Does this filter come with a chart for correct exposures?
61162
Mine didn't come with a chart but you can download an app for Long Exposure Calculator. I normally use the "rule of 3200" for my long exposure.
61163
Unfortunately no. But that's OK, there are thousands of charts online for anything you could ever need.
485483
Yes it does. I would never consider using a non-multi-coated filter on a digital camera. The reason is simple. The sensor has a flat glass protecting it (called a low-pass filter - LPF). Some light will bounce off the LPF and head out the lens. Since lens elements are multi-coated and curved, very little light will reflect back to the sensor. But since the front filter IS flat, you can get a lot of light bouncing back. If you use a non-coated, or single-coated filter, you get a lot of light reflected back into the sensor. This shows up as a loss of contrast (veiling flair) or as ghosts and hot spots. Multi-coated filters are designed to reduce this effect, but cannot eliminate it. This is a real problem when you shoot into a light source. When shooing into a light, ANY filter will degrade the image. Multi-coated filters are much better, though.
966924
None if the rolls ended up being 36 exposures like it was marked on the package. I purchased five and they were all around 12 exposures. What a waste of $50!
323511
I just looked at mine and it shows "B+W 58 010 UV - Haze 1x MRC". Not sure if you can specify the exact one you want in this listing. The manufacturers website is at: https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogItemDetail.aspx?CID=630&IID=5722 B&H Photo says the filter factor is 1.0.
2078066
Yes it does. I personally have taken 40+ second exposures. And yes you can have intervals and/or delays set with that as well.
1740302
Depends on what kind of light it is. If it's an unobstructed view of the sky there should be no lines or banding, with a possible opacity gradient (and supposedly no color temperature shift - that would be a hint of a cheap filter).
2122068
Depends on the environment you are in. You can tell by how full the filters appear. That would be my guess.
30421
You should probably call the manufacturer. A quick search of Adorama and B&H; does not reveal the answer (both sites carry this filter).
919370
I do a lot of time exposure waterfall pictures and I would be lost without it. In some cases as with all variables there is central and uneven darkening. Use numbered ND filters to over come this. http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/gene-rooney.html?tab=artworkgalleries
1684091
I used mine for B/W, but color is possible with post processing. The camera and lens combination makes all the difference. Not all camera and lenses work well with infared filter. My Nikon 3200 had a noticeable "hot spot" in the images. My Canon S110 point and shoot had only a minor hot spot. I strongly suggest that if you're interested in IR photography check out the web site Lifepixel. It explains all the ins and outs about IR photography.
470422
Adding to Klee's answer: there are 5 correction Filters:1/2 CTB (3200K to 4300K) [1/2 f/stop loss]Full CTO (6500K to 3200K) [1 f/stop loss]1/2 CTO (6500K to 3800K) [1/2 f/stop loss]1/4 CTO (6500K to 4600K) [1/2 f/stop loss]Plus Green (cc30 Green) [1/2 f/stop loss]Heavy Frost Diffusion [2 f/stop loss]
1701059
I personally did not like this filter because it had the glare and it also was not coated properly. I ended up sending it back for a refund and went with the B+W version. My photos came out poorly with it on.
878683
I am not sure which pieces you are talking about. Is it the Neutral Density Filters, which slow your exposure.
133499
If you look at the front of any interchangeable lens you will see a circle with a slash through it, followed by a number. That number is the size (in mm) of the filter that that lens uses.
1252946
It would be helpful if you were more specific on which lens you'd be mounting the filter to. Thanks.
96200
I have a Canon P23-DH V so I don't know about that one. Isn't there a chart on line that tells you that?
1418794
Yeah, I did. Keep in mind, though, that you'll probably not get 36 exposures out of this. This camera is very barebones, so there's no way to accurately keep track of what exposure you're even on.