How deep is this skillet? It looks shallow.
78426
This 12 inch diameter pan is actually 2 1/2 inches deep. The photo makes the pan look shallow, and I took a chance on the pan being deeper than it looked. I was pleasantly surprised when I received it and saw the actual depth.
78427
The picture is deceptive, it's just about 2 3/4" deep. The lid adds about another 1 1/2" at it's center
78428
It is about 3" deep. I have had no trouble cooking large meals in this skillet. I love this skillet. I also bought the stir pan. Loving this pan too. The lid from the skillet fits the stir fry also.
1637465
I'd say more like 3 inches, about 2 inches from the top of one pan to the bottom of the other. My skillets fit in here very well, even the one that is rather deep.
205576
The cooking depth is 2" the overall depth is 2 5/16 " there is a 5/16 heavy plate on the bottom of the skillet and yes it is Induction...cooks very even if anything was negitive..it is very heavy becouse of the thick bottom
1706359
Pretty shallow. I would not fry bacon in it unless you only made a few at a time. The grease will need to be emptied quite a bit.
1264971
Its about 6-7 inches deep... I wouldn't, it has a large King Kooker logo on bottom and may scratch your stove
534944
I can only estimate the depth to be around 1". Just make sure it is not resting on the bottom of the pan. I love this item!!!
1164763
It is about 6" deep. I was making lasagna in my "brownie pan" all these years, and it would always overflow (and not be very layered). This pan was great from the moment I used it. There are a lot of "warnings" about care that I will be following to the letter as I love it (ex. can not use it for high temps, must use warm soapy water to clean...duh!). The spatula they gave me with the pan is sort of flimsy...but it was good enough to cut the lasagna and dig it out (I just dont see it lasting very long).
1589991
B. Coomes asks the very same question I have. I got a 12" skillet and sent it back because it was warped in the middle and NOT flat. I now BADLY want this 5.5 qt. casserole to take it's place, but I see negative reviews for it as well, exactly like my review for the 12" skillet. That was exceedingly disappointing! Does anyone with a FLAT cooktop stove have a good review for this pan??????? I'm not ordering until I know that they are not ALL defective, and that I have a good chance with it.
1336596
It is not very deep at all. You have to be careful about the size of the logs you're using both for width and height. If you stack two layers of logs, you will not be able to fit the cooking grid in place. I didn't care about that because I had no intention of cooking on it.
1519972
The divided skillet is 1 3/4" deep but the center divider sits approx 3/4" less than the outer edges.
2278818
its a good 1-1/2" deep I cook chicken breast, meatballs etc... it's not shallow but not super deep either. Use mine almost daily
685003
It's very shallow, only about 1-1/2 inches with sloped sides, so not very good for cooking after braising dishes. Otherwise a great pan for frying meats of all kinds which I use more than any other.
1286402
Very shallow....I have a twelve inch one that is 3 inches deep...was disappointed when I gave this as a gift.
1892751
I cannot tell you the exact measurements, but this skillet is deep enough to simmer meat in a sauce without any splashing out.
96203
Yes, as I recall. It's flat and the handle had good length. Seemed well balanced too. It was a great pan all the way around. Just not deep enough for my needs.
88989
It is two inches deep. I'm going to try to upload a photo of the pan loaded with a dozen chicken thighs.
869357
There not 5.2 inches deep. I don't know where they came up with that. Best cookware you can buy. Buy with confidence!