>


Sir Mark said the force had not "applied the same level of ruthlessness" to upholding its integrity as it applied to fighting crime. 

That’s all everyone’s wanted, the same levels of accountability as the public. The same rules, same scrutiny, same consequences, same everything. Why do we rely on the publics iPhones to record police interactions with the police rather than body cameras? Why is it a crime to lie to the FBI, yet no consequences for Police?
I've never met police that say that >

Doctor who cared for children, ate them
The capitalization of who gives this an entirely different context that invariably comes up when headline writers use who after doctor. >

These are what we call scapegoats >

This is how the police force do layoffs >

The rest of them will get off scot-free.