>

so he turned whole world against him, his family and whole country just because of  imperialistic behavior and as revenge of USSR? not because NATO tries to surround my country with rockets of their western overlords? okay
So horrible. I'm disgusted that innocent people are dying like this. >

(Stupid) people question why are we arming Ukraine.  This is why, daily terrorist attacks. >

probably pro russia morons.
but...but the neo nazi threat!!!
no...that's a load of bollocks. >

The Definition of "Nazi" is a different than in the rest of the world. It means for them "not Russia supporter". >

Then, with the war and these murders, they created a lot of Nazis. Instead of denazifying the country, they have taken the hatred against ruzzia to the extreme. The more they fight against what they have sworn to destroy, the more people become what they have sworn to destroy. Well done, Ruzzia, you played yourself. >

Honestly, it is nothing, new. They did that to Ukraine for centuries. I was born there, and my family was heavily affected, by 1917 killings of educated people (only my grand-grandma survived of 9 children), Holodomor, WWII chaos (Russians behaved similar as today, they raped, killed and burned down, and then my grandma had to call them liberators and heroes. Stalin's rule, Chernobyl disaster, Soviet Union collapse crisis. You see where I am going with it.
Now is just the first time the world really cares. And Ukraine appreciates it greatly!
It goes much further back, but I don't want to spam Ukrainian history here. >

It is really sad to hear that. Before 2014 I wasn't much interested in politics until annexation of Crimea. And that worried me. Can only remember what my mom, said: This is how wars begin. Suddenly I was aware that we are in another cold war. It changed our world view. The ruzzian gov annyoed me more and more with their lies.
The reason, the world is more worried now is because we have experience from all the past genocides and wars, and the cold war. We are more connected and get more information through the internet whats happening around us.
I really hope for peace for the Ukraine as soon as possible. I truely think about the people there everyday. >

Like I said, Ukraine appreciates it so much, that finally somebody cares. It is one of many reasons they fight so hard, despite the unimaginable cruelty of this war. Because before that, nobody cared, and we were on our own. When my mother and I emigrated, it was so, so difficult. Nobody cared about Ukraine, even if children were slowly dying from the effects of the Chernobyl disaster (myself included). But somehow we found our safe haven and my health improved significantly.  I hope that Ukraine finds it too, because they have so much to give. >

Russia will count the civilian deaths as Ukraine soldier deaths.  Putin's cowards are unable to face real soldiers and win. >

Maybe this will be the catalyst that makes the civilized world give Ukraine what they need in order to win. >

Why are we delaying aid to Ukraine?
Russia is an illegitimate terror state and needs to be treated accordingly.
Ukriane needs tanks, ivf, rockets, airplanes and helicopters.   There is zero reason not to provide them. >

My thoughts exactly.  Took almost 6 months to decide that a patriot missile battery might be helpful to stop all the incoming missiles.   So we gave them one.  Its taken almost a year to figure out that it’s OK for Ukraine to have Bradley fighting vehicles, which the US is basically mothballing.  We still haven’t given any tanks or airplanes or ships or anything else that might be helpful in allowing the Ukrainians to kick the Russians out of their country.  It’s almost like the west would prefer a stalemate than actually give the Ukrainians what they need to win. >

It’s not just that you hand them over, you need to train up operators to use and maintain them first. You can’t just hand over advanced systems like the Patriot or the Bradley over. Well, you can, but then the people using them won’t be properly trained, they won’t have guys who know how to do proper checks and maintenance, and they don’t have supply of spare parts for when something breaks down. >

Isn't it exactly the reason it should have been done long ago? If training started in spring it would be enough people to operate and maintain those systems >

That’s exactly what the US and many EU countries have been doing for the past year. Not all soldiers being trained abroad are infantrymen, many are receiving advanced training in equipment and support as well, in preparation for receiving more advanced combat systems. >

Patriot training starts today >

RasPutin thinks he can do whatever he wants to do. His end will not be of natural cause.... >

This NATO, European & the current World Appeasement policy towards Russia will not stop a war, just as Appeasing Hitler didn't. This stupidity will only engage more & more acts of Human murder under the so called guise of Military action. The West should declare Russia and the Putin regime totally responsible for Acts of Genocide, Murder, Torture and we should equip Ukraine with all weapons to both defend itself and to take the war directly to the Russian infrastructure. >

At present Ukraine is limited in that capacity to weapons it can manufacture itself, or that it can obtain parts for. >

I bet Russia can't see what's bound to come for them. >

another day. another russian war crime.
russian continues to show the rest of the world it's a festering pile of old dicks in a sock covered with shit and piss.
can't wait for the horrors to end for the people of ukraine. putin please die soon and horribly. >

Careful with what you say is a war crime.
Arestovich has said in an interview already that the building was hit by Ukrainian air defense. Everyone's mad at him on Ukrainian telegram... Can't find any news on Google but you should easily find the interview on Twitter.
Ukrainians are incapable of commiting war crimes so be careful. >


Arestovich has said in an interview already that the building was hit by Ukrainian air defense.

He didn't say that, he said it could've been that Russian rocket was hit/downed by Ukrainian air defense -- thus saying it's possible that Russia wasn't intentionally targeting that residential building.
Even if your original claim was true -- why air defense has to shoot at anything? Oh yeah, because Russia. In any (reasonable) case it's Russia's fault. >

We need to expedite our assistance with heavy weapons. >

This is a war crime.
Another one >

Fuck Russia. Slava Ukraini. >

Glory to Olesya Buzina. 
You killed
your story >

The Russian government has to be completely eradicated at this point. >

That's a significant number of casualties... Russia will definitely have karma biting its ass. >

I hope that there will be an end to this nightmare... >

Whoever is blatantly supporting Russia, I hope you suffer really badly. >

I wonder when the World will start giving Ukraine the ability to reach out and touch Russians in Russia? >

They already have that capability and have only been targeting military targets near the border.  Ukraine is wisely choosing not to escalate too much for fear of getting nuked. >

"muh nukes" is really all Russia has by that point anymore... the thing is internationally speaking NO country would OK with Russia using nukes even if Ukraine would counter-invade because Russia started the goddamn war to begin with!
Additionally in case of nukes, ALL nuclear powers (including China) would have no choice but to (conventionally, as in: declaration of war + invasion) retaliate. Because the entire idea of nukes is that they are a defensive weapon to prevent wars. Not to be used as a weapon of conquest by a wannabe emperor. And an invaded force retaliating in the country they are being invaded by is just a normal part of war.
However in this case it would be the initial invader using nukes to a non-nuclear threat. After all Russia can defend itself very easily against the counter invasion without having to resort to nukes... and that is to pull out of the occupied territories and end the war they have started. That can not be accepted by any of the other nuclear powers due to the precedence it would set if it went unpunished.
The second Russia uses nukes it's no longer "Russia VS Ukraine, which is supported by the West" to "Russia VS the World". >

That's quite idealistic of you. I don't think any other country would use nukes against Russia if Russia nuked Ukraine. NATO would escalate in some way, but not nuclear.
And China would most definitely not get involved on either side. If Russia and the west nuke eachother into oblivion, China will inherit the rest of the world. >

Won't be much left to inherit. >

Peacetroops when? It's disgusting to see the Russian terrorists go on like this >

These tragedies will never cease, Putin isn't probably ever going to give up. >

Russia is a terrorist state and should be treated as such. >

it's 35 now
Edit:
40 now. 
If I would see just a streek of dead russian soldiers and exploded russian equipment from Bakhmut to the border I would not give a single shit. Absolute cunts. >

This will be asymmetric warfare until (R)ussia starts feeling it more close to home. >

This is why I think it’s time to start striking back at Russia.  Not doing the same as Russia, but hitting things like the Moscow power grid.. >

Nato strikes? >

Ukrainian long range drones, we already know they have the range. >

Yet people still wonder why many are donating weapons to Ukraine. >

Republicans jizzing in their pants about how great their leader Putin is. Fucking sick >

I don’t know who is saying what - but you would think that the American people would not be appreciative of supporting Russia. >

give Ukraine more and better anti-air defenses
give Ukraine ATACMS and cruise missiles to hit Russian airbases/bombers >

Republicans love these deaths >

Can you find me a source with a republican saying he loves seeing dead Ukrainians? Or are you just making shit up >

I think their point is that many Republicans don't support Ukraine or giving them aid. Many are blatantly pro-Russia. >

Trump said Putin is smart to invade Ukraine . Not a single GOP senator or in congress has denounced this >

How is this not a war crime and why does everyone else not step in and just fuck up Russia? >

They have a shit load of nuclear weapons. >

So they can just do whatever they want with no repercussions? >

Basically.  However, Russia has lost over 100k soldiers and almost 10k of armored personnel carriers, tanks, and artillery for almost no gain.
There's more we can do, but it takes time.  With Republicans in charge of the House, it's going to be difficult. >

Why are we allowing this to happen to a first world, democratically elected nation? I’m sick to my soul about this. It’s been a year and yet we still have countries who are Allies to NATO, The EU who and buying Russian petroleum. We know where their money is, SEIZE IT. I’m not a fool and I know my nation is utterly devoid of room to complain after Iraq But from a purely HUMAN approach this has to end. Life Liberty and the pursuit of happiness isn’t just meant for Americans. Idealistic? Yes but anger can drive action. >

Fuck Russia, to be honest. They should stop the terrorizing attacks. >

If hell is real, I wish Putin suffers tenfold eternally. >

Rest easy in God's hands now to those who tragically died from this. >

Sounds like a good time to send them heavier weapons for a little bit of payback, American style. >

"The number of deaths caused by the Russian attack" .. really? Just call it what it is "The number of people murdered by the murderous war criminal Putin and his cronies" >

Make Russia pay have no mercy on their troops! >

Can someone pls explain to Putin that bombing Ukraine won't make his dick work again! >

Can himars reach moscow? >

No. >

The analysts who were claiming that Russia was about to run out of missiles and that their weapons are too old for UA air defenses will totally be held accountable for their miscalculations, right >

We know they're running low on missiles. Theyve started slapping conventonal warheads onto old nuclear anti-carrier missiles with accuracies of hundreds of meters. Also, they've been trying ro buy Iranian cruise missiles.
As for Ukrainian anti-air, they have good %s for downing threats, but not enough to be able to down all of then. It'd require an incredible amount of AA to manage that. >

So, when will Russia will finally run dry? Why are we always 2 months away from Russia being finished? >

They are probably firing what they can produce.  Their goal now is to force Ukraine to give up the currently occupied territory.  Russia is counting on the western countries to get bored of this.
But as someone else answered, using anti ship missiles to target apartment buildings isn't a sign of being able to supply a lot. >

none of you were howling for 8 years of bombing DNR and LNR because you didnt get these news fresh on plate like this one. And then you are talking about russians living in information bubble. The hypocricy. Go find people from those cities in internet and talk to them, not just devour propaganda from any side of this conflict >

funny how all that started right after pootins puppet was kicked out... ruzzia would never kill people to get a war started would they >

yea like we just wanted to kill some civilians without any reason >

Ukraine has zero reasons to kill ethnic russians all that would do is give pootin an excuse meanwhile pootin has every reason to kill them he has an inferiority complex because his great Soviet union collapsed he's trying and failing to revive a dead country he doesn't care about 100,000 dead already he didn't care in Chechnya and he won't here. You maybe got asked yourself a question bud every journalist that has spoken out against pootin is either dead or in prison he doesn't care about killing anybody including plenty of russians but they don't care they are good obedient cannon fodder it's been like this for hundreds of years for russians nothing has changed