>


Democrats have traditionally been horrible about controlling their own narrative as well as bogging themselves down on "cultural issues"

Counter-point: Republican have their own media bubble whose whole job is to rapidly invent new "cultural issues" to get spun up about, it's impossible not to be overwhelmed by it.
Republicans would prefer genital checks before kids can use a bathroom but Democrats are framed as bogged down in "cultural issues" because they acknowledge trans people exist or that systemic racism exists.  Like most issues, the Democratic position is not characterized fairly.
I just want someone left wing >

Because of the dissatisfaction with the Dems and Reps, several news outlets have been claiming the USA needs a "third party" (usually with younger candidates).  However, we have more than three parties right now, and they offer younger candidates!  Here is a partial list (sorted alphabetically).  More info can be seen by Googling the name(s) below:  

American Independent  
Constitution Party  
Democratic  
Democratic Socialists  
Forward  
Green Party  
Independent  
Libertarian  
No Labels 
Peace and Freedom  
Reform  
Renew America
Republican  
Tea Party  

Each of those political parties claim to adhere to somewhat different philosophies.  The major difference, however, seems to be their funding.  The two major parties have significant funding.  The "wannabees" can't seem to get sufficient support.
So, the talk about "we need a third party" is really a complaint about the two major parties ... and those who espouse the "third party" seem to be unable to grasp the necessary fundamentals for significant recognition.  However, at least some of these third parties seem to be able to siphon votes from the major party that is most similar in goals, thus defeating their supposed purpose.
Botom line:
An increasing number of people want a third party, but have no idea or suggestions how to get a successful one. >

No 3rd party can mathematically exist until fptp voting system is abolished and replaced with ranked choice or a similar alternative.
Simple as that.  Change FPTP first, then you can start talking about 3rd parties >

Sure they can, they just need to get more votes. We've had a number of 3rd party candidates win in the US already. >

In the short term sure, but FPTP ensures that a 3rd party will never be viable long term.  It's game theory >

...is he trying to get Republicans elected in the next cycle? >


In 2022, dozens of former Republicans and Democrats created a new centrist-based party, called Forward. Some moderate presidential candidates could include Liz Cheney (R), Larry Hogan (R), David Jolly (R), John Kasich (R), Christine Todd Whitman (R) or Andrew Yang (I-diot).
...
[Article author] Steve Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa

Yes
e; I should mention, I took the liberty of adding those party identifiers in the parentheses since the author of editors here didn't think that information was necessary to include (also the part in brackets) >

Andrew Yang really had me fooled during the primary. I didn't scrutinize him enough. Never again. >

That’s certainly an opinion. Not a good one, but an opinion >

Biden has done an amazing job. Trump did a terrible job. They are not age related. Deceptive editing of clips try to paint Biden as confused etc. We know this is not true.
And with all democratic decisions, it is we the people who decide who to represent us. >


Biden is not senile
Biden has done an amazing job given the present political climate not only with the Republican party but also within the Democratic party
I'd prefer someone younger run
I'll happily and energetically vote for Biden again
Democrats have traditionally been horrible about controlling their own narrative as well as bogging themselves down on "cultural issues"
Democrats are the superior choice for economic issues.