If you could buy 1 lens Would it be this one or the 20mm? Why? Thanks
55702
14mm if the majority of what you shoot is lanscape/outdoor20mm is king for indoor or portrait.
2198741
I would go with the 19mm... I've got both and the 30mm is a little bit too "long"... I use the 30mm for portraits and the 19mm for all yhe rest. :)
956489
I would go with the 18/135 lense . Have had both , 18 is newer , better technology , wider and lighter . Pictures are outstanding
2240582
I've been using the 17-85mm IS USM with my cameras for several years - love it. I have not used this lens, but you can find the 17-85 used for several hundred dollars cheaper than the 17-40L and it is a more versatile lens.
346745
Good question. The 20mm 1.7 has a wider field of view. But ultimately I went with the 25mm because it's faster at 1.4 then the 20mm at 1.7. I've never personally compared the two but I've heard from people that the 25mm is also a lot sharper. It is an amazing lens!
582400
i found its a better piece of glass and you will only need one lens for all scenarios. I was constantly switching from one kit lens to the other, now I ack one lens and im good to go in most scenarios. I sold my kit lenses and got a nice 50m 1.8 for portraits and use this 18-200 for all other instances.
2251841
I do own a 18-50mm on my Rebel.. and this one is for my Nikon... But I really can't distinguish any differences since I am pretty new to the hobby. But I find it very easy now to just have one lens on all the time .. with my canon I would always have to keep changing from my 15-50mm to my zoom lens a lot and it takes too much time plus you have to carry another lens with you. So far so good.. its a really awesome lens.. and all my friends think its cool!
528654
I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't being used in 'zoom' as I would be for the 14-45mm. I used the camera much more when I have the 20mm on it. I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't... » Read More I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't being used in 'zoom' as I would be for the 14-45mm. I used the camera much more when I have the 20mm on it. « Show Less
1129944
It is better for me to carry only one lens for wide angle and telescope. I love it. Price going down, because D5300 in coming to the market.
1234809
I prefer the 19mm lens because I wanted a WA lens and the 19 translates to a 27 mm in the A6000 body. The 30 is the equivalent of a 45 mm lens, too long for WA work. Both come with hood and pouch
2227373
There are many choices depending on your budget. But of the 5 Canon lenses I own, the 17-40L is the one I use most. It has excellent optics, a wide zoom range, and is fast enough for most situations.
465320
I would recommend the 17-40mm unless you are really into wide angle nature shots.
108096
Honestly unless you are making good money off of it go with the 28mm 1.8 it is fantastic. The 24mm is exceptional but 9 times out of ten you will have the same image for 3x the price and twice the weight/size.
591605
the 20mm lens is a bit slower to focus but considerably sharper, I used them both with Cross Country action shots, and the 20mm blew the 17mm out of the photographic water so to speak.
1109261
The 17mm f1.8 is the default lens I use the most on my E-M5. I've taken some great pictures with it! I upgraded from a e-pl1 last year and have to say I totally love the E-M5. I may eventually upgrade to the OM-D E-M1 but at this time don't see a need.
2152800
Great，I use the sigma 30mm f2.8 lens, it's just approximate 1 pound. I bought it cost $449 with 18-55 and sigma 30mm lens is 120 dollar~
568548
200 isn't a lot more reach, but it was enough to make the decision for me. If you're concerned about weight and bulk, I'd say stick to the 45-150. Someday you can get the 100-300mm for serious reach. I think both lenses are good, so the decision boils down to personal preference.