>

I don't know, some of the content on /r/nutscapes is pretty compelling.
(NSFW sub specifically for landscape photography with Undernut)
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. >

We hear you loud and clear, Underboob is definitely the more popular choice! We'll consider adding a few more features to Undernut to make it just as enticing. ;) >

Nut nipples! >

I think he was talking about adding features nuts don't already have >

Chocolate fountain? >

Well, yeah, the two aren’t really direct analogues.
I’m bi, and I love a nice set of boobs. But if I’m going after a guy, I’m not looking for something to substitute for boobs. To me the common denominator is butts. I’ll take a nice butt on anyone — man, woman, enby, doesn’t matter. >

Yeah, people seem to have a hard time differentiating genitals from secondary sexual characteristics. A closer analogue to boobs would be male pattern baldness, or beards. >

Would the closest analogue not be male nipples or pectoral muscles? >

The secondary sexual characteristic is the particular development of breasts in women. You could see it as the male pectoral muscle being the "normal" state, and the female being the state caused by hormones. In this example you could also consider women's hair or facial hair as the normal state, and male pattern baldness or beards, as the state caused by hormones. Just for comparison's sake, I'm not actually saying any kind of development after puberty is an abnormal state. And of course this doesn't take into account unusual hormonal behavior which gives women beards or men breasts. >

Having generally larger and stronger muscles is another secondary sex characteristic of men