Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Can we Fix the Scope for Coreference? Problems and Solutions for
  Benchmarks beyond OntoNotes   Current work on automatic coreference resolution has focused on the OntoNotes
benchmark dataset, due to both its size and consistency. However many aspects
of the OntoNotes annotation scheme are not well understood by NLP
practitioners, including the treatment of generic NPs, noun modifiers,
indefinite anaphora, predication and more. These often lead to counterintuitive
claims, results and system behaviors. This opinion piece aims to highlight some
of the problems with the OntoNotes rendition of coreference, and to propose a
way forward relying on three principles: 1. a focus on semantics, not
morphosyntax; 2. cross-linguistic generalizability; and 3. a separation of
identity and scope, which can resolve old problems involving temporal and modal
domain consistency.

8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex