What is the difference between this model and the ClearStream4?
55241
The Clearstream 5 is the middle range antenna, their term is "long range". The Clearstream 4 is long range, their term is ultra long range. The web sites rate the C4 for 60 miles and I could not get half that distance using the C5.
55242
The C5 is a VHF antenna. The C4 is specifically for UHF. Check out antennaweb.org to see what band your local channels transmit at.
55243
I don't know the difference. I have never owned a clearstream 4. I purchased the clearstream 5 to pick up PBS (VHS) channels. I have it in my attic, and it works great.It also picks up uhf channels. My only problem is that many of the other channels come from a different direction. Clearstream 5 works great for me.
55244
ClearStream 5 is VHF, ClearStream 4 is UHF. If you buy only the 5, you will get long range VHF, and some short range UHF, and if you buy only the 4, you will get long range UHF, and short range VHF, so you really need both. I've had both installed since Dec 2012, saving me $1500 so far....would be more savings, but I still need the cable company for Internet access :-). If you get both, make sure the cable length between the antenna and the signal combiner is exactly the same....so just buy some pre-made 3', or 4' cable lengths.
862602
Clearwire. When you check the maps offered it's the same as clear's and when I do a speed test it is showing ISP as clear wireless even though the ip address starts with a 50, not a 96 which clear does.
22715
Also, the Clear Voyager Wimax model is 4G. I would suggest that, since the price is about the same.
2031118
This is different than the 920 in that it has the potential for higher definition video, but it also is very restricted in what software will accept & broadcast that potential. Whereas the 920 is rather plug-and-play, and comes with simple software for adjusting the image, the c930e does not come with any software, and is not useable with many common streaming softwares
1285541
The differences are on the Roku site. The XD has exended range wireless, that's what I would go with. http://shop.roku.com/Roku-Streaming-Player-Options-W5.aspx
1436660
I don't know the feature differences between the units, so I can't suggest a direction based on that. I usually fall towards buying the most up to date platform since this is an investment and you likely will have it for some time. An extra $100 is probably not significant given how you will spend even for the DS1512+. I can easily say that the DS1512+ will easily keep up with 2 users. I have 4 in my household, iTunes library, photo library, Movie and DVR library feeding 4 Rokus (streamers). Granted all is not active at once but never has the DS1512+ bogged down, except when I ask it to trans-code a movie on the fly. It does not have enough CPU for that, by design. I don't know the feature differences between the units, so I can't suggest a direction based on that. I usually fall towards buying the most up to date platform since this is an investment and you likely will have it for some time. An extra $100 is probably not significant given how you will spend even for the DS1512+. I can easily say that the DS1512+ will easily keep up with 2 users. I have 4 in my household, iTunes library, photo library, Movie and DVR library feeding 4 Rokus (streamers). Granted all is not active at once but never has the DS1512+ bogged down, except when I ask it to... » Read More I don't know the feature differences between the units, so I can't suggest a direction based on that. I usually fall towards buying the most up to date platform since this is an investment and you likely will have it for some time. An extra $100 is probably not significant given how you will spend even for the DS1512+. I can easily say that the DS1512+ will easily keep up with 2 users. I have 4 in my household, iTunes library, photo library, Movie and DVR library feeding 4 Rokus (streamers). Granted all is not active at once but never has the DS1512+ bogged down, except when I ask it to trans-code a movie on the fly. It does not have enough CPU for that, by design. « Show Less
2257165
I don't know the difference but I was not able to get this device working at all. I pitched mine in the trash after trying to get it working with the software for weeks.
602399
I don't know the technical aspects of the differences since I haven't tried both types with my computer. Sorry.
1906438
Video format it support: MPEG-1, MPEG-2 (VOB/ISO), MPEG-4 (DivX /Xvid), DivX HD, Xvid HD, AVI, MOV, MKV, RMVB, AVC HD, H.264, WMV9, VC-1, M2TS, TS/TP/M2T big question is why do you pick thi model over WD live streaming WDBHG70000NBK? WD live with build in wifi and it will play every video format you can think off https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5ix9f_aJt0
1494197
The main difference would be the transfer rate. 2248700 has a transfer rate of 320 MBps as oppose to 19160's 160 MBps...
1101384
Another difference is that the older model doesn't allow file management, you cannot copy, move, or delete files between usb drives. I don't know if that has changed with the firmware update, but if anyone can answer that here, I would appreciate it.Another question I have is does the Live natively decode DTS?
1430591
I believe it's just an older model number. I haven't found anything with any difference between the two of them.
2247456
The primary difference is that the WF-2540 has a wire ethernet interface in addition to USB and WiFi. The only other differences (according to the Epson website) are: * WF-2540 has a better LCD screen (2-line, mono text LCD for the WF-2530 vs 2.5" LCD for the WF-2540) * WF-2540 draws more energy (14 W vs 9 W for the WF-2530 - this one baffles me unless the LCD screen and Ethernet port really eat up a lot of energy... )
2249774
Exactly the same hardware. Better behaved firmware. Not the excellent build quality of the old Plextor but those were $300 and you will not see that again. All of mine are still running perfectly.
2187386
Brian, I have no idea if there is any difference, as I have only experience with the "other" model. I just really like the one I bought from Amazon.
2210514
Hello Mr. Bell - I'm not sure if there is any difference in the model, but I have been using with Time Warner Cable for quite some time & it's working absolutely fine. It's worth buying this instead of paying five bucks every month.
208793
It is a customized version for the granstream hardware. it is likely Asterisk 1.8. Check Grandstream's forum. It works well with bandwidth/sipstation trunks and versalink