Lightweight vs. Comfort? Looking at the specs online (long version), the only difference between the two different series (lightweight vs comfort) appears to be the weight.
81519
the difference comes in the fabric they use... they comfort models have the anti-slip dots on the bottom and the suede on top so your bag doesn't slide off the pad. On a level surface, which good luck finding in the woods, they are equal, on slants the comfort model will keep the pad still and you on it, whereas the lightweight model could have you waking up with the pad crumpled at the downhill end of the tent with you halfways off it.
694295
cannot really tell much of a difference in the ride or height. it probably does help if you have to carry a heavy load. you could add a leaf spring yourself or have a pro do it for more money and a better result.
1319046
Hi. I have not tried the comfort series, but I would probably stick to the same size that worked before. Hope they work for you.
1040627
I honestly don't think weight is an issue if you are confident you have a secure attachment. On the other hand, as you increase weight you decrease the displacement ratio which may impact comfort.
1515298
One of the main differences is the waist belt and back support which offer better weight distribution so that you can carry your baby for longer. Also the shoulder straps are wider.
672856
You answered it Wil. The weight expansion is the only difference I can see. The classic tops out at 70lbs whereas the elilte can top out at 130lbs
92620
The size is the same. (I think these come from different vendors...check the vendor when you select the size and see if it changes) I think the main thing to look for is if the tire is foldable or not. I bought the non-folding tires. They are a little heavier, but cost less. Folding tires cost a bit more, but are more expensive. You have to really look at the weight between the tires to tell them apart. I think the 700x23c are 280 grams for non folding and 230 grams for the folding. I am a big guy, so weight isn't an issue. I'm 6'5" 225lbs and these work great. I just did a half Ironman triathlon with them and had no issues. The size is the same. (I think these come from different vendors...check the vendor when you select the size and see if it changes) I think the main thing to look for is if the tire is foldable or not. I bought the non-folding tires. They are a little heavier, but cost less. Folding tires cost a bit more, but are more expensive. You have to really look at the weight between the tires to tell them apart. I think the 700x23c are 280 grams for non folding and 230 grams for the folding. I am a big guy, so weight isn't an issue. I'm 6'5" 225lbs and these work great. I just did a half... » Read More The size is the same. (I think these come from different vendors...check the vendor when you select the size and see if it changes) I think the main thing to look for is if the tire is foldable or not. I bought the non-folding tires. They are a little heavier, but cost less. Folding tires cost a bit more, but are more expensive. You have to really look at the weight between the tires to tell them apart. I think the 700x23c are 280 grams for non folding and 230 grams for the folding. I am a big guy, so weight isn't an issue. I'm 6'5" 225lbs and these work great. I just did a half Ironman triathlon with them and had no issues. « Show Less
598446
I'm sorry but I don't really know what the difference would be. We purchased the #6300 and am pleased with them. We bought them to use on vacations and to trash them when we leave the hotel. They are far from plush, just flat with no support. But they have never slipped even on wet tile floors so they have served their purpose well. Sorry I couldn't have been more help.
1317011
Hi, not sure what the difference is exactly, but I must admit that I find this one much better than the previous one. It is lighter and more durable so I fully recommend getting 83 slow. Sorry I can't be more of help
1970536
I debated this myself. I guess there is a reason why they make both because sometimes you want the smaller one and sometimes the larger one. But what I like is they are both lightweight. So if you can only get one, keep this is mind as you make final decision.
601002
I personally find this to be life changing in terms of comfort. After 2 weeks I was like, ehh maybe not, but after a year it is just so much more comfortable!! I am very light in weight fyi.
1689892
Hi. The difference is only the color and price. All other specifications are the same.
2055116
Exactly? I have no idea and don't want to remove it to weigh it. However, I had a relatively light seat, and this one felt about the same. If you're a serious competitor, I'd contact the manufacturer. Sorry
1323812
The more expensive version has a larger platform and a different headrest. So if you are a large man OU might consider the more expensive version. If you are a woman the less expensive version is fine.
2254078
I don't think they're too different, aside from weight limits. Although it's been years since I bounced on one. Hope that helps.
620370
When we demoed these at a shop the ultralight is longer and when folded would be difficult to fit in the car due to the length. The ergo is much heavier, but it feels sturdier and is a bit easier to control. It also folds down to a more reasonable size to fit in the car.
193619
Sorry my friend. I didn't make any comparisons. I just took a leap and am happy with the purchase.