>

Thanks, Obama. 
Do you all remember when Iran wouldn’t let UN inspectors in?
The Trump administration leaving the JCPOA was a pointless foreign policy blunder. If I were Iran, I certainly wouldn't trust the US to stick to any agreement considering the next president could be another unhinged demagogue. >


wouldn't trust the US to stick to any agreement considering the next president

Well that was the fundament flaw with the JCPOA, which made it unreliable from the start... It was an executive order.  It wasn't a treaty, it wasn't created with the advise and consent of the senate and then ratified by a 2/3 vote in the senate to become binding US law...
Just as easily as Obama unilaterally signed it into existence, any other president could sign it out of existence.  That's no basis by which foreign policy should be conducted. >

The alternatives to a deal in any form is to allow Iran to have nukes, or start yet another war. The US politics aren't there for a  real treaty which leaves us with what we had.  Trump could have and should have IMO kept the deal in place. What would be your solution? >

Translation: Putin has transferred enough material to Iran for several nuclear weapons. >

I'm pretty sure Iran has the capability to produce its own. >

This is not a threat by Iran, nor does it mean they are building a weapon. The IAEA still monitors their facilities under the NPT. Iran's nuclear program is often mischaracterized as some sort of mad dash for a bomb, when in reality if Iran wanted a nuclear weapon, they could have one in a couple of weeks.
Iran has had the capability of building nuclear weapons for several years now. As part of the nuclear deal, they were obliged to send their enriched nuclear material overseas as assurances to other countries that it would not be used in the production of weapons.
When Trump left the deal, Iran continued to abide by that agreement for a couple of years, hoping to entice the United States back to the deal. Now that the Biden Administration has taken the same tone as Trump (despite promising to re-enter the deal) Iran has stopped sending the material to other countries. This means of course that they will be stockpiling it.
Make no mistake; as they have done for the last 5 years Iran would like nothing more than to send their nuclear material overseas in exchange for sanctions relief. But as long as the United States refuses to remove sanctions, the only bargaining chip Iran has is to stockpile their enriched uranium. >

So? It’s not like there’s any agreement currently in place to monitor Iran’s nuclear activities and mitigate its accrual of nuclear materials. >

Fuck around and find out time. 
Just try it Iran. I savor the day you try and Israel wipes the floor with the Ayatollah’s beard. >

Israel would also be obliterated of the face of the earth in the process. What’s your point? >

You say that like they wouldn’t be aware of any of their plans in advance and there wouldn’t be air strikes. >

LOL you say that like Israel is some all seeing and all knowing person that knows every single possible threat to them and can plan accordingly by looking into the future. Believe it or not, Israel isn’t surrounded by countries that stand for what they aspire to be and patiently waiting for their downfall…. Or are they? >

You say that like if there’s a nuclear threat they’re not gonna be even more observant and the US isn’t gonna be paying even more attention too. >

No matter how careful they are, if Israel bombs Iran, Israel will suffer casualties as well. 100% fact. Case closed. >

They already take casualties, from Iranian backed terrorists. >

I meant it would be magnified, it would be a full on war most likely