Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Comparison of full-text versus metadata searching in an institutional
  repository: Case study of the UNT Scholarly Works   Authors in the library science field disagree about the importance of using
costly resources to create local metadata records, particularly for scholarly
materials that have full-text search alternatives. At the University of North
Texas (UNT) Libraries, we decided to test this concept by answering the
question: What percentage of search terms retrieved results based on full-text
versus metadata values for items in the UNT Scholarly Works institutional
repository? The analysis matched search query logs to indexes of the metadata
records and full text of the items in the collection. Results show the
distribution of item discoveries that were based on metadata exclusively, on
full text exclusively, and on the combination of both. This paper describes in
detail the methods and findings of this study.

35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph