>

but like he is not wrong and it’s not considered a conspiracy theory because it is proven. The US did a lot of stuff to destabilize other countries or put into place militant leaders who were capitalists. Just because you are not knowledgeable about a topic does not mean it is a conspiracy theory. The US did a lot of horrible things in the Cold War in the name of stopping communism, this is not a conspiracy theory but a fact. I can go into more specific examples if you really need but you could also just look into the topic your self.
Most are fleeing completly lawless countries that are being run by gangs and drug cartels. Others are fleeing cripling poverty. For them its a choice of  Illegaly immigrating into the US seeing your entire family die. If you can solve those two problems and youll drastically reduce illegal immigration . >

It would have helped if the US hadn't intervened in these countries thereby destabilizing them which contributed significantly to the conditions these countries now have. >

So let's be real here as bad as USA was in cold war it's not "these countries" as if all or most it's some. >

It really is at least most of them.
Here's a wikipedia page of direct US involvement regime change in Latin American countries.
This doesn't even include the indirect ways we mess with them, like drug cartels legally buying their weapons here or the war on drugs. >


It really is at least most of them.

Depends on what region you are talking about. Not for South America not that it changes what was done.

This doesn't even include the indirect ways we mess with them, like drug cartels legally buying their weapons here or the war on drugs.

You can point to things that can be done better in US, but blaming USA for indirectly impacting those countries isn't fair imo. Just because USA serves as a huge customer base for those drugs and cartels can get weapons from US doesn't mean it's USA fault or that USA wants that. >


Not for South America not that it changes what was done.

yes for South America >

I mean it's basic math. Count the counties on wiki in South America that were couped to the ones that aren't. 12 SA countries in total less than 6 couped so there you go. Not like this matters either way so not sure why you are making a big deal about it. >

Imagine believing Venezuela and Colombia are countries that did not have the USA choosing their leaders for them >

Imagine believing in conspiracy theories. Unless such activities have been proven, e.g. what was released during cold war or some form of independent 3rd party verified, you do not have adequate evidence to believe such things. America doing X bad things doesn't mean you can just assume in any and every circumstance.