What's the difference between this and the xls 12 besides the mid range size? Why is it almost half the price?
84443
This is a great speaker too. I almost went with these but thought the price was out of my budget. These will last longer with a higher level of abuse. These are made to play loud all night, night after night for years, like in a club. They both will sound very similar I would imagine, but the tweeters that are built for duration and punishment usually don not sound as sweet, especially at lower volumes. I would compare the two as a nice car vs a nice suv. They both require a 300 watt per channel amp to drive them. Always match power to capability with amp/speakers. If you go higher you may blow the unit, lower power ratings will result in degradation of the sound from the speaker (a low power source will make a great speaker sound like crap). Good luck and ROCK BABY!
84444
These are the only Cerwin Vega speakers I've ever had, so I couldn't compare the two. I can say that I've had these 3 years now, and couldn't be more pleased with them. I see that the XLS 12 has 5db higher sensitivity, so they'd be louder for the same input power.
84445
The xls is a line up in quality. Some of them have double woofers. I think they put more money into the tweeter/ horn too. I don't own one. This product has spectacular clarity, volume and clarity for the price. It's can be little bass heavy if there is no equalizer. If you can afford the xls, it's probably better for the highs.
57447
It looks like it is the 8' model because the 9' model would say XL. Also the price is more in line with the 8' model.
2249188
the xl50 is out already looked at one at home depot last week, there the same output since the xl100 have been updated but it doesnt say it on the packaging, the xl 100 has more features and motion sensor,
687310
Yeah, Amazon's got this info really messed up...I can't figure out what the difference is between this model and one $40 cheaper, as apparently they're both Atoms with 2GB and 64GB storage. The price difference would make sense if one of them had more storage (or SOMETHING), but I can't figure out what the difference is.
631138
HEY! I had a 12WX and fuuuuuuuking hated it. It was awful. I had the same reservations as you. However, i'm super happy with the 13. As long as you like the size - it's way way better. It's more portable, though still not perfect - there are a bunch of cables, but it all fits easily into a laptop bag. Good answer...
923266
I chose the Philips monitor - can't now recall the exact reasons, but I believe that it was due to slightly higher ratings and a little less cost. I'm happy with it. But, for my other office, I spent more and got an HP Envy 32 - slightly wider and the height is great.
63899
Thank you for your help. I think I will skip over the XS and try a more current model. My classes do not start till January so I do have time to do more research on the newer models. Looking over the specs I really like the 50D model, but it's out of my price range. Maybe I will get lucky and a refurbished one will show up in my price range. If no,t I might go for the T1 or T2.Thank you again for your help.
1780069
Hi Katie, the difference between the Large and XL is $40, and the XL to Giant is more because the Giant is significantly larger then the XL. The Giant is 12 inches wider then the XL, and the XL is 6 inches wider then the Large. Hope that helps!
456900
The BC75XLT is cheaper because it has none of the extra features that the BC125AT has. I bought the BC75XLT first and then bought the BC125AT. They are the same scanners except the BC125AT has a lot of "extras" that make it much more fun to use. For example, with the 125 you can label each channel so you don't have to make a list to keep track of them, you can also have the backlight come on when you receive a transmission, so you can see the channel info. There are a lot more features that the 125 has that the 75 does not have. Basically they did away with these extras on the BC75XLT so they could sell it cheaper. I think that the BC125AT is well worth the extra money.
728922
Haven't heard of a newer version but I know that some other xl's coming out are supposed to be having upgraded firmware. I would just read all the specs to make sure you are paying for what you want.
1216115
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe a standard ink is 7mil and XL is 11mil. Not a huge difference but XL is cheaper per mil. I tried to look it up to confirm this but couldn't find it quickly but hopefully I'm remembering correctly.
1051872
I put the 12 cell on mine and it lasted longer per charge but the life of the battery was a lot shorter. I wound up buying the standard but made sure it was a Toshiba brand. I believe quality is a big issue with these batteries I've had to return some non brand ones
473667
I think the XL is a larger size. I only say that because of the XL and the price from 12.99 to 19.99 for the XL. Sorry I couldn't help more.
1243687
defiantly the l12. bigger is almost always better. sometimes a bird might be at first uncomfortable in a large cage if they had a very small one before, but they quickly enjoy the new space. the beauty with this one is, that you can make it a L02 by not setting up the second "height section". I personally own three of them and would not trade them for anything else. you will see what I mean with the "second height extension" when you unpack it .
1702780
It is sort of a high yield cartridge. They used to be higher, 3 times the regular cartridge... Now the XL is 2x a regular cartridge. I don't know why they changed it, but it's still a better deal than the regular cartridge.
503607
There is no difference. Not sure why you are seeing it as more expensive. I'd just try to get the larger one at the lowest price you can find.
180350
Avoid the 12 inch st all costs to firm. The 8 inch is much better. The warranty is pointless by the way