Stylistic assessment of a Western first name as the basis for a Chinese name I need some help from native speakers who can provide critique of the following practice.
Imagine that someone is called Martin Schneider (fictional example) and is the head of the China department at the ministry of foreign affairs of a European country. As he is regularly contacted by Chinese partners, and v.v., he decides to adopt a Chinese name and picks 马丁, which is just a rendering of his first name Martin with common &quot;transliteration&quot; characters.
While 马丁 is, of course, obviously foreign sounding, it is still a &quot;valid&quot; Chinese name (姓名) since it consists of a valid surname (马) and one other character suggesting a given name part (名).
The question is: Is it stylistically appropriate for someone, especially in a high-ranking diplomatic position, to basically use his first name as his (full) Chinese name? Imagine if Martin Schneider/马丁 meets the Chinese ambassador who is 吴XX. The latter will be referred to as 吴大使 (Ambassador Wu), but won't the ambassador have a strange feeling referring to the host country's diplomat as 马丁先生 (lit. Mr. Martin), especially if he (undoubtedly) understands some English (or another European language), and knows that he's using the host diplomat's first name.
The general reason I ask is because I see this phenomenon of 'first name as Chinese name' among a lot of China focused journalists, &quot;China experts&quot;, etc. The more concrete reason is that I need to assess the competence of an actual head of China Dept. in a European country (who is, of course, not named Martin Schneider or 马丁, but follows this 'first name as Chinese name' practice.)
I understand that some Western names (first + last name) are hard to render in Chinese because of complex consonant clusters, and a transliteration like 马丁·施耐德 is neither very imaginative nor easy to type, remember, etc. for a Chinese native speaker. But I find it bizarre for someone to just go by his/her first name as a diplomat.
Note: I understand that this question can't be answered in an exact way, please suggest edits, or other possible ways to find a solution.
first name as Chinese name' practice

imo, it’s unacceptable. name is extremely important in chinese culture, a good one helps in every aspects in life.
because, the practice of transliteration one’s first name as chinese full name; most of the time, cannot generate a good enough chinese name.
the proper way is: first, transliterates the initial of a surname, then add characters semantically, to compose a good one (according to chinese culture).
example 1:
Bonnie S. Glaser, her chinese name is 葛來儀.
葛 - in cantonese, it’s got3; which preserve the initial of glaser
儀 - it sounds similar to “ie” in bonnie
來 - derived from the idiom “有鳳來儀” (roughly, a phoenix comes with grace to rest)
bingo, “來儀” as a given name is, strongly connected to phoenix (a female legendary creature), and 葛 is a common chinese surname.
every time i read this name in the news, i would salute to the guy who choose it 
example 2:
the last governor of hong kong, chris pattern 彭定康
彭 - again, in cantonese, paang preserves the initial p of pattern
定 - ding6, derived from t of tern —&gt; d (aspirated alveolar t —-&gt; unaspirated alveolar d)
康 - means “ease; vigour; health; peace; repose; well-being” in chinese
this name is quite good, imo. actually, most chinese name of the governors of hong kong are good, if not excellent.

find it bizarre for someone to just go by his/her first name as a diplomat.

absolutely. any high ranking officials should have a good chinese name, if they need to “deal” with . . . 

some Western names (first + last name) are hard to render in Chinese because of complex consonant clusters

use cantonese, which has more initial, final &amp; tone than mandarin; that it’s more likely you can find a suitable syllable
have fun :)