>

That’s the fun part:  he was actually 63 years old at the time but he says he was the first human to age backwards.
Unfortunately, McCarthy will probably use this as incentive to give Santos anything he wants. >

… then Santos votes to depose McCarthy and enough randomly aggrieved republicans will use it as another shortsighted opportunity to pedestal a dizzying array of nonsense meanwhile our government grinds to a halt wondering at itself—can Santos even do this? Are Republicans this disorganizedly dangerous? Does Matt Gaetz traffic children? >

People were worried about Biden, Pence, and Trump having unauthorized access to classified documents, then what does that say about Republicans if they willingly give access to classified documents to ~~Anthony Devolder~~, I mean ~~Kitara Ravache~~, I mean George Santos. >

Do reps have to fill out an SF-86, or do they just get access automatically because of their position?  
I can’t imagine him getting past “last name” and “first name” without lying >

Nope, Congress takes an oath that will keep any classified material they come across private but there is no form or clearance they must pass first, being "elected" is supposed to be their clearance.  I kind of get it, having the Executive Branch determine who in the Legislative Branch can have access to classified intel would open up a huge bag of worms and would likely lose in the courts easily, but our form of govt unfortunately assumes that voters will act in the best interest of the country and puts way too much trust in their hands on some of these things, seems there's a middle ground where maybe they all or specific ones get security reviews that are then given to their party leaders to determine if they should be made public or allowed on intel committees or something. >

But holy shit…really being “elected” is their clearance….fuck you can’t get a real job with the government without getting proper clearance…this seems like massive oversight that I’m sure Russia is keyed into… >

“Sure this man is completely and pathologically fake, but you see he’s on my team and I have no standards” >

“Please act like a sane person for like one day, please.” >

Trump looks over all the lies Santos has told. Looks at Santos stealing $3k from a homeless vet and says to himself " He's like the son I never had." >

Actually... >

No. Not actually. His sons are somehow not as big of scumbags as Santos. >

It's funny, McCarthy denied Schiff and Swalwell seats on committee due to "integrity" yet he gladly places Santos on committees with no utterance of integrity there. Is not hypocrisy neglect of integrity? >

GQP has never cared about hypocrisy or shame unless they can weaponize it. None of this should surprise anyone. >

McCarthy is almost certainly to some degree one of the Putin puppets in congress. >

Great, now McCarthy’s going to give him all the clearances to OWn tEh LiBZ >

Well given that McCarthy does not know what integrity means - he definitely not going to block it. >

Does this walking talking colostomy bag even have a birth certificate?  He hasn’t even been vetted. I couldn’t get a job without proper ID and a social security number.  And I’m not getting lifetime healthcare, expense account, or $175,000 per year salary. He never would have been elected if it weren’t for the lies and the “R”. His own constituents are embarrassed to have voted for this “pretend” politician. >

Santos would be a perfect VP running mate for Trump. The dream team of pathological liars! >

Doesn’t Santos’ face look like it has been altered with plastic surgery? Who is this really? Is he a U.S. citizen for real? Pathological liars lie about everything, do they not? >

In the name of national security, McCarthy is duty bound to deny this. However, he won't. Russia has successfully captured America.
New details link George Santos to cousin of sanctioned Russian oligarch >

Russia can't have been that successful, we've been supplying Ukraine the equipment to punch Putin in the mouth. >

How does this guy even qualify for a security clearance? >

That's the fun part: he doesn't. >

Under any other circumstances, Santos could not get a clearance. >

Lol. "There are four people that Putin pays. Swear to God." >

Since the materials are classified, how would anyone know if deSantos is lying or not if he claims to reveal some secret? >

I think Kevin is going down as the worst house speaker ever (if he’s not claimed that title already) >

Like saying the kid held after school is gonna be grading everyone’s test. >

Just because someone is a huge liar doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be kept from classified info. Trump got to see it, so Santos should be allowed too. It’s precedent!
 /s >

Oh lawd. I don't even want to think of how fast he'd leak the nuclear codes. *
(*I do know he wouldn't get the nuclear codes. Please don't.) >

He's already had them.  He was tasked with carrying the nuclear football for both terms of Bush 1's presidency. >

When he was 13 years old?