>

Sometimes it's as simple as a "My decisions have made me the subject of ridicule. Again." volte-face
Under previous management, if you had your location set to anywhere in Germany on Twitter (you could force set it, as opposed to having automatic location detection or something like that), certain content and even certain accounts would just be filtered out because they violated German hate speech laws or laws against promoting Naziism.
If your location was in the U.S. or elsewhere, you could see those things.
But I guess Musk fired all the people who were in charge of keeping up with that location-based filtering capability. >

he's making employees post purposefully vague statements about "listening to people that you disagree with" which, as always, strictly means "please entertain our beloved neo-nazi grifters" >

FWIW, I'm pretty sure he's letting banned Nazis, fascists, and other grifters back on to drive hate-views and media attention to keep his metrics up as he desperately tries to raise ad revenue or sell Blue accounts.
Twitter's draining him dry and he has no ideas how to turn it around, so he's turned to stunts and penny-wise, pound foolish shit to try to generate anything at all. >

The funny part being that him doing that is contributing massively to the advertisers leaving in the first place.
He really has no idea what he's doing, and he cannot tolerate the idea that he made a mistake. So he just keeps doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on it >

He is abjectly refusing to listen to the companies that have ended advertising on Twitter when they tell him that "the content is the reason" and insists that it is only because of "activists" forcing them to stop advertising. >

He also has not, despite this being the entire way social media and especially Twitter works, not figure out that Twitter's users are it's commodity and that the advertisers are Twitter's customers.
He's still literally trying to charge people for the privilege of making content he sells to advertisers. >


A group of Jewish students and an anti-hate speech association have filed a legal complaint against Twitter (TWTR.MX) at a German court, they said on Wednesday, arguing the company did not remove anti-Semitic content.

Of course Twitter didn't remove it. There are no rules on Twitter anymore except don't post anything that makes Elon Musk look bad, aka telling the truth. >

Or his location. Because that goes against free speech. >

Let's see how this turns out. The Germans don't take kindly to this, but the legal proces could get drawn out. >

There recently was already a decision by a Frankfurt court that even the previous content removal regime in regards to illegal and defamatory content was not good enough. The court noted that having been notified that certain content is illegal, Twitter has to proactively remove equivalent content and not just wait until those get reported, too.
Wonder how Elon wants to do that when he fired most people involved in the process. >

He's just not going to do it. He's been telling all regulators (FTC, EU, and more) to sit and spin and thinks he's too rich to ever Find Out. >

The EU has taken on Microsoft, Facebook and Google - he has been warned often enough there are rules to follow. He has no one to blame but himself if he thinks they won't come for Twitter >

Hmm, platform of hate and anti-Semitism. Won't pay their bills. Right wing billionaire floundering at the top.
Sounds familiar. >

Don't forget issues with hair. >

Accusations of improper behavior performed against women >

Flaccid doughy physique. >

I've noticed since the Musk take over twitter is filled with hate and misinformation. >


I've noticed since the Musk take over twitter is filled with hate and misinformation.

He unbanned Nick Fuentes over the weekend who then immediately started praising hitler >

Nick agrees with Elon politically so Elon will not go against Nick. >

Nick's account just got suspended again. >

Honestly I wonder what the last straw was.