Formalizing Homotopy Type theory in Idris Looking at the homotopy type theory blog one can easily find a lot of library formalizing most of Homotopy Type Theory in Agda and Coq. 

Is there anyone aware if there is any similar attempt to formalize HoTT in Idris?
Here is a small, incomplete, and inconsistent formalization of HoTT in Idris. It shows that you can derive a contradiction in Idris just by postulating univalence. There are two barriers to formalizing HoTT in Idris at the moment.

Barrier 1:
Idris has heterogeneous equality and heterogeneous equality rewriting. From the HoTT perspective this means we have access to the following rewriting principle, which is inconsistent with univalence:
$$
 \prod_{P \,:\, X \to \mathsf{Type}}\ \prod_{x\,:\,X}\ \prod_{p \,:\, x = x}\ \prod_{a,\,b \,:\, P\, x} (\mathsf{transport}\ P\ p\ a = b) \to (a = b)  
$$
With this principle, we can easily prove True = False.

Barrier 2: 
The pattern matching in Idris is too strong for HoTT, as Neel Krishnaswami suspected in a comment above. We can derive Streicher's K. This leads to uniqueness of identity proofs, and is therefore incompatible with univalence. We can once again show True = False.