Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: An empirical study on Java method name suggestion: are we there yet?   A large-scale evaluation for current naming approaches substantiates that
such approaches are accurate. However, it is less known about which categories
of method names work well via such naming approaches and how's the performance
of naming approaches. To point out the superiority of the current naming
approach, in this paper, we conduct an empirical study on such approaches in a
new dataset. Moreover, we analyze the successful naming approaches above and
find that: (1) around 60% of the accepted recommendation names are made on
prefixes within get, set, is, and test. (2) A large portion (19.3%) of method
names successfully recommended could be derived from the given method bodies.
The comparisons also demonstrate the superior performance of the empirical
study.

2
The categories of this paper are: math
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin