Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Adversarial TCAV -- Robust and Effective Interpretation of Intermediate
  Layers in Neural Networks   Interpreting neural network decisions and the information learned in
intermediate layers is still a challenge due to the opaque internal state and
shared non-linear interactions. Although (Kim et al, 2017) proposed to
interpret intermediate layers by quantifying its ability to distinguish a
user-defined concept (from random examples), the questions of robustness
(variation against the choice of random examples) and effectiveness (retrieval
rate of concept images) remain. We investigate these two properties and propose
improvements to make concept activations reliable for practical use.
  Effectiveness: If the intermediate layer has effectively learned a
user-defined concept, it should be able to recall --- at the testing step ---
most of the images containing the proposed concept. For instance, we observed
that the recall rate of Tiger shark and Great white shark from the ImageNet
dataset with "Fins" as a user-defined concept was only 18.35% for VGG16. To
increase the effectiveness of concept learning, we propose A-CAV --- the
Adversarial Concept Activation Vector --- this results in larger margins
between user concepts and (negative) random examples. This approach improves
the aforesaid recall to 76.83% for VGG16.
  For robustness, we define it as the ability of an intermediate layer to be
consistent in its recall rate (the effectiveness) for different random seeds.
We observed that TCAV has a large variance in recalling a concept across
different random seeds. For example, the recall of cat images (from a layer
learning the concept of tail) varies from 18% to 86% with 20.85% standard
deviation on VGG16. We propose a simple and scalable modification that employs
a Gram-Schmidt process to sample random noise from concepts and learn an
average "concept classifier". This approach improves the aforesaid standard
deviation from 20.85% to 6.4%.

30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
2
The categories of this paper are: math
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol