Where is the hood stored in this bag or any other holster bag for that matter if not able to be stored on the camera lens in the reversed position?
50702
My Sony a6000 and kit lens fit in main central compartment with lens hood in place, so this will depend on what camera you will be using this with. There are two additional side pockets were I keep extra lenses and these should provide enough room for lens hood.
50703
In my bag the hood, when not used, collapses onto the inside of the bag where it is attached by velcro. Hope this helps.
46362
To clarify - and I know this is an old post - leaving the hood reversed will do nothing to protect the delicate af - it must be left on as if shooting.
1148259
I have no problems to take out the lens hood. Just turn it counterclockwise.
1437779
Top to bottom, it's a good snug fit. Diameter-wise, there's plenty of room. When I put on the lens hood reverse, it's a properly snug fit.
1315127
The Bag is big enough to store the camera and lens attached. The compartments are movable (with Velcro). So you are able to arrange the bag any way desirable.
1004516
As do I. Oddly enough, my lens didn't come with a hood. Weird. I never knew it was supposed to.
309091
There are no threads on the outside to hold a lens cap. I don't leave mine on the camera when transporting it, so that's not an issue for me.
1617193
There is a space between holster and flap with a raised lip to secure on the belt. you just slip holster onto belt between the flap and the actual holster
2213694
Yes. I keep the camera in an upright position and it fits with the rubber hood on.
246739
No problems whatsoever. Lens hood will work just the same and be able to reverse for storage.
166040
I guess the answer is "possibly". But you will need to buy a case larger than you would normally need for the lens. You can reverse the hood to avoid the extra length, but the hood is still going to be substantially wider than the lens. So you need a case that won't be snug on the lens alone.
1734809
24-105 with hood does not fit into case at all. Without hood it is a very tight squeeze for lens and the body sticks out. Velcro will lock, barely. I would not call it a fit, but adequate for some uses.
1891443
I have the same problem with the right "clip" on mine. I gently spread the tines on the upper part of the "clip" each time I use it and it holds better. My primary camera is a Nikon D7000 with an 18-135mm lens. I carry my Nikon D80 with a 10-24mm lens in the second holster. I would like to keep my 70-300 lens on the D80, but lens creep makes that out of the question. The cameras do seem very heavy, but things stay together now. I believe part of the problem is the way the clip is attached at an angle which seems to put more stress on one side of the "clip." I plan to replace the "clips" with heavier spares I have if the problem continues to worsen. I really like the carrier and my only complaint is with the small "clips."
734
It will store the scope, but you cannot put the mount on the base if it is n the bag
2122164
I have a Sigma 170-500 with the hood reversed that measures 10 1/4 x 4 1/4 which fits securely. Great case.
732286
Lens hood, lens cap, the deatatchable leg, and a Carrying case/bag that you can put on your belt.
527407
If you mean the full-size EF (not EF-S) 75-300mm USM IS lens, then the lens+camera is slightly too long for the holster case. You will not be able to zip up the cover.