EfficientDet Lite 3 WITH TRANSFER LEARNING: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model

Description
I have a EfficientDet Lite 3 model that I have retrained with TRANSFER LEARNING (code below), that I am attempting to compile using the Google Colab notebook provided by Google https://colab.research.google.com/github/google-coral/tutorials/blob/master/compile_for_edgetpu.ipynb.
The colab notebook provided above failed due to large activation tensors in model., I then ran the following compilation command with the included flags edgetpu_compiler -s -d -a model_efficientdet_lite3_detection_metadata_1.tflite -- this command ran for several hours, attempting to compile and removing operations at every step. The model never compiled, each time providing an error similar to below:
Try to compile segment with 421 ops Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,Reshape_9 Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds. ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure. Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model. Compilation child process completed within timeout period. Compilation failed!
My questions are:

Why is this model failing to compile?
I am able to compile the EfficientDet Lite 3 model WITHOUT TRANSFER LEARNING (using the flags above); applying transfer learning should not change the structure of the neural network considerably, should it?
Can you provide a recommendation for how to compile this model

The code snippet I used for transfer learning and exporting the model is below:
train_data = object_detector.DataLoader.from_pascal_voc('train', 'train', label_map=['obstacle', 'null'], max_num_images=MAX_NUM_IMAGES)
validate_data = object_detector.DataLoader.from_pascal_voc('validate', 'validate', label_map=['obstacle', 'null'], max_num_images=MAX_NUM_IMAGES)
test_data = object_detector.DataLoader.from_pascal_voc('test', 'test', label_map=['obstacle', 'null'], max_num_images=10)

spec = model_spec.get('efficientdet_lite2') #Only lite 2 and below will compile for the Coral Edge TPU
print('spec = ', spec)

model = object_detector.create(train_data, model_spec=spec, batch_size=BATCH_SIZE, do_train=True, train_whole_model=False, epochs=EPOCHS, validation_data=validate_data)

model.export(export_dir='.', tflite_filename=TFLITE_MODEL_NAME)

NOTE: EfficientDet Lite models 0, 1, 2 WITH and WITHOUT TRANSFER LEARNING compiled without an error.
Thank you
Click to expand!
Issue Type
No response
Operating System
No response
Coral Device
No response
Other Devices
No response
Programming Language
No response
Relevant Log Output
Edge TPU Compiler version 16.0.384591198
Searching for valid delegate with step 1
Try to compile segment with 424 ops
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 423 ops
Intermediate tensors: Sigmoid1,tfl.dequantize
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 422 ops
Intermediate tensors: Sigmoid1,concat_1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 421 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,Reshape_9
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 420 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd_4;box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_4;box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp11
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 419 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 418 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Relu6_19;Relu6_19;box-3-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-3-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-3/BiasAdd_4;box-3/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-3/separable_conv2d_4;box-3/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 417 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box-3/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-3/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 416 ops
Intermediate tensors: Relu6_18;Relu6_18;box-2-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-2-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-2/BiasAdd_4;box-2/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-2/separable_conv2d_4;box-2/separable_conv2d_41,Sigmoid1,Reshape_7,Reshape_5,Reshape_3,Reshape_1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 415 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box-2/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-2/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 414 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Relu6_17;Relu6_17;box-1-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-1-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-1/BiasAdd_4;box-1/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-1/separable_conv2d_4;box-1/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 413 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box-1/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-1/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 412 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Relu6_16;Relu6_16;box-0-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-0-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;box-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-0/BiasAdd_4;box-0/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-0/separable_conv2d_4;box-0/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 411 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5,box-0/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-0/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 410 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_7,Sigmoid1,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 409 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_7,Sigmoid,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 408 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_7,concat,Reshape_3,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 407 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_7,Reshape_3,Reshape_8,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 406 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_5,Reshape_7,Reshape_2,Reshape_6,class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4;class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp11,Reshape_3,Reshape,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 405 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape,Reshape_4,Reshape_3,Reshape_7,class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise210,Reshape_2,Reshape_6,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 404 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_2,Reshape_6,Reshape_7,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_3,Relu6_19;Relu6_19;class-3-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-3-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-3/BiasAdd_4;class-3/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-3/separable_conv2d_4;class-3/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 403 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,class-3/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-3/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1,Reshape_4,Reshape_3,Reshape_7,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_5
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 402 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_5,Reshape_7,Reshape_2,Reshape_6,Relu6_18;Relu6_18;class-2-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-2-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-2/BiasAdd_4;class-2/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-2/separable_conv2d_4;class-2/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_3,Reshape,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 401 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_7,class-2/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-2/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1,Reshape_3,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 400 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Relu6_17;Relu6_17;class-1-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-1-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-1/BiasAdd_4;class-1/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-1/separable_conv2d_4;class-1/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_7,Reshape_3,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 399 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,class-1/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-1/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_7,Reshape_3,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 398 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_4,Reshape_5,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Relu6_16;Relu6_16;class-0-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-0-bn-7/FusedBatchNormV3;class-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;class-0/BiasAdd_4;class-0/BiasAdd_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-0/separable_conv2d_4;class-0/separable_conv2d_41,Reshape_7,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_3,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 397 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_2,Reshape_6,Reshape_7,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_3,class-0/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;class-0/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise1,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 396 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_2,Reshape_6,Reshape_7,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_4,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape,Reshape_3
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 395 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_3,Reshape_7,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_1,Reshape_5,Reshape,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d/depthwise;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d/depthwise1,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 394 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_6,Reshape_2,Reshape_7,Reshape_3,cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/Relu6;cell_5/fnode7/op_after_combine12/Relu6;cell_5/fnode7/add_n/add;cell_5/fnode7/add_n/add,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 393 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_7,Reshape_3,cell_5/fnode7/resample_1_11_12/max_pooling2d_23/MaxPool;cell_5/fnode7/resample_1_11_12/max_pooling2d_23/MaxPool,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 392 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_7,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_4,Reshape,Reshape_3
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 391 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_1,Reshape_5,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_3,box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd_3;box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_4;box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_3;box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp,Reshape,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 390 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape_1,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_2,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_3,box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 389 ops
Intermediate tensors: cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_2,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_5,Relu6_15;Relu6_15;box-3-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-3-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-3/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-3/BiasAdd_3;box-3/BiasAdd_3;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-3/separable_conv2d_3;box-3/separable_conv2d_31,Reshape_1,Reshape_4,Reshape,Reshape_3
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 388 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,Reshape_5,Reshape_1,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_3,box-3/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise;box-3/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 387 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape,Reshape_5,Relu6_14;Relu6_14;box-2-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-2-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-2/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-2/BiasAdd_3;box-2/BiasAdd_3;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-2/separable_conv2d_3;box-2/separable_conv2d_31,Reshape_1,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_3,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 386 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_3,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_2,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_5,Reshape_6,Reshape,Reshape_4,box-2/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise;box-2/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 385 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_3,Relu6_13;Relu6_13;box-1-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-1-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-1/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-1/BiasAdd_3;box-1/BiasAdd_3;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-1/separable_conv2d_3;box-1/separable_conv2d_31,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_2,Reshape_1,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_5,Reshape_6,Reshape,Reshape_4
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 384 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_1,Reshape_6,Reshape_5,box-1/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise;box-1/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise,Reshape,Reshape_4,Reshape_3
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 383 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_6,Reshape_5,Relu6_12;Relu6_12;box-0-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-0-bn-6/FusedBatchNormV3;box-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-0/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;box-0/BiasAdd_3;box-0/BiasAdd_3;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;box-0/separable_conv2d_3;box-0/separable_conv2d_31,Reshape_1,Reshape_4,Reshape,Reshape_3
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 382 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape,Reshape_4,box-0/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise;box-0/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise,Reshape_3,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_1,Reshape_6
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 381 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape,Reshape_4,Reshape_3,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_1,Reshape_6
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 380 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,Reshape,Reshape_4,Reshape_3,Reshape_2,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_1,class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd_3;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_3;class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!
Try to compile segment with 379 ops
Intermediate tensors: Reshape_5,class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_3/depthwise,Reshape_1,cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_4/fnode7/op_after_combine12/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_2,cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/bn/FusedBatchNormV3;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4/depthwise;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d;cell_5/fnode6/op_after_combine11/conv/separable_conv2d,Reshape_3,Reshape_4,Reshape
Started a compilation timeout timer of 180 seconds.
ERROR: Restored original execution plan after delegate application failure.
Compilation failed: Compilation failed due to large activation tensors in model.
Compilation child process completed within timeout period.
Compilation failed!

Hi @ghbn8 can you please share the model that you are not to compile with the compiler. Thanks!

Please find the EfficientDet Lite 3 with transfer learning attached.
082822_pm.zip

Reshape layers are not able to fit on edgeTPU memory. Please try the command below to compile the model. Thanks!
edgetpu_compiler -s -i "Reshape_1/shape,Reshape/shape" 082822_pm.tflite

@hjonnala thank you, this resolved my issue -- with the referenced flags I am able to compile the model, and with the example below (from the Coral team) I am able to run inference with the model https://github.com/google-coral/pycoral/blob/master/examples/classify_image.py
Here is the command I ran to execute the example script above (referencing the labels.txt file):
python3 examples/detect_image.py --model examples/082822_pm_edgetpu.tflite --labels test_data/labels.txt --input test_data/screenshot.jpg -o image_results.jpg
However, I am attempting to run inference with the example code snippet provided in my previous post (a minor modification to the code provided from the tflite team https://www.tensorflow.org/lite/inference_with_metadata/task_library/object_detector#step_2_using_the_model_3).
Here is the code snippet (similar to previous post, now includes argument for labels.txt file):
# Initialize the object detection model
base_options = core.BaseOptions(file_name=model, use_coral=enable_edgetpu, num_threads=num_threads)
detection_options = processor.DetectionOptions(display_names_locale='temp_code\labels.txt', max_results=3, score_threshold=0.3)
options = vision.ObjectDetectorOptions(base_options=base_options, detection_options=detection_options)

detector = vision.ObjectDetector.create_from_options(options)

My questions:

Can the edgetpu model be compiled to include the necessary metadata (instead of needing to provide an external labels file)?
If it cannot, should metadata be provided as a label.txt file?
The code snippet I provided above is providing the error below, any idea why (I want to be sure it is not a problem with how I have compiled the model)?

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "video_object_detection_run_on_pi.py", line 101, in <module>
    detector = vision.ObjectDetector.create_from_options(options)
  File "/home/pi/.local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/tensorflow_lite_support/python/task/vision/object_detector.py", line 83, in create_from_options
    options.detection_options)
ValueError: Object detection models require TFLite Model Metadata but none was found

API for providing the "display names locale" file (from tflite):
https://www.tensorflow.org/lite/api_docs/python/tflite_support/task/processor/DetectionOptions
Full python script:
video_object_detection_run_on_pi.zip
Thank you

Please check the tutorial at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqTLkw1IenI&list=RDCMUC0rqucBdTuFTjJiefW5t-IQ&index=35 and reach out to tflite support team for any further help: https://github.com/tensorflow/tflite-support. Thanks!

Please try the command below to map the max operations to EdgeTPU:
edgetpu_compiler -s -i "class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d_4;class_net/class-predict/separable_conv2d;class_net/class-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp,box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd;box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d_4;box_net/box-predict/separable_conv2d;box_net/box-predict/BiasAdd/ReadVariableOp"   082822_pm.tflite
https://github.com/google-coral/edgetpu/issues/656#issuecomment-1242413482


Updating the Widgets' Python Code to Python 3.X

Fixes #41.
In case if anyone is concerned, I used Flake8 and Python 3.6.2 to do the conversion.

DON'T merge this yet. I just noticed one issue that Flake8 didn't catch. Apparently, the StringIO and cStringIO modules have been depreciated as of Python 3.0. They are used in the ImageSlider and ImageDisplay widgets, and they need to be replaced with imports of the io module.

Issue: Zooming in the ImageDisplay and ImageSlider widgets is broken in Python 3 due to the changes to division.

@JeanBilheux and @yxqd,
This pull request is now ready to be merged. However, before you do, I just want to warn you about something. As a result of the division changes I made, the ImageDisplay, ImageSlider, and ImgDataGraph widgets now only work with Python 2.7+ (including all versions of 3.X). This is due to the from __future__ import division line at the beginning of the Python scripts. The future module only works with Python 2.7+ because it was meant to add cross-compatibility between 2.7 and 3.X. Let me know if this code should be changed so that versions of Python less than 2.7 can be used.

Sounds good. I don't think backward compatibility with python 2.6- is important.

I didn't think it would be, but I wanted to warn you, just in case.

Thanks @ilumsden. This looks great.


Add clickable references to comments (Feature request)

It would be awesome if we can have clickable references in inline comments in graph/linear views as we have in log.
Ideally it should allow some notation like @0x123456, @_main or something similar.

closed in favor of #1845

emm, we are still missing clickable symbol/function names


chore: 🔧 setup code formatting rules

Rationale
As a maintainer of Synergy Design System I want to be able to write code without approaching the team how to format it.
Description
Apparently we have different formatting settings and different settings on auto save which leads to problems in PRs: https://github.com/SickDesignSystem/synergy/pull/180#discussion_r1404268440
We need neutral ways to format code, to not lose any time on discussing line breaks, spacings etc.
Code formatting has therefore be able to be done automatically, so everyone can decide to do a pnpm format.fix or use auto-save including formatting or whatever.
A check has to be in place which checks every PR whether the formatting is correct.

cc @schilchSICKAG


Suggest a Topic Name
React - HOC (Higher order component)
What do you want to Learn?

React - HOC (Higher order component)
With example

How soon do you need this video tutorial?
1
Do you want to see your name, social handle as a requester in the Video Description?
No response

Done: 11 - Higher-Order Components in React - React Higher-Order Components with Example - React Patterns
https://youtu.be/dtwVjJMnOsw

Closing the issue.

Appriciate your efforts. Thanks a ton.
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022, 17:43 Tapas Adhikary, @.***> wrote:

Closing the issue.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/atapas/youtube/issues/28#issuecomment-1086854011, or
unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIZMB5JSD2A5CGFC53UQ4PTVDGDODANCNFSM5Q6KECBA
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>


logrotate is not performing for noobaa logs if it is inside the noobaa dir under logrotate.d directory

Environment info

NooBaa Version: VERSION
Platform: Kubernetes 1.14.1 | minikube 1.1.1 | OpenShift 4.1 | other: specify

noobaa-4.15.0
Standalone.
Actual behavior

logrotate should perform the compression once the size is reached
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# ls -lrh /var/log/noobaa*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4G Apr 23 00:40 /var/log/noobaa.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  19M Apr 22 16:30 /var/log/noobaa_events.log
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# logrotate /etc/logrotate.d/noobaa/logrotate_noobaa.conf
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# ls -lrh /var/log/noobaa*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  74M Apr 23 00:40 /var/log/noobaa.log.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.3K Apr 23 00:41 /var/log/noobaa.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  19M Apr 22 16:30 /var/log/noobaa_events.log.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 Apr 23 00:41 /var/log/noobaa_events.log
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# cd /var/log/noobaa.log.1.gz /tmp
-bash: cd: too many arguments
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# cp /var/log/noobaa.log.1.gz /tmp
[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 ~]# cd /tmp

[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 tmp]# file noobaa.log.1.gz
noobaa.log.1.gz: gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Apr 23 07:40:50 2024, from Unix, original size modulo 2^32<PHONE_NUMBER>

[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 tmp]# gunzip noobaa.log.1.gz

[root@rkomandu-ip-cls-x-worker2 tmp]# ls -lh noobaa.log.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4G Apr 23 00:41 noobaa.log.1

@naveenpaul1 and I did this over the webex
Note: We had an issue opened in RTC 38551,
Expected behavior

Logrotate should be invoked automatically for the noobaa.log and noobaa_events.log, Please also check on the size front. Is 100M sufficient to do the logrotate, when we enable the other log levels for any tracing purposes.
Steps to reproduce

Posted above, that logrotate is not functioning as expected
More information - Screenshots / Logs / Other output
Please check and fix this for the 4.15.z stream so we can consume for GA

@nimrod-becker this is for container application, we need to add fix for non-containerised application.

By mistake I clicked on close

closing per @naveenpaul1 fix, adding request validation label


How to render reference-style links inside ?

Hi,
First of all thank you for this super easy-to-use plugin. It has been a joy to use it without any issues and it empowers privacy.sexy.
I'm using a lot of reference-style links and I'd like to render them inside  blocks just like wikipedia does to not disturb to reading experience.
I did some research, see that this can be achieved through markdown-it-sup but this require caret syntax which I want to avoid.
Is there away to achieve this? Did anyone have the same issue? How did you resolve this?
Note: This is how I extend markdown rendering as of today.

For anyone looking for solution, I achieved this by:

Enabling HTML content in markdown (through html: true option).
I've done implemented a preprocessor that wraps bracket references inside , see InlineReferenceLabelsToSuperscriptConverter.ts.


Video playback issue on Nikean story platform

Issues:

some videos are stopping halfway through
if a video is paused briefly, it won't resume

These issues are happening in Safari. One possible reason could be that the server that serves the video files is not configured to support byte-range requests. Safari sends HTTP range requests in order to load videos in chunks and expects a 206 response from the server.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32996396/safari-9-0-can-not-play-mp4-video-on-the-storage-server
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33744633/safari-not-loading-html5-video-in-rails-app
https://blog.logrocket.com/streaming-video-in-safari/

original thread on the client's forum: https://nikean.org/forum/threads/small-video-edits-playback-issue-cookies-issue


up(core): version 0.5.6

Merge activity

Aug 27, 8:44 AM EDT: @Atternatt started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.


Workspaces and rbac

[x ] This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.

What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Provides a detailed description of the concepts and constraints for SystemLink workspaces and roles (e.g. org modeling).
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
Provides conceptual guidance on material referenced in the LDAP and OpenID connect chapters.
What testing has been done?
Mostly ensure terms used here match what is in product.

@jjaco2 this document is ready for your review and feedback per publication.

@jjaco2 this document is ready for your review and feedback per publication.


[PBIOS-299] Release 4.12.0

What does this PR do?
Playbook Swift version update
4.12.0
MARCH 18, 2024
List of changes:
** Kit Enhancements: **
Time Stacked kit https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/298 Rachel
Time Range Inline kit https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/297 Rachel
Currency Kit https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/293 Rachel
** Improvements: **
Time Kit function rework https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/294 Rachel
Add Presence Indicator to User Kit https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/292 Rachel
Remove Year From Date Kit When Current https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/pull/300 Rachel
Full Changelog: https://github.com/powerhome/playbook-swift/compare/4.11.1...4.12.0

LGTM!


[Diagnostics] Emit generated code buffers into diagnostic files.

Extend the serialized diagnostics file format to also support providing the contents of source files, which can include a reference to the "original source range" whose text is conceptually replaced with the contents of the serialized diagnostics file, e.g., due to macro expansion.
Implements the Swift side of rdar://103900370

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please smoke test

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please build toolchain

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please smoke test

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please build toolchain

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please smoke test

https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/5901
@swift-ci please build toolchain


TypeError: First argument must be an int at Promise using Parsers under Electron on Win10x64

SerialPort Version 5.0.0-beta3:

NodeJS Version 7.4.0 inside Elecron 1.6.6 (also tried in Electron 1.6.2, 1.4.7)

Operating System: Windows10, Platform: Intel x64:
(Checked on OsX Sierra 10.12.4 - same code works without this error, still having parser problems).

Have you checked the right version of the api docs?: yes  (5.0.0)

Are you having trouble installing and you checked the docs? yes

Are you using Electron and have you checked the Electron Docs?: yes
Tried: npm rebuild --build-from-source  and electron-rebuild - no result after rebuild.

Summary of Problem
Opening a Serialport instance with any parser attached invokes the TypeError -  Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: First argument must be an int.  Code is written exactly according to documentation sample.
Port is opened and .write works, yet parser doesn`t function.
Full error message:
…\node_modules\serialport\lib\util.js:13
Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: First argument must be an int
    at Promise (…\node_modules\serialport\lib\util.js:13:12)
    at …\node_modules\serialport\lib\util.js:5:12
    at read.then (…\node_modules\serialport\lib\bindings\win32.js:39:42)

Attempts to fix issue:

Tried: npm rebuild --build-from-source  and electron-rebuild - no result after rebuild.
Excluding parser attachment .pipe function - works OK (yet no reading),
Replacing parser type (tried Readline and Delimiter)
Attaching parser .on callback to port instead of parser
Changing platform - same code works on OsX Sierra 10.12.4
Question: Is it OK that under Win64 the win32.js bindings file is involved?

Steps and Code to Reproduce the Issue
Code is written exactly according to documentation sample:
var SerialPort = require('serialport');
var Readline = SerialPort.parsers.Readline;
var port = new SerialPort('COM4',{ autoOpen: false});
var parser = port.pipe(new Readline());
port.pipe(parser);
port.on('data', function(data) {
	console.log(data);
});
port.on(     'error', showError);
port.open(function (err) {
	if (err) {
		return console.log('Error opening port: ', err.message);
	}
	sendReadStatus();
});
function showError(error) {
	console.log('Serial port error: ' + error);
}

function sendReadStatus() {
	sendCommand('Status');

}
function sendCommand(Command) {
	var OutputString = Command + "\r\n";
	port.write(OutputString,'ascii', sendTesterCommandDone);
}
function sendCommandDone() {
	console.log('Command finished!');
}

#1171 is a dupe of this (this one was first). I'm seeing this only on Windows, totally kills output and expected promise return/callback. I will look into this a bit, but goodness it's layered. 😞

I was wrong, the output killer isn't this.. though this does appear to be erroring reliably.


Lambda expression forgets context type

Hi,
don't quite now why this works:
/**
 * @type {*}
 */
var x;
if (goog.isObject(x)) {
  /** @type {Object} */
  var y = x;
}

whereas this doesn't:
/**
 * @type {*}
 */
var x;
if (goog.isObject(x)) {
  (function() {
    /** @type {Object} */
    var y = x;
  })();
}

The test that tightens the type doesn't work across scopes.


Microsoft.Kusto: Questions to the Permissions API design

Why there is no dedicated RESTful sub-resource for Kusto Database permissions which uses a unique id like the subscription sub-resource of the service bus API?
Example:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/specification/servicebus/resource-manager/Microsoft.ServiceBus/stable/2017-04-01/servicebus.json#L2091
Current API:
POST /subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Kusto/clusters/{clusterName}/databases/{databaseName}/addPrincipal

Suggested resource-based API:
PUT /subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Kusto/clusters/{clusterName}/databases/{databaseName}/permissions/{permissionId}

I think the only open point would be to define a meaningful id. But maybe this could be a generated UUID?
And why other properties than role and FQN are required? Imho these two properties would be sufficient to add a permission for a given principal.

I think this is now solved with https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/7832.
Dedicated resources for ClusterPrincipalAssignment and DatabasePrincipalAssignment


Create OSS Crowdin project

@lunny please register a free opensource Crowdin project to get better support for updating the i18n files for our needs.

I already crreated one but it needs to be transfered to an OSS plan: https://crowdin.com/project/gitea

I think we could resolve translation question when #51 has been resolved. And before that, since gogs has a crowdin, maybe gitea doesn't need one.

IMHO it still makes sense to use crowdin as well as we will reach much more translators

OKay.

Just use https://crowdin.com/project/gitea?

Yes, i want to use that, but it's currently not registered as an OSS project and have to be payed after one month. We need to register it as an opensource project to get this service for free.

Project is dead, close.


MAINT : Refactoring lil List of Lists

This PR fixes the lil format from LInked List to List of Lists.

Great, merging, thanks


Build Error gcc: error: ”-DEIGEN_USE_VML”: No such file or directory

$ bazel build --config=mkl --copt=”-DEIGEN_USE_VML” -c opt //tensorflow/tools/pip_package:build_pip_package
WARNING: /home/mstf/workspace/tensorflow/tensorflow/contrib/learn/BUILD:15:1: in py_library rule //tensorflow/contrib/learn:learn: target '//tensorflow/contrib/learn:learn' depends on deprecated target '//tensorflow/contrib/session_bundle:exporter': Use SavedModel Builder instead.
WARNING: /home/mstf/workspace/tensorflow/tensorflow/contrib/learn/BUILD:15:1: in py_library rule //tensorflow/contrib/learn:learn: target '//tensorflow/contrib/learn:learn' depends on deprecated target '//tensorflow/contrib/session_bundle:gc': Use SavedModel instead.
INFO: Found 1 target...
ERROR: /home/mstf/.cache/bazel/_bazel_mstf/ac8273660b2bd94e42901d7fff45bcd5/external/grpc/BUILD.bazel:71:1: C++ compilation of rule '@grpc//:gpr' failed: gcc failed: error executing command /usr/bin/gcc -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fstack-protector -Wall -B/usr/bin -B/usr/bin -Wunused-but-set-parameter -Wno-free-nonheap-object -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 -O2 '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1' -DNDEBUG ... (remaining 34 argument(s) skipped): com.google.devtools.build.lib.shell.BadExitStatusException: Process exited with status 1.
gcc: error: ”-DEIGEN_USE_VML”: No such file or directory
Target //tensorflow/tools/pip_package:build_pip_package failed to build
Use --verbose_failures to see the command lines of failed build steps.
INFO: Elapsed time: 119.271s, Critical Path: 14.01s

Can you share the solution for this error?
gcc: error: ”-DEIGEN_USE_VML”: No such file or directory

I have the same error.

--copt=-DEIGEN_USE_VML
Without using the quotation marks, I have compiled the code with no this error.
Please let me know if it's right.

I have the same error too, anyone has solutions?
@mstfldmr @mrsabhar @Paeans

I think I ended up updating the compiler. It was one of those situations where I did a lot of stuff, and at the end, it wasn't clear what fixed it.

I've had the same problem, copied the build command from an intel blog article. As it turns out it really was the quotation marks, as @Paeans pointed out. Simply replace ” (stylish quotation marks) with " (simply double ticks).


HasOpenApi for BasicAuth

BasicAuth is defined in the servant package, so I think it makes sense to have instance HasOpenApi sub => HasOpenApi (BasicAuth realm a :> sub) in servant-openapi3.
There is an old issue about it in servant-swagger: https://github.com/haskell-servant/servant-swagger/issues/34. The last comment there recommends using servant-auth instead, but BasicAuth still exists in servant and is not deprecated, so I think this instance should be useful for some projects. I actually ported this implementation and got something like
instance HasOpenApi sub => HasOpenApi (BasicAuth realm a :> sub) where
  toOpenApi _ = toOpenApi @sub Proxy
    & OpenApi.security <>~ securityRequirements
    & OpenApi.components . OpenApi.securitySchemes <>~ securitySchemes
    where
      oneRequirement req = [OpenApi.SecurityRequirement req]
      securityRequirements =
        oneRequirement $ InsOrd.fromList [("BasicAuth", [])]
      securitySchemes = InsOrd.fromList [("BasicAuth", securityScheme)]
      securityScheme =
        OpenApi.SecurityScheme (OpenApi.SecuritySchemeHttp OpenApi.HttpSchemeBasic) Nothing

which looks in line with https://swagger.io/docs/specification/authentication/basic-authentication/.
So now I can make a PR with this instance, but before doing that I'd like to check whether it's actually needed :slightly_smiling_face:

Hi!
I don't mind having this instance in the package. I don't see a lot of sense in it though. Does anyone in the wild use BasicAuth provided by servant?
Feel free to make a PR if you think it should be there, I'll gladly accept it :)

We are also receiving requests on the servant side ( https://github.com/haskell-servant/servant/issues/1505 ), so I think there is a need for these instances (and servant-openapi3 definitely looks like the right place).


 I think it might be time to drop support. There's no way to hide their controls via the API so we had a kinda hack to hide them off screen (iframe was 200% height and then centered in the viewport) but clearly that's no longer working. Either they found it on someone's site or they discovered Plyr. A really downer.
I think the options are either we drop support or keep it but using their controls which would offer an inconsistent experience and frankly not as good looking.
It's a shame as they have some good quality videos but when it comes to embedding that content on your own website, YouTube far exceeds them and even they have their downsides.

As a temporary solution, I'm placing non-transparent plyr control over vimeo's one. And only in case of non-fullscreen, because in fullscreen the is no such problem for now.
Also, had to add defaultDelay to my fork of plyr to show plyr controls longer than vimeo's one.

This has happened to me as well, but it is possible to turn the controls off in the embed settings:
https://i.28hours.org/20171031-173541-1509.png
It's not perfect, and they then add a "play" button to the centre of the video, but it works well enough to make continuing to use Plyr viable. And the good news is Plyr can get rid of that Vimeo hack to hide controls now, since it's no longer of any use.

Is it possible to turn them off for everyone? I was planning to just use their "native" controls for now and add an option to the config to turn on the custom controls.

I'm afraid it's something people have to do themselves. People can use an embed preset that turns controls off, and then assign it to every one of their videos, which does the trick (that's what I did for 100+ videos), but there's no way for Plyr to control anything.
Perhaps the best option is to disable the custom controls by default (like you already do in iOS), but allow people to use them with a custom config option, so those of us who are OK with the settings workaround I described earlier can keep making use of the custom controls bar (which of course, would have to be documented).
Either way, what a pain supporting Vimeo must be! Thank you so much for all the effort you put into Plyr.

Looks like these embed settings are only available for Vimeo PRO, Plus and Business members...
https://help.vimeo.com/hc/en-us/articles/224972808-Customizing-the-embedded-player

Yes, they are, sadly, which is why I suggested it not be a default workaround. They're there for those of us who use Vimeo/Plyr for business.

Are there any insights into what's causing this issue? I can pass along information to Vimeo's dev team if there's something off with the interaction between those two systems.

Hey @danaburger , it's always been their intention to display their controls on embedded videos. I just took advantage of a loophole that allowed them to be hidden. A loophole they've now closed unfortunately.

interesting, what was the loophole? (if you don't mind me asking)

So the usual way to display an iframe in 16:9 is to sit it in an container with 0 height and padding bottom of 56.25% (to create 16:9) and then make the  absolute positioned and 100% height/width. With Vimeo, I added an extra div in between which was set to 200% height and then positioned in the center of the outer div using a transform. This kept the responsive functionality but to Vimeo the container was really tall so their controls would sit outside the of the 16:9 container of course, hidden off screen. They've since forced their own 16:9 container within the embeds so my loophole/hack no longer works. I guess it was only going to last so long anyway.

Obviously not something they'd like or support but I guess they have to make money somehow without resorting to ads.

@sampotts Appreciate you providing those details. Vimeo did make some changes, but you can override that change by adding ?transparent=0 to the end of the player URL in the embed code. I hope that's helpful.

Unfortanly transparent is not a supported option in the vimeo player. So it has to append when the iframe is initialized https://github.com/sampotts/plyr/pull/704

@danaburger Wow, great find! @jonnitto's commit does seem to resolve the problem, but for some reason the play/pause indicators then stop working. Trying to figure out why.

That issue can be resolved by customising Vimeo's own embed JS file to include the &transparent=0 when first creating the embed. It means that we'd have to maintain a fork of Vimeo's player JS, but it resolves the issue flawlessly — it goes back to exactly the way it was before.
I'm sure someone might be able to come up with a better way to do it without customising Vimeo's player, but if not, this is the most straightforward. The change is a single line; it'd be easy to keep the fork updated until support for the "transparent" option was added to their oEmbed API. Combined with unpkg, it'd be easy to serve the custom player JS, and resolve the issue for everyone using Vimeo with Plyr.

Great find @jonnitto! I wonder how long before they close that loophole though 😔
I think I can see why this is happening now - as their API is bound to the iframe and then the source changes, all events/bindings are lost perhaps?
I'm going to try initialising the Vimeo API with an <iframe> that I create first and see if that helps. I'm working in develop currently but I'll retro-fit it to master so those having issues currently at least have a solution. I wanted to offer this originally anyway as a true progressively enhanced solution but I think that'll wait for a later version.
I'm not sure if I'll get time tonight (it's 10pm Friday) but definitely at some point tomorrow. Will report back.

@sampotts Vimeo is not planning to end support for the ?transparent=0 parameter :)

Looks like the iframe solution works 👍 I've got it working in develop (which is still work in progress) but will port the changes over to master.
Nice find fellas.

I've just pushed v2.0.17 with the iframe fix in. Let me know if you find any issues. There's some other small bug fixes in there too:
https://github.com/sampotts/plyr/releases/tag/v2.0.17

Hey @sampotts, really sorry that I haven't understood completely what was going on, but is the fix supposed to fix the middle Play button showing up just by updating plyr? As it hasn't changed anything here, but I might be missing something?

@bleepsandblops: That's a plyr control. Vimeo doesn't have any middle button. Disabling specific controls is documented at the github index (see "options").

@bleepsandblops, try enabling the play bar in your Vimeo embed settings again. The middle play button appears when the play bar is disabled (and when a viewer hovers over it)

@danaburger thank you so much! that did it!

Glad it's fixed. Vimeo support is the primary reason I'm using this library (that and it's been easy enough for me to otherwise modify).


Add pre-commit configuration

Add pre-commit configuration (can be installed via pre-commit install) to make sure all commits follow the style guidelines.

Good idea!


perf: make sure gs:// uses batch submission correctly

Looks like s3 has this too: https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/s3.html#S3.Bucket.delete_objects


Update Settings - This should resolve, #1049

I just set USE_X_FORWARDED_FOR to  True. This will resolve this issue for most proxy servers.
This cannnot be tested locally and will require support from Ops.

Can you please add a link to the documents for how Django would use USE_X_FORWARDED_FOR? I am not seeing it on https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/settings/
And my guess for where the fix for #1049 would be is in the server configuration rather than the django settings file.

My bad. Sorry I was tired and not thinking. Will push a new commit in the next couple of days.

Updated Code.
X_FORWARDED_FOR
Install django-xff middleware and configure it.  https://pypi.org/project/django-xff/
There are a few middlewares that accomplish the same thing. All set `request.META['REMOTE_ADDR'] to the client ip. This one seemed to be the most well thought out.
The middleware itself provides some security features which I don't know that we need so I left them commented out with an explanation at the bottom of settings.py, in case we desire to take advantage of them.
.gitignore
Ignore .idea directory. I'm following the convention which already exists in the .gitignore of ignoring Editor configs.
Tests
There are no logic changes to the existing code only the addition of middleware. All existing tests pass.
Extraneous
I'm not sure why the github PR is showing a diff on files that have already been merged into main like the README. Caching maybe?


Add a package for instrumentation applications with OTel

OpenTelemetry is the library we'll be supporting for users interested in instrumenting their Cloud Run and GKE services for exporting metrics and traces.
But this setup is shared across anyone using the Go OpenTelemetry SDK. Why not support a package that anyone can just import and start writing metrics?
Once this is checked in, users can start calling telemetry.Start() or telemetry.StartWithStdoutExport().

Is this better served as an abc template as opposed to its own package? I'm not sure if setting up and managing a dedicated package is worth the trouble of wrapping this setup process.

Thanks for chiming in @shankiyani !

Is this better served as an abc template as opposed to its own package?
As a customer who just wants to set up monitoring, nothing appeals to me more than saying something like metrics.Initialize() or traces.Initialize() in my setup code. This is the zero-to-one goal of providing this shared library i.e. telemetry.Start() and having metrics/traces with labels and attributes already set up for the customer.

I'm not sure if setting up and managing a dedicated package is worth the trouble of wrapping this setup process.
The counterpart to this is the existing https://github.com/abcxyz/pkg/tree/main/logging built on slog.  It's an opinionated way to set up structured logging for GCP applications. One problem with the OpenTelemetry SDK is that it tries to cater to literally everyone ... so I think it's worthwhile for us to provide an opinionated way to set up OTel instrumentation for GCP.

I agree with the goal of providing an opinionated otel setup. However, given the sheer number of dependencies, I'd prefer creating a new module (aka repo). I'd strongly prefer to reduce the number of deps in pkg over time. If/when we move pkg/cli to it's own repo, we'd be down to effectively 0.

I agree with the goal of providing an opinionated otel setup. However, given the sheer number of dependencies, I'd prefer creating a new module (aka repo). I'd strongly prefer to reduce the number of deps in pkg over time. If/when we move pkg/cli to it's own repo, we'd be down to effectively 0.

Let's move it to a new repo then.


Oakland, CA Calls for Services

Someone has requested help on a data project:
Submission notes
Looking for Calls for Services in Oakland, CA for a longer time range than 48 hours.
Location
Oakland Police Department - CA
Requirements
Calls for Services
How to help
Leave a comment if you'd like to help. Do you have ideas, questions, or need any more information to get started?

http://gisapps1.mapoakland.com/callsforservice/
We wrote a web scraper to preserve more data: https://github.com/Police-Data-Accessibility-Project/github-actions-demo/


Eliminate shared this from std/internal/math/biguintcore.d

cc @don-clugston-sociomantic @donc @ibuclaw

@andralex CircleCI errors are fixed. Still good to go on this?


Nightmare test fails with custom window size

What are you trying to achieve?
I'm trying to run tests with custom window size
What do you get instead?
I get white screen and test fails.

Provide console output if related. Use --verbose mode for more details.

$ npm test -- --verbose

><EMAIL_ADDRESS>test /home/user/example
> codeceptjs run --steps "--verbose"

CodeceptJS v0.6.3
Using test root "/home/user/example"

Example --
   [1] Starting recording promises
   Emitted | suite.before ([object Object])
   [1] Queued | hook Nightmare._beforeSuite()
 test
   [2] Starting recording promises
   Emitted | test.before
   [2] Queued | hook Nightmare._before()
   Emitted | test.start ([object Object])
   Emitted | step.before (I am on page "/")
   [2] Queued | amOnPage: "/"
   Emitted | step.after (I am on page "/")
   [2] Queued | return step result
   [2] Queued | fire test.passed
   [2] Queued | finish test
   Emitted | step.start (I am on page "/")
 • I am on page "/"
   [2] Error | Nothing responds to "goto"
   [2] Starting <teardown> session
   Emitted | test.failed ([object Object])
   [2] <teardown> Queued | hook Nightmare._failed()
   [2] <teardown> Queued | () => done(err)
   [2] <teardown> Stopping recording promises
 > Screenshot is saving to /home/user/example/output/test.failed.png
   [2] <teardown> Error | Error: Evaluation timed out after 30000msec.  Are you calling done() or resolving your promises?
Error: Evaluation timed out after 30000msec.  Are you calling done() or resolving your promises?
   [2] <teardown> Stopping recording promises
 ✖ FAILED in 30284ms

   Emitted | test.after
   [2] <teardown> Queued | hook Nightmare._after()
   [3] Starting recording promises
   Emitted | suite.after ([object Object])
   [3] Queued | hook Nightmare._afterSuite()

-- FAILURES:

  1) Example: test:
     [Wrapped Error] "Nothing responds to \"goto\""

  Scenario Steps:

  - I.amOnPage("/") at Test.Scenario (example_test.js:6:5)

  Error: [Wrapped Error] "Nothing responds to \"goto\""
      at promise.catch (node_modules/codeceptjs-nightmare/node_modules/codeceptjs/lib/recorder.js:107:15)
      at <anonymous>

  FAIL  | 0 passed, 1 failed   // 30s
   Emitted | global.result ([object Object])
npm ERR! Test failed.  See above for more details.

Provide test source code if related

Feature('Example');

Scenario('test', (I) => {
  I.amOnPage('/');
});

Details

CodeceptJS version: 0.6.3
CodeceptJS Nightmare version: 1.1.0
NodeJS Version: v8.1.3
Operating System: Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
Nightmare: 2.10.0
Configuration file:

{
  "tests": "./*_test.js",
  "timeout": 10000,
  "output": "./output",
  "helpers": {
      "Nightmare": {
      "url": "https://google.com",
      "windowSize": "1000x1000",
      "show": true,
      "restart": false
    }
  },
  "include": {},
  "bootstrap": false,
  "mocha": {},
  "name": "example"
}

Please test in with 1.0.0 and send the update for us

Hi @APshenkin, it works as expected with new version. Thank you very much.


Broken documentation links

Some in-page links in the documentation page are broken when viewed on the hardhat doc site,
e.g. : https://hardhat.org/plugins/hardhat-deploy.html#1-hardhat-deploy
(strangely, they are completely valid while viewed in the github README.md file - but I believe many users are viewing it as the "official" deployer of hardhat)

I see this too.  Since this is an issue with hardhat.org rather than with this plugin, I submitted https://github.com/nomiclabs/hardhat/issues/1800 to track it there.

Closing this as this is not an hardhat-deploy issue


Update manage-external-access.md

https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-SkypeForBusiness/issues/5087
Added note and info.

@JohanFreelancer9 Copy editing is needed for this PR. Thanks.

@vinbelms could you review this PR and let me know whether it's OK to merge?  Thanks!


'booking-clicked' event not fired if booking duration is one night

Describe the bug
If you have a booking which lasts over 2 days, and 1 night. Ie, start date:  2021-04-15 and end date 2021-04-16, the booking-clicked event is not fired.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

Create bookings consisting of at least 1 booking which lasts 1 night:  [{ checkInDate: '2021-04-15', checkOutDate: '2021-04-16', style: xxx}]
Try to click either the 15th, or the 16th. Clicking the 15th does not trigger any event, and clicking the 16th triggers a new check in selection

Expected behavior
At least, clicking the check in date (15th) to trigger booking clicked event. Ideally if 16th is clicked, both events (check in changed and booking clicked) are triggered
Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

OS: Windows 10
Browser Firefox / Chrome
Version FF 87 / Chrome 89.0.4389.90

Did you checked on the last version?

Hi @Merton!! long time...
Sorry for the late response.
The "booking-clicked" event, only works with bookings, if the bookings prop was provided, then it shows those dates differently, and if the user click on one of those the event fires.
Best!


[REST API] PUT method and UploadedFile

Hello.
If used for data update "PUT" method, then UploadedFile does not work.

what Content-type are you using for your request?

multipart/form-data

multipart/form-data only works with POST

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55815

Depends on #12463

Solution proposed at #12466

Resolved by commit  4e59607


Failed to load GL Functions

Just run the example and built with Clang 12 (macOS) and getting this error. Any ideas why this could be, completely fresh clone of the repo as well.

I moved the project to opengl version to 3.3 and now it seems to be working properly on macOS, can you confirm?

Yes, works perfectly. Sorry only just been able to test it, cheers for your help ☺

On Oct 21, 2021 at 8:23 pm,  <Lui Habl @.***)>  wrote:
I moved the project to opengl version to 3.3 and now it seems to be working properly on macOS, can you confirm?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly,   view it on GitHub (https://github.com/luihabl/tinysdl/issues/1#issuecomment-948931294), or   unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGQHC2GXWEGH4NTUTCTKOODUIBSDLANCNFSM5GMRLNRQ).


Improve prompts and options

This may broaden use cases.
Including,

6eaa4196abb57d0a6a2bbd0fdf978d2705212161 : fix issue showing project name instead of namespace when namespace prompt.
de72777d9cd9f8669998084a62e9332225630643 :

Allow any string for project name and namespace. Microsoft recommends to use PascalCase for namespace. But this is not must-do and users should be allowed to use any string as they want.
Allow folder name different from project name. Folder name doesn't necessarily have to be the same with project name.

5a915231e917d63c6c9519de306ee10f809d8132 :

fix not to singularize enum field. I think it should not be singularized. I removed that feature but can be optional.

d0d18bf67626366cf273fe9f390125fd92630d88 :

Make singularize and pluralize of collections' name and items' name optional. According to PocketBase documentation, there's no specification to use plural for collection's name. So I made it optional (prompts at first time to generate code).

Thanks a lot
Very good contributions! :)
I can't right now, but i will review it in a few hours

Hi, I reviewed de code.
I like so much. I made some changes, minor fixes.
Thanks!


Error with Prisma Accelerate at the edge using unsupported Nodejs api

Bug description
When I try to run @prisma/client/edge with @prisma/extension-accelerate in nextjs middleware, I get an error about it using a Node API not yet supported in the Edge Runtime. See screenshot.
But the log after running prisma generate --no-engine suggests that you can use accelerate at the edge and points you to the accelerate docs.
Can it not yet be used at the edge and is the console printout an error?
Thank you.
Next JS Error

Edge Prisma declaration

Usage in middleware

Console print suggesting you can use accelerate in edge environments

How to reproduce
Create new prisma client with edge and accelerate.
Use in it a nextjs middleware build
Build the nextjs project.
Expected behavior
No edge runtime error about using an unsupported Node.js API

Prisma information

// Add your schema.prisma

datasource db {
  provider  = "postgresql"
  url       = env("DATABASE_URL")
  directUrl = env("DATABASE_DIRECT_URL")
}

generator client {
  provider = "prisma-client-js"
  previewFeatures = ["fullTextSearch"]
}

model UserProfile {
  id                              String                     @id @default(uuid()) @db.Uuid
  createdAt                       DateTime?                  @default(now())
  updatedAt                       DateTime?                  @default(now()) @updatedAt
  deletedAt                       DateTime?
  email                           String                     @unique
  authUserId                      String?                    @unique
}

// Add your code using Prisma Client

import { PrismaClient } from "@prisma/client/edge";
import { withAccelerate } from "@prisma/extension-accelerate";

const prismaClientEdge = new PrismaClient().$extends(withAccelerate());

Environment & setup

OS: macOS
Database: PostgreSQL
Node.js version: v18.17.1

Prisma Version
prisma                  : 5.4.2
@prisma/client          : 5.4.2
Current platform        : darwin-arm64
Query Engine (Node-API) : libquery-engine ac9d7041ed77bcc8a8dbd2ab6616b39013829574 (at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Schema Engine           : schema-engine-cli ac9d7041ed77bcc8a8dbd2ab6616b39013829574 (at ../../node_modules/@prisma/engines/schema-engine-darwin-arm64)
Schema Wasm             : @prisma/prisma-schema-wasm 5.4.1-2.ac9d7041ed77bcc8a8dbd2ab6616b39013829574
Default Engines Hash    : ac9d7041ed77bcc8a8dbd2ab6616b39013829574
Studio                  : 0.494.0
Preview Features        : fullTextSearch

Yes, generally that should work - but maybe we missed some case here. Thanks for reporting this!
Can you maybe create a minimal Next.js project with the setup you describe which shows this problem, and then put it on GitHub? That would make it the easiest for us to reproduce, otherwise there are quite a few steps where we might go wrong and mess it up. Thanks!

We had a first look, and the problem actually seems to be caused by the @prisma/extension-accelerate codebase - you can also see that in the error message above. I notified the correct team and they will look into that soon.

Great. I was just pondering how I'd go about making a repro, given that the accelerate service is hosted, and I'd have to put up a hosted db, shared that with accelerate to get an api key, etc.
Glad you tracked down the problem. I appreciate you looking into it.
Do I keep this open in the mean time?

Also running into this issue. Any updates?

@JoelVenable Our team is aware of this issue. I'll post a message here as soon as there is an update. 🙏

Internal notes

https://github.com/prisma/prisma-extension-accelerate/blob/993200927b163728cc2380972386e01884cbc61b/src/user-agent.ts#L27
This is likely the code involved here

/**
 * Generates a User-Agent segment for the JavaScript runtime environment.
 */
function getRuntimeSegment(): string {
  if (typeof navigator !== "undefined") {
    // Deno, Bun, Cloudflare Workers, general WinterCG compat
    return navigator.userAgent;
  } else if (
    typeof process !== "undefined" &&
    typeof process.versions !== "undefined"
  ) {
    return `Node/${process.versions.node} (${process.platform}; ${process.arch})`;
  } else if ("EdgeRuntime" in globalThis) {
    return `Vercel-Edge-Runtime`;
  } else {
    return `UnknownRuntime`;
  }
}

https://prisma-company.slack.com/archives/C042HLMAC5U/p1705941372897809

We try to access that Node API conditionally but Next.js does weird static analysis checks like this that are unavoidable. We'll probably need yet another hacky solution to hide this from Next.js's build system.

@Jolg42 any update on this? I am also running into it. It's a little weird that the accelerate extension package would use process.versions as its a node api that does not run on the edge and the whole point of accelerate is to run on the edge, right?

So the code actually only uses process.versions if it is defined.
The problem is static analysis from Next.js here, which is technically incorrect, since it will not be used at runtime.
The team in charge already knows about this, I'm unsure what they want to do for this.
To me, I think it would be a good idea to report it to Next.js to tweak the static analysis.
Source code for the error: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/e273b335da63b13331ffd367914fb9fbd8adc06c/packages/next/src/build/webpack/plugins/middleware-plugin.ts#L345-L366

Ok I reported it here
Let's see what they say