>

Still have more principles to debate about than GOP does.
"We know there is a high likelihood that our candidate will be a fucking moron, so we don't want a Democrat making them look bad". >

Im thinking at this point the choices are Trump, Desantis, Gina Carano, Kyle Rittenhouse, or a sentient MyPillow powered by Hunter Bidens laptop >

Kyle Rittenhouse isn't old enough to run, so he's out. Not sure about Gina, but last I heard she was being criticized for starring in a woke action movie with a female protagonist, so it wouldn't matter anyway. >


Kyle Rittenhouse isn't old enough to run, so he's out.

The age limit for running for President is in the Constitution, so it's not important to them. >


Age limits ~~for running for President is in the Constitution, so it's~~ are not important to them.

Fixed that one for you. >

Matt Gaetz has entered the chat. >

Apparently Gaetz got busted fucking his MALE press secretary. >

Matt Gaytz entered the chat >

Fine, go ahead and hold the debate with the democratic candidate and an empty podium. Mention once at the beginning of the broadcast that the republican candidate refused to participate then proceed. Keep the same questions and allow the democratic candidate to answer them in full. Basically a town hall. But keep that empty podium on the stage to remind viewers of who showed up.
Edit: In fact, put the LWV back in charge of it like they used to be. >

Even better, invite the libertarian party candidate to show up. If republicans want to step out, that’s fine, let a third party siphon their votes. There are no real grounds to complain from anyone. The third largest party got to debate, and the GOP was given the opportunity that they declined. >

That’s the better idea. The RNC will most likely hold an alternate Town Hall with just the Republican candidate, thereby splitting viewership. Having an actual debate with a libertarian is a GREAT idea. >

It'd require the Libertarians to have a decent candidate. If they're completely off their rocker the network is just going to look dumb but if they have a good candidate and a couple of networks do it, it could be really interesting. >

If you know anything about Libertarianism you'd know a real debate isn't possible. Libertarianism is three questions away from Feudalism.