>

If Barack Obama doesn’t have a team of lawyers searching EVERYTHING, EVERYWHERE right this minute, he should start.
Tell me again about Biden having classified docs and how he totally hasn't fully cooperated with the proper authorities. >

But but hunter biden's laptop?! >

Oh shit! I forgot about the laptop. It's full of buttery males dicks. >

That a blind repairman man found! >

Direct link to the clip, which has aged like milk >

The head nod after “I did not” >

Conflicting body language like (nodding yes while saying no/vise versa) this is a pretty big sign someone is lying. >

Tells like that are wrong as often as they are right. >

Yeah, looking for one little thing like that is usually problematic. What's actually telling in that clip is how much he fidgets and seems uncomfortable when he's usually robotic. Deviating from normal behaviors is the most reliable tell. >

See, I saw the head nod first and thought “huh”…
Then I saw that he was getting fidgety, and his foot was tapping quite a bit. Then I started to give that original “huh” a little more thought… >

You can see the same thing when MTG was questioned about 1/6 and her duties as a congresswoman if you're interested. >

I think the key takeaway here is there needs to be better accounting for these documents. Better documentation of who has what, thorough searches as a matter of course, active retention. Clearly what is in place isn’t working, and at this point they should be searching the properties of anyone that had access to high-level classified information just as a matter of diligence. Even if the government has a tendency to over-classify, there should be no exceptions, otherwise what’s the point? >


Even if the government has a tendency to over-classify, there should be no exceptions, otherwise what’s the point?

Exactly. Clearly classification is not being treated as seriously as it should be by ANYONE. There's another issue about intent and lying and such, but it is another issue different from mishandling classified materials.