Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: The high redshift SFR-M* relation is sensitive to the employed star
  formation rate and stellar mass indicators: Towards addressing the tension
  between observations and simulations   There is a severe tension between the observed star formation rate (SFR) -
stellar mass (${\rm M}_{\star}$) relations reported by different authors at $z
= 1-4$. In addition, the observations have not been successfully reproduced by
state-of-the-art cosmological simulations which tend to predict a factor of 2-4
smaller SFRs at a fixed ${\rm M}_{\star}$. We examine the evolution of the
SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relation of $z = 1-4 $ galaxies using the SKIRT simulated
spectral energy distributions of galaxies sampled from the EAGLE simulations.
We derive SFRs and stellar masses by mimicking different observational
techniques. We find that the tension between observed and simulated SFR$-{\rm
M}_{\star}$ relations is largely alleviated if similar methods are used to
infer the galaxy properties. We find that relations relying on infrared
wavelengths (e.g. 24 ${\rm \mu m}$, MIPS - 24, 70 and 160 ${\rm \mu m}$ or
SPIRE - 250, 350, 500 ${\rm \mu m}$) have SFRs that exceed the intrinsic
relation by 0.5 dex. Relations that rely on the spectral energy distribution
fitting technique underpredict the SFRs at a fixed stellar mass by -0.5 dex at
$z \sim 4$ but overpredict the measurements by 0.3 dex at $z \sim 1$. Relations
relying on dust-corrected rest-frame UV luminosities, are flatter since they
overpredict/underpredict SFRs for low/high star forming objects and yield
deviations from the intrinsic relation from 0.10 dex to -0.13 dex at $z \sim
4$. We suggest that the severe tension between different observational studies
can be broadly explained by the fact that different groups employ different
techniques to infer their SFRs.

16
The categories of this paper are: stat
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph