>

Can’t wait to see another frivolous lawsuit thrown out
“All these interviews were on the record and recorded with President Trump’s knowledge and agreement. Moreover, it is in the public interest to have this historical record in Trump’s own words. We are confident that the facts and the law are in our favor.” >

It's still bothersome that he was talking how how horrific COVID would be to Woodward all while hiding it from the American people the entire time he was president. Not just that he did it but that the population is dumb to the point where they almost reelected the guy. Was just another example of something that would have buried a candidate in most other time periods >

Dumb? I think the phrase you are looking for is outwardly racist lol
Edit: I mean most presidents have been racist. Very few of them are verbally racist. They just did racist things with legislation.
Edit: most presidents stopped being verbally racist in the 20th century if they could help it. That’s why trump made his voters feels so good >

Edit: Dude, you can turn off inbox replies to comments. >

rump is doing this because he needs to say "I am suing woodward" as a cover for the actual content of the interviews. >

Like a drop of fish blood to a starving shark, Trump could smell money being made off his name and wants a piece.
(I still love the story of how a super fan made dumb pens to support Trump and sold them online, Trump found out and tried to sue him into the ground for using his trademark. Now the super fan hates him.) >

I'm surprised he hasn't sued his own children for using the Trump name yet. >

And if Woodward had not released the actual tapes of Trump speaking, 
Trump would have denied he ever said those words, and would've sued him 
for libel. smh >

So Trump thinks he can take down the guy that tangled with the Nixon White House and won? >

Step 1:  Sue someone frivilously
Step 2:  Send email blast to followers asking for money to help fight this 'injustice'
Step 3:  Lawsuit gets thrown out, pocket the money. 
Return to step 1. >

title should be " TFG attempts to sue Woodard over Trump tapes which he authorized and agreed to but also failed to acquire an NDA for" >

Not going to lie, I kinda feel left out that Trump hasn't sued me for voting against him or whatever garbage lawsuit off the 37 he files on a given day >

How Dare you use my Words against me, Useless Bob? I sue you! >

Q.  What is, hands down, the best way to call more attention to the tapes?  
A.  Sue the person who released them and send out a press release. >

The Streisand effect in play. This is going to make more and more headlines as he heads to court over an interview he flat out agreed to.
So more and more people will be talking about him lying about the severity of covid-19. When the court rules in favor of Woodward they will have more precedence to show that Donald is a serial liar. Which will flow into his other cases.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. >

This lawsuit will go far because any lawyer who takes it is money hungry. Seriously any lawyer filing this case should be disbarred. >

Also has a history of not paying his lawyers >

Asking for another sanction? >

Where are these tapes? I want to listen to them. >

It's the interviews Woodward had with Trump for his books