Is rape condoned in the Bible? If so, why? Rape is not a judgment that's commanded upon those that violate the law, whether in the new testament or the old. So why does God choose to use rape as a means of judgement?

In america we have a bill of rights that prevents cruelty to criminals. We feel that this is a moral thing to do, why does God not have moral standards that would prevent him from using rape as a means of judgement?

Why is rape condoned in the Bible?


  Isaiah 13:15-18 (NIV)
  
  15 Whoever is captured will be thrust through;     all who are caught
  will fall by the sword.  16 Their infants will be dashed to pieces
  before their eyes;     their houses will be looted and their wives
  violated.
  
  17 See, I will stir up against them the Medes,     who do not care
  for silver     and have no delight in gold.  18 Their bows will strike
  down the young men;     they will have no mercy on infants,     nor
  will they look with compassion on children.
  
  Zechariah 14:1-2
  
  1 A day of the LORD is coming, Jerusalem, when your possessions will
  be plundered and divided up within your very walls.  2 I will gather
  all the nations to Jerusalem to fight against it; the city will be
  captured, the houses ransacked, and the women raped. Half of the city
  will go into exile, but the rest of the people will not be taken from
  the city.
  
  2 Samuel 12:11 (NIV)
  
  11 “This is what the LORD says: ‘Out of your own household I am going
  to bring calamity on you. Before your very eyes I will take your wives
  and give them to one who is close to you, and he will sleep with your
  wives in broad daylight.


Please feel free to target any of the suggested rape events that are listed here. http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm
God does not condone rape in the Bible.  This is a commonly raised objection to Christianity that's been answered ad-nauseum on apologetics websites, such as this one:

http://www.rationalchristianity.net/numbers31.html

Quote from the linked post:
Weren't the virgin women raped?


  There are two parts to this objection: did God instruct or permit the
  soldiers to rape the women, and did the soldiers actually rape them?
  
  It's clear that God didn't intend for the soldiers to rape the women,
  but rather to take them captive. The law God had given to the
  Israelites condemned rape, in some cases punishing it with death (Dt
  22:25-27). Also, immediately following the command to spare the virgin
  women, the soldiers were instructed to purify themselves and their
  captives (31:19), and rape (or consensual intercourse) would have
  violated this command (Lev 15:16-18). In the rest of the chapter, the
  women are usually referred to as people (using the masculine adam),
  not women or virgins, underscoring the notion that they were seen as
  captives rather than sexual objects.1
  
  It's theoretically possible that some of the soldiers raped the women,
  but given the circumstances it seems very unlikely. The soldiers would
  have known that rape was a violation of both the law and the
  instruction to purify themselves, as shown above; they had also seen
  God punish such violations with death during their travels in the
  desert. In fact, they had recently experienced a plague and executions
  resulting from their relations with Midianite women (25:1-9), as Moses
  reminded them. At that time, all those who had sexual relations with
  the Midianites were killed. It's highly implausible that the soldiers
  would have wanted to have anything to do with the Midianite women
  given this context.
  
  So what did happen to the women (and children)? God gave the
  Israelites permission to marry women they took captive, but they were
  to treat their wives with respect: the women were to have time to
  mourn their families first, and were not to be mistreated (Dt
  21:10-14). Those who didn't marry would have become servants, but
  there were rules against mistreating them as well (Ex 21:26-27, Dt
  23:15-16). See the article on slavery laws for more on the treatment
  of female slaves.


As with most commonly cited objections to Christianity, the idea that God condones rape is based on a mis-reading of scripture (intentional or unintentional), and taking verses out of context.

Edited to address the changes to the question since I originally answered.

The verses that are there now are not condoning rape, they are warning that this is what is to come. 

If I were to say "If you spend more than you earn you're going to go into debt and will suffer financially" I'm not condoning going into debt, I'm warning you. 

You'd have to be intentionally mis-reading the verses posted to interpret them as "condoning" rape.