What is the scholarly biblical argument against theistic evolution? In Catholics and Evolution | New Advent, it seems a case might be made for theistic evolution.

The question is what is the scholarly - as opposed to personal opinion - biblical argument against theistic evolution?

Evolution defined as


  Biological evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This
  definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene
  frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and
  large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common
  ancestor over many generations). Evolution helps us to understand the
  history of life. - Source.


Theistic evolution oversimplified as being evolution with God involved.

Please see also: Theistic evolution | Conservapedia.
Last week I heard this argument, again. According to theistic evolution, millions of years took place and animals died all the time. But Genesis 1 says that after each day God pronounced it as good, therefore there must not have been death, because death is bad. And if there was no death, then millions of years of dead animals is wrong too.

Sure my simplification doesn't sound scholarly, but I'm cutting to the chase.