What is the difference between the hcx and the 18x version?
46257
Hcx has greater bladder capacity than its predecessor. not sure if that is the 18x
369533
The 18-55 is a lot sharper than 18-135. I just bought the 18-200 VR from www.pcnation.com, was in stock and was delivered yesterday! Have not tried it yet.
196649
Hey there!!! good question. The x series have a slightly better timing. If you look at the normal XL($77.99) the timing stats read 9-9-9-24 and then if you look at the RL($89.99) the timing reads 9-9-9-24-2N. Now this may seem like a small difference but the main issue is with speed. 2N just means its a little faster and a little more stable, this is quite minuscule. Now I purchased the XL($77.99) for a gaming rig I was building at the time and I can tell you first hand that the RAM is flawless. I never had any issues with Windows 8 or Windows 7 and on top of that I ran the RAM overclocked 24/7 for about 4 months straight playing various games with heavy graphical mod enhancements such as CoD Ghosts and GTA: IV. If you want to get the best of the best go for the RL($89.99), but if you want to save a little cash I promise you there's very little difference, I actually doubt one would be able to tell the difference.
748000
Difference appears to be more design than anything. The TSX series is current--the Monitor 65's are discontinued. Eric C
674244
In the product description below it says that it is the HC8000D-BL. I would recommend getting one of the new Sony VPL HW40ES/B or even the Epson 5030 projector. I'm not really impressed with the 8000. I've installed dozens of the 7800's and a couple 8000's. The 8000's had issues right out of the box, but the Sony's and Epson's have been perfect right out of the box.
2149462
I don't believe there is any difference. 6145 is the manufacturer SKU for the 1-18.
2189792
I have the 18.5 and 22.5 for my family of four. The 18 will serve you better just in case you need to load it up with food. Charcoal consumption on the 14.5 and 18.5 will be very similar. Always better to have too much room than not enough.
956544
VX-2 is an up grade from VX-1 both are great. For price VX-1 price is good. If price is not an option go with VX-2
486788
Garmin ETrex Vista HCx is the latest Etrex. The mapping features in the Etrex are excellent. It shows you street maps, turn-by-turn directions, points-of-interest, etc. The Etrex also has much better battery life than the Edge. The Etrex is much bigger and heavier than the Edge 305, though. The Etrex also lacks training features like heart rate and cadence. You should also check out the new Edge 705, which has both training features and maps, but at a much higher price than either the Edge 305 or the Etrex.
1192318
I am extremely pleased with my 18-140. I do not own the 18-200, but I have handled it. The 18-140 is a bit lighter, and handles a bit quicker. It is sharper than my 18-105, especially at the wider focal lengths, where most pictures are taken.
1588421
I purchased the 1.4X, after doing research on the results of both products. From what I read, the images stay "sharper" at the edges, with the 1.4x. I have used the 1.4X, and have been very pleased with the results. I do intend to purchase the 2x, understanding that the clarity may not be as good.
1390006
The most major difference I see is the resolution, reference these two pages side by side to note the other differences.http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/
295161
Hey! I personally have had better luck with the Hyper X. It is actually optimized for Intel gen 3 processors (Ivy Bridge) vs the Corair's Gen 2 (makes a big difference as Intel may release a Gen 4 soon).The latency on the Hyperx is better as well, 9-9-9-24 vs 10-10-10-24 (you have to read the details at the bottom on the Corair page, they are different than the top.) It will automatically hyper thread as needed which can save power in laptops.AND it is also CHEAPER :-)
1427187
After some research and using magnifying glass I saw a C4 sign on it. Please take into account that card is SDHC. As far as I know HC is an enhancement in speed.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
1393900
I got confused reading the reviews in the search engine over this, and I almost bought the wrong model. This camera (HX400V) is NOT the same as the H400, and reviews about this camera compared with the Sony website is a bit confusing. One reviewer said they are both the same except for GPS, which is incorrect. The basic model has a 63x zoom, and no GPS or WiFI, and some other features are missing, but the HX 400B/V is the high end model with the Carl Zeiss 50x lens, (better glass, lower f/stop) the Wifi, GPS and the upgraded capabilities.
2113867
No difference as long as you purchase the hmdx plus versions. The plus versions connect in stereo via blue tooth where as the hmdx classic versions do not. Honestly though I own both the classic and the plus version and I prefer the one classic over my two plus. The classic is about the same loudness,cheaper,less hassle,a little less battery life but much much more rugged.