>

She scares them, my extremely conservative MAGA ass father loves this woman. Somehow she speaks to people like him and is waking them up lmao.
The GOP think she is the Democrats version of MTG. >

It's funny because /r/conservative posts this often too with the phrasing "because racism" and then the whole comments sections is "we just don't want her there because she's a muslim extremist spy, not because of racism" as if they think that for reasons for her being those things in their mind is beyond her religion and race. >

This is the problem with many racists. They think they are not racists. They think they are justified in their idiotic beliefs. >

racist often think that racism is when you hang black people, not when you dont like someone just because of where they were born or the skin they have, because to them that stuffs just obviously wrong >

"Large Marge?" What's that in reference to, haven't heard that before >

pee wee's big adventure.   a character named large marge.   it's from the 80s >

I swore that movie was a 90s thing, but i realize that was the pee-wee theatrical release. >

And because she's a woman. And because she's progressive. And because she's a Democrat.
The ideal GOP committee would be entirely comprised of old white Republican men over the age of 50. >

Or women who have had 5 open affairs by age 44 and believe in marrying rapists. >

Is this not a requirement? I am getting mixed messages on that. >

I think this is close to the truth, but not quite. I think they don't want her there because she speaks and proposes policies from the perspective of someone Black and Muslim (and also female and intelligent), that is, as someone with a different perspective than a straight white male. If she was a token Black Muslim conservative who 'shared' their views in public, they'd be fine with her on the committee. Part of Obama's strategy was to run as a 'qualified candidate who happened to be Black' rather than as a 'Black candidate'. Omar is outspoken on these identities that many conservatives want suppressed, so she is always going to be a target. >

Also because she is a refugee. They don't want that perspective to have any influence, even though that perspective is uniquely useful on this committee. >

Yeah, she's uppity. Can't have that. >

And is OBVIOUSLY antisemitic for even MENTIONING that Israel's shit might actually stink. >

Objecting to the policies and actions of Israel’s civil government is not antisemitism. >

Yeah that's the point of the comment you're replying to. >

Don’t forget woman, they hate women