Does this one have image Stabilization like xp60?
87057
Yes it does! Awesome! I took both video & pictures going down a water slide & both came out great! :)
87058
Yes. I have used this camera and the model just older than this one for 2+ years now and I have not had much issue with blurry photos. It is not perfect, in that if you are spinning a round or are sprinting down the track it will be Blurry. But over all it works quite well! :) hop this helps.
198028
It has a image stabilizer and if youre talking about advance what kind of advance like motion detection?!is!?I still would recommend it but if you want a advance one id recommend the JVCGZ-HD10U I love both cameras!! perfect for attaching fisheye and filming skate and travel trips
1052732
Hi John, Yes, you may turn off Optical Steady Shot/ Image Stabilization on your camcorder. Vincent
1831647
Yes very good ones! There is a 120,180 and 360 degree option! I just took my brand new xp200 to Hawaii and the picture quality and all the settings it has is amazing!!! Definitely worth the money 100%
1372408
Yes but it's an electronic stabilization, not as effective as more sophisticated techniques. Still better than nothing. Even more expensive camcorders of Panasonic/JVC range use the same technique according to my knowledge.
905914
I can't really answer that since my camera has image stabilization. Quality is great on my end
2155975
The 20-50 mm lens does not have stabilization; however some of the accessory lens does have that feature. I have been using my NX2000 for about a month, I like it, and the images it produces are very good. Mine does not have stabilization and I compensate by using the carrying strap around my neck, while holding the camera out in front with my arms slightly out stretched. This stabilizes the camera giving me an image that is clear and steady. Bob Kelley Jasper, Ga
1277751
no - the xp70 seemed much sturdier and the picture was sharper and there was no annoying and energy sapping focusing sound when shooting.
2227449
Yes. The default setting is to have stabilization on. You can turn it off in the menu.
1344377
No, therefore IN-camera stabilization is required. I am using on a Panasonic GX7 which does.
427198
Read this review it does mention that this lens does have "image stabilization".....hope this helps...http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron-18-270mm-3p5-6p3-vc-pzd
1697256
No, the body does not have image stabilization. Some of the lens do...the kit lens does but it isn't an ordinary kit lens. It is a superb piece of equipment.
427199
Read this review it does mention that this lens does have "image stabilization".....hope this helps... http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron-18-270mm-3p5-6p3-vc-pzd
1662629
No and not really necessary because of wide angle/low magnification. NEX cameras do not have built in stabilization; it is included in several lenses including the kit lenses.
1019026
That's the big problem with this camera, there's no image stabilization... Not even for non moving subjects... I have te same issue...I'm very disappointed with this camera and the money I spent on it.
891108
In practice, it means your ISO needs to be a bit higher than it would with a stabilized lens in some cases. It's certainly not a deal breaker for me. I find that the stabilization with the EM5 is helpful at times, but it doesn't do anything to help with motion blur from moving subjects for example. The gm1 is the camera I reach for most often and the lack of stabilization isn't really even a consideration for me.
191715
Hi Craig J., I don't know if it has image stabilization. I returned it the same week. The closure on the lens would not open properly, after only taking one picture. I did some research and found out it was a common problem with this particular nikon camera.