Why isn't supralapsarianism's first decree to create? From Wikipedia


  Supralapsarians believe that God chose which individuals to save
  logically prior to the decision to allow the race to fall and that the
  Fall serves as the means of realization of that prior decision to send
  some individuals to hell and others to heaven (that is, it provides
  the grounds of condemnation in the reprobate and the need for
  salvation in the elect).


Also from wikipedia Logical order of God's decree


  
  
  Save some and condemn others
  
  
  Create the elect and the reprobate
  
  
  Authorize the Fall (by which all deserve to be condemned)
  
  
  Provide salvation only for the elect
  
  


In my understanding - "to save and to condemn" need a preceding logical order (in mind) that there must be something to save and to condemn.

The question : why the logical order in Supralapsarian like 1, 2, 3 above ?
Isn't that the proper logical order is (in the mind) to (1) have something plural (create), and then the next order (2) want/will from those something plural, some are saved and some are condemned, and then (3) choose/elect which names that are saved and which names that are condemned.

Another source from  this link:


  
  the election of some men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the others)
  the decree to create the world and both kinds of men
  the decree that all men would fall
  the decree to redeem the elect, who are now sinners, by the cross work of Christ
  the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to these elect sinners
  


Can someone please explain how to elect something when there is nothing to be elected ? Wouldn't it we need number zero (0) in our mind there is Cain Abel Esau Jacob Mary Josef Moses Abraham Judas etc etc etc. Then next thing is (1) I want Cain Esau Judas to be in hell and I want Mary Josef Moses Jacob Abraham to be with me.

Thank you.
Quick note up front, I'm planning to edit this to add further info when I have time to break out my Berkhof and/or other relevant texts. But here's a quick response: 

I think part of the problem here is wikipedia. You are getting confused by the wording of wikipedia, which is confusing, and not exactly accurate. 

Supralapsarianism teaches, essentially, that God determined to create for himself a people to redeem and a people to judge (if you accept double predestination). Once he had made this decision he then determined how to accomplish this through the creation of a people who would fall and be redeemed by Christ. To use a logic order as you have above, it would be formulated as:


  Supralapsarianism (modified)



the election of some men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the rest of sinful
mankind in order to make known the riches of God's gracious mercy to the elect)
the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to the elect sinners
the decree to redeem the elect sinners by the cross work of Christ
the decree that men should fall
the decree to create the world and men


Infralapsarianim teaches, on the other hand, that God determined to create people, determined that these people would fall and that he would redeem them through his Son. Again, to use the logic order it should be formulated:


  Infralapsarianism



the decree to create the world and (all) men
the decree that (all) men would fall
the election of some fallen men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the others)
the decree to redeem the elect by the cross work of Christ
the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to the elect


Keep in mind that in both views God is proactively determining each step. None are reactionary but rather the will of God in eternity. The debate is purely over the logical order of God's thought and, therefore, necessarily speculative. 

Here's a much better source than wikipedia to help clarify these terms:  https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/qna/superinfra.html