>

It was never her rule though.
She supports House incumbents because she's their leader, just like Schumer supports Senate incumbents which is why he endorsed Markey.
Yass backs extremist candidates, he’s no moderate. 
Sinema isn’t a Democrat, or Moderate, either. She’s been exposed as the phony she is, and her political career will soon be over. She’ll probably go work for some hedge fund afterward. 
Yass is only looking to stir up trouble among Democrats here. Everyone should turn down his money, it’s poison. >

Sinema is an independent, not a democrat.  But yea basically another billionaire funded super pac that should be illegal. >

This is what we get when we allow spending to be respected as speech at the same time that we fail to TAX the BILLIONAIRES. >

Good luck with that, Republicans. >

The same folks who cheered when NY Dems shit the bed: the economic order must be maintained. >

Because it’s literally the same people. Yass donates to local NY politics all the time just to be a dick >

You mean Jeff Yass? The moron who got his dick caught in wringer shorting Gamestop? Habitual criminal Jeff Yass who could easily be prosecuted under RICO statutes if the DOJ had balls Jeff Yass? >

Centrist will gladly side with Fascist to go after progressives. >

Remember when democrats always supported incumbents….unless the incumbent was progressive Markey and Pelosi endorsed centrist Kennedy instead?  
All of my donations go to specific candidates now. >

Pelosi's position has always been supporting House incumbents (which Kennedy was) but I guess being honest doesn't really fit the narrative. >

The point is that in this case she broke her own rule, Markey is significantly more progressive than Kennedy.