>

By "harassment" you mean people asking you what you mean, including using your exact words (which you will then deny writing)?
"she could either comply with his demands to deepen their relationship or suffer “irrevocable” damage to her personal and professional endeavours."
How to win friends and influence people.
Not sure the year and a half of therapy worked. >

I would counter sue for anything and everything I thought I could make stick. 
Like, if I have to show to court, I’m going to be a pain about it. >

I'm actually considering suing the guy myself. Because reading about his asinine behavior has caused me discomfort and stress.
/s just in case >

Can there be a class action suit against a person? I would like to get in on this. Knowing a person can be this terrible has caused me trauma. >

I read this totally expecting it to be a stupid headline not really grounded in fact.
I was wrong.
This is what this sub is designed for! >

I really want to know the face his attorney made when he began describing why he wanted to sue her. >

Considering he's probably been billing this guy for years over this now...
This >

Yeah, well hopefully the lawyer gets disbarred over this nonsense. >

Lawyer probably isn’t even making a case, he’s just racking in the dough. >

Probably not friends anymore. >

Add that to the lawsuit. >

AaAaAAnd she won't even talk to me now that I've sued her! 🥺 >

Why would he do that? Now everytime someone Googles his name, this is all that comes up.
He just ensured that no one but the most desperate woman on earth will ever go out with him. >

Honestly committing murder would probably get him more potential suitors. >

Don't give him any ideas >

That is some next level stalking. >

r/inceltear >

Yup, read a few post and couldn't after the guy saying he wanted to rape a toddler so he could know what it was like to have a big penis >

Jesus Christ. 
I wonder what happened to that dude for him to think that 5 inches is a micro penis and end up in that state of mind that he needs to rape a kid to feel manly. >

I don't think the 8+ is even true. At least, I don't think it is actually the average. Male porn stars are shorter than average. And the women are typically even smaller. It's all about the illusion and so many angles and shots that you see all the time are designed for that. Less body fat also makes a difference. A big guy can have a big dick but a lot of it will be hidden. There are so many myths and misconceptions, like people joke about tall people having huge dicks but there is a reason you don't see people as tall as basketball players in porn. >


like people joke about tall people having huge dicks but there is a reason you don't see people as tall as basketball players in porn.

As someone that has been to a fair number of clothing optional places I can definitely tell you that height does not correlate to dick size. >

Taking incel level to the stock market >

What a fucking psycho. Idk why she went along with this creep. I’d be getting a restraining order before I was going to therapy with him. >

She eventually was awarded a protection order, thank goodness. She might have acted out of effort to maintain the friendship as strictly platonic, but potentially to protect herself from him by going along with the counseling plan. After a year and a half had gone by, she may have realized she was being held hostage by him and took steps to sever the friendship. It's sad that I'm relieved that he decided to sue instead of turn violent against her. >

It’s sad that this woman had to waste so much of her life dealing with this guy. A year and a half in therapy with him, can you imagine? >

WTF why would she agree to that, poor woman >

From the Talmud:
A man once conceived a passion for a certain woman, and his heart was consumed by his burning desire [his life being endangered thereby]. When the doctors were consulted, they said, 'His only cure is that she shall submit.' Thereupon the Sages said: 'Let him die rather than that she should yield.' Then, said the doctors; 'let her stand nude before him.' They answered, 'sooner let him die'. 'Then', said the doctors, 'let her converse with him from behind a fence'. 'Let him die,' the Sages replied, 'rather than she should converse with him from behind a fence.' >

based and talmud-pilled >

Where are the people making fun of “snowflakes”? He’s the ultimate one. >

The people calling everyone snowflakes are the snowflakes, they never call out one of their own >

Yep, the entire concept of snowflakery is projection. A person desiring a specific type of respect or treatment is never going to be a bigger baby than someone else whining about that person. >

I'm going to disagree with you on this. This person is a special fucking snowflake. >

I don’t know if people read the story. It’s crazier than the headline. This woman is in danger and the Singapore courts have failed her. >

How have the courts failed her?  There hasn't been any court yet. >

How did this suit even make it past a judge reading it? It's obviously meritless and purely done for harassment to force her to be in a relationship with him. I hope they penalise him and make him pay her. Wow. >

I hope the suit was allowed to go through so that it could more thoroughly ruin him. She has been dealing with his bullshit for years, now his bullshit is international news. At the very least she now qualifies for refugee status in many countries. >

I wonder if he's been publicly identified? Not that I'm calling for it to happen, but it won't look good on him or his business dealings. >

Good luck getting a date ever again you fuck-knuckle. >

“Fuck-knuckle” is also going to be his long term hobby >

We just reached a new peak in terms of excessive sensitivity. Who in their right mind would come up with this idea? 🙃 >

What lawyer would go along with this. My god if I had 1 million for every time I have been turned down. >

One that is paid by the hour >

Bill A. Blehours, Esq. >

Formerly from the law firm of Dewey, Cheatem and Howe. >

Aww, now I miss Ray and Tom. >

I know my first time seeing that joke was in 1989's Leisure Suit Larry, but I bet it goes back even further than that. >

Car Talk's history page says they incorporated under that name in 1989 as well. Wikipedia doesn't give a definitive origin of the joke. >

Lmao Andrew Tate lives on >

He's going to kill her one day.  What a sick fuck. >

That's my concern. She was granted a protection order. I don't know how effective that is in Singapore, but hopefully more helpful than they are in the US. >

At least he didn't kill her? All he did was engage in a frivolous lawsuit. 
I want to put /s because I am being sarcastic, but also, I am speaking some amount of truth. Women get stalked, harrassed, assaulted, and killed for turning men down every day.
Christ the bar is low. >


Ms Tan then obtained an expedited protection order against him and engaged lawyers to file her defence and counterclaim to the suit.

At the very least, thank goodness she was granted a protection order. I can only hope it remains permanent and effective and that she will be safe. >

Coming soon to US Courts: INCELs suing for damages, and winning. >

Haha sometimes pp small on body
Sometimes pp small in soul >

When incels take the “lawyer up” part of that meme too literally. >

Just think if every guy who ever heard "I like you as a friend" filed a law suit... >

Him: "...what I'm trying to say is I think I'm in love with you."
Her: "No comment. I'd like to speak to my attorney." >

Holy hell people are fragile these days. >


Ms Tan then obtained an expedited protection order against him and engaged lawyers to file her defence and counterclaim to the suit.

This was the best part of the article. I very much hope that protection order remains in effect permanently and that Ms Tan can live in safety. >

Judge better throw him in jail for contempt and a frivolous suit. >

It'll get dismissed outright, likely by a clerk of court before a judge has to waste their time. >

I hope she files a restraining order against him. This guy is unstable and clearly can't take NO for an answer. His ego is so bruised that I wouldn't put anything past him. >

Imagine spending $22,000 in legal fees just to look like a complete jackass and get laughed out of court, because that’s what’s gonna happen. >

Lol she has a stronger case to counter-sue for the same thing. >

I’d like to sue my wife, for not wanting to just be friends. - Henny Youngman, maybe? >

Probably made the right call to pass on that guy lmao >

Thank god the judge had common sense.  There should be fines for such frivolous lawsuits. >

Proud boy incel vibes >

Uber-incel energy for sure. >

I'm suing the guy because he won't date me. Turn tabled >

Why are men >

You think the people who are downvoting you don’t have the ‘context’ of the three-word comment you replied to? >

The Tragedy of Heterosexuality by Jane Ward goes into a great deal of detail regarding why men feel guilt, shame, or other powerful negative emotions when they are unable to establish an intimate relationship with a woman. It essentially comes down to the culture of entitlement men grow up in and inhabit most of their lives, one which marks a man's success by his romantic partnership with a woman in such a way that allows him access to her domestic, emotional, and reproductive labor. 
Failure to claim this, for straight men, is seen as a significant social failure akin to losing access to something you feel owed to you since birth. >

Actually, one of the other claims in a later chapter is that queer people find it endlessly frustrating when straight people are unable to endure even the mildest criticism of straight culture without trying to carve out some kind of mental niche for them to feel excepted from said criticism. >

I say this as someone very supportive of the struggle for LGBTQ rights and dignity....
....imagine if a straight man wrote a book called "The Tragedy of Homosexuality" telling us all about the negatives of being a same sex attracted person and how frustrating it is when someone gay thinks that they can "carve out some mental niche" instead of being a slave to a stereotype.
🤮 >


....imagine if a straight man wrote a book called "The Tragedy of Homosexuality" telling us all about the negatives of being a same sex attracted person and how frustrating it is when someone gay thinks that they can "carve out some mental niche" instead of being a slave to a stereotype.
🤮 

Yes, let's imagine that straight people haven't been calling homosexuality 'tragic' for decades. Let's imagine what it would be like for queer people to be called 'sinful' or 'degenerate'. Or perhaps 'evil', 'vile', 'wrong' or 'demonic'. We could imagine some straight people might even take these messages to heart and decided to target queer people. Imagine if, afterwards, because queer panic has become so normalized, they were able to justify their actions in court to face lesser or even no consequences.
Pretend hypothetical offense to straights doesn't compare to the real harm done to queers, and regardless The Tragedy of Heterosexuality is an effort to help straight people be better.
But I think it's hard to want to be better when you're more focused on feeling better about yourself. >


Yes, let's imagine that straight people haven't been calling homosexuality 'tragic' for decades. Let's imagine what it would be like for queer people to be called 'sinful' or 'degenerate'. Or perhaps 'evil', 'vile', 'wrong' or 'demonic'.

Ding ding ding.
You are absolutely right that that is what happened and is what is actually absolutely vile.
....so why would you want to become that same evil as soon as the opportunity presents itself?
To quote you...

But I think it's hard to want to be better when you're more focused on feeling better about yourself. 

That's literally exactly what you are doing. You are understandably focused on feeling better about yourself, after generations of oppression, but are focused on returning the spite instead of bettering yourself and everyone else. >

God damn straight men are the most delicate beings I have ever seen
When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression >

When you've been oppressed long enough, becoming an oppressor feels like equality.
Criticizing the idea of blatant blanket stereotyping isn't "privilege." It's simple criticism. You have every right to say it, and I have every right to point out why I think it's wrong.
It's funny, I steadfastly believe in the concept of that second sentence, and have used it in support of the fight for equality many times.
But as soon as I disagree with you in the slightest on one tiny issue, I'm the "delicate" one who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism. Sounds like neither of us like criticism, but at least I'm articulating why I feel it's misplaced and ultimately harmful, while you are just shouting slogans like you think that's going to erase the history of horrific things done to women and queer people by straight men (and women) for generations. >

There's no point. Only the nastiest members of any group stick around in the cultural battlefield long enough to be influential. You can't reason with bullies. >

Yup.
As someone who has been saddened watching the progressive side tear itself apart and inadvertently (possibly even in some ways intentionally) support regression for decades, with it coming to a head in recent years, I'm used to it. >

Cuz Baby I'm in the zone!
Like a King without a throne
I'd rather have you by my side
Than play the skin trumbone
I thought what we had was real
But I could not seal the deal
I'm a piece of shit
Cuz Baby, Baby I'm in the Zone!
source >

clicks the link. 
It's not Russell Greer!? >

Emotional damage! >

r/justneckbeardthings >

So is this just marketing for “Crazy Rich Asians 2”? >

"You just experienced life." >

What in the fucking nonsense? 
I don't know anything about Singapore's legal system, but I hope this man is forced to pay for her trauma, time, and resources wasted on someone who can't handle rejection. She spent a year and a half in therapy with this guy.
This is honestly scary when you think about it. Imagine getting sued, because you don't want to date someone. You're now forced to be involved with this person you don't want to be around. >

This guy is a piece of absolute shit >

How this guys didn’t seal the deal I will never know >

Fuuuuck, I'd be a billionaire by now. >

Any lawyer who took this should be fucking disbarred. >

Any Singapore lawyers here? Thats not gonna work right? Would it work in the Netherlands though? Asking for a friend. >

Whoa. This is a thing now? Payday baby! I can sue atleast 50 women. >

Let's make him in/famous, Mr K. Kawshigan is his name, aka douchebag. >

How can you get to this point in life: It’s just sad. >

Aggravated Friend Zoning >

I think the incels have a new king. >

Better than what rejected men usually do these days in situations like this >

dont this bullshit get dismisses as frivolous lawsuits? >

Woman doesn't want anything else than friendship. It should be fine. We can't demand things we can't have in such situations. >

SINGAPORE?! Did not see that coming. >

Imagine what this guy would do to a woman who makes the mistake of marrying him and then filing for divorce... >

/u/nostalgictuna I found an article about you. >

Bruh >

Anyone can sue someone else for any reason whatsoever. Judges (hopefully) sort them all out, with sanctions levied against those bringing such frivolous lawsuits. >

Wish that applied to Karen’s who call the cops on black people just living. >

As a rational person, this is multiples kinds of pathetic. 
As a broke person who has experienced his fair share of rejection though…
/s >

The lawyer who agreed to represent such a frivolous lawsuit should be disbarred. >

Well I guess Cartman did grow up >

Why do I get a feeling theres a shit ton more to this? >

Best thing i ever did was disconnect from those that don’t reciprocate that interest in connection. Be it family or romantic partner if you arent being valued dont waste energy on them >

Sounds like the plot of an Ally Mcbeal episode. >

How will the judge rule on tonight’s episode of The People vs. Friend Zoned Incel at 6 pm, on TLC. >

I would be a bazillionarie. >

First case of pre-palimony I've heard of. >

I don’t believe you can sue for a bruised ego. >

Guy should just get one of them new fandangled robot girlfriends. He can take it to corporate parties 🥳 >

Oh come the fuck on! >

Something tells me he'll no longer be in the friend zone after this... >

Typical king behavior >

Bahahahaha. Only in America. I'm embarrassed for you guy's, what a clusterfuck of a country. >

How to get even less women to even consider being friends with men.  Task completed. >

well shit. If I had known that was an option >

Wait, we can do that? >

Yes, if your goal is to be as psycho as this guy, you can. >

Ngl I also thought this claim to be ridiculous, but upon reading the article I think he might be entitled to some compensation. It's morally repreensible but let's wait to see if Singapore's law agrees with this. It's not the 1st time this happened in that country. >


upon reading the article I think he might be entitled to some compensation

Why do you think that? >

Just read the article. Or wait for the trial. I will. I am curious to see how it will turn out. >


Just read the article

The article tells me nothing about your thoughts, and presents nothing to lead me to the conclusion you made.  Can you explain your reasoning? >

And open myself to further harassement?
No thank you.