>
Of course they do, because they know that odds are that on some occasion -- probably many, over the years -- Biden would have been visited at his home by his son, because, you know, that's what families do. But they'll spin it into supporting whatever conspiracy theories about Hunter they're pushing. >

"Every December 25th HUNTER BIDEN VISITED HIS DAD! WAS JOE BIDEN BUYING DRUGS FOR HIS SON?!?!?"
-Republicans >

"Nevermind how a bunch of us spent July 4 in Russia that was just coincidence."
-those same Republicans >

Lol yes! The hypocrisy is just becoming so goddamn maddening >

you hit your head recently? >

Definitely a head injury. Playing the what about game is a sure sign of impaired brain function. >

Literally Trump's first point of order when he took office was to hide visitor logs >

Fun fact! It wasn't until the final days of his term that Trump realized the public schedule for the POTUS, was, well, public. He was furious and demanded that the information be censored moving forward. So the White House released a significantly shortened version for the final weeks of his presidency. 
He likely would have implemented that change upon taking office, too, if he wasn't too fucking dumb to know about it. >

What’s funny is most of it was “Executive Time” which now knowing he didn’t know it was public is hilarious >

Republicans want records of Biden Casino and Biden Steaks. >

Biden Airlines >

Biden University >

Biden Winery >

Pay attention Democrats because there are 74 million voters in this country who do not give a shit about your bipartisanship. You're never going to win them over by showing how fair and balanced you (think you) are with your investigations and legislation. >

💯 After decades of seeing everyone constantly give the right break after break and concede ground to them under the delusion that this time they’ll finally be appeased! I’m just so fcking tired. They always get everything they want and more while everyone else only has more and more taken from them. It hasn’t done a damn thing to get them to stop complaining about their persecution complex and it hasn’t kept them from doing anything just because we keep nicely playing by the rules. 
The voters dgaf if you’re not “winning”. Their party members dgaf and just continue to whine in bad faith before they stab you in the back. And the media dgaf how ridiculous they look trying to stretch further and further to push bOtH SiDeS. We need to wake tf up already. >

The right and russia share many tactics and traits, if we give ground, they will take it. 
Either the Democrats step up now or idiocracy is inevitable. >

Didn't Dick Cheney take the position in court that the vice president isn't bound by the Presidential Records Act making this whole thing moot because Biden was vice president at the time, and President currently? I'm being about as serious as I think this whole story is. >

The law only applies to Democrats. >

Didn't Republicans pass that back when Bush Jr was President and it just got lost?? >

It doesn’t matter if there is a law.  Republicans only care about enforcing the laws against Democrats.  When a Republican breaks the law they could care less. >

Fuck what republicans want. They have 0 credibility. >

Dems have credibility? Smashing the economy yes. We still have a baby formula shortage for christ sake. >

Yeah, that republicans voted against every solution for to help with. >

“We will respond to all subpoena’s once Congressman Jordan responds to his.” >

Well give them the logs if Trump releases all of his. Simple >

Biden: 10 documents from over 7 years ago.
Trump: over 100 documents from 3 years ago
There is no reason to suspect Biden’s case is more  concerning or warrants a visitor log and trump doesn’t.
I personally want them both to do it but by all accounts it appears trump is definitely the worse case >

makes no difference, they are both guilty for taking documents, rather it's one doc or 100 docs.  Like saying I only robbed the back of just a bit of cash not all of it.  It's still a bank robber.. >

I agree. Both need to be investigated and an impartial judicial group needs to be in charge of the investigation.
The only issue is that Biden appears to being complying and not holding up the FBI and other investigative organizations. whereas trump is halting and slowing down the whole process. 
Doesn’t prove anything but impressions aren’t looking favorably for trump >

Because every home has a visitor log. That’s how elitist Republicans are. >

To be fair, if you have a federal paid security detail there is probably someone writing down who comes to visit your home. >

What makes you say that? >

Well, it's standard practice for a security detail to perform vetting on visitors who are unknown to them and are going to be close enough to be a threat. 
This isn't extensive but it's probably going to mean getting a name and having someone run it through ncic.  That's 30 seconds work but it is going to generate a log of people that were visiting that were checked. >

The DOJ should have acted sooner.
From here on in Republicans will be trying to offset the crimes of the Trump years by inflating and exaggerating ANYTHING that has to do with Joe Biden. >

It looks like lots of people want to say “they both did it, let’s drop all charges and normalize this behavior” 
Fuck that! We need fair investigations into both, for all of the reasons. >

Arrogant reality-deniers take a break from underage trafficking to focus on manipulating the press. 
Great work GQP!  Now what about her emails?!  I heard there was some incredible bombshells about Benghazi in those!! >

Trump was asked by the National Archive to return the Classified documents. The National Archive knew which ones Trump had and made a specific request for their return. Trump refused. Next The National Archive and FBI went through a court to get a subpoena requiring the return of the specific classified document Trump had and Trump lied claiming he didn't have them. Lastly the FBI got a warrant and went in and got the damn classified documents themselves. The whole process took over a year. 
Biden's lawyers notified DOJ and The National Archive of the documents. The Documents were turned over without any formal requests needing to be made. 
Lying to authorities and refusing a court order is what led to Mar-a-logo being raised. Not Trump merely having documents. Authorities new for over a year Trump had documents. >

Please don't use facts and common sense around the Trump faithful. Their heads will explode. >

How come all we talk about is trump when this case involves Joe Biden, a completely different person? >

Because comparing this to Trump’s case highlights the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans? I thought that was obvious >

Is your goal to point out hypocrisy at the other end of the political spectrum? You could do that all day long for both sides of the political aisle. It sounds like a deflection to distract people from Biden’s crime, which is the topic of this news story. Lots of what aboutism going on here >

The democrats on that committee should also call for Trumps. >

What a farce this has become. >

Hypocrisy, thy name is Republican. >

When are we going to stop being surprised by republican shamelessness? >

I am never surprised by it. >

This is how you do headlines.
Always poimt out the double-standard. >

Of course they did. >

We're named the united states, but we're tribal as fuck and have descended into a divided nation. The fact that Trump didn't succeed because a black police officer named Eugene Goodman realized the intent of the mob and used his race to his advantage to bait them to go left instead of right, which gave time for all the senators and congressman to evacuate, paints a really grim picture about Democracy long-term. >

Repubs are unapologetic hypocrites. Of course they are behaving this way. >

Biden's visitor logs are online White House visitor logs
Trump's logs Visitor logs >

I read something yesterday that Trump didn't realize his visitor logs were public until the last weeks of his term and then he started trying to make them private.  🤣 >

Politicians love double standards twice as much as regular basic human standards >

Republicans never try to help investigate one of their own. >

Like democrats investigate their own neither party does >

lol they aren’t even attempting to put a facade of impartiality >

I feel like this whole thing has been an obvious trap, set by Biden, to trick Orcpublicans into condemning that which Trump is about to be arrested for.  Of course, it's not like bald-faced hypocrisy has ever stopped them in the past. >

Does Comer think we are as stupid as the Kentuckians who voted for him? 
Don’t investigate Jared and Ivanka for Qatar,Saudi Arabia and China contracts but go after Hunter like rabid dogs. >

The GOP is circling the wagons >

Question for Americans: Why are Republicans like this still alive? >

The democrats should push to have the same details from Trump.  If they won’t then Biden should release nothing. >

Does anyone else feel like Congress isn’t doing shit for the Citizen’s they are supposed to serve. >

Do politicians need to keep a visitor log for their home? I understand Mar-a-lago probably having one due to it being a hotel/resort, but not their personal homes. >

Anywhere guarded by Secret Service, there are probably visitor logs. >

As a Democrat, I believe ALL public official visitor logs should be public. Both home and in the office. Yes I’m aware that would be a huge invasion of privacy but I’m ok with it. No one has to run for public office. Being a politician is a 24hr job. You’re always on the clock so I think it’s only prudent to monitor who is talking to YOUR representative. 
Besides, aren’t telecommunication companies collecting  similar data on the entire population? Who in turn sell that information to both private and government sectors? 
If we aren’t allowed to own our private data, why should a public official be allowed to own their privacy?
Edit: I’m not even sure if that makes sense. It’s my day off. My wife is out. I took a gummy and watching football. If what I said is insane, just ignore. I’ll review it when I’m sober and delete if necessary. >

You’re literally a servant of the people. As such transparency should be 100% guaranteed. >

Sure here it is pal. 🖕🏻 >

Biden can tell them what Trump did "there are no visitor logs at my private residence" >

I mean, go for it. Just remember what’s good for the goose is good for the treasonous insurrectionist shitbag. >

I hope this ends in accusations about anonymous donors and Democrates offer to support a law overturning cItizens united. >

I heard Hunter Biden was seen entering the president’s home >

R words >

wait --- but that is hypocritical. i'm confused. >

Why not both Presidents' logs? Are the Republicans focused on only trashing Democrats instead of doing something useful for American citizens? Normal. USA politicians aren't helping you, they are wasting time holding sit-down pompous pontificating hearings to bolster their own names. So, call them names. >

It's no surprise at all is it? >

So cmon let’s not act like we don’t know what’s going on , they are going to charge Biden so that trump will have to be charged also … politics is poisonous >

The DOJ will not indict a sitting president. So that is unlikely >

Home visitor logs?     Gee, this dude is really fishing - does he believe that Russians went to JB home? >

Why would dems defend Santos? >

My point is that Santos is a typical republican scumbag.  Not Democrat. >

Because they have no values whatsoever. >

Democrats should ignore these subpoenas, just like repiglicans did. >

Tell them to pound sand. Do every trick they did. Fuck em. >

Of course.
And trump ceased to publish the WH's logs so we have no record of all the crooks that went there while he was there. >

Because Trump's are in his septic tank. >

Republicans being hypocrites, what a surprise >

Yet again the media and democrats allow the false equivalence. 
This story should be ignored and if they insist ask if there was an FBI raid. >

Shouldn’t we be mad that both of those clowns did this?  Shouldn’t we also be mad at the entire hypocrisy of the entire situation?  This shouldn’t be something we that we need to take sides on.  Both of them did the same illegal crap, get angry at both of them. >

Sure, they both did the same thing, in the same way some one driving 10 mph over the speed limit is the same thing as someone intentionally plowing into a crowd of people going 50 mph over the speed limit did the same thing. >

Isn't this regarding the classified docs not hunter biden? >

GQP are trying to tie the two together. Show Hunter - gasp! - visited his parents at a time there were classified documents sitting in a locked closet. Obviously Hunter only went to the Biden family home to steal said documents to sell to China or Ukraine. >

Ah, that makes sense. Don't know why I got downvotes for asking a question. Sometimes reddit is rude. Thank you for answering my question >

That's a whataboutism >

Not really. It's the same issue with a different person. >

Oh yeah, whatabout that other person?!  Huh?? >

More precedent than anything. >

Citing precedent is literally what lawyers are looking for, but to them it's "wHaTaBoUtIsM". >

Should’ve set a precedent then… >

Pound sand. >

Send them over - >

Of course they don’t >

Well trumps would be really embarrassing ando likely show so malfeasance or something.  But Bidens will show little if anything so they’ll be able to bullshit indefinitely >

At least they’re hypocritically consistent. >

Both Trump & Biden should be investigated for having documents. Let’s get logs from both of them. >

Can’t have it one way - that is untrustworthy >

Interesting. >

Is anyone surprised at all? >

How have Democrats done something for 6 years when we weren't aware of the documents from Mar-a-Lago that long?
I'm confused by simple timelines... >

What a surprise >

if Trump’s legacy is stricter transparency for future presidents maybe he did accomplish something lmao >

Ask them “how does it feel to want?”. >

No.  Your guy set the precedent.  Kick rocks. >

It’s funny how everyone is acting all surprised about these documents. This is what they ALL DO!!! Take work home and never bring it back. 
It’s not just Trump & Biden. Check the belongings of EVERY ex president or vice and we will see the same event play over and over and over and over. >

I thought they were all supposed to make visitors logs transparent. I need to see if Joe and corn-pop are still friends, that would warm my heart. >

Weird almost like they are disingenuous pieces of shit >

This i a DoJ matter not a congress matter >

Republicans can go fuck themselves.
Biden: Probably >

And democrats want Jr’s laptop but not Hunters 🤔🤔 >

Guliani says he had it. Remember that whole stink about Hunter's water soaked laptop he gave to a blind guy in either New Hampshire or Vermont. >

Both sets of logs should be made public. >

Would he even keep a visitors log at his own home? >

Whatever. >

Um also Garland is no longer in my GOOD GUYS LIST. >

"I need the visitor log, but I'm real busy, I've only got time for Biden's!"

"Are you sure?  I can get you both, no problem.  They're both right here."

"No, damnit, just Biden's!"

"It's really no trouble, I mean, just so you've got them, right?  I can just..."

"PUT THEM BACK.  NO TRUMP.  ONLY BIDEN."

"If you look here..."

"I'VE GOT MY EYES CLOSED GODDAMNIT I HAVEN'T READ ANYTHING ON IT JUST PUT BIDEN'S IN MY HAND-"

"Okay, if you insist..."

"...is this actually Biden's that you've given me, and not Trump's?"

"....maybe...." >

And the Dems want Trumps but not Bidens. Have you not figured out this is a game to these people. >

Got a source for Democrats requesting Mar-a-Lago visitor logs? >


House Democrats introduced the "Mar-a-Lago Act" in 2017 that would require Trump to regularly disclose visitors to his Florida home, but it was never voted on in the chamber or full Congress.

It's literally in the article.
And don't come back with the basic response "well, of course it was never voted on, blah blah". You asked for a source of Dems requesting the logs. The introduction of that the Mar-a-Lago Act by Democrats is requesting the logs. >

Bidens the president, not trump. We’re focusing on the current administration since they are, the current administration >

And if the previous administration didn't have to hand over visitor logs when they were the current administration, I don't see why the current administration would have to do so now. >

Tell the FBI to get good at their job >

What is that supposed to mean? >

It shouldn’t take this long to crackdown on criminals.
So by starting on the current administration, by the time Biden is almost done leaving office, we can hold him accountable for his crimes
We’re planning ahead here >

What crimes has Biden committed? >

Hiding OBAMA ERA documents (15 years?!)
Sexual assault
Pedophillia
Crimes against humanity internationally
War criminal internationally
Corruption, Lobbying and Embezzlement >

But we're only holding administrations accountable for that starting now, right? 
So what crimes has Biden committed during this current administration? Everything you mentioned would have allegedly been done during previous administrations and it just doesn't make sense to investigate anything that happened during a previous administration. >

crimes Biden committed this administration >

Daft headline. Trump isn't president or in any formal office. >

Except for the fact that Trump used his presidency to steal large of amounts of classified documents (especially ones designated as Top Secret), refused multiple requests by the NARA, DOJ and other federal agencies to return those documents and obstructed justice multiple times.  
On the other side, Biden had those documents from when he was VP, they have been returned when found and is cooperating the NARA and other federal agencies. >

I understand all that.
But it's all irrelevant now.
The investigations against Trump that need to be happening, are. >

And the investigations against Biden that need to be happening, are. >

Yeah, absolutely.
It's the GOP. Shit-show is all they have. >

I would like both. They’re both Scumbags. >

No they arent. One is a life long grifter, criminal, narcassist and traitor, and the other sometimes gets his words mixed up. They are not the same. >

Weird I thought the other did that crime bill so he can get that privatized prison money, effectively enslaving those below the poverty line, disproportionately black people. Wonder if hunter would get 20 years and his assets confiscated for a crack rock. >

This is going to progressively get worse and worse for Joe and his family. Seems like an incestuous, corrupt and criminal family. So much for parading around like he's an upstanding moral character. >


Seems like an incestuous, corrupt and criminal family. 

lol no >

$50 the guy you responded to had to use spell check for every word with more than 4 letters. >

Don't need to spellcheck when you're pasting off a provided script. >

Don't need spell check when you got ctrl+V >

Wrong. We want the FBI to raid Biden’s homes and find all the remaining classified docs.
Equal Justice. >


We want the FBI to raid Biden’s homes

As soon as Biden ignores a subpoena for those documents, you can go right ahead... but... oh wait, Biden just complied with the DOJ and NARA and handed over everything as soon as the documents were found, unlike the other guy.
Weird how raids don't happen if you comply with subpoenas, huh? >

It makes more sense to raid a house when sensitive documents are suspected to be improperly secured and exposed to adversaries. The FBI needs to turn over every inch of Biden’s properties. >

Funny how dems and republicans act the same when faced with how shitty their party and representatives are >

And democrats want trumps home visitor logs but not bidens what’s the big surprise? >

I just tried ctrl +f to see if anyone was claiming that and couldn't find any evidence for that.
But for the record, as someone left leaning I was to say I want to the logs to both. >

Honestly idk if this specific on is the case I’m just pointing out how it’s funny that the loud republicans and democrats only want dirt on the opposing side. >

Except that's not true. Biden reinstated WH visitor logs proactively. Trump removed them proactively. You're wrong and part of the problem with screaming both sides. >

Because MAL was in a secured locked area, protected and guarded by secret service. Biden’s secret service detail expired 6 months after leaving office. In his garage at a home rented by Hunter. The Chinese had a field day. >

There was a literal Chinese spy caught in the MAL grounds. She had made it past at least five Secret Service agents and into the main reception area before she was intercepted by officers. That’s the level of protection in Florida. >

Well, I mean, who had access to the Corvette docs? And, do those docs implicate something else? >

It’s the right thing to do. He could be trading with the Russians >

Is that sarcasm? Please let it be sarcasm. >

And I’m assuming Democrats want Trump’s but not Biden’s. See, that’s the problem with these glass half full politicians. Get both Trump and Biden’s visitor logs, and boom- there you go, glass all the way full. >

Uh oh, I sense that somebody really wanted to see one guy’s visitor logs but not the others…. 🤣 >

And trump never released the visitor's logs, so why should Biden? Either both should, or neither should