Journals with quick reviewing Background: The motivation for this question is two-fold. First, I would like to get some hard facts to better understand the ongoing conferences vs. journals debate. Second, if this information was somewhere available, I could make a more informed decision when submitting papers for review; I would be happy to favour journals whose editors do a good job at selecting and shepherding referees.



Question: Are there any TCS journals that have consistently fast reviewing?

The rules:


I am not looking for any anecdotal evidence; I would like to see hard facts, such as "according to our statistics, during the last 3 years, 98% of our submissions were reviewed in at most 4 months".
Only time from the initial submission to the first decision counts. I do not care how long it takes to actually print a physical journal; it is beyond our control anyway.
A journal that is just a series of conference proceedings does not count. We all know that conference reviewing is quick.
Open-access on-line journals are perfectly fine.


(And if a journal is so questionable that you would be embarrassed if your name was somehow associated with it, let's skip it entirely.)
Glencora Borradaile has an interactive graph with turnover time (among other information) for several journals from several sources.

However, not included is the first journal I think of with a fast turnaround time: Information Processing Letters (IPL).  I couldn't find any statistics, but rapid dissemination is their first goal.  When refereeing for a similar Elsevier journal with the same goal of rapid dissemination but with a slightly different scope, they requested my report within about 5 weeks.