>

And nothing will be done.
And of course, Trump is confessing again on Truth ahead of the hearing. >

What’s he saying? >

Here you go:
My phone call to the Secretary of State of Georgia, and a second call which the Marxists, Communists, Racists, and RINOS don’t even want to talk about, were “PERFECT” calls. Many people, including lawyers for both sides, were knowingly on the line. I was protesting a RIGGED & STOLEN Election, which evidence proves it was. I won Georgia by a lot, but only needed a small number of votes from that total number. They cheated in many ways including STUFFING Ballots, ALL CAUGHT LIVE ON TAPE...
With many people on the line on what was a PERFECT call protesting the Rigged Georgia Election, which I have a clear right to do, and in fact an obligation to do since I made the call as President, how come not one person said, while on the call, that I acted inappropriately, or made a statement of protest at what I said, & then slammed down the phone. Not one, even with so many opposing people, lawyers, and others on the line. NO ADMONISHMENT at all. We nicely  agreed to speak again….
That was the call to Georgia. It was PERFECT, nothing done or said wrong. We agreed to continue our conversation at a later date. The other call, that was probably taped by them illegally, was so good that when the Washington Post heard it, they did a retraction and apology because they were fed false information, perhaps by the Secretary of State’s office, and they were angry about it! The Election in Georgia was RIGGED AND STOLEN. We have all the evidence needed. That is the CRIME! >

Holy shit, he's still spouting the same bullshit he did from day one? >

This jackass hasn't changed his tune in years. It's the same dribble of bullshit. >

Everything he is doing and say are actually working, Until proven otherwise. >

Not really. He's no longer useful and the right wing media machine that brought him his throngs of worshippers is starting to steer clear of him, even acknowledging they want to move on from Trump. Yes, he still holds sway over his biggliest sycophantic devotees, but it's clear that he's a lost cause to everyone else who even has a toe in reality. The S.S. Trumpanic is starting to take on water, no matter how much he denies there is an iceberg. >

Everyone underestimated him in 2016 and they are again now. You’re correct that Fox and others are trying to steer the ship but they don’t control it. Go outside any city in the US and it’s Trump land no matter what is on TV. He isn’t a politician he is a savior and a symbol. To go against him would be like denouncing Christianity itself to these people. Ron DeSantis may be polling ahead of Trump but that’s not votes on a ballet and it’s certainly not a candidate the nation would be willing to go to civil war for. Trump is far from done despite how fucking ridiculous he continues to be. >

You mean the details like the absolutely open and shut proof in the phone call everyone on earth already heard? >

The Georgia investigation's scope is much wider than just the Raffensperger call.  The Special Grand Jury was looking into "multi-state, coordinated efforts to influence the results of the November 2020 elections in Georgia and elsewhere" and included other calls and attempts to pressure state and local officials (by Trump and by others), the Georgia fake electors, I think some financial crimes, false statements made to the Georgia legislature, intimidation of poll workers, etc.  
The call itself isn't as open and shut as it seems on the surface, either.  The Georgia law re: solicitation of election fraud requires proof of criminal intent.  It's the prosecution's burden to prove that Trump meant "fabricate votes out of thin air" when he technically said "find the existing votes that were made and/or discarded illegally, resulting in the election being stolen from me."   
(You don't have to argue with me:  I know what he really meant just as well as you and everyone else does, but proving it beyond a reasonable doubt in court is a different matter).  
If even part of the jury thinks Trump may have genuinely believed the election was stolen and he was defrauded of hundreds of thousands of votes in Georgia, then he can't be convicted of willful solicitation of election fraud.  I wouldn't want to be the prosecutor who has to prove Trump didn't believe a conspiracy theory.  
I think the House Committee's case did a great deal to demonstrate that Trump knew the conspiracy theories were false, but I haven't looked closely enough to see whether there's enough to show he knew at the time of the phone call which will be essential to the prosecution. >


I think that's a much weaker argument for the defense than you're making it out to be. 

I think it's much weaker now than it was a year or two ago.  With the evidence we know now, I think the defense I described is likely to lose.  That's why I'm glad the various investigations have taken their time to gather a preponderance of evidence instead of prosecuting 2 years ago when everyone on Reddit said "it's open and shut, just play the phone call and it's over!"  

It doesn't matter what Trump thinks.

It does though.  The words "knowingly" and "willfully" count for a lot in the law.  If the defense is able to convince a jury that Trump really believed he was asking Raffensperger to find and count genuine discarded votes and not just fabricate a number, then he did not solicit election fraud, and he cannot be convicted of it, no matter how boneheaded his belief was.  Fortunately I think his case for this has seriously weakened with time and evidence and this defense is not likely to succeed at this point. >

The law in question is not "going outside appropriate channels," the law in question is "criminal solicitation of election fraud."  If his intention were for Raffensperger to "find"  existing votes that had been discarded, and not to fabricate a false vote count, then he did not solicit Raffensperger to commit a felony.  
I agree with you, of course he was wrong and guilty as fuck, and of course he knew he was lying on that phone call.  I'm not defending Trump here, I'm just explaining a challenge involved in prosecuting this particular law. >

Listen, we're splitting the hairs of a hypothetical defense.  I agree fully with you that Trump committed criminal solicitation of election fraud.  And I think the context and the current evidence is enough to overcome an argument to the contrary.  
But if Trump had gone "outside of the appropriate channels" to ask an official to find and count fraudulently discarded ballots, this would not be solicitation of election fraud, because the official finding and counting fraudulently discarded ballots would not be election fraud.  His approach would be inappropriate and it might merit charges related to intimidation, etc., but it would not be criminal solicitation of election fraud.  That's all I'm saying.  
With only the call transcript/recording as evidence, two years ago, this could have been a genuine obstacle to prosecution.  A surmountable obstacle, but not a sure thing.  Now, because of the diligence of two years of investigations, there is (what I believe to be) a preponderance of evidence which destroys any argument that his intent was innocent or ambiguous. >

Fani's gonna get Ya! >

Big Fat gonna be hot 🥵 >

How about you put the traitor in prison for life? I'd like the details on that one. >

I would just be happy f I never heard his voice, saw his face or had to read about that guy ever again. He single handedly ruin America. >

We probably will not see much of this report, if any, until charging decisions are reached with the regular grand jury.
Prosecutors aren't going to want specifics divulged to a potential defense or a media reaction if they can avoid it. >

People worship this serial liar crybaby dunce. Still blows my mind >

I don’t think the read Reuter’s, probably too busy watching Newsmax. >

I care about an indictment, I can wait for details until the trial. We know much of what happened already with the J6 proceedings and prior reporting. An indictment would be big, many people, good people, maybe the best people, are saying it would be YUUGE. >

What do you think will be first the trial or the moon landing? >

Everyone knows he's a criminal. 
Releasing more info that everyone already knows won't do anything.
The DOJ needs to prosecute him now. >

This is the Georgia grand jury, not the DOJ investigation. >

The DOJ needs to prosecute him now. >

Sure, but that's probably better for a comment section concerning the DOJ.