>

What's the dilemma? She gets replaced at the soonest opportunity. It's not like any Democrat voters want to keep her.
The "dilemma" he's referring to is the notion that Democrats might be better off not running a candidate and supporting "Independent" Sinema as the best chance of holding onto the seat.
This makes sense if you live in Washington. If you populate the real world, Sinema has a 0% chance of reelection whether the Democrats run a candidate or not. She's so incredibly unpopular, she cannot win, even heads-up against whatever fucking lunatic the Arizona GOP selects.
The only real question is whether Sinema will run as an independent and spoil the election for the Dems. >

You are correct.  I think she's delusional.  Her whole calculation is she tried to create this maverick personal, because she had presidential aspiration.  Turns out people fucking hate her.  Everyone.  Despite the fact that she is delusional, I think somehow she will be convinced not to run. >

That is not true George Santos likes her.  (A little humor) >

Santos valued the time he spent working with her to save the world from an asteroid. >

They really bonded when they saved the Tulkans from the sky people. >

Replace her, no dilemma. >

I guess unless she goes third party to fuck democrats? Would she do that? >

That’s the entire point of her only going independent.  That is the constant threat she’s using to try to hold the Democrats hostage. >

Funny thing is, even if Dem's don't run a candidate, as long as Rep's run a candidate, she'll lose her seat anyways. She's pissed off a TON of Arizonan liberals and moderates who supported and pushed hard for her. 
At the rate things are going, she's never going to win a second term. >

So she doesn't have a chance but yet is poisoning the well! How disappointing. >

She can go drink from a different well..... so she doesn't really care about that. >

Everyone hates her. I think they are hoping she splits the vote so significantly that a repub will win, but that’s pretty idiotic since she’s generated so much easy ammo for dems to use. I mean sh￼e was a paid speaker at many gop events, no dem has been doing that — she’s cooked. >

The problem is that she only won by a 2.4% margin last time. And the Green Party candidate also carried 2.4% of the vote.
If a relative handful of the voters stick with her, she's likely to fuck over the Democrats. >

I'm hoping the political climate has shifted enough since she was elected to eliminate her as an option in Arizona and Gallego will get a larger margin to win. A lot of things have changed in Arizona during this last election. Maybe she'll get an equal number of republican and democrat vote to offset each other. >

Without a party backing her, that means she has to pay for a statewide campaign all on her own. She might not be so eager to fuck over the Democrats if she has to sign a seven figure loan to do it. >

Probably not since it would dig into her sell out money... I mean her earnings as senator.