Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -23,3 +23,55 @@ configs:
|
|
23 |
- split: train
|
24 |
path: data/train-*
|
25 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
- split: train
|
24 |
path: data/train-*
|
25 |
---
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
# Finance Fundamentals: Program Synthesis
|
28 |
+
|
29 |
+
This dataset contains 246 quantative reasoning financial math word problems, using data sourced from:
|
30 |
+
- [TatQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07624)
|
31 |
+
- [ConvFinQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03849)
|
32 |
+
|
33 |
+
Each question is annotated with both a numeric target solution, along with a python program containing the explicit steps to reach that solution. For more information, see the [BizBench paper.](https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452.pdf)
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
## Example
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
+
```
|
38 |
+
The market price of K-T-Lew Corporation's common stock is $60 per share, and each share gives its owner one subscription right. Four rights are required to purchase an additional share of common stock at the subscription price of $54 per share. If the common stock is currently selling rights-on, what is the theoretical value of a right? Answer to the nearest cent.
|
39 |
+
```
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
```
|
42 |
+
stock_price = 60.0
|
43 |
+
rights_sub_price_per_share = 54.0
|
44 |
+
rights_per_share = 4
|
45 |
+
value = (stock_price - rights_sub_price_per_share) / (rights_per_share + 1)
|
46 |
+
round(value, 2)
|
47 |
+
```
|
48 |
+
|
49 |
+
```
|
50 |
+
1.2
|
51 |
+
```
|
52 |
+
|
53 |
+
## Citation
|
54 |
+
If you find this data useful, please cite:
|
55 |
+
```
|
56 |
+
@inproceedings{krumdick-etal-2024-bizbench,
|
57 |
+
title = "{B}iz{B}ench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance",
|
58 |
+
author = "Krumdick, Michael and
|
59 |
+
Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik and
|
60 |
+
Lai, Viet Dac and
|
61 |
+
Reddy, Varshini and
|
62 |
+
Lovering, Charles and
|
63 |
+
Tanner, Chris",
|
64 |
+
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
|
65 |
+
Martins, Andre and
|
66 |
+
Srikumar, Vivek",
|
67 |
+
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
|
68 |
+
month = aug,
|
69 |
+
year = "2024",
|
70 |
+
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
|
71 |
+
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
72 |
+
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452/",
|
73 |
+
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.452",
|
74 |
+
pages = "8309--8332",
|
75 |
+
abstract = "Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model{'}s financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain."
|
76 |
+
}
|
77 |
+
```
|