>

She may have simply forgotten to remove the live rounds after target shooting with other crew the night before. People forget their own children in cars at times, with disastrous consequences. It's not inconceivable that she forgot to switch them out.
Friendly reminder to NOT speak to police without a lawyer present.
Ever. >

Or, ya know, go on national television and blab about it. >

The trick is that once you get the lawyer involved, they will tell you to shut up, your job is just to listen to their advice. >

But what if I'm my own lawyer because the internets told me I can declare my house free and independent so I can declare the trial illegal and invalid? >

That might work, is there a gold fringe on your flag? If so something something admiralty court something something freeman on the land. >

This guy somethings >

He somethings well. >

Here is my question, are all 5 producers being charged or just Alec Baldwin? Because if they don't charge all of them, he's going to get off by passing blame to one of the other producers. >

Yeah this is the part I have a hard time following.  I've seen it suggested that his negligence / culpability is not as an actor rehearsing the scene, but rather as a producer because gun safety on the set wasn't handled properly.  But if that's the case, why aren't the other producers being charged too? >

My understanding from the time of the shooting was that Baldwin specifically was asked by crew members about increasing gun safety on set (which included the armorer herself asking to receive more training when it comes to guns or for someone more experienced to be hired to handle them) and he ignored it.  However I don't have a recent source and would prefer to state this as old info and say it would be best if everyone just waits to learn about the decision making and evidence found that will likely be released soon. >

From everything that has been published, it seems like the armorer actually should take  more of the blame. Live rounds should never have been on the set. Baldwin, needs to take some of the blame, due to his mismanagement of the movie set. Like every accident, there is usually multiple points of failure. I am do not know how you can break it down legally, but the armorer should take 60% of the blame, the director not checking the weapon or calling over the armorer over to check the weapon and Baldwin for mismanagement of the movie set. No one in this chain of events should get off without any repercussions. >

Film dummy rounds are designed to be easily identifiable, both visually and because they have a ball bearing inside them in place of a powder charge. You shake the round and it rattles, before you put it into the firearm.
It’s inconceivable to me that the armorer failed at her job so badly that she put a live round into that firearm. Something else is going on here.