>

Why not men? but I understood somehow without explanation.
Absolutely never fails to surprise me to see blatant racism on Reddit. >

That is good but the women need to get out of Afghanistan first and male chauvinist Talibans are not going to make that easy. >

Progressives always do some half-assed job and launch rainbow-colored fireworks. What will happen in reality is Afghan men will send the women to get Danish citizenship, then come through "family reunion" route. Privileged EU lawmakers don't realize that women in these kind of countries are too oppressed to even know such emigration possibility exists, let alone having knowledge of how to execute this plan (they can't travel alone, how are they going to cross the border?). They can't do anything without their husbands or male supervisor knowing about it. From the Afghan side, this emigration process will always be controlled by men. There will be an entire mafia doing the smuggling/exploiting the system. It always devolves into it. And this mafia will be always 100% male, possibly even the Taliban themselves will control it.
Soon the country mostly known for LEGO and Quran-burning idiots will have an influx of refugees from the most funtamentalist islamist country. Bravo >

I am Danish, and its not a approved stamping line you enter. The case must still be dealth with like any asylum case.
And here a threat level assesment is part of it. 
But this effects in total 15 woman as we speak, so - we probably wont be overrun just yet. >

Let me tell you, the United States, despite is varied reputation, has been and continues to be a great place for Somali refugees, many of whom were born in refugee camps in Kenya or spent most of their lives there. When the Somali government collapsed in the 90s, all the people with means took off. The first wave of the Somali diaspora were the rich, the intellectuals, the professionals, etc. The whole world was good with those immigrants.
But the poor went to refugee camps, and the United States has been an important partner in getting Somalis out of refugee camps. What's the point.
Somalia has some of the most fundamentalist, violent mfers around. al Shabaab are fuckin demons. Yet, the refugees when they are first welcomed into the US - at first largely uneducated, very poor, potentially susceptible to the fundamentalist ideology of their homeland - they are the opposite of the people who ruined their country. Somali Americans are fuckin awesome. We have not had an "influx" of extremists. To the contrary, America's Somali population is among the most entrepreneurial, the most savvy, the most politically active and all around just great group of people that America has on offer.
To you, my Danish friend, I think you guys are gonna be OK. If any Somalis coming knocking, I highly recommend welcoming them in. >

Our immigration problems are almost never the first generation. From anywhere.
But we as society have a lot to learn about how to integrate - our attempts in the past can almost be described as assimilation more than intergration.
People from everywhere can be good, but it must also be extremely difficult to come here. Not knowing the language, the culture.
The memes are kinda correct, we are stamdoffish and cold. And wont help until you ask. Suppose we think its intrusive to just offer assistance.
So they end up in some apartment, isolated from the rest of society.
Would like to think we have gotten better at it, and taken the shared success stories across Europe from the last immigration crisis and acquired better protocols to deal with it.
but then i remember- we are building a asylum center in Rwanda to handle it all. >

Yeah I've learned it's different in European countries, for a lot of reasons, and most of them not necessarily good or bad just reasons. Integration is something America is good at. The Canadians are really good at it. European countries have an extra hurdle, but I whole heartedly support your nation's direction on this. I think it is an honorable act on your part, as a people, whatever comes after. I'm sure you'll figure it out. >

I see it less honourable and purely practical. We can skip half the application process for those in wait. And we wont have to have the entirety of the political world on our backs, because we deported the 10 woman who had gotten rejected already. >

Got paywalled but I whole heartedly support this. Serious question though, are women actually able to leave Afghanistan now? >

They can't leave without a male guardian and I'm pretty sure the family will face punishment if she breaks any rules while she's away. 
Like if she doesn't dress properly and follow the rules set forth by the Taliban. >

That's pretty sexist. >

Men from Afghanistan can still try to claim asylum if they have a valid reason.
"I'm a man" isn't a valid reason to fear for your life in Afghanistan.
"I'm a woman" is a valid reason thanks to the Taliban's abhorrent track record when it comes to women. >

USA too??