Duh. Back out most of my previous commit. It was mostly covered in the STANDARDS section of the page. Add one remark there about inet_pton(3) only understanding decimal values (in contrast to inet_aton(3) and friends who are happy with 0ac.020.25 for 172.16.0.25).
Duh. Back out most of my previous commit. It was mostly covered in the
STANDARDS section of the page. Add one remark there about inet_pton(3)
only understanding decimal values (in contrast to inet_aton(3) and
friends who are happy with 0ac.020.25 for 172.16.0.25).

Caught by:	ru
MFC after:	2 days

jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase,jrobhoward/SCADAbase