>


to have someone

You don't even need the "someone" anymore. Hand the assignment to GPT-3 and be done with it.
People need to stop acting like their emotions and personal beliefs matter at all when it comes to science. Your feelings don't matter, your opinion don't matter, only thing that matters when it comes to science is scientific evidence. >

That's not the only problem.
The biggest issue is that it is very easy(well, relatively easy) to take a real study and then use out of context quotes, or re-tell the results in a misleading way, or just outright lie about what the study says to further your misinformation agenda.
The rebuttal to these can take hours of work to figure out depending on the specifics, and are way too labour intensive for the average person to even begin to do, and often require high level knowledge to even understand. It's an endless game of whack-a-mole, and has really exploded with the ever expanding echo chambers online. 
Social media has really removed most kinds of nuance in favor of ingroup buzzwords and catchy or emotion inducing titles. >

It's also very easy/cheap to have someone write some bogus 'sienctific' study that says what you want to hear.