>

OK, I apprciate your analogy, but it's not a question of logic, but your underlying assumptions. Your premise is that humans are just like lions. So be it! Then let's not even have a society then, let's not have laws, let's not have equality between the sexes.....I'm a let someone else take over, because my palm has now completely covered my face, and I have nothing further to say.
Is being murdered by an ex-partner considered sexist? If so, what exactly makes it sexism? 
(Genuine question, I’m not saying this is okay, just asking which part makes it sexism) >

Yes, iirc under newer spanish law, violence against women by former or current romantic partners is considered a sexist crime (if attacker is a man, that is) >

Yeah I’m just trying to learn why that is considered a sexist crime. I would just consider a violent revenge / psychopathic crime. What in particular makes it into a sexist crime? Just if it’s a man attacking a woman? >

Gender-based violence occurs usually when the man believes the woman has done something that a woman, precisely, is not supposed to do, based on his beliefs about how women, precisely, should behave. Hence sexist. >

What if the roles are reversed? Is the women sexist? 
Also just trying to grasp this. >

Well, that sounds similar to when people ask about 'reverse racism'.  To say that gender is socially constructed (and go ahead and shoot me down for being 'woke', but Simone de Beauvoir came up with this many decades ago....), just like that racism is 'systemic' means it's built into our societal values, and also built in to the way behaviors/actions such as domestic violence/murder are punished (or not - see Russia or conservative Islamic societies).  So that doesn' t mean roles can' t be reversed, it just means that most of the time, for reasons pertaining to these values and the fact that the majority of people adhere to them unconsciously, the roles are not reversed.  Femicide is a thing because in the vast majority of cases it is women being murdered by their partner/ex-partner, not men.  And this is the case because this thing called sexism exists, where one sex is being opressed by the other thanks to a complex and historically robust system of values (beliefs/accepted behaviors).  That doesn't exclude nor is it contradicted by the fact that there may be cases where women kill men!  Does this help at all? >

' Femicide is a thing because in the vast majority of cases it is women being murdered by their partner/ex-partner, not men. And this is the case because this thing called sexism exists, where one sex is being opressed by the other thanks to a complex and historically robust system of values (beliefs/accepted behaviors). That doesn't exclude nor is it contradicted by the fact that there may be cases where women kill men! Does this help at all?' 
​
If ' a complex and historically robust system of values (beliefs/accepted behaviors' caused women to be hurt more , then that means that it would be logical for us to not see that through the entirety of human history , but we do, because you ARE WRONG .Stop with this nonsense. Enough is enough , please. In any physical conflict between a man and a woman , a woman is more likely to die because of physical factors. It was always like this and it will always be like this. It's a biological reality that has created this problem. Sexism has nothing to do with it. Unless you want to categorize the entirety of the human and animal experience as sexist. Through the entirety of human history women could and would be victimised unless protected by a man , or a group of men. A town is sacked and the men are dead then the women are raped and enslaved. A lion kills a rival and takes the females as his and then they either accept it or are killed too. Are lions sexist ? Try and be logical with your arguments or as demonstrated they will be easy to expose as inaccurate.