Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: An Empirical Study on Android for Saving Non-shared Data on Public
  Storage   With millions of apps that can be downloaded from official or third-party
market, Android has become one of the most popular mobile platforms today.
These apps help people in all kinds of ways and thus have access to lots of
user's data that in general fall into three categories: sensitive data, data to
be shared with other apps, and non-sensitive data not to be shared with others.
For the first and second type of data, Android has provided very good storage
models: an app's private sensitive data are saved to its private folder that
can only be access by the app itself, and the data to be shared are saved to
public storage (either the external SD card or the emulated SD card area on
internal FLASH memory). But for the last type, i.e., an app's non-sensitive and
non-shared data, there is a big problem in Android's current storage model
which essentially encourages an app to save its non-sensitive data to shared
public storage that can be accessed by other apps. At first glance, it seems no
problem to do so, as those data are non-sensitive after all, but it implicitly
assumes that app developers could correctly identify all sensitive data and
prevent all possible information leakage from private-but-non-sensitive data.
In this paper, we will demonstrate that this is an invalid assumption with a
thorough survey on information leaks of those apps that had followed Android's
recommended storage model for non-sensitive data. Our studies showed that
highly sensitive information from billions of users can be easily hacked by
exploiting the mentioned problematic storage model. Although our empirical
studies are based on a limited set of apps, the identified problems are never
isolated or accidental bugs of those apps being investigated. On the contrary,
the problem is rooted from the vulnerable storage model recommended by Android.
To mitigate the threat, we also propose a defense framework.

37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio