Added information on Accuity and transformation (#8)

- Added information on Accuity and transformation (d783572bb5d35627a13e3b43217f69abf2bab152)
- Merge and edit AcuityView updates. (d4ea118cc6011c3dd6c53c91cb704190d1ef9c64)
- Make inline citations more consistent. (75705f8578600f5e4db95402a7355a0f363be78a)


Co-authored-by: Christopher Lawrence <C-G-L@users.noreply.huggingface.co>

README.md

@@ -16,18 +16,24 @@ tags:
 - imbalanced
 - mimicry
 - cv
-pretty_name: Curated Gold Standard Cuthill Dataset
+pretty_name: Curated Gold Standard Hoyal Cuthill Dataset
 size_categories:
 - n<1K
 ---
-# Dataset Card for Curated Gold Standard Cuthill Dataset
+# Dataset Card for Curated Gold Standard Hoyal Cuthill Dataset
 
 ## Dataset Description
+
 Dorsal full body images of subspecies of _Heliconius erato_ and _Heliconius melpomene_ (18 subspecies total).
-960 images with 320 specimens, each photographed in RGB with bird and butterfly acuity included (3 images of each specimen).
-Subset of images processed from Cuthill et al. dataset available at [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
+There are 960 images with 320 specimens (3 images of each specimen: Original/ Bird transformed/ Butterfly transformed)
+The original images are low-resolution RGB photographs (photographs were "cropped and resized to a height of 64 pixels (maintaining the original image aspect ratio and padded to 140 pixels wide)"(Hoyal Cuthill et al., 2019)).
+These low-resolution images were then transformed using [AcuityView](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AcuityView/index.html) with estimates of acuity from [AcuityView 2.0](http://www.empiricalimaging.com/knowledge-base/acuityview/) and [(Land, 1997)](https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147).
+Users should know that since (Land, 1997), more recent estimates of insect visual acuity have been created. 
+
+This data represents a subset of images processed from Hoyal Cuthill et al. dataset available at [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978). Their original dataset also includes ventral images.
+
 
-**Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
+**Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Hoyal Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
 
 - **Homepage:** 
 - **Repository:** [Butterfly-mimicry](https://github.com/Imageomics/Butterfly-mimicry) contains research done using this dataset.
@@ -136,7 +142,7 @@ English
 * `addit_taxa_info`: additional taxonomic information (subspecies)
 * `type_stat`: indicates "classical" or "example" specimen of species or subspecies ('ST', 'PT', or 'HT', indicating syntypes, paratypes, or holotypes, respectively). This field is mostly null.
 * `hybrid_stat`: hybrid status ('valid subspecies', 'subspecies synonym' or 'unknown' (only 1))
-* `in_reduced`: whether or not the specimen was used in the second analysis by Cuthill et al. (1 or 0 to indicate yes or no, respectively). This was an effort to remove potential hybrids from their analysis; it does not always match our indication of hybrid status.
+* `in_reduced`: whether or not the specimen was used in the second analysis by Hoyal Cuthill et al. (1 or 0 to indicate yes or no, respectively). This was an effort to remove potential hybrids from their analysis; it does not always match our indication of hybrid status.
 * `locality`: where specimen was collected
 * `lat`: latitude where specimen was collected
 * `lon`: longitude where specimen was collected
@@ -175,15 +181,15 @@ Processing steps included:
 ### Curation Rationale
 
 This dataset was curated for training a model to classify different species of Heliconius Butterflies and to take into account mimicry between species and acuity of the observer (bird, butterfly, or human/other).
-The original data (Cuthill et al. 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies. 
+The original data (Hoyal Cuthill et al. 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies. 
 It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results. 
 To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples. 
-Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis.
+Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis using [AcuityView](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AcuityView/index.html) and estimates of observer acuity.
 
 
 ### Source Data
 
-Cuthill et al. [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
+Hoyal Cuthill et al. [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
 
 #### Initial Data Collection and Normalization