>

That’s the entire point of her only going independent.  That is the constant threat she’s using to try to hold the Democrats hostage.
The "dilemma" he's referring to is the notion that Democrats might be better off not running a candidate and supporting "Independent" Sinema as the best chance of holding onto the seat.
This makes sense if you live in Washington. If you populate the real world, Sinema has a 0% chance of reelection whether the Democrats run a candidate or not. She's so incredibly unpopular, she cannot win, even heads-up against whatever fucking lunatic the Arizona GOP selects.
The only real question is whether Sinema will run as an independent and spoil the election for the Dems. >

You are correct.  I think she's delusional.  Her whole calculation is she tried to create this maverick personal, because she had presidential aspiration.  Turns out people fucking hate her.  Everyone.  Despite the fact that she is delusional, I think somehow she will be convinced not to run. >

That is not true George Santos likes her.  (A little humor) >

Santos valued the time he spent working with her to save the world from an asteroid. >

They really bonded when they saved the Tulkans from the sky people. >

Replace her, no dilemma. >

I guess unless she goes third party to fuck democrats? Would she do that?