>

Isn't this regarding the classified docs not hunter biden?
Of course they do, because they know that odds are that on some occasion -- probably many, over the years -- Biden would have been visited at his home by his son, because, you know, that's what families do. But they'll spin it into supporting whatever conspiracy theories about Hunter they're pushing. >

"Every December 25th HUNTER BIDEN VISITED HIS DAD! WAS JOE BIDEN BUYING DRUGS FOR HIS SON?!?!?"
-Republicans >

"Nevermind how a bunch of us spent July 4 in Russia that was just coincidence."
-those same Republicans >

Lol yes! The hypocrisy is just becoming so goddamn maddening >

you hit your head recently? >

Definitely a head injury. Playing the what about game is a sure sign of impaired brain function. >

Literally Trump's first point of order when he took office was to hide visitor logs >

Fun fact! It wasn't until the final days of his term that Trump realized the public schedule for the POTUS, was, well, public. He was furious and demanded that the information be censored moving forward. So the White House released a significantly shortened version for the final weeks of his presidency. 
He likely would have implemented that change upon taking office, too, if he wasn't too fucking dumb to know about it. >

What’s funny is most of it was “Executive Time” which now knowing he didn’t know it was public is hilarious >

Republicans want records of Biden Casino and Biden Steaks. >

Biden Airlines >

Biden University >

Biden Winery >

Pay attention Democrats because there are 74 million voters in this country who do not give a shit about your bipartisanship. You're never going to win them over by showing how fair and balanced you (think you) are with your investigations and legislation. >

💯 After decades of seeing everyone constantly give the right break after break and concede ground to them under the delusion that this time they’ll finally be appeased! I’m just so fcking tired. They always get everything they want and more while everyone else only has more and more taken from them. It hasn’t done a damn thing to get them to stop complaining about their persecution complex and it hasn’t kept them from doing anything just because we keep nicely playing by the rules. 
The voters dgaf if you’re not “winning”. Their party members dgaf and just continue to whine in bad faith before they stab you in the back. And the media dgaf how ridiculous they look trying to stretch further and further to push bOtH SiDeS. We need to wake tf up already. >

The right and russia share many tactics and traits, if we give ground, they will take it. 
Either the Democrats step up now or idiocracy is inevitable. >

Didn't Dick Cheney take the position in court that the vice president isn't bound by the Presidential Records Act making this whole thing moot because Biden was vice president at the time, and President currently? I'm being about as serious as I think this whole story is. >

The law only applies to Democrats. >

Didn't Republicans pass that back when Bush Jr was President and it just got lost?? >

It doesn’t matter if there is a law.  Republicans only care about enforcing the laws against Democrats.  When a Republican breaks the law they could care less. >

Fuck what republicans want. They have 0 credibility. >

Dems have credibility? Smashing the economy yes. We still have a baby formula shortage for christ sake. >

Yeah, that republicans voted against every solution for to help with. >

“We will respond to all subpoena’s once Congressman Jordan responds to his.” >

Well give them the logs if Trump releases all of his. Simple >

Biden: 10 documents from over 7 years ago.
Trump: over 100 documents from 3 years ago
There is no reason to suspect Biden’s case is more  concerning or warrants a visitor log and trump doesn’t.
I personally want them both to do it but by all accounts it appears trump is definitely the worse case >

makes no difference, they are both guilty for taking documents, rather it's one doc or 100 docs.  Like saying I only robbed the back of just a bit of cash not all of it.  It's still a bank robber.. >

I agree. Both need to be investigated and an impartial judicial group needs to be in charge of the investigation.
The only issue is that Biden appears to being complying and not holding up the FBI and other investigative organizations. whereas trump is halting and slowing down the whole process. 
Doesn’t prove anything but impressions aren’t looking favorably for trump >

Because every home has a visitor log. That’s how elitist Republicans are. >

To be fair, if you have a federal paid security detail there is probably someone writing down who comes to visit your home. >

What makes you say that? >

Well, it's standard practice for a security detail to perform vetting on visitors who are unknown to them and are going to be close enough to be a threat. 
This isn't extensive but it's probably going to mean getting a name and having someone run it through ncic.  That's 30 seconds work but it is going to generate a log of people that were visiting that were checked. >

The DOJ should have acted sooner.
From here on in Republicans will be trying to offset the crimes of the Trump years by inflating and exaggerating ANYTHING that has to do with Joe Biden. >

It looks like lots of people want to say “they both did it, let’s drop all charges and normalize this behavior” 
Fuck that! We need fair investigations into both, for all of the reasons. >

Arrogant reality-deniers take a break from underage trafficking to focus on manipulating the press. 
Great work GQP!  Now what about her emails?!  I heard there was some incredible bombshells about Benghazi in those!! >

Trump was asked by the National Archive to return the Classified documents. The National Archive knew which ones Trump had and made a specific request for their return. Trump refused. Next The National Archive and FBI went through a court to get a subpoena requiring the return of the specific classified document Trump had and Trump lied claiming he didn't have them. Lastly the FBI got a warrant and went in and got the damn classified documents themselves. The whole process took over a year. 
Biden's lawyers notified DOJ and The National Archive of the documents. The Documents were turned over without any formal requests needing to be made. 
Lying to authorities and refusing a court order is what led to Mar-a-logo being raised. Not Trump merely having documents. Authorities new for over a year Trump had documents. >

Please don't use facts and common sense around the Trump faithful. Their heads will explode. >

How come all we talk about is trump when this case involves Joe Biden, a completely different person? >

Because comparing this to Trump’s case highlights the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans? I thought that was obvious >

Is your goal to point out hypocrisy at the other end of the political spectrum? You could do that all day long for both sides of the political aisle. It sounds like a deflection to distract people from Biden’s crime, which is the topic of this news story. Lots of what aboutism going on here >

The democrats on that committee should also call for Trumps. >

What a farce this has become. >

Hypocrisy, thy name is Republican. >

When are we going to stop being surprised by republican shamelessness? >

I am never surprised by it. >

This is how you do headlines.
Always poimt out the double-standard. >

Of course they did. >

We're named the united states, but we're tribal as fuck and have descended into a divided nation. The fact that Trump didn't succeed because a black police officer named Eugene Goodman realized the intent of the mob and used his race to his advantage to bait them to go left instead of right, which gave time for all the senators and congressman to evacuate, paints a really grim picture about Democracy long-term. >

Repubs are unapologetic hypocrites. Of course they are behaving this way. >

Biden's visitor logs are online White House visitor logs
Trump's logs Visitor logs >

I read something yesterday that Trump didn't realize his visitor logs were public until the last weeks of his term and then he started trying to make them private.  🤣 >

Politicians love double standards twice as much as regular basic human standards >

Republicans never try to help investigate one of their own. >

Like democrats investigate their own neither party does >

lol they aren’t even attempting to put a facade of impartiality >

I feel like this whole thing has been an obvious trap, set by Biden, to trick Orcpublicans into condemning that which Trump is about to be arrested for.  Of course, it's not like bald-faced hypocrisy has ever stopped them in the past. >

Does Comer think we are as stupid as the Kentuckians who voted for him? 
Don’t investigate Jared and Ivanka for Qatar,Saudi Arabia and China contracts but go after Hunter like rabid dogs. >

The GOP is circling the wagons >

Question for Americans: Why are Republicans like this still alive? >

The democrats should push to have the same details from Trump.  If they won’t then Biden should release nothing. >

Does anyone else feel like Congress isn’t doing shit for the Citizen’s they are supposed to serve. >

Do politicians need to keep a visitor log for their home? I understand Mar-a-lago probably having one due to it being a hotel/resort, but not their personal homes. >

Anywhere guarded by Secret Service, there are probably visitor logs. >

As a Democrat, I believe ALL public official visitor logs should be public. Both home and in the office. Yes I’m aware that would be a huge invasion of privacy but I’m ok with it. No one has to run for public office. Being a politician is a 24hr job. You’re always on the clock so I think it’s only prudent to monitor who is talking to YOUR representative. 
Besides, aren’t telecommunication companies collecting  similar data on the entire population? Who in turn sell that information to both private and government sectors? 
If we aren’t allowed to own our private data, why should a public official be allowed to own their privacy?
Edit: I’m not even sure if that makes sense. It’s my day off. My wife is out. I took a gummy and watching football. If what I said is insane, just ignore. I’ll review it when I’m sober and delete if necessary. >

You’re literally a servant of the people. As such transparency should be 100% guaranteed. >

Sure here it is pal. 🖕🏻 >

Biden can tell them what Trump did "there are no visitor logs at my private residence" >

I mean, go for it. Just remember what’s good for the goose is good for the treasonous insurrectionist shitbag. >

I hope this ends in accusations about anonymous donors and Democrates offer to support a law overturning cItizens united. >

I heard Hunter Biden was seen entering the president’s home >

R words >

wait --- but that is hypocritical. i'm confused. >

Why not both Presidents' logs? Are the Republicans focused on only trashing Democrats instead of doing something useful for American citizens? Normal. USA politicians aren't helping you, they are wasting time holding sit-down pompous pontificating hearings to bolster their own names. So, call them names. >

It's no surprise at all is it? >

So cmon let’s not act like we don’t know what’s going on , they are going to charge Biden so that trump will have to be charged also … politics is poisonous >

The DOJ will not indict a sitting president. So that is unlikely >

Home visitor logs?     Gee, this dude is really fishing - does he believe that Russians went to JB home? >

Why would dems defend Santos? >

My point is that Santos is a typical republican scumbag.  Not Democrat. >

Because they have no values whatsoever. >

Democrats should ignore these subpoenas, just like repiglicans did. >

Tell them to pound sand. Do every trick they did. Fuck em. >

Of course.
And trump ceased to publish the WH's logs so we have no record of all the crooks that went there while he was there. >

Because Trump's are in his septic tank. >

Republicans being hypocrites, what a surprise >

Yet again the media and democrats allow the false equivalence. 
This story should be ignored and if they insist ask if there was an FBI raid. >

Shouldn’t we be mad that both of those clowns did this?  Shouldn’t we also be mad at the entire hypocrisy of the entire situation?  This shouldn’t be something we that we need to take sides on.  Both of them did the same illegal crap, get angry at both of them. >

Sure, they both did the same thing, in the same way some one driving 10 mph over the speed limit is the same thing as someone intentionally plowing into a crowd of people going 50 mph over the speed limit did the same thing.