Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Development of Rubrics for Capstone Project Courses: Perspectives from
  Teachers and Students   This study attempted to develop fair, relevant, and content-valid assessment
tools for capstone project courses. Toward this goal, new rating instruments
based on the concept of rubrics were proposed. To ensure that the new
instruments were valid and fair, several meetings with faculty and students of
the computing science departments (i.e., Computer Science and Information
Technology) were successively conducted. Eight faculty members and 10 students
participated in the study. The final versions of the instruments were completed
after a series of careful deliberations with faculty and students. Faculty and
students perceived the new instruments fairer than the previous ones. Since the
final instruments will be deployed this semester, their strengths and
weaknesses are not yet known at this time. Directions for future research are
presented.

6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin