>

"Oh yeah definitely, source: my ass"
Is not evidence of a claim.
/u/Salt_Attorney (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

Except you’re wrong 
The less money people have , the more kids they crank out .
Look at the inner  cities and rural Appalachia, 
Poor people have a lot of kids 
Unmarried single poor women have lots of kids . 
Middle class married folks have one or two , sometimes three . >

> The less money people have , the more kids they crank out .
Yes and the more money people have, the less kids they have. Statistically. But what you are missing is that here we are talking about money people work for and earn. The less money people earn with their work, the more kids they have, and the more money people earn with their work, the less kids they have. But now imagine a person does not earn any money through work. They simply have free time, and get paid by the governemnt a certain salary for no particular reason. You would see that the more money you give them, the more likely they are to have children. >


You would see that the more money you give them, the more likely they are to have children.

Do you have literally any evidence for that claim? >

Oh yeah .
It’s called welfare queens 
Welfare brood mares etc etc 
All you have to do is crank out a kid and not be married , and the govt hands over a pile of cash every month 
Free housing , section 8
Free healthcare 
Free food 
Free utilities 
Free internet 
Free Obama phones 
Free everything .
Unless she  is married , then you don’t hardly get anything .