>

"free and appropriate" is a wide basket. you're right, it isn't required BUT it is a hindrance for those that can operate at that level in high school. I would argue it would not be appropriate for students with higher academic skills to not be able to use those skills to get credit. There's a lot associated with it but ultimately it won't matter because DeSantis doesn't give a shit.
I say go for it. A chance to fight back against this guy and a real-world civics lesson rolled into one. >

Imagine if every parent sued him but then represented themselves and used hours and hours of attorney time in frivilous arguments. He’d go broke. >

They can't sue him personally, his actions were as the governor. That means tax payers have to pay for his defense. >

It seems like the Florida tax payers deserve to pay for it TBH. They elected him. >

To be fair, plenty of us didn't want it. >

Yall gotta organize. >

He looks like he has jaundice. >

For real tho, he looks like a damn Simpsons character. >

I’ve always heard he looks (and acts) like a grown-up Muntz. >

Ha-ha! >

As well they should. >

They have no standing. And even less money >

ACLU would likely take this case. And they absolutely have standing. 
Scotus has ruled that education is a right. 
Seems like this mighty actually violate brown v board of Ed. >

100%. Every student has a right (especially in secondary where students are more able to choose classes) to take classes that suit their interests. Eliminating possibilities violates that right for free and appropriate education. It is also ridiculously discriminatory. Everything happening down that makes me sick to my stomach as a educator that strives to help appropriately program for kids in my district. >

I think their best argument is that it is an elective AP course. No one is forced to take it and DeSantis is taking away their ability to get college credit. But I'm no lawyer, hopefully one will chime in.