>

As it turns out making decisions based on spite isn’t that popular amongst people trying to be professional.
They need people to do the actual work. >

They need scapegoats when they inevitable burn it down. Again. >

Simultaneously, mounting opposition to Republicans in general by the American public. 
I say, let ‘em crash. >


I say, let ‘em crash.

Surely you can't be serious. >

I am serious and don’t call me Shirley. >

Looks like I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing glue! >


“Two wrongs do not make a right. Speaker Pelosi took unprecedented actions last Congress to remove Reps. Greene and Gosar from their committees without proper due process," she said.

What does "due process" look like in that situation, exactly? It's not enough to be a featured speaker at a white nationalist event? Because I think speaking at a white nationalist event would be enough to warrant some kind of punishment. >

It’s not who Greene and Gosar spoke to it’s that they called for violence against fellow members of Congress. In different methods (spoken remarks, animated showcase of murder) . I’m not sure what “due process” looks like for Spartz, but maybe she just disapproves of house wide votes without hearing both sides. Skeptical this is an “independent” thinking Republican >

I remember Gosar's incident now.
Still, the white nationalist thing and, in MTG's case, being a 9/11 truther, would seem to be reasons enough. >

Also he told to coup attempt organizers Trump will issue a blanket pardon for participants >

The effective time to show this opposition was when it was clear Kevin was giving the asylum to the lunatics. You just needed a half dozen to go to the Dems with an alternate speaker with a history of reasonable bipartisanship that the Dems could have worked together with on issues like the debt ceiling and voting reform that would have helped you kick the crazies out. 
They fact you didn't makes it clear that a reasonable GOP is a unicorn. >

You’re right, you’re not going to find completely reasonable GOP in congress at all. We’re left with “more reasonable,” but that’s an awfully low bar. Toddlers in need of a nap with their blankets are more reasonable than Marjorie Traitor Greene, Gaetz, and Boebert (aka Wish Sarah Palin). 
I just wonder how long before Traitor Greene and McCarthy are caught making out in a closet or something. >


Somebody like Ilhan Omar should not be serving on Foreign Affairs, especially with her stated positions with respect to the state of Israel. So I would absolutely vote to remove her,

So anyone who says anything “hostile” toward another foreign country shouldn’t be on the Foreign Affairs committee? Guess that disqualifies every republican…. >

Nope, just Israel. Because white evangelicals support Israel. 
It's absurd >

The reason they support Isreal is even more absurd. >

Yup they want the apocalypse to happen so they support Isreal