Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Automatic summarising: factors and directions   This position paper suggests that progress with automatic summarising demands
a better research methodology and a carefully focussed research strategy. In
order to develop effective procedures it is necessary to identify and respond
to the context factors, i.e. input, purpose, and output factors, that bear on
summarising and its evaluation. The paper analyses and illustrates these
factors and their implications for evaluation. It then argues that this
analysis, together with the state of the art and the intrinsic difficulty of
summarising, imply a nearer-term strategy concentrating on shallow, but not
surface, text analysis and on indicative summarising. This is illustrated with
current work, from which a potentially productive research programme can be
developed.

10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
2
The categories of this paper are: math
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph