Input:
NÕUKOGU OTSUS,
14. juuli 2014,
millega pikendatakse nõukogu otsuse 2011/492/EL kehtivust ja peatatakse selle sobivate meetmete kohaldamine
(2014/467/EL)
EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingut,
võttes arvesse koostöölepingut ühelt poolt Aafrika, Kariibi mere ja Vaikse ookeani piirkonna riikide rühma ning teiselt poolt Euroopa Ühenduse ja selle liikmesriikide vahel (edaspidi „AKV-ELi partnerlusleping”), millele on alla kirjutatud Cotonous 23. juunil 2000 (1) ja mida on viimati muudetud 22. juunil 2010 Burkina Fasos Ouagadougous, (2) eriti selle artiklit 96,
võttes arvesse nõukogus kokku tulnud liikmesriikide valitsuste esindajate sisekokkulepet AKV-ELi partnerluslepingu rakendamiseks võetavate meetmete ja järgitavate menetluste kohta, (3) eriti selle artiklit 3,
võttes arvesse Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekut
ning arvestades järgmist:
(1)
Nõukogu otsusega 2011/492/EL (4) viidi lõpule Guinea-Bissau Vabariigiga AKV-ELi partnerluslepingu artikli 96 alusel peetud nõupidamine ning võeti nimetatud otsuse lisas sätestatud sobivad meetmed.
(2)
Nõukogu otsusega 2013/385/EL (5) muudeti nõukogu otsust 2011/492/EL, eesmärgiga pikendada sobivate meetmete kohaldamisaega ühe aasta võrra kuni 19. juulini 2014.
(3)
AKV-ELi partnerluslepingu artiklis 9 osutatud olulisi lepinguosasid rikutakse jätkuvalt ning praegune olukord Guinea-Bissaus ei taga inimõiguste, demokraatlike põhimõtete ega õigusriigi austamist. Seetõttu on kohane pikendada nõukogu otsuse 2011/492/EL kehtivust ühe aasta võrra.
(4)
Võttes siiski arvesse rahumeelsete, vabade ja usaldusväärsete valimiste korraldamist 13. aprillil 2014 ja 18. mail 2014, mis on oluline samm suurema demokraatia ja stabiilsuse saavutamisel, ning selleks, et teha koostööd demokraatlikult valitud ametivõimudega ning neid otse toetada demokraatlike institutsioonide tugevdamisel, ühiskonna lepitamisel ja Guinea-Bissau sotsiaal-majanduslikul arendamisel, tuleks nõukogu määruses 2011/492/EL kehtestatud sobivate meetmete kohaldamine peatada.
(5)
Käesolev otsus tuleks vaadata läbi kuus kuud pärast selle jõustumist,
ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:
Artikkel 1
Otsuse 2011/492/EL ja selle sobivate meetmete kehtivust pikendatakse 19. juulini 2015. Sobivate meetmete kohaldamine aga peatatakse.
Sobivad meetmed vaadatakse pidevalt uuesti läbi ning neid hakatakse taas kohaldama, kui olukord Guinea-Bissaus peaks olulisel määral halvenema. Sellised meetmed vaadatakse igal juhul läbi kuue kuu järel pärast käesoleva otsuse jõustumist.
Artikkel 2
Käesoleva otsuse lisas esitatud kiri edastatakse Guinea-Bissau ametiasutustele.
Artikkel 3
Käesolev otsus jõustub selle vastuvõtmise kuupäeval.
Brüssel, 14. juuli 2014


Input:
EUROOPAN PARLAMENTIN JA NEUVOSTON ASETUS (EU) N:o 1216/2012,
annettu 12 päivänä joulukuuta 2012,
Kroatian Euroopan unioniin liittymisen vuoksi käyttöön otettavista Euroopan unionin virkamiesten ja väliaikaisten toimihenkilöiden palvelukseen ottamista koskevista väliaikaisista erityistoimenpiteistä
EUROOPAN PARLAMENTTI JA EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, jotka
ottavat huomioon Euroopan unionin toiminnasta tehdyn sopimuksen ja erityisesti sen 336 artiklan,
ottavat huomioon Euroopan komission ehdotuksen, joka on tehty henkilöstösääntökomitean kuulemisen jälkeen,
sen jälkeen kun esitys lainsäätämisjärjestyksessä hyväksyttäväksi säädökseksi on toimitettu kansallisille parlamenteille,
ottavat huomioon unionin tuomioistuimen lausunnon (1),
ottavat huomioon tilintarkastustuomioistuimen lausunnon (2),
noudattavat tavallista lainsäätämisjärjestystä (3),
sekä katsovat seuraavaa:
(1)
Kroatian 1 päivänä heinäkuuta 2013 tapahtuvan liittymisen vuoksi olisi toteutettava väliaikaisia erityistoimenpiteitä, jotka poikkeavat neuvoston asetuksessa (ETY, Euratom, EHTY) N:o 259/68 (4) säädetyistä Euroopan unionin virkamiehiin sovellettavista henkilöstösäännöistä, jäljempänä ’henkilöstösäännöt’, ja unionin muuta henkilöstöä koskevista palvelussuhteen ehdoista.
(2)
Ottaen huomioon Kroatian suhteellisen koon ja niiden henkilöiden määrän, joita asia mahdollisesti koskee, näiden väliaikaisten erityistoimenpiteiden olisi oltava voimassa riittävän ajan. Tätä varten 30 päivä kesäkuuta 2018 vaikuttaa tarkoituksenmukaisimmalta ajanjakson päättymisajankohdalta.
(3)
Ottaen huomioon tarpeen käynnistää palvelukseen ottaminen mahdollisimman nopeasti liittymisen jälkeen, tämä asetus olisi hyväksyttävä ennen liittymispäivää,
OVAT HYVÄKSYNEET TÄMÄN ASETUKSEN:
1 artikla
Virkamiesten palvelukseen ottaminen
1. Sen estämättä, mitä henkilöstösääntöjen 4 artiklan toisessa ja kolmannessa kohdassa, 7 artiklan 1 kohdassa, 27 artiklassa ja 29 artiklan 1 kohdan a ja b alakohdassa säädetään, Kroatian liittymispäivästä alkaen 30 päivään kesäkuuta 2018 saakka avoimiin virkoihin voidaan nimittää virkamiehiksi Kroatia kansalaisia tätä varten varattujen virkojen lukumäärän puitteissa ja talousarviota koskevat neuvottelut huomioon ottaen.
2. Tällaiset virkamiehet nimitetään liittymispäivästä alkaen ja, johtavassa asemassa olevia virkamiehiä (pääjohtajia tai vastaavia palkkaluokkiin AD 16 tai AD 15 kuuluvia virkamiehiä sekä johtajia tai vastaavia palkkaluokkiin AD 15 tai AD 14 kuuluvia virkamiehiä) lukuun ottamatta, henkilöstösääntöjen liitteen III mukaisesti järjestettyjen, tutkintotodistuksiin tai kokeisiin tai sekä tutkintotodistuksiin että kokeisiin perustuvien kilpailujen jälkeen.
2 artikla
Väliaikaisten toimihenkilöiden palvelukseen ottaminen
1. Tämän asetuksen 1 artiklan 1 kohtaa sovelletaan soveltuvin osin Kroatian kansalaisten palvelukseen ottamiseen väliaikaisina toimihenkilöinä.
2. Tällaiset väliaikaiset toimihenkilöt otetaan palvelukseen liittymispäivästä alkaen.
3 artikla
Voimaantulo
Tämä asetus tulee voimaan sitä päivää seuraavana päivänä, jona se julkaistaan Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä.
Tämä asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, ja sitä sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa jäsenvaltioissa.
Tehty Strasbourgissa 12 päivänä joulukuuta 2012.


Input:
NAŘÍZENÍ KOMISE (EU) č. 1182/2014
ze dne 30. října 2014,
kterým se stanoví zákaz rybolovu rejnokovitých ve vodách Unie oblastí VIa, VIb, VIIa-c a VIIe-k plavidly plujícími pod vlajkou Nizozemska
EVROPSKÁ KOMISE,
s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování Evropské unie,
s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES) č. 1224/2009 ze dne 20. listopadu 2009 o zavedení kontrolního režimu Společenství k zajištění dodržování pravidel společné rybářské politiky (1), a zejména na čl. 36 odst. 2 uvedeného nařízení,
vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
(1)
Nařízení Rady (EU) č. 43/2014 (2) stanoví kvóty na rok 2014.
(2)
Podle informací, jež Komise obdržela, úlovky populace uvedené v příloze tohoto nařízení, které byly odloveny plavidly plujícími pod vlajkou členského státu uvedeného ve zmíněné příloze nebo plavidly v něm registrovanými, vyčerpaly kvótu přidělenou na rok 2014.
(3)
Rybolov uvedené populace je proto nutné zakázat,
PŘIJALA TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ:
Článek 1
Vyčerpání kvóty
Rybolovná kvóta přidělená na rok 2014 členskému státu uvedenému v příloze tohoto nařízení pro populaci uvedenou ve zmíněné příloze se považuje za vyčerpanou od data stanoveného v uvedené příloze.
Článek 2
Zákazy
Rybolov populace uvedené v příloze tohoto nařízení plavidly plujícími pod vlajkou členského státu uvedeného ve zmíněné příloze nebo plavidly v něm registrovanými se zakazuje od data stanoveného v uvedené příloze. Po tomto datu se zejména zakazuje úlovky z uvedené populace odlovené těmito plavidly uchovávat na palubě, přemísťovat, překládat nebo vykládat.
Článek 3
Vstup v platnost
Toto nařízení vstupuje v platnost prvním dnem po vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.
Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech.
V Bruselu dne 30. října 2014.


Input:
UITVOERINGSVERORDENING (EU) Nr. 1055/2013 VAN DE COMMISSIE
van 25 oktober 2013
tot verlening van een vergunning voor een preparaat van orthofosforzuur als toevoegingsmiddel voor diervoeding voor alle diersoorten
(Voor de EER relevante tekst)
DE EUROPESE COMMISSIE,
Gezien het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie,
Gezien Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 22 september 2003 betreffende toevoegingsmiddelen voor diervoeding (1), en met name artikel 9, lid 2,
Overwegende hetgeen volgt:
(1)
Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 voorziet in de verlening van vergunningen voor toevoegingsmiddelen voor diervoeding, met inbegrip van de vergunningsgronden en -procedures. Artikel 10 van die verordening voorziet in de herbeoordeling van toevoegingsmiddelen waarvoor een vergunning is verleend overeenkomstig Richtlijn 70/524/EEG van de Raad (2).
(2)
Bij Richtlijn 76/603/EEG van de Commissie (3) is overeenkomstig Richtlijn 70/524/EEG een vergunning zonder tijdsbeperking verleend voor het gebruik van een preparaat van orthofosforzuur als toevoegingsmiddel voor diervoeding voor alle diersoorten. Vervolgens is dat preparaat overeenkomstig artikel 10, lid 1, van Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 als bestaand product opgenomen in het Communautair repertorium van toevoegingsmiddelen voor diervoeding.
(3)
Overeenkomstig artikel 10, lid 2, van Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 in samenhang met artikel 7 van die verordening is een aanvraag ingediend voor de herbeoordeling van orthofosforzuur (CAS-nr. 7664-38-2) als een toevoegingsmiddel voor diervoeding voor alle diersoorten, waarbij is verzocht om indeling van dat toevoegingsmiddel in de categorie „technologische toevoegingsmiddelen” en de functionele groep „conserveermiddelen”. Bij die aanvraag waren de krachtens artikel 7, lid 3, van Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 vereiste gegevens en documenten gevoegd. De aanvraag omvat tevens andere toepassingen van dezelfde stof, waarover nog geen beslissing is genomen.
(4)
De Europese Autoriteit voor voedselveiligheid (EFSA) heeft in haar advies van 13 december 2012 (4) geconcludeerd dat orthofosforzuur onder de voorgestelde voorwaarden voor gebruik in diervoeding geen ongunstige gevolgen voor de diergezondheid en de gezondheid van de consument heeft en naar verwachting geen extra risico voor het milieu zal vormen, en dat het beschikt over het vermogen om diervoeding te conserveren. De EFSA concludeerde tevens dat er geen veiligheidsproblemen voor de gebruikers zullen rijzen als de nodige beschermingsmaatregelen worden genomen. De EFSA heeft ook het rapport over de analysemethode voor het toevoegingsmiddel voor diervoeding geverifieerd dat door het bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 ingestelde referentielaboratorium was ingediend.
(5)
Uit de beoordeling van het preparaat van orthofosforzuur blijkt dat aan de in artikel 5 van Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/2003 vermelde voorwaarden voor de verlening van een vergunning is voldaan. Het gebruik van dat preparaat zoals omschreven in de bijlage bij deze verordening moet daarom worden toegestaan.
(6)
Aangezien er geen veiligheidsredenen zijn die de onmiddellijke toepassing van de wijzigingen van de vergunningsvoorwaarden vereisen, moet worden voorzien in een overgangsperiode om de bestaande voorraden van de toevoegingsmiddelen, voormengsels en mengvoeders die dit preparaat bevatten, zoals toegestaan bij Richtlijn 76/603/EEG, op te gebruiken.
(7)
De in deze verordening vervatte maatregelen zijn in overeenstemming met het advies van het Permanent Comité voor de voedselketen en de diergezondheid,
HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:
Artikel 1
Voor het in de bijlage beschreven preparaat, dat behoort tot de categorie „technologische toevoegingsmiddelen” en de functionele groep „conserveermiddelen”, wordt onder de in die bijlage vastgestelde voorwaarden een vergunning voor gebruik als toevoegingsmiddel voor diervoeding verleend.
Artikel 2
Het in de bijlage beschreven preparaat en de dat preparaat bevattende diervoeding die, in overeenstemming met de regels die vóór 19 november 2013 van toepassing waren, vóór 19 mei 2014 geproduceerd en geëtiketteerd zijn, mogen verder in de handel worden gebracht en worden gebruikt totdat de bestaande voorraden zijn uitgeput.
Artikel 3
Deze verordening treedt in werking op de twintigste dag na die van de bekendmaking ervan in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.
Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.
Gedaan te Brussel, 25 oktober 2013.


Input:
ΕΚΤΕΛΕΣΤΙΚΌΣ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΌΣ (ΕΕ) αριθ. 367/2013 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ
της 22ας Απριλίου 2013
για την έγκριση της δραστικής ουσίας Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus, σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τη διάθεση φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων στην αγορά και για την τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος του εκτελεστικού κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 540/2011 της Επιτροπής
(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)
Η ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ,
Έχοντας υπόψη τη Συνθήκη για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης,
Έχοντας υπόψη τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 21ης Οκτωβρίου 2009, σχετικά με τη διάθεση φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων στην αγορά και την κατάργηση των οδηγιών 79/117/ΕΟΚ και 91/414/ΕΟΚ του Συμβουλίου (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 13 παράγραφος 2 και το άρθρο 78 παράγραφος 2,
Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
(1)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 80 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο α) του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009, πρέπει να εφαρμόζεται η οδηγία 91/414/ΕΟΚ του Συμβουλίου (2), όσον αφορά τη διαδικασία και τους όρους έγκρισης, στις δραστικές ουσίες για τις οποίες έχει εκδοθεί απόφαση σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 6 παράγραφος 3 της εν λόγω οδηγίας πριν από τις 14 Ιουνίου 2011. Για την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus, οι όροι του άρθρου 80 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο α) του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 πληρούνται με την απόφαση 2007/669/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής (3).
(2)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 6 παράγραφος 2 της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, στις 2 Ιανουαρίου 2007 η Εσθονία έλαβε αίτηση από την εταιρεία Andermatt Biocontrol GmbH για την καταχώριση της δραστικής ουσίας Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus στο παράρτημα I της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ. Με την απόφαση 2007/669/ΕΚ επιβεβαιώθηκε ότι ο φάκελος ήταν «πλήρης», υπό την έννοια ότι μπορεί να θεωρηθεί ότι ικανοποιεί καταρχήν τις απαιτήσεις δεδομένων και πληροφοριών των παραρτημάτων II και III της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ.
(3)
Για την εν λόγω δραστική ουσία αξιολογήθηκαν οι επιδράσεις στην ανθρώπινη υγεία, στην υγεία των ζώων και στο περιβάλλον, σύμφωνα με τις διατάξεις του άρθρου 6 παράγραφοι 2 και 4 της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, για τις χρήσεις που προτείνονται από τον αιτούντα. Το κράτος μέλος που είχε οριστεί εισηγητής υπέβαλε σχέδιο έκθεσης αξιολόγησης στις 26 Μαρτίου 2009.
(4)
Το σχέδιο έκθεσης αξιολόγησης εξετάστηκε από τα κράτη μέλη και την Ευρωπαϊκή Αρχή για την Ασφάλεια των Τροφίμων (εφεξής «η Αρχή»). Η Αρχή υπέβαλε στην Επιτροπή το πόρισμά της σχετικά με την αξιολόγηση της εκτίμησης επικινδυνότητας φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων όσον αφορά τη δραστική ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (4) στις 10 Αυγούστου 2012. Το σχέδιο της έκθεσης αξιολόγησης και τα συμπεράσματα της Αρχής εξετάστηκαν από τα κράτη μέλη και την Επιτροπή στο πλαίσιο της μόνιμης επιτροπής για την τροφική αλυσίδα και την υγεία των ζώων και το σχέδιο έκθεσης αξιολόγησης οριστικοποιήθηκε στις 15 Μαρτίου 2013 με τη μορφή έκθεσης ανασκόπησης της Επιτροπής για την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus.
(5)
Με βάση τις διάφορες εξετάσεις που πραγματοποιήθηκαν σε φυτοπροστατευτικά προϊόντα που περιέχουν την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus, μπορεί να αναμένεται ότι, σε γενικές γραμμές, πληρούνται οι απαιτήσεις που θεσπίζονται στο άρθρο 5 παράγραφος 1 στοιχεία α) και β) και στο άρθρο 5 παράγραφος 3 της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, ιδίως όσον αφορά τις χρήσεις οι οποίες εξετάστηκαν και παρουσιάστηκαν λεπτομερώς στην έκθεση ανασκόπησης της Επιτροπής. Συνεπώς, είναι σκόπιμο να εγκριθεί η ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus.
(6)
Πριν από την έγκριση θα πρέπει να μεσολαβήσει εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα που θα επιτρέψει στα κράτη μέλη και στα ενδιαφερόμενα μέρη να προετοιμαστούν για να ανταποκριθούν στις νέες απαιτήσεις που θα προκύψουν από την έγκριση.
(7)
Με την επιφύλαξη των υποχρεώσεων που προβλέπονται στον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 ως συνέπεια της έγκρισης, λαμβανομένης υπόψη της ειδικής κατάστασης που δημιουργήθηκε λόγω της μετάβασης από την οδηγία 91/414/ΕΟΚ στον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 πρέπει, ωστόσο, να ισχύουν τα ακόλουθα. Στα κράτη μέλη θα πρέπει να δοθεί περίοδος έξι μηνών μετά την έγκριση για να επανεξετάσουν τις εγκρίσεις φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων που περιέχουν την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus. Τα κράτη μέλη θα πρέπει να τροποποιήσουν, να αντικαταστήσουν ή να ανακαλέσουν, ανάλογα με την περίπτωση, τις εγκρίσεις. Κατά παρέκκλιση από την ανωτέρω προθεσμία, πρέπει να προβλεφθεί μεγαλύτερη προθεσμία για την υποβολή και την αξιολόγηση της επικαιροποίησης του πλήρους φακέλου του παραρτήματος III, όπως προβλέπεται στην οδηγία 91/414/ΕΟΚ, κάθε φυτοπροστατευτικού προϊόντος για κάθε προβλεπόμενη χρήση σύμφωνα με τις ενιαίες αρχές.
(8)
Η πείρα που αποκτήθηκε από καταχωρίσεις δραστικών ουσιών στο παράρτημα I της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, οι οποίες αξιολογήθηκαν στο πλαίσιο του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ. 3600/92 της Επιτροπής, της 11ης Δεκεμβρίου 1992, σχετικά με τον καθορισμό των λεπτομερών κανόνων εφαρμογής της πρώτης φάσης του προγράμματος εργασίας που αναφέρεται στο άρθρο 8 παράγραφος 2 της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τη διάθεση φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων στην αγορά (5), έχει δείξει ότι μπορεί να προκύψουν δυσκολίες κατά την ερμηνεία των καθηκόντων που έχουν οι κάτοχοι υφιστάμενων εγκρίσεων όσον αφορά την πρόσβαση σε στοιχεία. Συνεπώς, για να αποφευχθούν περαιτέρω δυσκολίες, κρίνεται αναγκαίο να αποσαφηνιστούν τα καθήκοντα των κρατών μελών και, ιδίως, το καθήκον να επαληθεύουν ότι ο κάτοχος έγκρισης αποδεικνύει την πρόσβαση σε φάκελο που ικανοποιεί τις απαιτήσεις του παραρτήματος II της εν λόγω οδηγίας. Ωστόσο, η εν λόγω αποσαφήνιση δεν επιβάλλει νέες υποχρεώσεις στα κράτη μέλη ή στους κατόχους εγκρίσεων, σε σύγκριση με τις οδηγίες οι οποίες έχουν εκδοθεί μέχρι σήμερα για την τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος I της εν λόγω οδηγίας ή με τους κανονισμούς για την έγκριση δραστικών ουσιών.
(9)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 13 παράγραφος 4 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009, το παράρτημα του εκτελεστικού κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 540/2011 της Επιτροπής, της 25ης Μαΐου 2011, σχετικά με την εφαρμογή του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου όσον αφορά τον κατάλογο των εγκεκριμένων δραστικών ουσιών (6) θα πρέπει να τροποποιηθεί αναλόγως.
(10)
Τα μέτρα που προβλέπονται στον παρόντα κανονισμό είναι σύμφωνα με τη γνώμη της μόνιμης επιτροπής για την τροφική αλυσίδα και την υγεία των ζώων,
ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:
Άρθρο 1
Έγκριση δραστικής ουσίας
Η δραστική ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus, όπως καθορίζεται στο παράρτημα I, εγκρίνεται σύμφωνα με τους όρους που καθορίζονται στο εν λόγω παράρτημα.
Άρθρο 2
Εκ νέου αξιολόγηση φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων
1. Τα κράτη μέλη, σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009, τροποποιούν ή ανακαλούν, εφόσον είναι απαραίτητο, τις ισχύουσες εγκρίσεις φυτοπροστατευτικών προϊόντων που περιέχουν την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus ως δραστική ουσία πριν από τις 30 Νοεμβρίου 2013.
Έως την ημερομηνία αυτή επαληθεύουν, ιδίως, ότι πληρούνται οι όροι του παραρτήματος I του παρόντος κανονισμού, με εξαίρεση αυτών των όρων που επισημαίνονται στη στήλη που αφορά τους ειδικούς όρους στο εν λόγω παράρτημα, και ότι ο κάτοχος της έγκρισης διαθέτει φάκελο ή έχει πρόσβαση σε φάκελο που πληροί τις απαιτήσεις του παραρτήματος II της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, σύμφωνα με τους όρους του άρθρου 13 παράγραφοι 1 έως 4 της εν λόγω οδηγίας και του άρθρου 62 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009.
2. Κατά παρέκκλιση από την παράγραφο 1, για κάθε εγκεκριμένο φυτοπροστατευτικό προϊόν που περιέχει την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus, είτε ως μόνη δραστική ουσία είτε μαζί με άλλες δραστικές ουσίες που έχουν καταχωριστεί στο σύνολό τους στο παράρτημα του εκτελεστικού κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 540/2011 έως τις 31 Μαΐου 2013 το αργότερο, τα κράτη μέλη αξιολογούν εκ νέου το προϊόν σύμφωνα με τις ενιαίες αρχές που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 29 παράγραφος 6 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009, με βάση φάκελο που ικανοποιεί τις απαιτήσεις του παραρτήματος III της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ και λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τη στήλη σχετικά με τους ειδικούς όρους στο παράρτημα I του παρόντος κανονισμού. Με βάση την αξιολόγηση αυτή, εξακριβώνουν κατά πόσον το προϊόν πληροί τους όρους του άρθρου 29 παράγραφος 1 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1107/2009.
Ύστερα από αυτή την εξακρίβωση, τα κράτη μέλη:
α)
σε περίπτωση που ένα προϊόν περιέχει Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus ως τη μόνη δραστική ουσία, κατά περίπτωση, τροποποιούν ή ανακαλούν την έγκριση έως τις 30 Νοεμβρίου 2014 το αργότερο· ή
β)
σε περίπτωση που ένα προϊόν περιέχει την ουσία Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus ως μία από πολλές δραστικές ουσίες, κατά περίπτωση, τροποποιούν ή ανακαλούν την έγκριση έως τις 30 Νοεμβρίου 2014 ή έως την ημερομηνία που έχει οριστεί για μια τέτοια τροποποίηση ή ανάκληση στην αντίστοιχη νομοθετική πράξη ή πράξεις με τις οποίες καταχωρίστηκαν η σχετική ουσία ή ουσίες στο παράρτημα I της οδηγίας 91/414/ΕΟΚ, ή εγκρίθηκαν η εν λόγω ουσία ή ουσίες, εφόσον η τελευταία ημερομηνία είναι μεταγενέστερη.
Άρθρο 3
Τροποποιήσεις του εκτελεστικού κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 540/2011
Το παράρτημα του εκτελεστικού κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 540/2011 τροποποιείται σύμφωνα με το παράρτημα II του παρόντος κανονισμού.
Άρθρο 4
Έναρξη ισχύος και ημερομηνία εφαρμογής
Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει την εικοστή ημέρα από τη δημοσίευσή του στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
Εφαρμόζεται από την 1η Ιουνίου 2013.
Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.
Βρυξέλλες, 22 Απριλίου 2013.


Input:
REGULATION (EU) No 606/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 12 June 2013
on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a), (e) and (f) of Article 81(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
After consulting the European Economic and Social Committee,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (1),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1)
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured and access to justice is facilitated, in particular through the principle of mutual recognition of judicial and extrajudicial decisions in civil matters. For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, particularly when necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
(2)
Article 81(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications is to be based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and of decisions in extrajudicial cases.
(3)
In a common area of justice without internal borders, provisions to ensure rapid and simple recognition and, where applicable, enforcement in another Member State of protection measures ordered in a Member State are essential to ensure that the protection afforded to a natural person in one Member State is maintained and continued in any other Member State to which that person travels or moves. It is necessary to ensure that the legitimate exercise by citizens of the Union of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 21 TFEU, does not result in a loss of that protection.
(4)
Mutual trust in the administration of justice in the Union and the aim of ensuring quicker and less costly circulation of protection measures within the Union justify the principle according to which protection measures ordered in one Member State are recognised in all other Member States without any special procedure being required. As a result, a protection measure ordered in one Member State (‘Member State of origin’) should be treated as if it had been ordered in the Member State where its recognition is sought (‘Member State addressed’).
(5)
In order to attain the objective of free movement of protection measures, it is necessary and appropriate that the rules governing the recognition and, where applicable, enforcement of protection measures be governed by a legal instrument of the Union which is binding and directly applicable.
(6)
This Regulation should apply to protection measures ordered with a view to protecting a person where there exist serious grounds for considering that that person’s life, physical or psychological integrity, personal liberty, security or sexual integrity is at risk, for example so as to prevent any form of gender-based violence or violence in close relationships such as physical violence, harassment, sexual aggression, stalking, intimidation or other forms of indirect coercion. It is important to underline that this Regulation applies to all victims, regardless of whether they are victims of gender-based violence.
(7)
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (3) ensures that victims of crime receive appropriate information and support.
(8)
This Regulation complements Directive 2012/29/EU. The fact that a person is the object of a protection measure ordered in civil matters does not necessarily preclude that person from being defined as a ‘victim’ under that Directive.
(9)
The scope of this Regulation is within the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters within the meaning of Article 81 TFEU. This Regulation applies only to protection measures ordered in civil matters. Protection measures adopted in criminal matters are covered by Directive 2011/99/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the European Protection Order (4).
(10)
The notion of civil matters should be interpreted autonomously, in accordance with the principles of Union law. The civil, administrative or criminal nature of the authority ordering a protection measure should not be determinative for the purpose of assessing the civil character of a protection measure.
(11)
This Regulation should not interfere with the functioning of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (5) (‘Brussels IIa Regulation’). Decisions taken under the Brussels IIa Regulation should continue to be recognised and enforced under that Regulation.
(12)
This Regulation takes account of the different legal traditions of the Member States and does not interfere with the national systems for ordering protection measures. This Regulation does not oblige the Member States to modify their national systems so as to enable protection measures to be ordered in civil matters, or to introduce protection measures in civil matters for the application of this Regulation.
(13)
In order to take account of the various types of authorities which order protection measures in civil matters in the Member States, and unlike in other areas of judicial cooperation, this Regulation should apply to decisions of both judicial authorities and administrative authorities provided that the latter offer guarantees with regard, in particular, to their impartiality and to the right of the parties to judicial review. In no event should police authorities be considered as issuing authorities within the meaning of this Regulation.
(14)
Based on the principle of mutual recognition, protection measures ordered in civil matters in the Member State of origin should be recognised in the Member State addressed as protection measures in civil matters in accordance with this Regulation.
(15)
According to the principle of mutual recognition, the recognition corresponds to the duration of the protection measure. However, taking into account the diversity of protection measures under the laws of the Member States, in particular in terms of their duration, and the fact that this Regulation will typically apply in urgent situations, the effects of recognition under this Regulation should, by way of exception, be limited to a period of 12 months from the issuing of the certificate provided for by this Regulation, irrespective of whether the protection measure itself (be it provisional, time-limited or indefinite in nature) has a longer duration.
(16)
In cases where the duration of a protection measure is greater than 12 months, the limitation of the effects of recognition under this Regulation should be without prejudice to the right of the protected person to invoke that protection measure under any other available legal act of the Union providing for recognition or to apply for a national protection measure in the Member State addressed.
(17)
The limitation of the effects of recognition is exceptional due to the special nature of the subject matter of this Regulation and should not serve as a precedent for other instruments in civil and commercial matters.
(18)
This Regulation should deal only with the recognition of the obligation imposed by the protection measure. It should not regulate the procedures for implementation or enforcement of the protection measure, nor should it cover any potential sanctions that might be imposed if the obligation ordered by the protection measure is infringed in the Member State addressed. Those matters are left to the law of that Member State. However, in accordance with the general principles of Union law and particularly the principle of mutual recognition, Member States are to ensure that protection measures recognised under this Regulation can take effect in the Member State addressed.
(19)
Protection measures covered by this Regulation should afford protection to the protected person at his or her place of residence or place of work, or at another place which that person visits on a regular basis, such as the residence of close relatives or the school or educational establishment attended by his or her child. Irrespective of whether the place in question or the extent of the area covered by the protection measure is described in the protection measure by one or more specific addresses or by reference to a circumscribed area which the person causing the risk may not approach or enter, respectively (or a combination of the two), the recognition of the obligation imposed by the protection measure relates to the purpose which the place serves for the protected person rather than to the specific address.
(20)
In the light of the foregoing and provided that the nature and the essential elements of the protection measure are maintained, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should be allowed to adjust the factual elements of the protection measure where such adjustment is necessary in order for the recognition of the protection measure to be effective in practical terms in the Member State addressed. Factual elements include the address, the general location or the minimum distance the person causing the risk must keep from the protected person, the address or the general location. However, the type and the civil nature of the protection measure may not be affected by such adjustment.
(21)
In order to facilitate any adjustment of a protection measure, the certificate should indicate whether the address specified in the protection measure constitutes the place of residence, the place of work or a place that the protected person visits on a regular basis. Furthermore, if relevant, the circumscribed area (approximate radius from the specific address) to which the obligation imposed by the protection measure on the person causing the risk applies should also be indicated in the certificate.
(22)
In order to facilitate the free movement of protection measures within the Union, this Regulation should introduce a uniform model of certificate and provide for the establishment of a multilingual standard form for that purpose. The issuing authority should issue the certificate upon request by the protected person.
(23)
Free text fields in the multilingual standard form for the certificate should be as limited as possible, so that translation or transliteration may be provided in most cases without imposing any costs on the protected person by making use of the standard form in the relevant language. Any costs for necessary translation that goes beyond the text of the multilingual standard form are to be allocated as provided under the law of the Member State of origin.
(24)
Where a certificate contains free text, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should determine whether any translation or transliteration is required. This should not preclude the protected person or the issuing authority of the Member State of origin from providing a translation or transliteration on their own initiative.
(25)
To ensure respect for the rights of defence of the person causing the risk, where the protection measure was ordered in default of appearance or under a procedure that does not provide for prior notice to that person (‘ex-parte proceeding’), the issue of the certificate should only be possible if that person has had the opportunity to arrange for his or her defence against the protection measure. However, with a view to avoiding circumvention and taking into account the typical urgency of cases necessitating protection measures, it should not be required that the period for raising such defence has expired before a certificate may be issued. The certificate should be issued as soon as the protection measure is enforceable in the Member State of origin.
(26)
Having regard to the objectives of simplicity and speed, this Regulation provides for simple and quick methods to be used for bringing procedural steps to the notice of the person causing the risk. Those specific methods of notification should apply only for the purposes of this Regulation due to the special nature of its subject matter, should not serve as a precedent for other instruments in civil and commercial matters and should not affect any obligations of a Member State concerning the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil matters arising from a bilateral or multilateral convention concluded between that Member State and a third country.
(27)
When the certificate is brought to the notice of the person causing the risk and also when any adjustment is made to any factual elements of a protection measure in the Member State addressed, due regard should be paid to the interest of the protected person in not having his or her whereabouts or other contact details disclosed. Such details should not be disclosed to the person causing the risk unless such disclosure is necessary for compliance with, or the enforcement of, the protection measure.
(28)
The issuing of the certificate should not be subject to appeal.
(29)
The certificate should be rectified where, due to an obvious error or inaccuracy, such as a typing error or an error of transcription or copying, the certificate does not correctly reflect the protection measure, or should be withdrawn if it was clearly wrongly granted, for example where it was used for a measure that falls outside the scope of this Regulation or where it was issued in breach of the requirements for its issuing.
(30)
The issuing authority of the Member State of origin should, upon request, assist the protected person in obtaining information on the authorities of the Member State addressed before which the protection measure is to be invoked or enforcement is to be sought.
(31)
The harmonious functioning of justice requires that irreconcilable decisions should not be delivered in two Member States. To that end, this Regulation should provide for a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement of the protection measure in cases of irreconcilability with a judgment given or recognised in the Member State addressed.
(32)
Public interest considerations may, in exceptional circumstances, justify a refusal by the court of the Member State addressed to recognise or enforce a protection measure where its application would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy of that Member State. However, the court should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to refuse recognition or enforcement of a protection measure when to do so would be contrary to the rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof.
(33)
In the event of suspension or withdrawal of the protection measure or withdrawal of the certificate in the Member State of origin, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should, upon submission of the relevant certificate, suspend or withdraw the effects of recognition and, where applicable, the enforcement of the protection measure.
(34)
A protected person should have effective access to justice in other Member States. To ensure such effective access in procedures covered by this Regulation, legal aid is to be provided in accordance with Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2003 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes (6).
(35)
In order to facilitate the application of this Regulation, Member States should be required to provide certain information regarding their national rules and procedures concerning protection measures in civil matters within the framework of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters established by Council Decision 2001/470/EC (7). Access to the information provided by the Member States should be made available through the European e-Justice Portal.
(36)
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission with regard to the establishment and subsequent amendment of the forms provided for in this Regulation. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (8).
(37)
The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts establishing and subsequently amending the forms provided for in this Regulation.
(38)
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, it seeks to ensure the rights of the defence and fair trial, as established in Articles 47 and 48 thereof. This Regulation should be applied according to those rights and principles.
(39)
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to establish rules for a simple and rapid mechanism for the recognition of protection measures ordered in a Member State in civil matters, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(40)
In accordance with Article 3 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, those Member States have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
(41)
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(42)
The European Data Protection Supervisor delivered an opinion on 17 October 2011 (9), based on Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (10),
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
CHAPTER I
SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
Article 1
Subject matter
This Regulation establishes rules for a simple and rapid mechanism for the recognition of protection measures ordered in a Member State in civil matters.
Article 2
Scope
1. This Regulation shall apply to protection measures in civil matters ordered by an issuing authority within the meaning of point (4) of Article 3.
2. This Regulation shall apply to cross-border cases. For the purposes of this Regulation, a case shall be deemed to be a cross-border case where the recognition of a protection measure ordered in one Member State is sought in another Member State.
3. This Regulation shall not apply to protection measures falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003.
Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)
‘protection measure’ means any decision, whatever it may be called, ordered by the issuing authority of the Member State of origin in accordance with its national law and imposing one or more of the following obligations on the person causing the risk with a view to protecting another person, when the latter person’s physical or psychological integrity may be at risk:
(a)
a prohibition or regulation on entering the place where the protected person resides, works, or regularly visits or stays;
(b)
a prohibition or regulation of contact, in any form, with the protected person, including by telephone, electronic or ordinary mail, fax or any other means;
(c)
a prohibition or regulation on approaching the protected person closer than a prescribed distance;
(2)
‘protected person’ means a natural person who is the object of the protection afforded by a protection measure;
(3)
‘person causing the risk’ means a natural person on whom one or more of the obligations referred to in point (1) have been imposed;
(4)
‘issuing authority’ means any judicial authority, or any other authority designated by a Member State as having competence in the matters falling within the scope of this Regulation, provided that such other authority offers guarantees to the parties with regard to impartiality, and that its decisions in relation to the protection measure may, under the law of the Member State in which it operates, be made subject to review by a judicial authority and have similar force and effects to those of a decision of a judicial authority on the same matter;
(5)
‘Member State of origin’ means the Member State in which the protection measure is ordered;
(6)
‘Member State addressed’ means the Member State in which the recognition and, where applicable, the enforcement of the protection measure is sought.
CHAPTER II
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTION MEASURES
Article 4
Recognition and enforcement
1. A protection measure ordered in a Member State shall be recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure being required and shall be enforceable without a declaration of enforceability being required.
2. A protected person who wishes to invoke in the Member State addressed a protection measure ordered in the Member State of origin shall provide the competent authority of the Member State addressed with:
(a)
a copy of the protection measure which satisfies the conditions necessary to establish its authenticity;
(b)
the certificate issued in the Member State of origin pursuant to Article 5; and
(c)
where necessary, a transliteration and/or a translation of the certificate in accordance with Article 16.
3. The certificate shall take effect only within the limits of the enforceability of the protection measure.
4. Irrespective of whether the protection measure has a longer duration, the effects of recognition pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be limited to a period of 12 months, starting from the date of the issuing of the certificate.
5. The procedure for the enforcement of protection measures shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed.
Article 5
Certificate
1. The issuing authority of the Member State of origin shall, upon request by the protected person, issue the certificate using the multilingual standard form established in accordance with Article 19 and containing the information provided for in Article 7.
2. No appeal shall lie against the issuing of the certificate.
3. Upon request by the protected person, the issuing authority of the Member State of origin shall provide the protected person with a transliteration and/or a translation of the certificate by making use of the multilingual standard form established in accordance with Article 19.
Article 6
Requirements for the issuing of the certificate
1. The certificate may only be issued if the protection measure has been brought to the notice of the person causing the risk in accordance with the law of the Member State of origin.
2. Where the protection measure was ordered in default of appearance, the certificate may only be issued if the person causing the risk had been served with the document which instituted the proceeding or an equivalent document or, where relevant, had been otherwise informed of the initiation of the proceeding in accordance with the law of the Member State of origin in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable that person to arrange for his or her defence.
3. Where the protection measure was ordered under a procedure that does not provide for prior notice to be given to the person causing the risk (‘ex-parte proceeding’), the certificate may only be issued if that person had the right to challenge the protection measure under the law of the Member State of origin.
Article 7
Contents of the certificate
The certificate shall contain the following information:
(a)
the name and address/contact details of the issuing authority;
(b)
the reference number of the file;
(c)
the date of issue of the certificate;
(d)
details concerning the protected person: name, date and place of birth, where available, and an address to be used for notification purposes, preceded by a conspicuous warning that that address may be disclosed to the person causing the risk;
(e)
details concerning the person causing the risk: name, date and place of birth, where available, and address to be used for notification purposes;
(f)
all information necessary for enforcement of the protection measure, including, where applicable, the type of the measure and the obligation imposed by it on the person causing the risk and specifying the function of the place and/or the circumscribed area which that person is prohibited from approaching or entering, respectively;
(g)
the duration of the protection measure;
(h)
the duration of the effects of recognition pursuant to Article 4(4);
(i)
a declaration that the requirements laid down in Article 6 have been met;
(j)
information on the rights granted under Articles 9 and 13;
(k)
for ease of reference, the full title of this Regulation.
Article 8
Notification of the certificate to the person causing the risk
1. The issuing authority of the Member State of origin shall bring to the notice of the person causing the risk the certificate and the fact that the issuing of the certificate results in the recognition and, where applicable, in the enforceability of the protection measure in all Member States pursuant to Article 4.
2. Where the person causing the risk resides in the Member State of origin, the notification shall be effected in accordance with the law of that Member State. Where the person causing the risk resides in a Member State other than the Member State of origin or in a third country, the notification shall be effected by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or equivalent.
Situations in which the address of the person causing the risk is not known or in which that person refuses to accept receipt of the notification shall be governed by the law of the Member State of origin.
3. The whereabouts or other contact details of the protected person shall not be disclosed to the person causing the risk unless their disclosure is necessary for compliance with, or the enforcement of, the protection measure.
Article 9
Rectification or withdrawal of the certificate
1. Without prejudice to Article 5(2) and upon request by the protected person or the person causing the risk to the issuing authority of the Member State of origin or on that authority’s own initiative, the certificate shall be:
(a)
rectified where, due to a clerical error, there is a discrepancy between the protection measure and the certificate; or
(b)
withdrawn where it was clearly wrongly granted, having regard to the requirements laid down in Article 6 and the scope of this Regulation.
2. The procedure, including any appeal, with regard to the rectification or withdrawal of the certificate shall be governed by the law of the Member State of origin.
Article 10
Assistance to the protected person
Upon request by the protected person, the issuing authority of the Member State of origin shall assist that person in obtaining information, as made available in accordance with Articles 17 and 18, concerning the authorities of the Member State addressed before which the protection measure is to be invoked or enforcement is to be sought.
Article 11
Adjustment of the protection measure
1. The competent authority of the Member State addressed shall, where and to the extent necessary, adjust the factual elements of the protection measure in order to give effect to the protection measure in that Member State.
2. The procedure for the adjustment of the protection measure shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed.
3. The adjustment of the protection measure shall be brought to the notice of the person causing the risk.
4. Where the person causing the risk resides in the Member State addressed, the notification shall be effected in accordance with the law of that Member State. Where the person causing the risk resides in a Member State other than the Member State addressed or in a third country, the notification shall be effected by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or equivalent.
Situations in which the address of the person causing the risk is not known or in which that person refuses to accept receipt of the notification shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed.
5. An appeal against the adjustment of the protection measure may be lodged by the protected person or the person causing the risk. The appeal procedure shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed. However, the lodging of an appeal shall not have suspensive effect.
Article 12
No review as to substance
Under no circumstances may a protection measure ordered in the Member State of origin be reviewed as to its substance in the Member State addressed.
Article 13
Refusal of recognition or enforcement
1. The recognition and, where applicable, the enforcement of the protection measure shall be refused, upon application by the person causing the risk, to the extent such recognition is:
(a)
manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State addressed; or
(b)
irreconcilable with a judgment given or recognised in the Member State addressed.
2. The application for refusal of recognition or enforcement shall be submitted to the court of the Member State addressed as communicated by that Member State to the Commission in accordance with point (a)(iv) of Article 18(1).
3. The recognition of the protection measure may not be refused on the ground that the law of the Member State addressed does not allow for such a measure based on the same facts.
Article 14
Suspension or withdrawal of recognition or enforcement
1. In the event of suspension or withdrawal of the protection measure in the Member State of origin, suspension or limitation of its enforceability, or withdrawal of the certificate in accordance with point (b) of Article 9(1), the issuing authority of the Member State of origin shall, upon request by the protected person or the person causing the risk, issue a certificate indicating that suspension, limitation or withdrawal using the multilingual standard form established in accordance with Article 19.
2. Upon submission by the protected person or the person causing the risk of the certificate issued in accordance with paragraph 1, the competent authority of the Member State addressed shall suspend or withdraw the effects of the recognition and, where applicable, the enforcement of the protection measure.
CHAPTER III
GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 15
Legalisation and other similar formalities
No legalisation or other similar formality shall be required for documents issued in a Member State in the context of this Regulation.
Article 16
Transliteration or translation
1. Any transliteration or translation required under this Regulation shall be into the official language or one of the official languages of the Member State addressed or into any other official language of the institutions of the Union which that Member State has indicated it can accept.
2. Subject to Article 5(3), any translation under this Regulation shall be done by a person qualified to do translations in one of the Member States.
Article 17
Information made available to the public
The Member States shall provide, within the framework of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters established by Decision 2001/470/EC and with a view to making the information available to the public, a description of the national rules and procedures concerning protection measures in civil matters, including information on the type of authorities which are competent in the matters falling within the scope of this Regulation.
The Member States shall keep that information updated.
Article 18
Communication of information by the Member States
1. By 11 July 2014, Member States shall communicate to the Commission the following information:
(a)
the type of authorities which are competent in the matters falling within the scope of this Regulation, specifying, where applicable:
(i)
the authorities which are competent to order protection measures and issue certificates in accordance with Article 5;
(ii)
the authorities before which a protection measure ordered in another Member State is to be invoked and/or which are competent to enforce such a measure;
(iii)
the authorities which are competent to effect the adjustment of protection measures in accordance with Article 11(1);
(iv)
the courts to which the application for refusal of recognition and, where applicable, enforcement is to be submitted in accordance with Article 13;
(b)
the language or languages accepted for translations as referred to in Article 16(1).
2. The Commission shall make the information referred to in paragraph 1 available to the public through any appropriate means, in particular through the website of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters.
Article 19
Establishment and subsequent amendment of the forms
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing and subsequently amending the forms referred to in Articles 5 and 14. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 20.
Article 20
Committee procedure
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Article 21
Review
By 11 January 2020, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation. If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals for amendments.
Article 22
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 11 January 2015.
This Regulation shall apply to protection measures ordered on or after 11 January 2015, irrespective of when proceedings have been instituted.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Done at Strasbourg, 12 June 2013.


Input:
KOMMISSIONENS GENOMFÖRANDEFÖRORDNING (EU) nr 880/2014
av den 12 augusti
om ändring av genomförandeförordning (EU) nr 540/2011 vad gäller villkoren för godkännande av det verksamma ämnet Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV)
(Text av betydelse för EES)
EUROPEISKA KOMMISSIONEN HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING
med beaktande av fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt,
med beaktande av Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1107/2009 av den 21 oktober 2009 om utsläppande av växtskyddsmedel på marknaden och om upphävande av rådets direktiv 79/117/EEG och 91/414/EEG (1), särskilt artikel 13.2 c, och
av följande skäl:
(1)
Det verksamma ämnet Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV) infördes i bilaga I till rådets direktiv 91/414/EEG (2) genom kommissionens direktiv 2008/113/EG (3) i enlighet med förfarandet i artikel 24b i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 2229/2004 (4). Eftersom direktiv 91/414/EEG har ersatts av förordning (EG) nr 1107/2009 ska detta ämne anses ha blivit godkänt enligt den förordningen, och det förtecknas i del A i bilagan till kommissionens genomförandeförordning (EU) nr 540/2011 (5).
(2)
I enlighet med artikel 25a i förordning (EG) nr 2229/2004 lade Europeiska myndigheten för livsmedelssäkerhet (nedan kallad myndigheten) fram sina synpunkter på utkastet till granskningsrapport om Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV) för kommissionen den 4 april 2012 (6). Myndigheten delgav sökanden sina synpunkter på Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV). Kommissionen uppmanade sökanden att inkomma med synpunkter på utkastet till granskningsrapport. Medlemsstaterna och kommissionen granskade utkastet till granskningsrapport och myndighetens synpunkter. Utkastet till granskningsrapport färdigställdes i ständiga kommittén för växter, djur, livsmedel och foder den 11 juli 2014 i form av kommissionens granskningsrapport om Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV).
(3)
Det bekräftas att det verksamma ämnet Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV) ska anses ha blivit godkänt enligt förordning (EG) nr 1107/2009.
(4)
I enlighet med artikel 13.2 i förordning (EG) nr 1107/2009 jämförd med artikel 6 i samma förordning och mot bakgrund av aktuella vetenskapliga och tekniska rön, särskilt den nyligen offentliggjorda vägledningen om gränsvärden för mikrobiell kontaminering av mikrobiella växtskyddsmedel (7), är det nödvändigt att ändra villkoren för godkännande, särskilt det verksamma ämnets minsta renhetsgrad och vissa föroreningars beskaffenhet och maximala halt.
(5)
Genomförandeförordning (EU) nr 540/2011 bör därför ändras i enlighet med detta.
(6)
De åtgärder som föreskrivs i denna förordning är förenliga med yttrandet från ständiga kommittén för växter, djur, livsmedel och foder.
HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.
Artikel 1
Ändring av genomförandeförordning (EU) nr 540/2011
I kolumnen ”Renhetsgrad” i post 198 om ämnet Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (CpGV) i del A i bilagan till genomförandeförordning (EU) nr 540/2011 ska ”Förorenande mikroorganismer (Bacillus cereus): 1 × 106 CFU/g” ersättas med ”Lägsta koncentration: 1 × 1013 OB/l (ocklusionskroppar/l), Förorenande mikroorganismer (Bacillus cereus) i beredningen: 1 × 107 CFU/g”.
Artikel 2
Ikraftträdande
Denna förordning träder i kraft den tjugonde dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska unionens officiella tidning.
Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater.
Utfärdad i Bryssel den 12 augusti 2014.


Input:
РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2015/588 НА КОМИСИЯТА
от 14 април 2015 година
за изменение на Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 470/2014 за налагане на окончателно антидъмпингово мито и окончателно събиране на временното мито, наложено върху вноса на слънцезащитно стъкло с произход от Китайската народна република
ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) № 1225/2009 на Съвета от 30 ноември 2009 г. за защита срещу дъмпингов внос от страни, които не са членки на Европейската общност (1), и по-специално член 9, параграф 4 и член 14, параграф 1 от него,
като има предвид, че:
(1)
На 13 май 2014 г. Комисията прие Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 470/2014 („Регламент за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита“) (2), и Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 471/2014 (3) („Регламент за налагане на окончателни изравнителни мита“).
(2)
Съгласно Регламента за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита дъмпинговият марж за оказалите съдействие дружества, невключени в извадката, бе определен на 84,7 % (4). Приложимото за тези дружества равнище на отстраняване на вредата бе определено на 36,5 % (5).
(3)
Три от тези дружества не оказаха съдействие в паралелното антисубсидийно разследване и поради тази причина ставката на окончателното антисубсидийно мито за тези дружества бе определена на 17,1 % (6). Засегнатите дружества са:
-
Henan Ancai Hi-Tech Co., Ltd.;
-
Henan Succeed Photovoltaic Materials Corporation; и
-
Zibo Jinxing Glass Co. Ltd.
(4)
Съгласно съображение 167 от Регламента за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита в паралелни разследвания, при които маржовете на субсидията са по-ниски от равнището на отстраняване на вредата, окончателното антисубсидийно мито следва да бъде наложено на равнището на установените маржове на субсидията и окончателното антидъмпингово мито следва да бъде наложено до съответното равнище на отстраняване на вредата.
(5)
Въз основа на това за трите дружества, оказали съдействие в антидъмпинговото разследване, но не и в паралелното антисубсидийно разследване, ставката, на която следва да бъдат наложени антидъмпинговите и антисубсидийните мита, следва да бъде определена, както следва:
Дружество
Марж на субсидията
Дъмпингов марж
Равнище на отстраняване на вредата
Изравнително (антисубсидийно) мито
Антидъмпингово мито
Други дружества, оказали съдействие в антидъмпинговото разследване, но не и в паралелното антисубсидийно разследване
17,1 %
84,7 %
36,5 %
17,1 %
19,4 %
(6)
От това следва, че съображение 167 от Регламента за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита следва също да съдържа информацията за трите дружества, посочена в предходното съображение.
(7)
От това следва също така, че член 1, параграф 2 от Регламента за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита следва да бъде съответно изменен.
(8)
Ако сумата на платените или взетите под отчет мита в съответствие с член 1, параграф 2 от Регламента за налагане на окончателни антидъмпингови мита надвишава дължимите мита съгласно настоящия регламент, съответната сума следва да бъде възстановена или опростена. Същото правило се прилага по отношение на временните мита, събрани окончателно съгласно член 2 от същия регламент.
(9)
Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на комитета, създаден съгласно член 15, параграф 1 от Регламент (ЕО) № 1225/2009,
ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
Член 1
Таблицата в член 1, параграф 2 от Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 470/2014 се заменя със следната таблица:
„Дружество
Антидъмпингово мито
Допълнителен код по ТАРИК
Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd
36,1 %
B943
Zhejiang Hehe Photovoltaic Glass Technology Co., Ltd
9,1 %
B944
Zhejiang Jiafu Glass Co., Ltd; Flat Solar Glass Group Co., Ltd; Shanghai Flat Glass Co., Ltd
29,3 %
B945
Henan Yuhua New Material Co., Ltd
0,4 %
B946
Други оказали съдействие дружества, изброени в приложение I, но неизброени в приложение I към Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 471/2014 на Комисията (7)
19,4 %
Други оказали съдействие дружества, изброени в приложение I
24,1 %
Всички други дружества
25,0 %
B999
Член 2
1. Сумата на платените или взетите под отчет мита съгласно член 1 или член 2 от Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) № 470/2014, която надвишава митата, установени в съответствие с член 1 от настоящия регламент, се възстановява или опрощава.
2. Искането за възстановяване или опрощаване се отправя към националните митнически органи в съответствие с приложимото митническо законодателство в рамките на срока, предвиден в член 236, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕИО) № 2913/92 на Съвета (8).
Член 3
Настоящият регламент влиза в сила в деня след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
Той се прилага с обратна сила от 15 май 2014 г.
Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
Съставено в Брюксел на 14 април 2015 година.


Input:
DECISÃO DO CONSELHO
de 11 de fevereiro de 2014
respeitante à assinatura, em nome da União, e à aplicação provisória do Acordo entre a União Europeia e o Reino da Noruega sobre as modalidades da sua participação no Gabinete Europeu de Apoio em matéria de Asilo
(2014/204/UE)
O CONSELHO DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA,
Tendo em conta o Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia, nomeadamente o artigo 74.o e o artigo 78.o, n.os 1 e 2, em conjugação com o artigo 218.o, n.o 5,
Tendo em conta a proposta da Comissão Europeia,
Considerando o seguinte:
(1)
O Regulamento (UE) n.o 439/2010 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho (1) prevê que o Gabinete Europeu de Apoio em matéria de Asilo está aberto à participação da Islândia, do Listenstaine, da Noruega e da Suíça, na qualidade de observadores. Além disso, o referido regulamento prevê que devem ser acordadas modalidades que especifiquem nomeadamente a natureza, o âmbito e as formas da participação desses países nos trabalhos do Gabinete Europeu de Apoio em matéria de Asilo.
(2)
Em 27 de janeiro de 2012, o Conselho autorizou a Comissão a iniciar negociações entre a União Europeia e o Reino da Noruega relativamente a um acordo sobre as modalidades da sua participação no Gabinete Europeu de Apoio em matéria de Asilo («Acordo»). Essas negociações foram concluídas com êxito, tendo o Acordo sido rubricado em 28 de junho de 2013.
(3)
O Acordo deverá ser assinado e deverá ser aplicado a título provisório enquanto se aguardar a conclusão das formalidades necessárias à sua celebração.
(4)
Tal como especificado no considerando 21 do Regulamento (UE) n.o 439/2010, o Reino Unido e a Irlanda participam nesse regulamento e estão a ele vinculados. Deverão, portanto, dar execução ao artigo 49.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento (UE) n.o 439/2010, participando na presente decisão. O Reino Unido e a Irlanda participam, pois, na presente decisão.
(5)
Tal como especificado no considerando 22 do Regulamento (UE) n.o 439/2010, a Dinamarca não participa nesse regulamento e não está a ele vinculada. A Dinamarca não participa, pois, na presente decisão,
ADOTOU A PRESENTE DECISÃO:
Artigo 1.o
É autorizada a assinatura, em nome da União, do Acordo entre a União Europeia e o Reino da Noruega sobre as modalidades da sua participação no Gabinete Europeu de Apoio em matéria de Asilo, sob reserva da celebração do referido Acordo.
O texto do Acordo acompanha a presente decisão.
Artigo 2.o
O Presidente do Conselho fica autorizado a designar a(s) pessoa(s) com poderes para assinar o Acordo em nome da União.
Artigo 3.o
Enquanto se aguardar a conclusão das formalidades necessárias à sua celebração, o Acordo é aplicado a título provisório, nos termos do seu artigo 13.o, n.o 3 (2).
Artigo 4.o
A presente decisão entra em vigor na data da sua adoção.
Feito em Bruxelas, em 11 de fevereiro de 2014.


Input:
REGLAMENTO DE EJECUCIÓN (UE) N o 103/2014 DE LA COMISIÓN
de 4 de febrero de 2014
por el que se establecen valores de importación a tanto alzado para la determinación del precio de entrada de determinadas frutas y hortalizas
LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA,
Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea,
Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 del Consejo, de 22 de octubre de 2007, por el que se crea una organización común de mercados agrícolas y se establecen disposiciones específicas para determinados productos agrícolas (Reglamento único para las OCM) (1),
Visto el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) no 543/2011 de la Comisión, de 7 de junio de 2011, por el que se establecen disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 del Consejo en los sectores de las frutas y hortalizas y de las frutas y hortalizas transformadas (2), y, en particular, su artículo 136, apartado 1,
Considerando lo siguiente:
(1)
El Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) no 543/2011 establece, en aplicación de los resultados de las negociaciones comerciales multilaterales de la Ronda Uruguay, los criterios para que la Comisión fije los valores de importación a tanto alzado de terceros países correspondientes a los productos y períodos que figuran en el anexo XVI, parte A, de dicho Reglamento.
(2)
De acuerdo con el artículo 136, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) no 543/2011, el valor de importación a tanto alzado se calcula cada día hábil teniendo en cuenta datos que varían diariamente. Por lo tanto, el presente Reglamento debe entrar en vigor el día de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:
Artículo 1
En el anexo del presente Reglamento quedan fijados los valores de importación a tanto alzado a que se refiere el artículo 136 del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) no 543/2011.
Artículo 2
El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.
Hecho en Bruselas, el 4 de febrero de 2014.


Input:
REGLAMENTO DE EJECUCIÓN (UE) No 784/2013 DE LA COMISIÓN
de 14 de agosto de 2013
por el que se fijan los derechos de importación aplicables en el sector de los cereales a partir del 16 de agosto de 2013
LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA,
Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea,
Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 del Consejo, de 22 de octubre de 2007, por el que se crea una organización común de mercados agrícolas y se establecen disposiciones específicas para determinados productos agrícolas (Reglamento único para las OCM) (1),
Visto el Reglamento (UE) no 642/2010 de la Comisión, de 20 de julio de 2010, por el que se establecen disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 del Consejo en lo que concierne a los derechos de importación en el sector de los cereales (2), y, en particular, su artículo 2, apartado 1,
Considerando lo siguiente:
(1)
El artículo 136, apartado 1, del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 establece que el derecho de importación de los productos de los códigos NC 1001 19 00, 1001 11 00, ex 1001 91 20 (trigo blando para siembra), ex 1001 99 00 (trigo blando de calidad alta, excepto para siembra), 1002 10 00, 1002 90 00, 1005 10 90, 1005 90 00, 1007 10 90 y 1007 90 00, es igual al precio de intervención válido para la importación de tales productos, incrementado un 55 % y deducido el precio de importación cif aplicable a la remesa de que se trate. No obstante, ese derecho no puede sobrepasar los tipos de los derechos de importación del arancel aduanero común.
(2)
El artículo 136, apartado 2, del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 establece que, a efectos del cálculo del derecho de importación a que se refiere el apartado 1 de ese mismo artículo, deben establecerse periódicamente precios de importación cif representativos de los productos considerados.
(3)
Según lo dispuesto en el artículo 2, apartado 2, del Reglamento (UE) no 642/2010, el precio que debe utilizarse para calcular el derecho de importación de los productos de los códigos NC 1001 19 00, 1001 11 00, ex 1001 91 20 (trigo blando para siembra), ex 1001 99 00 (trigo blando de calidad alta, excepto para siembra), 1002 10 00, 1002 90 00, 1005 10 90, 1005 90 00, 1007 10 90 y 1007 90 00 es el precio representativo de importación cif diario, determinado con arreglo al método previsto en el artículo 5 de dicho Reglamento.
(4)
Resulta necesario fijar los derechos de importación para el período que comienza el 16 de agosto de 2013, que serán aplicables hasta que entren en vigor nuevos derechos.
(5)
Debido a la necesidad de garantizar que esta medida se aplica lo más rápidamente posible una vez disponibles los datos actualizados, conviene que el presente Reglamento entre en vigor el día de su publicación.
HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:
Artículo 1
A partir del 16 de agosto de 2013, los derechos de importación mencionados en el artículo 136, apartado 1, del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 aplicables en el sector de los cereales, serán los fijados en el anexo I del presente Reglamento sobre la base de los datos que figuran en el anexo II.
Artículo 2
El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.
Hecho en Bruselas, el 14 de agosto de 2013.


Input:
KOMMISSIONENS GENOMFÖRANDEFÖRORDNING (EU) nr 964/2014
av den 11 september 2014
om tillämpningsföreskrifter för Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 vad gäller standardvillkor för finansieringsinstrument
EUROPEISKA KOMMISSIONEN HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING
med beaktande av fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt,
med beaktande av Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 av den 17 december 2013 om fastställande av gemensamma bestämmelser för Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden, Europeiska socialfonden, Sammanhållningsfonden, Europeiska jordbruksfonden för landsbygdsutveckling och Europeiska havs- och fiskerifonden, om fastställande av allmänna bestämmelser för Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden, Europeiska socialfonden, Sammanhållningsfonden och Europeiska havs- och fiskerifonden samt om upphävande av rådets förordning (EG) nr 1083/2006 (1), särskilt artikel 38.3 andra stycket, och
av följande skäl:
(1)
För att underlätta användningen av de finansieringsinstrument som inrättats på nationell, regional, transnationell eller gränsöverskridande nivå och som förvaltas av den förvaltande myndigheten eller på dess ansvar i enlighet med artikel 38.3 a i förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 bör det fastställas regler avseende standardvillkor för vissa finansieringsinstrument. Sådana standardvillkor skulle göra dessa instrument färdiga att användas - så kallade standardiserade finansieringsinstrument.
(2)
För att underlätta användningen av finansieringsinstrumenten måste standardvillkoren säkerställa att reglerna för statligt stöd följs och underlätta tillhandahållandet av ekonomiskt stöd från unionen till slutmottagarna genom en kombination av finansieringsinstrument och bidragsstöd.
(3)
Standardvillkoren får inte tillåta att en finansiell leverantör, till exempel en offentlig eller privat investerare eller långivare, en förvaltare av finansieringsinstrumentet eller en slutmottagare tar emot något slags statligt stöd som är oförenligt med den inre marknaden. Standardvillkoren bör beakta de relevanta förordningarna om stöd av mindre betydelse, exempelvis kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 1407/2013 (2) och kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 1408/2013 (3), kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 651/2014 (4), kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 702/2014 (5), riktlinjerna för statligt stöd för att främja riskfinansieringsinvesteringar (6) och riktlinjerna för statligt stöd inom jordbruks- och skogsbrukssektorn och i landsbygdsområden 2014-2020 (7).
(4)
Med tanke på att reglerna för statligt stöd inte gäller för sådana jordbruksverksamheter som stöds genom Europeiska jordbruksfonden för landsbygdsutveckling bör det för dessa verksamheter vara frivilligt att följa standardvillkoren. För andra verksamheter som får stöd från samma fond gäller de allmänna reglerna för statligt stöd och standardvillkoren bör därför vara obligatoriska.
(5)
Det är möjligt att företag inom fiskerisektorn, i synnerhet små och medelstora företag, kan dra nytta av de finansieringsinstrument som finansieras av en europeisk struktur- och investeringsfond. När en sådan förmån finansieras av en annan europeisk struktur- och investeringsfond än Europeiska havs- och fiskerifonden bör det sammanlagda stödbelopp som beviljas genom finansieringsinstrumenten till samtliga företag inom fiskeri- och vattenbrukssektorn under tre år underskrida gränsen för den årliga fiskeri-, vattenbruks- och beredningsomsättningen per medlemsstat som anges i kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 717/2014 (8). Dessutom bör hänsyn tas till kommissionens förordning (EU) nr 702/2014 (9) och till riktlinjerna för granskning av statligt stöd inom sektorn för fiske- och vattenbruk (10).
(6)
Standardvillkoren bör också inbegripa en minimiuppsättning krav på styrning för att säkerställa att finansieringsinstrumenten förvaltas korrekt, i syfte att tillhandahålla mer utförliga regler än de i förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013.
(7)
För att stödja de små och medelstora företagens tillväxt i en problematisk finansieringsmiljö är en portfölj med riskdelningslån ett lämpligt finansieringsinstrument. Riskdelningslånet utgör en möjlighet för små och medelstora företag att få nya lån med enklare tillgång till finansiering, genom att finansiella intermediärer får finansieringsbidrag och kreditrisken delas upp. Därigenom erhåller de små och medelstora företagen mer pengar till förmånliga villkor i form av lägre ränta och/eller lägre säkerheter.
(8)
Finansiering genom riskdelningslån kan vara ett särskilt effektivt sätt att stödja små och medelstora företag i situationer med begränsad tillgång till finansiering eller när riskaptiten hos de finansiella intermediärerna för vissa sektorer eller typer av små och medelstora företag är relativt låg. I detta sammanhang är standardvillkoren ett effektivt sätt att ta itu med detta marknadsmisslyckande.
(9)
För att uppmuntra finansiella intermediärer att öka utlåningen till små och medelstora företag som omfattas av unionsfinansierade garantier är en portfölj med begränsad garanti ett lämpligt finansieringsinstrument.
(10)
Portföljen med begränsad garanti bör ta itu med de befintliga klyftorna på skuldmarknaden för små och medelstora företag genom att stödja nya lån, dvs. genom att tillhandahålla skydd mot kreditrisker (i form av en portfölj med begränsad garanti för första förlustläge), med målet att minska de särskilda svårigheter som små och medelstora företag ställs inför när det gäller att få tillgång till finansiering på grund av bristen på tillräckliga säkerheter i kombination med den relativt höga kreditrisk som de står för. För att uppnå den förväntade effekten får dock inte unionens bidrag till portföljen med begränsad garanti ersätta de likvärdiga garantier som erhålls av respektive finansinstitut för samma ändamål inom ramen för redan befintliga finansieringsinstrument på unionsnivå, nationell nivå eller regional nivå. I detta sammanhang är standardvillkoren ett effektivt sätt att ta itu med detta marknadsmisslyckande.
(11)
För att uppmuntra tillvaratagandet av den energibesparingspotential som uppstår när man renoverar bostadshus är ett renoveringslån ett lämpligt finansieringsinstrument.
(12)
Renoveringslånet bör rikta in sig på långsiktiga subventionerade lånevillkor och direkt tekniskt stöd och direkt finansiering som ägare av bostadshus kan använda sig av för att förbereda och genomföra renoveringsprojekt. Det beviljas på en finansieringsmarknad där bankerna i grund och botten utgör den enda finansieringskällan, men där denna finansiering antingen är för låg (på grund av intermediärens riskaptit), för kortsiktig, för dyr eller på annat sätt olämplig för den långsiktiga avkastningen på de projekt som finansieras. Detta utgör, tillsammans med ett ineffektivt system för identifiering och upphandling av byggentreprenader på uppdrag av ägare av flerbostadshus, utan att utesluta möjligheten att stödja privatpersoner, ett marknadsmisslyckande. I detta sammanhang är standardvillkoren ett effektivt sätt att ta itu med detta marknadsmisslyckande.
(13)
De åtgärder som föreskrivs i denna förordning är förenliga med yttrandet från samordningskommittén för de europeiska struktur- och investeringsfonderna.
HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.
Artikel 1
Syfte
Genom denna förordning fastställs regler gällande standardvillkoren för följande finansieringsinstrument:
a)
En portfölj med riskdelningslån.
b)
En portfölj med begränsad garanti.
c)
Ett renoveringslån.
Artikel 2
Ytterligare villkor
Förvaltande myndigheter får inkludera andra villkor utöver de som ingår i finansieringsavtalet i enlighet med de villkor för det valda finansieringsinstrumentet som anges i denna förordning.
Artikel 3
Efterlevnad av reglerna för statligt stöd enligt standardvillkoren
1. Om finansieringsinstrument kombineras med bidrag för tekniskt stöd till slutmottagare som omfattas av något av instrumenten, får sådana bidrag inte överskrida 5 % av de europeiska struktur- och investeringsfondernas bidrag till instrumentet, och de ska överensstämma med slutsatserna i den förhandsbedömning som motiverar sådana bidrag, vilken avses i artikel 37 i förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013.
2. Det organ som genomför finansieringsinstrumentet (nedan kallad den finansiella intermediären) ska förvalta bidraget för tekniskt stöd. Det tekniska stödet får inte omfatta sådana verksamheter som täcks av de förvaltningskostnader och -avgifter som erhålls för förvaltningen av finansieringsinstrumentet. De utgifter som omfattas av det tekniska stödet får inte utgöra en del av den investering som ska finansieras genom lånet enligt det berörda finansieringsinstrumentet.
Artikel 4
Styrning enligt standardvillkoren
1. Den förvaltande myndigheten eller, i förekommande fall, förvaltaren av fondandelsfonden ska finnas representerad i tillsynskommittén eller i en liknande typ av styrningsstruktur för finansieringsinstrumentet.
2. Den förvaltande myndigheten får inte delta direkt i några enskilda investeringsbeslut. När det rör sig om fondandelsfonder ska den förvaltande myndigheten utöva sin tillsynsfunktion i fråga om fondandelsfonden utan att påverka fondandelsfondens enskilda beslut.
3. Finansieringsinstrumentet ska ha en styrningsstruktur som gör det möjligt att fatta öppna beslut om kredit- och riskdiversifiering i linje med relevant marknadspraxis.
4. Förvaltaren av fondandelsfonden och den finansiella intermediären ska ha en styrningsstruktur som säkerställer deras opartiskhet och oberoende.
Artikel 5
Finansieringsavtal enligt standardvillkoren
1. Den förvaltande myndigheten ska skriftligen teckna ett finansieringsavtal för programmens bidrag till finansieringsinstrumentet, vilket ska innehålla standardvillkoren i enlighet med bilaga I.
2. Till finansieringsavtalet ska följande bifogas:
a)
Den förhandsbedömning som krävs enligt artikel 37 i förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 och som motiverar finansieringsinstrumentet.
b)
En verksamhetsplan för finansieringsinstrumentet, inbegripet investeringsstrategin och en beskrivning av investerings-, garanti- eller utlåningspolicyn.
c)
En beskrivning av instrumentet som ska vara anpassad till de detaljerade standardvillkoren för instrumentet och som ska fastställa de finansiella parametrarna för finansieringsinstrumenten.
d)
Övervaknings- och rapporteringsmallarna.
Artikel 6
Riskdelningslån
1. Riskdelningslånet ska utgöras av en lånefond som ska inrättas av en finansiell intermediär med bidrag från programmet och ett bidrag på minst 25 % av lånefonden från den finansiella intermediären. Lånefonden ska finansiera en portfölj med nyutfärdade lån, men får dock inte användas för återfinansiering av befintliga lån.
2. Riskdelningslånet ska uppfylla de villkor som anges i bilaga II.
Artikel 7
Portfölj med begränsad garanti
1. Portföljen med begränsad garanti ska tillhandahålla en kreditrisktäckning för varje enskilt lån upp till en garantisats på högst 80 %, för inrättandet av en portfölj med nya lån till små och medelstora företag upp till ett högsta förlustbelopp som fastställs av den högsta garantisatsen, vilken inte får överskrida 25 % av portföljens riskexponering.
2. Portföljen med begränsad garanti ska uppfylla de villkor som anges i bilaga III.
Artikel 8
Renoveringslån
1. Renoveringslånet ska utgöras av en lånefond som ska inrättas av en finansiell intermediär med bidrag från programmet och ett bidrag på minst 15 % av lånefonden från den finansiella intermediären. Lånefonden ska finansiera en portfölj med nyutfärdade lån, men får dock inte användas för återfinansiering av befintliga lån.
2. Slutmottagarna kan vara fysiska eller juridiska personer eller oberoende yrkesutövare som äger lokaler, liksom förvaltare eller andra juridiska enheter som agerar på uppdrag av och till förmån för ägare, som genomför energieffektivitetsåtgärder eller åtgärder beträffande förnybar energi som är stödberättigade enligt förordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 och har rätt till programstöd.
3. Renoveringslånet ska uppfylla de villkor som anges i bilaga IV.
Artikel 9
Denna förordning träder i kraft den tjugonde dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska unionens officiella tidning.
Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater.
Utfärdad i Bryssel den 11 september 2014.


Input:
RÈGLEMENT D'EXÉCUTION (UE) No 1033/2014 DE LA COMMISSION
du 29 septembre 2014
fixant les prix représentatifs et les montants des droits additionnels à l'importation des mélasses dans le secteur du sucre applicables à partir du 1er octobre 2014
LA COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE,
vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne,
vu le règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 17 décembre 2013 portant organisation commune des marchés des produits agricoles et abrogeant les règlements (CEE) no 922/72, (CEE) no 234/79, (CE) no 1037/2001 et (CE) no 1234/2007 du Conseil (1), et notamment son article 183,
considérant ce qui suit:
(1)
Le règlement (CE) no 951/2006 de la Commission (2) prévoit que le prix caf à l'importation de mélasses pour la qualité type définie à l'article 27 dudit règlement est considéré comme le «prix représentatif».
(2)
Pour la fixation des prix représentatifs, il doit être tenu compte de toutes les informations prévues à l'article 29 du règlement (CE) no 951/2006, sauf dans les cas prévus à l'article 30 dudit règlement et, le cas échéant, cette fixation peut être effectuée selon la méthode prévue à l'article 33 dudit règlement.
(3)
Pour l'ajustement de prix ne portant pas sur la qualité type, il y a lieu, selon la qualité de la mélasse offerte, d'augmenter ou de diminuer les prix en application de l'article 32 du règlement (CE) no 951/2006.
(4)
Lorsqu'il existe une différence entre le prix de déclenchement pour le produit en cause et le prix représentatif, il y a lieu de fixer des droits additionnels à l'importation dans les conditions visées à l'article 39 du règlement (CE) no 951/2006. En cas de suspension des droits à l'importation en application de l'article 40 dudit règlement, il y a lieu de fixer des montants particuliers pour ces droits.
(5)
Il y a lieu de fixer les prix représentatifs et les droits additionnels à l'importation des mélasses relevant des codes NC 1703 10 00 et 1703 90 00, conformément à l'article 34 du règlement (CE) no 951/2006.
(6)
En raison de la nécessité d'assurer que cette mesure s'applique le plus rapidement possible après la mise à disposition des données actualisées, il convient que le présent règlement entre en vigueur le jour de sa publication,
A ADOPTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT:
Article premier
Les prix représentatifs et les droits additionnels applicables à l'importation des mélasses relevant des codes NC 1703 10 00 et 1703 90 00 sont fixés à l'annexe du présent règlement.
Article 2
Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le jour de sa publication au Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.
Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre.
Fait à Bruxelles, le 29 septembre 2014.


Input:
ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΊΟΥ
της 11ης Μαρτίου 2014
για τη θέση που πρέπει να υιοθετηθεί εξ ονόματος της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης στο πλαίσιο της μεικτής επιτροπής γεωργίας που συστάθηκε με τη συμφωνία μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας και της Ελβετικής Συνομοσπονδίας σχετικά με τις συναλλαγές γεωργικών προϊόντων, όσον αφορά την τροποποίηση της απόφασης αριθ. 2/2003 της εν λόγω επιτροπής
(2014/143/ΕΕ)
ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ,
Έχοντας υπόψη τη Συνθήκη για τη λειτουργία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, και ιδίως το άρθρο 207 παράγραφος 4 σε συνδυασμό με το άρθρο 218 παράγραφος 9,
Έχοντας υπόψη την πρόταση της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής,
Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
(1)
Η συμφωνία μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας και της Ελβετικής Συνομοσπονδίας σχετικά με τις συναλλαγές γεωργικών προϊόντων (1) (εφεξής «η συμφωνία») τέθηκε σε ισχύ την 1η Ιουνίου 2002.
(2)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 6 της συμφωνίας συγκροτείται μεικτή επιτροπή γεωργίας (εφεξής «η επιτροπή»), επιφορτισμένη με τη διαχείριση της συμφωνίας και τη μέριμνα της ορθής λειτουργίας της.
(3)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 6 παράγραφος 4 της συμφωνίας, η επιτροπή θέσπισε, με την απόφαση αριθ. 1/2003,τον εσωτερικό κανονισμό της (2).
(4)
Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 6 παράγραφος 7 της συμφωνίας ιδρύθηκαν αρκετές ομάδες εργασίας για να διαχειρισθούν τα παραρτήματα της συμφωνίας, μεταξύ των οποίων η ομάδα εργασίας για την προστασία ονομασιών προέλευσης (ΠΟΠ) και για την προστασία γεωγραφικών ενδείξεων (ΠΓΕ), και εγκρίθηκαν οι εντολές τους με την απόφαση 2/2003/ της επιτροπής (3). Σύμφωνα με το παράρτημα της απόφασης αυτής, η ομάδα εργασίας «ΠΟΠ και ΠΓΕ» θα διερευνήσει την αμοιβαία προστασία των ΠΟΠ και των ΠΓΕ.
(5)
Το 2011, η Ένωση και η Ελβετία συνήψαν συμφωνία σχετικά με την προστασία των ονομασιών προέλευσης και των γεωγραφικών ενδείξεων (4) με την οποία τροποποιήθηκε η συμφωνία, στην οποία προστέθηκε ένα νέο παράρτημα 12 σχετικά με την προστασία των ονομασιών προέλευσης και των γεωγραφικών ενδείξεων των γεωργικών προϊόντων και των τροφίμων.
(6)
Η ομάδα εργασίας «ΠΟΠ και ΠΓΕ» συνεδρίασε για να εξετάσει συγκεκριμένα την τροποποίηση της απόφασης αριθ. 2/2003, όσον αφορά την εντολή της, προκειμένου να ληφθεί υπόψη η τροποποίηση της συμφωνίας.
(7)
Πρέπει να καθορισθεί η θέση που θα ληφθεί εξ ονόματος της Ένωσης όσον αφορά την τροποποίηση της απόφασης αριθ. 2/2003.
(8)
Η θέση της Ένωσης στην επιτροπή θα πρέπει συνεπώς να βασισθεί στο επισυναπτόμενο σχέδιο απόφασης,
ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ:
Άρθρο 1
Η θέση που θα ληφθεί εξ ονόματος της Ένωσης στο πλαίσιο της μεικτής επιτροπής γεωργίας βασίζεται στο σχέδιο απόφασης της μεικτής επιτροπής γεωργίας το οποίο επισυνάπτεται στην παρούσα απόφαση.
Οι εκπρόσωποι της Ένωσης στη μεικτή επιτροπή γεωργίας μπορούν να συμφωνήσουν τεχνικές αλλαγές στο σχέδιο απόφασης χωρίς περαιτέρω απόφαση του Συμβουλίου.
Άρθρο 2
Η απόφαση της επιτροπής δημοσιεύεται στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
Άρθρο 3
Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει την ημερομηνία της δημοσίευσής της στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
Βρυξέλλες, 11 Μαρτίου 2014.