What problems, if any, do Swedenborgians have with the Apostles' Creed? As a follow-up to previous questions, I'd like to know: Do Swedenborgians disagree with or "reinterpret" any phrases in the Apostles' Creed?

Here's the context: I'm listening to an audio series in which the Apostles' Creed is used as the framework for "Christian theology," implying that those who believe the Apostles' Creed are orthodox.  But in this series, non-trinitarians are not considered orthodox.

This makes me wonder – how do certain non-trinitarian groups understand the Apostles' Creed?  Do they accept it as written, or simply reject it?  Or perhaps they accept it, but interpret particular phrases in ways that trinitarians don't?

Here, I'm most interested in how Swedenborg himself viewed the creed.  If he did not address the Apostles' Creed in his writings, I'd be interested in the analysis of prominent Swedenborgian theologians (in overview style, if there is disagreement).

Related: Same question for Christadelphians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Oneness Pentecostals.
Swedenborg himself had no problems with the Apostles' Creed and he did address it in his writings.


  It is to be observed, that in the Apostles’ Creed it is said, “I
  believe in God the Father, in Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Spirit”;
  in the Nicene Creed, “I believe in one God, the Father, in one Lord
  Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Spirit,” thus only in one God; ... 1


It is the Athanasian Creed with which he had a problem.


  ... but in the Athanasian Creed it is, “In God the Father, God the Son,
  and God the Holy Spirit,” thus in three Gods. But whereas the authors
  and favorers of this creed clearly saw that an idea of three Gods
  would unavoidably result from the expressions therein used, therefore,
  in order to remedy this, they asserted that one substance or essence
  belongs to the three; but still there arises from thence no other
  ideas, than that there are three Gods unanimous and agreeing together:
  for when it is said of the three that their substance or essence is
  one and indivisible, it does not remove the idea of three, but
  confounds it, because the expression is a metaphysical, and the
  science of metaphysics, with all its ingenuity, cannot of three
  Persons, each whereof is God, make one; it may need make of them one
  in the mouth, but never in idea. 1


You can find many of his views concerning creeds and trinity in Canons (1769). 

Here's just one statement summary therein.


  Chapter V. The trinity of persons in the divinity is from the council
  of Nice, and was derived thence into the catholic church and [the
  churches] after it, and is therefore to be called the Nicene Trinity.
  But the trinity of God in one person, the Lord God the Saviour, is
  from Christ himself, and was thence in the Apostolic Church, and
  therefore is to be called the Christian Trinity; and this trinity of
  God is the Trinity of the new church. 2 (emphasis added)




1. The Teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg, Volume 2 by Emanuel Swedenborg (Simon and Schuster, Feb 4, 2013)
2. Canons by Emanuel Swedenborg, (1769) tr. by John Whitehead (1914)