>

Thats a bit of an oversimplification, US aircraft were excellent albeit in different areas than the Germans. Requirements were quite different - the Germans never could build bombers or escort fighters that were equivalent to what the USAAF used for instance.
The Germans were also more willing to essentially use prototypes on the field because they were desperate. A Me-262 looks futuristic, because it was at the time and was incredibly unreliable. Its even worse when you look at the rocket propelled Me-163, nobody in their right mind would mass produce such a thing except a country desperate for a secret weapon. This has the side effect of making them look more advanced vs countries that did not risk their pilots with machines that were not ready for mass production.
I guess they finally received the shipment from NK and it's making it to the frontlines. >

How pathetic do you have to be to go groveling to NK for weapons? >

NK actually makes a lot of its money through arms manufacturing and sales from what I've read before. >

And wish.Com makes a lot of money selling shitty knock off stuff.  Russia is going the knock off version of wish for military hardware. >

Yeah. Nobody said NK's weapons were good. Just that they made them (and a good number of them). Sometimes cheap and plentiful has its own level of impact. >

That’s what I was getting at.  How pathetic do you have to be to rely on NK weapons? >

There's only one way to get better at making weapons though. Test them in the field. US weaponry in 1941 was almost trash compared to 1945. >

I've heard that US airplanes in WW2 weren't nearly as good as the nazi ones, except that we could crank them out at insane speeds and we just overwhelmed them.