>

Mickey Rourke really needs to make more movies.  His stunt double is bored and running amok.  A full mok.
Why is the far right so deathly afraid of trans people? Could it be that they're incapable of empathy or understanding and hate or fear whatever they don't understand? >

They're not. For many conservatives, their fear lies in the creeping overt indoctrination practices so many in the "pro-trans" community seem to practice. 
For many, it feels so much like the dishonesty and lies they suffered under during the same-sex marriage movement.
We were promised honesty, but was it HONESTY to force some kids to miss out on having their Dad?
We were told the homosexual community owned the franchise on what love really means, but is it LOVING to destroy the primal love that exists between a baby and its Mother?
The homosexual community insisted THEY were the tolerant ones, but is it TOLERANT to silence others with "anti-discrimination" laws? (Gay people have the right to live as they choose, but no right to silence others who disagree with them on marriage and sexual right and wrong.)
Homosexuals insist they know what's best when it comes to informing others, but is it RIGHT to force homosexual education on ALL children? Do they allow equal time to opposing view points to be taught to their children?
The homosexual community insisted THEY were the honest ones when campaigning for their changes, but is it HONEST to lie about what you plan to do regarding marriage. ("Fighting for gay marriage generally involves LYING about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there, because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change...and this is a LIE. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change, and again I don't think it
should exist." - Masha Gessen, Lesbian Activist")
So is any of this EVEN NECESSARY now that all couples have equal benefits? (The truth is, from GAY COUPLES to the most "hyper-sectional Trans-Queer" person you can find, each of them have EQUAL BENEFITS under the law.)
HOWEVER - The relationship of couples to a child of any age is a different question COMPLETELY. In some states, same-sex couples do not have the right to adopt or create a child by surrogacy - because the right of the child to have both a mother and father role model outweighs the claims of same-sex adults to obtain a child.
Same-sex "marriage" abolishes either a mother or a father from the life of a child. It denies EQUALITY to children who become the victim, by design, of adults more eager to feed their selfish wishes than satisfy the most critical needs of an innocent child.
What so many in the trans community fail to acknowledge is, "the world doesn't owe them understanding". They're owed equal PROTECTION under the law, but not equal outcomes. 
To answer your question more precisely, most conservatives don't "fear" people in the trans community, nor do they empathy towards whatever personal struggles they might be dealing with. Perhaps you're making some of the same misjudgments toward conservatives you accuse them of making toward members of the trans community? (If you were in court, you might hear, "Objection your honor. Attempting to argue facts not in evidence." Personally, I can't for a moment imagine anyone from the trans community being rejected or looked down upon for attempting to enter my local Catholic church.
Conservatives don't fear anyone in the trans community. Instead, they fear being lied to in the same way they were during the far left's campaign to undermine the institution of traditional marriage. In the same way the homosexual community declared in the beginning they only wanted a chance to share in an equivalent legal bond with their partner, then it was private unions, then same sex marriage, etc...conservatives know what started as "we only want to be free to be who we really are" will soon turn into a demand for unearned privileges at the expense of other people's liberty. >

And there we have it. Let no one doubt for a second, the christofascist anti-trans crusade is rooted in a simmering rage over losing the fight for marriage equality. People like the OP here will fight tooth and nail for their "liberty" to treat the queer community like second-class citizens and then call you the intolerant one for not tolerating their bigotry. >

Any chance you're misrepresenting the points made in the point?
Again, the overwhelming majority of people on the right have no issue with those in the trans community. For most on the right, they simply aren't interested in what's bothering people in the trans community. They're more interested in being left alone and have no issues with leaving others alone.
Your use of terms like "Christi-fascist" is both misplaced and reflective of the left's popular tactic of name calling in place of any real substantive argument.  
The argument that the queer community is somehow being treated like second-class citizens by those on the right or conservatives is again an attempt to "argue facts not in evidence". Where exactly is the queer community in the US systematically or institutionally being held to a different standard or required to receive a lesser outcome? Sure, it's clearly in fashion by many on the left to ghost hunt when it comes to victimizing members of the queer community. However, in an industry growing at the pace the queer community is, one would expect far more circuit level and class action lawsuits filed in an attempt to benefit from the apparent hatred on the right.
As I pointed out in my post, one of the things many on the right mistrust of the current trans popularity movement is the push by so many in the queer community for "special rights and privileges". What starts with the traditional "we're allowed to name call and use classic 'S.I.G.N.' language techniques (Shame, Insults, Guilt, Need to be right) in blaming all members of the right for the individual sins of an isolated few...soon becomes many in the trans community demanding special rights and privileges that recognize and protect their gender identity beyond what all Americans already share equally. 
For many, this includes the right to use the restroom of their choice (even if it's at the expense of the safety of small children), access to gender-affirming healthcare (Key word being "affirming" or "queer means no one is allowed to say no to me.), and the right to be free from discrimination in the workplace (business owners must lose the right to shape the presentation of their business (or your favorite fancy restaurant must tolerate the pan-gendered trans-feminine man with optic pink hair and face that looks like a tackle box), or in housing and public accommodations (both areas where they share the same protections other Americans do). 
They are also calling for an end to the criminalization of gender-nonconforming behavior (again, a classic example of a queer double standard. Anyone not selectively approved by the queer community is not permitted to establish standards reflective of traditional gender roles...while members of the queer community enjoy their "no one is allowed to tell us what we can do") , and the recognition of their gender identity on official documents (a highly problematic thing from a legal standpoint). 
Additionally, many in the queer community are advocating for the right to self-determination, which would allow them to choose their own gender identity without interference from the government or other institutions. Finally, they are demanding the right to express their gender identity in a safe and affirming environment, free from harassment and violence (all media approved buzzwords that are code for "we want to be free to declare whatever identity we feel we are at anytime and free to change it at anytime without any government qualification or anyone having the right to question, critique, or reject our choices". 
Again, believing people on the right are overtly against queer people because they're queer or "how they choose to be queer" is arguing facts that are not in evidence. People on the right don't feel the left has a trustworthy track record after their campaign for same-sex marriage. It's the subjective nature of the queer community's double standard and their intent on imposing it on other Americans come hell or high water they dislike.
Lastly, the nature of your last post and your name calling use of terms like "Christofascist" is a violation of Reddit rules. >


Any chance you're misrepresenting the points made in the point?

Nope.
I'm not gonna play your game, dude. You've made it very clear who you are and what you believe. How do you expect me to have any desire to engage you in good faith when you ask for examples of systemic discrimination against queer people, and then preemptively list and shoot down examples of systemic discrimination as somehow not being examples of systemic discrimination? >

I'm not sure what game you imagine I'm playing and I'll assure you I'm no ideologue. The points I've made are not in dispute...and you seem to be under the impression that me or anyone on the right is somehow invested or cares about how anyone chooses to express their queerness. The political right is not out to persecute members of the queer community "for being queer" or for "how they're queer". While you believe the entirety of the queer community is under attack because a handful of jerks have had negative interactions with a handful of people in the queer community is simply not supported by the facts. In many ways it's like the mistaken belief so many have on the left than police are gunning down innocent unarmed black people by the thousands each year...when in fact the total number shot nationwide in 2020 was 28 total (and 3/4 of them were actively resisting arrest and order attempting to take the policeman's gun). The point is not argue the merits of any arrest in particular. The point is to demonstrate the attempts to gaslight an epidemic where one doesn't exist have been self serving for the media and those members of the left who profit from identity/outrage politics.
The right fears the queer community's efforts to gaslight animosity from the right in their attempt to foster the institutionalizing of special rights for those self-identifying as queer.
If you're interested in discussing the points I've raised and the topic behind it then please offer counter points supported by evidence. Otherwise, please be respectful and follow the rules we're all supposed to follow on Reddit. >

Lgbtqia+ folks just want the same quality of life anybody else has, free from prejudice, and to be protected under law from such discrimination which often times leads to violent ends. One of my trans neighbors/friends tried leaving a life of crime, and transitioning into the women she identified as. She ended up shanked to death in the street, no doubt by people from her old criminally enterprise, but because they were prejudiced against her existence. The LGBTQIA’s existence and lived experiences aren’t up for debate. They’re very real, and they should be protected from such. >

The National Crime Victimization Survey, which is conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, does not specifically track crime rates against the LGBT+ community. However, according to the Human Rights Campaign, transgender people are disproportionately the victims of violence and hate crimes. According to the HRC, there were 120 reported deaths of transgender people due to fatal violence in 2020 - nationwide.
No one disputes the Human Rights Campaign is a pro-trans instrument and no one in law enforcement or on the political right is attempting to minimize any crime committed against any American. However, as someone who works in the Criminal Justice field, I can assure you what's overtly missing from any crime stats related to members of the LGBTQ+ community are the many in reported and non-identity related factors associated with the vast majority of these crimes.
For example, last year I represented a client who is a member of the LGBTQ+ community. My client, a landlord, was stabbed 4 times in an altercation with a tenant over a rent dispute. The local paper reported the crime as "an attack on a member of the LGBTQ+ community" and my client as a victim of a potential hate crime. What was left out of the story was the fact that the defendant was ALSO a member of the LGBTQ+ community and the only "hate" associated with the crime was their "hate of having to pay rent".
Are there actual cases of people being victimized for no other reason than being a member of the LGBTQ+ community? Of course. Bigots and jerks have lived among us since the dawn of time.
Are members of the LGBTQ+ community being attacked and victimized on a wide scale basis throughout the country, by bigoted members of the far-right, for no other reason than being innocent members of the LGBTQ+ community? The FBI and the criminal justice community says NO. There is simply no evidence to support this claim.
In most cases I've encounter when defending members of the LGBTQ+ community accused of crimes or who are the victim of crimes, the related circumstances are completely unrelated to their LGBTQ+ identity. Instead, factors like drug use, money disputes or just plain impolite behavior is at the root of the crime...no different than any other group in society.
As one older client of mine and member of the LGBTQ+ community personally revealed and complained about..."Too many members of the LGBTQ+ community (mostly younger ones) like to play up their victim card among themselves. They enjoy the cache'. However, when pushed on the topic, being stared at on the subway or being treated impolitely by a stranger having a bad day are not crimes. We can't all be royalty." >

Oooo I’m a scaryyyy trans woman here to terrify you with the fact that I love Pokémon and cute skirts!!! 
Truly I am evil. >

Can I be evil with you? I also like Pokémon and cute skirts. >

Can I join the evil gang? Not trans but also love Pokémon and skirts >

Oh, yeah, I should have asked about qualifications. I'm not trans, but I am Ace and enjoy both masculine and feminine expressions of self. Is that a disqualifier? >

I’m pan 🥰😋 >

God this woman is hard to look at every day on this sub. >

Never go bobbing for anvils. >

She needs to go away >

She is angry because Trans women look better then her. Poor thing. >

You sound uncertain, but yeah, Marjorie identifies as a woman and uses she/her pronouns. >

It's just weird that 95% of conservative voters have never even seen a trans person in real life and yet they have all these feelings about them. Like, what is going on in their minds that they think trans people playing sports or using bathrooms is somehow the most important event possible? The number of elite trans athletes is ridiculously low, we're literally talking about a few dozen people across the entire planet and yet Republicans seem to think it's the most pressing cultural and legal issue. >

Those feelings come from porn. The only know trans people through trans porn. Transphobia has many roots/causes but one of them is due to people viewing trans porn and getting the wrong idea that being a trans person and/or crossdressing is purely a fetish and nothing more.
They can’t comprehend the idea that it is about identity not sexual pleasure. Watching trans porn is also a guilty pleasure of many conservatives. They get aroused by it but angry at themselves because they are supposed to be super straight and homophobic. 
So when they see trans people just… existing in society, to them it’s as if someone was walking around the streets naked. Or masturbating in public. Plus they get reminded of their “taboo” , of their guilty pleasure. So they wanna play the role of “Defenders of Purity and Family Values” and try to get rid of trans people, however they can.
Again, not saying this is the one and only cause for transphobia but it’s one of the causes. >

This is something that I don’t see talked about much, but I’m sure it has a disposal effect to mens perception of trans people. >

I’ve been looking into Marge’s family history. Honestly her parents were just rich people. Publicly they were not openly racist or anything. Hell Marge’s soon to be ex husband was basically picked out for her by dear old dad. Yet she is such a nutcase. Then you get this crazy stuff and openly 4 affairs and people in not only her county but around the country think she is amazing for: “owning the libs.” >

I don't like MTG either and I want her as far away from power as possible, but the amount of body shaming, misgendering, accusations of being closeted or "not passing", etc. in this thread are pretty discouraging to read as a trans person. The same kind of thinking there powers transphobia in general. Certainly there are other ways we can critique her. >

I downvoted like twenty comments in this post for that reason. It's depressing. My theory is that there are a lot of angry people who want to say homophobic, transphobic, racist, and (especially) misogynistic shit who know it's not socially acceptable. So when they're given a woman they can hate it all comes out.
I once saw a post that had two neonazis on stage. One was a woman and the things said about her in the comments were out of this world. Not so much about the guy (who the post was about). The sad sacks just want to scream insults at women in public. MTG gives them their moment. >

What is the Republican obsession with controlling other people’s bodies? They want to dictate more than half of the population of the United States starting with women and probably not ending with the LGBTQ community…
Mind your own sexuality ya pervs… >

Humans have a strong disgust reflex because we're omnivores. This disgust reflex is easily exploited by fascists. Mystery solved.