Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: An Aggregation-Based Overall Quality Measurement for Visualization   Aesthetics are often used to evaluate the quality of graph drawings. However,
the existing aesthetic criteria are useful in judging the extents to which a
drawing conforms to particular drawing rules. They have limitations in
evaluating overall quality. Currently the overall quality of graph drawings is
mainly evaluated based on personal judgments and user studies. Personal
judgments are not reliable, while user studies can be costly to run. Therefore,
there is a need for a direct measure of overall quality. This measure can be
used by visualization designers to quickly compare the quality of drawings at
hand at the design stage and make decisions accordingly. In an attempt to meet
this need, we propose a measure that measures overall quality based on
aggregation of individual aesthetic criteria. We present a user study that
validates this measure and demonstrates its capacity in predicting the
performance of human graph comprehension. The implications of the proposed
measure for future research are discussed.

24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th