>
It's just dumb to waste the time to put it in there, it's like needing to add to the rules masturbating in the chamber isn't allowed.  Just a bunch of pointless bullshit by a republican legislature that can't police their own rhetoric for the sake of "decorum." >

In my experience and from observing other areas of life when it comes to dress codes women are far more likely to push the boundaries than men. >

Clothing has no bearing on a person's ability to work.
And if you get distracted by arms of all things then you are the problem, not the other person. >

what? I dont understand >

There's been in the news that women in Missouri are having a dress code enforced on them to cover their arms (in the house of reps). But the men already have to cover their arms. So really this is just applying a same dress code to everyone. Women seem to always want to push the boundaries of any dress code (look at Twitch) and in this case they're upset when its a same standard for men and women. >

okay well everybody wearing sort of the space thing is good so uhm yeh >

From the time I started working, and had a job requiring men wear suits, I have noticed a weird double standard in what men are allowed to wear compared to women. I both understand how adding this rule would reduce the double standard, and why women would feel this is unfair given how much more they're allowed to wear in most circumstances. >

is the fact that men's fashion style "suits" while womens' fashion style is "dresses" a "double standard"? or is it just that traditionally they have had different styles of dress for men and women? >

this is an opinion specific to something said in one youtube video?