anybody compared this to B&W P7? thanks
70050
i bought them both to compare. The NAD was a bit more comfortable for me as the pads were soft and sealed very well. They both have a similar sound, fairly balanced across the board. I liked the P7 packaging, as it will fold in half, and into a nice case. The NAD folds, but goes in a bag and it's a bit more bulky (the ear cups swivel but they don't stay very flat in the bag and pop out). If you don't plan to use for travel as much, I would probably suggest the NAD as it is cheaper and sounds just as good with similar build quality
70051
Tyll Hertsens revues both the NADs & the B&Ws; at InnerFidelity.com. The NADs hit the "Wall of Fame" while the P7 does not. Read the reviews there and you'll probably decide to go with the HP50s. These are both great sets of Over-The-Ear Full-Sized-Sealed Cans, and they are both beauties... but in the end I would go with the NAD HP50s.
1069328
My son just bought the Audio-Technica ATHM50RD, and I give the Audio-Technica the edge sonically. It is more spacious sounding, and I find it to be more detailed. Of course the B&W; is much more beautifully built and looks far superior. But for the sounds and comfort I definitely prefer the Audio-Technica.
221542
Hornady progressive is faster, RCBS is easier. but you're comparing apples ti zebras with these two.
1014221
The pro model is just built to take more punishment, it's thicker and stronger than the basic one. If you are just in your back yard plinking the basic one will work just fine, but if you want to go hiking or put any significant strain on it, I would go for the professional version. It will last for years, I think the only con with it would be it being slightly heavier than the basic model.
1442810
I agree with Pishkado, the specs on this camera are everything I have been looking for and more. However, the P80 has not received rave reviews and this may be pushing the pixel-count envelope even more. I have had 3 DSLR's (Canon 10D, 20D, and 30D) and the IQ has been outstanding...but the cost of the bodies and lenses plus the "lug factor" is more than I want to endure now. The superzoom that has my eye right now is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28K and I almost pulled the trigger on it when I saw the P90 announcement. I will also wait for the reviews and if they are disappointing, the Lumix will be my choice. I agree with Pishkado, the specs on this camera are everything I have been looking for and more. However, the P80 has not received rave reviews and this may be pushing the pixel-count envelope even more. I have had 3 DSLR's (Canon 10D, 20D, and 30D) and the IQ has been outstanding...but the cost of the bodies and lenses plus the "lug factor" is more than I want to endure now. The superzoom that has my eye right now is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28K and I almost pulled the trigger on it when I saw the P90 announcement. I will also wait for the reviews and if they are disappointing,... » Read More I agree with Pishkado, the specs on this camera are everything I have been looking for and more. However, the P80 has not received rave reviews and this may be pushing the pixel-count envelope even more. I have had 3 DSLR's (Canon 10D, 20D, and 30D) and the IQ has been outstanding...but the cost of the bodies and lenses plus the "lug factor" is more than I want to endure now. The superzoom that has my eye right now is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28K and I almost pulled the trigger on it when I saw the P90 announcement. I will also wait for the reviews and if they are disappointing, the Lumix will be my choice. « Show Less
1375624
We bought the P7100 for my wife who wanted a better point and shoot and wanted a view finder.. She hasn't read any of the manual and the 600+ photos from our recent cruise are just great. On the other end, I've started using it because it has some features my older SLR digital lacks!
1924592
Don't be obsessed over pixel counts, consider the larges print you will be making. 12 mp can easily be printed at 12 x 18 and will be not see any differences had it been a 16 or 18 mp file. The quality of the picture, tonal range, color rendering etc, is excellent on the P7700. I have gotten very good prints at 14.5 X 11 from my old 4 mp camera. One advantage of higher mp counts it the ability to crop the picture and still be able to make a large print, or corp small areas for good smaller prints. I love my P7700 and am very satisfied with 12mp pictures. FYI, I also shoot 36mp pictures from my D800 which I print up to 40 x 60. Bottom line consider you you really need, and quality pictures should be a big priority over un-needed pixel counts.
1864398
From friends of mine who've had both (and also advised me to purchase this product. The number of upgrades are quite numerous and some of the best ones are subtle (like huge improvements to the interaction of strokes to emulate a real brush/pen feel for example.) From where I am sitting, I would say that it is very much worth the upgrade. In case you're still curious as to what all is actually different, here's a link to a list of what each version has. http://manga.smithmicro.com/comparison.html
2024050
I have both. Very little difference. Both are excellent for a point and shoot!
662371
The P12 can be concealed easier than the P16, however the P16 is the one I will be carring when I hunt, whereas around town and in the house I will be using the P12.I hope this helps.Thanks!!!Brandon
322
Not officially, but if you're really interested in strength I'd highly recommend the Stealth PBO. It's far, far stronger, and also much smoother. It's maybe $150 more, and well worth it.
34946
Same. They are usually neck-and-neck, with the P7000 leaning more towards DSLR owners, and the G12 more towards point-and-shooters. However, since Amazon is selling the P7000 for ~$240 right now, there's no contest.
1805596
The P07 takes different sight set. Suggest that you go to the CZ forum (czfirearms.us). Someone there should be able to give you the correct part #.
1915153
The expectations you bring to the question will be your best guide. For me the stability, control, accuracy of cut and "feel" are what keeps me very satisfied with my Mag 77(and now with the LT version). Finer cut? More teeth and less set on the teeth. Power? The 77 has no equal for me- and the clutch feature tops it off nicely. But my son's Bosch sidewinder is good and I use a Makita sidewinder with no great sacrifice. Try different models-if possible- before you decide. I don't believe there is one clear answer to your inquiry. Pay your money and take your choice!
62165
Shot both. Can't tell the weight difference out in the woods do need a sling for the walk.they both do 350 fps the scope is I guess a preference of choice
284765
I don´t know the different, the pp444 is cheaper, and it features are the same, for they are similar, but one silver and the other black...
209886
I don't own P7 but loan from a friend who does. I will say that P7 is a Different can compare to this. Beyer is more open as it is a open design but P7 will have more define mids n low