What is the difference between the 100 and the 100x models?
80824
The 100X is the silent series, but I really can't tell the difference in the sound level.
1863725
I own the 960 and the main difference I can see is the table, the 950 does not have the split table that can take the lumbar support and acupressure nubs. Also the hand rails are different, the 960 has longer rails for stretching.
287769
The main difference is that the 9500 ix is a GPS enabled radar detector. It actually uses the same scanning engine as the 8500 x50 for radar detection, but the GPS ability allows you to mark speed traps, and the 9500ix has the National red light camera and speedcam database programmed into it. You can update it with your computer to know where pretty much all the speedcams and red light cameras are.
730626
It isn't. The "equivalent" to the LX100 is the new D-Lux Type 109--the comparable model to the D-Lux 6 is the DMX-LX7.I say "equivalent" in quotes, because the equivalency is somewhat false--the Leicas have a superior build, better materials, a cleaner design, Leica Glass made in Germany (as opposed the Panasonic's Japanese glass with Leica "Specs"), and a copy of Lightroom. Thanks for looking!
1093834
One way to find out is to go to the Fuji website and search for the accessories that the x100s requires and you'll find out if they're compatible. You'll likely find commonality with both models.
326185
The X100s and the X100T both use the NP95 battery. Get the Wasabi that supports the NP95 battery. Take care in selection because the Fuji X-E2 uses a different battery.
362090
Sorry, but I can't answer that question. I don't have a privia px 100 and don't know where to find one. I see that it works for the px120 and px320, so it's quite likely that it will also work for the 100, but without seeing the 100 and it's specs, I can't say for sure.
1109727
I bought the 150 and the 100. Both were advertised as the pro versions and I received the pro versions.
343247
I believe (but am not certain) that the U120 has the facial identification software and the U100 doesn't. That's the only difference I've found.
1704613
The other difference between this model and the BRK-100 is the dimension of the oven. The BRK-200 is larger.
2170980
Spend the extra money for the 100. I've not been too happy with the 40. It handles pedals fine though
279650
I don't know the measurements of the nx100 but the shape of it seems to be same. Cast iron is always a great surface to use for cooking!!!
1057267
Yeah, I also came across X10 in my research, seems like a good option. I love the retro design and the manual controls. X100 is a bit too pricy in my opinion.
2015819
The reason is greater accuracy. You may get (very small) differences in measurements by not using the weights correctly. For items under 100 you should use the 100 calibration weight; over 100 use the 200.
1071775
I would say that it is but then again it depends on what you're looking for. I exchanged the 100 hs for the 300 hs. The 300 hs offers optical zoom during video and a greater zoom range. I love the size of it which is a bit smaller than the 100 hs, but i found the buttons are alot easier to use than the 100 hs. I also think the +.1 f stop makes a difference in pictures and allows for brighter pictures. The wide angle lens is also a plus! All in all it really depends on what you want out of the camera. Hope this helps!
1782876
I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous return option and (if possible) audition them side by side..... I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous... » Read More I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous return option and (if possible) audition them side by side..... « Show Less
1362387
200 is more versatile. Nothing at all wrong with thee 100, but the 200 does provide more options.