>

I'm starting to wonder if this isn't some Andy Kauffman / Sacha Baron Cohen performative piece, maybe to see just how much bullshit GOP voters and politicians are willing to excuse.
Can anybody anywhere point out anything about his campaign that wasn't fraudulent? >

So far, he appears to actually be gay. Though being gay and Republican isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of his critical thinking skills. >

More importantly: He's a man who got married FIRST, then proposed to his boyfriend WHILE STILL MARRIED. 
Gay or not, straight or not: Dick move. >

I'm pretty sure the wife knew and it was a greencard marriage. Not sure what she got out of it other than lower taxes? But they were married the precise length that a greencard marriage needs to be to not cause issues. >

Then how is he not being arrested and deported since it was a fake greencard marriage? >

Because they are underfunded and understaffed and there are enough people abusing the system by much larger margins with much higher visibility that they have their hands full just prosecuting those. 
But he was married almost the exact legal minimum to get full citizenship through marriage. >

How’s there a higher visibility than him? >

By higher visibility I mean "requires less effort to prosecute". Like a woman who had five husbands in five different states who all got divorced at exactly the seven-year mark and she was married to some of them at the same time. >

By yellow I mean green >

Russia owns the GOP, pure and simple. >

Yup, That’s why trump had a private meeting with Putin while he was in office and even made his translator leave the room. >

Several times, if memory serves. He also met with Russian lobbyists during his campaign and Jr let slip it was regarding adoptions, basically confirming it was about repealing the Magnitsky act. 
Named after an activist who was tortured to death by the Putin regime, and which allows the US to seize assets of those deemed guilty of crimes against humanity. >

I'm not sure, but maybe his pal Vlad was taking a leak in Donnie's shoe while they were alone together... >

I’m pretty sure he won that money back during the Revolutionary War when he was defending our airports against the Brits. >

It was a bonus for ramming the ramparts. >

You give trump too much credit on his vocabulary.  I have no doubt in his mind those were just ram parts. >

Watch the clip.

"Our Army manned the air, it rammed the ramparts, it took over the airports," >

Nah.  The subtitles say "Ramparts" but that's nothing that suggests anything to contradict Trump's obvious cluelessness about what he's saying.  Like you said, "watch the clip" He clearly has no idea what a "rampart" is or why ramming it wouldn't be an awesome idea. >

What do you mean "nah," we agree here.  He flubbed the line because he's a moron who's bad at reading teleprompters and said "rammed the ramparts." >

ah, I misunderstood your point.  I was getting at one step further...  I don't think he actual said "ramparts"...  I don't think he knows what those are.  I think he said "ram parts" because it's about as far as he understands the idea. >

Why in the actual fuck should we believe a single thing this guys says at this point???? >

We shouldn't.