>

I feel like there’s always a stage in a romantic relationship before it’s official, you move in together, you marry, have babies. How long these stages are is for everybody different but maybe OP doesn’t like to call these things stages.
"We're not ready for the next step yet" is just a simpler way of saying "We're happy where this relationship is right now but we're not ready for a deeper level of commitment". There aren't actually any "steps" it's just an easier way of explaining their relationship.
I love my boyfriend and we plan to be together for the rest of our lives but I wouldn't have moved in together after our first date because we weren't ready. I could also say we weren't ready to take that step and it means exactly the same thing >

It's not logical. If you love each other and plan to be together for the rest of your lives then you're ready to marry and move in. If you're not ready to marry and move in then you're not sure that you love each other enough and can be together for the rest of your lives. Everything else is bs. >

I'll say like this. I'm happily married but I am not willing to become a parent. So I decided to stay on stage of 2 person family. I'm not ready, and propably never will, to get to next step, whitch is having kids. Nope. Even if you think if I love somebody I should do all what's in the package. I think opposite >

Having children has nothing to do with it. It's not a "step" in a relationship, it's a separate question. Some people never want to have kids. It's a choice. >

It's your opinion. And I think you're the first person I faced who sees it this way >

Okay. If some people don't wan to have kids, do they have an "incomplete" relationship? How do they live without this step?
If someone wants to adopt a child without a relationship, then what's this? If a woman gets pregnant but doesn't have a partner and decides to have a kid anyway, then where this "step" is located? >

Trust me when I say, I've heared thousands times it is an incomplete relationship. It was like "why you even got married if you don't want kids?" or "you're waisting him time if you don't want kids, you should split". Like i said, you're the first person I have interaction with, who thinks kids is not the next obligatory step 🤣 >

You're oversimplifying the meaning of "we're not ready for the next step yet". What people mean by this is that the relationship is quite new to them and there are other things they want to know about each other before getting into, let's say, sex.  
Why are you so angry about the concept of relationships changing and flourishing over time? People "becoming comfortable with each other quickly" is still a process that takes time and effort. "Hitting it off" is not the only thing you need for a relationship. You need trust, knowledge and simply knowing the other person better. The "levels" you're talking about aren't linear and universal. Some people will feel comfortable quicker than others and be fine with having sex and getting into a full relationship on a second date. That's great for them. But others need time to feel ready to have sex, kiss or cuddle and that's perfectly fine aswell.  
I'm just trying to understand why you're so angry about this. You just sound entitled and impatient. >

Isn't sex always the first step? >

Nope >

So you're the "first date in the morning, married in the afternoon, having kids by dinner" type then.
Moving a little fast for my tastes, but you do you. >

More like: OP is 14 years old, has never been in a serious relationship before, and is bitter that their crush isn’t into them. >

Right? Also OP was just recently told by someone that the someone isn't ready for the next step... >

Not allowing people time to adjust (no matter how much time they need) is a huge red flag.
Personally, If we were dating and you said this, I would probably think you were trying to trap me. I would start assuming you're abusive, and becoming impatient with me. Not really something I'd be into, so obviously would end our "relationship" earlier than if you had just respected my boundaries and feelings. >

Have you ever been in a relationship OP?
If you start pulling long-term behaviour in the beginning stages of dating, most people are going to end it or straight up ghost you. It's unhealthy and weird to rush into things.
Like you don't just move in together within a week. Some people want time when it comes to even kissing let alone having sex. If someone isn't at a 'stage' it's a personal choice/boundary. >

Buttplay and grave plots kinda come later >

Have you ever been in a relationship? >

Doesn't sound like it. >

This post gives off "Recently rejected high-school" vibes. >

I too was once 12 >

Yeah fr >

This is just a bad take. >

Are you in high school? This reaks of “teenager with no relationship experience” >

Upvote for the unpopular opinion.
You sound like you have very little relationship experience.  This post reads like it was written by a school girl with an infatuation. >

I don't even feel like this is an opinion, it's a misconception lol. >

Some people need time to get comfortable to the level of other couples. You can hit it off and still want to ease your way into a relationship. >

How would you describe the difference between dating and being married to someone then?
You can't pretend a 2 week old relationship has the same "level" of commitment as a 2 year or even 20 year relationship. Differentiation is a thing. >

someone told you they were not ready yet, eh? >

So... if two 19 year olds are deeply in love, they should move in together, get married and directly start to have children with each other? 
Timing is everything. And growing up is realsing that finding someone you love and who loves you back is in fact not everything. Sometimes not even that is enough. >

So you think if two people like each other they should marry right after the first date? >

So you’re upset the person you like doesn’t want to sleep with you right off the bat? Seems to be the read I’m getting from your replies.
You have a lot of growing to do, sadly doesn’t seem like you’re willing. >

Sounds like this guys mad cause a girl doesn’t wanna f him straight away >

So you should move in with someone immediately as soon as you start dating?