>

Some states need to learn how to mind their own business. You know what states I’m talking about.
Wouldn't that be the same as not letting you go to Vegas and gamble if your home state does not have legal gambling? >

Yes. It’s clearly unconstitutional and will never hold up in court. >

I wouldn’t count on it. >

Imagine any State passing laws that are enforceable in any other State. Anyways, all you Texans better pay your California taxes or straight to jail. >

Well the federal gov't sets baseline laws and can willfully pull back funding to states based off of states not following those laws so it's not too hard to imagine. It's not a united states anymore it's a State finding states. >

This sounds strangely similar to the fugitive slave laws and political environment leading up to the civil war to be honest >

Yes, it’s very similar. 
Both are the exact opposite of “states rights.” >

Those proclaiming "states' rights" have never been satisfied with only controlling states.
Hatred is funny that way. >

Also, they've never been satisfied to control just their state. They want every state to follow what they do. >

From my corner of the prairie we'd be happy with controlling our own state/boundary. It's a majority rule in the metro's that try to control us and enact frivolous laws. We aren't interested in laws... just our communities... >


It's a majority rule in the metro's that try to control us and enact frivolous laws

Also known as democracy.