>

We conducted a thorough investigation of ourselves and found we did nothing wrong.
This is why Gaetz wants Santos to go through the House ethics process:  
House Republicans voted to gut the Office of Congressional Ethics, and George Santos said it was 'fantastic' >

Yeah, I assume it's a cake walk now. >

The ethics office will probably also lack the resources to conduct an investigation in a reasonable amount of time. >

Sex trafficking Gaetz should be shunned. >

Child rapist / sex trafficker says what? >

We've investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing. >

Didn't they just weaken the Office of Congressional Ethics just last week so it can't it's job? >

Yes >

You first Matt. >

Maybe do it a second time for Anthony Devolder. >

And a third time for George Devolder. >

What ethics process.  McCarthy just handicapped it. >

Happy cake day! >

Thank You! >

Why not both? >

Here is the problem- if this was a democrat Matt Gaetz- McCarthy and every Republican would be demanding he resign. >

Gaetz is sticking up for Santos but he brings money to the table. Doesn’t matter where it’s from or what he did to get it. If you bring campaign money to the party, the party rewards you. Plain and simple. >

It’s just a good thing the House Ethics systems are so robust and respected by the GOP!! Right? Right!?
Sit the fuck down, Gaetz, you craven and mealy-mouthed chucklefuck. >

Of course he says this right after he orchestrated the gutting of said office. What a fucking joke. >

Dui pedo Matt gaetz trying to be ethical. 
No one is buying it >

Why would anyone give a flying fish what Matt Gaetz says and/or thinks about Santos? They are both garbage people. How either one got elected is beyond me. >

Gaetz advocating for a GOP Frankenstein to 'be given a chance.' Par for the course. >

coughpedophileandsextraffikersayswhat?cough 🙄🖕🏻 >

There is no “House ethics process”. >

Efics?  Efficks?  What are those again matt ?  Is it efikal when u pay 'school fees' via vemlo for sex to underage girls matt? >

House ethics process?  You mean the same one republicans have dismantled? >


“George Santos will have to go through the congressional ethics process. I don’t want to prejudge that process, but I think he deserves the chance to at least make his case," Gaetz said. >

The same ethics board which the Republicans defanged. My money is on the Brazilians getting to The Talented Mr. Devolder before the US Congress does anything. >

"There are requirements members of Congress have to meet when it comes to the money that they donate to their own campaigns,” he added. >

A more surprising headline I have never seen >

It is no wonder TV series like House of Cards can't survive. The real life circus is more outrageous than they can imagine >

A sex trafficker of minors and a pathological liar become friends. >

I get that politicians generally lie a lot. Butt can someone explain this guy to me? He seems to just throw lies out like candy. Every single thing of his essence is a lie.
Was this not known before he was elected? >

Gaetz with the gas lighting. Don't believe with your own lying eyes, trust the process we corrupted. What Santos had done is bald faced and obvious, you don't need any process to see this is plainly true. >

That’d be great, BUT the GOP is dissolving the ethics committee. Looks like the biggest liars, cheaters and thieves get a pass try again. Good ol’ America
(Edited): damn autocorrect >

No matt he should be shunned…he should resign. >

You mean the same ethics process that the GQP just watered down to make it useless and even more unenforceable than it was before? >

The ethics process is now a palm reading >

Gaetz wants there to be a bigger shit bag in Congress to take the heat off of him. >

At the same time, the GOP is destroying the ethics process. >

Such bullshit. His constituents do have challenges. It’s housing, retirement, medical care and inflation. All the republicans care about are Hunter Biden dick pics, cutting entitlements instead of defense and expunging trumps impeachments. >

Doesnt  Gaetz have a prom date coming up? >

He shouldn’t be able to vote on anything or be involved in any aspect until the investigation is concluded. Period! >

Fuck you, Gaetz. No matter what, this piece of shit never fails to fail. >

Pedophile speaks out in defense of conman, just another day in Republican government >

One of the challenges they have is dealing with him as their rep... It's crazy these people are trying to defend him. Then again... >

They know no shame. >

If we start shunning liars where does it end? Will we shun the sex offenders next? >

Gaetz just needs someone to distract from him >

You mean the process they just gutted? >

That's rich, considering Gaetz has zero ethics himself. >

Why not both? >

Leave it to the pedophile to rush to Santos defence. Did he find out “George Santos“ is secretly 15? >

Birds of a feather.... and that's today's GOP. >

Of course he did, he’s in a party full of like minded grifters, con artists and conspiracy theorists. >

Person who should be shunned says other person who should be shunned should not be shunned. >

If Santos stays, it sets a precedent. A bunch of us should run for office as republicans talking all the ultra maga bs. Once we are sworn in, vote straight Democrat. What are they going to do? >

Um…is Matt the Frat talking about the Ethics process he and his fellow fascists want to abolish? Shitty hypocrite. >

Our government is beyond a farce at this point >

If Santos was a Democrat would you say exactly the same thing? >

Goetz commenting on Santos is like Ted Bundy commenting on the Boston Strangler. >

Is this Matt Gaetz the pedophile? >

Yes