>

women of reproductive age in these states need to either move or get sterilized ASAP.
That's nothing new, they've wanted that for decades. >

They did before, but they also want to now. >

RIP Mitch >

Let's go full bad faith, inverse paradox of tolerance on their asses:
If you hate abortions so much, why are you trying to abort so many people? >

Amen. Gloves off.
There's no reason to maintain good faith with people who want to ruin your life.
They're monsters. Potentially the worst kind: monsters who believe they're angels. Let those kinds of people act like assholes for too long, and you get jackboots in the face.
There's a reason Christ asked God to forgive these people (and rest assured, these are the same sort of people that killed Christ): "They know not what they do." 
That's commendable. Unfortunately, I'm not a christian, and I feel no moral or metaphysical compulsion to love someone who hates me. >

Cheers, well said. >

But what if the mother used a legally purchased firearm to do the abortion?!
Checkmate motherfuckers! >

2019 Alabama woman charged after losing unborn baby in shooting >

Might be the same state that charged a woman for a miscarriage. Or some other state in the south. It's all one tangled mess of fucked down here. >

Different states have both tried and have prosecuted women for miscarriages and stillbirths for 'actions that were negligent or harmful to the fetus' for decades. Specifically targeting women that society holds the most bias towards: POC and addicts. To set their precedent well ahead of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. >

I believe there was even a case in a conservative county of California where charges were brought against a poor woman of color who had a miscarriage. >

CA passed a law last year to protect women from just that. Not only that, but it made CA a sanctuary state for women from other states where abortion and miscarriages are punishable by law too. >

These fascists want to control every aspect of the freedoms that we Americans value.  If they want to live under fascist rule, they should leave for a fascist country. >

They should all move to Russia, but when they get there, they would quickly realize that they aren't the ones in control. >

Better yet. Afghanistan. That’s the world they want >

They were never going to stop at just banning abortion. >

The Justices said as much last year. >

They view women as property. >

I've never met a person that struck me as bad because they had an abortion. I've met plenty who struck me as bad for being judgmental and controlling. >

"At first breath"
Neither US law nor the bible recognize the unborn as having any rights
Does anybody else not see this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills! >

Correct! The Supreme Court doesn't recognize words in the constitution unless it pertains to the 2nd amendment. >

Wonder if women could claim self defense, and use a video of giving birth as an example of the assault and battery they were being threatened with. >

That's a fascinating idea 🤔 Would take a very good lawyer and very creative lawyering, plus a judge who'd at least allow case to proceed and not throw it out at outset... I'd actually love to see this happen! >

Soon having a miscarriage will be enough to put a woman through the legal ringer. They'll need to prove that their miscarriage was "legitimate" and not the result of any of their actions. And every thing they did will be examined to find something to blame the miscarriage on. Did the woman eat a McDonald's burger once instead of a salad? Obviously, she intentionally caused the miscarriage by not eating healthy.
The exception to this will be rich and powerful women (or women connected to rich and powerful men). Those women will get passes not only for their miscarriages, but for taking "vacations" where they obviously got an abortion even though middle class/poor women doing this would be charged with murder. >

In a true likeness of the logic of a two year old, the anti-abortion crowd now wants to kill those getting abortions or those assisting such.  You can't kill via abortion.  Or we will kill you.  Such children they are. >

Let's all thank the religious Court that gives abortion opponents near unlimited rights to harass and commit disorderly conduct under the guise of free speech. >

Is the goal to punish women for not being christian? Because there’s no other reason for this. Only christians believe abortion is murder.
Edit: changed “religious” to christian. >

“Only ~~religious people~~Christians believe abortion is murder”
It’s Jews who are fighting against abortion prohibitions on the grounds of religious freedom. >

I’ll edit it. >

That was the end goal.  Punish women for being women.  They couldn't rollback societal progress, so they go for the next best thing.  
You pick something that traditionally only women experience, then you make that thing illegal and charge as many women as possible.  Felons can't vote in the US for the most part, and the women still allowed to vote can be convinced to vote against their interests if you promise to not arrest them. >

They’ll be burning people at the stake next. >

Stay tuned. >

Republicans are fascists, plain and simple. It is too bad the media will never some out and call them exactly what they are. They hate our Constitution and freedom. I have a really bad feeling that in the near future, we could be living in a post Constitution, authoritarian USA. >

Is anyone surprised by this? AL and AK are death penalty states, as are all of the states that have banned abortion. They will put to death a woman who chooses to end her pregnancy, they will also execute the Dr's and the nurses. These forced birthers have been executing abortion providers since the 80's. >

I think you mean AL and AR. 
AK is Alaska, which  has no death penalty and has constitutional protection for abortions. >

Thank you! I steer clear of crazy Arkansa as much as possible! >

I mean, don't get me wrong, Alaska is definitely nuts in it's own ways. We are #1 in suicides, #3 in alcoholism, and have the most serial killers per capita, but at the very least we aren't Arkansas. >

So we'd rather the physician treat the resulting emergent situation that can develop after a miscarriage, with the potential for blood loss and sepsis, than offer the patient preventative or outpatient care that could have kept her from needing to go to the hospital?
Why are we allowing politicians to determine what is and isn't healthcare? There is a group of physicians in Texas right now suing the FDA over abortifacient availability stating that pregnancy is not a disease, knowing full well that we have a huge degree of unnecessary maternal mortality in the US largely related to a lack of prenatal care. >

Now?  Hasn’t that always been their goal? >

But not the gun lobbyists. Come on people, vote these assholes out. >

Face it, they want to kill people. >

That was always the plan.  Talk to an actual pro-life activist and they were always going this way.
I was talking to my uncle about the Roe repeal, and he was happy because it was states rights.  I mentioned that my state, Ohio, was getting read to ban some forms of birth control and possibly ban more further down the line.  He went into a detailed explication that I was wrong and that this was enough.  Finally, he brought over his friend who was part of Right to Life Ohio, to set me straight.
She explained that yes they were going after birth control that they considered abortifacients (which includes birth control pills because of corner cases where fertilized eggs didn't implant, based on right to life 'science') as well as things like criminally penalizing doctors and women who get abortions.  All of this was, of course, just a stalling tactic until the federal law ended abortion nationwide.  
She was 100% on board with anything necessary to end all abortion in the US because that was gods mission for her.  My uncle was flabbergasted, as he didn't think anyone was serious about all of that.  He realized they were going to keep pushing until they got what they said they wanted, and what they wanted was a total abortion ban and a birth control ban.   He decided then an there that he didn't want all reproductive care stripped away from wom... hahah.  
He voted straight R like normal.  The GOP has a nugget that really wants to end abortion and a larger group that doesn't care what the consequences of that action is. >

Damn, I was really hoping for a redemption story for your uncle there... ☹️ >

He was convinced by someone Alex Jones either sells or has on his show to put his own house into an LLC to save 'hundreds' per year.  Then he caught covid (unvaxed) and couldn't claim a homestead exemption and lost it when he declared bankrupsy (no insurance anymore because he doesn't need it).  He went from COVID isn't serious to mRNA vaccines will kill you faster than COVID.  His new house is okay, but decidedly smaller.  
So I wouldn't expect the arc.