PDPSizeChart .My experience, as a male, is that I normally wear a 32 waist, and these pants were too tight, primarily in the thighs, especially for active wear. I reordered a 34 and they fit well. Would they work for a 34 waist? _Probably_, if you were exactly or slightly less than a 34. But that's just a guess. Again, weigh that against Columbia's sizing information.
1084015
I am about a size 8 petite and ordered a medium. Way too big for me. If you lie them flat, they measure abaout 17" across the waist from side seam to zipper. The waist is high. The crotch is quite low - as if they are better suited for men. I would maybe say a large.
915251
I imagine you could try to get this in the correct postion if you had loose clothing on, but ski pants, motorcycle, or jeans your clothing would have to be slid down for clearance. Good question, I haven't tried it any other way.
153231
I've done pretty intense exercise in these pants (plyometrics, running) and so far the inside band in the pants have not slid down while exercising. However, I've only had the pants for a couple months. Who knows what will happen after multiple uses/washes... With that being said, an inside band that starts to get loose could also be a sign that you're losing inches from the waist!
31129
I just measured both my Discovery Skirts (Size 2) and they seemed to be around 30 and a half inches at the top. They don't actually sit on my waist but slide a bit below it. I have no experience with the Discovery Pants so I can't offer comparisons there. I would not normally wear a Size 2, so I think they run a bit big.
122748
They are a very relaxed fit. I would say they are more like snowboarding pants, with a loose fit through the legs. however, they are still comfortable and suitable for skiing or snowboarding.
442904
Robert, I purchased a pair of these pants with a 30" inseam. The sizing was accurate, and both the waist size and the inseam matched the dimensions of my other pants of the same stated size. The material is lightweight, and would require a talented seamstress to alter sucessfully.Hope this is helpful. Lynn
662188
Hey whatabob, I'm 5'9 and wear a medium, and these knickers come to about 6 inches above my ankle. I'm not sure of the exact measurement, but they are the perfect length between pants and shorts. Do you need more info?
1514237
I wouldn't recommend getting the leg warmers. After a couple of uses they start to slide down. I strongly suggest looking into long pants, much better, but I would recommend getting an extra large in pants or leg warmers, if you go that way
1515242
Yes. They are slightly lighter than denim jeans, but warmer than traditional cargo/hiking pants. (If in doubt, take a pair of footless tights - but unless it gets into the sub-freezing temps, I don't think you'd need any under layer. )
2183711
Hello, So here is my story, Im wearing 34 waist and purchased a 36 in leather pants knowning that they would be a bit larger. The larger size needed a belt but gave me more clearance in the crotch when riding in a sport bike position where when i purchased a 34 i was a bit crowded if you get my meaning.