Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens- major uses? Is this a good lens for all of those things?
84409
At one time, a 50mm lens like this was pretty much a standard kit lens included with brand new cameras. Yes, this versatile lens is good for these things (though maybe not close-ups) but it takes a little practice to get the most out it. Its not a zoom so you may need to move closer or farther to get the desired framing of your subject. To understand how to use the lens, it helps quite a bit to have a basic understanding of exposure and concepts like depth of field and the effects of aperture. The very, very, very super simplified super short version is to try AV mode. When you use a small f-number, the lens has a very narrow focus area which will give you a nice soft background blur. This is good for portraits (focus on the eyes) and for separating the subjects from the background. It also allows in more light in which is good for low-light (remember to bump up the ISO!). To make the lens sharper and get more area in focus, use a larger f-number like f16. While you're playing around with the lens, find a good basic photography book and everything will start making sense. Soon enough, these things will become second nature. BTW, to avoid blurring from camera shake, make sure to keep your shutter speed faster than 1/100 sec. You may need to increase the ISO (camera sensitivity) to do this in dim light. And last, but not least, have FUN while you're playing with your new lens!
1241576
Well, I'm assuming you're using the eos camera. So yeah, it's good for both and an all around excellent lense that I've been extremely pleased with.
1784422
I use this lens for family portraits all the time. Just one remark, my previous lens was a cheaper zoom lens that had smaller f stop for bigger focal lengths so I always had enough depth for closed up photos. With this lens I need to pay attention that all subjects are in focus when the camera sets automatically f/2.8 in low light conditions
1445794
the answer is yes to both questions. It's a matter of what you were trying to shoot. It's a good lens for the 70 to 200 millimeter focal length.
94148
It is a fast lens for sure. Great for poor lighting enviornments, but if course the cost is that it has a fixed focal length at 50mm so no ability to zoom in or out. It takes great portrait shots though. I would definitely recommend it!
735073
I have both the 50mm f1/8 and 40mm f2.8 lens. Both have very short DOF so you have to be careful of your focus. The 50 mm is slightly cheaper but I would rate the 40mm a 4.4 out of 5 and the 50mm 4.2 out of 5.
1312084
get the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pancake Lens - sharper, cheaper, betterThe Nikon 35mm 1.8 is not sharp until f2.8 anyway
182305
I second the recommendation for the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens. It is about the only inexpensive lens that will perform up to the capabilities of the T1i sensor. and/orThe Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Auto Focus Lens - Refurbished is the kit lens that normally comes with the T1i. Buying it refurbished will save you about $20.
1054578
The aperture control works even with manual lenses,No problems with the 50mm 1.8, It'll work
1796672
Hi Jorge, it's beautiful. I normally use the 50mm 1:1.2. I'm spoiled and prefer this over any zoom.
2109069
I am using it with my X-E1. I do not have any problems with the speed thus far for my uses (enthusiast photography, architectural and stills). I do like the quality, very sharp and great colors. I am not sure what kind of speed you are looking for and unfortunately I have not used the Canon lens you mention. If speed is desired, F2.8 is desirable, but as far as performance and price point is concerned; this is the sweet spot for me. Also, read some of the reviews on the purchase page. Very good info there as well. Good luck!
2022545
It is good for your wide establishing shots or elements that reveal atmosphere and/or ambience. It's a wide lens. 50 mm is best for medium shots and/or close ups because wides make people's faces distort, well, wides pretty much distort any image around the edges. It's a great lens, I have had mine for 4 years and sold it for nearly retail price. Glass is the only thing that holds its value in the video/photog world
672483
It's the only lens you'll need for travel and general use. The only time I remove this lens is for portraits or for macro shots, for each of which I have dedicated lenses. Outside of that, I use this lens for everything. There are times when I wish I had more power for nature or sports photography, but that's a matter of my budget, as I'm sure it is for many amateurs like myself.
827133
It's a good lens for my needs. I have found the 18-300mm type lenses just don't do all that well, I think too much range to cover but this does well and being a f/2.8 it's better for darker shots. Heavier than a kit lens but worth it in my opinion.
858189
Hi, thanks question. I think this lens is good for portraits. My recommendation is AF-S 50mm F1.8G, AF-S 35mm F1.8G. If certain distance is short focus , would be good if necessary zoom can afford. Thanks in advance.
827152
I don't have the 35mm 2.4 but I do have the 35mm 2.8 macro which I like very much (though the price difference is considerable). The 50mm is an excellent lens and is one of the first ones I grab when I go shooting. I will say though neither the 50mm or 35mm are good for sporting events of any kind. You really can't get the distance shots with either so you might want to reconsider using them for those purposes. The 50mm and 35mm are good for family photos, street photography and candid portraits. I hope that helps.
1448671
I have never owned a 50D, but the EF 24mm lens is excellent, and I don't know how it could be too much, whatever that means.