Apply ghastly hack to fix failing spec
Apply ghastly hack to fix failing spec

This is evidently breaking all the rules about encapsulation and not
testing implementation details, but it's the quickest way to get this
failing test passing again.

(And note, it is not strictly worse than what was there before either,
because the reason the test was broken was precisely because it was
wedded to implementation details; it turns out that this spec is an
assertion about implementation details...)

Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <c76ac2e9cd86441713c7dfae92c451f3e6d17fdc@wincent.com>

1234-/command-t,wincent/command-t,mtimkovich/command-t,vrkansagara/command-t,besarthoxhaj/command-t,lencioni/command-t,simichaels/dotfiles,simichaels/dotfiles,yrro/command-t,vrkansagara/command-t,supriyantomaftuh/command-t,lencioni/command-t,wincent/command-t,1234-/command-t,supriyantomaftuh/command-t,yrro/command-t,besarthoxhaj/command-t,wincent/command-t,mtimkovich/command-t