Unable to confirm theoretical evaluation Theory claims equality for Black in the below diagram. 
My engine claims White is better and demolishes the line with convincing moves. 
Since I have old laptop, with 2GHz dual core CPU, I was wondering if someone with stronger engine can analyze the below position for me (hopefully they will be able to prove my engine wrong). 
[StartFlipped &quot;0&quot;]
[Title &quot;Black to move&quot;]
[fen &quot;rn2kb1r/pp3ppp/2p1pnb1/q3N3/2BP2PP/2N5/PPP2P2/R1BQK2R b KQkq - 0 9&quot;]
For a Computer, White is Better.  For a Human, it's unclear.
White has quite a few advantages here - notably more space and superior development.  Black has one major advantage, though.  White's king is exposed and shall remain so for quite some time.
Computers excel at positions in which perfect defensive play is required - that is, positions such as White has here.  A computer will almost certainly see and defuse the various tactical threats to the White king, and eventually the computer should be able to convert the many advantages White has into something concrete.  But a human playing White is quite likely to err and allow Black the chance to make an effective attack.  Some humans will prefer to take on the Black pieces, on the premise that if they play aggressively White will eventually slip.  Other humans will prefer White.  Thus, we say that the position is &quot;unclear&quot;.