>

Built in 1978, had undergone recent maintenance, and consisted of two parallel systems but only one was damaged. This was definitely not sabotage.
This was two days ago already and they say it was a rupture rather than sabotage. >

They kind of have to; confirmed Russian sabotage of a pipeline between two NATO nations, on NATO soil, would more or less necessitate WWIII. >

Attack while they are weak. 
We would be in moscow by friday. >

Well we actually wouldn't since a nuke would probably fly in that case.
But they'd have no more soldiers in Ukraine, and no more nautical assets.....anywhere.