Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Measuring the evaluation and impact of scientific works and their
  authors   Problems for evaluation and impact of published scientific works and their
authors are discussed. The role of citations in this process is pointed out.
Different bibliometric indicators are reviewed in this connection and ways for
generation of new bibliometric indices are given. The influence of different
circumstances, like self-citations, number of authors, time dependence and
publication types, on the evaluation and impact of scientific papers are
considered. The repercussion of works citations and their content is
investigated in this respect. Attention is paid also on implicit citations
which are not covered by the modern bibliometrics but often are reflected in
the peer reviews. Some aspects of the Web analogues of citations and new
possibilities of the Internet resources in evaluating authors achievements are
presented.

32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
2
The categories of this paper are: math
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph