>

He literally says "because integrity matters" when making the announcement with a straight face. I can't even with this reality anymore.
Considering all the intel they don’t want democrats to know, this should surprise no one. >

I’m all seriousness Biden can just give it to them. >

Schiff and Swalwell are two of the most experienced, educated, and intelligent officials in Congress. McCarthy and the GQP are literally acting counter to US interests by excluding them. >

Is Schiff intelligent? He fell for a lot of tall tales. >


He fell for a lot of tall tales.

Can you be more specific? What "tall tales"? >

Didn’t they just arrest the fbi agent/director who cleared the trump campaign of Russian involvement because he has been involved with Russia for years? >

The one appointed by Comey? >

Do you mean Comey, the lifetime Republican who broke long-standing  DOJ rules and revealed that the FBI was investigating Clinton but kept the bureau's 2016 probe into Trump a secret?
That Comey? >

Comey, who did damage control on emails which everyone knew about, and leaked the most salacious parts of the bogus Steele dossier. >

Wasn't that in 2017, LONG AFTER the election, and also after Trump fired him because Comey wouldn't end the investigation on Flynn's treasonous activities?  
Trump likely would've lost if Comey treated Clinton and Trump equally. >

The country is less safe because of McCarthy and his loyalty to traitors DJT and MTG >

Based on nothing except childish payback. >

Otherwise known as '40 years of GOP Doctrine". >

I hate how well that’s worked. >

McCarthy is a conscienceless child. >

McCarthy is making America less safe by excluding them… especially Schiff with having so much experience on that committee. >

Wait, are you suggesting that a party of seditious traitors are governing on policies that make our nation less safe? Holy crap!
/s and 🤪 >

“I’m not letting you play with my toys!” >

Swalwell already has an active case against Trump that looks like it will go to trial.
With his legal acumen I presume we will see one for McCarthy as well if he follows through on his threat. Of course we the tax payer will have to pay to defend McCarthy most likely if it happens. >

Why stop there? Why not block all Dems from all committees? >

He will, if he can get away with it >

And who would stop him? >

The House, outside of the Rules Committee and Select Committees the Speaker doesn’t have unilateral power to just remove people from committees. If McCarthy wants to remove every Democrat each one will require a full House vote. There’s already 2 Republicans who publicly said that they don’t plan on supporting him in stripping Omar’s seat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, no chance he has the votes to remove them all. >

And that helps America how? >

Even the GOP is calling it a “charade” >

Where? >

I feel it’s unpatriotic to not keep your best people on the pitch during the big game, even if you hate their policy positions. >

I'd be surprised if the Democrats send someone more progressive in there just to troll him. >

they’re too smart.  we can’t have that on the intelligence committee >

It would be nice if the republiQan party would actually put some intelligent people on the ballot. >

“Gentlemen, we can’t have intelligence! This is the intelligence committee!” >

Of course he will. It probably was one of the promises that was made >

McCarthy is jealous of his fellow Californians. They’re not stuck in the armpit of California, and aren’t cucked by Donald John. >

Can he really do that? By majority vote? >

Select committees have different rules than standing committees so the speaker can block appointments there. If he intents to prevent Omar from being seated on the Foreign Affairs committee; which is a standing committee; that will require a majority vote of the house. >

Thank you for explaining 👍