>

That makes perfect sense. My brain was stuck on when you list stuff as in orders, “do this and then do this” and the other part in my head was “this rather than that.”
What if we all took turns being execs for a week at a time? >

if it's 6 figures a day i can go for 2-3 days and i'm good >

I’d retire at the end of the first week. >

I’d stay as long as this guy and then retire in luxury. >

I’d say I was going to do that but would get addicted to the dopamine rush of seeing numbers in accounts and would become a shitbag greedy shell of a human, refusing to put any money I touched to use helping my brethren. >

Sir have you ever considered a career in politics?! >

He’d never make it. Too honest. >

Idk these days “I’m a shitbag who wants to get rich off your misery” might be a winning campaign slogan. Plus, there are several pictures of me in drag floating around. >

Aren't you already a congressman? >

No, they're the other kind of psuedo cultist. >

He did so little and made more money in that 180 day time period of moving, negotiating, failing and moving back than I’ll most likely make in my entire life. >

It’s worse than that. It was 90 days. That’s much worse. 
That’s a minimum of $9 million in 3 months. Or $36mln/year. Wow! >

The median lifetime earnings for a US citizen with a bachelors degree is 2.8 million.  4 million for a doctorate.
Guy made more than twice as much in three months, sitting on his ass screwing around.  Our economy is broken. >

Don’t forget all the taxes he paid though…….. >

Used a website for this 
Assuming they live in Florida (no clue using Florida cause Disneyland is there) have 0 dependents or any other tax breaks. And that is the entirety of what they earned that year
I got about 3.2 million in taxes on that money. Less than I'd say they should be taxed. And probably more than they were in reality. When you make that much money you have people for your taxes who get you every break >

If Disneyland then California, if Disney World then Florida.
Edit: than then english. Same same but different. >

If nitpicking, then... then. >

Is it? I was battling myself when I typed it. >

It's a conditional statement. If something, then another thing.
If/then, rather than "than."
I just thought it was funny, given the context. :)