Tell the world we gave up on pushing CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
Tell the world we gave up on pushing CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

In commit 281dc5c5ec0f ("Give up on pushing CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE") we
already changed the actual default value, but the help-text still
suggested 'y'. Fix the help text too, for all the same reasons.

Sadly, -Os keeps on generating some very suboptimal code for certain
cases, to the point where any I$ miss upside is swamped by the downside.
The main ones are:

 - using "rep movsb" for memcpy, even on CPU's where that is
   horrendously bad for performance.

 - not honoring branch prediction information, so any I$ footprint you
   win from smaller code, you lose from less code density in the I$.

 - using divide instructions when that is very expensive.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <b0eeaac46e675e9f95bf68c0df1041cf581c26f4@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <69652caca27c8b940640ad396ab71f93cacec34f@linux-foundation.org>

KristFoundation/Programs,TeamVee-Kanas/android_kernel_samsung_kanas,KristFoundation/Programs,TeamVee-Kanas/android_kernel_samsung_kanas,KristFoundation/Programs,KristFoundation/Programs,TeamVee-Kanas/android_kernel_samsung_kanas,KristFoundation/Programs,KristFoundation/Programs,TeamVee-Kanas/android_kernel_samsung_kanas,TeamVee-Kanas/android_kernel_samsung_kanas