Doctrinal significance of the tense and subject of "Adored and Glorified" in the Nicene Creed So, I was working out a UML diagram to expose holes in every attempt to analogize the Trinity, and I came to:


  adored and glorified


 (formerly, worshiped and glorified)

everything else in the Creed are things that "I believe" what is the difference between saying, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified and saying who with the Father and the Son I adore and glorify?  

I'm pretty much asking, who is the subject of the predicate of sentence, is it still me, or us, or the Church Triumphant?  To put it another way, complete this sentence, "who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified by ..."



I'd prefer a Catholic answer, and not one that challenges my premises either!
It appears to be an issue directly related to the Latin. As we see in the original Latin that was brought out of the Council of Nicea the line:


  Qui cum Patre et Fílio simul adorátur et conglorificátur


Roughly translated to English, we see it translated to "Who with the Father and to the Son, He is worshiped and glorified". (We'll ignore the literal translation of worship for now).

I would gather that the original Council meant to have it taken that at this point of the creed we have already announced what we as individuals mean (I believe) and are now at the point where we talk about what the Church believes and holds true. Thus the Church Triumpant is the predicate of the sentence and no longer we as individuals.