>

this is an opinion specific to something said in one youtube video?
It's just dumb to waste the time to put it in there, it's like needing to add to the rules masturbating in the chamber isn't allowed.  Just a bunch of pointless bullshit by a republican legislature that can't police their own rhetoric for the sake of "decorum." >

In my experience and from observing other areas of life when it comes to dress codes women are far more likely to push the boundaries than men. >

Clothing has no bearing on a person's ability to work.
And if you get distracted by arms of all things then you are the problem, not the other person. >

what? I dont understand >

There's been in the news that women in Missouri are having a dress code enforced on them to cover their arms (in the house of reps). But the men already have to cover their arms. So really this is just applying a same dress code to everyone. Women seem to always want to push the boundaries of any dress code (look at Twitch) and in this case they're upset when its a same standard for men and women. >

okay well everybody wearing sort of the space thing is good so uhm yeh >

From the time I started working, and had a job requiring men wear suits, I have noticed a weird double standard in what men are allowed to wear compared to women. I both understand how adding this rule would reduce the double standard, and why women would feel this is unfair given how much more they're allowed to wear in most circumstances. >

is the fact that men's fashion style "suits" while womens' fashion style is "dresses" a "double standard"? or is it just that traditionally they have had different styles of dress for men and women?