>

Yes. I guess I do want to take away firearms for self-defense, as well. Taking them away from everyone is the only answer that makes any sense if we’re trying to stop the ever-increasing deaths by firearms.
While I support the rights of people to own guns, recent history has proven we need much more regulation.  We need full registration and required training to own a gun.  Something we are sorely lacking.  We need a license to get a car, why not a gun? >

Defense is a human right. Cars are not. >

Firearms are inhuman.
Not one of you can give me an argument that fixes school shootings outside of guns disappearing. >

So is someone breaking and entering someones home to rape or kill, and you want to take away the best tool for a victims means of self-defense? If someone has intent to rape and then kill someone living alone, you just want them to take it and accept it? What if the resident is paralyzed from the waist down? What if they have some other medical condition or ailment you don't know about that limits their motor ability to learn self defense fighting byt enough to operate a firearm? You don't know the situation of a victim or a perpetrator who could be way stronger or heavier, could be weaker, could be using narcotics and you want to take away and limit their ability to defend themselves or limit that ability.