Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT
  images: model generalizability   Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, worldwide research efforts have
focused on using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on various medical
data of COVID-19-positive patients in order to identify or classify various
aspects of the disease, with promising reported results. However, concerns have
been raised over their generalizability, given the heterogeneous factors in
training datasets. This study aims to examine the severity of this problem by
evaluating deep learning (DL) classification models trained to identify
COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from
different countries. We collected one dataset at UT Southwestern (UTSW), and
three external datasets from different countries: CC-CCII Dataset (China),
COVID-CTset (Iran), and MosMedData (Russia). We divided the data into 2
classes: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients. We trained nine
identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets
with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on
a single dataset achieved accuracy/area under the receiver operating
characteristics curve (AUC) values of 0.87/0.826 (UTSW), 0.97/0.988 (CC-CCCI),
and 0.86/0.873 (COVID-CTset) when evaluated on their own dataset. The models
trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the
datasets used for training performed better. However, the performance dropped
close to an AUC of 0.5 (random guess) for all models when evaluated on a
different dataset outside of its training datasets. Including the MosMedData,
which only contained positive labels, into the training did not necessarily
help the performance on the other datasets. Multiple factors likely contribute
to these results, such as patient demographics and differences in image
acquisition or reconstruction, causing a data shift among different study
cohorts.

16
The categories of this paper are: stat
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys