>

Agreeableness does not lead to better results in long term and instead turns you into a weak turd who anyone think can mess with. An eye for an eye atleast teaches others, forgiving doesn't unless they are extremely mature which most people are not, they need to be made clear what the boundaries are
If you’re always having to be the bigger person, stop surrounded yourself with small people. >

Also if everyone you meet in life is an asshole, it might be time to take a look in the mirror. >

100% agree. >

99% of the time you don't need to 'win' or 'show them' unless it's to stroke your own ego. >

Which is something that people who have a good hold on their life don't generally need to do. 
Whenever someone freaks out at someone else you just know it's because they have some shit going on in their life that's making them easy to trigger. >

Personally, I like my integrity. I don’t think I would feel good about myself acting like I have self-control and good judgment in one situation if I knew that just recently I’d beat someone’s face in or let myself sink to a lower level to teach them a lesson. >

Also you should probably try to understand why he doesn't kill >

The parent comment made by Concdfhj looks like it was made by a copycat bot. The original comment is here.
^(---) 
^(🤖 Beep boop. This message was written by a bot.) ^Why? ^🤖 >

Bigger man is bull but a smarter man would never lower themselves unnecessarily. Sometimes you don’t have a choice but to defend yourself but if you have an option to walk away you definitely should.  Run by the rule of. “Is this person worth going to prison for?” >

Perfect example is escalating a fight and accidently killing the person and ending up in jail. The smart move is to walk away. >

Not entirely true. If two people got in a fight and one died it doesn't mean the other person would go to jail/prison. >

No but if someone’s being brash and you escalate, hit him and he falls and hits his head you very well could do. To avoid the situation completely all you had to do was walk away. >

Eh that depends on the situation. A good chance doesn't mean it won't happen or will. Someone is being brash and attacking you will you not react because you are worried about potentially getting arrested or them dying? >

Come on man, been plenty of times I could have escalated someone being rude to me into a fight but you just walk away. Not the same as someone actually going to attack you. >

eh my argument is that you can get in a fight but won't always get in trouble for it. It is better overall to walk away and sometime you cant walk away >

and this tells me you don't have a concept of how legally it works, for reference look up Reckless Conduct. >

Again getting in a fight doesn’t always mean legal consequences. This applies toReckless conduct as well >

There are definitely some unreasonable people, and those who have no interest in finding common ground or compromising. But if you can be the bigger man it might serve as an example. >

I use to try be a bigger man but I think it's a naive concept. >

Then you're just resigning yourself to be a vengeful ass >

Just because sometimes you have to fight doesn't mean the whole concept is overrated. >

I think you will come to see that agreeableness (aka being the bigger man) tends to lead to better results long term, even though sometimes it may sting. 
Also, an eye for an eye approach, or  trying to teach someone rarely goes down well from my experience