Recommend a different exception_handler idiom
Recommend a different exception_handler idiom

Summary: This is a //tiny// documentation change. I noticed that there are lots of places in the codebase where people follow this recommended usage of `with_exception` in an if–else chain, (e.g., https://fburl.com/181606454). IMHO, a short-circuiting `||` operator is easier to read and write.

Reviewed By: yfeldblum

Differential Revision: D2687840

fb-gh-sync-id: 6354555aeba81dcfe7adf17e7e573de0b1206b37

rklabs/folly,juniway/folly,Orvid/folly,mqeizi/folly,charsyam/folly,mqeizi/folly,alexst07/folly,floxard/folly,mqeizi/folly,brunomorishita/folly,charsyam/folly,brunomorishita/folly,floxard/folly,rklabs/folly,Hincoin/folly,facebook/folly,facebook/folly,facebook/folly,Orvid/folly,rklabs/folly,alexst07/folly,brunomorishita/folly,facebook/folly,rklabs/folly,charsyam/folly,juniway/folly,floxard/folly,facebook/folly,juniway/folly,floxard/folly,Hincoin/folly,Orvid/folly,charsyam/folly,mqeizi/folly,rklabs/folly,brunomorishita/folly,alexst07/folly,Hincoin/folly,sonnyhu/folly,Orvid/folly,alexst07/folly,floxard/folly,sonnyhu/folly,sonnyhu/folly,alexst07/folly,sonnyhu/folly,Orvid/folly,mqeizi/folly,brunomorishita/folly,Hincoin/folly,Hincoin/folly,juniway/folly,sonnyhu/folly,juniway/folly