>

The murder argument is often a non starter, because there is no agreement that the fetus is living or even a human being. It's  a clumb of cells, it has the potential for life. But so does a bunch of other stuff.
/u/GlobalKamikaze (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

“If i was a woman and I was pregnant, I’d die for my child.”
And that’s your choice.
Why do you think you get to choose for everyone else?
And by your rationale, nobody should ever be allowed to kill in self defense. >

Do you support mandatory organ donation?
And, like, yes, I imagine it is a lot easier to claim that you would totally die for your child if you know for a fact you will never have to back up your words. >

If someone dies and their organs can be donated, yes I think that should be done. The dead person cannot take them with them after all. I know that is also a consent issue, but I think in that specific scenario, it's ultimately better for society if organs are harvested and donated to those in need to continue their life. >

What about the people who are alive? You can donate a bunch of stuff while living. >

I would say no then unless it's the choice of the person >

Why, then? What makes forcing someone to donate their body to an embryo fine, but forcing someone to donate part of their body to another person is beyond the pale? >

Because in one scenario you most likely chose to create said embryo. >

So then should biological parents be legally required to give survivable organ donations to their children ?
Even estranged children ? 
Hypothetical: Your child hated you, ditched you as soon as they turned 18, and hasn't spoken to you in 20 years. Now they need a half lung donation. Should you be legally forced to go provide that half lung, even against your will ? >

No the child now has to live with the consequences of their actions >

What about adopted children ? Are they entitled to their bio mothers organs ? >

Well I think to start, organ donation is different than supporting a child in the womb, in one scenario, you lose a functional organ (or part of one) in order to aid someone in need, in pregnancy, the body diverts some resources to provide some nutrients to the growing fetus.
I would say they can't be legally compelled to donate an organ to their child. You are however legally compelled to care for your child and if you are negligent, the child is removed from your custody. Pregnancy seems more inline with providing care (food and shelter) than permanent loss of organs >

I have a child. If I was pregnant again and it was life threatening, I would choose to live for my child. She needs a mother more than a sibling and a grieving father.