Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Parameter Independence and Outcome Independence in Dynamical Collapse
  Theories   Ghirardi, Grassi, Butterfield, and Fleming have previously argued that two
distinct formulations of dynamical reduction (GRW) theories have distinct
non-local properties: one (the "non-linear" formulation) violates Parameter
Independence while the other (the "linear + cooking" formulation) violates
Outcome Independence. The claim is then that, since theories violating Outcome
Independence are compatible with relativity in a way that theories violating
Parameter Independence are not, the "linear + cooking" dynamical reduction
theories hold the key to reconciling quantum non-locality with relativity. I
review and assess this claim, arguing that, while ultimately misleading, there
is an interesting and important lesson to be extracted.

34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
1
The categories of this paper are: cs
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con