Is this a 16MP SLR or a 24MP one.
81799
24 is the correct answer. And these are sharp images. I use a few manual lenses and love how crisp the photos turn out. So with all these pixels, PLEASE, don't put crappy glass in front of this sensor. This camera can do amazing things. Use all those megapixels and stick to the pentax primes or Sigmas Art glass. It's worth it.Hope that helps
81800
this is a 24.7 MP camera and for the humble price of about $1500 you get in one of the finest cameras on the market today
655889
The selling point was the 24.1 MP picture size. The D5100 had a few more features, but every review site that I went to said the pic quality between the two are virtually the same. It is an entry level camera that won't break the bank. So far I have been very pleased with the performance and picture quality.
284508
Yes, keep in mind this lens will be the equivalent of a 24mm on a DX sensor camera.
1357472
I can't compare image quality to the 28-70, but I am happy with the quality. I would really miss the 24mm if I had the 28-70. It is solid and relatively heavy, but is does not have VR which makes it feel fairly compact.
2004640
Which one did you finish up with? I'm interested because you said that you shoot mainly lanscapes, so why would you part with the 17-40mm? If your option had been for the 16-35mm f2.8L, I could have understood the reason, but a 24mm lens on any new camera (assuming it's not a film body, 5D or 1Ds) is only going to give you 31mm (1D) or 38mm (the rest). Not much good for landscape work.BTW, the 24-70mm eats the 24-105mm alive when it comes to contrast and sharpness, IS or not!
1853587
If I remember the specs of both cameras, I got the D6 because it has a wider lens, 24mm. Aside from that I cannot speak to the pricing.
1192318
I am extremely pleased with my 18-140. I do not own the 18-200, but I have handled it. The 18-140 is a bit lighter, and handles a bit quicker. It is sharper than my 18-105, especially at the wider focal lengths, where most pictures are taken.
1773513
I believe the optical zoom is the only difference. It is 24x vs. 30x optical zoom.
1580352
The T3i is 18mp, the T3 is 12mp. It states in bold description line at top of every offering that it is 18mp. Great camera.
1381523
Depends on if you have a full frame camera, or one with a cropped sensor. A 24mm is really wide on a full frame. With a cropped sensor, a 24mm is really close to what a 35mm gives you.
357722
I own both...in terms of image quality, there's no comparison - the 24-70 is in another league. It's a full stop faster (brighter viewfinder, better depth of field control, faster focusing, etc) and it gives you that "pop" you get from the best professional grade lenses. On the down-side, the 24-70 is a much narrower zoom range, so you might find yourself needing to carry two lenses whereas just the 24-120 would cover you otherwise. It's a personal thing I guess, but if I could only have one or the other, I'd take the 24-70 without a moment's thought.
794545
I'd always prefer a more extreme wide angle... So the 24mm is my favourite. The f/1.4 aperture is all the more glorious when the angle is wider.
2004639
I've tried both and I like the 24-70 far better. It is a sharper, faster lens.
942878
In my experience, you'll get very much the same pic with the 10-24 between 18-24mm as you would with the 18-105. That's one reason I sold it. The 10-24 should be shot at 10mm, which is why you're buying it in the first place and why it costs so much (Just my opinion of course). http://www.amazon.com/review/R1HCPRMG89GYZO/ref=cm_cr_dp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN;=B0026FCKC8&nodeID;=502394&tag;=&linkCode;=
1050004
Thank you for your interest in our bundle! In regards to your inquiry, this camera has 24.7 MP.
2074843
I'm not familiar with the lens you are using but the 16-35 is pretty fast. I prefer the 24 mm 1.4 for low light though
1907930
It's an L Series lens that comes with the camera as opposed to being a 'kit lens' and is awesome when combined with the Canon 6D. The 24-100 L IS gives you a great shooting range, has Image Stabilisation which gives you the 'extra stops' in low light and basically a is a great all round lens. So yes, it is very much worth getting with the camera.