>

I know…I thought this one was dead and gone when her lawyer was jailed
They indicted Michael Cohen for the hush money payments.  In the Michael Cohen indictment, it was "Individual-1" who directed Michael Cohen to make these payments and "Individual-1" was Trump. It's fucking crazy that Trump wasn't indicted on this alone, nevermind all the other fucking crimes he has committed. >

It's fucking crazy we allow our government to use the gentlemen's agreement of... "You can't indict a sitting President". >

It kinda a weird one, as I think certain people would try to find any weird argument to indict a president of the opposing party, and it would be a distraction. 
But if you broke laws to get elected or knowingly while in office, fuck you, straight to jail. >


But if you broke laws to get elected or knowingly while in office, fuck you, straight to jail.

The constitution spells out the exact qualifications to be president. You cannot add or subtract from those qualification without a constitutional amendment. You also cannot use the courts to stop the president from carrying out their constitutional obligations. We have a process for dealing with presidents who break the law and that's impeachment and/or invoking the 25th amendment. >

Yes, and the constitution is old and could not predict future issues of religion indoctrinating whole congregations to vote blindly for an orange Muppet. It should be amended to deal with criminal activity by elected officials, including the president. 
Leaving issues to a partisan group expecting them to do what's right is silly. >

Exactly, a ton of our politics apparently rests on the idea that both sides are civil and adult and acting in good faith. Once a literal repeat criminal became president, it exposed all of that as being outdated. >

Crazy to me that this 2016 case is now being reviewed now in 2023 with a Grand Jury. It'll be years before any of his other crimes are brought into the court systems. He'll unfortunately die before he does any jail time for his crimes. >

I swear they tryin to run out the statutes of limitations on all this shit so they can "awww schucks we missed it" and forget it happened. >

Give it up already, this nothing but a witch hunt.   
If using questionably obtained money to pay off a porn star you had sex with because she reminds you of your daughter and then claiming it was a "legal expense" on your taxes is against the law, we'd all be in jail.
:-) >

You had me in the first half >

What year is it?