>

That will likely win him another Pulitzer.
Jokes on them, it's not his real name! >

Joke's on us, you can serve in Congress from prison. So conviction would still leave us with the House having to vote to expel him, and, well... >

Even better, he'd be unable to be present for House votes and his seat wouldn't just be filled with some other scum. >

Even even better, as part of the new House rules package the GOP crafted, they eliminated virtual and proxy voting (because covid backlash requires idiotic steps backward) so he couldn't vote if not present! 
"Checkmate Kevin!" - Also Kevin 🤦‍♂️ >

I’ll believe it when I see it. >

Seeing as how he has not yet been CHARGED (in the US, for this specific crime), or INDICTED, seems premature to talk about convictions. Or sentencing.  Someone needs to get the authors a flow chart of this process. >

As of yet, Brazil hasn't submitted an extradition request. Following that, US authorities would make a determination as to whether to arrest him, then a judge reviews whether the extradition request is lawful, then the Secretary of State makes the final determination as to whether to extradite him. Notably, arrest does not require being charged/indicted in the US, & most extraditions don't include that... as indictments require crimes be committed within US jurisdiction.
I will say, though, that it's unlikely that he would be arrested without permission from the Secretary of State, due to his elected position...and I find it highly unlikely that the SoS would grant an extradition request for a sitting member of Congress for a 15yr old $700 check fraud case. The US regularly rejects around 20% of extradition requests for US citizens, & this would definitely fall in that category.
He'll be tried in absentia, if anything, & possibly convicted in absentia...but that won't change his daily life. >

He will just get a book deal.