canon eos xsi I am a beginning photographer and am contemplating buying the Canon EOS XSi camera body. I want to purchase a lens that is somewhat all purpose for starters. Any suggestions?
58502
A "simple" Question:How do I go FULLl manual with my EOS XSi? I want to set the ISO, the shutter speed and the aperature.?I might even want to "Spot Meter" as well.
58503
I also have the XSi (and LOVE it)... It's my first DSLR and I have learned so much with it. I ordered it with the kit lens (18-55mm) and also bought the 55-250mm. Both are great, inexpensive beginner lenses, but I have found that I am now out-growing them. The 55-250mm isn't as sharp as I would like (when the image is viewed at 100%) and, as Saleh AlMutawaa mentioned, the EF-S lenses are not compatible with the full-frame DSLRs. So, if you think you might upgrade, you might want to keep that in mind. The Rebel XSi, 18-55 and 55-250 are a great starter package.
58504
Just keep in mind that the Canon XSi does not have video at all. And the LCD screen does not support live view. Other than that I think the XSi is a good DSLR Camera to start with a DSLR experience. But it is not as great as T2i.
1787338
Any thoughts for general / home photography? I have a Digital Rebel XSI and recently bought the 70-200 mm F2.8 IS version mainly to photograph school events without the annoying flash, and take closeups of my rapidly-growing kids. I have been going back and forth between the two lenses (24-70 F2.8 vs. 24-105 F4.0 IS) but my instinct is that F2.8 is much better than F 4 even with IS. Any guidance appreciated from a professional.
347542
I am in the same boat, XSi or D90. Right now, I am leaning towards the Xsi, for around $650 at Amazon, this is a big savings, the camera was $900 in April. I would like the video option, and I believe that the Nikon will provide better detail in low light. However, I still am having a hard time justifying the extra, almost $600. I could almost buy another Xsi for that difference. I am not sure that the price difference is justified.
2170939
I own both lenses for the last three months. Initially had the 17-40mm on my XSi but after a couple weeks of frequent use of my camera i switched to the 10-22mm. Found the lense according to pics i was taking to be of more use to me than the 17-40mm. I guess what Bauista said is right, it all depends if you will go full frame in the future or not!!! Also the type of pictures you are taking is an important factor!! Both lenses are great but i think that 10-22mm is a bit ahead of the 17-40mm especially when you have a 1.6crop camera.Their prices vary, i bought through time both my lenses around $650!!! I own both lenses for the last three months. Initially had the 17-40mm on my XSi but after a couple weeks of frequent use of my camera i switched to the 10-22mm. Found the lense according to pics i was taking to be of more use to me than the 17-40mm. I guess what Bauista said is right, it all depends if you will go full frame in the future or not!!! Also the type of pictures you are taking is an important factor!! Both lenses are great but i think that 10-22mm is a bit ahead of the 17-40mm especially when you have a 1.6crop camera.Their prices vary, i bought through time both my... » Read More I own both lenses for the last three months. Initially had the 17-40mm on my XSi but after a couple weeks of frequent use of my camera i switched to the 10-22mm. Found the lense according to pics i was taking to be of more use to me than the 17-40mm. I guess what Bauista said is right, it all depends if you will go full frame in the future or not!!! Also the type of pictures you are taking is an important factor!! Both lenses are great but i think that 10-22mm is a bit ahead of the 17-40mm especially when you have a 1.6crop camera.Their prices vary, i bought through time both my lenses around $650!!! « Show Less
63897
The Canon Rebel XS is fine for learning photography. If you're more serious about your photography, however, I might recommend a model with more features and a little better performance like the Rebel T1i or T2i or maybe even a semi-pro 50D or perhaps the new 60D. But also leave some funds available for more lenses, an external flash, a spare battery and a case. If you only plan on taking the one course and then just using the camera for casual photography afterwards, the XS will do the job.
424368
Ken-The features between these two are very similar, however, the XSi has more features which advanced photographers might find useful. I would recommend the XS for casual snapshooters who aren't likely to purchase expensive lenses in the future. I would instead recommend the Xsi for those interested in pursuing photography in more depth, who plan to upgrade lenses in the future and who are likely to edit and crop their images in Photoshop rather than just print them out as-is.
99924
Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just... » Read More Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. « Show Less
1125279
This is a kinda "which should come first, the chicken or the egg?" question. Make the investment of a very good lens, then later, when you can afford it, upgrade your camera body.
597329
Sounds good! I'm buying my first digital camera for my daughter and her family. I've locked in on the t1i and 15-85. I really like my 24-105 lens and think that the 15-85 should be a great match for the camera.
1561300
So now I am wondering just what I am missing with regards to buying this lens for use on a DSLR like the Canon EOS 5D versus the much more expensive "EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM for EOS SLR"???
462699
Get the 40D kit. The 28-135 is an excellent lens; I used it for years. The 40D is an outstanding camera; we sold the XTi after owning the 40D a week. Worth every penny-you will love it. By the way, I paid considerably more than what it is selling for now and I don't regret buying it when I did as I got that much extra use out of it.
1866175
I was able to find a D40 kit for $400 a year ago. If you are going to pay $650 you might as well get a D3000, or even better a D40, a second lens, and maybe some accessories. The XS is a decent camera as well, it really depends on what ecosystem you want to get into. Both Canon and Nikon make nice cameras, I think you'll be happy with a camera from either.
1966952
Did you make a decision? I am currently debating the same two lenses. I am leaning towards the Canon since it seems there are quite a few quality/AF issues with the Sigma. Any advice is appreciated.
956946
I don't have the EOS 450D, but I did a search and it says it fits the XSi EOS 450D, so if that's what you have, it should fit. Let me just warn you, however. I was not happy with the lens. Sure, it zooms in just like it says, but the optics are lousy, so your photos come out grainy (they look like your ISO is on 6400). Also the 2x extender they send is just basically a tube and is completely ineffective. It's NOT a tele-extender like what you'd get from Canon. Bottom line, if you're going for sharp, crisp beautiful photos, you'll be extremely disappointed. I was. I used mine once and put it aside and will never use it again. Then I saved up for a good Canon lens, which made all the difference in the world--I wouldn't trade that one for anything. This is a great example of "you get what you pay for." Sorry, but I just don't want to see you waste your money on this lens and then be disappointed. I'd check out Canon's zooms and their tele-extenders or even a third party brand such as Tamron or Tokina for something better that you'll be happy with for a long, long time.
69004
As a novice photographer should I start with XSi to see if I will really get into photography? Or would you recommend T1i to be my first dSLR?
558538
Just make sure you select the right manufacture. For example if you have a canon make sure you buy the lens for the Canon body. With that said this is an all around great lens
1846734
Unfortunately, the EOS M is not one of Canon's finer moments. Ridiculously slow to focus and ponderous with an EOS adapter and EOS lens mounted... There's zero question in my mind that the Fuji X-Pro 1 is the camera (out of those two) to have. I had a shelf full of EOS lenses and I still never bought an EOS M. It's a dog :(