>

Can you stream all the episodes there?
Great, pass that shit. >

I'd say I'll vote against anybody who votes no on this bill, but...let's be honest, they all will. Abusing the public for personal profit has bipartisan support. >

We'll see. There's definitely gonna be some kind of poison pill in the bill. He wouldn't have named it that way if he actually wanted it to pass. >

It shouldn't be legal to have multiple unrelated motions in a single bill. Like poison pill shit is fucking evil. >

It’s the only way a lot of things can get passed (including good and important things). The system is pretty fucking broken. >

It's beyond broken. Stuff that's broken looks at the system & goes "damn, that shit's all fuckered up." >

I wonder if Pelosi could play the old Uno Reverse card and claim ownership of the bill. 
“This is something the American people support, and I’m proud to have my name on it.” >

I don't think she would be down for it, as she just sold Google stock right before the announcement that they will be questioning Google. Hawly is a pos, but why dress a turd with Pelosi? >

Kinda wild that people keep such tight tabs on Pelosi, but the 5 republican politicians who are doing it worse and some far worse are totally ignored and not spoken of. >

Yep. All  of them should have been pilloried in the media over these things. >

She's not even the top 10 in 2022 and people still keep railing her. >

They can all be crooked, ya know. >

Worth pointing out how reddit is obsessed with her in particular >

She’s the face of the Democratic Party, she gets about as much air time a McConnell in terms Reddit outrage. Which fits. >

When it comes to the stock trading thing she gets almost all the flack now adays despite not being the worst offender on either side of the aisle >

Yes because she is a high ranking official and a major figure of the democratic party.
To draw a comparison. Suppose that a rando republican house member and Obama during his presidency both got caught murdering their wife. Who do you think is gonna get the most media attention?
Leader figures are under more scrutiny than rank fillers. News at 11. >

Tragedy. The worst person I know just made an excellent point. >

But made it in the most asshole-ish way he could think of, of course. >

Who cares? Put my fucking name on the bill and then walk me through the streets yelling shame. This shit should’ve happened decades ago and is one of several absolutely essential changes to save our democracy >

True, but I am convinced this guy wouldn't have introduced this bill if he thought it had a snowball's chance in hell of passing. He probably checked to be sure McCarthy wouldn't bother to allow it to hit the House floor before he even ~~wrote it~~ paid someone to write it. >

Just a few months ago McCarthy said Republicans would pass a bill to change the current congressional stock trading behavior, and he noted he only owns mutual funds. >

Hell, maybe I'll be proven wrong and this really will happen. That would be great! >

He's not wrong, but this will fly like a lead balloon.
Naming it that just proves it's nothing more than political theater. >

Well good thing that mythbusters proved lead balloons do fly it just requires effort >

A mythbuster of culture I see >

Been doing a binge on discovery plus!