>

Those proclaiming "states' rights" have never been satisfied with only controlling states.
Hatred is funny that way.
Wouldn't that be the same as not letting you go to Vegas and gamble if your home state does not have legal gambling? >

Yes. It’s clearly unconstitutional and will never hold up in court. >

I wouldn’t count on it. >

Imagine any State passing laws that are enforceable in any other State. Anyways, all you Texans better pay your California taxes or straight to jail. >

Well the federal gov't sets baseline laws and can willfully pull back funding to states based off of states not following those laws so it's not too hard to imagine. It's not a united states anymore it's a State finding states. >

This sounds strangely similar to the fugitive slave laws and political environment leading up to the civil war to be honest >

Yes, it’s very similar. 
Both are the exact opposite of “states rights.”