>

In Germany we don’t have free restrooms at all. Still never seen it
Ima have to agree with this, some places definitely do a better place than others, my buddy once had an emergency and we were next to a subway and they held him up and said he couldn’t use the restroom unless he was a customer so he had to buy a cookie… >

Yeah, that’s just so morally wrong. >

But why? They need to be cleaned afterwards >

That's incorrect. They are scheduled to be cleaned at certain times. That cleaning will happen regardless of whether or not that specific person uses it. So it's not causing any extra cleaning.
Unless you are claiming that where you live they go and clean them after every single person who uses them? >

Okay than… water use and toilet paper use, maybe the trashcan is getting used. All of that causes extra money >

Only toilet paper use in some situations. And even when relevant, it wouldn't even be a pennies worth.
Minimal water use.
Incorrect again about the trash can. A bin being used by 1 additional person does not cost extra money. Again, like the cleaning, the bins will be emptied and collected regardless. The only argument you have here is if literally thousands of non-customers are using the facilities every day. And that just isn't realistic.
If a company is going to stop someone who needs the toilet from going because it might cost them 1p (or 1c or whatever currency) then it isn't logic dictating that choice, and they shouldn't be defended for it. >

You don’t use toilet paper every time?! >

I'm a guy, so no, not if I'm peeing. Same as every other guy. >

You still should use toilet paper to get rid of little drops 🤷🏾‍♀️ >

What makes you think that? I've never heard of that or seen anyone doing it. And at urinals they don't provide toilet paper for you to do it. >

Every Bus Stop?! >

This would generally lead to spending a lot of money to have bathrooms built that ended up being too damaged and dirty for most people to use. >

Then they should be cleaned and repaired. We can get the money for it >

Are you taking that from the school fund? Park maintenance? Road repair? Money has to come from somewhere. >

Assuming OP is American
The military budget of the USA can be cut a bit >

Yeah, but then all the countries in NATO would have to start paying their share >

my guy they do >

The US contributes the most to NATO by far, it's not even close. >

NATO is a North american alliance. I know it has other members but like, its main purpose is keeping the US safe. Canada does our part by doing the missile tracking over the poles. The whole point of NATO is pkeeping america safe, of course they contribute the most. >

Not all the countries contribute what they're supposed to. Only 10 do, and we contribute more than we're supposed to.
I'm objectively correct >

Everything i said is also objectively correct. Its the reasoning behind why it is how it is. >

So I guess you just shat yourself at a bus stop OP? >

No, my friend did >

If someone has to provide it for you it's not a right, nor can it ever be.  You can't compel others to do something because it's your "right". >

Uhh they would be disgusting. The homeless people would most likely sleep in them and they would smell horribly >

… then the homeless should have somewhere else to sleep >

But they don’t really have that. >

That should change >

Of course. We already have some public toilets in my city, they cost like 1 euro to use i think. But they are extremely dirty and smell terrible because the homeless use them to sleep or leave their drugs behind. >

Well do you want the homeless to shit in the toilet or to shit on the sidewalk? >

Never see shit of homeless people on the streets >

It’s a thing in some American cities because instead of having charged public bathrooms, the only bathrooms are in shops where you have to buy something or can’t use the bathroom. So with no other option, homeless people take shits where they can.