>

Rupert Murdoch is not a Boomer. He was born in 1931 and is a member of the silent generation.
I'm always disappointed when I see a Rupert Murdoch headline and the third word isn't "dies" >

Four words
Rupert Murdoch Fucking Dies >

Fucking Rupert Murdoch Dies >

Neither of these treasonous propaganda site should be called "news". >


treasonous

How can we call it treasonous if it's not even American? Rupert Murdoch is an Australian, in cahoots with Russia, trying to destroy America. There is nothing treasonous there. It's just an enemy of US trying to destroy US. >

He may have been born hete but he gave up his citizenship to become a naturalized USA citizen >

The reason is simple…
He knows a lawsuit is already underway with FOX NEWS and he’s more interested in hiding his assets just as Alex Jones had attempted to do after losing his case in court. Unfortunately for him, a forensic analysis of his holdings has revealed most if not all of his assets.
Murdoch deserves everything that’s coming his way and more. >

What is the lawsuit in regards to? >

The false promotion of a stolen election in 2020 by FOX NEWS declaring that dominion voting machines supposedly changed votes for trump to Biden.
Out of 62 Court cases brought by trump and Republicans, they lost 61 cases for providing no evidence whatsoever to the court. The one case that they won, was based on a technicality, not anything that in any way justified, their assertion of a stolen election. >

How much will they have to pay for those cases?  Weird I haven’t heard anything about this. >

Weird, indeed, since it’s been all over the news. Except for conservative news outlets, which conveniently omitted any mention of it. The lawsuit for defamation against dominion voting machines by FOX NEWS & Murdock News Division is for $1.8 billion, I believe. >

Correction; the lawsuit against Fox News is for $1.6 billion. The lawsuit combining Fox News three of its hosts +2 Trump attorneys all total $2.7 billion combined. >

Just trying to distance his assets from the Dominion lawsuit. He's going to get fucked, he just wants to lessen the severity. >

It's all about protecting his ass....ets. >

how about the plans to meet his maker >

Yes, yet he does have heirs who will gladly keep his treasonous,  vile, and corrupt methodology,.
 At some point, we genuinely need to ask ourselves if our future is less important than allowing for open disinformation. Some would call it censorship. 
 I would call it, destroying malevolent propaganda. >

I think he has one heir disavow his father's ideology. But then we have the other heir who reportedly actually drank the koolaid his father produced. >

I hope some installs a funnel over this guys grave one day. I wouldn’t want a single drop to miss him. >

He is the epitome of something that is wrong with his entire generation. >

Don't be ridiculous.  Any grouping of people isn't homogeneous.  He's a reptile, but my gram and gramps were beautific people that everyone loved. >

So were (are) mine. But there’s something about that generation that embraced the kind of division Murdoch peddled. Not all, for sure, a quarter of humanity is a lot of people, and they’re not one group, but many more than either the generation above or below them.
Interestingly, both in western cultures and east European ones too. It’s them watching the propaganda on Russian state TV.
Maybe some downstream effect of the Cold War, as well as the last major generation to still be meaningfully religious. Or perhaps they just didn’t live in as much of a world where your job has people in different counties on your team.
Most likely, a little bit of all of the above. >

Still nonsense.  That's just a collection of statements and ponderings, not one of which is coherent or demonstrable, much less have anything to do with each other.  His generation is a collection of people.  It was an interesting period.  There was an interesting period before it, and another one came after.  During them, most people just tried to live their lives.  Exactly like today. >

Ad hominem and gatekeeping.  What I am has nothing to do with your original prejudicial, and ageist, comment. >

Not at all. Saying “perhaps you’re subscribed to the way many of them view nation building” isn’t an attack. My mum is. Saying this doesn’t attack her. But it does serve to explain why so many people where she lives view the world this way. 
The way many (not all, but many) of the boomer generation saw nation building is through an us-or-them zero sum equation.
What age bracket does the Republican agenda appeal to those in the US?
What age bracket does the Russian propaganda on their state TV appeal to the most?
What age bracket did brexit get sold to?
Boomers. Boomers. And again, boomers.
They are the likeliest to consume divisive drivel, perhaps lacking some of the media literacy skills digital natives or the part-native GenX have. Perhaps other reasons. But where there is demand, Murdoch will be right there with a lifetime supply.