I have updated the O&M costs for the 'energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal' plant. Based on the 'energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal' O&M costs. The power plant really only provided inspiration for this split and it is not well-researched. I noticed that variable O&M for energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal are slightly higher than for energy_power_combined_cycle_network_gas plants. I used this to set the O&M variable costs for energy_chp_ultra_supercritical_coal slightly higher than for 'energy_chp_combined_cycle_network_gas'. I allocated the rest of the costs to fixed O&M. Note that this procedure is exactly the opposite as taken for the gas-fired CHPs. For issue #272.
I have updated the O&M costs for the 'energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal' plant. Based on the 'energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal' O&M costs. The power plant really only provided inspiration for this split and it is not well-researched. I noticed that variable O&M for energy_power_ultra_supercritical_coal are slightly higher than for energy_power_combined_cycle_network_gas plants. I used this to set the O&M variable costs for energy_chp_ultra_supercritical_coal slightly higher than for 'energy_chp_combined_cycle_network_gas'. I allocated the rest of the costs to fixed O&M. Note that this procedure is exactly the opposite as taken for the gas-fired CHPs. For issue #272.

quintel/etsource