>

A grand jury is examining evidence in the case.    That's a real thing that's happening.
The company that publishes the Enquirer admitted in late 2018 that it helped broker "catch and kill" deals with Daniels and other women, in which it paid the women hush money for their stories, effectively silencing them ahead of the 2016 election. >

Which was a waste of money because his idiot voters wouldn’t have gave a shit either way. >

Not only would they not care, they'd turn these women into the top-searched pornstars of the year. 
That hush money is probably nothing in comparison to the business they lost. >

Well, right behind “chicks with dicks”. >

Yes! >

Ah yes, Individual 1. Never made sense how Michael Cohen went to jail for this scheme but Individual 1 walked away scot-free. >

Same reason Maxwell went to prison for sex trafficking but none of her clients did. >

Kind of, but there's a bit more to it than that.
With the hush money payments the main problem was that a corrupt Attorney General went to great lengths to shut down any investigation, and having prosecuted the main witness who might co-operate it becomes a bit tricky to use their testimony.
With Maxwell and Epstein, part of the problem was the non-prosecution agreement signed by then US Attorney and later Trump Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, which purported to give immunity from Federal prosecution to any of Epstein's co-conspirators pre-2008, in exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to some lesser charges.
But it is probably also a case of them being good at what they did, and not having proof or records of any of their clients. Without an actual client list, and someone to testify to its authenticity, there isn't much to go on. Especially not with sexual offences, which are already very difficult to prosecute. Throw in unknown and/or uncooperative victims (particularly those who were complicit in other crimes), a main witness (Maxwell) who even if cooperative is not likely to be much use before a jury, and it becomes very difficult to pursue any sort of charges. >

Know what happens to the normal folks?  Prison sentences.  Often life long.  And near instantly. >

Not as often as it should for sexual offenders, though.
Organised crime gangs (which I guess Epstein and Maxwell counted as) tend to be pretty good at staying out of trouble as well. >

David Pecker's vault has much more incriminating information on T**** than this.  "Catch and Kill" was standard operating procedure.  It also probably contains much of the dirt on others he uses to make them "bend the knee". >

Between whatever Russia wanted him to have, Peckers vault, Epsteins blackmail cache, and whatever he could get his goons strip out of the three letter agencies, there is a reason no one prosecutes him. >

Trump is closer to criminal charges like I am closer to being a billionaire. And I have 50 bucks in my savings account. >

Oooo look at you with your $50. Stop trying to stunt on us poors. >

You know, we were happy in those days, even though we were poor. >

Please hurry the fuck up >

This was yet another blatant crime that trump got away with for little to no reason. I just dont understand what is stopping these supposedly "independent" prosecutors from doing their job >

I mean, there's a grand jury examining evidence.  Clearly someone's doing their job now, at least. >

Well? We're waiting! >

Closer to almost starting the process of beginning the steps necessary to the creation of a launching point that could mark a new direction for the assembly and organization needed for the genesis of accountability often unrealized for former President Trump.